Next Article in Journal
Exploring the Anticancer Potential of Proton Pump Inhibitors by Targeting GRP78 and V-ATPase: Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamics, PCA, and MM-GBSA Calculations
Previous Article in Journal
Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Properties of Postbiotics Derived from Lactiplantibacillus pentosus B1
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Review of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Its Mechanistic Development Focusing on Methylglyoxal and Counterbalancing Treatment Strategies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distinct Gut Microbiota Signatures Are Associated with Severity of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in People with HIV

by
Riccardo Righetti
1,2,3,
Felice Cinque
1,
Bertrand Lebouché
1,2,
Luz Ramos Ballesteros
1,
Jean-Pierre Routy
1,2,
Marina B. Klein
1,2,
Jason Szabo
1,
Joseph Cox
1,2,
Julian Falutz
1,
Louis-Patrick Haraoui
4,
Cecilia T. Costiniuk
1,2,
Alexandra De Pokomandy
1,2,
Thomas Pembroke
5,
Marco Constante
6,
Manuela Santos
7 and
Giada Sebastiani
1,2,*
1
Chronic Viral Illness Service, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
2
Infection and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
3
Internal Medicine Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Science for Children and Adults, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
4
Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC J1K 2R1, Canada
5
School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4EP, UK
6
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
7
Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(17), 8165; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178165
Submission received: 25 July 2025 / Revised: 19 August 2025 / Accepted: 20 August 2025 / Published: 22 August 2025

Abstract

The progression of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) to severe forms, including metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and liver fibrosis, involves metabolic dysfunction, genetics, and gut dysbiosis. People with HIV (PWH) represent a high-risk group for MASLD, but the role of gut microbiota alterations in disease severity within this population remains poorly understood. We prospectively recruited PWH with MASLD, defined as the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) ≥ 238 dB/m, and excluded those with viral hepatitis coinfection or alcohol abuse. Severe MASLD was defined as the presence of MASH (cytokeratin-18 ≥ 130.5 U/L) and/or significant liver fibrosis (liver stiffness ≥ 7.1 kPa). Stool samples were collected for 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize gut microbiota composition. Functional predictions were generated using PICRUSt. The differential abundance of bacterial taxa and predicted functions were analyzed using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution. Among 34 PWH with MASLD, 18 (53%) met the criteria for severe MASLD. Microbiota profiling revealed significant differences in bacterial genera between the PWH with and without severe MASLD. Enrichment was observed in the Ruminococcus gnavus group, Negativibacillus, Holdemanella, Subdoligranulum, the Eubacterium hallii group, and Butyricicoccus, while depletion was seen in Prevotella, Alloprevotella, Dialister, Catenibacterium, the Christensenellaceae R 7 group, Clostridium sensu stricto, Olsenella, Oscillospiraceae UCG-005, Libanicoccus, and the Eubacterium siraeum group. Predicted functional pathways related to fatty acid degradation, folate biosynthesis, and amino acids metabolism did not differ between groups. MASLD severity in PWH is associated with a distinct gut microbiota signature, though not with functional pathway alterations. Microbial profiling may complement existing non-invasive biomarkers for risk stratification in this high-risk population.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The advent of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for people with HIV (PWH) has transformed their condition into a chronic, manageable condition [1]. Chronic liver disease remains a significant cause of non-AIDS-related mortality in PWH [2], with the primary etiology shifting from viral hepatitis to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) [3]. MASLD ranges from a relatively benign accumulation of triglycerides in the hepatocytes, to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), a severe liver condition characterized by inflammation leading to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis [4,5]. The increased severity of this condition in PWH is driven by the higher occurrence of traditional metabolic risk factors, alongside HIV-specific contributors such as chronic inflammation, ART-induced mitochondrial damage, and lipodystrophy [6]. Thus, clarifying the underlying processes that drive MASH and liver fibrosis in PWH is pivotal to improving both diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Liver cross-talk with other organs, particularly the gut–liver axis, has recently been recognized as a critical factor in MASLD progression [7]. Notably, the gut microbiota is the primary component driving the dynamics of the gut–liver axis. Reduced gut microbiota diversity in PWH may elevate the risk of liver injury driven by disruptions in the gut–liver axis, ultimately contributing to significant liver fibrosis [8]. Recent findings indicate that Ruminococcus, Streptococcus, Holdemanella, Blautia, and Lactobacillus are more abundant in PWH who have MASLD compared with those without the liver condition [9]. Another study in PWH linked steatosis to depletions in Akkermansia muciniphilia and Bacteroides dorei, along with an increased abundance of Prevotella copri, Finegoldia magna, and Ruminococcus bromii [10]. Functional analysis has also identified abnormalities in microbiome-expressed metabolic pathways among MASLD patients without HIV [11]. Excessive or decreased short-chain fatty acid production [12] as well as amino acids [12,13] and folate depletion [13,14] are related to MASH progression due to the depletion of glutathione, the liver’s key intracellular antioxidant. However, the role of gut bacterial imbalances in metabolic pathways in MASLD in PWH remains unclear.
In this study, we aimed to characterize the microbiota signatures and investigate the alterations in enzymatic pathways associated with severe MASLD, defined as the presence of MASH or significant liver fibrosis, compared with non-severe MASLD, in PWH with no viral hepatitis coinfection or significant alcohol intake.

2. Results

Among 110 individuals screened from the LIVEHIV cohort, 34 were enrolled after applying the exclusion criteria (Figure 1). The characteristics of the study population stratified by severe MASLD status are presented in Table 1. Overall, the mean age was 51 years (standard deviation of 10), the majority were male, and the most represented ethnicities were White and Hispanic. Sixteen (47%) patients were overweight and twelve (35%) were obese. MASH diagnosed by CK-18 was present in 14 (41%) patients, while 8 (24%) had significant liver fibrosis by LSM. A total of 18 (53%) PWH were classified as severe MASLD. Compared with those with non-severe MASLD, PWH with severe MASLD had a higher absolute CD4 cell count, higher ALT, and higher triglycerides and fasting glucose. They also presented with higher CAP values. As expected, patients with severe MASLD had higher LSM and CK-18 values compared with those with non-severe MASLD.

2.1. Microbiota Diversity and Taxonomic Differences

We performed alpha- (Chao1, Shannon’s, and Phaith’s Diversities) and beta-diversity (Aitchison’s distance) analyses but the analyses were not significant. Subsequently, we analyzed genus-level differences between the two study groups and identified several significant variations (Figure 2). Within the phylum Firmicutes, patients with severe MASLD showed a lower abundance of Senegalimassilia, the Eubacterium ruminantium group, Dialister, Catenibacterium, Kandleria, the Family XIII AD3011 group, Asaccharospora, the Christensenellaceae R 7 group, Clostridium sensu stricto, Oscillospiraceae UCG-005, the Ruminococcaceae NK4A214 group, Libanicoccus, Romboutsia, the Eubacterium siraeum group, Megasphaera and a higher abundance of the Ruminococcus gnavus group, Negativibacillus, the Eubacterium eligens group, Anaerostipes, Holdemanella, Subdoligranulum, the Eubacterium hallii group, and Butyricicoccus. Among Bacteroidetes, a lower abundance of Prevotella 7, Phascolarctobacterium, Alloprevotella, Prevotella 9, and Prevotella were observed in severe MASLD, whereas Bacteroides was more abundant. Within less represented phyla, Desulfovibrio, Slackia, Olsenella, and Lutaonella were also reduced in severe MASLD.

2.2. Microbial Functional Pathways

Functional profiling revealed no significant MASLD group-level differences in the overall KEGG pathways for fatty acid degradation, amino acids metabolism, or folate biosynthesis pathways. However, the enzyme-level analysis identified the differential expression of several microbial genes. In the severe MASLD group, we observed a statistically significant higher predicted presence of succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase, L-asparaginase beta-aspartyl peptidase, alanine dehydrogenase, aspartate carbamoyltransferase regulatory subunit, and alanine dehydrogenase (K19244), alongside a lower predicted presence of alanine dehydrogenase (K00259), glutamate dehydrogenase (NAD(P)+), and 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase (Figure 3a). Regarding fatty acid metabolism (Figure 3b), the predicted presence of 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase, rubredoxin NAD reductase, and aldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) was significantly higher in severe MASLD. In contrast, the predicted presence of glutaryl-CoA dehydrogenase was significantly lower. Regarding folate biosynthesis (Figure 3c), severe MASLD was associated with a higher predicted presence of D-erythro-7,8-dihydroneopterin triphosphate epimerase, dihydromonapterin reductase, dihydroneopterin triphosphate diphosphatase, dihydroneopterin aldolase, and 4a-hydroxytetrahydrobiopterin dehydratase. Conversely, lower predicted levels were observed for para-aminobenzoate synthetase (K03342 and K13950).

2.3. Integration with Clinical Features

To assess whether specific microbial signatures or enzymatic pathways correlated with clinical features, we conducted exploratory correlation analyses. The expression of dihydroneopterin triphosphate diphosphatase (K08310) moderately correlated with LSM (Supplementary Figure S1). The expression levels of microbial enzymes—including 7-cyano-7-deazaguanine reductase (K06879), succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (K08324), 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase/enoyl-CoA hydratase/3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA epimerase/enoyl-CoA isomerase (K01825), GTP-cyclohydrolase I (K01497), erythron-7,8-dihydroneopterin-triphosphate epimerase (K07589), and dihydromonapterin reductase/dihydrofolate reductase (K13938)—correlated with serum triglyceride levels (Supplementary Figure S2). Similarly, the abundance of the bacterial genera Holdemanella and Escherichia-Shigella was associated with serum triglycerides (Supplementary Figure S3). These findings suggest possible links between the microbiome and hepatic or metabolic parameters. We further constructed multivariable models incorporating microbial genera, enzyme profiles, and clinical covariates. However, no statistically significant associations were retained after correction for multiple comparisons, likely due to sample size limitations and inter-individual variability.

3. Discussion

This study highlights the potential role of the gut microbiome in contributing to significant liver fibrosis and necroinflammation in MASLD, providing valuable insights into the underlying pathophysiology in PWH. Our study builds upon and extends the work of Martínez-Sanz et al. [9] and Yanavich et al. [10] by focusing on the association between the microbiota signature and MASLD severity. Importantly, we employed innovative techniques, with the use of CK-18 as a non-invasive biomarker of hepatocellular apoptosis, and emphasized alterations in the metabolic pathways known to play a pathogenic role, offering new insights into disease mechanism. Previous studies have reported that CK-18 achieves a sensitivity of 92.9% and specificity of 63% for MASH diagnosis [15], while FibroScan® has demonstrated a reliable accuracy in diagnosing significant fibrosis in PWH when compared with paired liver biopsies [16].
Within the phylum Firmicutes, the severe MASLD group exhibited decreased levels of bacteria recognized as protective factors against MASLD, including Senegalimassilia [17], Dialister [9], Catenibacterium [9], the Christensenellaceae R 7 group [18], Clostridium sensu stricto [19], and Oscillospiraceae UCG-005 [20]. Moreover, we found an enrichment of the genera the Ruminococcus gnavus group [21], Negativibacillus [22], Holdemanella [9], Subdoligranulum [23], Eubacterium hallii group [24], and Butyricicoccus [23,25] which are associated with MASLD and visceral fat accumulation. Among taxa correlated with serum triglycerides, we observed Holdemanella and Escherichia–Shigella, consistent with prior associations to inflammation and lipid metabolism. Contrary to prior studies, we observed a higher abundance of the Eubacterium eligens group, which has been associated with a reduction in visceral and subcutaneous fat [26], and Anaerostipes which is believed to be protective against MASLD due to butyrate production [27], but has also been associated with diabetes [28]. This unexpected enrichment may reflect functional divergence at the strain level or altered metabolic output in the context of HIV infection. Furthermore, we observed a reduced abundance of Megasphaera, previously linked to MASLD [29,30,31,32], along with Romboutsia, although its association with MASLD and disease severity remains inconclusive. These discrepancies may stem from differences in our study population, which is Canadian and likely adheres to a Western diet in a manner distinct from the populations in the cited studies. Additionally, unlike the referenced articles, our study included patients with HIV, a condition known to influence human microbiota composition [33]. PWH exhibit impaired α-diversity and unique microbiota signatures at the genus level [34]. Notably, this condition is characterized by an enrichment of Gammaproteobacteria and a concomitant depletion of beneficial taxa [35]. Consistent with previous findings, the severe MASLD group showed a reduced abundance of Bacteroidetes genera associated with HIV, such as Prevotella and Alloprevotella, which appear to have a protective role against MASLD [9]. Phascolarctobacterium levels were reduced in severe MASLD, in contrast to a previous study that associated this genus with increased liver stiffness [36]. Among the Bacteroidetes genera, Bacteroides was the only one found to be more prevalent, although its role in MASLD remains controversial [37]. Regarding less represented phyla, we found a decreased abundance of Desulfovibrio, Slackia, Olsenella, and Lutaonella. While Olsenella has been reported to exert a protective role in MASLD [38], findings related to Desulfovibrio remain discordant. The literature on the genera Slackia and Lutaonella remains scarce, but the former has been associated with lean MASLD in a single study [39].
Regarding amino acid metabolism, a decreased biosynthesis of alanine, aspartate, and glutamate has been described in PWH [40]. We found no significant differences between MASLD severity groups, but interestingly observed a predicted higher expression of L-asparaginase beta-aspartyl peptidase (K01251) in the severe MASLD group. This enzyme catalyzes the conversion of the amino acid L-asparagine into aspartate and ammonia [41]. It is utilized in chemotherapy for acute lymphocytic leukemia and has been linked to hepatic steatosis in a dose-dependent manner, due to the depletion of asparagine and arginine which may result from associated arginase activity [42]. This leads to persistent hepatic steatosis with minimal inflammation and necrosis, resembling the steatosis seen in Kwashiorkor and derived from arginine depletion [42]. These findings are concordant with previous literature, showing significantly reduced arginine levels in plasma in severe fibrosis compared with mild/moderate stages [43]. Concordantly, the expression of 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase (K00266) was estimated as being diminished in our patients with more severe disease, supporting the hypothesis of impaired antioxidant capacity. This enzyme is involved in the redox balance and the proline degradation pathway, converting proline into glutamate [44].
Concerning fatty acid metabolism, we could not find evidence for reduced degradation levels in severe MASLD. Conversely, several enzymes were predicted as upregulated, including 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (K00074), rubredoxin NAD+ reductase (K05912), and aldehyde dehydrogenase NAD+ (K00128), suggesting increased microbial fatty acid degradation. This may represent a maladaptive feature of this population, more exposed to dietary fatty acids and host lipid burden.
The analysis of the microbiome folate pathway did not show the anticipated reduction in biosynthesis expression in the severe MASLD group. A decreased microbiota production of group B vitamins in PWH has already been described [40]. However, since determining the extent to which gut-derived vitamins influence the host’s systemic levels remains challenging and is diet-dependent, these results should be interpreted with caution. Interestingly, we observed a suggested increased expression of several enzymes involved in folate metabolism, including GTP cyclohydrolase (K01497), erythron-7,8-dihydroneopterin-triphosphate-epimerase (K07589), dihydromonapterin reductase/dihydrofolate reductase (K13938), and dihydroneopterin triphosphate diphosphatase (K08310), the latter of which was also correlated with liver stiffness. The role of folate in MASLD remains unclear, but has been linked to hyperhomocysteinemia [45], choline metabolism [46], AMPK pathway activation [47], and NADPH oxidase synthesis [48]. Several enzymes, including 7-cyano-7-deazaguanine reductase (K06879), dihydroneopterin triphosphate diphosphatase (K08310), and succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (K08324), were correlated with serum triglycerides, suggesting functional microbiome–host interactions in lipid regulation. While these correlations are exploratory and require validation, they may offer insights into early dysbiosis-associated mechanisms in MASLD progression.
We should also consider that certain ART classes and specific drugs have been associated with an increased risk of MASLD. For example, Bischoff et al. [49] reported progressive increases in hepatic steatosis among patients treated with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). However, other longitudinal studies did not observe a significant impact of these agents on liver fibrosis, suggesting that their contribution may be limited to steatosis rather than fibrogenesis [50]. Beyond hepatic effects, ART can also influence the gut microbiome, leading to both beneficial and adverse changes. While ART effectively suppresses HIV replication and restores immune function, it does not fully normalize gut health: persistent inflammation, microbial translocation, and the incomplete recovery of beneficial bacterial communities are frequently observed [51]. Importantly, different ART regimens appear to differentially affect the gut microbiome, and certain bacterial taxa associated with metabolic homeostasis may not recover under long-term ART. Taken together, these findings highlight that the interplay between ART, steatosis, dysmetabolism, and the gut microbiome remains incompletely understood and warrants further investigation. Given our limited sample size, we were unable to explore the association between ART and gut microbiome.
Our study has several limitations, including the lack of a control group without HIV and of a group of PWH without MASLD. Additionally, the relatively small sample size and the absence of histological confirmation, excluded due to its invasiveness, represent further limitations of the study. Another limitation is the lack of detailed information on patients’ dietary habits or supplement consumption, which may influence microbiota composition. Despite these constraints, this study provides valuable insights into the relationship between gut dysbiosis, metabolic pathways, and liver disease in PWH. To confirm the significance of microbiota signatures and metabolic alterations in this population, larger multi-center studies are warranted.
In conclusion, our study suggests a possible link between gut dysbiosis and MASLD severity in PWH, highlighting metabolic pathway alterations potentially linked to disease progression. These insights offer a new perspective on MASLD in PWH, paving the way for future research into the pathogenic mechanisms of dysbiosis.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design and Participants

This is a single-center cross-sectional study conducted at the Chronic Viral Illness Service of the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC). From September 2017 to December 2024, all participants were enrolled in conjunction with the prospective clinical cohort LIVEr disease in HIV (LIVEHIV) [52]. Consecutive patients without viral hepatitis coinfection or antibiotic use within the past two months were offered enrollment into this sub-study. Participants were included if they met the following inclusion criteria: (i) 18 years or older; (ii) HIV infection documented by positive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with Western blot confirmation; (iii) on stable treatment with ART with controlled infection (HIV RNA < 20 copies/mL) for at least 6 months; (iv) having a diagnosis of hepatic steatosis, defined as a controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) ≥ 238 dB/m [29,53]. The exclusion criteria were (i) other causes of chronic liver disease, including coinfection with hepatitis B or C virus (by serologies), significant alcohol consumption (defined as >21 drinks/week in men and >14 drinks/week in women [5]), hemochromatosis, Wilson’s disease, autoimmune hepatitis, or previous liver transplantation; (ii) a history of inflammatory bowel disease or bariatric surgery; (iii) malnutrition (defined as body mass index, [BMI] < 18.5 Kg/m2); (iv) treatment with antibiotics within 2 months before inclusion; (v) pregnancy; (vi) decompensated cirrhosis; (vii) hepatocellular carcinoma.

4.2. Ethics

This study was approved in 2017 by the Research Ethics Board of the Research Institute of the MUHC (2017-2926) and conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrolment. The manuscript was prepared according to the STROBE statement checklist of items.

4.3. Transient Elastography Examination with CAP

During the study visit, a liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and CAP were acquired using vibration-controlled transient elastography (Fibroscan®, Echosens, Paris, France) on patients fasting for at least 3 h by an experienced operator. The M probe was routinely utilized, while the XL probe was employed if the M probe was unsuccessful, or the patient had a BMI exceeding 30 Kg/m2. A transient elastography examination was considered reliable if it met a minimum of 10 validated measurements and an interquartile range (IQR) below 30% of the median value [54].

4.4. Clinical and Biological Parameters

We collected data within 3 months from the transient elastography examination, namely demographic information, time since HIV diagnosis (defined as the interval between the date of patients’ first positive HIV test and the date of the visit), ART class (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTIs], protease inhibitors [PIs], INSTI, TAF, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NRTIs] including stavudine and didanosine), BMI, liver serum biomarkers, lipid profile, and hematological and immune–virological parameters. Undetectable viral load was defined as HIV viral load < 20 copies/mL. Overweight and obesity status were defined as a BMI 25–29 Kg/m2 and ≥30 Kg/m2, respectively. Questionnaires, including the AUDIT-C for alcohol use and a dedicated questionnaire for drug use, were administered. Mild alcohol consumption was defined as any intake <21 drinks/week in men and <14 drinks/week in women. MASLD was defined as hepatic steatosis by CAP plus at least one of the following criteria: (i) overweight or obesity; (ii) previous diagnosis or treatment for type 2 diabetes; (iii) blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg OR treatment for hypertension; (iv) triglycerides > 1.69 mmol/L or lipid-lowering therapy; (v) HDL cholesterol < 1.03 mmol/L (males) OR < 1.30 mmol/L (females) OR lipid-lowering therapy. Severe MASLD was defined as the presence of MASH, indicated by cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) > 130.5 U/L [15,55,56], and/or significant liver fibrosis, defined as LSM > 7.1 kPa [16].
Plasma and stool sample collection, microbial DNA extraction, amplicon library construction, and sequencing were also conducted.
Immediately after collection at the hospital, plasma samples were centrifuged and stored at −80 °C until used. Stools were collected by patients into RNA-Later stabilization solution (ThermoFisher Scientific, Montreal, QC, Canada) and stored at −80 °C within 7 h of collection. Plasma was used to measure CK-18 using a commercially available human cytokeratin ELISA kit (MJS Biolynx inc, Brockville, ON, Canada), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Stool sample DNA was isolated at the laboratory of the Chronic Viral Illness Service of MUHC using the PowerSoil DNA isolation kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Amplicon library preparation and sequencing for the stool microbiota analysis was then performed at the Genome Québec Innovation Center. Amplicon libraries were constructed with bacterial/archael PCR primers 347F and 803R, which target the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. A second PCR was performed to add sample barcodes and the adaptor sequences used by the Illumina sequencing systems. Samples were normalized using the Quant-iT™ PicoGreen® dsDNA Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Montreal, QC, Canada), then pooled and purified using Agencourt AMPure beads (Beckman Coulter, Mississauga, ON, Canada). The library was then sequenced on the MiSeq system (Miseq v2 reagent kit, 500 cycles PE—Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), spiked with 20% PhiX for quality control (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Demultiplexed forward and reverse 16S rRNA gene sequences were provided by Genome Québec and aligned using the Paired-End Read merger (PEAR). To obtain the Amplicon Sequences Variants (ASVs), sequences were then processed in R, version 4.4.2, using the package Divisive Amplicon Denoising Algorithm 2 (DADA2) [57] and the SILVA reference database, version 138.1 [58]. FastTree 2 was used to calculate a phylogenetic tree of sequences [59] and data were explored using the phyloseq package [60]. To infer microbial functional profiles, predicted metagenomes were generated using Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) [61]. This tool infers the abundance of gene families, including metabolic enzymes, based on the 16S rRNA gene data. Predicted gene abundances were then mapped to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Orthology identifiers and functionally annotated using the KEGG database [62]. The expression of metabolic enzymes pathways was inferred from these KEGG Orthology profiles, allowing for comparative analysis across study groups.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Taxonomic differences were evaluated using a generalized linear model with a negative binomial distribution [63], adjusting for sex as a confounding variable. Statistical differences between groups were identified using estimated marginal means using the emmeans package [64]. A correlation analysis was performed using Pearson’s test on normally distributed data, or Spearman’s correlations elsewhere. Qualitative variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test and quantitative variable using Mann–Whitney’s test. All hypotheses’ tests were conducted at a 5% level of significance (2-sided).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26178165/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.R., T.P., M.C., M.S. and G.S.; Methodology, F.C., B.L., L.R.B., J.-P.R., M.B.K., J.C., J.F., L.-P.H., C.T.C., A.D.P., T.P., M.C., M.S. and G.S.; Validation, M.S. and G.S.; Formal analysis, M.C. and G.S.; Investigation, R.R., F.C., L.R.B., M.B.K., M.C., M.S. and G.S.; Resources, J.S., J.C., A.D.P. and G.S.; Data curation, R.R., B.L., L.R.B., J.-P.R., J.S., J.F., L.-P.H., C.T.C., T.P., M.C. and G.S.; Writing—original draft, R.R., M.C. and G.S.; Writing—review and editing, F.C., B.L., J.-P.R., M.B.K., J.S., J.C., J.F., L.-P.H., C.T.C., A.D.P., T.P., M.S. and G.S.; Visualization, R.R. and M.C.; Supervision, M.S. and G.S.; Funding acquisition, G.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by an operating grant from the AIDS and Infectious Diseases Network of Fonds de Recherche Québec-Santé (FRQ-S). Cecilia T. Costiniuk is supported by a Senior Salary Award from FRQ-S. Marina B. Klein is supported by a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair. Giada Sebastiani is supported by a Merite Salary Award from FRQ-S (#366391).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved in 2 December 2016 by the Research Ethics Board of the Research Institute of the MUHC (2017-2926) and conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent prior to enrolment. The manuscript was prepared according to the STROBE statement checklist of items.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

Jean-Pierre Routy has acted as a speaker for Merck, Gilead, Abbvie, and ViiV, served as an advisory board member for Merck, ViiV, Abbvie, and Gilead, and has received research funding from Merck. Joseph Cox has received research and project funding (paid to institution) from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Abbvie, and received personal remuneration for lectures from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead. Cecilia T. Costiniuk has served on advisory boards for ViiV Healthcare and Gilead, and received grant support from Merck, Gilead, ViiV, and Tilray Inc. She has also received travel support to attend conferences from Gilead and ViiV Healthcare. Julian Falutz has acted as a speaker for ViiV Healthcare and Merck and served on an advisory board for Serono. Giada Sebastiani has acted as a speaker for Merck, Gilead, Abbvie, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk, and served as an advisory board member for Merck, Novo Nordisk, GSK, and Gilead. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Collins, L.F.; Palella, F.J.; Mehta, C.C.; Holloway, J.; Stosor, V.; Lake, J.E.; Brown, T.T.; Topper, E.F.; Naggie, S.; Anastos, K.; et al. Aging-Related Comorbidity Burden Among Women and Men with or At-Risk for HIV in the US, 2008–2019. JAMA Netw. Open 2023, 6, e2327584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Trickey, A.; McGinnis, K.; Gill, M.J.; Abgrall, S.; Berenguer, J.; Wyen, C.; Hessamfar, M.; Reiss, P.; Kusejko, K.; Silverberg, M.J.; et al. Longitudinal trends in causes of death among adults with HIV on antiretroviral therapy in Europe and North America from 1996 to 2020: A collaboration of cohort studies. Lancet HIV 2024, 11, e176–e185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gawrieh, S.; Vilar-Gomez, E.; Woreta, T.A.; Lake, J.E.; Wilson, L.A.; Price, J.C.; Naggie, S.; Sterling, R.K.; Heath, S.; Corey, K.E.; et al. Prevalence of steatotic liver disease, MASLD, MetALD and significant fibrosis in people with HIV in the United States. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2023, 59, 666–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Riazi, K.; Azhari, H.; Charette, J.H.; E Underwood, F.; A King, J.; Afshar, E.E.; Swain, M.G.; Congly, S.E.; Kaplan, G.G.; Shaheen, A.-A. The prevalence and incidence of NAFLD worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 7, 851–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rinella, M.E.; Neuschwander-Tetri, B.A.; Siddiqui, M.S.; Abdelmalek, M.F.; Caldwell, S.; Barb, D.; Kleiner, D.E.; Loomba, R. AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 2023, 77, 1797–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cervo, A.; Shengir, M.; Patel, K.; Sebastiani, G. NASH in HIV. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020, 17, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vallianou, N.G.; Kounatidis, D.; Psallida, S.; Vythoulkas-Biotis, N.; Adamou, A.; Zachariadou, T.; Kargioti, S.; Karampela, I.; Dalamaga, M. NAFLD/MASLD and the Gut–Liver Axis: From Pathogenesis to Treatment Options. Metabolites 2024, 14, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Duarte, M.J.; Tien, P.C.; Somsouk, M.; Price, J.C. The human microbiome and gut–liver axis in people living with HIV. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 2023, 20, 170–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Martínez-Sanz, J.; Talavera-Rodríguez, A.; Díaz-Álvarez, J.; Cancio-Suárez, M.R.; Rodríguez, J.M.; Alba, C.; Montes, M.L.; Martín-Mateos, R.; Burgos-Santamaría, D.; Moreno, S.; et al. A gut microbiome signature for HIV and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1297378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yanavich, C.; Perazzo, H.; Li, F.; Tobin, N.; Lee, D.; Zabih, S.; Morata, M.; Almeida, C.; Veloso, V.G.; Grinsztejn, B.; et al. A pilot study of microbial signatures of liver disease in those with HIV mono-infection in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. AIDS 2021, 36, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, J.; Vitetta, L. Gut Microbiota Metabolites in NAFLD Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Blaak, E.E.; Canfora, E.E.; Theis, S.; Frost, G.; Groen, A.K.; Mithieux, G.; Nauta, A.; Scott, K.; Stahl, B.; Van Harsselaar, J.; et al. Short chain fatty acids in human gut and metabolic health. Benef. Microbes 2020, 11, 411–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Simon, J.; Nuñez-García, M.; Fernández-Tussy, P.; Barbier-Torres, L.; Fernández-Ramos, D.; Gómez-Santos, B.; Buqué, X.; Lopitz-Otsoa, F.; Goikoetxea-Usandizaga, N.; Serrano-Macia, M.; et al. Targeting Hepatic Glutaminase 1 Ameliorates Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis by Restoring Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Triglyceride Assembly. Cell Metab. 2020, 31, 605–622.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, B.; Cao, J.-C.; Liu, F.-R.; Deng, Z.; Chen, C.-J.; Sun, Y.-Y. Folate intake and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in US adults. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2023, 32, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Arab, J.P.; Hernández-Rocha, C.; Morales, C.; Vargas, J.I.; Solís, N.; Pizarro, M.; Robles, C.; Sandoval, D.; Ponthus, S.; Benítez, C.; et al. Serum cytokeratin-18 fragment levels as noninvasive marker of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the Chilean population. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. (Engl. Ed.) 2017, 40, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lemoine, M.; Assoumou, L.; De Wit, S.; Girard, P.-M.; Valantin, M.A.; Katlama, C.; Necsoi, C.; Campa, P.; Huefner, A.D.; Wiesch, J.S.Z.; et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Markers of Steatosis, NASH, and Liver Fibrosis in HIV-Monoinfected Individuals at Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): Results From the ECHAM Study. Am. J. Ther. 2019, 80, e86–e94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dai, W.; Cai, D.; Zhou, S.; Li, A.; Xie, J.; Zhang, J. Uncovering a causal connection between the Lachnoclostridium genus in fecal microbiota and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1276790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pan, T.; Su, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yi, F.; Chen, Y. Impact of gut microbiota on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Insights from a leave-one-out cross-validation study. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1320279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lanthier, N.; Rodriguez, J.; Nachit, M.; Hiel, S.; Trefois, P.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Cani, P.D.; Bindels, L.B.; Thissen, J.-P.; Delzenne, N.M. Microbiota analysis and transient elastography reveal new extra-hepatic components of liver steatosis and fibrosis in obese patients. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Korobeinikova, A.V.; Zlobovskaya, O.A.; Sheptulina, A.F.; Ashniev, G.A.; Bobrova, M.M.; Yafarova, A.A.; Akasheva, D.U.; Kabieva, S.S.; Bakoev, S.Y.; Zagaynova, A.V.; et al. Gut Microbiota Patterns in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment Using Three Analysis Methods. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grahnemo, L.; Nethander, M.; Coward, E.; Gabrielsen, M.E.; Sree, S.; Billod, J.-M.; Engstrand, L.; Abrahamsson, S.; Langhammer, A.; Hveem, K.; et al. Cross-sectional associations between the gut microbe Ruminococcus gnavus and features of the metabolic syndrome: The HUNT study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022, 10, 481–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mai, H.; Yang, X.; Xie, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Q.; Wei, Y.; Yang, Y.; Lu, D.; Ye, L.; Cui, P.; et al. The role of gut microbiota in the occurrence and progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1257903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, C.; Wu, J.; Yang, L.; Hu, Q.; Li, L.; Yang, Y.; Hu, J.; Pan, D.; Zhao, Q. Altered gut microbial profile accompanied by abnormal short chain fatty acid metabolism exacerbates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease progression. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yan, H.; Qin, Q.; Chen, J.; Yan, S.; Li, T.; Gao, X.; Yang, Y.; Li, A.; Ding, S. Gut Microbiome Alterations in Patients with Visceral Obesity Based on Quantitative Computed Tomography. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 11, 823262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Forlano, R.; Martinez-Gili, L.; Takis, P.; Miguens-Blanco, J.; Liu, T.; Triantafyllou, E.; Skinner, C.; Loomba, R.; Thursz, M.; Marchesi, J.R.; et al. Disruption of gut barrier integrity and host–microbiome interactions underlie MASLD severity in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2304157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, L.; Ouyang, Y.; Li, H.; Shen, L.; Ni, Y.; Fang, Q.; Wu, G.; Qian, L.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, J.; et al. Metabolic phenotypes and the gut microbiota in response to dietary resistant starch type 2 in normal-weight subjects: A randomized crossover trial. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Du, L.; Zhang, K.; Liang, L.; Yang, Y.; Lu, D.; Zhou, Y.; Ren, T.; Fan, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; et al. Multi-omics analyses of the gut microbiota and metabolites in children with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. mSystems 2025, 10, e0114824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dong, T.S.; Luu, K.; Lagishetty, V.; Sedighian, F.; Woo, S.-L.; Dreskin, B.W.; Katzka, W.; Chang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Arias-Jayo, N.; et al. Gut microbiome profiles associated with steatosis severity in metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Hepatoma Res. 2021, 7, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arenas-Pinto, A.; Bakewell, N.; Milinkovic, A.; Williams, I.; Vera, J.; Post, F.A.; Anderson, J.; Beynon, M.; O’Brien, A.; Doyle, N.; et al. Hepatic steatosis in people older and younger than fifty who are living with HIV and HIV-negative controls: A cross-sectional study nested within the POPPY cohort. HIV Med. 2023, 25, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, C.; Xu, J.; Xu, X.; Xu, W.; Tong, B.; Wang, S.; Ji, R.; Tan, Y.; Zhu, Y. Characteristics of gut microbiota in patients with metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cornejo-Pareja, I.; Amiar, M.R.; Ocaña-Wilhelmi, L.; Soler-Humanes, R.; Arranz-Salas, I.; Garrido-Sánchez, L.; Gutiérrez-Repiso, C.; Tinahones, F.J. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with morbid obesity: The gut microbiota axis as a potential pathophysiology mechanism. J. Gastroenterol. 2024, 59, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Caussy, C.; Tripathi, A.; Humphrey, G.; Bassirian, S.; Singh, S.; Faulkner, C.; Bettencourt, R.; Rizo, E.; Richards, L.; Xu, Z.Z.; et al. A gut microbiome signature for cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Isnard, S.; Lin, J.; Fombuena, B.; Ouyang, J.; Varin, T.V.; Richard, C.; Marette, A.; Ramendra, R.; Planas, D.; Marchand, L.R.; et al. Repurposing Metformin in Nondiabetic People With HIV: Influence on Weight and Gut Microbiota. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, ofaa338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhao, H.; Feng, A.; Luo, D.; Wu, H.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, J.; Lin, Y.; Li, L.; Zou, H. Altered gut microbiota is associated with different immunologic responses to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected men who have sex with men. J. Med. Virol. 2023, 95, e28674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vujkovic-Cvijin, I.; Sortino, O.; Verheij, E.; Sklar, J.; Wit, F.W.; Kootstra, N.A.; Sellers, B.; Brenchley, J.M.; Ananworanich, J.; Van Der Loeff, M.S.; et al. HIV-associated gut dysbiosis is independent of sexual practice and correlates with noncommunicable diseases. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Y.; Yan, S.; Sheng, S.; Qin, Q.; Chen, J.; Li, W.; Li, T.; Gao, X.; Wang, L.; Ang, L.; et al. Comparison of gut microbiota in male MAFLD patients with varying liver stiffness. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 873048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, J.; Zhou, J.; He, Z.; Li, H. Bacteroides and NAFLD: Pathophysiology and therapy. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1288856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhang, L.; Zi, L.; Kuang, T.; Wang, K.; Qiu, Z.; Wu, Z.; Liu, L.; Liu, R.; Wang, P.; Wang, W. Investigating causal associations among gut microbiota, metabolites, and liver diseases: A Mendelian randomization study. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1159148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Iino, C.; Endo, T.; Iino, K.; Tateda, T.; Sato, S.; Igarashi, G.; Mikami, K.; Sakuraba, H.; Yokoyama, Y.; Nakaji, S.; et al. Reduced Equol Production and Gut Microbiota Features in Men with Lean Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Am. J. Men’s Health 2022, 16, 15579883221115598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, S.Y.; Faraci, G.; Nanda, S.; Ter-Saakyan, S.; Love, T.M.; Mack, W.J.; Dubé, M.P.; Lee, H.Y. Gut microbiome in people living with HIV is associated with impaired thiamine and folate syntheses. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 160, 105209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Batool, T.; Makky, E.A.; Jalal, M.; Yusoff, M.M. A Comprehensive Review on l-Asparaginase and Its Applications. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 178, 900–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kamal, N.; Koh, C.; Samala, N.; Fontana, R.J.; Stolz, A.; Durazo, F.; Hayashi, P.H.; Phillips, E.; Wang, T.; Hoofnagle, J.H.; et al. Asparaginase-induced hepatotoxicity: Rapid development of cholestasis and hepatic steatosis. Hepatol. Int. 2019, 13, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ajaz, S.; McPhail, M.J.; Gnudi, L.; Trovato, F.M.; Mujib, S.; Napoli, S.; Carey, I.; Agarwal, K. Mitochondrial dysfunction as a mechanistic biomarker in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Mitochondrion 2021, 57, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Phang, J.M.; Pandhare, J.; Liu, Y. The Metabolism of Proline as Microenvironmental Stress Substrate. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 2008S–2015S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Charatcharoenwitthaya, P.; Levy, C.; Angulo, P.; Keach, J.; Jorgensen, R.; Lindor, K.D. Open-label pilot study of folic acid in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Liver Int. 2007, 27, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Christensen, K.E.; Wu, Q.; Wang, X.; Deng, L.; Caudill, M.A.; Rozen, R. Steatosis in mice is associated with gender, folate intake, and expression of genes of one-carbon metabolism. J. Nutr. 2010, 140, 1736–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sid, V.; Wu, N.; Sarna, L.K.; Siow, Y.L.; House, J.D.; O, K. Folic acid supplementation during high-fat diet feeding restores AMPK activation via an AMP-LKB1-dependent mechanism. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2015, 309, R1215–R1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sarna, L.K.; Wu, N.; Wang, P.; Hwang, S.-Y.; Siow, Y.L.; O, K. Folic acid supplementation attenuates high fat diet induced hepatic oxidative stress via regulation of NADPH oxidase. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2012, 90, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bischoff, J.; Gu, W.; Schwarze-Zander, C.; Boesecke, C.; Wasmuth, J.-C.; van Bremen, K.; Dold, L.; Rockstroh, J.K.; Trebicka, J. Stratifying the risk of NAFLD in patients with HIV under combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). eClinicalMedicine 2021, 40, 101116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guaraldi, G.; Milic, J.; Renzetti, S.; Motta, F.; Cinque, F.; Bischoff, J.; Desilani, A.; Conti, J.; Medioli, F.; del Monte, M.; et al. The effect of weight gain and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease on liver fibrosis progression and regression in people with HIV. AIDS 2024, 38, 1323–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pinto-Cardoso, S.; Klatt, N.R.; Reyes-Terán, G. Impact of antiretroviral drugs on the microbiome: Unknown answers to important questions. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 2018, 13, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cinque, F.; Saeed, S.; Kablawi, D.; Ballesteros, L.R.; Elgretli, W.; Moodie, E.E.M.; Price, C.; Monteith, K.; Cooper, C.; Walmsley, S.L.; et al. Role of fatty liver in the epidemic of advanced chronic liver disease among people with HIV: Protocol for the Canadian LIVEHIV multicentre prospective cohort. BMJ Open 2023, 13, e076547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Macías, J.; González, J.; Tural, C.; Ortega-González, E.; Pulido, F.; Rubio, R.; Cifuentes, C.; Díaz-Menéndez, M.; Jou, A.; Rubio, P.; et al. Prevalence and factors associated with liver steatosis as measured by transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter in HIV-infected patients. AIDS 2014, 28, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Boursier, J.; Zarski, J.; de Ledinghen, V.; Rousselet, M.; Sturm, N.; Lebail, B.; Fouchard-Hubert, I.; Gallois, Y.; Oberti, F.; Bertrais, S.; et al. Determination of reliability criteria for liver stiffness evaluation by transient elastography. Hepatology 2012, 57, 1182–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sebastiani, G.; Saeed, S.; Lebouche, B.; de Pokomandy, A.; Szabo, J.; Haraoui, L.-P.; Routy, J.-P.; Wong, P.; Deschenes, M.; Ghali, P.; et al. Vitamin E is an effective treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in HIV mono-infected patients. AIDS 2020, 34, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Shengir, M.; Lebouche, B.; Elgretli, W.; Saeed, S.; Ramanakumar, A.V.; Giannakis, A.; De Pokomandy, A.; Cox, J.; Costiniuk, C.; Routy, J.; et al. Switch to a raltegravir-based antiretroviral regimen in people with HIV and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A randomized controlled trial. HIV Med. 2023, 25, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Callahan, B.J.; Mcmurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glöckner, F.O. The SILVA Ribosomal RNA Gene Database Project: Improved Data Processing and Web-Based Tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Price, M.N.; Dehal, P.S.; Arkin, A.P. FastTree 2—Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. McMurdie, P.J.; Holmes, S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Douglas, G.M.; Maffei, V.J.; Zaneveld, J.R.; Yurgel, S.N.; Brown, J.R.; Taylor, C.M.; Huttenhower, C.; Langille, M.G.I. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kanehisa, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Furumichi, M.; Tanabe, M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 44, D457–D462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, X.; Mallick, H.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Cui, X.; Benson, A.K.; Yi, N. Negative binomial mixed models for analyzing microbiome count data. BMC Bioinform. 2017, 18, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Package ‘Emmeans’ Type Package. Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. 2025. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/emmeans.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2025).
Figure 1. Flow chart displaying the selection of study participants. Legend: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; CAP, controlled attenuation parameter; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; BMI, body mass index; MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; LSM, liver stiffness measurement.
Figure 1. Flow chart displaying the selection of study participants. Legend: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; CAP, controlled attenuation parameter; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; BMI, body mass index; MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; LSM, liver stiffness measurement.
Ijms 26 08165 g001
Figure 2. Heatmap illustration showing microbiome signature with significant differences between MASLD and severe MASLD groups, divided for study participants. Legend: MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; sMASLD, severe metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; UCG, unclassified clostridia group; Unc, unclassified. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. p-values were not corrected for multiple testing.
Figure 2. Heatmap illustration showing microbiome signature with significant differences between MASLD and severe MASLD groups, divided for study participants. Legend: MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; sMASLD, severe metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; UCG, unclassified clostridia group; Unc, unclassified. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. p-values were not corrected for multiple testing.
Ijms 26 08165 g002
Figure 3. Heatmap illustrations of upregulated expression of specific enzymes in the severe MASLD and non-severe MASLD groups, divided by study participants. (a) Alanine, aspartate, and glutamate patterns. (b) Fatty acid metabolism. (c) Folate biosynthesis. Legend: MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; sMASLD, severe metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; NADP, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; CoA, Coenzyme A; GTP, guanosine triphosphate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Heatmap illustrations of upregulated expression of specific enzymes in the severe MASLD and non-severe MASLD groups, divided by study participants. (a) Alanine, aspartate, and glutamate patterns. (b) Fatty acid metabolism. (c) Folate biosynthesis. Legend: MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; sMASLD, severe metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; NADP, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NAD, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; CoA, Coenzyme A; GTP, guanosine triphosphate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 26 08165 g003aIjms 26 08165 g003b
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population by severe MASLD status (n = 34).
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population by severe MASLD status (n = 34).
Whole Study
Population (n = 34)
Severe MASLD
(n = 18)
Non-Severe MASLD
(n = 16)
p-Value
Age (years)51 (10)53 (10)49 (11)0.293
Male sex (%)31 (91)17 (94)14 (88)0.476
Ethnicity (%)
White21 (62)13 (72)8 (50)0.286
Hispanic9 (26)2 (11)6 (38)
Black non-Hispanic3 (9)1 (6)2 (13)
MSM (%)21 (62)12 (67)9 (56)0.533
IDU (%)1 (3)1 (6)00.325
Current alcohol use (%)20 (59)11 (61)9 (56)0.773
Current smoking (%)3 (9)1 (6)2 (13)0.476
Hypertension (%)11 (32)7 (39)4 (25)0.387
Diabetes (%)4 (12)5 (28)00.027
History of cardiovascular event (%)4 (12)4 (22)1 (6)0.189
BMI (Kg/m2)28.9 (4)29.9 (5)28.0 (4)0.222
Time since HIV diagnosis (years)16.3 (7)17.5 (8)15.1 (7)0.388
CD4 cell count (cells/μL)581 (248)680 (249)488 (213)0.028
CD4/CD8 ratio1 (1)1 (1)1 (0)0.714
Current ART regimen (%)
NRTIs28 (82)13 (72)15 (94)0.100
NNRTIs9 (26)6 (33)3 (19)0.336
Protease inhibitors11 (32)8 (44)3 (19)0.097
Integrase inhibitors22 (65)10 (56)12 (75)0.236
ALT (IU/L)27 (11)32 (9)23 (11)0.014
AST (IU/L)25 (9)27 (8)23 (10)0.150
GGT (IU/L)44 (24)51 (26)39 (22)0.112
Platelets (109/L)215 (61)220 (68)210 (54)0.676
Bilirubin (mmol/L)13 (10)15 (14)10 (9)0.171
Albumin (g/L)43 (4)44 (3)42 (5)0.888
Creatinine (mmol/L)83 (14)82 (13)84 (15)0.646
Triglycerides (mmol/L)2 (2)2 (2)2 (1)0.033
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)5 (1)5 (1)5 (1)0.370
HDL (mmol/L)1 (0)1 (0)1 (0)0.106
LDL (mmol/L)3 (1)2 (1)3 (1)0.099
Fasting glucose (mmol/L)6 (1)6 (1)6 (0)0.003
Glycosylated Hemoglobin6 (1)6 (1)6 (0)0.407
Statin use (%)13 (38)9 (50)4 (25)0.134
LSM (kPa)7 (5)9 (6)5 (1)0.007
CAP (dB/m)300 (48)319 (49)283 (41)0.031
Cytokeratin-18 (U/L)185 (161)253 (177)81 (26)0.002
Legend: Continuous variables are expressed as mean (standard deviation) and categorical variables are expressed as frequencies (%). The p-values refer to Student’s t-test or χ2 test between severe MASLD and MASLD. Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ART, antiretroviral therapy; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; CAP, controlled attenuation parameter; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IDU, injection drug use; IUs, international units; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; LSM, liver stiffness measurement; MSM, men having sex with men; MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease; NNRTIs, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NRTIs, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Righetti, R.; Cinque, F.; Lebouché, B.; Ramos Ballesteros, L.; Routy, J.-P.; Klein, M.B.; Szabo, J.; Cox, J.; Falutz, J.; Haraoui, L.-P.; et al. Distinct Gut Microbiota Signatures Are Associated with Severity of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in People with HIV. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178165

AMA Style

Righetti R, Cinque F, Lebouché B, Ramos Ballesteros L, Routy J-P, Klein MB, Szabo J, Cox J, Falutz J, Haraoui L-P, et al. Distinct Gut Microbiota Signatures Are Associated with Severity of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in People with HIV. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(17):8165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178165

Chicago/Turabian Style

Righetti, Riccardo, Felice Cinque, Bertrand Lebouché, Luz Ramos Ballesteros, Jean-Pierre Routy, Marina B. Klein, Jason Szabo, Joseph Cox, Julian Falutz, Louis-Patrick Haraoui, and et al. 2025. "Distinct Gut Microbiota Signatures Are Associated with Severity of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in People with HIV" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 17: 8165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178165

APA Style

Righetti, R., Cinque, F., Lebouché, B., Ramos Ballesteros, L., Routy, J.-P., Klein, M. B., Szabo, J., Cox, J., Falutz, J., Haraoui, L.-P., Costiniuk, C. T., De Pokomandy, A., Pembroke, T., Constante, M., Santos, M., & Sebastiani, G. (2025). Distinct Gut Microbiota Signatures Are Associated with Severity of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in People with HIV. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(17), 8165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26178165

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop