Next Article in Journal
microRNA Expression of Renal Proximal Tubular Epithelial Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles in an Inflammatory Microenvironment In Vitro
Next Article in Special Issue
Plants and Mushrooms as Possible New Sources of H2S Releasing Sulfur Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Macrophage Function Modulated by tPA Signaling in Mouse Experimental Kidney Disease Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Erucin, an H2S-Releasing Isothiocyanate, Exerts Anticancer Effects in Human Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Triggering Autophagy-Dependent Apoptotic Cell Death
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 13
10.3390/ijms241311063
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Glutathione Dithiophosphates as Long-Acting H2S Donors

by
Rezeda A. Ishkaeva
1,2,
Nail N. Khaertdinov
1,
Aleksey V. Yakovlev
1,
Marina V. Esmeteva
1,2,
Diana V. Salakhieva
1,2,
Ilyas S. Nizamov
3,4,
Guzel F. Sitdikova
1,* and
Timur I. Abdullin
1,2
1
Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., 420008 Kazan, Russia
2
Scientific and Educational Center of Pharmaceutics, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., 420008 Kazan, Russia
3
Alexander Butlerov Institute of Chemistry, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, 420008 Kazan, Russia
4
Arbuzov Institute of Organic and Physical Chemistry, FRC Kazan Scientific Center of RAS, 8 Arbuzov St., 420088 Kazan, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 11063; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311063
Submission received: 10 June 2023 / Revised: 28 June 2023 / Accepted: 30 June 2023 / Published: 4 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)-Donor Molecules: Chemical, Biological, and Therapeutical Tools)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Considering the important cytoprotective and signaling roles but relatively narrow therapeutic index of hydrogen sulfide (H2S), advanced H2S donors are required to achieve a therapeutic effect. In this study, we proposed glutathione dithiophosphates as new combination donors of H2S and glutathione. The kinetics of H2S formation in dithiophosphate solutions suggested a continuous H2S release by the donors, which was higher for the dithiophosphate of reduced glutathione than oxidized glutathione. The compounds, unlike NaHS, inhibited the proliferation of C2C12 myoblasts at submillimolar concentrations due to an efficient increase in intracellular H2S. The H2S donors more profoundly affected reactive oxygen species and reduced glutathione levels in C2C12 myocytes, in which these parameters were elevated compared to myoblasts. Oxidized glutathione dithiophosphate as well as control donors exerted antioxidant action toward myocytes, whereas the effect of reduced glutathione dithiophosphate at (sub-)micromolar concentrations was rather modulating. This dithiophosphate showed an enhanced negative inotropic effect mediated by H2S upon contraction of the atrial myocardium, furthermore, its activity was prolonged and reluctant for washing. These findings identify glutathione dithiophosphates as redox-modulating H2S donors with long-acting profile, which are of interest for further pharmacological investigation.

1. Introduction

As a gasotransmitter, H2S plays an important regulatory role in various physiological processes and functions in cardiovascular, nervous, gastrointestinal and other systems [1,2]. Some mechanisms of H2S action involve the regulation of membrane potential via interaction with ion channels and membrane receptors, gene expression through several pathways (PI3K/Akt, NF-κB, MAPK), cellular bioenergetics and proliferation, endocytotic and exocytotic processes [2,3,4]. H2S signaling is mediated by its redox reactions with cysteine residues in proteins [5] and formation of labile metabolites such as persulfides and (hydro-)polysulfides [6,7]. H2S has documented antioxidant and cytoprotective properties attributed to a direct reducing and radical-scavenging ability as well as the conversion of endogenic thiols to sulfane sulfur species with increased reactivity and lower susceptibility to irreversible oxidation [6,8].
Impaired H2S biosynthesis is implicated in different pathological conditions often associated with decreased expression and activity of H2S-synthesizing enzymes, namely cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) and cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE). Decreased H2S levels were reported upon hypertension [9], diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases [10] and myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) [11].
Blood plasma H2S levels were shown to be significantly lower in patients with coronary heart disease and heart failure in comparison with healthy individuals [12]. Both the plasma concentration of H2S and plasma capability for H2S production were reduced in streptozotocin-treated diabetic rats. Similarly, decreased H2S in the plasma of type 2 diabetic patients was reported [13].
The use of exogenic H2S in the form of donors was recognized as an important strategy for treating the aforementioned and other diseases. The state of the art in bioactive H2S donors is presented in recent reviews [1,14]. A series of proof-of-concept studies on the pharmacological effects of H2S in vitro and in vivo was performed using inorganic sulfide donors such as NaHS and Na2S [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. These donors provide fast extracellular release of H2S and therefore have restricted therapeutic potential. Garlic-derived polysulfides were shown to mitigate IRI in mice and hyperglycemia-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated apoptosis but were considered relatively toxic [23].
Particular efforts were focused on the development of advanced H2S donors generally in the form of pro-drugs or hybrid molecules with existing drugs, which are intensively studied in preclinical models, and some of them progressed into clinical trials [15]. In particular, ACS15 represents a diclofenac conjugate with H2S-releasing dithiol-thione moiety with enhanced multiple anti-inflammatory effects and decreased gastric toxicity [24].
Many H2S-releasing agents are reductant-sensitive so that abundant natural thiols such as cysteine-containing molecules can promote slow H2S generation [25]. A series of thiol-responsive H2S-releasing agents were designed on the base of perthiol [26], arylthioamide [27] and N-(benzoylthio) benzamide [28]. These donors were shown to protect myocardium upon IRI in mice [26] and exert beneficial effects in cardiovascular in vitro and in vivo models including a reduction in systolic blood pressure [27]. In spite of encouraging preclinical data, the therapeutic potential of such thiol-activated compounds can be restricted by deficient reduced glutathione (GSH) levels in cardiovascular diseases [29].
As a part of other approaches to the development of H2S pro-drugs, enzyme-sensitive agents (e.g., HP-101, Esterase-TCM-SA, NTR-H2S) [30] and pH-sensitive ones (e.g., JK-1~5) [31] were synthesized. In particular, the latter donors have been designed to preferably release H2S at low acidic conditions (pH < 6) revealed during IRI to potentiate their local protective effect [31]. While most newly proposed H2S donors are laboratory-synthesized ones, there are few commercially available agents for research purposes, e.g., morpholin-4-ium 4 methoxyphenyl(morpholino) phosphinodithioate (GYY4137) [32]. This donor features a slow release rate, requiring increased doses to achieve therapeutic H2S levels, and thus poses increased risks of adverse effects [16,33,34].
There is still a need for improved H2S donors with greater specificity and safety profile. Considering physiologically relevant redox conversions between H2S and thiol-based molecules and their role in H2S signaling, a promising strategy to modulate the activity of H2S donors could rely on their combination with glutathione. In addition to H2S, exogenic glutathione and its derivatives have proven cytoprotective, antidegenerative, antiviral and other beneficial activities [35,36,37,38].
We recently synthesized glutathione dithiophosphates, which are bioactive amphiphilic ammonium salts of the tripeptide and dithiophosphoric acid capable of generating H2S, glutathione and products of their redox exchange [39]. Their properties as a H2S donor have not been elucidated to date. This primary study is focused on the characterization of the H2S-releasing profile of the glutathione dithiophosphates as well as their effects on muscle cell responses and myocardium contraction. The results suggest glutathione dithiophosphates as a new type of long-acting H2S donors, which are of considerable interest for further pharmacological investigation.

2. Results

2.1. Cytotoxicity of Glutathione Dithiophosphates

Glutathione dithiophosphates are salt compounds obtained as a result of the ionic interaction between the protonated NH2 group of Glu residue of glutathione and the ionized S-H group of O,O-dimenthyl derivative of dithiophosphoric acid (DTP). The dithiophosphates of reduced glutathione and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) were designated as GSH–DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2, respectively (for their structure, see Section 4.1. of Materials and Methods). Previously, the compounds were found to undergo gradual dissociation in aqueous solution accompanied by the hydrolysis of free DTP components to phosphoric acid, menthol and H2S [39].
According to the MTT assay, GSH–DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2 at submillimolar concentrations inhibited the proliferation of C2C12 murine myoblast cells with IC50 values of 56.5 ± 1.3 μM and 41.0 ± 1.2 μM, respectively (Figure 1). The control agents showed lower (DTP) and no activity (NaHS) under the same conditions. The effect of dithiophosphates on cell viability was attributed to the release of relatively cytotoxic H2S. The increased activity of GSH–DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2 could be associated with their H2S donation ability as well as the cellular availability of the unhydrolyzed compounds.

2.2. H2S-Releasing Profile

The kinetics of H2S release by the glutathione dithiophosphates was studied using a 7-azido-4-methylcoumarin (AzMC) probe. The concentration of GSSG–(DTP)2 was normalized by one GSH/DTP moiety for a relevant comparison with GSH–DTP and DTP. The compounds were found to sustainably generate H2S with the following efficacy: DTP < GSSG–(DTP)2 < GSH–DTP (Figure 2A). GSH–DTP exhibited complex kinetics with a fast stepwise reaction during the first hour, which slowed down smoothly afterwards. GSSG–(DTP)2 and DTP provided smoother release profiles, where the reaction of DTP decayed more rapidly.
Unlike the synthesized compounds, NaHS, an immediate H2S donor, did not show a time-dependent increase in AzMC fluorescence. The relationships of this signal and the concentration of the probe and NaHS (Figure 2B,C) suggested that H2S content released by 1 mM glutathione dithiophosphates for 2 hrs was around 1 μM (given that ca. 11–13% of NaHS equivalents are converted into H2S [4]). These data show that GSH–DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2 are long-acting H2S donors with somewhat different release profiles.

2.3. Effect on Cellular H2S

Change in H2S content in C2C12 myoblasts exposed to the glutathione dithiophosphates was assessed at a pre-optimized concentration of 10 μM and exposure time of 20 min. Figure 3 shows the relative fluorescence intensities of the treated cells and representative laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) images; other images are provided in Figure S1 (Supplementary Material). The results demonstrate that the synthesized donors are capable of a moderate increase in cellular H2S in a similar manner by 1.2–1.3 times. Under the same conditions, NaHS significantly elevated the H2S level only at an excessive concentration, i.e., 1 mM (by a factor of ca. 1.5) (Figure 3). Although these data do not allow us to compare the studied compounds, they suggest that the glutathione dithiophosphates are cellular H2S donors, which act at a lower concentration than NaHS.

2.4. Effect on Cellular GSH and ROS

Considering the existing relationships between cellular H2S and redox state, the effect of glutathione dithiophosphates on GSH and ROS content in C2C12 cells was assessed before and after cell differentiation. According to monochlorobimane (MCB) and DCFDA fluorecence, myocytes had higher GSH and ROS levels than myoblasts by ca. 1.2 and 5 times, respectively (Figure S2), reflecting the alteration of cell redox state after differentiation. Short-term cell exposure to the compared donors in an antioxidant-free solution (HBSS) resulted in the noticeable modulation of both GSH and ROS levels, i.e., their increase or decrease depending on conditions. In myoblasts, only GSH–DTP at an upper concentration of 10 μM caused a profound decrease in GSH content comparable to that observed for an excess of added GSH (10 mM) (Figure 4A). Such an effect can be attributed to the unbalanced increase in cellular GSH leading to reductive stress and decreased cell viability, although without noticeable ROS overproduction (Figure 5A).
In myocytes, both GSH–DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2 decreased the GSH level similarly in the concentration range studied (0.1–10 μM), whereas among the control agents, only 1 mM NaHS caused a comparable effect (Figure 4B). NaHS, DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2 showed inhibitory activity against overproduced ROS in myocytes, whereas GSH–DTP featured a modulating concentration-dependent effect from low antioxidant (0.1 μM) to noticeable prooxidant (10 μM) (Figure 5B).
Together, these data indicate that the glutathione dithiophosphates exhibit variable in vitro effects on GSH and ROS, which can be both anti- and prooxidant depending on the initial redox form and concentration of the compounds as well as the cell state.

2.5. Effect on Contractile Activity of Myocardium Stripes

Contractile activity of isolated rat right atrial myocardium stripes exposed to the compounds was studied as established earlier [41,42]. The application of NaHS at a pre-optimized concentration of 200 μM induced a rapid H2S-mediated decrease in atria contraction (Figure 6A,C). The negative inotropic effect of NaHS was observed from the first minutes of application, while the contractile force decreased to an amplitude as follows (hereinafter, relative to initial values) 84 ± 2% (10 min), 73 ± 2% (20 min) and 68 ± 3% (30 min, n = 6; p < 0.05), which corresponded to the maximum effect maintained for up to 8 min (Figure 6C,E). Afterwards, the contraction amplitude started to recover due to H2S evaporation [4,43], and after washout, it was as high as 97 ± 4% by 20–30 min (p > 0.05, Figure 6C).
The treatment with 200 μM GSH did not significantly change the contractile force (101 ± 1%, n = 8) up to 60 min (Figure S3), whereas GSH–DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2 as well as DTP at the same concentration showed a profound negative inotropic effect attributed to H2S release.
DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2 decreased the contractile force relatively more slowly. In the case of DTP, the amplitudes were 90 ± 4% (10 min), 74 ± 2% (20 min) and 66 ± 2% (30 min) with a maximum effect of 64 ± 3% (n = 6, p < 0.05). The washout restored the amplitude to 74 ± 4% (n = 6, p < 0.05, Figure 6E). The corresponding values for GSSG–(DTP)2 were 92 ± 3% (10 min), 84 ± 4% (20 min) and finally 70 ± 6% (30 min). The washout restored the amplitude to 90 ± 6% (n = 9, p < 0.05; Figure 6E).
In the presence of GSH–DTP, the contractile force decreased to 81 ± 5% (10 min), 70 ± 6% (20 min), 63 ± 7% (30 min) and 53 ± 9% (60 min), whereas the amplitude was slightly recovered during washout (and at least 25 min afterward) to 57 ± 12% (n = 6, p < 0.05, Figure 6B,D). Moreover, all the DTP derivatives inhibited the maximum velocity of contraction (MVC) and relaxation (MVR) in a similar manner to NaHS, but to a somewhat higher extent (Figure 6F,G).

3. Discussion

This study identifies GSH–DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2 as effective H2S donors, which act at cellular and tissue levels. The compounds generate H2S in a sustained manner unlike fast-releasing salts such as NaHS/Na2S [44]. As was recently shown, they give rise to natural products in aqueous solutions [39] and expectedly have a decreased risk of adverse effects compared to xenobiotic donors. H2S is produced by the glutathione dithiophosphates upon gradual dissociation and hydrolysis of the DTP component, which in the case of free DTP occurs immediately. However, the current results suggest the continuous release of H2S in all dithiophosphate solutions (Figure 2A), indicating the formation of a DTP-derived sulfur-containing intermediate, which is gradually converted into H2S. The glutathione component of the dithiophosphates, although decreasing DTP hydrolysis [39], profoundly promoted H2S production by GSH–DTP (Figure 2A) presumably via a redox reaction of GSH with this intermediate. The latter reaction could explain a partial oxidation of the glutathione pool in GSH–DTP, whereas the interaction with generated H2S should underlie a partial reduction in this pool in GSSG–(DTP)2 according to previous data on redox conversions of the dithiophosphates [39]. Both reactions were accompanied by the formation of GSH persulfide (GSSH) (unpublished data), which is also in accordance with reported data on the interaction of glutathione with H2S and its derivatives [45,46,47].
Importantly, the glutathione dithiophosphates are envisaged as combination donors of H2S and GSH, both considered cytoprotective molecules. In addition to the therapeutic effects of H2S reviewed in the Section 1 [15,16,25,48,49], the administration of GSH per se or as prodrugs and derivatives was shown to provide beneficial effects upon different traumatic, degenerative and viral diseases [35,36,37,38].
To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of reports on the joint therapeutic potential of H2S and glutathione [50]. We hypothesized that their effects can complement each other, e.g., via the generation of GSSH as a key mediator of H2S bioactivities, which reversibly traps and liberates H2S, reaching a relatively high concentration in the brain (>100 μM) and the myocardium (ca. 50 μM) [51]. Compared to GSH, GSSH possesses higher nucleophilic properties, making it a better antioxidant, but which may exhibit electrophilic behavior and act as a prooxidant [6]. In addition to providing GSH and H2S molecules involved in biorelevant interactions, the glutathione dithiophosphates have increased lipophilicity contributed by the menthyl groups of DTP and shielding the amino group of Glu residue upon salt formation. Menthol was selected to design the dithiophosphates as a pharmaceutically relevant but low-active modifier compared to other constituents. The highly hydrophilic nature of GSH restricts its passive diffusion across the cell plasma membrane, commonly requiring modification of the tripeptide or its combination with a carrier to improve cellular uptake [38].
The glutathione dithiophosphates are expected to provide increased effective concentrations of H2S, e.g., via mechanisms associated with cellular availability and sustained release of H2S. This is supported by the increased cell growth inhibitory activity of GSH–DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2 and, to a lesser extent, DTP compared to NaHS (Figure 1) and GSH. Presumably, the activity is determined by released H2S which exhibits cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic activities in increased doses due to the inhibition of complex IV of ETC and ATP production [52]. Furthermore, although at relatively low doses, both H2S [5] and glutathione [35] were shown to exert cyto- and tissue-protective properties, their excessive amounts may cause redox imbalance finally leading to oxidative stress [53,54].
According to AzMC fluorescence (Figure 3), the dithiophosphates were capable of a moderate increase in cellular H2S. The effect of donors appeared upon short-term cell exposure presumably under non-equilibrium conditions, complicating the comparison of cell responses. Nevertheless, these results suggest that in comparison with NaHS, the dithiophosphates donate H2S at a lower concentration as if some non-hydrolyzed molecules delivered and acted intracellularly. The existing reports provide quite variable data on donor-mediated change in cellular H2S depending on the properties of donors and fluorescent probes and the assay conditions [55,56,57,58,59,60].
Considering the redox activity of H2S and glutathione, cellular effects of the dithiophosphates were additionally assessed according to changes in intracellular levels of ROS and GSH. For this purpose, C2C12 myoblasts and myocytes were used as a useful in vitro model of skeletal and cardiac muscles under physiological and pathological conditions [61,62,63,64,65]. These cells were used to study skeletal muscle atrophy due to apoptosis, oxidative stress and inflammation and to assess myoprotective molecules [66,67]. The cytoprotective activity of NaHS was recently shown in homocysteine-treated C2C12 myoblasts and untreated C2C12 myotubes, where released H2S, respectively, reversed oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stresses [68] and caused the upregulation of antioxidant-related genes, also decreasing ROS and homocysteine levels [69].
The differentiation of C2C12 cells was accompanied by a considerable ROS overproduction as well as a moderate and probably compensatory increase in GSH levels in accordance with earlier observations [70,71]. Exogenic GSH at excessive concentrations was also used to probe the cell redox state via changes in MCB fluorescence [40]. The detected decrease in the MCB signal of GSH-treated cells (Figure 4) suggests a saturated GSH pool in intact myoblasts and myocytes, meaning that its excessive elevation could provoke reductive stress [72,73,74].
The effects of dithiophosphates and NaHS were assessed in different concentration ranges, i.e., 0.1–10 μM and 0.1–1 mM, respectively, given the noticeable difference in their activities. The myocytes exposed to GSH–DTP, GSSG–(DTP)2 and NaHS showed a decreased MCB signal (Figure 4B), presumably due to redox imbalancing of the cells, similarly to that induced by exogenic GSH. The effect was observed only at upper concentrations of NaHS and weakly depended on the concentration of the glutathione derivatives. DTP did not significantly decrease the MCB signal in myocytes (Figure 4B). Furthermore, the donors affected the ROS level in myocytes differently, decreasing it in the case of GSSG–(DTP)2, DTP, GSH and NaHS and modulating it in the case of GSH–DTP (Figure 5B).
The results suggest that the compounds are potentially capable of inhibiting overproduced ROS in myocytes, which can be accompanied by a decrease in GSH content. GSSG–(DTP)2 and especially GSH–DTP tend to cause more complicated responses attributed to enhanced redox-modulating activity. These data are in accordance with concentration-dependent anti- and prooxidant properties of H2S in vitro and in vivo [75,76,77].
Considering the regulatory role of H2S in myocardial contractile activity [18,78,79,80], the inotropic function of the rat atrial myocardium in the presence of synthesized donors was evaluated in comparison with NaHS with established activity.
Previously, the dose-dependent inhibition of myocardium relaxation was revealed in isolated Langendorff hearts of frogs and rats treated with NaHS [19,20,81]. Furthermore, NaHS and L-cysteine decreased the contractility of isolated mouse atrium, while it was partially restored by glibenclamide [42], the inhibitor of K(ATP) channels. In single cardiomyocytes isolated from rat ventricles, NaHS reduced Ca2+-transients and contractions as well as the action potential amplitude [17,21].
Similar to NaHS, the dithiophosphates ensured a negative inotropic effect, decreasing the maximum velocity of the contraction and relaxation. However, the effect of the latter donors progressed more slowly and steadily, reaching a higher inhibition of the contractile force in the case of GSH–DTP and DTP (Figure 6 and Figure S3). This supports a more sustained release of H2S by the dithiophosphates in myocardium tissues compared to NaHS, which generates H2S in several seconds as a result of the dissociation and interaction of HS− ions formed with H+ [82]. Depending on the pH, temperature and salinity, only 11–13% of HS− are converted to H2S, and up to 50% of H2S is evaporated within 3 minutes [4,83,84]. The negative lusitropic effects of H2S are probably mediated by the S-sulfhydration of phospholamban, a key regulator of contraction and relaxation via Ca2+ uptake in the sarcoplasmic reticulum [19,83].
Altogether, these data suggest that the dithiophosphates are effective H2S donors with more sustained effect on atrial contraction compared to NaHS. Among them, GSH–DTP showed both the highest and most prolonged activity in accordance with its higher H2S donation potential (Figure 2A). The inferior activity of GSSG–(DTP)2 compared to both GSH–DTP and DTP could presumably be attributed to its lower availability at the tissue level or other factors associated with in situ redox conversions of released H2S and the glutathione component. Clarification of the specific activities of GSH–DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2 will be performed elsewhere.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

Reduced glutathione (purity 98%) and methanol was purchased from Acros Organ-ics (Geel, Belgium). Monochlorobimane (MCB) dye was purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). 7-azido-4-methylcoumarin (AzMC), sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) and 3-(4,5-dimethyl-thiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Milli-Q grade water (Milli-Q® Advantage A10, Merck Millipore, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used to prepare buffers and solutions. Cell culture media and reagents were purchased from Paneco (Moscow, Russia) and Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Ammonium salts of glutathione and O,O-(–)-dimenthyl dithiophosphoric acid (Figure 7) were synthesized and characterized as detailed earlier [39]. Stock solutions of the compounds were prepared in methanol.

4.2. Cell Culture and Viability Assessment

C2C12 immortalized mouse myoblast cell line (Institute of Cytology Russian Academy of Science) was used. The cells were cultured aseptically in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 4.5 g/L glucose, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C in humidified air atmosphere with 5% CO2.
Cell viability was assessed using an MTT proliferation assay [85] upon culturing in the presence of H2S donors in a concentration range of 0.05–100 μM for 72 h. Cell viability was presented in percent relative to untreated cells (100% viability). Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were calculated from concentration–viability relationships using GraphPad Prizm 5 software. The data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
For cell differentiation into myocytes, the medium was replaced by DMEM containing 2% horse serum, 1 g/L glucose, 1% L-glutamine, 0.4 μg/mL dexamethasone, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin [86]. Over the course of 5 days, the cells were morphologically differentiated and fused to form myotubes.

4.3. Detection of H2S Release

The kinetics of H2S release by the glutathione dithiophosphates was studied in PBS (pH = 7.4) using a 7-azido-4-methylcoumarin (AzMC) probe. H2S donors (1 mM) were dissolved in PBS, mixed AzMC probe (10 μM) and incubated at room temperature for 4 h. The emission spectra of AzMC were recorded on an FL3-221-NIR spectrofluorometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon, Kyoto, Japan) using a 1 cm quartz cuvette at λex = 365 nm. The fluorescence intensity of AzMC in the presence of compounds was measured every 5 min.

4.4. Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LSCM)

C2C12 myoblasts were grown overnight on coverslips in a 6-well plate at a density of 50 × 103 cells per coverslip. LSCM analysis of the cells was performed in an Attofluor™ cell chamber (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and using an LSM 780 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with a 405 nm laser. The cells were stained with 10 µM AzMC in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) for 30 min followed by treatment with 10 µM dithiophosphates or 100 µM NaHS for 20 min. The relative fluorescence of the cells in LSCM images was calculated using NIH ImageJ 1.48v software and presented as mean ± SD (n = 12). Statistical significance was determined via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s Multiple Comparison post-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).

4.5. GSH and ROS Detection

The effects of compounds on cytoplasmic ROS and reduced glutathione (GSH) levels were analyzed with DCFDA and MCB probes, respectively, as detailed previously [40,85]. The cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at a density of 20 × 103 cells per well in the culture medium and were grown overnight. The cells were exposed to GSH (1, 10 mM), NaHS (0.1, 1 mM) or dithiophosphates (0.1–1 μM) for 1 h in HBSS, followed by staining with 5 µM MCB for 1 h or 20 μM DCFDA for 20 min in CO2-incubator. Cell fluorescence intensity was registered at λex/em = 380/480 nm (MCB) and λex/em = 490/526 nm (DCFDA) on an Infinite M200 PRO microplate analyzer (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). Relative GSH and ROS levels were presented in percent versus untreated cells (100%) as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a Bonferroni post-test to compare replicate means by row (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).

4.6. Study of Isolated Rat Right Atrial Contraction

Animal experiments were performed using Wistar rats (250–300 g) in accordance with the EU Directive 2010/63/EU and approved by the Local Ethical Committee of Kazan Federal University (protocol No 33 from 25 November 2021). The rats were euthanized under deep isoflurane anesthesia, and the right atria were dissected from the heart. Atrial strips of 4–6 mm in length and 2–3 mm in thickness were vertically mounted in a 20 mL chamber with Tyrode’s solution composed of (mM): NaCl = 130, KCl = 5.6, NaH2PO4 = 0.6, MgCl2 = 1.1, CaCl2 = 1.8, NaHCO3 = 20 and glucose = 11, pH = 7.4. The solution was bubbled with carbogen (95% O2, 5% CO2). The atrial stripes were stimulated via two platinum electrodes at a frequency of 0.1 Hz. Muscle contraction was recorded using a transducer TSD 125C (Biopac Systems Inc., Goleta, CA, USA) and analyzed using a computerized recording system as described previously [41,87,88].
Following equilibration for 30–60 min to stabilize atrial contraction, H2S donors were applied at a concentration of 200 μM, and the measurements were repeated. The registered responses were normalized relative to the control contraction. The lack of effect of solvent used (0.001% methanol in Tyrode’s solution) was confirmed. The amplitude of contraction, maximal velocity of contraction (MVC) and maximal velocity of relaxation (MVR) were analyzed. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M (n = 6–8). To test the normal distribution of the data, the Fisher F-test and Shapiro–Wilk test were applied using OriginPro 8.5 software. To compare two independent groups and paired data, the Mann–Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon matched pairs test were used, respectively.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241311063/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.F.S. and T.I.A.; validation, R.A.I., N.N.K., A.V.Y., M.V.E., D.V.S. and I.S.N.; formal analysis, R.A.I., N.N.K., A.V.Y., M.V.E., D.V.S. and I.S.N.; investigation, N.N.K., A.V.Y., M.V.E., D.V.S. and I.S.N.; writing—original draft preparation, R.A.I., N.N.K., A.V.Y., G.F.S. and T.I.A.; writing—review and editing, R.A.I., A.V.Y., G.F.S. and T.I.A.; supervision, G.F.S. and T.I.A.; project administration, T.I.A.; funding acquisition, N.N.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the subsidy allocated to Kazan Federal University (KFU) for the state assignment in the sphere of scientific activities (project FZSM-2022-0020) and was supported by RSF #23-26-00167 (study of contractile activity of myocardium stripes).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Experimental protocols were performed in accordance with the European Community Council Directive of 22 September 2010 (2010/63/EEC), and the Local Ethics Committee of Kazan Federal University (protocol No 33 from 25 November 2021) approved the animal study protocol.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Abdulla Yergeshov and Amina Daminova for the microscopy analyses at the Interdisciplinary Center for Analytical Microscopy (KFU). This work is part of the Kazan Federal University strategic academic leadership program.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hermann, A.; Sitdikova, G.F.; Weiger, T.M. Gasotransmitters: Physiology and Pathophysiology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cirino, G.; Szabo, C.; Papapetropoulos, A. Physiological roles of hydrogen sulfide in mammalian cells, tissues, and organs. Physiol. Rev. 2023, 103, 31–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, J.; Mesfin, F.M.; Hunter, C.E.; Olson, K.R.; Shelley, W.C.; Brokaw, J.P.; Manohar, K.; Markel, T.A. Recent Development of the Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Hydrogen Sulfide Gasotransmitter. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sitdikova, G.F.; Fuchs, R.; Kainz, V.; Weiger, T.M.; Hermann, A. Phosphorylation of BK channels modulates the sensitivity to hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Front. Physiol. 2014, 5, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kabil, O.; Motl, N.; Banerjee, R. H2S and its role in redox signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Proteins Proteom. 2014, 1844, 1355–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Cuevasanta, E.; Benchoam, D.; Semelak, J.A.; Möller, M.N.; Zeida, A.; Trujillo, M.; Alvarez, B.; Estrin, D.A. Possible molecular basis of the biochemical effects of cysteine-derived persulfides. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 975988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kimura, H. Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) and Polysulfide (H2Sn) Signaling: The First 25 Years. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Iciek, M.; Kowalczyk-Pachel, D.; Bilska-Wilkosz, A.; Kwiecień, I.; Górny, M.; Włodek, L. S-sulfhydration as a cellular redox regulation. Biosci. Rep. 2016, 36, e00304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, G.; Wu, L.; Jiang, B.; Yang, W.; Qi, J.; Cao, K.; Meng, Q.; Mustafa, A.K.; Mu, W.; Zhang, S.; et al. H2S as a Physiologic Vasorelaxant: Hypertension in Mice with Deletion of Cystathionine γ-Lyase. Science 2008, 322, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Alsaeedi, A.; Welham, S.; Rose, P.; Zhu, Y.-Z. The Impact of Drugs on Hydrogen Sulfide Homeostasis in Mammals. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, Y.; Yao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Kang, K.; Sun, L.; Sun, X. The protective role of hydrogen sulfide in myocardial ischemia–reperfusion-induced injury in diabetic rats. Int. J. Cardiol. 2011, 152, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kolluru, G.K.; Shackelford, R.E.; Shen, X.; Dominic, P.; Kevil, C.G. Sulfide regulation of cardiovascular function in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2023, 20, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jain, S.K.; Bull, R.; Rains, J.L.; Bass, P.F.; Levine, S.N.; Reddy, S.; McVie, R.; Bocchini, J.A. Low Levels of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Blood of Diabetes Patients and Streptozotocin-Treated Rats Causes Vascular Inflammation? Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 12, 1333–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, R. Two’s company, three’s a crowd: Can H2S be the third endogenous gaseous transmitter? FASEB J. 2002, 16, 1792–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Wallace, J.L.; Vaughan, D.; Dicay, M.; MacNaughton, W.K.; de Nucci, G. Hydrogen Sulfide-Releasing Therapeutics: Translation to the Clinic. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2017, 28, 1533–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, Y.W.; Deng, N.H.; Tian, K.J.; Liu, L.S.; Wang, Z.; Wei, D.H.; Liu, H.T.; Jiang, Z.S. Development of hydrogen sulfide donors for anti-atherosclerosis therapeutics research: Challenges and future priorities. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 909178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, Y.-G.; Cao, Y.-X.; Wang, W.-W.; Ma, S.-F.; Yao, T.; Zhu, Y.-C. Hydrogen sulphide is an inhibitor of L-type calcium channels and mechanical contraction in rat cardiomyocytes. Cardiovasc. Res. 2008, 79, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hu, Q.; Lukesh, J.C. H2S Donors with Cytoprotective Effects in Models of MI/R Injury and Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mazza, R.; Pasqua, T.; Cerra, M.C.; Angelone, T.; Gattuso, A. Akt/eNOS signaling and PLN S-sulfhydration are involved in H2S-dependent cardiac effects in frog and rat. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2013, 305, R443–R451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sitdikova, G.F.; Khaertdinov, N.N.; Zefirov, A.L. Role of Calcium and Potassium Channels in Effects of Hydrogen Sulfide on Frog Myocardial Contractility. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2011, 151, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abramochkin, D.V.; Moiseenko, L.S.; Kuzmin, V.S. The Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide on Electrical Activity of Rat Atrial Myocardium. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2009, 147, 683–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, W.; Wang, R. H2S-induced vasorelaxation and underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 2002, 283, H474–H480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Banerjee, S.K.; Maulik, S.K. Effect of garlic on cardiovascular disorders: A review. Nutr. J. 2002, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, L.; Rossoni, G.; Sparatore, A.; Lee, L.C.; Del Soldato, P.; Moore, P.K. Anti-inflammatory and gastrointestinal effects of a novel diclofenac derivative. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2007, 42, 706–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Powell, C.R.; Dillon, K.M.; Matson, J.B. A review of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donors: Chemistry and potential therapeutic applications. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 149, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, Y.; Bhushan, S.; Yang, C.; Otsuka, H.; Stein, J.D.; Pacheco, A.; Peng, B.; Devarie-Baez, N.O.; Aguilar, H.C.; Lefer, D.J.; et al. Controllable Hydrogen Sulfide Donors and Their Activity against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 1283–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Martelli, A.; Testai, L.; Citi, V.; Marino, A.; Pugliesi, I.; Barresi, E.; Nesi, G.; Rapposelli, S.; Taliani, S.; Da Settimo, F.; et al. Arylthioamides as H2S Donors: L-Cysteine-Activated Releasing Properties and Vascular Effects in Vitro and in Vivo. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 904–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhao, Y.; Wang, H.; Xian, M. Cysteine-Activated Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Donors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wang, Y.; Chun, O.K.; Song, W.O. Plasma and Dietary Antioxidant Status as Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: A Review of Human Studies. Nutrients 2013, 5, 2969–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Levinn, C.M.; Cerda, M.M.; Pluth, M.D. Activatable Small-Molecule Hydrogen Sulfide Donors. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2019, 32, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kang, J.; Li, Z.; Organ, C.L.; Park, C.-M.; Yang, C.-t.; Pacheco, A.; Wang, D.; Lefer, D.J.; Xian, M. pH-Controlled Hydrogen Sulfide Release for Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6336–6339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lane, T.; Fontana, M.; Martinez-Naharro, A.; Quarta, C.C.; Whelan, C.J.; Petrie, A.; Rowczenio, D.M.; Gilbertson, J.A.; Hutt, D.F.; Rezk, T.; et al. Natural History, Quality of Life, and Outcome in Cardiac Transthyretin Amyloidosis. Circulation 2019, 140, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhou, Z.; von Wantoch Rekowski, M.; Coletta, C.; Szabo, C.; Bucci, M.; Cirino, G.; Topouzis, S.; Papapetropoulos, A.; Giannis, A. Thioglycine and l-thiovaline: Biologically active H2S-donors. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 2675–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, L.; Whiteman, M.; Guan, Y.Y.; Neo, K.L.; Cheng, Y.; Lee, S.W.; Zhao, Y.; Baskar, R.; Tan, C.-H.; Moore, P.K. Characterization of a Novel, Water-Soluble Hydrogen Sulfide–Releasing Molecule (GYY4137). Circulation 2008, 117, 2351–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Gaucher, C.; Boudier, A.; Bonetti, J.; Clarot, I.; Leroy, P.; Parent, M. Glutathione: Antioxidant Properties Dedicated to Nanotechnologies. Antioxidants 2018, 7, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Zhu, H.; Dronamraju, V.; Xie, W.; More, S.S. Sulfur-containing therapeutics in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Med. Chem. Res. 2021, 30, 305–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, H.; Du, Y.-s.; Xu, W.-s.; Li, C.-j.; Sun, H.; Hu, K.-r.; Hu, Y.-z.; Yu, T.-j.; Guo, H.-m.; Xie, L.; et al. Exogenous glutathione exerts a therapeutic effect in ischemic stroke rats by interacting with intrastriatal dopamine. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2022, 43, 541–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cacciatore, I.; Cornacchia, C.; Pinnen, F.; Mollica, A.; Di Stefano, A. Prodrug Approach for Increasing Cellular Glutathione Levels. Molecules 2010, 15, 1242–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ishkaeva, R.A.; Nizamov, I.S.; Blokhin, D.S.; Urakova, E.A.; Klochkov, V.V.; Nizamov, I.D.; Gareev, B.I.; Salakhieva, D.V.; Abdullin, T.I. Dithiophosphate-Induced Redox Conversions of Reduced and Oxidized Glutathione. Molecules 2021, 26, 2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ishkaeva, R.A.; Zoughaib, M.; Laikov, A.V.; Angelova, P.R.; Abdullin, T.I. Probing Cell Redox State and Glutathione-Modulating Factors Using a Monochlorobimane-Based Microplate Assay. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lifanova, A.; Khaertdinov, N.; Sitdikova, G. Interplay Between Hydrogen Sulfide and Adrenergic and Muscarinic Receptors in the Mouse Atrium. BioNanoScience 2017, 7, 306–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lifanova, A.; Khaertdinov, N.; Zakharov, A.; Gizzatullin, A.; Sitdikova, G. Role of potassium channels in the negative inotropic effect of hydrogen sulfide in mouse atrium. Genes Cells 2014, 9, 94–98. [Google Scholar]
  43. DeLeon, E.R.; Stoy, G.F.; Olson, K.R. Passive loss of hydrogen sulfide in biological experiments. Anal. Biochem. 2012, 421, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Whiteman, M.; Li, L.; Rose, P.; Tan, C.-H.; Parkinson, D.B.; Moore, P.K. The Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide Donors on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Formation of Inflammatory Mediators in Macrophages. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 12, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Benchoam, D.; Cuevasanta, E.; Möller, M.N.; Alvarez, B. Hydrogen Sulfide and Persulfides Oxidation by Biologically Relevant Oxidizing Species. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Cuevasanta, E.; Möller, M.N.; Alvarez, B. Biological chemistry of hydrogen sulfide and persulfides. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2017, 617, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mishanina, T.V.; Libiad, M.; Banerjee, R. Biogenesis of reactive sulfur species for signaling by hydrogen sulfide oxidation pathways. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015, 11, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Shen, Y.; Shen, Z.; Luo, S.; Guo, W.; Zhu, Y.Z. The Cardioprotective Effects of Hydrogen Sulfide in Heart Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Potential. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 925167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kashfi, K.; Olson, K.R. Biology and therapeutic potential of hydrogen sulfide and hydrogen sulfide-releasing chimeras. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2013, 85, 689–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Yu, B.; Yuan, Z.; Wang, B. Persulfide Prodrugs. In Hydrogen Sulfide; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 293–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ida, T.; Sawa, T.; Ihara, H.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Watanabe, Y.; Kumagai, Y.; Suematsu, M.; Motohashi, H.; Fujii, S.; Matsunaga, T.; et al. Reactive cysteine persulfides and S-polythiolation regulate oxidative stress and redox signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 7606–7611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Paul, B.D.; Snyder, S.H.; Kashfi, K. Effects of hydrogen sulfide on mitochondrial function and cellular bioenergetics. Redox Biol. 2021, 38, 101772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Olas, B. Chapter Six—Hydrogen Sulfide as a “Double-Faced” Compound: One with Pro- and Antioxidant Effect. In Advances in Clinical Chemistry; Makowski, G.S., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; Volume 78, pp. 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wusheng Xiao, J.L. Metabolic Responses to Reductive Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2020, 32, 1330–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Xiang, H.; Ye, T.; Li, Y.; Lin, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhou, H.; Wang, J.; Li, L. A New Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe Based on BODIPY for Highly Selective Detection of Hydrogen Sulfide. Molecules 2022, 27, 7499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lin, V.S.; Lippert, A.R.; Chang, C.J. Cell-trappable fluorescent probes for endogenous hydrogen sulfide signaling and imaging H2O2-dependent H2S production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 7131–7135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Trummer, M.; Galardon, E.; Fischer, A.; Toegel, S.; Mayer, B.; Steiner, G.; Kloesch, B. Characterization of the Inducible and Slow-Releasing Hydrogen Sulfide and Persulfide Donor P*: Insights into Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Star, B.S.; van der Slikke, E.C.; Ransy, C.; Schmitt, A.; Henning, R.H.; Bouillaud, F.; Bouma, H.R. GYY4137-Derived Hydrogen Sulfide Donates Electrons to the Mitochondrial Electron Transport Chain via Sulfide: Quinone Oxidoreductase in Endothelial Cells. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Xu, Z.; Xu, L.; Zhou, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, W.; Qian, X. A highly selective fluorescent probe for fast detection of hydrogen sulfide in aqueous solution and living cells. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 10871–10873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhao, Y.; Steiger, A.K.; Pluth, M.D. Colorimetric Carbonyl Sulfide (COS)/Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Donation from γ-Ketothiocarbamate Donor Motifs. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 13101–13105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lacerda, L.; Smith, R.M.; Opie, L.; Lecour, S. TNFα-induced cytoprotection requires the production of free radicals within mitochondria in C2C12 myotubes. Life Sci. 2006, 79, 2194–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zebedin, E.; Mille, M.; Speiser, M.; Zarrabi, T.; Sandtner, W.; Latzenhofer, B.; Todt, H.; Hilber, K. C2C12 skeletal muscle cells adopt cardiac-like sodium current properties in a cardiac cell environment. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 2007, 292, H439–H450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Koh, G.Y.; Klug, M.G.; Soonpaa, M.H.; Field, L.J. Differentiation and long-term survival of C2C12 myoblast grafts in heart. J. Clin. Investig. 1993, 92, 1548–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Reinecke, H.; Minami, E.; Poppa, V.; Murry, C.E. Evidence for Fusion Between Cardiac and Skeletal Muscle Cells. Circ. Res. 2004, 94, e56–e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Menasché, P. Skeletal muscle satellite cell transplantation. Cardiovasc. Res. 2003, 58, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Lee, D.-Y.; Chun, Y.-S.; Kim, J.-K.; Lee, J.-O.; Lee, Y.-J.; Ku, S.-K.; Shim, S.-M. Curcumin Ameliorated Oxidative Stress and Inflammation-Related Muscle Disorders in C2C12 Myoblast Cells. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mizugaki, A.; Kato, H.; Takeda, T.; Inoue, Y.; Hasumura, M.; Hasegawa, T.; Murakami, H. Cystine reduces mitochondrial dysfunction in C2C12 myotubes under moderate oxidative stress induced by H2O2. Amino Acids 2022, 54, 1203–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Majumder, A.; Singh, M.; Behera, J.; Theilen, N.T.; George, A.K.; Tyagi, N.; Metreveli, N.; Tyagi, S.C. Hydrogen sulfide alleviates hyperhomocysteinemia-mediated skeletal muscle atrophy via mitigation of oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress injury. Am. J. Physiol.-Cell Physiol. 2018, 315, C609–C622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Parsanathan, R.; Jain, S.K. Hydrogen sulfide increases glutathione biosynthesis, and glucose uptake and utilisation in C2C12 mouse myotubes. Free Radic. Res. 2018, 52, 288–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ardite, E.; Barbera, J.A.; Roca, J.; Fernández-Checa, J.C. Glutathione Depletion Impairs Myogenic Differentiation of Murine Skeletal Muscle C2C12 Cells through Sustained NF-κB Activation. Am. J. Pathol. 2004, 165, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, P.; Li, M.; Lu, Y.; Han, J. Myoblast differentiation of C2C12 cell may related with oxidative stress. Intractable Rare Dis. Res. 2021, 10, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pérez-Torres, I.; Guarner-Lans, V.; Rubio-Ruiz, M.E. Reductive Stress in Inflammation-Associated Diseases and the Pro-Oxidant Effect of Antioxidant Agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Bellezza, I.; Riuzzi, F.; Chiappalupi, S.; Arcuri, C.; Giambanco, I.; Sorci, G.; Donato, R. Reductive stress in striated muscle cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 3547–3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ma, W.-X.; Li, C.-Y.; Tao, R.; Wang, X.-P.; Yan, L.-J. Reductive Stress-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Cardiomyopathy. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 5136957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yakovleva, O.V.; Ziganshina, A.R.; Dmitrieva, S.A.; Arslanova, A.N.; Yakovlev, A.V.; Minibayeva, F.V.; Khaertdinov, N.N.; Ziyatdinova, G.K.; Giniatullin, R.A.; Sitdikova, G.F. Hydrogen Sulfide Ameliorates Developmental Impairments of Rat Offspring with Prenatal Hyperhomocysteinemia. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 2746873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Yakovleva, O.; Bogatova, K.; Mukhtarova, R.; Yakovlev, A.; Shakhmatova, V.; Gerasimova, E.; Ziyatdinova, G.; Hermann, A.; Sitdikova, G. Hydrogen Sulfide Alleviates Anxiety, Motor, and Cognitive Dysfunctions in Rats with Maternal Hyperhomocysteinemia via Mitigation of Oxidative Stress. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yakovleva, O.V.; Bogatova, K.S.; Skripnikova, V.V.; Sitdikova, G.F. Effects of Moderate Chronic Stressing of Female Rats Before and During Pregnancy of Sensorimotor Development, Anxiety Levels, and Cognitive Functions in Their Offspring. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 2022, 52, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Geng, B.; Chang, L.; Pan, C.; Qi, Y.; Zhao, J.; Pang, Y.; Du, J.; Tang, C. Endogenous hydrogen sulfide regulation of myocardial injury induced by isoproterenol. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 318, 756–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Elsey, D.J.; Fowkes, R.C.; Baxter, G.F. Regulation of cardiovascular cell function by hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Cell Biochem. Funct. 2010, 28, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Testai, L.; Marino, A.; Piano, I.; Brancaleone, V.; Tomita, K.; Di Cesare Mannelli, L.; Martelli, A.; Citi, V.; Breschi, M.C.; Levi, R.; et al. The novel H2S-donor 4-carboxyphenyl isothiocyanate promotes cardioprotective effects against ischemia/reperfusion injury through activation of mitoKATP channels and reduction of oxidative stress. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 113, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Geng, B.; Yang, J.; Qi, Y.; Zhao, J.; Pang, Y.; Du, J.; Tang, C. H2S generated by heart in rat and its effects on cardiac function. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 313, 362–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Cerra, M.C.; Imbrogno, S. Phospholamban and cardiac function: A comparative perspective in vertebrates. Acta Physiol. 2012, 205, 9–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Li, L.; Rose, P.; Moore, P.K. Hydrogen Sulfide and Cell Signaling. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2011, 51, 169–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Furne, J.; Saeed, A.; Levitt, M.D. Whole tissue hydrogen sulfide concentrations are orders of magnitude lower than presently accepted values. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2008, 295, R1479–R1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Akhmadishina, R.A.; Kuznetsova, E.V.; Sadrieva, G.R.; Sabirzyanova, L.R.; Nizamov, I.S.; Akhmedova, G.R.; Nizamov, I.D.; Abdullin, T.I. Glutathione salts of O,O-diorganyl dithiophosphoric acids: Synthesis and study as redox modulating and antiproliferative compounds. Peptides 2018, 99, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Witt, R.; Weigand, A.; Boos, A.M.; Cai, A.; Dippold, D.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Schubert, D.W.; Hardt, M.; Lange, C.; Arkudas, A.; et al. Mesenchymal stem cells and myoblast differentiation under HGF and IGF-1 stimulation for 3D skeletal muscle tissue engineering. BMC Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Zakharov, A.V. Elph: An open-source program for acquisition control and analysis of electrophysiological signals. Uchenye Zap. Kazan. Univ. Seriya Estestv. Nauk. 2019, 161, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Abramochkin, D.V.; Haertdinov, N.N.; Porokhnya, M.V.; Zefirov, A.L.; Sitdikova, G.F. Carbon monoxide affects electrical and contractile activity of rat myocardium. J. Biomed. Sci. 2011, 18, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 24 11063 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of (A) glutathione dithiophosphates and (B) DTP and NaHS on viability of C2C12 myoblasts (MTT assay, 72 h).
Figure 1. Effect of (A) glutathione dithiophosphates and (B) DTP and NaHS on viability of C2C12 myoblasts (MTT assay, 72 h).
Ijms 24 11063 g001
Ijms 24 11063 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Kinetics of H2S release upon hydrolysis of glutathione dithiophosphates (1 mM) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.4) according to fluorescence of AzMC (10 μM). Dependence of AzMC signal on (B) concentration of the probe (1 mM NaHS) and (C) concentration of NaHS (10 μM AzMC). For (A), the measurements were taken every 5 min.
Figure 2. (A) Kinetics of H2S release upon hydrolysis of glutathione dithiophosphates (1 mM) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.4) according to fluorescence of AzMC (10 μM). Dependence of AzMC signal on (B) concentration of the probe (1 mM NaHS) and (C) concentration of NaHS (10 μM AzMC). For (A), the measurements were taken every 5 min.
Ijms 24 11063 g002
Ijms 24 11063 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of glutathione dithiophosphates, DTP and NaHS on H2S level in C2C12 myoblasts according to AzMC fluorescence. (A) Relative cell fluorescence intensity vs. control value of untreated cells (100%). (B) Representative LSCM images of control and GSH–DTP-treated cells. The pre-stained cells were exposed to dithiophosphates (10 μM) and NaHS (1 mM) for 20 min. Mean ± SD are shown (n = 12, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control). The scale bar is 10 μm.
Figure 3. Effect of glutathione dithiophosphates, DTP and NaHS on H2S level in C2C12 myoblasts according to AzMC fluorescence. (A) Relative cell fluorescence intensity vs. control value of untreated cells (100%). (B) Representative LSCM images of control and GSH–DTP-treated cells. The pre-stained cells were exposed to dithiophosphates (10 μM) and NaHS (1 mM) for 20 min. Mean ± SD are shown (n = 12, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. control). The scale bar is 10 μm.
Ijms 24 11063 g003
Ijms 24 11063 g004 550
Figure 4. Relative GSH content in (A) C2C12 myoblasts and (B) C2C12 myocytes after 1 h exposure to H2S donors and GSH in HBSS according to MCB microplate assay [40] (vs. control values = 100%). Concentrations (mM) are shown in the legend (dithiophosphates) and above the diagram (NaHS, GSH). Mean ± SD are shown (n = 6, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 4. Relative GSH content in (A) C2C12 myoblasts and (B) C2C12 myocytes after 1 h exposure to H2S donors and GSH in HBSS according to MCB microplate assay [40] (vs. control values = 100%). Concentrations (mM) are shown in the legend (dithiophosphates) and above the diagram (NaHS, GSH). Mean ± SD are shown (n = 6, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 24 11063 g004
Ijms 24 11063 g005 550
Figure 5. Relative ROS content in (A) C2C12 myoblasts and (B) C2C12 myocytes after 1 h exposure to H2S donors and GSH in HBSS according to DCFDA fluorescence (vs. control values = 100%). Concentrations (mM) are shown in the legend (dithiophosphates) and above the diagram (NaHS, GSH). Mean ± SD are shown (n = 4, * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 5. Relative ROS content in (A) C2C12 myoblasts and (B) C2C12 myocytes after 1 h exposure to H2S donors and GSH in HBSS according to DCFDA fluorescence (vs. control values = 100%). Concentrations (mM) are shown in the legend (dithiophosphates) and above the diagram (NaHS, GSH). Mean ± SD are shown (n = 4, * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001).
Ijms 24 11063 g005
Ijms 24 11063 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of H2S donors on contractile force of atrial myocardium stripes. (A,B) Original traces of contraction curves of myocardium stripes in control (Ctrl), after treatment with H2S donors (NaHS or GSH–DTP, 200 µM) and washout (Wash). The time course of negative inotropic action of (C) NaHS and (D) GSH–DTP. (E–G) Maximum effects of NaHS (30 min), DTP (40 min), GSH (30 min), GSH–DTP (60 min) and GSSG–(DTP)2 (30 min) on (E) contractile force, (F) maximum velocity of contraction (MVC) and (G) maximum velocity of relaxation (MVR) vs. control (100%, dotted line). * p < 0.05 vs. control, # p < 0.05 vs. NaHS.
Figure 6. Effects of H2S donors on contractile force of atrial myocardium stripes. (A,B) Original traces of contraction curves of myocardium stripes in control (Ctrl), after treatment with H2S donors (NaHS or GSH–DTP, 200 µM) and washout (Wash). The time course of negative inotropic action of (C) NaHS and (D) GSH–DTP. (E–G) Maximum effects of NaHS (30 min), DTP (40 min), GSH (30 min), GSH–DTP (60 min) and GSSG–(DTP)2 (30 min) on (E) contractile force, (F) maximum velocity of contraction (MVC) and (G) maximum velocity of relaxation (MVR) vs. control (100%, dotted line). * p < 0.05 vs. control, # p < 0.05 vs. NaHS.
Ijms 24 11063 g006
Ijms 24 11063 g007 550
Figure 7. Structural formulas of O,O–(–)–dimenthyl dithiophosphoric acid (DTP) and its salts with reduced and oxidized glutathione denoted as GSH–DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2. Frame: scheme for GSH–DTP formation.
Figure 7. Structural formulas of O,O–(–)–dimenthyl dithiophosphoric acid (DTP) and its salts with reduced and oxidized glutathione denoted as GSH–DTP and GSSG–(DTP)2. Frame: scheme for GSH–DTP formation.
Ijms 24 11063 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ishkaeva, R.A.; Khaertdinov, N.N.; Yakovlev, A.V.; Esmeteva, M.V.; Salakhieva, D.V.; Nizamov, I.S.; Sitdikova, G.F.; Abdullin, T.I. Characterization of Glutathione Dithiophosphates as Long-Acting H2S Donors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311063

AMA Style

Ishkaeva RA, Khaertdinov NN, Yakovlev AV, Esmeteva MV, Salakhieva DV, Nizamov IS, Sitdikova GF, Abdullin TI. Characterization of Glutathione Dithiophosphates as Long-Acting H2S Donors. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(13):11063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ishkaeva, Rezeda A., Nail N. Khaertdinov, Aleksey V. Yakovlev, Marina V. Esmeteva, Diana V. Salakhieva, Ilyas S. Nizamov, Guzel F. Sitdikova, and Timur I. Abdullin. 2023. "Characterization of Glutathione Dithiophosphates as Long-Acting H2S Donors" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13: 11063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241311063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop