Next Article in Journal
Folic Acid Supplementation and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of β-Core Fragment hCG in Embryo Implantation and Early Pregnancy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Systematic Evaluation of Biodegradation of Azo Dyes by Microorganisms: Efficient Species, Physicochemical Factors, and Enzymatic Systems

by
Domingo Cesar Carrascal-Hernández
1,*,
Erney José Orozco-Beltrán
2,
Daniel Insuasty
1,
Edgar Márquez
1 and
Carlos David Grande-Tovar
2,*
1
Departamento de Química y Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla 080020, Colombia
2
Grupo de Investigación de Fotoquímica y Fotobiología, Programa de Química, Universidad del Atlántico, Carrera 30 No. 8–49, Puerto Colombia 081007, Colombia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(16), 7973; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167973
Submission received: 5 July 2025 / Revised: 12 August 2025 / Accepted: 13 August 2025 / Published: 18 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)

Abstract

Modern culture, strongly influenced by the growth of sectors such as the fashion and textile industries, has generated an environmental trend that is difficult to reverse. It is estimated that between 60 and 70% of the dyes used in these sectors are synthetic, which offer great versatility, a low cost, and a broad spectrum of colors, making them indispensable in many sectors. Among these synthetic dyes, azo dyes stand out due to their excellent chromophoric properties, structural stability, and ease of synthesis. However, these compounds are considered xenobiotics with a strong recalcitrant potential. This review article comprehensively examines the biodegradation potential of azo contaminants by microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, microalgae, and consortia, using the PRISMA 2020 methodology. In this regard, this study identified 720 peer-reviewed articles on this topic that are outstanding. The analysis of these studies focused on the effect of parameters such as pH, temperature, and exposure time, as well as the enzymatic degradation pathways associated with the degradation efficiency of these contaminants. For example, the results identified that microorganisms such as Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Trametes versicolor, Pichia kudriavzevi, Chlorella vulgaris, and Candida tropicalis possess significant potential for degrading azo dyes (up to 90%). This degradative efficiency was attributed to the high enzymatic activity that cleaves the azo bonds of these contaminants through specialized enzymes, such as azoreductases, laccases, and peroxidases. Furthermore, the results highlight synergistic effects or metabolic cooperation between species that enhance the biodegradation of these contaminants, suggesting an eco-friendly alternative for environmental remediation.

1. Introduction

The expansion and strengthening of global economic matrices have improved the quality of life for people and have also fostered the development of industrial sectors, such as the textile and fashion industries, which have a profound influence on modern culture. These sectors exert environmental pressure that is difficult to control due to the use of synthetic dyes in dyeing processes [1,2,3]. It is well known that several industrial sectors with a strong influence on modern culture are predominant in the use of synthetic dyes such as azo dyes [4]. The projections suggest that the global market for these dyes could reach USD 14.8 billion by 2032, underscoring not only the sector’s growth, but also the escalating environmental burden associated with dye discharge [5]. A critical problem lies in the inefficiency of dye fixation processes. For example, several prominent studies have reported that the annual production of synthetic dyes worldwide is around 7 × 107, of which the textile industry alone uses more than 10,000 tons of these dyes for dyeing processes that are often inefficient (the dyes do not fully fix to the fibers), resulting in the discharge of between 15 and 50% of the dyes that do not bind to fibers into wastewater [4,6,7,8,9].
Industrial discharges with high concentrations of azo dyes have a significant impact on aquatic ecosystems. When they enter water bodies, these compounds increase the total organic carbon (TOC) levels, an indicator that reflects the sum of biodegradable and non-biodegradable organic matters present in the environment. This increase is due to the high chemical stability and structural strength of the dyes, which can disrupt essential biochemical processes, such as microbial respiration, photosynthesis, and the nitrogen cycle [9,10]. From a water quality perspective, azo dyes affect biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) parameters in several ways. BOD, used to determine the amount of oxygen required by microorganisms to decompose the biodegradable fraction of organic matter, typically increases moderately in the presence of these dyes, given their limited biodegradability and structural stability [11,12]. On the other hand, COD, which quantifies the oxygen required to chemically oxidize all organic matter (including the recalcitrant fraction), increases considerably [13]. This disparity demonstrates that azo dyes contribute more to the chemical load than to the biological load of the system, making their treatment difficult using conventional purification methods [14].
Furthermore, changes in parameters such as pH also have a profound impact on water quality. Many azo dyes contain sulfonate groups (-SO3Na) in their structure. These acidify the water, disrupting the ecosystem balance, affecting the solubility of metals and other substances, and increasing the toxicity of other pollutants [15]. Chromophore groups in these dyes enhance light absorption, which prevents or limits the penetration of sunlight, hindering photosynthetic processes in species such as algae and aquatic plants [16,17].
The chromophoric behavior of azo dyes is intricately modulated by the presence of electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents flanking the azo bond. This electronic interplay enables the precise tuning of both color intensity and solubility, allowing chemists to tailor dyes for specific substrates and industrial applications [18]. Their structural complexity and resistance to biodegradation have positioned them as a growing concern in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, where they contribute to long-term contamination and pose challenges for conventional wastewater treatment technologies [19].
This resilience becomes particularly problematic under anaerobic conditions, such as those found in sediment layers or within the gastrointestinal tracts of aquatic organisms. In such environments, the azo bonds are susceptible to reductive cleavage, leading to the formation of aromatic amines, many of which are recognized for their carcinogenic, mutagenic, and endocrine-disrupting properties [20,21,22].
Among the various strategies employed for textile effluent remediation, physical methods are commonly used due to their operational simplicity and low cost in removing chromophoric compounds such as azo dyes [23]. The most common methods include filtration processes (using membrane systems), adsorption (e.g., using activated carbon), and oxidation methods [24]. More robust prototypes employing nanostructured materials (e.g., graphene oxide and magnetic biochar) have been reported; their efficiency is limited, and they involve high costs [25,26,27,28].
Micro/nanofiltration is an attractive and common method for treating effluents with high azo dye loading. This technique is based on the removal of contaminants through size exclusion and electrostatic attraction that retains the dyes [29]. Membrane fouling requires persistent maintenance, which poses a prohibitive barrier to efficient removal of these contaminants [30,31].
Good degradation results have been reported with azo dyes through photocatalytic oxidation processes with TiO2 and/or ZnO. This process releases reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as OH, which are efficient for the mineralization of azo dyes, but affect other systems and species in the environment, generating another problem that is difficult to solve [32,33]. In response to this challenge, a range of biotechnological strategies has been explored. Notably, microbial strains such as Streptomyces lavendulae, Streptomyces cyaneus, and Marinomonas mediterranea have demonstrated promising capabilities in degrading azo dyes [34].
These biotechnological strategies are not only environmentally benign, but also economically viable, making them particularly attractive for large-scale applications in resource-constrained settings [35]. Biosorption enables the passive binding of dyes to microbial biomass, while enzymatic degradation (mediated by oxidoreductases such as laccases, peroxidases, and azoreductases) targets the chromophoric structures directly, often leading to complete mineralization. Synergistic enhancement of these mechanisms has been reported, which enhances the mineralization of these contaminants, while preventing the production of more toxic metabolites, representing an improvement in the treatment of dye-contaminated effluents [36].
A biotechnological approach demonstrated in several studies is the biosorption of azo pollutants; several microorganisms with the potential to degrade azo dyes have been reported [37]. It is well known that cell wall composition plays a fundamental role in the assimilation of these dyes; that is, walls rich in lipid compounds and heteropolysaccharides improve degradation efficiency because these macromolecules present groups, such as amino (–NH2, –NH3+), carboxyl (–COO), phosphate (PO42−) and hydroxyl (–OH), act as active sites for molecular recognition and complex formation with contaminants [38,39,40]. In addition, microorganisms present enzymatic machinery (azoreductase enzymes, which use reducing cofactors, such as NADH, NADPH, and FADH, to initiate electron transfer reactions) of high efficiency in the degradation of these dyes. This dual functionality (biosorption together with enzymatic degradation) positions microbial systems as versatile agents in the bioremediation of dye-laden effluents [41,42].
The eukaryotic microorganisms not only demonstrate resilience in the face of physicochemical stressors, but also possess highly effective mechanisms for removing xenobiotic compounds, including azo dyes. Their capacity to couple biosorption with enzymatic degradation has proven particularly advantageous, as the synergistic interplay between these pathways often results in enhanced decolorization and detoxification efficiencies [37,43,44]. Environmental parameters, such as pH and temperature, are essential for degradation efficiency because they modulate the assimilation and degradation potential. That is, Candida albicans, at an acidic pH (around 2.5 and room temperature), efficiently degrades Direct Violet 51 [38]. Similarly, Candida tropicalis is more efficient at slightly lower pH levels (around 4 and 43 °C), which underlines the need to control these parameters to favor its degradation efficiency [45].
This systematic review, conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, offers a critical and integrative perspective on recent peer-reviewed research concerning microbial bioremediation of azo dye-contaminated wastewater. The review explores how key operational parameters (such as pH, temperature, dye concentration, and exposure time) influence the efficiency of microbial degradation. It also delves into the enzymatic pathways that facilitate these processes. Special attention is given to identifying the most effective microbial species reported to date, with a focus on understanding the biochemical mechanisms that underpin their degradative capabilities.

2. Methodology

This systematic review was developed in alignment with the PRISMA framework (see Figure 1) [46]. Our study identifies various operating conditions that favor or enhance the degradation efficiency of azo dyes. Similarly, the microbial strains with the highest efficiency in degrading these pollutants were comprehensively reviewed. This is important because it enables the design of innovative, highly efficient biotechnological strategies for treating effluents contaminated with these dyes.
To ensure methodological rigor and comprehensive coverage, the PICO strategy (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) was employed to structure the literature search. Table 1 outlines the development of the search key, which integrated Boolean operators, DeCS descriptors [47], and MeSH terms [48], to maximize the relevance and scope of retrieved studies [49]. The final search strategy was applied to Scopus and Web of Science (WoS), two databases recognized for their breadth and scientific reliability [50,51].
A total of 1707 scientific articles were initially identified in Web of Science and 556 in Scopus through an exhaustive bibliographic search using a Boolean combination of descriptors related to azo dyes, environmental matrices (soil and water), and microbial degradation pathways. The selection criteria consisted of selecting recent articles because it is relevant to report and discuss updated physical and biotechnological methods and/or alternatives for the degradation of azo dyes; the most recent articles on these technologies will include novel advances and improvements in the limitations presented in previous studies. Likewise, the search was limited to the English language because this is the universal language in which research is published. All keywords unrelated to the objective of this research were eliminated, and duplicate reports were eliminated to avoid information bias. The selection of the most notable results based on their approach, methodological relevance, and potential for industrial scalability is summarized in Figure 1.
The investigation of highly efficient biotechnological alternatives for the degradation of azo dyes is a dynamic field that has received growing interest in recent years, with microorganisms playing a central role in these studies. These microorganisms belong to diverse microbial communities, such as adapted microbiomes and biofilms, that are highly resistant to extreme environments. Notably, several studies have reported the complete mineralization of azo dyes under optimized conditions, highlighting the potential of microbial consortia to assimilate dye-derived intermediates [52,53,54].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Azo Dyes

There are two predominant types of dye, synthetic and natural, of which azo dyes are of particular interest to industries operating worldwide. These dyes are attractive because they exhibit excellent chemical stability, ease of synthesis, low costs, and have groups in their structures that allow for a wide range of structural versatility [16]. A distinctive feature of these compounds lies in the azo bond (–N=N–), which fulfills an important function. It acts as chromophores and joins various aromatic and/or heterocyclic compounds, generating conjugated systems that give rise to a wide range of shades; in addition, these conjugated systems present a strong absorption in the visible spectrum giving rise to intense colors [55]. These particularities make azo dyes indispensable for the textile and fashion industries [56].
The synthesis of azo compounds occurs through coupling reactions between various aromatic diazonium salts and activated nucleophiles, resulting in multiple structures depending on the number of units (N=N): monoazo, diazo, or polyazo [57]. Some common coupling agents include naphthol derivatives and sulfonated aromatic compounds such as J acid (2-amino-5-naphthol-7-sulfonic acid), H acid (1-amino-8-hydroxynaphthalene-3,6-disulfonic acid), and gamma acid [58]. The reaction proceeds via an electrophilic aromatic substitution mechanism, offering considerable structural flexibility through the strategic selection of precursors and reaction conditions, as illustrated in Figure 2.
Azo dyes are classified according to several criteria, including water solubility, dyeing behavior, number of azo linkages, and the nature of the substrate to which they are applied [35]. This versatility allows for them to be used across a wide range of materials, from natural fibers like cotton, silk, and wool to synthetic polymers, such as polyester, acrylics, and polyamides. Beyond textiles, azo dyes are also incorporated into inks, varnishes, lacquers, food additives, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetic formulations, reflecting their broad industrial relevance [35,59].
Azo dyes are commercially available in various physical forms (powders, liquids, and pastes) formulated according to their intended application [60]. Their solubility and dyeing behavior vary widely; acidic azo dyes, often containing sulfonate groups, are water-soluble, and suited for protein and polyamide fibers, while basic (cationic) dyes are typically applied to modified acrylics and synthetic textiles [56]. Direct dyes used primarily on cellulosic fibers require no mordants and are applied from aqueous solutions with electrolytes. In parallel, dyes with minimal solubility (such as disperse dyes) are designed for specific applications; that is, they are used in hydrophobic polyester and nylon-based fibers, which require particular pressure and temperature conditions (usually high temperatures) for greater fixation [58]. For this reason, the frequent use of these dyes is of concern in poorly treated effluents or those without rigorous pretreatment, given that they have been designed to be stable under extreme conditions.
Furthermore, innovative synthesis methods for obtaining functionalized dyes have been reported [61]. For example, the Gewald reaction is widely applied for dye synthesis [62,63]. That is, the condensation reaction between benzo-thiophene-3(2H)-one-1,1-dioxide and ethyl cyanoacetate, followed by diazotization using nitrosylsulfuric acid and N,N-dialkyl-substituted aryl amines (for acid coupling), has been reported to give rise to dyes of high interest in industrial sectors, as shown in Figure 3 [61,64]. However, these compounds can cause chronic toxicity, primarily through ingestion, which may occur when consuming foods highly contaminated with these compounds [65].

3.1.1. Azo Dyes and Their Structural Versatility

The environmental persistence of these compounds is closely tied to their chemical structure. The presence of functional groups influences properties such as polarity, solubility, thermal stability, and lightfastness (see Figure 4). Electron-donating substituents (e.g., –NH2 and –OH) tend to enhance biodegradability under reducing conditions, whereas electron-withdrawing groups (e.g., –NO2) confer greater stability and resistance to degradation [66,67]. Additionally, some azo dyes form coordination complexes with transition metals, such as chromium, copper, and cobalt, which improves dye fixation, but simultaneously increases toxicity and environmental recalcitrance [68].
Once released into the environment, azo dyes exert a series of harmful effects. That is, the degradation of these compounds generates metabolites that are even more toxic than the original dyes. These metabolites present higher toxicity levels (LD50) than the original molecules, which are carcinogenic, mutagenic, or endocrine disruptors, with the potential to bioaccumulate in organisms and biomagnify through food chains [69,70].
The chemical structures of several chemical dyes widely used in various industries are represented in Figure 4. These dyes are attractive due to their stability in extreme situations and chemical versatility. Due to the toxicity of azo dye metabolites, it is essential to use innovative and efficient strategies for their transformation and/or bioremediation to ensure more sustainable wastewater treatment [71,72].

3.1.2. Toxicological Potential of Azo Dyes

Despite their industrial relevance, azo dyes remain poorly regulated in many regions, particularly where environmental legislation is weak or underdeveloped [3,73]. This regulatory gap has led to the widespread and often indiscriminate use of these dyes, resulting in the direct discharge of structurally complex dyes into natural ecosystems. Many of these compounds contain sulfonate, nitro, halogen, or heterocyclic groups that enhance their chemical stability and resistance to degradation, making their removal through conventional treatment methods more complicated [74].
More concerning is that environmental degradation (especially under anaerobic conditions) often leads to the formation of toxic byproducts [75]. Microbial azoreductases cleave the azo bond (–N=N–), releasing aromatic amines, such as β-naphthylamine, aniline, and p-phenylenediamine, several of which are classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as confirmed carcinogens [76,77]. Dyes such as Reactive Red 195, Acid Orange 7, and Reactive Black 5, though widely used for their dyeing efficiency, are now recognized as precursors to these hazardous metabolites [78,79,80,81].
Ecotoxicological assessments often overlook these transformation products, instead focusing on the parent compounds under controlled conditions that fail to reflect environmental complexity accurately. Some studies have shown that photolytic, chemical, and microbial degradation can yield more toxic and bioactive derivatives [82]. The resilience of azo contaminants depends largely on extrinsic dynamic factors, such as oxygen availability, light exposure, temperature, pH, and the abundance of compounds involved in redox reactions. In addition, the molecular characteristics involve the number and position of bonds –N=N– and the chemical nature of substituent groups [83]. Microbial consortia have been reported to be effective in degrading azo dyes because they possess enzymes capable of metabolizing these bonds (as shown in Figure 5). However, most are severely affected by these contaminants, resulting in the alteration of the ecological balance [84,85].
Several studies have shown that some dyes classified as “non-toxic” in acute tests (such as Acid Orange 7) generate carcinogenic metabolites under natural conditions [72]. This situation generates a false sense of security. Coupled with inadequate infrastructure for the treatment of wastewater contaminated with these dyes, they continue to aggravate environmental and public health risks [86].
Intrinsic factors, on the other hand, are determined by the molecular structure of the dye. The number and position of azo bonds, the nature of the functional groups (donors such as –OH and –NH2 or attractors such as –NO2, –Cl, and –SO3H), and the presence of heteroatoms or condensed structures directly influence chemical reactivity and susceptibility to enzymatic biodegradation [87]. The microbial communities that encounter these dyes vary significantly in their response capacity. While some bacterial and fungal consortia have azoreductases, laccases, peroxidases, or monooxygenases capable of metabolizing azo compounds, other microbial populations can be suppressed or damaged, altering the ecological balance of the contaminated environment [69].
Given this situation, the lack of strict regulatory frameworks and toxicological assessment methodologies currently in place to ensure the proper management of highly contaminated industrial effluents does not guarantee effective management [88,89]. This demonstrates that the lack of methodological rigidity in evaluating the toxicity of synthetic dyes is generating significant environmental pressure, as they are freely released without appropriate prior treatment, despite being considered non-toxic [90].
As illustrated in Figure 5, certain widely used dyes (such as Direct Black 38, Direct Red 28, and Direct Blue 1) have been shown to be moderately toxic at 7600 mg/kg. In comparison, Direct Blue 1 is toxic at 6700 mg/kg, which is classified as class VI. The degradation of these contaminants does not necessarily neutralize their toxicity [37]. On the contrary, it leads to the formation of byproducts whose hazards persist, albeit to varying degrees [91]. A detailed analysis using the Protox 3.0 server [91] (a specialized tool for predicting chemical toxicity) allowed for the estimation of median lethal doses (LD50) of some of these compounds, expressed in mg/kg [92].
In the case of Direct Black 38, metabolites such as biphenyl-4,4′-diamine, benzene-1,2,4-triamine, and aniline were identified, with LD50 values of 205, 80, and 250 mg/kg, respectively. These data place them in the class III toxicity category, i.e., potentially toxic compounds if ingested in quantities between 50 and 300 mg/kg. Meanwhile, the byproducts of Direct Red 28 (naphthalene-1,2-diamine, naphthalene, and biphenyl-4,4′-diamine) exhibit more moderate toxicity, with LD50 values of 727, 316, and 205 mg/kg, respectively, classifying them in category IV (300 < LD50 ≤ 2000). Finally, Direct Blue 1 generates a byproduct (3,3-dimethoxybenzidine) with an LD50 value of 1920 mg/kg, also within class IV, suggesting relatively minor toxicity [92].
Given the enormous structural diversity of azo dyes (many of them proprietary formulations and confidential compositions), exhaustive toxicological studies for each compound are impractical [93]. In response to this limitation, the scientific community has begun to develop predictive models based on structure–activity relationships (SARs), computational toxicology, and environmental simulations, which allow for the prediction of toxic or persistent behaviors based on specific molecular characteristics [94,95,96].
The real danger posed by azo dyes is not limited to their visible presence as color pollutants [97]. Their greatest threat lies in the byproducts of the transformations these pollutants undergo in ecosystems; their conversion generates reactive, persistent, and often carcinogenic species, which increases their potential for contamination [98]. Addressing this challenge requires going beyond static toxicity models, adopting dynamic, integrative, and systemic approaches that capture the true complexity of the interactions between these synthetic molecules and the living systems that absorb, degrade, or suffer the consequences [99,100].

4. Conventional Methods for Treating Azo Contaminants: Principles, Challenges, and Perspectives for Environmental Remediation

In response to the environmental impacts caused by the release of synthetic dyes, particularly azo compounds, various remediation strategies based on physicochemical and biological processes have been developed [101]. These technologies aim to mitigate the toxicity, mobility, and persistence of these pollutants; however, each approach presents technical, economic, and environmental limitations that must be considered during their implementation [102].
Among the most widely used physicochemical methods are membrane separation processes, such as reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, and nanofiltration (see Figure 6) [37]. These systems rely on pressure and/or concentration gradients to force the passage of water or solvent through semipermeable membranes, retaining larger molecules, including dissolved dyes. Their effectiveness depends on the quality of the influent; the presence of organic matter, suspended solids, or fats can quickly saturate the membranes, reducing their efficiency [103]. For this reason, pretreatments such as coagulation and adsorption are commonly implemented to prevent scaling and extend the system’s useful life. Despite their high removal capacity, these technologies require considerable energy consumption and can generate concentrated waste streams, which pose a new management challenge [104].
Ion exchange represents another alternative based on the affinity between charged functional groups of polymeric resins and the ionic groups of dyes (see Figure 7) [105]. This technique has proven effective for the selective removal of certain anionic or cationic dyes; its applicability is limited, as many industrial dyes have neutral or mixed structures that do not interact efficiently with the available resins. Furthermore, the process requires periodic regeneration of the exchange medium, which entails the use of saline solutions that can generate problematic liquid waste [106].
Coagulation–flocculation is a widely used technique in textile wastewater treatment for removing colloidal and insoluble particles. It involves the addition of chemical coagulants (such as aluminum or iron salts) that neutralize the surface charges of contaminants, allowing for their agglomeration and subsequent sedimentation. Although effective in removing turbidity and certain hydrophobic dyes, this technique generates chemical sludge that requires further treatment, increasing the disposal costs and increasing the risk of secondary pollution if not properly managed [105].
Some other methods involve advanced oxidation processes to produce hydroxyl radicals (•OH) as oxidizing agents. These radicals are known for their strong oxidative character, which makes them highly reactive chemical species in the presence of organic compounds [107]. They subtract hydrogen atoms or add hydrogen atoms to double bonds, giving rise to new oxidized species or intermediates, or even almost entirely mineralizing the organic compounds [108]. The more advanced methods for degrading azo dyes involve the use of potent oxidizing agents that produce reactive oxygen species [109]. For example, the Fenton method is beneficial for treating azo contaminants through their oxidative degradation using the redox couple Fe2+/Fe3+. This oxidative degradation generates less recalcitrant metabolites, representing an attractive approach for more efficiently degrading azo dyes. Figure 8 summarizes the standard Fenton process methods reported for the degradation of azo dyes [109,110].
The Fenton method variants has four essential steps: (I) acidification of the reaction medium to an optimal pH of approximately 3.0; (II) oxidative degradation of the target pollutants; (III) neutralization of the treated effluent; and (IV) a final coagulation–flocculation phase aimed at removing residual solids and metal complexes [111]. The initial acidification step is particularly critical, as it establishes the physicochemical conditions necessary for the efficient generation and stabilization of •OH, the primary oxidative species in the process. Within this mildly acidic environment, both hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and ferrous ions (Fe2+) exhibit enhanced reactivity and stability, thereby maximizing the oxidative potential of the system and ensuring the effective breakdown of recalcitrant contaminants [112].
Furthermore, the redox pair Fe2+/Fe3+ plays a crucial role not only in redox processes, but also as a coagulating agent. This physicochemical characteristic enhances its efficiency in the removal and degradation of azo structures [113]. This dual behavior highlights the versatility of the Fenton method for the treatment of highly contaminated industrial effluents. Its mechanism is described in Equations (1)–(4), where -R indicates the organic structure of any azo dye; these equations specifically show the reactive species directly involved in the degradation of these pollutants [114,115,116].
F e 2 + + H 2 O 2 F e 3 +   O H + O H
R H + O H R + H 2 O
R + F e 3 + R + + F e 2 +
F e 2 + + O H F e 3 + + O H
Finally, heterogeneous photocatalysis utilizes semiconductors such as titanium dioxide (TiO2) that are activated by ultraviolet or visible radiation [117]. By absorbing light energy, these materials generate electron–hole pairs that react with water or oxygen present, producing reactive oxygen species that can degrade a wide range of organic pollutants. Although this technique is promising for its ability to mineralize dyes to CO2 and H2O completely, its efficiency depends on variables such as light intensity, the surface area of the catalyst, and the presence of interfering substances [118]. These technologies represent significant advances in mitigating azo dye pollution, but also highlight the need to integrate combined treatments and more sustainable approaches (Table 2). The development of hybrid systems, which incorporate physical, chemical, and biological processes, is emerging as a promising strategy for maximizing efficiency and minimizing collateral impacts in the remediation of complex effluents [119].

Application of Biological Treatments in the Remediation of Industrial Effluents

A range of microorganisms have evolved metabolic strategies to degrade azo dyes, with genera such as Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Enterococcus, and Saccharomyces standing out for their enzymatic versatility [129]. The microbial enzymatic machinery is efficient in cleaving monoazo, diazo, and polyazo bonds from complex and persistent dye structures. For example, azoreductases are considered flavo-dependent enzymes. That is, they employ FMN and/or FAD as cofactors (FMN, flavin mononucleotide, which participates as an electron transporter in redox enzymes; FAD, flavin adenine, which participates in more complex redox reactions and can act as a redox mediator). These enzymes reduce the –N=N– bond through a highly efficient biocatalytic mechanism, transforming dyes into cyclic amines that can then be degraded in other metabolic pathways [130]. A notable example is AzRA (FMN-dependent), identified in Bacillus sp. B29 (PDB code: 3W77), which efficiently degrades Acid Red 88 and Orange I [131]. However, the interaction between dyes and microbial communities is far from neutral. Microbiological studies have shown that the presence of these compounds can significantly alter microbial assemblages. Beneficial species, such as nitrogen-fixing Niveispirillum spp., may be displaced by more tolerant opportunistic strains, disrupting key ecological functions, including nutrient cycling, organic matter decomposition, and overall ecosystem stability [132].
Given the growing environmental impact generated by effluents from the textile industry (particularly due to the presence of recalcitrant azo dyes), various bioremediation strategies have gained prominence as sustainable and effective alternatives for mitigation [133]. Among these, biomass-based treatments stand out, operating through biosorption and/or adsorption processes. However, microbial systems (comprising bacteria, filamentous fungi, yeasts, actinobacteria, and microalgae) offer the most significant potential for transforming and mineralizing these pollutants into harmless compounds, such as CO2 and H2O, and, in some cases, additional biomass, provided optimal environmental conditions are maintained [134].
Table 3 summarizes a representative selection of microorganisms capable of degrading azo structures, whose physicochemical properties (such as the high stability of the azo bond (–N=N–) and the presence of aromatic functional groups) hinder their spontaneous degradation in the environment [135]. This structural resistance makes azo dyes persistent pollutants with a high ecotoxicological risk. However, the phylogenetic diversity of the reported microorganisms allows us to infer the existence of multiple metabolic pathways capable of adapting to different environments (aerobic, anaerobic, and microaerophilic), which reinforces their applicability in wastewater treatment processes [136].
At the enzymatic level, these microorganisms exhibit distinct, but complementary mechanisms of action; bacteria play a central role under reducing conditions, where they catalyze azo bond cleavage using NADH/NADPH-dependent azoreductases as cofactors [137,138]. They can also express oxidoreductases, monooxygenases, and peroxidases, which facilitate the subsequent degradation of intermediate metabolites; filamentous fungi, on the other hand, use broad-spectrum ligninolytic enzymes, such as laccase, lignin peroxidase (LiP), and manganese peroxidase (MnP), capable of attacking complex aromatic compounds through non-specific oxidative mechanisms [139]. Yeasts have demonstrated versatility in aerobic systems, expressing azoreductases, laccase, LiP, and MnP, making them useful biotechnological tools in variable environments [140]. In the case of microalgae and cyanobacteria, their degradation capacity is linked to both surface adsorption processes and the production of specific enzymes (e.g., azoreductases), in addition to their interaction with light and CO2, which gives them additional advantages in photoautotrophic systems. Actinobacteria, particularly active in anoxic conditions, employ metabolic pathways based on anaerobic respiration and fermentation, utilizing alternative electron acceptors to oxygen to break azo bonds, thereby demonstrating effectiveness in environments where other species fail [141].
The versatility of both these biological and physicochemical mechanisms, as well as their synergistic effects, demonstrates the existing ecological and operational capacity for treating effluents contaminated with azo dyes. However, some limitations must be overcome to achieve greater efficiency. These limitations could be overcome synergistically with other species that overcome the limitations of other species in the presence of specific conditions or specific compounds. To achieve this, further research is needed on the synergistic effects of the enzymatic potential of appropriate taxa [142].
Table 3. A sample of microorganisms used for the degradation of azo dyes.
Table 3. A sample of microorganisms used for the degradation of azo dyes.
Type of MicroorganismSpeciesTreated Azo DyesMechanism InvolvedConditions (pH, Temperature, and Presence or Absence of O2)Efficiency (%)Ref.
BacteriaPseudomonas putidaReactive Red 120AzoreductasepH 7.492.6[143]
Reactive Black 535 °C92.6
Reactive Blue 13Anaerobic conditions88.0
Bacillus subtilis (DY1KVG)Azo dye mixtures: Reactive red, Reactive brown, Reactive blackAzoreductasepH 7–8.587.3[144]
50–70 °C
Aerobic conditions
Escherichia coliBasic Orange 2AzoreductasepH 489.8[145]
40 °C
Aerobic conditions
Pseudomonas geniculata Ka38Methyl orangeAzoreductasepH 789.0[146]
30 °C
Mixed conditions (aerobic/anaerobic)
Filamentous fungiOudemansiella canarii (EF72)Congo RedLaccasepH 5.580.0[88]
30 °C
Presence of O2
Trametes hirsuta D7Acid Blue 29
Reactive Blue 4
LaccasepH 4–586–90[88]
25 °C
Aerobic conditions
Nigrospora spSynazol Red HF-6BNLigninolytic enzymespH 5–785.0
25–30 °C
Aerobic conditions
Trametes versicolorDirect Pink BManganese PeroxidasepH 5.272.4[147]
29.6
Aerobic conditions
Aspergillus terreusAcid Blue 29
Disperse Red 1
Congo Red
Ligninolytic enzymespH 792.7[88,148]
30 °C90.5
Aerobic conditions96.7
Aspergillus nigerpH 793.4
30 °C84.2
Aerobic conditions96.5
Aspergillus flavuspH 792.4
30 °C80.5
Aerobic conditions96.3
Aspergillus fumigatusDirect Pink BManganese PeroxidasepH 791.8[147]
35 °C95.5
Aerobic conditions97.0
ActinobacteriaStreptomyces albidoflavus 3MGHReactive Orange 122Reductive enzymes (such as azoreductase) and oxidative enzymes (such as laccase)pH 694.4[149]
Direct Blue 1536 °C86.3
Black Direct 38Aerobic conditions68.2
Arthrobacter bambusae DP-A9Methyl red
Brilliant black
Azoreductase
Peroxidase
Laccase
pH 7
30 °C
Aerobic conditions
100[150]
100
100
Dermacoccus nishinomyaensis DP-D10100
74.0
97.6
Leifsonia shinshuensis DP-L11
Streptomyces maritimus (A011)Amido Black10BExtracellular enzymes: peroxidases (lignin peroxidase, manganese peroxidase), LaccasespH 7–985.4[151]
30–40 °C
Anoxic conditions
YeastsGeotrichum candidumCongo redManganese peroxidase, Lignin peroxidasepH 5–685.4[152]
25–30 °C
Microaerophilic/anoxic conditions
Sterigmatomyces haophilus SSA1575Reactive Black 5NADH-dichlorophenol indophenol (NADH--DCIP).
Reductase
Lignin peroxidase (LiP).
pH 5100[153]
30 °C
Aerobic conditions
Meyerozyma guilliermondii A4Acid Red BAzoreductase.
NADH-DCIP reductase.
Lignin peroxidase.
Manganese peroxidase.
Laccase
pH 6
35 °C
Aerobic conditions
>97[154,155]
Acid Orange II
Acid Scarlet GR
Acid Red 3R
Reactive Brilliant
Red K-2G
Reactive Violet KN-4R
Reactive Yellow 3R
Meyerozyma caribbicaAcid Orange 7Manganese peroxidasepH 5–793.8[155]
28 °C
Aerobic conditions
MicroalgaeLychaete pellucidaReactive Blue 4BiosorptionpH 8.096–97[156]
Reactive Red 12025 °C95–97
Brilliant Reactive Yellow 3GThe study reports photoautotrophic culture conditions with continuous light exposure and O2 supplementation at room temperature96–97
Reactive Green 12
Chlorella vulgarisReactive Black 5AzoreductasepH 5–880[157]
Direct Blue 7140 °C78
Scattered Red 1The study reports mixotrophic culture conditions, with controlled light exposure to enhance dye degradation84
On the other hand, it is essential to take into account the final destination and disposal of the microbial biomass generated in these processes because the accidental or intentional release of adapted microorganisms (or genetically modified to increase their degradative efficiency) into the environment can hurt native microbial communities; in addition, the appearance of strong odors can generate respiratory diseases if there are nearby populations [158]. For example, several studies have reported diverse metabolites present in the residual biomass generated in these microbial treatments for the treatment of wastewater contaminated with azo dyes, which can vary in toxicity, chemical structure, and persistence in the environment, depending on the type of microorganism, environmental conditions, and types of dye. In this sense, among the reported metabolites, aromatic amines are common, such as aniline, 2-naphthylamine, p-nitroaniline, 4-aminoazobenzene, and bezidine. These substances are considered carcinogenic and mutagenic with a strong potential for bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms [159]. Substituted phenols (generated by the oxidation of aromatic rings), such as 4-hydroxybenzene and 2,4-dinitrophenol, can be toxic to a wide range of organisms and can interfere with metabolic processes [160]. In addition, organic acids, such as benzoic acid and carboxylic acid derivatives, are considered less toxic, but can significantly alter the pH and affect the solubility of other substances [17].
In this context, it is recommended to be rigorous in the implementation of safe biomass disposal strategies; anaerobic digestion and controlled composting are attractive strategies for biomass treatment [161,162]. Similarly, it is essential to consider the relevant physical and biological containment measures to avoid the release of these microorganisms and prevent their negative impact on microbial communities, as well as the monitoring of collateral environmental consequences, such as the generation of strong odors that can cause respiratory diseases.

5. Enzymatic Systems in the Biodegradation of Azo Dyes: Reductive and Oxidative Mechanisms in Bioremediation

Microorganisms have established themselves as key players in various environmental biotechnology applications, particularly in the bioremediation of organic pollutants. This is due to their remarkable physiological properties, including rapid growth, the ability to synthesize degradative enzymes, and their remarkable metabolic versatility in transforming complex compounds, such as synthetic dyes, especially azo dyes [17,163].
These characteristics make microorganisms ideal tools for environmental decontamination processes. Several recent studies have confirmed that the effectiveness of various microorganisms in degrading azo dyes is based on the action of specialized enzymes, such as azo reductases and laccase. These enzymes catalyze the cleavage of the azo bond (–N=N–), which is considered key to the structural stability and toxicity of these compounds [164,165].
For example, the bacterial degradation of azo dyes involves complex enzymatic systems, in which both azoreductases and laccases play crucial roles. Paenochrobactrum glaciei has been documented to degrade the disperse red dye 167 through the coordinated production of laccase (oxidative) and azoreductase (reductive), as shown in Figure 9. Analysis by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) elucidated a metabolic pathway in which two intermediate products were identified after the cleavage of the azo bond: the first, 2-chloro-4-nitrophenylamine, and the second, an ethyl ester derived from a substituted aniline. These compounds emerge after the synergistic action of azoreductase and subsequent dealkylation reactions [166].
In parallel, other studies have shown that Pseudomonas aeruginosa can degrade the dye methyl red through an enzymatic system centered on azoreductases, as shown in Figure 10. The reductive cleavage of the azo group produces two key metabolites: 2-aminobenzoic acid and N,N-dimethylaminobenzene [167]. The former undergoes enzymatic deamination to form benzoic acid, while the latter is initially transformed into N,N-dimethylbenzene, which can be demethylated to form aniline. Aniline, in turn, can be deaminated to generate benzene (Figure 9). Finally, through methylation reactions (possibly catalyzed by S-adenosylmethionine and tetrahydrofolate), benzene is converted into o-xylene. These transformations were confirmed by GC-MS, validating the ability of P. aeruginosa to efficiently destructurize and detoxify the dye [168].
Several notable investigations have demonstrated the good efficiency of laccases and lignin peroxidases in degrading azo bonds, such as Reactive Red 198, also known as RR198. For example, bacterial strains such as Bacillus cereus SKB12 and Enterobacter hormaechei SKB16 have been reported to be capable of synthesizing laccases, lignin peroxidases, and azoreductases [169]. This characteristic confers on them the ability to biodegrade azo bonds, as shown in Figure 11. These microorganisms are attractive for the bioremediation of azo dye contamination due to their strong potential for cleaving N=N bonds. Furthermore, rigorous toxicity studies have shown that the metabolites of the dyes biodegraded by these species are non-toxic. That is, aromatic amines that are normally toxic are biodegraded by an alternative metabolic pathway, thereby decreasing the carcinogenicity of the metabolites, which is desirable for ecological environmental remediation [170].

6. Fungi Remediation of Synthetic Dyes: A Biotechnological Alternative for the Treatment of Textile Effluents

The elimination of dyes from textile effluents using biotechnological strategies has emerged as an effective and environmentally sustainable alternative, offering advantages, including low operating costs and a reduced ecological impact [171]. Among the most promising techniques is the use of fungal biomass, which has demonstrated high efficiency in degrading azo dyes. The success of these processes depends mainly on the proper optimization of parameters, such as pH, temperature, humidity, nutrient availability, and culture conditions, which directly affect the enzymatic activity of the fungi involved [172,173].
Recent studies have demonstrated that filamentous fungi utilize a combination of biosorption and enzymatic catalysis to break down azo bonds [174]. For example, Bjerkandera adusta strain CX-9 has been reported to produce extracellular peroxidases, such as lignin peroxidase (LiP) and manganese peroxidase (MnP), capable of efficiently degrading dyes such as methyl green, acid blue 158, and Remazol brilliant violet 5R, reaching decolorization rates of 75%, 91%, and 70%, respectively. These results reinforce the potential of fungal enzymes as the key catalysts in bioremediation processes [175].
The degradation of azo dyes by ligninolytic fungi has been the subject of extensive research. A sequential enzymatic mechanism has been described in species such as Trametes versicolor and Phanerochaete chrysosporium based on two complementary phases. In the first step, fungal azoreductases reduce azo bonds under microaerophilic conditions, generating aromatic amines as intermediate products. Subsequently, in the second phase, ligninolytic laccases and peroxidases oxidize these compounds, promoting their complete mineralization [176,177]. This system has achieved decolorization efficiencies between 90% and 100% for dyes such as reactive black 5 and orange II, with reaction times ranging from 20 to 72 h, depending on whether free or immobilized enzymes or submerged cultures are used [178]. In this context, the use of enzymes immobilized on matrices such as chitosan or alginate has been shown to offer greater operational stability and reusability, being particularly useful for repeated applications in small-scale treatments. In contrast, submerged fungal cultures, although less efficient in enzyme recovery, are more suitable for mass production of enzymes. The optimal conditions for the reported degradation processes include a slightly acidic pH (between 4.5 and 5.0), moderate temperatures (25–30 °C), and dye concentrations ranging from 100 to 500 mg/L [179].
A particularly relevant study demonstrated the catalytic action of manganese peroxidase (MnP), a ligninolytic oxidoreductase secreted by Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Trametes pubescens, which allows for the oxidation of Mn2+ to Mn3+ in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) under anaerobic conditions. The generated Mn3+ acts as a diffusible redox mediator, capable of breaking azo bonds and degrading aromatic structures of dyes such as reactive black 5 and direct blue 1. This catalytic capacity is supported by the formation of high-valent species, such as the intermediate compounds ferric I (Fe4+=O) and II (Fe4+–OH), which are essential for the activity of peroxidases. Thus, these enzymes emerge as versatile and highly effective tools for the degradation of persistent synthetic dyes [180]. Table 4 summarizes a representative selection of recent studies using fungi for the degradation of azo dyes, specifying the optimal operating conditions, the decolorization efficiencies achieved, and the enzymatic mechanisms involved in each case.
Table 4. Sample of enzymatic degradation studies of azo dyes using filamentous fungi.
Table 4. Sample of enzymatic degradation studies of azo dyes using filamentous fungi.
FungiEnzymeAzo DyeOptimal Conditions (pH, T (°C), Absence or Presence of O2)Metabolites/Degraded ProductsMechanism of ActionEfficiency (%)Ref.
Fusarium oxysporumLaccase
Azorreductasa
Reactive Black 5
Orange II
-Aniline.
Phenolic compounds
Oxidation of phenolic groups (laccases) and cleavage of the azo bond (azoreductases)89.8
91.3
[181]
30 °C
Aerobiosis
Aspergillus tamariLaccaseCrystal VioletpH 7N,N,N′,N′-Tetramethylpararosaniline.
2-(Methylamino)phenol.
Benzophenone.
4-methyl amino phenol.
4-(Dimethylamino)benzaldehyde.
Oxidative catalysis of the azo bond33.8[182]
Congo Red27 °C74.0
Aerobiosis
Aspergillus flavus ASP1Laccase
Lignin peroxidase
Quinine reductase
Reactive Orange 16pH 3Aniline.
6-(acetylamino)naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid
(Lac/LiP)-mediated azo bond cleavage and detoxification by quinine reductase100[183]
30 °C
Aerobic conditions
Trametes versicolorLaccaseRemazol RedpH 5-Laccase oxidizes the dye by transferring electrons from the substrate (RR) to molecular oxygen, resulting in the formation of water.54.0[184]
45 °C
-
Peroneutypa scopariaLaccaseAcid Red 97pH 6-Reduction of the azo bond87.5[185]
40 °C
-
Irpex lacteus F17Manganese PeroxidaseMalachite green--Reduction of the azo bond and oxidation of aromatic rings96.0
-
-
Bjerkandera adusta Reactive Blue 120pH 5-Mn3+-mediated radical oxidation90
28 °C
Aerobic conditions
Paraconiothyrium variabileLaccaseAcid Red 18--Oxidative degradation of the azo group90
Direct Red 81-68.3
-
RH-2 Consortium *Laccase
Manganese Peroxidase
Congo redpH 5-Enzymatic oxidation of the azo bond97.1[186]
28 °C
Aerobic conditions
* RH-2 Consortium: Penicillium oxalicum (DS-2) and Aspergillus tubingensis (DS-4).

7. Photoautotrophic Microalgae and Microbial Consortia in the Biotransformation of Azo Dyes

Photoautotrophic microorganisms, particularly microalgae, have garnered increasing attention as a sustainable and ecologically viable alternative for the remediation of industrial effluents contaminated with synthetic azo dyes [187]. A unique feature of these microorganisms is their ability to harness carbon generated during the mineralization of azo compounds as a primary source of energy, which they integrate into their metabolism [188]. This harnessing capacity minimizes the production of toxic byproducts that remain after the degradation of these pollutants. These autotrophic mechanisms make these technologies eco-friendly tools and also align with the principles of the circular bioeconomy [89].
Furthermore, several microalgae species also exhibit tolerance to high concentrations of azo dyes with strong recalcitrant potential. This resilience, coupled with their enzymatic machinery, gives them a strong potential for cleaving azo bonds. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that the mechanisms by which degradation occurs generate low-toxicity aromatic amines [37].
Microalgae are two-way agents in wastewater bioremediation, with the advantage of not only degrading artificial dyes, but also exhibiting a pronounced tendency towards adsorption and intracellular accumulation of heavy metals. This is a dual benefit in the case of combined treatment systems, where the removal of organic and inorganic contaminants simultaneously is necessary for effective detoxification [189]. New advances in omics-based approaches and metabolic engineering have already begun to reveal the complex regulatory networks that govern these processes, enabling the rational design of genetically engineered strains with enhanced bioremediation capacity [190].
Microbial consortia have been experimentally shown to also possess the potential to biodegrade a wide variety of azo contaminants. However, their efficiency is strongly dependent on their enzymatic profile. Table 5 reports kinergic consortia consisting of Chlorella sp., Pseudomonas putida, and Lactobacillus plantarum, which have demonstrated efficiency percentages of up to 90% in the degradation of Reactive Blue 40 [191]. This extraordinary biodegradation capacity is largely attributed to the kinergic effects of azoreductases and laccases, enhanced by biosorption processes. These results demonstrate a significant advance in metabolic complementarity against emerging contaminants such as azo dyes [192].
Under more severe conditions, concentrations of up to 500 mg/L of azo contaminants and a pH of 6.5 have been reported. Under these conditions, strains such as Oedogonium subplagiostomum (strain AP1) have shown efficiency percentages of up to 97% in the assimilation and degradation of Reactive Orange 122 [193]. Additionally, species such as Oscillatoria sp. and Scenedesmus obliquus have been reported to have degradation efficiencies of up to 98.5% for Reactive Orange 122 under slightly alkaline conditions (pH 11). These results suggest that these species have developed adaptive abilities that not only enable them to survive in these harsh conditions, but also facilitate their evolution and utilization of dyes as a primary source of carbon [36].
Table 5. Examples of the use of different algae strains and consortia in the bioremediation of azo dyes.
Table 5. Examples of the use of different algae strains and consortia in the bioremediation of azo dyes.
Algae Strain/ConsortiumAzo DyeMechanisms InvolvedMetabolites/Degraded ProductsOptimal Conditions (Concentration (mg/L), pH, Temperature)Efficiency (%)Ref.
Chlorella vulgarisDirect Green 6Reductive cleavage of azo bonds by azoreductase and decomposition by peroxidases and laccase-200 mg/L78.4[194]
pH 8
25 °C
Direct Black 22Photodegradation (primary), enzymatic degradation (secondary), and adsorption-30 mg/L-[194]
pH 7.2
28 °C
Oedogonium subplagiostomum AP1Methyl orangeBiosorptionPhenols*.
Aromatic amines*.
Organic acids*.
500 mg/L97.0[195]
pH 6.5
30 °C
Oscillatoria sp. y S. obliquusReactive Orange 122Enzymatic degradation, adsorptionCyclic amines*.
Phenolic compounds*.
20 mg/L98.5[196]
pH 11
25 °C
Consortium (Chlorella, Pseudomonas putida, and Lactobacillus plantarum)Reactive Blue 40Synergistic degradation:
- Azo bond cleavage (azoreductases)
- Oxidation of intermediates (laccases/peroxidases)
- Adsorption in biomass
Aromatic amines* (typical product of azo bond cleavage).
Phenols and modified alcohols*.
1000 mg/L99.0[191]
11
35 °C
Fucus vesiculosusMethyl orangeBiosorptionN1,N1-dimethylbenzene-1,4-diamine.
4-aminobenzenesulfonate.
57.676.8[197]
pH 9
25 °C
Chlamydomonas mexicanaRed HE8BCombined enzymatic biodegradation mechanism (Laccases and peroxidases)N-phenylhydroxylamine.
Naphthalen-1-ol.
Sodium 5-hydroxynaphthalene-2-sulfonate.
5 mg/L62[188]
pH 739
27 °C
Reactive Green 27
* The degradation of the dyes was followed by changes in absorption peaks before and after biosorption using FT-IR, indicating the formation of new chemical bonds.

8. Yeast-Based Biocatalytic Systems for Azo Dye Degradation: Enzymes, Biosorptive Dynamics, and Biotechnological Potential in Textile Effluent Remediation

Several yeast species have been reported as efficient biotechnological alternatives for the bioremediation of azo contaminants, which is attractive as an eco-friendly alternative to the reported conventional methods [198]. The interest in yeasts stems from their specific mechanisms, which integrate biosorption processes, followed by efficient enzymatic machinery that cleaves azo bonds [199]. The cleavage of azo bonds is so efficient that it does not produce toxic or recalcitrant metabolites. These combined characteristics, coupled with their resilience under extreme environmental conditions, make yeasts promising biotechnological alternatives for ecological environmental remediation methods [185].
Several prominent studies have shown that species such as Yarrowia lipolytica and Candida pseudoglaebosa exhibit up to 90% efficiency in the biodegradation of persistent pollutants such as RR198; this efficiency is attributed to the high-level endogenous production of oxidoreductases and tyrosinases, which catalyze the degradation of azo dyes by the oxidative cleavage of their chromophore structures. This process converts the complex structures of the dyes into less-complex and/or unstable structures, which facilitates their mineralization by other less-efficient organisms [198,200]. In addition, these species possess an extraordinary adaptive capacity, resisting harsh pH conditions, temperature, and high concentrations of pollutants; these characteristics give them an advantage compared to other microorganisms that are more sensitive [201].
The biocatalytic potential of yeasts is exemplified by the microbial consortium Y-BC-SH, composed of Yarrowia sp., Barnettozyma californica, and Sterigmatomyces halophilus [185]. This consortium achieved complete decolorization of Reactive Black 5 within three hours, a result driven by the synergistic activity of laccases, manganese peroxidases (MnP), and azoreductases (AzoR) (Table 6). This metabolic–enzymatic synergism, combined with the stability and adaptive resilience of the various strains reported, indicates the relevance and viability of these highly efficient biotechnological alternatives [201].
A representative case is Geotrichum candidum, which generates DyP class peroxidases that degrade methyl orange up to 94.6% at high concentrations [202]. The generated metabolites are not completely degraded, and this may require a synergistic contribution from another species that degrades these metabolites. Similarly, Galactomyces geotrichum KL20A demonstrated 76.6% removal of methylene blue at 35 °C and 50 mg/L, whereas the HYC consortium (Sterigmatomyces halophilus and Meyerozyma guilliermondii) achieved 96.1% removal within 48 h, mediated by NADH-DCIP reductases [203]. These findings reinforce the importance of selecting metabolically compatible and enzymatically potent strains for biotechnological applications [201].
Among the most efficient yeast species reported are Cyberlindnera fabianii, Candida tropicalis A1, Candida zeylanoides, and Galactomyces geotrichum (strain MTCC 1360), all of which achieved degradation rates exceeding 97% in less than 12 h. Notably, Galactomyces geotrichum demonstrated complete degradation of methyl red within one hour at pH 3, while Candida tropicalis A1 achieved 97.5% degradation of Acid Red B, producing fewer recalcitrant metabolites such as 4-amino-naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid. The Y-BC-SH consortium also demonstrated complete degradation of Reactive Black 5 within three hours, facilitated by the combined activity of lipases, xylanases, and ligninolytic enzymes [204,205,206].
Table 6. Reports of synthetic dye degradation by yeasts and microbial consortia.
Table 6. Reports of synthetic dye degradation by yeasts and microbial consortia.
Yeast Strain/ConsortiumDyeMechanisms InvolvedMetabolites/Degraded ProductsConditions (Time (h), pH, T (°C), Dye Concentration (mg/L))Removal/
Decolorization (%)
Ref.
Cyberlindnera fabianiiAcid Red 14Laccase (Lac), Tyrosinase (Tyr), Manganese Peroxidase (Mnp), Azoreductase (AzoR)-12 h97[205]
pH 5
30 °C
50 mg/L
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeAcid Orange 7Biosorption (Immobilization in Fe3O4)-2.3 h
pH 6.5
35 °C
50 mg/L
Violet crystalThe enzymes involved are not identified.-24 h84.9[203,207]
pH 7
30 °C
1000 mg/L
Pichia kudriavzevii SDG12Reactive Black 5AzoreductaseUnspecified amines and aromatic compounds18 h100[208]
pH 7
32 °C
100 mg/L
Candida tropicalis A1Acid Red BAzoreductase (AZR), Laccase (Lac), Manganese peroxidase (MnP), Lignin peroxidases (LiP)4-amino-naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid, 4-hydrazinylnaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid, naphthalene-1,2,4-triol, 1-phenylethenol12 h966[209]
pH 7
30 °C
70 mg/L
Galactomyces geotrichum MTCC 1360Methyl Red-2-Aminobenzoic acid N,N-Dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine1 h100[204]
pH 3
30 °C
100 mg/L
Sterigmatomyces halophilus SSA-1575Reactive Black 55NADH-DCIP reductase
Lignin peroxidase (LiP)
Azoreductase
Catechol cis-9-octadecenoic acid Aniline 4-methylsulfonyl aniline Benzene 2-(4′-aminophenyl) sulfonyltholNaphthalene-1,2,4-triol2,7,8-triaminonaphthalenol12 h98.7[210]
pH 5
30 °C
750 mg/L
Candida zeylanoidesReactive Orange 16 (RO16)Reductases (azoreductase, NADH-dichlorophenolindophenol reductase)4-(Methyl sulfonyl)aniline, α-Hydroxybenzene propanoic acid5 days100[206]
-
28 °C
150 mg/L
Mixed consortium (Pleurotus ostreatus and Candida zeylanoides)Reactive Orange 16 (RO16)Manganese peroxidase (MnP), Laccase4-(Ethenyl Sulfonyl) benzene, (Methylsulfonyl) benzene, 2-(Phenyl Sulfonyl) ethanol, 4-(Ethenyl Sulfonyl) aniline, α-Hydroxybenzenepropanoic acid11 days87.5
-
28 °C
150 mg/L
Y-BC-SH Consortium *Reactive Black 5Lipase, Xylanase, Laccase, Azoreductase, LiP, MnP2,7,8-triaminenonaphthalen-1-ol, 2-chloro-4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazine, aniline, 2-naphthol, lauric anhydride3 h100[185]
pH 8
18 °C
200 mg/L
HYC Consortium **NADH-DCIP reductase, azoreductase, veratryl alcohol oxidase, aldehyde dehydrogenase1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (TMB), benzoic acid (BA), 2,4-Di-tert-butyl phenol (DTBP)48 h96.1[201]
pH 7
35 °C
50 mg/L
* Y-BC-SH: Yarrowia sp. SSA1642, Barnettozyma californica SSA1518, Sterigmatomyces halophilus SSA1511. ** HYC: Dominated by Sterigmatomyces halophilus SSA-1575 and Meyerozyma guilliermondii SSA-1547.

9. Conclusions

Synthetic dyes, particularly azo dyes, are abundant and widely used, with applications in a diverse range of industries worldwide. Of these dyes, more than 7000 variants are estimated to be commonly used in influential industrial sectors. It has been identified that the discharge of industrial effluents with high azo compound loads is generating environmental damage that is difficult to reverse. This is problematic because these compounds alter key parameters, such as pH, oxygen levels, and dissolved carbon levels, which are essential to maintaining ecological balance. Furthermore, the formation of recalcitrant and toxic intermediates poses an imminent threat to human and animal health. Given this situation, several remediation strategies have recently been reported, among which high-efficiency biotechnological processes stand out. More information is needed on the synergistic effects between species that enhance the mineralization of these pollutants, while minimizing the production of toxic intermediates.
Given the effects of the growing environmental pressure generated by these pollutants, biotechnological applications are attracting significant attention as efficient and eco-friendly strategies with the potential to decontaminate industrial effluents with high azo contaminant loads. These organic compounds, whose robust molecular structures confer extraordinary environmental resilience, challenge the traditional and standard physicochemical methods for treating these effluents, finding biotechnological methods a highly robust and efficient alternative. An interesting example is yeast, which not only demonstrates remarkable tolerance to harsh conditions, but also deploys a diverse enzymatic repertoire (laccases, peroxidases, and azoreductases) combined with biosorption processes capable of degrading complex chromophore structures with high efficiency. Furthermore, microorganisms such as Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus cereus, fungi such as Trametes versicolor and Aspergillus flavus and microalgae such as Chlorella vulgaris and Lychaete pellucida have demonstrated complementary capacities to remove these contaminants, each adapted to specific niches of pH, temperature, and concentration, which could exhibit synergistic effects with microorganisms that present limitations in a particular condition. This functional diversity not only expands the range of applications, but also invites us to rethink bioremediation as a cooperative process, where synergy between species can overcome individual limitations. In this sense, microorganisms are positioned not only as mere technical agents, but also as silent, highly efficient allies in restoring an ecological balance that has been deeply affected by the uncontrollable fashion and color industries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.C.C.-H. and C.D.G.-T.; methodology, D.C.C.-H. and C.D.G.-T.; validation, C.D.G.-T., E.J.O.-B., E.M. and D.I.; formal analysis, D.C.C.-H., C.D.G.-T., E.M., D.I. and E.J.O.-B.; investigation, D.C.C.-H., C.D.G.-T., E.M., D.I. and E.J.O.-B.; resources, D.C.C.-H.; data curation, D.C.C.-H. and C.D.G.-T.; writing—original draft preparation, D.C.C.-H. and E.J.O.-B.; writing—review and editing, D.C.C.-H., C.D.G.-T., E.M., D.I. and E.J.O.-B.; visualization, D.C.C.-H. and C.D.G.-T.; supervision, C.D.G.-T., E.M. and D.I.; project administration, C.D.G.-T.; funding acquisition, E.M., D.I. and C.D.G.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by Universidad del Norte.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors declare that AI was used only for grammar corrections using Grammarly software (v1.2.185.1726).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Solís, M.; Solís, A.; Pérez, H.I.; Manjarrez, N.; Flores, M. Microbial Decolouration of Azo Dyes: A Review. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 1723–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bafana, A.; Devi, S.S.; Chakrabarti, T. Azo Dyes: Past, Present and the Future. Environ. Rev. 2011, 19, 350–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chung, K.-T. Azo Dyes and Human Health: A Review. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C 2016, 34, 233–261, Erratum in J. Environ. Sci. Health Part C 2016, 34, 233–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Alsantali, R.I.; Raja, Q.A.; Alzahrani, A.Y.A.; Sadiq, A.; Naeem, N.; Mughal, E.U.; Al-Rooqi, M.M.; El Guesmi, N.; Moussa, Z.; Ahmed, S.A. Miscellaneous Azo Dyes: A Comprehensive Review on Recent Advancements in Biological and Industrial Applications. Dye. Pigment. 2022, 199, 110050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barciela, P.; Perez-Vazquez, A.; Prieto, M.A. Azo Dyes in the Food Industry: Features, Classification, Toxicity, Alternatives, and Regulation. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2023, 178, 113935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sen, S.K.; Raut, S.; Bandyopadhyay, P.; Raut, S. Fungal Decolouration and Degradation of Azo Dyes: A Review. Fungal Biol. Rev. 2016, 30, 112–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tiwari, A.; Joshi, M.; Salvi, N.; Gupta, D.; Gandhi, S.; Rajpoot, K.; Tekade, R.K. Chapter 21—Toxicity of Pharmaceutical Azo Dyes. In Advances in Pharmaceutical Product Development and Research; Tekade, R.K., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; Volume 2, pp. 569–603. ISBN 978-0-323-98367-9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yamjala, K.; Nainar, M.S.; Ramisetti, N.R. Methods for the Analysis of Azo Dyes Employed in Food Industry—A Review. Food Chem. 2016, 192, 813–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ramamurthy, K.; Priya, P.S.; Murugan, R.; Arockiaraj, J. Hues of Risk: Investigating Genotoxicity and Environmental Impacts of Azo Textile Dyes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 33190–33211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shetty, A.; Goyal, A. Total Organic Carbon Analysis in Water—A Review of Current Methods. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 65, 3881–3886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Y.; Li, C.; Bao, J.; Wang, X.; Yu, W.; Shao, L. Degradation of Azo Dyes with Different Functional Groups in Simulated Wastewater by Electrocoagulation. Water 2022, 14, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khare, U.K.; Bose, P.; Vankar, P.S. Impact of Ozonation on Subsequent Treatment of Azo Dye Solutions. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 82, 1012–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Akter, T.; Protity, A.T.; Shaha, M.; Al Mamun, M.; Hashem, A. The Impact of Textile Dyes on the Environment. In Nanohybrid Materials for Treatment of Textiles Dyes; Ahmad, A., Jawaid, M., Mohamad Ibrahim, M.N., Yaqoob, A.A., Alshammari, M.B., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 401–431. ISBN 978-981-99-3901-5. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ma, S.; Lee, S.; Kim, K.; Im, J.; Jeon, H. Purification of Organic Pollutants in Cationic Thiazine and Azo Dye Solutions Using Plasma-Based Advanced Oxidation Process via Submerged Multi-Hole Dielectric Barrier Discharge. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 255, 117715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lade, H.; Kadam, A.; Paul, D.; Govindwar, S. Biodegradation and Detoxification of Textile Azo Dyes by Bacterial Consortium under Sequential Microaerophilic/Aerobic Processes. EXCLI J. 2015, 14, 158–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Benkhaya, S.; M’rabet, S.; El Harfi, A. Classifications, Properties, Recent Synthesis and Applications of Azo Dyes. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ajaz, M.; Shakeel, S.; Rehman, A. Microbial Use for Azo Dye Degradation—A Strategy for Dye Bioremediation. Int. Microbiol. 2020, 23, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singh, K.R.; Poluri, K.M. Facile Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization of κ-Carrageenan-Silver-Bentonite Based Nanocatalytic Platform for Efficient Degradation of Anionic Azo Dyes. Environ. Res. 2023, 231, 116145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, A.; Sheng, D.; Zhang, C.; Gong, J.; Fu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, W.; Xia, L.; Xu, W. Salt-Free Reactive Dyeing of Cotton Fibers in a Ternary Solvent System with Different Reactive Dye Chemistries. Cellulose 2023, 30, 463–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Puvaneswari, N.; Muthukrishnan, J.; Gunasekaran, P. Toxicity Assessment and Microbial Degradation of Azo Dyes. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2006, 44, 618. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rubalajyothi, P.; Rajendran, A.; Gangadhar, L.; Pandiyan, V. Chronic Neurological Effects and Photocatalytic Investigation of AZO Dyes. Neurosci. Inform. 2022, 2, 100049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fouad, F.A.; Youssef, D.G.; Shahat, F.M.; Abd El-Ghany, M.N. Role of Microorganisms in Biodegradation of Pollutants. In Handbook of Biodegradable Materials; Ali, G.A.M., Makhlouf, A.S.H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 221–260. ISBN 978-3-031-09710-2. [Google Scholar]
  23. Adane, T.; Adugna, A.T.; Alemayehu, E. Textile Industry Effluent Treatment Techniques. J. Chem. 2021, 2021, 5314404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ahmad, A.A.; Hameed, B.H. Fixed-Bed Adsorption of Reactive Azo Dye onto Granular Activated Carbon Prepared from Waste. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 175, 298–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ying, T.Y.; Raman, A.A.A.; Bello, M.M.; Buthiyappan, A. Magnetic Graphene Oxide-Biomass Activated Carbon Composite for Dye Removal. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 37, 2179–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Konicki, W.; Aleksandrzak, M.; Moszyński, D.; Mijowska, E. Adsorption of Anionic Azo-Dyes from Aqueous Solutions onto Graphene Oxide: Equilibrium, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 496, 188–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bazgir, A.; Khorshidi, A.; Kamani, H.; Ashrafi, S.D.; Naghipour, D. Modeling of Azo Dyes Adsorption on Magnetic NiFe2O4/RGO Nanocomposite Using Response Surface Methodology. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2019, 17, 931–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mossavi, E.; Hosseini Sabzevari, M.; Ghaedi, M.; Ahmadi Azqhandi, M.H. Adsorption of the Azo Dyes from Wastewater Media by a Renewable Nanocomposite Based on the Graphene Sheets and Hydroxyapatite/ZnO Nanoparticles. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 350, 118568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sirajudheen, P.; Nikitha, M.R.; Karthikeyan, P.; Meenakshi, S. Perceptive Removal of Toxic Azo Dyes from Water Using Magnetic Fe3O4 Reinforced Graphene Oxide–Carboxymethyl Cellulose Recyclable Composite: Adsorption Investigation of Parametric Studies and Their Mechanisms. Surf. Interfaces 2020, 21, 100648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Banerjee, P.; Barman, S.R.; Mukhopadhayay, A.; Das, P. Ultrasound Assisted Mixed Azo Dye Adsorption by Chitosan–Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2017, 117, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mielczarski, J.A.; Atenas, G.M.; Mielczarski, E. Role of Iron Surface Oxidation Layers in Decomposition of Azo-Dye Water Pollutants in Weak Acidic Solutions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2005, 56, 289–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gnanasekaran, L.; Priya, A.K.; Ghfar, A.A.; Sekar, K.; Santhamoorthy, M.; Arthi, M.; Soto-Moscoso, M. The Influence of Heterostructured TiO2/ZnO Nanomaterials for the Removal of Azo Dye Pollutant. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Topkaya, E.; Konyar, M.; Yatmaz, H.C.; Öztürk, K. Pure ZnO and Composite ZnO/TiO2 Catalyst Plates: A Comparative Study for the Degradation of Azo Dye, Pesticide and Antibiotic in Aqueous Solutions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 430, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kanagaraj, J.; Senthilvelan, T.; Panda, R.C. Degradation of Azo Dyes by Laccase: Biological Method to Reduce Pollution Load in Dye Wastewater. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2015, 17, 1443–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Senthil Rathi, B.; Senthil Kumar, P. Sustainable Approach on the Biodegradation of Azo Dyes: A Short Review. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 33, 100578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Singh, P.K.; Singh, R.L. Bio-Removal of Azo Dyes: A Review. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 5, 108–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shi, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xing, L.; Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, D. Recent Advances in the Biodegradation of Azo Dyes. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vitor, V.; Corso, C.R. Decolorization of Textile Dye by Candida Albicans Isolated from Industrial Effluents. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35, 1353–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Charumathi, D.; Das, N. Packed Bed Column Studies for the Removal of Synthetic Dyes from Textile Wastewater Using Immobilised Dead C. Tropicalis. Desalination 2012, 285, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aksu, Z.; Dönmez, G. A Comparative Study on the Biosorption Characteristics of Some Yeasts for Remazol Blue Reactive Dye. Chemosphere 2003, 50, 1075–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Van der Zee, F.P.; Cervantes, F.J. Impact and Application of Electron Shuttles on the Redox (Bio) Transformation of Contaminants: A Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 256–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dos Santos, A.B.; Cervantes, F.J.; Van Lier, J.B. Review Paper on Current Technologies for Decolourisation of Textile Wastewaters: Perspectives for Anaerobic Biotechnology. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2369–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jafari, N.; Soudi, M.R.; Kasra-Kermanshahi, R. Biodegradation Perspectives of Azo Dyes by Yeasts. Microbiology 2014, 83, 484–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Song, L.; Shao, Y.; Ning, S.; Tan, L. Performance of a Newly Isolated Salt-Tolerant Yeast Strain Pichia Occidentalis G1 for Degrading and Detoxifying Azo Dyes. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 233, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Charumathi, D.; Das, N. Bioaccumulation of Synthetic Dyes by Candida tropicalis Growing in Sugarcane Bagasse Extract Medium. Adv. Biol. Res. 2010, 4, 233–240. [Google Scholar]
  46. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Campos, A.C.E.; Treuherz, A.; Murasaki, R.T.; Gonzalez, D.; Mújica, O.J. New Health Science Descriptors to classify and retrieve information on equity. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 2020, 44, e98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wang, S.; Li, H.; Scells, H.; Locke, D.; Zuccon, G. MeSH Term Suggestion for Systematic Review Literature Search. In Proceedings of the 25th Australasian Document Computing Symposium, Virtual, 9 December 2021; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  49. Riva, J.J.; Malik, K.M.P.; Burnie, S.J.; Endicott, A.R.; Busse, J.W. What Is Your Research Question? An Introduction to the PICOT Format for Clinicians. J. Can. Chiropr. Assoc. 2012, 56, 167. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ballew, B.S. Elsevier’s Scopus® Database. J. Electron. Resour. Med. Libr. 2009, 6, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhu, J.; Liu, W. A Tale of Two Databases: The Use of Web of Science and Scopus in Academic Papers. Scientometrics 2020, 123, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Haque, M.M.; Haque, M.A.; Mosharaf, M.K.; Marcus, P.K. Decolorization, Degradation and Detoxification of Carcinogenic Sulfonated Azo Dye Methyl Orange by Newly Developed Biofilm Consortia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 793–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Haque, M.M.; Haque, M.A.; Mosharaf, M.K.; Marcus, P.K. Novel Bacterial Biofilm Consortia That Degrade and Detoxify the Carcinogenic Diazo Dye Congo Red. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Agrawal, S.; Tipre, D.; Dave, S.R. Biotreatment of Azo Dye Containing Textile Industry Effluent by a Developed Bacterial Consortium Immobilised on Brick Pieces in an Indigenously Designed Packed Bed Biofilm Reactor. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 39, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. John, A.; Yang, H.H.; Muhammad, S.; Khan, Z.I.; Yu, H.; Luqman, M.; Tofail, M.; Hussain, M.I.; Awan, M.U.F. Cross Talk between Synthetic Food Colors (Azo Dyes), Oral Flora, and Cardiovascular Disorders. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Saini, R.; Choudhary, K. Chapter 32—Toxic Potential of Azo Dyes: A Broader Understanding. In Hazardous Chemicals; Chawla, M., Singh, J., Kaushik, R.D., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2025; pp. 469–481. ISBN 978-0-323-95235-4. [Google Scholar]
  57. Goswami, D.; Mukherjee, J.; Mondal, C.; Bhunia, B. Bioremediation of Azo Dye: A Review on Strategies, Toxicity Assessment, Mechanisms, Bottlenecks and Prospects. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 954, 176426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hihara, T.; Okada, Y.; Morita, Z. Relationship between Photochemical Properties and Colourfastness Due to Light-Related Effects on Monoazo Reactive Dyes Derived from H-Acid, γ-Acid, and Related Naphthalene Sulfonic Acids. Dye. Pigment. 2004, 60, 23–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Benkhaya, S.; M’rabet, S.; Lgaz, H.; El Bachiri, A.; El Harfi, A. Dyes: Classification, Pollution, and Environmental Effects. In Dye Biodegradation, Mechanisms and Techniques: Recent Advances; Muthu, S.S., Khadir, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 1–50. ISBN 978-981-16-5932-4. [Google Scholar]
  60. Phan, K.-H.; Le, L.-T.; Ninh, T.-T.N.; Tran, C.-S.; Nguyen, T.-T.; Nguyen, D.-T.-D.; Tra, V.-T.; Tran, T.-D.; Nguyen, T.-B.; Mai, T.-P.; et al. Decolorization and Degradation of Azo Dyes in Thermophilic Biological Wastewater Treatment Process: A Mini-Review. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2024, 10, 101018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tkaczyk, A.; Mitrowska, K.; Posyniak, A. Synthetic Organic Dyes as Contaminants of the Aquatic Environment and Their Implications for Ecosystems: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 717, 137222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Balalaie, S.; Ramezanpour, S.; Bararjanian, M.; Gross, J.H. DABCO-Catalyzed Efficient Synthesis of Naphthopyran Derivatives via One-Pot Three-Component Condensation Reaction at Room Temperature. Synth. Commun. 2008, 38, 1078–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dhungana, B.; Peng, H.; Kutarna, S.; Umbuzeiro, G.; Shrestha, S.; Liu, J.; Jones, P.D.; Subedi, B.; Giesy, J.P.; Cobb, G.P. Abundances and Concentrations of Brominated Azo Dyes Detected in Indoor Dust. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 252, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sabnis, R.W.; Rangnekar, D.W.; Sonawane, N.D. 2-Aminothiophenes by the Gewald Reaction. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1999, 36, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Islam, T.; Repon, M.R.; Islam, T.; Sarwar, Z.; Rahman, M.M. Impact of Textile Dyes on Health and Ecosystem: A Review of Structure, Causes, and Potential Solutions; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; Volume 30, ISBN 0123456789. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang, M.-M.; Chen, W.-M.; Chen, B.-Y.; Chang, C.-T.; Hsueh, C.-C.; Ding, Y.; Lin, K.-L.; Xu, H. Comparative Study on Characteristics of Azo Dye Decolorization by Indigenous Decolorizers. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 2651–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ozdemir, O.; Armagan, B.; Turan, M.; Çelik, M.S. Comparison of the Adsorption Characteristics of Azo-Reactive Dyes on Mezoporous Minerals. Dye. Pigment. 2004, 62, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dembitsky, V.M.; Terent’ev, A.O. Azo Dyes and the Microbial World: Synthesis, Breakdown, and Bioactivity. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 16, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mahmood, S.; Azeem, K.; Muhammad, A.; Tariq, M.; Crowley, D.E. Detoxification of Azo Dyes by Bacterial Oxidoreductase Enzymes. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2016, 36, 639–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pandey, A.; Singh, P.; Iyengar, L. Bacterial Decolorization and Degradation of Azo Dyes. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2007, 59, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jeong, S.W.; Yang, J.E.; Choi, Y.J. Microbial Treatment of Azo Dyes Using Biogenic Bimetallic Iron–Molybdenum Nanoparticles. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 41, 2059–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lu, X.; Liu, R. Treatment of Azo Dye-Containing Wastewater Using Integrated Processes. In Biodegradation of Azo Dyes; Atacag Erkurt, H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 133–155. ISBN 978-3-642-11847-0. [Google Scholar]
  73. Mota, I.G.C.; Renata Alexandra Moreira Das, N.; Sara Sayonara Da Cruz, N.; Bruna Leal Lima, M.; Ana Heloneida De Araújo, M.; Passos, T.S. Artificial Dyes: Health Risks and the Need for Revision of International Regulations. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 1578–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ozyurt, M.; Ataçag, H. Biodegradation of Azo Dyes: A Review. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2003, 12, 1294–1302. [Google Scholar]
  75. Shyla, H.; Saha, P.; Rao, K.V.B. Biodegradation and Decolorization of Two Different Azo Dyes, Reactive Blue 221 and Direct Black 38, and Assessment of the Degraded Dye Metabolites. Desalin. Water Treat. 2018, 123, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mishra, D. Food Colors and Associated Oxidative Stress in Chemical Carcinogenesis. In Handbook of Oxidative Stress in Cancer: Mechanistic Aspects; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  77. Libardi, N.; Schallemberger, J.B.; Hassemer, M.E.N.; da Costa, R.H.R.; Soccol, C.R.; de Souza Vandenberghe, L.P. A Combination of Biosorption and Enzymatic Degradation of Azo Dyes. In Microbial Remediation of Azo Dyes with Prokaryotes; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 259–277. [Google Scholar]
  78. Kamani, H.; Hosseinzehi, M.; Ghayebzadeh, M.; Azari, A.; Ashrafi, S.D.; Abdipour, H. Degradation of Reactive Red 198 Dye from Aqueous Solutions by Combined Technology Advanced Sonofenton with Zero Valent Iron: Characteristics/ Effect of Parameters/Kinetic Studies. Heliyon 2024, 10, e23667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Khan, S.; Noor, T.; Iqbal, N.; Yaqoob, L. Photocatalytic Dye Degradation from Textile Wastewater: A Review. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 21751–21767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Al Arni, S.; Ghareba, S.; Solisio, C.; Alves Palma, M.S.; Converti, A. Methods of Reactive Red 141 Dye Decolorization, Treatment, and Removal from Industrial Wastewaters: A Critical Review. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2020, 38, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Deb, H.; Hasan, M.K.; Islam, M.Z.; Yang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, J. Deep Analysis of Adsorption Isotherm for Rapid Sorption of Acid Blue 93 and Reactive Red 195 on Reactive Graphene. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 67410–67428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nho, S.W.; Cui, X.; Kweon, O.; Jin, J.; Chen, H.; Moon, M.S.; Kim, S.J.; Cerniglia, C.E. Phylogenetically Diverse Bacteria Isolated from Tattoo Inks, an Azo Dye-Rich Environment, Decolorize a Wide Range of Azo Dyes. Ann. Microbiol. 2021, 71, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Singh, G.B.; Vinayak, A.; Mudgal, G.; Kesari, K.K. Azo Dye Bioremediation: An Interdisciplinary Path to Sustainable Fashion. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2024, 36, 103832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Alegbe, E.O.; Uthman, T.O. A Review of History, Properties, Classification, Applications and Challenges of Natural and Synthetic Dyes. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mukherjee, P.; Sharma, R.S.; Mishra, V. Deciphering the Ecological Impact of Azo Dye Pollution through Microbial Community Analysis in Water–Sediment Microcosms. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dissanayake, M.; Liyanage, N.; Herath, C.; Rathnayake, S.; Fernando, E.Y. Mineralization of Persistent Azo Dye Pollutants by a Microaerophilic Tropical Lake Sediment Mixed Bacterial Consortium. Environ. Adv. 2021, 3, 100038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bardi, L.; Marzona, M. Factors Affecting the Complete Mineralization of Azo Dyes. In Biodegradation of Azo Dyes; Atacag Erkurt, H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 195–210. ISBN 978-3-642-11847-0. [Google Scholar]
  88. Zafar, S.; Bukhari, D.A.; Rehman, A. Azo Dyes Degradation by Microorganisms—An Efficient and Sustainable Approach. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 103437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ngo, A.C.R.; Tischler, D. Microbial Degradation of Azo Dyes: Approaches and Prospects for a Hazard-Free Conversion by Microorganisms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kumari, U. Textile Dyes and Their Impact on the Natural Environment. In Dye Pollution from Textile Industry: Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development; Singh, P., Ed.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 17–30. ISBN 978-981-97-5341-3. [Google Scholar]
  91. Banerjee, P.; Kemmler, E.; Dunkel, M.; Preissner, R. ProTox 3.0: A Webserver for the Prediction of Toxicity of Chemicals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024, 52, W513–W520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Banerjee, P.; Ulker, O.C. Combinative Ex Vivo Studies and in Silico Models ProTox-II for Investigating the Toxicity of Chemicals Used Mainly in Cosmetic Products. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2022, 32, 542–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rawat, D.; Sharma, R.S.; Karmakar, S.; Arora, L.S.; Mishra, V. Ecotoxic Potential of a Presumably Non-Toxic Azo Dye. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 148, 528–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Luan, F.; Xu, X.; Liu, H.; Cordeiro, M.N.D.S. Review of Quantitative Structure-Activity/Property Relationship Studies of Dyes: Recent Advances and Perspectives. Color. Technol. 2013, 129, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Toropova, A.P.; Toropov, A.A.; Roncaglioni, A.; Benfenati, E. Monte Carlo Technique to Study the Adsorption Affinity of Azo Dyes by Applying New Statistical Criteria of the Predictive Potential. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2022, 33, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Abd-El-Aziz, A.S.; Alsaggaf, A.; Assirey, E.; Naqvi, A.; Okasha, R.M.; Afifi, T.H.; Hagar, M. A New Family of Benzo[h]Chromene Based Azo Dye: Synthesis, In-Silico and DFT Studies with in Vitro Antimicrobial and Antiproliferative Assessment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kamenická, B. Chemical Degradation of Azo Dyes Using Different Reducing Agents: A Review. J. Water Process Eng. 2024, 61, 105350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Saxena, A.; Gupta, S. Toxicological Impact of Azo DyesAzo Dyes and Their Microbial Degraded Byproducts on Flora and Fauna. In Innovations in Environmental Biotechnology; Arora, S., Kumar, A., Ogita, S., Yau, Y.-Y., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 319–343. ISBN 978-981-16-4445-0. [Google Scholar]
  99. Gomaa, H.; Emran, M.Y.; El-Gammal, M.A. Biodegradation of Azo Dye Pollutants Using Microorganisms. In Handbook of Biodegradable Materials; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Selvaraj, V.; Swarna Karthika, T.; Mansiya, C.; Alagar, M. An over Review on Recently Developed Techniques, Mechanisms and Intermediate Involved in the Advanced Azo Dye Degradation for Industrial Applications. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1224, 129195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dai, Q.; Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Huang, J.; Li, L. Sulfide-Mediated Azo Dye Degradation and Microbial Community Analysis in a Single-Chamber Air Cathode Microbial Fuel Cell. Bioelectrochemistry 2020, 131, 107349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Yousif, M.; Ibrahim, A.H.; Al-Rawi, S.S.; Majeed, A.; Iqbal, M.A.; Kashif, M.; Abidin, Z.U.; Arbaz, M.; Ali, S.; Hussain, S.A.; et al. Visible Light Assisted Photooxidative Facile Degradation of Azo Dyes in Water Using a Green Method. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 16138–16149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Biswas, K.; Ahamed, Z.; Dutta, T.; Mallick, B.; Khuda-Bukhsh, A.R.; Biswas, J.K.; Mandal, S.K. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Waste Leaves of Tea (Camellia Sinensis) and Their Catalytic Potential for Degradation of Azo Dyes. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1318, 139448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Dadvar, E.; Kalantary, R.R.; Ahmad Panahi, H.; Peyravi, M. Efficiency of Polymeric Membrane Graphene Oxide-TiO2 for Removal of Azo Dye. J. Chem. 2017, 2017, 6217987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wawrzkiewicz, M.; Kucharczyk, A. Adsorptive Removal of Direct Azo Dyes from Textile Wastewaters Using Weakly Basic Anion Exchange Resin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 4886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ismail, A.M.; Menazea, A.A.; Ali, H. Selective Adsorption of Cationic Azo Dyes onto Zeolite Nanorod-Based Membranes Prepared via Laser Ablation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 19352–19367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mohajerani, M.; Mehrvar, M.; Ein-Mozaffari, F. An Overview of the Integration of Advanced Oxidation Technologies and Other Processes for Water and Wastewater Treatment. Int. J. Eng. 2009, 3, 120–146. [Google Scholar]
  108. Kawsar, M.; Sahadat Hossain, M.; Tabassum, S.; Bahadur, N.M.; Ahmed, S. Synthesis of Different Types of Nano-Hydroxyapatites for Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Textile Dye (Congo Red): A Crystallographic Characterization. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 11570–11583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hsueh, C.L.; Huang, Y.H.; Wang, C.C.; Chen, C.Y. Degradation of Azo Dyes Using Low Iron Concentration of Fenton and Fenton-like System. Chemosphere 2005, 58, 1409–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fan, J.; Fan, F.; Wang, W.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Chang, J.; Liang, Q.; Wang, D.; Liu, Z.; Shao, L. Treatment of Acid Red 73 Wastewater by the O3/RSR-BCR Process. Chem. Eng. Process.-Process Intensif. 2021, 160, 108296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Fu, L.; You, S.-J.; Zhang, G.; Yang, F.-L.; Fang, X. Degradation of Azo Dyes Using In-Situ Fenton Reaction Incorporated into H2O2-Producing Microbial Fuel Cell. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 160, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ribeiro, J.A.S.; Alves, J.F.; Salgado, B.C.B.; Oliveira, A.C.; Araújo, R.S.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E. Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Degradation of Azo Dyes over a Magnetite-Based Catalyst: Kinetic and Thermodynamic Studies. Catalysts 2024, 14, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sun, J.-H.; Sun, S.-P.; Sun, J.-Y.; Sun, R.-X.; Qiao, L.-P.; Guo, H.-Q.; Fan, M.-H. Degradation of Azo Dye Acid Black 1 Using Low Concentration Iron of Fenton Process Facilitated by Ultrasonic Irradiation. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2007, 14, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Guivarch, E.; Trevin, S.; Lahitte, C.; Oturan, M.A. Degradation of Azo Dyes in Water by Electro-Fenton Process. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2003, 1, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Tantak, N.P.; Chaudhari, S. Degradation of Azo Dyes by Sequential Fenton’s Oxidation and Aerobic Biological Treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 136, 698–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Sun, J.-H.; Sun, S.-P.; Wang, G.-L.; Qiao, L.-P. Degradation of Azo Dye Amido Black 10B in Aqueous Solution by Fenton Oxidation Process. Dye. Pigment. 2007, 74, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kumar, J.E.; Sahoo, M.K. A Review on Effect of Operational Parameters for the Degradation of Azo Dyes by Some Advanced Oxidation Processes. Sustain. Chem. Environ. 2025, 11, 100274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wang, S.; Luo, C.; Tan, F.; Cheng, X.; Ma, Q.; Wu, D.; Li, P.; Zhang, F.; Ma, J. Degradation of Congo Red by UV Photolysis of Nitrate: Kinetics and Degradation Mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 262, 118276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chowdhury, A.P.; Anantharaju, K.S.; Keshavamurthy, K.; Rokhum, S.L. Recent Advances in Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation Approaches for Azo Dyes. J. Chem. 2023, 2023, 9780955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Arora, C.; Kumar, P.; Soni, S.; Mittal, J.; Mittal, A.; Singh, B. Efficient Removal of Malachite Green Dye from Aqueous Solution Using Curcuma Caesia Based Activated Carbon. Desalin. Water Treat. 2020, 195, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Akpomie, K.G.; Conradie, J. Advances in Application of Cotton-Based Adsorbents for Heavy Metals Trapping, Surface Modifications and Future Perspectives. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 201, 110825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Zhao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Song, M.; Xu, Z.; Sun, Z.; Xu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liao, X. Interface Engineering of Ti-MOFs: Adsorption of Anionic, Cationic and Neutral Dyes in Wastewater. J. Mol. Struct. 2023, 1283, 135268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Joseph, J.; Radhakrishnan, R.C.; Johnson, J.K.; Joy, S.P.; Thomas, J. Ion-Exchange Mediated Removal of Cationic Dye-Stuffs from Water Using Ammonium Phosphomolybdate. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 242, 122488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rathod, P.B.; Singh, M.P.; Taware, A.S.; Deshmukh, S.U.; Tagad, C.K.; Kulkarni, A.; Kanagare, A.B. Comprehensive Insights into Water Remediation: Chemical, Biotechnological, and Nanotechnological Perspectives. Environ. Pollut. Bioavailab. 2024, 36, 2329660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zainudin, N.F.; Sam, S.T.; Wong, Y.S.; Ismail, H.; Walli, S.; Inoue, K.; Kawamura, G.; Tan, W.K. Degradation of Diazo Congo Red Dye by Using Synthesized Poly-Ferric-Silicate-Sulphate through Co-Polymerization Process. Polymers 2023, 15, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Wei, Y.; Cheng, X.; Ding, A.; Xu, J. Magnesium Silicate Polymer as a Coagulant for Reactive Dye Removal from Wastewater: Considering the Intrinsic PH in Magnesium Silicate Polymer and Coagulation Behavior. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 26094–26100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kadhim, R.J.; Al-Ani, F.H.; Al-Shaeli, M.; Alsalhy, Q.F.; Figoli, A. Removal of Dyes Using Graphene Oxide (Go) Mixed Matrix Membranes. Membranes 2020, 10, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Al-Tohamy, R.; Ali, S.S.; Li, F.; Okasha, K.M.; Mahmoud, Y.A.-G.; Elsamahy, T.; Jiao, H.; Fu, Y.; Sun, J. A Critical Review on the Treatment of Dye-Containing Wastewater: Ecotoxicological and Health Concerns of Textile Dyes and Possible Remediation Approaches for Environmental Safety. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 231, 113160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ikram, M.; Zahoor, M.; Naeem, M.; Islam, N.U.; Shah, A.B.; Shahzad, B. Bacterial Oxidoreductive Enzymes as Molecular Weapons for the Degradation and Metabolism of the Toxic Azo Dyes in Wastewater: A Review. Z. Phys. Chem. 2023, 237, 187–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Dias, A.A.; Lucas, M.S.; Sampaio, A.; Peres, J.A.; Bezerra, R.M.F. Decolorization of Azo Dyes by Yeasts. In Biodegradation of Azo Dyes; Atacag Erkurt, H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 183–193. ISBN 978-3-642-11847-0. [Google Scholar]
  131. Yu, J.; Ogata, D.; Gai, Z.; Taguchi, S.; Tanaka, I.; Ooi, T.; Yao, M. Structures of AzrA and of AzrC Complexed with Substrate or Inhibitor: Insight into Substrate Specificity and Catalytic Mechanism. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2014, 70, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Krishnamoorthy, R.; Choudhury, A.R.; Jose, P.A.; Suganya, K.; Senthilkumar, M.; Prabhakaran, J.; Gopal, N.O.; Choi, J.; Kim, K.; Anandham, R.; et al. Long-Term Exposure to Azo Dyes from Textile Wastewater Causes the Abundance of Saccharibacteria Population. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sehar, S.; Rasool, T.; Syed, H.M.; Mir, M.A.; Naz, I.; Rehman, A.; Shah, M.S.; Akhter, M.S.; Mahmood, Q.; Younis, A. Recent Advances in Biodecolorization and Biodegradation of Environmental Threatening Textile Finishing Dyes. 3 Biotech 2022, 12, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Khudhair, S.H.; Al-Fayaad, D.B.M. Bacterial Biodegradation of Congo Red Dye Using Local Bacterial Isolates. Iraqi J. Sci. 2022, 63, 4674–4682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhao, B.-H.; Zhang, B.-L.; Zhang, B.-Y.; Liu, R.-X.; Liu, X.-M. The Bio-Decolorization of Methyl Orange by S.Putrefaciens CN32 and Responding Mechanism to Salinity Stress Based on Transcriptomic Analysis. Water Res. 2025, 272, 122923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Jasińska, A.; Walaszczyk, A.; Paraszkiewicz, K. Omics-Based Approaches in Research on Textile Dye Microbial Decolorization. Molecules 2024, 29, 2771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kamal, I.M.; Abdeltawab, N.F.; Ragab, Y.M.; Farag, M.A.; Ramadan, M.A. Biodegradation, Decolorization, and Detoxification of Di-Azo Dye Direct Red 81 by Halotolerant, Alkali-Thermo-Tolerant Bacterial Mixed Cultures. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Masarbo, R.S.; Karegoudar, T.B. Decolourisation of Toxic Azo Dye Fast Red E by Three Bacterial Strains: Process Optimisation and Toxicity Assessment. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2022, 102, 2686–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Pundir, A.; Thakur, M.S.; Prakash, S.; Kumari, N.; Sharma, N.; Parameswari, E.; He, Z.; Nam, S.; Thakur, M.; Puri, S.; et al. Fungi as Versatile Biocatalytic Tool for Treatment of Textile Wastewater Effluents. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2024, 36, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Nagraj; Chaurasia, P.K.; Bharati, S.L.; Sharma, N.; Kumar, J.; Sivalingam, A.M. Degradation of Dyes by Fungi: An Overview on Recent Updates. Microbe 2025, 6, 100232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Takkar, S.; Tyagi, B.; Kumar, N.; Kumari, T.; Iqbal, K.; Varma, A.; Thakur, I.S.; Mishra, A. Biodegradation of Methyl Red Dye by a Novel Actinobacterium Zhihengliuella Sp. ISTPL4: Kinetic Studies, Isotherm and Biodegradation Pathway. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 26, 102348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Gomaa, H.; Emran, M.Y.; El-Gammal, M.A. Biodegradation of Azo Dye Pollutants Using Microorganisms. In Handbook of Biodegradable Materials; Ali, G.A.M., Makhlouf, A.S.H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 781–809. ISBN 978-3-031-09710-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Samuchiwal, S.; Abhishek, S.; Koushalya, S.; Shubha, S.; Malik, A. Unveiling the Azo-Reductase Mechanism in Pseudomonas Putida for Efficient Decolorization of Textile Reactive Dyes: An in-Silico Study. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2025, 43, 5164–5177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Krithika, A.; Gayathri, K.V.; Kumar, D.T.; Doss, C.G.P. Mixed Azo Dyes Degradation by an Intracellular Azoreductase Enzyme from Alkaliphilic Bacillus Subtilis: A Molecular Docking Study. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 3033–3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ikram, M.; Naeem, M.; Zahoor, M.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Oyekanmi, A.A.; Ullah, R.; Farraj, D.A.A.; Elshikh, M.S.; Zekker, I.; Gulfam, N. Biological Degradation of the Azo Dye Basic Orange 2 by Escherichia Coli: A Sustainable and Ecofriendly Approach for the Treatment of Textile Wastewater. Water 2022, 14, 2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhu, C.; Mahmood, Z.; Siddique, M.S.; Wang, H.; Anqi, H.; Sillanpää, M. Structure-Based Long-Term Biodegradation of the Azo Dye: Insights from the Bacterial Community Succession and Efficiency Comparison. Water 2021, 13, 3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Fayyaz, I.; Saddick, S.; Mahmood, R.T.; Asad, M.J.; Hussain, M.A.; Hu, J.; Awais, M.; Khan, M.I.; Saydaxmetova, S. Biodegradation of Azo and Disperse Dyes by Trametes versicolor: Process Optimization and MnP Enzyme Dynamics. Results Eng. 2025, 25, 103980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ameen, F.; Dawoud, T.M.; Alshehrei, F.; Alsamhary, K.; Almansob, A. Decolorization of Acid Blue 29, Disperse Red 1 and Congo Red by Different Indigenous Fungal Strains. Chemosphere 2021, 271, 129532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. El Awady, M.E.; El-Shall, F.N.; Mohamed, G.E.; Abd-Elaziz, A.M.; Abdel-Monem, M.O.; Hassan, M.G. Exploring the Decolorization Efficiency and Biodegradation Mechanisms of Different Functional Textile Azo Dyes by Streptomyces Albidoflavus 3MGH. BMC Microbiol. 2024, 24, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kumaran, S.; Ngo, A.C.R.; Schultes, F.P.J.; Saravanan, V.S.; Tischler, D. In Vitro and in Silico Analysis of Brilliant Black Degradation by Actinobacteria and a Paraburkholderia sp. Genomics 2022, 114, 110266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kameche, K.; Amrani, S.; Mouzaoui, S.; Aït-Amar, H. Biodegradation of Diazo Dye Evans Blue by Four Strains of Streptomyces Isolated from Soils of Algeria. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 46, 102529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Aounallah, F.; Hkiri, N.; Fouzai, K.; Elaoud, A.; Ayed, L.; Asses, N. Biodegradation Pathway of Congo Red Azo Dye by Geotrichum Candidum and Toxicity Assessment of Metabolites. Catal. Lett. 2024, 154, 6064–6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Al-Tohamy, R.; Sun, J.; Fareed, M.F.; Kenawy, E.R.; Ali, S.S. Ecofriendly Biodegradation of Reactive Black 5 by Newly Isolated Sterigmatomyces Halophilus SSA1575, Valued for Textile Azo Dye Wastewater Processing and Detoxification. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Feng, Y.; Cui, J.; Xu, B.; Jiang, Y.; Fu, C.; Tan, L. A Potentially Practicable Halotolerant Yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii A4 for Decolorizing and Detoxifying Azo Dyes and Its Possible Halotolerance Mechanisms. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ali, S.S.; Al-Tohamy, R.; Sun, J. Performance of Meyerozyma Caribbica as a Novel Manganese Peroxidase-Producing Yeast Inhabiting Wood-Feeding Termite Gut Symbionts for Azo Dye Decolorization and Detoxification. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Khalaf, H.A.; El-Sheekh, M.M.; Makhlof, M.E.M. Lychaete Pellucida as a Novel Biosorbent for the Biodegradation of Hazardous Azo Dyes. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Ishchi, T.; Sibi, G. Azo Dye Degradation by Chlorella vulgaris: Optimization and Kinetics. Int. J. Biol. Chem 2020, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Filote, C.; Roșca, M.; Hlihor, R.M.; Cozma, P.; Simion, I.M.; Apostol, M.; Gavrilescu, M. Sustainable Application of Biosorption and Bioaccumulation of Persistent Pollutants in Wastewater Treatment: Current Practice. Processes 2021, 9, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Pinheiro, L.R.S.; Gradíssimo, D.G.; Xavier, L.P.; Santos, A.V. Degradation of Azo Dyes: Bacterial Potential for Bioremediation. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Ayub, A.; Wani, A.K.; Chopra, C.; Sharma, D.K.; Amin, O.; Wani, A.W.; Singh, A.; Manzoor, S.; Singh, R. Advancing Dye Degradation: Integrating Microbial Metabolism, Photocatalysis, and Nanotechnology for Eco-Friendly Solutions. Bacteria 2025, 4, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Kapoor, R.T.; Danish, M.; Singh, R.S.; Rafatullah, M.; HPS, A.K. Exploiting Microbial Biomass in Treating Azo Dyes Contaminated Wastewater: Mechanism of Degradation and Factors Affecting Microbial Efficiency. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 43, 102255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Aragaw, T.A.; Bogale, F.M. Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 764958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Riva, V.; Mapelli, F.; Syranidou, E.; Crotti, E.; Choukrallah, R.; Kalogerakis, N.; Borin, S. Root Bacteria Recruited by Phragmites Australis in Constructed Wetlands Have the Potential to Enhance Azo-Dye Phytodepuration. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Sandhya, S. Biodegradation of Azo Dyes Under Anaerobic Condition: Role of Azoreductase. In Biodegradation of Azo Dyes; Atacag Erkurt, H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 39–57. ISBN 978-3-642-11847-0. [Google Scholar]
  165. Shweta, D.; Sanjeev, G. Biodegradation of Environmentally Hazardous Azo Dyes and Aromatic Amines Using Klebsiella Pneumoniae. J. Environ. Eng. 2018, 144, 4018035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Bhatia, D.; Kanwar, R.S.; Singh, J.; Sharma, N.R.; Khandare, R.V. Degradation and Decolorization of Disperse Red 167 Dye with an In-Situ Isolated Azo-Reductase Enzyme Producing Bacterium Paenochrobactrum Glaciei. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 2389–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Ahmed, A.A.; Musa, S.A.; Fugu, M.B.; Mohammed, A.I.; Adam, H.B.; Wakil, I.M. A Comprehensive Review on Anthranilic Acid-Derived Schiff Bases and Their Metal Chelates: Structures and Applications. Chem. Rev. Lett. 2023, 6, 350–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Ikram, M.; Naeem, M.; Zahoor, M.; Rahim, A.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Oyekanmi, A.A.; Shah, A.B.; Mahnashi, M.H.; Al Ali, A.; Jalal, N.A.; et al. Biodegradation of Azo Dye Methyl Red by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: Optimization of Process Conditions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 9962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Thangaraj, S.; Bankole, P.O.; Sadasivam, S.K. Microbial Degradation of Azo Dyes by Textile Effluent Adapted, Enterobacter Hormaechei under Microaerophilic Condition. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 250, 126805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Thangaraj, S.; Bankole, P.O.; Sadasivam, S.K.; Kumarvel, V. Biodegradation of Reactive Red 198 by Textile Effluent Adapted Microbial Strains. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Sharma, M.; Sharma, S.; Alkhanjaf, A.A.M.; Kumar Arora, N.; Saxena, B.; Umar, A.; Ibrahim, A.A.; Akhtar, M.S.; Mahajan, A.; Negi, S.; et al. Microbial Fuel Cells for Azo Dye Degradation: A Perspective Review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2025, 142, 45–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Santos, G.C.; Corso, C.R. Comparative Analysis of Azo Dye Biodegradation by Aspergillus Oryzae and Phanerochaete Chrysosporium. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2014, 225, 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Rosu, C.M.; Avadanei, M.; Gherghel, D.; Mihasan, M.; Mihai, C.; Trifan, A.; Miron, A.; Vochita, G. Biodegradation and Detoxification Efficiency of Azo-Dye Reactive Orange 16 by Pichia kudriavzevii CR-Y103. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2018, 229, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Arif, M. Catalytic Degradation of Azo Dyes by Bimetallic Nanoparticles Loaded in Smart Polymer Microgels. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 3008–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Bouacem, K.; Rekik, H.; Jaouadi, N.Z.; Zenati, B.; Kourdali, S.; El Hattab, M.; Badis, A.; Annane, R.; Bejar, S.; Hacene, H.; et al. Purification and Characterization of Two Novel Peroxidases from the Dye-Decolorizing Fungus Bjerkandera Adusta Strain CX-9. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 636–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. de Almeida, A.P.; Macrae, A.; Ribeiro, B.D.; do Nascimento, R.P. Decolorization and Detoxification of Different Azo Dyes by Phanerochaete Chrysosporium ME-446 under Submerged Fermentation. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021, 52, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Thampraphaphon, B.; Phosri, C.; Pisutpaisal, N.; Thamvithayakorn, P.; Chotelersak, K.; Sarp, S.; Suwannasai, N. High Potential Decolourisation of Textile Dyes from Wastewater by Manganese Peroxidase Production of Newly Immobilised Trametes Hirsuta PW17-41 and FTIR Analysis. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Rane, A.; Joshi, S.J. Biodecolorization and Biodegradation of Dyes: A Review. Open Biotechnol. J. 2021, 15, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Mani, P.; Fidal, V.T.; Bowman, K.; Breheny, M.; Chandra, T.S.; Keshavarz, T.; Kyazze, G. Degradation of Azo Dye (Acid Orange 7) in a Microbial Fuel Cell: Comparison Between Anodic Microbial-Mediated Reduction and Cathodic Laccase-Mediated Oxidation. Front. Energy Res. 2019, 7, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Chang, Y.; Yang, D.; Li, R.; Wang, T.; Zhu, Y. Textile Dye Biodecolorization by Manganese Peroxidase: A Review. Molecules 2021, 26, 4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Thoa, L.T.K.; Thao, T.T.P.; Nguyen-Thi, M.-L.; Chung, N.D.; Ooi, C.W.; Park, S.-M.; Lan, T.T.; Quang, H.T.; Khoo, K.S.; Show, P.L.; et al. Microbial Biodegradation of Recalcitrant Synthetic Dyes from Textile-Enriched Wastewater by Fusarium Oxysporum. Chemosphere 2023, 325, 138392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Henagamage, A.P.; Peries, C.M. Degradation and Decolorization of Textile Azo Dyes by Effective Fungal-Bacterial Consortium. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 50, 8901–8914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Qin, W.; Guo, S.; Li, Q.; Tang, A.; Liu, H.; Liu, Y. Biotransformation of the Azo Dye Reactive Orange 16 by Aspergillus Flavus A5P1: Performance, Genetic Background, Pathway, and Mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 468, 133562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Hürmüzlü, R.; Okur, M.; Saraçoğlu, N. Immobilization of Trametes versicolor Laccase on Chitosan/Halloysite as a Biocatalyst in the Remazol Red RR Dye. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 192, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Ali, S.S.; Al-Tohamy, R.; Xie, R.; El-Sheekh, M.M.; Sun, J. Construction of a New Lipase- and Xylanase-Producing Oleaginous Yeast Consortium Capable of Reactive Azo Dye Degradation and Detoxification. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 313, 123631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Thakor, R.; Mistry, H.; Tapodhan, K.; Bariya, H. Efficient Biodegradation of Congo Red Dye Using Fungal Consortium Incorporated with Penicillium Oxalicum and Aspergillus Tubingensis. Folia Microbiol. 2022, 67, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Khadir, A.; Muthu, S.S. Biological Approaches in Dye-Containing Wastewater; Springer: Singapore, 2022; Volume 2, ISBN 9789811905254. [Google Scholar]
  188. Mustafa, G.; Zahid, M.T.; Kurade, M.B.; Alvi, A.; Ullah, F.; Yadav, N.; Park, H.-K.; Khan, M.A.; Jeon, B.-H. Microalgal and Activated Sludge Processing for Biodegradation of Textile Dyes. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 349, 123902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Deka, R.; Shreya, S.; Mourya, M.; Sirotiya, V.; Rai, A.; Khan, M.J.; Ahirwar, A.; Schoefs, B.; Bilal, M.; Saratale, G.D.; et al. A Techno-Economic Approach for Eliminating Dye Pollutants from Industrial Effluent Employing Microalgae through Microbial Fuel Cells: Barriers and Perspectives. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Kundu, N.; Yadav, S.; Bhattacharya, A.; Aseri, G.K.; Jain, N. Constructed Wetland–Microbial Fuel Cell (CW-MFC) Mediated Bio-Electrodegradation of Azo Dyes from Textile Wastewater. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2025, 78, ovaf010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Ayed, L.; Ladhari, N.; El Mzoughi, R.; Chaieb, K. Decolorization and Phytotoxicity Reduction of Reactive Blue 40 Dye in Real Textile Wastewater by Active Consortium: Anaerobic/Aerobic Algal-Bacterial-Probiotic Bioreactor. J. Microbiol. Methods 2021, 181, 106129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Aragaw, T.A.; Bogale, F.M.; Gessesse, A. Adaptive Response of Thermophiles to Redox Stress and Their Role in the Process of Dye Degradation From Textile Industry Wastewater. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 908370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Alaguprathana, M.; Poonkothai, M. Haematological, Biochemical, Enzymological and Histological Responses of Labeo Rohita Exposed to Methyl Orange Dye Solution Treated with Oedogonium Subplagiostomum AP1. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 17602–17612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Moradi, Z.; Haghjou, M.M.; Zarei, M.; Sharifan, H. Harnessing Chlorella vulgaris for the Phycoremediation of Azo Dye: A Comprehensive Analysis of Metabolic Responses and Antioxidant System. Algal Res. 2024, 82, 103660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Maruthanayagam, A.; Mani, P.; Kaliappan, K.; Chinnappan, S. In Vitro and In Silico Studies on the Removal of Methyl Orange from Aqueous Solution Using Oedogonium Subplagiostomum AP1. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. El-Sheekh, M.M.; El-Shanshoury, A.R.; Abou-El-Souod, G.W.; Gharieb, D.Y.; El Shafay, S.M. Decolorization of Dyestuffs by Some Species of Green Algae and Cyanobacteria and Its Consortium. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 18, 3895–3906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. El-Naggar, N.E.A.; Hamouda, R.A.; Saddiq, A.A.; Alkinani, M.H. Simultaneous Bioremediation of Cationic Copper Ions and Anionic Methyl Orange Azo Dye by Brown Marine Alga Fucus Vesiculosus. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Mendes, M.; Cassoni, A.C.; Alves, S.; Pintado, M.E.; Castro, P.M.L.; Moreira, P. Screening for a More Sustainable Solution for Decolorization of Dyes and Textile Effluents Using Candida and Yarrowia spp. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 307, 114421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Li, M.; Zhou, P.; Chen, M.; Yu, H.; Ye, L. Spatiotemporal Regulation of Astaxanthin Synthesis in S. Cerevisiae. ACS Synth. Biol. 2022, 11, 2636–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Rana, S.; Handa, S.; Aggarwal, Y.; Puri, S.; Chatterjee, M. Role of Candida in the Bioremediation of Pollutants: A Review. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 76, ovad103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Al-Tohamy, R.; Ali, S.S.; Xie, R.; Schagerl, M.; Khalil, M.A.; Sun, J. Decolorization of Reactive Azo Dye Using Novel Halotolerant Yeast Consortium HYC and Proposed Degradation Pathway. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 263, 115258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Sugano, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Fernandez-lafuente, R. DyP-Type Peroxidases: Recent Advances and Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Azeez, R.A.; Al-Zuhairi, F.K.I. Biosorption of Dye by Immobilized Yeast Cells on the Surface of Magnetic Nanoparticles. Alexandria Eng. J. 2022, 61, 5213–5222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Ihsanullah, I.; Jamal, A.; Ilyas, M.; Zubair, M.; Khan, G.; Atieh, M.A. Bioremediation of Dyes: Current Status and Prospects. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 38, 101680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Danouche, M.; Ferioun, M.; Bahafid, W.; El Ghachtouli, N. Mycoremediation of Azo Dyes Using Cyberlindnera Fabianii Yeast Strain: Application of Designs of Experiments for Decolorization Optimization. Water Environ. Res. 2021, 93, 1402–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Šlosarčíková, P.; Plachá, D.; Malachová, K.; Rybková, Z.; Novotný, Č. Biodegradation of Reactive Orange 16 Azo Dye by Simultaneous Action of Pleurotus Ostreatus and the Yeast Candida Zeylanoides. Folia Microbiol. 2020, 65, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Zahmatkesh Anbarani, M.; Nourbakhsh, S.; Toolabi, A.; Bonyadi, Z. Biodegradation of Crystal Violet Dye by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Aqueous Medium. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Gholizadeh-Balderlou, F.; Soudi, M.R.; Darvishi, F. Performance of Pichia kudriavzevii SDG12 in Decolorization and Biodegradation of Azo Dye under Optimized Conditions. J. Water Process Eng. 2025, 71, 107168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Wang, Y.; Xu, B.; Ning, S.; Shi, S.; Tan, L. Magnetically Stimulated Azo Dye Biodegradation by a Newly Isolated Osmo-Tolerant Candida tropicalis A1 and Transcriptomic Responses. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 209, 111791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Al-Tohamy, R.; Kenawy, E.R.; Sun, J.; Ali, S.S. Performance of a Newly Isolated Salt-Tolerant Yeast Strain Sterigmatomyces Halophilus SSA-1575 for Azo Dye Decolorization and Detoxification. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. PRISMA methodology for searching and screening information. * characters are added to search terms to indicate plural terms.
Figure 1. PRISMA methodology for searching and screening information. * characters are added to search terms to indicate plural terms.
Ijms 26 07973 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structure of azo dyes: two-dimensional representation of azo dye with groups in its structure that give it attractive properties.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of azo dyes: two-dimensional representation of azo dye with groups in its structure that give it attractive properties.
Ijms 26 07973 g002
Figure 3. General scheme for synthesis of azo compounds.
Figure 3. General scheme for synthesis of azo compounds.
Ijms 26 07973 g003
Figure 4. Chemical structures of azo dyes, which are common in industries that use dyes.
Figure 4. Chemical structures of azo dyes, which are common in industries that use dyes.
Ijms 26 07973 g004
Figure 5. Chemical structures of common dyes and their decomposition products that hurt the environment.
Figure 5. Chemical structures of common dyes and their decomposition products that hurt the environment.
Ijms 26 07973 g005
Figure 6. Mechanism of dye separation using membranes.
Figure 6. Mechanism of dye separation using membranes.
Ijms 26 07973 g006
Figure 7. Ion exchange-mediated dye removal.
Figure 7. Ion exchange-mediated dye removal.
Ijms 26 07973 g007
Figure 8. Classification of Fenton methods for degradation of dyes.
Figure 8. Classification of Fenton methods for degradation of dyes.
Ijms 26 07973 g008
Figure 9. Mechanism of disperse red 167 degradation by Paenochrobactrum glaciei [166].
Figure 9. Mechanism of disperse red 167 degradation by Paenochrobactrum glaciei [166].
Ijms 26 07973 g009
Figure 10. Mechanism of methyl red degradation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa [168].
Figure 10. Mechanism of methyl red degradation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa [168].
Ijms 26 07973 g010
Figure 11. Proposed mechanistic pathway of reactive red (RR 198) degradation by Bacillus cereus SKB12 [170].
Figure 11. Proposed mechanistic pathway of reactive red (RR 198) degradation by Bacillus cereus SKB12 [170].
Ijms 26 07973 g011
Table 1. Steps of PICO methodology for designing search keywords.
Table 1. Steps of PICO methodology for designing search keywords.
STEP 1Study IdeaDegradation of Azo Dyes by Aquatic and Terrestrial Microorganisms
STEP 2Study problemPAzo dyes
IDegradation/removal of azo dyes by microorganisms such as yeast, bacteria, fungi, microalgae, and consortia
CDegradation/removal of azo dyes by conventional treatments
OBioremediation
STEP 3Research questionCan biodegradation based on yeast, bacteria, fungi, microalgae, and consortia offer a viable and environmentally friendly solution for detoxifying aquatic ecosystems severely affected by persistent azo dyes?
STEP 4DeCSAzo compoundsDeCS
Accumulation in water and landSoil*, Water*
Aquatic and terrestrial microorganismsMicroorganism*
BioremediationBioremediation (Environmental Health)
STEP 5MeSH similarity in PUBMEDAzo dyesAzo Compounds*Compounds, Azo*Dyes, Azo*Azo Dye*Dye, Azo
Soil*, Water*Soil*Water*Aquatic*
Microorganism*Microbe*Microbiota*Bacteria*Fungi*Microbiome*
BioremediationDegradation*Biodegradation*Depolymarization*Mineralization*Assimilation*
STEP 6Search approach by variablesAzo dyeAzo dyes* OR Azo Compounds* OR Compounds, Azo* OR Dyes, Azo* OR Azo Dye* OR Dye, Azo
Biodegradation, EnvironmentalSoil* OR territorial* OR land* OR water* OR aquatic*
MicroorganismMicrobe* OR microorganism* OR microbiota* OR microbiome* OR bacteria* OR fungi* OR biofilm*
BioremediationDegradation* OR biodegradation* OR depolymerization* OR mineralization* OR assimilation*
STEP 7Advanced search key(Azo dyes* OR Azo Compounds* OR Compounds, Azo* OR Dyes, Azo* OR Azo Dye* OR Dye, Azo) AND (soil* OR territorial* OR land* OR water* OR aquatic*) AND (microbe* OR microorganism* OR microbiota* OR microbiome* OR bacteria* OR fungi* OR biofilm*) AND (degradation* OR biodegradation* OR depolymerization* OR mineralization* OR assimilation*)
* It is used to indicate in the search that the root of the word should be recognized regardless of whether it is plural or singular or the gender of the term.
Table 2. General characteristics of the most used physicochemical methods for dye removal.
Table 2. General characteristics of the most used physicochemical methods for dye removal.
Method/TechniqueRemoval MechanismAdvantagesDisadvantages *Ref.
AdsorptionDye removal by adhesion to the surface of an adsorbentReuse of adsorbents, high efficiency, and short times for removing dye from wastewater-Only soluble dyes.
-High energy consumption.
[120,121,122]
Ion exchangeUse of resins that allow ionic exchange between the substances involvedThe ion exchange process can effectively remove cationic dyes from contaminated waterThe resulting sludge may contain concentrated metals, posing challenges for disposal[123,124]
Coagulation and flocculationIn this process, coagulants are used to destabilize dissolved dyes, enabling their removal through sedimentation.Coagulation–flocculation is a simple and widely used process for removing dyes from wastewater.The initial pH and the dosage of the coagulant have a significant influence on the coagulation and flocculation process.[125,126]
Membrane filtrationThey use membranes with small pores that trap solutes larger than themselves, allowing the passage of a dye-free solution-High separation efficiency, reliability, cost-effectiveness, and simplicity.
-They have low operating costs compared to conventional technologies.
-Production of toxic byproducts.
-Sludge production.
[127,128]
* Pore fouling is another critical disadvantage of membrane filtration systems. This technical limitation affects the operational efficiency and lifespan of the systems.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carrascal-Hernández, D.C.; Orozco-Beltrán, E.J.; Insuasty, D.; Márquez, E.; Grande-Tovar, C.D. Systematic Evaluation of Biodegradation of Azo Dyes by Microorganisms: Efficient Species, Physicochemical Factors, and Enzymatic Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 7973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167973

AMA Style

Carrascal-Hernández DC, Orozco-Beltrán EJ, Insuasty D, Márquez E, Grande-Tovar CD. Systematic Evaluation of Biodegradation of Azo Dyes by Microorganisms: Efficient Species, Physicochemical Factors, and Enzymatic Systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(16):7973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167973

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carrascal-Hernández, Domingo Cesar, Erney José Orozco-Beltrán, Daniel Insuasty, Edgar Márquez, and Carlos David Grande-Tovar. 2025. "Systematic Evaluation of Biodegradation of Azo Dyes by Microorganisms: Efficient Species, Physicochemical Factors, and Enzymatic Systems" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 16: 7973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167973

APA Style

Carrascal-Hernández, D. C., Orozco-Beltrán, E. J., Insuasty, D., Márquez, E., & Grande-Tovar, C. D. (2025). Systematic Evaluation of Biodegradation of Azo Dyes by Microorganisms: Efficient Species, Physicochemical Factors, and Enzymatic Systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(16), 7973. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167973

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop