Next Article in Journal
Inflammation-Based Cell Ratios Beyond White Blood Cell Count for Predicting Postimplantation Syndrome After EVAR and TEVAR
Previous Article in Journal
Hsp70 Peptides Induce TREM-1-Dependent and TREM-1-Independent Activation of Cytotoxic Lymphocytes
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of miRNA in Endometriosis-Related Infertility—An Update
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Proteins and MicroRNAs with Prognostic Value for Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes in Follicular Fluid of Women with Endometriosis: A Pilot Study

by
Ana Catarina Neto
1,2,
Cláudia Freitas
3,
Ângela Ribeiro
1,2,4,
Adriana R. Rodrigues
1,2,5,
João L. Silva-Carvalho
4,
Henrique Almeida
1,2,6 and
Delminda Neves
1,2,*
1
Departmento de Biomedicina—Unidade de Biologia Experimental, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
2
Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde da Universidade do Porto (i3S), 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
3
Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Hospital Dr. Nélio Mendonça, Serviço de Saúde da Região Autónoma da Madeira (SESARAM), 9004-514 Funchal, Portugal
4
CETI—Centro de Estudo e Tratamento da Infertilidade, 4100-118 Porto, Portugal
5
Faculdade de Nutrição e Alimentação da Universidade do Porto, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal
6
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital CUF Porto, 4100-180 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(19), 9752; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199752
Submission received: 21 July 2025 / Revised: 18 September 2025 / Accepted: 1 October 2025 / Published: 7 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endometriosis and Infertility)

Abstract

This study aims to identify molecular markers with prognostic value for biochemical pregnancy in follicular fluid (FF) samples from women with endometriosis after assisted reproductive technology (ART) intervention. Levels of growth differentiation factor-9 (GDF-9), bone morphogenetic protein-15 (BMP-15), and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) proteins were semi-quantified by Western blotting and microRNAs 20a_1, 145_1, 320a_1, 125-b-5p, 212-3p, and 199_a by qPCR in FF samples from women submitted to ART with a previous diagnosis of endometriosis (n = 20) or male factor infertility (controls) (n = 44). An increase in GDF-9 and BMP-15 and a decrease in AMH mature protein were observed, as well as an increase in miR20a_1 (p = 0.04), miR145_1 (p = 0.003), and miR320a_1 (p = 0.006) in FF samples collected from women with endometriosis compared with controls. A reduction was observed in miR125b-5p (p = 0.004) and 212-3p (p = 0.02) in endometriosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that miR125b-5p, miR212-3p, and miR-145_1 are potential predictors of endometriosis, and miR145_1 and miR320a_1 of biochemical pregnancy in controls. Although limited by a small sample size, the current study demonstrated alterations in AMH, BMP-15, GDF-9, and specific miRNA levels in FF samples harvested from women with endometriosis, emphasizing their potential roles in endometriosis-related infertility. These microRNAs, dysregulated in women with endometriosis, unveil their biomarker properties and their predictive value for ART success.

1. Introduction

Infertility affects approximately 15% of couples in Western societies [1]. Among the female causes of infertility, endometriosis presents a major contribution, considering that it globally afflicts 5–15% of women of reproductive age and up to 40% of infertile women [2].
Endometriosis is characterized by ectopic presence of endometrial-like glands and stroma that cause pelvic pain and anatomic distortion [3]. The pathophysiology of the disease remains poorly understood, but it is known that endometriosis comprises a complex inflammatory response induced by pro-oxidative conditions, cellular proliferation, migration and invasion, and angiogenesis [4,5].
Patients with endometriosis-associated infertility often require assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments [6,7]. During oocyte harvesting for in vitro fertilization or intra-cytoplasmatic sperm injection, follicular fluid (FF) is aspirated and usually discarded. Because FF composition parallels composition of the serum as a result of molecular diffusion, it presents a high potential for use in the detection of markers with prognostic value, despite rarely being analyzed in the setting of ART treatments. Indeed, FF contains a multitude of hormones, metabolites, polysaccharides, growth factors [8], and microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) (small, non-coding RNAs approximately 22–25 nucleotides in length) [9,10], mostly secreted by theca and granulosa cells (GCs), that reflect metabolic activity and follicular development phase, influence oocyte quality and success of fertilization, and ultimately embryo development [11].
Growth differentiation factor-9 (GDF-9) and bone morphogenetic protein-15 (BMP-15) are two oocyte-secreted factors (OSFs) that exhibit greater homology between themselves than with the remaining members of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) family [12]. Those OSFs appear to intervene synergistically in cellular mechanisms and are crucial for folliculogenesis and female fertility [13]. However, while GDF-9 silencing in mice results in decreased GC proliferation, abnormal oocyte growth, and follicular development failure [14] because GDF-9 inhibits follicular atresia and GC apoptosis [15], BMP-15 induces proliferation of those cells [16].
In contrast to GDF-9 and BMP-15, anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH), also a member of the TGF-β family, is produced by GCs from 36 weeks of gestation until menopause and considered a marker of oocyte reserve [17,18]. In endometriosis patients, AMH levels are diminished in peritoneal fluid, even when serum levels are normal, suggesting that AMH may have a role in the disease [19]. The discrepancy between circulating and local levels suggest differential regulation of AMH synthesis or disposal in endometriosis. In this setting, miRNAs are potential contributors on account of their recognized role as post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression [20]. MicroRNAs are concentrated in exosomes and secreted into body fluids, such as blood and FF, which makes them putative prognostic biomarkers of ART outcome in endometriosis, owing to their easy accessibility and stability under experimental conditions [10,21,22]. Several miRNAs have been implicated in endometriosis-related infertility (Table 1). In particular, miR-125b-5p is upregulated in serum and plasma of women with endometriosis, being considered a putative marker of endometriosis [10] and contributing to systemic inflammation and potentially altering the follicular and oocyte environment through PI3K/Akt (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B) and MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathways [23,24]. In FF, miR-212-3p and miR-320a have been associated with embryo developmental potential and oocyte and embryo quality, respectively [25,26,27]. These miRs correlate with fertilization success and embryo quality in in vitro fertilization (IVF) [25], processes that may be compromised in endometriosis [28], with lower levels of both linked to impaired fertilization outcomes [26,29]. miR199a, miR20a, and miR145 are involved in TGF-β signalling [30,31,32], impacting crucial endometriosis-associated mechanisms, such as hypoxia, angiogenesis, inflammation, and cell proliferation [33,34]. While miR-20a is frequently dysregulated in endometriosis tissue and serum, which links to disease recurrence, implantation failure, follicular dysfunction, angiogenesis, and cell proliferation [35,36,37], miR-145 has been shown to suppress GC proliferation in mice [38]. Functionally, overexpression of miR-145 in human endometriotic cell lines (12Z) inhibits proliferation, invasion, and stem-like traits by repressing pluripotency factors and cytoskeletal proteins expression [39]. Moreover, miR-199a levels are also altered in the serum of patients, with lower levels linked to disease severity according to the endometriosis fertility index (EFI) and poorer fertility outcomes, possibly due to miR-199a impact in extracellular matrix remodelling, inflammation, and lesion invasiveness [40,41,42,43].
To identify biomarkers with prognostic value for ART outcomes in women with endometriosis, AMH, GDF-9, BMP-15, and miRNAs 20a_1, 145_1, 320a_1, 125-b-5p, 212-3p, and 199_a, were quantified in FF samples harvested from endometriosis patients that undertook ART procedures [27].

2. Results

2.1. Population Characteristics

Data relative to women enrolled in this study are summarized in Table 2. The average age of women from whom FF samples were collected, which impacts the expression of AMH and the quality of oocytes, was equivalent between groups: both in those employed for protein analysis (35 and 36.1 years in male factor and endometriosis groups, respectively, p = 0.5) and for miRNAs analysis (34.8 and 34.6 years in male factor and endometriosis groups, respectively, p = 0.8). As well, no differences were observed in body mass index or parity between women included in the two groups (p = 0.34). Neither the mean number of type A embryos observed at day 3 (p = 0.19), nor the percentage of transfers at day 3 or day 5, differ between patients with endometriosis and controls.

2.2. AMH Decreases and GDF-9 and BMP-15 Increases in FF Samples of Women with Endometriosis

A single band with an apparent molecular weight of 60 kDa corresponding to AMH protein was identified in all samples from both groups of women (Figure 1a). A decrease in AMH levels in FF samples of endometriosis patients was found relative to the controls (p = 0.009) (Figure 1b).
No correlation of AMH levels in FF with age was found within the group of women without disease through the Pearson correlation test [45] (Figure 1c).
GDF-9 was detected in all the studied FF samples, and three bands with different molecular weight were identified: the pro-protein (51 kDa) (Figure 1d) and the mature protein present in homodimeric/heterodimeric forms presenting two bands with very close molecular weight (about 31 kDa) (Figure 1d). An increase in expression of both the pro-protein (Figure 1e) and dimeric forms (Figure 1f) of GDF-9 in patients with endometriosis relative to the controls was found (p = 0.01 and p = 0.036, respectively). No Pearson correlation for GDF-9 levels and age [45] in the male factor group of women was found (Figure 1g).
BMP-15 was also identified by Western blotting, and, similarly to what was observed for GDF-9, three bands were detected in all FF samples. A pro-protein (45 kDa) (Figure 1h) more expressed in the group of patients with endometriosis was identified (p = 0.0009) (Figure 1i), and in line with this the dual band referring to protein present in homodimeric and heterodimeric complexes (about 31 kDa) (Figure 1j) was also significantly increased in this group (p < 0.0001) (Figure 1j). A negative correlation between the pro-form of BMP-15 levels and age (p = 0.01) in male factor group of women was found (Figure 1k). No correlation was found for BMP-15 dimer levels and age in those women.

2.3. Levels of miR125b-5p and miR212-3p Decrease and of miR20a_1, miR145_1, and miR320a_1 Increase in FF Samples of Women with Endometriosis

The levels of miR125b-5p, miR212-3p, miR20a_1, miR145_1, miR199a_1, and miR320a_1 assessed by RT-qPCR are depicted in Figure 2.
Levels of miR125b-5p (Figure 2a) and miR212-3p (Figure 2b) were decreased in the FF samples of women with endometriosis when compared with controls (p = 0.004 and p = 0.017, respectively). On the other hand, levels of miR20a_1 (Figure 2c), miR145_1 (Figure 2d), and miR320a_1 (Figure 2f) were increased in the FF samples of women with endometriosis relative to those without disease (p = 0.04, p = 0.003 and p = 0.006, respectively). No difference was found in miR199a_1 level between the groups (Figure 2e).
To identify whether women’s age interferes in the FF levels of miRs, a Pearson correlation between the studied miRNAs and age in patients and controls was carried out separately for each miRNA (Figure 2g–l). Among those analyses, no correlations were found in neither endometriosis patients nor controls.

2.4. MiR125b-5p, miR212-3p, and miR145_1 Levels in FF Are Putatively Predictors of Endometriosis and miR145_1 and miR320a_1 of Biochemical Pregnancy

To assess whether the studied miRNAs could be valuable markers of endometriosis, ROC analysis was performed. Among the studied miRNAs, miR125b-5p (area under the curve—AUC: 0.84; p = 0.0009) (Figure 3a), miR-212-3p (AUC: 0.73; p = 0.03) (Figure 3b), and miR-145_1 (AUC: 0.74; p = 0.049) (Figure 3d) were shown to be putative predictors of endometriosis.
In addition, ROC analysis was also employed to verify whether studied miRNAs could be used as predictors for biochemical pregnancy achievement (β-human chorionic gonadotropin—hCG-positive test). In the control group of women, both miR-145_1 (AUC: 0.77; p = 0.05) (Figure 3j) and miR-320a_1 (AUC: 0.79; p = 0.03) (Figure 3l) levels in FF were shown to be indicators of increased probability of biochemical pregnancy achievement. Regarding miR125b-5p levels in FF (AUC: 0.73; p = 0.07) (Figure 3g), a strong parallel tendency was observed; however, it did not reach statistical significance.

3. Discussion

Infertility is a public health problem that leads to ART treatments for a growing number of couples. Research on the molecular mechanisms that underlie infertility has gained increasing importance, and analysis of biological samples, collected when oocytes are retrieved for ART interventions, has been identified as an important approach to predict the success of treatment [46,47]. In particular, FF is a valuable source for studying infertility causes since FF directly contacts and receives the molecules secreted by the oocyte, thus reflecting the microenvironment of the female gametes in ovaries. In the present study, the levels of AMH, GDF-9, BMP-15, and specific miRNAS in FF samples collected from patients with endometriosis were assessed in an attempt to identify molecular markers with prognostic value for biochemical pregnancy.
Our findings show that FF of women with endometriosis presented lower levels of AMH when compared with controls, indicating reduced ovarian reserve and supporting the impaired fertility often observed in endometriosis patients [17]. This result aligns with previous studies showing parallel decrease in AMH levels in FF and serum in women with endometriosis [48,49]. Additionally, Kitajima et al. reported a reduction in AMH levels in the peritoneal fluid, but not in serum, of women with endometriosis, further suggesting a local, pelvic, effect of AMH decline in a reduced fertility disease [19].
The decrease in AMH correlates with the increase in miRs targeting its mRNA, as reported by Belguith et al. who detected an upregulation of miR199a in the plasma of infertile women with dysregulated AMH levels [50]. We did not observe such a difference in miR199a levels in FF samples of endometriosis patients (possibly due to the different sample types here analyzed), but we found an increase in miR20a_1 and miR145_1, which have been reported as intervenients in AMH gene expression regulation through TGF-β signalling modulation [31,32,51,52].
The proteins GDF-9 and BMP-15, primarily secreted by the oocyte [53], are crucial for follicular development and oocyte quality [11,54]. Both proteins belong to the TGF-β family and form homo- and heterodimers [55], detectable in the FF [27,53]. In cumulus oophorus cells, when acting as homodimers or as heterodimers (known as cumulin) [56], they enhance oocyte maturation in vitro and improve embryo development and fetal survival in several animal models [56,57,58,59,60,61]. Levels of the monomeric form of GDF-9 protein, albeit rarely detected in FF, positively correlate with oocyte maturation and embryo development [27,62]. As well, high BMP-15 levels in FF, particularly in younger women, improve pregnancy chances [62,63]. In agreement with this observation, in the current study FF BMP-15 pro-protein levels in older women were lower when compared to younger women and with all the other studied peptides. This odd finding provides additional support to the view that BMP-15 has a major role in the follicle development of mono-ovulatory species such as humans [64,65] and sheep [66], in contrast to poli-ovulatory species [67], and it is interesting to verify that cumulus cell receptors for BMP-15 in humans show age-related decrements too [68].
In this study, an increase in BMP-15 and GDF-9 levels was found in FF samples of patients with endometriosis, both in pro-proteins and mature proteins in dimers, considering the 31kDa double band identified in blots when BMP-15 or GDF-9 were detected. That increase appears amidst conflicting GDF-9 results which show a decrease or no difference when women with severe endometriosis are compared to women without the disease [69,70,71,72]. The isolated assessment of GDF-9 pro-protein, compared to the simultaneous immature and mature protein assay of the present study, may underlie such differences. In addition, this discrepancy may also be attributed to the type of analysis, as some results were obtained from serum or granulosa cells, while others reflect mRNA expression rather than protein levels [70,72]. In contrast to GDF-9, BMP-15 levels agree with a previous observation [71], which provides additional consistency to BMP-15 relevance in human follicle growth and development. As a whole, the consistent increase in both GDF-9 and BMP-15 proteins, and the probable formation of homo- and heterodimers found in FF samples of women with endometriosis, favour their role as an intrinsic compensatory mechanism to enhance oocyte quality.
The analysis of miRNA levels in FF provides further insight into the molecular landscape of endometriosis. We found a decrease in miR125b-5p levels in FF of patients with endometriosis that contrasts with previous reports showing its upregulation in serum [40]. MiR125b-5p acts as a tumour suppressor, inhibiting cell proliferation and promoting apoptosis [73,74,75], processes that are dysregulated in endometriosis. Indeed, the decrease in miR-125b-5p in FF locally favours the inflammatory and proliferative nature of endometriosis [76]. Interestingly, the inflammatory response modulator miR212-3p [77,78] is also downregulated, which aligns with the disrupted immune environment in endometriosis. The potential contribution of miR125b-5p and miR212-3p to endometriosis establishment is supported by their significant predictive value for endometriosis found by ROC analysis, anticipating the clinical utility of both miRNAs as diagnostic tools. Besides miR125b-5p and miR212-3p, miR145_1 levels in FF also showed predictive value for endometriosis, distinguishing women with endometriosis-related infertility from fertile women undergoing ART due to male factors, which agrees with previous studies that highlight the role of specific miRNAs in endometriosis diagnosis and pathogenesis [37,79,80]. In addition, levels of miR145_1 and of miR320a_1 were found to be strong predictors of biochemical pregnancy success in women with male factor infertility, reinforcing that miRNAs in FF not only influence endometriosis, but may also impact fertility outcomes. Unfortunately, information relative to biochemical pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis is scarce, which impedes us concluding whether those miRs present equivalent prognostic value in those patients and constitutes a limitation of this study.
Levels of miR20a_1, miR145_1, and miR320a_1 were increased in FF of women with endometriosis. According to Andreas et al., the overexpression of miR20a_1, differently expressed in cumulus cells (higher) and oocyte (lower), accelerated maturation of oocytes in vitro [81]. MiR20a_1 directly targets phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) and bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2 (BMPR2) to regulate their expression both at the mRNA and protein levels in cultured GCs [82] and takes part in TGF-β signalling [31]. In fact, overexpression of both miR20a_1 and miR145_1 [32,51] inhibits TGF-β signalling and supresses cell migration and invasion [83]. Moreover, in line with our results, miR320_a levels were significantly upregulated in serum exosomes from patients with endometriosis [44]. This miRNA presents tumour suppressor properties [84,85,86] and modulates migration of endometrial stromal cells [87], which might result in a balanced condition when confronted with miR-125. It is interesting to note that miR320a_1 in FF had been associated with high-quality embryos [29], a finding consistent with the correlation we found for miR320a_1 levels in FFs of control women and biochemical pregnancy success. Together with data relative to GDF-9 and BMP-15, the increase in miR20a_1, miR145_1, and miR320a_1 levels in FFs of women with endometriosis supports an adaptive response to increase oocyte quality and mitigate endometriosis progression in patients.
Considering that pregnancy outcome in ART strongly depends on women age, Pearson’s correlation between levels of every analyzed molecule in FF and age were assessed. In what concerns OSFs, only a negative correlation for BMP-15 pro-protein and age was found, which agrees with the overall oocyte quality decrement along time [88]. We failed to identify a correlation between miRNA levels and women’s age, although previous studies evidenced variation in specific miRNAs with age in serum and in airways [89,90]. Although miRNAs are considered key regulators of reproductive processes [91], we hypothesize that miRNA levels in FF are more likely to be influenced by disease state than by patient age, reinforcing their potential as disease biomarkers.
However, the present study presents limitations. The main is the low sample size, particularly of women with diagnosed endometriosis. In addition, considering that FF analysis is restricted to women that are undertaking ART interventions, it will be of interest to assess levels of miRNAs with potential prognostic value in blood.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Follicular Fluid Collection and Processing

FF samples obtained from women aged 26–41 years submitted for ART after informed consent from 2008 to 2020 were assigned by CETI (Centro de Estudo e Tratamento de Infertilidade), Porto. The use of biological samples discarded during processing in ART was approved by the local Ethics Committee (Unidade de Bioética, Biodireito e Economia da Saúde DCSS—Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto). Rules and directives of the Helsinki Declaration were fully adopted. The harvest of the FF was conducted during the follicular puncture with a 17-gauge needle (Vitrolife, Göteborg, Sweden) on the largest follicle (diameter greater than 17mm, which predicts higher oocyte maturation and competence—both of which may serve as indirect indicators of oocyte quality) [92] identified by ultrasound at the most reachable ovary in each patient.
For this study, only samples from women who completed their ART treatment were selected. Completion of the treatment cycle was defined as undergoing embryo transfer, regardless of whether it was performed on the 3rd or 5th day of embryo development. The decision regarding the day for embryo transfer was based on the number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, and the number of grade A embryos at the cleavage stage on days 2 and 3 of development. Embryo classification during the cleavage stage was based on three main morphological criteria: cleavage symmetry, blastomere size uniformity, and the extent of cytoplasmic fragmentation [93]. For instance, an embryo at approximately 68 h post-fertilization (corresponding to day 3 of development) is expected to present around eight blastomeres. Ideally, these cells should be symmetrical. Additionally, high-quality embryos (classified as Grade A) typically exhibit ≤25% cytoplasmic fragmentation. These characteristics are indicative of optimal developmental. In certain cases, previous endometrial maturation assessments and hormonal analyses on the day of the trigger for oocyte pick-up were performed to facilitate not only the decision on the transfer day but also on whether to proceed with a freeze-all strategy. The therapeutic indications and the execution of the most appropriate technique, either conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), were followed to complete the respective cycle of treatment. Following the retrieval of cumulus-oocyte complexes, the FF of each woman were collected into conical-bottom tubes and centrifuged at 200× g for 6 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected, aliquoted into 1 mL fractions, and stored at −20 °C for subsequent analysis.
Immediately after ovarian follicular puncture, FF samples were anonymized and classified according to the age of the patient and clinical diagnosis. According to infertility origin, FF samples were divided into two groups: male factor (control group) (n = 44) and endometriosis (n = 20). Data relative to women enrolled in this study are summarized in Table 2. All patients with infertility were evaluated for suspected endometriosis, starting with a clinical history and physical examination, followed by imaging techniques, such as ultrasound and, when indicated, magnetic resonance imaging. Laparoscopy was performed in patients presenting with symptoms strongly suggestive of endometriosis. In our dataset, we included patients with a history of previous surgery, those who underwent adapted hormonal suppression prior to ovarian stimulation, or both. Patients who presented co-morbidities, such as diabetes, arterial hypertension, asthma, depression, dyslipidemia, polycystic ovary syndrome, tubal issues, or endometriosis associated with other infertility cause, were excluded from the study. All the patients included in the control group were evaluated by a gynecologist, independently of the identification of male cause of infertility, to confirm the unlikeliness of endometriosis or exclude additional causes of infertility.

4.2. Semi-Quantification of AMH, BMP-15, and GDF-9 in FF by Western Blotting

Analysis of proteins in FF requires the prior removal of albumin, with the ALBUMINOUTTM kit (G Biosciences, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After this procedure, total protein in samples was quantified by the colorimetric method of Bradford [94]. Then, electrophoretic separation of 15 µg of total protein of each FF sample loaded on a 12% sodium dodecylsulfate–polyacrylamide resolution gel, was performed in a discontinuous buffer system (Biorad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) [95] for approximately 1h at room temperature under a constant electric current of 25mA per gel.
After electrophoretic separation, proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane 0.45 μm (Biorad Laboratories), applying a potential difference of 30V for 90 min. After staining with Ponceau S for 2 min, membrane images were captured in Chemidoc TM XRS equipment (BioRad Laboratories). Then, membranes were incubated for 1h at room temperature with blocking solution (5% w/v non-fat powdered milk Molico® in TBS with 0.1% v/v Tween-20 (TBS.T)), or alternatively 5% w/v bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TBS.T for membranes used for the detection of BMP-15, and then with primary antibodies, rabbit anti-AMH (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) diluted 1: 7500 v/v or goat anti-BMP-15 (R & D, Minneapolis, MN, USA) diluted 1: 1000 v/v in blocking solution, overnight at 4 °C and with stirring. GDF-9 was detected with a rabbit anti-GDF-9 antibody (Abcam) diluted 1:500 v/v or 1:250 v/v (for hetero- or homodimers, respectively) in blocking solution for two nights at 4 °C. Membranes were then washed with TBS.T and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase diluted in blocking solution for 1h at room temperature with stirring. Immunoreaction of the membrane was performed through application of chemiluminescent substrate for peroxidase Clarity Western ECL SUBS (BioRad Laboratories) for 5 min, followed by signal detection in Chemidoc TM XRS equipment (BioRad Laboratories). Normalization of the studied proteins was carried out with the corresponding lane stained with Ponceau S. Each experiment was repeated three times.

4.3. Reverse Transcription qPCR

MiRNAs were extracted from FF samples using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified RNAs were converted to cDNA using miRCURY LNA RT kit (Qiagen). Then, miRNAs were analyzed in 384-well plates after mixing 1 mL of cDNA with 1 mL of miRNA-specific primer (miScript Primer Assay/miRCURY LNA miRNA assay) (Table 3), 3.5 mL of 2x miRCURY SYBR Green Master mix (Qiagen), and 4.5 mL of MQ water. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was conducted on a CFX Opus 384 real-time PCR system (BioRad Laboratories) and started with denaturation (10 min) at 95 °C, followed by 50 cycles of 15 s denaturation at 95 °C, 30 s annealing at 55 °C, and 30 s extension at 60 °C. PCR data were normalized with a control, RNU5G, using the formula 2−(CT target–CT control) to quantify miRNA’s expression levels. RNU5G, a small nucleolar RNA, was selected as the reference gene for miRNA normalization due to its stability, abundance, size similarity, and comparable biological and technical properties to target miRNAs, as well as its high conservation across species. One negative control per experiment was prepared by omission of reverse transcriptase.

4.4. Pregnancy Assessment

All participants were instructed to undergo biochemical pregnancy assessment 12 days post-embryo transfer. This involved the collection of peripheral blood for the quantification of β-hCG levels by quimioluminesce analysis. In cases of a positive β-hCG result, clinical pregnancy was confirmed approximately 15 days later via transvaginal ultrasound.
All data were systematically recorded by associating the respective sample code with the corresponding pregnancy follow-up outcomes.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 10.3.1 (GraphPad Software Inc. San Diego, CA, USA). Results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Comparative analysis of the proteins studied was carried out by Student’s t test. The analysis of miRNAs was performed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Probability values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. For the correlation analysis of the studied protein levels the Pearson correlation test was employed [45]. Considering that this is an exploratory study carried out in a small group of women, in which data are collected with an objective but not with a prespecified key hypothesis, multiple test adjustments, such as Bonferroni correction, were not performed [96].

5. Conclusions

In sum, our pilot study reveals significant alterations in AMH, BMP-15, GDF-9, and specific miRNAs in FF samples from women with endometriosis. While the increase in BMP-15 and GDF-9 may represent a compensatory mechanism to increase oocyte quality, miRNA dysregulation highlights their role as biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in both endometriosis and ART management. These findings set the stage for further investigations into the molecular pathways influencing fertility in women with endometriosis.

Author Contributions

A.C.N. conceived the research and wrote the original draft, A.C.N. and A.R.R. obtained and analyzed data, C.F. diagnosed patients, Â.R. collected the samples during A.R.R. techniques, H.A. and D.N. supervised and wrote and revised the manuscript, and J.L.S.-C. reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the 2011 Grant for Fertility Innovation (GFI) from Merck Serono, KGaA. Adriana Rodrigues (DL57/2016/CP1355/CT0009) is supported by the European Union and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The use of biological samples discarded along processing in ART was approved on 2 April 2013 (the ethical code has not been attributed to the approval document) by the local Ethics Committee (Unidade de Bioética, Biodireito e Economia da Saúde DCSS—Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto). Rules and directives of the Helsinki Declaration were fully adopted.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all women submitted to ART involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data is not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions but are available from the corresponding author by reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AUCArea Under the Curve
AMHAnti-Mullerian hormone
ARTAssisted Reproductive Technology
BMP-15Bone morphogenetic protein-15
BSABovine Serum Albumin
CETICentro de Estudo e Tratamento de Infertilidade
ENDEndometriosis
FFFollicular fluid
GCGranulosa cells
GDF-9Growth differentiation factor-9
β-hCGHuman Chorionic Gonadotropin
ICSIIntracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
IVFIn vitro fertilization
MFMale Factor
miRMicroRNA
MiRNAMicroRNA
OSFsOocyte-Secreted Factors
ROCReceiver Operating Characteristic
TBSTris-buffer Saline
TGF-βTransforming Growth Factor β

References

  1. Vander Borght, M.; Wyns, C. Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clin. Biochem. 2018, 62, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Saunders, P.T.K.; Horne, A.W. Endometriosis: Etiology, pathobiology, and therapeutic prospects. Cell 2021, 184, 2807–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Becker, C.M.; Bokor, A.; Heikinheimo, O.; Horne, A.; Jansen, F.; Kiesel, L.; King, K.; Kvaskoff, M.; Nap, A.; Petersen, K.; et al. ESHRE guideline: Endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Open 2022, 2022, hoac009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Neto, A.C.; Botelho, M.; Rodrigues, A.R.; Lamas, S.; Araújo, B.; Guimarães, J.T.; Gouveia, A.M.; Almeida, H.; Neves, D. Metformin reverses infertility in a mouse model of endometriosis: Unveiling disease pathways and implications for future clinical approaches. Reprod. BioMed. Online 2024, 50, 104474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Santulli, P.; Chouzenoux, S.; Fiorese, M.; Marcellin, L.; Lemarechal, H.; Millischer, A.E.; Batteux, F.; Borderie, D.; Chapron, C. Protein oxidative stress markers in peritoneal fluids of women with deep infiltrating endometriosis are increased. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 30, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Soares, S.R.; Martínez-Varea, A.; Hidalgo-Mora, J.J.; Pellicer, A. Pharmacologic therapies in endometriosis: A systematic review. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 98, 529–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Prefumo, F.; Rossi, A.C. Endometriosis, endometrioma, and ART results: Current understanding and recommended practices. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018, 51, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Freitas, C.; Neto, A.C.; Matos, L.; Silva, E.; Ribeiro, Â.; Silva-Carvalho, J.L.; Almeida, H. Follicular Fluid redox involvement for ovarian follicle growth. J. Ovarian Res. 2017, 10, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sang, Q.; Yao, Z.; Wang, H.; Feng, R.; Wang, H.; Zhao, X.; Xing, Q.; Jin, L.; He, L.; Wu, L.; et al. Identification of microRNAs in human follicular fluid: Characterization of microRNAs that govern steroidogenesis in vitro and are associated with polycystic ovary syndrome in vivo. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 3068–3079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qasemi, M.; Amidi, F. Extracellular microRNA profiling in human follicular fluid: New biomarkers in female reproductive potential. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2020, 37, 1769–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Da Broi, M.G.; Giorgi, V.S.I.; Wang, F.; Keefe, D.L.; Albertini, D.; Navarro, P.A. Influence of follicular fluid and cumulus cells on oocyte quality: Clinical implications. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2018, 35, 735–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Peng, J.; Li, Q.; Wigglesworth, K.; Rangarajan, A.; Kattamuri, C.; Peterson, R.T.; Eppig, J.J.; Thompson, T.B.; Matzuk, M.M. Growth differentiation factor 9:bone morphogenetic protein 15 heterodimers are potent regulators of ovarian functions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E776–E785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yan, C.; Wang, P.; DeMayo, J.; DeMayo, F.J.; Elvin, J.A.; Carino, C.; Prasad, S.V.; Skinner, S.S.; Dunbar, B.S.; Dube, J.L.; et al. Synergistic roles of bone morphogenetic protein 15 and growth differentiation factor 9 in ovarian function. Mol. Endocrinol. 2001, 15, 854–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Su, Y.Q.; Wu, X.; O’Brien, M.J.; Pendola, F.L.; Denegre, J.N.; Matzuk, M.M.; Eppig, J.J. Synergistic roles of BMP15 and GDF9 in the development and function of the oocyte-cumulus cell complex in mice: Genetic evidence for an oocyte-granulosa cell regulatory loop. Dev. Biol. 2004, 276, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Craig, J.; Orisaka, M.; Wang, H.; Orisaka, S.; Thompson, W.; Zhu, C.; Kotsuji, F.; Tsang, B.K. Gonadotropin and intra-ovarian signals regulating follicle development and atresia: The delicate balance between life and death. Front. Biosci. 2007, 12, 3628–3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, L.N.; Liang, X.Y.; Fang, C.; Zhang, M.F. Abnormal expression of growth differentiation factor 9 and bone morphogenetic protein 15 in stimulated oocytes during maturation from women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 96, 464–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. La Marca, A.; Sighinolfi, G.; Radi, D.; Argento, C.; Baraldi, E.; Artenisio, A.C.; Stabile, G.; Volpe, A. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum. Reprod. Update 2010, 16, 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. van Rooij, I.A.; Broekmans, F.J.; Scheffer, G.J.; Looman, C.W.; Habbema, J.D.; de Jong, F.H.; Fauser, B.J.; Themmen, A.P.; te Velde, E.R. Serum antimullerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: A longitudinal study. Fertil. Steril. 2005, 83, 979–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kitajima, M.; Matsumoto, K.; Murakami, N.; Kajimura, I.; Harada, A.; Kitajima, Y.; Masuzaki, H.; Miura, K. AMH Concentrations in Peritoneal Fluids of Women With and Without Endometriosis. Front. Surg. 2020, 7, 600202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs: Target Recognition and Regulatory Functions. Cell 2009, 136, 215–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Faruq, O.; Vecchione, A. microRNA: Diagnostic Perspective. Front. Med. 2015, 2, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Agrawal, S.; Tapmeier, T.T.; Rahmioglu, N.; Kirtley, S.; Zondervan, K.T.; Becker, C.M. The miRNA Mirage: How Close Are We to Finding a Non-Invasive Diagnostic Biomarker in Endometriosis? A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nematian, S.E.; Mamillapalli, R.; Kadakia, T.S.; Majidi Zolbin, M.; Moustafa, S.; Taylor, H.S. Systemic Inflammation Induced by microRNAs: Endometriosis-Derived Alterations in Circulating microRNA 125b-5p and Let-7b-5p Regulate Macrophage Cytokine Production. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rekker, K.; Saare, M.; Roost, A.M.; Kaart, T.; Sõritsa, D.; Karro, H.; Sõritsa, A.; Simón, C.; Salumets, A.; Peters, M. Circulating miR-200-family micro-RNAs have altered plasma levels in patients with endometriosis and vary with blood collection time. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 104, 938–946.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Martinez, R.M.; Liang, L.; Racowsky, C.; Dioni, L.; Mansur, A.; Adir, M.; Bollati, V.; Baccarelli, A.A.; Hauser, R.; Machtinger, R. Extracellular microRNAs profile in human follicular fluid and IVF outcomes. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Khan, H.L.; Bhatti, S.; Abbas, S.; Kaloglu, C.; Isa, A.M.; Younas, H.; Ziders, R.; Khan, Y.L.; Hassan, Z.; Turhan, B.O.; et al. Extracellular microRNAs: Key players to explore the outcomes of in vitro fertilization. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2021, 19, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gode, F.; Gulekli, B.; Dogan, E.; Korhan, P.; Dogan, S.; Bige, O.; Cimrin, D.; Atabey, N. Influence of follicular fluid GDF9 and BMP15 on embryo quality. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 2274–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Machtinger, R.; Rodosthenous, R.S.; Adir, M.; Mansour, A.; Racowsky, C.; Baccarelli, A.A.; Hauser, R. Extracellular microRNAs in follicular fluid and their potential association with oocyte fertilization and embryo quality: An exploratory study. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2017, 34, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Feng, R.; Sang, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Fu, W.; Liu, M.; Xu, Y.; Shi, H.; Xu, Y.; Qu, R.; Chai, R.; et al. MiRNA-320 in the human follicular fluid is associated with embryo quality in vivo and affects mouse embryonic development in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, Y.; Fan, K.-J.; Sun, Q.; Chen, A.-Z.; Shen, W.-L.; Zhao, Z.-H.; Zheng, X.-F.; Yang, X. Functional screening for miRNAs targeting Smad4 identified miR-199a as a negative regulator of TGF-β signalling pathway. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 9286–9297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fu, X.; Qie, J.; Fu, Q.; Chen, J.; Jin, Y.; Ding, Z. miR-20a-5p/TGFBR2 Axis Affects Pro-inflammatory Macrophages and Aggravates Liver Fibrosis. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Melling, G.E.; Flannery, S.E.; Abidin, S.A.; Clemmens, H.; Prajapati, P.; Hinsley, E.E.; Hunt, S.; Catto, J.W.F.; Coletta, R.D.; Mellone, M.; et al. A miRNA-145/TGF-β1 negative feedback loop regulates the cancer-associated fibroblast phenotype. Carcinogenesis 2018, 39, 798–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, L.; Liu, H.Y. Small RNA molecules in endometriosis: Pathogenesis and therapeutic aspects. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014, 183, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jia, S.Z.; Yang, Y.; Lang, J.; Sun, P.; Leng, J. Plasma miR-17-5p, miR-20a and miR-22 are down-regulated in women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 322–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Cho, S.; Mutlu, L.; Grechukhina, O.; Taylor, H.S. Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 103, 1252–1260.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Suryawanshi, S.; Vlad, A.M.; Lin, H.M.; Mantia-Smaldone, G.; Laskey, R.; Lee, M.; Lin, Y.; Donnellan, N.; Klein-Patel, M.; Lee, T.; et al. Plasma microRNAs as novel biomarkers for endometriosis and endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 1213–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ohlsson Teague, E.M.; Van der Hoek, K.H.; Van der Hoek, M.B.; Perry, N.; Wagaarachchi, P.; Robertson, S.A.; Print, C.G.; Hull, L.M. MicroRNA-regulated pathways associated with endometriosis. Mol. Endocrinol. 2009, 23, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yan, G.; Zhang, L.; Fang, T.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, S.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, H.; Hu, Y. MicroRNA-145 suppresses mouse granulosa cell proliferation by targeting activin receptor IB. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586, 3263–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Adammek, M.; Greve, B.; Kässens, N.; Schneider, C.; Brüggemann, K.; Schüring, A.N.; Starzinski-Powitz, A.; Kiesel, L.; Götte, M. MicroRNA miR-145 inhibits proliferation, invasiveness, and stem cell phenotype of an in vitro endometriosis model by targeting multiple cytoskeletal elements and pluripotency factors. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 99, 1346–1355.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cosar, E.; Mamillapalli, R.; Ersoy, G.S.; Cho, S.; Seifer, B.; Taylor, H.S. Serum microRNAs as diagnostic markers of endometriosis: A comprehensive array-based analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hsu, C.Y.; Hsieh, T.H.; Tsai, C.F.; Tsai, H.P.; Chen, H.S.; Chang, Y.; Chuang, H.Y.; Lee, J.N.; Hsu, Y.L.; Tsai, E.M. miRNA-199a-5p regulates VEGFA in endometrial mesenchymal stem cells and contributes to the pathogenesis of endometriosis. J. Pathol. 2014, 232, 330–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Maged, A.M.; Deeb, W.S.; El Amir, A.; Zaki, S.S.; El Sawah, H.; Al Mohamady, M.; Metwally, A.A.; Katta, M.A. Diagnostic accuracy of serum miR-122 and miR-199a in women with endometriosis. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2018, 141, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, G.; Guo, J.; Li, W.; Zheng, R.; Shang, H.; Wang, Y. Diagnostic value of the combination of circulating serum miRNAs and CA125 in endometriosis. Medicine 2023, 102, e36339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Yuan, M.; Li, D.; Sun, C.; Wang, G. Serum Exosomal MicroRNAs as Potential Circulating Biomarkers for Endometriosis. Dis. Markers 2020, 2020, 2456340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dancey, C.P.; Reidy, J. Statistics Without Maths for Psychology: Using SPSS for Windows; Prentice Hall: Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  46. Templeton, A. Infertility and the establishment of pregnancy—Overview. Br. Med. Bull. 2000, 56, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nagy, B.; Poto, L.; Farkas, N.; Koppan, M.; Varnagy, A.; Kovacs, K.; Papp, S.; Bohonyi, N.; Bodis, J. Follicular fluid progesterone concentration is associated with fertilization outcome after IVF: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. BioMed. Online 2019, 38, 871–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yoo, J.H.; Cha, S.H.; Park, C.W.; Kim, J.Y.; Yang, K.M.; Song, I.O.; Koong, M.K.; Kang, I.S.; Kim, H.O. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone is a better predictor of ovarian response than FSH and age in IVF patients with endometriosis. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 2011, 38, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lemos, N.A.; Arbo, E.; Scalco, R.; Weiler, E.; Rosa, V.; Cunha-Filho, J.S. Decreased anti-Mullerian hormone and altered ovarian follicular cohort in infertile patients with mild/minimal endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2008, 89, 1064–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Belguith, I.; Dhieb, D.; Turki, M.; Yaich, S.; Chaabene, K.; Mnif, M.; Ayadi, F.; Keskes, L.A. Diagnostic value of miR-199a and miR-21 in the plasma of infertile women with dysregulated AMH levels. Hum. Fertil. 2022, 25, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lutful Kabir, F.; Ambalavanan, N.; Liu, G.; Li, P.; Solomon, G.M.; Lal, C.V.; Mazur, M.; Halloran, B.; Szul, T.; Gerthoffer, W.T.; et al. MicroRNA-145 Antagonism Reverses TGF-β Inhibition of F508del CFTR Correction in Airway Epithelia. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 197, 632–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhao, N.; Koenig, S.N.; Trask, A.J.; Lin, C.H.; Hans, C.P.; Garg, V.; Lilly, B. MicroRNA miR145 regulates TGFBR2 expression and matrix synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. McNatty, K.P.; Moore, L.G.; Hudson, N.L.; Quirke, L.D.; Lawrence, S.B.; Reader, K.; Hanrahan, J.P.; Smith, P.; Groome, N.P.; Laitinen, M.; et al. The oocyte and its role in regulating ovulation rate: A new paradigm in reproductive biology. Reproduction 2004, 128, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Xie, J.; Xu, X.; Liu, S. Intercellular communication in the cumulus–oocyte complex during folliculogenesis: A review. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2023, 11, 1087612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liao, W.X.; Moore, R.K.; Otsuka, F.; Shimasaki, S. Effect of intracellular interactions on the processing and secretion of bone morphogenetic protein-15 (BMP-15) and growth and differentiation factor-9. Implication of the aberrant ovarian phenotype of BMP-15 mutant sheep. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 3713–3719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mottershead, D.G.; Sugimura, S.; Al-Musawi, S.L.; Li, J.J.; Richani, D.; White, M.A.; Martin, G.A.; Trotta, A.P.; Ritter, L.J.; Shi, J.; et al. Cumulin, an Oocyte-secreted Heterodimer of the Transforming Growth Factor-beta Family, Is a Potent Activator of Granulosa Cells and Improves Oocyte Quality. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 24007–24020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chatroudi, M.H.; Khalili, M.A.; Ashourzadeh, S.; Anbari, F.; Shahedi, A.; Safari, S. Growth differentiation factor 9 and cumulus cell supplementation in in vitro maturation culture media enhances the viability of human blastocysts. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 2019, 46, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, J.-J.; Sugimura, S.; Mueller, T.D.; White, M.A.; Martin, G.A.; Ritter, L.J.; Liang, X.-Y.; Gilchrist, R.B.; Mottershead, D.G. Modifications of human growth differentiation factor 9 to improve the generation of embryos from low competence oocytes. Mol. Endocrinol. 2015, 29, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sudiman, J.; Sutton-McDowall, M.L.; Ritter, L.J.; White, M.A.; Mottershead, D.G.; Thompson, J.G.; Gilchrist, R.B. Bone morphogenetic protein 15 in the pro-mature complex form enhances bovine oocyte developmental competence. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sudiman, J.; Ritter, L.J.; Feil, D.K.; Wang, X.; Chan, K.; Mottershead, D.G.; Robertson, D.M.; Thompson, J.G.; Gilchrist, R.B. Effects of differing oocyte-secreted factors during mouse in vitro maturation on subsequent embryo and fetal development. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2014, 31, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yeo, C.X.; Gilchrist, R.B.; Thompson, J.G.; Lane, M. Exogenous growth differentiation factor 9 in oocyte maturation media enhances subsequent embryo development and fetal viability in mice. Hum. Reprod. 2008, 23, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, Y.; Li, R.-Q.; Ou, S.-B.; Zhang, N.-F.; Ren, L.; Wei, L.-N.; Zhang, Q.-X.; Yang, D.-Z. Increased GDF9 and BMP15 mRNA levels in cumulus granulosa cells correlate with oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryo quality in humans. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2014, 12, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wu, Y.T.; Wang, T.T.; Chen, X.J.; Zhu, X.M.; Dong, M.Y.; Sheng, J.Z.; Xu, C.M.; Huang, H.F. Bone morphogenetic protein-15 in follicle fluid combined with age may differentiate between successful and unsuccessful poor ovarian responders. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2012, 10, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Di Pasquale, E.; Beck-Peccoz, P.; Persani, L. Hypergonadotropic ovarian failure associated with an inherited mutation of human bone morphogenetic protein-15 (BMP15) gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004, 75, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Di Pasquale, E.; Rossetti, R.; Marozzi, A.; Bodega, B.; Borgato, S.; Cavallo, L.; Einaudi, S.; Radetti, G.; Russo, G.; Sacco, M.; et al. Identification of new variants of human BMP15 gene in a large cohort of women with premature ovarian failure. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 91, 1976–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Otsuka, F.; McTavish, K.J.; Shimasaki, S. Integral role of GDF-9 and BMP-15 in ovarian function. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2011, 78, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Guéripel, X.; Brun, V.; Gougeon, A. Oocyte Bone Morphogenetic Protein 15, but not Growth Differentiation Factor 9, Is Increased During Gonadotropin-Induced Follicular Development in the Immature Mouse and Is Associated with Cumulus Oophorus Expansion1. Biol. Reprod. 2006, 75, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ribeiro, A.; Freitas, C.; Matos, L.; Gouveia, A.; Gomes, F.; Silva Carvalho, J.L.; Almeida, H. Age-related expression of TGF beta family receptors in human cumulus oophorus cells. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2017, 34, 1121–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hendarto, H.; Prabowo, P.; Moeloek, F.A.; Soetjipto, S. Growth differentiation factor 9 concentration in the follicular fluid of infertile women with endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2010, 94, 758–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kawabe, S.; Yamashita, Y.; Saito, N.; Kokunai, K.; Hayashi, A.; Hayashi, M.; Terai, Y.; Miyazaki, K.; Ohmichi, M. The effect of moderate to severe endometriosis on expression of growth differentiation factor-9 mRNA in human granulosa cells under controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2015, 14, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Rasulzade, A.; Akalın, M.; Demirdağ, E.; Erdem, M.; Erdem, A. Comparing serum and follicle fluid GDF-9 and BMP-15 parameters in IVF patients with ovarian endometrioma. Reprod. BioMed. Online 2023, 47, 103459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shamsa, A.; Gilchrist, R.B.; Robertson, D.M.; Rodgers, R.J.; Donoghoe, M.W.; Ledger, W.L.; Abbott, J.A.; Riepsamen, A.H. Oocyte-Secreted Serum Biomarkers GDF9 and BMP15 in Women with Endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 2023, 30, 1521–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hua, S.; Quan, Y.; Zhan, M.; Liao, H.; Li, Y.; Lu, L. miR-125b-5p inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma via targeting TXNRD1. Cancer Cell Int. 2019, 19, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, Y.; Wei, Y.; Fan, X.; Zhang, P.; Wang, P.; Cheng, S.; Zhang, J. MicroRNA-125b as a tumor suppressor by targeting MMP11 in breast cancer. Thorac. Cancer 2020, 11, 1613–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tang, C.; Wu, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, K.; Tang, Z.; Guo, X. LncRNA MAFG-AS1 regulates miR-125b-5p/SphK1 axis to promote the proliferation, migration, and invasion of bladder cancer cells. Hum. Cell 2021, 34, 588–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Vallvé-Juanico, J.; Houshdaran, S.; Giudice, L.C. The endometrial immune environment of women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2019, 25, 565–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.L.; Li, X.F.; Tang, Y.C.; Zhao, X. miR-212-3p reduced proliferation, and promoted apoptosis of fibroblast-like synoviocytes via down-regulating SOX5 in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chen, W.; Ma, X.; Zhang, P.; Li, Q.; Liang, X.; Liu, J. MiR-212-3p inhibits LPS-induced inflammatory response through targeting HMGB1 in murine macrophages. Exp. Cell Res. 2017, 350, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ohlsson Teague, E.M.C.; Print, C.G.; Hull, M.L. The role of microRNAs in endometriosis and associated reproductive conditions. Hum. Reprod. Update 2009, 16, 142–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Vanhie, A.; Caron, E.; Vermeersch, E.; O, D.; Tomassetti, C.; Meuleman, C.; Mestdagh, P.; D’Hooghe, T.M. Circulating microRNAs as Non-Invasive Biomarkers in Endometriosis Diagnosis—A Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Andreas, E.; Pandey, H.O.; Hoelker, M.; Salilew-Wondim, D.; Gebremedhn, S.; Schellander, K.; Tesfaye, D. The regulatory role of miR-20a in bovine cumulus cells and its contribution to oocyte maturation. Zygote 2021, 29, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Andreas, E.; Hoelker, M.; Neuhoff, C.; Tholen, E.; Schellander, K.; Tesfaye, D.; Salilew-Wondim, D. MicroRNA 17-92 cluster regulates proliferation and differentiation of bovine granulosa cells by targeting PTEN and BMPR2 genes. Cell Tissue Res. 2016, 366, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Yin, Q.; Han, Y.; Zhu, D.; Li, Z.; Shan, S.; Jin, W.; Lu, Q.; Ren, T. miR-145 and miR-497 suppress TGF-β-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition of non-small cell lung cancer by targeting MTDH. Cancer Cell Int. 2018, 18, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Li, Y.S.; Zou, Y.; Dai, D.Q. MicroRNA-320a suppresses tumor progression by targeting PBX3 in gastric cancer and is downregulated by DNA methylation. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2019, 11, 842–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Khandelwal, A.; Sharma, U.; Barwal, T.S.; Seam, R.K.; Gupta, M.; Rana, M.K.; Vasquez, K.M.; Jain, A. Circulating miR-320a Acts as a Tumor Suppressor and Prognostic Factor in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 645475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. De-Ugarte, L.; Balcells, S.; Guerri-Fernandez, R.; Grinberg, D.; Diez-Perez, A.; Nogues, X.; Garcia-Giralt, N. Effect of the Tumor Suppressor miR-320a on Viability and Functionality of Human Osteosarcoma Cell Lines Compared to Primary Osteoblasts. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Berkhout, R.P.; Keijser, R.; Repping, S.; Lambalk, C.B.; Afink, G.B.; Mastenbroek, S.; Hamer, G. High-quality human preimplantation embryos stimulate endometrial stromal cell migration via secretion of microRNA hsa-miR-320a. Hum. Reprod. 2020, 35, 1797–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Han, M.; Park, S.B.; Park, B.J. Lower growth factor expression in follicular fluid undergone in-vitro fertilization. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 2011, 38, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ong, J.; Woldhuis, R.R.; Boudewijn, I.M.; van den Berg, A.; Kluiver, J.; Kok, K.; Terpstra, M.M.; Guryev, V.; de Vries, M.; Vermeulen, C.J.; et al. Age-related gene and miRNA expression changes in airways of healthy individuals. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Noren Hooten, N.; Fitzpatrick, M.; Wood, W.H., 3rd; De, S.; Ejiogu, N.; Zhang, Y.; Mattison, J.A.; Becker, K.G.; Zonderman, A.B.; Evans, M.K. Age-related changes in microRNA levels in serum. Aging 2013, 5, 725–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Salas-Huetos, A.; James, E.R.; Aston, K.I.; Jenkins, T.G.; Carrell, D.T.; Yeste, M. The Expression of miRNAs in Human Ovaries, Oocytes, Extracellular Vesicles, and Early Embryos: A Systematic Review. Cells 2019, 8, 1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Abbara, A.; Vuong, L.N.; Ho, V.N.A.; Clarke, S.A.; Jeffers, L.; Comninos, A.N.; Salim, R.; Ho, T.M.; Kelsey, T.W.; Trew, G.H.; et al. Follicle Size on Day of Trigger Most Likely to Yield a Mature Oocyte. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Calhaz-Jorge, C. Orientações Técnicas em Medicina da Reprodução; Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina da Reprodução: Coimbra, Portugal, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  94. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bender, R.; Lange, S. Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how? J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2001, 54, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Representative blots and graphical depictions of AMH, GDF-9, and BMP-15 analyses in FF samples from 2 different patients of male factor group (MF) and 2 different patients with endometriosis (End). (a) A single band corresponding to AMH was detected with a molecular weight of 60 kDa. (b) AMH levels in MF/controls and endometriosis. (c) The correlation between AMH levels and age in controls. (d) Representative blots of GDF-9 pro-protein and homo/heterodimers in FF that show, respectively, a 51 KDa pro-protein single band (e) or 31 KDa dimers (f) in controls and endometriosis. (g) Representation of correlation between GDF-9 and age in controls. (h) Representative blots of FF BMP-15 pro-protein and homo/heterodimers showing, respectively, a single band with an apparent molecular weight of 45 kDa (i) and 31 KDa dimers (j) in controls and End. (k) Graphical representation of the correlation between BMP-15 levels and age in controls. For loading control of immunoblots the respective Ponceau S-stained membrane was used. AMH—anti Mullerian hormone, BMP-15—bone morphogenetic protein 15, End—endometriosis, FF—follicular fluid, GDF-9—growth differentiation factor 9, MF—male factor/controls (n = 17); endometriosis patients (End, n = 7). * p < 0.05 compared to MF, ** p < 0.01 compared to MF. *** p < 0.001 compared with MF, **** p < 0.0001 compared with MF.
Figure 1. Representative blots and graphical depictions of AMH, GDF-9, and BMP-15 analyses in FF samples from 2 different patients of male factor group (MF) and 2 different patients with endometriosis (End). (a) A single band corresponding to AMH was detected with a molecular weight of 60 kDa. (b) AMH levels in MF/controls and endometriosis. (c) The correlation between AMH levels and age in controls. (d) Representative blots of GDF-9 pro-protein and homo/heterodimers in FF that show, respectively, a 51 KDa pro-protein single band (e) or 31 KDa dimers (f) in controls and endometriosis. (g) Representation of correlation between GDF-9 and age in controls. (h) Representative blots of FF BMP-15 pro-protein and homo/heterodimers showing, respectively, a single band with an apparent molecular weight of 45 kDa (i) and 31 KDa dimers (j) in controls and End. (k) Graphical representation of the correlation between BMP-15 levels and age in controls. For loading control of immunoblots the respective Ponceau S-stained membrane was used. AMH—anti Mullerian hormone, BMP-15—bone morphogenetic protein 15, End—endometriosis, FF—follicular fluid, GDF-9—growth differentiation factor 9, MF—male factor/controls (n = 17); endometriosis patients (End, n = 7). * p < 0.05 compared to MF, ** p < 0.01 compared to MF. *** p < 0.001 compared with MF, **** p < 0.0001 compared with MF.
Ijms 26 09752 g001
Figure 2. MiRNAs analyses. Graphical representation of expression levels of (a) miR125b-5p, (b) miR212-3p, (c) miR20a_1, (d) miR145_1, (e) miR199a_1, and (f) miR320a_1 assessed by RT-qPCR in FF samples of women with male factor/controls infertility (MF) and with endometriosis (End). (gl) Graphical representation of correlation between miRs levels and age in male factor/controls (n = 32) and endometriosis women (n = 20). * p < 0.05 compared to MF, ** p < 0.01 compared to MF. End—endometriosis, MF—male factor.
Figure 2. MiRNAs analyses. Graphical representation of expression levels of (a) miR125b-5p, (b) miR212-3p, (c) miR20a_1, (d) miR145_1, (e) miR199a_1, and (f) miR320a_1 assessed by RT-qPCR in FF samples of women with male factor/controls infertility (MF) and with endometriosis (End). (gl) Graphical representation of correlation between miRs levels and age in male factor/controls (n = 32) and endometriosis women (n = 20). * p < 0.05 compared to MF, ** p < 0.01 compared to MF. End—endometriosis, MF—male factor.
Ijms 26 09752 g002
Figure 3. ROC analysis for miRNAs based on the real-time qPCR data. Male factor/controls vs. endometriosis for (a) miR125b-5p, (b) miR212-3p, (c) miR20a_1, (d) miR145_1, (e) miR199a_1, and (f) miR320a_1. Positive β-hCG vs. negative β-hCG in male factor group (gl). AUC—area under the curve; β-hCG—human chorionic gonadotropin, ROC—receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 3. ROC analysis for miRNAs based on the real-time qPCR data. Male factor/controls vs. endometriosis for (a) miR125b-5p, (b) miR212-3p, (c) miR20a_1, (d) miR145_1, (e) miR199a_1, and (f) miR320a_1. Positive β-hCG vs. negative β-hCG in male factor group (gl). AUC—area under the curve; β-hCG—human chorionic gonadotropin, ROC—receiver operating characteristic.
Ijms 26 09752 g003
Table 1. MiRNA specific roles on endometriosis-related infertility.
Table 1. MiRNA specific roles on endometriosis-related infertility.
miRNARole in Endometriosis-Related InfertilityReference(s)
miR-125b-5pUpregulated in endometriosis.
Implicated in lesion invasion, inflammation, and alterations of the oocyte/follicular environment.
Pathways: PI3K/Akt, MAPK, and inflammation-related signalling.
[10,23,24,40]
miR-212-3pHigher levels are associated with improved embryo development.
Pathways: Regulation of folliculogenesis and oocyte competence (specific targets not consistently identified).
[25,26]
miR-320a_1Upregulated in serum exosomes of endometriosis patients.
Associated with oocyte and embryo quality and IVF outcomes.
Lower or altered expression linked to poorer embryo development.
Pathways: Regulation of energy metabolism, oxidative stress, and embryo development genes.
[26,29,44]
miR-199a_1Upregulated in serum of endometriosis patients.
Considered in the EFI and related to disease severity.
Lower levels correlate with worse EFI and poor fertility prognosis.
Pathways: ECM remodelling, inflammation, and lesion invasiveness.
[40,41,42]
miR-20a_1Dysregulated in endometriosis.
Associated with disease recurrence and lesion biology.
Influences implantation and follicular function, impacting fertility.
Pathways: TGF-β signalling, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis.
[35,36,37]
miR-145_1Downregulated in endometriosis (serum and lesions).
Functional studies show regulation of granulosa cell proliferation.
Impacts follicular cell behaviour, potentially reducing oocyte quality and ovarian function.
Pathways: Cell-cycle regulation and expression of cytoskeletal-related genes.
[38,39]
Abbreviations: PI3K/Akt—phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B; MAPK—mitogen-activated protein kinase; IVF—in vitro fertilization; EFI—endometriosis fertility index; ECM—extracellular matrix; TGF-β—transforming growth factor β.
Table 2. Resume of the characteristics of the women enrolled in the study.
Table 2. Resume of the characteristics of the women enrolled in the study.
Age
(Years)
Body Mass Index
(Kg/m2)
Parity
(Number of Live Births/% of Women)
Type A embryos at 3rd day
(Average Number)
3rd Day Transfer
(% of Cases)
5th Day Transfer
(% of Cases)
Male factor (n = 34)26–4223.50/88
1/8
2/4
1.8147.152.9
Endometriosis (n = 15)27–4121.90/67
1/33
2.6346.753.3
Table 3. List of primers used in miRNAs quantification by reverse transcription qPCR.
Table 3. List of primers used in miRNAs quantification by reverse transcription qPCR.
MiRNAReference
RNU5Ghsa_miR-RNU5G miRCURY LNA miRNA PCR Assay (YP00203908)
miR-125b-5phsa_miR-125b-5p miRCURY LNA miRNA PCR Assay (YP00205713)
miR-212-3p_1Mm_miR-212-3p_1 miScript Primer Assay (MS00024570)
miR-20a_1Hs_miR-20a_1 miScript Primer Assay (MS00003199)
miR-199a_1Hs_miR-199a_1 miScript Primer Assay (MS0006741)
miR-145_1Hs_miR-145_1 miScript Primer Assay (MS00003528)
miR-320a_1Hs_miR-320a_1 miScript Primer Assay (MS00014707)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Neto, A.C.; Freitas, C.; Ribeiro, Â.; Rodrigues, A.R.; Silva-Carvalho, J.L.; Almeida, H.; Neves, D. Identification of Proteins and MicroRNAs with Prognostic Value for Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes in Follicular Fluid of Women with Endometriosis: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 9752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199752

AMA Style

Neto AC, Freitas C, Ribeiro Â, Rodrigues AR, Silva-Carvalho JL, Almeida H, Neves D. Identification of Proteins and MicroRNAs with Prognostic Value for Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes in Follicular Fluid of Women with Endometriosis: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(19):9752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199752

Chicago/Turabian Style

Neto, Ana Catarina, Cláudia Freitas, Ângela Ribeiro, Adriana R. Rodrigues, João L. Silva-Carvalho, Henrique Almeida, and Delminda Neves. 2025. "Identification of Proteins and MicroRNAs with Prognostic Value for Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes in Follicular Fluid of Women with Endometriosis: A Pilot Study" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 19: 9752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199752

APA Style

Neto, A. C., Freitas, C., Ribeiro, Â., Rodrigues, A. R., Silva-Carvalho, J. L., Almeida, H., & Neves, D. (2025). Identification of Proteins and MicroRNAs with Prognostic Value for Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes in Follicular Fluid of Women with Endometriosis: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(19), 9752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199752

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop