Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Differential GPX4 Essentiality Between Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma via Leveraging of a Large-Scale Functional Genomic Screen
Previous Article in Journal
Proline-, Glutamic Acid-, Leucine-Rich Protein 1 (PELP1): Diversity, Structural Conservation, and Evolutionary Origins Across the Species
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antimicrobial Peptide with a Bent Helix Motif Identified in Parasitic Flatworm Mesocestoides corti
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Creation of New Antimicrobial Peptides 3: Research Promises and Shortcomings

by
Oxana V. Galzitskaya
1,2
1
Gamaleya Research Centre of Epidemiology and Microbiology, 123098 Moscow, Russia
2
Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(24), 11992; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411992
Submission received: 26 September 2025 / Accepted: 13 October 2025 / Published: 12 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Creation of New Antimicrobial Peptides 3.0)
The studies conducted and published in this issue highlight the potential of new peptides as a basis for developing new antibacterial drugs, especially in the face of growing antibiotic resistance [1,2,3]. Recently, they have increasingly been discovered in parasitic organisms or from animal venoms. Thus, a new antimicrobial peptide (AMP) called mesco-2 was discovered in the parasitic flatworm Mesocestoides corti [4]. Also, another article is devoted to the design, synthesis and characterization of new chimeric analogs of mastoparan (MP), an antimicrobial cationic peptide from the venom of the wasp Paravespula lewisii [5].
Mesco-2 was identified through genomic analysis among three potential peptides (mesco-1, -2, -3). This peptide was found to be highly cationic and amphipathic, which is characteristic of many AMPs [6]. The peptide demonstrated strong activity against Gram-negative (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from submicromolar to low micromolar values [4]. Mesco-2 acts by disrupting bacterial membranes, as confirmed by fluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry, and atomic force microscopy (AFM), and does not damage eukaryotic membranes, indicating its selectivity. Circular dichroism spectroscopy and molecular modeling revealed that mesco-2 forms an unusual curved α-helical structure when binding to anionic membranes. The central CRGIGRG motif plays a key role in this structure. The peptide exhibited cytotoxicity only at concentrations significantly higher than antimicrobial concentrations, indicating its safety for mammalian cells.
Mastoparan (INLKALAALAKKIL) is effective against bacteria, but its use is limited due to toxicity (hemolytic activity, mast cell degranulation). The authors of the article created the analogs with improved properties: high antimicrobial activity and low toxicity [5]. Several groups of chimeric peptides were synthesized, combining the mastoparan sequence with other biologically active molecules: analogs with an inverted sequence (retroMP) and their chimeras; chimeras with RNA III inhibiting peptide (RIP), which does not kill bacteria on its own, but suppresses toxin synthesis and cell adhesion in S. aureus; chimeras with galanin (Gal) and its fragments, including the known cell-penetrating peptides transportan (TP) and transportan 10 (TP10); conjugates with benzimidazole derivatives attached to the side chain of lysine. The authors determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against three reference bacterial strains: S. aureus, E. coli and P. aeruginosa.
A new antifungal peptide, Blap-6, isolated from the hemolymph of the Chinese medicinal beetle Blaps rhynchopetera, was presented by the authors of the paper [7]. Blap-6 demonstrates high activity against the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans, which causes dangerous infections, including meningitis, especially in people with weakened immunity. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for C. neoformans was 0.81 μM, which is 6–8 times lower than that of fluconazole. Blap-6 disrupts the integrity of the fungal cell membrane, as confirmed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The peptide also inhibits the formation of C. neoformans biofilms and disrupts existing ones, which is important for the treatment of chronic infections. Blap-6 demonstrated low hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity in human cell tests, making it a promising candidate for further research. The peptide consists of 17 amino acid residues (KRCRFRTYRWGFPRRRF) and is rich in arginine and tryptophan, which contributes to its amphiphilic and antimicrobial properties. Its unique structure with an αβ motif distinguishes it from other known peptides of the defensin family. Blap-6 offers a potential alternative to traditional antifungal drugs, such as amphotericin B, which are toxic [7].
Peptides that exhibit multiple biological activities deserve special attention. For example, an ultrashort cyclic peptide of six amino acids cWY6 (WKRKRY) was studied, which has two key properties: antibiotic potentiation and wound healing [8]. Gram-negative bacteria have an outer membrane made of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which serves as a barrier to many drugs. The authors developed a peptide that does not kill bacteria by itself but disrupts this barrier, allowing common antibiotics to penetrate and act. It is cyclic (head-tail), which increases its stability. Its structure is based on the LPS-binding motif of longer “β-boomerang” peptides developed by the authors previously [9]. It was shown that cWY6 acquires a distinct structure upon binding to LPS. Positively charged residues (Arginine, Lysine) interact with the negatively charged phosphate groups of LPS, while aromatic residues (Tryptophan, Tyrosine) are embedded in the lipid portion of the membrane. This disrupts its integrity. cWY6 significantly enhances the activity of antibiotics that are ineffective against Gram-negative bacteria on their own (vancomycin, rifampin, novobiocin, erythromycin). The effect depended on the bacteria–antibiotic combination, achieving a more than 120-fold reduction in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for novobiocin against K. pneumoniae and S. enterica. An unexpected discovery was that cWY6 stimulated cell migration and proliferation (fibroblasts and keratinocytes) in in vitro wound healing models, demonstrating efficacy comparable to natural growth factors. The peptide exhibited very low hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity even at high concentrations. The combination of these properties in a single short, low-toxicity molecule makes it extremely promising for the development of new therapeutic agents.
In the next paper the authors selected polymer conjugates for polymyxin B (PMX B), a peptide antibiotic used against Gram-negative bacteria, to reduce its toxicity, extend its duration of action, and increase its efficacy [10]. All conjugates demonstrated reduced cytotoxicity compared to free polymyxin B. The highest antimicrobial activity (MIC = 4 μg/mL) was observed for the poly(2-deoxy-2-methacrylamido-D-glucose)–PMX B conjugate (PMAG–PMX B) with a hydrolyzable linkage (schiff base). Conjugates with a siderophore (deferoxamine) showed a moderate decrease in activity but remain promising for targeted therapy. Antibiotic release was faster in a slightly acidic environment (pH 5.8), which mimics inflammatory conditions. PMAG proved to be the most promising carrier due to its good biocompatibility, controlled release, and preservation of the antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B. This article represents a significant contribution to the development of antibiotic delivery systems to overcome bacterial resistance and reduce the toxicity of therapy.
Another article is devoted to the development and study of new hybrid antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) created on the basis of amyloidogenic regions of the ribosomal protein S1 of Staphylococcus aureus, and demonstration of their effectiveness against pathogenic bacteria, including antibiotic-resistant strains [11]. R23F, R23DI, and R23EI are hybrid peptides containing cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) for penetration into bacterial cells (TAT peptide fragment: RKKRRQRRR) and amyloidogenic sequences from domains D1, D3 and D4 of protein S1 of S. aureus. Modifications (sarcosine, aminosuccinimide) have been added to the peptides to increase stability. Antimicrobial activity has been demonstrated against both Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus, MRSA (methicillin-resistant S. aureus), Bacillus cereus) and Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli, P. aeruginosa). R23F has the lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (75–300 μM depending on the strain). The effectiveness of the peptides varied depending on bacterial strain, emphasizing the importance of specificity. It is believed that the peptides penetrate the cell via CPP and coaggregate with bacterial proteins (e.g., the S1 protein itself), disrupting vital processes. This results in a bacteriostatic or bactericidal effect without direct membrane lysis. Hybrid peptides based on the amyloidogenic regions of the S. aureus S1 protein exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. They are effective against multidrug-resistant strains (e.g., MRSA). Such peptides are promising candidates for the development of new antimicrobial drugs [12,13,14,15].
The last article in this issue investigates the mechanism of antimicrobial peptide (AMP) penetration through the lipid bilayer of a membrane using molecular dynamics (MD) methods [16]. The authors explore whether computer modeling can predict which peptides most readily penetrate the membrane and what factors influence this penetration. A total of 656 steered molecular dynamics simulations were conducted for 15 peptides. A membrane made of POPC (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-phosphatidylcholine) was simulated. The main conclusions that can be drawn from this work are: the membrane reaction force is maximum at the moment of peptide entry into the bilayer; the lowest reaction was observed for peptides with a high instability index (correlation > 0.9) [17]; the addition of a TAT peptide (cell-penetrating peptide) to the amyloidogenic peptide did not worsen, and in some cases improved, permeability; pulling by the center of mass causes greater drag than by an individual atom due to peptide compaction; the pulling speed (0.01–0.1 Å/ps) did not significantly affect the accuracy of the results. The work does not reveal the actual molecular mechanism of spontaneous penetration of antimicrobial peptides.
Conclusions: It is worth noting that the research conducted in the above-mentioned articles highlights the importance of insects as a source of new antimicrobial compounds and the need to develop safe and effective drugs against resistant bacterial and fungal infections [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. It is important to consider the synergistic effects of peptides, as demonstrated in recent studies [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35] and as it works in nature, for example, in frogs, where a cocktail of AMPs appears in their mucus [36]. Particular attention should be paid to peptide stability through the introduction of non-standard amino acids, their modification, or cyclization of the peptide itself [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. Control peptides are needed that would be composed of the same amino acid residues as the AMPs, but in a randomized order. As emphasized at the very beginning of this summary, peptide and antibiotic resistance is an important and key issue in this area of research [3,47,48].
For practically all peptides, there are no in vivo studies (in animal models) that could confirm their safety and efficacy in the body. Whether these peptides induce resistance in bacteria and fungi during long-term exposure has not been studied. Pharmacokinetics (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination) have not been studied. A more in-depth analysis of the mechanism of action (effect on membrane proteins, risk of resistance) is needed. Comparisons with other peptides should be made to assess competitiveness, not just a narrow range of strains. Before these peptides are considered promising, significantly more in-depth preclinical studies are needed.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. El Shazely, B.; Yu, G.; Johnston, P.R.; Rolff, J. Resistance Evolution Against Antimicrobial Peptides in Staphylococcus Aureus Alters Pharmacodynamics Beyond the MIC. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Maron, B.; Rolff, J.; Friedman, J.; Hayouka, Z. Antimicrobial Peptide Combination Can Hinder Resistance Evolution. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e00973-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Okeke, I.N.; de Kraker, M.E.A.; Van Boeckel, T.P.; Kumar, C.K.; Schmitt, H.; Gales, A.C.; Bertagnolio, S.; Sharland, M.; Laxminarayan, R. The Scope of the Antimicrobial Resistance Challenge. Lancet 2024, 403, 2426–2438, Erratum in Lancet 2024, 404, 1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rončević, T.; Gerdol, M.; Pacor, S.; Cvitanović, A.; Begić, A.; Weber, I.; Krce, L.; Caporale, A.; Mardirossian, M.; Tossi, A.; et al. Antimicrobial Peptide with a Bent Helix Motif Identified in Parasitic Flatworm Mesocestoides Corti. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ruczyński, J.; Parfianowicz, B.; Mucha, P.; Wiśniewska, K.; Piechowicz, L.; Rekowski, P. Structure–Activity Relationship of New Chimeric Analogs of Mastoparan from the Wasp Venom Paravespula Lewisii. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhu, A.; Chen, B.; Ma, J.; Wang, J.; Tang, R.; Liu, L.; Sun, W.; Zheng, X.; Pan, G. Application of Antimicrobial Peptides in Wound Dressings. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2025, 19, 8523–8539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, L.-M.; Zhou, S.-W.; Huang, X.-S.; Chen, Y.-F.; Mwangi, J.; Fang, Y.-Q.; Du, T.; Zhao, M.; Shi, L.; Lu, Q.-M. Blap-6, a Novel Antifungal Peptide from the Chinese Medicinal Beetle Blaps Rhynchopetera against Cryptococcus Neoformans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sinha, S.; Dhanabal, V.B.; Manivannen, V.L.; Cappiello, F.; Tan, S.-M.; Bhattacharjya, S. Ultra-Short Cyclized β-Boomerang Peptides: Structures, Interactions with Lipopolysaccharide, Antibiotic Potentiator and Wound Healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bhunia, A.; Mohanram, H.; Domadia, P.N.; Torres, J.; Bhattacharjya, S. Designed β-Boomerang Antiendotoxic and Antimicrobial Peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 21991–22004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Dvoretckaia, A.; Egorova, T.; Dzhuzha, A.; Levit, M.; Sivtsov, E.; Demyanova, E.; Korzhikova-Vlakh, E. Polymyxin B Conjugates with Bio-Inspired Synthetic Polymers of Different Nature. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kravchenko, S.V.; Domnin, P.A.; Grishin, S.Y.; Panfilov, A.V.; Azev, V.N.; Mustaeva, L.G.; Gorbunova, E.Y.; Kobyakova, M.I.; Surin, A.K.; Glyakina, A.V.; et al. Multiple Antimicrobial Effects of Hybrid Peptides Synthesized Based on the Sequence of Ribosomal S1 Protein from Staphylococcus Aureus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kumar, D.K.V.; Choi, S.H.; Washicosky, K.J.; Eimer, W.A.; Tucker, S.; Ghofrani, J.; Lefkowitz, A.; McColl, G.; Goldstein, L.E.; Tanzi, R.E.; et al. Amyloid-β Peptide Protects against Microbial Infection in Mouse and Worm Models of Alzheimer’s Disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Spitzer, P.; Condic, M.; Herrmann, M.; Oberstein, T.J.; Scharin-Mehlmann, M.; Gilbert, D.F.; Friedrich, O.; Grömer, T.; Kornhuber, J.; Lang, R.; et al. Amyloidogenic Amyloid-β-Peptide Variants Induce Microbial Agglutination and Exert Antimicrobial Activity. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Liu, Y.; Nussinov, R.; Zheng, J. Exploring Pathological Link between Antimicrobial and Amyloid Peptides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2024, 53, 8713–8763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wani, N.A.; Gazit, E.; Ramamoorthy, A. Interplay between Antimicrobial Peptides and Amyloid Proteins in Host Defense and Disease Modulation. Langmuir 2024, 40, 25355–25366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Likhachev, I.V.; Balabaev, N.K.; Galzitskaya, O.V. Is It Possible to Find an Antimicrobial Peptide That Passes the Membrane Bilayer with Minimal Force Resistance? An Attempt at a Predictive Approach by Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Guruprasad, K.; Reddy, B.V.B.; Pandit, M.W. Correlation between Stability of a Protein and Its Dipeptide Composition: A Novel Approach for Predicting in Vivo Stability of a Protein from Its Primary Sequence. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 1990, 4, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Silva, J.D.M.E.; Bezerra, F.W.F.; Martins, I.R.; Fontanari, G.G.; Oliveira, J.A.R.D.; Martins, L.H.D.S. Propolis and Geopropolis from Stingless Bees as a Source of Bioactive Compounds with Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Action: A Review. Food Res. Int. 2025, 214, 116674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Woods, D.C.; Olsson, M.A.; Heard, T.A.; Wallace, H.M.; Tran, T.D. Quality Assessment and Chemical Diversity of Australian Propolis from Tetragonula Carbonaria and Tetragonula Hockingsi Stingless Bees. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 17928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wu, J.; Zhang, M.; Tao, J.; Liu, M.; Xiong, J.; Jiang, T.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Yin, C.; et al. Structural Characterization, Derivatization, and Bioactivities of Secondary Metabolites Produced by Termite-Associated Streptomyces Lannensis BYF-106. Microbiol. Spectr. 2025, 13, e0181824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bhattacharya, B.; Bhattacharya, S.; Khatun, S.; Bhaktham, N.A.; Maneesha, M.; Subathra Devi, C. Wasp Venom: Future Breakthrough in Production of Antimicrobial Peptides. Protein J. 2025, 44, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Q.; Tao, J.; Kan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S. Diversity, Antibacterial and Phytotoxic Activities of Actinomycetes Associated with Periplaneta Fuliginosa. PeerJ 2024, 12, e18575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mendonça, R.Z.; Nascimento, R.M.; Fernandes, A.C.O.; Silva, P.I. Antiviral Action of Aqueous Extracts of Propolis from Scaptotrigona Aff. Postica (Hymenoptera; Apidae) against Zica, Chikungunya, and Mayaro Virus. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 15289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ndungu, N.N.; Kegode, T.M.; Kurgat, J.K.; Baleba, S.B.S.; Cheseto, X.; Turner, S.; Tasse Taboue, G.C.; Kasina, J.M.; Subramanian, S.; Nganso, B.T. Bio-Functional Properties and Phytochemical Composition of Selected Apis Mellifera Honey from Africa. Heliyon 2024, 10, e30839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chavarría-Pizarro, L.; Núñez-Montero, K.; Gutiérrez-Araya, M.; Watson-Guido, W.; Rivera-Méndez, W.; Pizarro-Cerdá, J. Novel Strains of Actinobacteria Associated with Neotropical Social Wasps (Vespidae; Polistinae, Epiponini) with Antimicrobial Potential for Natural Product Discovery. FEMS Microbes 2024, 5, xtae005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dho, M.; Candian, V.; Tedeschi, R. Insect Antimicrobial Peptides: Advancements, Enhancements and New Challenges. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Niode, N.J.; Mahono, C.K.; Lolong, F.M.; Matheos, M.P.; Kepel, B.J.; Tallei, T.E. A Review of the Antimicrobial Potential of Musca Domestica as a Natural Approach with Promising Prospects to Countermeasure Antibiotic Resistance. Vet. Med. Int. 2022, 2022, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ye, Z.; Fu, L.; Li, S.; Chen, Z.; Ouyang, J.; Shang, X.; Liu, Y.; Gao, L.; Wang, Y. Synergistic Collaboration between AMPs and Non-Direct Antimicrobial Cationic Peptides. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eyni, A.; Goudarzi, M.; Ghadikolaii, F.P.; Dehpori, A.; Soltani, S. Synergistic Effect of a Novel Antimicrobial Peptide and Silver Nanoparticles against Drug-Resistant P. Aeruginosa. AMB Express 2025, 15, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. de Albernaz, D.T.F.; Allend, S.O.; Neto, A.C.P.S.; Senta, D.d.O.D.; Pinto, L.d.S.; Kremer, F.S.; Hartwig, D.D. Novel Antimicrobial Peptides Against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: In Silico Design and Experimental Validation. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 136, lxaf287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Santos, M.H.d.M.; Endo, T.H.; Scandorieiro, S.; Pavanelli, W.R.; Kobayashi, R.K.T.; Nakazato, G. Silver Nanoparticle-Antibiotic Combinations: A Strategy to Overcome Bacterial Resistance in Escherichia Coli, Salmonella Enteritidis and Staphylococcus Aureus. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kaur, N.; Mondal, K.; Mitchell, M.E.; Padi, S.; Klauda, J.B.; Cardone, A.; Heinrich, F.; Harris, C.R.; Giles, D.K.; Rooney, M.T.; et al. Poly-Arginine Tails and Helical Segments of Natural Antimicrobial Peptides Display Concerted Action at Membranes for Enhanced Antimicrobial Effects. ACS Bio. Med. Chem. Au 2025, 5, 706–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ma, W.-Y.; Shen, K.-S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Q.; Diao, X.-J.; Liu, G.-R. Synergistic Antimicrobial Effect and Mechanism of Enterocin Gr17 and Cinnamaldehyde against Escherichia Coli and Candida Albicans. Arch. Microbiol. 2025, 207, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ciobanasu, C. Bacterial Extracellular Vesicles and Antimicrobial Peptides: A Synergistic Approach to Overcome Antimicrobial Resistance. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schouten, G.; Paulussen, F.; Grossmann, T.N.; Bitter, W.; van Ulsen, P. Membrane Modification and Adaptation of Metabolism by Acinetobacter Baumannii Prompts Resistance to Antimicrobial Activity of Outer Membrane Perturbing Peptide L8. J. Mol. Biol. 2025, 437, 169135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Samgina, T.Y.; Vasileva, I.D.; Trebše, P.; Torkar, G.; Surin, A.K.; Meng, Z.; Zubarev, R.A.; Lebedev, A.T. Tandem Mass Spectrometry de Novo Sequencing of the Skin Defense Peptides of the Central Slovenian Agile Frog Rana Dalmatina. Molecules 2023, 28, 7118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Baumann, T.; Nickling, J.H.; Bartholomae, M.; Buivydas, A.; Kuipers, O.P.; Budisa, N. Prospects of In Vivo Incorporation of Non-Canonical Amino Acids for the Chemical Diversification of Antimicrobial Peptides. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Enninful, G.N.; Kuppusamy, R.; Tiburu, E.K.; Kumar, N.; Willcox, M.D.P. Non-canonical Amino Acid Bioincorporation into Antimicrobial Peptides and Its Challenges. J. Pept. Sci. 2024, 30, e3560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Groover, K.E.; Randall, J.R.; Davies, B.W. Development of a Selective and Stable Antimicrobial Peptide. ACS Infect. Dis. 2024, 10, 2151–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chang, D.H.; Richardson, J.D.; Lee, M.-R.; Lynn, D.M.; Palecek, S.P.; Van Lehn, R.C. Machine Learning-Driven Discovery of Highly Selective Antifungal Peptides Containing Non-Canonical β-Amino Acids. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16, 5579–5594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. He, Y.; Song, X.; Wan, H.; Zhao, X. AmpHGT: Expanding Prediction of Antimicrobial Activity in Peptides Containing Non-Canonical Amino Acids Using Multi-View Constrained Heterogeneous Graph Transformer. BMC Biol. 2025, 23, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, H.; Chen, S. Cyclic Peptide Drugs Approved in the Last Two Decades (2001–2021). RSC Chem. Biol. 2022, 3, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wessolowski, A.; Bienert, M.; Dathe, M. Antimicrobial Activity of Arginine- and Tryptophan-Rich Hexapeptides: The Effects of Aromatic Clusters, D-Amino Acid Substitution and Cyclization. J. Pept. Res. 2004, 64, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mitra, S.; Chen, M.-T.; Stedman, F.; Hernandez, J.; Kumble, G.; Kang, X.; Zhang, C.; Tang, G.; Daugherty, I.; Liu, W.; et al. How Unnatural Amino Acids in Antimicrobial Peptides Change Interactions with Lipid Model Membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2024, 128, 9772–9784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yang, X.; Chen, M.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, P.; Luo, X.; Lv, S. Alpha-Aminoisobutyric Acid Incorporated Peptides for the Construction of Electrochemical Biosensors with High Stability and Low Fouling in Serum. Anal. Chim. Acta 2023, 1238, 340646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Ding, Y.; Ting, J.P.; Liu, J.; Al-Azzam, S.; Pandya, P.; Afshar, S. Impact of Non-Proteinogenic Amino Acids in the Discovery and Development of Peptide Therapeutics. Amino Acids 2020, 52, 1207–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Verma, D.P.; Tripathi, A.K.; Thakur, A.K. Innovative Strategies and Methodologies in Antimicrobial Peptide Design. J. Funct. Biomater. 2024, 15, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Luo, X.; Deng, H.; Ding, L.; Ye, X.; Sun, F.; Qin, C.; Chen, Z. Cationicity Enhancement on the Hydrophilic Face of Ctriporin Significantly Reduces Its Hemolytic Activity and Improves the Antimicrobial Activity against Antibiotic-Resistant ESKAPE Pathogens. Toxins 2024, 16, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galzitskaya, O.V. Creation of New Antimicrobial Peptides 3: Research Promises and Shortcomings. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 11992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411992

AMA Style

Galzitskaya OV. Creation of New Antimicrobial Peptides 3: Research Promises and Shortcomings. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(24):11992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411992

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galzitskaya, Oxana V. 2025. "Creation of New Antimicrobial Peptides 3: Research Promises and Shortcomings" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 24: 11992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411992

APA Style

Galzitskaya, O. V. (2025). Creation of New Antimicrobial Peptides 3: Research Promises and Shortcomings. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(24), 11992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262411992

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop