Next Article in Journal
Do We Know Enough About the Safety Profile of Silver Nanoparticles in Oncology? A Focus on Novel Methods and Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
Th2-High Severe Asthma with Hypereosinophilia in the Spectrum of Type 2 Inflammatory Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural and Functional Characteristics of TLR19 in Barbel Chub Compared to TLR19 in Grass Carp
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea, Richardson) E2F4, a Cyclin-Dependent Transcription Factor, Forms a Heterodimer with DP1

1
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Beibu Gulf Marine Biodiversity Conservation, College of Marine Sciences, Beibu Gulf University, Qinzhou 535011, China
2
Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Resources Use in Beibu Gulf, Ministry of Education, Nanning Normal University, Nanning 530001, China
3
School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(11), 5343; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26115343
Submission received: 11 January 2025 / Revised: 2 May 2025 / Accepted: 23 May 2025 / Published: 2 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish Immunology, 5th Edition)

Abstract

E2F transcription factors regulate cell cycle progression by influencing the expression of proteins required for the G1-S phase transition and DNA synthesis with its heterodimeric partners (DP1 or DP2). The dimerization domain is the E2Fs and DP1 protein interaction interface and is believed to function in protein dimerization. In this study, eight E2F transcription factors (PcE2F1–8) of large yellow croaker Pseudosciaena crocea and one dimerization partner (PcDP1) are identified in the genome of large yellow croakers. The prediction of E2Fs conserved domains revealed that PcE2F1–6 has one DNA-binding domain (DBD) and one dimerization-binding domain (DD), while PcE2F7–8 only possess two duplicate DBDs but not DD, indicating that E2F7–8 cannot form the E2F/DP1 heterodimer. To explore whether PcDP1 is a partner of PcE2F1–6, the ORF of PcE2F1–6 was cloned. Subsequently, its sequence characteristics, the expression pattern in healthy fish, and subcellular co-localization were analyzed, and an interaction between PcDP1 and PcE2F1–6 were detected directly by yeast two-hybrid and BiFC. The PcE2F1, PcE2F2, PcE2F3, PcE2F4, PcE2F5, and PcE2F6 genes encode a protein of 454, 448, 444, 392, 362, and 396 amino acids, respectively, with accession numbers QFZ93593.1, QFZ93594.1, QFZ93595.1, QFZ93596.1, QFZ93597.1, and QFZ93598.1, respectively. Sequence characteristics analysis found that PcE2F1–5 but not PcE2F6 proteins share the pocket protein-binding domain sequestering in dimerization domains and transactivation domains. The PcE2F1,2,4 proteins possess one nuclear localization signal (NLS), and PcE2F3 protein possess two NLSs, but there is no NLS in PcE2F5 and 6 protein. Moreover, PcE2F4 also contains one NES. However, PcE2F1–6 proteins were all located in nucleus by using Euk-mPloc 2.0 programs and were confirmed by performing the Cherry and EGFP reporter assay. Regarding co-expression of DP1, only E2F4 can transfer DP1’s subcellular location from cytoplasm to the nucleus. RT-qPCR analysis indicated that PcE2F1–6 are constitutively and tissue specifically expressed in all of the tissues tested of a healthy large yellow croaker. The PcE2F16, except for PcE2F3, mRNA levels were all detected higher in the liver. PcE2F14 were also highly specifically expressed in the kidney, PcE2F4,6 in the brain, and PcE2F5 in the spleen of a healthy large yellow croaker, respectively. Using a yeast two-hybrid system, PcE2F4 interacting with PcDP1 was identified. The interaction between PcE2F4 and PcDP1 was further confirmed by a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay. Collectively, these results indicate that an interaction between PcE2F4 and PcDP1 was detected, which may form heterodimer E2F4/DP1 to regulate cell cycles and immune-related pathways in large yellow croakers.

1. Introduction

Cell cycle regulation is critical to normal growth and division. The cell cycle checkpoints, particularly the G1toS checkpoint, serve crucial roles in the transmission of genetic information and cell replication. Central to the temporal control of the G1toS phase transition is the regulation of the activity of the E2F transcription factor (TF) family [1,2]. In mammalian cells, the E2F transcription factors constitute a superfamily of basal elongation factors, which comprises eight different proteins (E2F1–8) and its dimerization partner (DP) proteins (DP1–4) [1,3]. Based on their function, they have been categorized as activators (E2F1–E2F3a) and repressors (E2F3b–8) [4]. At the early G1 phase of the cell cycle and in quiescent cells, the E2F4 and E2F5 transcriptional repressors interact with the retinoblastoma protein (RB) to inhibit target gene transcription [5], while transcriptional activators (E2F1–3) with free RB replace the repressors, leading to the increase in G1/S phase gene expression and promote DNA replication at the S phase [6]. During progression from quiescent to S phase, RB phosphorylation by cyclin-CDK complexes activates E2F activity [7]. E2F6–8 negatively regulates the transcription of E2F-responsive genes [8,9,10]. Besides their cell cycle regulation, E2Fs also regulate genes involved in oncogenesis, organ development, nerve regeneration, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. For example, E2F-1 regulates apoptosis as well as proliferation, in part by stabilizing the p53 tumor suppressor, which is an important mediator of apoptosis [11]. Elevated expression levels of E2F4 have been associated with gastric cancer [12], solid osteosarcoma [13], and breast tumor progression [14]. In addition, E2F4 can partially promote neuronal regeneration and functional recovery after spinal cord injury in zebrafish [15], and E2F5 is required for normal development of the brain, eye, and ovarian of zebrafish [16].
On the other hand, E2F proteins have also been categorized as classic E2Fs (E2F1–6) and atypical E2Fs (E2F7–8) according to their conserved domains [9]. Studies revealed that six classical E2F proteins all possess one N-terminally located DNA-binding domain (DBD) immediately followed by a dimerization domain, allowing interaction with a DP protein [2], while atypical E2Fs have only two DNA-binding domains (DBD1 and DBD2) but no dimerization domain [4]. The three DP family members, DP1, DP2/3, and DP4, encode proteins that are related to the E2F family with homology in the DNA-binding and dimerization domains of E2F [17]. Although recent research has verified that DP proteins can directly associates with other proteins (i.e., p53) [18], the DP proteins mainly play a role as the heterodimeric partners for the E2F family to increase the DNA-binding efficiency and transactivation potential of the E2F proteins. E Huber et al. (1993) found that a dramatic (100- to 1000-fold) increase in specific DNA-binding activity of E2Fs was observed on mixing the E2Fs and DP1/2 components together [19]. It is well established that the classical E2F transcriptional activity is mediated by heterodimers of E2F1–6 with DP1 or DP2 proteins through their dimerization domain [17,20]. The dimerization of E2F/DP is a prerequisite for high-affinity, sequence-specific binding of the E2F proteins to promoters of target genes [21]. Now, studies have showed that DP proteins not only affect the phosphorylation state of E2F/DP heterodimer but also affect the types of proteins binding, subcellular localizations, and expression level of E2Fs, which all influence the DNA-binding ability and transcription activity of the E2F/DP heterodimer [22]. In embryos, the expression patterns of E2F target genes RNR2 and PCNA are lost in dDP mutants [23,24]. Co-expression of E2F4 with DP2 protein can result in them transferring from the cytoplasm to the nucleus [25]. Of note, DP1 protein can also block E2F1 competing with p50 for binding to p65, which impairs the NFκB signal and sensitizes cells to apoptosis [26]. Therefore, DP protein plays an important role in the regulation of E2F-dependent genes, DNA synthesis, apoptosis, and even tumorigenesis.
The large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea Richardson, 1864) is one of the most economically important marine fish species cultured in the coastal temperate zone, especially in the Fujian and Zhejiang provinces of China. In order to obtain important genes involved in physiological and pathological processes, we originally constructed the cDNA library of the head and kidney of a large yellow croaker with PG as immunostimulant in 2008 [27] (Huang et al., 2008), and subsequently the DP1 gene (named as PcDP1 with an accession number of DQ821446) was cloned from SSH cDNA library [27,28]. A comparison of Pc-DP1with human DP1 and house mouse DP1 indicated that their DNA-binding and dimerization domains are strikingly conserved [28], implicating the importance of these proteins in cellular function. And, we have confirmed the DNA-binding activity of PcDP1 with a DIG-labeled probe containing a consensus DNA-binding site using EMSA [28] (Cai et al., 2021). However, whether PcDP1 can form heterodimers with E2Fs of a large yellow croaker and with which one of the E2Fs has not been reported.
Presently, the genome of large yellow croakers has been sequenced in 2014 and 2015, successively [29,30]. Through searching the whole genome, we found that eight E2F transcription factors are present in different chromosomes of large yellow croakers Pseudosciaena croce, while its dimerization partner DP1, not DP2 and DP3, was found in the genome of large yellow croakers. To further explore whether PcDP1 is a heterodimer partner of PcE2F1–6, the classic E2Fs of large yellow croakers were cloned. Subsequently, their sequence structural characteristics, expression patterns, and subcellular localizations were analyzed. The interaction between PcDP1 and PcE2F1–6 was detected directly by yeast two-hybrid and BiFC. We show that PcE2F1–6 were specifically expressed in the liver and kidney, and that the PcE2F4 protein can interact with PcDP1 and co-localize with it from the cytoplasm to nucleus, which lays the foundation for further study on the biological function in the cell cycle- and immune-related pathways of heterodimer E2F4/DP1.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Cloning of Large Yellow Croaker E2Fs Family Genes

Through searching the large yellow croaker genome database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/?term=Larimichthys+crocea, accessed on 15 March 2019), we identified eight different E2F family genes, E2F1 (XM_010743609.3), E2F2 (XM_027275214.1), E2F3 (XM_019256914.2), E2F4 (XM_010734861.3), E2F5 (XM_027288557.1), E2F6 (XM_027279409.1), E2F7 (XM_010750303.3), and E2F8 (XM_027281565.1). Our results showed that they are located on different chromosomes, with E2F1 being on chromosome 15, E2F2 being on chromosome 13, E2F3 being on chromosome 21, E2F4 being on chromosome 2, E2F5 being on chromosome 6, E2F6 being on chromosome 5, E2F7 being on chromosome 20, and E2F8 being on chromosome 8. These contained 7~13 exons separated by 6~12 introns, respectively (Figure 1). The prediction of E2F family protein conserved domains revealed that E2F1–6 has one N-terminally located DNA-binding domain (DBD) and one dimerization-partner-binding domain (DD) following the DBD while E2F7–8 only possess two duplicate DBDs but no DD, which means that E2F7–8 cannot form the E2F/DP1 heterodimer (Figure S1). Therefore, the open reading frame (ORF) of six E2F genes (E2F1–6) were amplified from mixed cDNA of a large yellow croaker liver, spleen, intestines, kidney, head kidney, brain, gill, and heart tissues using specific primers designed based on the above predicted E2F genes sequences, and were named PcE2F1, PcE2F2, PcE2F3, PcE2F4, PcE2F5, and PcE2F6, respectively. The assembled PcE2F2, PcE2F3, PcE2F4, PcE2F5, and PcE2F6 sequence was 1365 bp, 1247 bp, 1335 bp, 1179 bp, 1089 bp, and 1181bp in length, respectively, which has been deposited into the GenBank database with the accession numbers MK922550, MK922551, MK922552, MK922553, MK922554, and MK922555, respectively. The predicted ORF of PcE2F2, PcE2F3, PcE2F4, PcE2F5, and PcE2F6 encodes, respectively, a protein of 454, 448, 444, 392, 362, and 396 amino acids with the accession numbers QFZ93593.1, QFZ93594.1, QFZ93595.1, QFZ93596.1, QFZ93597.1, and QFZ93598.1, respectively. The deduced E2F proteins of a large yellow croaker contains one DBD and one DD (Figure 2B), which are well conserved in large yellow croakers (Figure 2A) and among multiple species, including tilapia, zebrafish, human, mouse, and bovine (Figures S2–S7). In addition, PcE2F1–5 but not PcE2F6 proteins share the pocket protein-binding domain sequestering in the DD and transactivation domain, and it has been confirmed that it can specifically interact with distinct members of the pRB family proteins. Furthermore, PcE2F5 possesses a linker for the activation of T-cells (LAT) following the dimerization domain, indicating that it may be involved in the development of T-cells in the large yellow croaker.
To investigate the possibility of forming a heterodimer between PcE2F1–6 and PcDP1, the alignment of the dimerization domains of PcE2F1–6 and PcDP1 compared to human E2F1–6 and DP1 using the Clustal X program and GeneDoc software 2.7 shows high homology with DP and E2F intermolecular contacts motif (Figure 3A). Further analysis of the secondary structure elements of PcE2F4 and PcDP1 revealed that they both contain a varying number of helices and strands and are similar to human E2F4 and DP1 (Figure 3A). However, there is an extra helix (α3) in the secondary structure of PcE2F4. Phylogenetically, the dimerization domain of large yellow croaker PcE2F1–6 and human hE2F1–6, PcDP1, and hDP1 cluster together (Figure 3B). Significantly, when the full-length large yellow croaker E2F1–6 proteins were analyzed for evolutionary relationship on the basis of their primary structure, we found that PcE2F1, 2 and 3, and PcE2F4, 5, and 6 cluster together, which shows a segregation pattern that is reflective of their known functional characteristics (Figure 3C).

2.2. Subcellular Colocalization of Large Yellow Croaker E2F and DP1

Using cNLS Mapper (http://nls-mapper.iab.keio.ac.jp/cgi-bin/NLS_Mapper_form.cgi, accessed on 13 July 2019) programs, the PcE2F1,2,4 proteins were predicted to possess one nuclear localization signal (NLS) and PcE2F3 protein to possess two NLSs, indicating that they are a nuclear factor (Figure 2B). No NLS was predicted in PcE2F5 and 6 protein. Moreover, one leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES) was predicted in PcE2F4 by NetNES 1.1 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNES/, accessed on 13 July 2019). However, PcE2F1–6 proteins of large yellow croakers are all located in the nucleus using Euk-mPloc 2.0 programs (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/euk-multi-2/, accessed on 13 July 2019). To determine if large yellow croaker E2F1–6 were localized to the nucleus and affected by PcDP1, we performed the cherry and EGFP reporter assays. COS-7 cells were transfected with plasmid constructs expressing either a cherry-tagged E2F1–6 protein or/and an EGFP-tagged DP1 protein. As shown in Figure 4, when both DP1 and E2F1, or E2F2, or E2F3, or E2F4, or E2F5, or E2F6 co-transformed into COS-7 cells, the E2F1–6 of large yellow croakers were exclusively localized to the nucleus of the transfected cells and the DP1 proteins except for E2F4 were all enriched in the cytoplasm. DP1 was localized to the nucleus of the transfected cells in accordance with the subcellular localization of the E2F4 protein (Figure 4). Thus, E2F1–6 of large yellow croakers are the nuclear protein, respectively, and E2F4 may interact with DP1 to perform its biological function.

2.3. E2F1–6 Expression Pattern in Healthy Large Yellow Croaker

Primers designed, respectively, to specifically amplify the PcE2F1, PcE2F2, PcE2F3, PcE2F4, PcE2F5, and PcE2F6 transcripts were used in the RT-PCR analysis of tissue distribution in healthy large yellow croakers. As shown in Figure 5, PcE2F1–6 were expressed in all detected tissues, such as the liver, spleen, intestine, head kidney, kidney, brain, gill, and heart. Further RT-PCR analysis showed that PcE2F1 and PcE2F2 are highly expressed in the liver, head kidney, and kidney, and expressed lower in the spleen, intestine, brain, gill, and heart. The similarity expression pattern gives rise to the possibility that PcE2F1 and PcE2F2 may have overlapping or complementary functions in these organs. As the activator subclass, PcE2F3 is also highly expressed in the head kidney and kidney, but lower in other tissues. In addition, the repressor subclass (PcE2F4, PcE2F5, and PcE2F6) showed differently expressed patterns in healthy large yellow croakers. Similarly, the transcriptional expression level of the three genes in the liver is relatively high, especially PcE2F5 where the relative expression value is about 15-fold. Interestingly, we observed that PcE2F4 and PcE2F6 are expressed more highly in the brain than in other tissues, which may suggest that the two genes are involved in the biological process of brain development and cell cycle.

2.4. Evaluation of Interaction of PcE2F1–6 with DP1

The dimerization domain is the E2F and DP1 protein interaction interface. The identical residues in the dimerization domain contributes to the overall stability of the E2F-DP heterodimer [31]. Sequence alignment of PcE2F1–6 shows that they all possess one dimerization domain, and in total 11 residues are identical within the dimerization domain (Figure 2A). To determine if PE2F1–6 proteins can interact with the cytoplasm protein DP1, we performed a direct yeast two-hybrid analysis. Yeast cells expressing GAL4-BD fused DP1 (bait) were mated with cells expressing GAL-AD tagged E2F1, or 2, or 3, or 4, or 5, or 6 (preys). Growth of blue yeast cells co-expressing GAL4 BD-DP1 and GAL4 AD-E2F4 fusion proteins was readily observed on selective SD/–Ade/–His/–Leu/–Trp X-gal plates; however, no cell growth was observed on selective plates when yeast cells transformed with pGBKT7-DP1 plasmids were mated with cells expressing pGADT7-E2F1, or 2, or 3, or 5, or 6 fusion proteins (Figure 5). These results indicate that PcDP1 may be a specific interacting partner of PcE2F4 but not PcE2F1–3 and 5–6.
Further confirmation of the interaction between E2F4 and DP1 was performed by bimolecular fluorescence complementation analysis. As shown in Figure 6, yellow fluorescence filled the whole cell from nucleus to cytoplasm when empty pBiFC-VN173 and pBiFC-VC155 were co-transfected into COS-7. However, yellow fluorescence signals were observed in discrete cellular regions corresponding to the nucleus with pBiFC-VN173-PcDP1 and pBiFC-VC155-E2F4, or pBiFC-VC155-DP1 and pBiFC-VN173-E2F4. In contrast, a single transfection using pBiFC-VN173-E2F4 or DP1 and pBiFC-VC155-E2F4 or DP1 induced no green fluorescence signal, serving as a negative control (Figure 7). Collectively, the results indicated that PcDP1 is a specific interacting partner of PcE2F4 and that they can form a heterodimer.

3. Discussion

The E2F transcription factor family is distributed widely in higher eukaryotes, including mammals, worms, fruit flies, and plants, which are very conservative in evolution [4,32,33,34]. The functional study of E2Fs has gradually attracted attention in aquatic animals. Currently, five types of E2Fs genes have been identified, namely E2F2 from P. monodon [35], E2F3 from Apostichopus japonicus [36], E2F4 and E2F5 from zebrafish and Lethenteron reissneri [16,37,38,39], and E2F8 from Lethenteron reissneri [39] and their functions were found to be related to cell and tissue proliferation and host immunity. To determine all large yellow croaker E2F genes, its genome was scrutinized for genes containing motifs homologous to the E2F DNA-binding domain and dimerization domain. Fortunately, eight genes were detected that were related to E2Fs (PcE2F1–8) in this study, but they were located on different chromosomes and possessed different structures (Figure 1). Furthermore, prediction of E2F family protein conserved domains revealed that PcE2F1–6 have one N-terminally located DNA-binding domain (DBD) and one dimerization partner binding domain (DD) following the DBD, while PcE2F7–8 only possess two duplicate DBDs containing the residues needed for DNA-binding and dimerization but cannot form complexes with DPs. This indicated that PcE2F1–6 belong to the classical E2F proteins and PcE2F7–8 to atypical group according to the E2F family taxonomy in mammals [2]. In this study, our purpose is to detect the target E2F proteins associated with a dimerization partner (PcDP1) of large yellow croakers. Therefore, we will mainly focus on the typical E2F family proteins of large yellow croakers.
Besides the DBDs and DDs, the typical E2F family proteins PcE2F1–5 in large yellow croakers, but not PcE2F6, shared a transactivation domain and a pocket protein-binding domain, and the latter sequester in dimerization domains and the transactivation domain (Figure 2). It has been confirmed that the pocket protein-binding domain can specifically interact with distinct members of the pRB family proteins (pRb, p130 and p170) to form trimeric complexes (E2F1–3 with pRB, and E2F4–5 with p107 or p130) restricting cell cycle progression and apoptosis [4]. In quiescent cells, Rb associates with E2Fs, resulting in the repression of proliferation-associated genes. As cells progress into the cell cycle, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDks) phosphorylate Rb proteins to release E2Fs, freeing E2F which can directly transactivate genes required for S-phase entry [40]. For example, the E2F-1/DP-1 heterodimer appears to be inactivated through its binding to hypophosphorylated pRb in G1 [41,42]. Conversely, phosphorylation of both pRb and E2F-1 [43] in late G1 results in the release of active E2F-1/DP-1 transcription factors and the transient expression of E2F-1-dependent genes. It is noteworthy that a linker for the activation of T cells (LAT) was identified in PcE2F5 following the dimerization domain, which plays an essential role in T cell development in mice [44]. LAT-deficient mice have a blocked thymocyte development at the immature CD25+ CD44, CD4 CD8 stage and a complete lack of mature peripheral T cells [44]. However, the function of E2Fs’ LAT on T cell development have not been reported. Finally, conservative domain analysis of PcE2F6 showed that, like mammals, it lacks the C-terminal transactivation and pocket protein-binding domains, indicating that PcE2F can also act as a repressor of E2F-responsive genes by binding to promoters, preventing activation by E2F family members [45].
Accumulating evidence has suggested that E2F activity is regulated by cell cycle-dependent changes in subcellular localization [2,5,25,46]. Through searching nuclear localization signals (NLSs) on the amino acid sequence of the PcE2F1–6 protein, we found that the C-terminal of PcE2F1–4, but not E2F5–6, contains nuclear localization signals. Moreover, a nuclear export signal domain (NES) sequestering in the dimerization domain of PcE2F4 was also identified, but it was not excited in the amino acid of E2F4 in mammals. Curiously, PcE2F1–6 are all found almost exclusively in the nucleus of COS-7, which is the same with E2F1–3 nuclear localization in mammals and different from cytoplasm localization of E2F4–5 in mammals. In mammals, many studies have revealed that the subcellular localization of E2F4 and E2F5 is dependent on the cell cycle, which can be regulated through association with other factors (pocket protein or DP protein) [25,46,47]. Co-expression of p107, p130, and DP2, but not DP1, can promote nuclear localization of E2F4 and E2F5 in quiescent cells or cycling cells [47], which might be attributable to the NLS of p107, p130, and DP2 in mammals. On the other hand, Müller et al. (1997) found that the subcellular localization of the E2F-DP1 complexes is decided by the E2F [5]. They revealed that DP-1 of humans is localized in the nucleus when co-expressed with E2F1 and in the cytoplasm when co-expressed with E2F4. However, co-expression of PcDP1 and PcE2F4 can promote the transfer of PcDP1 from cytoplasm to nucleus in this study, but other PcE2Fs have no effect on subcellular localization of PcDP1 which is still distributed in cytoplasm. Thus, the subcellular localization of PcDP1 is regulated by PcE2F4, providing a potential possibility that DP1 of large yellow croakers might a partner of PcE2F4 to form the heterodimer PcE2F4/PcDP1.
Recent studies showed that E2F proteins are not only aspects controlling cell proliferation and differentiation, but that they also have tissue-specific, developmentally regulated functions [48]. Thus, the idea that E2F proteins are broadly expressed in adult tissues and display tissue-specific expression patterns to play diverse roles in different tissues has been accepted [6,49,50]). In the present study, we characterized PcE2F1–6 by evaluating their expression in different tissues of a healthy adult large yellow croaker. RT-qPCR analysis indicated that PcE2F1–6 are also constitutively expressed in all tissues tested in healthy large yellow croakers. Interestingly, higher PcE2F1–2,4–6 mRNA level were all detected in the liver of a healthy large yellow croaker. As is well known, the fish liver, as a key organ, controls many life functions and plays a prominent role in fish physiology, both in anabolism (proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates) and catabolism (nitrogen, glycogenolysis, and detoxication, etc.), as well as in vitellogenesis. Furthermore, fish hepatocytes possess strong differentiation ability [51]. All those results indicated that fish liver is a highly proliferative tissue, which might be regulated by PcE2F1–6 through cell cycle checkpoints. In addition, we found that PcE2F4 and PcE2F6 were also highly specifically expressed in the brain of large yellow croakers, which is perhaps due to the fact that PcE2F4 and PcE2F6, as a suppressor, can keep highly differentiated neurons in a quiescent phase so they no longer enter the cell cycle. This is also verified by the consistently low expression level of activators (E2F1) in the brain [52]. It is noteworthy that PcE2F1–3 were also highly specifically expressed in the kidney and PcE2F4–5 were expressed in the liver of large yellow croakers, which indicates that they might be involved in the pathways related to the immune system. This view has been supported by the expression pattern of E2F after pathogen stimulation and its regulated target genes in different tissues. For example, E2F-1-free stimulates the NF-kB signaling pathway, leading to activation of monocytes [53]. E2F2 directly regulates the STAT1 and PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathways to exacerbate the inflammatory phenotype in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts and mouse embryonic fibroblasts [54]. E2F3 can promote upregulation of IL-1 α, IL-β, TNF-α, and MyD88 through direct binding to their promoters [55]. Expression of E2F4 gene was upregulated in larvae Chinese oak silkworm (Antheraea pernyi) by bacterial (Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus), viral (nuclear polyhedrosis virus), and fungal (Beauveria bassiana) pathogens [56]. However, in zebrafish, the expression of E2F4 shows different phenomena, with lowest expression in the liver [39], which may be related to the fish species.
Heterodimerization between an E2F polypeptide and a DP polypeptide is required for the generation of a functional E2F transcription factor capable of high affinity, sequence-specific DNA binding [57,58,59]. Previous studies in our laboratory found that only DP1 has been found in the genome of large yellow croakers, and it displays ubiquitous expression in different tissues of adults [28] (. In mammals, DP1, as a heterodimerization partner, can interact with members of the E2F family (E2F1–E2F6) to increase E2F DNA-binding activity and E2F-dependent transcription in vitro [57,58,59,60]. For example, DP1 can cooperate with E2F1, E2F4, and E2F5 to induce proliferation in the epidermis of biogenic mice and serum-starved or p16INK4a-arrested cells [61,62,63,64] and with E2F1 to enhance apoptosis [65]. DP1 has also been shown in cell culture-based transformation assays to have weak oncogenic activity that is augmented by co-expression of E2F1 [66,67]. Overexpression of E2F4 in the epidermis, particularly in conjunction with DP1, results in skin tumors [61]. In this study, we found that only PcE2F4 can interact with PcDP1 by direct yeast two-hybrid and BiFC assays, indicating that the two proteins may form heterodimers to play their regulatory role. However, whether it plays the same regulatory role as the human heterodimer proteins of E2F4 and DP1 has not been reported in fish yet. Now, the dimerization domain is the PcE2F4 and PcDP1 protein interaction interface and it is believed to function in protein dimerization [68]. The crystal structure of the human E2F4-DP1 complex showed that they consist mainly of a heterodimeric coiled-coil subdomain and a heterodimeric β-sandwich subdomain that was bridged by two small helices and two small strands [31]. Furthermore, comparing the sequences of the human E2Fs, Liban et al. (2017) found that 20 residues are identical within the dimerization domain which contribute to the overall stability of the E2F-DP heterodimer and map primarily to the coiled-coil interface and the structural core that bridges the β-sandwich and coiled-coil domains [31]. In this study, we found that PcE2F4 contains one dimerization domain by prediction of the E2F family protein conserved domains (Figure 2), which also was found in PcDP1 in our previous experiment data [27]. Further analysis of the secondary structure elements of PcE2F4 and PcDP1 revealed that they both contain a varying number of helices and strands and are the similar to human E2F4 and DP1 (Figure 3). However, we noticed that there is an extra helix (α3) in the secondary structure of PcE2F4, which is also present in zebrafish E2F4 but is missing in lamprey E2F. Du et al.(2025) found that E2Fs exhibited greater diversity compared to those in jawed vertebrates [38]. In addition, there are only 11 identical residues within the dimerization domain of PcE2Fs, which is far less than the 20 identical residues within human E2Fs (Figure 2A). To understand whether these differences between larger yellow croakers and humans affects the stability of the larger yellow croaker E2F/DP1 heterodimer, and what role the extra helix (α3) plays in the formation of the PcE2F/PcDP1 heterodimer, the structural features resolution of the larger yellow croaker E2F/DP1 heterodimer may shed some light for those problem.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Searching E2F/DP Family Genes of Large Yellow Croaker Pseudosciaena crocea

To explore all E2F/DP family genes of large yellow croakers, the SSH cDNA library constructed in our lab and the genome of large yellow croakers from the NCBI database were used in this study. Only the genes that were homologous with E2F (Evalue ≤ 10−5) and contained both the DNA-binding domain and dimerization domain were considered as PcE2Fs. The functional conserved domains of E2F proteins were re-presumed using CDD software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, accessed on 16 March 2019).

4.2. Experimental Fish and Sampling

Healthy large yellow croakers, average body weight 150 g, were obtained from a marine cage cultured farm with 20 ± 1 °C at Xiangshan harbor, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China. To amplify sequences of E2F1, E2F2, E2F3, E2F4, E2F5, and E2F6 and measure its tissue distribution in healthy fish, samples including liver, spleen, intestines, kidney, head kidney, brain, gill, and heart were collected from three fish, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until use. All experiments were conducted under a protocol approved by the Medical and Laboratory Animal Ethics Sub-Committee (MLAEC, Qinzhou, China).

4.3. Cloning the Sequences of PcDP1 and PcE2Fs Genes of Large Yellow Croaker Pseudosciaena crocea

Total RNA was extracted from the liver, spleen, intestines, kidney, head kidney, brain, gill, and heart of healthy samples using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The first strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using EasyScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China). The specific primer for amplifying the open reading frames of PcE2F1–6 were designed based on large yellow croaker isolate SSNF genome data (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/1517460876, accessed on 18 March 2019) and listed in Table S1. The PCR was performed using a touchdown PCR procedure: 5 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 3 min; 5 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, 70 °C for 3 s, and 72 °C for 3 min; and 25 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, 69 °C for 3 s, and 72 °C for 3 min. PCR products were detected on a 1.5% agarose gel and purified with a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). The purified PCR products were ligated into a pMD18-T Vector (TaKaRa, Osaka, Japan) and transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α cells. The positive clones were sequence by Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China).

4.4. Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis

The homology searches of the sequences were analyzed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 20 June 2019) program, and the open reading frames (ORFs) and amino acid sequences were identified and predicted by ORF Finder (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gorf/orfig.cgi, accessed on 20 June 2019). The functional conserved domains of Pc-DP1 were presumed using CDD (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, accessed on 11 July 2019). Nuclear localization signals and leucine-rich nuclear export signals were predicted by cNLS Mapper (http://nls-mapper.iab.keio.ac.jp/cgi-bin/NLS_Mapper_form.cgi, accessed on 13 July 2019) and NetNES 1.1 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNES/, accessed on 13 July 2019). The secondary structure elements were predicted by the Psipred 4.0 software (http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/, accessed on 20 July 2019). Multiple sequence alignments were performed using the Clustal X 2.0 program and visualized using GeneDoc software. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the Neighbor-Joining method in the MEGA 7.0 with 1000 bootstraps replications.

4.5. Tissue Distribution of PcE2Fs in Healthy Large Yellow Croakers Pseudosciaena crocea

Transcriptional tissue distributions PcE2Fs in healthy large yellow croakers were detected by using real-time PCR. The total RNA from tissues mentioned in Section 2.2 were extracted as templates to synthesize the first strand cDNA using the EasyScript One-Step cDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen, Beijing, China). Real-time PCR was performed with the specific primers (Table S1) designed based on the ORF sequence of PcE2Fs on QuantStudio™ 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System, and the β-actin gene was used as an internal control in all of the RT-qPCR experiments. Each reaction contains 1 μL of reverse and forward primers, 10 μL of SYBR Green Mix (TransGen, Beijing, China), and 2 μL of 1:8 diluted cDNA and RNase-free water is added to a final reaction volume of 20 μL. The program was performed as follows: 1 cycle of 10 min at 95 °C, and 40 cycles of 10 s at 95 °C, 15 s at 55 °C, and 15 s at 72 °C. The relative expression level of PcE2Fs mRNA were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [69]. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

4.6. Subcellular Co-Localization Analysis

The full-length ORF of PcDP1 was PCR-amplified using gene-specific primers containing XhoI and SalI sites (Table S1) and cloned in pEGFP-N1 vector (a gift from Jichang Jian from Fisheries College of Guangdong Ocean University) to generate the recombinant expression plasmid DP1-GFP with green fluorescence. PcE2F1–6 were cloned into pmcherry-N1 between EcoRI and XhoI sites. The full-length ORF of all PcE2F1–6 were also PCR-amplified using gene-specific primers containing between EcoRI and XhoI sites (Table S1) and cloned into pmcherry-N1 vector (Wuhan Miaoling Bioscience & Technology Co. Ltd., Wuhan, China) to generate the recombinant expression plasmid E2F1-Cherry, E2F2-Cherry, E2F3-Cherry, E2F4-Cherry, E2F5-Cherry, and E2F6-Cherry with red fluorescence.
COS-7 cells were plated onto 14 mm diameter Poly-D-lysine-coated coverslips (Shanghai Solarbio Bioscience & Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) placed inside 24-well plates. Twenty-four hours after seeding, cells were co-transfected with a GFP and mCherry fusion constructs or pEGFP-N1 and pmcherry-N1empty vectors. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells on coverslips were washed with 1 × PBS three times and fixed in paraformaldehyde for 30 min followed by DAPI staining. Images were taken by the confocal fluorescence microscope (Olympus, FV10i-Oil, Tokyo, Japan).

4.7. Direct Yeast Two-Hybridization

Protein interactions between PcDP1 and PcE2F1–6 were assessed by direct yeast two-hybrid analysis using the Matchmaker Two-Hybrid System (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA, USA). The coding region of PcDP1 was cloned in-frame into pGBKT7 vector to generate BD constructs (pGBKT7-DP1). The coding regions of PcE2F1–6 were cloned in-frame into the pGADT7 vector, generating AD constructs (pGADT7-E2F1-6). Each pair of pAD and pBD derivatives were transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae AH109 using the LiAc Yeast Transformation Procedure (Clontech, USA). All transformants were tested for toxicity and auto-activation before mating according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The yeast cells expressing BD-DP1 were mated with cells expressing either AD-E2F1, or 2, or 3, or 4, or 5, or 6 fusion proteins. After mating at 30 °C for 24 h, yeast cells were plated on SD/–Leu/–Trp double dropout selection medium (lacking leucine and tryptophan) plates and incubated at 30 °C for 3–5 days. Single blue colonies (>2 mm) were selected and streaked onto fresh SD/–Ade/–His/–Leu/–Trp quadruple dropout plates (lacking adenine, histidine, leucine, and tryptophan without or supplemented with X-Gal and Aureobasidin A).

4.8. Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC)

The BiFC plasmids, pBiFC-VN173 and pBiFC-VC155, were obtained from Wuhan Miaoling Bioscience & Technology Co. Ltd., China. Coding regions of PcDP1 and PcE2F4 were PCR-amplified and cloned into vectors pBiFC-VC155 and pBiFC-VN173 respectively, generating pBiFC-VN173-PcDP1, pBiFC-VC155-DP1, pBiFC-VC155-E2F4, and pBiFC-VN173-E2F4 fusion constructs. COS-7 cells were co-transfected with equal amounts of a VN and VC fusion construct. Single transfections using either pBiFC-VN173-PcDP1 or pBiFC-VN173-E2F4 were served as negative controls. YFP signals due to BiFC were measured by a confocal fluorescence microscope (Olympus, FV10i-Oil, Tokyo, Japan).

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26115343/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.C.H. and X.W.; methodology, X.C. and H.C.; software, J.F. and P.X.; validation, M.X., M.C. and Q.Q.; data curation, X.C.; writing—original draft preparation X.C.; writing—review and editing, X.W.; supervision, X.W.; funding acquisition, X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grant No. 31272682), the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 2023GXNSFAA026335 and 2018GXNSFAA281208) the Guangxi Key Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016GXNSFDA380011), and the Science and Technology Program of Guangxi Province (Grant No. AB18221112).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of BEIBU GULF UNIVERSITY SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY (protocol code LW-2025007 and 18 March 2019).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article or Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Attwooll, C.; Denchi, E.L.; Helin, K. The E2F family: Specific functions and overlapping interests. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 4709–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dimova, D.K.; Dyson, N.J. The E2F transcriptional network: Old acquaintances with new faces. Oncogene 2005, 24, 2810–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rowland, B.D.; Bernards, R. Re-evaluating cell-cycle regulation by E2Fs. Cell 2006, 127, 871–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Trimarchi, J.M.; Lees, J.A. Sibling rivalry in the E2F family. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Müller, H.; Moroni, M.C.; Vigo, E.; Petersen, B.O.; Bartek, J.; Helin, K. Induction of S-phase entry by E2F transcription factors depends on their nuclear localization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 5508–5520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. DeGregori, J. The genetics of the E2F family of transcription factors: Shared functions and unique roles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1602, 131–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cobrinik, D. Regulatory interactions among E2Fs and cell cycle control proteins. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 1996, 208, 31–61. [Google Scholar]
  8. Westendorp, B.; Mokry, M.; Groot Koerkamp, M.J.; Holstege, F.C.; Cuppen, E.; de Bruin, A. E2F7 represses a network of oscillating cell cycle genes to control S-phase progression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 3511–3523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lammens, T.; Li, J.; Leone, G.; de Veylder, L. Atypical E2Fs: New players in the E2F transcription factor family. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Trimarchi, J.M.; Fairchild, B.; Verona, R.; Moberg, K.; Andon, N.; Lees, J.A. E2F-6, a member of the E2F family that can behave as a transcriptional repressor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 2850–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Phillips, A.C.; Vousden, K.H. E2F-1 induced apoptosis. Apoptosis 2001, 6, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, X.; Ni, Z.; Duan, Z.; Xin, Z.; Wang, H.; Tan, J.; Wang, G.; Li, F. Overexpression of E2F mRNAs associated with gastric cancer progression identified by the transcription factor and miRNA co-regulatory network analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fuchs, B.; Zhang, K.; Schabel, A.; E Bolander, M.; Sarkar, G. Identification of twenty-two candidate markers for human osteogenic sarcoma. Gene 2001, 278, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Farman, F.U.; Haq, F.; Muhammad, N.; Ali, N.; Rahman, H.; Saeed, M. Aberrant promoter methylation status is associated with upregulation of the E2F4 gene in breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 8461–8469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sasagawa, S.; Nishimura, Y.; Hayakawa, Y.; Murakami, S.; Ashikawa, Y.; Yuge, M.; Okabe, S.; Kawaguchi, K.; Kawase, R.; Tanaka, T. E2F4 promotes neuronal regeneration and functional recovery after spinal cord injury in zebrafish. Front. Pharmacol. 2016, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, Q.; Hu, J.; Ye, D.; Zhao, C.; Song, S.; Gong, W.; Tan, Z.; Song, P. Identification and expression analysis of two zebrafish E2F5 genes during oogenesis and development. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 1773–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Milton, A.; Luoto, K.; Ingram, L.; Munro, S.; Logan, N.; Graham, A.L.; Brummelkamp, T.R.; Hijmans, E.M.; Bernards, R.; La Thangue, N.B. A functionally distinct member of the DP family of E2F subunits. Oncogene 2006, 25, 3212–3218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sørensen, T.S.; Girling, R.; Lee, C.-W.; Gannon, J.; Bandara, L.R.; La Thangue, N.B. Functional Interaction between DP-1 and p53. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16, 5888–5895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. E Huber, H.; Edwards, G.; Goodhart, P.J.; Patrick, D.R.; Huang, P.S.; Ivey-Hoyle, M.; Barnett, S.F.; Oliff, A.; Heimbrook, D.C. Transcription factor E2F binds DNA as a heterodimer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 3525–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qiao, H.; Di Stefano, L.; Tian, C.; Li, Y.-Y.; Yin, Y.-H.; Qian, X.-P.; Pang, X.-W.; Li, Y.; McNutt, M.A.; Helin, K.; et al. Human TFDP3, a novel DP protein, inhibits DNA binding and transactivation by E2F. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 454–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Heuvel, S.v.D.; Dyson, N.J. Conserved functions of the pRB and E2F families. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 713–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hitchens, M.R.; Robbins, P.D. The role of the transcription factor DP in apoptosis. Apoptosis 2003, 8, 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Duronio, R.J.; Bonnette, P.C.; O’Farrell, P.H. Mutations of the Drosophila dDP, dE2F, and cyclin E genes reveal distinct roles for the E2F-DP transcription factor and cyclin E during the S-phase transition. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Royzman, I.; Whittaker, A.J.; Orr-Weaver, T.L. Mutations in Drosophila DP and E2F distinguish G1-S progression from an associated transcriptional program. Genes Dev. 1997, 11, 1999–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Verona, R.; Moberg, K.; Estes, S.; Starz, M.; Vernon, J.P.; Lees, J.A. E2F activity is regulated by cell cycle-dependent changes in subcellular localization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997, 17, 7268–7282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tanaka, H.; Matsumura, I.; Ezoe, S.; Satoh, Y.; Sakamaki, T.; Albanese, C.; Machii, T.; Pestell, R.G.; Kanakura, Y. E2F1 and c-Myc potentiate apoptosis through inhibition of NF-κB activity that facilitates MnSOD-mediated ROS elimination. Mol. Cell 2002, 9, 1017–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, Y.; Lou, H.; Wu, X.; Chen, Y. Characterization of the BPI-like gene from a subtracted cDNA library of large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea) and induced expression by formalin-inactivated Vibrio alginolyticus and Nocardia seriolae vaccine challenges. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2008, 25, 740–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cai, X.H.; Huang, Y.Q.; Chen, H.L.; Qi, Q.C.; Xu, M.J.; Xu, P.; Wu, X.Z. Identification and functional characterization of the transcription factor coding Dp1 gene in large yellow croaker Pseudosciaena crocea. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ao, J.; Mu, Y.; Xiang, L.-X.; Fan, D.; Feng, M.; Zhang, S.; Shi, Q.; Zhu, L.-Y.; Li, T.; Ding, Y.; et al. Genome sequencing of the perciform fish larimichthys crocea provides insights into molecular and genetic mechanisms of stress adaptation. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, C.; Zhang, D.; Kan, M.; Lv, Z.; Zhu, A.; Su, Y.; Zhou, D.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, M.; et al. The draft genome of the large yellow croaker reveals well-developed innate immunity. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liban, T.J.; Medina, E.M.; Tripathi, S.; Sengupta, S.; Henry, R.W.; Buchler, N.E.; Rubin, S.M. Conservation and divergence of C-terminal domain structure in the retinoblastoma protein family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 4942–4947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Weimer, A.K.; Nowack, M.K.; Bouyer, D.; Zhao, X.; Harashima, H.; Naseer, S.; De Winter, F.; Dissmeyer, N.; Geldner, N.; Schnittger, A. Retinoblastoma related1 regulates asymmetric cell divisions in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 4083–4095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kirienko, N.V.; Fay, D.S. Transcriptome profiling of the C. elegans Rb ortholog reveals diverse developmental roles. Dev. Biol. 2007, 305, 674–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Milet, C.; Rincheval-Arnold, A.; Mignotte, B.; Guenal, I. The Drosophila retinoblastoma protein induces apoptosis in proliferating but not in post-mitotic cells. Cell Cycle 2010, 9, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xie, B.; Wang, P.; Zhao, C.; Qiu, L. Genomic structure, expression pattern, and functional characterization of transcription factor E2F-2 from black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0177420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Y.; Shao, Y.N.; Lv, Z.M.; Li, C.H. MiR-210 regulates coelomocyte proliferation through targeting E2F3 in Apostichopus japonicus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 106, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chong, Y.L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, F.; Roy, S. Distinct requirements of E2f4 versus E2f5 activity for multiciliated cell development in the zebrafish embryo. Dev. Biol. 2018, 443, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Du, X.Y.; Lin, L.; Yu, Y.C.; Yang, N.; Gao, S.; Guo, J.Y.; Fang, L.L.; Su, P. The evolution and functional characterization of transcription factors E2Fs in lamprey, Lethenteron reissneri. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2025, 165, 105348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jin, X.L.; Liu, J.J.; Wang, S.; Shi, J.L.; Zhao, C.T.; Xie, H.B.; Kang, Y.S. E2f4 is required for intestinal and otolith development in zebrafish. J. Cell. Physiol. 2022, 237, 2690–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nahle, Z.; Polakoff, J.; Davuluri, R.V.; McCurrach, M.E.; Jacobson, M.D.; Narita, M.; Zhang, M.Q.; Lazebnik, Y.; Bar-Sagi, D.; Lowe, S.W. Direct coupling of the cell cycle and cell death machinery by E2F. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cobrinik, D.; Dowdy, S.F.; Hinds, P.W.; Mittnacht, S.; Weinberg, R.A. The retinoblastoma protein and the regulation of cell cycling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1992, 17, 312–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Helin, K.; Ed, H. The retinoblastoma protein as a transcriptional repressor. Trends Cell Biol. 1993, 3, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fagan, R.; Flint, K.J.; Jones, N. Phosphorylation of E2F-1 modulates its interaction with the retinoblastoma gene product and the adenoviral E4 19 kDa protein. Cell 1994, 78, 799–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, W.; Sommers, C.L.; Burshtyn, D.N.; Stebbins, C.C.; DeJarnette, J.B.; Trible, R.P.; Grinberg, A.; Tsay, H.C.; Jacobs, H.M.; Kessler, C.M.; et al. Essential role of LAT in T cell development. Immunity 1999, 10, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Stevens, C.; La Thangue, N.B. E2F and cell cycle control: A double-edged sword. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 412, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lindeman, G.J.; Gaubatz, S.; Livingston, D.M.; Ginsberg, D. The subcellular localization of E2F-4 is cell-cycle dependent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 5095–5100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Olgiate, J.; Ehmann, G.L.; Vidyarthi, S.; Hilton, M.J.; Bachenheimer, S.L. Herpes simplex virus induces intracellular redistribution of E2F4 and accumulation of E2F pocket protein complexes. Virology 1999, 258, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Julian, L.M.; Liu, Y.; A Pakenham, C.; Dugal-Tessier, D.; Ruzhynsky, V.; Bae, S.; Tsai, S.-Y.; Leone, G.; Slack, R.S.; Blais, A. Tissue-specific targeting of cell fate regulatory genes by E2f factors. Cell Death Differ. 2016, 23, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zappia, M.P.; Frolov, M.V. E2F function in muscle growth is necessary and sufficient for viability in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cuitiño, M.C.; Pécot, T.; Sun, D.; Kladney, R.; Okano-Uchida, T.; Shinde, N.; Saeed, R.; Perez-Castro, A.J.; Webb, A.; Liu, T.; et al. Two distinct E2F transcriptional modules drive cell cycles and differentiation. Cell Rep. 2019, 27, 3547–3560.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kan, N.G.; Junghans, D.; Belmonte, J.C.I. Compensatory growth mechanisms regulated by BMP and FGF signaling mediate liver regeneration in zebrafish after partial hepatectomy. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 3516–3525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tevosian, S.G.; Paulson, K.E.; Bronson, R.; Yee, A.S. Expression of the E2F-1/DP-1 transcription factor in murine development. Cell Growth Differ. Publ. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 1996, 7, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  53. Yan, L.-H.; Chen, Z.-N.; Li, L.; Mo, X.-W.; Qin, Y.-Z.; Wei, W.-E.; Qin, H.-Q.; Lin, Y.; Chen, J.-S. E2F-1 promotes DAPK2-induced anti-tumor immunity of gastric cancer cells by targeting miR-34a. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 15925–15936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, S.; Wang, L.; Wu, C.; Sun, S.; Pan, J.-H. E2F2 directly regulates the STAT1 and PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathways to exacerbate the inflammatory phenotype in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts and mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2018, 20, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liao, Y.; Du, W. Rb-independent E2F3 promotes cell proliferation and alters expression of genes involved in metabolism and inflammation. FEBS Open Biol. 2017, 7, 1611–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Abbas, M.N.; Kausar, S.; Sun, Y.X.; Sun, Y.; Wang, L.; Qian, C.; Wei, G.Q.; Zhu, B.J.; Liu, C.L. Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of E2F transcription factor 4 from Antheraea pernyi. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2017, 107, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bandara, L.R.; Buck, V.M.; Zamanian, M.; Johnston, L.H.; Thangue, N.B.L. Functional synergy between DP-1 and E2F-1 in the cell cycle-regulating transcription factor DRTF1/E2. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 4317–4324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Helin, K.; Wu, C.L.; Fattaey, A.R.; A Lees, J.; Dynlacht, B.D.; Ngwu, C.; Harlow, E. Heterodimerization of the transcription factors E2F-1 and DP-1 leads to cooperative trans-activation. Genes Dev. 1993, 7, 1850–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Krek, W.; Livingston, D.M.; Shirodkar, S. Binding to DNA and the retinoblastoma gene product promoted by complex formation of different E2F family members. Science 1993, 262, 1557–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wu, C.-L.; Zukerberg, L.R.; Ngwu, C.; Harlow, E.; Lees, J.A. In vivo association of E2F and DP family proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995, 15, 2536–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, D.; Russell, J.; Xu, H.; Johnson, D.G. Deregulated expression of DP1 induces epidermal proliferation and enhances skin carcinogenesis. Mol. Carcinog. 2001, 31, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. DeGregori, J.; Leone, G.; Miron, A.; Jakoi, L.; Nevins, J.R. Distinct roles for E2F proteins in cell growth control and apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 7245–7250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Dirks, P.B.; Rutka, J.T.; Hubbard, S.L.; Mondal, S.; Hamel, P.A. The E2F-family proteins induce distinct cell cycle regulatory factors in p16-arrested, U343 astrocytoma cells. Oncogene 1998, 177, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lukas, J.; Petersen, B.O.; Holm, K.; Bartek, J.; Helin, K. Deregulated expression of E2F family members induces S-phase entry and overcomes p16INK4A-mediated growth suppression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16, 1047–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shan, B.; A Farmer, A.; Lee, W.H. The molecular basis of E2F-1/DP-1-induced S-phase entry and apoptosis. Cell Growth Differ. 1996, 7, 689–697. [Google Scholar]
  66. Johnson, D.G.; Cress, D.; Jakoi, L.; Nevins, J.R. Ocogenic capacity of the E2F1 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 12823–12827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jooss, K.; Lam, E.W.; Bybee, A.; Girling, R.; Müller, R.; La Thangue, N.B. Proto-oncogenic properties of the DP family of proteins. Oncogene 1995, 10, 1529–1536. [Google Scholar]
  68. Rubin, S.M.; Gall, A.-L.; Zheng, N.; Pavletich, N.P. Structure of the Rb C-terminal domain bound to E2F1-DP1: A mechanism for phosphorylation-induced E2F release. Cell 2005, 123, 1093–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using realtime quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of large yellow croaker E2F genes and its transcripts E2F1, E2F2, E2F3, E2F4, E2F5, E2F6, E2F7, and E2F8. The large yellow croaker E2F gene contains 7, 7, 8, 11, 8, 8, 12, and 13 exons and introns about 3~9 kb.
Figure 1. Structure of large yellow croaker E2F genes and its transcripts E2F1, E2F2, E2F3, E2F4, E2F5, E2F6, E2F7, and E2F8. The large yellow croaker E2F gene contains 7, 7, 8, 11, 8, 8, 12, and 13 exons and introns about 3~9 kb.
Ijms 26 05343 g001
Figure 2. Sequence alignment of E2F family proteins in the large yellow croaker. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of E2F1–6 proteins. Sequence alignment was performed using Clustal X 2.0 and GeneDoc software 2.7. The functional domains were determined by searching the CDD database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, accessed on 11 July 2019). The asterisk indicates identical residues. (B) Schematic representation of the domain structure of full-length E2F1–8 proteins. Nuclear localization signals and leucine-rich nuclear export signals were predicted by cNLS Mapper (http://nls-mapper.iab.keio.ac.jp/cgi-bin/NLS_Mapper_form.cgi, accessed on 13 July 2019) and NetNES 1.1 Server (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/NetNES-1.1/, accessed on 13 July 2019). The DNA-binding, dimerization, transactivation domains, NLS, NES, and RB family protein binding domain (RB) are indicated by orange, gray, blue, yellow, pink, and green boxes, respectively.
Figure 2. Sequence alignment of E2F family proteins in the large yellow croaker. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of E2F1–6 proteins. Sequence alignment was performed using Clustal X 2.0 and GeneDoc software 2.7. The functional domains were determined by searching the CDD database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi, accessed on 11 July 2019). The asterisk indicates identical residues. (B) Schematic representation of the domain structure of full-length E2F1–8 proteins. Nuclear localization signals and leucine-rich nuclear export signals were predicted by cNLS Mapper (http://nls-mapper.iab.keio.ac.jp/cgi-bin/NLS_Mapper_form.cgi, accessed on 13 July 2019) and NetNES 1.1 Server (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/NetNES-1.1/, accessed on 13 July 2019). The DNA-binding, dimerization, transactivation domains, NLS, NES, and RB family protein binding domain (RB) are indicated by orange, gray, blue, yellow, pink, and green boxes, respectively.
Ijms 26 05343 g002
Figure 3. Sequence alignment and evolutionary relationship of dimerization domains between large yellow croakers and humans. (A) Sequence alignment of E2F and DP1 domains between large yellow croakers and humans. The secondary structure elements of PcE2F4 were predicted by the Psipred 4.0 software (http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/, accessed on 20 July 2019). The secondary structure elements of hE2F4 were quoted from its crystal structure. Black indicates identical residues. Grey indicates highly conserved amino acids residues. Pink indicates a helix structure. Yellow indicates a strand structure. (B) The evolutionary relationship of E2F1–6 and DP1 dimerization domains between large yellow croakers and humans. hE2F1: human E2F1 (NP_005216.1), hE2F2: human E2F2 (NP_004082.1), hE2F3: human E2F3(NP_001940.1), hE2F4: human E2F4 (NP_001941.2), hE2F5: human E2F5 (NP_001942.2), hE2F6: human E2F6 (NP_937987.2), and hDP1: human DP1 (NP_009042.1). (C) The evolutionary relationship of E2F1–6 and DP1 of large yellow croakers. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA 7.0 with 1000 bootstrap replications.
Figure 3. Sequence alignment and evolutionary relationship of dimerization domains between large yellow croakers and humans. (A) Sequence alignment of E2F and DP1 domains between large yellow croakers and humans. The secondary structure elements of PcE2F4 were predicted by the Psipred 4.0 software (http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/, accessed on 20 July 2019). The secondary structure elements of hE2F4 were quoted from its crystal structure. Black indicates identical residues. Grey indicates highly conserved amino acids residues. Pink indicates a helix structure. Yellow indicates a strand structure. (B) The evolutionary relationship of E2F1–6 and DP1 dimerization domains between large yellow croakers and humans. hE2F1: human E2F1 (NP_005216.1), hE2F2: human E2F2 (NP_004082.1), hE2F3: human E2F3(NP_001940.1), hE2F4: human E2F4 (NP_001941.2), hE2F5: human E2F5 (NP_001942.2), hE2F6: human E2F6 (NP_937987.2), and hDP1: human DP1 (NP_009042.1). (C) The evolutionary relationship of E2F1–6 and DP1 of large yellow croakers. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA 7.0 with 1000 bootstrap replications.
Ijms 26 05343 g003
Figure 4. Subcellular colocalization of pE2Fs protein and pDP1 analyzed by a cherry and GFP reporter assay. COS-7 cells were co-transfected with cherry and GFP reporter constructs expressing a cherry-tagged E2Fs and EGFP-tagged DP1. Empty pmcherryN1 and pEGFPN1 vectors were used as a control. Nuclear DNA was stained with DAPI, and cells were analyzed with a fluorescence confocal microscope. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure 4. Subcellular colocalization of pE2Fs protein and pDP1 analyzed by a cherry and GFP reporter assay. COS-7 cells were co-transfected with cherry and GFP reporter constructs expressing a cherry-tagged E2Fs and EGFP-tagged DP1. Empty pmcherryN1 and pEGFPN1 vectors were used as a control. Nuclear DNA was stained with DAPI, and cells were analyzed with a fluorescence confocal microscope. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Ijms 26 05343 g004
Figure 5. Tissue distributions of PcE2Fs mRNA in a healthy large yellow croaker. Tissues tested include the intestine, gill, liver, spleen, body kidney, head kidney, brain, and heart. Large yellow croaker β-actin gene expression was used as an internal control. The PcE2F1–6 mRNA level was compared with the expression level in the gill, intestine, liver and head kidney to determine the relative fold change. Vertical bars represent the mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 5. Tissue distributions of PcE2Fs mRNA in a healthy large yellow croaker. Tissues tested include the intestine, gill, liver, spleen, body kidney, head kidney, brain, and heart. Large yellow croaker β-actin gene expression was used as an internal control. The PcE2F1–6 mRNA level was compared with the expression level in the gill, intestine, liver and head kidney to determine the relative fold change. Vertical bars represent the mean ± SD (n = 3).
Ijms 26 05343 g005
Figure 6. Yeast two-hybrid analysis of protein interactions between PcDP1 and PcE2Fs. Right plate: growth of yeast cells on SD/–Leu/–Trp double dropout selection medium showing successful co-transformations. Middle and left plate: growth of yeast cells on selective SD/–Ade/–His/–Leu/–Trp quadruple dropout plates (without or with X-α-gal) indicating protein–protein interactions. Notes: BD53/AD-T was positive group, BD-lam/AD-T was negative group, 2968 was DP1, 2970 was E2F1, 2971 was E2F2, 2971 was E2F3, 2972 was E2F4, 2973 was E2F5, and 2974 was E2F6.
Figure 6. Yeast two-hybrid analysis of protein interactions between PcDP1 and PcE2Fs. Right plate: growth of yeast cells on SD/–Leu/–Trp double dropout selection medium showing successful co-transformations. Middle and left plate: growth of yeast cells on selective SD/–Ade/–His/–Leu/–Trp quadruple dropout plates (without or with X-α-gal) indicating protein–protein interactions. Notes: BD53/AD-T was positive group, BD-lam/AD-T was negative group, 2968 was DP1, 2970 was E2F1, 2971 was E2F2, 2971 was E2F3, 2972 was E2F4, 2973 was E2F5, and 2974 was E2F6.
Ijms 26 05343 g006
Figure 7. BiFC analysis of interactions between PcDP1 proteins and PcE2F4. COS-7 cells were co-transfected with equal amounts of BiFC expression constructs encoding pBiFC-VN173-PcDP1 and pBiFC-VC155-E2F4, or pBiFC-VC155-DP1 and pBiFC-VN173-E2F4 fusion proteins. Co-transfected with equal amounts of VN173 and VC155 was served as a blank control. Single transfection using the construct encoding pDP1 or pE2F4 was served as a negative control. YFP signals due to BiFC were measured by fluorescence confocal microscope. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Figure 7. BiFC analysis of interactions between PcDP1 proteins and PcE2F4. COS-7 cells were co-transfected with equal amounts of BiFC expression constructs encoding pBiFC-VN173-PcDP1 and pBiFC-VC155-E2F4, or pBiFC-VC155-DP1 and pBiFC-VN173-E2F4 fusion proteins. Co-transfected with equal amounts of VN173 and VC155 was served as a blank control. Single transfection using the construct encoding pDP1 or pE2F4 was served as a negative control. YFP signals due to BiFC were measured by fluorescence confocal microscope. Scale bars, 10 μm.
Ijms 26 05343 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, X.; Chen, H.; Fang, J.; Xu, M.; Chen, M.; Qi, Q.; Xu, P.; Hanington, P.C.; Wu, X. Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea, Richardson) E2F4, a Cyclin-Dependent Transcription Factor, Forms a Heterodimer with DP1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 5343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26115343

AMA Style

Cai X, Chen H, Fang J, Xu M, Chen M, Qi Q, Xu P, Hanington PC, Wu X. Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea, Richardson) E2F4, a Cyclin-Dependent Transcription Factor, Forms a Heterodimer with DP1. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(11):5343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26115343

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cai, Xiaohui, Honglin Chen, Jing Fang, Meijuan Xu, Meijuan Chen, Qiancheng Qi, Peng Xu, Patrick C. Hanington, and Xinzhong Wu. 2025. "Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea, Richardson) E2F4, a Cyclin-Dependent Transcription Factor, Forms a Heterodimer with DP1" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 11: 5343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26115343

APA Style

Cai, X., Chen, H., Fang, J., Xu, M., Chen, M., Qi, Q., Xu, P., Hanington, P. C., & Wu, X. (2025). Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea, Richardson) E2F4, a Cyclin-Dependent Transcription Factor, Forms a Heterodimer with DP1. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(11), 5343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26115343

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop