Next Article in Journal
Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor M3 Expression and Survival in Human Colorectal Carcinoma—An Unexpected Correlation to Guide Future Treatment?
Next Article in Special Issue
Acacia senegal Budmunchiamines as a Potential Adjuvant for Rejuvenating Phenicol Activities towards Escherichia coli-Resistant Strains
Previous Article in Journal
Nanotechnology in Targeted Drug Delivery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Evaluation of Hypoglycemic Activity of Structural Isomers of ((Benzyloxy)phenyl)propanoic Acid Bearing an Aminobornyl Moiety
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Uncovering the Cryptic Gene Cluster ahb for 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoate Derived Ahbamycins, by Searching SARP Regulator Encoding Genes in the Streptomyces argillaceus Genome

1
Departamento de Biología Funcional e Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias (I.U.O.P.A), Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain
2
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Asturias (ISPA), 33011 Oviedo, Spain
3
Fundación MEDINA, Centro de Excelencia en Investigación de Medicamentos Innovadores en Andalucía, Armilla, 18016 Granada, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 8197; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098197
Submission received: 30 March 2023 / Revised: 29 April 2023 / Accepted: 30 April 2023 / Published: 3 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosynthesis and Application of Natural Compound)

Abstract

:
Genome mining using standard bioinformatics tools has allowed for the uncovering of hidden biosynthesis gene clusters for specialized metabolites in Streptomyces genomes. In this work, we have used an alternative approach consisting in seeking “Streptomyces Antibiotic Regulatory Proteins” (SARP) encoding genes and analyzing their surrounding DNA region to unearth cryptic gene clusters that cannot be identified using standard bioinformatics tools. This strategy has allowed the unveiling of the new ahb cluster in Streptomyces argillaceus, which had not been retrieved before using antiSMASH. The ahb cluster is highly preserved in other Streptomyces strains, which suggests a role for their encoding compounds in specific environmental conditions. By combining overexpression of three regulatory genes and generation of different mutants, we were able to activate the ahb cluster, and to identify and chemically characterize the encoded compounds that we have named ahbamycins (AHBs). These constitute a new family of metabolites derived from 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoate (3,4-AHBA) known for having antibiotic and antitumor activity. Additionally, by overexpressing three genes of the cluster (ahbH, ahbI, and ahbL2) for the synthesis and activation of 3,4-AHBA, a new hybrid compound, AHB18, was identified which had been produced from a metabolic crosstalk between the AHB and the argimycin P pathways. The identification of this new BGC opens the possibility to generate new compounds by combinatorial biosynthesis.

1. Introduction

Natural products, also known as specialized metabolites (SM) [1], are the richest source of bioactive compounds used in medicine, livestock, and agriculture [2]. Among microorganisms, bacteria belonging to the Streptomyces genus stand out for producing the highest percentage of SM, and about 68% of the most important bioactive SM [3]. Since the first Streptomyces genomes were sequenced [4,5], it became clear that these bacteria have the capacity to encode far more biosynthesis gene clusters (BGCs) for SM than was initially expected. Over the last twenty years, several bioinformatics tools have been developed to search for BGCs including the Antibiotic and Secondary Metabolites Analysis Shell (antiSMASH) [6,7,8]. This tool has greatly facilitated identifying a huge number of BGCs in Streptomyces, which highlighted the potential of their genomes to encode a vast number of bioactive compounds to be discovered. Most of the BGCs identified so far encode polyketide and/or peptide derived compounds [9]. However, novel classes of BGCs encoding other SMs remain difficult to be identified although some approaches have been developed [10,11].
BGC-associated genes typically include those encoding biosynthetic enzymes, self-resistance systems, and transport-related proteins. In addition, most BGCs contain genes for “Cluster-Situated Regulators” (CSR) [12] that together with a complex network of global regulatory genes, regulate the expression of other genes within BGCs [13,14,15]. The so-called “Streptomyces Antibiotic Regulatory Proteins” (SARPs) [16] are the CSR most frequently found in Streptomyces BGCs, which are usually functioning as pathway-specific activators [13]. An approach to uncover novel classes of BGCs could be the use of SARP encoding genes as a genome mining hook, since this type of genes are often located at BGCs [13].
Streptomyces argillaceus ATCC 12956 is the producer of the known antitumor compound mithramycin. Its genome has been sequenced [17] and mined for BGCs using antiSMASH analysis [6,8]. This has allowed identifying 31 BGCs, some of which have been already characterized. These include the previously characterized BGC for the antitumor mithramycin (mtm) [18]; four silent BGCs encoding desferrioxamine (desa), carotenoids (crta), germicidins (gcs), and antimycins (anta) [19]; and two cryptic BGCs, which encode the biosynthesis of argimycins P (arp) [17] and largimycins (lrg) [20]. The aim of this work was to test searching SARP encoding genes as a strategy to identify new BGCs that are not detected using antiSMASH. We report the identification of SARP genes in S. argillaceus genome to uncover the previously unidentified ahb BGC, its activation by overexpressing three CSR genes, and the identification and chemical characterization of their encoded compounds, the ahbamycins (AHBs), which constitute a new group of metabolites derived from 3,4-AHBA known for having antibiotic and antitumor activity. Following this strategy, we have additionally generated a new hybrid compound produced from the metabolic crosstalk between the AHB and the argimycin P (ARP) pathways.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of the ahb Biosynthesis Gene Cluster

The S. argillaceus genome has been previously sequenced and mined using the antiSMASH bioinformatics tool version 3.0.2 [6,8], which has allowed identifying 31 BGCs [17]. The newest version of that program (version 6.0) [7] identified the same number of BGCs, although with some differences (see Table S1 in Supplementary Materials): version 3.0.2 predicted two unknown BGCs (cluster three and four), while version 6.0 predicted the existence of only one BGC at those positions (cluster four; NRPS-like). In addition, version 6.0 predicted the existence of a BGC (cluster 21) that had not been identified before. In an attempt to identify additional BGCs in S. argillaceus genome undetected with any antiSMASH version, we have mined its genome looking for SARP encoding genes using Curated Blast software [21]. Eleven SARP genes were identified, four located at BGCs (mtm, arp, and BGC 28), and seven outside any BGC previously identified by antiSMASH. Analysis of the DNA region surrounding two of these SARP-encoding genes closely located at the chromosome allowed us to identify a new BGC (named ahb, see below) not uncovered in previous analyses (Figure 1). This new cluster was located between clusters 17 and 18 (Table S1) detected by antiSMASH, at the right arm of the chromosome. To determine if similar gene clusters were present in other Streptomyces strains and to propose limits to ahb BGC, each ahb gene product was compared with others in databases using BlastP analyses [22] to identify similar proteins. Then, those coding genes were located in the corresponding Streptomyces genomes, and their positions were identified to determine if they were clustered in the same DNA region. In this way, five BGCs were identified (named as rah, oah, dah, pah, and tah, in Table S2 and Figure 1) in different Streptomyces strains, which showed high similarity to the ahb BGC: rah from Streptomyces sp. AC555_RSS877 (NZ_JAGMUK010000018.1: nucleotides 10109 to 46535); oah from S. roseolus JCM 4411 (NZ_BMTV01000035.1: nucleotides 66046 to 66695; NZ_BMTV01000014.1: nucleotides 1 to 30426); dah from S. adustus NBRC 109810 (NZ_VJZD01000001.1: nucleotides 222 to 14383; NZ_VJZD01000132.1: nucleotides 5002 to 25986); pah from S. prasinopilosus CGMCC 4.3504 (NZ_FMZK01000002.1: nucleotides 53452 to 89451); and tah from Streptomyces sp. Tü 3180 (NZ_WOXS01000002.1: nucleotides 6715158 to 6753232). All these clusters showed high synteny to cluster ahb, displaying the same gene organization, and only showing few differences: the absence of one or two genes in some BGCs (ahbP1 homologous gene was absent in oah and pah; ahbS in dah) or the presence of an additional gene in tah BGC (WP_159536573). Based on these comparisons, ahbO1 and ahbT3 are proposed as the limits of the ahb cluster. A phylogenetic analysis of the above-mentioned Streptomyces strains was carried out based on 82 housekeeping genes [23] (see Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials). This analysis indicated that those strains were not closely related among them.
The ahb cluster would span 36.48 kb and contain 31 open reading frames (orfs) (Figure 1 and Table S2). It would include genes for the biosynthesis of 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoic acid (3,4-AHBA) (ahbH and ahbI); acyl-CoA ligases (ahbL1 and ahbL2); oxygenases (ahbO1 to ahbO4); reductases (ahbK1 to ahbK5); methyltransferases (ahbM1 to ahbM4); carbohydrate kinases (ahbP1 and ahbP2); a cupin domain-containing protein (ahbC); a lyase (ahbS); proteins related to an activated methyl-cycle (ahbA and ahbF); regulatory proteins (ahbR1 to ahbR5); and transport proteins (ahbT1 to ahbT3). The presence of ahbH and ahbI suggested that compounds encoded by these ahb BGCs contained a 3,4-AHBA moiety [24] (Figure 2; see Section 3).

2.2. Identification of Compounds Encoded by the ahb Cluster

To identify compounds encoded by ahb, several approaches were tried. The first was the generation of two independent deleted mutants in which a DNA region from the ahb BGC was replaced by an apramycin resistance gene (Figure 1): (i) S. argillaceus ΔAHBA. Using pHZΔasu (Table 1) genes ahbH and ahbI were deleted and replaced by an apramycin resistance cassette; and (ii) S. argillaceus ΔR2K3 in which genes from ahbR2 to ahbK3 were deleted by using pHZΔasu1705 (Table 1). The genotypes of these two mutant strains were confirmed by PCR (see Figures S2 and S3 in Supplementary Materials). Comparison of UPLC chromatograms of broth extracts from the wild type strain and from these two mutants did not show any differential peak, suggesting that cluster ahb was silent.
Secondly, three genes (ahbI, ahbH, and ahbL2) were overexpressed in S. argillaceus wild type strain using pEM4T-AHBA (Table 1). These genes would encode enzymes for the biosynthesis of 3,4-AHBA (AhbH and AhbI) and for its activation by adenylation (AhbL2). UPLC analyses of metabolite profiles of cultures from S. argillaceus (pEM4T-AHBA) and S. argillaceus pEM4T (as control) extracted with n-butanol or ethyl acetate, revealed several peaks that were present in the former and absent in the latter (Figure 3A). Some of these compounds were also produced when cultures of S. argillaceus wild type strain were fed with 3,4-AHBA, while those that were absent in cultures of S. argillaceus ΔR2K3 were fed with the same compound (Figure 3B). This suggested that those differential peaks contained compounds derived from 3,4-AHBA, whose biosynthesis would require the genes deleted in S. argillaceus ΔR2K3. The major compound 1 detected in n-butanol extracts at 360 nm was purified from cultures of S. argillaceus (pEM4T-AHBA) grown in R5A, and structurally characterized (see below). It corresponded to a hybrid new compound constituted by two moieties, a 3,4-AHBA and an ARP compound [17,25,26], and it was given the name ahbamycin 18 (AHBA18) (Figure 4).
The third approach was overexpression of regulatory genes from the ahb cluster. Individual overexpression of ahbR2 and ahbR3 that encode AfsR/SARP putative transcriptional activators did not result in production of any differential compound. Then, we jointly co-expressed both SARP-encoding genes, and ahbR4 that encodes a protein with Ada_Zn_binding and HTH_ARAC domains and is located downstream of the 3,4-AHBA encoding genes. These three regulatory genes were cloned under the control of the erythromycin resistance promoter, and the resultant plasmid pREGT (Table 1) was introduced in S. argillaceus WT, S. argillaceus ΔAHBA, and S. argillaceus ΔR2K3. The resultant recombinant strains (S. argillaceus WT-pREGT; S. argillaceus ΔAHBA-pREGT; and S. argillaceus ΔR2K3-pREGT) were cultivated in R5A and SM10 media, and cultures were extracted with different organic solvents.
In all culture and extraction conditions, several peaks were detected in extracts from S. argillaceus WT-pREGT that were absent in those from S. argillaceus ΔR2K3-pREGT and/or S. argillaceus ΔAHBA-pREGT (Figure 5). Production of those peaks was recovered in S. argillaceus ΔAHBA-pREGT when the deleted genes in this strain were expressed in trans using plasmid pSETeAHBAHyg (Table 1; see Figure S4). This confirmed the involvement of ahb BGC in the production of those differential peaks. These new compounds were produced better in SM10 cultures, and best extracted with ethyl acetate containing 1% formic acid. Consequently, these conditions were used thereafter. Compounds from peaks 28 were purified from S. argillaceus WT-pREGT and were named AHB74 to AHB77 (peaks 5 to 8), and AHB118 to AHB120 (peaks 2 to 4) (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

2.3. Structural Elucidation and Bioactivity of Ahbamycins

The structure of the isolated ahbamycins was established by UV/vis (DAD), MS, and NMR spectroscopic analyses (see Supplementary Materials).
AHB18 was assigned the molecular formula C19H18N2O3 based on the observed [M + H]+ ion at m/z = 323.1396 (calcd. for C19H19N2O3+ = 323.1390, Δ = 1.9 ppm), indicating twelve degrees of unsaturation. Its UV/vis (DAD) spectrum suggested the presence of an aromatic or conjugated π system. Analysis of the 1H and HSQC NMR spectra indicated a total of fifteen non-exchangeable hydrogens. The HSQC spectrum revealed the presence of one aliphatic methyl group, two methylenes (one likely bound to nitrogen), and eight sp2 methines. Such structural features are not compatible with any of the compounds included in the Dictionary of Natural Products [27] having the same molecular formula, confirming the novelty of the compound. Additional 2D NMR spectra, including COSY, NOESY, HMBC (the standard 1H-13C), and 1H-15N HMBC, were acquired to determine the compound structure. The key correlations observed in the COSY spectrum identified the different spin systems, which were connected via the long-range correlations observed in both the 1H-13C HMBC and 1H-15N HMBC spectra (Figure 6), which likewise unambiguously determined the position of the enolic oxygen and amino groups to finally establish the connectivity of the compound. Key NOESY correlations (Figure 6) allowed determining an E stereochemistry for both bonds in the exocyclic chain (Δ5,8 and Δ9,10) and further supported the proposed connectivity. The compound contains a 3,4-AHBA moiety interestingly conjugated with an ARP subunit, confirming the proposed existence of crosstalk between their two biosynthetic pathways.
AHB74 was assigned the molecular formula C11H13NO4 based on the observed [M + H]+ ion at m/z = 224.0918 (calcd. for C11H14NO4+ = 224.0917, Δ = 0.4 ppm), indicating six degrees of unsaturation. Its UV/vis (DAD) spectrum suggested the presence of an aromatic or conjugated π system. 1D 1H and 2D NMR spectra (including COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) were acquired to determine the structure of the purified compound. Surprisingly, the 1H and HSQC revealed more than a single component in the sample. A possible equilibrium in solution between different interconverting species (in slow exchange on the NMR time scale) would account for such observation. Detailed analysis of the NMR spectra revealed this hypothesis to be correct. To sort out the chemical structure of such equilibrating species, the elucidation started from the aliphatic methine observed at δH 4.12, δC 58.1 ppm. Observed key COSY and HMBC correlations (Figure 6) indicated that such methine is directly bound to a methyl group, a carbonyl (from a methyl ketone) and, based on its 13C chemical shift, a nitrogen. This nitrogen corresponds to the amino functionality of a 3,4-AHBA moiety according to the key 2D NMR correlations observed in the 2D spectra (Figure 6). The determined connectivity of the first component possesses one chiral center whose stereochemistry remained undetermined. Once we established the structure of this component, it was easier to determine that the other sets of signals correspond to the two possible epimers that originate in the cyclization via nucleophilic attack of the phenol group of the 3,4-AHBA subunit to the ketone carbonyl, rendering two diastereomeric hemiketals whose connectivity was unambiguously corroborated by the observed key COSY and HMBC correlations (Figure 6). The presence of a hemiketal functionality in the molecules is additionally corroborated by the existence of 13C signals at 96.4 and 98.5 ppm corresponding to both stereoisomers at C-2′. A stereospecific assignment of the signals of each epimer was not carried out.
AHB75 was assigned the molecular formula C15H10N2O5 based on the observed [M + H]+ ion at m/z = 299.0662 (calcd. for C15H11N2O5+ = 299.0662, Δ = 0 ppm), indicating twelve degrees of unsaturation. Its UV/vis (DAD) spectrum alongside the molecular formula suggested a high degree of conjugation. A search of the molecular formula in the Dictionary of Natural Products [27] retrieved just four possible candidates, all of them compatible with the UV/vis spectrum obtained. To ensure successful dereplication, a set of NMR spectra (1H, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) was acquired. Analysis of the 1H and HSQC NMR spectra indicated a total of eight non-exchangeable hydrogens corresponding to five sp2 methines and one aliphatic methyl group from an acetyl substituent according to its chemical shift. These features are compatible with the structure of carboxyexfoliazone [28], also known as umicyn A [29], which interestingly contains a 3,4-AHBA substructural moiety. Analysis of the key correlations observed in the COSY and HMBC spectra (Figure 6) and comparison with the reported NMR data for carboxyexfoliazone [28] unambiguously confirmed its identity.
AHB76 was assigned the molecular formula C12H15NO4 based on the observed [M + H]+ ion at m/z = 238.1075 (calcd. for C12H16NO4+ = 238.1074, Δ = 0.4 ppm), indicating six degrees of unsaturation. The UV/vis (DAD) spectrum was identical to that of AHBA74, anticipating a homologous chemical structure containing one additional CH2 unit, according to the determined molecular formula. The NMR spectra (1H, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) confirmed the expected structural relationship and showed the same pattern of signals for interconverting species at equilibrium. Analysis of the NMR information, especially key COSY and HMBC correlations (Figure 6), and comparison with the NMR spectra of AHBA74 revealed that in this case the molecules are identical by just replacing the methyl ketone in AHB74 by an ethyl ketone in AHB76. Regarding the equilibrating hemiketals, a stereospecific assignment of the signals of each epimer was not carried out.
AHB77 was assigned the molecular formula C17H12N2O4 based on the observed [M + H]+ ion at m/z = 309.0875 (calcd. for C17H13N2O4+ = 309.0870, Δ = 1.6 ppm), indicating thirteen degrees of unsaturation. Its UV/vis (DAD) spectrum suggested the presence of conjugated π systems. A search of the molecular formula in the Dictionary of Natural Products [27] retrieved 6 possible candidates which could account for the UV/vis spectrum obtained. As none of them contained a 3,4-AHBA substructural moiety, 1D 1H and 2D NMR spectra (including COSY, NOESY, HSQC, and HMBC) were acquired to determine the structure of the purified compound. Analysis of the 1H and HSQC NMR spectra indicated the target compound contains three exchangeable hydrogens. The HSQC spectrum revealed the presence of nine methine groups, one aliphatic and eight of aromatic nature. Detailed analysis of COSY and HMBC key correlations (Figure 6) determined the compound’s connectivity, showing on the one hand the presence of one aromatic (benzene) ring with a 1,3,4 substitution pattern that turned out to correspond to the expected 3,4-AHBA substructural moiety, and on the other hand an indole unit moiety which is connected to an imine carbon contained in a heterocyclic ring fused to the 3,4-AHBA moiety. Such heterocycle is closed via a hemiacetal (according to a δC of 85.7 for C-8), resembling the ketal closure found in AHB74 and AHB76. Key NOESY correlations further corroborated the established connectivity. The stereochemistry of the hemiacetal chiral center remained unassigned.
AHB118 was assigned the molecular formula C10H11NO5 based on the observed [M + H]+ ion at m/z = 226.0707 (calcd. for C12H12NO5+ = 226.0710, Δ = 1.3 ppm), indicating six degrees of unsaturation. The UV/vis (DAD) spectrum was identical to those of AHB74 and AHB76, anticipating a closely related chemical structure. None of the ten compounds listed in the Dictionary of Natural Products [27] with such a molecular formula contain a 3,4-AHBA substructural moiety. A set of NMR spectra (1H, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) was acquired to elucidate the structure of the purified compound. Interestingly, the 1H and HSQC revealed two sets of signals, very close in resonance frequency. Detailed analysis of the NMR spectra confirmed it. To determine the structure of the equilibrating species, the elucidation started from each of the aliphatic methine observed in the region at δH 5.25–5.46, δC 89.05–91.0 ppm (C-1′). Their chemical shift indicated that such methine signals belong to each of two epimeric hemiacetals in equilibrium, analogous to the epimeric hemiketals found for AHB74 and AHB76. As expected, the determined connectivity of the hemiacetals contains a 3,4-AHBA moiety. Interestingly, in this case the signals of the open aldehyde from which those hemiacetals would be originated are not detected, indicating an equilibrium completely shifted towards the hemiacetalic forms. COSY and HMBC correlations (Figure 6) additionally confirmed the fragment C-1′/C-2′/C-3′ and the linkage of C-1′ to C4 via an oxygen and of C-2′ to C-3 via a nitrogen bridge. The stereochemistry remained undetermined and a stereospecific assignment of the signals of each epimer was not carried out.
AHB119 was assigned the molecular formula C9H9NO4 based on the observed [M + H]+ ion at m/z = 196.0604 (calcd. for C9H10NO4+ = 196.0604, Δ = 0 ppm), indicating six degrees of unsaturation. Its UV/vis (DAD) spectrum suggested the presence of an aromatic or conjugated π system. The molecular formula matches that of an acetylated derivative of 3,4-AHBA. To determine the structure a set of NMR spectra (1H, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) was acquired. The 1H and HSQC spectra revealed the presence in the molecule of three sp2 methines and one methyl group with the characteristic chemical shift of an acetyl group. Straightforward analysis of the key COSY and HMBC correlations (Figure 6) rendered the structure of the compound, which corresponded to the N-acetyl derivative of 3,4-AHBA.
AHB120 was assigned the molecular formula C10H11NO4 based on the observed [M + H]+ ion at m/z = 210.0760 (calcd. for C10H12NO4+ = 210.0761, Δ = 0.5 ppm), indicating six degrees of unsaturation. Its UV/vis (DAD) spectrum was identical to that of AHB119 and the molecular formula also suggested a possible homologous derivative of AHB119. Analysis of the set of NMR spectra (1H, COSY, HSQC, and HMBC) acquired revealed identical aromatic signals, corresponding to the 3,4-AHBA moiety. The key COSY and HMBC correlations (Figure 6) indicated that the compound corresponds to the N-propionyl derivative of 3,4-AHBA.
The structure of all AHBs confirms that they all derive from 3,4-AHBA. This is a building block present in different metabolites such as grixazone, bagremycin and ferroverdin, the manumycin family of compounds, cremeomycin, or platensimycin and platencin [30,31,32,33,34,35]. Many of these compounds show antibiotic and antitumour activities, such as platensimycin and platencin that are inhibitors of bacterial type II fatty acid synthases [35]. The antibiotic activity of all AHB compounds was tested by bioassay. Among all compounds, only AHB75 (also known as carboxyexfoliazone or umicyn A) showed some antibiotic activity.

3. Discussion

Identification of BGCs in Streptomyces genomes is mostly performed using the antiSMASH bioinformatics tool [6,7,8]. However, this and other bioinformatics tools have been developed based on current knowledge of BGCs, which hampers the discovery of novel families of BGCs [36]. In this work, we have used an alternative approach to identify a novel BGC in S. argillaceus, consisting in seeking SARP encoding genes in its genome and analyzing their surrounding DNA region. In this way, we have been able to identify the new ahb BGC, which had not been retrieved using antiSMASH. This strategy could be used as an additional tool to uncover unknown BGCs. The ahb cluster is silent under standard laboratory culture conditions, and is highly preserved in several Streptomyces strains, which suggests that their encoding compounds may play an important role when microbial strains face specific environmental conditions. Joint overexpression of three ahb regulatory genes (ahbR2, ahbR3, and ahbR4) allowed the activation of the ahb cluster and the identification of its encoded AHBs products. We have been able to purify and characterize the chemical structure of seven AHBs, all of them derived from 3,4-AHBA, including four new bicyclic compounds (AHB74, AHB76, AHB77, and AHB118); two acylated 3,4-AHBA (AHB119, also known as 3,4-AcAHBA [24]; and the new AHB120); and the phenoxazinone AHB75 (acetyl-APOC), also known as carboxyexfoliazone [28] or umycin A [29]. Moreover, by overexpressing three genes (ahbH, ahbI, and ahbL2) for the synthesis and activation of 3,4-AHBA, a new hybrid compound, AHB18, was identified, containing a 3,4-AHBA moiety and an ARP bicyclic derivative constituted by a 2,3-dihydropiridine ring fused with a five-membered ring. This ARP moiety closely resembles those synthesized during the final steps of the ARP biosynthetic pathway [17,25,26]. Biosynthesis of AHB18 would result from a metabolic crosstalk between the AHB and the ARP pathways.
As mentioned above, 3,4-AHBA is a building block present in different metabolites such as grixazone [24,34]. The biosynthetic pathway of the phenoxazinone grixazone A starts with the formation of 3,4-AHBA from two metabolites, aspartate semialdehyde (ASA) and dihydroxyacetone-P (DHAP), by an initial aldol condensation catalyzed by GriI to give rise to the acyclic 2-amino-4,5-dihydro-6-one-heptanoate-7-P, followed by a cyclodehydrative aromatization catalyzed by GriH [24]. Formation of 3,4-AHBA is followed by its conversion into an acyl-AMP intermediate by action of the AMP-binding protein GriC, and its reduction to 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzaldehide (3,4-AHBAL) mediated by GriD [37]. Afterwards, formation of the phenoxazinone backbone is preceded by the oxidation of 3,4-AHBAL to its quinone imine by the action of the phenoxazinone synthase GriF [38]. The AHBs biosynthetic pathway would follow similar initial steps as grixazone. The ahb cluster contains two genes, ahbI and ahbH, encoding enzymes with high similarity to fructose-biphosphate aldolases and 3-dehydroquinate synthases II, which would catalyze the initial steps leading to 3,4-AHBA (Figure 2). This would be adenylated by an AMP-binding protein. The ahb BGC encodes two acyl-CoA ligases (ahbL1 and ahbL2) that could be involved in adenylation of 3,4-AHBA. Since the 5′-end of ahbL2 overlaps with the 3′-end of ahbH, we propose AhbL2 for this role. As expected, the ahb cluster does not encode any homologous to GriD, since AHBs retain the carboxylic group in their molecules. Formation of bicyclic AHBs and the phenoxazinone AHB75 most likely would require the previous oxidation of 3,4-AHBA to its quinone imine, which would be coupled to another quinone imine unit to generate APOC, or to different carbon chains or an indole unit to generate the bicyclic AHBs (Figure 2). In the grixazone and in actinomycin biosynthesis pathways, the oxidation of the corresponding o-aminophenols is carried out by phenoxazinone synthases [38,39,40]. The ahb cluster lacks any gene encoding that type of enzyme. However, it contains several oxidoreductase coding genes that could be involved in this event. The existence of another acyl-CoA ligase AhbL1 and two kinases (AhbP1 and AhbP2) suggests that condensation of 3,4-AHBA to the different carbon chain and indole units might occur through adenylated or phosphorylated derivatives. Additionally, formation of APOC (precursor of AHB78) could also occur non-enzymatically, although probably more slowly, as it has been reported [38]. In addition, the cluster contains other genes such as methyltransferases, oxygenases, and oxidoreductases that could participate in the biosynthesis of the aliphatic side chains. Further studies will be required to determine the origin of such carbon chains and indole moiety and how they are incorporated to the quinone imine to generate the bicyclic AHBs. AHB119 and AHB120 would be shunt products of the pathway generated by incorporation of acyl groups. Additionally, in the case of AHB75, acylation would be the final steps in its biosynthesis. These acylations would involve acyltransferases. The ahb cluster does not contain any acyltransferase coding gene, which indicates that this gene would be in another region of the chromosome. Further studies would be required to clarify the biosynthetic steps downstream of 3,4-AHBA formation.
Although the reported AHBs did not show antibiotic activity (except AHB75), the identification of the ahb genes opens the possibility to use those genes as tools to generate potentially new bioactive compounds by combinatorial biosynthesis. In this sense, we have recently reported a new hybrid antibiotic compound generated by combining genes from the arp and cpk clusters, which encode the non-bioactive compounds ARP and coelimycin P, respectively [26].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Strains, Culture Conditions, Plasmids, and DNA Manipulations

S. argillaceus ATCC 12956 was used as the source of DNA to express ahb genes and to generate mutants in the ahb BGC. Escherichia coli DH10B (Invitrogen) and E. coli ET12567/pUB307 [41] were used as cloning hosts for plasmid propagation and for conjugation experiments, respectively. MA, R5A, and SM10 media [17,42] were used for sporulation or AHB production. When required, antibiotics were added to culture media at the following final concentrations: kanamycin (50 µg/mL), nalidixic acid (25 µg/mL), apramycin (25 µg/mL), hygromycin (200 μg/mL), and thiostrepton (50 µg/mL). Plasmid pCR-Blunt (Invitrogen) and pUO9090 (M. C. Martín, unpublished results) were used for subcloning. Plasmid pHZ1358 [43] was used to generate mutant strains by gene replacement. Plasmids pEM4T [44], pEM4 [45] and pSETe [46] were used for gene expression. pLHyg [47] was used as a source of the hygromycin resistance cassette. DNA manipulations, intergeneric conjugations, and transformations were carried out according to standard procedures for Streptomyces [41] and for E. coli [48]. PCR amplifications were carried out using Herculase II (Stratagene) and 5% dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO). Purified amplicons were sequenced and compared to others in databases. Curated Blast software [21], BLAST [22] and, antiSMASH 6.0 [7] were used for sequence analyses. The maximum-likelihood tree was generated by using the autoMLST server [49]. An IQ-TREE Ultrafast Bootstrap analysis (1000 replicates) was performed, and ModelFinder was applied to find the optimal model for tree building. Genbank files containing the genomic sequences from the strains under study were used as inputs for phylogenetic inference using “de novo mode” pipeline, as in Ceniceros et al. [23].

4.2. Plasmid Constructs to Generate Mutant Strains

Several plasmids were constructed to generate knock out mutant strains (Table 1), using oligoprimers from Table S3:
  • pHZΔasu: This plasmid was used for jointly deleting ahbH and ahbI. First, a 2.11 kb DNA fragment containing the 5′-end of ahbR4, ahbL2 and the 3′-end of ahbH was amplified using oligonucleotides Delta ASU A fwd and Delta ASU A rev, digested with EcoRI and PstI and cloned upstream the apramycin resistance cassette in pUO9090 digested with the same enzymes. Secondly, a 2 kb DNA fragment containing the 5′-end of ahbI, ahbK5 and the 5′-end of ahbO4 was amplified using oligonucleotides Delta ASU B fwd and Delta ASU B rev, digested with BamHI and EcoRV and cloned downstream the apramycin resistance cassette in the above pUO9090-derivative generated plasmid that was digested with the same enzymes. Finally, the whole insert in pUO9090 was recovered as a SpeI fragment and cloned into the XbaI site of pHZ1358, generating pHZΔasu.
  • pHZΔasu1705: This plasmid was used for deleting a DNA region from ahbR1 to ahbK3. First, a 1.9 kb DNA fragment containing the 5′-end of ahbO1, ahbM1, ahbM2 and the 3′-end of ahbR1 was amplified using oligonucleotides Delta 1705A fwd and Delta 1705A rev, digested with EcoRI and PstI (this last cutting within ahbR1) and cloned upstream the apramycin resistance cassette in pUO9090 digested with the same enzymes. Additionally, a 2 kb DNA fragment containing the 3′-end of ahbK3, ahbM4, ahbK4 and the 5′-end of ahbO3 was amplified using oligonucleotides Delta 1705B fwd and Delta 1705B rev, digested with BamHI and EcoRV and cloned downstream the apramycin resistance cassette in the pUO9090 plasmid containing the first fragment and digested with the same enzymes. Finally, the whole fragment was released as a SpeI fragment and cloned into the XbaI site of pHZ1358, generating pHZΔasu1705.
These plasmids were introduced into S. argillaceus to generate S. argillaceus ΔAHBA and S. argillaceus ΔR2K3 mutant strains. Mutants were selected by their apramycin-resistance and thiostrepton-sensitive phenotype, and their genotypes were further verified by PCR amplification with appropriate oligonucleotides (Table S2; Figures S2 and S3) and by sequencing the resultant PCR products.

4.3. Plasmid Constructs for Gene Expression

Several plasmids were constructed to express several ahb genes (Table 1), using oligoprimers from Table S3 as follows:
  • pEM4T-AHBA: This plasmid was used to overexpress ahbI, ahbH, and ahbL2. These genes were amplified as a 3.84 kb fragment using oligonucleotides AHBAermE fwd and AHBAermE rev, digested with BamHI and EcoRI, and cloned downstream of the erythromycin resistance promoter in pEM4T digested with the same enzymes. The final plasmid pEM4T-AHBA was introduced into S. argillaceus WT to generate S. argillaceus WT-pEM4T-AHBA strain.
  • pREGT: This plasmid was used for overexpressing ahbR2, ahbR3, and ahbR4. First, ahbR2 was amplified as a 0.92 kb fragment using oligonucleotides SARP1304 fwd and SARP1304 rev, cloned into pCR-Blunt, recovered as a PstI fragment, and cloned into the PstI site of pEM4 downstream of the erythromycin resistance promoter, generating pEM4-ahbR2. Second, ahbR3 was amplified as a 1 kb fragment using oligonucleotides SARP1705 fwd and SARP1705 rev, cloned into pCR-Blunt, recovered as a XbaI fragment, and cloned into the XbaI site, in the right orientation, downstream of pEM4-ahbR2 to generate pEM4-ahbR2R3. Third, ahbR4 was amplified as a 1.26 kb fragment using oligonucleotides 1705araC fwd and 1705araC rev, cloned into pCR-Blunt, recovered as an EcoRI fragment, and cloned in the right orientation, in the EcoRI site of the downstream of ahbR3 in pEM4-ahbR2R3, generating pREG. Finally, the oriT fragment was recovered from pEM4T as a PstI fragment, cloned into pCR-Blunt, recovered as a HindIII fragment, and cloned into the same site of the pREG. The final plasmid pREGT was introduced into S. argillaceus WT, ΔAHBA and ΔR2K3 to generate S. argillaceus WT-pREGT, ΔAHBA-pREGT and ΔR2K3-pREGT, respectively.
  • pSETeAHBAHyg: This plasmid was used to complement S. argillaceus ΔAHBA. Genes ahbI, ahbH, and ahbL2 were amplified as a 3.84 kb fragment using oligonucleotides AHBAermE fwd and AHBAermE rev, cloned into pCR-Blunt, and recovered as a BamHI-EcoRI fragment to be cloned in the right orientation downstream of the erythromycin resistance promoter in pSETe digested with the same enzymes, to generate pSETeAHBA. Then, a hygromycin resistance cassette was obtained from pLHyg as an EcoRV fragment and cloned in pSETeAHBA digested with NheI and filled ends with Klenow. The final plasmid pSETeAHBAHyg was introduced into S. argillaceus ΔAHBA-pREGT to generate S. argillaceus ΔAHBA-pREGT-pSETeAHBAHyg strain.

4.4. Feeding Experiments

Feeding experiments were carried out in 24-square deep-well plates, containing 3 mL of R5A medium and 3,4-AHBA (100 µM final concentration). After 24 h of incubation, samples of 1 mL were harvested for further extraction with ethyl acetate or n-butanol.

4.5. Extraction, UPLC Analysis and Purification of Ahbamycins

AHBs were extracted from cultures with equal volumes of either n-butanol (AHB18) or ethyl acetate containing 1% formic acid (AHB74 to AHB77, and AHB118 to AHB120). Preliminary analyses were carried out by reversed-phase chromatography, as previously reported [17]. Detection and UV-based identification was performed by photodiode array detection. Chromatograms were extracted at 230 nm, 360 nm, and 400 nm. For purification purposes, S. argillaceus strains were grown by a two-step culture method, as previously described [42], using forty 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks in the production step. AHB18 was purified from 7 days old cultures of S. argillaceus WT-pEM4T-AHBA in R5A, while AHB74 to AHB747 and AHB118 to AHB120 were purified from cultures of S. argillaceus WT-pREGT in SM10. Purification of AHB18 and AHB74 to AHB77 was carried out, as previously described [17], using isocratic chromatography conditions optimized for each compound. In the case of AHB118 to AHB120, as they were not retained in the solid-phase extraction cartridge, they were recovered from the non-retained material by ethyl acetate extraction, followed by evaporation in vacuo, and purification by preparative HPLC.

4.6. Structural Elucidation of Ahbamycins

Structural elucidation of the new compounds was carried out using a combination of ESI-TOF mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy (see Supplementary Materials). HRMS spectra were collected from LC-DAD-MS analyses using an Agilent 1200 Rapid Resolution HPLC system equipped with a SB-C8 column (2.1 × 30 mm, Zorbax) and coupled to a Bruker maXis mass spectrometer. Chromatographic and ionization conditions were identical to those previously described [50,51]. UV/vis (DAD) spectra were also collected in the same chromatographic analyses. NMR spectra were recorded in CD3OD or DMSO-d6 at 24 °C on a Bruker AVANCE III-500 (500 MHz and 125 MHz for 1H and 13C NMR, respectively) equipped with a 1.7 mm TCI MicroCryoProbeTM, using the residual solvent signal as internal reference (δH 3.31 and δC 49.0 for CD3OD; δH 2.51 and δC 40.0 for DMSO-d6). The molecular formula obtained from the experimental accurate mass of each compound combined with the analysis of the 1D and 2D NMR spectra rendered the chemical structure of the compounds.

4.7. Accession Codes

The sequence of Streptomyces argillaceus ahb gene cluster has been deposited at GenBank under the accession number OQ117053.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24098197/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M. and J.A.S.; investigation, S.Y., B.M., I.P.-V., I.M., A.F.B., S.A. and J.M.; resources, C.M., J.A.S. and C.O.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.; writing—review and editing, C.M., S.Y., I.P.-V., I.M. and F.R.; supervision, C.M.; project administration, C.M.; funding acquisition, C.M., J.A.S. and C.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (BIO2014-56752-R, BIO2017-82462-R), the Spanish Ministry of Science and Competitiveness (PID2020-113062RB-I00) to CM, and Principado de Asturias-FEDER (FC-15-GRUPIN14-014). The APC was funded by PID2020-113062RB-100.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article and in Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Van Keulen, G.; Dyson, P.J. Production of specialized metabolites by Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 89, 217–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 770–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Baltz, R.H. Gifted microbes for genome mining and natural product discovery. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 573–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bentley, S.D.; Chater, K.F.; Cerdeño-Tárraga, A.M.; Challis, G.L.; Thomson, N.R.; James, K.D.; Harris, D.E.; Quail, M.A.; Kieser, H.; Harper, D.; et al. Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Nature 2002, 417, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ikeda, H.; Ishikawa, J.; Hanamoto, A.; Shinose, M.; Kikuchi, H.; Shiba, T.; Sakaki, Y.; Hattori, M.; Omura, S. Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of the industrial microorganism Streptomyces avermitilis. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Blin, K.; Medema, M.H.; Kazempour, D.; Fischbach, M.A.; Breitling, R.; Takano, E.; Weber, T. antiSMASH 2.0--a versatile platform for genome mining of secondary metabolite producers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, W204–W212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Kloosterman, A.M.; Charlop-Powers, Z.; van Wezel, G.P.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. antiSMASH 6.0: Improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W29–W35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Weber, T.; Blin, K.; Duddela, S.; Krug, D.; Kim, H.U.; Bruccoleri, R.; Lee, S.Y.; Fischbach, M.A.; Müller, R.; Wohlleben, W.; et al. antiSMASH 3.0-a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W237–W243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baltz, R.H. Natural product drug discovery in the genomic era: Realities, conjectures, misconceptions, and opportunities. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 46, 281–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Medema, M.H.; de Rond, T.; Moore, B.S. Mining genomes to illuminate the specialized chemistry of life. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021, 22, 553–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scherlach, K.; Hertweck, C. Mining and unearthing hidden biosynthetic potential. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Huang, J.; Shi, J.; Molle, V.; Sohlberg, B.; Weaver, D.; Bibb, M.J.; Karoonuthaisiri, N.; Lih, C.J.; Kao, C.M.; Buttner, M.J.; et al. Cross-regulation among disparate antibiotic biosynthetic pathways of Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 58, 1276–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, G.; Chater, K.F.; Chandra, G.; Niu, G.; Tan, H. Molecular regulation of antibiotic biosynthesis in streptomyces. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013, 77, 112–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Martín, J.F.; Liras, P. Engineering of regulatory cascades and networks controlling antibiotic biosynthesis in Streptomyces. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2010, 13, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xia, H.; Zhan, X.; Mao, X.M.; Li, Y.Q. The regulatory cascades of antibiotic production in Streptomyces. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wietzorrek, A.; Bibb, M. A novel family of proteins that regulates antibiotic production in streptomycetes appears to contain an OmpR-like DNA-binding fold. Mol. Microbiol. 1997, 25, 1181–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ye, S.; Molloy, B.; Braña, A.F.; Zabala, D.; Olano, C.; Cortés, J.; Morís, F.; Salas, J.A.; Méndez, C. Identification by Genome Mining of a Type I Polyketide Gene Cluster from Streptomyces argillaceus Involved in the Biosynthesis of Pyridine and Piperidine Alkaloids Argimycins P. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lombó, F.; Menéndez, N.; Salas, J.A.; Méndez, C. The aureolic acid family of antitumor compounds: Structure, mode of action, biosynthesis, and novel derivatives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 73, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Becerril, A.; Álvarez, S.; Braña, A.F.; Rico, S.; Díaz, M.; Santamaría, R.I.; Salas, J.A.; Méndez, C. Uncovering production of specialized metabolites by Streptomyces argillaceus: Activation of cryptic biosynthesis gene clusters using nutritional and genetic approaches. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Becerril, A.; Pérez-Victoria, I.; Ye, S.; Braña, A.F.; Martín, J.; Reyes, F.; Salas, J.A.; Méndez, C. Discovery of Cryptic Largimycins in Streptomyces Reveals Novel Biosynthetic Avenues Enriching the Structural Diversity of the Leinamycin Family. ACS Chem. Biol. 2020, 15, 1541–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Price, M.N.; Arkin, A.P. Curated BLAST for Genomes. mSystems 2019, 4, e00072-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Altschul, S.F.; Schäffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ceniceros, A.; Cuervo, L.; Méndez, C.; Salas, J.A.; Olano, C.; Malmierca, M.G. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Unraveling the Natural Product Biosynthetic Potential of a Streptomyces Strain Collection Isolated from Leaf-Cutting Ants. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Suzuki, H.; Ohnishi, Y.; Furusho, Y.; Sakuda, S.; Horinouchi, S. Novel benzene ring biosynthesis from C(3) and C(4) primary metabolites by two enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 36944–36951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ye, S.; Braña, A.F.; González-Sabín, J.; Morís, F.; Olano, C.; Salas, J.A.; Méndez, C. New Insights into the Biosynthesis Pathway of Polyketide Alkaloid Argimycins P in Streptomyces argillaceus. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ye, S.; Ballin, G.; Pérez-Victoria, I.; Braña, A.F.; Martín, J.; Reyes, F.; Salas, J.A.; Méndez, C. Combinatorial biosynthesis yields novel hybrid argimycin P alkaloids with diverse scaffolds in Streptomyces argillaceus. Microb. Biotechnol. 2022, 15, 2905–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dictionary of Natural Products on USB v. 31:2; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022.
  28. Abdelfattah, M.S. A new bioactive aminophenoxazinone alkaloid from a marine-derived actinomycete. Nat. Prod. Res. 2013, 27, 2126–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zeeck, A.; Breiding-Mack, S.; Grabley, S.; Voelskow, H.; Seibert, G. Preparation of Phenoxazinone Derivatives by Fermentation with Streptomyces DSM 3813 and Their Use as Parasiticides. Eur Patent EP26 0486, 23 March 1988. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ohnishi, Y.; Furusho, Y.; Higashi, T.; Chun, H.K.; Furihata, K.; Sakuda, S.; Horinouchi, S. Structures of grixazone A and B, A-factor-dependent yellow pigments produced under phosphate depletion by Streptomyces griseus. J. Antibiot. 2004, 57, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bertasso, M.; Holzenkämpfer, M.; Zeeck, A.; Dall’Antonia, F.; Fiedler, H.P. Bagremycin A and B, novel antibiotics from Streptomyces sp. Tü 4128. J. Antibiot. 2001, 54, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rui, Z.; Petrícková, K.; Skanta, F.; Pospísil, S.; Yang, Y.; Chen, C.Y.; Tsai, S.F.; Floss, H.G.; Petrícek, M.; Yu, T.W. Biochemical and genetic insights into asukamycin biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 24915–24924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Waldman, A.J.; Pechersky, Y.; Wang, P.; Wang, J.X.; Balskus, E.P. The Cremeomycin Biosynthetic Gene Cluster Encodes a Pathway for Diazo Formation. Chembiochem 2015, 16, 2172–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Walsh, C.T.; Haynes, S.W.; Ames, B.D. Aminobenzoates as building blocks for natural product assembly lines. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 37–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rudolf, J.D.; Dong, L.B.; Shen, B. Platensimycin and platencin: Inspirations for chemistry, biology, enzymology, and medicine. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017, 133, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kalkreuter, E.; Pan, G.; Cepeda, A.J.; Shen, B. Targeting Bacterial Genomes for Natural Product Discovery. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 41, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Suzuki, H.; Ohnishi, Y.; Horinouchi, S. GriC and GriD constitute a carboxylic acid reductase involved in grixazone biosynthesis in Streptomyces griseus. J. Antibiot. 2007, 60, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Suzuki, H.; Furusho, Y.; Higashi, T.; Ohnishi, Y.; Horinouchi, S. A novel o-aminophenol oxidase responsible for formation of the phenoxazinone chromophore of grixazone. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barry, C.E., 3rd; Nayar, P.G.; Begley, T.P. Phenoxazinone synthase: Mechanism for the formation of the phenoxazinone chromophore of actinomycin. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 6323–6333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Le Roes-Hill, M.; Goodwin, C.; Burton, S. Phenoxazinone synthase: What’s in a name? Trends Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kieser, T.; Bibb, M.J.; Buttner, M.J.; Chater, K.F.; Hopwood, D.A. Practical Streptomyces Genetics; The John Innes Foundation: Norwich, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fernández, E.; Weissbach, U.; Sánchez Reillo, C.; Braña, A.F.; Méndez, C.; Rohr, J.; Salas, J.A. Identification of two genes from Streptomyces argillaceus encoding glycosyltransferases involved in transfer of a disaccharide during biosynthesis of the antitumor drug mithramycin. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 4929–4937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, Y.; Zhou, X.; Liu, J.; Bao, K.; Zhang, G.; Tu, G.; Kieser, T.; Deng, Z. ‘Streptomyces nanchangensis’, a producer of the insecticidal polyether antibiotic nanchangmycin and the antiparasitic macrolide meilingmycin, contains multiple polyketide gene clusters. Microbiology 2002, 148, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Menéndez, N.; Nur-e-Alam, M.; Fischer, C.; Braña, A.F.; Salas, J.A.; Rohr, J.; Méndez, C. Deoxysugar transfer during chromomycin A3 biosynthesis in Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus: New derivatives with antitumor activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Quirós, L.M.; Aguirrezabalaga, I.; Olano, C.; Méndez, C.; Salas, J.A. Two glycosyltransferases and a glycosidase are involved in oleandomycin modification during its biosynthesis by Streptomyces antibioticus. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 28, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cano-Prieto, C.; García-Salcedo, R.; Sánchez-Hidalgo, M.; Braña, A.F.; Fiedler, H.P.; Méndez, C.; Salas, J.A.; Olano, C. Genome Mining of Streptomyces sp. Tü 6176: Characterization of the Nataxazole Biosynthesis Pathway. Chembiochem 2015, 16, 1461–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Olano, C.; Wilkinson, B.; Sánchez, C.; Moss, S.J.; Sheridan, R.; Math, V.; Weston, A.J.; Braña, A.F.; Martin, C.J.; Oliynyk, M.; et al. Biosynthesis of the angiogenesis inhibitor borrelidin by Streptomyces parvulus Tü4055: Cluster analysis and assignment of functions. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sambrook, J.; Russell, D.W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  49. Alanjary, M.; Steinke, K.; Ziemert, N. AutoMLST: An automated web server for generating multi-locus species trees highlighting natural product potential. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W276–W282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Martín, J.; Crespo, G.; González-Menéndez, V.; Pérez-Moreno, G.; Sánchez-Carrasco, P.; Pérez-Victoria, I.; Ruiz-Pérez, L.M.; González-Pacanowska, D.; Vicente, F.; Genilloud, O.; et al. MDN-0104, an antiplasmodial betaine lipid from Heterospora chenopodii. J. Nat. Prod. 2014, 77, 2118–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pérez-Victoria, I.; Martín, J.; Reyes, F. Combined LC/UV/MS and NMR Strategies for the Dereplication of Marine Natural Products. Planta Med. 2016, 82, 857–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Genetic organization of cluster ahb from Streptomyces argillaceus, and comparison to homologous clusters in other Streptomyces strains. Clusters shown are ahb from S. argillaceus; rah from Streptomyces sp. AC555_RSS877 (NZ_JAGMUK010000018.1); oah from S. roseolus JCM 4411 (NZ_BMTV01000035.1; NZ_BMTV01000014.1); dah from S. adustus NBRC 109810 (NZ_VJZD01000001.1; NZ_VJZD01000132.1); pah from S. prasinopilosus CGMCC 4.3504 (NZ_FMZK01000002.1); and tah from Streptomyces sp. Tü 3180 (NZ_WOXS01000002.1). Genes belonging to the BGCs are colored: yellow, 3,4-AHBA biosynthesis genes; green, other biosynthesis genes; red, regulatory genes; blue, transport-related genes; grey, additional genes; white, genes not belonged to the clusters. Arrows with dashed lines indicate genes not wholly sequenced. Genes are shown to scale. Bars indicate DNA regions that have been deleted in S. argillaceus mutants.
Figure 1. Genetic organization of cluster ahb from Streptomyces argillaceus, and comparison to homologous clusters in other Streptomyces strains. Clusters shown are ahb from S. argillaceus; rah from Streptomyces sp. AC555_RSS877 (NZ_JAGMUK010000018.1); oah from S. roseolus JCM 4411 (NZ_BMTV01000035.1; NZ_BMTV01000014.1); dah from S. adustus NBRC 109810 (NZ_VJZD01000001.1; NZ_VJZD01000132.1); pah from S. prasinopilosus CGMCC 4.3504 (NZ_FMZK01000002.1); and tah from Streptomyces sp. Tü 3180 (NZ_WOXS01000002.1). Genes belonging to the BGCs are colored: yellow, 3,4-AHBA biosynthesis genes; green, other biosynthesis genes; red, regulatory genes; blue, transport-related genes; grey, additional genes; white, genes not belonged to the clusters. Arrows with dashed lines indicate genes not wholly sequenced. Genes are shown to scale. Bars indicate DNA regions that have been deleted in S. argillaceus mutants.
Ijms 24 08197 g001
Figure 2. Proposed biosynthesis pathway for ahbamycins. ASA, aspartate semialdehyde; DAHP, dihydroxyacetone-P; AT, acyltransferase.
Figure 2. Proposed biosynthesis pathway for ahbamycins. ASA, aspartate semialdehyde; DAHP, dihydroxyacetone-P; AT, acyltransferase.
Ijms 24 08197 g002
Figure 3. Effect of 3,4-AHBA on ahbamycins production by S. argillaceus. UPLC chromatograms (360 nm) of extracts of cultures in R5A medium of (A) S. argillaceus wild type strain overexpressing genes encoding enzymes for the biosynthesis of 3,4-AHBA (pEM4T-AHBA) (red line), in comparison to S. argillaceus wild type strain containing the vector (pEM4T) (black line); and (B) S. argillaceus wild type (red line) and mutant S. argillaceus ΔR2K3 (black line) strains, fed with 3,4-AHBA. M, mithramycins. Peak 1 corresponds to ahbamycin 18 (AHB18).
Figure 3. Effect of 3,4-AHBA on ahbamycins production by S. argillaceus. UPLC chromatograms (360 nm) of extracts of cultures in R5A medium of (A) S. argillaceus wild type strain overexpressing genes encoding enzymes for the biosynthesis of 3,4-AHBA (pEM4T-AHBA) (red line), in comparison to S. argillaceus wild type strain containing the vector (pEM4T) (black line); and (B) S. argillaceus wild type (red line) and mutant S. argillaceus ΔR2K3 (black line) strains, fed with 3,4-AHBA. M, mithramycins. Peak 1 corresponds to ahbamycin 18 (AHB18).
Ijms 24 08197 g003
Figure 4. Chemical structures of ahbamycins (AHB).
Figure 4. Chemical structures of ahbamycins (AHB).
Ijms 24 08197 g004
Figure 5. Production of ahbamycins by S. argillaceus strains overexpressing regulatory genes. UPLC chromatograms (230 nm) of extracts of S. argillaceus WT-pREGT (black line), S. argillaceus ΔAHBA-pREGT (green line), and S. argillaceus ΔR2K3-pREGT (red line), cultivated in SM10. Peaks with numbers correspond to those ahbamycins (AHB) selected for chemical characterization. Peaks for AHB118, AHB119, AHB120, AHB74, and AHB75 to AHB77 are indicated.
Figure 5. Production of ahbamycins by S. argillaceus strains overexpressing regulatory genes. UPLC chromatograms (230 nm) of extracts of S. argillaceus WT-pREGT (black line), S. argillaceus ΔAHBA-pREGT (green line), and S. argillaceus ΔR2K3-pREGT (red line), cultivated in SM10. Peaks with numbers correspond to those ahbamycins (AHB) selected for chemical characterization. Peaks for AHB118, AHB119, AHB120, AHB74, and AHB75 to AHB77 are indicated.
Ijms 24 08197 g005
Figure 6. Key COSY (bold bonds), HMBC (blue arrows), and NOESY (dashed red arrows) correlations used to determine the chemical structure of ahbamycins.
Figure 6. Key COSY (bold bonds), HMBC (blue arrows), and NOESY (dashed red arrows) correlations used to determine the chemical structure of ahbamycins.
Ijms 24 08197 g006
Table 1. Strains and plasmids generated in this study.
Table 1. Strains and plasmids generated in this study.
Mutant StrainPlasmidDeleted Genes
ΔAHBApHZΔasuahbH, ahbI
ΔR2K3pHZΔasu1705ahbR1, ahbR2, ahbP1, ahbA, ahbS, ahbK1, ahbM3, ahbL1, ahbO2, ahbR3, ahbT1, ahbK2, ahbC, ahbK3
Recombinant StrainPlasmidExpressed Genes
WT-pEM4TpEM4T-
WT-pEM4T-AHBApEM4T-AHBAahbI, ahbH, ahbL2
WT-pREGTpREGTahbR2, ahbR3, ahbR4
ΔAHBA-pREGTpREGTahbR2, ahbR3, ahbR4
ΔR2K3-pREGTpREGTahbR2, ahbR3, ahbR4
ΔAHBA-pREG-pSETeAHBAHygpREGT
pSETeAHBAHyg
ahbR2, ahbR3, ahbR4
ahbI, ahbH, ahbL2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ye, S.; Molloy, B.; Pérez-Victoria, I.; Montero, I.; Braña, A.F.; Olano, C.; Arca, S.; Martín, J.; Reyes, F.; Salas, J.A.; et al. Uncovering the Cryptic Gene Cluster ahb for 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoate Derived Ahbamycins, by Searching SARP Regulator Encoding Genes in the Streptomyces argillaceus Genome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8197. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098197

AMA Style

Ye S, Molloy B, Pérez-Victoria I, Montero I, Braña AF, Olano C, Arca S, Martín J, Reyes F, Salas JA, et al. Uncovering the Cryptic Gene Cluster ahb for 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoate Derived Ahbamycins, by Searching SARP Regulator Encoding Genes in the Streptomyces argillaceus Genome. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(9):8197. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098197

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ye, Suhui, Brian Molloy, Ignacio Pérez-Victoria, Ignacio Montero, Alfredo F. Braña, Carlos Olano, Sonia Arca, Jesús Martín, Fernando Reyes, José A. Salas, and et al. 2023. "Uncovering the Cryptic Gene Cluster ahb for 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoate Derived Ahbamycins, by Searching SARP Regulator Encoding Genes in the Streptomyces argillaceus Genome" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 9: 8197. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098197

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop