Next Article in Journal
Mesothelioma and Colorectal Cancer: Report of Four Cases with Synchronous and Metachronous Presentation
Previous Article in Journal
Modulatory Effects of Fractalkine on Inflammatory Response and Iron Metabolism of Lipopolysaccharide and Lipoteichoic Acid-Activated THP-1 Macrophages
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nitro-Deficient Niclosamide Confers Reduced Genotoxicity and Retains Mitochondrial Uncoupling Activity for Cancer Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms23052627
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mitochondrial Proteins as Source of Cancer Neoantigens

by
Gennaro Prota
1,*,†,
Ana Victoria Lechuga-Vieco
2,† and
Gennaro De Libero
1,†
1
Experimental Immunology, Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Hebelstrasse 20, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
2
The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7FY, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(5), 2627; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052627
Submission received: 28 January 2022 / Revised: 21 February 2022 / Accepted: 24 February 2022 / Published: 27 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mitochondrial Targeting as an Efficient Anti-cancer Therapy)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the past decade, anti-tumour immune responses have been successfully exploited to improve the outcome of patients with different cancers. Significant progress has been made in taking advantage of different types of T cell functions for therapeutic purposes. Despite these achievements, only a subset of patients respond favorably to immunotherapy. Therefore, there is a need of novel approaches to improve the effector functions of immune cells and to recognize the major targets of anti-tumour immunity. A major hallmark of cancer is metabolic rewiring associated with switch of mitochondrial functions. These changes are a consequence of high energy demand and increased macromolecular synthesis in cancer cells. Such adaptations in tumour cells might generate novel targets of tumour therapy, including the generation of neoantigens. Here, we review the most recent advances in research on the immune response to mitochondrial proteins in different cellular conditions.

1. Genetics of Mammalian Mitochondria

Mitochondria are organelles with primary functions in producing energy and metabolic intermediates required for many cellular activities. They regulate several important cellular processes, including proliferation and differentiation, redox homeostasis, differentiation, and programmed cell death [1].
Recent novel phylogenomic analyses support the theory that mitochondria originated from an alphaproteobacterial endosymbiont [2,3]. During evolution, this endosymbiotic interaction gradually became further intertwined, with most mitochondrial genetic information being transferred to the nucleus. However, mitochondria retained vestigial DNA (mtDNA) with autonomous transcriptional and replicative machinery. Nuclear and mitochondrial genomes take advantage of a mutual regulatory system, which coordinates their respective functions through a series of signals, although these remain to be fully elucidated [4,5]. The mammalian mitochondrion comprises between 1000 and 1500 proteins, the vast majority of which are encoded by the nuclear genome, whilst a small number is encoded by the mitochondrial genome [6,7]. The human mitochondrial genome is a genetically compact, circular, double-stranded, 16.5 kb, large DNA molecule. Typically, between 100 and 10,000 mtDNA copies exist per cell, based on the specific cell type [8,9]. In mammalian cells, mtDNA is anchored to the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) within the mitochondrial matrix, packaged into protein–DNA complexes known as ‘nucleoids’, which are principally formed by the mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) [10]. Human mtDNA encodes 11 mRNAs, 22 tRNAs, and 2 rRNAs [11]. Within the 11 mRNAs, 13 highly hydrophobic polypeptides are co-translationally inserted into the IMM, where they act as the core, membrane-bound subunits of the respiratory chain complexes I, III, and IV and ATP synthase. Moreover, mitochondrial proteins physically interact with other peptides produced by the nuclear genome to form respiratory chain complexes; alterations in the mtDNA sequence may therefore modify the assembly and function of each complex [12]. Such modifications may alter cell phenotype and functions, and consequently this paradigm is of particular interest in diseases, including cancer.

2. MtDNA Mutations and Cancer

The role of mtDNA mutations in cancer development and progression remains highly debated [13,14]. Historically, mitochondrial genetics in cancer was largely neglected, due to the attention paid to nuclear DNA but also to technical limitations [15]. A major difficulty in performing investigation stems from the fact that there is extensive heterogeneity in the mutational burden of the mitochondrial genome across multiple tumours [14]. Secondly, there are limited validated specific approaches which can be employed to determine the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and mutations in mitochondrial genes. For example, it is difficult to knock out or silence mitochondrially-encoded genes, although recent studies have elegantly and initially addressed some of the technical hurdles [16]. This limitation can be overcome through employment of mitochondrial cybrids, cell lines in which endogenous mitochondria are substituted with mitochondria isolated from other cell types [17,18]. However, despite the apparent usefulness and elegance of this approach, it remains technically complex and requires testing for a large number of mutations, therefore limiting its use. This lack of information has resulted in several in silico studies which have attempted to correlate mutations and phenotypes [19,20].
It is common knowledge that mtDNA has a higher basal mutation rate compared with the nuclear genome [21]. Somatic mutations in the mitochondrial genome have been identified in studies comparing mtDNA sequences between cancer patients and matched controls in healthy and tumoral tissues. These studies showed that neoplastic cells accumulate mutations in mtDNA during cancer progression. The first evidence of mitochondrial somatic mutations was identified in 1998 in colorectal cancer cell lines [22], followed by studies in which mtDNA mutations were detected in solid and hematological cancers [23,24,25,26]. In one study, mtDNA mutations did not confer any advantage to tumorigenesis, suggesting that only random processes contributed to the homoplastic incidence of the mtDNA mutations [27]. More recently, neutral selection of missense mtDNA mutations was described, and no evidence of positive selection in truncating mutations was detected across 31 tumour types comparing 1675 mtDNA sequences from cancer and paired healthy tissues from patients [28]. It was later found that most mtDNA mutations in multiple tumours are due to replication errors and the selective pressure against deleterious mutations [29]. Finally, proof of selection against the transmission of deleterious mtDNA and propagation of functional mtDNA during oogenesis in the human germline was provided [30]. Such selection of intact mtDNA does not occur in cancer cells, in which mtDNA mutations instead accumulate and confer proliferative advantages [31]. Equally, somatic mtDNA mutations generate different mitochondrial-encoded respiratory complex peptides, evidenced in multiple tumour lineages [32]. Mutations in Complex I peptides increase both tumorigenesis and metastatic potential, directly linking consequences of mitochondrial genome alterations to cancer progression [33]. These findings were complemented with bioinformatic analysis showing elevated mutagenesis in genes encoding respiratory complex I subunits such as MT-ND1, MT-ND4, and MT-ND5 in kidney, thyroid, and colorectal cancers [31,32,34]. In conclusion, mutations in mitochondrial proteins are present in most cancer cells and correlate with modulations in tumour metabolic profiles and cancer cell metastatic potential. Despite these correlative studies associating mutations to tumour development, the same altered proteins could induce cancer-specific immune responses, with direct implications for the rational design of cancer vaccines.

3. Mitochondrial Mutated Proteins and Cancer Immunotherapy

T cell immunity against human cancer cells contributes to controlling tumour growth, and therapeutic enhancement of such immune responses has proven extremely effective in enhancing anti-tumour immune responses in select patients [35,36]. One major achievement has been the identification of immunogenic peptides present in tumour cells and not in healthy ones, thus allowing the induction of T cells specific for such peptides and capable of targeting only tumour cells. Methods of predicting cancer peptides representing neoantigens have been validated in a few cases, thus showing our current limited understanding of how cancer-specific peptides are generated and why their immunogenicity is limited [37]. These studies have not fully addressed the potential relationship between mtDNA mutations and the generation of tumour-specific neoantigens. Although mitochondria frequently develop mutations and other changes during cancer progression, very little is known about mitochondrial DNA-encoded antigens recognized by tumour-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells. Evidence was provided of a positive correlation between increased mitochondrial protein content and modulation of responses to immunotherapy in melanoma patients [38]. These effects were attributed to an increase in the efficiency of peptide presentation by MHC molecules and to type I and II interferon signaling [38]. Analysis of patient melanoma samples showed that mutations in the mitochondrial-encoded respiratory complex III subunit cytochrome b gene (Cytb) induce peptide sequence modifications leading to neopeptides stimulating specific CD4+ T cells. Most Cytb mutations were T→C and A→G, and this protein product encoded by a mitochondrial gene mutation was present in the cytoplasm and in late endosomal compartments, permitting loading onto MHC class I and II molecules, respectively [39]. The exact mechanism of how these proteins cross membranes remains unclear. These studies provided the first convincing evidence that mutated peptides encoded in mitochondrial genome may induce specific immunity.
In the same manner, a cancer vaccine was formulated using an enriched mitochondrial protein extract from cancer cells. Prophylactic injections were followed by tumour challenge, resulting in delayed tumour growth in the vaccinated group compared to the control group. Evidence was also provided that mutations in mitochondrial proteins generated neo-antigens inducing the tumour-specific immune response [40]. Thus, this study convincingly showed the therapeutic potential of T cells specific for mitochondrial neoantigens.
Our research contribution built upon these results and showed that mitochondrial location of T cell-stimulatory proteins significantly enhances priming of antigen-specific CD8 T cells in vivo [41]. In the same study, mitochondria purified from B16 melanoma cells injected as vaccines induced potent CD8 T cell responses that protected mice challenged with the same tumour cells. The immunogenicity of mitochondrial proteins was also confirmed in a cancer patient. By comparing the sequences obtained from tumour and germline DNA, tumour-specific, nonsynonymous single-nucleotide variations were identified and 60 neoepitopes were predicted. Using HLA tetramers loaded with mitochondrial mutated peptides, CD8 T cells specific for 4 neoantigens derived from 2 mitochondrial-localized mutated proteins were identified [41].
Several studies confirmed that mitochondrial localization of proteins correlates with their immunogenicity. Proteins such as aconitase [42], the MLRQ subunit of the NADH ubiquinone oxidoreductase [43], and the E2 component of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex [44,45], which are encoded in the nucleus but resident in mitochondria, are highly immunogenic. The mechanism whereby mitochondrial localization confers increased immunogenicity is poorly defined. Cross-priming events, which are facilitated by both the frequency of mitochondria-localized proteins and the activation of the STING–cGAS pathway, probably play an important role [41]. Indeed, immunogenicity of the prototype antigens NY-ESO-1 and OVA is higher when they are localized in mitochondria than in cytoplasm of tumour cells [41]. This promising field of investigation requires additional studies to understand the molecular mechanisms linking mitochondrial localization to increased immunogenicity, to address the question of how frequently T cell responses are directed against peptides encoded by mutated mtDNA and to evaluate these immune cells in patients with different types of cancers.

4. Post-Translational Modifications: A Different Way to Generate Neoepitopes?

Post translational modifications (PTMs) play a key role in numerous biological processes by significantly affecting the structure and function of proteins [46]. PTMs contribute to several alterations in cancer cells including the regulation of tumour suppressor proteins or oncogene activity [47,48]. Unique PTMs may also generate neoepitopes [49,50], thus harnessing the scientific interest for using modified proteins as new anti-cancer vaccines [51,52]. Amongst PTMs, peptide oxidation [53], phosphorylation [54,55], and citrullination [56] have the potential to generate unique pools of antigens shared by cells with similar metabolic alterations. Post-translational modifications of proteins may also impact mitochondrial dynamics, protein quality control, and, ultimately, mitochondrial performance [57]. SUMOylation, S-oxidation (sulfinylation and sulfenylation), S-glutathionylation, S-nitrosylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, glycosylation, protein cleavage, crotonylation, ubiquitination, and ADP-ribosylation are PTMs reported in the mitoproteome [57,58]. All these PTMs generate new antigens independently of their encoding genes, and in several instances these modifications promote MHC binding and TCR/MHC interactions.
Below, we briefly summarize most known PTMs with their effects on T cell recognition.

4.1. Oxidation

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are signaling molecules involved in several physiological processes, including the regulation of mitochondrial homeostasis, cell differentiation, immune responses, and ageing. In the cell, ROS are generated via different routes, which may involve cytochrome p450, peroxisomes, xanthine oxidase, and NADPH oxidase. However, in non-phagocytic cells, the main sources of ROS are respiratory complexes I and III in the mitochondrial electron transport chain [59]. ROS generation can be important in antigen-specific T cell expansion [60]. ROS may also affect the oxidation state of peptide antigens, thus inducing the appearance of slightly different peptides that may show increased interaction with specific TCRs [53]. Accordingly, cancer-derived oxidized peptides can stimulate specific T cells recognizing ovarian epithelial cancer cells [61]. Whether oxidation of mitochondrial proteins may also generate cancer-specific immunity remains to be investigated.
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) promotes PTM of peptides through oxidation of cysteine residues, with subsequent effects on cell signaling. Under physiological pH conditions, cysteine residues exist as thiolate anions (Cys-S-), and in the presence of H2O2 the thiolate moiety is oxidized to its sulfonic form (Cys-SOH). Such oxidation process is reversible, with thioredoxins and glutaredoxins being involved in protein reduction. Oxidation of a Cytomegalovirus (CMV) immuno-dominant peptide decreased its antigenicity by hampering its interaction with the TCR, thus implying that during infection the oxidative state of infected cells may affect recognition by virus-specific T cells [53]. On the other hand, evidence of increased peptide immunogenicity after oxidation is still lacking.

4.2. Phosphorylation

Phosphorylation of mitochondrial peptides is a rapid and reversible modification which influences many important cellular activities, including metabolic signaling. More than 90% of the mitochondrial proteins contain at least one phosphorylation site, with an average of 8 phosphorylation sites in all annotated, mitochondrial-located proteins [62]. Phosphorylation modifications compete with glycosylation in serine/threonine residues, and therefore, they may both affect the immunogenicity of peptides carrying such modifications. One example is the chaperone Hsp60, located in the mitochondrial compartment. PTMs through glycosylation, phosphorylation, and hyperacetylation can alter the functional domains of this protein [63]. Some of these modifications may induce conformational changes sufficient to enhance the recognition by specific TCRs [49]. The immunogenicity of peptides abnormally phosphorylated in cancer cells is an active field and different screening approaches have been established to identify MHC I- and MHC II-binding tumour-specific phosphopeptides [49,50,54]. Clinical trials evaluating the therapeutic use of phosphorylated peptides as cancer vaccine are ongoing [64,65].

5. Mechanism of Mitochondrial Antigen Direct and Cross-Presentation in Cancer

In most cases, tumour cells do not prime specific immune responses, probably as a result of low co-stimulation. Conversely, dendritic cells (DCs) behave as professional antigen-presenting cells, capable of efficient internalization of tumour debris and IL-12-production [66,67]. DCs may also take exogenous proteins and prime MHC class I-restricted T cells, a function identified as cross-priming. With this mechanism they may efficiently prime tumour-specific killer T cells [66,67]. DC may take up mitochondrial proteins within the tumour microenvironment, migrate to draining lymph nodes, and cross-present tumour antigens to MHC class I-restricted T cells [41]. The mechanism leading to mitochondria release by tumour cells and their uptake by DC is not understood. The transfer of mitochondria or mitochondrial proteins might involve tunnelling nanotubes (TNTs) [68,69], extracellular vesicle (EVs) uptake [70], and cytoplasts uptake [71] (Figure 1). Recent findings showed that a mechanism of quality control of mitochondrial integrity and function is represented by a release of free naked mitochondria [72]. The uptake of such released damaged organelles by professional antigen-presenting cells might represent an additional mechanism promoting presentation of mitochondrial proteins. A recent study also outlined that on some occasions an exchange of mitochondria between cells may occur [73]. Whether this organelle trafficking occurs in diseases and affects presentation of mitochondrial antigens remains unknown.
Another important aspect is how mitochondrial proteins are handled by tumour cells before their processing and binding to MHC molecules. Protein immunogenicity is determined via localization within a peculiar cellular compartment. Indeed, when the same protein is localized in the cytoplasm or in mitochondria, different peptides are generated and stimulate T cells with different specificities [74]. Thus, mitochondrial localization determines the type of processing.
Autophagy allows recycling of self-components through lysosomal degradation and is involved in the presentation of endogenous antigens by both MHC class I and class II molecules [75]. Accordingly, mitophagy, a selective process of autophagy that selectively degrades damaged mitochondria, might play a role in the presentation of mitochondrial antigens, although few data indicate such possibility [76].
A mechanism relying on the generation and trafficking of mitochondria-derived vesicles (MDVs) rather than on autophagy/mitophagy was described in a model of Parkinson’s disease [77]. These studies showed that stress conditions such as heat stress or LPS stimulation induced the formation of MDV in a monocyte/macrophage-like cell line. The formed vesicles could fuse with late endosomes/lysosomes where mitochondrial antigens are processed by hydrolytic enzymes. The authors speculated that mitochondrial peptides are released in the cytosol, where they are processed by the proteasome, allowing their translocation in the endoplasmic reticulum and presentation by MHC class I molecules to T cells [77,78]. In normal cells, this process is constitutively suppressed by Parkin, a known regulator of mitophagy that is frequently defective in Parkinson’s disease patients [79]. Recent evidence indicates that defects in the mitophagy machinery may also have a role in the progression of cancer. Indeed, in several cancer types Parkin function is lost [80]. The absence of Parkin in tumour cells might permit the accumulation of MDVs and thus induce mitochondrial antigen presentation with a mechanism similar to that observed in Parkinson’s disease. It will be of interest to investigate whether other kinds of stress (i.e., hypoxia, proliferative stress, lack of nutrients, cytokine stimulation) may induce MDV formation thus promoting presentation of mitochondrial antigens in cancer cells.

6. Immune Response to Mitochondrial Proteins in Diseases Other Than Cancer

Several studies showed that mitochondrial proteins may induce specific immune responses. Immune recognition of mitochondrial-encoded proteins was first reported by Kelley et al. in 1974, who observed that myocardial infarction in dogs triggers auto-antibodies against antigens located in the outer and inner mitochondrial membrane [81]. Later, it was observed that patients affected by autoimmune diseases may generate T cell responses against mitochondrial mutated self-peptides and that in some instances these T cells cross-reacted with the same non-mutated proteins [82]. On the contrary, in healthy donors T cells recognizing mitochondrial mutated self-proteins did not cross-react with non-mutated ones, suggesting that autoimmune responses can arise upon expansion of T cells recognizing both mutated and wild-type mitochondrial proteins. In addition, mouse studies showed that mitochondrial proteins may induce strong immune responses. In some mouse strains, skin graft rejection was dependent on unknown factors inherited from the mother. Maternal inheritance of these characteristics suggested a possible implication of a gene present in mtDNA [83]. This antigen was later identified as the amino-terminal peptide of ND-1, a protein encoded within mtDNA, that is presented by H2-M3, an MHC class I-like molecule [83,84]. As the H2-M3 gene is not present in the human genome, there is no homologous system presenting this peptide to human T cells.
In a few studies, mtDNA-encoded proteins were investigated for their possible relevance in transplant rejection. A landmark study showed that the rejection of autologous, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) can be mediated by T cells specific for mutated proteins encoded by mtDNA. Consequently, in vitro expanded iPSCs accumulate de novo mtDNA mutations encoding altered self-peptides presented by select MHC alleles in humans and mice [85].

7. Conclusions

The ability of the human immune system to recognize and mount an immune response against mitochondrial mutated proteins has been observed under different pathological conditions. Mutations in mtDNA have been observed in several cancers, and whether such mutations induce specific immunity is a topic of active investigation. Several questions remain open: (i) what is the relevance of cross-presentation of mitochondrial antigens, in relation to cellular components exchange between DCs and tumour cells; (ii) how are mitochondrial proteins handled by tumour cells before their processing and loading on MHC molecules; (iii) do mtDNA mutations have a role in specific recognition of cancer cells by T lymphocytes; (iv) which mutated peptides become immunogenic, considering their cellular localization and post-translational modifications; (v) how frequently mitochondrial PTMs generate neoantigens in cancer cells. All these issues are of great interest and will reveal novel features of the physiological role of mitochondria in the immune response.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, G.P., G.D.L. and A.V.L.-V.; Writing—review and editing, G.P., G.D.L. and A.V.L.-V., funding acquisition G.D.L. and A.V.L.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants of the Swiss National Foundation (310030-173240), Swiss Cancer League (KFS-4707-02-2019), Cancer League beider Basel (KLbB-4779-02-2019), and by the University and University Hospital of Basel. A.V.L.-V. was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Fundacion Alfonso Martin Escudero (Spain).

Acknowledgments

We thank D.T. Cain and P. Cullen for proofreading the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chandel, N.S. Evolution of mitochondria as signaling organelles. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 204–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, Z.; Wu, M. An integrated phylogenomic approach toward pinpointing the origin of mitochondria. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 7949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Roger, A.J.; Munoz-Gomez, S.A.; Kamikawa, R. The Origin and Diversification of Mitochondria. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R1177–R1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Frezza, C. The role of mitochondria in the oncogenic signal transduction. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 48, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wiese, M.; Bannister, A.J. Two genomes, one cell: Mitochondrial-nuclear coordination via epigenetic pathways. Mol. Metab. 2020, 38, 100942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rhee, H.W.; Zou, P.; Udeshi, N.D.; Martell, J.D.; Mootha, V.K.; Carr, S.A.; Ting, A.Y. Proteomic mapping of mitochondria in living cells via spatially restricted enzymatic tagging. Science 2013, 339, 1328–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Calvo, S.E.; Clauser, K.R.; Mootha, V.K. MitoCarta2.0: An updated inventory of mammalian mitochondrial proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D1251–D1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Clay Montier, L.L.; Deng, J.J.; Bai, Y. Number matters: Control of mammalian mitochondrial DNA copy number. J. Genet. Genom. 2009, 36, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wachsmuth, M.; Hubner, A.; Li, M.; Madea, B.; Stoneking, M. Age-related and heteroplasmy-related variation in human mtDNA copy number. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1005939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kukat, C.; Wurm, C.A.; Spahr, H.; Falkenberg, M.; Larsson, N.G.; Jakobs, S. Super-resolution microscopy reveals that mammalian mitochondrial nucleoids have a uniform size and frequently contain a single copy of mtDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 13534–13539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gustafsson, C.M.; Falkenberg, M.; Larsson, N.G. Maintenance and Expression of Mammalian Mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2016, 85, 133–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Latorre-Pellicer, A.; Moreno-Loshuertos, R.; Lechuga-Vieco, A.V.; Sanchez-Cabo, F.; Torroja, C.; Acin-Perez, R.; Calvo, E.; Aix, E.; Gonzalez-Guerra, A.; Logan, A.; et al. Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA matching shapes metabolism and healthy ageing. Nature 2016, 535, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Seyfried, T.N.; Flores, R.E.; Poff, A.M.; D’Agostino, D.P. Cancer as a metabolic disease: Implications for novel therapeutics. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 515–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hertweck, K.L.; Dasgupta, S. The landscape of mtDNA modifications in cancer: A tale of two cities. Front. Oncol 2017, 7, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gammage, P.A.; Frezza, C. Mitochondrial DNA: The overlooked oncogenome? BMC Biol. 2019, 17, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Hussain, S.A.; Yalvac, M.E.; Khoo, B.; Eckardt, S.; McLaughlin, K.J. Adapting CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeting mitochondrial genome. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 627050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vithayathil, S.A.; Ma, Y.; Kaipparettu, B.A. Transmitochondrial cybrids: Tools for functional studies of mutant mitochondria. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 837, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marco-Brualla, J.; Al-Wasaby, S.; Soler, R.; Romanos, E.; Conde, B.; Justo-Mendez, R.; Enriquez, J.A.; Fernandez-Silva, P.; Martinez-Lostao, L.; Villalba, M.; et al. Mutations in the ND2 Subunit of Mitochondrial Complex I Are Sufficient to Confer Increased Tumorigenic and Metastatic Potential to Cancer Cells. Cancers 2019, 11, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kaneva, K.; O’Halloran, K.; Triska, P.; Liu, X.; Merkurjev, D.; Bootwalla, M.; Ryutov, A.; Cotter, J.A.; Ostrow, D.; Biegel, J.A.; et al. The spectrum of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations in pediatric CNS tumors. Neurooncol. Adv. 2021, 3, vdab074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Perez-Amado, C.J.; Tovar, H.; Gomez-Romero, L.; Beltran-Anaya, F.O.; Bautista-Pina, V.; Dominguez-Reyes, C.; Villegas-Carlos, F.; Tenorio-Torres, A.; Alfaro-Ruiz, L.A.; Hidalgo-Miranda, A.; et al. Mitochondrial DNA Mutation Analysis in Breast Cancer: Shifting From Germline Heteroplasmy Toward Homoplasmy in Tumors. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 572954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Parsons, T.J.; Muniec, D.S.; Sullivan, K.; Woodyatt, N.; Alliston-Greiner, R.; Wilson, M.R.; Berry, D.L.; Holland, K.A.; Weedn, V.W.; Gill, P.; et al. A high observed substitution rate in the human mitochondrial DNA control region. Nat. Genet. 1997, 15, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Polyak, K.; Li, Y.; Zhu, H.; Lengauer, C.; Willson, J.K.; Markowitz, S.D.; Trush, M.A.; Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B. Somatic mutations of the mitochondrial genome in human colorectal tumours. Nat. Genet. 1998, 20, 291–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fliss, M.S.; Usadel, H.; Caballero, O.L.; Wu, L.; Buta, M.R.; Eleff, S.M.; Jen, J.; Sidransky, D. Facile detection of mitochondrial DNA mutations in tumors and bodily fluids. Science 2000, 287, 2017–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Jeronimo, C.; Nomoto, S.; Caballero, O.L.; Usadel, H.; Henrique, R.; Varzim, G.; Oliveira, J.; Lopes, C.; Fliss, M.S.; Sidransky, D. Mitochondrial mutations in early stage prostate cancer and bodily fluids. Oncogene 2001, 20, 5195–5198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Jones, J.B.; Song, J.J.; Hempen, P.M.; Parmigiani, G.; Hruban, R.H.; Kern, S.E. Detection of mitochondrial DNA mutations in pancreatic cancer offers a “mass”-ive advantage over detection of nuclear DNA mutations. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 1299–1304. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kirches, E.; Krause, G.; Warich-Kirches, M.; Weis, S.; Schneider, T.; Meyer-Puttlitz, B.; Mawrin, C.; Dietzmann, K. High frequency of mitochondrial DNA mutations in glioblastoma multiforme identified by direct sequence comparison to blood samples. Int. J. Cancer 2001, 93, 534–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Coller, H.A.; Khrapko, K.; Bodyak, N.D.; Nekhaeva, E.; Herrero-Jimenez, P.; Thilly, W.G. High frequency of homoplasmic mitochondrial DNA mutations in human tumors can be explained without selection. Nat. Genet. 2001, 28, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ju, Y.S.; Alexandrov, L.B.; Gerstung, M.; Martincorena, I.; Nik-Zainal, S.; Ramakrishna, M.; Davies, H.R.; Papaemmanuil, E.; Gundem, G.; Shlien, A.; et al. Origins and functional consequences of somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in human cancer. eLife 2014, 3, e02935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Stewart, J.B.; Alaei-Mahabadi, B.; Sabarinathan, R.; Samuelsson, T.; Gorodkin, J.; Gustafsson, C.M.; Larsson, E. Simultaneous DNA and RNA Mapping of Somatic Mitochondrial Mutations across Diverse Human Cancers. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pereira, L.; Soares, P.; Radivojac, P.; Li, B.; Samuels, D.C. Comparing phylogeny and the predicted pathogenicity of protein variations reveals equal purifying selection across the global human mtDNA diversity. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 88, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Grandhi, S.; Bosworth, C.; Maddox, W.; Sensiba, C.; Akhavanfard, S.; Ni, Y.; LaFramboise, T. Heteroplasmic shifts in tumor mitochondrial genomes reveal tissue-specific signals of relaxed and positive selection. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, 2912–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gorelick, A.N.; Kim, M.; Chatila, W.K.; La, K.; Hakimi, A.A.; Berger, M.F.; Taylor, B.S.; Gammage, P.A.; Reznik, E. Respiratory complex and tissue lineage drive recurrent mutations in tumour mtDNA. Nat. Metab. 2021, 3, 558–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Koshikawa, N.; Akimoto, M.; Hayashi, J.I.; Nagase, H.; Takenaga, K. Association of predicted pathogenic mutations in mitochondrial ND genes with distant metastasis in NSCLC and colon cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 15535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yuan, Y.; Ju, Y.S.; Kim, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Yoon, C.J.; Yang, Y.; Martincorena, I.; Creighton, C.J.; Weinstein, J.N.; et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of mitochondrial genomes in human cancers. Nat. Genet. 2020, 52, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Robert, C. A decade of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yarchoan, M.; Hopkins, A.; Jaffee, E.M. Tumor Mutational Burden and Response Rate to PD-1 Inhibition. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2500–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vitiello, A.; Zanetti, M. Neoantigen prediction and the need for validation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 815–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Harel, M.; Ortenberg, R.; Varanasi, S.K.; Mangalhara, K.C.; Mardamshina, M.; Markovits, E.; Baruch, E.N.; Tripple, V.; Arama-Chayoth, M.; Greenberg, E.; et al. Proteomics of Melanoma Response to Immunotherapy Reveals Mitochondrial Dependence. Cell 2019, 179, 236–250.e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Voo, K.S.; Zeng, G.; Mu, J.B.; Zhou, J.; Su, X.Z.; Wang, R.F. CD4+ T-cell response to mitochondrial cytochrome B in human melanoma. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 5919–5926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Pierini, S.; Fang, C.; Rafail, S.; Facciponte, J.G.; Huang, J.; De Sanctis, F.; Morgan, M.A.; Uribe-Herranz, M.; Tanyi, J.L.; Facciabene, A. A Tumor Mitochondria Vaccine Protects against Experimental Renal Cell Carcinoma. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 4020–4027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Prota, G.; Gileadi, U.; Rei, M.; Lechuga-Vieco, A.V.; Chen, J.L.; Galiani, S.; Bedard, M.; Lau, V.W.C.; Fanchi, L.F.; Artibani, M.; et al. Enhanced Immunogenicity of Mitochondrial-Localized Proteins in Cancer Cells. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2020, 8, 685–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Fan, R.; Tykodi, S.S.; Braciale, T.J. Recognition of a sequestered self peptide by influenza virus-specific CD8+ cytolytic T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 2000, 164, 1669–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Sasada, T.; Ghendler, Y.; Neveu, J.M.; Lane, W.S.; Reinherz, E.L. A naturally processed mitochondrial self-peptide in complex with thymic MHC molecules functions as a selecting ligand for a viral-specific T cell receptor. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 194, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shimoda, S.; Van de Water, J.; Ansari, A.; Nakamura, M.; Ishibashi, H.; Coppel, R.L.; Lake, J.; Keeffe, E.B.; Roche, T.E.; Gershwin, M.E. Identification and precursor frequency analysis of a common T cell epitope motif in mitochondrial autoantigens in primary biliary cirrhosis. J. Clin. Invest. 1998, 102, 1831–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Matsumura, S.; Kita, H.; He, X.S.; Ansari, A.A.; Lian, Z.X.; Van De Water, J.; Yamamoto, K.; Tsuji, T.; Coppel, R.L.; Kaplan, M.; et al. Comprehensive mapping of HLA-A0201-restricted CD8 T-cell epitopes on PDC-E2 in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2002, 36, 1125–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mann, M.; Jensen, O.N. Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, L.; Liu, S.; Tao, Y. Regulating tumor suppressor genes: Post-translational modifications. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bode, A.M.; Dong, Z. Post-translational modification of p53 in tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 793–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Petersen, J.; Wurzbacher, S.J.; Williamson, N.A.; Ramarathinam, S.H.; Reid, H.H.; Nair, A.K.N.; Zhao, A.Y.; Nastovska, R.; Rudge, G.; Rossjohn, J.; et al. Phosphorylated self-peptides alter human leukocyte antigen class I-restricted antigen presentation and generate tumor-specific epitopes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 2776–2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mohammed, F.; Stones, D.H.; Zarling, A.L.; Willcox, C.R.; Shabanowitz, J.; Cummings, K.L.; Hunt, D.F.; Cobbold, M.; Engelhard, V.H.; Willcox, B.E. The antigenic identity of human class I MHC phosphopeptides is critically dependent upon phosphorylation status. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 54160–54172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Theivendran, S.; Tang, J.; Lei, C.; Yang, Y.; Song, H.; Gu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Jin, L.; Yu, C. Post translational modification-assisted cancer immunotherapy for effective breast cancer treatment. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 10421–10430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Chen, R.; Fulton, K.M.; Twine, S.M.; Li, J. Identification of MHC Peptides Using Mass Spectrometry for Neoantigen Discovery and Cancer Vaccine Development. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2021, 40, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Weiskopf, D.; Schwanninger, A.; Weinberger, B.; Almanzar, G.; Parson, W.; Buus, S.; Lindner, H.; Grubeck-Loebenstein, B. Oxidative stress can alter the antigenicity of immunodominant peptides. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2010, 87, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Depontieu, F.R.; Qian, J.; Zarling, A.L.; McMiller, T.L.; Salay, T.M.; Norris, A.; English, A.M.; Shabanowitz, J.; Engelhard, V.H.; Hunt, D.F.; et al. Identification of tumor-associated, MHC class II-restricted phosphopeptides as targets for immunotherapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12073–12078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Olsen, J.V.; Blagoev, B.; Gnad, F.; Macek, B.; Kumar, C.; Mortensen, P.; Mann, M. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 2006, 127, 635–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Durrant, L.G.; Metheringham, R.L.; Brentville, V.A. Autophagy, citrullination and cancer. Autophagy 2016, 12, 1055–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Liu, J.; Zhong, L.; Guo, R. The Role of Posttranslational Modification and Mitochondrial Quality Control in Cardiovascular Diseases. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 2021, 6635836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stram, A.R.; Payne, R.M. Post-translational modifications in mitochondria: Protein signaling in the powerhouse. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 4063–4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Holmstrom, K.M.; Finkel, T. Cellular mechanisms and physiological consequences of redox-dependent signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sena, L.A.; Li, S.; Jairaman, A.; Prakriya, M.; Ezponda, T.; Hildeman, D.A.; Wang, C.R.; Schumacker, P.T.; Licht, J.D.; Perlman, H.; et al. Mitochondria are required for antigen-specific T cell activation through reactive oxygen species signaling. Immunity 2013, 38, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Chiang, C.L.; Ledermann, J.A.; Aitkens, E.; Benjamin, E.; Katz, D.R.; Chain, B.M. Oxidation of ovarian epithelial cancer cells by hypochlorous acid enhances immunogenicity and stimulates T cells that recognize autologous primary tumor. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 4898–4907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Niemi, N.M.; Pagliarini, D.J. The extensive and functionally uncharacterized mitochondrial phosphoproteome. J. Biol. Chem 2021, 297, 100880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gorska, M.; Marino Gammazza, A.; Zmijewski, M.A.; Campanella, C.; Cappello, F.; Wasiewicz, T.; Kuban-Jankowska, A.; Daca, A.; Sielicka, A.; Popowska, U.; et al. Geldanamycin-induced osteosarcoma cell death is associated with hyperacetylation and loss of mitochondrial pool of heat shock protein 60 (hsp60). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Engelhard, V.H.; Obeng, R.C.; Cummings, K.L.; Petroni, G.R.; Ambakhutwala, A.L.; Chianese-Bullock, K.A.; Smith, K.T.; Lulu, A.; Varhegyi, N.; Smolkin, M.E.; et al. MHC-restricted phosphopeptide antigens: Preclinical validation and first-in-humans clinical trial in participants with high-risk melanoma. J. Immunother. Cancer 2020, 8, e000262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Penny, S.A.; Abelin, J.G.; Malaker, S.A.; Myers, P.T.; Saeed, A.Z.; Steadman, L.G.; Bai, D.L.; Ward, S.T.; Shabanowitz, J.; Hunt, D.F.; et al. Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes Target HLA-I Phosphopeptides Derived From Cancer Signaling in Colorectal Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 723566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Roberts, E.W.; Broz, M.L.; Binnewies, M.; Headley, M.B.; Nelson, A.E.; Wolf, D.M.; Kaisho, T.; Bogunovic, D.; Bhardwaj, N.; Krummel, M.F. Critical Role for CD103(+)/CD141(+) Dendritic Cells Bearing CCR7 for Tumor Antigen Trafficking and Priming of T Cell Immunity in Melanoma. Cancer Cell 2016, 30, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Cruz, F.M.; Colbert, J.D.; Merino, E.; Kriegsman, B.A.; Rock, K.L. The Biology and Underlying Mechanisms of Cross-Presentation of Exogenous Antigens on MHC-I Molecules. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 35, 149–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Pinto, G.; Brou, C.; Zurzolo, C. Tunneling Nanotubes: The Fuel of Tumor Progression? Trends Cancer 2020, 6, 874–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Saha, T.; Dash, C.; Jayabalan, R.; Khiste, S.; Kulkarni, A.; Kurmi, K.; Mondal, J.; Majumder, P.K.; Bardia, A.; Jang, H.L.; et al. Intercellular nanotubes mediate mitochondrial trafficking between cancer and immune cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2022, 17, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ma, F.; Vayalil, J.; Lee, G.; Wang, Y.; Peng, G. Emerging role of tumor-derived extracellular vesicles in T cell suppression and dysfunction in the tumor microenvironment. J. Immunother. Cancer 2021, 9, e003217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Headley, M.B.; Bins, A.; Nip, A.; Roberts, E.W.; Looney, M.R.; Gerard, A.; Krummel, M.F. Visualization of immediate immune responses to pioneer metastatic cells in the lung. Nature 2016, 531, 513–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Choong, C.J.; Okuno, T.; Ikenaka, K.; Baba, K.; Hayakawa, H.; Koike, M.; Yokota, M.; Doi, J.; Kakuda, K.; Takeuchi, T.; et al. Alternative mitochondrial quality control mediated by extracellular release. Autophagy 2021, 17, 2962–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tan, A.S.; Baty, J.W.; Dong, L.F.; Bezawork-Geleta, A.; Endaya, B.; Goodwin, J.; Bajzikova, M.; Kovarova, J.; Peterka, M.; Yan, B.; et al. Mitochondrial genome acquisition restores respiratory function and tumorigenic potential of cancer cells without mitochondrial DNA. Cell Metab. 2015, 21, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Yamazaki, H.; Tanaka, M.; Nagoya, M.; Fujimaki, H.; Sato, K.; Yago, T.; Nagata, T.; Minami, M. Epitope selection in major histocompatibility complex class I-mediated pathway is affected by the intracellular localization of an antigen. Eur. J. Immunol. 1997, 27, 347–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Munz, C. Autophagy proteins in antigen processing for presentation on MHC molecules. Immunol. Rev. 2016, 272, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Bell, C.; English, L.; Boulais, J.; Chemali, M.; Caron-Lizotte, O.; Desjardins, M.; Thibault, P. Quantitative proteomics reveals the induction of mitophagy in tumor necrosis factor-alpha-activated (TNFalpha) macrophages. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2013, 12, 2394–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Matheoud, D.; Sugiura, A.; Bellemare-Pelletier, A.; Laplante, A.; Rondeau, C.; Chemali, M.; Fazel, A.; Bergeron, J.J.; Trudeau, L.E.; Burelle, Y.; et al. Parkinson’s Disease-Related Proteins PINK1 and Parkin Repress Mitochondrial Antigen Presentation. Cell 2016, 166, 314–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Fahmy, A.M.; Boulais, J.; Desjardins, M.; Matheoud, D. Mitochondrial antigen presentation: A mechanism linking Parkinson’s disease to autoimmunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2019, 58, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kitada, T.; Asakawa, S.; Hattori, N.; Matsumine, H.; Yamamura, Y.; Minoshima, S.; Yokochi, M.; Mizuno, Y.; Shimizu, N. Mutations in the parkin gene cause autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism. Nature 1998, 392, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bernardini, J.P.; Lazarou, M.; Dewson, G. Parkin and mitophagy in cancer. Oncogene 2017, 36, 1315–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kelley, R.E.; Olson, M.S.; Pinckard, R.N. Characterization of anti-heart mitochondria autoantibodies produced in dogs following myocardial infarction. Circ. Res. 1974, 35, 862–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Chen, L.; Duvvuri, B.; Grigull, J.; Jamnik, R.; Wither, J.E.; Wu, G.E. Experimental evidence that mutated-self peptides derived from mitochondrial DNA somatic mutations have the potential to trigger autoimmunity. Hum. Immunol. 2014, 75, 873–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Loveland, B.; Wang, C.-R.; Yonekawa, H.; Hermel, E.; Lindahl, K.F. Maternally transmitted histocompatibility antigen of mice: A hydrophobic peptide of a mitochondrially encoded protein. Cell 1990, 60, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lindahl, K.F.; Hausmann, B.; Robinson, P.J.; Guénet, J.L.; Wharton, D.C.; Winking, H. Mta, the maternally transmitted antigen, is determined jointly by the chromosomal Hmt and the extrachromosomal Mtf genes. J. Exp. Med. 1986, 163, 334–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Deuse, T.; Hu, X.; Agbor-Enoh, S.; Koch, M.; Spitzer, M.H.; Gravina, A.; Alawi, M.; Marishta, A.; Peters, B. De novo mutations in mitochondrial DNA of iPSCs produce immunogenic neoepitopes in mice and humans. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 1137–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 02627 g001 550
Figure 1. Mitochondrial-derived antigens and possible mechanisms promoting their immunogenicity. In tumour cells neo-antigens can be generated via mutations of mitochondrial DNA and different modifications compared to normal cells. The uptake of mitochondria and mitochondrial debris by dendritic cells may involve tunnelling nanotubes (TNTs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), and mitochondria-derived vesicles (MDVs). Tumour antigens (red dot) are presented to specific T cells, which in turn expand and acquire the capacity to recognize tumour cells. Mitochondrial proteins released in the cytoplasm may be processed by proteasome, translocated into the endoplasmic reticulum, and presented by MHC class I molecules. Autophagy is involved in the presentation of endogenous antigens by both MHC class I and class II molecules. Accordingly, mitophagy, a form of macro autophagy that selectively degrades damaged mitochondria, might play a role in presentation of mitochondrial antigens. Other components of mitochondria from tumour cells, including lipids and metabolites, could also represent antigens stimulating specific T cells. However, experimental evidence is still lacking.
Figure 1. Mitochondrial-derived antigens and possible mechanisms promoting their immunogenicity. In tumour cells neo-antigens can be generated via mutations of mitochondrial DNA and different modifications compared to normal cells. The uptake of mitochondria and mitochondrial debris by dendritic cells may involve tunnelling nanotubes (TNTs), extracellular vesicles (EVs), and mitochondria-derived vesicles (MDVs). Tumour antigens (red dot) are presented to specific T cells, which in turn expand and acquire the capacity to recognize tumour cells. Mitochondrial proteins released in the cytoplasm may be processed by proteasome, translocated into the endoplasmic reticulum, and presented by MHC class I molecules. Autophagy is involved in the presentation of endogenous antigens by both MHC class I and class II molecules. Accordingly, mitophagy, a form of macro autophagy that selectively degrades damaged mitochondria, might play a role in presentation of mitochondrial antigens. Other components of mitochondria from tumour cells, including lipids and metabolites, could also represent antigens stimulating specific T cells. However, experimental evidence is still lacking.
Ijms 23 02627 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Prota, G.; Lechuga-Vieco, A.V.; De Libero, G. Mitochondrial Proteins as Source of Cancer Neoantigens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052627

AMA Style

Prota G, Lechuga-Vieco AV, De Libero G. Mitochondrial Proteins as Source of Cancer Neoantigens. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(5):2627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052627

Chicago/Turabian Style

Prota, Gennaro, Ana Victoria Lechuga-Vieco, and Gennaro De Libero. 2022. "Mitochondrial Proteins as Source of Cancer Neoantigens" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 5: 2627. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052627

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop