Next Article in Journal
Impact of TRP Channels on Extracellular Matrix Remodeling: Focus on TRPV4 and Collagen
Previous Article in Journal
A Prospective Observational Study Analyzing the Diagnostic Value of Hepcidin-25 for Anemia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Structure and Nucleotide-Binding Characteristics of Regulated Cystathionine β-Synthase Domain-Containing Pyrophosphatase without One Catalytic Domain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

State-of-the-Art Molecular Biophysics in Russia

by
Oxana V. Galzitskaya
1,2
1
Institute of Protein Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
2
Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(7), 3565; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073565
Submission received: 15 March 2024 / Accepted: 19 March 2024 / Published: 22 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Molecular Biophysics in Russia)
Thirty years ago, scientists’ attention was focused on studying individual molecules, as well as their structure and function. However, in recent years, research has shifted towards the analysis of protein complexes. Firstly, it is crucial to understand how the functioning of protein complexes is regulated, as this affects the binding strength of individual molecules within such complexes. Particular attention is paid to protein complexes, for which structural data are difficult to obtain due to their unusual mobility (flexibility) and their tendency to form highly ordered oligomeric structures [1]. Meanwhile, technology for determining the functional activity of single molecules of enzymes based on nanopores is under continuous development. Natural nanopores have established uses in research involving single molecules of enzymes. Moreover, approaches using artificial solid-state nanopores are also promising, but studies on this technique are currently insufficient. Recently, researchers have demonstrated the use of an approach to study the enzymatic activity of a single molecule of horseradish peroxidase with a solid-state nanopore [2].
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused a global pandemic in 2020, resulting in significant challenges for humanity. Many laboratories focused their efforts, first and foremost, on developing a vaccine, and then on finding targets to combat the coronavirus. Due to time constraints, the effectiveness of existing drugs was reconsidered, as this was more efficient than creating entirely new medications. In parallel, efforts were made to create theoretical models for both the growth and spread of infections and the body’s response to the effects of different antibody vaccines. This is because the possibility of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection upon vaccination remains poorly understood. The aim of the work was to theoretically determine the conditions leading to the occurrence of ADE in COVID-19 [3]. How SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to an inflammatory response in various types of cells, including those lacking angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors needed for infection, remains a key question in this field [4]. Interestingly, machine learning analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 proteome identified amino acid patterns that mimic host antimicrobial peptides, particularly human cathelicidin LL-37, which may enhance inflammation. The SARS-CoV-2 proteome is enriched in such AMPs compared to low-pathogenic coronaviruses [4]. It transpired that peptides from proteins can not only act as AMPs [5], but can also regulate the activity of receptors. Thus, two peptides from the protein Tag7 were identified and were found to interact differently with the TNFR1 receptor [6]. If the first peptide can activate the receptor together with Hsp70, then the second peptide can inhibit signal transmission through this receptor. Such peptides can be used in the treatment of autoimmune and cancer diseases.
SARS-CoV-2 proteome includes 16 non-structural proteins, 9 accessory proteins, and 4 major structural proteins: the spike (S) protein, the membrane protein, the envelope protein, and the nucleocapsid protein [7]. Each virus particle of SARS-CoV-2 has 26 ± 15 spikes randomly distributed on the virion [8], which is 10 times fewer than the influenza virus [9]. Since the emergence of the original variant in Wuhan in 2019, many different variants of SARS-CoV-2 have been described and characterized, varying in transmissibility and pathogenicity in the human population, although the molecular basis of this difference remains controversial. Specifically, the Omicron variant is known for its contagiousness, transmissibility, and lower pathogenicity (mortality). This is largely attributed to amino acid substitutions on the surface of the Spike protein, which interact with the ACE2 receptor; these can facilitate the penetration of the virus into the cell or help it to evade the immune response. Mutations in this strain result in increased amyloidogenicity for the Omicron strain in the ACE2 receptor binding regions, resulting in an increase in the strength of this interaction for the Omicron BA.1 RBD compared to the Wuhan-Hu-1 or Delta RBD, and this effect is more pronounced at pH 5 [10]. This result is associated with Omicron variants’ increased ability to spread through the population. It has been suggested that the more positively charged surface of the Omicron RBD variant may facilitate its distribution in the upper respiratory tract, but not in the lower respiratory tract, where pH estimates vary [10].
It should be noted that Cui et al. identified pH-dependent structural changes in the S-protein, which affect the RBD domain [11]. In Figure S2, they show the structures at different pH. Electrostatic RBD surfaces of different variants are shown in Figures 4I and S6 in the paper [12], showing the difference between the variants. Moreover, an electrostatic map of the external surface of SARS-CoV-2 was obtained in the paper [13].
One way to end the Coronavirus impasse is to review existing medications. More than 800 papers have been published regarding in silico and in vitro screening of anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of known drugs [14,15].
Recent work has revealed that S-acylation of the SARS-CoV-2 spike is required for virus infectivity [16,17]. Therefore, to combat SARS-CoV-2, it is proposed that we should block DHHC20, an acylating S protein [18,19], since S-acylation of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces lipid reorganization. Cys residues from a cytoplasmic tail of S2 subunit are sites for post-translational modification by S-acylation [16,20,21], a reaction that is mediated by host cell S-acyltransferases belonging to the zinc finger Asp-His-His-Cys domain-containing (ZDHHC) family of transmembrane enzymes. In [22], the authors attempt to find selective inhibitors targeting ZDHHC20 acyltransferases involved in spike S-acylation [22]. This is just the beginning; future research will aim to further our understanding of protein S-acylation, as this process is critical for the replication cycle of other pathogenic viruses.
Research examining the functioning of the complexes can be considered one of the most advanced approaches in the field of structure-based rational drug discovery and will significantly reduce the time and money spent searching for new drugs. Nowadays, not a single medicine is created without the use of computer calculations [23].

Funding

This research was funded by government funding FFRN-2024-0001 and № 075-00224-24-01.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zamakhov, I.M.; Anashkin, V.A.; Moiseenko, A.V.; Orlov, V.N.; Vorobyeva, N.N.; Sokolova, O.S.; Baykov, A.A. The Structure and Nucleotide-Binding Characteristics of Regulated Cystathionine β-Synthase Domain-Containing Pyrophosphatase without One Catalytic Domain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 17160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ivanov, Y.D.; Ableev, A.N.; Shumov, I.D.; Ivanova, I.A.; Vaulin, N.V.; Lebedev, D.V.; Bukatin, A.S.; Mukhin, I.S.; Archakov, A.I. Registration of Functioning of a Single Horseradish Peroxidase Macromolecule with a Solid-State Nanopore. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Boldova, A.E.; Korobkin, J.D.; Nechipurenko, Y.D.; Sveshnikova, A.N. Theoretical Explanation for the Rarity of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Infection (ADE) in COVID-19. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Bharathi, V.; Dokoshi, T.; De Anda, J.; Ursery, L.T.; Kulkarni, N.N.; Nakamura, Y.; Chen, J.; Luo, E.W.C.; Wang, L.; et al. Viral Afterlife: SARS-CoV-2 as a Reservoir of Immunomimetic Peptides That Reassemble into Proinflammatory Supramolecular Complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2300644120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Galzitskaya, O.V.; Kurpe, S.R.; Panfilov, A.V.; Glyakina, A.V.; Grishin, S.Y.; Kochetov, A.P.; Deryusheva, E.I.; Machulin, A.V.; Kravchenko, S.V.; Domnin, P.A.; et al. Amyloidogenic Peptides: New Class of Antimicrobial Peptides with the Novel Mechanism of Activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yurkina, D.M.; Sharapova, T.N.; Romanova, E.A.; Yashin, D.V.; Sashchenko, L.P. Short Peptides of Innate Immunity Protein Tag7 (PGLYRP1) Selectively Induce Inhibition or Activation of Tumor Cell Death via TNF Receptor. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yoshimoto, F.K. The Proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS CoV-2 or n-COV19), the Cause of COVID-19. Protein J. 2020, 39, 198–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yao, H.; Song, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, N.; Xu, J.; Sun, C.; Zhang, J.; Weng, T.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, Z.; et al. Molecular Architecture of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus. Cell 2020, 183, 730–738.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Harris, A.; Cardone, G.; Winkler, D.C.; Heymann, J.B.; Brecher, M.; White, J.M.; Steven, A.C. Influenza Virus Pleiomorphy Characterized by Cryoelectron Tomography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 19123–19127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Aksenova, A.Y.; Likhachev, I.V.; Grishin, S.Y.; Galzitskaya, O.V. The Increased Amyloidogenicity of Spike RBD and pH-Dependent Binding to ACE2 May Contribute to the Transmissibility and Pathogenic Properties of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron as Suggested by In Silico Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Cui, Z.; Liu, P.; Wang, N.; Wang, L.; Fan, K.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, K.; Chen, R.; Feng, R.; Jia, Z.; et al. Structural and Functional Characterizations of Infectivity and Immune Evasion of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron. Cell 2022, 185, 860–871.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Han, P.; Li, L.; Liu, S.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, D.; Xu, Z.; Han, P.; Li, X.; Peng, Q.; Su, C.; et al. Receptor Binding and Complex Structures of Human ACE2 to Spike RBD from Omicron and Delta SARS-CoV-2. Cell 2022, 185, 630–640.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fedorov, V.; Kholina, E.; Khruschev, S.; Kovalenko, I.; Rubin, A.; Strakhovskaya, M. Electrostatic Map of the SARS-CoV-2 Virion Specifies Binding Sites of the Antiviral Cationic Photosensitizer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jang, W.D.; Jeon, S.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.Y. Drugs Repurposed for COVID-19 by Virtual Screening of 6,218 Drugs and Cell-Based Assay. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2024302118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pickard, A.; Calverley, B.C.; Chang, J.; Garva, R.; Gago, S.; Lu, Y.; Kadler, K.E. Discovery of Re-Purposed Drugs That Slow SARS-CoV-2 Replication in Human Cells. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Puthenveetil, R.; Lun, C.M.; Murphy, R.E.; Healy, L.B.; Vilmen, G.; Christenson, E.T.; Freed, E.O.; Banerjee, A. S-Acylation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein: Mechanistic Dissection, in Vitro Reconstitution and Role in Viral Infectivity. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 297, 101112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wu, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Ren, C.; Li, Y.; Gao, L.; Liang, X.; Wang, P.; Ma, C. Palmitoylation of SARS-CoV-2 S Protein Is Essential for Viral Infectivity. Sig Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mesquita, F.S.; Abrami, L.; Sergeeva, O.; Turelli, P.; Qing, E.; Kunz, B.; Raclot, C.; Paz Montoya, J.; Abriata, L.A.; Gallagher, T.; et al. S-Acylation Controls SARS-CoV-2 Membrane Lipid Organization and Enhances Infectivity. Dev. Cell 2021, 56, 2790–2807.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Vilmen, G.; Banerjee, A.; Freed, E.O. Rafting through the Palms: S-Acylation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Lipid Reorganization. Dev. Cell 2021, 56, 2787–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. McBride, C.E.; Machamer, C.E. Palmitoylation of SARS-CoV S Protein Is Necessary for Partitioning into Detergent-Resistant Membranes and Cell–Cell Fusion but Not Interaction with M Protein. Virology 2010, 405, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Petit, C.M.; Chouljenko, V.N.; Iyer, A.; Colgrove, R.; Farzan, M.; Knipe, D.M.; Kousoulas, K.G. Palmitoylation of the Cysteine-Rich Endodomain of the SARS–Coronavirus Spike Glycoprotein Is Important for Spike-Mediated Cell Fusion. Virology 2007, 360, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Panina, I.S.; Krylov, N.A.; Chugunov, A.O.; Efremov, R.G.; Kordyukova, L.V. The Mechanism of Selective Recognition of Lipid Substrate by hDHHC20 Enzyme. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jorgensen, W.L. The Many Roles of Computation in Drug Discovery. Science 2004, 303, 1813–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galzitskaya, O.V. State-of-the-Art Molecular Biophysics in Russia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073565

AMA Style

Galzitskaya OV. State-of-the-Art Molecular Biophysics in Russia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(7):3565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073565

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galzitskaya, Oxana V. 2024. "State-of-the-Art Molecular Biophysics in Russia" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 7: 3565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073565

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop