You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Review
  • Open Access

23 June 2023

Chitosan-Based Biomaterials for Hemostatic Applications: A Review of Recent Advances

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Faculty of Material Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, District 6, 060042 Bucharest, Romania
2
Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
4
Academy of Romanian Scientists, 54 Splaiul Independentei, 050094 Bucharest, Romania
This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Natural Compound for Wound and Tissue Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

Hemorrhage is a detrimental event present in traumatic injury, surgery, and disorders of bleeding that can become life-threatening if not properly managed. Moreover, uncontrolled bleeding can complicate surgical interventions, altering the outcome of surgical procedures. Therefore, to reduce the risk of complications and decrease the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with hemorrhage, it is necessary to use an effective hemostatic agent that ensures the immediate control of bleeding. In recent years, there have been increasingly rapid advances in developing a novel generation of biomaterials with hemostatic properties. Nowadays, a wide array of topical hemostatic agents is available, including chitosan-based biomaterials that have shown outstanding properties such as antibacterial, antifungal, hemostatic, and analgesic activity in addition to their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and wound-healing effects. This review provides an analysis of chitosan-based hemostatic biomaterials and discusses the progress made in their performance, mechanism of action, efficacy, cost, and safety in recent years.

1. Introduction

1.1. Hemorrhage in Surgical and Trauma Setting

Hemorrhage is a life-threatening condition that represents the first most common cause of death in combat casualties and the second among civilians as a result of traumatic injury. Hemorrhage refers to excessive blood loss occurring due to the unsuccessful formation of a platelet plug at the site of injury [,].
In traumatic injuries, bleeding represents a leading cause of potentially preventable death. Moreover, trauma-induced coagulopathy is a complication attributed to trauma that describes abnormal clotting processes in which blood clots are not formed properly. Coagulation abnormalities are associated with internal bleeding and require proper management to restore circulating blood volume and reduce the risk of worsening trauma-induced coagulopathy [,]. Efficient bleeding management in the first hour of post-injury is the key to minimizing the deleterious side effects of uncontrolled bleeding [,].
Additionally, many complex surgical interventions, such as cardiovascular, cranial, spinal, orthopedic, and liver surgeries present a high incidence of uncontrolled bleeding that require hemostatic intervention []. In the intraoperative environment, uncontrolled bleeding can cause a wide array of complications for both surgeons and patients that may lead to adverse intraoperative or perioperative outcomes, including prolonged operation times and postoperative hospitalization, delayed wound healing, increased risk of infection and shock, hematoma formation, multi-organ failure, coagulopathy and increased morbidity and mortality [,,,]. Figure 1 presents the complications of uncontrolled bleeding.
Figure 1. Main complications of uncontrolled bleeding in the intraoperative environment.
During surgery, it is important to achieve rapid and effective hemostasis to retain visualization of the surgical field, maintain patients’ hemodynamic equilibrium, and reduce procedure and anesthesia time as well as the occurrence of complications. Bleeding that is not effectively controlled can cause important blood loss volumes, which may require blood transfusions or blood-related products, thus exposing the patient to the numerous complications associated with transfusions, such as immunologic reactions, infection, and immunosuppression, thereby complicating the operative procedure and increasing the risk of morbidity and mortality [,,].
Preventing excessive blood loss during surgery equates to significantly decreasing the risk of major perioperative complications. Therefore, as the risk of surgical re-intervention decreases, the patient needs a shorter hospital stay, which in turn may result in lower hospitalization costs. The appropriate management of such cases is critically important and thus a major consideration for surgeons aiming to avoid these adverse effects [,,].

1.2. Achieving Hemostasis

Hemostasis represents the body’s natural and physiological reaction to injury and the first step in wound healing. It is a vital process that involves multiple interlinked steps in order to stop the bleeding by forming a stable clot. The mechanism of hemostasis works like a multifaceted response to prevent and stop the blood loss that occurs due to a disruption of the vessel walls [,].
Conventional techniques for achieving hemostasis in a surgery setting include a variety of mechanical techniques (e.g., sutures, ligatures, vascular clips, bone wax) and thermal techniques (e.g., electrocautery). To further aid in achieving hemostasis, adjunctive topical hemostatic products are also employed in conjunction with these primary techniques. Topical hemostatic agents play an important role in the surgery environment as well as in first-aid treatment, controlling blood loss and minimizing the risk of associated complications and consequent mortality and morbidity []. Figure 2 schematically illustrates multiple topical hemostatic materials used to control hemorrhage.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of multiple external hemostatic materials for hemorrhage control.
Topical hemostatic agents can be categorized based on the raw materials used into two types: organic-based and inorganic-based hemostatic products []. Organic-based hemostatic agents have two sources: natural sources that comprise both naturally derived (carbohydrate-based) and biologically derived (protein-based) materials and synthetic sources. Figure 3 presents the intraoperative aspects of different hemostatic materials used in cardiovascular surgery.
Figure 3. Intraoperative aspects of different hemostatic materials used in cardiovascular surgery: bone wax—(a) physical aspect of bone wax (blue arrow) and (b) sternum aspect after the application of bone wax (white arrows); (c) cellulose-based material, type Surgicel Original; and (d) cellulose-based material, type Surgicel Fibrillar.
Polysaccharides such as chitosan, alginate, cellulose, dextran, starch, and keratin are currently the most commonly used natural polymeric hemostatic materials that are widely available. While biologically derived hemostatic materials (e.g., collagen, gelatin, thrombin) facilitate platelet aggregation and activation, achieving rapid hemostasis, their high cost, risk of immune reactions, and poor mechanical properties have limited their widespread use []. Many researchers have aimed to develop hemostatic agents from natural resources and the results have proven to be promising. For example, Singh Chandel et al. conducted a comprehensive investigation to assess the impact of sponge compression on the hemostatic and antiadhesive properties of bilayer alginate sponges prepared through lyophilization. The findings of their study revealed that the 100 mm compressed sponge exhibited enhanced hemostatic effects in a mice liver bleeding model, whereas the 200 mm compressed sponge displayed improved antiadhesive properties in a rat model of hepatectomy-induced adhesion []. A novel hemostatic sponge composed of chemically cross-linked gelatin, developed by Reiner Hajosch et al., demonstrated promising results. The gelatin sponge, manufactured using pharmaceutical-grade materials, exhibited exceptionally fast absorption of human blood based on in vitro blood uptake assays. The absorption rate was found to be two to three times quicker compared to other hemostatic devices tested. Furthermore, in an in vitro hemorrhage model utilizing human veins, the novel gelatin sponge matrix achieved hemostasis within less than a minute following the induction of bleeding [].
Synthetic hemostatic agents are represented by polyesters (polycaprolactone (PCL), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), polycyanoacrylates, polyurethane (PU), siloxane, polyethylene oxide (PEO), polyacrylamide (PAM), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polydioxanone (PDS). These agents are widely used in various hemostasis operations because of their low immunogenicity, relatively high stability, and the ability to customize their chemical properties to enhance their clinical performance. However, the production cost of synthetic polymers is usually higher than that of natural polymers, and their poor biodegradability and potential cytotoxicity may impede their use in clinical practice [].
Several inorganic materials have been developed to accelerate blood coagulation, including silicate minerals, silica-based materials, metal-containing materials, phosphate, and carbon derivatives. Inorganic hemostatic materials are often cheaper than organic materials, and they are physically and chemically stable, easy to produce and transport, and carry no risk of bloodborne disease. However, most inorganic materials are not bioabsorbable and need to be removed after use.
Some types of natural mineral clays (silicate minerals) have been found to have hemostatic properties and are used in medical applications to promote hemostasis. Kaolin is a type of clay that is commonly used in medical applications to promote hemostasis. It has a large surface area and can absorb water and blood, which helps to promote clotting. Montmorillonite is a type of clay that has a layered structure and a high cation exchange capacity. It is often used in hemostatic dressings and can promote clotting by absorbing blood and concentrating platelets. Zeolites are microporous, crystalline aluminosilicates that have unique properties, including a high surface area and the ability to selectively adsorb molecules [,,].
Phosphates are a class of compounds that contain the element phosphorus. They have been studied for their potential use as hemostatic agents, particularly in the form of calcium phosphate materials. Hydroxyapatite is a common component of bone and has been shown to be effective in promoting hemostasis in surgical settings. Tricalcium phosphate is another calcium phosphate material that has been studied for its hemostatic properties and has been shown to be effective in controlling bleeding in dental procedures.
Carbon derivatives are another class of compounds that have been investigated for their potential use as hemostatic agents. Carbon nanotubes are long, thin tubes made up of carbon atoms that have unique mechanical and electrical properties. Carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide have been shown to promote blood clotting and enhance the effectiveness of other hemostatic agents [,].
Silica-based materials, including mesoporous silica, mesoporous bioactive glasses, diatom silica, and their composites, have recently been explored as a promising avenue in the field of hemostasis due to their negative charge and highly absorptive pores, which give them inherent hemostatic abilities. Diatom silica, for instance, is a nanostructured silica biomaterial with a 3D porous structure with high porosity and specific surface area, enabling it to absorb water, concentrate coagulation factors, and promote hemostasis. Mesoporous silica particles share similarities with natural mineral clays in that they can quickly absorb water and aggregate platelets, blood cells, and coagulation factors at the site of injury [,]. Table 1 highlights the characteristics and hemostatic mechanism of different hemostatic materials and commercially available topical hemostatic agents. Table 2 presents examples of commercial brands of hemostatic materials containing chitosan and their mechanism of action.
Table 1. Characteristics and hemostatic mechanism of different hemostatic materials and commercially available topical hemostatic agents.
Table 2. Examples of commercial brands of hemostatic materials containing chitosan and their mechanism of action.
Metal-containing materials have been effectively utilized in the field of hemostasis due to their demonstrated procoagulant activity. Silver nanoparticles have been shown to have antimicrobial properties, which may be useful in preventing infections at the site of bleeding and promoting blood clotting. Copper nanoparticles have been shown to have antibacterial properties and promote blood clotting in both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Similar to copper nanoparticles, zinc nanoparticles have been found to promote blood clotting and prevent bleeding when applied to a wound. Several studies showed that zinc nanoparticles significantly accelerated blood clotting in vitro and demonstrated antibacterial activity [,,,,,].
There is a significant range in the cost of different agents, with pricing observed to be influenced by the active ingredient responsible for stopping bleeding. Among the less costly hemostatic agents were those that are absorbable and composed of oxidized regenerated cellulose, chitosan, collagen, and gelatin, with a price range between $15 and $100. Absorbable agents made with microfibrillar collagen are priced at a higher level compared to other absorbable agents ($101–$300). Biologically active agents (made with human fibrinogen and human thrombin), dual agents (combining thrombin and gelatin), and synthetic hemostatic agents range from $301 to $500, with the latter being the most expensive [,]. For example, Baxter Coseal Surgical Sealant, which consists of two biocompatible polyethylene glycols that form a covalently bonded hydrogel (adhering to both tissue and synthetic graft materials), has a price of $439.00 per kit [,], while a 15 g pack of Celox Haemostatic Granules, consisting of macroscopic granular flakes prepared from chitosan, costs only $16.67 []. Thus, chitosan is more cost-effective compared to other alternatives [].
According to the analysis conducted by Data Bridge Market Research, the hemostats market is projected to reach USD 4.65 billion by 2029, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.85% during the forecast period. The market growth is primarily driven by the rising number of surgical procedures being performed. The largest share in the hemostatic market is attributed to the thrombin-based hemostats segment when categorized by type. When considering formulation, the matrix and gel segment held the largest share. The medical-grade chitosan market was valued at USD 284.6 million in 2022, and it is projected to reach USD 610.2 million by 2030. The market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10% during the period from 2022 to 2030. In 2022, the shrimp segment held the largest revenue share, accounting for 63% of the chitosan market. Shrimp is the primary source of chitosan due to its higher chitin content, ranging from 25% to 40%, compared to crab shells, which typically contain around 15% to 20% chitin. Two of the major players in the chitosan market are Primex EHF, an Icelandic marine biotechnology company renowned for its sustainable production of high-quality chitosan, and Heppe Medical Chitosan GmbH, a German chitosan producer catering to the global medical technology and pharmaceutical industry [,].
More research is needed to fully understand their mechanisms of action and to optimize their use in hemostasis. It is also important to consider potential safety concerns associated with the use of these materials in medical applications, including the potential for toxicity or immunological reactions [,]. Numerous materials possess inherent properties that assist with the coagulation process and can effectively act as hemostatic agents. However, complex clinical requirements are not always met by the hemostatic efficiency of these materials.
When evaluating the efficacy of hemostatic agents, several clinical endpoints can be considered. These include parameters such as the time to hemostasis (the time it takes for bleeding to stop), the reduction in blood loss or volume, the improvement in clot formation or stability, the prevention of rebleeding, wound healing, and overall patient outcomes such as morbidity and mortality rates. The specific endpoint results should be evaluated according to the specific context and clinical situation.
Although the desired properties of an ideal local hemostatic agent may differ depending on the surgical specialty, certain characteristics are generally valued, including immediate and effective bleeding control, good safety profile (non-toxic, non-immunogenic), and ease of preparation and administration [].
The process of blood clotting involves a complex interplay of biological, chemical, and physical reactions. In various blood-clotting mechanisms, chitosan has demonstrated its effectiveness in hemostasis by virtue of its porous structure. By working in tandem with two or more hemostatic mechanisms, the hemostatic efficacy of chitosan can be further enhanced [].

2. Chitosan Properties and Hemostasis Efficiency

2.1. Chitosan Source and Structure

Chitin is a white, hard, inelastic, nitrogenous, natural polysaccharide (molecular formula: (C8H13O5N)n), which was extracted in 1911 from mushrooms and has been identified as the second-most abundant polysaccharide found in nature after cellulose [,,]. Chitin represents a strengthening material for the cell walls of fungi, the exoskeletons of crustaceans (e.g., shrimps, lobsters, crabs) and insects, and fish scales [,,]. Chitin and its derivatives are used in various sectors such as chemistry, cosmetics, medicine, and agriculture as well as in the textile and paper industry []. For biomedical applications, chitin is usually converted through biological (enzymatic) or chemical deacetylation to its most well-known derivative, chitosan []. Microorganisms and enzymes are used in biological methods, but the main obstacle to achieving scalable enzymatic deacetylation is the high crystallinity of chitin. Chemical deacetylation, performed under severe alkaline conditions, is the predominant method used for the industrial-scale conversion of chitin [,].
When considering the desired application of chitosan, the source and obtention process play crucial roles as they determine the characteristics of the final product. For biomedical purposes, factors such as purity, crystallinity, molecular weight (Mw), and deacetylation degree (DD) are particularly significant. These factors are closely linked to the mechanical and biological properties of chitosan [,].
Chitosan can have varying degrees of deacetylation and is classified as a copolymer of N-acetyl-D-glucose amine and D-glucose amine (C6H11O4N)n containing a varied number of N-acetyl groups [,]. Depending on the source and preparation, the molecular weight of chitosan is typically between 300 and 1000 kDa, with a DD varying between 60 and 100% []. The acetylation degree of chitosan is at least 60% of glucose amine residue [,]. The high versatility of chitosan offers the possibility to be used in physical forms such as fibers (and nanofibers), films and dressings, gels and hydrogels, sponges, beads, particles (and nanoparticles), membranes, and scaffolds []. Figure 4 illustrates sources, the chemical structures of chitin and chitosan, and chitosan’s main forms.
Figure 4. Sources, chemical structures of chitin and chitosan, and chitosan’s main forms.

2.2. Chitosan Properties

Chitosan is a weak base insoluble in H2O and organic solvents but soluble in acidic solutions (pH < 6.5) [,]. Due to its increased versatility and biological properties, much research has been conducted on chitosan. In vitro studies have demonstrated that chitosan exhibits superior cytocompatibility when compared to chitin [].
Chitosan is a biopolymer that has captured the attention of researchers and industries alike due to its unique physical and chemical properties, remarkable macromolecular framework, and biological activities. These attributes distinguish it from synthetic polymers, making it an exciting and promising material for applications in fundamental science, applied research, and industrial biotechnology [].
Significant attention is directed towards its potential medical and pharmaceutical applications due to its remarkable properties, such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and non-toxicity, which make it very valuable in the biomedical field [,]. Chitosan is a biocompatible substance that does not trigger an immune response, making it compatible with living tissues. Chitosan also possesses several other distinctive properties, including hemostatic and antithrombogenic properties and the ability to form polyoxysalts, create films, and demonstrate molecular adsorption properties []. Several studies have shown that chitin and chitosan are both biocompatible and biodegradable biopolymers, present antimicrobial properties, and enhance blood coagulation [,].
The bacteriostatic and fungistatic properties of chitosan-based materials are particularly useful for wound treatment. In addition to their antimicrobial properties, chitosan and its oligosaccharides can stimulate cell growth. Chitosan-based materials such as non-wovens, nanofibers, composites, films, and sponges have been shown to promote wound healing and dermal regeneration. As a result, chitosan’s primary commercial applications in the biomedical field are related to wound healing [].
Due to its versatility, chitosan has proven to be a valuable material for a variety of practical applications in numerous fields such as medicine, chemistry, cosmetics, biotechnology, agriculture, and chromatography, as well as textile and fiber industries []. Chitosan has tremendous potential in the medical and biomedical fields, with applications ranging from pharmaceutical formulations and drug delivery (including antibiotics, vaccines, anti-inflammatory agents, peptides, proteins, and growth factors) to antimicrobial treatments, burns, wound healing, gene delivery and therapy, regenerative medicine, and tissue engineering (for tendon, cartilage, ligament, bone, liver, neural, and skin regeneration). Additionally, chitosan has potential applications in cancer treatment, therapy, and diagnostics, as well as in dentistry, dermatology, ophthalmology, biosensors, bio-imaging (such as magnetic resonance imaging), support for immobilized enzymes, and veterinary medicine [,,].
The widespread use of chitosan is somewhat restricted due to its limitations, including poor solubility, reactivity, and certain physical properties such as rigidity and brittleness. Chitosan, in its pure form, is insoluble in aqueous solutions and exhibits limited antibacterial activity when dissolved. Additionally, the poor solubility of unmodified chitosan in organic solvents further restricts its practical applications [].
Chitosan’s molecular structure possesses three distinct types of reactive functional groups: a secondary hydroxyl group at C-3, a primary hydroxyl group at C-6, and an amino group at C-2, as displayed in Figure 4. The presence of these functional groups enables the conjugation of various substituents, leading to the development of new modified derivatives of chitosan.
Some of the modifications include nitration, sulfation, thiolation, acylation, esterification, carboxyalkylation, phosphorylation, graft copolymerization, and crosslinking techniques []. The principal derivatives of chitosan include carboxymethyl chitosans, quaternary ammonium chitosan salts, carboxyalkyl chitosans, hydroxyalkyl chitosans, phosphorylated chitosan, and thiolated chitosans. Among these derivatives, carboxymethyl chitosans have been extensively studied and explored [,].
The modifications applied to chitosan provide it with new properties. For example, the introduction of quaternary ammonium groups into chitosan increases the number of positively charged centers, resulting in enhanced platelet aggregation compared to chitosan alone. Additionally, it has been observed that platelet aggregation increases with the degree of substitution of these groups []. In a study conducted by Wang et al., a novel hemostatic hydrogel was developed by chemically reacting the carboxyl group in carboxymethyl chitosan. The resulting hydrogel exhibited favorable mechanical strength and swelling properties. In vitro coagulation assay results indicated that the hydrogel had the potential to enhance blood clotting at wound sites [].

2.3. Hemostatic Application of Chitosan

The concept of blood coagulation originated in the 1960s when “waterfall” and “cascade” theories of blood coagulation were proposed, serving as a cornerstone for the exploration of endogenous coagulation pathways.
Numerous studies [,] have demonstrated that chitosan induces coagulation without activating the intrinsic pathway, suggesting that the hemostatic mechanism of chitosan operates independently of the classical coagulation cascade. This aspect makes chitosan an ideal biomaterial of particular interest because it can stop bleeding in coagulopathic patients (clotting dysfunction) [,].
While the specific hemostatic mechanism of chitosan is not yet fully comprehended, available data indicate some potential ways in which it may help regulate bleeding []. Thus, some properties of chitosan (cationic, absorbent) are of great importance for promoting hemostasis.
While many naturally occurring polysaccharides, such as agar, dextran, pectin, carrageenan, cellulose, agarose, and alginic acid are neutral or acidic in nature, chitosan stands out as an example of a highly basic polysaccharide. Chitosan’s most distinctive property is its cationic nature and its unique behavior in solution, which is also of great importance for its medical applications. This biopolymer is the only naturally occurring cationic polymer known to exist in nature [,].
Chitosan’s cationic properties play a significant role in inducing hemostasis, as the surfaces of erythrocytes carry negative charges. The presence of opposite charges between chitosan and erythrocytes leads to the assertion that chitosan has an attracting effect and crosslinks with erythrocytes, resulting in the formation of a “mucoadhesive barrier” at the wound site to halt bleeding [,]. The amino groups found in chitosan (poly-N-acetyl glucosamine) play a crucial role in facilitating the aggregation of erythrocytes through electrostatic interactions with the surface charges of the cells [,]. Figure 5 presents the hemostatic mechanism of chitosan-based material.
Figure 5. Hemostatic mechanism of chitosan-based material: the aggregation of erythrocytes occurs due to the interaction between positively charged chitosan and negatively charged molecules present on the surface of erythrocytes.
Moreover, this cationic nature of chitosan also allows it to bind with the anions on bacterial cell walls, thereby impeding their entry into the cell. This microbicidal action of chitosan is crucial in the wound-healing process []. It is noteworthy that the majority of the biological and chemical applications of chitosan rely on its cationic properties and its versatility as a biomaterial [].
Upon contact with blood, chitosan has been demonstrated to stop bleeding by absorbing liquid, which leads to the concentration of erythrocytes and platelet adherence to the injured area []. The molecular weight and degree of deacetylation attained during the purification process have a significant impact on the hemostatic efficacy of chitosan. A higher degree of deacetylation enhances the aggregation of erythrocytes and platelets, which is crucial for initiating hemostasis [].
In fact, scientific research has shown that a chitosan dressing was able to effectively control an arterial hemorrhage in dogs []. Several animal model studies have demonstrated that chitosan-based dressings are effective hemostatic agents, even in coagulopathic conditions. Chitosan has been demonstrated to be a highly effective hemostatic agent in various formulations such as gels/hydrogels, powders, membranes and films, dressings, sponges, foams, and microspheres.

4. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Uncontrolled bleeding is a significant factor that can impact a patient’s recovery and quality of life after surgery. Managing blood loss during surgery can significantly reduce the risk of major perioperative complications. In cases of traumatic injuries, prompt and effective hemostasis is critical to prevent excessive blood loss, which can lead to shock and potentially fatal outcomes. Effective blood management strategies, including the use of appropriate hemostatic agents, can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality associated with traumatic injuries.
Chitosan’s exceptional biochemical properties make it an important polymeric biomaterial for use in biomedical applications that require hemostatic properties. It can be processed into various products, such as scaffolds and nanoparticles, which are increasingly being used in the rapidly growing field of nanomedicine. Chitosan-based composite materials can be optimized in various forms to achieve fast hemostasis. In order to obtain these composite materials, chitosan can be blended with other functional components, such as pain relievers, anti-inflammatory agents, and wound-healing materials, to obtain multi-functional CS-based composite hemostatic materials.
Currently, there is no hemostatic product on the market that can be considered an ideal hemostatic product, but this ideal could be achieved using composite materials obtained by combining different hemostatic materials with different mechanisms of hemostasis that can lead to synergistic effects and, thus, faster hemostasis.
It is anticipated that the field of nanotechnology will continue to improve hemostatic materials by improving key properties and incorporating new functionalities. The ultimate goal is to design a hemostatic material with optimal properties that can induce rapid and effective clotting under a variety of bleeding conditions, such as patients with blood deficiencies or injuries of different sizes and shapes. To achieve this, it is important to continue developing a deeper understanding of the interactions between different nanomaterials and blood.
As medical services continue to advance, the demand for high-performance hemostatic materials is increasing. The fabrication of novel hemostatic materials that are efficient, safe, and easy to transport has become a critical research area. Despite advances in surgical techniques and procedures, uncontrolled bleeding remains an important complication that contributes to poor clinical outcomes, remaining one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in trauma, childbirth, and complex surgeries.
In order to develop an optimal hemostatic dressing, significant interdisciplinary research endeavors are essential. These efforts involve conducting comprehensive studies that encompass various disciplines. Key areas of focus include establishing and refining animal models of trauma, devising efficient hemostatic devices, and performing clinical trials within multidisciplinary settings. These combined research efforts are crucial for advancing the field and achieving the fabrication of an ideal hemostatic dressing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M. and I.A.; methodology, D.G., H.M., E.G. and I.A.; software, D.G., A.R., A.-I.B. and I.C.; validation, D.G., H.M., A.R., A.-I.B., E.G., A.A., I.C., I.A., A.D.B. and C.I.B.; formal analysis, A.D.B. and C.I.B.; investigation, D.G., A.R., A.-I.B., A.A. and I.C.; resources, I.C., C.I.B. and A.D.B.; data curation, H.M. and I.A.; writing—original draft preparation, D.G., E.G. and A.A.; writing—review and editing, D.G., E.G. and A.A.; visualization, D.G., A.R., A.-I.B., E.G., A.A., I.C., A.D.B. and C.I.B.; supervision, H.M. and I.A.; project administration, H.M.; funding acquisition, I.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CCCDI-UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P2-2.1.-PED-2019-5236, within PNCDI III. In addition, financial support from the Competitiveness Operational Program 2014-2020, Action 1.1.3: Creating Synergies with RDI Actions of the EU’s HORIZON 2020 framework program, and other international RDI programs, MySMIS code 108792, the Acronym Project “UPB4H”, financed by the contract 250/11.05.2020, is gratefully acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data reported in this manuscript are available upon official request to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Malik, A.; Rehman, F.U.; Shah, K.U.; Naz, S.S.; Qaisar, S. Hemostatic Strategies for Uncontrolled Bleeding: A Comprehensive Update. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2021, 109, 1465–1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mohamed, E.; Fitzgerald, A.; Tsuzuki, T. The Role of Nanoscale Structures in the Development of Topical Hemostatic Agents. Mater. Today Nano 2021, 16, 100137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moore, E.E.; Moore, H.B.; Kornblith, L.Z.; Neal, M.D.; Hoffman, M.; Mutch, N.J.; Schöchl, H.; Hunt, B.J.; Sauaia, A. Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2021, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yesudasan, S.; Averett, R.D. Recent Advances in Computational Modeling of Fibrin Clot Formation: A Review. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2019, 83, 107148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shah, A.; Palmer, A.J.R.; Klein, A.A. Strategies to Minimize Intraoperative Blood Loss during Major Surgery. Br. J. Surg. 2020, 107, e26–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Renkens, K.L.; Payner, T.D.; Leipzig, T.J.; Feuer, H.; Morone, M.A.; Koers, J.M.; Lawson, K.J.; Lentz, R.; Shuey, H.; Conaway, G.L.; et al. A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating a New Hemostatic Agent for Spinal Surgery. Spine 2001, 26, 1645–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moldovan, H.; Antoniac, I.; Gheorghiță, D.; Safta, M.S.; Preda, S.; Broască, M.; Badilă, E.; Fronea, O.; Scafa-Udrişte, A.; Cacoveanu, M.; et al. Biomaterials as Haemostatic Agents in Cardiovascular Surgery: Review of Current Situation and Future Trends. Polymers 2022, 14, 1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Han, W.; Wang, S. Advances in Hemostatic Hydrogels That Can Adhere to Wet Surfaces. Gels 2022, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dang, N.C.; Ardehali, A.; Bruckner, B.A.; Parrino, P.E.; Gillen, D.L.; Hoffman, R.W.; Spotnitz, R.; Cavoores, S.; Shorn, I.J.; Manson, R.J.; et al. Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating the Performance of a Novel Combination Powder vs. Hemostatic Matrix in Cardiothoracic Operations. J. Card. Surg. 2020, 35, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Agarwal, R.; Niezgoda, J.; Niezgoda, J.; Madetipati, N.; Gopalakrishnan, S. Advances in Hemostatic Wound Dressings: Clinical Implications and Insight. Adv. Skin Wound Care 2022, 35, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moldovan, H.; Gheorghita, D.; Antoniac, I.; Gheorghe, D.; Fiori, F.; Mohan, A.; Raftu, G.; Ionel, C.; Costache, V. Bioadhesives Used in Cardiovascular Surgery. Rev. Chim. 2018, 69, 2799–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Park, S.M.; Kang, D.R.; Lee, J.H.; Jeong, Y.H.; Shin, D.A.; Yi, S.; Ha, Y.; Kim, K.N. Efficacy and Safety of a Thrombin-Containing Collagen-Based Hemostatic Agent in Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. World Neurosurg. 2021, 154, e215–e221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Scridon, A. Platelets and Their Role in Hemostasis and Thrombosis—From Physiology to Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, L.; Hao, F.; Tian, S.; Dong, H.; Nie, J.; Ma, G. Targeting Polysaccharides Such as Chitosan, Cellulose, Alginate and Starch for Designing Hemostatic Dressings. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 291, 119574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, L.; Du, Y.; Yin, Z.; Li, L.; Peng, H.; Zheng, H.; Yang, A.; Li, H.; Lv, G. Preparation and the Hemostatic Property Study of Porous Gelatin Microspheres Both in Vitro and in Vivo. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 2020, 187, 110641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singh Chandel, A.K.; Ohta, S.; Taniguchi, M.; Yoshida, H.; Tanaka, D.; Omichi, K.; Shimizu, A.; Isaji, M.; Hasegawa, K.; Ito, T. Balance of Antiperitoneal Adhesion, Hemostasis, and Operability of Compressed Bilayer Ultrapure Alginate Sponges. Biomater. Adv. 2022, 137, 212825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hajosch, R.; Suckfuell, M.; Oesser, S.; Ahlers, M.; Flechsenhar, K.; Schlosshauer, B. A Novel Gelatin Sponge for Accelerated Hemostasis. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2010, 94, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Antoniac, I. (Ed.) Biologically Responsive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Volume 1, ISBN 978-1-4614-4327-8. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zheng, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, C. Inorganic-Based Biomaterials for Rapid Hemostasis and Wound Healing. Chem. Sci. 2022, 14, 29–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Baharlouei, P.; Rahman, A. Chitin and Chitosan: Prospective Biomedical Applications in Drug Delivery, Cancer Treatment, and Wound Healing. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mecwan, M.; Li, J.; Falcone, N.; Ermis, M.; Torres, E.; Morales, R.; Hassani, A.; Haghniaz, R.; Mandal, K.; Sharma, S.; et al. Recent Advances in Biopolymer-Based Hemostatic Materials. Regen. Biomater. 2022, 9, rbac063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Feng, Y.; He, Y.; Lin, X.; Xie, M.; Liu, M.; Lvov, Y. Assembly of Clay Nanotubes on Cotton Fibers Mediated by Biopolymer for Robust and High-Performance Hemostatic Dressing. Adv. Health Mater. 2023, 12, 2202265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shakiba-Marani, R.; Ehtesabi, H. A Flexible and Hemostatic Chitosan, Polyvinyl Alcohol, Carbon Dot Nanocomposite Sponge for Wound Dressing Application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 224, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Patil, G.; Torris, A.; Suresha, P.R.; Jadhav, S.; Badiger, M.V.; Ghormade, V. Design and Synthesis of a New Topical Agent for Halting Blood Loss Rapidly: A Multimodal Chitosan-Gelatin Xerogel Composite Loaded with Silica Nanoparticles and Calcium. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2021, 198, 111454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sun, X.; Fang, Y.; Tang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liu, X.; Liu, H. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Carried on Chitosan Microspheres for Traumatic Bleeding Control. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 127, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, Y.; Wang, M.; Liu, Q.; Liu, G.; Wang, S.; Li, J. Recent Advances in the Medical Applications of Hemostatic Materials. Theranostics 2023, 13, 161–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Behrens, A.M.; Sikorski, M.J.; Kofinas, P. Hemostatic Strategies for Traumatic and Surgical Bleeding. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2014, 102, 4182–4194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Koumentakou, I.; Terzopoulou, Z.; Michopoulou, A.; Kalafatakis, I.; Theodorakis, K.; Tzetzis, D.; Bikiaris, D. Chitosan Dressings Containing Inorganic Additives and Levofloxacin as Potential Wound Care Products with Enhanced Hemostatic Properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 693–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sultankulov, B.; Berillo, D.; Sultankulova, K.; Tokay, T.; Saparov, A. Progress in the Development of Chitosan-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ouyang, Q.; Hou, T.; Li, C.; Hu, Z.; Liang, L.; Li, S.; Zhong, Q.; Li, P. Construction of a composite sponge containing tilapia peptides and chitosan with improved hemostatic performance. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 139, 719–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Uranues, S.; Fingerhut, A.; Levin, E.; Spazierer, D.; Rahimi, N.; Baumgartner, B. Effectiveness of Hemopatch® versus Surgicel® Original to Control Mild and Moderate Liver Bleeding. BMC Surg. 2022, 22, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ponsen, A.C.; Proust, R.; Soave, S.; Mercier-Nomé, F.; Garcin, I.; Combettes, L.; Lataillade, J.J.; Uzan, G. A New Hemostatic Agent Composed of Zn2+-Enriched Ca2+ Alginate Activates Vascular Endothelial Cells in Vitro and Promotes Tissue Repair in Vivo. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 18, 368–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kliuk-Ben Bassat, O.; Schwartz, D.; Zubkov, A.; Gal-Oz, A.; Gorevoy, A.; Romach, I.; Grupper, A. WoundClot® Hemostatic Gauze Reduces Bleeding Time after Arterial Venous Fistula Decannulation. Blood Purif. 2021, 50, 952–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mena-Álvarez, J.; Quispe-López, N.; Zubizarreta-Macho, Á.; Rico-Romano, C.; Rodero-Villanueva, R.; Fernández-Aceñero, M.J. Histological Analysis of Different Local Haemostatic Agents Used for Periapical Surgery: An Experimental Study with Sprague-Dawley Rats. Aust. Endod. J. 2019, 45, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rao, K.; Gomati, A.; Yuen Hao Tong, E.; Ah-See, K.W.; Shakeel, M. Use of PerClot® in Head and Neck Surgery: A Scottish Centre Experience. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2021, 278, 1965–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Y.B.; Wang, H.J.; Raza, A.; Liu, C.; Yu, J.; Wang, J.Y. Preparation and Evaluation of Chitosan/Polyvinylpyrrolidone/Zein Composite Hemostatic Sponges. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 205, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Capella-Monsonís, H.; Shridhar, A.; Chirravuri, B.; Figucia, M.; Learn, G.; Greenawalt, K.; Badylak, S.F. A Comparative Study of the Resorption and Immune Response for Two Starch-Based Hemostat Powders. J. Surg. Res. 2023, 282, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, W.; Wu, J.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, D.; Chen, F.; Liu, C. A Self-Gelling Starch-Based Sponge for Hemostasis. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 11, 1331–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Karimi, N.; Amooee, A.; SafiDahaj, F. Comparison of the Effect of PerClot® Powder and a Chitosan Derivative on Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Adhesions in Rat Animal Models. Pol. Przegląd Chir. 2021, 94, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Goldis, A.; Goldis, R.; Chirila, T.V. Biomaterials in Gastroenterology: A Critical Overview. Medicina 2019, 55, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, Y.; Cheng, N.; Sun, H.; Hou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Z. Advances in the Development and Optimization Strategies of the Hemostatic Biomaterials. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 10, 1062676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cziperle, D.J. AviteneTM Microfibrillar Collagen Hemostat for Adjunctive Hemostasis in Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Literature Review. Med. Devices Evid. Res. 2021, 14, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhong, Y.; Hu, H.; Min, N.; Wei, Y.; Li, X.; Li, X. Application and Outlook of Topical Hemostatic Materials: A Narrative Review. Ann. Transl. Med. 2021, 9, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ghimire, S.; Sarkar, P.; Rigby, K.; Maan, A.; Mukherjee, S.; Crawford, K.E.; Mukhopadhyay, K. Polymeric Materials for Hemostatic Wound Healing. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pereira, B.M.; Bortoto, J.B.; Fraga, G.P. Topical Hemostatic Agents in Surgery: Review and Prospects. Rev. Col. Bras. Cir. 2018, 45, 5. [Google Scholar]
  46. Salama, N.M.; Tabashy, R.H.; Mahmoud, I.H.; El Rahman, A.E.R.M.A.; Mohamed, D.N.E.; El Kassas, H. Does Gelfoam Slurry Embolization Post-Pulmonary Biopsy Reduce Risk of Pneumothorax? A Prospective Randomized Control Study. Egypt. J. Radiol. Nucl. Med. 2023, 54, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sekyi-Djan, N.; Chapple, C.; Hammond-Kenny, A.; Hilger, A. The Use of ARTISS Fibrin Sealant in Thyroid Surgery: Case Series and Review of the Literature. Br. J. Surg. 2022, 109, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Somani, S.N.; Moshirfar, M.; Shmunes, K.M.; Ronquillo, Y.C. Comparison and Application of Commercially Available Fibrin Sealants in Ophthalmology. Ocul. Surf. 2020, 18, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jolly, K.; Gupta, K.K.; Egbuji, O.; Naik, P.P.; Ahmed, S.K. Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery Reconstruction Using the Fibrin Sealant Patch Tachosil®. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Carretta, A.; Epskamp, M.; Ledermann, L.; Staartjes, V.E.; Neidert, M.C.; Regli, L.; Stienen, M.N. Collagen-Bound Fibrin Sealant (TachoSil®) for Dural Closure in Cranial Surgery: Single-Centre Comparative Cohort Study and Systematic Review of the Literature. Neurosurg. Rev. 2022, 45, 3779–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Eichinger, J.K.; Oldenburg, K.S.; Lin, J.; Wilkie, E.; Mock, L.; Tavana, M.L.; Friedman, R.J. Comparing Dermabond PRINEO versus Dermabond or Staples for Wound Closure: A Randomized Control Trial Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2022, 31, 2066–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mirzaei, Y.; Hagemeister, K.; Tolba, R.H.; Steitz, J. Novel In Vitro Study to Assess Microbial Barrier Properties of Polyurethane-Based Tissue Adhesives in Comparison to the Gold Standard Dermabond®. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 5249214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gong, M.; Liu, Z.; Kong, J.; Zhao, B.; He, X.; Gu, J.; Su, H. Transcatheter Arterial Embolization Using N-Butyl-2 Cyanoacrylate Glubran® 2 for Acute Massive Pancreati Coduodenal Arterial Hemorrhage. Front. Mater. 2022, 9, 1003539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Slezak, P.; Klang, A.; Ferguson, J.; Monforte, X.; Schmidt, P.; Bauder, B.; Url, A.; Osuchowski, M.; Redl, H.; Spazierer, D.; et al. Tissue Reactions to Polyethylene Glycol and Glutaraldehyde-Based Surgical Sealants in a Rabbit Aorta Model. J. Biomater. Appl. 2020, 34, 1330–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dhandapani, V.; Ringuette, V.; Desrochers, M.; Sirois, M.; Vermette, P. Composition, Host Responses and Clinical Applications of Bioadhesives. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2022, 110, 2779–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Keskin, E.; Aydin, H.A.; Kalayci, M.; Işik, E.; Özgen, U.; Şimşek, K.; Baklaci, D.; Gökçe, M. The Histopathological Effects of Reabsorbable Polyethylene Glycol Hydrogel (Coseal) on Epidural Fibrosis in an Experimental Postlaminectomy Model in Rats. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 51, 1512–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, X.F.; Lu, P.; Jia, H.R.; Li, G.; Zhu, B.; Wang, X.; Wu, F.G. Emerging Materials for Hemostasis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 475, 214823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ohlinger, R.; Rutkowski, R.; Kohlmann, T.; Paepke, S.; Alwafai, Z.; Flieger, C.; Moller, S.; Lenz, F.; Zygmunt, M.; Unger, J. Impact of the Lysine-Urethane Adhesive Tissuglu® on Postoperative Complications and Interventions after Drain-Free Mastectomy. Anticancer Res. 2020, 40, 2801–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yılmaz, G.; Özdenkaya, Y.; Karatepe, O.; Tanrıkulu, Y.; Kamalı, G.; Yalçın, O. Effects of Polyurethane Membrane on Septic Colon Anastomosis and Intra-Abdominal Adhesions. Turk. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2021, 27, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kim, K.; Siddiqui, Z.; Acevedo-Jake, A.M.; Roy, A.; Choudhury, M.; Grasman, J.; Kumar, V. Angiogenic Hydrogels to Accelerate Early Wound Healing. Macromol. Biosci. 2022, 22, 2200067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Meng, F.C.; Lee, C.Y. Safety and Efficiency of Femoral Artery Access Closure Using QuikClot Combat Gauze in Patients with Severe Arterial Calcification of Access Sites. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2023, 13, 282–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jia, Y.J.; Du, W.Q.; Zong, Z.W.; Jiang, R.Q.; Zhong, X.; Ye, Z.; Li, T.S.; Yang, H.Y.; Xiao, L.P.; Fan, J. Hemostatic Effects of Bio-Zeolite Gauze and QuikClot Combat Gauze on Major Bleeding in Rabbits Acutely Exposed to High Altitude. Prehosp. Emerg. Care 2022, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ding, S.; Wei, X.; Yang, K.; Lin, S.; Tian, F.; Li, F. Ca-Ga Double Doping Strategy to Fabricate Hemostatic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles (MSN) with Antibacterial Activity. Silicon 2020, 13, 4033–4045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pogorielov, M.V.; Sikora, V.Z. Chitosan as a Hemostatic Agent: Current State. Eur. J. Medicine. Ser. B 2015, 2, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Biranje, S.S.; Sun, J.; Shi, Y.; Yu, S.; Jiao, H.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Liu, J. Polysaccharide-Based Hemostats: Recent Developments, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Cellulose 2021, 28, 8899–8937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Khan, M.A.; Mujahid, M. A Review on Recent Advances in Chitosan Based Composite for Hemostatic Dressings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 124, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Khoshmohabat, H.; Paydar, S.; Kazemi, H.M.; Dalfardi, B. Overview of Agents Used for Emergency Hemostasis. Trauma. Mon. 2016, 21, e26023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Milić, M.; Vuković, B.; Barbir, R.; Pem, B.; Milić, M.; Šerić, V.; Frőhlich, E.; Vinković Vrček, I. Effect of Differently Coated Silver Nanoparticles on Hemostasis. Platelets 2021, 32, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Fernando, L.; Chen, W.-T.; Lai, C.-W.; Ye, F.-Y.; Lai, P.-S.; Lin, J.-J.; Yasuda, K.; Song, T.-T.; Song, J.-M. Biocompatibility and Antimicrobial Activity of Copper(II) Oxide Hybridized with Nano Silicate Platelets. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2022, 435, 128253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Milić, M.; Cvetić, Ž.; Bendelja, K.; Vuković, B.; Galić, E.; Ćurlin, M.; Dobrošević, B.; Jurak Begonja, A.; Vinković Vrček, I. Response of Platelets to Silver Nanoparticles Designed with Different Surface Functionalization. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2021, 224, 111565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Metwally, W.M.; El-Habashy, S.E.; El-Nikhely, N.A.; Mahmoud, H.E.; Eltaher, H.M.; El-Khordagui, L. Nano Zinc Oxide-Functionalized Nanofibrous Microspheres: A Bioactive Hybrid Platform with Antimicrobial, Regenerative and Hemostatic Activities. Int. J. Pharm. 2023, 638, 122920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Shefa, A.A.; Taz, M.; Hossain, M.; Kim, Y.S.; Lee, S.Y.; Lee, B.-T. Investigation of Efficiency of a Novel, Zinc Oxide Loaded TEMPO-Oxidized Cellulose Nanofiber Based Hemostat for Topical Bleeding. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 786–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Yang, C.M.; Lee, J.; Lee, S.Y.; Lee, H.; Chathuranga, K.; Lee, J.; Park, W. Silk Fibroin/Tannin/ZnO Nanocomposite Hydrogel with Hemostatic Activities. Gels 2022, 8, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Allotey, J.K.; King, A.H.; Kumins, N.H.; Wong, V.L.; Harth, K.C.; Cho, J.S.; Kashyap, V.S. Systematic Review of Hemostatic Agents Used in Vascular Surgery. J. Vasc. Surg. 2021, 73, 2189–2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tompeck, A.J.; Gajdhar, A.u.R.; Dowling, M.; Johnson, S.B.; Barie, P.S.; Winchell, R.J.; King, D.; Scalea, T.M.; Britt, L.D.; Narayan, M. A Comprehensive Review of Topical Hemostatic Agents: The Good, the Bad, and the Novel. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020, 88, e1–e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Baxter. Coseal. Available online: https://globaladvancedsurgery.baxter.com/coseal (accessed on 6 June 2023).
  77. Esutures. Available online: https://www.Esutures.Com/Product/0-in-Date/84-Baxter/739-Coseal/29008-Baxter-Coseal-Surgical-Sealant-4ml-934071/ (accessed on 6 June 2023).
  78. Sorbus. Celox Haemostatic Granules. Available online: https://Www.Sorbus-Intl.Co.Uk/Celox-Haemostatic-Granules-15g-Pack (accessed on 6 June 2023).
  79. Chen, Y.; Wu, L.; Li, P.; Hao, X.; Yang, X.; Xi, G.; Liu, W.; Feng, Y.; He, H.; Shi, C. Polysaccharide Based Hemostatic Strategy for Ultrarapid Hemostasis. Macromol. Biosci. 2020, 20, 1900370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Global Hemostats Market—Industry Trends and Forecast to 2029. Available online: Https://Www.Databridgemarketresearch.Com/Reports/Global-Hemostats-Market (accessed on 6 June 2023).
  81. Iannitti, D.A.; Kim, C.; Ito, D.; Epstein, J. Impact of an Active Hemostatic Product Treatment Approach on Bleeding-Related Complications and Hospital Costs among Inpatient Surgeries in the United States. J. Med. Econ. 2021, 24, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Pennington, Z.; Ehresman, J.; Westbroek, E.M.; Lubelski, D.; Cottrill, E.; Sciubba, D.M. Interventions to Minimize Blood Loss and Transfusion Risk in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2020, 196, 106004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Elieh-Ali-Komi, D.; Hamblin, M.R.; Daniel, E.-A.-K. Chitin and Chitosan: Production and Application of Versatile Biomedical Nanomaterials. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2016, 4, 411. [Google Scholar]
  84. Al-Rooqi, M.M.; Hassan, M.M.; Moussa, Z.; Obaid, R.J.; Suman, N.H.; Wagner, M.H.; Natto, S.S.A.; Ahmed, S.A. Advancement of Chitin and Chitosan as Promising Biomaterials. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2022, 26, 101561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Motelica, L.; Ficai, D.; Ficai, A.; Truşcă, R.D.; Ilie, C.I.; Oprea, O.C.; Andronescu, E. Innovative Antimicrobial Chitosan/Zno/Ag Nps/Citronella Essential Oil Nanocomposite—Potential Coating for Grapes. Foods 2020, 9, 1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ojeda-Hernández, D.D.; Canales-Aguirre, A.A.; Matias-Guiu, J.; Gomez-Pinedo, U.; Mateos-Díaz, J.C. Potential of Chitosan and Its Derivatives for Biomedical Applications in the Central Nervous System. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Pellis, A.; Guebitz, G.M.; Nyanhongo, G.S. Chitosan: Sources, Processing and Modification Techniques. Gels 2022, 8, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Jones, M.; Kujundzic, M.; John, S.; Bismarck, A. Crab vs. Mushroom: A Review of Crustacean and Fungal Chitin in Wound Treatment. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ibrahim, H.M.; El-Zairy, E.M.R. Chitosan as a Biomaterial—Structure, Properties, and Electrospun Nanofibers. In Concepts, Compounds and the Alternatives of Antibacterials; InTech Open: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  90. Janvikul, W.; Uppanan, P.; Thavornyutikarn, B.; Krewraing, J.; Prateepasen, R. In Vitro Comparative Hemostatic Studies of Chitin, Chitosan, and Their Derivatives. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 102, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tiplea, R.E.; Lemnaru, G.M.; Trușcă, R.D.; Holban, A.; Kaya, M.G.A.; Dragu, L.D.; Ficai, D.; Ficai, A.; Bleotu, C. Antimicrobial Films Based on Chitosan, Collagen, and Zno for Skin Tissue Regeneration. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 11, 11985–11995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Radu, E.R.; Pandele, A.M.; Tuncel, C.; Miculescu, F.; Voicu, S.I. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan/LDH Composite Membranes for Drug Delivery Application. Membranes 2023, 13, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Okamoto, Y.; Yano, R.; Miyatake, K.; Tomohiro, I.; Shigemasa, Y.; Minami, S. Effects of Chitin and Chitosan on Blood Coagulation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2003, 53, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Crini, G.; Lichtfouse, E. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 35, Chitin and Chitosan: History, Fundamentals and Innovations; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; ISBN 978-3-03016-537-6. [Google Scholar]
  95. Spoială, A.; Ilie, C.I.; Dolete, G.; Croitoru, A.M.; Surdu, V.A.; Trușcă, R.D.; Motelica, L.; Oprea, O.C.; Ficai, D.; Ficai, A.; et al. Preparation and Characterization of Chitosan/TiO2 Composite Membranes as Adsorbent Materials for Water Purification. Membranes 2022, 12, 804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Subramanian, A.; Krishnan, U.M.; Sethuraman, S. Skin Tissue Regeneration. In Electrospinning for Tissue Regeneration; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 298–316. [Google Scholar]
  97. Chandel, A.K.S.; Shimizu, A.; Hasegawa, K.; Ito, T. Advancement of Biomaterial-Based Postoperative Adhesion Barriers. Macromol. Biosci. 2021, 21, e2000395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yin, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ren, X.; Qiu, Y.; Huang, T.-S. Novel Quaternarized N-Halamine Chitosan and Polyvinyl Alcohol Nanofibrous Membranes as Hemostatic Materials with Excellent Antibacterial Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 232, 115823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, Y.; Cao, H.; Wang, X. Synthesis and Characterization of an Injectable ε-Polylysine/Carboxymethyl Chitosan Hydrogel Used in Medical Application. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 248, 122902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hu, Z.; Zhang, D.Y.; Lu, S.T.; Li, P.W.; Li, S.D. Chitosan-Based Composite Materials for Prospective Hemostatic Applications. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Chen, K.Y.; Chen, Y.C.; Lin, T.H.; Yang, C.Y.; Kuo, Y.W.; Lei, U. Hemostatic Enhancement via Chitosan Is Independent of Classical Clotting Pathways—A Quantitative Study. Polymers 2020, 12, 2391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Jiménez-Gómez, C.P.; Cecilia, J.A. Chitosan: A Natural Biopolymer with a Wide and Varied Range of Applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Chen, K.Y.; Lin, T.H.; Yang, C.Y.; Kuo, Y.W.; Lei, U. Mechanics for the Adhesion and Aggregation of Red Blood Cells on Chitosan. J. Mech. 2018, 34, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Szatmári, V. Chitosan Hemostatic Dressing for Control of Hemorrhage from Femoral Arterial Puncture Site in Dogs. J. Vet. Sci. 2015, 16, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Pan, M.; Tang, Z.; Tu, J.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Q.; Xiao, R.; Liu, H. Porous Chitosan Microspheres Containing Zinc Ion for Enhanced Thrombosis and Hemostasis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 85, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Karahaliloğlu, Z.; Demirbilek, M.; Ulusoy, İ.; Gümüşkaya, B.; Denkbaş, E.B. Active Nano/Microbilayer Hemostatic Agents for Diabetic Rat Bleeding Model. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2017, 105, 1573–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, C.; Luo, W.; Li, P.; Li, S.; Yang, Z.; Hu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ao, N. Preparation and Evaluation of Chitosan/Alginate Porous Microspheres/Bletilla Striata Polysaccharide Composite Hemostatic Sponges. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 174, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rodríguez-Acosta, H.; Tapia-Rivera, J.M.; Guerrero-Guzmán, A.; Hernández-Elizarraráz, E.; Hernández-Díaz, J.A.; Garza-García, J.J.O.; Pérez-Ramírez, P.E.; Velasco-Ramírez, S.F.; Ramírez-Anguiano, A.C.; Velázquez-Juárez, G.; et al. Chronic Wound Healing by Controlled Release of Chitosan Hydrogels Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles and Calendula Extract. J. Tissue Viability 2022, 31, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Biranje, S.S.; Madiwale, P.V.; Patankar, K.C.; Chhabra, R.; Dandekar-Jain, P.; Adivarekar, R.V. Hemostasis and Anti-Necrotic Activity of Wound-Healing Dressing Containing Chitosan Nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 121, 936–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Zhao, W.Y.; Fang, Q.Q.; Wang, X.F.; Wang, X.W.; Zhang, T.; Shi, B.H.; Zheng, B.; Zhang, D.D.; Hu, Y.Y.; Ma, L.; et al. Chitosan-Calcium Alginate Dressing Promotes Wound Healing: A Preliminary Study. Wound Repair. Regen. 2020, 28, 326–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Song, F.; Kong, Y.; Shao, C.; Cheng, Y.; Lu, J.; Tao, Y.; Du, J.; Wang, H. Chitosan-Based Multifunctional Flexible Hemostatic Bio-Hydrogel. Acta Biomater. 2021, 136, 170–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Shou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yan, S.; Xia, P.; Xu, P.; Li, G.; Zhang, K.; Yin, J. Thermoresponsive Chitosan/DOPA-Based Hydrogel as an Injectable Therapy Approach for Tissue-Adhesion and Hemostasis. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 3619–3629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rao, K.M.; Narayanan, K.B.; Uthappa, U.T.; Park, P.H.; Choi, I.; Han, S.S. Tissue Adhesive, Self-Healing, Biocompatible, Hemostasis, and Antibacterial Properties of Fungal-Derived Carboxymethyl Chitosan-Polydopamine Hydrogels. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Xia, L.; Wang, S.; Jiang, Z.; Chi, J.; Yu, S.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Zhou, C.; Liu, W.; et al. Hemostatic Performance of Chitosan-Based Hydrogel and Its Study on Biodistribution and Biodegradability in Rats. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 264, 117965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhou, P.; Xia, Z.; Qi, C.; He, M.; Yu, T.; Shi, L. Construction of Chitosan/Ag Nanocomposite Sponges and Their Properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 192, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Fan, X.; Li, Y.; Li, N.; Wan, G.; Ali, M.A.; Tang, K. Rapid Hemostatic Chitosan/Cellulose Composite Sponge by Alkali/Urea Method for Massive Haemorrhage. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 2769–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Sathiyaseelan, A.; Saravanakumar, K.; Mariadoss, A.V.A.; Wang, M.H. Antimicrobial and Wound Healing Properties of Feo Fabricated Chitosan/Pva Nanocomposite Sponge. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Gordienko, M.G.; Palchikova, V.V.; Kalenov, S.V.; Lebedev, E.A.; Belov, A.A.; Menshutina, N.V. The Alginate–Chitosan Composite Sponges with Biogenic Ag Nanoparticles Produced by Combining of Cryostructuration, Ionotropic Gelation and Ion Replacement Methods. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2022, 71, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Huang, N.; Lin, J.; Li, S.; Deng, Y.; Kong, S.; Hong, P.; Yang, P.; Liao, M.; Hu, Z. Preparation and Evaluation of Squid Ink Polysaccharide-Chitosan as a Wound-Healing Sponge. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 82, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Buriuli, M.; Kumari, W.G.; Verma, D. Evaluation of Hemostatic Effect of Polyelectrolyte Complex-Based Dressings. J. Biomater. Appl. 2017, 32, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Misgav, M.; Lubetszki, A.; Brutman-Barazani, T.; Martinowitz, U.; Kenet, G. The Hemostatic Efficacy of Chitosan-Pads in Hemodialysis Patients with Significant Bleeding Tendency. J. Vasc. Access 2017, 18, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Wu, H.; Yan, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C. Preparation and Properties of Electrospun Chitosan/Polybutylenes Succinate Nanofiber Membrane for Wound Hemostatic Dressing. J. Ind. Text. 2022, 52, 15280837221113086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Akram, A.M.; Omar, R.A.; Ashfaq, M. Chitosan/Calcium Phosphate-Nanoflakes-Based Biomaterial: A Potential Hemostatic Wound Dressing Material. Polym. Bull. 2022, 80, 5071–5086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wang, Y.W.; Liu, C.C.; Cherng, J.H.; Lin, C.S.; Chang, S.J.; Hong, Z.J.; Liu, C.C.; Chiu, Y.K.; Hsu, S.D.; Chang, H. Biological Effects of Chitosan-Based Dressing on Hemostasis Mechanism. Polymers 2019, 11, 1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, C.H.; Cherng, J.H.; Liu, C.C.; Fang, T.J.; Hong, Z.J.; Chang, S.J.; Fan, G.Y.; Hsu, S. Der Procoagulant and Antimicrobial Effects of Chitosan in Wound Healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Xie, M.; Zeng, Y.; Wu, H.; Wang, S.; Zhao, J. Multifunctional Carboxymethyl Chitosan/Oxidized Dextran/Sodium Alginate Hydrogels as Dressing for Hemostasis and Closure of Infected Wounds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 219, 1337–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Elangwe, C.N.; Morozkina, S.N.; Olekhnovich, R.O.; Krasichkov, A.; Polyakova, V.O.; Uspenskaya, M.V. A Review on Chitosan and Cellulose Hydrogels for Wound Dressings. Polymers 2022, 14, 5163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, D.; Hu, Z.; Li, S.; Zhang, L.; Lu, S.; Liang, F. Chitosan-Based Thermo-Sensitive Hydrogel Loading Oyster Peptides for Hemostasis Application. Materials 2020, 13, 5038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Patil, G.; Pawar, R.; Jadhav, S.; Ghormade, V. A Chitosan Based Multimodal “Soft” Hydrogel for Rapid Hemostasis of Non-Compressible Hemorrhages and Its Mode of Action. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2022, 4, 100237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lin, X.; Shen, Y.; Wang, L. Multi-Scale Photoacoustic Assessment of Wound Healing Using Chitosan–Graphene Oxide Hemostatic Sponge. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kim, K.; Ryu, J.H.; Koh, M.-Y.; Yun, S.P.; Kim, S.; Park, J.P.; Jung, C.-W.; Lee, M.S.; Seo, H.-I.; Kim, J.H.; et al. Coagulopathy-Independent, Bioinspired Hemostatic Materials: A Full Research Story from Preclinical Models to a Human Clinical Trial. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabc9992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wu, Z.; Zhou, W.; Deng, W.; Xu, C.; Cai, Y.; Wang, X. Antibacterial and Hemostatic Thiol-Modified Chitosan-Immobilized AgNPs Composite Sponges. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 20307–20320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Deineka, V.; Sulaieva, O.; Pernakov, M.; Korniienko, V.; Husak, Y.; Yanovska, A.; Yusupova, A.; Tkachenko, Y.; Kalinkevich, O.; Zlatska, A.; et al. Hemostatic and Tissue Regeneration Performance of Novel Electrospun Chitosan-Based Materials. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Bal-Ozturk, A.; Karal-Yilmaz, O.; Akguner, Z.P.; Aksu, S.; Tas, A.; Olmez, H. Sponge-like Chitosan-Based Nanostructured Antibacterial Material as a Topical Hemostat. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 47522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zheng, L.; Gu, B.; Li, S.; Luo, B.; Wen, Y.; Chen, M.; Li, X.; Zha, Z.; Zhang, H.T.; Wang, X. An Antibacterial Hemostatic AuNPs@corn Stalk/Chitin Composite Sponge with Shape Recovery for Promoting Wound Healing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 296, 119924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.