Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Stress Improves Fat Graft Survival by Promoting Adipose-Derived Stem Cells Proliferation
Next Article in Special Issue
Spontaneous Transition of Alkyl Carbocations to Unsaturated Vinyl-Type Carbocations in Organic Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Transglutaminase Post-Treatment on the Stability and Swelling Behavior of Casein Micro-Particles
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Chloronium Cation [(C2H3)2Cl+] and Unsaturated C4-Carbocations with C=C and C≡C Bonds in Their Solid Salts and in Solutions: An H1/C13 NMR and Infrared Spectroscopic Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Definition of the Acceptor Substrate Binding Specificity in Plant Xyloglucan Endotransglycosylases Using Computational Chemistry

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11838; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911838
by Barbora Stratilová 1, Eva Stratilová 1, Maria Hrmova 2,3,* and Stanislav Kozmon 1,4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11838; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911838
Submission received: 17 August 2022 / Revised: 27 September 2022 / Accepted: 28 September 2022 / Published: 5 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structure, Energy and Dynamics of Molecular Interactions)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This manuscript by Stratilová et al. emplyed compuational chemistry approach to define the acceptor substrate biding spectrum in plant xyloglycan endotransglycisylases (XETs). Although the reuslts were demonstrated and explained nicely, this readers might still prefer some experimental results. Without the verification of the binding affinity between the XETs and substrats, the authors should tone down some of the conlusions along with more citable results from other literature. Still, this paper is well-written and suitable for publication with minor revision if the authors can provide some results from real chemical experiments.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

please find attached our manuscript entitled ‘Definition of the acceptor substrate binding specificity in plant xyloglucan endotransglycosylases using computational chemistry’, by Barbora Stratilová, Eva Stratilová, Maria Hrmova, and Stanislav Kozmon.

We have revised the manuscript and taken into consideration all your comments.

Specifically, as advised, we have revised the entire text, included a new Reference [63], and extended the Conclusions section. The changes are highlighted in green.

Thank you for your report.

With best wishes,

Maria Hrmova 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This study investigated the basis of acceptor substrate binding specificity in non-specific Tropaeolum majus (TmXET6.3) and specific Populus tremula x tremuloides (PttXET16A) XETs, using molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations combined with binding free energy calculations. The findings in this study explain the differences in acceptor-binding specificity between non-specific and specific XETs and associate theoretical to experimental data. As the authors claim, XET enzymes will contribute not only to XG but also to other biopolymers integrations into plant CWs and potentially to the synthesis of the XG-hybrid molecules. Therefore, I recommend the publication of this manuscript after the following minor revisions.

1.       In Table 1, some acceptor structures are not entirely drawn. Please revise.

2. English throughout the text should be checked and revised.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

please find attached our manuscript entitled ‘Definition of the acceptor substrate binding specificity in plant xyloglucan endotransglycosylases using computational chemistry’, by Barbora Stratilová, Eva Stratilová, Maria Hrmova, and Stanislav Kozmon.

We have revised the manuscript and taken into consideration all your comments.

Specifically, as advised, we have revised the entire text (checked the English syntax), revised Tables 1 and 3, included a new Reference [63], and extended the Conclusions section. The changes are highlighted in green.

Thank you for your report.

With best wishes,

Maria Hrmova 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop