Next Article in Journal
Using ncRNAs as Tools in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment—The Way towards Personalized Medicine to Improve Patients’ Health
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Foods and Nutrition on the Gut Microbiome and Implications for Intestinal Health
Previous Article in Journal
Combined Treatment of Bronchial Epithelial Calu-3 Cells with Peptide Nucleic Acids Targeting miR-145-5p and miR-101-3p: Synergistic Enhancement of the Expression of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) Gene
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of the Lipid Profile, Type 2 Diabetes and Medication on the Metabolic Syndrome—Associated Gut Microbiome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 16
10.3390/ijms23169350
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Depletion of Gut Microbiota Inhibits Hepatic Lipid Accumulation in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice

by
Hui Han
1,2,
Mengyu Wang
1,
Ruqing Zhong
1,
Bao Yi
1,*,
Martine Schroyen
2 and
Hongfu Zhang
1
1
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
2
Precision Livestock and Nutrition Unit, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 4000 Gembloux, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(16), 9350; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169350
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 9 August 2022 / Accepted: 14 August 2022 / Published: 19 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gut Microbiota in Gastroenterology and Hepatology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Dysregulated lipid metabolism is a key pathology in metabolic diseases and the liver is a critical organ for lipid metabolism. The gut microbiota has been shown to regulate hepatic lipid metabolism in the host. However, the underlying mechanism by which the gut microbiota influences hepatic lipid metabolism has not been elucidated. Here, a gut microbiota depletion mouse model was constructed with an antibiotics cocktail (Abx) to study the mechanism through which intestinal microbiota regulates hepatic lipid metabolism in high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice. Our results showed that the Abx treatment effectively eradicated the gut microbiota in these mice. Microbiota depletion reduced the body weight and fat deposition both in white adipose tissue and liver. In addition, microbiota depletion reduced serum levels of glucose, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), insulin, and leptin in HFD-fed mice. Importantly, the depletion of gut microbiota in HFD-fed mice inhibited excessive hepatic lipid accumulation. Mechanistically, RNA-seq results revealed that gut microbiota depletion changed the expression of hepatic genes involved in cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism, such as Cd36, Mogat1, Cyp39a1, Abcc3, and Gpat3. Moreover, gut microbiota depletion reduced the abundance of bacteria associated with abnormal metabolism and inflammation, including Lachnospiraceae, Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002, Enterorhabdus, Faecalibaculum, and Desulfovibrio. Correlation analysis showed that there was strong association between the altered gut microbiota abundance and the serum cholesterol level. This study indicates that gut microbiota ameliorates HFD-induced hepatic lipid metabolic dysfunction, which might be associated with genes participating in cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism in the liver.

1. Introduction

The liver plays a central role in lipid metabolism. Dysfunction of hepatic lipid metabolism can cause metabolic diseases, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), obesity, and type 2 diabetes, which have become the most common and costly chronic disorders globally [1].
A large body of evidence has revealed the critical role of gut microbiota in maintaining host lipid metabolism [2,3,4]. For example, patients with NAFLD had lower microbial diversity than healthy controls [5,6]. Additionally, alterations in the gut microbiota community have been identified to accelerate the development of dysbiosis of hepatic lipid metabolism in both clinical and animal studies [7,8,9,10]. Several studies reported that the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was elevated in mice fed a high-fat diet (HFD) that induced obesity and NAFLD [11,12], while in another study, a reduced Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was reported [13]. As for the certain bacteria at the genus level, NAFLD is frequently associated with increased abundance of Escherichia, Dorea, and Peptoniphilus and decreased Prevotella, Faecalibacterium, Eubacterium, and Coprococcus [14,15]. However, another study showed that children with obesity and NAFLD exhibited increased Prevotella compared to those without NAFLD [16]. The obvious opposite results indicate that the composition of intestinal microbiota is dynamic and can be shaped in different physical conditions.
Furthermore, microbial metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acids (BAs), amino-acid-derived microbial metabolites, and even liposaccharide (LPS, the major component of the cell membrane of Gram-negative bacteria) play an important role in modulating lipid metabolism through regulating pathways related to lipid absorption, synthesis, and clearance [4,17,18]. For example, SCFAs, the main metabolites produced by microbial fermentation of dietary carbohydrate, can act as signaling molecules to regulate the expression of genes related to lipogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, and adipogenesis [18]. What is more, it has been found that SCFAs can accelerate the progress of obesity via elevating intestinal energy harvesting, but also reduce energy intake via inhibiting appetite [19]. Therefore, microbiota-derived components or metabolites are complex and precisely modulated in response to genes/pathways in lipid metabolism and the relationship between gut microbiota and host hepatic lipid metabolism needs further investigations.
A recent study showed that treatment with the combination of vancomycin, metronidazole, neomycin, and ampicillin through drinking water can effectively eradicate gut microbiota in mice [20]. Moreover, the combination of these four antibiotics was widely used to investigate the effects of targeted gut microbiota on host metabolism [21,22]. Mice with gut microbiota depletion via an antibiotics cocktail (Abx) treatment still have gut microbiota residues to sustain development of the immune system and metabolism, which are different from germ-free mice [23]. Thus, mice with gut microbiota depletion treated with Abx can be used as a proper model to explore the specific role of gut microbiota on host metabolism. With this model, a study by Zarrinpar et al. (2018) showed that depleted microbiota potentially regulated glucose homeostasis by promoting the utilization of glucose by the colonocytes and by elevating hepatic glucose production and transport in mice [23]. Another study showed that Abx-induced microbiota depletion alleviated insulin resistance and inhibited hepatic lipid accumulation and lipogenesis through modulating bile acid metabolism in HFD-fed hamsters [24].
The gut microbiota and its metabolites involved in hepatic metabolism and inflammation via the gut–liver axis were summarized in our previous review [4]. In particular, gut microbial metabolites, such as SCFAs and BAs can directly affect hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism [25,26,27]. However, the effects of gut microbiota depletion via Abx treatment on hepatic lipid metabolism in mice are not entirely clear yet. Thus, in the current study, the effects of the gut microbiota on hepatic lipid metabolism using an Abx-induced pseudo-germ-free mouse model were investigated.

2. Results

2.1. Gut Microbiota Composition Was Altered by Abx Treatment in HFD-Fed Mice

To determine the effect of gut microbiota on host lipid metabolism, gut microbiota was depleted by Abx treatment in HFD-fed mice (Figure 1A). 16S rRNA sequencing analysis of mice feces was performed to investigate the altered microbiota community in the intestine. After removing the low-quality sequences, in total, 1,282,709 clean tags were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on 97% identity. The Venn diagram showed that the Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups contained 347, 450, and 211 OTUs, respectively (Figure 1B). Additionally, there were 274 common OTUs between the chow and HFD groups and 100 common OTUs between the HFD+Abx group (Figure 1B), suggesting that there was the biggest similarity between the Chow and HFD. The α-diversity results showed that the HFD had no significant effects on the Sobs, Shannon, Ace, Chao1, and Simpson indexes compared to the chow diet (p > 0.05) (Figure 1C–G). However, Sobs, Shannon, Ace, and Chao1 indexes were significantly lower and the Simpson index was significantly higher in the HFD+Abx group compared with the HFD group (p < 0.05) (Figure 1C–G). These data suggested that Abx treatment reduced the microbial richness and diversity. Moreover, β-diversity analysis was conducted using principal component analysis (PCA), principal coordinates analysis (PCoA), and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) methods. The results showed that although the microbiota cluster in mice of the Chow and the HFD group was relatively similar, the microbial community structure was significantly different between the HFD and HFD+Abx groups (Figure 1H–J).
Specifically, the relative abundance results showed that at the phylum level, Firmicutes was the most abundant, followed by Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteriota in the Chow group and Actinobacteriota in the HFD group (Figure 2A). These phyla accounted for the majority of the gut microbiota abundances in the Chow (96.19%) and HFD (94.91%) groups (Figure 2A). However, in the mice of the HFD+Abx group, Proteobacteria (78.23%) was the most abundant, followed by Firmicutes (20.70%) (Figure 2A). In addition, the relative abundances of Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobiota were significantly lower in the mice fed an HFD than those in mice fed a chow diet (p < 0.05) (Figure 2A). Abx treatment induced a significant decrease in the relative abundance of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Desulfobacterota, while it increased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in HFD-fed mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 2A). In addition, at the genus level, mice fed an HFD had significantly lower relative abundance of nonrank_f_Muribaculaceae, Alistipes, Odoribacter, Parabacteroides, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Turicibacter, Marvinbryantia, Monoglobus, Euacterium_nodatum_group, and Akkermansia than those fed a chow diet (p < 0.05) (Figure 2B,C). Meanwhile, HFD markedly increased the relative abundance of Roseburia, which was restored by Abx treatment (p < 0.05) (Figure 2B,C). In HFD-fed mice, Abx treatment significantly decreased the relative abundance of Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002, Enterorhabdus, Desulfovibrio, Faecalibaculum, Lachnoclostridium, nonrank_f_Lachnospiraceae, noran_f_Ruminococcaceae, Eubacterium_brachy_group, norank_f_norank_o_Clostridia_UCG-014, while it increased the relative abundance of Enterobacter (p < 0.05) (Figure 2B,C).

2.2. LPS and SCFA Concentrations

LPS and SCFAs are microbial synthesized components and metabolites and were investigated to confirm the altered composition of intestinal microbiota. The results showed that the serum concentration of LPS was significantly higher in the mice fed an HFD than those fed a chow diet, which was significantly restored by gut microbiota depletion (p < 0.05) (Figure 3A). In addition, as shown in Figure 3B–F, HFD failed to affect the concentration of fecal SCFAs compared with the normal chow diet (p > 0.05). Gut microbiota depletion induced no detectable butyrate and isovalerate in HFD-fed mice (Figure 3D,F). However, the levels of fecal acetate, propionate, and iso-butyrate were not significantly different between the HFD-fed mice with and without gut microbiota depletion (p > 0.05) (Figure 3B,C,E).

2.3. Gut Microbiota Depletion Reduced Body Weight and Energy Intake in Mice with HFD

After 3 weeks of feeding, mice fed an HFD showed significantly higher body weight than those fed a chow diet (p < 0.05) (Figure 4A,B). From the first week to the end of the experiment, Abx treatment significantly decreased the body weight in HFD-fed mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 4B). In addition, mice fed an HFD had markedly higher energy intake than those fed a chow diet during the whole experiment (p < 0.05) (Figure 4C). Abx treatment significantly decreased the energy intake from the first to the third week in HFD-fed mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 4C).

2.4. Gut Microbiota Depletion Alleviated Serum Lipid Metabolic Parameters in HFD-Fed Mice

Serum total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and free fatty acid (FFA) levels were examined as representative lipid metabolic parameters. Compared with the Chow group, mice in the HFD group had significantly higher serum HDL levels (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in serum TC, TG, LDL, and FFA levels between the Chow and HFD groups (p > 0.05) (Figure 5A–E). However, microbial depletion significantly decreased the serum TC and LDL levels in HFD-fed mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 5B,D).
In addition, HFD significantly lowered the blood glucose concentration (p < 0.05) (Figure 5F), while it had no significant effects on the fasting blood glucose level (p > 0.05) (Figure 5G) compared with chow diet. However, ablation of gut microbiota markedly reduced the blood glucose and fasting blood glucose concentrations in HFD-fed mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 5F,G), suggesting that gut microbiota depletion modulated glucose metabolism. We then investigated the serum concentrations of leptin and insulin. The results showed that HFD significantly increased the serum leptin and insulin levels, which were alleviated by the depletion of gut microbiota (p < 0.05) (Figure 5H,I).

2.5. Gut Microbiota Depletion Reduced Fat Deposition in Obese Mice

To determine the effect of gut microbiota depletion on body fat deposition, inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT), representing the subcutaneous adipose tissue, and perirenal adipose tissue (pWAT) and epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT), which represent the visceral adipose tissues, were investigated. The results showed that the ratios of the mass of iWAT, pWAT, and eWAT, to total body weight in mice fed an HFD were significantly higher than those fed a chow diet, which were markedly restored by gut microbiota depletion (p < 0.05) (Figure 6A,B). We hypothesize that the weight loss induced by microbiota depletion mainly comes from a reduced WAT mass.
Besides adipose tissue, liver, the central organ for lipid metabolism, is sensitive to HFD, and rapidly develops lipid accumulation [28]. Our present study showed that HFD induced a significant increase in the liver weight (p < 0.05), while failed to affect the relative weight of liver (p > 0.05) (Figure 6C,D). Gut microbiota ablation mediated by Abx treatment tended to decrease the weight and relative weight of liver in HFD-fed mice, although the difference was not significant (p > 0.05) (Figure 6C,D). Results from H&E staining indicated that, compared with mice fed a chow diet, mice fed an HFD displayed an excessive hepatic lipid accumulation, which is characterized by more lipid droplets (Figure 6E). In contrast, microbiota depletion inhibited hepatic lipid accumulation in HFD-fed mice (Figure 6E). These data demonstrated that gut microbial depletion reduced hepatic lipid accumulation in HFD-fed mice.

2.6. Gut Microbiota Depletion Modulated the Expression of Genes Involved in Lipid Metabolism in the Liver

The protective effect of gut microbial depletion against HFD-induced excessive hepatic lipid accumulation was further investigated in a more mechanistic manner. The gene expression profile in the liver detected by RNA sequencing is shown in Figure 7. The PCA result showed a unique clustering of Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx samples (Figure 7A). A total of 154 genes were significantly differentially expressed, with 35 being upregulated and 119 being downregulated in mice fed an HFD compared to those fed a chow diet (Figure 7B,D). Meanwhile, compared with the HFD treatment, a total of 76 genes were significantly differentially expressed, with 21 being upregulated and 55 being downregulated in mice treated with HFD+Abx (Figure 7C,D). As shown in Figure 7E,F, compared with chow diet, HFD mainly altered the expression of genes related to lipid metabolism, such as mevalonate diphosphate decarboxylase (Mvd), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 1 (Hmgcs1), proprotein convertase subtilisin/Kexin type 9 (Pcsk9), stearoyl-CoA desaturase (Scd1), and ATP-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 (Abcb1). Similarly, gut microbiota depletion also mainly changed the expression of genes associated with lipid metabolism, such as cytochrome P450 family 39 subfamilies A polypeptide 1 (Cyp39a1), ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 3 (Abcc3), fatty acid translocase (Fat, also known as Cd36), and Acyl-CoA:glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (Gpat3) (Figure 7E,F). Notably, HFD significantly upregulated the expression of Cyp39a1, which was restored by gut microbiota depletion (Figure 7E,F).
The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups were analyzed based on Gene Ontology (GO) (Figure 8A,B). The results of DEGs between the Chow and HFD groups showed enriched GO terms in the three categories, Biological Process (BP), Cellular Component (CC), and Molecular Function (MF). Cellular process, biological regulation, and metabolic process were the most enriched in the BP category; cell part, organelle, and membrane were the most enriched for the CC category; binding, catalytic activity, and transporter activity were the top 3 items in the MF category (Figure 8A). In addition, the results of DEGs between the HFD-fed mice with and without microbiota depletion showed that in the BP category the top 3 items remained cellular process, biological regulation, and metabolic process. Additionally, for the CC category the same top terms were enriched, namely cell part, organelle, and membrane, as well as for the MF category, with binding, catalytic activity, and transporter activity (Figure 8B).
The results of the KEGG pathway annotation analysis revealed that, compared to the chow diet, genes upregulated by HFD were mainly involved in lipid metabolism, metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides, and endocrine system (Figure 8C). Genes downregulated by HFD were mainly involved in the endocrine system, signal transduction, and lipid metabolism (Figure 8C). Gut microbiota depletion mainly increased the genes associated with lipid metabolism, metabolism of cofactors and vitamins, nervous system, sensory system, and cancer in HFD-fed mice (Figure 8D). In addition, microbiota depletion mainly decreased the genes involved in lipid metabolism, signal transduction, endocrine system, carbohydrate metabolism, and metabolism of cofactor and vitamins in HFD-fed mice (Figure 8D).

2.7. Validation of Gene Expression by qRT-PCR

To confirm the RNA-seq data, DEGs involved in lipid metabolism, including Scd1, fatty acid synthase (Fasn), Gpat3, Abcb1b, Abcc3, Pcsk9, Mvd, Hmgcs1, and Cyp39a1, were further validated by qRT-PCR in the three groups of mouse livers (Figure 9). Consistent with the RNA-seq results, qPCR results showed that compared to chow diet, HFD downregulated the mRNA expression levels of Scd1 and Cyp39a1 but upregulated Fasn (p < 0.05) (Figure 9). Meanwhile, microbial depletion decreased the mRNA expression levels of Gpat3 and Abcc3, while increased the mRNA expression levels of Psk9, Mvd, and Hmgcs1 in HFD-fed mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 9).

2.8. Correlation Analysis between Gut Microbiota and Serum Lipid Metabolic Parameters

A Spearman correlation between gut microbiota and serum lipid metabolic parameters showed that the abundance of Turicibacter was negatively correlated with body weight (p < 0.05) (Figure 10). The abundance of Enterobacter was significantly negatively correlated with the serum levels of TC and LDL, while the abundance of unclassified_f_Lachnospiraceae, Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002, Anaerotruncus, Lachnoclostridium, Desulfovibrio, norank_f_Lachnospiraceae, Blautia, Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group, norank_f_Ruminococcaceae, Roseburia, and Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006 were significantly positively correlated with the serum levels of TC and LDL (p < 0.05) (Figure 10). In addition, there were significantly positive associations between the abundance of Faecalibaculum, Enterorhabdus, and nonrank_f_Erysipelotrichaceae and serum TG level (p < 0.05) (Figure 10). The abundances of Blautia and Roseburia were significantly positively correlated with serum leptin level (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the abundances of Lactobacillus and Enterococcus were significantly positively correlated with serum insulin level (p < 0.05) (Figure 10). These data demonstrated there were strong associations between the gut microbiota and serum lipid metabolic parameters, especially the serum TC and LDL.

3. Discussion

Metabolic diseases, such as obesity and NAFLD, are regarded as the most serious public health problems worldwide [29]. Mounting evidence has shown a strong association between gut microbiota and hepatic metabolic disorders, including obesity, diabetes, and NAFLD [3,4,30,31]. Therefore, strategies to alter the gut microbiome have been used for the treatment of metabolic disorders in clinical studies [32,33,34]. It is vital to understand the mechanism of gut microbiota in regulating host hepatic metabolism, especially lipid metabolism. Mice intestinal microbiota depletion established by Abx treatment, also called pseudo-germ-free mice, has been widely used for exploring the role of gut microbiota in the host. In this study, we investigated the effects of gut microbiota on the host hepatic lipid metabolism by depleting gut microbiota via an Abx treatment in HFD-fed mice.
The present data showed that HFD had no significant effect on the richness and diversity of gut microbiota when compared to chow diet, which is consistent with a previous study [35]. On the other hand, an Abx treatment reduced gut microbial diversity and richness shown by OTUs and α-diversity analyses, indicating that an Abx treatment could effectively abolish gut microbiota. Previous studies have demonstrated that Abx-depleted microbiota had beneficial metabolic effects on the host, which is characterized by a decreased body weight and blood glucose level in HFD-fed mice [36,37]. Consistently, our present study showed that an HFD induces a higher body weight, WAT weight, and blood glucose levels, which were alleviated by microbiota depletion. Furthermore, HFD commonly induced hyperlipidemia, which is a serious cause of metabolic disorders. In the present study, we found that the absence of gut microbiota reduced the serum levels of TC and LDL in HFD-fed mice. These data demonstrate that gut microbiota depletion was involved in alleviating HFD-induced obesity.
It is well established that insulin plays a crucial role in modulating glucose and lipid metabolism by involving hepatic glucose uptake and lipid synthesis and storage [38]. Leptin is synthesized primarily by adipose tissue and the circulating leptin levels are typically proportional to body fat mass [39]. Leptin can modulate glucose and lipid metabolism and inhibit feed intake by directly acting on the central nervous system, which collectively regulates the metabolism of the host [40]. HFD usually induces elevated serum insulin and leptin levels [41,42,43], which are the indicators of insulin and leptin resistance, respectively, and risk factors for metabolic disorders [44]. Partial leptin reduction improved leptin and insulin sensitivity and decreased body weight in mice with HFD-induced obesity [44]. Our present results showed that the absence of gut microbiota ameliorated HFD-elevated serum insulin and leptin levels in mice, which further confirmed that microbial abolishment has beneficial metabolic effects in obese mice fed an HFD.
The liver plays a central role in controlling systemic glucose and lipid homeostasis by modulating pathways in glucose and lipid metabolism, such as glycogenesis, glycolysis, lipogenesis, cholesterol metabolism, and fatty acid oxidation [45,46]. In the present study, microbiota depletion reduced hepatic lipid accumulation in HFD-fed mice. Liver RNA-seq analysis showed that HFD upregulated the expression levels of Hmgcs1, Mvd, and Idi1, also confirmed by qPCR, which have been reported to be involved in de novo cholesterol biosynthesis [47]. In addition, HFD downregulated the expression of Abcg4, which can promote the efflux of cellular cholesterol to HDL and inhibit hepatic cholesterol accumulation [48]. These data demonstrated that HFD caused damage to cholesterol metabolism, which might contribute to hepatic lipid accumulation. Meanwhile, in this study, gut microbiota depletion upregulated the expression of genes in the cytochrome P450 (CYP) family, including Cyp2c40, Cyp2c70, Cyp2c68, and Cyp39a1. Cyp2c40 has been reported to be involved in the metabolism of linolenic acid generating epoxy-eicosatrienoic acids [49], which has an anti-inflammatory capacity and exhibits protective effects on metabolic diseases via promoting fatty acid oxidation [50,51,52,53]. Cyp2c70 can metabolize chenodeoxycholic acid into rodent-specific hydrophilic muricholic acid, which can inhibit intestinal cholesterol absorption by decreasing the solubilization of intraluminal micellar cholesterol in mice [54,55]. Cyp39a1 is involved in the alternative bile aid synthesis [56], which plays a critical role in removing cholesterol and inhibiting the sterol accumulation in the liver [57]. Moreover, clinical studies showed that patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) had lower liver Cyp39a1 expression [58,59]. We found that HFD downregulated the expression of Cyp39a1; however, the ablation of gut microbiota upregulated the expression of Cyp39a1. Bile acid homeostasis is not only due to the bile acid biosynthesis, but bile acid transport as well. It has been reported that double knockout of Abcb1a and Abcb1b decreased circulating bile acid concentration in mice [60]. In addition, multidrug-resistance-associated proteins 3 (MRP3/Abcc3) is considered as a bile salt efflux pump and involved in the excretion of bile acids to the circulation [61,62]. In this study, the results showed that HFD downregulated the expression of Abcb1b, while microbial depletion downregulated the expression of Abcc3. These data suggest that gut microbiota depletion might contribute to cholesterol homeostasis.
In addition, gut microbiota depletion downregulated the expression of Mogat1 and Gpat3, which contribute to the synthesis of TG [63,64,65]. It has been reported that HFD-induced and genetically obese mice had higher expression of Mogat1 [66]. Moreover, overexpression of Mogat1 promoted the TG synthesis, while knockdown of liver Mogat1 decreased body weight, improved insulin sensitivity, and alleviated hepatic lipid accumulation and steatosis in HFD-induced and genetic obese mice [67]. Furthermore, a previous study showed that PCSK9 promoted the degradation of CD36 and then decreased hepatic TG content and fatty acid uptake in mice [68]. In this regard, we found that gut microbiota depletion upregulated the expression level of Psck9, while downregulated the expression of Cd36. CD36 is known as a fatty acid translocase associated with enhancing hepatic fatty acid uptake and then causes toxicity, inflammation, and apoptosis in hepatocytes; therefore, driving the development of NAFLD [69,70]. These data suggest that microbiota depletion might alleviate hepatic lipid accumulation via inhibiting CD36-mediated hepatic fatty acid uptake in HFD-fed mice. The decreased fatty acid uptake is accompanied by altered expressions of genes associated with fatty acid β-oxidation, including downregulated Acaa1b and Ehhadh after microbiota depletion via Abx treatment. Taken together, the RNA-seq data suggest that gut microbiota depletion might play a protective role in ameliorating the development of the fatty liver by modulating cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism.
As for microorganism species involved in hepatic cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism, using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, we found that at the genus level, a detailed analysis showed that HFD dramatically decreased the abundance of Alistipes, Odoribacter, Parabacteroides, norank_f_Muribaculaceae, and Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, which all have been reported to have the ability of producing SCFAs [71,72,73,74,75,76]. In addition, our present study showed that HFD induced lower abundance of Turicibacter and Akkermansia, which have anti-inflammatory and beneficial metabolic effects [77,78,79,80,81]. However, we found that HFD decreased abundance of Rikenellaceae, which was contrary to other studies [82,83]. Roseburia is a butyrate-producing bacteria and has been considered to have anti-obesity effects [84]. A previous study showed that HFD decreased the abundance of Roseburia, which was restored by antibiotic pretreatment in male mice [37]. However, Abx pretreatment decreased the abundance of Roseburia in female HFD-fed mice fed [37]. Our study found an increased abundance of Roseburia in the HFD group. However, Abx treatment decreased the abundance of Roseburia, which might be an explanation for the undetectable butyrate levels in the HFD+Abx group. These inconsistent data might be due to the different sex and age of mice and Abx treatment protocol between the present and previous studies, which needs further investigations. Meanwhile, in this study, we found that Abx treatment decreased the abundance of the genus (Lachnoclostridium and nonrank_f_Lachnospiraceae) belonging to the Lachnospiraceae family. The Lachnospiraceae has been reported to be a dominant family in HFD-fed mice [85], suggesting that Lachnospiraceae might contribute to abnormal metabolism. Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002 and Enterorhabdus are members of the Coribacteriaceae family, which has been reported to be involved in promoting intestinal cholesterol absorption and positively associated with hepatic TG levels [86,87,88]. Here, we observed that Abx treatment decreased the abundance of Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002 and Enterorhabdus, which might contribute to lower serum TC levels by inhibiting cholesterol uptake. Moreover, the abundance of Coriobacteriaceae_UCG-002 and Enterorhabdus were significantly positively correlated with serum TC and TG levels, respectively. In addition, Abx treatment also decreased the abundance of Faecalibaculum and Desulfovibrio, which contribute to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [89,90,91,92] and then promote the development of metabolic dysfunction. Similarly, it has been demonstrated that Desulfovibrio can produce LPS and then induce inflammation and insulin resistance [91,92]. A recent study showed that an HFD elevated the intestinal and fecal levels of LPS, which might be due to the increased LPS-producing bacteria and damaged intestinal integrity induced by HFD [93,94]. Similarly, our present study showed that an HFD increased the serum LPS levels. Additionally, Abx treatment decreased the serum LPS levels in HFD-fed mice, which might be because of the downregulated abundance of Desulfovibrio. Notably, Abx treatment markedly increased the abundance of Enterobacter, which might be because it is a major antibiotic-resistant genus [95,96]. Taken together, these data suggest that Abx treatment mainly induced the alterations in gut microbiota involved in hepatic fatty acid and cholesterol metabolism and inflammatory responses in HFD-fed mice, which were also confirmed by differential expression analysis using hepatic RNA sequencing.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Reagents, Mice, and Ethics

The antibiotics were purchased from Meilun Bio (Dalian, China). The standard chow diet (Chow, 10% of energy from fat, D12450B) and high-fat diet (HFD, 60% of energy from fat, D12492) were purchased from Beijing Keao Xieli Feed Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) and the composition of the diets is shown in Table 1. Six-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were purchased from the Peking University Health Science Center (Beijing, China). Mice (two mice per cage) were housed in standardized environment conditions (room temperature, 22 ± 2 °C; 12/12 h light/dark cycle), with free access to control food and water. All procedures used in this experiment were approved by the Experimental Animal Welfare and Ethical Committee of the Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

4.2. Mouse Experiments and Sampling

After acclimatization for 1 week, the mice were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 8 per group) and labeled as Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx, respectively. Groups HFD and HFD+Abx were fed an HFD, whereas group Chow was fed a standard chow diet for 5 weeks. Mice in HFD+Abx groups received drinking water supplemented with an antibiotic cocktail (Abx: 1 g/L ampicillin, 1 g/L neomycin, 1 g/L metronidazole, and 0.5 g/L vancomycin hydrochloride) during the whole experimental period, according to previous studies [20,23]. Mice in the Chow and HFD groups were given normal drinking water without antibiotics. Water bottles were changed twice weekly to contain fresh Abx (experimental design is shown in Figure 1A). Body weight and feed intake were recorded weekly. At the end of the 5th week, mice were fasted to collect blood by orbital blooding, and then killed by cervical dislocation. Liver and white adipose tissues (inguinal white adipose tissue, iWAT; perirenal adipose tissue, pWAT; epididymal white adipose tissue, eWAT) were rapidly excised and weighed. Liver tissues were quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C for further analysis.

4.3. Fecal Microbiota Analysis

Total genome DNA from fecal samples were extracted using an E.Z.N.A.® Stool DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek Inc., Norcross, GA, USA), then DNA concentration and purity were monitored on 1% agarose gels. The V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene was amplified using a specific primer (338F, 5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′; 806R, 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). PCR was performed in a 20 μL mixture containing 4 μL 5×FastPfu Buffer, 2 μL of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.8 μL of Forward Primer, 0.8 μL of Reverse Primer, 0.4 μL of FastPfu Polymerase, 0.2 μL of BSA, and 10 ng of template DNA. The reactions were performed using a thermocycler PCR system and then amplicons were detected using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and purified using an AxyPrep DNA gel extraction kit (Axygen Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantified and purified amplicons were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) according to standard protocols. The raw reads were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (Accession Number: PRJNA807051). The sequences were analyzed and assigned to operational taxonomic units (OTUs; 97% identity). Alpha diversity was analyzed using QIIME (Version 1.7.0), which included the calculation of Sobs, Shannon, Ace, Chao1, and Simpson indices.

4.4. SCFAs Detection

The fecal concentrations of acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, and isovalerate were detected. Approximately 100 mg of feces was placed into a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube, dissolved with 1 mL ddH2O, and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Then, 0.9 mL of the supernatant was added to 0.1 mL 25% metaphosphoric acid solution, then vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C after standing at 4 °C for over 2 h. The supernatant was then filtered using a 0.45 μm polysulfone filter and analyzed using an Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph (Agilent Tecnologies, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

4.5. Blood Glucose and Serum Parameter Analyses

Blood glucose and fasting blood glucose (after fasting for 6 h) concentrations were measured from blood obtained after tail vessel incision using an Accu-Check Performa glucometer (Roche). Serum samples were separated from the blood by centrifugation at 1000× g for 15 min at 4 °C and stored at −80 °C for further analysis. Serum TC, TG, LDL, HDL, and FFA levels were measured using an automatic biochemical analyzer (fully automatic bioanalyzer BK-280, Biobase Biodustry Co., Ltd, Shandong, China). Serum LPS, insulin, and leptin levels were measured using the ELISA assay (Nanjing Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.6. Hepatic Histology Analysis

Liver tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-PBS overnight, then were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin blocks. After that, a section of 5 μm was cut and mounted on slides. The sections were further deparaffinized, hydrated, and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for histological analysis. Images were captured using a DM300 microscope (Leica, Weztlar, Germany).

4.7. Hepatic Transcriptomics Analysis

Total RNAs were isolated using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), and contaminating genomic DNA was removed using DNAase I (Takara, Otsu, Japan). The RNA quality was determined with a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, alo Alto, CA, USA) and quantified with ND-2000 (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). Oligo (dT)-enriched mRNA was fragmented by fragmentation buffer, and the cleaved RNA fragments were reverse transcribed to establish the final cDNA library using a SuperScript double-stranded cDNA synthesis kit with random hexamer primers (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). After being end-repaired, adenylated, and ligated to the sequencing adaptors, the RNA-seq sequencing library was sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq xten/NovaSeq 6000 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The data were analyzed using the online platform of Majorbio Cloud Platform (www.majorbio.com, accessed on 5 December 2021). Statistical significance of the differentially expressed data was defined with p adjust < 0.05 and fold change ≥ 2.

4.8. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from liver samples using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) reagent and then was treated with DNase I (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The RNA samples (1 μg) were reverse transcribed to cDNA using PrimeScript Enzyme Mix 1, RT Primer Mix and 5 × PrimerScript Buffer 2 (Takara, Dalian, China). The reverse transcription was conducted at 37 °C for 15 min, 85 °C for 5 s. Gene-specific primer sequences (Table 2) were designed using Primer 5.0 software and synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Real-time PCR was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 1 μL cDNA template was added to a total volume of 10 μL containing 5 μL KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Master Mix Universal, 0.4 μL PCR forward primer, 0.4 μL PCR reverse primer, 0.2 μL ROX low, and 3 μL PCR-grade water (Kapa biosystems, Beijing, China). The amplification procedure was as follows: 3 min at 95 °C; 3 s at 95 °C and 34 s at 60 °C for 40 cycles; 15 s at 95 °C, 1 min at 60 °C, and 15 s at 95 °C. Relative mRNA expression was normalized using reference gene β-actin and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis was performed by using the one-way ANOVA with Duncan’s post hoc test (SPSS version 21.0, IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA). Spearman correlation analyses between the gut microbiota and serum metabolic parameters were conducted using GraphPad Prism 9.0. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

5. Conclusions

Collectively, the present study showed that gut microbiota depletion alleviated HFD-induced obesity and inhibited hepatic lipid accumulation, which might be associated with alterations in the expression of genes related to hepatic cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism. An Abx-induced microbiota depletion model is low cost and easier to establish relative to germ-free mice; however, to be precautious, the effects of Abx treatment on the host metabolism should be taken into consideration in the future. For our further research, there are three aspects that need to be considered. Firstly, a 5-week experimental period may be a little short for an HFD to exhibit remarkable effects on the gut microbiota and hepatic lipid metabolism. Secondly, some important microbiota-derived metabolites including SCFAs, BAs, and other metabolites in the serum or liver were not detected here, which should be further evaluated as mediators of gut microbiota in regulating liver metabolism. Thirdly, both depletion and supplementation (transplantation) of gut microbiota are necessary to evaluate the role of microbiota, which could provide a better and more definitive explanation.

Author Contributions

H.H., M.W. and R.Z. performed the experiment and wrote the paper; B.Y., M.S. and H.Z. designed the experiment and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (No. Y2022GH02 and PJ01618301), the Major Scientific Research Tasks for Scientific and Technological Innovation Projects of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ZDRW202006-02), State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition (2004DA125184G2102), and the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-41).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Experimental Animal Welfare and Ethical Committee of the Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Protocol code: IAS2020-86; Approve data: 9 October 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Sequencing raw data on fecal microbiota of mice were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (PRJNA807051, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA807051). Sequencing raw data on hepatic transcriptomics were deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database (PRJNA 832803, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA832803).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Loos, R.J.F.; Yeo, G.S.H. The genetics of obesity: From discovery to biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jardon, K.M.; Canfora, E.E.; Goossens, G.H.; Blaak, E.E. Dietary macronutrients and the gut microbiome: A precision nutrition approach to improve cardiometabolic health. Gut 2022, 71, 1214–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Han, H.; Yi, B.; Zhong, R.; Wang, M.; Zhang, S.; Ma, J.; Yin, Y.; Yin, J.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H. From gut microbiota to host appetite: Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key regulators. Microbiome 2021, 9, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Han, H.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, M.; Melaku, M.; Liu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Everaert, N.; Yi, B.; Zhang, H. Intestinal dysbiosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): Focusing on the gut-liver axis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 18, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Astbury, S.; Atallah, E.; Vijay, A.; Aithal, G.P.; Grove, J.I.; Valdes, A.M. Lower gut microbiome diversity and higher abundance of proinflammatory genus Collinsella are associated with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 569–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Schwimmer, J.B.; Johnson, J.S.; Angeles, J.E.; Behling, C.; Belt, P.H.; Borecki, I.; Bross, C.; Durelle, J.; Goyal, N.P.; Hamilton, G.; et al. Microbiome Signatures Associated With Steatohepatitis and Moderate to Severe Fibrosis in Children With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2019, 157, 1109–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Asnicar, F.; Berry, S.E.; Valdes, A.M.; Nguyen, L.H.; Piccinno, G.; Drew, D.A.; Leeming, E.; Gibson, R.; Le Roy, C.; Khatib, H.A.; et al. Microbiome connections with host metabolism and habitual diet from 1,098 deeply phenotyped individuals. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Depommier, C.; Everard, A.; Druart, C.; Plovier, H.; Van Hul, M.; Vieira-Silva, S.; Falony, G.; Raes, J.; Maiter, D.; Delzenne, N.M.; et al. Supplementation with Akkermansia muciniphila in overweight and obese human volunteers: A proof-of-concept exploratory study. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1096–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dao, M.C.; Everard, A.; Aron-Wisnewsky, J.; Sokolovska, N.; Prifti, E.; Verger, E.O.; Kayser, B.D.; Levenez, F.; Chilloux, J.; Hoyles, L.; et al. Akkermansia muciniphila and improved metabolic health during a dietary intervention in obesity: Relationship with gut microbiome richness and ecology. Gut 2016, 65, 426–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, G.; You, H.J.; Bajaj, J.S.; Joo, S.K.; Yu, J.; Park, S.; Kang, H.; Park, J.H.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, D.H.; et al. Distinct signatures of gut microbiome and metabolites associated with significant fibrosis in non-obese NAFLD. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, M.; Yin, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, H.; Ma, X.; Yin, Y.; Tan, B.; Chen, J. Supplementation With Lycium barbarum Polysaccharides Reduce Obesity in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice by Modulation of Gut Microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 719967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Porras, D.; Nistal, E.; Martínez-Flórez, S.; Pisonero-Vaquero, S.; Olcoz, J.L.; Jover, R.; González-Gallego, J.; García-Mediavilla, M.V.; Sánchez-Campos, S. Protective effect of quercetin on high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in mice is mediated by modulating intestinal microbiota imbalance and related gut-liver axis activation. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 102, 188–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ortega-Hernández, A.; Martínez-Martínez, E.; Gómez-Gordo, R.; López-Andrés, N.; Fernández-Celis, A.; Gutiérrrez-Miranda, B.; Nieto, M.L.; Alarcón, T.; Alba, C.; Gómez-Garre, D.; et al. The Interaction between Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress and Gut Microbiota in the Cardiometabolic Consequences in Diet-Induced Obese Rats. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tilg, H.; Adolph, T.E.; Dudek, M.; Knolle, P. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: The interplay between metabolism, microbes and immunity. Nat. Metab. 2021, 3, 1596–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aron-Wisnewsky, J.; Warmbrunn, M.V.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Clément, K. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Modulating Gut Microbiota to Improve Severity? Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1881–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Michail, S.; Lin, M.; Frey, M.R.; Fanter, R.; Paliy, O.; Hilbush, B.; Reo, N.V. Altered gut microbial energy and metabolism in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2015, 91, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aron-Wisnewsky, J.; Warmbrunn, M.V.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Clément, K. Metabolism and Metabolic Disorders and the Microbiome: The Intestinal Microbiota Associated With Obesity, Lipid Metabolism, and Metabolic Health-Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Strategies. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 573–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nogal, A.; Valdes, A.M.; Menni, C. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between gut microbiota and diet in cardio-metabolic health. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Canfora, E.E.; Jocken, J.W.; Blaak, E.E. Short-chain fatty acids in control of body weight and insulin sensitivity. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2015, 11, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xu, J.; Xu, H.M.; Peng, Y.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, H.L.; Huang, W.; Huang, H.L.; He, J.; Du, Y.L.; Zhou, Y.J.; et al. The effect of different combinations of antibiotic cocktails on mice and selection of animal models for further microbiota research. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 1669–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zeng, S.L.; Li, S.Z.; Xiao, P.T.; Cai, Y.Y.; Chu, C.; Chen, B.Z.; Li, P.; Li, J.; Liu, E.H. Citrus polymethoxyflavones attenuate metabolic syndrome by regulating gut microbiome and amino acid metabolism. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaax6208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, M.; Shen, Y.; Cen, M.; Zhu, Y.; Cheng, F.; Tang, L.; Zheng, X.; Kim, J.J.; Dai, N.; Hu, W. Modulation of the Gut Microbiota-farnesoid X Receptor Axis Improves Deoxycholic Acid-induced Intestinal Inflammation in Mice. J. Crohns Colitis 2021, 15, 1197–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zarrinpar, A.; Chaix, A.; Xu, Z.Z.; Chang, M.W.; Marotz, C.A.; Saghatelian, A.; Knight, R.; Panda, S. Antibiotic-induced microbiome depletion alters metabolic homeostasis by affecting gut signaling and colonic metabolism. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, L.; Pang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wu, Q.; Liu, H.; Liu, B.; Liu, G.; Ye, M.; Kong, W.; Jiang, C. Ablation of gut microbiota alleviates obesity-induced hepatic steatosis and glucose intolerance by modulating bile acid metabolism in hamsters. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2019, 9, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Almeida, J.I.; Tenreiro, M.F.; Martinez-Santamaria, L.; Guerrero-Aspizua, S.; Gisbert, J.P.; Alves, P.M.; Serra, M.; Baptista, P.M. Hallmarks of the human intestinal microbiome on liver maturation and function. J. Hepatol. 2022, 76, 694–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Vos, W.M.; Tilg, H.; Van Hul, M.; Cani, P.D. Gut microbiome and health: Mechanistic insights. Gut 2022, 71, 1020–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Delzenne, N.M.; Knudsen, C.; Beaumont, M.; Rodriguez, J.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Bindels, L.B. Contribution of the gut microbiota to the regulation of host metabolism and energy balance: A focus on the gut-liver axis. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2019, 78, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. DesOrmeaux, G.J.; Petrick, H.L.; Brunetta, H.S.; Holloway, G.P. Independent of mitochondrial respiratory function, dietary nitrate attenuates HFD-induced lipid accumulation and mitochondrial ROS emission within the liver. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 321, e217–e228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dyck, L.; Prendeville, H.; Raverdeau, M.; Wilk, M.M.; Loftus, R.M.; Douglas, A.; McCormack, J.; Moran, B.; Wilkinson, M.; Mills, E.L.; et al. Suppressive effects of the obese tumor microenvironment on CD8 T cell infiltration and effector function. J. Exp. Med. 2022, 219, e20210042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fan, Y.; Pedersen, O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rao, Y.; Kuang, Z.; Li, C.; Guo, S.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, D.; Hu, Y.; Song, B.; Jiang, Z.; Ge, Z.; et al. Gut Akkermansia muciniphila ameliorates metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease by regulating the metabolism of L-aspartate via gut-liver axis. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wilson, B.C.; Vatanen, T.; Jayasinghe, T.N.; Leong, K.S.W.; Derraik, J.G.B.; Albert, B.B.; Chiavaroli, V.; Svirskis, D.M.; Beck, K.L.; Conlon, C.A.; et al. Strain engraftment competition and functional augmentation in a multi-donor fecal microbiota transplantation trial for obesity. Microbiome 2021, 9, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yu, E.W.; Gao, L.; Stastka, P.; Cheney, M.C.; Mahabamunuge, J.; Torres Soto, M.; Ford, C.B.; Bryant, J.A.; Henn, M.R.; Hohmann, E.L. Fecal microbiota transplantation for the improvement of metabolism in obesity: The FMT-TRIM double-blind placebo-controlled pilot trial. PLoS Med. 2020, 17, e1003051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Van der Vossen, E.W.J.; Bastos, D.; Stols-Gonçalves, D.; de Goffau, M.C.; Davids, M.; Pereira, J.P.B.; Li Yim, A.Y.F.; Henneman, P.; Netea, M.G.; de Vos, W.M.; et al. Effects of fecal microbiota transplant on DNA methylation in subjects with metabolic syndrome. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1993513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kim, Y.; Hwang, S.W.; Kim, S.; Lee, Y.S.; Kim, T.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.J.; Yoo, H.J.; Kim, E.N.; Kweon, M.N. Dietary cellulose prevents gut inflammation by modulating lipid metabolism and gut microbiota. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 944–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Peng, C.; Xu, X.; He, Z.; Li, N.; Ouyang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, N.; He, C. Helicobacter pylori infection worsens impaired glucose regulation in high-fat diet mice in association with an altered gut microbiome and metabolome. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 2081–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peng, C.; Xu, X.; Li, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, X.; Chen, H.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, N.; He, C. Sex-specific association between the gut microbiome and high-fat diet-induced metabolic disorders in mice. Biol Sex Differ. 2020, 11, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Titchenell, P.M.; Lazar, M.A.; Birnbaum, M.J. Unraveling the Regulation of Hepatic Metabolism by Insulin. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. TEM 2017, 28, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Harris, R.B. Direct and indirect effects of leptin on adipocyte metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1842, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pereira, S.; Cline, D.L.; Glavas, M.M.; Covey, S.D.; Kieffer, T.J. Tissue-Specific Effects of Leptin on Glucose and Lipid Metabolism. Endocr. Rev. 2021, 42, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guerra-Cantera, S.; Frago, L.M.; Collado-Pérez, R.; Canelles, S.; Ros, P.; Freire-Regatillo, A.; Jiménez-Hernaiz, M.; Barrios, V.; Argente, J.; Chowen, J.A. Sex Differences in Metabolic Recuperation After Weight Loss in High Fat Diet-Induced Obese Mice. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 796661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pistell, P.J.; Utsuki, T.; Francis, J.; Ebenezer, P.J.; Terrebonne, J.; Roth, G.S.; Ingram, D.K. An Avocado Extract Enriched in Mannoheptulose Prevents the Negative Effects of a High-Fat Diet in Mice. Nutrients 2021, 14, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gart, E.; van Duyvenvoorde, W.; Toet, K.; Caspers, M.P.M.; Verschuren, L.; Nielsen, M.J.; Leeming, D.J.; Souto Lima, E.; Menke, A.; Hanemaaijer, R.; et al. Butyrate Protects against Diet-Induced NASH and Liver Fibrosis and Suppresses Specific Non-Canonical TGF-β Signaling Pathways in Human Hepatic Stellate Cells. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhao, S.; Zhu, Y.; Schultz, R.D.; Li, N.; He, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Caron, A.; Zhu, Q.; Sun, K.; Xiong, W.; et al. Partial Leptin Reduction as an Insulin Sensitization and Weight Loss Strategy. Cell Metab. 2019, 30, 706–719.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bechmann, L.P.; Hannivoort, R.A.; Gerken, G.; Hotamisligil, G.S.; Trauner, M.; Canbay, A. The interaction of hepatic lipid and glucose metabolism in liver diseases. J. Hepatol. 2012, 56, 952–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yki-Järvinen, H.; Luukkonen, P.K.; Hodson, L.; Moore, J.B. Dietary carbohydrates and fats in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 770–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Groen, A.K.; Bloks, V.W.; Verkade, H.; Kuipers, F. Cross-talk between liver and intestine in control of cholesterol and energy homeostasis. Mol. Asp. Med. 2014, 37, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, N.; Westerterp, M. ABC Transporters, Cholesterol Efflux, and Implications for Cardiovascular Diseases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1276, 67–83. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tsao, C.C.; Foley, J.; Coulter, S.J.; Maronpot, R.; Zeldin, D.C.; Goldstein, J.A. CYP2C40, a unique arachidonic acid 16-hydroxylase, is the major CYP2C in murine intestinal tract. Mol. Pharmacol. 2000, 58, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sonnweber, T.; Pizzini, A.; Nairz, M.; Weiss, G.; Tancevski, I. Arachidonic Acid Metabolites in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gai, Z.; Visentin, M.; Gui, T.; Zhao, L.; Thasler, W.E.; Häusler, S.; Hartling, I.; Cremonesi, A.; Hiller, C.; Kullak-Ublick, G.A. Effects of Farnesoid X Receptor Activation on Arachidonic Acid Metabolism, NF-kB Signaling, and Hepatic Inflammation. Mol. Pharmacol. 2018, 94, 802–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Guan, X.X.; Rao, D.N.; Liu, Y.Z.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, H.H. Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acids and Fibrosis: Recent Insights for the Novel Therapeutic Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, W.M.; Shi, F.X.; Lu, L.Z.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.L.; Zhang, J.; Tao, Z.R.; Shen, J.D.; Li, G.Q.; Wang, D.Q.; et al. Effects of linoleic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid on cell proliferation and lipid-metabolism gene expression in primary duck hepatocytes. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2011, 352, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Honda, A.; Miyazaki, T.; Iwamoto, J.; Hirayama, T.; Morishita, Y.; Monma, T.; Ueda, H.; Mizuno, S.; Sugiyama, F.; Takahashi, S.; et al. Regulation of bile acid metabolism in mouse models with hydrophobic bile acid composition. J. Lipid Res. 2020, 61, 54–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, D.Q.; Tazuma, S.; Cohen, D.E.; Carey, M.C. Feeding natural hydrophilic bile acids inhibits intestinal cholesterol absorption: Studies in the gallstone-susceptible mouse. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2003, 285, G494–G502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ikeda, H.; Ueda, M.; Ikeda, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Honda, Y. Oxysterol 7alpha-hydroxylase (CYP39A1) in the ciliary nonpigmented epithelium of bovine eye. Lab. Investig. 2003, 83, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. De Boer, J.F.; Kuipers, F.; Groen, A.K. Cholesterol Transport Revisited: A New Turbo Mechanism to Drive Cholesterol Excretion. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. TEM 2018, 29, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ji, F.; Zhang, J.; Liu, N.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, P.; Zhang, N.; Lin, S.; Pan, R.; Meng, Z.; et al. Blocking hepatocarcinogenesis by a cytochrome P450 family member with female-preferential expression. Gut 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lu, M.; Hu, X.H.; Li, Q.; Xiong, Y.; Hu, G.J.; Xu, J.J.; Zhao, X.N.; Wei, X.X.; Chang, C.C.; Liu, Y.K.; et al. A specific cholesterol metabolic pathway is established in a subset of HCCs for tumor growth. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 5, 404–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, R.; Salem, M.; Yousef, I.M.; Tuchweber, B.; Lam, P.; Childs, S.J.; Helgason, C.D.; Ackerley, C.; Phillips, M.J.; Ling, V. Targeted inactivation of sister of P-glycoprotein gene (spgp) in mice results in nonprogressive but persistent intrahepatic cholestasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 2011–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Henkel, A.S.; LeCuyer, B.; Olivares, S.; Green, R.M. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Regulates Hepatic Bile Acid Metabolism in Mice. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 3, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Garzel, B.; Zhang, L.; Huang, S.M.; Wang, H. A Change in Bile Flow: Looking Beyond Transporter Inhibition in the Development of Drug-induced Cholestasis. Curr. Drug Metab. 2019, 20, 621–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hall, A.M.; Kou, K.; Chen, Z.; Pietka, T.A.; Kumar, M.; Korenblat, K.M.; Lee, K.; Ahn, K.; Fabbrini, E.; Klein, S.; et al. Evidence for regulated monoacylglycerol acyltransferase expression and activity in human liver. J. Lipid Res. 2012, 53, 990–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Soufi, N.; Hall, A.M.; Chen, Z.; Yoshino, J.; Collier, S.L.; Mathews, J.C.; Brunt, E.M.; Albert, C.J.; Graham, M.J.; Ford, D.A.; et al. Inhibiting monoacylglycerol acyltransferase 1 ameliorates hepatic metabolic abnormalities but not inflammation and injury in mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 30177–30188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cao, J.; Li, J.L.; Li, D.; Tobin, J.F.; Gimeno, R.E. Molecular identification of microsomal acyl-CoA:glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase, a key enzyme in de novo triacylglycerol synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 19695–19700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hall, A.M.; Soufi, N.; Chambers, K.T.; Chen, Z.; Schweitzer, G.G.; McCommis, K.S.; Erion, D.M.; Graham, M.J.; Su, X.; Finck, B.N. Abrogating monoacylglycerol acyltransferase activity in liver improves glucose tolerance and hepatic insulin signaling in obese mice. Diabetes 2014, 63, 2284–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lee, Y.J.; Ko, E.H.; Kim, J.E.; Kim, E.; Lee, H.; Choi, H.; Yu, J.H.; Kim, H.J.; Seong, J.K.; Kim, K.S.; et al. Nuclear receptor PPARγ-regulated monoacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (MGAT1) expression is responsible for the lipid accumulation in diet-induced hepatic steatosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13656–13661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Demers, A.; Samami, S.; Lauzier, B.; Des Rosiers, C.; Ngo Sock, E.T.; Ong, H.; Mayer, G. PCSK9 Induces CD36 Degradation and Affects Long-Chain Fatty Acid Uptake and Triglyceride Metabolism in Adipocytes and in Mouse Liver. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2015, 35, 2517–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rada, P.; González-Rodríguez, Á.; García-Monzón, C.; Valverde, Á.M. Understanding lipotoxicity in NAFLD pathogenesis: Is CD36 a key driver? Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhou, J.; Febbraio, M.; Wada, T.; Zhai, Y.; Kuruba, R.; He, J.; Lee, J.H.; Khadem, S.; Ren, S.; Li, S.; et al. Hepatic fatty acid transporter Cd36 is a common target of LXR, PXR, and PPARgamma in promoting steatosis. Gastroenterology 2008, 134, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, K.; Liao, M.; Zhou, N.; Bao, L.; Ma, K.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Wang, W.; Wang, J.; et al. Parabacteroides distasonis Alleviates Obesity and Metabolic Dysfunctions via Production of Succinate and Secondary Bile Acids. Cell Rep. 2019, 26, 222–235.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. David, L.A.; Maurice, C.F.; Carmody, R.N.; Gootenberg, D.B.; Button, J.E.; Wolfe, B.E.; Ling, A.V.; Devlin, A.S.; Varma, Y.; Fischbach, M.A.; et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 2014, 505, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Smith, B.J.; Miller, R.A.; Ericsson, A.C.; Harrison, D.C.; Strong, R.; Schmidt, T.M. Changes in the gut microbiome and fermentation products concurrent with enhanced longevity in acarbose-treated mice. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hu, W.; Lu, W.; Li, L.; Zhang, H.; Lee, Y.K.; Chen, W.; Zhao, J. Both living and dead Faecalibacterium prausnitzii alleviate house dust mite-induced allergic asthma through the modulation of gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acid production. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 5563–5573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ormerod, K.L.; Wood, D.L.; Lachner, N.; Gellatly, S.L.; Daly, J.N.; Parsons, J.D.; Dal’Molin, C.G.; Palfreyman, R.W.; Nielsen, L.K.; Cooper, M.A.; et al. Genomic characterization of the uncultured Bacteroidales family S24-7 inhabiting the guts of homeothermic animals. Microbiome 2016, 4, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ye, J.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhou, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, N.; Lui, E.M.K.; Xiao, M. Pu-erh tea ameliorates obesity and modulates gut microbiota in high fat diet fed mice. Food Res. Int. 2021, 144, 110360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhao, Q.; Hou, D.; Fu, Y.; Xue, Y.; Guan, X.; Shen, Q. Adzuki Bean Alleviates Obesity and Insulin Resistance Induced by a High-Fat Diet and Modulates Gut Microbiota in Mice. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jiao, N.; Baker, S.S.; Nugent, C.A.; Tsompana, M.; Cai, L.; Wang, Y.; Buck, M.J.; Genco, R.J.; Baker, R.D.; Zhu, R.; et al. Gut microbiome may contribute to insulin resistance and systemic inflammation in obese rodents: A meta-analysis. Physiol. Genom. 2018, 50, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Everard, A.; Belzer, C.; Geurts, L.; Ouwerkerk, J.P.; Druart, C.; Bindels, L.B.; Guiot, Y.; Derrien, M.; Muccioli, G.G.; Delzenne, N.M.; et al. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 9066–9071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lee, N.Y.; Shin, M.J.; Youn, G.S.; Yoon, S.J.; Choi, Y.R.; Kim, H.S.; Gupta, H.; Han, S.H.; Kim, B.K.; Lee, D.Y.; et al. Lactobacillus attenuates progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by lowering cholesterol and steatosis. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2021, 27, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cani, P.D. Human gut microbiome: Hopes, threats and promises. Gut 2018, 67, 1716–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, J.; Hao, W.; He, Z.; Kwek, E.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, H.; Liang, N.; Ma, K.Y.; Lei, L.; He, W.S.; et al. Beneficial effects of tea water extracts on the body weight and gut microbiota in C57BL/6J mice fed with a high-fat diet. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 2847–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. He, W.S.; Li, L.; Rui, J.; Li, J.; Sun, Y.; Cui, D.; Xu, B. Tomato seed oil attenuates hyperlipidemia and modulates gut microbiota in C57BL/6J mice. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 4275–4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wu, T.; Sun, M.; Liu, R.; Sui, W.; Zhang, J.; Yin, J.; Fang, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, M. Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum Remodeled Roseburia and Phosphatidylserine Levels and Ameliorated Intestinal Disorders and liver Metabolic Abnormalities Induced by High-Fat Diet. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 4632–4640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhao, L.; Zhang, Q.; Ma, W.; Tian, F.; Shen, H.; Zhou, M. A combination of quercetin and resveratrol reduces obesity in high-fat diet-fed rats by modulation of gut microbiota. Food Funct. 2017, 8, 4644–4656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Martínez, I.; Wallace, G.; Zhang, C.; Legge, R.; Benson, A.K.; Carr, T.P.; Moriyama, E.N.; Walter, J. Diet-induced metabolic improvements in a hamster model of hypercholesterolemia are strongly linked to alterations of the gut microbiota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 4175–4184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Clavel, T.; Desmarchelier, C.; Haller, D.; Gérard, P.; Rohn, S.; Lepage, P.; Daniel, H. Intestinal microbiota in metabolic diseases: From bacterial community structure and functions to species of pathophysiological relevance. Gut Microbes 2014, 5, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Claus, S.P.; Ellero, S.L.; Berger, B.; Krause, L.; Bruttin, A.; Molina, J.; Paris, A.; Want, E.J.; de Waziers, I.; Cloarec, O.; et al. Colonization-induced host-gut microbial metabolic interaction. mBio 2011, 2, e00271-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cai, W.; Xu, J.; Li, G.; Liu, T.; Guo, X.; Wang, H.; Luo, L. Ethanol extract of propolis prevents high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance and obesity in association with modulation of gut microbiota in mice. Food Res. Int. 2020, 130, 108939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yang, X.; He, Z.; Hu, R.; Yan, J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, B.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, H.; He, J.; Wu, S. Dietary β-Carotene on Postpartum Uterine Recovery in Mice: Crosstalk Between Gut Microbiota and Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 744425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Xu, P.; Hong, F.; Wang, J.; Cong, Y.; Dai, S.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Jin, X.; Wang, F.; Liu, J.; et al. Microbiome Remodeling via the Montmorillonite Adsorption-Excretion Axis Prevents Obesity-related Metabolic Disorders. EBioMedicine 2017, 16, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Panasevich, M.R.; Meers, G.M.; Linden, M.A.; Booth, F.W.; Perfield, J.W., 2nd; Fritsche, K.L.; Wankhade, U.D.; Chintapalli, S.V.; Shankar, K.; Ibdah, J.A.; et al. High-fat, high-fructose, high-cholesterol feeding causes severe NASH and cecal microbiota dysbiosis in juvenile Ossabaw swine. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 314, e78–e92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Tian, B.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, M.; Chen, Z.; Ma, Q.; Liu, H.; Nie, C.; Zhang, Z.; An, W.; Li, J. Lycium ruthenicum Anthocyanins Attenuate High-Fat Diet-Induced Colonic Barrier Dysfunction and Inflammation in Mice by Modulating the Gut Microbiota. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2021, 65, e2000745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Saad, M.J.; Santos, A.; Prada, P.O. Linking Gut Microbiota and Inflammation to Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Physiology (Bethesda) 2016, 31, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Davin-Regli, A.; Lavigne, J.P.; Pagès, J.M. Enterobacter spp.: Update on Taxonomy, Clinical Aspects, and Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00002-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zong, Z.; Feng, Y.; McNally, A. Carbapenem and Colistin Resistance in Enterobacter: Determinants and Clones. Trends Microbiol. 2021, 29, 473–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 09350 g001 550
Figure 1. Abx treatment effectively depleted fecal microbiota. (A) Experimental design; (B) Venn diagram showing the unique and overlapping OTUs presented in Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups; (C–G) α-diversity results; (H–J) β-diversity with PCA, PCoA, and NMDS score plots for discriminating the colonic microbiota from Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups. * p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Abx treatment effectively depleted fecal microbiota. (A) Experimental design; (B) Venn diagram showing the unique and overlapping OTUs presented in Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups; (C–G) α-diversity results; (H–J) β-diversity with PCA, PCoA, and NMDS score plots for discriminating the colonic microbiota from Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 09350 g001
Ijms 23 09350 g002 550
Figure 2. Gut microbiota depletion changed the microbial composition in HFD-fed mice. (A) Bacterial taxonomic profiling at the phylum level of fecal microbiota from different groups; (B) bacterial taxonomic profiling at the genus level of fecal microbiota from different groups; (C) heatmap of the bacterial taxonomic profiling at the genus level of fecal microbiota from different groups. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Gut microbiota depletion changed the microbial composition in HFD-fed mice. (A) Bacterial taxonomic profiling at the phylum level of fecal microbiota from different groups; (B) bacterial taxonomic profiling at the genus level of fecal microbiota from different groups; (C) heatmap of the bacterial taxonomic profiling at the genus level of fecal microbiota from different groups. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 09350 g002
Ijms 23 09350 g003 550
Figure 3. Gut microbiota depletion decreased the serum LPS and fecal SCFA content. (A) Serum LPS level; (B) fecal acetate content; (C) fecal propionate content; (D) fecal butyrate content; (E) fecal isobutyrate content; (F) fecal isovalerate content. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Gut microbiota depletion decreased the serum LPS and fecal SCFA content. (A) Serum LPS level; (B) fecal acetate content; (C) fecal propionate content; (D) fecal butyrate content; (E) fecal isobutyrate content; (F) fecal isovalerate content. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 09350 g003
Ijms 23 09350 g004 550
Figure 4. Gut microbiota depletion decreased body weight in HFD-fed mice. (A) Representative mice in the Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups; (B) body weight; (C) energy intake. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 compared to HFD+Abx; # p < 0.05 compared to Chow.
Figure 4. Gut microbiota depletion decreased body weight in HFD-fed mice. (A) Representative mice in the Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups; (B) body weight; (C) energy intake. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 compared to HFD+Abx; # p < 0.05 compared to Chow.
Ijms 23 09350 g004
Ijms 23 09350 g005 550
Figure 5. Gut microbiota depletion alleviated HFD-induced dyslipidemia. (A) Serum TG level; (B) serum TC level; (C) serum HDL level; (D) serum LDL level; (E) serum FFA level; (F) blood glucose concentration; (G) fasting blood glucose concentration; (H) serum leptin content; (I) serum insulin content. TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FFA, free fatty acid. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Gut microbiota depletion alleviated HFD-induced dyslipidemia. (A) Serum TG level; (B) serum TC level; (C) serum HDL level; (D) serum LDL level; (E) serum FFA level; (F) blood glucose concentration; (G) fasting blood glucose concentration; (H) serum leptin content; (I) serum insulin content. TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FFA, free fatty acid. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 09350 g005
Ijms 23 09350 g006 550
Figure 6. Gut microbiota depletion reduced fat deposition in HFD-fed mice. (A) Representative pictures for mice in the Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups; (B) the ratios of iWAT, pWAT, and eWAT to body weight; (C) representative pictures for liver in mice from the Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups; (D) liver weight and the ratio of liver to body weight; (E) representative pictures for H&E-stained liver sections. iWAT, inguinal white adipose tissue; pWAT, perirenal adipose tissue; eWAT, epididymal white adipose tissue. Small black squares are magnified in the bottom. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Gut microbiota depletion reduced fat deposition in HFD-fed mice. (A) Representative pictures for mice in the Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups; (B) the ratios of iWAT, pWAT, and eWAT to body weight; (C) representative pictures for liver in mice from the Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups; (D) liver weight and the ratio of liver to body weight; (E) representative pictures for H&E-stained liver sections. iWAT, inguinal white adipose tissue; pWAT, perirenal adipose tissue; eWAT, epididymal white adipose tissue. Small black squares are magnified in the bottom. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 09350 g006
Ijms 23 09350 g007 550
Figure 7. Gut microbiota depletion altered liver gene expression in HFD-fed mice. (A) PCA score plots for discriminating the liver gene expression from Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups; (B) volcano plot of DEGs between mice fed a chow diet and HFD; (C) volcano plot of DEGs between mice with and without Abx treatment when fed an HFD; (D) heatmap of all the DEGs altered by HFD and Abx treatment; (E) heatmap of DEGs related to metabolism between mice fed a Chow diet and HFD; (F) heatmap of DEGs related to metabolism between mice with and without Abx treatment when fed an HFD. DEGs, differentially expressed genes.
Figure 7. Gut microbiota depletion altered liver gene expression in HFD-fed mice. (A) PCA score plots for discriminating the liver gene expression from Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups; (B) volcano plot of DEGs between mice fed a chow diet and HFD; (C) volcano plot of DEGs between mice with and without Abx treatment when fed an HFD; (D) heatmap of all the DEGs altered by HFD and Abx treatment; (E) heatmap of DEGs related to metabolism between mice fed a Chow diet and HFD; (F) heatmap of DEGs related to metabolism between mice with and without Abx treatment when fed an HFD. DEGs, differentially expressed genes.
Ijms 23 09350 g007
Ijms 23 09350 g008 550
Figure 8. Gut microbiota depletion altered the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism. (A) GO analysis of all differential genes that were altered by HFD feeding compared with chow diet fed mice; (B) GO analysis of all differential genes that were altered by Abx treatment in HFD-fed mice; (C) KEGG analysis of all differentially expressed genes that were altered by HFD feeding compared with chow diet fed mice; (D) KEGG analysis of all differential genes that were altered by Abx treatment in HFD-fed mice.
Figure 8. Gut microbiota depletion altered the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism. (A) GO analysis of all differential genes that were altered by HFD feeding compared with chow diet fed mice; (B) GO analysis of all differential genes that were altered by Abx treatment in HFD-fed mice; (C) KEGG analysis of all differentially expressed genes that were altered by HFD feeding compared with chow diet fed mice; (D) KEGG analysis of all differential genes that were altered by Abx treatment in HFD-fed mice.
Ijms 23 09350 g008
Ijms 23 09350 g009 550
Figure 9. qRT-PCR validation of the differentially expressed genes between Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Figure 9. qRT-PCR validation of the differentially expressed genes between Chow, HFD, and HFD+Abx groups. Data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 23 09350 g009
Ijms 23 09350 g010 550
Figure 10. Heatmap result of Spearman correlation between the alterations in the fecal microbial population and the changes in serum lipid metabolic parameters. * p < 0.05 were significantly negative (green) or positive (red) Spearman correlation.
Figure 10. Heatmap result of Spearman correlation between the alterations in the fecal microbial population and the changes in serum lipid metabolic parameters. * p < 0.05 were significantly negative (green) or positive (red) Spearman correlation.
Ijms 23 09350 g010
Table
Table 1. Composition of normal chow diet and high-fat diet.
Table 1. Composition of normal chow diet and high-fat diet.
Ingredient (g/kg)Chow DietHigh-Fat Diet
Casein200200
L-Cystine33
Corn starch3510
Maltodextrin35125
Sucrose35068.8
Cellulose5050
Soybean oil2525
Lard20245
Minera mix1010
Dicalcium phosphate1313
Calcium carbonate5.55.5
Potassium citrate, 1 H2O16.516.5
Vitamin mix V100011010
Choline bitartrate22
Table
Table 2. Primers used for qPCR assay.
Table 2. Primers used for qPCR assay.
GeneAccession No.Sequence (5′-3′)
β-actinNM_007393.5F: TGTCCACCTTCCAGCAGATGT
R: GCTCAGTAACAGTCCGCCTAGAA
Scd1NM_009127.4F: CCTGCCTCTTCGGGATTTT
R: GCCCATTCGTACACGTCATT
FasnNM_007988.3F: CTCCACAGCTCTTCCAGTGAG
R: ATGCTATTCTCTACCGCTGGG
Gpat3NM_172715.3F: GGGCAAGGGTAGAGTGTAGAAAA
R: CGGAAAACACAGCGTCCAG
Abcb1bNM_011075.2F: AGTGGCTCTTGAAGCCGTAA
R: AACTCCATCACCACCTCACG
Abcc3NM_029600.4F: ACTCTCATGTGGCGAAGCAT
R: GATAAAGTCCGTCTGGGGCA
Pcsk9NM_153565.2F: ATCACCGACTTCAACAGCGT
R: GCCCTTCCCTTGACAGTTGA
MvdNM_138656.2F: CCACAACCGTTGCCATTAGC
R: GTAGAGTGTCCCCGTCCTCT
Hmgcs1NM_001291439.1F: CTGATCCCCTTTGGCTCTTTCA
R: CCCAGGCCGATGGTATACTT
Cyp39a1NM_018887.4F: TCACCAATAGCAATCGCCGT
R: GAGGGGCTTTCCCAAACTCA
F, forward; R, reverse.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, H.; Wang, M.; Zhong, R.; Yi, B.; Schroyen, M.; Zhang, H. Depletion of Gut Microbiota Inhibits Hepatic Lipid Accumulation in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169350

AMA Style

Han H, Wang M, Zhong R, Yi B, Schroyen M, Zhang H. Depletion of Gut Microbiota Inhibits Hepatic Lipid Accumulation in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(16):9350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169350

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Hui, Mengyu Wang, Ruqing Zhong, Bao Yi, Martine Schroyen, and Hongfu Zhang. 2022. "Depletion of Gut Microbiota Inhibits Hepatic Lipid Accumulation in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 16: 9350. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169350

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop