Next Article in Journal
Exogenous Glycine Betaine Decreases Cell Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in Human Colorectal Adenocarcinoma HT-29 Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
The Potential of NGTs to Overcome Constraints in Plant Breeding and Their Regulatory Implications
Previous Article in Journal
The Anthocyanidins Malvidin and Cyanidin Alleviate Irinotecan-Triggered Intestinal Mucositis by Modulating Oxidative Stress and Cytokine Release
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Breeding for Fungal Resistance in Common Bean
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 26
Issue 21
10.3390/ijms262110750
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of the SnRK2 Gene Family and Its Response to Abiotic Stress in Populus euphratica

by
Hongyan Jin
1,†,
Jing Li
1,†,
Tongrui Song
1,
Donghui Miao
1,
Qi Ning
1,
Xiao Zhang
1,
Zhongshuai Gai
1,
Zhijun Li
1,
Peipei Jiao
1,* and
Zhihua Wu
2,*
1
Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin, College of Life Science, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China
2
College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(21), 10750; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110750
Submission received: 30 September 2025 / Revised: 3 November 2025 / Accepted: 4 November 2025 / Published: 5 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Breeding and Genetics: New Findings and Perspectives)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Improving plant water use efficiency (WUE) and drought tolerance by modulating stomatal activity constitutes a promising strategy for mitigating the impacts of water scarcity. SnRK2, a key component of the abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway, plays a critical role in modulating stomatal behavior under abiotic stress. However, the functional role of SnRK2 in regulating stomatal movement to enhance WUE and drought tolerance in Populus euphratica remains to be characterized. In this study, 11 PeSnRK2 genes were identified in the P. euphratica genome, each comprising 9–14 exons and exhibiting an uneven distribution across seven chromosomes. Subcellular localization predictions indicated that these proteins are predominantly localized in the Cytoplasm and Cytoskeleton. Phylogenetic analysis grouped the PeSnRK2 genes into three distinct subfamilies, and conserved gene structures were observed within each clade. Analysis of cis-acting regulatory elements suggested that PeSnRK2 genes were involved in hormonal signaling and stress response pathways. Further transcriptomic data also indicated substantial alterations in PeSnRK2 expression due to polyethylene glycol (PEG) and abscisic acid (ABA) treatment. Finally, qRT-PCR and subcellular localization showed that PeSnRK2.6 is highly induced by ABA and functions in both nucleus and cytoplasm. This first characterization in a desert woody species bridged gaps in SnRK2 evolution and function.

1. Introduction

Global warming has intensified the severity of droughts worldwide, and as climate change progresses, droughts are projected to become more frequent and severe [1]. As sessile organisms, plants have evolved intricate mechanisms to cope with water deficit primarily through the modulation of signaling pathways [2,3]. Central to this adaptation is the dynamic regulation of stomatal aperture, which governs gas exchange and transpiration. Reduced stomatal conductance is a key water conservation strategy under limited water availability, and stomatal closure is a rapid and critical response that enhances drought tolerance by minimizing water loss [2,4,5].
Abscisic acid (ABA) is the primary regulator of stress-induced stomatal closure under drought conditions [6]. This phytohormone profoundly influences plant growth, development and responses to biotic and abiotic stressors [7]. During drought stress, SnRK2s that initiate the ABA signaling pathway are activated in plants, which comprises ABA receptors (PYR/PYL/RCAR), clade A protein phosphatase 2Cs (PP2Cs) and SnRK2s [8,9,10]. In the absence of ABA, PP2Cs repress SnRK2 kinase activity, thereby suppressing ABA signaling. Upon ABA binding, PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors bind to ABA and form complexes, relieving inhibition of SnRK2s and activating downstream signaling [11,12]. Water stress-induced ABA accumulation initiates a signaling cascade culminating in stomatal closure [13]. Specifically, ABA-bound PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors inhibit PP2C activity, permitting the autophosphorylation and activation of SnRK2 kinases. These activated SnRK2s subsequently phosphorylate downstream transcription factors governing stomatal closure and stress responses [14,15,16].
The Sucrose Non-Fermenting-1-Related protein Kinase (SnRK) family consists of evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine kinases ubiquitous in plants. Phylogenetically, this family is categorized into three subfamilies according to domain structure and function: SnRK1, SnRK2 and SnRK3 [17,18]. SnRKs can synergistically regulate stomatal development with auxin. The interaction between auxin and ABA signaling pathways suggests that SnRKs may act as integrators of these hormonal signals. SnRK1/KIN10 and SnRK2 interact with auxin signaling, modulating stomatal responses to abiotic stress through energy metabolism and stress response pathways [19]. Of these, SnRK2 is a plant-specific protein kinase family that plays a critical role in plant responses to stress. In Arabidopsis thaliana, 10 SnRK2 genes (AtSnRK2.1–2.10) have been identified and classified into three groups according to their sensitivity to ABA. Group I (AtSnRK2.1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.9 and 2.10) shows minimal or no response to ABA. Group II (AtSnRK2.7 and 2.8) exhibits weak ABA responsiveness. Group III (AtSnRK2.2, 2.3 and 2.6) is strongly induced by ABA and is essential for ABA signaling and drought response [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Notably, AtSnRK2.6 (OST1) plays a critical role in ABA-mediated stomatal closure. Loss-of-function mutants (snrk2.6) exhibit impaired stomatal regulation and excessive foliar water loss under drought stress [26,27]. The functional importance of SnRK2s has been demonstrated in various plant species apart from Arabidopsis, including dicots, such as Fragaria vesca [28], Brassica rapa [29], Gossypium hirsutum [30] and Solanum tuberosum [31], and monocots, such as Oryza sativa [18], Zea mays [32], Triticum aestivum [33] and Saccharum officinarum [34].
Advancements in computational power, coupled with the exponential expansion of biological datasets, have positioned bioinformatics as an indispensable discipline for addressing complex biological questions. In the present study, an integrated bioinformatics approach was employed, along with established software tools and curated online databases, for the systematic identification of SnRK2 family members within the Populus euphratica genome. We further conducted a comprehensive characterization of these genes, including analyses of their physicochemical properties, chromosomal localization, conserved protein domains, cis-regulatory elements and phylogenetic relationships across species. These analyses provide critical insights into the potential functional roles of PeSnRK2 kinases in abiotic stress responses.
Populus euphratica (commonly known as ‘desert poplar’) serves as a valuable model organism owing to its exceptional in vitro regeneration capacity, rapid clonal propagation and substantial ecological and economic relevance across Northern Hemisphere ecosystems [35]. As a halophytic relict species uniquely adapted to hyper-arid environments [36], P. euphratica provides an important system for investigating molecular mechanisms underlying abiotic stress tolerance, particularly drought and salinity resilience. Previous studies have demonstrated that overexpressing the ABA receptor PYL4 upstream of the ABA signaling pathway or the downstream transcription factor ABF3 can enhance poplar drought tolerance by regulating stomatal function [37,38]. While the biological functions of the SnRK2 kinase family and the key ABA signaling pathway gene SnRK2.6 have been extensively studied across diverse plant taxa, their functional characteristics in woody perennial plants remain poorly characterized. We hypothesized that PeSnRK2 genes, particularly those in SubGroup III, are up-regulated under drought and ABA, contributing to stress tolerance via nuclear signaling. This study presents a systematic characterization of the SnRK2 gene family in P. euphratica, aiming to elucidate the regulatory functions of PeSnRK2 genes in adaptive stress physiology. The findings not only provide new insights into the role of PeSnRK2 in coping with abiotic stresses, but also provide a reference for the development and utilization of desert plant germplasm resources and for the restoration and reconstruction of vegetation, which is of great significance for ecological conservation.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Characterization of the Physicochemical Properties of PeSnRK2 Family Members

Eleven PeSnRK2 genes were identified in the P. euphratica genome, with properties detailed in Table 1. The physicochemical properties of the corresponding proteins were computationally characterized using ExPASy (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/; accessed on 16 November 2024). The analysis covered parameters such as polypeptide length, molecular weight, isoelectric point, instability index, aliphatic index, GRAVY, and predicted subcellular location. The protein lengths ranged from 338 amino acids (PeuTF03G00739.1) to 581 amino acids (PeuTF05G01370.1), with an average length of 381 amino acids. Molecular weights ranged from 38 kDa (PeuTF03G00739.1) to 65 kDa (PeuTF05G01370.1), with an average of approximately 43 kDa. The predicted pI values varied between 4.76 (PeuTF09G01080.1) and 9.57 (PeuTF05G01370.1), and most are acidic/weakly acidic, with only one being strongly alkaline. Acidic kinases may exhibit a greater propensity to phosphorylate basic regions on substrates (such as sequences near nuclear localization signals), whilst basic kinases may preferentially phosphorylate regions rich in acidic amino acids (e.g., glutamic acid, aspartic acid) on their substrate proteins. Instability index values ranged from 35.69 (PeuTF05G01370.1) to 50.77 (PeuTF19G00050.1), indicating potential instability under in vitro conditions. Unstable kinases permit cells to rapidly adjust their intracellular concentration through swift synthesis and degradation. This is characteristic of short-term signal responses. Stable kinases serve as enduring signaling scaffolds, participating in more fundamental, sustained cellular processes. All PeSnRK2 proteins exhibited negative GRAVY values, indicating their hydrophilic nature. Predictions of subcellular localization indicated that most PeSnRK2s are mainly found in the cytoskeleton and cytoplasm.

2.2. Analysis of Gene and Protein Structure of the PeSnRK2s

The gene structure of each P. euphratica SnRK2 family member was analyzed. Intron–exon grouping diagrams were constructed according to gene location information. Most members contained motifs 1–9, suggesting a high degree of conservation of these motifs. By contrast, motif 10 was present only in PeuTF05G01129.1, PeuTF04G01353.1 and PeuTF09G01080.1, implying that motif 10 is less conserved within the family. Motif 10 is a sequence containing SH3 and RIO domains that can bind to target proteins, thereby altering their function by modifying enzyme activity, cellular localization, or interactions with other proteins (Figure 1A). Further domain analysis using the Pfam database confirmed that all PeSnRK2 proteins possess the canonical SnRK2 domain. Two members—PeuTF04G01353.1 and PeuTF09G01080.1—also contained the SnRK2-3 subtype domain. In addition, the domain found in PeuTF05G01129.1 was similar to the PKc superfamily, whereas PeuTF05G01370.1 featured a ribosome-S6e domain (Figure 1B). The results showed that the number of exons in each member ranged from 9 to 14 (Figure 1C). The conserved protein domains of P. euphratica SnRK2s were identified using MEME v5.4.1 analysis, revealing 10 conserved motifs (motifs 1–10; Figure 1D). These findings are consistent with the domain architecture observed in Arabidopsis SnRK2 family members, suggesting evolutionary conservation of core functional regions.

2.3. Prediction of Cis-Acting Elements in the Promoter Regions of PeSnRK2s

We conducted a systematic analysis of cis-regulatory elements within 2000 bp promoter regions to explore the functional diversification of PeSnRK2 genes. The forecasted cis-acting elements displayed varied distribution patterns among family members and were largely grouped into three main categories: hormone signaling, light responsiveness, and stress adaptation. Stress-related cis-acting elements were primarily associated with defense responses, drought tolerance and low-temperature adaptation. Hormone-responsive elements included salicylic acid-responsive elements (TCA-element), gibberellin-responsive elements (P-box and TATC-box), methyl jasmonate-responsive elements (CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif), auxin-responsive elements (TGA-element) and ABA-responsive elements (ABRE), which are the key regulators of plant responses under abiotic stress conditions (Figure 2). Among the identified categories, hormone-responsive elements were the most prevalent, followed by light- and stress-responsive elements. Notably, ABREs demonstrated near-universal conservation, present in all PeSnRK2 promoters except PeuTF03G00739.1 and PeuTF19G00050.1. This evolutionary retention highlights ABA signaling as a central regulatory axis in P. euphratica stress adaptation mechanisms via SnRK2.

2.4. Collinearity Analysis of the SnRK2 Family in Multiple Species, PeSnRK2 Gene Duplication Types and Their Chromosomal Localization

Collinearity analysis can generally be divided into two categories. The first category is interspecific genomic collinearity analysis, which looks at the level of genome conservation and similarity between various species. The second type focuses on intraspecific collinearity, assessing homology among chromosomes within a single genome, and the distribution of repetitive sequences and multi-copy genes was assessed. Cross-species collinearity analysis provides crucial insights into the evolutionary development and expansion strategies of gene families. Such analysis provides a framework for elucidating the evolutionary dynamics of the PeSnRK2 gene family and its potential role in drought adaptation, thereby identifying candidate genes for molecular breeding and genetic improvement. Hence, SnRK2 gene family members were identified from the genomes of several related Salicaceae species. A total of 11, 14 and 10 SnRK2 genes were identified in Populus pruinosa, Populus deltoides and Salix sinopurpurea, respectively.
To further investigate the evolutionary trajectory of the PeSnRK2 gene family, collinearity analyses were conducted between P. euphratica and three other Salicaceae species (P. pruinosa, P. deltoides and S. sinopurpurea) and two model plant species: the dicot A. thaliana and monocot O. sativa. A total of 27, 31, 26, 12 and 15 collinear SnRK2 gene pairs were identified between P. euphratica and P. pruinosa, P. deltoides, S. sinopurpurea, A. thaliana and O. sativa, respectively. These results demonstrate a higher degree of evolutionary conservation and orthology of SnRK2 genes within the Populus genus than within the more distantly related species, such as A. thaliana and O. sativa (Figure 3A). Intraspecific collinearity analysis within P. euphratica, performed using the MCScanX function in TBtools, revealed five segmental duplication events involving seven of the 11 PeSnRK2 genes: PeuTF09G01080.1/PeuTF05G01129.1, PeuTF09G01080.1/PeuTF04G01353.1, PeuTF05G01129.1/PeuTF04G01353.1, PeuTF03G00118.1/PeuTF04G02065.1, PeuTF07G01031.1/PeuTF02G00789.1 and PeuTF09G01080.1/PeuTF04G01129.1 (Figure 3B). All segmental duplication events occurred between different chromosomes but within three distinct subfamilies. These results suggest that multiple PeSnRK2 genes arose during gene duplication, and segmental duplication events may have contributed to SnRK2 gene expansion in P. euphratica. Gene duplication mode analysis further showed that whole-genome duplication or segmental duplication accounted for 82% of the PeSnRK2 genes. By contrast, scattered duplication and proximal duplication each contributed 9%, while no tandem or singleton duplication events were observed (Figure 3C). The PeSnRK2 fragment replication pattern may be associated with gene functional differentiation. The ratio of Ka/Ks is generally used to assess selective pressure and the evolutionary divergence of protein coding genes [39]. We estimated the Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks ratio of homologous genes in P. euphratica (Table S1): their Ka/Ks ratios were all less than 1. These results suggested that the PeSnRK2 gene family underwent purifying selection after duplication.
The number of PeSnRK2 genes (11 members) is slightly greater than that of AtSnRK2 (10) and OsSnRK2 (10). This suggests that during the evolutionary history of P. euphratica, its SnRK2 gene family may have undergone a minor species-specific expansion, potentially providing richer regulatory potential for the poplar’s adaptation to specific environments. The higher number of collinear pairs between PeSnRK2s and OsSnRK2s (15 pairs) compared to those with AtSnRK2s (12 pairs) indicates that poplar is evolutionarily closer to monocotyledons (rice). This suggests poplar may have inherited more conserved duplication units from a common ancestral gene or maintained a high degree of genomic structural conservation following divergence.
Chromosomal localization analysis of these 11 PeSnRK2s revealed that they are distributed across 7 of the 19 chromosomes of P. euphratica (Figure 4). Chromosome 4 contains the highest number of PeSnRK2s (three PeSnRK2s), followed by chromosomes 3 and 5 (two PeSnRK2s).

2.5. Systematic Evolutionary Analysis of the SnRK2 Gene Family in P. euphratica, P. pruinosa, A. thaliana and O. sativa

We constructed a gene tree using full-length protein sequences from the 11 PeSnRK2 members of the woody dicotyledon P. euphratica, 10 OsSnRK2 members from the herbaceous monocotyledon O. sativa, 10 AtSnRK2 members from the herbaceous dicotyledon A. thaliana and 11 PpSnRK2 members from the closely related woody dicotyledon P. pruinosa to investigate the evolutionary relationships among PeSnRK2 genes. Based on the established subgroup classification from Arabidopsis and Oryza, the PeSnRK2 members were assigned to three distinct subgroups: Subgroup I (PeuTF03G00118.1, PeuTF04G02065.1, PeuTF04G01285.1 and PeuTF19G00050.1), Subgroup II (PeuTF02G00789.1, PeuTF05G01370.1, PeuTF07G01031.1 and PeuTF03G00739.1), and Subgroup III (PeuTF04G01353.1, PeuTF09G01080.1 and PeuTF05G01129.1; Figure 5). Comparative analysis revealed differential gene expansion within the PeSnRK2 family relative to A. thaliana. Notably, two PeSnRK2 genes (PeuTF04G01353.1 and PeuTF09G01080.1) clustered with AtSnRK2.6, whereas another pair (PeuTF05G01370.1 and PeuTF02G00789.1) grouped with AtSnRK2.8, suggesting the functional conservation in physiological and biochemical processes. Furthermore, phylogenetic proximity indicated that P. euphratica shares a closer evolutionary relationship with P. pruinosa than with A. thaliana or O. sativa.

2.6. Prediction of the Secondary Structure and Three-Dimensional Structure of the PeSnRK2 Protein

All PeSnRK2 proteins contain four secondary structures: α-helices, β-turns, random coils, and extended strands (Figure 6A). Random coils were the most abundant, followed by α-helices and extended strands. The predominance of α-helices and random coils suggests that these two structural features constitute the primary conformational framework of PeSnRK2 proteins. Random coils play a vital role in maintaining protein flexibility by facilitating conformational changes and enabling the connection between the more rigid α-helices and β-sheet structures. This flexibility is largely stabilized by hydrogen bonding interactions between backbone atoms or between backbone and side chains. α-Helices, which are stabilized through regular intra-chain hydrogen bonds, are critical for protein stability, often forming the core of functional domains and contributing to molecular interactions and protein folding. Three-dimensional structural modeling further revealed that all PeSnRK2 proteins exhibit highly similar tertiary conformations. Structural alignment showed that sequence identities exceeded 40% across all members, with the serine/threonine-protein kinase SRK2E serving as the homologous structural template. PeSnRK2 protein kinases all contain conserved core catalytic residues, including K50 (VAIK motif), D160 (HRD motif) and N191 (DFG motif), which collectively form the catalytic machinery for phosphate transfer. Furthermore, S175/S176 on the activation loop and the C-terminal D313 (ABA box) serve as crucial regulatory residues, governing the kinase’s conformational switch and interaction with the upstream inhibitor PP2C, respectively. Only subgroup III members harbor the ABA box, potentially correlating with their ABA-inducibility (Figure 6B).

2.7. Expression Profiles of PeSnRK2 Genes in Response to Abiotic Stresses

Under PEG6000 treatment, five PeSnRK2 genes, namely, PeuTF04G02065.1, PeuTF05G01129.1, PeuTF07G01031.1, PeuTF19G00050.1 and PeuTF05G01370.1, were significantly up-regulated. By contrast, the expression levels of these genes were down-regulated in response to ABA. Three genes (PeuTF03G00118.1, PeuTF03G00739.1 and PeuTF04G01285.1) exhibited reduced expression levels under both PEG-induced drought and ABA treatments (Figure 7A). Conversely, PeuTF04G01353.1, PeuTF09G01080.1 and PeuTF02G00789.1 were consistently up-regulated under both stress conditions. After normalizing the data, PeuTF09G01080.1 demonstrated the most pronounced increase in transcript levels in response to ABA. Notably, this gene shares 89% sequence identity with AtSnRK2.6, a key regulator in ABA-mediated stress responses in Arabidopsis. Based on its strong inducibility and sequence homology, PeuTF09G01080.1 was designated PeSnRK2.6 and selected for subsequent functional characterization. Using qRT-PCR, we evaluated the expression levels of genes from eight members per branch of the phylogenetic tree. The results demonstrate that the expression patterns of all detected genes are broadly consistent with those observed in RNA-seq analyses (Figure 7B,C).

2.8. Subcellular Localization of PeSnRK2s

Protein function is often influenced by their localization within cells. Mature proteins perform stable biological functions after localizing to specific subcellular organelles. The SnRK2 proteins are plant-specific serine/threonine (Ser/Thr) kinases that modulate stress-responsive gene expression by phosphorylating downstream substrates, thereby enabling adaptive responses in distinct tissues under adverse environmental conditions. To determine the subcellular localization of PeSnRK2.6, a recombination plasmid containing the PeSnRK2.6 coding sequence fused to yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) under the control of the CaMV 35S promoter (35S::PeSnRK2.6-YFP) was introduced into Nicotiana benthamiana leaves via Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient transformation. Fluorescence signals were visualized through laser scanning confocal microscopy. The fusion protein PeSnRK2.6-YFP was observed to colocalize with the nuclear marker H2B, confirming its primary localization in the cell nucleus, with some cytoplasmic localization also noted. This finding was the same as in previous research [40] (Figure 8).

2.9. Predicting Protein–Protein Interactions of the PeSnRK2.6

To further elucidate the biological functions and regulatory networks of the PeSnRK2.6 protein, a protein–protein interaction network was generated using the STRING database (http://string-db.org, accessed on 28 December 2024). Given the evolutionary conservation of SnRK2 kinases, the interaction network of PeSnRK2.6 was inferred according to its homologous protein, AtSnRK2.6 (also known as SnRK2E), in A. thaliana. The predicted interaction network revealed that SnRK2.6 interacts with several key regulators of ABA signaling, including ABI1, ABI2, HAB1, PP2CA and SAG113, all of which encode type 2C PP2Cs, the S-type anion channel SLAC1, the ABA receptor PYR1, ABA-responsive transcription factors ABF1 and ABF2 and the cold-response transcription factor ICE1 (SCRM; Figure 9A). The functional annotation of this interaction indicates that PeSnRK2.6 is likely involved in ABA-activated signaling pathways, ABA-mediated responses, peptidyl-threonine dephosphorylation and the regulation of stomatal movement (Figure 9B). These results suggest that PeSnRK2.6 plays a central role in ABA-dependent stress response signaling networks in P. euphratica.

3. Discussion

3.1. Identification of 11 SnRK2 Family Members in P. euphratica

Protein kinase-mediated phosphorylation is a critical mechanism for mitigating ecological stress [41]. As central components of the serine-threonine kinase subfamily, SnRK2 kinases are indispensable to plant adaptation to environmental challenges, including drought [42,43]. These enzymes serve as key regulators within the ABA signaling transduction pathway [14], modulating gene expression and protein activity through target phosphorylation and coordinating osmotic stress responses and stomatal dynamics [44,45].
SnRK2 genes have been isolated and identified in several species, such as 10 genes in O. sativa [18] and A. thaliana [46], 14 genes in Z. mays [32], 22 genes in tobacco [40]. In this study, 11 SnRK2 genes were identified in both P. euphratica and P. pruinosa, 14 SnRK2 genes in P. deltoides, 10 SnRK2 genes in S. sinopurpurea. Bioinformatic analyses revealed conserved gene architectures, aligning with established structure–function relationships observed in plant kinase subfamilies. Previous research has indicated that SnRK2 genes in most higher plants consist of nine exons, with some exceptions such as ZmSnRK2.5 (one exon) [32], OsSAPK5 (three exons) [47], and AtSnRK2.8 (five exons) [48]. Typically, plant SnRK2 genes contain eight introns, reflecting a high degree of structural conservation across species. Notably, the majority of PeSnRK2 genes possess nine exons and eight introns, with the exception of two members of subgroup II (PeuTF02G00789.1 and PeuTF05G01370.1) (Figure 2), consistent with the predominant exon number reported in Nicotiana tabacum SnRK2 homologues [40]. This structural conservation across diverse higher plant taxa provides an evolutionary basis for future functional characterization of PeSnRK2 kinases.

3.2. PeSnRK2 Family Members Respond to Abiotic Stress

The variation in gene expression levels is largely governed by the composition of cis-regulatory elements within its promoter region, which provide the crucial molecular foundations for responding to environmental stimuli. Promoter cis-acting element analysis of PeSnRK2 genes elucidates their potential regulatory responses to environmental stimuli. In line with established mechanisms, ABA-responsive gene expression typically requires multiple ABREs or a single ABRE in conjunction with auxiliary motifs such as DRE/CRT [49]. In this study, ABRE motifs were identified in 9 of the 11 PeSnRK2 promoters (Figure 2), consistent with observations in Capsicum [50], Brassica napus [51] and Ammopiptanthus nanus [52]. Subgroup III members (PeuTF05G01129.1, PeuTF04G01353.1 and PeuTF09G01080.1) possess a relatively high number of AREB cis-acting elements and share motif10, suggesting they are strongly linked to ABA response. Additionally, the presence of low-temperature responsive elements within these promoters’ mirror patterns observed in Liriodendron chinense SnRK2 genes [53], suggesting a conserved regulatory framework. These findings collectively imply functional roles for PeSnRK2 genes in both ABA-mediated signaling and cold stress adaptation.
Genome-wide studies on plant responses to abiotic stresses are becoming increasingly thorough and systematic. SnRK2 gene expression is widely induced by diverse abiotic stresses across plant species. In rice, SnRK2 family members are regulated in an organ-specific manner by osmotic stress, salinity and ABA; SAPK3, SAPK8, and SAPK9 were up-regulated by salt and drought, and SAPK6 was transcriptionally activated by cold stress [18,46]. Similarly, in wheat, overexpression of TaSnRK2.4 significantly increased the resistance of transgenic plants to salt, drought and freezing [54], while maize SnRK2s respond to both NaCl and ABA stimuli [32]. Overexpression of MYB transcription factors downstream of the SnRK2 can enhance plant resilience against multiple abiotic stresses [55]. Based on these findings, we induced the expression of candidate genes in poplar trees under different treatment conditions involving PEG and ABA. In this study, two PeSnRK2 genes were strongly induced by PEG and ABA treatments. PeuTF05G01370.1 was strongly induced by PEG, while PeuTF09G01080.1 was strongly induced by ABA. We further identified LTRs alongside multiple ARE and MRE elements within 7 of these 11 PeSnRK2 genes. These elements interact synergistically with numerous cis-acting regulatory elements associated with abiotic stress responses, including ABRE and MBS (Figure 2). These key characteristics suggest that PeSnRK2s may play a pivotal role in transcriptional reprogramming events during the plant system’s response to diverse environmental stimuli, thereby ensuring the natural developmental growth process of poplar. However, the responsiveness of PeSnRK2 genes to salt and low-temperature stress remains to be experimentally validated.

3.3. PeSnRK2.6 Enhances Plant Drought Tolerance by Regulating Stomatal Movement

Evolutionary analysis of SnRK2 proteins in P. euphratica and A. thaliana enables inference of PeSnRK2 expression patterns and regulatory functions based on phylogenetic relationships with well-characterized AtSnRK2 genes. For example, AtSnRK2.6 is predominantly expressed in guard cells and plays a central role in regulating stomatal aperture in response to abiotic stress [27]. In contrast, the closely related Group III members AtSnRK2.2 and AtSnRK2.3, although phylogenetically proximate to AtSnRK2.6, exhibit broader tissue expression profiles and function primarily in ABA-mediated responses during key developmental stages, including seed germination, dormancy and early seedling growth [11]. Studies in Populus tremula have demonstrated that Ptre-SnRK2.6a and Ptre-SnRK2.6b, despite exhibiting high peptide sequence similarity, appear to exert distinct biological functions [56].
Phylogenetic analysis reveals that PeSnRK2.6 shares 89% sequence identity with Arabidopsis OST1/SnRK2.6/SnRK2E, the primary regulator of stress-responsive stomatal movement [57]. This kinase plays a pivotal role in enhancing drought tolerance through ABA-mediated stomatal closure, a mechanism conserved across species including A. thaliana, Camellia sinensis [58], and Zea mays [59]. In P. euphratica, PeSnRK2.6 expression is specifically induced by PEG-simulated drought stress and ABA treatment (Figure 6), suggesting its involvement in early drought perception and signal transduction. As a core component of the ABA signaling pathway, PeSnRK2.6 likely operates through upstream PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors and downstream ABF transcription factors and regulates stress-responsive gene expression. We propose that PeSnRK2.6 enhances drought resistance by phosphorylating key stomatal regulators, such as ion channels or transcriptional effectors, thereby promoting stomatal closure. While homology suggests roles, direct knockouts are needed to confirm. This study focuses on bioinformatics analysis and lacks functional validation through mutant or overexpressing plants; subsequent work will incorporate CRISPR editing technology or gene overexpression in poplar. Previous research indicated that overexpressing AtSnRK2.8 in poplar may enhance abiotic stress tolerance via stomatal regulation [60]. This provides a reference for testing tolerance by overexpressing PeSnRK2.6 in drought-sensitive poplar varieties. Given this functional conservation, PeSnRK2.6 represents a promising candidate for genetic enhancement of drought tolerance in both woody perennials and crop species.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification and Physical and Chemical Property Analysis of Members of the PeSnRK2 Family

PeSnRK2 genes were identified from the genomic dataset of P. euphratica [61]. Initial identification involved aligning the P. euphratica genome with protein sequences of the 10 A. thaliana SnRK2 family members via BLASTp website (e-value ≤ 1.0 × 10−10) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 15 October 2024). To detect potential SnRK2 proteins, HMMER searches were performed using the HMM profile of the SnRK2 domain (Pfam: PF00069) (http://pfam.xfam.org/search, accessed on 17 November 2024). Candidate sequences were further validated by screening for complete conserved domains using Pfam batch sequence search (http://pfam.xfam.org, accessed on 19 November 2024) and NCBI’s Conserved Domain Database (CDD) batch search (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd, accessed on 19 November 2024) and confirmed using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de, accessed on 19 November 2024). The physiochemical properties of the identified PeSnRK2 proteins, including theoretical isoelectric point and molecular weight, were predicted using the ExPASy ProtParam tool (https://www.expasy.org, accessed on 24 November 2024). Subcellular localization predictions were conducted using WOLF PSORT (https://www.genscript.com/, accessed on 24 November 2024).

4.2. Genetic Structure and Conserved Domain Analysis of Members of the PeSnRK2 Family

Conserved motifs in the PeSnRK2 proteins were identified using the web-based software MEME v5.4.1 (http://meme-suite.org, accessed on 28 November 2024). The motif discovery parameters were set with a minimum and maximum motif width of 10 and 150 amino acids, respectively, and the maximum number of motifs limited to 10. All other settings were kept at default values. Gene structure and motif distribution diagrams were visualized and analyzed using TBtools (Version 2.119).

4.3. Analysis of Cis-Acting Elements of PeSnRK2s

To investigate the regulatory elements and potential functional roles of PeSnRK2 genes, we retrieved and analyzed 2000 bp upstream sequences from the translation start site of each PeSnRK2 member, using the Plant CARE database (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html, accessed on 6 December 2024). The predicted cis-acting elements were subsequently visualized using TBtools software (Version 2.119).

4.4. Multispecies Collinearity, Gene Duplication Types and Chromosome Localization of PeSnRK2s

SnRK2 family members from three additional Salicaceae species, namely, P. pruinosa (NCBI BioProject accession PRJNA863418), P. deltoides (WV94_445) [62] and S. sinopurpurea [63], were obtained using publicly available genome assemblies.
To investigate the evolutionary conservation and genomic synteny of PeSnRK2 genes, homologous gene pairs between P. euphratica and five other species, namely, P. pruinosa, P. deltoides, S. sinopurpurea, A. thaliana and O. sativa, were identified through BLASTP alignment. Conserved genomic intervals between P. euphratica and these species were subsequently detected using TBtools (Version 2.119) and visualized. To further explore the evolutionary dynamics of the PeSnRK2 gene family, we employed MCScanX (https://hmegasoftware.net; accessed on 14 December 2024) and analyzed whole-genome duplication events in P. euphratica. This analysis enabled classification of duplication types (e.g., segmental, tandem) and characterization of their distribution patterns within the genome. These findings provide insight into the expansion and evolutionary history of the SnRK2 gene family in P. euphratica. TBtools software calculates the Ka and Ks values of duplicated genes.
Chromosomal localization of PeSnRK2 genes in P. euphratica was determined using TBtools software (Version 2.119). Chromosome length information was obtained via the ‘Fasta Stats’ function, while gene IDs and positional data were extracted from the genome annotation (GFF3 file) using the ‘GFF3 Gene Position Parse’ and ‘Text Block Extract and Filter‘ tools. Gene density information was retrieved using the ‘Gene Density Profile’ module. Finally, the chromosomal distribution of PeSnRK2 genes was visualized using the ‘Gene Location Visualize’ function, providing an overview of their physical positions across P. euphratica chromosomes.

4.5. Phylogenetic Analysis of PeSnRK2s

To investigate the evolutionary relationships among SnRK2 proteins, domain coordinates for SnRK2 sequences from P. euphratica, P. pruinosa and A. thaliana were retrieved using the SMART database (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de, accessed on 22 December 2024). Based on these coordinates, SnRK2 domain regions were extracted and concatenated into new protein sequences for each species. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using the Clustal W algorithm under default parameters in MEGA-X software (version 11.0.13). A phylogenetic tree was then constructed based on the aligned SnRK2 domain sequences. The resulting tree was visualized and graphically enhanced using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) online tool (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 27 December 2024), providing a clear depiction of the evolutionary clustering patterns among SnRK2 proteins from the three species.

4.6. Prediction of the Secondary and Three-Dimensional Structures of PeSnRK2 Proteins

Secondary structure prediction of the PeSnRK2 protein family was conducted using the SOPMA tool (https://npsa-prabi.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=npsa_sopma.html, accessed on 27 December 2024). To further explore the spatial conformation, the three-dimensional (3D) structures of PeSnRK2 proteins were modeled using the SWISS-MODEL server (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/, accessed on 27 December 2024). PeSnRK2 protein was annotated with the kinase domain using PyMOL software (Version 3.1.6.1). These structural predictions provide insights into the folding patterns and potential functional domains of PeSnRK2 proteins.

4.7. Transcriptome Sequencing and Data Analysis of PeSnRK2s

Transcriptome sequencing data were obtained from P. euphratica seedlings treated with 15% PEG 6000, 100 μmol/L ABA and corresponding control conditions. Quantitative expression data for each treatment were used to extract the expression profiles of PeSnRK2 gene family members [64]. RNA extraction, cDNA library construction, RNA-seq and primary data analysis were conducted by Frasergen Bioinformatics Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). Following library quality assessment, DNA nanoballs were prepared and loaded onto sequencing chips for high-throughput sequencing using the MGI platform. Raw sequencing reads were processed using SOAPnuke software (Version 2.1.0) [65] to remove low-quality data and adapters, yielding high-quality clean reads. Subsequent transcriptomic analysis followed methods described in a previous study [66]. Clean reads were aligned to the P. euphratica reference genome using HISAT2 (version 2.1.0) [67]. Gene expression quantification was performed with StringTie (Version 1.3.4d) [68]. Expression levels were normalized and reported as fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM). Differentially expressed genes) were identified using the DESeq2 R package (version 1.30.1). Thresholds were set at |log2 Foldchange| > 1 and p-value < 0.05. The expression profiles of PeSnRK2s were extracted and visualized using TBtools (Version 2.119).
P. euphratica seedling cultivation conditions: light cycle, 16 h photoperiod; temperature, 25 °C ± 1 °C; relative humidity, 75%; irrigation, the seedlings were well watered at their roots every 2 weeks for 2 months before treatment. Two-month-old poplar seedlings underwent drought stress treatment with 15% PEG6000 for five days and 100 μM ABA for four hours. Each treatment included a control group with three replicates. After processing is finished, take three leaves of the same size from poplar seedlings and quickly submerge them in liquid nitrogen to freeze. Keep them at –80 °C until they are analyzed. SPARKscript‖RT Plus Kit with gDNA Eraser (SparkJade, Jinan, China) was applied to produce the cDNA through the reverse template of total RNA (1 µg). The reaction mixture (10 μL) contained 5 μL of 2 × SYRB Green qPCR Mix (SparkJade, China), 0.2 μL each of forward and reverse primers, 3.1 μL ddH2O and 1.5 μL of cDNA template. Amplification was achieved using the following cycle settings: 95 °C for 30 s, then 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 10 s, and 72 °C for 30 s for plate reading. qRT-PCR yielded products between 80 bp and 150 bp in size. After normalization with PeActin, relative expression was assessed. The 2−ΔΔCt method was applied to data evaluation. The primer sequences used are listed in Table S2 available as Supplementary Data.

4.8. Subcellular Localization of PeSnRK2.6

PeSnRK2.6’s 2000 bp promoter sequence was cloned into the pGreen0179-35S-MCS-YFP vector. After the ligated vector was transformed into E. coli DH5α, a single clone was isolated. The target fragment was then amplified using PCR for positive detection and sequenced to confirm the positive plasmid. The recombinant plasmid 35S::PeSnRK2.6-YFP was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 by electroporation. Separately, the strain carrying the nuclear marker plasmid H2B-CFP was cultured overnight in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with appropriate antibiotics. The resulting bacterial cultures were inoculated into fresh LB medium containing 50 µM acetosyringone and incubated with shaking until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached 1.0–1.2. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in infiltration buffer (10 mM MES, pH 5.6; 10 mM MgCl2·6H2O; and 50 µM acetosyringone) to a final OD600 of approximately 1.0. The suspension was incubated in darkness at room temperature for 3 h to activate the virulence genes. Equal volumes of Agrobacterium cultures harboring 35S::PeSnRK2.6-YFP and H2B-CFP were mixed and co-infiltrated into the abaxial surface of 4-week-old Nicotiana benthamiana leaves using a 1 mL needleless syringe. Plants were kept in the dark for 12 h post-infiltration and then transferred to standard growth conditions (22 °C, 16 h light/8 h dark) for an additional 36 h. Epidermal leaf tissue was collected and visualized under a laser scanning confocal microscope (TS100, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). YFP signals were excited with a 488 nm laser, and emission was detected in the 500–550 nm range.

4.9. Predicting Protein–Protein Interactions of PeSnRK2.6

Owing to the absence of P. euphratica protein entries in the STRING database (http://string-db.org, accessed on 28 December 2024), functional predictions of protein–protein interactions were inferred using homologous proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana. The Arabidopsis orthologue of PeSnRK2.6 was identified based on sequence similarity, and its corresponding protein sequence was used as a query in the STRING database to construct a putative protein interaction network. The analysis employed default settings, including an interaction confidence score threshold, to visualize predicted interactions with known ABA signaling components and potential regulatory partners [69].

4.10. Statistical Analysis

DESeq2 was used for RNA-seq with |log2FC| > 1, p < 0.05; 2−ΔΔCt was used for qRT-PCR. Data were represented as means ± standard error. For the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, * indicates significant differences at based on Sidak’s multiple comparisons test (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

In this study, 11 members of the PeSnRK2 gene family were identified, with an analysis of their structure, phylogenetic relationships, orthologs, and cis-acting elements. By predicting cis-elements and analyzing the phylogenetic and ortholog relationships of AtSnRK2 family members in three Salicaceae species, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Oryza sativa, it was discovered that these structures have been highly conserved throughout evolution. Research indicates that subgroup III members of this family could be crucial in managing responses to abiotic stress through the ABA signaling pathway. The PeSnRK2.6 gene showed significant upregulation in response to ABA stress, as revealed by both RNA sequencing data and qRT-PCR. Further subcellular localization confirmed PeSnRK2.6 functions in both nucleus and cytoplasm. This research establishes a foundation for more in-depth investigation of the PeSnRK2.6 gene in Populus euphratica and, by thoroughly analyzing the PeSnRK2 gene family, enhances our comprehension of abiotic stress responses in this species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms262110750/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.J.; methodology, H.J., J.L. and T.S.; software, H.J., J.L., T.S., D.M., Q.N. and X.Z.; formal analysis, H.J.; writing—original draft preparation, H.J. and J.L.; writing—review and editing, H.J., P.J., Z.W., Z.G. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 32160355 and 32371838, Tianshan Top Talents Program, grant number 2024TSYCCX0114, Natural Science Support Program of XPCC, grant number 2024DA034, Guidance Program for Science & Technology Projects of XPCC, grant number 2024ZD087, and Tianchi Talent—Young Doctor Introduction Program, grant number 524307006.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the authors for their contributions to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gebrechorkos, S.H.; Sheffield, J.; Vicente-Serrano, S.M.; Funk, C.; Miralles, D.G.; Peng, J.; Dyer, E.; Talib, J.; Beck, H.E.; Singer, M.B.; et al. Warming accelerates global drought severity. Nature 2025, 642, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  2. Rosso, L.; Cantamessa, S.; Bergante, S.; Biselli, C.; Fricano, A.; Chiarabaglio, P.M.; Gennaro, M.; Nervo, G.; Secchi, F.; Carra, A. Responses to Drought Stress in Poplar: What Do We Know and What Can We Learn? Life 2023, 13, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, J.S.; Jeon, B.W.; Kim, J. Signaling peptides regulating abiotic stress responses in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 704490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baker, N.R.; Rosenqvist, E. Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: An examination of future possibilities. J. Exp. Bot. 2004, 55, 1607–1621, Correction in J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, L.; Zhang, C.; Yang, N.; Cao, W.; Li, Y.; Peng, Y.; Wei, X.; Ma, B.; Ma, F.; Ruan, Y.; et al. Apple vacuolar sugar transporters regulated by MdDREB2A enhance drought resistance by promoting accumulation of soluble sugars and activating ABA signaling. Hortic. Res. 2024, 11, uhae251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Postiglione, A.E.; Muday, G.K. The Role of ROS Homeostasis in ABA-Induced Guard Cell Signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hasan, M.M.; Liu, X.D.; Waseem, M.; Guang-Qian, Y.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Jahan, M.S.; Fang, X.W. ABA activated SnRK2 kinases: An emerging role in plant growth and physiology. Plant Signal. Behav. 2022, 17, 2071024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, J.X.; Wang, X.Q.; Watson, M.B.; Assmann, S.M. Regulation of Abscisic Acid-Induced Stomatal Closure and Anion Channels by Guard Cell AAPK Kinase. Science 2000, 287, 300–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Umezawa, T.; Yoshida, R.; Maruyama, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. SRK2C, a SNF1-related protein kinase 2, improves drought tolerance by controlling stress-responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 17306–17311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Z.; Ali, S.; Zhang, T.; Wang, W.; Xie, L. Identification, Evolutionary and Expression Analysis of PYL-PP2C-SnRK2s Gene Families in Soybean. Plants 2020, 9, 1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fujii, H.; Verslues, P.E.; Zhu, J.K. Identification of Two Protein Kinases Required for Abscisic Acid Regulation of Seed Germination, Root Growth, and Gene Expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 485–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cheng, C.; Wang, Z.; Ren, Z.; Zhi, L.; Yao, B.; Su, C.; Liu, L.; Li, X. SCFAtPP2-B11 modulates ABA signaling by facilitating SnRK2.3 degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLOS Genet. 2017, 13, e1006947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fujii, H.; Chinnusamy, V.; Rodrigues, A.; Rubio, S.; Antoni, R.; Park, S.Y.; Cutler, S.R.; Sheen, J.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Zhu, J.K. In vitro reconstitution of an abscisic acid signaling pathway. Nature 2009, 462, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ma, Y.; Szostkiewicz, I.; Korte, A.; Moes, D.; Yang, Y.; Christmann, A.; Grill, E. Regulators of PP2C Phosphatase Activity Function as Abscisic Acid Sensors. Science 2009, 324, 1064–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Park, S.Y.; Fung, P.; Nishimura, N.; Jensen, D.R.; Fujii, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lumba, S.; Santiago, J.; Rodrigues, A.; Chow, T.F.; et al. Abscisic Acid Inhibits Type 2C Protein Phosphatases via the PYR/PYL Family of START Proteins. Science 2009, 324, 1068–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sun, H.L.; Wang, X.J.; Ding, W.H.; Zhu, S.Y.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, Y.X.; Xin, Q.; Wang, X.F.; Zhang, D.P. Identification of an important site for function of the type 2C protein phosphatase ABI2 in abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 5713–5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hrabak, E.M.; Chan, C.W.; Gribskov, M.; Harper, J.F.; Choi, J.H.; Halford, N.; Kudla, J.; Luan, S.; Nimmo, H.G.; Sussman, M.R.; et al. The Arabidopsis CDPK-SnRK Superfamily of Protein Kinases. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 666–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kobayashi, Y.; Yamamoto, S.; Minami, H.; Kagaya, Y.; Hattori, T. Differential Activation of the Rice Sucrose Nonfermenting1–Related Protein Kinase2 Family by Hyperosmotic Stress and Abscisic Acid. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1163–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Umar, A.W.; Ahmad, N.; Hussain, H.; Zeeshan, M.; Xu, M. Deciphering auxin-regulated stomatal development: Novel insights into phytochrome-interacting factors, FOUR LIPS, and SNF1-related kinase interactions. Plant Sci. 2025, 362, 112815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Soma, F.; Mogami, J.; Yoshida, T.; Abekura, M.; Takahashi, F.; Kidokoro, S.; Mizoi, J.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. ABA-unresponsive SnRK2 protein kinases regulate mRNA decay under osmotic stress in plants. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 16204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Szymańska, K.P.; Polkowska-Kowalczyk, L.; Lichocka, M.; Maszkowska, J.; Dobrowolska, G. SNF1-Related Protein Kinases SnRK2.4 and SnRK2.10 Modulate ROS Homeostasis in Plant Response to Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Julkowska, M.M.; McLoughlin, F.; Galvan-Ampudia, C.S.; Rankenberg, J.M.; Kawa, D.; Klimecka, M.; Haring, M.A.; Munnik, T.; Kooijman, E.E.; Testerink, C. Identification and functional characterization of the Arabidopsis Snf1-related protein kinase SnRK2.4 phosphatidic acid-binding domain. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 614–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lee, H.J.; Park, Y.J.; Seo, P.J.; Kim, J.H.; Sim, H.J.; Kim, S.G.; Park, C.M. Systemic Immunity Requires SnRK2.8-Mediated Nuclear Import of NPR1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 3425–3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, P.; Xue, L.; Batelli, G.; Lee, S.; Hou, Y.J.; Van Oosten, M.J.; Zhang, H.; Tao, W.A.; Zhu, J.K. Quantitative phosphoproteomics identifies SnRK2 protein kinase substrates and reveals the effectors of abscisic acid action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 11205–11210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zheng, Z.; Xu, X.; Crosley, R.A.; Greenwalt, S.A.; Sun, Y.; Blakeslee, B.; Wang, L.; Ni, L.; Sopko, M.S.; Yao, C.; et al. The Protein Kinase SnRK2.6 Mediates the Regulation of Sucrose Metabolism and Plant Growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yoshida, R.; Hobo, T.; Ichimura, K.; Mizoguchi, T.; Takahashi, F.; Aronso, J.; Ecker, J.R.; Shinozaki, K. ABA-Activated SnRK2 Protein Kinase is Required for Dehydration Stress Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 1473–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mustilli, A.C.; Merlot, S.; Vavasseur, A.; Fenzi, F.; Giraudat, J. Arabidopsis OST1 Protein Kinase Mediates the Regulation of Stomatal Aperture by Abscisic Acid and Acts Upstream of Reactive Oxygen Species Production. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 3089–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, Y.; Dang, R.; Li, J.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, N.; Jia, M.; Wei, L.; Li, Z.; Li, B.; Jia, W. SUCROSE NONFERMENTING1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE2.6, an Ortholog of OPEN STOMATA1, Is a Negative Regulator of Strawberry Fruit Development and Ripening. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 915–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, Z.; Tang, J.; Duan, W.; Wang, Z.; Song, X.; Hou, X. Molecular evolution, characterization, and expression analysis of SnRK2 gene family in Pak-choi (Brassica rapa ssp. chinensis). Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, Z.; Ge, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, G.; Chen, E.; Liu, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, F. Genome-wide identification and characterization of SnRK2 gene family in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). BMC Genet. 2017, 18, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bai, J.; Mao, J.; Yang, H.; Khan, A.; Fan, A.; Liu, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, D.; Gao, H.; Zhang, J. Sucrose non-ferment 1 related protein kinase 2 (SnRK2) genes could mediate the stress responses in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). BMC Genet. 2017, 18, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Long, T.; Xu, B.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mao, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H.; Huang, H.; Liu, Y.; et al. Genome-wide identification of ZmSnRK2 genes and functional analysis of ZmSnRK2.10 in ABA signaling pathway in maize (Zea mays L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, H.; Li, W.; Mao, X.; Jing, R.; Jia, H. Differential Activation of the Wheat SnRK2 Family by Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, C.; Nong, Q.; Xie, J.; Wang, Z.; Liang, Q.; Solanki, M.K.; Malviya, M.K.; Liu, X.; Li, Y. Molecular Characterization and Co-expression Analysis of the SnRK2 Gene Family in Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tuskan, G.A.; Difazio, S.; Jansson, S.; Bohlmann, J.; Grigoriev, I.; Hellsten, U.; Putnam, N.; Ralph, S.; Rombauts, S.; Salamov, A. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 2006, 313, 1596–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qiu, Q.; Ma, T.; Hu, Q.; Liu, B.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Liu, J. Genome-scale transcriptome analysis of the desert poplar, Populus euphratica. Tree Physiol. 2011, 31, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, Q.; Shen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Niu, M.; Wang, H.L.; Lian, C.; Tian, Q.; Mao, W.; Wang, X.; et al. PePYL4 enhances drought tolerance by modulating water-use efficiency and ROS scavenging in Populus. Tree Physiol. 2023, 43, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yang, Y.; Li, H.G.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.L.; He, F.; Su, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, C.H.; Niu, M.; Li, Z.; et al. ABF3 enhances drought tolerance via promoting ABA-induced stomatal closure by directly regulating ADF5 in Populus euphratica. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 7270–7285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nekrutenko, A.; Makova, K.D.; Li, W.H. The K(A)/K(S) ratio test for assessing the protein-coding potential of genomic regions: An empirical and simulation study. Genome Res. 2002, 12, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, J.; Song, J.; Li, C.; Ma, J.; Liu, J.; Zhu, X.; Li, J.; He, F.; Yang, C. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profile Analysis of the SnRK2 Gene Family in Nicotiana tabacum. Biochem. Genet. 2022, 60, 1511–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ghillebert, R.; Swinnen, E.; Wen, J.; Vandesteene, L.; Ramon, M.; Norga, K.; Rolland, F.; Winderickx, J. The AMPK/SNF1/SnRK1 fuel gauge and energy regulator: Structure, function and regulation. FEBS J. 2011, 278, 3978–3990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kulik, A.; Wawer, I.; Krzywińska, E.; Bucholc, M.; Dobrowolska, G. SnRK2 Protein Kinases—Key Regulators of Plant Response to Abiotic Stresses. OMICS A J. Integr. Biol. 2011, 15, 859–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fujii, H.; Zhu, J.K. Osmotic stress signaling via protein kinases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 3165–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Fatima, A.; Khan, M.J.; Awan, H.M.; Akhtar, M.N.; Bibi, N.; Sughra, K.; Khan, M.R.; Ahmad, R.; Ibrahim, M.; Hussain, J.; et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of SnRK2 gene family in mungbean (Vigna radiata) in response to drought stress. Crop Pasture Sci. 2020, 71, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xu, P.; Zhang, X.; Su, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Hong, G. Genome-wide analysis of PYL-PP2C-SnRK2s family in Camellia sinensis. Bioengineered 2020, 11, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Saha, J.; Chatterjee, C.; Sengupta, A.; Gupta, K.; Gupta, B. Genome-wide analysis and evolutionary study of sucrose non-fermenting 1-related protein kinase 2 (SnRK2) gene family members in Arabidopsis and Oryza. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2014, 49, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, M.R.; Huang, L.Y.; Zhang, F.; Zhu, L.H.; Zhou, Y.L.; Li, Z.K. Genome-wide phylogenetic analysis of stress-activated protein kinase genes in rice (OsSAPKs) and expression profiling in response to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola infection. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 31, 877–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wei, H.; Movahedi, A.; Xu, C.; Wang, P.; Sun, W.; Yin, T.; Zhuge, Q. Heterologous overexpression of the Arabidopsis SnRK2.8 gene enhances drought and salt tolerance in Populus × euramericana cv ‘Nanlin895’. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 13, 245–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fujita, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Pivotal role of the AREB/ABF-SnRK2 pathway in ABRE-mediated transcription in response to osmotic stress in plants. Physiol. Plant. 2012, 147, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wu, Z.; Cheng, J.; Hu, F.; Qin, C.; Xu, X.; Hu, K. The SnRK2 family in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): Genome-wide identification and expression analyses during fruit development and under abiotic stress. Genes Genom. 2020, 42, 1117–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yoo, M.; Ma, T.; Zhu, N.; Liu, L.; Harmon, A.C.; Wang, Q.; Chen, S. Genome-wide identification and homeolog-specific expression analysis of the SnRK2 genes in Brassica napus guard cells. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 91, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tang, Y.; Lu, F.; Feng, W.; Liu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Li, W.; Fu, F.; Yu, H. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analyses of AnSnRK2 Gene Family under Osmotic Stress in Ammopiptanthus nanus. Plants 2021, 10, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hussain, Q.; Zheng, M.; Chang, W.; Ashraf, M.F.; Khan, R.; Asim, M.; Riaz, M.W.; Alwahibi, M.S.; Elshikh, M.S.; Zhang, R.; et al. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of SnRK2 Gene Family in Dormant Vegetative Buds of Liriodendron chinense in Response to Abscisic Acid, Chilling, and Photoperiod. Genes 2022, 13, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Miao, L.L.; Li, Y.Y.; Zhang, H.J.; Zhang, H.J.; Liu, X.L.; Wang, J.Y.; Chang, X.P.; Mao, X.G.; Jing, R.L. TaSnRK2.4 is a vital regulator in control of thousand-kernel weight and response to abiotic stress in wheat. J. Integr. Agric. 2021, 20, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hong, Y.; Ahmad, N.; Zhang, J.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ma, X.; Xiuming, L.; Na, Y. Genome-wide analysis and transcriptional reprogrammings of MYB superfamily revealed positive insights into abiotic stress responses and anthocyanin accumulation in Carthamus tinctorius L . Mol. Genet. Genom. 2022, 297, 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jakubowicz, M.; Nowak, W.; Gałgański, Ł.; Babula-Skowrońska, D.; Kubiak, P. Expression profiling of the genes encoding ABA route components and the ACC oxidase isozymes in the senescing leaves of Populus tremula. Plant Physiol. 2020, 248, 153143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liang, S.; Lu, K.; Wu, Z.; Jiang, S.; Yu, Y.; Bi, C.; Xin, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, D. A link between magnesium-chelatase H subunit and sucrose nonfermenting 1 (SNF1)-related protein kinase SnRK2.6/OST1 in Arabidopsis guard cell signaling in response to abscisic acid. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6355–6369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, Y.; Wan, S.; Liu, X.; He, J.; Cheng, L.; Duan, M.; Liu, H.; Wang, W.; Yu, Y. Overexpression of CsSnRK2.5 increases tolerance to drought stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 150, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wu, Q.; Wang, M.; Shen, J.; Chen, D.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, W. ZmOST1 mediates abscisic acid regulation of guard cell ion channels and drought stress responses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 61, 478–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Horvat, B.; Shikakura, Y.; Ohtani, M.; Demura, T.; Kikuchi, A.; Watanabe, K.N.; Oguchi, T. Heterogeneous Expression of Arabidopsis Subclass II of SNF1-Related Kinase 2 Improves Drought Tolerance via Stomatal Regulation in Poplar. Life 2024, 14, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Wang, D.; Kang, M.; Wu, H.; Yang, Y.; et al. Improved genome assembly provides new insights into genome evolution in a desert poplar (Populus euphratica). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 20, 781–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Xue, L.; Wu, H.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Hou, J.; Lu, J.; Wei, S.; Dai, X.; Olson, M.S.; Liu, J.; et al. Evidences for a role of two Y-specific genes in sex determination in Populus deltoides. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhou, R.; Macaya-Sanz, D.; Carlson, C.H.; Schmutz, J.; Jenkins, J.W.; Kudrna, D.; Sharma, A.; Sandor, L.; Shu, S.; Barry, K.; et al. A willow sex chromosome reveals convergent evolution of complex palindromic repeats. Genome Biol. 2020, 21, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sun, J.; Xu, J.; Qu, W.; Han, X.; Qiu, C.; Gai, Z.; Zhai, J.; Qin, R.; Liu, H.; Wu, Z.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of R2R3-MYB transcription factors reveals their differential responses to drought stress and ABA treatment in desert poplar (Populus euphratica). Gene 2023, 855, 147124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Shan, G. A simple and versatile paper-based electrochemiluminescence biosensing platform for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection. Biochem. Eng. J. 2018, 129, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cheng, Y.; Hong, X.; Zhang, L.; Yang, W.; Zeng, Y.; Hou, Z.; Yang, Z.; Yang, D. Transcriptomic analysis provides insight into the regulation mechanism of silver ions (Ag+) and jasmonic acid methyl ester (MeJA) on secondary metabolism in the hairy roots of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge (Lamiaceae). Med. Plant Biol. 2023, 2, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kim, D.; Paggi, J.M.; Park, C.; Bennett, C.; Salzberg, S.L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pertea, M.; Kim, D.; Pertea, G.; Leek, J.T.; Salzberg, S.L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11, 1650–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, J.; Wang, P.; Hu, T.; Wang, Z.; Hou, Y.J.; Wan, Y.; Liu, W.; Xie, S.; et al. Arabidopsis Duodecuple Mutant of PYL ABA Receptors Reveals PYL Repression of ABA-Independent SnRK2 Activity. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 3340–3351.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 26 10750 g001
Figure 1. Analysis of gene structure and conserved structural domains of the PeSnRK2 genes. (A) The distribution of conserved structural domains of PeSnRK2 genes. (B) Pfam model of PeSnRK2s, 8 of the 11 PeSnRK2 members have the STKc-SnRK2 domain model (green), 2 genes have the STKc-SnRK2-3 domain (yellow), 1 gene is characterized by the PKc-like-superfamily domain, and 1 gene is characterized by the ribosomal protein S6e domain. (C) The gene structures of PeSnRK2 genes. (D) Conserved motif analysis of PeSnRK2 proteins.
Figure 1. Analysis of gene structure and conserved structural domains of the PeSnRK2 genes. (A) The distribution of conserved structural domains of PeSnRK2 genes. (B) Pfam model of PeSnRK2s, 8 of the 11 PeSnRK2 members have the STKc-SnRK2 domain model (green), 2 genes have the STKc-SnRK2-3 domain (yellow), 1 gene is characterized by the PKc-like-superfamily domain, and 1 gene is characterized by the ribosomal protein S6e domain. (C) The gene structures of PeSnRK2 genes. (D) Conserved motif analysis of PeSnRK2 proteins.
Ijms 26 10750 g001
Ijms 26 10750 g002
Figure 2. Cis-elements in the promoter region of PeSnRK2s. Color bars indicate the classification of cis-elements: pink bars represent biotic/abiotic stress; orange bars represent low-temperature responsiveness; yellow bars represent light-responsive elements; blue bars represent phytohormone response.
Figure 2. Cis-elements in the promoter region of PeSnRK2s. Color bars indicate the classification of cis-elements: pink bars represent biotic/abiotic stress; orange bars represent low-temperature responsiveness; yellow bars represent light-responsive elements; blue bars represent phytohormone response.
Ijms 26 10750 g002
Ijms 26 10750 g003
Figure 3. Collinearity analysis of SnRK2s from multiple species, PeSnRK2 gene duplication types and chromosomal localization. (A) Collinearity analysis indicates that P. europratica shares collinearity with five other species (P. pruinosa, P. deltoides, S. sinopurpurea, A. thaliana and O. sativa). The gray lines in the background indicate collinearity groups within the P. europratica and other plant genomes, while the red lines highlight collinear SnRK2 pairs. (B) Intraspecific collinearity analysis of PeSnRK2s. (C) Gene duplication types of PeSnRK2s.
Figure 3. Collinearity analysis of SnRK2s from multiple species, PeSnRK2 gene duplication types and chromosomal localization. (A) Collinearity analysis indicates that P. europratica shares collinearity with five other species (P. pruinosa, P. deltoides, S. sinopurpurea, A. thaliana and O. sativa). The gray lines in the background indicate collinearity groups within the P. europratica and other plant genomes, while the red lines highlight collinear SnRK2 pairs. (B) Intraspecific collinearity analysis of PeSnRK2s. (C) Gene duplication types of PeSnRK2s.
Ijms 26 10750 g003
Ijms 26 10750 g004
Figure 4. Analysis of chromosomal localization of PeSnRK2s. Blue, yellow and red bars represent low, medium and high gene densities on the chromosomes, respectively.
Figure 4. Analysis of chromosomal localization of PeSnRK2s. Blue, yellow and red bars represent low, medium and high gene densities on the chromosomes, respectively.
Ijms 26 10750 g004
Ijms 26 10750 g005
Figure 5. Dendrogram tree of SnRK2 genes of P. euphratica, P. pruinosa, A. thaliana, and O. sativa. The neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed using MEGA-X with 1000 bootstrap replicates to assess node reliability (values shown on branches). Evolutionary distances were calculated using the p-distance method, expressed as the number of amino acid substitutions per site. Bootstrap values <50 were disregarded. The gene tree of dendrogram was visualized using TBtools and the iTOL online website (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 5 March 2025). Gray triangles represent P. pruinosa, red triangles represent P. euphratica, yellow triangles represent A. thaliana, and green triangles represent O. sativa. Based on the topology of the gene tree, the SnRK2 gene family was divided into three subgroups: I–III. The green band represents subgroup I, the orange band represents subgroup II, and the blue band represents subgroup III.
Figure 5. Dendrogram tree of SnRK2 genes of P. euphratica, P. pruinosa, A. thaliana, and O. sativa. The neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed using MEGA-X with 1000 bootstrap replicates to assess node reliability (values shown on branches). Evolutionary distances were calculated using the p-distance method, expressed as the number of amino acid substitutions per site. Bootstrap values <50 were disregarded. The gene tree of dendrogram was visualized using TBtools and the iTOL online website (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 5 March 2025). Gray triangles represent P. pruinosa, red triangles represent P. euphratica, yellow triangles represent A. thaliana, and green triangles represent O. sativa. Based on the topology of the gene tree, the SnRK2 gene family was divided into three subgroups: I–III. The green band represents subgroup I, the orange band represents subgroup II, and the blue band represents subgroup III.
Ijms 26 10750 g005
Ijms 26 10750 g006
Figure 6. Secondary structure and 3D structure prediction of PeSnRK2 proteins. (A) Secondary structure prediction of PeSnRK2 proteins, Hh (alpha helix), Tt (beta turn), Cc (random coil), and Ee (extended strand). (B) Protein 3D structure prediction model of PeSnRK2 gene families. Red denotes the DFG motif, yellow represents the VAIK motif, orange indicates the HRD motif, cyan signifies the ABA box, while purple and blue denote the phosphorylation sites S175 and S176 on the activation loop.
Figure 6. Secondary structure and 3D structure prediction of PeSnRK2 proteins. (A) Secondary structure prediction of PeSnRK2 proteins, Hh (alpha helix), Tt (beta turn), Cc (random coil), and Ee (extended strand). (B) Protein 3D structure prediction model of PeSnRK2 gene families. Red denotes the DFG motif, yellow represents the VAIK motif, orange indicates the HRD motif, cyan signifies the ABA box, while purple and blue denote the phosphorylation sites S175 and S176 on the activation loop.
Ijms 26 10750 g006
Ijms 26 10750 g007
Figure 7. Expression patterns of PeSnRK2s under drought stress and ABA treatment. (A) Heat map of PeSnRK2 expression patterns under drought stress (15% PEG 6000 treatment) and ABA treatment. The color scale indicating Z-score value; red indicates high levels, and blue indicates low levels of transcripts. (B,C) Validation of RNA-seq data by qRT-PCR, Statistical tests were performed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. The ‘****’ indicates significant differences of p < 0.0001; ‘ns’ indicates no significance.
Figure 7. Expression patterns of PeSnRK2s under drought stress and ABA treatment. (A) Heat map of PeSnRK2 expression patterns under drought stress (15% PEG 6000 treatment) and ABA treatment. The color scale indicating Z-score value; red indicates high levels, and blue indicates low levels of transcripts. (B,C) Validation of RNA-seq data by qRT-PCR, Statistical tests were performed by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. The ‘****’ indicates significant differences of p < 0.0001; ‘ns’ indicates no significance.
Ijms 26 10750 g007
Ijms 26 10750 g008
Figure 8. Nuclear localization of the 35S::PeSnRK2.6-YFP protein in tobacco leaf epidermal cells: fluorescence images of PeSnRK2.6 (35S::PeSnRK2.6-YFP), nuclear localization signals (H2B-CFP), and fusion images (35S::PeSnRK2.6-YFP/H2B-CFP). Scale bar = 25 µm.
Figure 8. Nuclear localization of the 35S::PeSnRK2.6-YFP protein in tobacco leaf epidermal cells: fluorescence images of PeSnRK2.6 (35S::PeSnRK2.6-YFP), nuclear localization signals (H2B-CFP), and fusion images (35S::PeSnRK2.6-YFP/H2B-CFP). Scale bar = 25 µm.
Ijms 26 10750 g008
Ijms 26 10750 g009
Figure 9. Functional network analysis of PeSnRK2.6 protein and associated signaling pathways. (A) Protein–protein interaction network of PeSnRK2.6. (B) Predicted signaling pathways.
Figure 9. Functional network analysis of PeSnRK2.6 protein and associated signaling pathways. (A) Protein–protein interaction network of PeSnRK2.6. (B) Predicted signaling pathways.
Ijms 26 10750 g009
Table 1. Characteristics of PeSnRK2s.
Table 1. Characteristics of PeSnRK2s.
Gene IDNumber of Amino AcidsMolecular WeightTheoretical pIInstability IndexAliphatic IndexGrand Average of Hydropathicity (GRAVY)Prediction of Subcellular Localization
PeuTF05G01370.158165,986.139.5735.6982.03−0.508Cytoplasm
PeuTF04G01285.135640,929.45.6949.8182.39−0.496Cytoskeleton
PeuTF04G01353.136341,201.824.8640.2486.97−0.325Cytoplasm
PeuTF19G00050.136141,608.175.6650.7783.99−0.516Cytoskeleton
PeuTF05G01129.136241,140.954.8640.8586.13−0.277Chloroplast
PeuTF03G00118.135741,088.736.0946.0278.94−0.527Cytoskeleton
PeuTF07G01031.134038,669.795.2044.0985.74−0.370Cytoplasm
PeuTF03G00739.133838,204.715.8037.6387.07−0.300Cytoskeleton
PeuTF02G00789.141246,602.215.4240.6197.21−0.156Cytoplasm
PeuTF09G01080.136240,992.694.7640.7189.67−0.246Cytoskeleton
PeuTF04G02065.136341,612.345.6147.1184.05−0.499Cytoskeleton
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, H.; Li, J.; Song, T.; Miao, D.; Ning, Q.; Zhang, X.; Gai, Z.; Li, Z.; Jiao, P.; Wu, Z. Genome-Wide Identification of the SnRK2 Gene Family and Its Response to Abiotic Stress in Populus euphratica. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 10750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110750

AMA Style

Jin H, Li J, Song T, Miao D, Ning Q, Zhang X, Gai Z, Li Z, Jiao P, Wu Z. Genome-Wide Identification of the SnRK2 Gene Family and Its Response to Abiotic Stress in Populus euphratica. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(21):10750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110750

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Hongyan, Jing Li, Tongrui Song, Donghui Miao, Qi Ning, Xiao Zhang, Zhongshuai Gai, Zhijun Li, Peipei Jiao, and Zhihua Wu. 2025. "Genome-Wide Identification of the SnRK2 Gene Family and Its Response to Abiotic Stress in Populus euphratica" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 21: 10750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110750

APA Style

Jin, H., Li, J., Song, T., Miao, D., Ning, Q., Zhang, X., Gai, Z., Li, Z., Jiao, P., & Wu, Z. (2025). Genome-Wide Identification of the SnRK2 Gene Family and Its Response to Abiotic Stress in Populus euphratica. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(21), 10750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110750

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop