Next Article in Journal
Identification and Molecular Simulation of Genetic Variants in ABCA1 Gene Associated with Susceptibility to Dyslipidemia in Type 2 Diabetes
Next Article in Special Issue
The White Clover TrMYB33-TrSAMS1 Module Contributes to Drought Tolerance by Modulation of Spermidine Biosynthesis via an ABA-Dependent Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Hell’s Gate Globin-I from Methylacidiphilum infernorum Displays a Unique Temperature-Independent pH Sensing Mechanism Utililized a Lipid-Induced Conformational Change
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exogenous Eugenol Alleviates Salt Stress in Tobacco Seedlings by Regulating the Antioxidant System and Hormone Signaling
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Genome-Wide Identification of NDPK Family Genes and Expression Analysis under Abiotic Stress in Brassica napus

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(12), 6795; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126795
by Long Wang 1,2,3,4, Zhi Zhao 1,2,3,4, Huaxin Li 1,2,3,4, Damei Pei 1,2,3,4, Zhen Huang 5, Hongyan Wang 6,* and Lu Xiao 1,2,3,4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(12), 6795; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25126795
Submission received: 17 April 2024 / Revised: 13 June 2024 / Accepted: 13 June 2024 / Published: 20 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Plant Abiotic Stress)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript is an interesting piece of work on the general picture of Nucleoside diphosphate kinase genes s in Brassica genus.

Some major points needed to be improved to further valorise the manuscript:

- please, check the latin names, some of them are wrong and/or the abbreviation is not used after the first mention

- please check if you are speaking about genes or putative NDPK , sometimes there are confused  (such occurring in Table A1)

- very few details are given in Materials and Methods on gene expression (e.g. protocols and reagents)

- no statistical analysis was reported for gene expression analysis

Comments on the Quality of English Language

as reported above

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Comments to authors:

The authors should add graphic abstract.

The authors should do English editing to the manuscript.

 

Title:

Why you select only Brassica napus and not the other two species, may be you can adjust the title based on that.

Introduction

 Please add short note about B. napus, B. rapa, and B. oleracea and their uses and importances.

Material and method

Why you choose 16, 9, and 8 NDPK genes particularly to identify, please explain in more details

Discussion

Please, try to focus on your results analysis and highlight your work importance and its impact.

Conclusion

Future prospective should be added for further development in this area.

 

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

English editing are minor recommended 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop