Next Article in Journal
Flavonoids as Antidiabetic and Anti-Inflammatory Agents: A Review on Structural Activity Relationship-Based Studies and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Mouse Models of Atherosclerosis: Approaches to Exploring the Translational Potential of New Therapies
Previous Article in Journal
Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Neurodegenerative Disorders: Role of Nutritional Supplementation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of a Method for Producing oxLDL: Characterization of Their Effects on HPV-Positive Head and Neck Cancer Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms232012604
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Non-Traditional Pro-Inflammatory and Pro-Atherosclerotic Risk Factors Related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

by
Patricia Richter
1,2,
Anca Cardoneanu
1,2,*,
Ciprian Rezus
3,4,*,
Alexandra Maria Burlui
1,2 and
Elena Rezus
1,2
1
Department of Rheumatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania
2
Clinical Rehabilitation Hospital, 700661 Iasi, Romania
3
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Grigore T Popa”, 700115 Iasi, Romania
4
“Sfantul Spiridon” Emergency Hospital, 700111 Iasi, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(20), 12604; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012604
Submission received: 4 September 2022 / Revised: 16 October 2022 / Accepted: 17 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Atherosclerosis: From Molecular Biology to Therapeutic Perspective 3.0)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are one of the leading causes of high mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The Framingham risk score and other traditional risk factors do not fully reflect the CVD risk in SLE patients. Therefore, in order to stratify these high-risk patients, additional biomarkers for subclinical CVD are needed. The mechanisms of atherogenesis in SLE are still being investigated. During the past decades, many reports recognized that inflammation plays a crucial role in the development of atherosclerosis. The aim of this report is to present novel proinflammatory and pro-atherosclerotic risk factors that are closely related to SLE inflammation and which determine an increased risk for the occurrence of early cardiovascular events.

1. Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease with the involvement of various organs [1]. It has been demonstrated that cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are currently a leading cause of comorbidity and mortality in SLE patients [2,3,4,5]. Particularly, coronary artery disease (CAD) causes nearly 30% of deaths in SLE [2,6,7]. SLE patients present a great prevalence of asymptomatic CAD [8]. Young women with SLE are prone to higher risks, as they are 50 times more likely than controls to develop a myocardial infarction; nevertheless, males also present the worst outcomes [9,10,11,12]. Regarding the risk of cerebrovascular complications in SLE, it is lower than coronary diseases, but compared to the general population, the risk is twice as high [2,13]. If these occur later in the disease course, the main cause may be attributed to atherosclerosis [14]. Additionally, the risk of peripheral artery occlusive disease has been found to be nine-fold higher in SLE patients than in general population [2,15].
The main traditional risk factors involved in CVD are: older age, arterial hypertension, obesity, and high cholesterol serum levels [2,16,17,18]. Particularly, for almost a century, cholesterol has been regarded as the main factor that promotes the development of atherosclerosis [19]. The burst of cardiovascular events (CVE) in SLE cannot be entirely related to traditional risk factors; it is thought to be driven also by immunologic and inflammatory features found in SLE [9,20,21,22]. Unfortunately, all these traditional cardiovascular models in use underestimate the risk of fatal events in SLE patients. There are currently no lupus-specific screening investigations to classify patients at risk for future major CVE, although traditional Framingham risk factors are insufficient to assess the risk of CVD [9,23,24]. Thus, extensive studies regarding non-traditional SLE-related risk factors that contribute to cardiovascular complications have been conducted [25].
Studies and book chapters relevant to this work were identified using the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Clinical Key research platforms. We have selected the most important works published in the last 5 years (2017–August 2022). For certain significant data for this review, but for which we found insufficient data in this time period, we extended the search to the last 10 years (2012–2022).

2. Atherosclerosis and Inflammation in SLE

Subclinical atherosclerosis, an early event in SLE individuals, plays an important role related to cardiovascular risk and morbidity. Among the changes it causes, we can list peripheral embolism, arterial hypertension with subsequent left ventricular hypertrophy, and diastolic dysfunction [2,26,27].
Medical conditions characterized by systemic inflammation like SLE have been strongly associated with atherosclerosis. Evidence show that inflammation process is crucial for the development of accelerated atherosclerosis in SLE. Therefore, it is plausible to assume that SLE inflammation may consecutively increase the CVD risk [2,9,28,29]. Inflammation has been linked to the development of atherosclerotic CVD in the general population as well [9,30,31]. Reducing inflammation is one of the essential targets in decreasing the CVD risk in SLE patients; it was highlighted that inflammation is responsible for initiation, formation and destabilization of atherosclerotic plaques [19,25,32,33].

Atherosclerosis Mechanism in SLE

Under a variety of irritant factors, endothelial cells on the vascular wall become activated; this results in a cascade of inflammatory reactions that can lead to the formation of atherosclerotic plaque [34]. There are three stages illustrated in Figure 1, as follows:
I. Firstly, the inflammatory process leads to the activation of the endothelial cells that determines the expression of surface molecules such as vascular cell and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1, ICAM-1), selectins, and integrins necessary to leukocyte adhesion, rolling and attachment [2,35,36].
II. Secondly, the adherent leukocytes move through the intima layer and reach the media. This monocyte transmigration into subendothelial layer is promoted by chemokines, such as monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) [2,34,35]. Interestingly, a report showed that a high carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) is associated with elevated circulating levels of MCP-1 in humans [2,31]. The expression of MCP-1 and interleukin-8 (IL-8) can be induced by l-homocysteine, another factor that stimulates leukocyte recruitment [2,37].
At this point, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (OxLDL) play two significant roles: first, they upregulate the adhesion molecules, and second, the adhesion of MCP-1 [2,38].
III. Low-density lipoproteins (LDL) are trapped in the subendothelial region, where they are exposed to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and are transformed into OxLDL. This is the beginning of the third and final stage. OxLDL, in turn, amplifies the inflammatory response by activating endothelial cells that will secrete adhesion molecules and chemokines that will stimulate the recruitment of monocytes. Additionally, OxLDL, found in the subendothelial layer, stimulates monocytes to differentiate into macrophages. The conversion of macrophages into foam cells and the multiplication of smooth muscle cells occur in this last stage, leading to atherosclerotic plaque proliferation [2,34,35,39,40].
On the other hand, the interaction between platelets and endothelial cells generates the production of cytokines such as IL-8 and stimulates ICAM-1, leading to endothelial dysfunction and a high risk of thrombosis. In SLE, these platelet–endothelium interactions are frequently seen and can accelerate the development of CVE [34,41].

3. Non-Traditional Pro-Atherosclerotic Biomarkers in sSLE

Multiple non-Framingham inflammatory biomarkers, such as plasma soluble TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (sTWEAK), dysfunctional pro-inflammatory high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (piHDL), leptin, and homocysteine, are independently linked to atherosclerosis in SLE [9,42,43,44,45,46]. Due to the increasing number of individual biomarkers attributed to CVD risk in SLE, a study from the University of California, Los Angeles, has developed a biomarker panel that could help to quantify more accurately the atherosclerosis risk and CVE risk in SLE. Thus, a model was created that is called PREDICTS (the Predictors of Risk for Elevated Flares, Damage Progression, and Increased Cardiovascular Disease in SLE) [45]. It integrates four inflammatory biomarkers (homocysteine, piHDL, TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis TWEAK, and leptin) and two risk factors (age and diabetes). Among non-traditional risk factors, an increased piHDL function, high leptin levels and plasma soluble TWEAK significantly correlated with plaque formation. Interestingly, this complete panel showed a better predictive capacity for plaque formation in SLE compared with individual markers [45].

3.1. piHDL

Although HDL cholesterol is typically regarded as atheroprotective, in systemic inflammation it can change its properties. This occurs when it shifts from the typical anti-inflammatory form to the proinflammatory HDL (piHDL) form, phenomena that tend to occur during the onset of chronic inflammatory conditions, also seen in SLE [2,47]. A cause may be the ongoing oxidative damage in the chronic inflammatory state that generates piHDL and high levels of ox-LDL [48]. piHDL is found in SLE patients more frequently compared to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) individuals and the general population (Table 1). In this situation, the favorable effects of HDL, the decrease of LDL oxidation, are lost. Instead, this dysfunctional HDL enhances accelerated atherogenesis. McMahon et al. showed that piHDL is strongly linked to the development of carotid plaque and intima-media thickness (IMT) in SLE patients [34,45,48,49,50]. Interestingly, dysfunctional HDL may also be generated by atypical HDL oxidation. This is driven by the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and low-density granulocytes that are specific for SLE [9,31,51]. Moreover, piHDL has proteomic and lipidomic abnormalities that are specific for HDL particles derived from SLE individuals [9,52,53,54].
Summarizing, it seems that piHDL is commonly found in SLE patients compared to general population. There is a strong link between piHDL and carotid plaque progression. In SLE cases, piHDL has atherogenic properties due to oxidative damage and also due to proteomic and lipidomic abnormalities.

3.2. Endothelial Progenitor Cells

Endothelial dysfunction, seen in the early stages of atherosclerosis development, has been studied for its contribution to CVD risk in SLE [25,56,57,58]. Data suggested that endothelial dysfunction is already present in SLE patients before CVD development [25,59,60,61,62]. Patients with SLE have functionally and quantitatively decreased levels of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) [25,63]. EPCs are a subpopulation of circulating stem cells involved in the repair of blood vessels [34]. They are essential for maintaining the endothelial function, neovascularization, and vascular repair [25]. EPCs are thought to be able to replace damaged endothelial cells and restore endothelial integrity and, therefore, to improve the endothelial function [25,29,64]. They might be used as possible biomarkers to identify patients at risk for developing a CVD [34,65]. Castejon et al. showed that SLE patients with lower levels of progenitor cells had an increased arterial stiffness and a greater preponderance of cardiovascular risk factors, such as smoking and metabolic syndrome [34,66].
In multiple reports evaluating patients with SLE versus healthy controls, the levels of circulating EPCs were significantly low (Table 2). Thus, a reduced level of circulating EPC may be a marker for an early vascular disease [34,66]. The therapeutic and prognostic role of EPCs as an early CVD biomarker in SLE patients remain to be elucidated. New methods for measuring endothelial function and quantifying EPC as prognostic indicators of CVD are needed in SLE patients [25].
Encouraging in vitro results show the reversibility of the decrease in EPC number after treatment with anti-type 1 INFα and anti B cell activating factor (BAFF) [34].
In summary, it is known that SLE patients present endothelial dysfunction more frequently. It seems that an important biomarker can be considered the low level of EPCs. Moreover, these cells have an altered function. The decrease in the number and alteration of the functionality of EPCs is associated with an increase in arterial stiffness and with the occurrence of CVD in SLE cases.

3.3. Endocan

Endocan is another marker of angiogenesis and endothelial cell activation. It contributes to the recruitment, adhesion and migration of leukocytes across the endothelium [2,74,75].
Icli et al. investigated the impact of endocan on atherosclerotic process in SLE. They found that endocan serum levels were higher in SLE patients versus controls; also, endocan levels were strongly associated with carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) [2,76]. Its potential role as a useful biomarker in the SLE pathogenesis needs to be further investigated (Table 3). In the literature, only two studies focus on endocan in SLE and on the link between it and atherosclerosis. Furthermore, no animal model studies were identified.
In conclusion, although there are only few studies focused on endocan role in atherosclerosis, it has been found an increased endocan titer in SLE individuals versus controls. Moreover, it seems that there is an association between the endocan level and carotid intima-media thickness. These studies raise the hypothesis that endocan may become a reliable predictor of early atherosclerosis in SLE patients.

3.4. Leptin

Leptin, an adipokine that controls satiety and fat deposits, is considered to be an atherosclerotic risk factor [34,78]. According to the first study that examined the relationship between adipokines and subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE individuals, McMahon et al., showed that higher leptin levels were independently associated with carotid plaques formation and positively correlated with piHDL and oxidized phospholipids levels (Table 4) [34,44,79].
Many immune cell subsets are influenced by leptin [9,80]. For instance, leptin may have particularly pro-inflammatory actions on macrophages in SLE, such as the activation of phagocytosis and an increased presentation of apoptosis-derived self-antigen to T lymphocytes [9,81]. In addition, leptin may induce an increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress in endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes [9,82,83].
However, some contradictory studies reported a reduced leptin serum in SLE patients [84,85], while others reported no statistically significant differences between SLE patients and controls [86,87].
Table
Table 4. Leptin and SLE patients.
Table 4. Leptin and SLE patients.
BiomarkerStudyResults
LeptinGarcia-Gonzalez et al., 2002 [88]
  • Elevated leptin levels in women with SLE than control
Sada et al., 2006 [89]
  • Higher plasma leptin levels in SLE patients than controls
Chung et al., 2009 [90]
  • No important correlation between leptin levels and coronary calcification in SLE individuals versus controls
Al et al., 2009 [91]
  • Elevated serum leptin concentrations in one-third of SLE patients
Kim et al., 2010 [92]
  • Increased leptin levels in Korean SLE patients than HC
McMahon et al., 2011 [44]
  • Higher levels of leptin in patients with SLE versus controls
  • Higher leptin levels in SLE patients with plaque compared with those without
  • Significantly higher plasma levels of leptin in SLE patients with atherosclerotic plaque
  • Positive correlation between high leptin levels and elevated inflammatory biomarkers such as piHDL, Lp(a) and OxPL/apoB100
  • High leptin levels correlate with 2.8-fold more atherosclerosis in SLE female patients
  • High leptin levels increase the risk of subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE
Vadacca et al., 2013 [93]
  • Higher levels of leptin in SLE patients compared to controls
  • Positive association between leptin levels and vascular stiffness parameters
  • Correlation between leptin levels and disease activity and cumulative damage indexes
Wang et al., 2017 [94]
  • Inverse correlation between increased leptin serum levels in SLE patients and the frequency of circulating Tregs
  • Leptin inhibition can expand Tregs
Diaz-Rizo et al., 2017 [95]
  • No correlation between leptin levels in LN patients versus non-LN patients
  • No correlation between leptin levels and proteinuria severity
Demir et al., 2018 [96]
  • Significantly higher leptin levels in SLE patients with MetS versus SLE patients without MetS
  • Correlation between leptin and cIMT levels in premenopausal women with SLE
piHDL = proinflammatory HDL; Lp(a) = Lipoprotein a; oxPL = oxidised phospholipids; MetS = metabolic syndrome; Tregs = regulatory T cells; pSLE = paediatric SLE; HC = healthy control; LN = lupus nephritis.
Studies confirm the presence of a high level of leptin in SLE patients. In SLE, leptin has particular actions on macrophages, favoring the secretion of inflammatory cytokines and increasing oxidative stress. Moreover, it seems to be positively associated with other pro-atherosclerotic and proinflammatory markers. This evidence suggests that leptin may be a promising marker in SLE.

3.5. Resistin

Resistin is another adipose tissue-specific secretory marker. It contributes to the inflammatory response by upregulating adhesion molecules, expanding the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α. SLE patients with more severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) showed increased levels of resistin [34,71]. Serum resistin may be an encouraging biomarker for renal involvement in SLE patients, but there are insufficient reports (Table 5).
Studies have shown that resistin is present in an increased titer in lupus patients versus controls. The data support that resistin is involved in the inflammatory process and favors arterial calcification Furthermore, it seems that there is a relationship between resistin and kidney damage in SLE cases.

3.6. S100A8 and S100A9

S100A8 and S100A9, two Ca2+ binding proteins, are members of the S100 family. The heterodimeric complex S100 A8/A9 is involved in cytoskeleton rearrangement and arachidonic acid metabolism. It is mainly secreted by phagocytic cells such as neutrophils, monocytes and dendritic cells. S100A8/A9 could be released from activated polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), as part of NETs [101]. During the inflammatory process, it promotes leukocyte recruitment and induces cytokine secretion [102,103].
Lood et al. evaluated two large cohorts of SLE patients and showed that this proinflammatory and prothrombotic protein complex was found in naïve platelets and has elevated levels in SLE patients. Interestingly, S100A8/A9 is expressed around the thrombus and atherosclerotic plaque and it is synthesized by megakaryocytes, platelet progenitor cells. Wang et al. previously found that this thrombotic effect is mediated through CD36 interaction. This protein complex is associated with CVD, particularly being related to a four-fold increased risk of myocardial infarction [34,103,104].
The serum levels of S100A8/A9 secreted by polymorphonuclear cells are increased in SLE patients, specifically in individuals with positive anti-dsDNA antibodies and glomerulonephritis. Since higher levels of S100A8/A9 have been associated with both inactive and active SLE, serum S100A8/A9 levels may be needed to monitor the disease’s course [101,104,105].
New data consider that S100A8/A9 may also play an interesting role in neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) due to its action on endothelial cells, contributing to vasculopathy and atherosclerosis development at the central nervous system level [106].
Furthermore, S100A8/A9 may be used as a therapeutic biomarker in CVD due to its contribution to atherogenesis, plaque vulnerability, ischemia-associated myocardial inflammation, and heart failure [107] (Table 6). It can generate a proinflammatory response and an increased secretion of IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α [101]. A promising clinical target may be type-1 interferon (IFN) as it induces the upregulation of platelet-derived S100A8/A9 complex protein [34,103]. S100A8/A9 is becoming a more sensitive biomarker for inflammation activity and for therapeutic response by comparison with traditional inflammation markers, such as C-reactive protein [102,108,109].
This proinflammatory and prothrombotic protein complex S100 A8/A9, especially the one secreted by platelets, is secreted in excess in SLE patients. It is associated with various clinical manifestations of SLE, such as renal or neuropsychiatric damage. It actively participates in the occurrence of CVD by increasing atherogenesis and the vulnerability of the atherosclerotic plaque. Moreover, it favors the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

3.7. NETs and Microparticles (MPs)

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are chromatin fibers released from dying neutrophils. The death of neutrophils with subsequent NETs production is called “NETosis”. During their activation, neutrophils secrete ROS. The major function of NETs consists of trapping and killing pathogens. NETs exert their antimicrobial mechanism through antimicrobial enzymes such as myeloperoxidase (MPO), neutrophil elastase, but also through other molecules such ascathelicidin, histones and DNA [25,110,111].
The main source of autoantigens in SLE is considered to be the inefficient clearance of necrotic and apoptotic cells. Furthermore, there is a deficient clearing of NETs [2]. Hakkim et al. reported that this impaired degradation of NETs in SLE is apparently due to two mechanisms: the presence of antibodies against endonuclease DNase1—necessary for NETs disassembly and the appearance of anti-NET autoantibodies that prevent NETs from degradation [2,112]. In SLE, the development of NETs is stimulated by ribonucleoprotein-specific antibodies [25,113]. SLE neutrophils are stimulated by type I IFN and die upon exposure to SLE-derived anti-ribonucleoprotein antibodies, releasing NETs [113].
According to the latest research, NETs formation might contribute to atherosclerosis progression [110,114]. NETs can directly cause endothelial cell apoptosis by many mechanisms such as: endothelial cell death mediated by endothelial MMP2 stimulation; activation of platelets, coagulation cascade and thrombosis by releasing serine proteases that deteriorate tissue factor pathway inhibitor and activate factor XII and vascular leakage [25,115,116]. Indirectly, NETs determine low-density granulocytes and plasmacytoid dendritic cells to produce large amounts of IFN, which increases IFN-induced endothelial toxicity, enhances HDL-c oxidation and reduces cholesterol outflow capacity [25,117,118,119]. NETs also determine inflammasome activation, consequently increasing the IL1β and IL-18 production, which finally creates a positive loop of NETs production [2,120]. NETs promote the production and release of type I IFN which further promotes NETosis [2,113]. That is why it has been proposed that NETosis could serve as a therapeutic target in SLE [110].
The production of circulating plasma microparticles (MPs) and NETs are two significant processes that have been described in the context of endothelial dysfunction in SLE (Table 7). MPs are generated from apoptotic cells and have high levels in SLE patients [25,121,122]. Moreover, circulating plasma MP can directly cause endothelial cell death. In addition, MPs and MP-immune complexes can cause alterations in endothelial cell permeability and death by increasing the disruption of endothelial microstructure in SLE [25,123]. MPs are not exclusively linked to endothelial cells; individuals with SLE were found to have high levels of MP produced by platelets, monocytes, granulocytes, and lymphocytes [25,124].
In conclusion, in SLE there is a degradation and deficient clearance of NETs. Thus, through excessive accumulation, atherogenic mechanisms are favored both directly through endothelial cell apoptosis and indirectly through increased IFN secretion, HDL-c oxidation and reduced cholesterol outflow capacity. Moreover, the increase in MPs is associated with the occurrence of CVD due to the increase in vascular permeability and the death of endothelial cells.

3.8. Other Potential Biomarkers of Atherosclerosis in SLE

Homocysteine can lead to lipid peroxidation, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative damage [127,128]. Several studies have associated homocysteine with atherosclerosis in SLE patients [9,45,46,129].
sTWEAK is a potential biomarker for SLE nephritis and CVD in general population. It can increase IFN- expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [9,130,131].
Pentraxin-3 (PTX3), a newly identified pro-atherosclerotic marker in SLE, is synthesized by mononuclear phagocytes, myeloid-derived dendritic cells and endothelium cells as a response to local inflammation. It is recognized as a local vascular inflammatory biomarker in SLE [2,132]. It presents high levels in SLE and correlates with disease activity [2,133]. PTX3 is also associated with other indicators of endothelial dysfunction such as soluble VCAM-1 and vWf [2,134]. These findings suggest that PTX3 may be a novel biomarker for early atherosclerosis in SLE.

Interferon

The synthesis of lipid mediators, of platelet-activating factors and eicosanoids, antigen presentation, and the synthesis of TNF-α and IL-1 are a small number of pro-atherogenic processes that are upregulated by type II interferon (IFN). IFN -γ is one of the most important cytokine in SLE [2,135,136].
Type 1 IFN, which is mainly secreted by plasmacytoid dendritic cells and low-density granulocytes, plays a crucial role in SLE pathogenesis. Type I IFNs are associated with endothelial dysfunction and with CVD progression in SLE, even in patients without risk factors for vascular diseases [34]. IFN-α has a high toxicity against endothelium [25,137]. IFN-α expression is increased as a result of the activation of Toll-like receptors 7 and 9 [2,138]. Additionally, IFN is involved in abnormal vascular repair because it modulates plaque instability by suppressing the development of smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells and the synthesis of collagen [2]. Activation of IFN pathways is linked to a fast atherosclerosis progression in SLE [69,139]. It remains to be established whether type I IFNs would be able to influence platelet S100A8/A9 levels [103].
TNF-α and IL-1 levels are significantly elevated in SLE patients with CVD. Their role is to promote adhesion molecule expression. TNF-α also contributes to the final stage of atherogenesis through down-regulation of lipoprotein lipase, an enzyme that hydrolyses triglycerides in VLDL (very low density lipoproteins) [2,34,140,141,142].
Interleukin-18 (IL-18) manifests its pro-atherosclerotic and pro-inflammatory effects on endothelial cells. Serum IL-18 levels are increased in SLE and correlate with EPC/CAC (circulating angiogenic cells) dysfunction. In SLE, the increased circulating IFN-α levels determine a chronic dysregulation of inflammasome activity with subsequent increased IL-18 levels that led to an abnormal vascular repair [143,144].
Osteoprotegerin (OPG) belongs to the TNF receptor family. Higher levels of CAC (circulating angiogenic cells) and cIMT have been seen in SLE individuals with higher levels of OPG. Kiani et al. suggested that OPG may be a marker for subclinical atherosclerosis in SLE patients, but it requires additional validation in larger trials [145].
The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), which are known to enhance the risk of thrombosis in SLE through a variety of pathways, may also be associated with an accelerated atherosclerosis [2]. Interestingly, Lood et al. reported that aPL antibodies, anti-beta 2 glycoprotein 1 (β2-GP1), anti-cardiolipin and lupus anticoagulant, are correlated with high levels of S100A8/A9 in platelets [103]. aPL interact with endothelial cells and monocytes, creating a pro-inflammatory and pro-coagulant state [2,146,147]. aPL also activate the complement generating C5a; in turn, C5a activates neutrophils and a subsequent extrinsic coagulation cascade [2,148].
In contrast with native LDL, oxLDL can form complexes with IgG β2-GP, also increased in SLE. Moreover, the presence of IgG anti-β2-GP1 enhances OxLDL uptake by macrophages. SLE patients with CVD present increased levels of circulating OxLDL and antibodies against OxLDL. The atherosclerotic process has been positively linked to elevated levels of antibodies against OxLDL epitopes [2,149,150].
The extracellular matrix protein osteopontin (OPN) is considered to be a mediator of systemic inflammation. The role of OPN in SLE and atherosclerosis is linked to type I IFN response regulation [151]. Some studies reported that higher OPN levels correlate with SLE and LN compared with other diseases [152,153,154]. A positive association between OPN and cIMT in SLE patients was also described [155].
Low-density granulocytes (LDGs), a subclass of neutrophils that are frequently found in SLE, are highly susceptible to predispose NETosis. Due to their negative effects on endothelium, due to the synthesis of high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-α and to the disruption of the EPC development into mature endothelial cells, LDG NETs are believed to contribute to atherosclerosis acceleration in SLE. LDGs also determine an important mitochondrial ROS production. This ROS hyperproduction and the stimulation of lipoproteins peroxidation by a decreased paraoxonase 1 activity, are two additional mechanisms of atherogenesis [2].
SLE patients also have higher levels of specific soluble mediators such as annexin A5, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM1) and activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM). These mediators have been linked to endothelial dysfunction [25,156]. Moreover, Valer et al. showed that serum annexin A5 levels were independently correlated with endothelial dysfunction and with an increased carotid intima-media thickness in SLE patients [25,157].

4. Conclusions

The balance of endothelial integrity is maintained by the homeostasis between endothelial injury and repair. This is crucial for maintaining a normal endothelial function and consequently, the vascular health. Endothelial dysfunction, which is thought to be the first stage in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, develops when endothelial damage exceeds the repair process. It is well known that the atherogenesis process includes both traditional and non-traditional factors, the latter less known, but very important in the mechanism of the disease. Systemic inflammation, also present in SLE, is a main factor in the occurrence of early atherosclerosis, being associated with the presence of a cytokine cascade and multiple cell activations. It is extremely important to find novel biomarkers that can predict the development of atherosclerosis and, why not, to use them as new therapeutic targets.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.R. and A.C.; methodology, P.R.; software, A.M.B. and A.C.; validation, E.R., A.C. and A.M.B.; formal analysis, C.R.; investigation, P.R.; resources, P.R., A.M.B. and C.R.; data curation, P.R.; writing—original draft preparation, P.R.; writing—review and editing, A.C. and C.R.; visualization, A.M.B. and E.R.; supervision, E.R. and C.R.; project administration, E.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hammad, S.M.; Harden, O.C.; Wilson, D.A.; Twal, W.O.; Nietert, P.J.; Oates, J.C. Plasma Sphingolipid Profile Associated With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Clinical Disease Markers of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Potential Predictive Value. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 694318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Teixeira, V.; Tam, L.S. Novel Insights in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Atherosclerosis. Front. Med. 2018, 4, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Leone, P.; Cicco, S.; Prete, M.; Solimando, A.G.; Susca, N.; Crudele, L.; Buonavoglia, A.; Colonna, P.; Dammacco, F.; Vacca, A.; et al. Early echocardiographic detection of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus asymptomatic for cardiovascular disease. Clin. Exp. Med. 2020, 20, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lorenzo-Vizcaya, A.; Isenberg, D. Analysis of trends and causes of death in SLE patients over a 40-years period in a cohort of patients in the United Kingdom. Lupus 2021, 30, 702–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ståhl-Hallengren, C.; Jönsen, A.; Nived, O.; Sturfelt, G. Incidence studies of systemic lupus erythematosus in Southern Sweden: Increasing age, decreasing frequency of renal manifestations and good prognosis. J. Rheumatol. 2000, 27, 685–691. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aranow, C.; Ginzler, E.M. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2000, 9, 166–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lai, E.C.; Huang, Y.C.; Liao, T.C.; Weng, M.Y. Premature coronary artery disease in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease: A population-based study. RMD Open 2022, 8, e001993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mendoza-Pinto, C.; Munguía-Realpzo, P.; García-Carrasco, M.; Godinez-Bolaños, K.; Rojas-Villarraga, A.; Morales-Etchegaray, I.; Ayón-Aguilar, J.; Méndez-Martínez, S.; Cervera, R. Asymptomatic coronary artery disease assessed by coronary computed tomography in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2022, 100, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Skaggs, B.J.; Grossman, J.; Sahakian, L.; Perry, L.; FitzGerald, J.; Charles-Schoeman, C.; Gorn, A.; Taylor, M.; Moriarty, J.; Ragavendra, N.; et al. A Panel of Biomarkers Associates With Increased Risk for Cardiovascular Events in Women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2021, 3, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Manzi, S.; Meilahn, E.N.; Rairie, J.E.; Conte, C.G.; Medsger, T.A., Jr.; Jansen-McWilliams, L.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Kuller, L.H. Age-specific incidence rates of myocardial infarction and angina in women with systemic lupus erythematosus: Comparison with the Framingham Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1997, 145, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Vavlukis, M.; Pop-Gjorcevab, D.; Poposka, L.; Sandevska, E.; Kedev, S. Myocardial Infarction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus—The Sex-Specific Risk Profile. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2021, 27, 3221–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. McMahon, M.; Hahn, B.H. Atherosclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus: Mechanistic basis of the association. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2007, 19, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Arkema, E.V.; Svenungsson, E.; Von Euler, M.; Sjöwall, C.; Simard, J.F. Stroke in systemic lupus erythematosus: A Swedish population-based cohort study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 1544–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hanly, J.G.; Li, Q.; Su, L.; Urowitz, M.B.; Gordon, C.; Bae, S.C.; Romero-Diaz, J.; Sanchez-Guerrero, J.; Bernatsky, S.; Clarke, A.E.; et al. Cerebrovascular Events in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results From an International Inception Cohort Study. Arthritis Care Res. 2018, 70, 1478–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chuang, Y.W.; Yu, M.C.; Lin, C.L.; Yu, T.M.; Shu, K.H.; Kao, C.H. Risk of Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Medicine 2015, 94, e2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Manzi, S.; Selzer, F.; Sutton-Tyrrell, K.; Fitzgerald, S.G.; Rairie, J.E.; Tracy, R.P.; Kuller, L.H. Prevalence and risk factors of carotid plaque in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1999, 42, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Voutilainen, A.; Brester, C.; Kolehmainen, M.; Tuomainen, T.P. Epidemiological analysis of coronary heart disease and its main risk factors: Are their associations multiplicative, additive, or interactive? Ann. Med. 2022, 54, 1500–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Adam, C.A.; Șalaru, D.L.; Prisacariu, C.; Marcu, D.T.M.; Sascău, R.A.; Stătescu, C. Novel Biomarkers of Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease-Latest Insights in the Research Field. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Raggi, P.; Genest, J.; Giles, J.T.; Rayner, K.J.; Dwivedi, G.; Beanlands, R.S.; Gupta, M. Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and therapeutic interventions. Atherosclerosis 2018, 276, 98–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Stojan, G.; Petri, M. Atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2013, 62, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Yazdany, J.; Tonner, C.; Trupin, L.; Panopalis, P.; Gillis, J.Z.; Hersh, A.O.; Julian, L.J.; Katz, P.P.; Criswell, L.A.; Yelin, E.H. Provision of preventive health care in systemic lupus erythematosus: Data from a large observational cohort study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2010, 12, R84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oliveira, C.B.; Kaplan, M.J. Cardiovascular disease risk and pathogenesis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin. Immunopathol. 2022, 44, 309–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Colaco, K.; Ocampo, V.; Ayala, A.P.; Harvey, P.; Gladman, D.D.; Piguet, V.; Eder, L. Predictive Utility of Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Algorithms in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review. J. Rheumatol. 2020, 47, 928–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mosca, M.; Tani, C.; Aringer, M.; Bombardieri, S.; Boumpas, D.; Cervera, R.; Doria, A.; Jayne, D.; Khamashta, M.A.; Kuhn, A.; et al. Development of quality indicators to evaluate the monitoring of SLE patients in routine clinical practice. Autoimmun. Rev. 2011, 10, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mak, A.; Chan, J.K.Y. Endothelial function and endothelial progenitor cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2022, 18, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ryan, M.J. The pathophysiology of hypertension in systemic lupus erythematosus. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2009, 296, R1258–R1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Roldan, C.A.; Alomari, I.B.; Awad, K.; Boyer, N.M.; Qualls, C.R.; Greene, E.R.; Sibbitt, W.L., Jr. Aortic stiffness is associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus: A controlled transesophageal echocardiographic study. Clin. Cardiol. 2014, 37, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Liu, Y.; Kaplan, M.J. Cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: An update. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2018, 30, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Tumurkhuu, G.; Montano, E.; Jefferies, C. Innate immune dysregulation in the development of cardiovascular disease in lupus. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2019, 21, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ridker, P.M. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein: Potential adjunct for global risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2001, 103, 1813–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Larsson, P.T.; Hallerstam, S.; Rosfors, S.; Wallén, N.H. Circulating markers of inflammation are related to carotid artery atherosclerosis. Int. Angiol. 2005, 24, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  32. Montarello, N.J.; Nguyen, M.T.; Wong, D.T.L.; Nicholls, S.J.; Psaltis, P.J. Inflammation in Coronary Atherosclerosis and Its Therapeutic Implications. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2022, 36, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Oikonomou, E.; Leopoulou, M.; Theofilis, P.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Siasos, G.; Latsios, G.; Mystakidi, V.C.; Antoniades, C.; Tousoulis, D. A link between inflammation and thrombosis in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: Clinical and therapeutic implications. Atherosclerosis 2020, 309, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Saeli, S.; Bichile, T.; Thakkar, P.; Manzi, S. Cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: An update. In Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Basic, Applied and Clinical Aspects, 2nd ed.; Tsokos, G.C., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; Chapter 44; pp. 415–426. [Google Scholar]
  35. Libby, P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 2002, 420, 868–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hansson, G.K. Immune mechanisms in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2001, 21, 1876–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Poddar, R.; Sivasubramanian, N.; DiBello, P.M.; Robinson, K.; Jacobsen, D.W. Homocysteine induces expression and secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and interleukin-8 in human aortic endothelial cells: Implications for vascular disease. Circulation 2001, 103, 2717–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Chen, C.; Khismatullin, D.B. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein contributes to atherogenesis via co-activation of macrophages and mast cells. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Borén, J.; Chapman, M.J.; Krauss, R.M.; Packard, C.J.; Bentzon, J.F.; Binder, C.J.; Daemen, M.J.; Demer, L.L.; Hegele, R.A.; Nicholls, S.J.; et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Pathophysiological, genetic, and therapeutic insights: A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 2313–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hansson, G.K.; Hermansson, A. The immune system in atherosclerosis. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nhek, S.; Clancy, R.; Lee, K.A.; Allen, N.M.; Barrett, T.J.; Marcantoni, E.; Nwaukoni, J.; Rasmussen, S.; Rubin, M.; Newman, J.D.; et al. Activated Platelets Induce Endothelial Cell Activation via an Interleukin-1β Pathway in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017, 37, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Sánchez-Pérez, H.; Quevedo-Abeledo, J.C.; de Armas-Rillo, L.; Rua-Figueroa, Í.; Tejera-Segura, B.; Armas-González, E.; Machado, J.D.; García-Dopico, J.A.; Jimenez-Sosa, A.; Rodríguez-Lozano, C.; et al. Impaired HDL cholesterol efflux capacity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients is related to subclinical carotid atherosclerosis. Rheumatology 2020, 59, 2847–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Carlucci, P.M.; Purmalek, M.M.; Dey, A.K.; Temesgen-Oyelakin, Y.; Sakhardande, S.; Joshi, A.A.; Lerman, J.B.; Fike, A.; Davis, M.; Chung, J.H.; et al. Neutrophil subsets and their gene signature associate with vascular inflammation and coronary atherosclerosis in lupus. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e99276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. McMahon, M.; Skaggs, B.J.; Sahakian, L.; Grossman, J.; FitzGerald, J.; Ragavendra, N.; Charles-Schoeman, C.; Chernishof, M.; Gorn, A.; Witztum, J.L.; et al. High plasma leptin levels confer increased risk of atherosclerosis in women with systemic lupus erythematosus, and are associated with inflammatory oxidised lipids. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 70, 1619–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. McMahon, M.; Skaggs, B.J.; Grossman, J.M.; Sahakian, L.; Fitzgerald, J.; Wong, W.K.; Lourenco, E.V.; Ragavendra, N.; Charles-Schoeman, C.; Gorn, A.; et al. A panel of biomarkers is associated with increased risk of the presence and progression of atherosclerosis in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014, 66, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Roman, M.J.; Crow, M.K.; Lockshin, M.D.; Devereux, R.B.; Paget, S.A.; Sammaritano, L.; Levine, D.M.; Davis, A.; Salmon, J.E. Rate and determinants of progression of atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 56, 3412–3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pownall, H.J.; Rosales, C.; Gillard, B.K.; Gotto, A.M., Jr. High-density lipoproteins, reverse cholesterol transport and atherogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021, 18, 712–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. McMahon, M.; Grossman, J.; FitzGerald, J.; Dahlin-Lee, E.; Wallace, D.J.; Thong, B.Y.; Badsha, H.; Kalunian, K.; Charles, C.; Navab, M.; et al. Proinflammatory high-density lipoprotein as a biomarker for atherosclerosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 2541–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. McMahon, M.; Grossman, J.; Skaggs, B.; Fitzgerald, J.; Sahakian, L.; Ragavendra, N.; Charles-Schoeman, C.; Watson, K.; Wong, W.K.; Volkmann, E.; et al. Dysfunctional proinflammatory high-density lipoproteins confer increased risk of atherosclerosis in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 60, 2428–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Reiss, A.B.; Jacob, B.; Ahmed, S.; Carsons, S.E.; DeLeon, J. Understanding Accelerated Atherosclerosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Toward Better Treatment and Prevention. Inflammation 2021, 44, 1663–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, S.Y.; Yu, M.; Morin, E.E.; Kang, J.; Kaplan, M.J.; Schwendeman, A. High-Density Lipoprotein in Lupus: Disease Biomarkers and Potential Therapeutic Strategy. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020, 72, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Han, C.Y.; Tang, C.; Guevara, M.E.; Wei, H.; Wietecha, T.; Shao, B.; Subramanian, S.; Omer, M.; Wang, S.; O’Brien, K.D.; et al. Serum amyloid A impairs the antiinflammatory properties of HDL. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Gaál, K.; Tarr, T.; Lőrincz, H.; Borbás, V.; Seres, I.; Harangi, M.; Fülöp, P.; Paragh, G. High-density lipopoprotein antioxidant capacity, subpopulation distribution and paraoxonase-1 activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lipids Health Dis. 2016, 15, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Marsillach, J.; Becker, J.O.; Vaisar, T.; Hahn, B.H.; Brunzell, J.D.; Furlong, C.E.; de Boer, I.H.; McMahon, M.A.; Hoofnagle, A.N.; DCCT/EDIC Research Group. Paraoxonase-3 is depleted from the high-density lipoproteins of autoimmune disease patients with subclinical atherosclerosis. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 2046–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Skaggs, B.J.; Hahn, B.H.; Sahakian, L.; Grossman, J.; McMahon, M. Dysfunctional, pro-inflammatory HDL directly upregulates monocyte PDGFRβ, chemotaxis and TNFα production. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 137, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Steyers, C.M., III; Miller, F.J., Jr. Endothelial dysfunction in chronic inflammatory diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 11324–11349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Sitia, S.; Tomasoni, L.; Atzeni, F.; Ambrosio, G.; Cordiano, C.; Catapano, A.; Tramontana, S.; Perticone, F.; Naccarato, P.; Camici, P.; et al. From endothelial dysfunction to atherosclerosis. Autoimmun. Rev. 2010, 9, 830–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mauro, D.; Nerviani, A. Endothelial Dysfunction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Pathogenesis, Assessment and Therapeutic Opportunities. Rev. Recent Clin. Trials 2018, 13, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Stalc, M.; Tomsic, M.; Jezovnik, M.K.; Poredos, P. Endothelium-dependent and independent dilation capability of peripheral arteries in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2011, 29, 616–623. [Google Scholar]
  60. Johnson, S.R.; Harvey, P.J.; Floras, J.S.; Iwanochko, M.; Ibanez, D.; Gladman, D.D.; Urowitz, M. Impaired brachial artery endothelium dependent flow mediated dilation in systemic lupus erythematosus: Preliminary observations. Lupus 2004, 13, 590–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kiss, E.; Soltesz, P.; Der, H.; Kocsis, Z.; Tarr, T.; Bhattoa, H.; Shoenfeld, Y.; Szegedi, G. Reduced flow-mediated vasodilation as a marker for cardiovascular complications in lupus patients. J. Autoimmun. 2006, 27, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ghosh, P.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.; Aggarwal, A.; Sinha, N.; Misra, R. Subclinical atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction in young South-Asian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin. Rheumatol. 2009, 28, 1259–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ding, X.; Xiang, W.; He, X. IFN-I Mediates Dysfunction of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Atherosclerosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 581385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yu, H.H.; Chen, P.C.; Yang, Y.H.; Wang, L.C.; Lee, J.H.; Lin, Y.T.; Chiang, B.L. Statin reduces mortality and morbidity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with hyperlipidemia: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Atherosclerosis 2015, 243, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Adam, C.A.; Anghel, R.; Marcu, D.T.M.; Mitu, O.; Roca, M.; Mitu, F. Impact of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors on Arterial Stiffness and Vascular Aging-What Do We Know So Far? (A Narrative Review). Life 2022, 12, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Castejon, R.; Jimenez-Ortiz, C.; Valero-Gonzalez, S.; Rosado, S.; Mellor, S.; Yebra-Bango, M. Decreased circulating endothelial progenitor cells as an early risk factor of subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 2014, 53, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Westerweel, P.E.; Luijten, R.K.; Hoefer, I.E.; Koomans, H.A.; Derksen, R.H.; Verhaar, M.C. Haematopoietic and endothelial progenitor cells are deficient in quiescent systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2007, 66, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Moonen, J.R.; de Leeuw, K.; van Seijen, X.J.; Kallenberg, C.G.; van Luyn, M.J.; Bijl, M.; Harmsen, M.C. Reduced number and impaired function of circulating progenitor cells in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2007, 9, R84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Denny, M.F.; Thacker, S.; Mehta, H.; Somers, E.C.; Dodick, T.; Barrat, F.J.; McCune, W.J.; Kaplan, M.J. Interferon-alpha promotes abnormal vasculogenesis in lupus: A potential pathway for premature atherosclerosis. Blood 2007, 110, 2907–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Lee, P.Y.; Li, Y.; Richards, H.B.; Chan, F.S.; Zhuang, H.; Narain, S.; Butfiloski, E.J.; Sobel, E.S.; Reeves, W.H.; Segal, M.S. Type I interferon as a novel risk factor for endothelial progenitor cell depletion and endothelial dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 56, 3759–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Baker, J.F.; Zhang, L.; Imadojemu, S.; Sharpe, A.; Patil, S.; Moore, J.S.; Mohler, E.R., III; Von Feldt, J. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells are reduced in SLE in the absence of coronary artery calcification. Rheumatol. Int. 2012, 32, 997–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kim, J.Y.; Park, Y.J.; Kim, K.J.; Choi, J.J.; Kim, W.U.; Cho, C.S. Osteoprotegerin causes apoptosis of endothelial progenitor cells by induction of oxidative stress. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 65, 2172–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Huang, J.; Kow, N.Y.; Lee, H.Y.; Fairhurst, A.M.; Mak, A. CD34+CD133+CD309+ circulating angiogenic cell level is reduced but positively related to hydroxychloroquine use in SLE patients-a case-control study and meta-regression analysis. Rheumatology 2021, 60, 3936–3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sarrazin, S.; Adam, E.; Lyon, M.; Depontieu, F.; Motte, V.; Landolfi, C.; Lortat-Jacob, H.; Bechard, D.; Lassalle, P.; Delehedde, M. Endocan or endothelial cell specific molecule-1 (ESM-1): A potential novel endothelial cell marker and a new target for cancer therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1765, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Lee, H.G.; Choi, H.Y.; Bae, J.S. Endocan as a potential diagnostic or prognostic biomarker for chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2014, 86, 1079–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Icli, A.; Cure, E.; Cure, M.C.; Uslu, A.U.; Balta, S.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Ozturk, C.; Arslan, S.; Sakız, D.; Sahin, M.; et al. Endocan Levels and Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Angiology 2016, 67, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tokarska, K.; Bogaczewicz, J.; Robak, E.; Woźniacka, A. The role of endocan and selected pro-inflammatory cytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus. Postepy Dermatol. Alergol. 2020, 37, 898–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Tselios, K.; Sheane, B.J.; Gladman, D.D.; Urowitz, M.B. Optimal Monitoring for Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review. J. Rheumatol. 2016, 43, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Lee, Y.H.; Song, G.G. Association between circulating leptin levels and systemic lupus erythematosus: An updated meta-analysis. Lupus 2018, 27, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yuan, Q.; Chen, H.; Li, X.; Wei, J. Leptin: An unappreciated key player in SLE. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020, 39, 305–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Amarilyo, G.; Iikuni, N.; Liu, A.; Matarese, G.; La Cava, A. Leptin enhances availability of apoptotic cell-derived self-antigen in systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Bouloumie, A.; Marumo, T.; Lafontan, M.; Busse, R. Leptin induces oxidative stress in human endothelial cells. FASEB J. 1999, 13, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Dong, F.; Zhang, X.; Ren, J. Leptin regulates cardiomyocyte contractile function through endothelin-1 receptor-NADPH oxidase pathway. Hypertension 2006, 47, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Chougule, D.; Nadkar, M.; Venkataraman, K.; Rajadhyaksha, A.; Hase, N.; Jamale, T.; Kini, S.; Khadilkar, P.; Anand, V.; Madkaikar, M.; et al. Adipokine interactions promote the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Cytokine 2018, 111, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. De Sanctis, J.B.; Zabaleta, M.; Bianco, N.E.; Garmendia, J.V.; Rivas, L. Serum adipokine levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity 2009, 42, 272–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Toussirot, E.; Gaugler, B.; Bouhaddi, M.; Nguyen, N.U.; Saas, P.; Dumoulin, G. Elevated adiponectin serum levels in women with systemic autoimmune diseases. Mediat. Inflamm. 2010, 2010, 938408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Wisłowska, M.; Rok, M.; Stepień, K.; Kuklo-Kowalska, A. Serum leptin in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol. Int. 2008, 28, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Garcia-Gonzalez, A.; Gonzalez-Lopez, L.; Valera-Gonzalez, I.C.; Cardona-Muñoz, E.G.; Salazar-Paramo, M.; González-Ortiz, M.; Martínez-Abundis, E.; Gamez-Nava, J.I. Serum leptin levels in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol. Int. 2002, 22, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Sada, K.E.; Yamasaki, Y.; Maruyama, M.; Sugiyama, H.; Yamamura, M.; Maeshima, Y.; Makino, H. Altered levels of adipocytokines in association with insulin resistance in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Rheumatol. 2006, 33, 1545–1552. [Google Scholar]
  90. Chung, C.P.; Long, A.G.; Solus, J.F.; Rho, Y.H.; Oeser, A.; Raggi, P.; Stein, C.M. Adipocytokines in systemic lupus erythematosus: Relationship to inflammation, insulin resistance and coronary atherosclerosis. Lupus 2009, 18, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Al, M.; Ng, L.; Tyrrell, P.; Bargman, J.; Bradley, T.; Silverman, E. Adipokines as novel biomarkers in paediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 2009, 48, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Kim, H.A.; Choi, G.S.; Jeon, J.Y.; Yoon, J.M.; Sung, J.M.; Suh, C.H. Leptin and ghrelin in Korean systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2010, 19, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Vadacca, M.; Zardi, E.M.; Margiotta, D.; Rigon, A.; Cacciapaglia, F.; Arcarese, L.; Buzzulini, F.; Amoroso, A.; Afeltra, A. Leptin, adiponectin and vascular stiffness parameters in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2013, 8, 705–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, X.; Qiao, Y.; Yang, L.; Song, S.; Han, Y.; Tian, Y.; Ding, M.; Jin, H.; Shao, F.; Liu, A. Leptin levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus inversely correlate with regulatory T cell frequency. Lupus 2017, 26, 1401–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Diaz-Rizo, V.; Bonilla-Lara, D.; Gonzalez-Lopez, L.; Sanchez-Mosco, D.; Fajardo-Robledo, N.S.; Perez-Guerrero, E.E.; Rodriguez-Jimenez, N.A.; Saldaña-Cruz, A.M.; Vazquez-Villegas, M.L.; Gomez-Bañuelos, E.; et al. Serum levels of adiponectin and leptin as biomarkers of proteinuria in lupus nephritis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Demir, S.; Erten, G.; Artım-Esen, B.; Şahinkaya, Y.; Pehlivan, Ö.; Alpay-Kanıtez, N.; Deniz, G.; Inanç, M. Increased serum leptin levels are associated with metabolic syndrome and carotid intima media thickness in premenopausal systemic lupus erythematosus patients without clinical atherosclerotic vascular events. Lupus 2018, 27, 1509–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Baker, J.F.; Morales, M.; Qatanani, M.; Cucchiara, A.; Nackos, E.; Lazar, M.A.; Teff, K.; von Feldt, J.M. Resistin levels in lupus and associations with disease-specific measures, insulin resistance, and coronary calcification. J. Rheumatol. 2011, 38, 2369–2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Hutcheson, J.; Ye, Y.; Han, J.; Arriens, C.; Saxena, R.; Li, Q.Z.; Mohan, C.; Wu, T. Resistin as a potential marker of renal disease in lupus nephritis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2015, 179, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Gamez-Nava, J.I.; Diaz-Rizo, V.; Perez-Guerrero, E.E.; Muñoz-Valle, J.F.; Saldaña-Cruz, A.M.; Fajardo-Robledo, N.S.; Jacobo-Cuevas, H.; Nava-Valdivia, C.A.; Alcaraz-Lopez, M.F.; Trujillo, X.; et al. Assessment of serum macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), adiponectin, and other adipokines as potential markers of proteinuria and renal dysfunction in lupus nephritis: A cross-sectional study. Biomark. Res. 2020, 8, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Shaaban, A.; Helmy, M.; Barakat, M.; Elneily, D.; Ahmed, O. Serum resistin, insulin resistance and carotid intima-media thickness as an indication of subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Egypt. Rheumatol. 2021, 43, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tydén, H.; Lood, C.; Gullstrand, B.; Jönsen, A.; Nived, O.; Sturfelt, G.; Truedsson, L.; Ivars, F.; Leanderson, T.; Bengtsson, A.A. Increased serum levels of S100A8/A9 and S100A12 are associated with cardiovascular disease in patients with inactive systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology 2013, 52, 2048–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Wang, S.; Song, R.; Wang, Z.; Jing, Z.; Wang, S.; Ma, J. S100A8/A9 in Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Lood, C.; Tydén, H.; Gullstrand, B.; Jönsen, A.; Källberg, E.; Mörgelin, M.; Kahn, R.; Gunnarsson, I.; Leanderson, T.; Ivars, F.; et al. Platelet-Derived S100A8/A9 and Cardiovascular Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016, 68, 1970–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Wang, Y.; Fang, C.; Gao, H.; Bilodeau, M.L.; Zhang, Z.; Croce, K.; Liu, S.; Morooka, T.; Sakuma, M.; Nakajima, K.; et al. Platelet-derived S100 family member myeloid-related protein-14 regulates thrombosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 2160–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Tydén, H.; Lood, C.; Gullstrand, B.; Jönsen, A.; Ivars, F.; Leanderson, T.; Bengtsson, A.A. Pro-inflammatory S100 proteins are associated with glomerulonephritis and anti-dsDNA antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2017, 26, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zervides, K.A.; Jern, A.; Nystedt, J.; Gullstrand, B.; Nilsson, P.C.; Sundgren, P.C.; Bengtsson, A.A.; Jönsen, A. Serum S100A8/A9 concentrations are associated with neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: A cross-sectional study. BMC Rheumatol. 2022, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Schiopu, A.; Cotoi, O.S. S100A8 and S100A9: DAMPs at the crossroads between innate immunity, traditional risk factors, and cardiovascular disease. Mediat. Inflamm. 2013, 2013, 828354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Soyfoo, M.S.; Roth, J.; Vogl, T.; Pochet, R.; Decaux, G. Phagocyte-specific S100A8/A9 protein levels during disease exacerbations and infections in systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Rheumatol. 2009, 36, 2190–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ometto, F.; Friso, L.; Astorri, D.; Botsios, C.; Raffeiner, B.; Punzi, L.; Doria, A. Calprotectin in rheumatic diseases. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 242, 859–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Salemme, R.; Peralta, L.N.; Meka, S.H.; Pushpanathan, N.; Alexander, J.J. The Role of NETosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. J. Cell. Immunol. 2019, 1, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  111. Brinkmann, V.; Reichard, U.; Goosmann, C.; Fauler, B.; Uhlemann, Y.; Weiss, D.S.; Weinrauch, Y.; Zychlinsky, A. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 2004, 303, 1532–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hakkim, A.; Fürnrohr, B.G.; Amann, K.; Laube, B.; Abed, U.A.; Brinkmann, V.; Herrmann, M.; Voll, R.E.; Zychlinsky, A. Impairment of neutrophil extracellular trap degradation is associated with lupus nephritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9813–9818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Garcia-Romo, G.S.; Caielli, S.; Vega, B.; Connolly, J.; Allantaz, F.; Xu, Z.; Punaro, M.; Baisch, J.; Guiducci, C.; Coffman, R.L.; et al. Netting neutrophils are major inducers of type I IFN production in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011, 3, 73ra20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Mozzini, C.; Garbin, U.; Fratta Pasini, A.M.; Cominacini, L. An exploratory look at NETosis in atherosclerosis. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2017, 12, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Pieterse, E.; Rother, N.; Garsen, M.; Hofstra, J.M.; Satchell, S.C.; Hoffmann, M.; Loeven, M.A.; Knaapen, H.K.; van der Heijden, O.W.H.; Berden, J.H.M.; et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Drive Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017, 37, 1371–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. von Brühl, M.L.; Stark, K.; Steinhart, A.; Chandraratne, S.; Konrad, I.; Lorenz, M.; Khandoga, A.; Tirniceriu, A.; Coletti, R.; Köllnberger, M.; et al. Monocytes, neutrophils, and platelets cooperate to initiate and propagate venous thrombosis in mice in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2012, 209, 819–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lande, R.; Ganguly, D.; Facchinetti, V.; Frasca, L.; Conrad, C.; Gregorio, J.; Meller, S.; Chamilos, G.; Sebasigari, R.; Riccieri, V.; et al. Neutrophils activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells by releasing self-DNA-peptide complexes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci. Transl. Med. 2011, 3, 73ra19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Döring, Y.; Manthey, H.D.; Drechsler, M.; Lievens, D.; Megens, R.T.; Soehnlein, O.; Busch, M.; Manca, M.; Koenen, R.R.; Pelisek, J.; et al. Auto-antigenic protein-DNA complexes stimulate plasmacytoid dendritic cells to promote atherosclerosis. Circulation 2012, 125, 1673–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Knight, J.S.; Subramanian, V.; O’Dell, A.A.; Yalavarthi, S.; Zhao, W.; Smith, C.K.; Hodgin, J.B.; Thompson, P.R.; Kaplan, M.J. Peptidylarginine deiminase inhibition disrupts NET formation and protects against kidney, skin and vascular disease in lupus-prone MRL/lpr mice. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 2199–2206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Kahlenberg, J.M.; Carmona-Rivera, C.; Smith, C.K.; Kaplan, M.J. Neutrophil extracellular trap-associated protein activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome is enhanced in lupus macrophages. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 1217–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  121. Mobarrez, F.; Vikerfors, A.; Gustafsson, J.T.; Gunnarsson, I.; Zickert, A.; Larsson, A.; Pisetsky, D.S.; Wallén, H.; Svenungsson, E. Microparticles in the blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): Phenotypic characterization and clinical associations. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Rother, N.; Yanginlar, C.; Pieterse, E.; Hilbrands, L.; van der Vlag, J. Microparticles in Autoimmunity: Cause or Consequence of Disease? Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 822995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Atehortúa, L.; Rojas, M.; Vásquez, G.; Muñoz-Vahos, C.H.; Vanegas-García, A.; Posada-Duque, R.A.; Castaño, D. Endothelial activation and injury by microparticles in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2019, 21, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. López, P.; Rodríguez-Carrio, J.; Martínez-Zapico, A.; Caminal-Montero, L.; Suárez, A. Circulating microparticle subpopulations in systemic lupus erythematosus are affected by disease activity. Int. J. Cardiol. 2017, 236, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Dieker, J.; Tel, J.; Pieterse, E.; Thielen, A.; Rother, N.; Bakker, M.; Fransen, J.; Dijkman, H.B.; Berden, J.H.; de Vries, J.M.; et al. Circulating Apoptotic Microparticles in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients Drive the Activation of Dendritic Cell Subsets and Prime Neutrophils for NETosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016, 68, 462–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Carmona-Pérez, L.; Rojas, M.; Muñoz-Vahos, C.; Vanegas-García, A.; Vásquez, G. Plasma microparticles from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus modulate the content of miRNAs in U937 cells. Immunology 2021, 164, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Zhou, J.; Austin, R.C. Contributions of hyperhomocysteinemia to atherosclerosis: Causal relationship and potential mechanisms. Biofactors 2009, 35, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Davì, G.; Falco, A. Oxidant stress, inflammation and atherogenesis. Lupus 2005, 14, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lertratanakul, A.; Wu, P.; Dyer, A.R.; Kondos, G.; Edmundowicz, D.; Carr, J.; Ramsey-Goldman, R. Risk factors in the progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res. 2014, 66, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Suttichet, T.B.; Kittanamongkolchai, W.; Phromjeen, C.; Anutrakulchai, S.; Panaput, T.; Ingsathit, A.; Kamanamool, N.; Ophascharoensuk, V.; Sumethakul, V.; Avihingsanon, Y. Urine TWEAK level as a biomarker for early response to treatment in active lupus nephritis: A prospective multicentre study. Lupus Sci. Med. 2019, 6, e000298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Xue, L.; Liu, L.; Huang, J.; Wen, J.; Yang, R.; Bo, L.; Tang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z. Tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis activates type I interferon signals in lupus nephritis. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 4927376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Mantovani, A.; Garlanda, C.; Doni, A.; Bottazzi, B. Pentraxins in innate immunity: From C-reactive protein to the long pentraxin PTX3. J. Clin. Immunol. 2008, 28, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Pang, Y.; Tan, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guo, Y.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, C.; Yu, F.; Zhao, M.H. Pentraxin 3 is closely associated with tubulointerstitial injury in lupus nephritis: A large multicenter cross-sectional study. Medicine 2016, 95, e2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Cieślik, P.; Hrycek, A. Pentraxin 3 as a biomarker of local inflammatory response to vascular injury in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity 2015, 48, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Peilot, H.; Rosengren, B.; Bondjers, G.; Hurt-Camejo, E. Interferon-gamma induces secretory group IIA phospholipase A2 in human arterial smooth muscle cells. Involvement of cell differentiation, STAT-3 activation, and modulation by other cytokines. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 22895–22904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Kuriyama, Y.; Shimizu, A.; Kanai, S.; Oikawa, D.; Motegi, S.I.; Tokunaga, F.; Ishikawa, O. Coordination of retrotransposons and type I interferon with distinct interferon pathways in dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus and autoimmune blistering disease. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 23146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Mak, A.; Kow, N.Y. Imbalance between endothelial damage and repair: A gateway to cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 178721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Avalos, A.M.; Busconi, L.; Marshak-Rothstein, A. Regulation of autoreactive B cell responses to endogenous TLR ligands. Autoimmunity 2010, 43, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kirou, K.A.C.P.; Salmon, J.E.; Roman, M.J.; Crow, M.K. Identification of molecular pathways associated with progression of carotid atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, S807. [Google Scholar]
  140. Agarwal, S.; Elliott, J.R.; Manzi, S. Atherosclerosis risk factors in systemic lupus erythematosus. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2009, 11, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kahlenberg, J.M.; Kaplan, M.J. The interplay of inflammation and cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2011, 13, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Arida, A.; Protogerou, A.D.; Kitas, G.D.; Sfikakis, P.P. Systemic Inflammatory Response and Atherosclerosis: The Paradigm of Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Kahlenberg, J.M.; Thacker, S.G.; Berthier, C.C.; Cohen, C.D.; Kretzler, M.; Kaplan, M.J. Inflammasome activation of IL-18 results in endothelial progenitor cell dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 6143–6156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Rezaieyazdi, Z.; AkbariRad, M.; Saadati, N.; Salari, M.; Orang, R.; Sedighi, S.; Esmaily, H.; Azarpazhooh, M.R.; Firoozi, A.; Akbarpour, E. Serum interleukin-18 and its relationship with subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. ARYA Atheroscler. 2021, 17, 1. [Google Scholar]
  145. Kiani, A.N.; Aukrust, P.; Ueland, T.; Hollan, I.; Barr, E.; Magder, L.S.; Petri, M. Serum osteoprotegrin (OPG) in subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2017, 26, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Harris, E.N.; Pierangeli, S.S. Primary, secondary, and catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: What’s in a name? Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2008, 34, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Meroni, P.L.; Raschi, E.; Testoni, C.; Borghi, M.O. Endothelial cell activation by antiphospholipid antibodies. Clin. Immunol. 2004, 112, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ritis, K.; Doumas, M.; Mastellos, D.; Micheli, A.; Giaglis, S.; Magotti, P.; Rafail, S.; Kartalis, G.; Sideras, P.; Lambris, J.D. A novel C5a receptor-tissue factor cross-talk in neutrophils links innate immunity to coagulation pathways. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 4794–4802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Doria, A.; Shoenfeld, Y.; Wu, R.; Gambari, P.F.; Puato, M.; Ghirardello, A.; Gilburd, B.; Corbanese, S.; Patnaik, M.; Zampieri, S.; et al. Risk factors for subclinical atherosclerosis in a prospective cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2003, 62, 1071–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Svenungsson, E.; Jensen-Urstad, K.; Heimbürger, M.; Silveira, A.; Hamsten, A.; de Faire, U.; Witztum, J.L.; Frostegård, J. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Circulation 2001, 104, 1887–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Wirestam, L.; Saleh, M.; Svensson, C.; Compagno, M.; Zachrisson, H.; Wetterö, J.; Sjöwall, C. Plasma osteopontin versus intima media thickness of the common carotid arteries in well-characterised patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2021, 30, 1244–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Wirestam, L.; Enocsson, H.; Skogh, T.; Padyukov, L.; Jönsen, A.; Urowitz, M.B.; Gladman, D.D.; Romero-Diaz, J.; Bae, S.C.; Fortin, P.R.; et al. Osteopontin and Disease Activity in Patients with Recent-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results from the SLICC Inception Cohort. J. Rheumatol. 2019, 46, 492–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Quaglia, M.; Chiocchetti, A.; Cena, T.; Musetti, C.; Monti, S.; Clemente, N.; Dianzani, U.; Magnani, C.; Stratta, P. Osteopontin circulating levels correlate with renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus and are lower in ACE inhibitor-treated patients. Clin. Rheumatol. 2014, 33, 1263–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Wirestam, L.; Frodlund, M.; Enocsson, H.; Skogh, T.; Wetterö, J.; Sjöwall, C. Osteopontin is associated with disease severity and antiphospholipid syndrome in well characterised Swedish cases of SLE. Lupus Sci. Med. 2017, 4, e000225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  155. Carbone, F.; Dallegri, F.; Montecucco, F.; Poggi, A.; Nobili, F.M.; Cacciapaglia, F.; Afeltra, A.; Moccetti, T.; Colombo, B.M. Serum osteopontin negatively impacts on intima-media thickness in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 49, e13089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Mancardi, D.; Arrigo, E.; Cozzi, M.; Cecchi, I.; Radin, M.; Fenoglio, R.; Roccatello, D.; Sciascia, S. Endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk in lupus nephritis: New roles for old players? Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 51, e13441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Valer, P.; Paul, B.; Eugenia, B.; Camelia, B. Annexin A5 as independent predictive biomarker for subclinical atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Clin. Lab. 2013, 59, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 12604 g001 550
Figure 1. Stages of atherosclerosis mechanism in SLE patients.
Figure 1. Stages of atherosclerosis mechanism in SLE patients.
Ijms 23 12604 g001
Table
Table 1. Pro-inflammatory HDL in SLE patients.
Table 1. Pro-inflammatory HDL in SLE patients.
BiomarkerStudyResults
piHDLMcMahon et al., 2006 [48]
  • piHDL was found more frequently in SLE patients than in controls and RA patients
  • A higher number of SLE patients had piHLD compared to controls or RA patients (44.7% vs. 4.1% vs. 20.1%)
  • ox-LDL levels correlated with piHDL levels
  • Significantly higher piHDL in SLE patients with CAD than patients without CAD
McMahon et al., 2009 [49]
  • piHDL association with higher IMT
  • Strong piHDL association with atherosclerotic plaque on carotid ultrasound
Skaggs et al., 2010 [55]
  • Direct role of piHDL on monocyte chemotaxis and secretion of pro-inflammatory molecules MCP-1 and TNFα
  • Direct alteration of a small number of transcripts in circulating monocytes
  • HDL inhibition restored monocyte chemotaxis
RA = rheumatoid arthritis; HDL = high-density lipoproteins; oxLDL = oxidized low-density lipoprotein; CAD = coronary artery disease; MCP-1 = monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; TNF = tumor necrosis factor; IMT = intima-media thickness.
Table
Table 2. Endothelial progenitor cells and the relation with SLE manifestations.
Table 2. Endothelial progenitor cells and the relation with SLE manifestations.
BiomarkerStudyResults
EPCsWesterweel et al., 2007 [67]
  • Lower levels of EPCs in SLE patients in clinical remission
Moonen et al., 2007 [68]
  • Reduced number of CD34–CD133 double-positive CPC cells in SLE patients
Denny et al., 2007 [69]
  • Significantly lower circulating EPC levels in SLE patients
  • Correlation between decreased EPC numbers and SLEDAI; also in patients with no clinical or serologic disease activity (SLEDAI = 0)
  • Reduced EPC may significantly affect vascular repair
Lee et al., 2007 [70]
  • SLE patients had notably decreased levels of EPC colony-forming units compared to controls
  • Elevated levels of IFN-I showed an important depletion of EPCs in SLE patients
  • CRP independently associated with the decrease of EPCs
Baker et al., 2012 [71]
  • Significantly lower number of EPCs in SLE patients with no evidence of CAC
Kim et al., 2013 [72]
  • Reduced number of EPCs in SLE patients
  • High levels of OPG correlate with low levels of EPCs
  • OPG may induce EPCs apoptosis
Castejon et al., 2014 [66]
  • Association between lower levels of EPCs and high arterial stiffness and other CV risk factors, such as tobacco use or metabolic syndrome
Huang et al., 2021 [73]
  • Significantly reduced CD34+ CD133+ CD309+ CAC level in SLE patients versus HC
  • Notable correlation between HCQ use and a higher level of CAC
EPC = Endothelial progenitor cells; SLEDAI = Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index; CAC = coronary artery calcification; CRP = C-reactive protein; IFN = interferon; CPC = circulating progenitor cells; OPG = osteoprotegerin; CV = cardiovascular; HCQ = hydroxychloroquine.
Table
Table 3. Endocan in SLE cases.
Table 3. Endocan in SLE cases.
BiomarkerStudyResults
EndocanIcli et al., 2016 [76]
  • Positive correlation between endocan levels and cIMT
Tokarska et al., 2020 [77]
  • Significantly association between high endocan serum concentration in SLE patients versus HC
  • Notable correlation between serum levels of endocan and IL-1β, suggesting that a high endocan level may be a biomarker of endothelial dysfunction in SLE
cIMT = carotid intima-media thickness; HC = healthy controls; IL = interleukin.
Table
Table 5. Resistin in SLE patients.
Table 5. Resistin in SLE patients.
BiomarkerStudyResults
ResistinBaker et al., 2011 [97]
  • Higher resistin levels in SLE patients with CAC compared to SLE without CAC
  • Positive correlation between high resistin levels and markers of inflammation and renal dysfunction in SLE patients
  • No correlation with insulin resistance
Hutcheson et al., 2015 [98]
  • Increased resistin levels in sera and urine of LN patients
  • Correlation between serum resistin and renal dysfunction in LN
Chougule et al., 2018 [84]
  • Statistically significant elevation of resistin levels in SLE patients versus HC
  • High resistin levels in SLE patients with renal manifestations
Gamez-Nava et al., 2020 [99]
  • Higher resistin levels in SLE patients with renal involvement versus patients without renal SLE
  • Association between resistin and proteinuria
  • Resistin correlations with increased creatinine levels
Shaaban et al., 2021 [100]
  • Significantly association between serum resistin and hs-CRP, HDL and anti-nuclear antibody
  • No significantly elevated levels of resistin in SLE compared to controls
CAC = coronary artery calcification; LN = lupus nephritis; HC = healthy controls; hs-CRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HDL = high-density lipoprotein.
Table
Table 6. Protein complex S100 A8/A9 in SLE patients.
Table 6. Protein complex S100 A8/A9 in SLE patients.
BiomarkerStudyResults
Protein complex S100 A8/A9Soyfoo et al., 2009 [108]
  • Significantly elevated S100A8/A9 serum levels in SLE patients compared to pSS patients and HC
  • Positive correlation between S100A8/A9 and SLEDAI
  • S100A8/A9 may also be considered a marker of infection, as SLE patients with infections presented elevated serum levels of S100A8/A9
Tydén et al., 2013 [101]
  • Increased serum levels of S100A8/A9 in SLE patients with inactive disease (SLEDAI = 0) versus controls
  • Importantly increased serum levels of S100A8/A9 in SLE patients with a history of acute myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular complications compared to SLE patients without CVD or venous thromboembolism
  • Association between serum levels of S100A8/A9 and disease severity and organ damage, independently of CVD
  • Correlation between anti-dsDNA and elevated S100A8/A9 concentrations
Lood et al., 2016 [103]
  • Increased platelet S100A8/A9 expression in SLE when compared with controls
  • Specifically, high S100A8/A9 protein levels in platelets from SLE patients
  • Association between increased plasma levels of S100A8/A9 with platelet activation in SLE patients
  • Strong association between high levels of platelet S100A8/A9 and CVD such as myocardial infarction or APS
Tydén et al., 2016 [105]
  • High serum levels of S100A8/A9 in SLE patients with high disease activity versus patients with low disease activity
  • Increased levels of S100A8/A9 in patients with anti-dsDNA antibodies and GN before treatment
pSS = primary Sjögren’s syndrome; HC = healthy controls; CVD = cardiovascular disease; SLEDAI = Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index; APS = antiphosolipidic syndrome; anti-dsDNA = anti-double stranded DNA; GN = glomerulonephritis.
Table
Table 7. Microparticles in SLE cases.
Table 7. Microparticles in SLE cases.
BiomarkerStudyResults
MPsMobarrez et al., 2016 [121]
  • MP are 2-10 times more abundant in SLE blood compared to controls
Dieker et al., 2016 [125]
  • Plasma MP from SLE patients exerts significant effects on MDCs and PDCs by stimulating the production of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF, and ITN-α)
  • MP enhances NETosis by blood-derived neutrophils interaction
Atehortúa et al., 2019 [123]
  • MPs and MPs-ICs from patients with SLE and RA induce structural modifications on macrovascular and microvascular endothelial cells by increasing adhesion molecules expression and chemokine production
Carmona-Pérez et al., 2021 [126]
  • Significantly elevated CD14+ MPs in patients with SLE than HCs
  • Positive correlation between MPs and SLEDAI score
  • Increased plasma MPs concentration in patients with active SLE
MPs = microparticles; IC = immune complexes; RA = rheumatoid arthritis; IL-6 = interleukin-6; TNF = tumor necrosis factor; ITN-α = interferon-α; PDCs = blood-derived plasmacytoid dendritic cells; MDCs = myeloid dendritic cells; SLEDAI = SLE Disease Activity Index.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Richter, P.; Cardoneanu, A.; Rezus, C.; Burlui, A.M.; Rezus, E. Non-Traditional Pro-Inflammatory and Pro-Atherosclerotic Risk Factors Related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012604

AMA Style

Richter P, Cardoneanu A, Rezus C, Burlui AM, Rezus E. Non-Traditional Pro-Inflammatory and Pro-Atherosclerotic Risk Factors Related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(20):12604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012604

Chicago/Turabian Style

Richter, Patricia, Anca Cardoneanu, Ciprian Rezus, Alexandra Maria Burlui, and Elena Rezus. 2022. "Non-Traditional Pro-Inflammatory and Pro-Atherosclerotic Risk Factors Related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 20: 12604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012604

APA Style

Richter, P., Cardoneanu, A., Rezus, C., Burlui, A. M., & Rezus, E. (2022). Non-Traditional Pro-Inflammatory and Pro-Atherosclerotic Risk Factors Related to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(20), 12604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012604

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop