Next Article in Journal
Shared Inflammatory Pathology of Stroke and COVID-19
Next Article in Special Issue
A Single Injection of NTG-101 Reduces the Expression of Pain-Related Neurotrophins in a Canine Model of Degenerative Disc Disease
Previous Article in Journal
On Collective Molecular Dynamics in Biological Systems: A Review of Our Experimental Observations and Theoretical Modeling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Extracellular Vesicles: Interplay with the Extracellular Matrix and Modulated Cell Responses
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Fractone Stem Cell Niche Components Provide Intuitive Clues in the Design of New Therapeutic Procedures/Biomatrices for Neural Repair

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(9), 5148; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095148
by James Melrose 1,2,3,4
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(9), 5148; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095148
Submission received: 2 March 2022 / Revised: 25 April 2022 / Accepted: 2 May 2022 / Published: 5 May 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors describe about the important instructive contributions of hyaluronan in neural structures, neural cell regulation and its potential application in neural repair biology. Although this manuscript is well-written, I would like to point out several points to be improved.

  1. There are some overlap between this manuscript and the published article from the same author (Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115583) . It's better to decrease the overlap by revising the manuscript. (Otherwise, this manuscript won't be accepted.)
  2. The organization of abstract is not good. The author should revise the abstract to follow the standardized manner.
  3.  Figure 1 is not high quality. The author should draw the illustration more clearly and beautifully and revise the figure legend so that the readers can understand the schemes visually.

Author Response

Reviewer 1 COMMENTS

 

The authors describe about the important instructive contributions of hyaluronan in neural structures, neural cell regulation and its potential application in neural repair biology. Although this manuscript is well-written, I would like to point out several points to be improved.

  1. There are some overlap between this manuscript and the published article from the same author (Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115583) . It's better to decrease the overlap by revising the manuscript. (Otherwise, this manuscript won't be accepted.)
  2. The organization of abstract is not good. The author should revise the abstract to follow the standardized manner.
  3.  Figure 1 is not high quality. The author should draw the illustration more clearly and beautifully and revise the figure legend so that the readers can understand the schemes visually.

Author responses

The manuscript has been revised removing content overlap with Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115583 and re-organised with additional comments on HA as a scaffolding material, all new material is highlighted in the marked up revised manuscript. A revised figure 1 is provided and a new figure 2 to explain fractone organisation better. Table 1 has also been modified with the inclusion of additional information.

 

 

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear author
in my opinion the review entitled "The Niche Components of Fractone Stem Cells Provide Intuitive Clues in the Design of Novel Therapeutic / Biomatic Procedures for Neural Repair"
does not seem entirely and completely clear. Even though the very interesting and innovative argument in the field,
it does not seem to have original ideas with regards to published literature and could be presented in a more structured-way.
Conversely references are appropriate.

Also, the figure should be more explicative. Table 2 seems inappropriate. in coclusion the review is difficult to read and interpret.

Author Response

Reviewer 2 COMMENTS

 

Dear author
in my opinion the review entitled "The Niche Components of Fractone Stem Cells Provide Intuitive Clues in the Design of Novel Therapeutic / Biomatic Procedures for Neural Repair" does not seem entirely and completely clear. Even though the very interesting and innovative argument in the field, it does not seem to have original ideas with regards to published literature and could be presented in a more structured-way. Conversely references are appropriate.

Also, the figure should be more explicative. Table 2 seems inappropriate. in coclusion the review is difficult to read and interpret.

Author responses

The manuscript has been extensively revised with additional comments on HA as a scaffolding material, all new material is highlighted in the marked up revised manuscript. A revised figure 1 is provided and a new figure 2 has been added to better explain fractone organisation and interactions between cell populations in the niche environment. Table 2 has been deleted and a new more informative Table 1 provided.

 

 

 

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The author revised the manuscript adequately.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear author

I appreciated the article and the corrections made.  Moreover, I wonder if there are any trials in which HA has been used for neurodegenerative diseases. The potential applications of this material should be extensively investigated.

Back to TopTop