Next Article in Journal
Connexin 43 Channels in Osteocytes Are Necessary for Bone Mass and Skeletal Muscle Function in Aged Male Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Expression of Adaptor Protein FAM159B with Different Markers for Neuroendocrine Cells: An Immunocytochemical and Immunohistochemical Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification, Evolution and Expressional Analysis of OSCA Gene Family in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Proteomic Analysis of Roots Response to Potassium Deficiency and the Effect of TaHAK1-4A on K+ Uptake in Wheat

1
State Key Laboratory of North China Crop Improvement and Regulation, North China Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Resources of Education Ministry, Key Laboratory for Crop Germplasm Resources of Hebei, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China
2
Cangzhou Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Cangzhou 061001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(21), 13504; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113504
Submission received: 16 September 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 31 October 2022 / Published: 4 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wheat Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Potassium (K+) is essential for plant growth and stress responses. A deficiency in soil K+ contents can result in decreased wheat quality and productivity. Thus, clarifying the molecular mechanism underlying wheat responses to low-K+ (LK) stress is critical. In this study, a tandem mass tag (TMT)-based quantitative proteomic analysis was performed to investigate the differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) in roots of the LK-tolerant wheat cultivar “KN9204” at the seedling stage after exposure to LK stress. A total of 104 DAPs were identified in the LK-treated roots. The DAPs related to carbohydrate and energy metabolism, transport, stress responses and defense, and post-translational modifications under LK conditions were highlighted. We identified a high-affinity potassium transporter (TaHAK1-4A) that was significantly up-regulated after the LK treatment. Additionally, TaHAK1-4A was mainly expressed in roots, and the encoded protein was localized in the plasma membrane. The complementation assay in yeast suggested that TaHAK1-4A mediates K+ uptake under extreme LK conditions. The overexpression of TaHAK1-4A increased the fresh weight and root length of Arabidopsis under LK conditions and improved the growth of Arabidopsis athak5 mutant seedlings, which grow poorly under LK conditions. Moreover, silencing of TaHAK1-4A in wheat roots treated with LK stress decreased the root length, dry weight, K+ concentration, and K+ influx. Accordingly, TaHAK1-4A is important for the uptake of K+ by roots exposed to LK stress. Our results reveal the protein metabolic changes in wheat induced by LK stress. Furthermore, we identified a candidate gene potentially relevant for developing wheat lines with increased K+ use efficiency.

1. Introduction

Potassium (K+) is an essential macronutrient that directly or indirectly affects plant physiological and biochemical processes crucial to growth, development, quality, and yield [1,2]. Additionally, K+ can increase the resistance of crop plants to biotic and abiotic stresses (e.g., cold, waterlogging, drought, salinity, and sodicity) [3].
As a major staple food consumed by billions of people, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) provides humans with a large proportion of the daily intake of nutrients [4]. In terms of agricultural production, a stable and sufficient supply of soluble K+ fertilizer is important for maintaining wheat quality and yield. An exposure to K-deficient conditions results in obvious phenotypic changes in wheat plants (e.g., wilting, leaf chlorosis from the tip to the edge, and ultimately necrosis) [1]. Although soil reserves of K+ are generally large, most soil K+ (90–98%) is in a structural form, such as feldspar and mica, and only a limited amount of soil K+ is in bioavailable water-soluble (0.1–0.2%) and exchangeable (1–2%) forms [5,6]. Therefore, large amounts of chemical K+ fertilizers are applied annually, thereby increasing farming costs and the potential risk of environmental pollution [7]. There is thus an urgent need to improve how K+ fertilizers are absorbed and used by plants to minimize their application. The identification of key candidate genes is the basis for characterizing the molecular mechanisms underlying K+ absorption and use.
The development of large-scale sequencing technology has provided researchers with another tool for studying K+ absorption and utilization. We previously conducted an integrated analysis of gene expression and metabolite profiles that revealed the importance of genes related to ion homeostasis, cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis, and the glutamate metabolic pathway in response to K-deficiency [8]. Zhang et al. [9] identified 258 peptides in cotton (Gossypium spp.) xylem sap, while also confirming that low-K+ (LK) stress significantly alters the abundance of environmental stress-related proteins, decreasing plant tolerance to external stresses. In another study, an iTRAQ-based proteomics approach was used to characterize the proteome profiles of alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides L.) under LK conditions; a pathway enrichment analysis indicated that most of the differentially abundant proteins (DAPs) were related to carbohydrate and energy metabolism, secondary metabolism, signal sensing and transduction, stress responses, and protein synthesis or degradation [10]. However, fully elucidating the LK response mechanism of wheat will require considerably more research.
In response to soil K+ deficiency, crops have evolved multiple strategies to meet the demand for K+ during growth, which include altering the morphological structure of the root system, enhancing K+ absorbance, and reallocating cytosolic K+ to maintain cellular homeostasis [11]. In plants, K+ absorption and distribution are mediated by potassium channels and transporters. The HAK/KUP/KT (high-affinity K+/K+ uptake/K+ transporter) family is the largest potassium transporter family in plants [12,13]. Genes encoding HAK/KUP/KT transporters are ubiquitous among plants, with 13 in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), 16 in peach (Prunus persica L. Batch), and 27 in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), rice (Oryza sativa L.), and maize (Zea mays L.) [14,15,16,17]. The HAK/KUP/KT gene family comprises four major clusters (I–IV), of which several members of cluster I have been thoroughly characterized. For example, the expression of OsHAK1/5/16, AtHAK5, HvHAK1, and ZmHAK1/5 is induced under LK conditions, with the encoded proteins helping to maintain K+ uptake or translocation in plants [18,19,20,21,22,23]. Moreover, AtHAK5 is a high-affinity K+ transporter that facilitates K+ uptake under severely K+-deficient conditions; athak5 mutants exhibit inhibited root growth only in response to LK stress [24,25,26]. The HvHAK1 gene, which is the closest homolog of AtHAK5 in barley, also contributes to K+ uptake [22]. In rice, OsHAK1 and OsHAK5, which are highly similar to AtHAK5 (i.e., sequence identity), encode high-affinity K+ transporters [13] that differentially affect K+ distribution and rice architecture, with OsHAK1 mediating K+ acquisition and translocation at both low and high K+ concentrations, whereas OsHAK5 is functional only under LK conditions [19,20]. According to these earlier studies, HAK transporters vary in terms of their functions related to K+ uptake or translocation. Cheng et al. [12] identified 56 putative HAK/KUP/KT family members in wheat (reference: TGACv1) and determined that TaHAK1b-2BL mediates K+ transport in yeast. However, additional research conducted to clarify the role of HAK transporters in plants, especially in common wheat, is needed.
In this study, the root proteome profile of the LK-tolerant cultivar “KN9204” exposed to K-deficient conditions was analyzed using a tandem mass tag (TMT)-based comparative proteomics approach. Moreover, the importance of the high-affinity K+ transporter TaHAK1-4A during wheat responses to LK stress was verified in yeast, Arabidopsis, and wheat. This investigation of protein metabolic networks in wheat provides new insights into the mechanisms underlying wheat tolerance to LK stress and may form the foundation for future genetic improvements.

2. Results

2.1. Wheat Root Proteomic Profiles under LK Conditions

In our TMT-based proteomic analysis, we identified 50,522 peptides from 123,107 peptide-spectrum matches, as well as 9535 proteins, of which 9527 were common in the 9 examined root samples. Specific details regarding these proteins are listed in Table S1. We used |fold change| > 1.20 and p < 0.05 as the thresholds for assessing the significance of LK-induced changes to protein contents, which resulted in the identification of 104 significant DAPs (Table S2). More specifically, 59 (42 up-regulated/17 down-regulated), 36 (24 up-regulated/12 down-regulated), and 36 (17 up-regulated/19 down-regulated) DAPs were detected in the 24 h vs. 0 h, 48 h vs. 0 h, and 48 h vs. 24 h comparisons, respectively (Figure 1a). The Venn diagram indicated that 37, 20, and 20 of the DAPs were specifically up-regulated or down-regulated in the 24 h vs. 0 h, 48 h vs. 0 h, and 48 h vs. 24 h comparisons, respectively (Figure 1b). In addition, the changes in the abundances of 11 DAPs were similar (8 up-regulated and 3 down-regulated) in the 24 h vs. 0 h and 48 h vs. 0 h comparisons (Table S2). These DAPs included a tonoplast intrinsic protein (TIP; W5G5H0) and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90; F4Y590). It is considered that HAKs are directly involved in potassium absorption or transport. Notably, the abundance of a potassium transporter (A0A3B6I5B5) increased significantly (fold change of 1.23) after 24 h exposure to LK stress.

2.2. Functional Analysis of DAPs Related to LK Stress Responses

The DAPs in the LK-stressed wheat roots were mainly assigned to 16 COG categories (Figure 2). Of the DAPs annotated according to the COG database, most were associated with “carbohydrate transport and metabolism” (15 DAPs), “energy production and conversion” (8 DAPs), “cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis” (7 DAPs), “posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones” (7 DAPs), “inorganic ion transport and metabolism” (5 DAPs), and “amino acid transport and metabolism” (5 DAPs).
A GO analysis was performed to functionally annotate the 104 DAPs. The broad range of GO terms assigned to the DAPs included 23, 3, and 17 terms from the biological process, cellular component, and molecular function categories, respectively (Figure 3). Three carbohydrate-related GO terms (“carbohydrate metabolic process”, “carbohydrate derivative metabolic process”, and “carbon fixation”) were assigned to 15 DAPs (e.g., sucrose synthase and ATP synthase subunit alpha). Eleven DAPs (e.g., potassium transporter, putative zinc transporter, multidrug resistance protein 1 homolog, HMA domain-containing protein, tonoplast intrinsic protein) were annotated with transport-related GO terms, including “potassium ion transport”, “transport”, “metal ion transport”, and “transmembrane transport”.

2.3. Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) Network Analysis of the DAPs Related to LK Stress Responses

To reveal the complex network of interacting proteins associated with wheat root responses to potassium deprivation, a PPI network was predicted using the String database. The corresponding relationships between protein_IDs and PPI map gene_IDs are listed in Table S3. A total of 31, 17, and 16 DAPs were included in the PPI map for the 24 h vs. 0 h, 48 h vs. 0 h, and 48 h vs. 24 h comparisons, respectively (Figure 4). In the 24 h vs. 0 h comparison, Hsp90.1-B1, Traes_2BL_5D64E8C87.1, Traes_2AL_783CF383F.1, and Traes_4AL_B128F1907.2 were the proteins with the most interactions. In the 48 h vs. 0 h comparison, Traes_7AS_DE1248005.1 and Traes_6DL_3BCB83718.2 were the two major proteins that interacted with other proteins. The PPI network for the DAPs in the 48 h vs. 24 h comparison suggested Traes_2DS_3A92B17F0.1 and Traes_7AS_DE1248005.1 may be involved in regulating wheat root responses to potassium deficiency.

2.4. Expression Analysis and Molecular Characterization of TaHAK1-4A

According to our TMT data, the abundance of a potassium transporter (A0A3B6I5B5 encoded by TraesCS4A02G410200) increased after the exposure to LK stress (Table S2). The phylogenetic analysis of TraesCS4A02G410200, TraesCS4B02G310300, and TraesCS4D02G308200 (i.e., three gene copies on chromosomes 4A, 4B, and 4D, respectively) and HAK-encoding rice genes indicated these three wheat genes are closely related to OsHAK1. We named TraesCS4A02G410200, TraesCS4B02G310300, and TraesCS4D02G308200 as TaHAK1-4A, TaHAK1-4B, and TaHAK1-4D, respectively, according to their subgenome positions (Figure 5a).
To further elucidate TaHAK functions during the wheat LK stress response, we analyzed the expression levels of 89 TaHAK family members in wheat (reference genome: IWGSC v 2.0) under LK stress conditions using our published RNA-seq data [8]. The results showed that TaHAK1-4A, TaHAK1-4B, and TaHAK1-4D were the three TaHAK genes with the highest expression levels under LK conditions among the TaHAK genes in the wheat genome (Figure S1a). The fold changes in the expression levels of these three genes were higher in the LK-tolerant cultivar “KN9204” than in the LK-sensitive cultivar “BN207”. Additionally, TaHAK1-4A had the highest expression-level fold change in “KN9204” (9.72-fold), implying TaHAK1-4A is important for the LK tolerance of wheat (Figure S1b). Our analysis of the tissue-specific expression of TaHAK1-4A on the basis of public RNA-seq data [27] indicated TaHAK1-4A was predominantly expressed in wheat roots (Figure S2). The RT-PCR data confirmed that TaHAK1-4A expression in wheat roots was induced under LK conditions (Figure 5b). Thus, the TaHAK1-4A function was analyzed further.

2.5. Subcellular Localization of TaHAK1-4A

The 12 transmembrane segments revealed by Protter implied TaHAK1-4A is a transmembrane protein (Figure 5c). During the subcellular localization analysis, the fluorescence of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) alone (i.e., positive control) was detected in the cytoplasm and nucleus, whereas the TaHAK1-4A-GFP signal was exclusive to the plasma membrane (PM). Moreover, in Nicotiana benthamiana cells with TaHAK1-4A-GFP and the mCherry-labeled PM marker, we detected a substantial overlap in the green and red fluorescent signals (Figure 5d). Accordingly, TaHAK1-4A appears to be a PM protein in cells.

2.6. TaHAK1-4A Mediates K+ Uptake in Yeast

The R5421 yeast strain, which is defective in terms of K+ uptake, cannot grow under LK conditions [28]. Thus, we transformed this yeast mutant with TaHAK1-4A and compared its growth with R757 (i.e., the wild-type (WT) strain of R5421) to determine whether TaHAK1-4A is involved in the uptake of K+ (Figure 6). When the K+ concentration was less than 2 mM, R5421 was unable to grow. Additionally, there were no major differences among transformants when they were grown on AP medium containing 5 mM K+. However, TaHAK1-4A restored the growth of R5421, even under extreme LK conditions (0.02 mM K+). The growth curves of the yeast cells in liquid AP medium supplemented with 0.10 mM and 2 mM K+ further demonstrated the restorative effects of TaHAK1-4A on the growth of the transformed mutant strain. At 0.10 mM K+, the TaHAK1-4A-expressing strains and R757 grew well, with an OD600 of up to 2.0 at 48 h. In contrast, the OD600 values of the p416-GPD and R5421 strains were still below 0.2 after 48 h. At 2 mM K+, there were no significant growth differences among these strains, and the OD600 reached up to almost 2.0 within 24 h. Hence, TaHAK1-4A is a high-affinity K+ transporter that mediates K+ uptake.

2.7. TaHAK1-4A-Overexpressing Arabidopsis Lines Are Tolerant to LK Stress

In the phylogenetic tree, TaHAK1-4A was most closely related to AtHAK5 in Arabidopsis (Figure 5a). To functionally characterize TaHAK1-4A and determine whether TaHAK1-4A and AtHAK5 have similar roles, WT Arabidopsis and the athak5 mutant were transformed with TaHAK1-4A. In the current study, the athak5 mutant exhibited defective growth under LK conditions, with shorter primary roots than the WT plants, but the growth could be gradually restored by increasing the K+ content. To confirm TaHAK1-4A was present and highly expressed in the transformants, two transformed WT and mutant lines underwent a semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis (Figure 7a).
Following the 5 mM K+ treatment, there were no phenotypic differences between the WT and TaHAK1-4A-overexpressing (OE) lines, whereas the TaHAK1-4A-OE lines grew better than the WT plants under LK conditions (10 µM K+) (Figure 7b). The fresh weight and primary root length were similar between the OE lines and the WT control after the 5 mM K+ treatment, but the OE lines had a higher fresh weight and primary root length under LK conditions (10 µM K+) (Figure 7c,d). The athak5 mutant exhibited severely defective growth in the medium supplemented with 10 µM K+, but the expression of TaHAK1-4A clearly restored the growth of the mutant to almost WT levels. The phenotypes of the athak5 mutant and the TaHAK1-4A-OE lines were confirmed on the basis of the fresh weight and primary root length (Figure 7c,d). Thus, TaHAK1-4A functioned as a high-affinity K+ transporter in Arabidopsis exposed to LK stress.

2.8. TaHAK1-4A Promotes K+ Uptake in Wheat

To further clarify the molecular basis of the effects of TaHAK1-4A, we constructed BSMV-VIGS vectors to silence TaHAK1-4A expression in wheat. At 12 d post-inoculation, the third leaf of the wheat plants inoculated with BSMV:PDS (positive control) exhibited photobleaching symptoms (Figure 8a), implying our VIGS conditions were appropriate. Additionally, the plants inoculated with BSMV:γ0 or BSMV:TaHAK1-4A had mild chlorotic mosaic symptoms (Figure 8a), and the efficiency of the BSMV-VIGS exceeded 78.3% (Figure 8b). Compared with the control plants, the TaHAK1-4A transcript levels were markedly lower in the silenced plants according to the RT-PCR results (Figure 8c). At 6 mM K+, there were no obvious phenotypic differences between the BSMV:TaHAK1-4A plants and the BSMV:γ0 plants (control). However, compared with the BSMV:γ0 plants, the growth of the BSMV:TaHAK1-4A plants was substantially inhibited (Figure 8d) under LK conditions (15 µM K+). In addition, the wheat root and shoot lengths, dry weights, and K+ concentrations of the BSMV:TaHAK1-4A plants decreased significantly under LK conditions (Figure 8e–g).
Non-invasive micro-test technology (NMT) was applied to compare the K+ flux rate in the root tips of the BSMV:γ0 and BSMV:TaHAK1-4A plants (Figure 8h–j). In response to 6 mM and 15 µM K+, the overall K+ influx rate was higher for the BSMV:γ0 plants than for the BSMV:TaHAK1-4A plants. Compared with the effects of 6 mM K+, the 15 µM K+ treatment resulted in a greater difference in the K+ influx rate between the BSMV:γ0 and BSMV:TaHAK1-4A plants. The down-regulated expression of TaHAK1-4A decreased the influx of K+ into wheat roots, which indicated that the silencing of TaHAK1-4A impairs the ability of wheat roots to take up K+ from the soil.

3. Discussion

3.1. Proteins Related to Carbohydrate and Energy Metabolism in Wheat Roots under LK Conditions

Carbohydrate and energy metabolism generally changes rapidly in plants exposed to adverse environmental conditions to satisfy energy demands [29,30,31]. The transcription of genes encoding key enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, including sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH) and sucrose synthase (SUS), increases significantly in plants under K-deficient conditions [32,33,34]. In the current study, the expression of two SUS-encoding genes was up-regulated by the LK stress. Moreover, DAPs annotated as β-glucosidases and sucrose:sucrose fructosyltransferases (SSTs) increased in abundance under LK conditions. Similarly to sucrose, fructan is an important storage carbohydrate that is also involved in stress responses, partly because it is soluble and osmotically active [35,36]. A previous study demonstrated that SST is a key enzyme for fructan biosynthesis in higher plants; the overexpression of SST genes improves the tolerance of cotton to drought [37] and the resistance of rice to low temperatures [38]. In the present study, the expression of genes encoding enzymes associated with carbon metabolism in the roots increased after exposure to LK stress, suggesting metabolic activities are enhanced to meet the increased energy demands for K+ uptake and growth in wheat.

3.2. Proteins Related to Stress Responses and Defense in Wheat Roots under LK Conditions

Pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, such as chitinases, peroxidases, β-1,3-glucanases, and nonspecific lipid-transfer proteins (nsLTPs), are activated in response to various biotic and abiotic stresses [39,40]. The accumulation of ROS in roots, which occurs during the early plant response to the LK stress, results in the increased mobilization of ROS scavengers, including peroxidases that can help to reinforce cell walls by catalyzing lignification-related reactions [41] and provide protection against multiple pathogens [39]. The production of three peroxidases was significantly induced in response to the LK treatment. The accumulation of these peroxidases can protect cells against membrane peroxidation and enhance the cell wall strength in wheat roots exposed to the LK stress. Chitinases are important hydrolytic enzymes that are activated by a variety of biotic and abiotic stress conditions, as well as by various phytohormones, including ethylene, jasmonic acid, and salicylic acid [42]. The results of the current study indicated that two chitinases with the highest fold changes were up-regulated under LK conditions. In addition, the production of other PR proteins, such as β-glucanases and nsLTPs, was also up-regulated. Therefore, we speculated that LK stress induces the expression of genes encoding PR proteins associated with the LK resistance of “KN9204”.
Heat shock proteins are crucial for minimizing the effects of adverse environmental stimuli because they limit protein misfolding and protein aggregation [43]. For example, the overexpression of AtHSP90.2, AtHSP90.5, and AtHSP90.7 reportedly increases the sensitivity of Arabidopsis to salt and drought conditions [44]. Earlier research confirmed that plant SHSP20s modulate the resistance to various abiotic stresses (e.g., heat, drought, and cold) and also influence somatic embryogenesis and seed germination [45,46,47]. In the present study, HSP90 and two SHSPs (HSP20s) were up-regulated in response to LK stress. The accumulation of HSPs has also been observed in other plants exposed to LK conditions, including banana (Musa acuminata L.) and alligator weed [48,49]. These results suggest HSPs may participate in plant responses to LK stress. Furthermore, a LEA_2-domain-containing protein and cold-induced proteins also accumulated significantly following the LK treatments. Hence, these stress-responsive proteins may cooperatively protect plants against LK stress.

3.3. Proteins Related to Post-Translational Modifications in Wheat Roots under LK Conditions

Phosphorylations catalyzed by protein kinases and ubiquitinations catalyzed by ubiquitin ligases are common post-translational modifications that affect various processes in eukaryotic cells [50]. Previous studies demonstrated the regulatory effects of phosphorylation on some K+ transporters/channels. For example, CIPK23 can activate AtHAK5 via phosphorylation, leading to an increase in the affinity for K+ and the Vmax of K+ transport [51]. The activity of AKT1 (i.e., OsAKT1 and AtAKT1) is also mediated by phosphorylations [52]. Interestingly, the abundance of protein phosphatase (A0A3B5Y6D9) and HAK (A0A3B6I5B5) increased in the LK-stressed samples. Whether the activation of HAKs in wheat is also dependent on phosphorylations needs to be determined in future investigations.
Ubiquitination is a multi-step process involving the sequential action of E1 (activating enzyme), ubiquitin E2 (conjugating enzyme), and ubiquitin E3 (ligase). Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation pathways are critical for plant growth and responses to diverse stresses, including drought, high salinity, and nutrient deprivation [53]. The lack of ubiquitin-specific protease16 (AtUBP16) enhances the sensitivity of Arabidopsis to salt because of the associated effects on the Na+/H+ antiport activity and serine hydroxymethyltransferase stability [54]. Additionally, the up-regulation of E1 was previously observed in alligator weed roots exposed to LK stress [10]. The abundance of a NEDD8-activating enzyme E1 catalytic subunit (A0A3B6EEE4), which is highly similar to Arabidopsis E1 C-terminal related 1 (AtECR1) (i.e., amino acid sequence identity of 70.39%), increased under LK conditions. In Arabidopsis, AtECR1 contains a C-terminal RUB E1 domain and functions as a heterodimer with AXR1 to activate RUB [55]. Our results indicate that phosphorylations and ubiquitinations may be involved in wheat root responses to LK stress.

3.4. Transporters and Channel Proteins in Wheat Roots under LK Conditions

Potassium ions can interact with micronutrients, such as iron, manganese, zinc, and copper, leading to decreased or increased nutrient uptake, transport, and utilization [56]. Zinc contributes to the enzymatic catalysis of reactions that require an electrophile, whereas iron, manganese, and copper help mediate redox transformations [57]. Thus, these components are important for respiration, photosynthesis, and other plant metabolic processes. The absorption and transport of metal ions depend on transporters, including the zinc transporter (ZIP), heavy metal ATPase (HMA), and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters [58,59]. The two metal transporters that were down-regulated at 24 h after initiating the LK treatment were identified as a ZIP and HMA. Therefore, the uptake of some metals by wheat roots may be affected by LK conditions. An earlier study indicated that increasing the availability of zinc significantly promotes the uptake of K+ by cotton [60]. Moreover, the application of K+ can decrease the toxicity of Cd by increasing antioxidant enzyme activities, thereby enhancing faba bean (Vicia faba L.) growth [61].
In plants, ABC transporters are involved in the transport and accumulation of substances, stress defenses, and other physiological activities [62,63]. The abundance of a multidrug resistance protein 1 homolog (TaMDR1), which belongs to the ABC transporter family, increased under LK conditions. In wheat, TaMDR1 expression is induced by aluminum; this induction is caused by the disruption of calcium (Ca2+) homeostasis, which occurs soon after exposure to toxic levels of aluminum [64]. Additionally, Ca2+ is an important signaling molecule involved in the regulation of K+ transport [65]. Intracellular Ca2+ levels are modulated as part of the initial response to LK stress [66]. However, the relationship between plant responses to LK stress and micronutrient uptake mediated by these transporters needs to be precisely characterized in future studies.
Aquaporins (AQPs) facilitate the transport of water and other small solutes across cell membranes [67]. A TIP, which belongs to the plant AQP family responsive to abiotic stresses, was up-regulated under LK conditions. The overexpression of SlTIP2;2 can positively affect plant tolerance to drought, salinity, and cold stress by increasing the osmotic water permeability of the tonoplast and the osmotic buffering capacity of vacuoles [68]. The expression of the wheat TaTIP2;2 gene negatively regulates drought and salinity stress responses in transgenic Arabidopsis via an abscisic acid-independent pathway [69]. In addition, AtTIP1;1 and AtTIP1;2 can serve as channels for hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), suggesting they may be associated with stress signaling pathways induced by ROS [70]. Thus, the regulatory effects of TIPs on plant responses to LK stress, as well as the underlying mechanisms, should be investigated.

3.5. The K+ Transporter TaHAK1-4A Contributes to the K+ Uptake by Wheat Roots under LK Conditions

The HvHAK1 gene, which encodes a high-affinity potassium transporter, was the first KUP/HAK/KT gene in higher plants to be cloned [71]. Since then, various homologs of HvHAK1 have been identified and characterized, including AtHAK5, OsHAK1, OsHAK5, ZmHAK5, and HbHAK1 [18,19,20,23,72]. The expression levels of these genes are up-regulated significantly under LK conditions as part of a common plant adaptive response to LK stress. Notably, the tissue-specific expression patterns of these genes have been reported. For example, in Arabidopsis, AtHAK5 is a major transporter mediating the high-affinity uptake of K+ by the roots [25]. ZmHAK5 is mainly expressed in maize roots, wherein it influences K+ uptake, whereas ZmHAK1 is primarily expressed in maize shoots; the overexpression of ZmHAK1 significantly affects K+ distribution in the shoots [23]. OsHAK5 is highly expressed in the root epidermis and stele, as well as in vascular tissues and mesophyll cells. The encoded protein mediates the uptake of K+ by the roots and the transport of K+ from the roots to the shoots of LK-stressed rice plants [20]. We identified a K+ transporter (TaHAK1-4A) that was up-regulated in the roots exposed to the LK stress. The RNA-seq data revealed that TaHAK1-4A was mainly expressed in the roots, implying that it modulates the uptake of K+ from the soil.
A yeast complementation assay indicated that TaHAK1-4A mediates K+ uptake under extreme LK conditions. On the basis of the analyses of the LK-induced phenotypes and physiological indices of the control and TaHAK1-4A-overexpressed and -silenced plants, we determined that TaHAK1-4A controls the uptake of K+ by plants, which is consistent with the induced accumulation of TaHAK1-4A under LK conditions. Furthermore, the overexpression of TaHAK1-4A improved the growth of the Arabidopsis athak5 mutant exposed to the LK stress, implying that TaHAK1-4A and AtHAK5 may have similar functions related to K+ uptake by the roots. Our results suggest that TaHAK1-4A is a high-affinity K+ transporter involved in the uptake of K+ by wheat in response to LK stress.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Wheat Seedling Culture and LK Stress

“KN9204” was used in this investigation, which is a K deprivation-tolerant cultivar selected based on our previous study [8]. Seedlings (12 days old) under full K+ condition (6 mM K+) were subjected to LK stress with a modified Hoagland solution containing LK (15 μM K+). The roots were harvested at 0, 24, and 48 h for further analysis. Three independent biological replicates were conducted per treatment. The root samples of each biological replication were collected from 15 plants and stored at −80 °C.

4.2. Protein Extraction

Nine root samples were ground individually into fine powder in liquid nitrogen. The cold acetone method was employed to extract total protein of these samples. The powder of each sample was lysed with protein lysis buffer (pH 8, 6 M Urea, 100 mM NH4HCO3, and 0.2% SDS), followed by 5 min ultrasonication on ice. The supernatant of lysate was transferred into a new pre-cooled tube after centrifugation. The samples were incubated at 56 °C for 1 h with 10 mM DTT, followed by an alkylation reaction under darkness conditions at room temperature for 1 h. The samples were mixed with pre-cooled acetone and kept at −20 °C overnight. After centrifugation at 12,000× g at 4 °C for 15 min, the precipitation was collected. The precipitated samples were washed with pre-cooled acetone three times. The protein samples were redissolved in a dissolution buffer containing 6 M urea, and 100 mM TEAB (pH 8.5). The protein concentration was quantified according to the Bradford assay methods. The gradient concentration of the BSA standard solution ranged from 0 to 0.5 μg/μL.

4.3. Digestion and Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) Labeling of Peptides

For digestion treatment, a 120 μg sample was taken and the volume was increased up to 100 μL with lysis buffer; 500 μL of 0.05 M TEAB and 3 μL of 1 μg/μL trypsin were added. Samples were mixed and digested at 37 °C overnight, then an equal volume of 1% formic acid (FA) was added into the samples. After centrifugation at 12,000× g for 15 min, the supernatant was injected into the C18 desalting column, followed by washing (three times) and elution (twice). The eluents of each root sample were reconstituted in 100 μL of 0.1 M TEAB and incubated for 2 h at room temperature after mixing with TMT reagent. A common reference was created by pooling an equal quantity of the nine samples. The 0 h_1, 0 h_2, 0 h_3, 24 h_1, 24 h_2, 24 h_3, 48 h_1, 48 h_2, and 48 h_3 samples were labeled with the TMT tags 127N, 127C, 128N, 130N, 130C, 131, 128C, 129C, and 129N, respectively.

4.4. High-pH Reversed-Phase HPLC Fractionation and LC-MS/MS Analysis

The samples were fractionated using a water BEH C18 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm) on a Rigol L3000 HPLC system, the column oven was set as 50 °C. The eluates were monitored at UV 214 nm. We collected the peptides each minute and finally combined them into 10 fractions. The samples were dried under vacuum and then reconstituted with 0.1% (v/v) FA in water. TMT-labeled samples were analyzed using an EASY-nLCTM 1200 UHPLC system coupled with a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer operating in the data-dependent acquisition mode. Each sample (1 μg) was injected into a home-made C18 Nano-Trap column (3 μm, 2 cm × 75 μm). Peptides were separated in a home-made analytical column (1.9 μm, 15 cm × 150 μm) using a linear gradient elution with a flow rate of 600 nL/min. The separated peptides were analyzed by Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher). Parameters were set as follows: ion source of Nanospray Flex™ (ESI) spray voltage of 2.3 kV, and ion transport capillary temperature of 320 °C. Full scan range from m/z 350 to 1500 was used with a resolution of 60,000 (at m/z 200), along with an automatic gain control (AGC) target value of 3,000,000 and a maximum ion injection time of 20 ms. The top 20 precursors of the highest abundant in the full scan were selected and fragmented by higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) and then analyzed in MS/MS, where the resolution was 15,000 (at m/z 200) for 6 plex. The AGC target value was 50,000 and the maximum ion injection time was 45 ms. The normalized collision energy was set as 32%, the intensity threshold was set as 1,900,000, and the dynamic exclusion parameter was 20 s.

4.5. Bioinformatics Analysis of Identified Proteins

Proteome Discoverer v2.2 software was used to analyze the raw data. The reference protein database was downloaded from the Uniport database (https://www.uniprot.org/, accessed on 25 October 2019). Trypsin was specified as a cleavage enzyme. A maximum of two miscleavage sites were allowed. The mass tolerance for the precursor ion was 10 ppm and mass tolerance for product ion was 0.02 Da. Carbamidomethyl was specified in PD 2.2 as fixed modifications. Oxidation of methionine (M), acetylation of the N-terminus, and TMT 6-plex of tyrosine and lysine were specified in PD 2.2 as variable modifications. The identified proteins with|fold changes| > 1.20 and p-value < 0.05 in different compared groups were considered as differential abundance proteins (DAPs).
The Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG) of proteins was analyzed with the database from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/, accessed on 10 February 2020). The Gene Ontology (GO) was analyzed with the Enrich Pipeline process [73]. The PPI networks of proteins were analyzed using the String database (http://string-db.org/, accessed on 21 February 2020).

4.6. Identification of HAK Gene Family and Expression Profiles of HAKs under the LK Stress in Wheat

The identification of the TaHAK gene family (Pfam ID: PF02705) was performed according to the method in our previous study [74]. The reference wheat genome was assembly version IWGSC 2.0, downloaded from Ensembl Plants database (http://ftp.ensemblgenomes.org/pub/plants/release-51/fasta/triticum_aestivum/, accessed on 21 November 2021). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method in MEGA X, with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The expression patterns of TaHAKs under the LK stress in wheat were analyzed based on our previous RNA-Seq data [8]. The expression analysis of TaHAK1-4A in different tissues was based on the publicly available wheat RNA-Seq datasets (http://bar.utoronto.ca/efp_wheat/cgi-bin/efpWeb.cgi, accessed on 21 November 2021) [27].

4.7. RNA Extraction and Transcript Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from seedling roots with the FastPure Plant Total RNA Isolation Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The first-stand cDNA was synthesized using five HiScript®III qRT SuperMix Kits (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). RT-PCR was performed with the ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) and the QuantStudio 5 Real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). TaTEF1 and AtTUB2 served as constitutive genes in wheat and Arabidopsis, respectively. All reactions were run in triplicate to obtain comparable results. Statistical analysis for RT-PCR data was performed using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Specific primers used for RT-PCR are shown in Table S4.

4.8. Functional Complementation of TaHAK1-4A in Yeast

The coding sequence (CDS) of TaHAK1-4A was cloned into the p416-GPD vector driven by the GAP promoter, then transformed into the K+ uptake-deficient strain R5421 (trk1∆, trk1∆), in which TRK1 and TRK2 (two endogenous K+ transporter genes) were deleted. R757 was used as a positive control. The yeast complementation experiment was performed according to the method described by Li et al. [52]. In brief, p416-GPD and p416-TaHAK1-4A were transformed into R5421 and named p416-GPD and TaHAK1-4A, respectively. R5421 and R757 were grown on arginine phosphate (AP) medium supplemented with different concentrations of K+.

4.9. Subcellular Localization of TaHAK1-4A

The CDS, excluding the stop codon of TaHAK1-4A, was obtained via PCR amplification using the specific primers (Table S4) and inserted into the pSuper1300-GFP vector containing the MAS promoter (MAS::GFP). The control plasmid MAS::GFP and the fusion plasmid MAS::TaHAK1-4A-GFP were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101, which was then transformed into epidermal cells of N. benthamiana. The tobacco plants were cultivated for 48 h in darkness. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) and fluorescence signals were observed using confocal laser scanning microscopy.

4.10. Generation of Arabidopsis Transgenic Plants and LK Stress Response Analysis

The CDS of TaHAK1-4A was inserted into pCAMBIA-1302 with the CaMV 35S promoter (35S::TaHAK1-4A). The 35S::TaHAK1-4A was transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101 and introduced into the athak5 mutant or the WT Arabidopsis using the floral dip method [75]. Seeds of transgenic plants were selected on MS medium with hygromycin. Arabidopsis plants were grown in pots filled with vermiculite and kept in growth chambers at 23 °C under 16 h light/8 h darkness for seed collection. For the phenotype assay of plants, seeds were placed on different K+ containing media (10 µM and 5 mM) and treated at 4 °C for 3 d in darkness, and then the plants were grown at 23 °C under 16 h light/8 h darkness for 14 d in a growth chamber.

4.11. Silencing of TaHAK1-4A and LK Stress Response Assay in Wheat

Silencing of TaHAK1-4A with barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) was performed according to the method from our previous study [30]. The in vitro-synthesized BSMV RNA of BSMV:α, BSMV:β, BSMV:γ0, or BSMV:target (BSMV:TaHAK1-4A and BSMV:PDS) was inoculated on the first fully expanded leaves of 8 d old“KN9204” wheat by rub-inoculation with a gloved finger. The seedlings were treated in a dark, damp incubator for 12 h and then were transferred to the modified Hoagland solution with full K+ (6 mM K+) or LK (15 µM K+) at 16/8 h light/dark at 23 °C. Wheat plants infected with BSMV:γ0 and BSMV:PDS were used as the control and positive control, respectively. After 12 days of BSMV inoculation, the third leaf of each plant was collected for expression analysis of TaHAK1-4A using RT-PCR (Table S4). The fresh weight, dry weight, length, and K+ concentration of seedlings infected with BSMV:γ0 or BSMV:TaHAK1-4A were measured as described in our previous study [76]. Net K+ flux was measured from root tips using non-invasive micro-test technology (NMT) according to the method described by Zhang et al. [77].

4.12. Statistical Analysis

SPSS v25 statistical software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for the data analysis. Student’s t-test was used to test the statistical significance between the control and treatment. GraphPad Prism 8 (https://www.graphpad-prism.cn/, accessed on 25 November 2021) was used for the histogram drawing. Each value is the mean standard deviation from at least three independent biological replicates.

5. Conclusions

We performed a TMT-based proteomic analysis that revealed 104 DAPs in wheat roots treated with LK stress. The DAPs were related to carbohydrate and energy metabolism, transport, stress responses and defense, and post-translational modifications induced by LK conditions. The expression of TaHAK1-4A, encoding a high-affinity potassium transporter, was mainly induced by LK stress in wheat roots. Functional analyses of TaHAK1-4A in yeast, Arabidopsis, and wheat indicated that it mediates K+ uptake under LK conditions. This study provides insights into the protein network involved in LK stress responses. Furthermore, the identified candidate gene may be useful for enhancing K+ contents in wheat plants.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms232113504/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.X.; Data curation, K.X.; Funding acquisition, Y.Z. and X.Y.; Investigation, K.X., Y.Y. and W.W.; Methodology, Y.Y., R.S. and W.W.; Project administration, Y.Z.; Software, K.X. and R.S.; Writing–original draft, K.X.; Writing–review & editing, Y.Z., S.Z. and X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF1000400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901539), and the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (C2021204066).

Acknowledgments

We thank Weihua Wu and Yi Wang (China Agricultural University, Beijing, China) for providing the seeds of athak5 and the yeast strain (R5421 and R757). We also thank Dongmei Wang (Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China) for kindly providing the vectors of VIGS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zorb, C.; Senbayram, M.; Peiter, E. Potassium in agriculture—Status and perspectives. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 656–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Çolpan, E.; Zengin, M.; Özbahçe, A. The effects of potassium on the yield and fruit quality components of stick tomato. Hortic. Environ. Biote 2013, 54, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, M.; Zheng, Q.; Shen, Q.; Guo, S. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 7370–7390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Dinu, M.; Whittaker, A.; Pagliai, G.; Benedettelli, S.; Sofi, F. Ancient wheat species and human health: Biochemical and clinical implications. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2018, 52, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sparks, D. Potassium dynamics in soils. Adv. Soil Sci. 1987, 6, 1–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ghadam Khani, A.; Enayatizamir, N.; Norouzi Masir, M. Impact of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on different forms of soil potassium under wheat cultivation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, X.; Wang, D.; Riaz, M.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, C. Investigating the effect of biochar on the potential of increasing cotton yield, potassium efficiency and soil environment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 182, 109451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, Y.; Sun, R.; Liu, H.; Liu, X.; Xu, K.; Xiao, K.; Zhang, S.; Yang, X.; Xue, C. Multi-omics analyses reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying the adaptation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to potassium deprivation. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 588994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Z.; Chao, M.; Wang, S.; Bu, J.; Tang, J.; Li, F.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, B. Proteome quantification of cotton xylem sap suggests the mechanisms of potassium-deficiency-induced changes in plant resistance to environmental stresses. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, L.Q.; Liu, L.; Zhuo, W.; Chen, Q.; Hu, S.; Peng, S.; Wang, X.Y.; Lu, Y.F.; Lu, L.M. Physiological and quantitative proteomic analyses unraveling potassium deficiency stress response in alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides L.) root. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 97, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ahanger, M.A.; Agarwal, R.M. Potassium up-regulates antioxidant metabolism and alleviates growth inhibition under water and osmotic stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Protoplasma 2017, 254, 1471–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cheng, X.; Liu, X.; Mao, W.; Zhang, X.; Chen, S.; Zhan, K.; Bi, H.; Xu, H. Genome-wide identification and analysis of HAK/KUP/KT potassium transporters gene family in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gupta, M.; Qiu, X.; Wang, L.; Xie, W.; Zhang, C.; Xiong, L.; Lian, X.; Zhang, Q. KT/HAK/KUP potassium transporters gene family and their whole-life cycle expression profile in rice (Oryza sativa). Mol. Genet. Genom. 2008, 280, 437–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Song, Z.; Yang, Y.; Ma, R.; Xu, J.; Yu, M. Transcription of potassium transporter genes of KT/HAK/KUP family in peach seedlings and responses to abiotic stresses. Biol. Plant. 2014, 59, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cai, K.; Zeng, F.; Wang, J.; Zhang, G. Identification and characterization of HAK/KUP/KT potassium transporter gene family in barley and their expression under abiotic stress. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Banuelos, M.A.; Garciadeblas, B.; Cubero, B.; Rodriguez-Navarro, A. Inventory and functional characterization of the HAK potassium transporters of rice. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 784–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, R.; Wang, H.; Wei, J. Genome-wide analysis and identification of HAK potassium transporter gene family in maize (Zea mays L.). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 8465–8473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rubio, F.; Nieves-Cordones, M.; Aleman, F.; Martinez, V. Relative contribution of AtHAK5 and AtAKT1 to K+ uptake in the high-affinity range of concentrations. Physiol. Plant 2008, 134, 598–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, G.; Hu, Q.; Luo, L.; Yang, T.; Zhang, S.; Hu, Y.; Yu, L.; Xu, G. Rice potassium transporter OsHAK1 is essential for maintaining potassium-mediated growth and functions in salt tolerance over low and high potassium concentration ranges. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 2747–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, T.; Zhang, S.; Hu, Y.; Wu, F.; Hu, Q.; Chen, G.; Cai, J.; Wu, T.; Moran, N.; Yu, L.; et al. The role of a potassium transporter OsHAK5 in potassium acquisition and transport from roots to shoots in rice at low potassium supply levels. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Feng, H.; Tang, Q.; Cai, J.; Xu, B.; Xu, G.; Yu, L. Rice OsHAK16 functions in potassium uptake and translocation in shoot, maintaining potassium homeostasis and salt tolerance. Planta 2019, 250, 549–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Fulgenzi, F.R.; Peralta, M.L.; Mangano, S.; Danna, C.H.; Vallejo, A.J.; Puigdomenech, P.; Santa-Maria, G.E. The ionic environment controls the contribution of the barley HvHAK1 transporter to potassium acquisition. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 252–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Qin, Y.-J.; Wu, W.-H.; Wang, Y. ZmHAK5 and ZmHAK1 function in K uptake and distribution in maize under low K conditions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2019, 61, 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Rubio, F.; Aleman, F.; Nieves-Cordones, M.; Martinez, V. Studies on Arabidopsis athak5, atakt1 double mutants disclose the range of concentrations at which AtHAK5, AtAKT1 and unknown systems mediate K uptake. Physiol. Plant 2010, 139, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gierth, M.; Maser, P.; Schroeder, J.I. The potassium transporter AtHAK5 functions in K(+) deprivation-induced high-affinity K(+) uptake and AKT1 K(+) channel contribution to K(+) uptake kinetics in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 1105–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Zhao, S.; Zhang, M.L.; Ma, T.L.; Wang, Y. Phosphorylation of ARF2 relieves its repression of transcription of the K+ transporter gene HAK5 in response to low potassium stress. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 3005–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Ramirez-Gonzalez, R.H.; Borrill, P.; Lang, D.; Harrington, S.A.; Brinton, J.; Venturini, L.; Davey, M.; Jacobs, J.; van Ex, F.; Pasha, A.; et al. The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat. Science 2018, 361, 6403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gaber, R.F.; Styles, C.A.; Fink, G.R. TRK1 encodes a plasma membrane protein required for high-affinity potassium transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 1988, 8, 2848–2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ruan, L.; Zhang, J.; Xin, X.; Zhang, C.; Ma, D.; Chen, L.; Zhao, B. Comparative analysis of potassium deficiency-responsive transcriptomes in low potassium susceptible and tolerant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Xu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Gu, J.; Zhou, M.; Gao, L.; Sun, R.; Wang, W.; Zhang, S.; Yang, X. Proteomic analysis reveals the molecular mechanism underlying the cold acclimation and freezing tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci. 2022, 318, 111242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Y.; Ji, D.; Turgeon, R.; Chen, J.; Lin, T.; Huang, J.; Luo, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, C.; Lv, Z. Physiological and proteomic responses of mulberry Trees (Morus alba. L.) to combined salt and drought stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Yang, H.; Li, Y.; Jin, Y.; Kan, L.; Shen, C.; Malladi, A.; Nambeesan, S.; Xu, Y.; Dong, C. Transcriptome analysis of Pyrus betulaefolia seedling root responses to short-term potassium deficiency. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, L.; Lyu, C.; Li, J.; Tong, Z.; Lu, Y.; Wang, X.; Ni, S.; Yang, S.; Zeng, F.; Lu, L. Physiological analysis and proteome quantification of alligator weed stems in response to potassium deficiency stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Armengaud, P.; Sulpice, R.; Miller, A.J.; Stitt, M.; Amtmann, A.; Gibon, Y. Multilevel analysis of primary metabolism provides new insights into the role of potassium nutrition for glycolysis and nitrogen assimilation in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 772–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Nemati, F.; Ghanati, F.; Gavlighi, H.A.; Sharifi, M. Fructan dynamics and antioxidant capacity of 4-day-old seedlings of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars during drought stress and recovery. Funct. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 1000–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Livingston, D.P., 3rd; Hincha, D.K.; Heyer, A.G. Fructan and its relationship to abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 2007–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, R.; Jiao, T.; Zhang, Z.; Yao, Z.; Li, Z.; Wang, S.; Xin, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, A.; Zhu, J. Ectopic Expression of the Allium cepa 1-SST gene in cotton improves drought tolerance and yield under drought stress in the field. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 783134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kawakami, A.; Sato, Y.; Yoshida, M. Genetic engineering of rice capable of synthesizing fructans and enhancing chilling tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. van Loon, L.C.; Rep, M.; Pieterse, C.M. Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2006, 44, 135–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Naz, R.; Bano, A.; Wilson, N.L.; Guest, D.; Roberts, T.H. Pathogenesis-related protein expression in the apoplast of wheat leaves protected against leaf rust following application of plant extracts. Phytopathology 2014, 104, 933–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Passardi, F.; Penel, C.; Dunand, C. Performing the paradoxical: How plant peroxidases modify the cell wall. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kasprzewska, A. Plant chitinases--regulation and function. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 2003, 8, 809–824. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Jacob, P.; Hirt, H.; Bendahmane, A. The heat-shock protein/chaperone network and multiple stress resistance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Song, H.; Zhao, R.; Fan, P.; Wang, X.; Chen, X.; Li, Y. Overexpression of AtHsp90.2, AtHsp90.5 and AtHsp90.7 in Arabidopsis thaliana enhances plant sensitivity to salt and drought stresses. Planta 2009, 229, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sun, W.; Van Montagu, M.; Verbruggen, N. Small heat shock proteins and stress tolerance in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1577, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. He, Y.; Yao, Y.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Gao, J.; Fan, M. A heat-shock 20 protein isolated from watermelon (ClHSP22.8) negatively regulates the response of Arabidopsis to salt stress via multiple signaling pathways. PeerJ 2021, 9, e10524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bourgine, B.; Guihur, A. Heat shock signaling in land plants: From plasma membrane sensing to the transcription of small heat shock proteins. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 710801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. He, Y.; Li, R.; Lin, F.; Xiong, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, B.; Guo, J.; Hu, C. Transcriptome changes induced by different potassium levels in banana roots. Plants 2019, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Li, L.; Lyu, C.; Huang, L.; Chen, Q.; Zhuo, W.; Wang, X.; Lu, Y.; Zeng, F.; Lu, L. Physiology and proteomic analysis reveals root, stem and leaf responses to potassium deficiency stress in alligator weed. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Filipcik, P.; Curry, J.R.; Mace, P.D. When worlds collide-mechanisms at the interface between phosphorylation and ubiquitination. J. Mol. Biol. 2017, 429, 1097–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ragel, P.; Rodenas, R.; Garcia-Martin, E.; Andres, Z.; Villalta, I.; Nieves-Cordones, M.; Rivero, R.M.; Martinez, V.; Pardo, J.M.; Quintero, F.J.; et al. The CBL-interacting protein kinase CIPK23 regulates HAK5-mediated high-affinity K+ uptake in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2863–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Li, J.; Long, Y.; Qi, G.N.; Li, J.; Xu, Z.J.; Wu, W.H.; Wang, Y. The Os-AKT1 channel is critical for K+ uptake in rice roots and is modulated by the rice CBL1-CIPK23 complex. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 3387–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Zelazny, E.; Barberon, M.; Curie, C.; Vert, G. Ubiquitination of transporters at the forefront of plant nutrition. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1597–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Zhou, H.; Zhao, J.; Yang, Y.; Chen, C.; Liu, Y.; Jin, X.; Chen, L.; Li, X.; Deng, X.W.; Schumaker, K.S.; et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease16 modulates salt tolerance in Arabidopsis by regulating Na(+)/H(+) antiport activity and serine hydroxymethyltransferase stability. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 5106–5122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Pozo, J.C.; Timpte, C.; Tan, S.; Callis, J.; Estelle, M. The ubiquitin-related protein RUB1 and auxin response in Arabidopsis. Science 1998, 280, 1760–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mostofa, M.G.; Rahman, M.M.; Ghosh, T.K.; Kabir, A.H.; Abdelrahman, M.; Rahman Khan, M.A.; Mochida, K.; Tran, L.P. Potassium in plant physiological adaptation to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 186, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Merchant, S.S. The elements of plant micronutrients. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154, 512–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Guerinot, M.L. The ZIP family of metal transporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1465, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Arguello, J.M.; Eren, E.; Gonzalez-Guerrero, M. The structure and function of heavy metal transport P1B-ATPases. Biometals 2007, 20, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Subbarayan, S.; Dhanasekaran, K. Effects of different sources and levels of manganese on dry matter production and nutrient uptake by cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in salt affected soil. Life Sci. Arch. 2015, 1, 293–297. [Google Scholar]
  61. Siddiqui, M.H.; Al-Whaibi, M.H.; Sakran, A.M.; Basalah, M.O.; Ali, H.M. Effect of calcium and potassium on antioxidant system of Vicia faba L. Under cadmium stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 6604–6619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Nguyen, V.N.; Moon, S.; Jung, K.H. Genome-wide expression analysis of rice ABC transporter family across spatio-temporal samples and in response to abiotic stresses. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 1276–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Kang, J.; Park, J.; Choi, H.; Burla, B.; Kretzschmar, T.; Lee, Y.; Martinoia, E. Plant ABC Transporters. Arab. Book 2011, 9, e0153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Sasaki, T.; Ezaki, B.; Matsumoto, H. A gene encoding multidrug resistance (MDR)-like protein is induced by aluminum and inhibitors of calcium flux in wheat. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Liu, C.; Liao, W. Potassium signaling in plant abiotic responses: Crosstalk with calcium and reactive oxygen species/reactive nitrogen species. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 173, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, X.; Hao, L.; Zhu, B.; Jiang, Z. Plant calcium signaling in response to potassium deficiency. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Roche, J.V.; Tornroth-Horsefield, S. Aquaporin Protein-protein interactions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Sade, N.; Vinocur, B.J.; Diber, A.; Shatil, A.; Ronen, G.; Nissan, H.; Wallach, R.; Karchi, H.; Moshelion, M. Improving plant stress tolerance and yield production: Is the tonoplast aquaporin SlTIP2;2 a key to isohydric to anisohydric conversion? New Phytol. 2009, 181, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xu, C.; Wang, M.; Zhou, L.; Quan, T.; Xia, G. Heterologous expression of the wheat aquaporin gene TaTIP2;2 compromises the abiotic stress tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Bienert, G.P.; Moller, A.L.; Kristiansen, K.A.; Schulz, A.; Moller, I.M.; Schjoerring, J.K.; Jahn, T.P. Specific aquaporins facilitate the diffusion of hydrogen peroxide across membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 1183–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Santa María, G.; Rubio, F.; Dubcovsky, J.; Rodriguez-Navarro, A. The HAK1 gene of barley is a member of a large gene family and encodes a high-affinity potassium transporter. Plant Cell 1998, 9, 2281–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, H.; Xiao, W.; Yu, W.; Jiang, Y.; Li, R. Halophytic Hordeum brevisubulatum HbHAK1 facilitates potassium retention and contributes to salt tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Huang, W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: Paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Xu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, S.; Liu, H.; Wang, W.; Zhang, S.; Yang, X. Genome-wide identification and low tmperature responsive pattern of Actin Depolymerizing Factor (ADF) gene family in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 618984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Zhao, Y.; Xu, K.; Liu, G.; Li, S.; Zhao, S.; Liu, X.; Yang, X.; Xiao, K. Global identification and characterization of miRNA family members responsive to potassium deprivation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhang, J.; Yu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, J.; Duan, L.; Zhang, M.; Li, Z. Increased abscisic acid levels in transgenic maize overexpressing AtLOS5 mediated root ion fluxes and leaf water status under salt stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 1339–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Differential abundance proteins (DAPs) responsive to low-K+ (LK) stress in wheat roots. (a) Number of DAPs in different comparisons. (b) The Venn diagram describing overlaps among DAPs in different comparisons. Twelve-day-old seedlings under full K+ condition (6 mM K+) were subjected to LK stress under modified Hoagland solution containing LK (15 µM K+) and the roots harvested at 0, 24, and 48 h.
Figure 1. Differential abundance proteins (DAPs) responsive to low-K+ (LK) stress in wheat roots. (a) Number of DAPs in different comparisons. (b) The Venn diagram describing overlaps among DAPs in different comparisons. Twelve-day-old seedlings under full K+ condition (6 mM K+) were subjected to LK stress under modified Hoagland solution containing LK (15 µM K+) and the roots harvested at 0, 24, and 48 h.
Ijms 23 13504 g001
Figure 2. Function clusters of Orthologous Groups of Protein (COG) classification for the differential abundance proteins (DAPs) in wheat roots under LK stress.
Figure 2. Function clusters of Orthologous Groups of Protein (COG) classification for the differential abundance proteins (DAPs) in wheat roots under LK stress.
Ijms 23 13504 g002
Figure 3. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of low-K+ responsive differential abundance proteins (DAPs) in roots of wheat. (ac) The GO in 24 h vs. 0 h, 48 h vs. 0 h, and 48 h vs. 24 h comparisons, respectively. BP: biological process; CC, cellular component; MF: molecular function.
Figure 3. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of low-K+ responsive differential abundance proteins (DAPs) in roots of wheat. (ac) The GO in 24 h vs. 0 h, 48 h vs. 0 h, and 48 h vs. 24 h comparisons, respectively. BP: biological process; CC, cellular component; MF: molecular function.
Ijms 23 13504 g003
Figure 4. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of differential abundance proteins (DAPs) in LK stressed roots. (ac) The PPIs in 24 h vs. 0 h, 48 h vs. 0 h, and 48 h vs. 24 h comparisons, respectively.
Figure 4. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of differential abundance proteins (DAPs) in LK stressed roots. (ac) The PPIs in 24 h vs. 0 h, 48 h vs. 0 h, and 48 h vs. 24 h comparisons, respectively.
Ijms 23 13504 g004
Figure 5. Characteristics and expression of TaHAK1-4A. (a) Phylogenetic tree of TaHAK1-4A, OsHAKs, and AtHAKs. Ta, Triticum aestivum; Os, Oryza sativa; At, Arabidopsis thaliana. (b) Expression analysis of TaHAK1s at transcript level. Twelve-day-old seedlings at two-leaf stage were treated with LK stress for the indicated durations. (c) Predicted transmembrane segments of TaHAK1-4A. (d) Subcellular location of TaHAK1-4A in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Scale bars = 50 µm.
Figure 5. Characteristics and expression of TaHAK1-4A. (a) Phylogenetic tree of TaHAK1-4A, OsHAKs, and AtHAKs. Ta, Triticum aestivum; Os, Oryza sativa; At, Arabidopsis thaliana. (b) Expression analysis of TaHAK1s at transcript level. Twelve-day-old seedlings at two-leaf stage were treated with LK stress for the indicated durations. (c) Predicted transmembrane segments of TaHAK1-4A. (d) Subcellular location of TaHAK1-4A in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Scale bars = 50 µm.
Ijms 23 13504 g005
Figure 6. TaHAK1-4A mediates K+ transport in yeast. (a) TaHAK1-4A complement the K+ uptake-deficient yeast mutant R5421 on AP medium containing various K+ concentrations. R757 was used as positive control. (b) Growth curves of the R757, R5421, and R5421 strains transformed with P416-GPD (empty vector) or TaHAK1-4A in liquid AP medium with 0.10 mM K+ or 2.00 mM K+.
Figure 6. TaHAK1-4A mediates K+ transport in yeast. (a) TaHAK1-4A complement the K+ uptake-deficient yeast mutant R5421 on AP medium containing various K+ concentrations. R757 was used as positive control. (b) Growth curves of the R757, R5421, and R5421 strains transformed with P416-GPD (empty vector) or TaHAK1-4A in liquid AP medium with 0.10 mM K+ or 2.00 mM K+.
Ijms 23 13504 g006
Figure 7. Overexpression of TaHAK1-4A enhanced the LK tolerance of Arabidopsis and improved the growth of athak5 under LK condition. (a) Detection of TaHAK1-4A mRNA expression levels in Arabidopsis using demi-quantitative RT-PCR. (b) The phenotype analysis of Arabidopsis with various amounts of K+ added. (c) Fresh weight and (d) primary root length of plants in (b). Letters denote significantly different groups identified by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05); ns indicates non-substantial differences at that level of significance.
Figure 7. Overexpression of TaHAK1-4A enhanced the LK tolerance of Arabidopsis and improved the growth of athak5 under LK condition. (a) Detection of TaHAK1-4A mRNA expression levels in Arabidopsis using demi-quantitative RT-PCR. (b) The phenotype analysis of Arabidopsis with various amounts of K+ added. (c) Fresh weight and (d) primary root length of plants in (b). Letters denote significantly different groups identified by Student’s t-test (p < 0.05); ns indicates non-substantial differences at that level of significance.
Ijms 23 13504 g007
Figure 8. Effects of silencing TaHAK1-4A using VIGS technique under LK stress in wheat. (a) The third leaf of BSMV-inoculated plants, bar = 1 cm. (b) Infection success rate of BSMV-inoculated plants. (c) Relative expression of plants infected with BSMV:γ0 or BSMV:TaHAK1-4A. (d) Performance of the wheat plants under control (6 mM K+) and LK stress (15 µM K+), bar = 10 cm. (e) Length, (f) dry weight, and (g) K+ concentration of plants under CK or LK conditions. (h) Bright-field microscopy images of the net K+ flux determination at root tip surface. (i,j) The rates of net K+ fluxes in tested materials. Error bars represent standard errors of at least three independent replicates. Student’s t-test was used to test the statistical significance (** p < 0.01) between the control and treatment.
Figure 8. Effects of silencing TaHAK1-4A using VIGS technique under LK stress in wheat. (a) The third leaf of BSMV-inoculated plants, bar = 1 cm. (b) Infection success rate of BSMV-inoculated plants. (c) Relative expression of plants infected with BSMV:γ0 or BSMV:TaHAK1-4A. (d) Performance of the wheat plants under control (6 mM K+) and LK stress (15 µM K+), bar = 10 cm. (e) Length, (f) dry weight, and (g) K+ concentration of plants under CK or LK conditions. (h) Bright-field microscopy images of the net K+ flux determination at root tip surface. (i,j) The rates of net K+ fluxes in tested materials. Error bars represent standard errors of at least three independent replicates. Student’s t-test was used to test the statistical significance (** p < 0.01) between the control and treatment.
Ijms 23 13504 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, K.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Sun, R.; Wang, W.; Zhang, S.; Yang, X. Proteomic Analysis of Roots Response to Potassium Deficiency and the Effect of TaHAK1-4A on K+ Uptake in Wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113504

AMA Style

Xu K, Zhao Y, Yu Y, Sun R, Wang W, Zhang S, Yang X. Proteomic Analysis of Roots Response to Potassium Deficiency and the Effect of TaHAK1-4A on K+ Uptake in Wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(21):13504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113504

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Ke, Yong Zhao, Yaxin Yu, Ruoxi Sun, Weiwei Wang, Shuhua Zhang, and Xueju Yang. 2022. "Proteomic Analysis of Roots Response to Potassium Deficiency and the Effect of TaHAK1-4A on K+ Uptake in Wheat" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 21: 13504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232113504

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop