Next Article in Journal
DNA Polymerases for Whole Genome Amplification: Considerations and Future Directions
Next Article in Special Issue
Overexpression of a Grape MYB Transcription Factor Gene VhMYB2 Increases Salinity and Drought Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana
Previous Article in Journal
Genetically Engineered Mice Unveil In Vivo Roles of the Mediator Complex
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Elucidating the Mesocarp Drupe Transcriptome of Açai (Euterpe oleracea Mart.): An Amazonian Tree Palm Producer of Bioactive Compounds

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(11), 9315; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119315
by Elaine Darnet 1,2,†, Bruno Teixeira 1,†, Hubert Schaller 2,3, Hervé Rogez 1,* and Sylvain Darnet 1,2,3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(11), 9315; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119315
Submission received: 29 April 2023 / Revised: 13 May 2023 / Accepted: 16 May 2023 / Published: 26 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Omics Study to Uncover Signalling and Gene Regulation in Plants 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1.      The annotation contains numbers that do not carry a semantic load: lines 15-18.

2.      The use of two specimens of the plant as a source of raw materials is considered insufficiently representative. Even for cloned plants, at least four specimens are usually taken.                                        

 

3.      Figure captions are too long. Perhaps the details should be moved to the main text.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf


Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the positive comments on this paper. Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In the manuscript submitted for review, the Authors describe the mesocarp drupe transcriptome of Açai (Euterpe oleracea Mart.), an Amazonian tree palm. 

I find the topic of the manuscript extremely interesting, and "up to date", and the whole work is written well and thoughtfully. The reader's attention is undoubtedly drawn to carefully prepared figures.

 

My comments/questions:

1. For me, there was no clearly defined aim presented for the review of the experience.

2. While in the conclusion it would be important to know in which fields of science (medicine?) the results obtained by the Authors could be applied.

 

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the positive comments on this paper. Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop