Next Article in Journal
The Role of Post-Translational Modifications in Regulation of NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation
Previous Article in Journal
HPLC Analysis of Polyphenols Derived from Hungarian Aszú from Tokaj Wine Region and Its Effect on Inflammation in an In Vitro Model System of Endothelial Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adipose Tissue-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Contribute to Phenotypic Plasticity of Prostate Cancer Cells
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

CA-IX-Expressing Small Extracellular Vesicles (sEVs) Are Released by Melanoma Cells under Hypoxia and in the Blood of Advanced Melanoma Patients

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(7), 6122; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076122
by Marta Venturella 1, Alessandro Falsini 1, Federica Coppola 1, Gaia Giuntini 1, Fabio Carraro 2, Davide Zocco 3, Antonio Chiesi 4 and Antonella Naldini 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(7), 6122; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076122
Submission received: 27 January 2023 / Revised: 17 March 2023 / Accepted: 22 March 2023 / Published: 24 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exosomes in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript "CA-IX-expressing small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are re- 2 leased by melanoma cells under hypoxia and in the blood of 3 advanced melanoma patients" shows that two melanoma cell lines release small extracellular vesicles(sEVs) in vitro. Under hypoxia conditions, one of the cell lines A375 releases sEVs containing CA-IX mRNA and protein. In the melanoma patient's plasma, enriched CA-IX-positive sEVs showed a higher copy of BRAFV600E mutation gene, suggesting CA-IX-positive sEVs may be a potential biomarker for liquid biopsy. The contents are of broad interest. With that said, some limitations raise concerns.

  1. The authors only test two melanoma cell lines, which weakens the conclusion, it would be better to assess more cell lines.
  2. Only one of two melanoma cell line release CA-IX-positive sEVs under hypoxia conditions, the author should at least discuss what makes the difference.
  3. For figure 4, the resolution is very low. The explanation in the text and the figure legend is not matching. 
  4. "After detergent treatment with RIPA buffer, the positive signal from A375 hypoxic sEVs was abrogated due to the disruption of EV membranes (Figure 5B). These results indicate that CA-IX protein is expressed on the surface of A375 sEVs released under hypoxia". The results show RIPA might destroy the binding between antibody and CA-IX protein. more experiments are required for supporting the conclusion they made.
  5. For Fig.6, the copy of CA-IX in each group should be included to show the isolation does work. And it would be better to have a control to show that the input for RT-PCR for each group is the same.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have an original research scope on melanoma biology focusing on small EVs (sEVs) harbouring a unique expression of CA-IX, which is also demonstrated in the clinical samples derived from BRAF V600E-positive melanoma patients. The marker of CA-IX looks very convinsing in cell culture experiments as clearly shown in the manuscript. However, some essential details can be covered in the section of clinical study.

Figure 6.

1. I wonder if any statistics could support a significant finding on the analysis. 

2. Besides CA-IX immuno-isolation of sEVs, would it be possible to quantify mRNA or protein level of CA-IX in the generally precipitated sEV samples? 

3. Ct values are not sufficient enough for quantification. Instead, comparable ⊿CT or a standard-based measurement of BRAF gene mutation should be considered.  

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors addressed all my questions. 

Back to TopTop