Next Article in Journal
Effect of Genetic Variants on Rosuvastatin Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers: Involvement of ABCG2, SLCO1B1 and NAT2
Next Article in Special Issue
High Copy Number Variations Correlate with a Pro-Tumoral Microenvironment and Worse Prognosis in Acral Lentiginous Melanoma
Previous Article in Journal
The Synergy of Chitosan and Azoxystrobin Against Fusarium graminearum Is Modulated by Selected ABC Transporters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rosmarinic Acid Ameliorates Dermatophagoides farinae Extract-Induced Atopic Dermatitis-like Skin Inflammation by Activating the Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling Pathway
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Fragments in Patients with Psoriasis

by
Mila Broby Johansen
1,2,*,
Signe Holm Nielsen
3,
Helena Port
3,
Tanja Todberg
1,
Marianne Bengtson Løvendorf
1,4 and
Lone Skov
1,2
1
Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
2
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
3
Nordic Bioscience, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
4
The Leo Foundation Skin Immunology Research Center, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(1), 261; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26010261
Submission received: 21 November 2024 / Revised: 16 December 2024 / Accepted: 27 December 2024 / Published: 30 December 2024

Abstract

:
Blood-based extracellular matrix (ECM) fragments have been identified as potential pharmacologic biomarkers in spondyloarthritis and diagnostic biomarkers in psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis vulgaris. This study aimed to explore whether ECM fragments can differentiate patients with psoriasis from healthy controls (HC) and determine their potential as biomarkers for response to treatment in psoriasis. The study population included 59 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, not receiving systemic anti-psoriatic treatment at inclusion, and 52 HC matched by age, sex, and BMI. An EDTA plasma sample was taken from all subjects at inclusion. Nine patients with psoriasis who initiated treatment with adalimumab after inclusion and responded successfully had an additional EDTA plasma sample taken after three to six months. Twelve ECM fragments were measured using validated ELISAs and Immunodiagnostic Systems automated chemiluminescent assays. C4M, indicating collagen IV degradation, PRO-C3, indicating tissue fibrosis, and PRO-C4, indicating epidermal basement membrane turnover showed significantly elevated levels in psoriasis patients compared with HC (p = 0.005, p = 0.016, and p = 0.018, respectively). Despite successful treatment, adalimumab did not alter C4M, PRO-C3, or PRO-C4 levels. In conclusion, compared with controls, C4M, PRO-C3, and PRO-C4 were elevated in psoriasispatients, but treatment did not modulate these fragments.

1. Introduction

Psoriasis (PSO) is a multifactorial chronic inflammatory skin disease [1]. The pathogenesis of psoriasis involves a combination of the innate and adaptive immune systems and is mainly driven by the Th1 and Th17 T-cells/IL-23 axis. Around 20% of patients with psoriasis develop psoriatic arthritis (PsA) [2,3]. Blood-based biomarkers may be an important supplement in the clinic to improve the monitoring of the patients. In PSO, only a limited number of biomarkers are available to predict disease progression, assess the risk of comorbidities, and evaluate response to systemic treatment. HLA-C*06:02 is one of the only more well studied biomarkers that predicts the response to ustekinumab, an IL-12/23 inhibitor [4,5]. Nevertheless, additional biomarkers are required.
The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a non-cellular network present in all tissues and organs, playing a vital role in maintaining structural integrity. In healthy skin, the ECM undergoes continuous regeneration, a process regulated by various ECM fragments to maintain balance in the skin [6]. Fibroblasts and keratinocytes are key contributors to tissue homeostasis and remodelling of the skin. Fibroblasts synthesise matrix-degrading enzymes such as matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and are responsible for producing fibrillar collagens. The MMPs play a critical role in maintaining ECM stability by facilitating the cleavage of various ECM components, including elastin and collagens [7,8,9]. Collagens, the most abundant protein family in the ECM, are essential for maintaining the structural integrity and organisation of the skin’s different layers. Collagen types III and VI are present in the dermis, while collagen types IV, VII, XVII, and XXII are present in the epidermal basement membrane [7,10,11,12]. PRO-C4 is the most abundant in the basement membrane [13]. Collagens are synthesised from precursor procollagens (PRO-C) [13] and subsequently degraded by MMPs. Specific MMPs facilitate the release of distinct collagen fragments. For instance, C3M is a fragment released from collagen type III, C4M is a fragment released from collagen type IV, and C6M is a fragment released from collagen type VI. C4G is released from type IV collagen as a consequence of its degradation by the T-cell active protease, Granzyme B [14]. CPa9-HNE is a neo-epitope derived from an HNE-derived fragment of calprotectin, and one of its functions is to recruit leukocytes such as neutrophils. Neutrophils can release neutrophil extracellular trap formations (NETosis), which may be involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis [15].
In PSO, the regenerative process of the ECM is disrupted. Research shows that certain proteins including heparanases, syndecans, elastin, tissue inhibitor metalloproteinase, laminin, and MMPs can alter ECM in psoriatic skin [8,9,16,17,18]. Among these, MMPs such as MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-9, and MMP-12 play a role in the development of PSO. MMP-9 facilitates the release of the collagen type III fragment C3M, while other MMPs release the collagen type IV fragment C4M [9,17,19]. The inflammatory environment in PSO drives collagen degradation through the upregulation of MMP expression, leading to increased turnover and the release of ECM fragments into the bloodstream [6]. While the role of MMPs and collagen genes in PSO has been investigated [20,21], few studies have specifically focused on fragments derived from collagen formation and degradation, immune cell activity-related ECM fragments, or elastin degradation in PSO [7,12,17].
ECM fragments might be potential blood-based biomarkers for disease activity and treatment response in other diseases. For instance, in patients with axial spondyloarthritis, certain ECM fragments have been identified as biomarkers for response to TNF-α inhibitor treatment [22,23]. Additionally, blood-based ECM fragments have been explored in small studies as potential markers to distinguish between healthy controls and patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or patients with PSO [12].
This study aimed to validate and expand upon these findings in a larger, well-defined cohort of patients with PSO. The central hypothesis was that ECM components contribute to psoriatic pathology. The specific objectives were to investigate whether ECM fragments can serve as biomarkers to distinguish patients with moderate to severe PSO from healthy controls (HC) and to evaluate the potential of ECM fragments as predictive biomarkers for treatment response in patients with PSO.

2. Results

2.1. ECM Fragment Levels in Patients with PSO Compared with HC

The baseline characteristics of patients and controls are shown in Table 1. The study cohort comprised 59 patients with PSO and 52 HC. The mean age was 47 years in the PSO group and 46 years in the HC group. Most of the participants were male, consisting of 33 individuals (56%) in the PSO group and 28 (54%) in the HC group. The median Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) was 10.0 (8.0–36.8), and 15% (nine patients) had been diagnosed with PsA by a physician.
The analysed ECM fragments included: elastin degradation and neutrophil activity (ELP-3) [24], T-cell activity (C4G) [14], neutrophil activity (CPa9-HNE) [25], type III, IV, and VI collagen degradation (C3M [26], C4M [27], and C6M [28]), type III, VI, and VII collagen formation (PRO-C3 [29], PRO-C6 [30], and PRO-C7 [31]), and type IV, XVII, and XXII collagen turnover (PRO-C4 [32], PRO-C17 [33], and PRO-C22 [34]). Detailed information on each ECM fragment can be found in Table 2.
The differences in the levels of all 12 ECM fragments (ELP-3, C4G, CPa9-HNE, C3M, C4M, C6M, PRO-C3, PRO-C4, PRO-C6, PRO-C7, PRO-C17, PRO-C22) in patients with PSO compared with HC are presented in Figure 1 and Table S1. Significantly elevated levels of C4M, assessing collagen IV degradation (p = 0.005), PRO-C3, assessing tissue fibrosis (p = 0.016), and PRO-C4, assessing epidermal basement membrane turnover (p = 0.018), were observed in patients with PSO compared with HC (Figure 1E,G,H). No differences were observed in the remaining fragment levels between patients with PSO and HC (Table S1).
No significant difference was found in ECM fragment levels between patients with PSO without PsA (n = 50) and HC compared with patients with PSO with PsA (n = 9) (Figure S1).

2.2. ECM Fragment Levels in Patients with PSO with a Successful Treatment Response

To determine the potential of ECM fragments as biomarkers for response to treatment in patients with PSO, the three ECM fragments elevated in patients with PSO (C4M, PRO-C3, and PRO-C4), were selected to be measured after treatment in a selected group of nine good responders (PASI ≤ 2).
The nine patients had a mean age of 36 years, the majority being males (56%) and with a median baseline PASI of 10.2 (8.1–21.4) and 0.0 (0.0–2.0) 3–6 months after biological treatment. One patient had PsA (Table 1). No significant change was observed in levels of C4M (p = 0.301), PRO-C3 (p = 0.945), and PRO-C4 (p = 0.570) when comparing before and after treatment values in the group with a successful treatment response (Figure 2).

3. Discussion

This study measured a panel of ECM fragments to identify if ECM fragments showed any potential to differentiate patients with PSO from HC and as a secondary aim, if the selected ECM fragments were modulated during treatment. The results demonstrated a small but significant increase in C4M, PRO-C3, and PRO-C4 levels in patients with PSO compared to HC, but no change in the measured markers after treatment. Most of the degradation fragments measured in this study are released by MMP-9. In the literature, different MMPs have been shown to impact tissue remodelling in the psoriatic epidermis [7,9]. However, there are limited reports on elastin degradation, immune cell activity-related ECM fragments and ECM fragments derived from collagen formation and degradation in PSO (Table 2) [7,12,17].
Contrary to our findings, C4M and PRO-C4 were not elevated in a small study of patients with PSO; the authors found decreased levels of C3M in patients with PSO and patients with PsA compared with HC. Furthermore, they found elevated levels of PRO-C3 in both patients with PsA and patients with PSO. The latter finding with elevated PRO-C3 in patients with PSO is in line with the results of this study [12]. Another study by Holm Nielsen et al. showed elevated levels of PRO-C4, C4M, and PRO-C3 in patients with PsA compared with HC, but no difference in C3M was found [35]. C3M is a fragment of type III collagen. PRO-C3 is mainly found in connective tissue and primarily reflects type III collagen formation by fibrogenesis and healing. PRO-C3 peptides have often been used as a marker of liver fibrosis in patients with PSO treated with methotrexate; however, they were eventually replaced by fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) [36,37]. Measurement of PRO-C3 peptides has been used primarily in dermatology and it is well known that patients with active arthritis can have elevated levels [38]. Only nine patients in this study had PsA. In a small group, the differences in the ECM fragments were examined between patients with PSO without PsA, HC, and patients with PSO with PsA. However, no evidence of differences was found. Studies investigating early diffuse systemic sclerosis, where fibrosis is developed in the skin and internal organs, also observed elevated levels of PRO-C4 and PRO-C3 compared with HC [39,40]. Our findings support that increased fibrogenesis reflected by excessed type III collagen formation play a role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis [41,42]. The contrary findings of C4M, PRO-C4, and C3M in patients with PSO compared with HC indicate that the direct function of these fragments in patients with PSO remains unknown.
Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of ECM fragments to illustrate the pharmacologic effects of biological treatments in patients with spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel disease [22,23,43]. Port et al. has shown that C1M, C3M, C4M, C6M, CRP, PRO-C4, and CPa9-HNE levels declined after 12 weeks in patients with spondyloarthritis treated with adalimumab compared with placebo [23], but on the contrary, this was not confirmed in another study with patients with spondyloarthritis 22 weeks after adalimumab treatment [22]. C4M has been shown to predict treatment response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [43]. However, in this small study with a subgroup of a limited number of patients with a successful treatment response, C4M, PRO-C3, and PRO-C4 levels were not modulated by a successful treatment with adalimumab (PASI ≤ 2). This was an explorative study that only consisted of nine patients and the results should be interpreted with caution.
Additionally, various factors and pathological processes in different tissues can lead to an imbalance of ECM fragments and their release into the bloodstream. These factors include lean body mass, liver fibrosis, alcohol binge drinking, pulmonary fibrosis, lung diseases, and other inflammatory diseases [6,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. In addition, the immune-cell activity-derived fragment, CPa9-HNE, quantifies activated neutrophils and has been associated with patients affected by inflammatory bowel diseases and hidradenitis suppurativa [25,51]. Neutrophils also play an important role in psoriasis pathogeneses, especially in systemic inflammation, and are found in the dermis and epidermis and form Munro’s microabscesses [52]. Despite that, there were no changes in the immune-cell activity-derived fragments (CPa9-HNE and C4G) from patients with PSO compared with HC in this study. However, the group of patients with PSO had a low BMI, and individuals with diabetes, autoimmune diseases, cancer, or infections were excluded from the study [53]. This exclusion helps to minimise the risk of other disease-affected tissues influencing the results in this cohort. This complexity of different factors that can influence ECM fragments release into the blood makes it challenging to determine the exact cause of the differences in ECM fragments between patients with PSO and HC. These differences may be due to the skin pathology in psoriasis or other factors and affected tissues [54,55]. Therefore, we cannot determine if these ECM fragments measured in this study are specific for patients with PSO. The ECM fragments may be more specific for PsA as other studies have indicated.

Strengths and Limitations

The strength of this study is the large cohort of patients with untreated moderate to severe psoriasis and with a carefully matched control group. Few studies have investigated the potential of ECM fragments as biomarkers to differentiate between patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and HC and their potential as biomarkers for response to treatment in patients with PSO. A limitation of this study is the relatively limited sample size of patients with PSO who had a successful treatment response and PsA. A longitudinal prospective study with a larger patient cohort is necessary to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the potential of ECM fragments, as a measure of anti-psoriatic treatment efficacy.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design and Study Population

The study population comprised patients with PSO who were not receiving systemic anti-psoriatic treatment and HC matched by age, sex, and BMI. The population has previously been described [53,56]. All participants provided informed consent before their enrolment in the study. The study was approved by the ethics committees of the Capital Region of Denmark (H-18041455) on the 22 October 2018 and by the Danish Data Protection Agency (P-2020-747) on the 19 July 2023. The study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration. Inclusion criteria were individuals aged 18–74, residing in the capital region of Denmark, with a BMI < 35 kg/m2, baseline EDTA plasma blood samples at inclusion, a diagnosis of plaque psoriasis for more than six months, no systemic anti-psoriatic treatment for ≥3 months, and PASI ≥ 8 at inclusion. HC had the same inclusion criteria as patients with PSO excluding the psoriasis-specific criteria. Patients with PSO were recruited from the outpatient clinic of the Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. Nine patients with PSO who commenced adalimumab treatment after inclusion and exhibited a successful treatment response (defined as a PASI score ≤ 2 post-treatment) were selected for an explorative follow-up study, and a new EDTA plasma blood sample was collected after 3–6 months.

4.2. ECM Fragments Assessment in EDTA Plasma

Upon their collection, the EDTA plasma blood samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis. A panel of 12 ECM fragments was measured using validated ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) and Immunodiagnostic Systems (IDS) automated chemiluminescent assays, at Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark. The assays were previously developed and technically validated; detailed information on each ECM fragment can be found in Table 2. Sample measurements were performed in duplicates, and values were accepted when the standard curve had a coefficient of variance ≤ 10% and if at least three of the five control samples had a coefficient of variance ≤ 20%. Before measurements, technical assay parameters were validated according to Nordic Bioscience criteria. For more detailed information of the method, please refer to Supplementary Text S1.

4.3. Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics are presented as mean with standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed continuous variables and median with range (minimum to maximum) for non-normally distributed continuous variables. For categorical variables, numbers were used with frequencies expressed as percentages. Quantile–quantile plots, Gaussian normal distribution, and the D’Agostino–Pearson normality test were used to assess the data distribution. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to analyse any differences in ECM fragment levels between independent groups: (1) patients with PSO and HC, (2) patients with PSO with PsA compared to HC, and (3) patients with PSO with PsA compared to patients with PSO without PsA. The response to treatment in patients with PSO with successful treatment response (PASI ≤ 2) was analysed using the Wilcoxon paired (signed-rank) test. Analysis and graphs were conducted in GraphPad Prism (version 10). A p-value below 0.05 was considered significant.

5. Conclusions

The results demonstrated that the ECM fragments C4M, PRO-C3, and PRO-C4 were slightly elevated in patients with PSO compared with HC, although their specific clinical role in psoriasis remains unclear. Treatment of psoriasis did not appear to modulate the levels of these fragments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26010261/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.J., S.H.N., H.P., M.B.L. and L.S.; formal analysis, M.B.J., S.H.N., H.P., M.B.L. and L.S.; investigation, T.T.; methodology, M.B.J., S.H.N., M.B.L. and L.S.; project administration, M.B.J., S.H.N., M.B.L. and L.S.; resources, M.B.J., S.H.N., H.P., M.B.L. and L.S.; supervision, M.B.L. and L.S.; visualisation, M.B.J., M.B.L. and L.S.; writing—original draft, M.B.J., M.B.L. and L.S.; writing—review and editing, M.B.J., S.H.N., H.P., T.T., M.B.L. and L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the LEO Foundation grant number [LF-ST-21-500002], Copenhagen University Hospital—Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark. The funding sources had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the ethics committees of the Capital Region of Denmark (H-18041455) on 22 October 2018 and by the Danish Data Protection Agency (P-2020-747) on 19 July 2023. The study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration.

Informed Consent Statement

All participants provided informed consent before their enrolment in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank, Cecilie Møller Hausgaard, Malene Lilli Pilgaard, and Mads Engelhardt Knudsen for conducting the ECM fragment measurements. We sincerely appreciate Lisbeth Klausen for her valuable assistance with handling the blood samples. Furthermore, we thank the patients for their participation.

Conflicts of Interest

M.B.J., T.T. and M.B.L. declare no conflict of interest. S.H.N. and H.P. is a full-time employee at Nordic Bioscience A/S. Nordic Bioscience is a privately owned, small–medium-size enterprise (SME) partly focused on the development of biomarkers. None of the authors received fees, bonuses, or other benefits for the work described in the manuscript. S.H.N. holds stock in Nordic Bioscience A/S. L.S. has been a paid speaker for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, and LEO Pharma, and has been a consultant or served on Advisory Boards with AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, UCB, Almirall, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, and Sanofi. L.S. has received research and educational grants from Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, Almirall, Sanofi, Janssen Cilag, and Leo Pharma. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Griffiths, C.E.M.; Armstrong, A.W.; Gudjonsson, J.E.; Barker, J.N.W.N. Psoriasis. Lancet 2021, 397, 1301–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ritchlin, C.T.; Colbert, R.A.; Gladman, D.D. Psoriatic Arthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 957–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alinaghi, F.; Calov, M.; Kristensen, L.E.; Gladman, D.D.; Coates, L.C.; Jullien, D.; Gottlieb, A.B.; Gisondi, P.; Wu, J.J.; Thyssen, J.P.; et al. Prevalence of Psoriatic Arthritis in Patients with Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational and Clinical Studies. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2019, 80, 251–265.e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Corbett, M.; Ramessur, R.; Marshall, D.; Acencio, M.L.; Ostaszewski, M.; Barbosa, I.A.; Dand, N.; Di Meglio, P.; Haddad, S.; Jensen, A.H.M.; et al. Biomarkers of Systemic Treatment Response in People with Psoriasis: A Scoping Review. Br. J. Dermatol. 2022, 187, 494–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ramessur, R.; Corbett, M.; Marshall, D.; Acencio, M.L.; Barbosa, I.A.; Dand, N.; Di Meglio, P.; Haddad, S.; Jensen, A.H.M.; Koopmann, W.; et al. Biomarkers of Disease Progression in People with Psoriasis: A Scoping Review. Br. J. Dermatol. 2022, 187, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Karsdal, M.A.; Nielsen, M.J.; Sand, J.M.; Henriksen, K.; Genovese, F.; Bay-Jensen, A.C.; Smith, V.; Adamkewicz, J.I.; Christiansen, C.; Leeming, D.J. Extracellular Matrix Remodeling: The Common Denominator in Connective Tissue Diseases Possibilities for Evaluation and Current Understanding of the Matrix as More than a Passive Architecture, but a Key Player in Tissue Failure. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2013, 11, 70–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pfisterer, K.; Weninger, W.; Shaw, L.E.; Symmank, D. The Extracellular Matrix in Skin Inflammation and Infection. Cell Dev. Biol 2021, 9, 682414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Heinz, A. Elastases and Elastokines: Elastin Degradation and Its Significance in Health and Disease. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 55, 252–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mezentsev, A.; Nikolaev, A.; Bruskin, S. Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Role in Psoriasis. Gene 2014, 540, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nyström, A.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L. Matrix Molecules and Skin Biology. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 89, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Frantz, C.; Stewart, K.M.; Weaver, V.M. The Extracellular Matrix at a Glance. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123, 4195–4200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nielsen, S.H.; Magee, C.; Groen, S.S.; Sinkevičiūtė, D.; Bay-Jensen, A.C.; Karsdal, M.A.; Pennington, S.R.; FitzGerald, O. Differentiating Patients with Psoriasis from Psoriatic Arthritis Using Collagen Biomarkers. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2023, 41, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gelse, K.; Pöschl, E.; Aigner, T. Collagens—Structure, Function, and Biosynthesis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2003, 55, 1531–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jensen, C.; Sinkeviciute, D.; Madsen, D.H.; Önnerfjord, P.; Hansen, M.; Schmidt, H.; Karsdal, M.A.; Svane, I.M.; Willumsen, N. Granzyme B Degraded Type IV Collagen Products in Serum Identify Melanoma Patients Responding to Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Cancers 2020, 12, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lambert, S.; Hambro, C.A.; Johnston, A.; Stuart, P.E.; Tsoi, L.C.; Nair, R.P.; Elder, J.T. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Induce Human Th17 Cells: Effect of Psoriasis-Associated TRAF3IP2 Genotype. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 1245–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. McFadden, J.P.; Kimber, I. A Review on the Potential Role of Basement Membrane Laminin in the Pathogenesis of Psoriasis. Scand. J. Immunol. 2016, 83, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wagner, M.F.M.G.; Theodoro, T.R.; Filho, C.D.A.S.M.; Oyafuso, L.K.M.; Pinhal, M.A.S. Extracellular Matrix Alterations in the Skin of Patients Affected by Psoriasis. BMC Mol. Cell Biol. 2021, 22, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karas, A.; Holmannova, D.; Borsky, P.; Fiala, Z.; Andrys, C.; Hamakova, K.; Svadlakova, T.; Palicka, V.; Krejsek, J.; Rehacek, V.; et al. Significantly Altered Serum Levels of NAD, AGE, RAGE, CRP, and Elastin as Potential Biomarkers of Psoriasis and Aging—A Case-Control Study. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bhattacharjee, O.; Ayyangar, U.; Kurbet, A.S.; Ashok, D.; Raghavan, S. Unraveling the ECM-Immune Cell Crosstalk in Skin Diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 447867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Caputo, V.; Strafella, C.; Termine, A.; Campione, E.; Bianchi, L.; Novelli, G.; Giardina, E.; Cascella, R. RNAseq-Based Prioritization Revealed COL6A5, COL8A1, COL10A1 and MIR146A as Common and Differential Susceptibility Biomarkers for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Confirmation from Genotyping Analysis of 1417 Italian Subjects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Starodubtseva, N.L.; Sobolev, V.V.; Soboleva, A.G.; Nikolaev, A.A.; Bruskin, S.A. Expression of Genes for Metalloproteinases (MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-9, and MMP-12) Associated with Psoriasis. Genetika 2011, 47, 1254–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Holm Nielsen, S.; Sun, S.; Bay-Jensen, A.C.; Karsdal, M.; Sørensen, I.J.; Weber, U.; Loft, A.G.; Kollerup, G.; Thamsborg, G.; Madsen, O.R.; et al. Levels of Extracellular Matrix Metabolites Are Associated with Changes in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score and MRI Inflammation Scores in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis during TNF Inhibitor Therapy. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2022, 24, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Port, H.; Holm Nielsen, S.; Frederiksen, P.; Madsen, S.F.; Bay-Jensen, A.C.; Sørensen, I.J.; Jensen, B.; Loft, A.G.; Madsen, O.R.; Østergaard, M.; et al. Extracellular Matrix Turnover Biomarkers Reflect Pharmacodynamic Effects and Treatment Response of Adalimumab in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis—Results from Two Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2023, 25, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gudmann, N.S.; Manon-Jensen, T.; Sand, J.M.B.; Diefenbach, C.; Sun, S.; Danielsen, A.; Karsdal, M.A.; Leeming, D.J. Lung Tissue Destruction by Proteinase 3 and Cathepsin G Mediated Elastin Degradation Is Elevated in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 503, 1284–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mortensen, J.H.; Sinkeviciute, D.; Manon-Jensen, T.; Domislović, V.; Mccall, K.; Thudium, C.S.; Brinar, M.; Önnerfjord, P.; Goodyear, C.S.; Krznarić, Z.; et al. A Specific Calprotectin Neo-Epitope [CPa9-HNE] in Serum from Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Is Associated with Neutrophil Activity and Endoscopic Severity. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2022, 16, 1447–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Barascuk, N.; Veidal, S.S.; Larsen, L.; Larsen, D.V.; Larsen, M.R.; Wang, J.; Zheng, Q.; Xing, R.; Cao, Y.; Rasmussen, L.M.; et al. A Novel Assay for Extracellular Matrix Remodeling Associated with Liver Fibrosis: An Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for a MMP-9 Proteolytically Revealed Neo-Epitope of Type III Collagen. Clin. Biochem. 2010, 43, 899–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Veidal, S.S.; Karsdal, M.A.; Nawrocki, A.; Larsen, M.R.; Dai, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Hägglund, P.; Vainer, B.; Skjøt-Arkil, H.; Leeming, D.J. Assessment of Proteolytic Degradation of the Basement Membrane: A Fragment of Type IV Collagen as a Biochemical Marker for Liver Fibrosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 2011, 4, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Veidal, S.S.; Karsdal, M.A.; Vassiliadis, E.; Nawrocki, A.; Larsen, M.R.; Nguyen, Q.H.T.; Hägglund, P.; Luo, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Vainer, B.; et al. MMP Mediated Degradation of Type VI Collagen Is Highly Associated with Liver Fibrosis—Identification and Validation of a Novel Biochemical Marker Assay. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nielsen, M.J.; Nedergaard, A.F.; Sun, S.; Veidal, S.S.; Larsen, L.; Zheng, Q.; Suetta, C.; Henriksen, K.; Christiansen, C.; Karsdal, M.A.; et al. The Neo-Epitope Specific PRO-C3 ELISA Measures True Formation of Type III Collagen Associated with Liver and Muscle Parameters. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2013, 5, 303. [Google Scholar]
  30. Frimodt-Møller, M.; Hansen, T.W.; Rasmussen, D.G.K.; Theilade, S.; Nielsen, S.H.; Karsdal, M.A.; Genovese, F.; Rossing, P. A Marker of Type VI Collagen Formation (PRO-C6) Is Associated with Higher Arterial Stiffness in Type 1 Diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2019, 56, 711–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Holtsche, M.M.; Van Beek, N.; Hashimoto, T.; Di Zenzo, G.; Zillikens, D.; Prost-Squarcioni, C.; Titeux, M.; Hovnanian, A.; Schmidt, E.; Goletz, S. Diagnosis of Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita: Multicentre Comparison of Different Assays for Serum Anti-Type VII Collagen Reactivity. Acta Derm.-Venereol. 2021, 101, adv00420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Leeming, D.J.; Nielsen, M.J.; Dai, Y.; Veidal, S.S.; Vassiliadis, E.; Zhang, C.; He, Y.; Vainer, B.; Zheng, Q.; Karsdal, M.A. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Serum Assay Specific for the 7S Domain of Collagen Type IV (P4NP 7S): A Marker Related to the Extracellular Matrix Remodeling during Liver Fibrogenesis. Hepatol. Res. 2012, 42, 482–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Crespo-Bravo, M.; Thorlacius-Ussing, J.; Nissen, N.I.; Pedersen, R.S.; Boisen, M.K.; Liljefors, M.; Johansen, A.Z.; Johansen, J.S.; Karsdal, M.A.; Willumsen, N. Levels of Type XVII Collagen (BP180) Ectodomain Are Elevated in Circulation from Patients with Multiple Cancer Types and Is Prognostic for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. BMC Cancer 2023, 23, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Madsen, E.A.; Thorlacius-Ussing, J.; Nissen, N.I.; Jensen, C.; Chen, I.M.; Johansen, J.S.; Diab, H.M.H.; Jørgensen, L.N.; Hansen, C.P.; Karsdal, M.A.; et al. Type XXII Collagen Complements Fibrillar Collagens in the Serological Assessment of Tumor Fibrosis and the Outcome in Pancreatic Cancer. Cells 2022, 11, 3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Holm Nielsen, S.; Sardar, S.; Siebuhr, A.S.; Schlemmer, A.; Schmidt, E.B.; Bay-Jensen, A.C.; Karsdal, M.A.; Christensen, J.H.; Kristensen, S. Effect of N-3 PUFA on Extracellular Matrix Protein Turnover in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Rheumatol. Int. 2021, 41, 1065–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Raaby, L.; Zachariae, C.; Østensen, M.; Heickendorff, L.; Thielsen, P.; Grønbæk, H.; Skov, L.; Kyvsgaard, N.; Madsen, J.T.; Heidenheim, M.; et al. Methotrexate Use and Monitoring in Patients with Psoriasis: A Consensus Report Based on a Danish Expert Meeting. Acta Derm.-Venereol. 2017, 97, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, J.H.M.; Loo, C.H.; Tan, W.C.; Lee, C.K.; Jamil, A.; Khor, Y.H. Comparison of Noninvasive Screening Tools for Hepatic Fibrosis, Association with Methotrexate Cumulative Dose, and Risk Factors in Psoriasis Patients. Dermatol. Ther. 2022, 35, e15203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zachariae, H.; Muhammad Aslam, H.; Bjerring, P.; Søgaard, H.; Zachariae, E.; Heickendorff, L. Serum Aminoterminal Propeptide of Type III Procollagen in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Relation to Liver Fibrosis and Arthritis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1991, 25, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Juhl, P.; Vinderslev Iversen, L.; Karlsmark, T.; Asser Karsdal, M.; Bay-Jensen, A.C.; Mogensen, M.; Siebuhr, A.S. Association of Metabolites Reflecting Type III and VI Collagen Formation with Modified Rodnan Skin Score in Systemic Sclerosis—A Cross-Sectional Study. Biomarkers 2019, 24, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dobrota, R.; Jordan, S.; Juhl, P.; Maurer, B.; Wildi, L.; Bay-Jensen, A.C.; Karsdal, M.A.; Herrick, A.L.; Distler, J.H.W.; Allanore, Y.; et al. Circulating Collagen Neo-Epitopes and Their Role in the Prediction of Fibrosis in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A Multicentre Cohort Study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2021, 3, e175–e184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shi, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, R.; Deng, Y.; Li, D. The Role of Dermal Fibroblasts in Autoimmune Skin Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1379490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Jiang, J.; Shao, X.; Liu, W.; Wang, M.; Li, Q.; Wang, M.; Xiao, Y.; Li, K.; Liang, H.; Wang, N.; et al. The Mechano-Chemical Circuit in Fibroblasts and Dendritic Cells Drives Basal Cell Proliferation in Psoriasis. Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 114513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. van Haaften, W.T.; Mortensen, J.H.; Dige, A.K.; Grønbæk, H.; Hvas, C.L.; Bay-Jensen, A.C.; Karsdal, M.A.; Olinga, P.; Manon-Jensen, T.; Dijkstra, G. Serological Biomarkers of Tissue Turnover Identify Responders to Anti-TNF Therapy in Crohn’s Disease: A Pilot Study. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2020, 11, e00217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Domislovic, V.; Høg Mortensen, J.; Lindholm, M.; Kaarsdal, M.A.; Brinar, M.; Barisic, A.; Manon-Jensen, T.; Krznaric, Z. Inflammatory Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Remodeling and Disease Activity in Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lønsmann, I.; Grove, J.I.; Haider, A.; Kaye, P.; Karsdal, M.A.; Leeming, D.J.; Aithal, G.P. Biomarkers of Type IV Collagen Turnover Reflect Disease Activity in Patients with Early-Stage Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver (NAFL). Biology 2023, 12, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nedergaard, A.; Karsdal, M.A.; Sun, S.; Henriksen, K. Serological Muscle Loss Biomarkers: An Overview of Current Concepts and Future Possibilities. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2013, 4, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Torp, N.; Israelsen, M.; Nielsen, M.J.; Åstrand, C.P.; Juhl, P.; Johansen, S.; Hansen, C.D.; Madsen, B.; Villesen, I.F.; Leeming, D.J.; et al. Binge Drinking Induces an Acute Burst of Markers of Hepatic Fibrogenesis (PRO-C3). Liver Int. 2022, 42, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Erhardtsen, E.; Rasmussen, D.G.K.; Frederiksen, P.; Leeming, D.J.; Shevell, D.; Gluud, L.L.; Karsdal, M.A.; Aithal, G.P.; Schattenberg, J.M. Determining a Healthy Reference Range and Factors Potentially Influencing PRO-C3—A Biomarker of Liver Fibrosis. JHEP Rep. 2021, 3, 100317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jenkins, R.G.; Simpson, J.K.; Saini, G.; Bentley, J.H.; Russell, A.M.; Braybrooke, R.; Molyneaux, P.L.; McKeever, T.M.; Wells, A.U.; Flynn, A.; et al. Longitudinal Change in Collagen Degradation Biomarkers in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: An Analysis from the Prospective, Multicentre PROFILE Study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2015, 3, 462–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Breisnes, H.W.; Leeming, D.J.; Karsdal, M.A.; Burke, H.; Freeman, A.; Wilkinson, T.; Fazleen, A.; Bülow Sand, J.M. Biomarkers of Tissue Remodelling Are Elevated in Serum of COVID-19 Patients Who Develop Interstitial Lung Disease—An Exploratory Biomarker Study. BMC Pulm. Med. 2024, 24, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Holm Nielsen, S.; Groen, S.S.; Yao, Y.; Jørgensen, A.H.R.; Nielsen, V.W.; Karsdal, M.; Gehring, K.; Bay-Jensen, A.C.; Thomsen, S.F. Biomarkers of Tissue Turnover and Systemic Inflammation Are Associated with Disease Severity and Activity in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2023, 143, 328–331.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wang, W.M.; Jin, H.Z. Role of Neutrophils in Psoriasis. J. Immunol. Res. 2020, 2020, 3709749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Todberg, T.; Egeberg, A.; Zachariae, C.; Sørensen, N.; Pedersen, O.; Skov, L. Patients with Psoriasis Have a Dysbiotic Taxonomic and Functional Gut Microbiota. Br. J. Dermatol. 2022, 187, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gineyts, E.; Millet, M.; Borel, O.; Coutant, F.; Rousseau, J.C.; Chapurlat, R.; Marotte, H.; Garnero, P. Serum Col3-4: A New Type III and IV Collagen Biochemical Marker of Synovial Tissue Turnover in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0282954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Sun, S.; Henriksen, K.; Karsdal, M.A.; Byrjalsen, I.; Rittweger, J.; Armbrecht, G.; Belavy, D.L.; Felsenberg, D.; Nedergaard, A.F. Collagen Type III and VI Turnover in Response to Long-Term Immobilization. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Todberg, T.; Egeberg, A.; Zachariae, C.; Sørensen, N.; Pedersen, O.; Skov, L. Successful Treatment of Psoriasis with Adalimumab Induced No Changes in the Gut Microbiota. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2022, 36, e464–e467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Comparison of ECM fragment levels between patients with PSO (PSO) and healthy controls (HC). Plasma levels of 12 ECM fragments were measured in healthy controls, (HC, n = 52), and patients with psoriasis (PSO, n = 59). We observed significantly elevated levels of C4M, assessing collagen IV degradation (p = 0.005), PRO-C3, assessing tissue fibrosis (p = 0.016), and PRO-C4, assessing epidermal basement membrane turnover (p = 0.018), in patients with PSO compared with HC (E,G,H). (AC): Elastin degradation and neutrophil activity (ELP-3), T-cell activity (C4G), neutrophil activity (CPa9-HNE). (DF): Catabolic ECM fragments of type III collagen (C3M), type IV collagen (C4M), type VI (C6M). (GL): Anabolic ECM fragments of type III collagen (PRO-C3), type IV collagen (PRO-C4), type VI collagen (PRO-C6), type VII collagen (PRO-C7), type XVII (PRO-C17), and type XXII collagen (PRO-22). The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05 *, and data are presented as scatterplots with bars and lines at the median.
Figure 1. Comparison of ECM fragment levels between patients with PSO (PSO) and healthy controls (HC). Plasma levels of 12 ECM fragments were measured in healthy controls, (HC, n = 52), and patients with psoriasis (PSO, n = 59). We observed significantly elevated levels of C4M, assessing collagen IV degradation (p = 0.005), PRO-C3, assessing tissue fibrosis (p = 0.016), and PRO-C4, assessing epidermal basement membrane turnover (p = 0.018), in patients with PSO compared with HC (E,G,H). (AC): Elastin degradation and neutrophil activity (ELP-3), T-cell activity (C4G), neutrophil activity (CPa9-HNE). (DF): Catabolic ECM fragments of type III collagen (C3M), type IV collagen (C4M), type VI (C6M). (GL): Anabolic ECM fragments of type III collagen (PRO-C3), type IV collagen (PRO-C4), type VI collagen (PRO-C6), type VII collagen (PRO-C7), type XVII (PRO-C17), and type XXII collagen (PRO-22). The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05 *, and data are presented as scatterplots with bars and lines at the median.
Ijms 26 00261 g001
Figure 2. Levels of EMC fragments C4M, PRO-C3, and PRO-C4 before and after successful treatment response in patients with PSO. Plasma levels of three ECM fragments were measured at inclusion and 3–6 months after adalimumab treatment in patients with PSO with a successful treatment response (n = 9). No significant change was observed in C4M, PRO-C3, and PRO-C4 before and after treatment in the group with a successful response. (A): Catabolic ECM fragments of type IV collagen (C4M). (B,C): Anabolic ECM fragments of type III collagen (PRO-C3) and type IV collagen (PRO-C4). The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Levels of EMC fragments C4M, PRO-C3, and PRO-C4 before and after successful treatment response in patients with PSO. Plasma levels of three ECM fragments were measured at inclusion and 3–6 months after adalimumab treatment in patients with PSO with a successful treatment response (n = 9). No significant change was observed in C4M, PRO-C3, and PRO-C4 before and after treatment in the group with a successful response. (A): Catabolic ECM fragments of type IV collagen (C4M). (B,C): Anabolic ECM fragments of type III collagen (PRO-C3) and type IV collagen (PRO-C4). The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05.
Ijms 26 00261 g002
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
VariablesPatients with PSO
(n = 59)
PSO After Treatment
(n = 9)
Healthy Controls
(n = 52)
Age, years, mean (SD)47 (±16)36 (±12)46 (±14)
Men, n (%)33 (56%)5 (56%)28 (54%)
Age at diagnosis, years, mean (SD)24 (±16)17 (±10)-
Family history, n (%)
Yes33 (56%)5 (56%)-
No23 (39%)2 (22%)-
Unknown4 (7%)2 (22%)-
PASI all patients, median (min-max)10.0 (8.0–36.8)--
PASI before treatment, median (min-max)-10.2 (8.1–21.4)-
PASI after treatment, median (min-max)- 0.0 (0.0–2.0)-
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), n (%)9 (15%)1 (11%)-
Age at diagnosis, years, median (min-max)31 (16–42)--
PSO: psoriasis, HC: Healthy controls, PsA: psoriasis arthritis, n: number, SD: standard deviation, %: percent, PASI: Psoriasis Area Severity Index, min: minimum, max: maximum. Means with standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed continuous variables and median with range (minimum to maximum) for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Number and frequency as percentages for categorical variables.
Table 2. Panel of 12 extracellular matrix (ECM) fragments measured in this study.
Table 2. Panel of 12 extracellular matrix (ECM) fragments measured in this study.
AbbreviationDescriptionFunctionReference
ELP-3Neo-epitope of proteinase-3 mediated degradation of elastinDegradation of elastin[24]
C4GFragment of type IV collagen released by granzyme-BT-cell migration through the basement membrane by the degradation of type IV collagen[14]
CPa9-HNEFragment of S100A9 (calprotectin) released by neutrophil elastaseNeutrophil activity and neutrophil extracellular trap formation (NETosis)[25]
C3MFragment of type III collagen released by MMP-9ECM degradation[26]
C4MFragment of type IV collagen released by MMP (multiple)Basement membrane degradation and ECM degradation[27]
C6MFragment of type VIa1 collagen released by MMP-2/9Interface matrix degradation and fibrogenesis[28]
PRO-C3Fragment of N-terminal type III collagenFibrogenesis and ECM formation[29]
PRO-C4Fragment of the internal 7S domain of type IV collagenBasement membrane synthesis and ECM formation[32]
PRO-C6Fragment of C-terminal type VIa3 collagen (Endotrophin)Pro-fibrotic signalling and ECM formation[30]
PRO-C7Fragment of C-terminal type VII collagenECM formation[31]
PRO-C17Fragment of C-terminal type XVII collagenECM formation and epithelial damage[33]
PRO-C22C-terminal of type XXII collagen, neoepitope-specificConnective tissue formation[34]
MMP: Metalloproteinase, ECM: Extracellular matrix, HNE: Human elastase, NET: Neutrophil extracellular traps.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Johansen, M.B.; Nielsen, S.H.; Port, H.; Todberg, T.; Løvendorf, M.B.; Skov, L. Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Fragments in Patients with Psoriasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26010261

AMA Style

Johansen MB, Nielsen SH, Port H, Todberg T, Løvendorf MB, Skov L. Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Fragments in Patients with Psoriasis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(1):261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26010261

Chicago/Turabian Style

Johansen, Mila Broby, Signe Holm Nielsen, Helena Port, Tanja Todberg, Marianne Bengtson Løvendorf, and Lone Skov. 2025. "Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Fragments in Patients with Psoriasis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 1: 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26010261

APA Style

Johansen, M. B., Nielsen, S. H., Port, H., Todberg, T., Løvendorf, M. B., & Skov, L. (2025). Biomarkers of Extracellular Matrix Fragments in Patients with Psoriasis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(1), 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26010261

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop