Next Article in Journal
Comparative Evaluation of Reproducibility of Phage-Displayed Peptide Selections and NGS Data, through High-Fidelity Mapping of Massive Peptide Repertoires
Next Article in Special Issue
SbNAC9 Improves Drought Tolerance by Enhancing Scavenging Ability of Reactive Oxygen Species and Activating Stress-Responsive Genes of Sorghum
Previous Article in Journal
Esculetin Alleviates Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease on High-Cholesterol-Diet-Induced Larval Zebrafish and FFA-Induced BRL-3A Hepatocyte
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assembly of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Gelsemium elegans Revealed the Existence of Homologous Conformations Generated by a Repeat Mediated Recombination
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ectopic Expression of Sugarcane ScAMT1.1 Has the Potential to Improve Ammonium Assimilation and Grain Yield in Transgenic Rice under Low Nitrogen Stress

Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, National Engineering Research Center for Sugarcane, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Fujian Universities and Colleges Engineering Research Center of Modern Facility Agriculture, School of Food and Bioengineering, Fujian Polytechnic Normal University, Fuqing 350300, China.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1595; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021595
Submission received: 24 November 2022 / Revised: 2 January 2023 / Accepted: 4 January 2023 / Published: 13 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Crop Stress Biology and Molecular Breeding 2.0)

Abstract

:
In China, nitrogen (N) fertilizer is excessively used in sugarcane planting areas, while the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of sugarcane is relatively low. Mining and identifying the key genes in response to low N stress in sugarcane can provide useful gene elements and a theoretical basis for developing sugarcane varieties with high NUE. In our study, RNA-Seq combined with qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the ScAMT1.1 gene responded positively to low N stress, resulting in the stronger low N tolerance and high NUE ability of sugarcane cultivar ROC22. Then, ScAMT1.1 was cloned from sugarcane. The full-length cDNA of the ScAMT1.1 gene is 1868 bp, containing a 1491 bp open reading frame (ORF), and encoding 496 amino acids. ScAMT1.1 belongs to the AMT superfamily and shares 91.57% homologies with AMT1.1 from Oryza sativa. Furthermore, it was stably overexpressed in rice (O. sativa). Under low N treatment, the plant height and the fresh weight of the ScAMT1.1-overexpressed transgenic rice were 36.48% and 51.55% higher than that of the wild-type, respectively. Both the activity of ammonium assimilation key enzymes GS and GDH, and the expression level of ammonium assimilation key genes, including GS1.1, GS1.2, GDH, Fd-GOGAT, and NADH-GOGAT2 in the transgenic plants, were significantly higher than that of the wild-type. The grain number and grain yield per plant in the transgenic rice were 6.44% and 9.52% higher than that of the wild-type in the pot experiments, respectively. Taken together, the sugarcane ScAMT1.1 gene has the potential to improve ammonium assimilation ability and the yield of transgenic rice under low N fertilizer conditions. This study provided an important functional gene for improving sugarcane varieties with high NUE.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is one of the essential elements for crop growth and development [1]. N supply is a critical limiting factor of high yield in crop production, resulting in much chemical N fertilizer used in crop production worldwide. Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) is the most important sugar crop. As a tall perennial grass, sugarcane requires a large quantity of N for normal growth, and excessive chemical N fertilizer has been applied to increase sugarcane yield, leading to the low nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), with only 20–40% absorbed of the N application amount in sugarcane production [2,3,4], especially in China and India, two of the top three sugarcane producing countries [5]. This not only causes soil acidification and compaction but also reduces the sugar content of the sugarcane. The breeding of high NUE varieties is an effective way to reduce N fertilizer consumption [6]. Identification of the key genes and studying the physiological and molecular mechanism regulating N metabolism in the sugarcane response to low N stress can provide key gene elements for breeding sugarcane varieties with high NUE.
Ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3) are the main inorganic N sources absorbed by crops. The roots of most crops mainly absorb NO3. However, the energy required for NH4+ uptake by roots is less than that for NO3 uptake [7,8]. In the case of N deficiency, the roots of sugarcane and rice preferentially absorbed NH4+ [5,9]. In order to adapt to soil environments with different N concentrations, plants have evolved two types of N uptake and transport systems: low- and high-affinity transport systems. The former plays a major role in N uptake under high N concentration and the latter plays a major role in N uptake under low N concentration [10,11]. The uptake and transport of NH4+ by plant roots are mediated by ammonium transporters (AMT) [10,12]. The AMT family is mainly divided into the AMT1 (AMT1 cluster) and AMT2 (AMT2/3/4 cluster) subfamilies [7,13]. AMT1-type ammonium transporters mainly mediate high-affinity ammonium uptake in plant roots, which has been well demonstrated in various species by previous studies [1,9]. Most AMT2 subfamily members belong to the low-affinity transport system [14]. In Arabidopsis, in addition to contributing to root uptake in the low-affinity transport system, the AtAMT2.1 gene plays a role in the root-to-shoot translocation of ammonium [15]. Due to the low homology with the AMT1 subfamily, the AMT2 subfamily may have different biological functions from that of the AMT1 [7].
Within the AMT1 family, the AMT1.1 gene has been shown to respond positively to low N stress and play an important role in the process of NH4+ uptake in crop roots [9,16]. In barley, there was a positive correlation between AMT gene expression (AMT1.1 was expressed 2.8 times more than AMT2.1) and the N content in the leaves at anthesis and the 1000-kernel weight [17]. The AtAMT1.1 gene of Arabidopsis was strongly expressed in the roots under the N-deficiency stress. However, it was strongly expressed in the leaves when the stress disappeared [18]. The ability to absorb NH4+ in the AtAMT1.1 gene knock-out plants was 30% lower than that of the wild-type [19]. Similar results were found in rice. OsAMT1.1 was expressed in both rice roots and leaves under low N stress. However, the expression level of OsAMT1.1 increased significantly in the roots when rice plantlets were transferred from the nutrient conditions of high N to low N [20]. Knockout of OsAMT1.1 significantly decreased the total N transport from roots to shoots under low N stress, which suggested that the gene OsAMT1.1 plays an important role in the N-K homeostasis in rice [16]. Some scholars obtained the OsAMT1.1 overexpressed rice and observed an increase in the NH4+ absorption capacity and the NH4+ content in these plants [21,22], and the yield of the transgenic rice was about 30% higher than that of the wild-type under low N stress [9].
Due to its vital role in increasing NH4+ uptake, AMT1.1 should have great potential in the development of varieties with high NUE in ammonium-preferring crops under low N stress. However, the physiological function of AMT1.1 from sugarcane, as well as its mechanisms, remains unclear so far. Here, we identified an N deficiency-responsive AMT1.1 gene based on the comparative transcriptional analysis between the low N-tolerant sugarcane cultivar ROC22 and the low N-sensitive sugarcane cultivar Badila. The AMT1.1 gene, termed ScAMT1.1, was subsequently cloned from ROC22. Then, the ScAMT1.1 gene was stably transformed into rice to explore the ammonium assimilation process of transgenic plants under low N stress. The results help us to preliminarily understand the biological function of sugarcane ScAMT1.1 and lay a foundation for the molecular improvement of sugarcane with high NUE in the future.

2. Results

2.1. The ScAMT1.1 Gene Responded Positively to Low N Stress in Sugarcane

From samples of leaf and root in two sugarcane varieties ROC22 and Badila treated with low N stress, five differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of the AMT family were identified based on the previous mRNA transcriptomic datasets generated by RNA-Seq [23]. Their expression patterns in sugarcane under low N stress were evaluated by both RNA-Seq and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) using the samples of roots and leaves, indicating the consistency of their expression patterns in both detections (Figure 1). In detail, ScAMT1.2 or ScAMT2.1 was upregulated in the roots of both ROC22 and Badila, as well as in the leaves (Figure 1B,C). Contrary to ScAMT1.2 and ScAMT2.1, ScAMT3.2 presented a downregulated pattern in two tissues of both high- and low-NUE sugarcane cultivars (Figure 1D). In addition, ScAMT3.3 was specifically downregulated in the roots (Figure 1E). Moreover, the expression levels of ScAMT1.2, ScAMT2.1, ScAMT3.2, and ScAMT3.3 were not significantly different between the two cultivars under low N conditions. Interestingly, ScAMT1.1′ expression profiles were different from the other four ScAMTs. Within those AMT family members, only ScAMT1.1 was kept at higher levels in ROC22 than that in Badila under low N concentration (Figure 1A). The higher expression level of ScAMT1.1 might contribute to improving the low N tolerance and high NUE ability of ROC22.

2.2. Gene Cloning and Bioinformatics Analysis of ScAMT1.1 Gene

In the present study, a ScAMT1.1 gene was cloned from the sugarcane cultivar ROC22 (Supplementary Figure S1). Its full-length cDNA was 1868 bp, containing a 1491 bp open reading frame (ORF) and encoding 496 amino acids (Supplementary Figure S2). A conservative AMT1.1 domain, belonging to the AMT superfamily, was located at the middle region (from 36th to 459th amino acid residues) of the ScAMT1.1 protein sequence (Figure 2). The theoretical molecular weight of the ScAMT1.1 protein was 124.47 kDa, which belongs to the acidic hydrophobic protein and contains transmembrane domains with the greatest probability of localization in the plasma membrane.
The ScAMT1.1 from sugarcane and the AMT family from the other four species, i.e., A. thaliana, O. sativa, S. bicolor, and S. spontaneum, were used to generate a phylogenetic tree. The results showed that the genetic relationship coincided with the plant AMT class (Figure 3). ScAMT1.1 was classed into the AMT1.1 group and had the closest genetic relationship with SbAMT1.1 (Figure 3). The multiple sequence alignment result was similar to the phylogenetic analysis. The amino acid sequence of ScAMT1.1 shares 98.19%, 96.18%, 91.57%, 85.29%, 73.67%, and 72.87% identity with AMT1.1 from S. bicolor, Z. mays, O. sativa, T. aestivum, G. max, and A. thaliana, respectively (Figure 4). Sugarcane is one of the monocotyledonous C4 crops, alongside S. bicolor and Z. mays. Therefore, the phylogenetic analysis and sequence alignment results were consistent with their biological classification features (Supplementary Figure S3).

2.3. Identification of the ScAMT1.1 Overexpressed Rice

The seeds from 20 transgenic rice lines were screened for response to herbicide treatment at germination, as well as the three-leaf stage. Among them, 19 lines were determined as the positive transgenic plants by seed germination and plant sprayed using Basta solution (Figure 5A,B) and detected using PCR (Figure 5C).

2.4. Phenotypic Index Analysis Shows Overexpressing ScAMT1.1 Enhances Plants’ Height and Fresh Weight in the Transgenic Rice under Low N Stress

Four homozygous T3 generation transgenic lines (T-2, T-5, T-6, and T-12) were obtained according to the methods described in 4.4. Compared to the other transgenic lines, higher ScAMT1.1 expression levels in the transgenic lines of T-5, T-6, and T-12 were found by qRT-PCR (Figure 6A), and thus they were used to investigate the agronomic traits in the following assay. The transgenic lines showed a better performance than the wild-type plants under low N stress. After culturing for 16 d under low N nutrient solution, transgenic rice seedlings of T-5, T-6, and T-12 grew significantly better than the wild-type (Figure 6B), and their plant height was 46.83%, 26.58%, and 36.03% higher than that of the wild-type (Figure 6C), respectively. In addition, their fresh weight was 59.30%, 43.02%, and 52.33% higher than that of the wild-type, respectively (Figure 6D).

2.5. The Four Ammonium Assimilation Related Enzymes Were More Active in the Transgenic Lines Than That in the Wild-Type Plants

Co-expression analysis results showed that the expression levels of all the ammonium assimilation-related genes, except for the NADH-dependent glutamate synthase gene (NADH-GOGAT1), were significantly upregulated in the transgenic lines under low N condition (Figure 7A). Similar results were obtained from the experiments on enzyme activities (Figure 7B). No significant differences were found in the activity of the glutamate synthase (GOGAT) enzyme between the transgenic lines and the wild-type plants (Figure 7B). However, the activity of the other enzymes (glutamine synthetase, GS, and glutamate dehydrogenase, GDH) in the transgenic lines was significantly higher than those in the wild-type (Figure 7B).

2.6. Overexpressed ScAMT1.1 Enhanced Grain Number and Grain Yield of the Transgenic Plants in the Pot Experiment under Low N Condition

Under low N conditions, transgenic lines of the ScAMT1.1 overexpressed rice and the wild-type were planted in the planting pots. The ripening time of transgenic lines was extended by about 15 d compared to the wild-type. However, the transgenic lines grew better than the wild-type during the whole growth duration of the rice. Figure 7A showed the different phenotypes of the wild-type and the ScAMT1.1 transgenic rice at the grain filling stage. At harvesting time, the grain number per plant of the transgenic lines T-5, T-6, and T-12 was 6.87%, 4.72%, and 7.72% higher than that of the wild-type (Figure 8B), and the grain yield per plant was 11.80%, 7.64%, and 9.12% higher than that of the wild-type (Figure 8C), respectively. In the pot experiment, the ScAMT1.1 overexpressed transgenic rice is more productive than the wild-type under low N conditions because its grain number and grain yield were 4.72–7.72% and 7.64–11.80% higher than that of the wild-type, respectively (Figure 8B,C).

3. Discussion

AMT is the most important ammonium transporter gene family in plants [24] and plays an important role in the absorption and transport of ammonium under low N stress [1]. The first AMT gene was isolated from S. cerevisiae [25]. So far, the AMT gene family has been identified and classified into four clusters (AMT1–AMT4) from various plant species, such as O. sativa [26] and S. bicolor [13]. Our previous study found five AMT-type DEGs (AMT1.1, AMT1.2, AMT2.1, AMT3.2, and AMT3.3), belonging to three AMT subfamilies (AMT1, AMT2, and AMT3), based on the comparative transcriptomic analyses of low N-response in two sugarcane cultivars with contrasting NUE [23]. Recently, genome-wide identification results showed that sugarcane wild species, S. spontaneum, contained six AMTs (AMT2.1, AMT2.2, AMT3.1, AMT3.2, AMT3.3, and AMT4) belonging to three AMT subfamilies (AMT2, AMT3, and AMT4) [7]. Surprisingly, according to this report, AMT1.1 was absent in the AMT family in the sugarcane wild species S. spontaneum.
Within the AMT family, AMT1.1 was an important member of the high-affinity transport system [1,9,16]. As a type of low ammonia concentration stress-sensitive gene, AMT1.1 was found to express preponderantly in the roots in both A. thaliana [18] and O. sativa [20] under low N stress. Sugarcane is one of the few ammonium-preferring crops. In this study, one AMT1.1 gene, termed ScAMT1.1, was cloned from the low N-tolerant sugarcane cultivar ROC22. Similar to the AMT1.1 from A. thaliana or O. sativa, ScAMT1.1 was induced under low N stress and highly expressed in the roots of sugarcane (Figure 1).
The other four members of the AMT family studied here exhibited a differential expression pattern in sugarcane under low N stress. ScAMT2.1 was significantly upregulated in the leaves of sugarcane under low N treatment (0.6 mM N) for six hours (Figure 1). However, ScAMT3.2 was significantly downregulated in the leaves at the same condition (Figure 1). The opposite expression trends were also found between SsAMT2.1 and SsAMT3.2 in S. spontaneum under low N stress (0.1 Mm N) [7]. Moreover, we found that the expression trends of ScAMT2.1 and ScAMT3.2 were similar under low N stress between two contrasting NUE sugarcane cultivars (Figure 1). However, it is worth noting that the expression level of ScAMT1.1 was significantly higher in the low N-tolerant cultivar ROC22 than that in the low N-sensitive cultivar Badila (Figure 1). It could be speculated that ScAMT1.1 played a positive role in the N absorption process in sugarcane.
N is typically supplied by a mixture of NH4+ and NO3 in natural environments [2]. Most crops strongly preferred NO3 [7]. While some crops, e.g., rice and sugarcane, showed a stronger preference towards NH4+ [7,8,9]. However, the reasons for the preference for NH4+ or NO3 remain unclear [27]. AMTs are most likely involved in ammonium transport in a crop, which might be partially associated with the answer [28]. Therefore, the functions and molecular regulatory mechanisms of AMTs in NH4+ uptake cause particular attention. AMT1.1 is an important ammonium transporter gene under low N stress. Whether overexpression of AMT1.1 in rice can lead to an increase in the NH4+ absorption and yield production remained controversial.
Kumar et al. [21] and Huang et al. [22] overexpressed OsAMT1.1 in rice. The NH4+ concentration was too high for transgenic plants to assimilate in time, thus resulting in toxicity and damage to plant growth. However, the results in another report were different [9]. The transgenic rice overexpressing OsAMT1.1 showed significant enrichment of OsAMT1.1 transcript under the nutrient solution of 30 μM (NH4)2SO4, which was 20 times higher than the wild-type [9]. At the same time, the expression levels of ammonium assimilation key genes (GS1.1, GS1.2, GS2.1, Fd-GOGAT, NADH-GOGAT, and GDH) in the transgenic plants were significantly increased [9]. After ammonium is absorbed into the roots, it is converted into glutamine (Gln) through GS. Gln and α-Ketoglutaric acid generate glutamic acid by the GS/GOGAT cycle, and inorganic N is converted into organic N. GS1.2 and NADH-GOGAT were the key genes in the NH4+ assimilation of plant roots, and GS1.1 and Fd-GOGAT were the key genes for N utilization in plants [9,29]. Therefore, the yield of the transgenic rice was about 30% higher than that of the wild-type [9].
To identify the function of ScAMT1.1 under N-deficient conditions, homozygous transgenic rice lines overexpressed ScAMT1.1 were developed in the present study. Our results were similar to Ranathunge et al. [9]. Heterologously expressed ScAMT1.1 in rice enhanced the ammonium assimilation ability of the transgenic plants. The evidence was as follows. Firstly, the activity of ammonium assimilation key enzymes GS, and GDH, as well as the expression levels of ammonium assimilation-related genes (GS1.1, GS1.2, GDH, Fd-GOGAT, and NADH-GOGAT2), were all significantly higher in the transgenic plants than those in the wild-type (Figure 7). Secondly, the plant height and fresh weight of the transgenic rice seedlings were 36.48% and 51.55% higher than those of the wild-type under N-deficient conditions (Figure 6). Thirdly, grain number and grain yield per plant of the transgenic rice were 6.44% and 9.52% higher than those of the wild- type, respectively (Figure 8). These demonstrated that the ammonium assimilation ability of the transgenic rice was higher than that of the wild-type. It could be speculated that enhancement of NH4+ uptake in ScAMT1.1-overexpressed rice plants promotes the activity of enzymes involved in ammonium assimilation under low ammonium conditions. The NH4+ content in the wild-type and the transgenic rice, together with its absorption and transport mechanism in the transgenic rice, need to be determined in the future. Additionally, the potential for improved grain yield in the ScAMT1.1 transgenic rice under low N stress also needs to be further detected in the field.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials and Treatments

Sugarcane leaf and root samples obtained from low N treatment and used in qRT-PCR were the same as those used in the previous study of RNA-Seq [23]. The leaves (low N treatment for 0 h, 6 h) and roots (low N treatment for 0 h, 3 h) of sugarcane cultivar ROC22 (low N-tolerant) and Badila (low N-sensitive) plantlets under low N condition (0.6 mM N) were selected. The samples of the leaves and roots from the cultivars ROC22 and Badila under low N treatment for 0 h were selected as the control, respectively.
The culture experiment of the transgenic rice under low N stress: seeds of the transgenic and wild-type rice were germinated and cultivated in the seedling trays. The plantlets at the three-leaf stage with uniform size were selected as experimental materials and divided into two groups as follows:
Group one, plantlets were cultured for 16 days in the low N nutrient solution (0.01 mM NH4NO3, 2.0 mM KCl, 1.0 mM KH2PO4, 2.5 mM CaCl2•2H2O, 0.5 mM Na2SiO3•9H2O, 0.025 mM Fe-EDTA, 1.0 mM MgSO4•7H2O, 20.0 μM H3BO3, 5.0 μM MnCl2•4H2O, 0.4 μM ZnSO4•7H2O, 0.2 μM CuSO4•5H2O, and 0.05 μM Na2MoO4•2H2O, pH 5.8), and the whole plant samples were collected. Ten randomly selected plantlets were pooled into a biological duplicate. Among them, six seedlings were used for physiological index determination, and the other four seedlings were frozen rapidly in liquid N for qRT-PCR of ammonium assimilation key genes. The experiments were done in three biological replicates. Total RNA of the transgenic and wild-type rice plantlets was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) for the qRT-PCR experiment. RNA and cDNA were obtained referring to the method of the previous study [23].
The plantlets of the other group were cultivated in the planting pots (one seedling per pot). The pot sizes were 0.40 m in both diameter and depth, with eight 1.0 cm diameter holes located at the bottom. Each pot was filled with 10 kg of low N soil (pH 5.0 to 5.5) with an organic matter content of 7.09 g/kg, alkali-hydrolyzable N of 0.04 g/kg, effective phosphorus of 0.02 g/kg, rapidly available potassium of 0.10 g/kg, total N of 0.38 g/kg, total phosphorus of 0.28 g/kg, and total potassium of 20.1 g/kg. All planting pots were provided with the same amount of water and under the same cultivation management. Grain number and grain yield per plant were recorded at harvest time.

4.2. RNA-Seq Data Analysis and qRT-PCR Experiment

Based on RNA-Seq in the previous study [23], five differentially expressed (padj < 0.05 and a fold change ≥ 2) AMT family genes (AMT1.1, AMT1.2, AMT2.1, AMT3.2, and AMT3.3) were identified in the two contrasting NUE sugarcane cultivars (ROC22 and Badila) under low N condition. The expression profiles (in log2 Fold change) of the mentioned five genes in the leaves and roots were detected, respectively.
The qRT-PCR experiment was further used to examine the expression profiles of the five AMT family genes in the leaves and the roots of ROC22 and Badila under low N stress. In addition, the relative expression levels of ammonium assimilation key genes, e.g., GS1.1, GS1.2, GDH, ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase (Fd-GOGAT), NADH-GOGAT1, and NADH-GOGAT2 were assessed in the transgenic rice. The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) [30] and eukaryotic elongation factor1-alpha (eEF-1a) [31,32] were used as the reference genes in sugarcane and rice, respectively. The 2−△△Ct method [33] was used to calculate the relative gene expression of the samples. The experiments were done in three biological replicates, and SYBR Green was used for training. The primer sequences of qRT-PCR in sugarcane and rice are shown in Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Table S2, respectively.

4.3. Gene Cloning and Bioinformatics Analysis of Sugarcane ScAMT1.1 Gene

The samples of RNA and cDNA from the sugarcane cultivar ROC22 were obtained from the previous study [23]. A pair of cloning primers, ScAMT1.1-F (5’-GCCACACCCTCCCAATCC-3’) and ScAMT1.1-R (5′-ACACACTGAAAAAGGCAAGCAC-3’), was designed according to the unigene template from the transcriptome sequencing data. The PCR amplification procedure was consistent with the previous study [23]. The PCR product was ligated to pMD20-T cloning vector and transformed into Escherichia coli cells for proliferation. The plasmid was extracted and sequenced.
NCBI Conserved Domains (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi/ (accessed on 28 October 2022), ProtParam (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/ (accessed on 28 October 2022), ProtScale (http://web.expasy.org/protscale/ (accessed on 28 October 2022), TMHMM Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/servers/TMHMM/ (accessed on 28 October 2022) and PSORT analysis (http://www.psort.org/ (accessed on 28 October 2022) were used to predict the conserved domain, physicochemical properties, hydrophobicity, transmembrane domain, and subcellular localization of ScAMT1.1 protein, respectively. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using DNAMAN 8.0 software. The phylogenetic tree of AMTs from various plant species was constructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method using MEGA 6.0. The chosen proteins were SsAMT2.1 (S. spontaneum/Sspon.03G0003380-1P), SsAMT2.2 (Sspon.03G0003380-1A), SsAMT3.1 (Sspon.03G0002070-1A), SsAMT3.2 (Sspon.01G0032110-2B), SsAMT3.3 (Sspon.04G0010470-1A), SsAMT4 (Sspon.01G0007620-1A). OsAMT1.1 (O. sativa/XP_015636241.1), OsAMT1.2 (XP_015623207.1), OsAMT1.3 (XP_015624850.1), OsAMT2.1 (XP_015639562.1), OsAMT2.2 (XP_015643018.1), OsAMT2.3 (XP_015621584.1), OsAMT3.1 (XP_015622013.1), OsAMT3.2 (XP_015630045.1), OsAMT3.3 (XP_015626434.1), OsAMT4.1 (Q10CV4.1). AtAMT1.1 (A. thaliana/NP_193087.1), AtAMT1.2 (NP_176658.1), AtAMT1.3 (NP_189073.1), AtAMT1.4 (NP_194599.1), AtAMT1.5 (NP_189072.1), AtAMT2 (NP_973634.1). SbAMT2.1 (S. bicolor/XP_002439939.1), SbAMT2.2 (XP_002458715.2), SbAMT3.1 (XP_002456706.1), SbAMT3.2 (XP_002466132.1), SbAMT3.3 (XP_002452249.1), SbAMT4.1 (XP_021307349.1), SbAMT1.1 (XP_021319114.1), and SbAMT1.2 (XP_002452468.1).

4.4. Generation of the Transgenic Rice Overexpressed ScAMT1.1

The ORF of the ScAMT1.1 gene was subcloned into the Bsa I site of the binary plant expressed vector pBWA(V)BU, which was used to construct the overexpressed vector pBWA(V)BU-ScAMT1.1. The recombinant expression vector pBWA(V)BU-ScAMT1.1 was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 by electroporation. Then, the genetic transformation of rice (O. sativa L. sp. Japonica cv. Nipponbare) was carried out to obtain the T0 generation transgenic plants. These works were entrusted to BioRun Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China).
From the generations T0 to T3, an assay for the transgenic rice with Basta resistance was as follows. Three hundred seeds of each transgenic line were taken and soaked in 0.1% Basta solution for germination. The rice seedlings germinated normally were planted in the seedling tray. When the seedlings were at the three-leaf stage, 0.2% Basta solution was used for the second spray screening. The plants with normal growth were transplanted into pots for soil culture to obtain seeds. The screening procedure was repeated. The seeds were firstly soaked with 0.1% Basta solution for screening, followed by spraying the seedlings with 0.2% Basta solution for further screening until the homozygous transgenic lines of the T3 generation were screened. The transgenic-positive plants were confirmed by PCR using ScAMT1.1F (5’-TGGGTTCATGCTCAAGTCCG-3’) and ScAMT1.1R (5’-ATAACAGGGTAATGCGGCCC-3’) primers.

4.5. Determination of Enzyme Activities Involved in Ammonium Assimilation

The activities of the ammonium assimilation key enzymes GS, GOGAT, and GDH were measured in the transgenic and wild-type rice plantlets under low N stress for 16 days. The GS activity was measured according to the method of Wang et al. [34]. The activities of GOGAT and GDH enzymes were determined according to the experimental methods of Groat and Vance [35].

5. Conclusions

We characterized a sugarcane ammonium transporter gene, ScAMT1.1, with a significantly higher expression level in the low N-tolerant cultivar ROC22 than that in the low N-sensitive cultivar Badila under low N stress. The activity of ammonium assimilation key enzymes (GS and GDH) and the gene expression levels of ammonium assimilation key genes (GS1.1, GS1.2, GDH, Fd-GOGAT, and NADH-GOGAT2) in the transgenic rice were all significantly higher than those in the wild-type under low ammonium condition, indicating that the ScAMT1.1 has the ability to improve ammonium assimilation. Transgenic rice lines overexpressed ScAMT1.1 show superior growth and significantly higher grain yield under low N stress in the pot experiment. Taken together, it is suggested that ScAMT1.1 has the potential for improving ammonium assimilation, plant growth, and grain yield under low N fertilizer conditions; however, the potential for increasing production needs to be further verified in the field.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24021595/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G., Y.Y., L.X.; methodology, S.G., Y.Y., X.Z., M.F. and L.X.; software, S.G., Y.Y. and X.Z.; validation, S.G., Y.Y., Y.S. and J.G.; writing-original draft preparation, S.G. and Y.Y.; writing-review and editing, S.G., Y.Y., J.G., Y.S., L.X. and Y.Q.; supervision, Y.Y. and L.X.; project administration, L.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32101810, 31871690, 32272149), the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (2021J011238), the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFD1000500), and China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-17).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sonoda, Y.; Ikeda, A.; Saiki, S.; von Wiren, N.; Yamaya, T.; Yamaguchi, J. Distinct expression and function of three ammonium transporter genes (OsAMT1;1-1;3). Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Franco, H.C.J.; Otto, R.; Faroni, C.E.F.; Vitti, A.C.; de Oliveira, E.C.A.; Trivelin, P.C.O. Nitrogen in sugarcane derived from fertiliser under Brazilian field conditions. Field Crop. Res. 2011, 121, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kingston, G.; Anink, M.C.; Allen, D. Acquisition of nitrogen by ratoon crops of sugarcane as influenced by waterlogging and split applications. Proc. Conf. Aust. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 2008, 30, 202–211. [Google Scholar]
  4. Meyer, J.H.; Schumann, A.W.; Wood, R.A.; Nixon, D.; Van den Berg, M. Recent advances to improve nitrogen use efficiency of sugarcane in the South African sugar industry. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 2007, 26, 238–246. [Google Scholar]
  5. Robinson, N.; Brackin, R.; Vinall, K.; Soper, F.; Holst, J.; Gamage, H.; Paungfoo-Lonhienne, C.; Rennenberg, H.; Lakshmanan, P.; Schmidt, S. Nitrate paradigm does not hold up for sugarcane. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hirel, B.; Bertin, P.; Quilleré, I.; Bourdoncle, W.; Attagnant, C.; Dellay, C.; Gouy, A.; Cadiou, S.; Retailliau, C.; Falque, M.; et al. Towards a better understanding of the genetic and physiological basis for nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 1258–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wu, Z.L.; Gao, X.N.; Zhang, N.N.; Feng, X.M.; Huang, Y.H.; Zeng, Q.Y.; Wu, J.Y.; Zhang, J.S.; Qi, Y.W. Genome-wide identification and transcriptional analysis of ammonium transporters in Saccharum. Genomics 2021, 113, 1671–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bloom, A.J.; Sukrapanna, S.S.; Warner, R.L. Root respiration associated with ammonium and nitrate absorption and assimilation by barley. Plant Physiol. 1992, 99, 1294–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ranathunge, K.; El-Kereamy, A.; Gidda, S.; Bi, Y.M.; Rothstein, S.J. AMT1;1 transgenic rice plants with enhanced NH4+ permeability show superior growth and higher yield under optimal and suboptimal NH4+ conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 965–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, Y.Y.; Hsu, P.K.; Tsay, Y.F. Uptake, allocation and signaling of nitrate. Trends. Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kronzucker, H.J.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D.M. Kinetics of NH4+ influx in spruce. Plant Physiol. 1996, 110, 773–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Rennenberg, H.; Dannenmann, M.; Gessler, A.; Kreuzwieser, J.; Simon, J.; Papen, H. Nitrogen balance in forest soils: Nutritional limitation of plants under climate change stresses. Plant Biol. 2009, 11, 4–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Koegel, S.; Lahmidi, N.A.; Arnould, C.; Chatagnier, O.; Walder, F.; Ineichen, K.; Boller, T.; Wipf, D.; Wiemken, A.; Courty, P. The family of ammonium transporters (AMT) in Sorghum bicolor: Two AMT members are induced locally, but not systemically in roots colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 853–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ninnemann, O.; Jauniaux, J.C.; Frommer, W.B. Identification of a high affinity NH4+ transporter from plants. EMBO J. 1994, 13, 3464–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Giehl, R.F.H.; Laginha, A.M.; Duan, F.; Rentsch, D.; Yuan, L.; von Wire’n, N. A critical role of AMT2;1 in root-to-shoot translocation of ammonium in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2017, 10, 1449–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, C.; Tang, Z.; Wei, J.; Qu, H.Y.; Xie, Y.J.; Xu, G.H. The OsAMT1.1 gene functions in ammonium uptake and ammonium–potassium homeostasis over low and high ammonium concentration ranges. J. Genet. Genom. 2016, 43, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Esmaeilzadeh-Salestani, K.; Samandari-Bahraseman, M.R.; Tohidfar, M.; Khaleghdoust, B.; Keres, I.; Mottus, A.; Loit, E. Expression of AMT1.1 and AMT2.1 is stimulated by mineral nitrogen and reproductive growth stage in barley under field conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2022, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Engineer, C.B.; Kranz, R.G. Reciprocal leaf and root expression of AtAMT1.1 and root architectural changes in response to nitrogen starvation. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 236–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kaiser, B.N.; Rawat, S.R.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Masle, J.; Glass, A.D.M. Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis T-DNA “knockout” of the high-affinity NH4+ transporter AtAMT1;1. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 1263–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kumar, A.; Silim, S.N.; Okamoto, M.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D.M. Differential expression of three members of the AMT1 gene family encoding putative high-affinity NH4+ transporters in roots of Oryza sativa subspecies indica. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, A.; Kaiser, B.N.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D.M. Functional characterization of OsAMT1.1 overexpression lines of rice. Funct. Plant Biol. 2006, 33, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hoque, M.S.; Masle, J.; Udvardi, M.K.; Ryan, P.R.; Upadhyaya, N.M. Over-expression of the rice OsAMT1.1 gene increases ammonium uptake and content, but impairs growth and development of plants under high ammonium nutrition. Funct. Plant Biol. 2006, 33, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yang, Y.Y.; Gao, S.W.; Su, Y.C.; Lin, Z.L.; Guo, J.L.; Li, M.J.; Wang, Z.T.; Que, Y.X.; Xu, L.P. Transcripts and low nitrogen tolerance: Regulatory and metabolic pathways in sugarcane under low nitrogen stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 163, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ludewig, U. Ion transport versus gas conduction: Function of AMT/Rh-type proteins. Transfus. Clin. Biol. 2006, 13, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Marini, A.M.; Vissers, S.; Urrestarazu, A.; Andre, B. Cloning and expression of the MEP1 gene encoding an ammonium transporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1994, 13, 3456–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hao, D.L.; Zhou, J.Y.; Yang, S.Y.; Qi, W.; Yang, K.J.; Su, Y.H. Function and regulation of ammonium transporters in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Daryanto, S.; Wang, L.X.; Gilhooly, W.P.; Jacinthe, P.A. Nitrogen preference across generations under changing ammonium nitrate ratios. J. Plant Ecol. 2019, 12, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lanquar, V.; Loqué, D.; Hörmann, F.; Yuan, L.X.; Bohner, A.; Engelsberger, W.R.; Lalonde, S.; Schulze, W.X.; von Wirén, N.; Frommer, W.B. Feedback inhibition of ammonium uptake by a phospho-dependent allosteric mechanism in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009, 21, 3610–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tabuchi, M.; Abiko, T.; Yamaya, T. Assimilation of ammonium ions and reutilization of nitrogen in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2319–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ling, H.; Wu, Q.B.; Guo, J.L.; Xu, L.P.; Que, Y.X. Comprehensive selection of reference genes for gene expression normalization in sugarcane by real time quantitative RT-PCR. PLoS One 2014, 9, e97469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Shin, S.Y.; Jeong, J.S.; Lim, J.Y.; Kim, T.; Park, J.H.; Kim, J.K.; Shin, C. Transcriptomic analyses of rice (Oryza sativa) genes and non-coding RNAs under nitrogen starvation using multiple omics technologies. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jain, M.; Nijhawan, A.; Tyagi, A.K.; Khurana, J.P. Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 345, 646–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−△△Ct method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wang, G.L.; Ding, G.D.; Li, L.; Cai, H.M.; Ye, X.S.; Zou, J.; Xu, F.S. Identification and characterization of improved nitrogen efficiency in interspecific hybridized new-type Brassica napus. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Groat, R.G.; Vance, C.P. Root nodule enzymes of ammonia assimilation in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) developmental patterns and response to applied nitrogen. Plant Physiol. 1981, 67, 1198–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The expression patterns of the five AMT family DEGs between two sugarcane cultivars with contrastive NUE under low N condition. Notes: (AE) represent the expression patterns of ScAMT1.1, ScAMT1.2, ScAMT2.1, ScAMT3.2, and ScAMT3.3, respectively. The expression patterns determined by qRT-PCR (the ratio of DEGs expression level between low N treatment and their control groups, Ratio of low N treatment/CK) and RNA-Seq (in log2 Fold change) are shown on the left and right sides in the same figure, respectively. DRL and DBL (RLT vs. RLCK, DRL. BLT vs. BLCK, DBL) mean the DEGs in the leaves of ROC22 and Badila under low N treatment (0.6 mM N) for 6 h vs. 0 h (used as control), respectively. DRR and DBR (RRT vs. RRCK, DRR. BRT vs. BRCK, DBR) mean the DEGs in the roots of ROC22 and Badila under low N treatment (0.6 mM N) for 3 h vs. 0 h (used as control), respectively. Error bars represent ± standard error from the mean of three biological replicates. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. The expression patterns of the five AMT family DEGs between two sugarcane cultivars with contrastive NUE under low N condition. Notes: (AE) represent the expression patterns of ScAMT1.1, ScAMT1.2, ScAMT2.1, ScAMT3.2, and ScAMT3.3, respectively. The expression patterns determined by qRT-PCR (the ratio of DEGs expression level between low N treatment and their control groups, Ratio of low N treatment/CK) and RNA-Seq (in log2 Fold change) are shown on the left and right sides in the same figure, respectively. DRL and DBL (RLT vs. RLCK, DRL. BLT vs. BLCK, DBL) mean the DEGs in the leaves of ROC22 and Badila under low N treatment (0.6 mM N) for 6 h vs. 0 h (used as control), respectively. DRR and DBR (RRT vs. RRCK, DRR. BRT vs. BRCK, DBR) mean the DEGs in the roots of ROC22 and Badila under low N treatment (0.6 mM N) for 3 h vs. 0 h (used as control), respectively. Error bars represent ± standard error from the mean of three biological replicates. Different letters above columns indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 24 01595 g001
Figure 2. The conserved domain of the ScAMT1.1 gene.
Figure 2. The conserved domain of the ScAMT1.1 gene.
Ijms 24 01595 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationship of sugarcane ScAMT1.1 protein and AMTs from S. spontaneum, A. thaliana, O. sativa, and S. bicolor.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationship of sugarcane ScAMT1.1 protein and AMTs from S. spontaneum, A. thaliana, O. sativa, and S. bicolor.
Ijms 24 01595 g003
Figure 4. Sequence alignment of ScAMT1.1 and AMT1.1s from other species. Notes: S. bicolor (SbAMT1.1, AGK25010.1), Z. mays (ZmAMT1.1, NP_001140828.1), O. sativa (OsAMT1.1, Q7XQ12.1), T.aestivum (TaAMT1.1, AAS19466.2), G. max (GmAMT1.1, XP_003555734.1), and A. thaliana (AtAMT1.1, EFH51425.1).
Figure 4. Sequence alignment of ScAMT1.1 and AMT1.1s from other species. Notes: S. bicolor (SbAMT1.1, AGK25010.1), Z. mays (ZmAMT1.1, NP_001140828.1), O. sativa (OsAMT1.1, Q7XQ12.1), T.aestivum (TaAMT1.1, AAS19466.2), G. max (GmAMT1.1, XP_003555734.1), and A. thaliana (AtAMT1.1, EFH51425.1).
Ijms 24 01595 g004
Figure 5. Identification of transgenic-positive rice plants. Notes: (A), The seeds germinate during soaking with 0.1% Basta solution. (B), The typical phenotype of the leaves spraying with 0.2% Basta solution. (C), Analysis of PCR amplification products by gel electrophoresis. WT: wild-type; ScAMT1.1: ScAMT1.1-overexpressing transgenic rice. M: 2000 bp DNA marker; H: H2O (blank control); -: negative control (wild-type rice); +: positive control (pBWA(V)BU-ScAMT1.1 plasmid), 1–20: different transgenic rice lines. The PCR product for the target sequence is 512 base pairs.
Figure 5. Identification of transgenic-positive rice plants. Notes: (A), The seeds germinate during soaking with 0.1% Basta solution. (B), The typical phenotype of the leaves spraying with 0.2% Basta solution. (C), Analysis of PCR amplification products by gel electrophoresis. WT: wild-type; ScAMT1.1: ScAMT1.1-overexpressing transgenic rice. M: 2000 bp DNA marker; H: H2O (blank control); -: negative control (wild-type rice); +: positive control (pBWA(V)BU-ScAMT1.1 plasmid), 1–20: different transgenic rice lines. The PCR product for the target sequence is 512 base pairs.
Ijms 24 01595 g005
Figure 6. The transcription levels of ScAMT1.1 and the morphological parameters of the transgenic rice seedlings under low N stress. Notes: (A), Transcription level detection of the ScAMT1.1 gene in its transgenic rice plants. (BD) represent the phenotype, plant height, and fresh weight of the transgenic and wild-type rice seedlings under low N stress, respectively. T-2, T-5, T-6, and T-12 represent the different transgenic lines. WT, wild-type. Data were mean ± standard error of three biological replicates. Bars with different letters were significantly different at the p < 0.05 level.
Figure 6. The transcription levels of ScAMT1.1 and the morphological parameters of the transgenic rice seedlings under low N stress. Notes: (A), Transcription level detection of the ScAMT1.1 gene in its transgenic rice plants. (BD) represent the phenotype, plant height, and fresh weight of the transgenic and wild-type rice seedlings under low N stress, respectively. T-2, T-5, T-6, and T-12 represent the different transgenic lines. WT, wild-type. Data were mean ± standard error of three biological replicates. Bars with different letters were significantly different at the p < 0.05 level.
Ijms 24 01595 g006
Figure 7. The gene expression levels and enzyme activities of ammonium assimilation-related enzymes in the transgenic rice under low N stress. Notes: (A), The expression levels of ammonium assimilation-related enzyme genes in the transgenic rice under low N stress. (B), The activities of three ammonium assimilation-related enzymes in the transgenic rice under low N stress. WT: wild-type. T-5, T-6, T-12: different transgenic lines. Data were presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Bars with different letters were significantly different at the p < 0.05 level.
Figure 7. The gene expression levels and enzyme activities of ammonium assimilation-related enzymes in the transgenic rice under low N stress. Notes: (A), The expression levels of ammonium assimilation-related enzyme genes in the transgenic rice under low N stress. (B), The activities of three ammonium assimilation-related enzymes in the transgenic rice under low N stress. WT: wild-type. T-5, T-6, T-12: different transgenic lines. Data were presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Bars with different letters were significantly different at the p < 0.05 level.
Ijms 24 01595 g007
Figure 8. Phenotype and yield components of the transgenic rice in the pot experiment under low N stress. Notes: (A), The phenotype of the transgenic rice at the late filling stage under low N stress. (B,C), The number of filled grains and grain yield per plant of the transgenic rice under low N stress, respectively. WT: wild-type. T-5, T-6, and T-12: different transgenic lines. Data were presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Bars with different letters were significantly different at the p < 0.05 level.
Figure 8. Phenotype and yield components of the transgenic rice in the pot experiment under low N stress. Notes: (A), The phenotype of the transgenic rice at the late filling stage under low N stress. (B,C), The number of filled grains and grain yield per plant of the transgenic rice under low N stress, respectively. WT: wild-type. T-5, T-6, and T-12: different transgenic lines. Data were presented as the mean ± standard error (n = 3). Bars with different letters were significantly different at the p < 0.05 level.
Ijms 24 01595 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gao, S.; Yang, Y.; Guo, J.; Zhang, X.; Feng, M.; Su, Y.; Que, Y.; Xu, L. Ectopic Expression of Sugarcane ScAMT1.1 Has the Potential to Improve Ammonium Assimilation and Grain Yield in Transgenic Rice under Low Nitrogen Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021595

AMA Style

Gao S, Yang Y, Guo J, Zhang X, Feng M, Su Y, Que Y, Xu L. Ectopic Expression of Sugarcane ScAMT1.1 Has the Potential to Improve Ammonium Assimilation and Grain Yield in Transgenic Rice under Low Nitrogen Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(2):1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021595

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gao, Shiwu, Yingying Yang, Jinlong Guo, Xu Zhang, Minxie Feng, Yachun Su, Youxiong Que, and Liping Xu. 2023. "Ectopic Expression of Sugarcane ScAMT1.1 Has the Potential to Improve Ammonium Assimilation and Grain Yield in Transgenic Rice under Low Nitrogen Stress" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 2: 1595. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021595

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop