Next Article in Journal
PQBP1: The Key to Intellectual Disability, Neurodegenerative Diseases, and Innate Immunity
Next Article in Special Issue
Single-Cell Transcriptomic Profiling in Inherited Retinal Degeneration Reveals Distinct Metabolic Pathways in Rod and Cone Photoreceptors
Previous Article in Journal
A Universal Fluorescent Immunochromatography Assay Based on Quantum Dot Nanoparticles for the Rapid Detection of Specific Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms23116226
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential of Aqueous Humor as a Liquid Biopsy for Uveal Melanoma

by
Deborah H. Im
1,2,†,
Chen-Ching Peng
1,2,†,
Liya Xu
1,2,
Mary E. Kim
1,2,
Dejerianne Ostrow
3,
Venkata Yellapantula
3,4,
Moiz Bootwalla
3,4,
Jaclyn A. Biegel
3,4,
Xiaowu Gai
3,4,
Rishvanth K. Prabakar
5,
Peter Kuhn
5,6,7,8,
James Hicks
5,6,9 and
Jesse L. Berry
1,2,6,10,*
1
The Vision Center at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA
2
USC Roski Eye Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
3
Center for Personalized Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA
4
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
5
Department of Biological Sciences, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
6
Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
7
Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
8
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA
9
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
10
The Saban Research Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(11), 6226; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116226
Submission received: 7 May 2022 / Revised: 27 May 2022 / Accepted: 30 May 2022 / Published: 2 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genome Stability in Visual Sciences)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tumor biopsy can identify prognostic biomarkers for metastatic uveal melanoma (UM), however aqueous humor (AH) liquid biopsy may serve as an adjunct. This study investigated whether the AH of UM eyes has sufficient circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to perform genetic analysis. This is a case series of 37 AH samples, taken before or after radiation, and one tumor wash sample, from 12 choroidal and 8 ciliary body (CB) melanoma eyes. AH was analyzed for nucleic acid concentrations. AH DNA and one tumor wash sample underwent shallow whole-genome sequencing followed by Illumina sequencing to detect somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs). Four post-radiation AH underwent targeted sequencing of BAP1 and GNAQ genes. Post-radiation AH had significantly higher DNA and miRNA concentrations than paired pre-radiation samples. Highly recurrent UM SCNAs were identified in 0/11 post-radiation choroidal and 6/8 post-radiation CB AH. SCNAs were highly concordant in a CB post-radiation AH with its matched tumor (r = 0.978). BAP1 or GNAQ variants were detected in 3/4 post-radiation AH samples. AH is a source of ctDNA in UM eyes, particularly in post-radiation CB eyes. For the first time, UM SCNAs and mutations were identified in AH-derived ctDNA. Suggesting that AH can serve as a liquid biopsy for UM.

1. Introduction

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular cancer in adults [1]. Tumors arise from the uveal tract and can affect the choroid, iris, and ciliary body, with the latter two lesions being anatomically closer to the aqueous humor (AH). Conservative treatment consists of radiation, with enucleation reserved for the most advanced cases. Even when the intraocular tumor is successfully treated, approximately half of all patients with UM will develop metastases [2]. Unfortunately, metastatic UM is usually fatal within one year of symptom onset, as it is poorly responsive to chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy.
It is widely known that identifying tumor biomarkers stratifies the risk of metastatic disease and may help improve the earlier detection of metastases [3]. While once taboo, intraocular tumor biopsy via fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is now part of the routine clinical workup for UM for prognostication and not for diagnosis. Tumor-derived prognostic molecular markers can be categorized into (1) gene expression profiles (GEP) (2) somatic copy number alterations (SCNA), or (3) mutations in key genes for UM oncogenesis. Recent multi-omic work has used these three categories to divide UM patients into four subsets of low (Type A), intermediate (Type B), and high (Types C and D) metastatic potential [4]. Clinically, Onken et al. found that this translated into a four-year risk of metastasis of 3% for Types A and B and upwards of 80% for Types C and D [5]. Cytogenetic characteristics include highly recurrent UM SCNAs such as monosomy 3, losses of chromosome arms 1p, 6q, 8p, and 16q, and gains of 1q, 6p, and 8q [6], with monosomy 3, 8q gain, and 1p loss being the most prognostically unfavorable [7]. Although the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging of UM does not currently include cytogenetic information and is based only on clinical observations, it has been shown that the addition of these molecular subsets yields a significant improvement in prognostication compared to the AJCC stage alone [8,9,10,11,12]. While FNAB is considered a safe procedure, there remain small risks of retinal detachment, subretinal hemorrhage, and vitreous hemorrhage, sometimes requiring further surgical intervention to repair [13,14]. Furthermore, direct tumor biopsy is often not repeatable without returning to the operating room. Given these risks, liquid biopsy has emerged as a less invasive alternative that also offers the ability to track genomic changes longitudinally over time without the need to return to the operating room.
Most liquid biopsy research in UM has focused on the blood as a biofluid source of circulating tumor cells and/or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). However, the low tumor fraction found in the blood due to the blood-ocular barrier limits the detection of prognostic biomarkers; thus, blood liquid biopsies for UM may be better utilized to detect systemic disease [15,16,17,18]. AH liquid biopsies have been investigated as an eye-specific alternative. However, previous studies of the AH in UM patients have only reported on cytokines and soluble HLA [19,20,21,22,23]. To our knowledge, no genomic prognostic biomarkers have been found in UM AH. Given that we have not only demonstrated the presence but also established the clinical utility of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in the AH of retinoblastoma eyes [24,25]. we hypothesized that the AH of UM eyes may similarly harbor tumor-derived nucleic acids to serve as a surrogate tumor biopsy in UM. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine if ctDNA is present in the AH of UM eyes. The presence and prognostic significance of ctDNA isolated from the AH of UM patients has yet to be evaluated. Furthermore, eye-specific biopsy allows for repeatable testing near the primary tumor and may allow for detection of local recurrence, new avenues for prognostication, and objective markers of tumoral regression post-therapy.

2. Results

2.1. Patient Clinical Characteristics and Demographics

Overall, 37 AH and one tumor wash sample from 20 UM patients (20 eyes) were evaluated. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. A total of twelve (60%) choroidal and eight (40%) ciliary body (CB) tumor patients were included. All choroidal tumors (100%) were AJCC stage I or IIA and did not have concomitant CB involvement. Of CB tumors, 5/8 (62.5%) were AJCC stage I or IIA, while the other three were more advanced. A significant number of CB tumors were diagnosed at a more advanced AJCC stage than choroidal tumors (p = 0.003; Table 1). Of note, one choroidal UM patient underwent primary enucleation due to the tumor surrounding the optic nerve head. Results from a clinically indicated tumor biopsy, including UM mutation, preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) status, and GEP class is included (Table 1).

2.2. Evaluation of AH Nucleic Acid Content before and after Brachytherapy Radiation

Analysis of AH samples revealed measurable levels of nucleic acids in the majority of eyes with choroidal and CB melanomas, with the exception of RNA which was only detectable in post-radiation AH from four CB tumors (Figure 1C and Figure S1). Paired pre- and post-radiation AH samples from nine choroidal and eight CB melanoma eyes were analyzed. In both choroidal and CB AH, post-radiation AH samples had significantly higher concentrations of DNA and miRNA (choroidal: ssDNA, p = 0.035 and miRNA, p = 0.016) (CB: dsDNA, p = 0.023 and miRNA, p = 0.008) (Figure 1A,B,D).

2.3. Circulating Tumor DNA in AH

To determine the presence of ctDNA in the AH, shallow WGS was performed to profile SCNAs in all 37 AH samples (Figure S2). All pre-radiation AH SCNA profiles were neutral. SCNAs were found only in AH collected after brachytherapy radiation, with significantly more positive SCNAs found in CB post-radiation AH samples (6/8, 75%) than in choroidal post-radiation AH samples (0/11, p = 0.001; Figure 2B). Highly recurrent UM SCNAs of monosomy 3, 6p gain, 6q loss, and 8q gain were identified in SCNA-positive post-radiation AH samples (Figure 2C). A tumor wash (UM_019) was performed in a single case to determine whether this would be a feasible mechanism to obtain tumor samples for research (instead of a repeat tumor biopsy). There was high concordance of SCNA alterations between the post-radiation AH sample and the tumor wash collected before radiation (Pearson’s r = 0.978; Figure 2D).
Due to limited DNA concentration, four SCNA-positive AH samples (UM_005, 007, 012, and 013) were further evaluated for the presence of tumor variants in the BAP1 and GNAQ genes. We analyzed the presence of SNVs using a pan-cancer predisposition panel and identified UM mutations in BAP1 and GNAQ in 3/4 (75%) post-radiation AH samples (UM_005, 007, 012, and 013, Table 2). These were concordant with clinical tumor SNV testing from Castle Biosciences in two patients (UM_007 and 013). A mutation was identified in the AH from patient UM_005; however, this patient did not have FNAB results available from Castle Biosciences to determine concordance (Table 2). Additional gene variants were investigated to determine the potential of detecting mutations from the AH cfDNA beyond the BAP1 and GNAQ genes (Figure S3).

3. Discussion

We examined 37 AH samples from 20 UM patients to investigate whether the AH liquid biopsy can serve as a surrogate for tumor biopsy. We hypothesized that the AH may contain ctDNA and may serve as a liquid biopsy for UM; these hypotheses arose from our work on another ocular cancer, retinoblastoma, wherein we and others have demonstrated that the AH is an enriched source of ctDNA [26,27,28,29,30] In this pilot study, we first demonstrated that there were measurable concentrations of nucleic acids (dsDNA, ssDNA, RNA, and miRNA) in the small volumes of AH that can be extracted from UM patients during plaque brachytherapy or enucleation. This is the first-time nucleic acids were quantified and characterized in the AH of UM patients. When comparing pre- and post-radiation AH samples, there was a significantly higher concentration of evaluated nucleic acids in post-radiation AH samples, most notably in patients with CB tumors (Figure 1A–D). We hypothesize that the increased nucleic acids in post-radiation AH are tumor-derived due to necrosis and lysis of tumor cells after radiation. Further, we hypothesize that the higher mean concentration of nucleic acids in CB AH compared to choroidal AH is likely due to the proximity of the tumor to the AH in these more anteriorly located neoplasms. Importantly, 17/20 (85%) UM tumors included herein were AJCC stage I or IIA tumors, suggesting utility in AH liquid biopsy even for smaller, early-stage UM.
Next, we determined whether the AH DNA was tumor-derived. Copy number variation profiling confirmed the presence of highly recurrent UM SCNAs [31] in post-radiation CB AH samples including monosomy 3, 6p gain, 6q loss, and 8q gain (Figure 2A). No SCNAs were found in post-radiation choroidal AH samples or any pre-radiation AH samples. Altered SCNA profiles were found in 0/11 and 6/8 (75.0%) post-radiation AH samples of choroidal and CB melanomas respectively, with a significant difference (p = 0.001) (Figure 2B). This suggests that AH liquid biopsy may be more useful for tumors that form anteriorly in the eye in proximity to the anterior chamber, thus allowing an increased amount of ctDNA to diffuse into the AH after radiation-induced necrosis of tumor cells.
In one patient, we attempted a tumor wash sample wherein the needle that had performed the tumor biopsy was washed with basic saline solution after it had already been flushed for clinical GEP analysis for Castle Biosciences. We were able to effectively identify ctDNA for research purposes without impacting the Castle Biosciences analysis required for the clinical care of this patient. We demonstrated near-complete concordance in the presence and amplitude of SCNAs between the genomic profiles from the post-radiation AH and tumor wash samples (Pearson’s r = 0.978; Figure 2D).
Finally, four post-radiation AH samples that harbored SCNAs (thus, a higher fraction of ctDNA) were evaluated for canonical UM mutations in BAP1 and GNAQ genes. Common UM mutations GNAQ/11 are thought to be an early event in the development of UM [32], and other mutations such as BAP1 portend a worse prognosis [32]. We identified tumor-derived de novo UM mutations in 3/4 (75%) post-radiation AH samples in BAP1 or GNAQ (Table 2). These were concordant with clinical tumor SNV testing results from Castle Biosciences in two patients with available clinical testing of tumor samples (Table 2).
Both the presence of SCNAs and SNVs in post-radiation AH samples provides strong evidence that dsDNA isolated from the AH is tumor-derived. SCNAs can be visualized by shallow WGS with lower nucleic acid input requirements with a lower limit of detection at ~5% tumor fraction [24]. Targeted next-generation sequencing for mutation detection requires higher nucleic acid input, which is a potential explanation for why some SCNA-containing samples with a known tumor SNV mutation were not detected. While further optimization is needed, these results suggest that the AH may serve as a valid surrogate biopsy to identify not only SCNAs but also specific UM mutations. As AH paracentesis is repeatable and can be performed in clinic, this may also facilitate the evaluation of other eye-specific biomarkers and longitudinal evaluation of local disease.
While we identified quantifiable amounts of dsDNA, ssDNA, miRNA, and RNA in the AH, the levels were much higher after radiation. In contrast to retinoblastoma, it appears that UM, known to be less necrotic, does not shed into the AH at the same level and may require radiation or other interventions to cause cell death and shedding [25,26]. This may be somewhat confounded by tumor size, as the majority of choroidal tumors in this cohort were relatively small. The larger and more anteriorly located CB tumors had a higher concentration of nucleic acids in post-radiation AH samples, which facilitated the detection of SCNAs and SNVs. Research has shown benefits in identifying tumor-derived prognostic molecular markers and even that eye color may play a role in the interaction of these biomarkers [33]. Thus, an AH liquid biopsy may serve as an adjunct to FNAB, for example, a biopsy performed at plaque placement and a paracentesis performed at the time of plaque removal, so that the complex prognostic association of tumoral biomarkers including GEP, SCNA, and mutations in key UM-related genes can be better understood and utilized.
A limitation of this study is that only 20 UM patients were evaluated, with the majority of choroidal tumors being relatively small. Additionally, because there are some risks associated with tumor biopsy, tumor was not available for research only analysis. We relied instead on clinically available information from Castle Biosciences testing. This was available for most, but not all patients. Future studies should maximize the availability of tumors as well as include larger study populations and larger choroidal tumors. Most liquid biopsy platforms center on identifying ctDNA, which was the aim of our study as well. However, we are also investigating other nucleic acids as potential biomarkers in UM. MiRNA has been detected in plasma, enveloped in extracellular vesicles, and discovered here in the AH; miRNA has been investigated as a significant target in many cancers, and future studies should explore its role in UM [34].

4. Materials and Methods

This investigation was a case series study at a tertiary care hospital (University of Southern California Roski Eye Institute). Samples were taken between August 2020 and May 2021.

4.1. Patient and Specimen Characteristics

This study included a convenience sample of 20 UM patients at the University of Southern California Roski Eye Institute from whom written informed consent for an AH sample was obtained. All samples consisted of ~0.1 mL of AH extracted via clear cornea paracentesis at the end of surgery for brachytherapy plaque placement (pre-radiation), brachytherapy plaque removal (post-radiation) or after enucleation without radiation. We include 37 AH samples from 20 UM eyes: a total of 17 matched AH samples pre-radiation and post-radiation, two AH samples post-radiation only, and one AH sample after enucleation without radiation. Radiation methods in the treatment of UM have been detailed and published previously [35] Genomic testing results were coded and maintained separately from clinical data and thus did not alter patient treatment for all participants.

4.2. Specimen Collection and Storage

A clear corneal paracentesis with a 30-gauge needle was performed to extract ~0.1 mL of AH from UM eyes during clinically indicated surgery to treat UM. The extraction method has been described in detail and published previously by our group for specimen collection from retinoblastoma eyes [26]. Briefly, needles only entered the anterior chamber via the clear cornea at the limbus and did not make contact with the iris, lens, vitreous, or UM tumor. Samples were stored on dry ice immediately and transferred to −80 °C within hours of extraction. Routine FNAB with either a 25- or 27-gauge needle was conducted on 14 patients for mutational analysis and 15 patients for GEP and PRAME status which was performed at Castle Biosciences (Phoenix, AZ, USA). In one patient, the same tumor biopsy needle was washed with basic saline solution separately to obtain a tumor wash sample.

4.3. Analysis of Nucleic Acid Content in the AH

Nucleic acids (dsDNA, ssDNA, RNA, and miRNA) were assayed using Qubit Assay Kits (Thermo Fischer, Waltham, MA, USA), which measures the concentration of the assayed nucleic acid with the Qubit Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s manual.

4.4. Genomic Analysis of Samples

All samples underwent DNA isolation, sequencing, and analysis within 1 month of collection, as consistent with established methods of SCNA analysis [1,2,3]. Briefly, cell-free DNA of AH was isolated with the QIAamp circulating nucleic acid kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and DNA from FNAB was isolated with the QIAamp DNA blood mini kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Isolated DNA was used to prepare whole-genome libraries with the QIAseq Ultralow Input Library Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) followed by 2 × 150 bp paired end shallow 0.1–0.3x whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for copy-number alteration profiling. SCNAs were considered to be present at 20% deflection from a baseline human genome, which is based on liquid biopsy analyses that have been previously established [26,36].

4.5. Single Nucleotide Variants (SNV) Analysis of Samples

For four SCNA-positive AH samples (UM_005, 007, 012, and 013), the same sequencing libraries then underwent targeted resequencing for mutation detection using a customized hybridization panel laboratory developed test (Twist Bioscience, San Francisco, CA, USA) at the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles Center for Personalized Medicine that covers BAP1 and GNAQ gene exon regions. Bioinformatics analysis was performed in parallel and blind to the clinically available tumor testing (Castle Biosciences, Phoenix, AZ, USA). Results were compared to tumor SNV results in all but one patient for whom AH analysis was performed but there was no matched clinical analysis as insurance refused to cover the Castle testing.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were compared using the Fisher’s exact test or linear-by-linear association test as indicated. Continuous variables were summarized as the mean ± standard error and percentages and non-normally distributed variables were compared by the Mann–Whitney U test. Paired t-test was used for pre- and post- paired AH sample comparison. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. p-values are represented as: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001. The Pearson’s coefficient was calculated by comparing the segmented ratio to medians at 5k bins. All statistical analyses and plots were conducted using the Prism 8 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the AH is a source of ctDNA in UM, with a significantly higher yield of nucleic acids after radiation. Given the significantly higher concentration of nucleic acids in CB AH compared to choroidal AH, AH biopsy may be more useful in anteriorly located tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first study determining that (1) tumor nucleic acids are present and quantifiable in the AH of UM eyes and that (2) UM SCNAs and mutations can be identified from the AH. These results suggest that the AH can serve as a liquid biopsy for UM, especially in CB tumors. With further investigations, this novel AH liquid biopsy platform may allow clinicians to better prognosticate, monitor disease progression, and investigate local intraocular biomarkers for UM.

6. Patents

Drs. Berry, Xu and Hicks have filed a patent application entitled: Aqueous humor cell free DNA for diagnostic and Prognostic evaluation of Ophthalmic Disease.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23116226/s1.

Author Contributions

J.L.B. and L.X. conceived of the presented idea. M.E.K. and L.X. carried out the data collection and data analysis. D.H.I. and C.-C.P. prepared the original draft. D.H.I., C.-C.P., L.X., M.E.K., D.O., V.Y., M.B., J.A.B., X.G., R.K.P., P.K., J.H. and J.L.B. contributed to original draft editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Berle & Lucy Adams Chair in Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute of the National Institute of Health Award Number K08CA232344. Knights Templar Eye Foundation, The Larry and Celia Moh Foundation, The Institute for Families, Inc., Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, an unrestricted departmental grant from Research to Prevent Blindness. The Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation (J.H., P.K.). Dr. Berry has grant support not directly related to the scope of work from: Hyundai Hope on Wheels, Childhood Eye Cancer Trust, Wright Foundation, Children’s Cancer Research Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California (HS-19-00293) and at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA-20-00167). The research conformed to the requirements of the United States Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

We’d like to acknowledge Brianne Brown, Dilshad Contractor, and Armine Begijianmasihi for the coordination of this study, David Ruble for technical assistance, as well as Mark Reid for biostatistical expertise. We’d also like to acknowledge Arnold Michels, a tireless activist for research endeavors, and staunch supporter in the fight against uveal melanoma. This work is dedicated to him.

Conflicts of Interest

Berry, Xu and Hicks have filed a patent application entitled: Aqueous humor cell free DNA for diagnostic and Prognostic evaluation of Ophthalmic Disease. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Jager, M.J.; Shields, C.L.; Cebulla, C.M.; Abdel-Rahman, M.H.; Grossniklaus, H.E.; Stern, M.-H.; Carvajal, R.D.; Belfort, R.N.; Jia, R.; Shields, J.A.; et al. Uveal melanoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2020, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kujala, E.; Mäkitie, T.; Kivelä, T. Very Long-Term Prognosis of Patients with Malignant Uveal Melanoma. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003, 44, 4651–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Damato, E.M.; Damato, B.E. Detection and Time to Treatment of Uveal Melanoma in the United Kingdom: An Evaluation of 2384 Patients. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 1582–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jager, M.J.; Brouwer, N.J.; Esmaeli, B. The Cancer Genome Atlas Project: An Integrated Molecular View of Uveal Melanoma. Ophthalmology 2018, 125, 1139–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Onken, M.D.; Worley, L.A.; Char, D.H.; Augsburger, J.J.; Correa, Z.M.; Nudleman, E.; Aaberg, T.M., Jr.; Altaweel, M.M.; Bardenstein, D.S.; Finger, P.T.; et al. Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Report Number 1: Prospective Validation of a Multi-Gene Prognostic Assay in Uveal Melanoma. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 1596–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Shields, C.L.; Say, E.A.T.; Hasanreisoglu, M.; Saktanasate, J.; Lawson, B.M.; Landy, J.E.; Badami, A.U.; Sivalingam, M.D.; Mashayekhi, A.; Shields, J.A.; et al. Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Uveal Melanoma Based on Tumor Features and Size in 1059 Patients: The 2016 W. Richard Green Lecture. Ophthalmology 2017, 124, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Staby, K.M.; Gravdal, K.; Mørk, S.J.; Heegaard, S.; Vintermyr, O.K.; Krohn, J. Prognostic impact of chromosomal aberrations and GNAQ, GNA11 and BAP1 mutations in uveal melanoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 96, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bagger, M.; Andersen, M.T.; Andersen, K.K.; Heegaard, S.; Kiilgaard, J.F. The Prognostic Effect of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging and Genetic Status in Patients with Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanoma. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 56, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Dogrusöz, M.; Bagger, M.; Van Duinen, S.G.; Kroes, W.G.; Ruivenkamp, C.A.L.; Böhringer, S.; Andersen, K.K.; Luyten, G.P.M.; Kiilgaard, J.F.; Jager, M.J. The Prognostic Value of AJCC Staging in Uveal Melanoma Is Enhanced by Adding Chromosome 3 and 8q Status. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2017, 58, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Gelmi, M.C.; Bas, Z.; Malkani, K.; Ganguly, A.; Shields, C.L.; Jager, M.J. Adding the Cancer Genome Atlas Chromosome Classes to American Joint Committee on Cancer System Offers More Precise Prognostication in Uveal Melanoma. Ophthalmology 2021, 129, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ewens, K.G.; Kanetsky, P.A.; Richards-Yutz, J.; Purrazzella, J.; Shields, C.L.; Ganguly, T.; Ganguly, A. Chromosome 3 Status Combined with BAP1 and EIF1AX Mutation Profiles Are Associated with Metastasis in Uveal Melanoma. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 5160–5167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Decatur, C.L.; Ong, E.; Garg, N.; Anbunathan, H.; Bowcock, A.M.; Field, M.G.; Harbour, J.W. Driver Mutations in Uveal Melanoma: Associations with Gene Expression Profile and Patient Outcomes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016, 134, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Sellam, A.; Desjardins, L.; Barnhill, R.; Plancher, C.; Asselain, B.; Savignoni, A.; Pierron, G.; Cassoux, N. Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Uveal Melanoma: Technique, Complications, and Outcomes. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 162, 28–34.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bagger, M.; Smidt-Nielsen, I.; Andersen, M.K.; Jensen, P.K.; Heegaard, S.; Andersen, K.K.; Friis, S.; Kiilgaard, J.F. Long-Term Metastatic Risk after Biopsy of Posterior Uveal Melanoma. Ophthalmology 2018, 125, 1969–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jin, E.; Burnier, J.V. Liquid Biopsy in Uveal Melanoma: Are We There Yet? Ocul. Oncol. Pathol. 2021, 7, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Suesskind, D.; Ulmer, A.; Schiebel, U.; Fierlbeck, G.; Spitzer, B.; Spitzer, M.S.; Bartz-Schmidt, K.U.; Grisanti, S. Circulating melanoma cells in peripheral blood of patients with uveal melanoma before and after different therapies and association with prognostic parameters: A pilot study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011, 89, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bande, M.F.; Santiago, M.; Muinelo-Romay, L.; Blanco, M.J.; Mera, P.; Capeans, C.; Pardo, M.; Piñeiro, A. Detection of circulating melanoma cells in choroidal melanocytic lesions. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Anand, K.; Roszik, J.; Gombos, D.; Upshaw, J.; Sarli, V.; Meas, S.; Lucci, A.; Hall, C.; Patel, S. Pilot Study of Circulating Tumor Cells in Early-Stage and Metastatic Uveal Melanoma. Cancers 2019, 11, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wierenga, A.P.A.; Gezgin, G.; van Beelen, E.; Eikmans, M.; Spruyt-Gerritse, M.; Brouwer, N.J.; Versluis, M.; Verdijk, R.M.; van Duinen, S.G.; Marinkovic, M.; et al. Soluble HLA in the Aqueous Humour of Uveal Melanoma Is Associated with Unfavourable Tumour Characteristics. Cancers 2019, 11, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wierenga, A.P.A.; Cao, J.; Mouthaan, H.; Van Weeghel, C.; Verdijk, R.M.; Van Duinen, S.G.; Kroes, W.G.M.; Dogrusöz, M.; Marinkovic, M.; Van Der Burg, S.S.H.; et al. Aqueous Humor Biomarkers Identify Three Prognostic Groups in Uveal Melanoma. Investig. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 4740–4747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lee, C.S.; Jun, I.H.; Kim, T.-I.; Byeon, S.H.; Koh, H.J.; Lee, S.C. Expression of 12 cytokines in aqueous humour of uveal melanoma before and after combined Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy and transpupillary thermotherapy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012, 90, e314–e320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Cheng, Y.; Feng, J.; Zhu, X.; Liang, J. Cytokines concentrations in aqueous humor of eyes with uveal melanoma. Medicine 2019, 98, e14030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Midena, E.; Parrozzani, R.; Midena, G.; Trainiti, S.; Marchione, G.; Cosmo, E.; Londei, D.; Frizziero, L. In vivo intraocular biomarkers: Changes of aqueous humor cytokines and chem-okines in patients affected by uveal melanoma. Medicine 2020, 99, e22091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kim, M.E.; Xu, L.; Prabakar, R.K.; Shen, L.; Peng, C.-C.; Kuhn, P.; Gai, X.; Hicks, J.; Berry, J.L. Aqueous Humor as a Liquid Biopsy for Retinoblastoma: Clear Corneal Paracentesis and Genomic Analysis. J. Vis. Exp. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, L.; Polski, A.; Prabakar, R.K.; Reid, M.W.; Chevez-Barrios, P.; Jubran, R.; Kim, J.W.; Kuhn, P.; Cobrinik, D.; Hicks, J.; et al. Chromosome 6p Amplification in Aqueous Humor Cell-Free DNA Is a Prognostic Biomarker for Retinoblastoma Ocular Survival. Mol. Cancer Res. 2020, 18, 1166–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Berry, J.L.; Xu, L.; Kooi, I.; Murphree, A.L.; Prabakar, R.K.; Reid, M.W.; Stachelek, K.; Le, B.H.A.; Welter, L.; Reiser, B.J.; et al. Genomic cfDNA Analysis of Aqueous Humor in Retinoblastoma Predicts Eye Salvage: The Surrogate Tumor Biopsy for Retinoblastoma. Mol. Cancer Res. 2018, 16, 1701–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Berry, J.L.; Xu, L.; Murphree, A.L.; Krishnan, S.; Stachelek, K.; Zolfaghari, E.; McGovern, K.; Kathleen, M.; Carlsson, A.; Kuhn, P.; et al. Potential of Aqueous Humor as a Surrogate Tumor Biopsy for Retinoblastoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017, 135, 1221–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Xu, L.; Kim, M.; Polski, A.; Prabakar, R.; Shen, L.; Peng, C.-C.; Reid, M.; Chévez-Barrios, P.; Kim, J.; Shah, R.; et al. Establishing the Clinical Utility of ctDNA Analysis for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Monitoring of Retinoblastoma: The Aqueous Humor Liquid Biopsy. Cancers 2021, 13, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gerrish, A.; Stone, E.; Clokie, S.; Ainsworth, J.R.; Jenkinson, H.; McCalla, M.; Hitchcott, C.; Colmenero, I.; Allen, S.; Parulekar, M.; et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of retinoblastoma using cell-free DNA from aqueous humour. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 103, 721–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Le Gall, J.; Dehainault, C.; Benoist, C.; Matet, A.; Rouic, L.L.-L.; Aerts, I.; Jiménez, I.; Schleiermacher, G.; Houdayer, C.; Radvanyi, F.; et al. Highly Sensitive Detection Method of Retinoblastoma Genetic Predisposition and Biomarkers. J. Mol. Diagn. 2021, 23, 1714–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Johansson, P.A.; Brooks, K.; Newell, F.; Palmer, J.M.; Wilmott, J.S.; Pritchard, A.L.; Broit, N.; Wood, S.; Carlino, M.S.; Leonard, C.; et al. Whole genome landscapes of uveal melanoma show an ultraviolet radiation signature in iris tumours. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vader, M.J.C.; Madigan, M.C.; Versluis, M.; Suleiman, H.M.; Gezgin, G.; A Gruis, N.; Out-Luiting, J.J.; Bergman, W.; Verdijk, R.M.; Jager, M.J.; et al. GNAQ and GNA11 mutations and downstream YAP activation in choroidal nevi. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 117, 884–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Wierenga, A.P.; Brouwer, N.J.; Gelmi, M.C.; Verdijk, R.M.; Stern, M.-H.; Bas, Z.; Malkani, K.; van Duinen, S.G.; Ganguly, A.; Kroes, W.G.; et al. Chromosome 3 and 8q Aberrations in Uveal Melanoma Show Greater Impact on Survival in Patients with Light Iris versus Dark Iris Color. Ophthalmology 2022, 129, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, Y.S.; Dutta, A. MicroRNAs in Cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2009, 4, 199–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Joh, S.; Kim, M.E.; Reilly, M.; Zhou, S.Y.; Kim, J.; Jennelle, R.L.; Berry, A.D.O.O.O.J.L. Outpatient Ocular Brachytherapy: The USC Experience. Adv. Radiat. Oncol. 2021, 6, 100737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Baslan, T.; Kendall, J.; Rodgers, L.; Cox, H.; Riggs, M.; Stepansky, A.; Troge, J.; Ravi, K.; Esposito, D.; Lakshmi, B.; et al. Genome-wide copy number analysis of single cells. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7, 1024–1041, Erratum in Commun. Nat. Protoc. 2016, 11, 616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 06226 g001 550
Figure 1. Quantification of cell-free nucleic acids in UM aqueous humor samples before (pre-) and after (post-) radiation. Concentration of (A), double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), (B), single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), (C), RNA and (D), microRNA (miRNA), were determined in 18 (9-paired) choroidal melanoma (choroidal) and 16 (8-paired) ciliary body (CB) melanoma AH samples. AH samples were grouped by collection time at pre- and post-radiation. P values were calculated by paired t-test. Mean and standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) were indicated. NA, not-available.
Figure 1. Quantification of cell-free nucleic acids in UM aqueous humor samples before (pre-) and after (post-) radiation. Concentration of (A), double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), (B), single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), (C), RNA and (D), microRNA (miRNA), were determined in 18 (9-paired) choroidal melanoma (choroidal) and 16 (8-paired) ciliary body (CB) melanoma AH samples. AH samples were grouped by collection time at pre- and post-radiation. P values were calculated by paired t-test. Mean and standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) were indicated. NA, not-available.
Ijms 23 06226 g001
Ijms 23 06226 g002 550
Figure 2. Somatic copy number alterations in UM post-radiation aqueous humor samples. (A) Schematic heatmap of the somatic copy number alterations (SCNA) in UM post-radiation AH samples. Gains and losses of chromosomes are shown. (B) Comparison of SCNA status (altered/neutral) between choroidal UM (n = 11) and ciliary body tumor (n = 8) in post-radiation samples. P value was calculated by the Fisher’s exact test. (C,D) Altered SCNA profiles identified from 6 UM post-radiation AH samples (UM_005, 007, 012, 013, 014 and 019). Highly recurrent UM SCNAs (monosomy 3, 6p gain, 6q loss and 8q gain) are indicated with an * on DNA profiles. (D) Consistency of the copy number variation (CNV) profile between UM_019_pre, UM_019_post and its corresponding tumor wash sample. Pearson’s correlation coefficient compared at 5k bins between each sample is indicated.
Figure 2. Somatic copy number alterations in UM post-radiation aqueous humor samples. (A) Schematic heatmap of the somatic copy number alterations (SCNA) in UM post-radiation AH samples. Gains and losses of chromosomes are shown. (B) Comparison of SCNA status (altered/neutral) between choroidal UM (n = 11) and ciliary body tumor (n = 8) in post-radiation samples. P value was calculated by the Fisher’s exact test. (C,D) Altered SCNA profiles identified from 6 UM post-radiation AH samples (UM_005, 007, 012, 013, 014 and 019). Highly recurrent UM SCNAs (monosomy 3, 6p gain, 6q loss and 8q gain) are indicated with an * on DNA profiles. (D) Consistency of the copy number variation (CNV) profile between UM_019_pre, UM_019_post and its corresponding tumor wash sample. Pearson’s correlation coefficient compared at 5k bins between each sample is indicated.
Ijms 23 06226 g002
Table
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of choroidal and ciliary body melanoma patients.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of choroidal and ciliary body melanoma patients.
CharacteristicChoroidal, n = 12Ciliary Body Tumor, n = 8p-Value
Gender, n (%) 0.197
Females5 (41.7)6 (75.0)
Males7 (58.3)2 (25.0)
Eye, n (%) 0.650
OD5 (41.7)5 (62.5)
OS7 (58.3)3 (37.5)
Age at diagnosis, mean (± SD)60.8 (12.5)54.0 (15.5)0.438
Eye Color, n (%) 0.999
Light (blue, gray, green, hazel)8 (66.7)6 (75.0)
Dark (brown)4 (33.3)2 (25.0)
Ciliary Body Involvement, n (%) <0.001
Yes0 (0)8 (100)
No12 (100)0 (0)
AJCC Stage, n (%) 0.003
I9 (75.0)1 (12.5)
IIA3 (25.0)4 (50.0)
IIB0 (0)2 (25.0)
IIIA, IIIB, IIIC0 (0)1 (12.5)
IV0 (0)0 (0)
PRAME Status, known in 15 cases, n (%) 0.999
Negative7 (100)7 (87.5)
Positive0 (0)1 (12.5)
GEP Class, known in 15 cases, n (%) 0.876
1A5 (71.4)6 (75.0)
1B0 (0)0 (0)
22 (28.6)2 (25.0)
Tumor Stage, n (%) 0.159
T19 (75.0)4 (50.0)
T23 (25.0)3 (37.5)
T30 (0)1 (12.5)
T40 (0)0 (0)
AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; GEP, gene expression profile; PRAME, preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma; SD, standard deviation; Categorical variables (Gender, Eye, Eye color, Ciliary body involvement, PRAME, and GEP Class) were compared by Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables (age at diagnosis) were compared by the Mann-Whitney U test. AJCC Stage and Tumor Stage were compared by Linear-by-Linear association.
Table
Table 2. Single nucleotide variant analysis of BAP1 and GNAQ in four CB patients.
Table 2. Single nucleotide variant analysis of BAP1 and GNAQ in four CB patients.
SampleBAP1 (VAF%)GNAQ (VAF%)
ciliary body tumor
UM_005_TumorNANA
UM_005_AHNDc.626A > T (42.9)
UM_007_TumorNDc.626A > T (23.2)
UM_007_AHNDc.626A > T (40.9)
UM_012_TumorNDc.626A > T (53.0)
UM_012_AHNDND
UM_013_Tumorc.830_831del (68.0)ND
UM_013_AHc.830_831del (81.8)ND
VAF, variant allele frequency; NA, not-available, tumor biopsy not conducted; ND, non-detectable Mutation detection assay in UM AH samples after radiation compared to clinical tumor single nucleotide variant (SNV) testing. UM mutations BAP1 and GNAQ were detected in 3/4 (75%) post-radiation AH. These were concordant with clinical tumor tissue SNV testing from Castle Biosciences in two patients with available clinical testing of tumor tissue samples.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Im, D.H.; Peng, C.-C.; Xu, L.; Kim, M.E.; Ostrow, D.; Yellapantula, V.; Bootwalla, M.; Biegel, J.A.; Gai, X.; Prabakar, R.K.; et al. Potential of Aqueous Humor as a Liquid Biopsy for Uveal Melanoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116226

AMA Style

Im DH, Peng C-C, Xu L, Kim ME, Ostrow D, Yellapantula V, Bootwalla M, Biegel JA, Gai X, Prabakar RK, et al. Potential of Aqueous Humor as a Liquid Biopsy for Uveal Melanoma. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(11):6226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116226

Chicago/Turabian Style

Im, Deborah H., Chen-Ching Peng, Liya Xu, Mary E. Kim, Dejerianne Ostrow, Venkata Yellapantula, Moiz Bootwalla, Jaclyn A. Biegel, Xiaowu Gai, Rishvanth K. Prabakar, and et al. 2022. "Potential of Aqueous Humor as a Liquid Biopsy for Uveal Melanoma" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 11: 6226. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116226

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop