Next Article in Journal
Emerging Evidence of Pathological Roles of Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL)
Next Article in Special Issue
Dynamics of Connexin 43 Down Modulation in Human Articular Chondrocytes Stimulated by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha
Previous Article in Journal
Storage Mite Precision Allergy Molecular Diagnosis in the Moderate-to-Severe T2-High Asthma Phenotype
Previous Article in Special Issue
Calcined Hydroxyapatite with Collagen I Foam Promotes Human MSC Osteogenic Differentiation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

YY2 Promotes Osteoblast Differentiation by Upregulating Osterix Transcriptional Activity

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(8), 4303; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084303
by Meiyu Piao 1,†, Sung Ho Lee 1,†, Myeong Ji Kim 1, Hyung Sik Kim 2,* and Kwang Youl Lee 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(8), 4303; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084303
Submission received: 25 March 2022 / Revised: 11 April 2022 / Accepted: 11 April 2022 / Published: 13 April 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper it has been demonstrated that YY2 overexpression increases osteoblast differentiation and protein levels of osterix while YY2 knockdown has the opposite effect. 

The paper is well-written, conducted experiments are described in detail while results are clearly presented. 

Author Response

We really appreciate your comments.

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

The article titled “YY2 Promotes Osteoblast Differentiation by Upregulating Osterix Transcriptional Activity”, submitted to the International Journal of Molecular Sciences is in the scope of the journal. In my opinion, the manuscript presents unique results about the role and the mechanism of activity of YY2 transcription factor in osteoblast differentiation. The research methods and statistical analysis are chosen correctly, the descriptions of used methods are detail to be reproducible. Although the presentation of results is good quality, I find that it should be indicated, e.g. in caption of Y axis, that relative fold induction is concerned with ALP (Fig.1 and 2). Moreover, in my opinion the statements in lines 244 and 245 (Discussion) are a little bit contradictory with results descriptions presented in lines 137 -143.

Author Response

We really appreciate your comments. Please see the attachment regarding "Response to your comments".

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop