Next Article in Journal
Lipid Nanoparticles: Promising Treatment Approach for Parkinson’s Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
CRP in Outpatients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Linked to the Blood Microbiota
Previous Article in Journal
Using ncRNAs as Tools in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment—The Way towards Personalized Medicine to Improve Patients’ Health
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatments and Predictive Biomarkers of Therapeutic Response
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review of Pre-Clinical Murine Models of Human Disease

by
Brunette Katsandegwaza
1,
William Horsnell
2 and
Katherine Smith
3,*
1
Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, University of Liege, 4000 Liege, Belgium
2
Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
3
School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 3XN, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(16), 9344; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169344
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 15 August 2022 / Accepted: 17 August 2022 / Published: 19 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Pre-clinial Models into Translation)

Abstract

:
Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are both highly inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, collectively known as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although the cause of IBD is still unclear, several experimental IBD murine models have enabled researchers to make great inroads into understanding human IBD pathology. Here, we discuss the current pre-clinical experimental murine models for human IBD, including the chemical-induced trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) model, oxazolone and dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) models, the gene-deficient I-kappa-B kinase gamma (Iκκ-γ) and interleukin(IL)-10 models, and the CD4+ T-cell transfer model. We offer a comprehensive review of how these models have been used to dissect the etiopathogenesis of disease, alongside their limitations. Furthermore, the way in which this knowledge has led to the translation of experimental findings into novel clinical therapeutics is also discussed.

1. Introduction

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are chronic relapsing inflammatory conditions of the gastro-intestinal tract. A systematic review of bibliographic databases up to and including 31 December 2016 revealed that the reported prevalence of IBD exceeded 0.3% in North America, Oceania, and many countries in Europe [1], with analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017 revealing an age-standardised prevalence rate of 464.5 per 100,000 population (0.46%) in the United States of America and 449.6 per 100,000 (0.45%) in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2017 [2]. Although historically lower in East and South Asia, Oceania, and sub-Saharan Africa, the age-standardised prevalence rate of IBD has increased in newly industrialised countries over the last 30 years [2]. Currently, diagnosis of IBD is complex and invasive, effective treatment requires tailoring to the individual, and there is no cure for disease. The annual financial burden of disease estimated at more than USD 31 billion in the USA alone [3]—the increasing costs of care for disease, as well as the increasing incidence of IBD, necessitates a pressing need for cost-effective strategies to address this disease burden. The use of pre-clinical murine models of human IBD is currently employed by researchers to better understand disease etiology. Murine experimental models of human IBD exhibit immune pathological signatures resembling Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). These models include the chemical-induced trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) model, oxazolone and dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) models, the gene-deficient I-kappa-B kinase gamma (Iκκ-γ) and interleukin(IL)-10 models, and the CD4+ T-cell transfer model [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Although most pre-clinical murine models do not fully recapitulate the complexity of human IBD, these models have added to our knowledge about the causes of disease and have provided targets for developing new treatments. In this review, we discuss the most widely used pre-clinical murine models of human IBD, those which have proven significant in understanding disease and in the use of novel therapeutics in the clinic. Table 1 summarises the advantages and disadvantages of these pre-clinical murine models for IBD, grouped by method of induction.

2. Chemical Induced Colitis

2.1. Oxazolone Colitis

Oxazolone colitis (OC) is induced by the intrarectal administration of a haptenising agent known as oxazolone (4-ethoxymethylene-2-phenyl-2-oxazolin-5-one) in ethanol (Figure 1) [4].
Two methods of OC induction are currently employed to elicit either a self-resolving acute or a chronic response. The former is achieved by the single administration of an oxazolone enema, while the latter is preceded by a dermal pre-sensitisation five days before administration of an oxazolone enema, leading to chronic OC [10,11]. Both acute and chronic OC in mice are characterised by a superficial inflammation of the distal colon mucosa, a high volume of inflammatory infiltrate (neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes), goblet-cell depletion, oedema formation, epithelial cell loss, haemorrhage, and vascular dilation [10,12,13]. These histologic features, as well as the distribution of OC, resemble human UC [4].
Chronic activation of type-2 immune responses has been proposed to be the main driver of human UC [14] (Figure 1). In the murine model, oxazolone activation of the type-2 immune response is characterised by the production of interleukin (IL)-4 in the acute phase, then superseded by the production of IL-13 in the chronic phase [10,15,16,17]. Increased production of IL-13 (and IL-5) was also evident in lamina propria T cells isolated from UC patients [18]. Interestingly, the use of mice deficient in IL-4 receptor-alpha (IL-4Rα), a common receptor for both IL-4 and IL-13, resulted in the exacerbation of OC, which could only be rescued by depletion of IL-13 in these mice [19]. Moreover, OC was prevented in mice given an IL-13 receptor subunit alpha-2 (IL-13Rα2) fusion protein that neutralises IL-13 bioactivity [10], alluding to the possible involvement of IL-13 signalling in the exacerbation of IBD in both pre-clinical models and patients [20]. Similarly, human subjects carrying a variant of IL-13 (R130Q) with a reduced affinity for IL-13Rα2 had a lower risk for CD [20]. Heller et al. proposed that prevention of OC in mice given the IL-13Rα2 fusion protein may be due to the involvement of IL-13 in mediating tissue injury and subsequent inflammation in the mucosa [10]. Subsequently, IL-13 signalling through IL-13Rα2 was shown to regulate transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 production during OC and promoted the deposition of collagen in a lung fibrosis model [21]. However, pre-clinical experiments using Pitrakinra, an antibody that blocks the production of IL-13 and IL-4, had no significant therapeutic effect on OC [22]. No significant therapeutic effect was found in a Phase IIa clinical trial of UC patients with an antibody targeting IL-13 (anrukinzumab) [23]. Similarly, phase IIa clinical trials of UC patients with tralokinumab, another IL-13-neutralising antibody, did not significantly improve clinical response but did result in a higher clinical remission rate and mucosal healing rate in 43 patients with UC, compared to 37 patients with UC receiving a placebo control [24].
Although the initial cell source of IL-13 in UC is yet undetermined, both natural killer T cells (NKT) and conventional CD4+ T cells secrete copious amounts of IL-13 during OC [10,19]. CD1d-restricted NKT cells expressing an invariant T-cell receptor can secrete IFN-γ or IL-4, activating CD4+ T cells to become Th1 or Th2 cells (Figure 1) [25]. Indeed, oxazolone administration resulted in IL-13 production by populations of CD1-restricted invariant NKT cells [10] (Figure 1). Although depletion of NK1.1-positive cells protected mice from OC [10], removing DX5+CD1d-tetramer+ NKT cells from transferred CD4+ T cells still resulted in restoration of OC in mice lacking IL-4Rα on CD4+ T-cells, strongly suggesting that IL-4Rα-responsive Th2 cells also play a role in the development of disease [26]. Interestingly, tissue from human ulcerative colitis patients is dominated by non-classical NKT cells, differing from the dominance of invariant NKT cells in mice [18]. This discrepancy may suggest the challenges of translating animal findings to human clinical settings but may also signify the need for novel methods to define all subclasses of NKT cells in both experimental and clinical colitis.
More recently, the role of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) has grabbed the attention of researchers seeking to elucidate the initial responders to assault on the mucosa (Figure 1). In response to IL-25 production during OC, both NKT and the nuocyte population of ILC2s produced IL-13 [27]. Interestingly, the frequency of group 2 ILC (ILC2) populations expressing chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2) in intestinal biopsies was increased in patients newly diagnosed with UC, whereas the frequency of both ILC2 and group 1 ILC (ILC1) populations was increased in patients with established UC or CD [28]. A recent study reported increased proportions of ILC2s within the ileal fraction of CD patients, compared to healthy controls [29].
Several experimental challenges are associated with this pre-clinical model, including rapid weight loss and high levels of mortality following oxazolone administration in the acute model of disease [4]. In addition, administration of lower doses of oxazolone resulted in a dichotomous inflammatory response, characterised by the majority of mice dying rapidly, or selective survival of a minority of mice with only mild, transient disease [10]. In comparison, animals in the chronic model of OC given this same dose of oxazolone developed a sustained weight loss, with high mortality by day 9 post-administration [10]. Variation in responses and the need for optimisation in this model necessitates the use of large experimental mice numbers per treatment group, which may be costly and raise ethical issues.
As a model for human UC, oxazolone colitis aetiology does not fully reflect that in UC, exemplified by the difference in NKT subsets pivotal in both pathologies and the insignificance of IL-13 neutralisation in human UC. Although the chronic oxazolone colitis model leads to progressive colitis [10], human disease is characterised by periods of remission and repeated relapses. Researchers have broadened the use of the oxazolone colitis model in a novel humanised mouse model, transplanting human peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with UC into immune-deficient non-obese diabetic-severe combined immunodeficiency interleukin-2Rγ(null) mice (NOD-SCID IL2Rγ(null)), allowing for a more accurate assessment of the efficacy of therapeutics targeting the immunological responses underlying the development of IBD in patients [30].

2.2. TNBS-Induced Colitis

This pre-clinical model also utilises intrarectal administration of a haptenising agent in ethanol: 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS). Administration of 0.5 mg of TNBS in 50% ethanol to mice resulted in chronic transmural colitis, characterised by diarrhoea, weight loss, and rectal prolapse, pathology that mimics some characteristics of CD in humans [7]. Although one administration of TNBS resulted in acute chemical damage to the gut epithelium, inflammation was self-limiting, rather than the chronic inflammation seen in human disease [7]. Differing responses in mice are apparent in this acute model of colitis, varying according to several factors including age, genetic background, and TNBS dose [31]. To achieve chronic colitis, this model was developed by pre-sensitising the skin with 1% TNBS, followed by up to six repeated weekly intrarectal administrations of increasing doses of TNBS [17]. This model resembled the chronic phase of CD and was accompanied by production of IL-23 and IL-17 by lamina propria cells [32].
Isolated lamina propria CD4+ T cells from mice given TNBS secreted high levels of the Th1 cytokine interferon (IFN)-γ, resembling the cytokine profile produced by isolated lamina propria CD4+ T cells from CD patients [33]. This distinguished them from the Th2 profile of the same cells isolated from UC patients, or mice given oxazolone [33]. Although antibodies against IL-12, a pivotal cytokine for Th1 differentiation, abrogated established colitis and the initiation of TNBS-disease in BALB/c mice [7], TNBS-dependent colitis was exacerbated in IFN-γ-deficient mice on a BALB/c background [34].
The clinical importance of the TNBS model is demonstrated by the translation of Neurath’s anti-IL-12 antibody findings from TNBS murine experiments to successful human trials [35]. Importantly, the antibody used in these same studies was later found to react with the promiscuous p40 subunit shared by both IL-12 (a 70 kDa heterodimer of the p40 and a p35 subunit) and IL-23 (heterodimer of the p40 and a p19 subunit) (reviewed in [36]). Clinical trials with “brakinumab”, a monoclonal antibody recognising the human p40 subunit, downregulated both IL-12p70 and IL-23 secretion [37] and resulted in a clinical improvement in patients with active CD [38]. Drug development of brakinumab was discontinued due to the existence of another IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor, Stelera (ustekinumab), on the market, which significantly increased the induction and maintenance of clinical remission in patients with UC [39]. Despite the findings of exacerbated TNBS-colitis in mice lacking the p19 subunit of IL-23, novel therapies targeting IL-23 and the IL-23R have been developed and deemed successful when tested in clinical trials of patients with IBD [40].
The TNBS-colitis model has also been proven useful in understanding the mechanisms by which genetic mutations might result in IBD. This is exemplified by nucleotide-binding and oligomerisation-domain-containing 2 (NOD2)-deficient mice, designed to model one of three possible variations in the NOD2 gene, carried by approximately 40% of CD patients [41]. Although these mice did not develop spontaneous colitis, they displayed increased susceptibility to TNBS-colitis [42]. Following administration of TNBS, NOD2−/− mice exhibited increased lymphoid formations as well as increased IFN-γ production, paracellular permeability, and bacterial translocation in Peyer’s patches when compared to wild-type mice [43]. Studies demonstrating the absence of bacterial muramyl dipeptide recognition by macrophages from NOD2−/− mice [44] and the increased susceptibility of these animals to bacterial-induced intestinal inflammation [45] led to the suggestion that NOD2 plays a role in limiting inflammation in response to the intestinal bacterial flora. Moreover, a parallel study demonstrated that NOD2 negatively regulated Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2)-driven activation of excessive type 1 cytokine responses [46]. Indeed, the construction of mice that overexpress NOD2 demonstrated their resistance to TLR2 ligation as well as a significantly reduced resistance to TNBS-colitis [47].
A lack of spontaneous colitis in NOD2−/− mice was also associated with increased proportions of CD4+ regulatory cell populations bearing the latency associated peptide (LAP) within the lamina propria, when compared with wild-type mice [42]. Indeed, NOD2−/− recipients of lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMC) from ethanol-treated NOD2−/− donors that had been depleted of CD4+LAP+Foxp3 cells exhibited increased TNBS-induced weight loss when compared to NOD2−/− recipients of intact LPMCs, which did not develop colitis [42]. Interestingly, through co-housing experiments with NOD2−/− and wild-type mice, Amendola et al. demonstrated an influence of the endogenous gut microbiota on the proportion of LAP+ T cells in the lamina propria and susceptibility to TNBS colitis [42]. During co-housing with NOD2−/− mice, acquisition of Rickenellaceae by wild-type mice was associated with increased proportions of CD4+LAP+Foxp3 T cells and less severe TNBS-colitis [48]. The presence of NOD2 variants in 15% of the healthy population and the failure of NOD2-deficient mice to develop spontaneous colitis confirmed the multigenic nature of CD [41]. However, these findings using the TNBS-colitis model strongly suggest that environmental factors impact genetic susceptibility to IBD via their impact on the microbiota. Indeed, there is now a focus on associating IBD implicated genes with variants in the gut microbiota to identify possible mechanisms by which host–gut microbial interactions influence human disease [49,50,51].
Like the oxazolone model, variation in responses to TNBS necessitates optimisation and the need to use large experimental mouse numbers per treatment group [31,52]. Variation in responses can arise due to the differing colitogenic activity of TNBS lots, TNBS dose, mouse strain, and the microbial status of the animal facility [17]. In addition, the high rates of mortality that can occur in susceptible strains [31], or following repeated administrations of TNBS [53], raise ethical implications over the use of this pre-clinical model of disease.

2.3. Dextran-Sulphate-Sodium-Induced Colitis

Dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) colitis is the most widely used experimental murine model of colitis, established by Okayasu in 1990 through the administration of DSS with a molecular weight of 40–50 kDa in drinking water [8]. DSS is thought to form nano-lipid vesicles with medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) in the colon, which fuse with colonocyte membranes and increase inflammatory cytokine levels [54]. A high-fat diet rich in MCFAs exacerbated weight loss, inflammatory cytokine expression, and colon shortening in this model, with dodecanoic acid favouring disruption of intestinal barrier function and increased vesicle formation in vitro [54]. One day after administration, DSS particles were present systemically in Kupffer cells of the liver, in macrophages of the mesenteric lymph node, and in the lamina propria of the large intestine [55]. DSS administration was also characterised by erosion of the intestinal epithelium, inflammatory infiltration of the large intestine, and dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiome [8]. While these features are similar to those found in human disease, the transmural inflammation apparent in TNBS-colitis is absent in this model [56]. Although repeated rounds of DSS can be administered to provide the pattern of remitting, relapsing inflammation in human IBD, some of the limitations of this model include inter-batch variability of DSS and the need to optimise DSS dose, given the impact of the intestinal microbiome on disease [56,57].
The acute inflammatory response in DSS-colitis was typified by increased expression of IL-1β, IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the colon (Figure 2) [58].
Although prototypical Th2-type biased BALB/c mice did not develop chronic colitis, disease was characterised by Th1 and Th2 cytokines [59] and was absent in prototypical Th1-type C57BL/6 mice lacking the Th2 cytokine IL-4 [60]. Using this model, plasma levels of haptoglobin were found to correlate well with human clinical symptoms of IBD [61].
DSS-colitis can be induced in immunodeficient mice including recombination-activating gene (RAG)-1-deficient and severe combined immune deficient (SCID) mice, suggesting the dispensability of the adaptive immune system in initiating disease [62,63]. Although Kim et al. demonstrated colitis induction in RAG-1-deficient mice, the resultant mild colitis in these mice compared to their wild-type counterparts insinuates that lymphocytes may be necessary for subsequent colitis progression [63]. Histological assessment of biopsy specimens from IBD patients correlated UC and CD with severe mononuclear cell infiltration and basal plasmacytosis (plasma B cells) [64]. In the acute phase of the DSS-colitis model, this infiltrate consisted of innate macrophage, neutrophil, and eosinophil populations recruited following increased cytokine and chemokine expression [60].
Elevated expression of IL-17 and IL-23 was reported in IBD patients and in DSS-colitis, where expression of the two cytokines was intertwined (Figure 2) [37,65,66,67,68,69]. The use of the DSS-colitis model to test the role of these cytokines in disease has revolutionised not only the possible interventions available for patients but has also developed our understanding of mucosal immunology. At steady state, the p19 subunit of IL-23 is highly expressed within Peyer’s patches and the thymus, as well as in polarised Th1 cells, activated macrophages, and dendritic cell populations derived from peripheral blood [70]. IL-23 induced proliferation of memory T cells and elevated secretion of IL-17 in vitro [71]. Subsequently, IL-23 signalling within intestinal epithelial cells was found to play an important role in protection against DSS colitis by regulating regenerating-islet-derived protein 3-beta (Reg3β)-dependent control of flagellated intestinal bacterial abundance and promoting IL-22 production [72]. Indeed DSS-colitis was exacerbated in IL-22-deficient mice [73] and blockade of IL-22 expression delayed recovery from DSS-colitis and exacerbated disease scores [74].
Interestingly, the IL-23 receptor was upregulated in lamina propria CD4+ T cells from both UC and CD patients [75]. While upregulated IL-23p19 mRNA expression correlated with increased IL-17 mRNA expression in UC patients, it correlated with increased IFN-γ mRNA expression in CD patients [75]. Both the IL-17 family members IL-17A and IL-17F co-ordinate local tissue inflammation by regulating the release of proinflammatory cytokines and the recruitment of neutrophils [76]. Thus, activation of the transcription factor retinoid-acid-related orphan nuclear receptor gamma (RORγt) in CD4+ T helper 17 (Th17) cells led to the production of IL-17, IL-12, IL-21, and IL-23 as well as the upregulation of IL-23R (reviewed in [77]) (Figure 2). In vitro culture of CD and UC mucosal tissue demonstrated enhanced production of IL-21, with IL-21 inhibition attenuating intestinal inflammation as well as the Th17 response in DSS-exposed mice [78].
However, DSS-colitis was shown to be independent of the production of IL-17 within lamina propria CD4+ T cells [79], where neutralisation of IL-17A in prototypical Th2 biased BALB/c mice aggravated disease [80]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that production of IL-17A by specialised γδ+CD4+ T cells was shown to regulate intestinal permeability and injury in the DSS model, independently of IL-23 signalling [81]. Paradoxically, although one study had demonstrated that IL-17A-deficiency in prototypical Th1-type C57BL/6 mice reduced DSS colitis [82], a separate study using IL-17A- and IL-17F-deficient mice demonstrated a deleterious role for IL-17F in the development of disease [83]. In this latter study, both T-cell-derived IL-17F and colonic-resident-cell-derived IL-17F controlled antimicrobial-protein-dependant changes to the commensal microbiota, as well as the expansion of anti-inflammatory regulatory T cell populations in the colon [83].
In UC patients and the DSS model, high levels of IL-17F were associated with an abundance of Fusobacterium nucleatum, an opportunistic bacterium that enhanced pro-inflammatory cytokine production and disrupted the mucosal barrier via the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-kB) pathway [84]. These studies explained the poor efficacy of anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody and anti-IL-17 receptor monoclonal antibody treatment of CD patients, both of which worsened disease [85,86]. Although neutralisation of IL-17A and IL-17F with bimekizumab appeared efficacious in alleviating tissue inflammation in patients with mild or moderate-to-severe psoriasis [87,88], it is yet to be tested in clinical trials with IBD patients.
A potent pro-inflammatory cytokine, TNF-α, was highly upregulated during DSS-colitis and was elevated in intestinal biopsies from CD patients [89]. Mice engineered to express elevated TNF-α levels (TNFDARE mice) developed spontaneous intestinal inflammation resembling human CD [90]. Although neutralisation of TNF-α had detrimental effects on inflammation during acute DSS-induced colitis, it significantly improved histological scores in chronic DSS-induced colitis [91]. TNF-α was later proposed to regulate epithelial cell apoptosis, neutrophil infiltration, pro-inflammatory cytokine production, and systemic inflammation in response to the intestinal microbiota through TNF-α receptor 1 [92]. Since the approval of the anti-TNFα drug infliximab for treatment of CD in 1998 and subsequent approval for use in UC in 2006, anti-TNF-α therapy has become the cornerstone of treatment strategies for IBD. One single administration of infliximab induced clinical remission in 48% of CD patients, compared to 4% in the placebo group [93]. However, treatment failures with anti-TNF-α are common [94], and there have been concerns with potential complications from therapy, including an increased risk of malignancies [95]. Interestingly, a recent study correlated the responsiveness of IBD patients to TNF-α therapy with bacteria diversity, but not fungal diversity, in the faecal microbiome [96].

3. Spontaneous Colitis

Several murine models of spontaneous colitis have also been used to model IBD triggered by dysbiosis in the gut microbiota and specific IBD-related genes, reviewed in brief below.

3.1. Iκκ-γ (NEMO) Deficiency Colitis

Conditional ablation of the NF-kB essential modulator (NEMO), also known as I-kappa-B kinase gamma (Iκκ-γ), within the intestinal epithelium, resulted in spontaneous colitis in mice [6]. Chronic disease in intestinal-epithelial-cell-specific NEMO-deficient mice was associated with TNFR1-dependent colonic epithelial cell death, compromised epithelial integrity, bacterial translocation in the colon, immune cell infiltration, and increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α [6]. Absence of disease in double-deficient (NEMOIEC−KO + MYD88−/−) mice, lacking NEMO and the important bacterial sensor myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MYD88), supported a role for the gut microbiota in driving colitis [6]. Indeed NEMOIEC−KO mice raised under germ-free conditions did not develop spontaneous colitis, whereas co-housing of these mice with specific pathogen-free animals restored disease [97]. Two-week-old NEMOIEC−KO depleted of beta-defensin-3, an antimicrobial peptide (AMP) produced by intestinal Paneth cells following bacterial sensing [6], developed spontaneous colitis. These findings supported genome-wide DNA copy number profiling studies, which associated a lower copy number of the human homologue of this murine defensin, human beta defensin-2, with a higher risk of colonic CD [98].
Ablation of the NF-κB p65 subunit, encoded by the RELA gene, resulted in a loss of Paneth cells but an absence of spontaneous colitis, suggesting that the epithelial protective effects of NEMO signalling may be NF-κβ independent [99]. These authors suggested a therapeutic potential for receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) inhibition in IBD patients, after demonstrating that RIPK1 prevented epithelial cell death and colitis development in NEMOIEC−KO mice [99]. Although this pre-clinical model is of use to study the interactions between the intestinal microbiome and spontaneous colitis, NEMO-deficient patients exhibit a variety of mucocutaneous diseases, and it is feasible that they may also carry concomitant mutations in IBD-associated genes [100].

3.2. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) Deficiency Colitis

Although IBD is common among adults, childhood IBD constitutes about a quarter of all patients with IBD [101]. Approximately 15% of childhood IBD occurs in children <6 years old and is termed very early onset IBD (VEO-IBD) [102]. While most childhood IBD cases are polygenic in nature, many children with VEO-IBD have an underlying monogenetic disorder that results in severe enterocolitis, including mutations in IL-10 and/or IL-10R (reviewed in [103]). Mice deficient in IL-10 develop spontaneous enterocolitis, characterised by progressive cellular infiltration of the cecum, colon, rectum, and small intestine, with transmural lesions and a high incidence of colorectal adenocarcinomas observed in 6-month-old mice [5,104]. Mice lacking IL-10 receptor β also developed spontaneous enterocolitis [105,106]. However, this receptor is shared with other type II cytokine receptors including those specific for IL-22, IL-26, and lambda interferons, in addition to IL-10 [107].
Interestingly, IL-23 deficiency (IL-12p19−/−), but not IL-12 deficiency (IL-12p35−/−), abrogated spontaneous colitis in IL-10−/− mice [108]. These findings demonstrate the importance of IL-23 instead of IL-12 in the development of experimental IL-10−/− colitis. As previously discussed (under DSS colitis), IL-23 synergises with IL-17, IL-21, and IL-22 to drive colon inflammation in the event of defective immune regulation mechanisms. Work from this group suggested a role for IL-23-dependent production of IL-17 and IL-6 in accelerating IBD in a T cell transfer model (reviewed below) [108]. Subsequently, IL-22 was found to be frequently co-expressed with IL-17A, with the cellular source of IL-22 playing an important role in determining a role in host defence, or disease pathogenesis (reviewed in [109]). IL-10 inhibited IL-22 secretion by macrophages and T cells [110], and spontaneous colitis was prevented in mice lacking IL-10 and IL-22 [111]. In the latter study, IL-22 was expressed in the lamina propria by CD4+ T cells and populations of innate lymphoid cells [111].
An important role for the gut microbiota in influencing the general enterocolitis seen in IL-10-deficient mice was implicated by a lack of disease in mice housed in specific pathogen-free conditions, or in germ-free conditions [5,112]. Treatment of IL-10-deficient mice with two different antibiotics, both shown to improve scores in patients with Crohn’s disease [113,114], attenuated the development of spontaneous colitis [115]. Similar to IBD patients, colitic IL-10-deficient mice exhibited a markedly reduced species diversity in their faecal microbiome when compared to disease-free controls [111,112,116]. In addition, IL-10/IL-22 double-deficient mice lacking colitis exhibited higher microbial diversity when compared to IL-10-deficient mice [111].
Although infection with Helicobacter species was found to drive enterocolitis in IL-10-deficient mice [117,118], adult germfree IL-10-deficient mice in a specific pathogen-free (SPF) environment lacking Helicobacter developed more severe colitis when compared to IL-10-deficient mice colonised at weaning [112]. Similarly, taxon-based analysis of the microbiota revealed that levels of the Helicobacter genus inversely correlated with severe colitis in IL-10-deficient mice, demonstrating disease is not dependent on co-colonisation with this pathobiont [111]. Mono-colonisation of germfree IL-10-deficient mice with Enterococcus faecalis triggered enterocolitis [119], with subsequent studies showing distal colitis in Enterococcus faecalis mono-colonised IL-10-deficient mice and a mild cecal inflammation in Escherichia coli mono-colonised animals [120]. Administration of Lactobacillus species from birth prevented the development of enterocolitis in IL-10-deficient mice [121] and administration of an 8-strain probiotic to IL-10-deficient mice with established inflammation improved disease by normalising the epithelial barrier [122]. Although antibiotic treatment provides an attractive candidate for the treatment of colitis in patients with IL-10 deficiency, a recent study in IL-10-deficient animals demonstrated that intermittent antibiotic exposure accelerated the development of severe colitis in male mice [123].
Repeated intravenous or subcutaneous administration of recombinant human IL-10 (rhIL-10) to patients with active steroid-resistant Crohn’s disease [124] or mild to moderately active Crohn’s disease [125] was well tolerated and resulted in an improvement in disease scores, while subcutaneous administration of rhIL-10 to healthy patients and those with CD resulted in a reversible decline in haemoglobin and thrombocyte counts, or an increased production of IFN-γ [126,127,128,129]. Due to these undesirable side effects, researchers engineered L. lactis bacteria [130,131] and targeted the transcytosis pathway activated by the intestinal pathogen Vibrio cholerae with a novel fusion protein [132] to deliver IL-10 to the gastrointestinal tract. Daily intragastric delivery of L. lactis modified to contain the murine IL-10 prevented the onset of colitis in IL-10-deficient mice more efficiently than systemic delivery of recombinant murine IL-10 [130]. An absence of systemic side effects in a small phase 1 clinical trial of CD patients with L. lactis, modified to contain the human IL-10 sequence, demonstrated the safety of this approach [133]. Although the IL-10 fusion protein and an invasive L. lactis strain carrying the IL-10 plasmid both alleviated colitis in a range of colitis models, including IL-10-deficient mice [131,132], IBD patients can have raised levels of IL-10 in serum [134] and may not benefit from IL-10 therapy [129,135].

4. Immune Cell Induced Colitis

T-Cell Adoptive Transfer Model

The transfer of murine CD45RBhighCD4+ T cells from healthy donors to severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) (Figure 3) mice resulted in the development of a lethal wasting disease, an influx of inflammatory cells, and increased inflammatory cytokine production in the colon of the recipient [9].
The resulting chronic colitis that developed within 5–8 weeks was T cell dose-dependent, and despite the presence of transferred T cells in several organs, significant pathology was limited to the large intestine [9]. Interestingly, the transfer of naïve CD45RBhighCD4+ cells into SCID mice with a reduced microbiota significantly reduced colitis when compared to SCID mice housed in SPF conditions [136]. Restoration of T-cell proliferation in germ-free RAG-deficient mice following reconstitution with cecal bacterial lysate-pulsed dendritic cells and induction of colitis in SPF RAG-deficient mice following the transfer of T cells specific for a microbiota flagellin antigen cemented the role of the commensal microbiota in driving disease in this model [137].
Although both CD45RBlow and CD45RBhighCD4+ T cells homed to the intraepithelial and lamina propria compartments of both the small and large intestine [136], CD45RBlow or total unfractionated CD4+ T-cells were incapable of inducing colitis [9]. Following the discovery that the CD45RBlow population comprised a population of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells that could cure colitis in SCID or RAG1-deficient recipients of CD4+CD45RBhigh T cells [138], the T-cell transfer model of colitis was further refined by reconstitution of SCID mice with CD25-depleted CD4+ cells [139]. Although colitis in this model was accredited to the production of the Th1 cytokine IFN-γ [9,140], enhanced emergence of IL-17A+IFN-γ population of T cells and suppression of populations of Foxp3+ and IL-10-producing regulatory T cells was attributed to IL-23R signalling in T cells [141]. Similarly, an absence of IL-23 in IL-12p19-deficient RAG-deficient recipients resulted in significantly decreased levels of proinflammatory cytokine production in the intestine [142]. While intestinal inflammation was significantly reduced in the RAG-deficient recipients of IL-23R-deficient CD45RBhighCD4+ T cells, or p19−/−RAG−/− recipients of CD4+CD25CD45RBhigh T cells, these mice still exhibited systemic inflammation and weight loss [141,142], suggesting a tissue-restricted activity of IL-23.
Using IFN-γ-deficient RAG−/− recipients, IFN-γ was subsequently shown to be dispensable for the induction and progression of CD4+CD25CD45RBhigh T cell transfer colitis [143]. Inflammatory responses in these recipients favoured IL-17A production, where neutralisation of IL-17A/F significantly reduced weight loss and histopathological score in these animals [143]. A population of CD4+IL-17F+ T cells was sufficient to induce colitis in RAG1-deficient recipients, where the transition of these precursors to Th1-like cells was an absolute requirement for disease [144]. Interestingly, IL-21 signalling was recently proposed to dampen T-cell transfer colitis by reducing IL-17A production and augmenting IL-22 production in populations of ILC3s [145].
Intriguingly, RAG-deficient (RAG−/−) recipients lacking signalling through the type 1 interferon α/β receptor subunit 1 (RAG−/−IFNAR1−/−) developed severe accelerated colitis following T-cell transfer of CD45RBhighCD4+ T cells from wild-type mice [146]. Co-transfer of CD4+CD25+Foxp3GFP+ regulatory T cells (Treg) and CD45RBhighCD4+ T cells to RAG−/−IFNAR1−/− recipients resulted in a loss of Treg expansion, Treg stability, and suppressive function when compared to RAG−/− recipients [146]. Kole et al. revealed an important role of IFNAR signalling on RAG−/− hematopoietic cells to suppress colitis in this model [146]. Subsequently, NK cells were revealed as an important regulator of colitis in this system through the action of perforin on Th1 immune responses [147]. Despite this immune-regulatory role, intraepithelial NK cells were the cellular source of IFN-γ in germ-free SCID colonised with altered Schaedler’s flora and were proposed to contribute to the pathogenesis of colitis in these mice [148]. In addition, NKGD receptor signalling on NK cells, activated macrophages, activated CD8+ αβ T cells, γδ+ T cells, and subsets of NKT cells was proposed to play a role in initiating colitis [149]. Recent evidence suggests that 6-mercaptopurine, a mainstay for IBD patients to maintain disease remission, mediated apoptosis of NK cells and decreased NK cell activity and number in the intestinal biopsies of CD patients [150].
An advantage to this model is the ability to examine early immunological events associated with gut inflammation, including regulatory T cells responses. In addition, the apparent inflammatory response in both the small bowel as well as the colon makes this model ideal for the study of CD [140]. However, the SCID and RAG−/− recipients used in this model spontaneously develop T and B cell populations as they age [151], while NK cells from RAG−/− mice are reported to exhibit altered function and fitness [152]. The lower prevalence of human SCID patients, estimated at 1 in 58,000 new-borns in the United States (0.0017%) [153], compared to a higher incidence of CD (estimated at 10.7 cases per 100,000 individuals in the United States (0.0107%) [101], points to a factorial model of CD induction/development, independent of primary immunodeficiencies in T and B cells. This excludes this model as an exact model of CD, despite the many similarities.

5. Conclusions

Although several murine findings have contributed immensely to IBD research, the translation of mouse work to human applications should be cautionary to all researchers due to some reasons mentioned below:
  • Mice and humans differ in their immune responses due to different immune system development, immune activation, and immune responses to similar antigens [154].
  • Mouse experiments tend to not recapitulate the genetic and environmental diversity inherent in human populations, although these can be closely modelled through diet, microbiome, and environmental manipulations.
  • To determine the importance of certain genes in disease pathology, researchers tend to depend on transgenic knockout mice or antibody depletion, whereas human disease risk is rarely associated with the complete loss of function of a single gene or protein.
  • Most pre-clinical murine experiments fail to account for variability in response to a therapeutic intervention that may appear in human trials due to genetic polymorphisms. This may be addressed through the use of outbred mice but may have ethical and economic implications, due to the likely need to use a large sample size to achieve statistical significance between treatment groups [155].
Despite these limitations, murine pre-clinical models still present the opportunity to discover potential mechanisms that drive IBD, if experimentation considers the different caveats associated with each model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, B.K. and K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, B.K.; writing—review and editing, B.K., K.S. and W.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the EUROPEAN COMMISSION, grant number 65739, and the NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION, grant number 99074.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

IBDInflammatory bowel disease
CDCrohn’s disease
UCUlcerative colitis
TNBSTrinitrobenzene sulfonic acid
DSSDextran sulphate sodium
OCOxazolone colitis
NKTNatural killer T cell
IL-Interleukin
TGFTransforming growth factor
Infl.ECInflamed epithelial cells
HECHealthy epithelial cells
Dam.ECDamaged epithelial cell
CDCluster of differentiation
ILCInnate lymphoid cell
NOD2Nucleotide-binding and oligomerisation domain-containing 2
SCIDSevere combined immunodeficiency
NF-κBNuclear factor kappa B
NEMONF-kB essential modulator (NEMO)
Iκκ-γI-kappa-B kinase gamma
RAGRecombination-activating gene

References

  1. Ng, S.C.; Shi, H.Y.; Hamidi, N.; Underwood, F.E.; Tang, W.; Benchimol, E.I.; Panaccione, R.; Ghosh, S.; Wu, J.C.Y.; Chan, F.K.L.; et al. Worldwide incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in the 21st century: A systematic review of population-based studies. Lancet 2017, 390, 2769–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Alatab, S.; Sepanlou, S.G.; Ikuta, K.; Vahedi, H.; Bisignano, C.; Safiri, S.; Sadeghi, A.; Nixon, M.R.; Abdoli, A.; Abolhassani, H.; et al. The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kappelman, M.D.; Rifas–Shiman, S.L.; Porter, C.Q.; Ollendorf, D.A.; Sandler, R.S.; Galanko, J.A.; Finkelstein, J.A. Direct Health Care Costs of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis in US Children and Adults. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 1907–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Boirivant, M.; Fuss, I.J.; Chu, A.; Strober, W. Oxazolone Colitis: A Murine Model of T Helper Cell Type 2 Colitis Treatable with Antibodies to Interleukin 4. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 188, 1929–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kühn, R.; Löhler, J.; Rennick, D.; Rajewsky, K.; Müller, W. Interleukin-10-deficient mice develop chronic enterocolitis. Cell 1993, 75, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nenci, A.; Becker, C.; Wullaert, A.; Gareus, R.; Van Loo, G.; Danese, S.; Huth, M.; Nikolaev, A.; Neufert, C.; Madison, B.; et al. Epithelial NEMO links innate immunity to chronic intestinal inflammation. Nature 2007, 446, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Neurath, M.F.; Fuss, I.; Kelsall, B.L.; Stüber, E.; Strober, W. Antibodies to interleukin 12 abrogate established experimental colitis in mice. J. Exp. Med. 1995, 182, 1281–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Okayasu, I.; Hatakeyama, S.; Yamada, M.; Ohkusa, T.; Inagaki, Y.; Nakaya, R. A novel method in the induction of reliable experimental acute and chronic ulcerative colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 1990, 98, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Powrie, F.; Leach, M.W.; Mauze, S.; Caddie, L.B.; Coffman, R.L. Phenotypically distinct subsets of CD4+ T cells induce or protect from chronic intestinal inflammation in C. B-17 scid mice. Int. Immunol. 1993, 5, 1461–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Heller, F.; Fuss, I.J.; E Nieuwenhuis, E.; Blumberg, R.S.; Strober, W. Oxazolone Colitis, a Th2 Colitis Model Resembling Ulcerative Colitis, Is Mediated by IL-13-Producing NK-T Cells. Immunity 2002, 17, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, J.; Zhao, J.; Nakaguchi, T.; Gregersen, H. Biomechanical changes in oxazolone-induced colitis in BALB/C mice. J. Biomech. 2009, 42, 811–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kasaian, M.T.; Page, K.M.; Fish, S.; Brennan, A.; Cook, T.A.; Moreira, K.; Zhang, M.; Jesson, M.; Marquette, K.; Agostinelli, R.; et al. Therapeutic activity of an interleukin-4/interleukin-13 dual antagonist on oxazolone-induced colitis in mice. Immunology 2014, 143, 416–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, X.; Ouyang, Q.; Luo, W.J. Oxazolone-induced murine model of ulcerative colitis. Chin. J. Dig. Dis. 2004, 5, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Strober, W.; Fuss, I.J. Proinflammatory Cytokines in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 1756–1767.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fuss, I.J.; Strober, W. The role of IL-13 and NK T cells in experimental and human ulcerative colitis. Mucosal Immunol. 2008, 1 (Suppl. 1), S31–S33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kiesler, P.; Fuss, I.J.; Strober, W. Experimental Models of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2015, 1, 154–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wirtz, S.; Popp, V.; Kindermann, M.; Gerlach, K.; Weigmann, B.; Fichtner-Feigl, S.; Neurath, M.F. Chemically induced mouse models of acute and chronic intestinal inflammation. Nat. Protoc. 2017, 12, 1295–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fuss, I.J.; Heller, F.; Boirivant, M.; Leon, F.; Yoshida, M.; Fichtner-Feigl, S.; Yang, Z.; Exley, M.; Kitani, A.; Blumberg, R.S.; et al. Nonclassical CD1d-restricted NK T cells that produce IL-13 characterize an atypical Th2 response in ulcerative colitis. J. Clin. Investig. 2004, 113, 1490–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hoving, J.C.; Cutler, A.; Leeto, M.; Horsnell, W.G.C.; Dewals, B.G.; Nieuwenhuizen, N.; Brombacher, F. Interleukin 13-mediated colitis in the absence of IL-4Rα signalling. Gut 2017, 66, 2037–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Karmele, E.P.; Pasricha, T.S.; Ramalingam, T.R.; Thompson, R.W.; Iii, R.L.G.; Knilans, K.J.; Hegen, M.; Farmer, M.; Jin, F.; Kleinman, A.; et al. Anti-IL-13Rα2 therapy promotes recovery in a murine model of inflammatory bowel disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2019, 12, 1174–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fichtner-Feigl, S.; Strober, W.; Kawakami, K.; Puri, R.K.; Kitani, A. IL-13 signaling through the IL-13α2 receptor is involved in induction of TGF-β1 production and fibrosis. Nat. Med. 2006, 12, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Palamides, P.; Jodeleit, H.; Föhlinger, M.; Beigel, F.; Herbach, N.; Mueller, T.; Wolf, E.; Siebeck, M.; Gropp, R. A mouse model for ulcerative colitis based on NOD-scid IL2R gammanull mice reconstituted with peripheral blood mononuclear cells from affected individuals. Dis. Model. Mech. 2016, 9, 985–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Reinisch, W.; Panes, J.; Khurana, S.; Toth, G.; Hua, F.; Comer, G.M.; Hinz, M.; Page, K.; O’Toole, M.; Moorehead, T.M.; et al. Anrukinzumab, an anti-interleukin 13 monoclonal antibody, in active UC: Efficacy and safety from a phase IIa randomised multicentre study. Gut 2015, 64, 894–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Danese, S.; Rudziński, J.; Brandt, W.; Dupas, J.-L.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Bouhnik, Y.; Kleczkowski, D.; Uebel, P.; Lukas, M.; Knutsson, M.; et al. Tralokinumab for moderate-to-severe UC: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIa study. Gut 2015, 64, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kronenberg, M.; Gapin, L. The unconventional lifestyle of NKT cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hoving, J.C.; Kirstein, F.; Nieuwenhuizen, N.; Fick, L.C.; Hobeika, E.; Reth, M.; Brombacher, F. B Cells That Produce Immunoglobulin E Mediate Colitis in BALB/c Mice. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Camelo, A.; Barlow, J.L.; Drynan, L.F.; Neill, D.R.; Ballantyne, S.J.; Wong, S.H.; Pannell, R.; Gao, W.; Wrigley, K.; Sprenkle, J.; et al. Blocking IL-25 signalling protects against gut inflammation in a type-2 model of colitis by suppressing nuocyte and NKT derived IL-13. J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 47, 1198–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Forkel, M.; Van Tol, S.; Höög, C.; Michaëlsson, J.; Almer, S.; Mjösberg, J. Distinct Alterations in the Composition of Mucosal Innate Lymphoid Cells in Newly Diagnosed and Established Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2019, 13, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Salvo, C.; Buela, K.-A.; Creyns, B.; Corridoni, D.; Rana, N.; Wargo, H.L.; Cominelli, C.L.; Delaney, P.G.; Rodriguez-Palacios, A.; Cominelli, F.; et al. NOD2 drives early IL-33–dependent expansion of group 2 innate lymphoid cells during Crohn’s disease–like ileitis. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e140624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nolte, T.; Zadeh-Khorasani, M.; Safarov, O.; Rueff, F.; Gülberg, V.; Herbach, N.; Wollenberg, A.; Mueller, T.; Siebeck, M.; Wolf, E.; et al. Oxazolone and ethanol induce colitis in non-obese diabetic-severe combined immunodeficiency interleukin-2Rγnull mice engrafted with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2013, 172, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Velde, A.A.T.; Verstege, M.I.; Hommes, D.W. Critical appraisal of the current practice in murine TNBS-induced colitis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2006, 12, 995–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fichtner-Feigl, S.; Fuss, I.J.; Preiß, J.; Strober, W.; Kitani, A. Treatment of murine Th1- and Th2-mediated inflammatory bowel disease with NF- B decoy oligonucleotides. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 3057–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fuss, I.J.; Neurath, M.; Boirivant, M.; Klein, J.S.; De La Motte, C.; A Strong, S.; Fiocchi, C.; Strober, W. Disparate CD4+ lamina propria (LP) lymphokine secretion profiles in inflammatory bowel disease. Crohn’s disease LP cells manifest increased secretion of IFN-gamma, whereas ulcerative colitis LP cells manifest increased secretion of IL-5. J. Immunol. 1996, 157, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Dohi, T.; Fujihashi, K.; Rennert, P.D.; Iwatani, K.; Kiyono, H.; McGhee, J.R. Hapten-induced Colitis Is Associated with Colonic Patch Hypertrophy and T Helper Cell 2–Type Responses. J. Exp. Med. 1999, 189, 1169–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Croxford, A.L.; Kulig, P.; Becher, B. IL-12-and IL-23 in health and disease. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2014, 25, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Langrish, C.L.; McKenzie, B.S.; Wilson, N.J.; Malefyt, R.D.W.; Kastelein, R.A.; Cua, D.J. IL-12 and IL-23: Master regulators of innate and adaptive immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2004, 202, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fuss, I.J.; Becker, C.; Yang, Z.; Groden, C.; Hornung, R.L.; Heller, F.; Neurath, M.F.; Strober, W.; Mannon, P.J. Both IL-12p70 and IL-23 are synthesized during active Crohnʼs disease and are down-regulated by treatment with anti-IL-12 p40 monoclonal antibody. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2006, 12, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mannon, P.J.; Fuss, I.J.; Mayer, L.; Elson, C.O.; Sandborn, W.J.; Present, D.; Dolin, B.; Goodman, N.; Groden, C.; Hornung, R.L.; et al. Anti–Interleukin-12 Antibody for Active Crohn’s Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 2069–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sands, B.E.; Sandborn, W.J.; Panaccione, R.; O’Brien, C.D.; Zhang, H.; Johanns, J.; Adedokun, O.J.; Li, K.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Van Assche, G.; et al. Ustekinumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 1201–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sewell, G.W.; Kaser, A. Interleukin-23 in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Implications for Therapeutic Intervention. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2022, 16, ii3–ii19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hugot, J.-P.; Laurent-Puig, P.; Gower, C.; Olson, J.M.; Lee, J.C.; Beaugerie, L.; Naom, I.; Dupas, J.-L.; Van Gossum, A.; Af, G.D.T.D.; et al. Mapping of a susceptibility locus for Crohn’s disease on chromosome 16. Nature 1996, 379, 821–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Amendola, A.; Butera, A.; Sanchez, M.; Strober, W.; Boirivant, M. Nod2 deficiency is associated with an increased mucosal immunoregulatory response to commensal microorganisms. Mucosal Immunol. 2014, 7, 391–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Barreau, F.; Meinzer, U.; Chareyre, F.; Berrebi, D.; Kawakita, M.; Dussaillant, M.; Foligné, B.; Ollendorff, V.; Heyman, M.; Bonacorsi, S.; et al. CARD15/NOD2 Is Required for Peyer’s Patches Homeostasis in Mice. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kobayashi, K.S.; Chamaillard, M.; Ogura, Y.; Henegariu, O.; Inohara, N.; Nuñez, G.; Flavell, R.A. Nod2-Dependent Regulation of Innate and Adaptive Immunity in the Intestinal Tract. Science 2005, 307, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Maeda, S.; Hsu, L.-C.; Liu, H.; Bankston, L.A.; Iimura, M.; Kagnoff, M.F.; Eckmann, L.; Karin, M. Nod2 Mutation in Crohn’s Disease Potentiates NF-κB Activity and IL-1ß Processing. Science 2005, 307, 734–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Watanabe, T.; Kitani, A.; Murray, P.J.; Wakatsuki, Y.; Fuss, I.J.; Strober, W. Nucleotide Binding Oligomerization Domain 2 Deficiency Leads to Dysregulated TLR2 Signaling and Induction of Antigen-Specific Colitis. Immunity 2006, 25, 473–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, Z.; Fuss, I.J.; Watanabe, T.; Asano, N.; Davey, M.P.; Rosenbaum, J.T.; Strober, W.; Kitani, A. NOD2 Transgenic Mice Exhibit Enhanced MDP-Mediated Down-Regulation of TLR2 Responses and Resistance to Colitis Induction. Gastroenterology 2007, 133, 1510–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Butera, A.; Di Paola, M.; Pavarini, L.; Strati, F.; Pindo, M.; Sanchez, M.; Cavalieri, D.; Boirivant, M.; De Filippo, C. Nod2 Deficiency in mice is Associated with Microbiota Variation Favouring the Expansion of mucosal CD4+ LAP+ Regulatory Cells. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cohen, L.J.; Cho, J.H.; Gevers, D.; Chu, H. Genetic Factors and the Intestinal Microbiome Guide Development of Microbe-Based Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 2174–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hall, A.B.; Tolonen, A.; Xavier, R.J. Human genetic variation and the gut microbiome in disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2017, 18, 690–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hu, S.; Vila, A.V.; Gacesa, R.; Collij, V.; Stevens, C.; Fu, J.M.; Wong, I.; E Talkowski, M.; A Rivas, M.; Imhann, F.; et al. Whole exome sequencing analyses reveal gene–microbiota interactions in the context of IBD. Gut 2021, 70, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Antoniou, E.; Margonis, G.A.; Angelou, A.; Pikouli, A.; Argiri, P.; Karavokyros, I.; Papalois, A.; Pikoulis, E. The TNBS-induced colitis animal model: An overview. Ann. Med. Surg. 2016, 11, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Abad, C.; Martinez, C.; Juarranz, M.G.; Arranz, A.; Leceta, J.; Delgado, M.; Gomariz, R.P. Therapeutic effects of vasoactive intestinal peptide in the trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid mice model of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2003, 124, 961–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Laroui, H.; Ingersoll, S.A.; Liu, H.C.; Baker, M.T.; Ayyadurai, S.; Charania, M.A.; Laroui, F.; Yan, Y.; Sitaraman, S.V.; Merlin, D. Dextran Sodium Sulfate (DSS) Induces Colitis in Mice by Forming Nano-Lipocomplexes with Medium-Chain-Length Fatty Acids in the Colon. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kitajima, S.; Takuma, S.; Morimoto, M. Tissue Distribution of Dextran Sulfate Sodium(DSS) in the Acute Phase of Murine DSS-Induced Colitis. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 1999, 61, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chassaing, B.; Aitken, J.D.; Malleshappa, M.; Vijay-Kumar, M. Dextran Sulfate Sodium (DSS)-Induced Colitis in Mice. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 2014, 104, 15.25.1–15.25.14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Perše, M.; Cerar, A. Dextran Sodium Sulphate Colitis Mouse Model: Traps and Tricks. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 718617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kim, S.H.; Kwon, D.; Son, S.W.; Bin Jeong, T.; Lee, S.; Kwak, J.-H.; Cho, J.-Y.; Hwang, D.Y.; Seo, M.-S.; Kim, K.S.; et al. Inflammatory responses of C57BL/6NKorl mice to dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis: Comparison between three C57BL/6 N sub-strains. Lab. Anim. Res. 2021, 37, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. A Dieleman, L.; Palmen, M.J.H.J.; Akol, H.; Bloemena, E.; Peña, A.S.; Meuwissen, S.G.M.; Van Rees, E.P. Chronic experimental colitis induced by dextran sulphate sodium (DSS) is characterized by Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1998, 114, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Stevceva, L.; Pavli, P.; Husband, A.; Ramsay, A.; Doe, W. Dextran sulphate sodium-induced colitis is ameliorated in interleukin 4 deficient mice. Genes Immun. 2001, 2, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Melgar, S.; Karlsson, A.; Michaëlsson, E. Acute colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium progresses to chronicity in C57BL/6 but not in BALB/c mice: Correlation between symptoms and inflammation. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2005, 288, G1328–G1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dieleman, L.A.; Ridwan, B.U.; Tennyson, G.S.; Beagley, K.W.; Bucy, R.; Elson, C.O. Dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis occurs in severe combined immunodeficient mice. Gastroenterology 1994, 107, 1643–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kim, T.W.; Seo, J.N.; Suh, Y.H.; Park, H.J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Oh, K.I. Involvement of lymphocytes in dextran sulfate sodium-induced experimental colitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006, 12, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tanaka, M.; Riddell, R.H.; Saito, H.; Soma, Y.; Hidaka, H.; Kudo, H. Morphologic Criteria Applicable to Biopsy Specimens for Effective Distinction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease from Other Forms of Colitis and of Crohn’s Disease from Ulcerative Colitis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1999, 34, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fujino, S.; Andoh, A.; Bamba, S.; Ogawa, A.; Hata, K.; Araki, Y.; Bamba, T.; Fujiyama, Y. Increased expression of interleukin 17 in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2003, 52, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gheita, T.A.; El Gazzar, I.I.; El-Fishawy, H.S.; Aboul-Ezz, M.A.; Kenawy, S.A. Involvement of IL-23 in enteropathic arthritis patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Preliminary results. Clin. Rheumatol. 2014, 33, 713–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jiang, W.; Su, J.; Zhang, X.; Cheng, X.; Zhou, J.; Shi, R.; Zhang, H. Elevated levels of Th17 cells and Th17-related cytokines are associated with disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Agents Actions 2014, 63, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lucaciu, L.A.; Ilieș, M.; Vesa, C.; Seicean, R.; Din, S.; Iuga, C.A.; Seicean, A. Serum Interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-17 Profile in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Patients Could Differentiate between Severe and Non-Severe Disease. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mirsattari, D.; Seyyedmajidi, M.; Zojaji, H.; Haghazali, M.; Orimi, P.G.; Shoushtarizadeh, T.; Almasi, S. The relation between the level of interleukin-23 with duration and severity of ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2012, 5, 49–53. [Google Scholar]
  70. Oppmann, B.; Lesley, R.; Blom, B.; Timans, J.C.; Xu, Y.; Hunte, B.; Vega, F.; Yu, N.; Wang, J.; Singh, K.; et al. Novel p19 Protein Engages IL-12p40 to Form a Cytokine, IL-23, with Biological Activities Similar as Well as Distinct from IL-12. Immunity 2000, 13, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Aggarwal, S.; Ghilardi, N.; Xie, M.-H.; de Sauvage, F.J.; Gurney, A.L. Interleukin-23 Promotes a Distinct CD4 T Cell Activation State Characterized by the Production of Interleukin-17. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 1910–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Aden, K.; Rehman, A.; Falk-Paulsen, M.; Secher, T.; Kuiper, J.; Tran, F.; Pfeuffer, S.; Sheibani-Tezerji, R.; Breuer, A.; Luzius, A.; et al. Epithelial IL-23R Signaling Licenses Protective IL-22 Responses in Intestinal Inflammation. Cell Rep. 2016, 16, 2208–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zenewicz, L.A.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; Valenzuela, D.M.; Murphy, A.J.; Stevens, S.; Flavell, R.A. Innate and Adaptive Interleukin-22 Protects Mice from Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Immunity 2008, 29, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sugimoto, K.; Ogawa, A.; Mizoguchi, E.; Shimomura, Y.; Andoh, A.; Bhan, A.K.; Blumberg, R.S.; Xavier, R.J.; Mizoguchi, A. IL-22 ameliorates intestinal inflammation in a mouse model of ulcerative colitis. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 534–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kobayashi, T.; Okamoto, S.; Hisamatsu, T.; Kamada, N.; Chinen, H.; Saito, R.; Kitazume, M.T.; Nakazawa, A.; Sugita, A.; Koganei, K.; et al. IL23 differentially regulates the Th1/Th17 balance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Gut 2008, 57, 1682–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gaffen, S.L. Structure and signalling in the IL-17 receptor family. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 556–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Geremia, A.; Arancibia-Cárcamo, C.V. Innate Lymphoid Cells in Intestinal Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Caruso, R.; Fina, D.; Peluso, I.; Stolfi, C.; Fantini, M.C.; Gioia, V.; Caprioli, F.; Blanco, G.D.V.; Paoluzi, O.A.; MacDonald, T.T.; et al. A Functional Role for Interleukin-21 in Promoting the Synthesis of the T-Cell Chemoattractant, MIP-3α, by Gut Epithelial Cells. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kim, Y.S.; Lee, M.H.; Ju, A.S.; Rhee, K.-J. Th17 Responses Are Not Induced in Dextran Sodium Sulfate Model of Acute Colitis. Immune Netw. 2011, 11, 416–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ogawa, A.; Andoh, A.; Araki, Y.; Bamba, T.; Fujiyama, Y. Neutralization of interleukin-17 aggravates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice. Clin. Immunol. 2004, 110, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lee, J.S.; Tato, C.M.; Joyce-Shaikh, B.; Gulen, M.F.; Cayatte, C.; Chen, Y.; Blumenschein, W.M.; Judo, M.; Ayanoglu, G.; McClanahan, T.K.; et al. Interleukin-23-Independent IL-17 Production Regulates Intestinal Epithelial Permeability. Immunity 2015, 43, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ito, R.; Kita, M.; Shin-Ya, M.; Kishida, T.; Urano, A.; Takada, R.; Sakagami, J.; Imanishi, J.; Iwakura, Y.; Okanoue, T.; et al. Involvement of IL-17A in the pathogenesis of DSS-induced colitis in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 377, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Tang, C.; Kakuta, S.; Shimizu, K.; Kadoki, M.; Kamiya, T.; Shimazu, T.; Kubo, S.; Saijo, S.; Ishigame, H.; Nakae, S.; et al. Suppression of IL-17F, but not of IL-17A, provides protection against colitis by inducing Treg cells through modification of the intestinal microbiota. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 755–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Cao, P.; Su, W.; Zhan, N.; Dong, W. Fusobacterium nucleatum facilitates ulcerative colitis through activating IL-17F signaling to NF-κB via the upregulation of CARD3 expression. J. Pathol. 2020, 250, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Hueber, W.; E Sands, B.; Lewitzky, S.; Vandemeulebroecke, M.; Reinisch, W.; Higgins, P.D.R.; Wehkamp, J.; Feagan, B.G.; Yao, M.D.; Karczewski, M.; et al. Secukinumab, a human anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, for moderate to severe Crohn’s disease: Unexpected results of a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Gut 2012, 61, 1693–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Targan, S.R.; Feagan, B.; Vermeire, S.; Panaccione, R.; Melmed, G.Y.; Landers, C.; Li, D.; Russell, C.; Newmark, R.; Zhang, N.; et al. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study of Brodalumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Crohn’s Disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 111, 1599–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Glatt, S.; Helmer, E.; Haier, B.; Strimenopoulou, F.; Price, G.; Vajjah, P.; Harari, O.A.; Lambert, J.; Shaw, S. First-in-human randomized study of bimekizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody and selective dual inhibitor of IL-17A and IL-17F, in mild psoriasis. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017, 83, 991–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gordon, K.B.; Foley, P.; Krueger, J.G.; Pinter, A.; Reich, K.; Vender, R.; Vanvoorden, V.; Madden, C.; White, K.; Cioffi, C.; et al. Bimekizumab efficacy and safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE READY): A multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised withdrawal phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021, 397, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Reimund, J.M.; Wittersheim, C.; Dumont, S.; Muller, C.D.; Kenney, J.S.; Baumann, R.; Poindron, P.; Duclos, B. Increased production of tumour necrosis factor-alpha interleukin-1 beta, and interleukin-6 by morphologically normal intestinal biopsies from patients with Crohn’s disease. Gut 1996, 39, 684–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kontoyiannis, D.; Pasparakis, M.; Pizarro, T.T.; Cominelli, F.; Kollias, G. Impaired On/Off Regulation of TNF Biosynthesis in Mice Lacking TNF AU-Rich Elements: Implications for Joint and Gut-Associated Immunopathologies. Immunity 1999, 10, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kojouharoff, G.; Hans, W.; Obermeier, F.; Ma¨nnel, D.N.; Andus, T.; Scho¨lmerich, J.; Gross, V.; Falk, W. Neutralization of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) but not of IL-1 reduces inflammation in chronic dextran sulphate sodium-induced colitis in mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1997, 107, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Wang, K.; Diao, L.-H.; Gong, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Y. NEMO differentially regulates TCR and TNF-α induced NF-κB pathways and has an inhibitory role in TCR-induced NF-κB activation. Cell. Signal. 2012, 24, 1556–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Targan, S.R.; Hanauer, S.B.; Van Deventer, S.J.; Mayer, L.; Present, D.H.; Braakman, T.; DeWoody, K.L.; Schaible, T.F.; Rutgeerts, P.J. A Short-Term Study of Chimeric Monoclonal Antibody cA2 to Tumor Necrosis Factor α for Crohn’s Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 337, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kopylov, U.; Seidman, E. Predicting durable response or resistance to antitumor necrosis factor therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2016, 9, 513–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Dahmus, J.; Rosario, M.; Clarke, K. Risk of Lymphoma Associated with Anti-TNF Therapy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Implications for Therapy. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 2020, 13, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Schierova, D.; Roubalova, R.; Kolar, M.; Stehlikova, Z.; Rob, F.; Jackova, Z.; Coufal, S.; Thon, T.; Mihula, M.; Modrak, M.; et al. Fecal Microbiome Changes and Specific Anti-Bacterial Response in Patients with IBD during Anti-TNF Therapy. Cells 2021, 10, 3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Vlantis, K.; Polykratis, A.; Welz, P.-S.; van Loo, G.; Pasparakis, M.; Wullaert, A. TLR-independent anti-inflammatory function of intestinal epithelial TRAF6 signalling prevents DSS-induced colitis in mice. Gut 2015, 65, 935–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Fellermann, K.; Stange, D.E.; Schaeffeler, E.; Schmalzl, H.; Wehkamp, J.; Bevins, C.L.; Reinisch, W.; Teml, A.; Schwab, M.; Lichter, P.; et al. A Chromosome 8 Gene-Cluster Polymorphism with Low Human Beta-Defensin 2 Gene Copy Number Predisposes to Crohn Disease of the Colon. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 79, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Vlantis, K.; Wullaert, A.; Polykratis, A.; Kondylis, V.; Dannappel, M.; Schwarzer, R.; Welz, P.; Corona, T.; Walczak, H.; Weih, F.; et al. NEMO Prevents RIP Kinase 1-Mediated Epithelial Cell Death and Chronic Intestinal Inflammation by NF-κB-Dependent and -Independent Functions. Immunity 2016, 44, 553–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kohn, L.L.; Braun, M.; Cordoro, K.M.; McCalmont, T.H.; Shah, S.D.; Frieden, I.J.; Mathur, A.N. Skin and Mucosal Manifestations in NEMO Syndrome: A Case Series and Literature Review. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2022, 39, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Loftus, E.V., Jr. Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: Incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences. Gastroenterology 2004, 126, 1504–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Heyman, M.B.; Kirschner, B.S.; Gold, B.D.; Ferry, G.; Baldassano, R.; Cohen, S.A.; Winter, H.S.; Fain, P.; King, C.; Smith, T.; et al. Children with early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): Analysis of a pediatric IBD consortium registry. J. Pediatr. 2005, 146, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhu, L.; Shi, T.; Zhong, C.; Wang, Y.; Chang, M.; Liu, X. IL-10 and IL-10 Receptor Mutations in Very Early Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterol. Res. 2017, 10, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Berg, D.; Davidson, N.; Kühn, R.; Muller, W.; Menon, S.; Holland, G.; Thompson-Snipes, L.; Leach, M.W.; Rennick, D. Enterocolitis and colon cancer in interleukin-10-deficient mice are associated with aberrant cytokine production and CD4(+) TH1-like responses. J. Clin. Investig. 1996, 98, 1010–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Shouval, D.S.; Biswas, A.; Goettel, J.A.; McCann, K.; Conaway, E.; Redhu, N.S.; Mascanfroni, I.D.; Al Adham, Z.; Lavoie, S.; Ibourk, M.; et al. Interleukin-10 Receptor Signaling in Innate Immune Cells Regulates Mucosal Immune Tolerance and Anti-Inflammatory Macrophage Function. Immunity 2014, 40, 706–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Spencer, S.D.; Di Marco, F.; Hooley, J.; Pitts-Meek, S.; Bauer, M.; Ryan, A.M.; Sordat, B.; Gibbs, V.C.; Aguet, M. The Orphan Receptor CRF2-4 Is an Essential Subunit of the Interleukin 10 Receptor. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 187, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mendoza, J.L.; Schneider, W.M.; Hoffmann, H.-H.; Vercauteren, K.; Jude, K.M.; Xiong, A.; Moraga, I.; Horton, T.M.; Glenn, J.S.; de Jong, Y.P.; et al. The IFN-λ-IFN-λR1-IL-10Rβ Complex Reveals Structural Features Underlying Type III IFN Functional Plasticity. Immunity 2017, 46, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yen, D.; Cheung, J.; Scheerens, H.; Poulet, F.; McClanahan, T.; McKenzie, B.; Kleinschek, M.A.; Owyang, A.; Mattson, J.; Blumenschein, W.; et al. IL-23 is essential for T cell–mediated colitis and promotes inflammation via IL-17 and IL-6. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 1310–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Eyerich, K.; DiMartino, V.; Cavani, A. IL-17 and IL-22 in immunity: Driving protection and pathology. Eur. J. Immunol. 2017, 47, 607–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Gu, Y.; Yang, J.; Ouyang, X.; Liu, W.; Li, H.; Yang, J.; Bromberg, J.; Chen, S.; Mayer, L.; Unkeless, J.C.; et al. Interleukin 10 suppresses Th17 cytokines secreted by macrophages and T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2008, 38, 1807–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gunasekera, D.C.; Ma, J.; Vacharathit, V.; Shah, P.; Ramakrishnan, A.; Uprety, P.; Shen, Z.; Sheh, A.; Brayton, C.F.; Whary, M.T.; et al. The development of colitis in Il10−/− mice is dependent on IL-22. Mucosal Immunol. 2020, 13, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Sellon, R.K.; Tonkonogy, S.; Schultz, M.; Dieleman, L.A.; Grenther, W.; Balish, E.; Rennick, D.M.; Sartor, R.B. Resident Enteric Bacteria Are Necessary for Development of Spontaneous Colitis and Immune System Activation in Interleukin-10-Deficient Mice. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 5224–5231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Colombel, J.-F.; Lémann, M.; Cassagnou, M.; Bouhnik, Y.; Duclos, B.; Dupas, J.-L.; Notteghem, B.; Mary, J.-Y. A Controlled Trial Comparing Ciprofloxacin With Mesalazine for The Treatment of Active Crohn’s Disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1999, 94, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sutherland, L.; Singleton, J.; Sessions, J.; Hanauer, S.; Krawitt, E.; Rankin, G.; Summers, R.; Mekhjian, H.; Greenberger, N.; Kelly, M. Double blind, placebo controlled trial of metronidazole in Crohn’s disease. Gut 1991, 32, 1071–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Madsen, K.L.; Doyle, J.S.; Tavernini, M.M.; Jewell, L.D.; Rennie, R.P.; Fedorak, R.N. Antibiotic therapy attenuates colitis in interleukin 10 gene–deficient mice. Gastroenterology 2000, 118, 1094–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Ott, S.J.; Musfeldt, M.; Wenderoth, D.F.; Hampe, J.; Brant, O.; Fölsch, U.R.; Timmis, K.N.; Schreiber, S. Reduction in diversity of the colonic mucosa associated bacterial microflora in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2004, 53, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Burich, A.; Hershberg, R.; Waggie, K.; Zeng, W.; Brabb, T.; Westrich, G.; Viney, J.L.; Maggio-Price, L. Helicobacter-induced inflammatory bowel disease in IL-10- and T cell-deficient mice. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2001, 281, G764–G778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kullberg, M.C.; Ward, J.M.; Gorelick, P.L.; Caspar, P.; Hieny, S.; Cheever, A.; Jankovic, D.; Sher, A. Helicobacter hepaticus Triggers Colitis in Specific-Pathogen-Free Interleukin-10 (IL-10)-Deficient Mice through an IL-12- and Gamma Interferon-Dependent Mechanism. Infect. Immun. 1998, 66, 5157–5166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Balish, E.; Warner, T. Enterococcus faecalis Induces Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Interleukin-10 Knockout Mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2002, 160, 2253–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kim, S.C.; Tonkonogy, S.L.; Albright, C.A.; Tsang, J.; Balish, E.J.; Braun, J.; Huycke, M.M.; Sartor, R.B. Variable phenotypes of enterocolitis in interleukin 10-deficient mice monoassociated with two different commensal bacteria. Gastroenterology 2005, 128, 891–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Madsen, K.L.; Doyle, J.S.; Jewell, L.D.; Tavernini, M.M.; Fedorak, R.N. Lactobacillus species prevents colitis in interleukin 10 gene–deficient mice. Gastroenterology 1999, 116, 1107–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Madsen, K.; Cornish, A.; Soper, P.; McKaigney, C.; Jijon, H.; Yachimec, C.; Doyle, J.; Jewell, L.; De Simone, C. Probiotic bacteria enhance murine and human intestinal epithelial barrier function. Gastroenterology 2001, 121, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Li, S.; Jin, Y.; Fu, W.; Cox, A.D.; Lee, D.; Reddivari, L. Intermittent antibiotic treatment accelerated the development of colitis in IL-10 knockout mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 146, 112486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. van Deventer, S.; Elson, C.; Fedorak, R. Multiple doses of intravenous interleukin 10 in steroid-refractory Crohn’s disease. Crohn’s Disease Study Group. Gastroenterology 1997, 113, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Fedorak, R.N.; Gangl, A.; Elson, C.O.; Rutgeerts, P.; Schreiber, S.; Wild, G.; Hanauer, S.B.; Kilian, A.; Cohard, M.; LeBeaut, A.; et al. Recombinant human interleukin 10 in the treatment of patients with mild to moderately active Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2000, 119, 1473–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Huhn, R.D.; Radwanski, E.; Gallo, J.; Affrime, M.B.; Sabo, R.; Gonyo, G.; Monge, A.; Cutler, D.L. Pharmacodynamics of subcutaneous recombinant human interleukin-10 in healthy volunteers*. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1997, 62, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Schreiber, S.; Fedorak, R.N.; Nielsen, O.H.; Wild, G.; Williams, C.; Nikolaus, S.; Jacyna, M.; Lashner, B.A.; Gangl, A.; Rutgeerts, P.; et al. Safety and efficacy of recombinant human interleukin 10 in chronic active Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2000, 119, 1461–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Sosman, J.A.; Verma, A.; Moss, S.; Sorokin, P.; Blend, M.; Bradlow, B.; Chachlani, N.; Cutler, D.; Sabo, R.; Nelson, M.; et al. Interleukin 10-induced thrombocytopenia in normal healthy adult volunteers: Evidence for decreased platelet production. Br. J. Haematol. 2000, 111, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Tilg, H.; Van Montfrans, C.; Ende, A.V.D.; Kaser, A.; Van Deventer, S.J.H.; Schreiber, S.; Gregor, M.; Ludwiczek, O.; Rutgeerts, P.; Gasche, C.; et al. Treatment of Crohn’s disease with recombinant human interleukin 10 induces the proinflammatory cytokine interferon gamma. Gut 2002, 50, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Steidler, L.; Hans, W.; Schotte, L.; Neirynck, S.; Obermeier, F.; Falk, W.; Fiers, W.; Remaut, E. Treatment of Murine Colitis by Lactococcus lactis Secreting Interleukin-10. Science 2000, 289, 1352–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zurita-Turk, M.; Souza, B.M.; De Castro, C.P.; Pereira, V.B.; Da Cunha, V.P.; Preisser, T.M.; De Faria, A.M.C.; Machado, D.C.C.; Miyoshi, A. Attenuation of intestinal inflammation in IL-10 deficient mice by a plasmid carrying Lactococcus lactis strain. BMC Biotechnol. 2020, 20, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Fay, N.C.; Muthusamy, B.-P.; Nyugen, L.P.; Desai, R.C.; Taverner, A.; Mackay, J.; Seung, M.; Hunter, T.; Liu, K.; Chandalia, A.; et al. A Novel Fusion of IL-10 Engineered to Traffic across Intestinal Epithelium to Treat Colitis. J. Immunol. 2020, 205, 3191–3204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Braat, H.; Rottiers, P.; Hommes, D.W.; Huyghebaert, N.; Remaut, E.; Remon, J.; van Deventer, S.J.; Neirynck, S.; Peppelenbosch, M.P.; Steidler, L. A Phase I Trial With Transgenic Bacteria Expressing Interleukin-10 in Crohn’s Disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006, 4, 754–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Kucharzik, T.; Stoll, R.; Lügering, N.; Domschke, W. Circulating antiinflammatory cytokine IL-10 in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1995, 100, 452–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Colombel, J.-F.; Rutgeerts, P.; Malchow, H.; Jacyna, M.; Nielsen, O.H.; Rask-Madsen, J.; Van Deventer, S.; Ferguson, A.; Desreumaux, P.; Forbes, A.; et al. Interleukin 10 (Tenovil) in the prevention of postoperative recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Gut 2001, 49, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Aranda, R.; Sydora, B.C.; McAllister, P.L.; Binder, S.W.; Yang, H.Y.; Targan, S.R.; Kronenberg, M. Analysis of intestinal lymphocytes in mouse colitis mediated by transfer of CD4+, CD45RBhigh T cells to SCID recipients. J. Immunol. 1997, 158, 3464–3473. [Google Scholar]
  137. Feng, T.; Wang, L.; Schoeb, T.R.; Elson, C.O.; Cong, Y. Microbiota innate stimulation is a prerequisite for T cell spontaneous proliferation and induction of experimental colitis. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 1321–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Mottet, C.; Uhlig, H.H.; Powrie, F. Cutting Edge: Cure of Colitis by CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cells. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 3939–3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kjellev, S.; Lundsgaard, D.; Poulsen, S.S.; Markholst, H. Reconstitution of Scid mice with CD4+CD25− T cells leads to rapid colitis: An improved model for pharmacologic testing. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2006, 6, 1341–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Powrie, F.; Leach, M.W.; Mauze, S.; Menon, S.; Caddle, L.B.; Coffman, R.L. Inhibition of Thl responses prevents inflammatory bowel disease in scid mice reconstituted with CD45RBhi CD4+ T cells. Immunity 1994, 1, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ahern, P.P.; Schiering, C.; Buonocore, S.; McGeachy, M.J.; Cua, D.J.; Maloy, K.J.; Powrie, F. Interleukin-23 Drives Intestinal Inflammation through Direct Activity on T Cells. Immunity 2010, 33, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Hue, S.; Ahern, P.; Buonocore, S.; Kullberg, M.C.; Cua, D.J.; McKenzie, B.S.; Powrie, F.; Maloy, K.J. Interleukin-23 drives innate and T cell–mediated intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 2473–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Brasseit, J.; Chung, C.K.C.K.; Noti, M.; Zysset, D.; Hoheisel-Dickgreber, N.; Genitsch, V.; Corazza, N.; Mueller, C. Divergent Roles of Interferon-γ and Innate Lymphoid Cells in Innate and Adaptive Immune Cell-Mediated Intestinal Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Harbour, S.N.; Maynard, C.L.; Zindl, C.L.; Schoeb, T.R.; Weaver, C.T. Th17 cells give rise to Th1 cells that are required for the pathogenesis of colitis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 7061–7066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Poholek, C.; Dulson, S.J.; Zajac, A.J.; Harrington, L.E. IL-21 Controls ILC3 Cytokine Production and Promotes a Protective Phenotype in a Mouse Model of Colitis. ImmunoHorizons 2019, 3, 194–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kole, A.; He, J.; Rivollier, A.; Silveira, D.D.; Kitamura, K.; Maloy, K.J.; Kelsall, B.L. Type I IFNs Regulate Effector and Regulatory T Cell Accumulation and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokine Production during T Cell–Mediated Colitis. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 2771–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Fort, M.M.; Leach, M.W.; Rennick, D.M. A role for NK cells as regulators of CD4+ T cells in a transfer model of colitis. J. Immunol. 1998, 161, 3256–3261. [Google Scholar]
  148. A Keilbaugh, S.; E Shin, M.; Banchereau, R.F.; McVay, L.D.; Boyko, N.; Artis, D.; Cebra, J.J.; Wu, G.D. Activation of RegIII/and interferon expression in the intestinal tract of SCID mice: An innate response to bacterial colonisation of the gut. Gut 2005, 54, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kjellev, S.; Haase, C.; Lundsgaard, D.; Ursø, B.; Tornehave, D.; Markholst, H. Inhibition of NKG2D receptor function by antibody therapy attenuates transfer-induced colitis in SCID mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37, 1397–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yusung, S.; McGovern, D.; Lin, L.; Hommes, D.; Lagishetty, V.; Braun, J. NK cells are biologic and biochemical targets of 6-mercaptopurine in Crohn’s disease patients. Clin. Immunol. 2017, 175, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Bosma, G.C.; Fried, M.; Custer, R.P.; Carroll, A.; Gibson, D.M.; Bosma, M.J. Evidence of functional lymphocytes in some (leaky) scid mice. J. Exp. Med. 1988, 167, 1016–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Karo, J.M.; Schatz, D.G.; Sun, J.C. The RAG Recombinase Dictates Functional Heterogeneity and Cellular Fitness in Natural Killer Cells. Cell 2014, 159, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Kwan, A.; Abraham, R.S.; Currier, R.; Brower, A.; Andruszewski, K.; Abbott, J.; Baker, M.; Ballow, M.; Bartoshesky, L.E.; Bonilla, F.A.; et al. Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency in 11 Screening Programs in the United States. JAMA 2014, 312, 729–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Mestas, J.; Hughes, C.C.W. Of mice and not men: Differences between mouse and human immunology. J. Immunol. 2004, 172, 2731–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Chia, R.; Achilli, F.; Festing, M.F.W.; Fisher, E.M.C. The origins and uses of mouse outbred stocks. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 1181–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Immune response during oxazolone colitis. Oxazolone administration results in the production of IL-25, activation of ILC2, and production of IL-13, activating CD4+ T cell responses and amplifying type-2 cytokine production. Oxazolone administration also results in the expansion of T cells with surrogate markers of NKT cell function and IL-13 production by populations of CD1-restricted NKT cells. The resulting chronic inflammatory responses result in goblet cell depletion, increased intestinal permeability, and increased adhesion of commensal intestinal microbiota to the epithelium. Key: inflamed epithelial cells (Infl.EC), healthy epithelial cells (HEC), damaged epithelial cell (dam.EC). Created with BioRender.com, accessed on 18 August 2022.
Figure 1. Immune response during oxazolone colitis. Oxazolone administration results in the production of IL-25, activation of ILC2, and production of IL-13, activating CD4+ T cell responses and amplifying type-2 cytokine production. Oxazolone administration also results in the expansion of T cells with surrogate markers of NKT cell function and IL-13 production by populations of CD1-restricted NKT cells. The resulting chronic inflammatory responses result in goblet cell depletion, increased intestinal permeability, and increased adhesion of commensal intestinal microbiota to the epithelium. Key: inflamed epithelial cells (Infl.EC), healthy epithelial cells (HEC), damaged epithelial cell (dam.EC). Created with BioRender.com, accessed on 18 August 2022.
Ijms 23 09344 g001
Figure 2. Immune response to DSS administration. DSS administration results in epithelial release of IL-1β, activation of ILC3, and release of IL-23. IL-23 release results in the influx of neutrophils and CD4+ T cells, which further respond through enhanced IL-17 signalling. The resulting chronic inflammatory responses result in goblet cell depletion, increased intestinal permeability, and increased adhesion of commensal intestinal microbiota to the epithelium. Key: Inflamed epithelial cells (Infl.EC), healthy epithelial cells (HEC), damaged epithelial cell (dam.EC), macrophages (MΦ), neutrophils (NΦ). Created with BioRender.com, accessed on 18 August 2022.
Figure 2. Immune response to DSS administration. DSS administration results in epithelial release of IL-1β, activation of ILC3, and release of IL-23. IL-23 release results in the influx of neutrophils and CD4+ T cells, which further respond through enhanced IL-17 signalling. The resulting chronic inflammatory responses result in goblet cell depletion, increased intestinal permeability, and increased adhesion of commensal intestinal microbiota to the epithelium. Key: Inflamed epithelial cells (Infl.EC), healthy epithelial cells (HEC), damaged epithelial cell (dam.EC), macrophages (MΦ), neutrophils (NΦ). Created with BioRender.com, accessed on 18 August 2022.
Ijms 23 09344 g002
Figure 3. CD45RBhiCD4+ T cell adoptive transfer scheme. Created with BioRender.com, accessed on 18 August 2022.
Figure 3. CD45RBhiCD4+ T cell adoptive transfer scheme. Created with BioRender.com, accessed on 18 August 2022.
Ijms 23 09344 g003
Table 1. Summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the most widely used pre-clinical murine models of IBD, organised by induction method.
Table 1. Summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the most widely used pre-clinical murine models of IBD, organised by induction method.
Induction MethodExamplesDisease ModelledAdvantagesDisadvantages
Chemical Induced ColitisOxazolone colitisUC
  • Model used to uncover the role of type-2 immune responses and propose a role for NKT cells during UC.
  • Inflammation in the distal colon closely resembles UC.
  • High mortality of experimental animals, or a dichotomous inflammatory response required optimisation and a large sample size.
  • Despite findings from this model, clinical trial of novel therapeutics targeting IL-13 were not significant.
Trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) colitisCD
  • Model revealed importance of IL-12 and IL-23 and successful clinical trials.
  • Model used to develop understanding of genetic determinants of CD (e.g., NOD2).
  • Model enables better understanding of how host-gut microbial interactions influence disease.
  • Mice develop a chronic transmural colitis, mimicking characteristics of CD.
  • Variation in responses requires optimisation and the use of large experimental mouse numbers per treatment group.
  • Variability between TNBS lots requires testing and re-optimization between batches
Dextran Sulfate Sodium (DSS)UC and CD
  • The Th1/Th2 cytokine mileu closely models both UC and CD
  • Model revealed the importance of innate immunity in disease induction.
  • Model has revealed the importance of IL-17 and IL-23 in IBD.
  • Interbatch variability of DSS affects colitis phenotype.
  • Disease is highly dependent on microbial status
  • Repeated administration of DSS required to elicit chronic, remitting and relapsing colitis.
Spontaneous colitisIκκ-γ (NEMO) Deficiency ColitisNEMO-deficiency
  • This model enables research into the interaction between gut microbiota and spontaneous intestinal inflammation.
  • NEMO-deficient patients exhibit a variety of mucocutaneous diseases and may carry concomitant mutations in IBD-associated genes
IL-10 Deficiency ColitisChildhood IBD
  • Model has enabled research into the influence of the microbiome on intestinal inflammation.
  • IBD patients are not always deficient in IL-10 and may not benefit from IL-10 therapy.
Immune cell Induced ColitisCD4+ T cell transferCD
  • Revealed the importance of regulatory T cells in IBD development.
  • Allows early events underlying IBD to be studied.
  • Supported a role for IL-17 and IL-23 in IBD development.
  • Supported a role for NK cells in IBD development.
  • Inflammation in small bowel and colon similar to CD.
  • “Leakiness” and altered NK function in immune-deficient mice.
  • Model requires use of magnetic cell separation and/or automated cell sorting, which can be costly.
  • Use of immune-deficient mice precludes modelling of the multifactorial nature of CD induction/development.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Katsandegwaza, B.; Horsnell, W.; Smith, K. Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review of Pre-Clinical Murine Models of Human Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169344

AMA Style

Katsandegwaza B, Horsnell W, Smith K. Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review of Pre-Clinical Murine Models of Human Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(16):9344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169344

Chicago/Turabian Style

Katsandegwaza, Brunette, William Horsnell, and Katherine Smith. 2022. "Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review of Pre-Clinical Murine Models of Human Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 16: 9344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169344

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop