Next Article in Journal
Development of Two Innovative Performance-Based Objective Measures in Feline Osteoarthritis: Their Reliability and Responsiveness to Firocoxib Analgesic Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Westernization on the Insulin/IGF-I Signaling Pathway and the Metabolic Syndrome: It Is Time for Change
Previous Article in Journal
Cancer Three-Dimensional Spheroids Mimic In Vivo Tumor Features, Displaying “Inner” Extracellular Vesicles and Vasculogenic Mimicry
Previous Article in Special Issue
MicroRNA 132-3p Is Upregulated in Laron Syndrome Patients and Controls Longevity Gene Expression
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms231911781
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mini Review: Molecular Interpretation of the IGF/IGF-1R Axis in Cancer Treatment and Stem Cells-Based Therapy in Regenerative Medicine

by
Syuan-Ling Lin
1,†,
Chih-Yang Lin
2,†,
Wei Lee
1,
Chiao-Fang Teng
3,4,
Woei-Cherng Shyu
1,3,5,6,* and
Long-Bin Jeng
4,7,*
1
Translational Medicine Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
2
Translational Medicine Center, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei 111045, Taiwan
3
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Yingcai Campus, Taichung 404333, Taiwan
4
Organ Transplantation Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
5
Department of Neurology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
6
Department of Occupational Therapy, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan
7
Cell Therapy Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404327, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(19), 11781; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911781
Submission received: 5 September 2022 / Revised: 28 September 2022 / Accepted: 30 September 2022 / Published: 4 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of the IGF Axis in Disease 2.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In addition to the fundamental role of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)/IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R) signaling dysregulation in cancer initiation and proliferation, the IGF/IGF-1R signaling also plays an important role in the maintenance of stem cell characteristics and enhancement of stem cell-based therapeutic efficacy. This review focused on the role of IGF/IGF-1R signaling in preclinical IGF-targeted therapies, including IGF-1R monoclonal antibodies, IGF-1R tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and neutralizing antibodies of IGFs in multiple tumors and endocrine disorders. On the other hand, the function of IGF/IGF-1R signaling in stem cell self-renewal, pluripotency and therapeutic efficacy in regenerative medicine was outlined. Finally, the review summarized ongoing studies on IGF/IGF-1R signaling blockade in multiple cancers and highlighted the IGF-1R signaling modifications in stem cells as a potential strategy to improve stem cell-based therapeutics in regenerative medicine.

1. Introduction

Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) play pivotal autocrine, paracrine and endocrine roles in the promotion of cell proliferation, differentiation and survival [1,2]. IGFs are members of a ligand family that includes insulin, IGF-1 as well as IGF-2, and they exert their action by binding to specific glycoprotein membrane receptors, namely, type 1 and type 2 IGF receptors (IGF-1R and IGF-2R), insulin receptors A and B (INSR-A and INSR-B) and hybrid receptors (IGF-1R/INSR-A and IGF-1R/INSR-B) [3,4]. Moreover, there is a noticeable homology among the IGF receptors, implying structural similarity and the possibility of signaling crosstalk [3]. Notably, IGFs binding to IGF receptors is regulated by soluble IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs), a family of six homologous molecules with high binding affinity for IGF-1 and IGF-2; IGFBP-3 is the most important of the homologous molecules, which binds to 80% of the IGF-1 [5]. IGF-1R has a tetrameric structure that is comprised of two alpha (α) subunits and two transmembrane beta (β) subunits linked by disulfide bonds [6]. The α subunits are the extracellular domain that directly binds to IGF, and each transmembrane β subunit contains an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain [7]. After engaging, the binding of IGFs induces a conformational change that activates the tyrosine kinase domain of the β subunit, leading to the autophosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues, which appears to be a critical step in receptor activation [8].
The IGF/IGF-1R signaling has been reported to play an important role in cancer development (Figure 1). Previous studies have reported that the activation of IGF/IGF-1R signaling is essential for cancer initiation and progression through several distinct pathways, including phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), which subsequently increases cell proliferation, the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase (PI3K), which decreases apoptosis, and the regulation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) expression, which results in translational adaptation [9,10]. However, the activation of signaling pathways is also enhanced by other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). For example, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) enhances MAPK expression, promoting tumor cell proliferation and metastasis; fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) increases PI3K/AKT expression, enhancing tumor angiogenesis; and hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR or MET) enhances phosphorylated extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) expression, resulting in tumor survival and growth [11,12,13,14]. Notably, IGF-1R signaling has also been demonstrated to regulate the cancer stemness in various cancer stem cell (CSC) models, involving colorectal [15], breast [16], liver [17] and lung cancers [18]. IGF-1R signaling is also implicated in cancer development due to its stemness-related properties [16,19] and the resistance of radiation therapy and chemotherapy [20]. Furthermore, several studies showed that the elimination of cancer stemness by inhibiting IGF-1R signaling could be a considered way of targeting IGF/IGF-1R in cancer therapy [19,21]. However, several clinical trials of IGF/IGF-1R-targeting have experienced difficulty, leading to being terminated [22]. Hence, specific biomarkers for selecting suitable patients and the precise targeting of IGF-1R in CSCs are required. For example, the precise targeting of IGF-1R is feasible through the bioengineering of patient-derived chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells in sarcomas [23].
On the other hand, regenerative medicine is a major focus to determine novel therapies as well as to explore the biology and the pathogenesis of disease [24]. Recent advances in the isolation and development of stem cell have prompted scientists to identify and culture specific cell types for regeneration in various disorders including Parkinson [25], Alzheimer [26], or diseases of the heart [27], muscles [28], lung [29] and liver tissue [30]. Therefore, stem cells are considered efficient tools to treat tissue injuries in regenerative medicine. Several studies have indicated that growth factors including basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and IGFs maintain the stemness and pluripotency of stem cells. Notably, the IGF/IGF-1R signaling has been reported to regulate the self-renewal and stemness of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) [31,32] as well as the multipotent differentiation and repair capability of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In hESCs differentiation, the overexpression of both IGF-1 and IGF-2 and IGF-1R phosphorylation lead to the differentiation of ESCs into hepatocytes [33,34]. In addition, the overexpression of IGF-1 in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) has been reported to induce CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in vitro. After transplantation in a rat model of permanent coronary artery occlusion, IGF-1 overexpression in BMSCs accelerated cell mobilization and retention in the injured area through the paracrine action of CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling to improve cardiomyocyte repair [35]. In this review, we discuss the clinical relevance of therapeutic strategies that target the IGF/IGF-1R axis in multiple malignant tumors and the applicability of IGF/IGF-1R axis strategies to improve stem cell-based therapies for human diseases.

2. Therapeutic Strategies Targeting IGF/IGF-1R Axis in Cancer

Recently, a number of different strategies targeting IGF/IGF-1R signaling have been developed for clinical evaluation, including anti-IGF-1R monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and IGF-1 and 2 neutralizing antibodies (Figure 2). The following sections summarize the physical properties of each class of agents and their clinical evaluation status.

2.1. Anti-IGF-1R mAbs

Several studies have declared that IGF-1R is necessary for cellular oncogenes and is important in modulating the cell survival, motility, adhesion, and metastasis in multiple tumors and endocrine disorders [36,37]. For example, IGF-1R was frequently overexpressed in breast tumors, and its overexpression was important in the malignant transformation of mammary cells [38]. Moreover, the overexpression of IGF-1R provides breast tumors with an inherent resistance to radiotherapy and worsens the prognosis of patients [39]. These findings suggest that IGF-1R is a potential target for therapeutic interventions. The initial strategy involves the use of anti-IGF-1R mAbs to block ligand–receptor interactions and cause IGF-1R internalization and subsequent degradation [40,41]. Several therapeutic mAbs directed against IGF-1R have been developed, and encouraging preclinical outcomes have been observed with figitumumab (IgG2a, phase III) [42,43,44], ganitumab (IgG1, phase III) [45,46,47], dalotuzumab (IgG1, phase III) [48,49], teprotumumab (IgG1, phase II) [50,51], cixutumumab (IgG1, phase II) [52,53], robatumumab (IgG1, phase II) [54,55], and BIIB022 (IgG4, phase I) [56] in many malignant tumors. Moreover, istiratumab is a bispecific mAb that inhibits both IGF-1R and ErbB3 (IgG1 with two scFvs, phase II) [57] to kill malignant tumors. In addition, even though some IGF-1R mAbs for INSR exert negligible affinity, these IGF-1R mAbs still bind to their hybrid receptors, causing signal down-regulation. Some preclinical trials have reported Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS)-mutant tumors with high levels of free circulating IGF-1 in patients, and several reports have suggested that KRAS mutation has varying significance on the effect of IGF-1R inhibition, depending on the tumor type and/or molecular context. For instance, dalotuzumab has been used to treat KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer, with no evidence of anti-tumor activity [43]. However, this report indicated that the KRAS mutation enhanced IGF overexpression and resulted in PI3K activation, which were suppressed by targeting IGF-1R using figitumumab in non-small cell lung cancer cells (NSCLCs) [58]. Conversely, ganitumab was reported to be ineffective in sensitizing patients with KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer to folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) chemotherapy [59]. However, several clinical studies showed that the development of IGF-1R mAbs (figitumumab and ganitumab) was terminated, even though they exhibited preclinical activity against IGF-1R in some tumors, such as myeloma, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer [22]. It is notable that the two mAbs, ganitumab and teprotumumab, which are used as monotherapeutic agents or in combination therapies are in ongoing clinical trials. For example, a combination chemotherapy with ganitumab in patients with Ewing sarcoma is currently in a randomized phase III trial (NCT02306161). Additionally, teprotumumab was evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) in active stages, with a response in 69% of patients receiving the teprotumumab agent compared to a response in 20% of patients receiving a placebo agent in a randomized Phase II trial (NCT01868997) [60]. Subsequently, positive outcomes of the Phase III OPTIC trial of teprotumumab (NCT03298867) were reported in April 2019 [61]. Notably, teprotumumab was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in TAO (2020) [62].

2.2. IGF-1R TKIs

An alternative approach to suppress IGF-1R signaling involves the treatment with small molecule IGF-1R TKIs that block IGF-1R kinase activity. As mentioned previously, approximately 85% of sequence homology was observed between the IGF-1R and INSR-A/B kinase domains, including the ATP-binding site [63]. Some studies indicated that ATP competitive antagonist of IGF-1R also inhibited the kinase activity of INSR [64,65]; therefore, linsitinib and BMS-754807 were frequently described as dual IGF-1R/INSR inhibitors [64,65]. For instance, linsitinib was reported to exert a superior anti-tumor activity of IGF-1R TKI and significantly blocked the compensatory INSR-A signaling. However, owing to the influence of linsitinib on metabolic insulin signaling through INSR-B, side effects including insulin resistance and hyperglycemia ensue [40,66]. Several studies have indicated the high expression of IGF signaling in many tumors and the sensitivity of tumors to IGF-1R inhibition. For example, the overexpression of IGF-1 in breast cancer cells in vitro was associated with poor prognosis of clinical cancers and correlated with the sensitivity to BMS-754807 in patients with triple-negative breast cancer in vivo [67,68]. Moreover, BMS-754807 has been known to have off-target effects in inhibiting the activation of tropomyosin-receptor-kinase A and B (TrkA and TrkB) and aurora kinases in pancreatic cancer [65], which influenced their therapeutic efficacy. However, some TKIs have exhibited promising preclinical activity in vitro; a few TKIs, including NVP-AEW541 [69], AZ12253801 [70] and BMS-536924 [71], have undergone clinical evaluation, and the results obtained have resulted in their termination. In addition, some TKIs belong to non-ATP competitive antagonists, which only inhibit IGF-1R; the INSR signaling is not affected, and these TKIs also suppress additional related genes. For instance, picropodophyllin (AXL1717) exhibits noticeable anti-tumor activity in multiple tumors through IGF-1R inhibition, leading to tumor regression [72,73], and AXL1717 also interferes with microtubule dynamics, which arrests G2/M phase [74]. Notably, the safety and efficacy of AXL1717 was demonstrated in a phase I clinical trial on patients with NSCLCs [75]. The other non-ATP competitive antagonist, nordihydroguai- aretic acid (masoprocol), was reported to inhibit cell proliferation of prostate tumor both in vitro and in vivo, but the clinical trial of nordihydroguaiaretic acid was terminated (NCT00678015) due to its hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity adverse effects [76].

2.3. IGF-Neutralizing Antibodies

This therapeutic approach involves neutralizing antibodies that directly target IGF-1 and IGF-2, thereby inhibiting survival signals through IGF-1R, INSR-A, and IGF-1R/INSR-A without interfering with INSR-B signaling and insulin action [77,78]. Therefore, these agents exhibit higher anti-tumor efficacy in multiple tumors and have a lower potential to cause hyperglycemia compared to IGF-1R TKIs [79,80,81]. Two IGF-neutralizing antibodies, including dusigitumab, a human IgG2λ monoclonal antibody with a high binding affinity for IGF-1 and IGF-2, inhibiting IGF-1R phosphorylation and INSR-A signaling, respectively, have been used in clinical trials [77]. Notably, dusigitumab suppresses the activation of IGF-1R and INSR-A, without binding to insulin, and thus retains insulin/INSR signaling [77]. Moreover, the phase I/II clinical trial of dusigitumab (NCT01446159) evaluated its anti-tumor efficacy and safety in combination with aromatase inhibitor in patients with metastatic breast cancer (hormone receptor (HR)-positive, and epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative) [78]. The other antibody is xentuzumab, a IgG1 monoclonal antibody modified by humanization that binds to IGF-1 and IGF-2 with high affinity and blocks the IGF-1R and INSR-A functions [79]. Several studies showed that xentuzumab, in combination with other RTK inhibitors, was used in early clinical trials, including in EGFR-mutant NSCLC with afatinib (NCT02191891), in metastatic prostate cancer with enzalutamide (NCT02204072) and in HR-positive metastatic breast cancer with everolimus and exemestane (NCT02123823). Therefore, these combination agents demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy and a favorable safety profile, and they may serve as new promising therapeutic strategies in cancer therapy.

3. Activation of IGF/IGF-1R Signaling Improves Stem Cell-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Regenerative Medicine

Regenerative medicine is a new promising strategy to improve the treatment of tissue injury caused by trauma, disease, or aging. Owing to their self-renewal ability and pluripotency, stem cells are considered as efficient tools in preventing and treating diseases as well as tissue injuries. Moreover, several studies indicated that some factors and signaling pathways, such as bFGF [82], transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) [83], leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) [84], bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) [85], Wnt/β-catenin signaling [86], SMAD signaling [85], and MAPK signaling [87], maintain the stemness and pluripotency of stem cells. Notably, several studies suggest that IGF/IGF-1R axis activation is a possible regulator of the self-renewal and pluripotent capacities of stem cells through autocrine, paracrine, and receptor crosstalk. The following sections focus on IGF/IGF-1R signaling modification as a promising strategy to improve stem cell-based therapies for human diseases, including heart failure, neurodegenerative and neurological diseases, as well as bone disorders (Table 1).

3.1. Human Embryonic Stem Cells (hESCs)

Human ESCs are derived from the inner cell mass and contribute to multiple types of cells in the body [98]. Although many factors have been reported to maintain hESC populations, including bFGF [82,99], TGF-β1 [83,100], activin A [101], neurotrophins [102], Wnt/β-catenin signaling [86] and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) [103], knowledge on the receptor activation required for the self-renewal of hESCs is limited. Notably, this study displayed the activation of IGF-1R signaling upon the co-culture of hESCs in the conditional medium of mouse embryonic fibroblast [31]. Furthermore, IGF-1R was overexpressed along with specific markers such as OCT4, SSEA4, and SSEA3. In addition, suppressing IGF-1R activation using IGF-1R mABs and knocking down IGF-1R expression by siRNA not only limits cell expansion but also promotes cell differentiation [31]. Moreover, the activation of IGF/IGF-1R signaling in hESCs promotes self-renewal by HRG/ERBB2 signaling and enhances cell survival through the PI3K/AKT pathway [31]. In addition, another study indicated that the activation of IGF-2/IGF-1R signaling is also essential for self-renewal, and high levels of IGF-2 maintain hESC proliferation and promote cell survival via a bFGF-dependent pathway [32]. Furthermore, IGF-1R signaling was implicated in the regulation of the pluripotency of hESCs. For example, this study indicated that IGF-1R signaling induced the proliferative ability of cardiomyocytes that differentiated from hESCs. Likewise, blocking IGF-1R activation using a IGF-1R mAbs decreased cardiomyocyte proliferation, while the addition of recombinant protein of IGF-1 or IGF-2 induced cardiomyocyte proliferation through the PI3K/AKT pathway [88]. However, this study demonstrated that microRNA-223 directly targeted IGF-1R and inhibited the AKT signaling, leading to hESCs differentiation [104]. The study also indicated that suppressing the activation of IGF-1R and its downstream signaling pathway induced hepatocyte differentiation from hESCs [34]. Therefore, these studies demonstrate that IGF-1R signaling is required for the maintenance of the stemness of hESCs, but the role of IGF-1R signaling in the differentiation of hESC needs to be elucidated.

3.2. Human Neural Stem Cells (hNSCs)

Human NSCs are derived from regions such as the subgranular zone (SGZ) in the hippocampal dentate gyrus and subventricular zone (SVZ) adjacent to the lateral ventricles. The hNSCs function as an additional tool for the development of regenerative therapy, and several clinical trials have indicated hNSCs as a promising target to treat neurological disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [105,106]. ALS is a lethal neurodegenerative disease that causes the rapid loss of motor neurons and muscular paralysis [107]. The report indicated that the overexpression of IGF-1 on hNSCs cultures enhances neural differentiation and promotes neuronal development by neurite outgrowth [95]. Furthermore, IGF-1-overexpressing hNSCs exhibit augmented neuroprotective effects against excitotoxicity, suggesting the potential of stem cell-based therapy in ALS [95]. In addition, another study indicated that hNSCs transplantation with IGF-1 transduction demonstrably improved injury-induced spatial learning deficits and decreased the activation of astroglial and microglial accumulation while enhancing the mobilization of oligodendrocyte precursor cells [108].

3.3. Cardiac Stem Cells (CSCs)

Although the reports on cardiac stem cells have been controversial in recent years, the IGF/IGF-1R axis has been reported to play a role in activating cardiac repair by governing CSCs survival, proliferation, migration and differentiation [109]. The IGF-1/IGF-1R activation is a basic cardioprotective mechanism associated with survival that improves ischemic cardiac function [96]. Moreover, a study indicated that c-kit+ expression in human CSCs promoted IGF-1 secretion, thereby enhancing IGF-1R signaling and ultimately improving cardiomyocyte survival [110]. IGF-1 overexpression in a subset of CD90+ CSCs was shown to activate IGF-1R signaling, promote stem cell survival, and protect surrounding cardiomyocytes from apoptosis after myocardial infarction. In intramyocardial transplantation, IGF-1-overexpressing MSCs are transplanted into the injured area, leading to preserved CSCs in the injured region; this enhances myocardial regeneration without differentiating into cardiac myocytes, smooth muscle, or endothelial cells [111]. Moreover, a study demonstrated that the mechanism of IGF-1 signaling activation promotes c-kit+ murine CSCs proliferation through the down-regulation of FOXO3/p27/p57 signaling [97]. Furthermore, the overexpression of IGF-1 promotes c-kit+/CD45- CSCs survival in obese mice, leading to significant improvements in cardiomyopathy caused by Western diet-induced obesity [112].

3.4. Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)

MSCs are multipotent adult stem cells with a great potential to differentiate into adipocytes, osteocytes, chondrocytes, neurons, and glial cells [113,114,115] and to maintain the self-renewal capability [116]. Several studies have demonstrated that IGF-1R signaling regulates MSC differentiation and maintains multipotency. For example, the addition of IGF-1 in adipocyte induction culture medium promotes adipogenesis in BMSCs by stimulating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) expression and lipid accumulation [117]. A report also indicated that IGFs positively regulate the activation of AKT signaling, induce PPAR-γ expression and contribute to the maintenance of adipogenic differentiation in an AKT-1- and AKT-2-depleted animal model [118]. Moreover, the addition of bFGF enhances the autocrine IGF-1 and IGF-2 induction and induces IGF-1R activation, resulting in the adipogenesis and osteogenesis of UMSCs [89]. In addition to adipogenesis, IGF-1R signaling reportedly participates in osteogenic differentiation [90]. This study demonstrated that the autocrine IGFs/IGF-1R loop in BMSCs was activated and up-regulated through hedgehog signaling, which is required for osteoblast differentiation in skeletal development. Moreover, IGF-1R and its downstream AKT/mTOR signaling stabilize Gli2 protein and enhance the hedgehog-mediated effect on osteogenic differentiation [90]. Signaling via both IGF-1 and Runx2, which are osteogenic transcription factors, was up-regulated by serum response factor (SRF) to control bone remodeling. In mice with SRF-deleted osteoblasts, the transactivity of IGF-1 and Runx2 was restored through SRF overexpression, promoting osteoblastogenesis [119]. In addition, a few studies indicated that adding IGF-1 to hPMSCs under low-oxygen condition increased OCT4 expression, leading to cell proliferation and maintenance of the multipotency of hPMSCs through the activation of IGF-1R signaling [91,92]. In an animal model of acute myocardial infarction, the transplantation of adipose-derived MSCs (ADSCs) that overexpressed both IGF-1 and HGF to the injured area promoted neovascularization and suppressed inflammation. Although this report showed that both IGF-1 and HGF were overexpressed in ADSCs, significant cardiac regeneration was not observed [120]. Furthermore, several studies also demonstrated that IGF-1R activation in MSCs induces crosstalk and influences neighboring cells as well as their surrounding microenvironment, which could aid in tissue regeneration in human diseases. Stroke causes nervous system damage via ischemic and hypoxic changes to the injured brain, inducing muscle weakness and paralysis. Therefore, MSCs are considered as a promising therapeutic tool to treat stroke. For example, this study demonstrated that the intravenous injection of BMSCs in the brains of rats with stroke-induced middle cerebral artery occlusion increased IGF-1 expression and enhanced the activation of IGF-1/IGF-1R signaling, which corresponds to enhanced cell survival and neural progenitor cell recruitment to the injured area, leading to improved neurological functions [93]. Furthermore, the study reported that the transplantation of IGF-1R-overexpressing hDPSCs that crosstalk with CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling exhibited greater anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects as well as neural differentiation capacity in a cerebral ischemic animal model [94]. In addition, MSCs are consider to be a potential target in treating muscular injury and myocardial infarction. For example, IGF-1 addition to MSCs in vitro displayed the potential target for reducing scar formation, enhancing angiogenesis, promoting the reconstitution of muscle structure, and improving muscle function [121]. Furthermore, the in vivo transplantation of IGF-1-primed BMSCs represses cardiac dysfunction, increases the survival ability of engrafted BMSCs in the injured heart, leads to decreased cardiomyocytes cell apoptosis, and suppresses the expression of several inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and IL-6 [122]. In addition, IGF-2 is an essential factor of the stem cell niche and has been reported to modulate the proliferation and differentiation of ADSCs. The study showed that the IGF-2/IGF-1R axis significantly induced the cell proliferation of ADSCs and increased the expression of stemness markers, such as Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2. Notably, IGF-2 had been reported to have a pivotal role in the differentiation of ADSCs to adipocytes and osteoblasts [123].

4. Conclusions

Studies on the role of IGFs in cancer have been conducted mainly on solid tumors including colon [124], prostate [124,125] and breast cancers [126]. For instance, high levels of IGF-1R in patients with colon cancer, as compared to healthy control, could indicate poor prognosis [127]. Therefore, a deeper understanding of cancer biology has led to the development of anti-tumor drugs targeting the specific oncogenic substrate IGF-1R. Since the IGFs/IGF-1R signaling is often dyseregulated in cancer development, it has been considered an attractive pharmacological target for solid tumors. This review summarizes the contribution of IGFs/IGF-1R signaling in the treatment of cancer and stem cells and also highlights the relevance of IGFs/IGF-1R signaling in potential strategies for cancer or stem cell-based therapies, respectively. In cancer, the dysregulation of IGFs/IGF-1R signaling can induce several hallmark genes of cancer and contribute to malignant transformation, tumor progression and resistance to a number of anti-tumor therapies such as radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Hence, the suppression of IGF-1R signaling is considered to be a promising strategy to inhibit tumor growth and improve survival in multiple cancers. Currently, several strategies have been developed to inhibit IGFs/IGF-1R signaling in cancer therapy. For example, teprotumumab, introduced in 2020, was the first licensed anti-IGF-1R agent for TAO treatment [62]. However, most anti-tumor IGF-1R mAbs or TKIs have not yet displayed significant benefits in patients randomly recruited to phase II/III clinical trials, which is probably due to the paucity of reliable predictive biomarkers of IGF-1R inhibition. Therefore, studies that target IGFs/IGF-1R in multiple tumors with suitable molecular contexts, including IGF-1R suppression, are being conducted to efficiently treat triple-negative breast cancers rather than HR-positive metastatic breast cancers [128,129,130] as well as treat KRAS-mutant NSCLCs rather than wild-type lung cancers [58]. Moreover, because the activation of IGFs/IGF-1R signaling results in the bypass pathway, the combination of IGF-1R mAbs/TKIs and other RTKs as anti-tumor agents is considered to a more effective strategy in cancer therapy.
On the other hand, IGFs are among the earliest growth factors to be found in a developing embryo and putatively act as autocrine and paracrine factors on several developing cells such as stem cells. This review emphasizes that IGF-1/IGF-1R signaling is an important functional pathway to identify stem cells and MSCs with superior self-renewal capacities as well as to determine the pluripotency of these cells. Furthermore, regulating IGF-1/IGF-1R signaling is a promising strategy to maintain stemness and improve the efficacy of stem cell-based therapies in several disease conditions. Moreover, IGF-1R signaling is also implicated in cancer development due to its stemness-related properties and resistance of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Therefore, the activation of IGF-1R signaling in stem cell-based therapies wherein the stem cells differentiate into tissue-specific cell types in vitro deserves attention. Additionally, it is also imperative to research the use of the in vivo transplantation of genetically modified IGF-1R stem cells or MSCs to minimize the adverse consequences of tissue regeneration therapy and improve the therapeutic efficacy of regeneration in human diseases.

Author Contributions

S.-L.L., C.-Y.L. and W.-C.S.: conception and design, writing, review, and revision of the manuscript. W.L. and C.-F.T.: review and revision of the manuscript. W.-C.S. and L.-B.J.: study supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kasprzak, A.; Kwasniewski, W.; Adamek, A.; Gozdzicka-Jozefiak, A. Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis in cancerogenesis. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 2017, 772, 78–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. LeRoith, D.; Roberts, C.T., Jr. The insulin-like growth factor system and cancer. Cancer Lett. 2003, 195, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. De Meyts, P.; Whittaker, J. Structural biology of insulin and IGF1 receptors: Implications for drug design. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2002, 1, 769–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, S.Y.; Toretsky, J.A.; Scher, D.; Helman, L.J. The role of IGF-1R in pediatric malignancies. Oncologist 2009, 14, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Baxter, R.C. IGF binding proteins in cancer: Mechanistic and clinical insights. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2014, 14, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adams, T.E.; Epa, V.C.; Garrett, T.P.; Ward, C.W. Structure and function of the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2000, 57, 1050–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, Y.; Kong, G.K.; Menting, J.G.; Margetts, M.B.; Delaine, C.A.; Jenkin, L.M.; Kiselyov, V.V.; De Meyts, P.; Forbes, B.E.; Lawrence, M.C. How ligand binds to the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kavran, J.M.; McCabe, J.M.; Byrne, P.O.; Connacher, M.K.; Wang, Z.; Ramek, A.; Sarabipour, S.; Shan, Y.; Shaw, D.E.; Hristova, K.; et al. How IGF-1 activates its receptor. Elife 2014, 3, 3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dearth, R.K.; Cui, X.; Kim, H.J.; Hadsell, D.L.; Lee, A.V. Oncogenic transformation by the signaling adaptor proteins insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2. Cell Cycle 2007, 6, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Limesand, K.H.; Chibly, A.M.; Fribley, A. Impact of targeting insulin-like growth factor signaling in head and neck cancers. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 2013, 23, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Tang, H.; Jiang, Z.; You, L.; Liao, Y. Crosstalk between IGF-1R and other tumor promoting pathways. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2014, 20, 2912–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tang, R.; Chen, J.; Tang, M.; Liao, Z.; Zhou, L.; Jiang, J.; Hu, Y.; Liao, Q.; Xiong, W.; Tang, Y.; et al. LncRNA SLCO4A1-AS1 predicts poor prognosis and promotes proliferation and metastasis via the EGFR/MAPK pathway in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 15, 2885–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Brader, S.; Eccles, S.A. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase signalling pathways in tumor progression, invasion and angiogenesis. Tumori 2004, 90, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Owusu, B.Y.; Galemmo, R.; Janetka, J.; Klampfer, L. Hepatocyte Growth Factor, a Key Tumor-Promoting Factor in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancers 2017, 9, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Dallas, N.A.; Xia, L.; Fan, F.; Gray, M.J.; Gaur, P.; van Buren, G., 2nd; Samuel, S.; Kim, M.P.; Lim, S.J.; Ellis, L.M. Chemoresistant colorectal cancer cells, the cancer stem cell phenotype, and increased sensitivity to insulin-like growth factor-I receptor inhibition. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 1951–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chang, W.W.; Lin, R.J.; Yu, J.; Chang, W.Y.; Fu, C.H.; Lai, A.; Yu, J.C.; Yu, A.L. The expression and significance of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and its pathway on breast cancer stem/progenitors. Breast Cancer Res. 2013, 15, R39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chang, T.S.; Chen, C.L.; Wu, Y.C.; Liu, J.J.; Kuo, Y.C.; Lee, K.F.; Lin, S.Y.; Lin, S.E.; Tung, S.Y.; Kuo, L.M.; et al. Inflammation Promotes Expression of Stemness-Related Properties in HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Xu, C.; Xie, D.; Yu, S.C.; Yang, X.J.; He, L.R.; Yang, J.; Ping, Y.F.; Wang, B.; Yang, L.; Xu, S.L.; et al. beta-Catenin/POU5F1/SOX2 transcription factor complex mediates IGF-I receptor signaling and predicts poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 3181–3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hart, L.S.; Dolloff, N.G.; Dicker, D.T.; Koumenis, C.; Christensen, J.G.; Grimberg, A.; El-Deiry, W.S. Human colon cancer stem cells are enriched by insulin-like growth factor-1 and are sensitive to figitumumab. Cell Cycle 2011, 10, 2331–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Ojo, D.; Wei, F.; Liu, Y.; Wang, E.; Zhang, H.; Lin, X.; Wong, N.; Bane, A.; Tang, D. Factors Promoting Tamoxifen Resistance in Breast Cancer via Stimulating Breast Cancer Stem Cell Expansion. Curr. Med. Chem. 2015, 22, 2360–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Urtasun, N.; Vidal-Pla, A.; Perez-Torras, S.; Mazo, A. Human pancreatic cancer stem cells are sensitive to dual inhibition of IGF-IR and ErbB receptors. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Osher, E.; Macaulay, V.M. Therapeutic Targeting of the IGF Axis. Cells 2019, 8, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Huang, X.; Park, H.; Greene, J.; Pao, J.; Mulvey, E.; Zhou, S.X.; Albert, C.M.; Moy, F.; Sachdev, D.; Yee, D.; et al. IGF1R- and ROR1-Specific CAR T Cells as a Potential Therapy for High Risk Sarcomas. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Suman, S.; Domingues, A.; Ratajczak, J.; Ratajczak, M.Z. Potential Clinical Applications of Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1201, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xi, J.; Zhang, S.C. Stem cells in development of therapeutics for Parkinson’s disease: A perspective. J. Cell Biochem. 2008, 105, 1153–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Magga, J.; Savchenko, E.; Malm, T.; Rolova, T.; Pollari, E.; Valonen, P.; Lehtonen, S.; Jantunen, E.; Aarnio, J.; Lehenkari, P.; et al. Production of monocytic cells from bone marrow stem cells: Therapeutic usage in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2012, 16, 1060–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Perin, E.C.; Silva, G.V.; Zheng, Y.; Gahremanpour, A.; Canales, J.; Patel, D.; Fernandes, M.R.; Keller, L.H.; Quan, X.; Coulter, S.A.; et al. Randomized, double-blind pilot study of transendocardial injection of autologous aldehyde dehydrogenase-bright stem cells in patients with ischemic heart failure. Am. Heart J. 2012, 163, 415–421.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cerletti, M.; Jurga, S.; Witczak, C.A.; Hirshman, M.F.; Shadrach, J.L.; Goodyear, L.J.; Wagers, A.J. Highly efficient, functional engraftment of skeletal muscle stem cells in dystrophic muscles. Cell 2008, 134, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Weiss, D.J.; Bertoncello, I.; Borok, Z.; Kim, C.; Panoskaltsis-Mortari, A.; Reynolds, S.; Rojas, M.; Stripp, B.; Warburton, D.; Prockop, D.J. Stem cells and cell therapies in lung biology and lung diseases. Proc. Am. Thorac Soc. 2011, 8, 223–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rashid, S.T.; Corbineau, S.; Hannan, N.; Marciniak, S.J.; Miranda, E.; Alexander, G.; Huang-Doran, I.; Griffin, J.; Ahrlund-Richter, L.; Skepper, J.; et al. Modeling inherited metabolic disorders of the liver using human induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2010, 120, 3127–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, L.; Schulz, T.C.; Sherrer, E.S.; Dauphin, D.S.; Shin, S.; Nelson, A.M.; Ware, C.B.; Zhan, M.; Song, C.Z.; Chen, X.; et al. Self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells requires insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and ERBB2 receptor signaling. Blood 2007, 110, 4111–4119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Bendall, S.C.; Stewart, M.H.; Menendez, P.; George, D.; Vijayaragavan, K.; Werbowetski-Ogilvie, T.; Ramos-Mejia, V.; Rouleau, A.; Yang, J.; Bosse, M.; et al. IGF and FGF cooperatively establish the regulatory stem cell niche of pluripotent human cells in vitro. Nature 2007, 448, 1015–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Magner, N.L.; Jung, Y.; Wu, J.; Nolta, J.A.; Zern, M.A.; Zhou, P. Insulin and IGFs enhance hepatocyte differentiation from human embryonic stem cells via the PI3K/AKT pathway. Stem Cells 2013, 31, 2095–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Waraky, A.; Aleem, E.; Larsson, O. Downregulation of IGF-1 receptor occurs after hepatic linage commitment during hepatocyte differentiation from human embryonic stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 478, 1575–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Haider, H.; Jiang, S.; Idris, N.M.; Ashraf, M. IGF-1-overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells accelerate bone marrow stem cell mobilization via paracrine activation of SDF-1alpha/CXCR4 signaling to promote myocardial repair. Circ. Res. 2008, 103, 1300–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Smith, T.J.; Janssen, J. Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Receptor and Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy. Endocr. Rev. 2019, 40, 236–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Loughran, G.; Huigsloot, M.; Kiely, P.A.; Smith, L.M.; Floyd, S.; Ayllon, V.; O’Connor, R. Gene expression profiles in cells transformed by overexpression of the IGF-I receptor. Oncogene 2005, 24, 6185–6193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Jones, R.A.; Campbell, C.I.; Wood, G.A.; Petrik, J.J.; Moorehead, R.A. Reversibility and recurrence of IGF-IR-induced mammary tumors. Oncogene 2009, 28, 2152–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Taunk, N.K.; Goyal, S.; Moran, M.S.; Yang, Q.; Parikh, R.; Haffty, B.G. Prognostic significance of IGF-1R expression in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. Radiother. Oncol. 2010, 96, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. King, H.; Aleksic, T.; Haluska, P.; Macaulay, V.M. Can we unlock the potential of IGF-1R inhibition in cancer therapy? Cancer Treat. Rev. 2014, 40, 1096–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sachdev, D.; Li, S.L.; Hartell, J.S.; Fujita-Yamaguchi, Y.; Miller, J.S.; Yee, D. A chimeric humanized single-chain antibody against the type I insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptor renders breast cancer cells refractory to the mitogenic effects of IGF-I. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 627–635. [Google Scholar]
  42. Pavlicek, A.; Lira, M.E.; Lee, N.V.; Ching, K.A.; Ye, J.; Cao, J.; Garza, S.J.; Hook, K.E.; Ozeck, M.; Shi, S.T.; et al. Molecular predictors of sensitivity to the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor inhibitor Figitumumab (CP-751,871). Mol. Cancer Ther. 2013, 12, 2929–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. de Bono, J.S.; Piulats, J.M.; Pandha, H.S.; Petrylak, D.P.; Saad, F.; Aparicio, L.M.; Sandhu, S.K.; Fong, P.; Gillessen, S.; Hudes, G.R.; et al. Phase II randomized study of figitumumab plus docetaxel and docetaxel alone with crossover for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 1925–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Calvo, E.; Soria, J.C.; Ma, W.W.; Wang, T.; Bahleda, R.; Tolcher, A.W.; Gernhardt, D.; O’Connell, J.; Millham, R.; Giri, N.; et al. A Phase I Clinical Trial and Independent Patient-Derived Xenograft Study of Combined Targeted Treatment with Dacomitinib and Figitumumab in Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 1177–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Beltran, P.J.; Chung, Y.A.; Moody, G.; Mitchell, P.; Cajulis, E.; Vonderfecht, S.; Kendall, R.; Radinsky, R.; Calzone, F.J. Efficacy of ganitumab (AMG 479), alone and in combination with rapamycin, in Ewing’s and osteogenic sarcoma models. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2011, 337, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Glisson, B.; Besse, B.; Dols, M.C.; Dubey, S.; Schupp, M.; Jain, R.; Jiang, Y.; Menon, H.; Nackaerts, K.; Orlov, S.; et al. A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 1b/2 Study of Rilotumumab or Ganitumab in Combination With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Lung Cancer 2017, 18, 615–625.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Beltran, P.J.; Mitchell, P.; Chung, Y.A.; Cajulis, E.; Lu, J.; Belmontes, B.; Ho, J.; Tsai, M.M.; Zhu, M.; Vonderfecht, S.; et al. AMG 479, a fully human anti-insulin-like growth factor receptor type I monoclonal antibody, inhibits the growth and survival of pancreatic carcinoma cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Brana, I.; Berger, R.; Golan, T.; Haluska, P.; Edenfield, J.; Fiorica, J.; Stephenson, J.; Martin, L.P.; Westin, S.; Hanjani, P.; et al. A parallel-arm phase I trial of the humanised anti-IGF-1R antibody dalotuzumab in combination with the AKT inhibitor MK-2206, the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus, or the NOTCH inhibitor MK-0752, in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 111, 1932–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sclafani, F.; Kim, T.Y.; Cunningham, D.; Kim, T.W.; Tabernero, J.; Schmoll, H.J.; Roh, J.K.; Kim, S.Y.; Park, Y.S.; Guren, T.K.; et al. A Randomized Phase II/III Study of Dalotuzumab in Combination With Cetuximab and Irinotecan in Chemorefractory, KRAS Wild-Type, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2015, 107, djv258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ramalingam, S.S.; Spigel, D.R.; Chen, D.; Steins, M.B.; Engelman, J.A.; Schneider, C.P.; Novello, S.; Eberhardt, W.E.; Crino, L.; Habben, K.; et al. Randomized phase II study of erlotinib in combination with placebo or R1507, a monoclonal antibody to insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 4574–4580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Pappo, A.S.; Vassal, G.; Crowley, J.J.; Bolejack, V.; Hogendoorn, P.C.; Chugh, R.; Ladanyi, M.; Grippo, J.F.; Dall, G.; Staddon, A.P.; et al. A phase 2 trial of R1507, a monoclonal antibody to the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R), in patients with recurrent or refractory rhabdomyosarcoma, osteosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, and other soft tissue sarcomas: Results of a Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration study. Cancer 2014, 120, 2448–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Malempati, S.; Weigel, B.; Ingle, A.M.; Ahern, C.H.; Carroll, J.M.; Roberts, C.T.; Reid, J.M.; Schmechel, S.; Voss, S.D.; Cho, S.Y.; et al. Phase I/II trial and pharmacokinetic study of cixutumumab in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors and Ewing sarcoma: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Attias-Geva, Z.; Bentov, I.; Ludwig, D.L.; Fishman, A.; Bruchim, I.; Werner, H. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) targeting with monoclonal antibody cixutumumab (IMC-A12) inhibits IGF-I action in endometrial cancer cells. Eur. J. Cancer 2011, 47, 1717–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wang, Y.; Hailey, J.; Williams, D.; Wang, Y.; Lipari, P.; Malkowski, M.; Wang, X.; Xie, L.; Li, G.; Saha, D.; et al. Inhibition of insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR) signaling and tumor cell growth by a fully human neutralizing anti-IGF-IR antibody. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2005, 4, 1214–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Anderson, P.M.; Bielack, S.S.; Gorlick, R.G.; Skubitz, K.; Daw, N.C.; Herzog, C.E.; Monge, O.R.; Lassaletta, A.; Boldrini, E.; Papai, Z.; et al. A phase II study of clinical activity of SCH 717454 (robatumumab) in patients with relapsed osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2016, 63, 1761–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. von Mehren, M.; Britten, C.D.; Pieslor, P.; Saville, W.; Vassos, A.; Harris, S.; Galluppi, G.R.; Darif, M.; Wainberg, Z.A.; Cohen, R.B.; et al. A phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study of BIIB022 (anti-IGF-1R monoclonal antibody) in subjects with relapsed or refractory solid tumors. Invest. New Drugs 2014, 32, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Fitzgerald, J.B.; Johnson, B.W.; Baum, J.; Adams, S.; Iadevaia, S.; Tang, J.; Rimkunas, V.; Xu, L.; Kohli, N.; Rennard, R.; et al. MM-141, an IGF-IR- and ErbB3-directed bispecific antibody, overcomes network adaptations that limit activity of IGF-IR inhibitors. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 410–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Molina-Arcas, M.; Hancock, D.C.; Sheridan, C.; Kumar, M.S.; Downward, J. Coordinate direct input of both KRAS and IGF1 receptor to activation of PI3 kinase in KRAS-mutant lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2013, 3, 548–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Cohn, A.L.; Tabernero, J.; Maurel, J.; Nowara, E.; Sastre, J.; Chuah, B.Y.S.; Kopp, M.V.; Sakaeva, D.D.; Mitchell, E.P.; Dubey, S.; et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of ganitumab or conatumumab in combination with FOLFIRI for second-line treatment of mutant KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2013, 24, 1777–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Smith, T.J.; Kahaly, G.J.; Ezra, D.G.; Fleming, J.C.; Dailey, R.A.; Tang, R.A.; Harris, G.J.; Antonelli, A.; Salvi, M.; Goldberg, R.A.; et al. Teprotumumab for Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 1748–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Slentz, D.H.; Nelson, C.C.; Smith, T.J. Teprotumumab: A novel therapeutic monoclonal antibody for thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2020, 29, 645–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Markham, A. Teprotumumab: First Approval. Drugs 2020, 80, 509–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Favelyukis, S.; Till, J.H.; Hubbard, S.R.; Miller, W.T. Structure and autoregulation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor kinase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001, 8, 1058–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Mulvihill, M.J.; Cooke, A.; Rosenfeld-Franklin, M.; Buck, E.; Foreman, K.; Landfair, D.; O’Connor, M.; Pirritt, C.; Sun, Y.; Yao, Y.; et al. Discovery of OSI-906: A selective and orally efficacious dual inhibitor of the IGF-1 receptor and insulin receptor. Future Med. Chem. 2009, 1, 1153–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Carboni, J.M.; Wittman, M.; Yang, Z.; Lee, F.; Greer, A.; Hurlburt, W.; Hillerman, S.; Cao, C.; Cantor, G.H.; Dell-John, J.; et al. BMS-754807, a small molecule inhibitor of insulin-like growth factor-1R/IR. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 3341–3349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Buck, E.; Gokhale, P.C.; Koujak, S.; Brown, E.; Eyzaguirre, A.; Tao, N.; Rosenfeld-Franklin, M.; Lerner, L.; Chiu, M.I.; Wild, R.; et al. Compensatory insulin receptor (IR) activation on inhibition of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R): Rationale for cotargeting IGF-1R and IR in cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 2652–2664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Creighton, C.J.; Casa, A.; Lazard, Z.; Huang, S.; Tsimelzon, A.; Hilsenbeck, S.G.; Osborne, C.K.; Lee, A.V. Insulin-like growth factor-I activates gene transcription programs strongly associated with poor breast cancer prognosis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 4078–4085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Litzenburger, B.C.; Creighton, C.J.; Tsimelzon, A.; Chan, B.T.; Hilsenbeck, S.G.; Wang, T.; Carboni, J.M.; Gottardis, M.M.; Huang, F.; Chang, J.C.; et al. High IGF-IR activity in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines and tumorgrafts correlates with sensitivity to anti-IGF-IR therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 2314–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Piao, W.; Wang, Y.; Adachi, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; Li, R.; Imsumran, A.; Li, H.; Maehata, T.; Ii, M.; Arimura, Y.; et al. Insulin-like growth factor-I receptor blockade by a specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor for human gastrointestinal carcinomas. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2008, 7, 1483–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Chitnis, M.M.; Lodhia, K.A.; Aleksic, T.; Gao, S.; Protheroe, A.S.; Macaulay, V.M. IGF-1R inhibition enhances radiosensitivity and delays double-strand break repair by both non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination. Oncogene 2014, 33, 5262–5273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Litzenburger, B.C.; Kim, H.J.; Kuiatse, I.; Carboni, J.M.; Attar, R.M.; Gottardis, M.M.; Fairchild, C.R.; Lee, A.V. BMS-536924 reverses IGF-IR-induced transformation of mammary epithelial cells and causes growth inhibition and polarization of MCF7 cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 226–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Vasilcanu, R.; Vasilcanu, D.; Rosengren, L.; Natalishvili, N.; Sehat, B.; Yin, S.; Girnita, A.; Axelson, M.; Girnita, L.; Larsson, O. Picropodophyllin induces downregulation of the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor: Potential mechanistic involvement of Mdm2 and beta-arrestin1. Oncogene 2008, 27, 1629–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Girnita, A.; Girnita, L.; del Prete, F.; Bartolazzi, A.; Larsson, O.; Axelson, M. Cyclolignans as inhibitors of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and malignant cell growth. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Waraky, A.; Akopyan, K.; Parrow, V.; Stromberg, T.; Axelson, M.; Abrahmsen, L.; Lindqvist, A.; Larsson, O.; Aleem, E. Picropodophyllin causes mitotic arrest and catastrophe by depolymerizing microtubules via insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor-independent mechanism. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 8379–8392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Ekman, S.; Harmenberg, J.; Frodin, J.E.; Bergstrom, S.; Wassberg, C.; Eksborg, S.; Larsson, O.; Axelson, M.; Jerling, M.; Abrahmsen, L.; et al. A novel oral insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor pathway modulator and its implications for patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma: A phase I clinical trial. Acta Oncol. 2016, 55, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Friedlander, T.W.; Weinberg, V.K.; Huang, Y.; Mi, J.T.; Formaker, C.G.; Small, E.J.; Harzstark, A.L.; Lin, A.M.; Fong, L.; Ryan, C.J. A phase II study of insulin-like growth factor receptor inhibition with nordihydroguaiaretic acid in men with non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 27, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Gao, J.; Chesebrough, J.W.; Cartlidge, S.A.; Ricketts, S.A.; Incognito, L.; Veldman-Jones, M.; Blakey, D.C.; Tabrizi, M.; Jallal, B.; Trail, P.A.; et al. Dual IGF-I/II-neutralizing antibody MEDI-573 potently inhibits IGF signaling and tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 1029–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Haluska, P.; Menefee, M.; Plimack, E.R.; Rosenberg, J.; Northfelt, D.; LaVallee, T.; Shi, L.; Yu, X.Q.; Burke, P.; Huang, J.; et al. Phase I dose-escalation study of MEDI-573, a bispecific, antiligand monoclonal antibody against IGFI and IGFII, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 4747–4757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Friedbichler, K.; Hofmann, M.H.; Kroez, M.; Ostermann, E.; Lamche, H.R.; Koessl, C.; Borges, E.; Pollak, M.N.; Adolf, G.; Adam, P.J. Pharmacodynamic and antineoplastic activity of BI 836845, a fully human IGF ligand-neutralizing antibody, and mechanistic rationale for combination with rapamycin. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014, 13, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Goya, M.; Miyamoto, S.; Nagai, K.; Ohki, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Shitara, K.; Maeda, H.; Sangai, T.; Kodama, K.; Endoh, Y.; et al. Growth inhibition of human prostate cancer cells in human adult bone implanted into nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient mice by a ligand-specific antibody to human insulin-like growth factors. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 6252–6258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Dransfield, D.T.; Cohen, E.H.; Chang, Q.; Sparrow, L.G.; Bentley, J.D.; Dolezal, O.; Xiao, X.; Peat, T.S.; Newman, J.; Pilling, P.A.; et al. A human monoclonal antibody against insulin-like growth factor-II blocks the growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2010, 9, 1809–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Xu, C.; Rosler, E.; Jiang, J.; Lebkowski, J.S.; Gold, J.D.; O’Sullivan, C.; Delavan-Boorsma, K.; Mok, M.; Bronstein, A.; Carpenter, M.K. Basic fibroblast growth factor supports undifferentiated human embryonic stem cell growth without conditioned medium. Stem Cells 2005, 23, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mullen, A.C.; Wrana, J.L. TGF-beta Family Signaling in Embryonic and Somatic Stem-Cell Renewal and Differentiation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017, 9, a022186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Williams, R.L.; Hilton, D.J.; Pease, S.; Willson, T.A.; Stewart, C.L.; Gearing, D.P.; Wagner, E.F.; Metcalf, D.; Nicola, N.A.; Gough, N.M. Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature 1988, 336, 684–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ying, Q.L.; Nichols, J.; Chambers, I.; Smith, A. BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 2003, 115, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Dravid, G.; Ye, Z.; Hammond, H.; Chen, G.; Pyle, A.; Donovan, P.; Yu, X.; Cheng, L. Defining the role of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in the survival, proliferation, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2005, 23, 1489–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ying, Q.L.; Wray, J.; Nichols, J.; Batlle-Morera, L.; Doble, B.; Woodgett, J.; Cohen, P.; Smith, A. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 2008, 453, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. McDevitt, T.C.; Laflamme, M.A.; Murry, C.E. Proliferation of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells is mediated via the IGF/PI 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2005, 39, 865–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Park, S.B.; Yu, K.R.; Jung, J.W.; Lee, S.R.; Roh, K.H.; Seo, M.S.; Park, J.R.; Kang, S.K.; Lee, Y.S.; Kang, K.S. bFGF enhances the IGFs-mediated pluripotent and differentiation potentials in multipotent stem cells. Growth Factors 2009, 27, 425–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Shi, Y.; Chen, J.; Karner, C.M.; Long, F. Hedgehog signaling activates a positive feedback mechanism involving insulin-like growth factors to induce osteoblast differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 4678–4683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Youssef, A.; Han, V.K. Low Oxygen Tension Modulates the Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 or -2 Signaling via Both Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor and Insulin Receptor to Maintain Stem Cell Identity in Placental Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Endocrinology 2016, 157, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Youssef, A.; Iosef, C.; Han, V.K. Low-oxygen tension and IGF-I promote proliferation and multipotency of placental mesenchymal stem cells (PMSCs) from different gestations via distinct signaling pathways. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 1386–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Yang, M.; Katakowski, M.; Lu, M.; Chopp, M. Expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 and receptor in ischemic rats treated with human marrow stromal cells. Brain Res. 2004, 1030, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lee, H.T.; Chang, H.T.; Lee, S.; Lin, C.H.; Fan, J.R.; Lin, S.Z.; Hsu, C.Y.; Hsieh, C.H.; Shyu, W.C. Role of IGF1R(+) MSCs in modulating neuroplasticity via CXCR4 cross-interaction. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Lunn, J.S.; Sakowski, S.A.; McGinley, L.M.; Pacut, C.; Hazel, T.G.; Johe, K.; Feldman, E.L. Autocrine production of IGF-I increases stem cell-mediated neuroprotection. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 1480–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Troncoso, R.; Ibarra, C.; Vicencio, J.M.; Jaimovich, E.; Lavandero, S. New insights into IGF-1 signaling in the heart. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 25, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Johnson, A.M.; Kartha, C.C. Proliferation of murine c-kit(pos) cardiac stem cells stimulated with IGF-1 is associated with Akt-1 mediated phosphorylation and nuclear export of FoxO3a and its effect on downstream cell cycle regulators. Growth Factors 2014, 32, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Klimanskaya, I.; Kimbrel, E.A.; Lanza, R. Embryonic Stem Cells. In Principles of Tissue Engineering; Academic Press: London, UK, 2014; pp. 565–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mossahebi-Mohammadi, M.; Quan, M.; Zhang, J.S.; Li, X. FGF Signaling Pathway: A Key Regulator of Stem Cell Pluripotency. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Amit, M.; Shariki, C.; Margulets, V.; Itskovitz-Eldor, J. Feeder layer- and serum-free culture of human embryonic stem cells. Biol. Reprod. 2004, 70, 837–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Beattie, G.M.; Lopez, A.D.; Bucay, N.; Hinton, A.; Firpo, M.T.; King, C.C.; Hayek, A. Activin A maintains pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder layers. Stem Cells 2005, 23, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pyle, A.D.; Lock, L.F.; Donovan, P.J. Neurotrophins mediate human embryonic stem cell survival. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Pebay, A.; Wong, R.C.; Pitson, S.M.; Wolvetang, E.J.; Peh, G.S.; Filipczyk, A.; Koh, K.L.; Tellis, I.; Nguyen, L.T.; Pera, M.F. Essential roles of sphingosine-1-phosphate and platelet-derived growth factor in the maintenance of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2005, 23, 1541–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yu, Y.H.; Zhang, L.; Wu, D.S.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, F.F.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.P.; Liang, D.S.; Zeng, H.; Chen, F.P. MiR-223 regulates human embryonic stem cell differentiation by targeting the IGF-1R/Akt signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Feldman, E.L.; Boulis, N.M.; Hur, J.; Johe, K.; Rutkove, S.B.; Federici, T.; Polak, M.; Bordeau, J.; Sakowski, S.A.; Glass, J.D. Intraspinal neural stem cell transplantation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Phase 1 trial outcomes. Ann. Neurol. 2014, 75, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Glass, J.D.; Hertzberg, V.S.; Boulis, N.M.; Riley, J.; Federici, T.; Polak, M.; Bordeau, J.; Fournier, C.; Johe, K.; Hazel, T.; et al. Transplantation of spinal cord-derived neural stem cells for ALS: Analysis of phase 1 and 2 trials. Neurology 2016, 87, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Zarei, S.; Carr, K.; Reiley, L.; Diaz, K.; Guerra, O.; Altamirano, P.F.; Pagani, W.; Lodin, D.; Orozco, G.; Chinea, A. A comprehensive review of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2015, 6, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Koutsoudaki, P.N.; Papastefanaki, F.; Stamatakis, A.; Kouroupi, G.; Xingi, E.; Stylianopoulou, F.; Matsas, R. Neural stem/progenitor cells differentiate into oligodendrocytes, reduce inflammation, and ameliorate learning deficits after transplantation in a mouse model of traumatic brain injury. Glia 2016, 64, 763–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lewis, F.C.; Kumar, S.D.; Ellison-Hughes, G.M. Non-invasive strategies for stimulating endogenous repair and regenerative mechanisms in the damaged heart. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 127, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Kawaguchi, N.; Smith, A.J.; Waring, C.D.; Hasan, M.K.; Miyamoto, S.; Matsuoka, R.; Ellison, G.M. c-kitpos GATA-4 high rat cardiac stem cells foster adult cardiomyocyte survival through IGF-1 paracrine signalling. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e14297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Jackson, R.; Tilokee, E.L.; Latham, N.; Mount, S.; Rafatian, G.; Strydhorst, J.; Ye, B.; Boodhwani, M.; Chan, V.; Ruel, M.; et al. Paracrine Engineering of Human Cardiac Stem Cells With Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Enhances Myocardial Repair. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2015, 4, e002104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Andrade, D.; Oliveira, G.; Menezes, L.; Nascimento, A.L.; Carvalho, S.; Stumbo, A.C.; Thole, A.; Garcia-Souza, E.; Moura, A.; Carvalho, L.; et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 short-period therapy improves cardiomyopathy stimulating cardiac progenitor cells survival in obese mice. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 30, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Dominici, M.; Le Blanc, K.; Mueller, I.; Slaper-Cortenbach, I.; Marini, F.; Krause, D.; Deans, R.; Keating, A.; Prockop, D.; Horwitz, E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8, 315–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Hernandez, R.; Jimenez-Luna, C.; Perales-Adan, J.; Perazzoli, G.; Melguizo, C.; Prados, J. Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells towards Neuronal Lineage: Clinical Trials in Nervous System Disorders. Biomol. Ther. 2020, 28, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zhang, Y.; Dong, N.; Hong, H.; Qi, J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J. Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Therapeutic Mechanisms for Stroke. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jackson, W.M.; Nesti, L.J.; Tuan, R.S. Concise review: Clinical translation of wound healing therapies based on mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2012, 1, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Scavo, L.M.; Karas, M.; Murray, M.; Leroith, D. Insulin-like growth factor-I stimulates both cell growth and lipogenesis during differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into adipocytes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 3543–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Peng, X.D.; Xu, P.Z.; Chen, M.L.; Hahn-Windgassen, A.; Skeen, J.; Jacobs, J.; Sundararajan, D.; Chen, W.S.; Crawford, S.E.; Coleman, K.G.; et al. Dwarfism, impaired skin development, skeletal muscle atrophy, delayed bone development, and impeded adipogenesis in mice lacking Akt1 and Akt2. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1352–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Chen, J.; Yuan, K.; Mao, X.; Miano, J.M.; Wu, H.; Chen, Y. Serum response factor regulates bone formation via IGF-1 and Runx2 signals. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2012, 27, 1659–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gomez-Mauricio, G.; Moscoso, I.; Martin-Cancho, M.F.; Crisostomo, V.; Prat-Vidal, C.; Baez-Diaz, C.; Sanchez-Margallo, F.M.; Bernad, A. Combined administration of mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing IGF-1 and HGF enhances neovascularization but moderately improves cardiac regeneration in a porcine model. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2016, 7, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Pumberger, M.; Qazi, T.H.; Ehrentraut, M.C.; Textor, M.; Kueper, J.; Stoltenburg-Didinger, G.; Winkler, T.; von Roth, P.; Reinke, S.; Borselli, C.; et al. Synthetic niche to modulate regenerative potential of MSCs and enhance skeletal muscle regeneration. Biomaterials 2016, 99, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Guo, J.; Zheng, D.; Li, W.F.; Li, H.R.; Zhang, A.D.; Li, Z.C. Insulin-like growth factor 1 treatment of MSCs attenuates inflammation and cardiac dysfunction following MI. Inflammation 2014, 37, 2156–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wang, C.; Li, X.; Dang, H.; Liu, P.; Zhang, B.O.; Xu, F. Insulin-like growth factor 2 regulates the proliferation and differentiation of rat adipose-derived stromal cells via IGF-1R and IR. Cytotherapy 2019, 21, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Tufail, M.; Wu, C. Targeting the IGF-1R in prostate and colorectal cancer: Reasons behind trial failure and future directions. Ther. Deliv. 2022, 13, 167–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Ahearn, T.U.; Peisch, S.; Pettersson, A.; Ebot, E.M.; Zhou, C.K.; Graff, R.E.; Sinnott, J.A.; Fazli, L.; Judson, G.L.; Bismar, T.A.; et al. Expression of IGF/insulin receptor in prostate cancer tissue and progression to lethal disease. Carcinogenesis 2018, 39, 1431–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Lero, M.W.; Shaw, L.M. Diversity of insulin and IGF signaling in breast cancer: Implications for therapy. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2021, 527, 111213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wolpin, B.M.; Meyerhardt, J.A.; Chan, A.T.; Ng, K.; Chan, J.A.; Wu, K.; Pollak, M.N.; Giovannucci, E.L.; Fuchs, C.S. Insulin, the insulin-like growth factor axis, and mortality in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Robertson, J.F.; Ferrero, J.M.; Bourgeois, H.; Kennecke, H.; de Boer, R.H.; Jacot, W.; McGreivy, J.; Suzuki, S.; Zhu, M.; McCaffery, I.; et al. Ganitumab with either exemestane or fulvestrant for postmenopausal women with advanced, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: A randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hartog, H.; Horlings, H.M.; van der Vegt, B.; Kreike, B.; Ajouaou, A.; van de Vijver, M.J.; Marike Boezen, H.; de Bock, G.H.; van der Graaf, W.T.; Wesseling, J. Divergent effects of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor expression on prognosis of estrogen receptor positive versus triple negative invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011, 129, 725–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Davison, Z.; de Blacquiere, G.E.; Westley, B.R.; May, F.E. Insulin-like growth factor-dependent proliferation and survival of triple-negative breast cancer cells: Implications for therapy. Neoplasia 2011, 13, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 11781 g001 550
Figure 1. Downstream signaling of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R). Ligand binding to IGF-1R or IGF-1R/INSR hybrid receptors leads to the phosphorylation of tyrosines that create binding sites for docking proteins including IRS and Shc. Recruitment of IRS and Shc activates signaling via the PI3K/Akt and Ras/Raf/MAPK pathways, which regulate cellular proliferation, survival, migration, and metabolism. In addition to these pathways, interactions between IGF-1R and integrins, via scaffolding with RACK1 and FAK proteins, regulate cellular adhesion and motility. Black arrows indicate activation. Red arrows indicate inhibition. The symbol of P represents the site of phosphorylation. Akt, protein kinase B; ERK, extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; IRS, INSR substrate; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/Erk kinase; mTORC1, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; Shc, Src homology and collagen domain protein.
Figure 1. Downstream signaling of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R). Ligand binding to IGF-1R or IGF-1R/INSR hybrid receptors leads to the phosphorylation of tyrosines that create binding sites for docking proteins including IRS and Shc. Recruitment of IRS and Shc activates signaling via the PI3K/Akt and Ras/Raf/MAPK pathways, which regulate cellular proliferation, survival, migration, and metabolism. In addition to these pathways, interactions between IGF-1R and integrins, via scaffolding with RACK1 and FAK proteins, regulate cellular adhesion and motility. Black arrows indicate activation. Red arrows indicate inhibition. The symbol of P represents the site of phosphorylation. Akt, protein kinase B; ERK, extracellular-signal-regulated kinase; IRS, INSR substrate; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/Erk kinase; mTORC1, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; Shc, Src homology and collagen domain protein.
Ijms 23 11781 g001
Ijms 23 11781 g002 550
Figure 2. Examples of IGF-targeted agents. Anti-IGF-1R mAbs block ligand–receptor interactions and induce receptor internalization and degradation. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors bind to the receptor tyrosine kinase domain and block the downstream signaling of IGF-1R and INSR. IGF ligand-neutralizing mAbs bind to both IGF ligands (IGF-1 and IGF-2), thereby blocking the activation of IGF-1R and INSR-A. IGF-1R, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor; mAbs, monoclonal antibodies; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitors; INSR, insulin receptor.
Figure 2. Examples of IGF-targeted agents. Anti-IGF-1R mAbs block ligand–receptor interactions and induce receptor internalization and degradation. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors bind to the receptor tyrosine kinase domain and block the downstream signaling of IGF-1R and INSR. IGF ligand-neutralizing mAbs bind to both IGF ligands (IGF-1 and IGF-2), thereby blocking the activation of IGF-1R and INSR-A. IGF-1R, insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor; mAbs, monoclonal antibodies; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitors; INSR, insulin receptor.
Ijms 23 11781 g002
Table
Table 1. Therapy efficacy in stem cells and MSCs that overexpress IGF-1R in regenerative medicine.
Table 1. Therapy efficacy in stem cells and MSCs that overexpress IGF-1R in regenerative medicine.
Overexpression of IGF/IGF-1R in Stem CellsFunctionPathwayDiseaseRef.
hESCsPromoting self-renewal and survivalSelf-renewal through HRG/ERBB2, and anti-apoptosis through PI3K/AKT-[31,88]
UMSCsAdipogenic differentiationbFGF induces IGF and FGF receptor-[89]
BMSCsOsteogenic differentiationHedgehog pathway-[90]
PMSCsIncreasing cell proliferation and maintaining multipotencyInduce OCT4 expression-[91,92]
BMSCsPromoting cell survival and neural progenitor cell recruitment-Ischemic stroke[93]
DPSCsPromoting neuroplasticityCrosstalk between IGF-1/IGF-1R and CXCL12/CXCR4 pathwayIschemic stroke[94]
hNSCsPromoting neuroprotection-Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)[95]
CSCsPromoting cardiomyocyte survival and myocardial regenerationFOXO3/p27/p51 pathwayMyocardial infarction[96,97]
hESCs, human embryonic stem cells; UMSCs, umbilical cord-derived MSCs; BMSCs, bone marrow-derived MSCs; PMSCs, placental mesenchymal stem cells; DPSCs, dental pulp-derived MSCs; hNSCs, human neural stem cells; CSCs, cardiac stem cells.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, S.-L.; Lin, C.-Y.; Lee, W.; Teng, C.-F.; Shyu, W.-C.; Jeng, L.-B. Mini Review: Molecular Interpretation of the IGF/IGF-1R Axis in Cancer Treatment and Stem Cells-Based Therapy in Regenerative Medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911781

AMA Style

Lin S-L, Lin C-Y, Lee W, Teng C-F, Shyu W-C, Jeng L-B. Mini Review: Molecular Interpretation of the IGF/IGF-1R Axis in Cancer Treatment and Stem Cells-Based Therapy in Regenerative Medicine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(19):11781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911781

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Syuan-Ling, Chih-Yang Lin, Wei Lee, Chiao-Fang Teng, Woei-Cherng Shyu, and Long-Bin Jeng. 2022. "Mini Review: Molecular Interpretation of the IGF/IGF-1R Axis in Cancer Treatment and Stem Cells-Based Therapy in Regenerative Medicine" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 19: 11781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911781

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop