Next Article in Journal
The Metabolism of a Novel Cytochrome P450 (CYP77B34) in Tribenuron-Methyl-Resistant Descurainia sophia L. to Herbicides with Different Mode of Actions
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of SBI2/ALG12/EBS4 in the Regulation of Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation (ERAD) Studied by a Null Allele
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adsorption Behavior of 3-phenoxybenzoic Acid by Lactobacillus Plantarum and Its Potential Application in Simulated Digestive Juices

1
College of Food Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China
2
Institute of Food Processing and Safety, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625014, China
3
College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
4
Integrated Agricultural Development Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China
5
College of Resources, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(10), 5809; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105809
Submission received: 22 April 2022 / Revised: 13 May 2022 / Accepted: 19 May 2022 / Published: 22 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)

Abstract

:
3-PBA is a major degradation intermediate of pyrethroids. Its widespread existence in the environment poses a severe threat to the ecosystem and human health. This study evaluated the adsorption capacity of L. plantarum RS20 toward 3-PBA. Batch adsorption experiments indicated that the optimal adsorption conditions were a temperature of 37 °C and initial pH of 6.0–8.0, under which the removal rate was positively correlated with the cell concentration. In addition, there was no link between the incubation time and adsorption rate. The kinetic study showed that the adsorption process fitted well with the pseudo-second-order model, and the adsorption isotherms could be described by both Langmuir and Freundlich equations. Heat and acid treatments showed that the ability of strain RS20 in removing 3-PBA was independent of microbial vitality. Indeed, it was involved with chemisorption and physisorption via the cell walls. The cell walls made the highest contribution to 3-PBA removal, according to the adsorption experiments using different cellular components. This finding was further reconfirmed by SEM. FTIR spectroscopy analysis indicated that carboxyl, hydroxyl, amino groups, and –C–N were the functional sites for the binding of 3-PBA. The co-culture experiments showed that the adsorption of strain RS20 enhanced the degradation of 3-PBA by strain SC-1. Strain RS20 could also survive and effectively remove 3-PBA in simulated digestive juices. Collectively, strain RS20 could be employed as a biological detoxification agent for humans and animals by eliminating 3-PBA from foods, feeds, and the digestive tract in the future.

1. Introduction

Due to the growth of the world’s population, the pressure on food production has increased, which has led to an increase in the use of pesticides. Synthetic pyrethroid insecticides (SPs) are widely used to prevent and remove insects both in agriculture and households because of their broad-spectrum insecticidal and high effectiveness [1]. However, due to their high recalcitrance and strong hydrophobicity, SPs may eventually pose risks or threats toward animal and human life. As a key degradation intermediate of SPs, 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA) is refractory to natural degradation, possessing a half-life of 120–180 d in soil, which is significantly longer than that of its parent compound, which is approximately 30 d [2]. Additionally, 3-PBA exhibits higher mobility and stronger polarity compared with SPs. Accumulating evidence suggests that 3-PBA can be classified as an endocrine-disrupting chemical and it demonstrates ubiquity in the environment [3,4]. In recent years, 3-PBA bioelimination using microorganisms has emerged as a research hotspot and attracted more attention [3]. Microbial methods can be mainly categorized into biodegradation and bioadsorption. Bioadsorption is considered to be a safer approach, since new toxic byproducts may be avoided. Additionally, toxic substances removal by microorganisms has outstanding advantages, including being simple to use and having low cost, high adsorption capacity, and high availability [5].
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are one kind of intestinal probiotic and have been employed in food fermentation for at least 4000 years, such as cheese and yogurt [6]. At present, many studies have reported that LAB can remove toxic and harmful substances, including mycotoxins, plasticizers, and heavy metals [3]. Particularly, Lactobacillus [7] and Bifidobacterium [8] are the main participants. On the other hand, LAB-derived products can also be added to poultry and livestock feedstuffs to bind mycotoxins. For instance, deoxynivalenol, fumonisins B1, and fumonisins B2 were considerably removed by inoculating LAB during fodder fermentation [9]. It is also worthy to mention that the mycotoxin adsorption ability depends on the microbial candidate, according to the findings of El-Nezami et al. that Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus rhamnosus LC-705 displayed different abilities in removing common fusarium toxins, trichothecenes [10]. LAB, as probiotics, are a kind of safe and edible microorganism commonly found in the natural environment. Many health benefits have been attributed to probiotic LAB, including the prevention of lactose intolerance, anti-carcinogenic effects, immunostimulatory effects, anti-obesity, and the reduction of serum cholesterol levels, among others [11]. To our best knowledge, there have been few studies reporting 3-PBA adsorption by LAB.
In the present study, L. plantarum RS20 was isolated from traditional Chinese home-made fermented vegetables (Sichuan paocai) and efficiently adsorbed 3-PBA. The characteristics and mechanism of 3-PBA adsorption by L. plantarum RS20 were explored. Additionally, its adsorption applications in intestinal gastric juice were evaluated, paving the way for food, feed, or intestinal probiotic products.

2. Results

2.1. 3-PBA Tolerance of L. plantarum RS20

Strain RS20 was isolated from Chinese home-made fermented vegetables (Sichuan paocai) and identified as Lactobacillus plantarum by physiological, biochemical, and molecular biology (Supplementary Figures S1–S3 and Table S1). The growth curves of L. plantarum RS20 at different 3-PBA concentrations are presented as Figure 1. It can be observed that the growth patterns were essentially similar in the absence and presence of 3-PBA. The strain entered the logarithmic phase after about 4 h, which was reflected in the medium’s turbidity increasing rapidly. Then, a stable phase was reached at 16 h. However, 3-PBA exerted an adverse effect on bacteria to an extent when it was at a high concentration (100 mg/L), which was embodied as the growth rate significantly slowing down. This inhibition could be ignored when the concentrations of 3-PBA were 5 and 50 mg/L, indicating that L. plantarum RS20 demonstrated good tolerance to 3-PBA.

2.2. Effects of Different Factors on 3-PBA Removal

The 3-PBA adsorption rate of L. plantarum RS20 reached 71.09% since the incubation started at 0.5 h. With the extension of time, the adsorption firstly decreased to a certain extent, which may be related to the desorption behavior. After that, the adsorption rate increased slowly and gradually reached equilibrium (73.21%) at 8 h (Figure 2a). This demonstration is similar to the report of Tang et al. [12], where complete aflatoxin B1 adsorption was attained within 30 min by Lactobacillus F22. However, the adsorption efficiency decreased dramatically after 4 h, indicating that the mycotoxin adsorption by lactic acid bacteria was rapid and reversible.
As shown in Figure 2b, the 3-PBA adsorption rate changed slightly in the range of 15–30 °C and was maintained below 60%. The adsorption rate reached the highest when the temperature was 37 °C; however, it dropped below 60% again when the temperature rose to 42 °C. The same performance was observed by Khanafari et al. [13] during aflatoxin adsorption by Lactobacillus plantarum. In their case, the highest yield was also attained at 37 °C. In addition, Zhang et al. [14] reported that the fumonisin adsorption rate of lactic acid bacteria reached the maximum at 37 °C, then it plunged beyond this temperature, which was similar to the present study. In comparison with neutral conditions, acidic and alkaline conditions exerted negative effects on 3-PBA adsorption by L. plantarum RS20. In particular, the interaction between strain RS20 and 3-PBA was significantly changed under pH 2.0–6.0 and the 3-PBA adsorption rate varied from 63.79% to 68.45% (Figure 2c). Fernandez [15] found that two strains of Enterococcus sp. could adsorb aflatoxin efficiently when the pH was 7.0. The results are consistent with this paper, indicating that hydrogen bonding and ionic exchange may be the main interaction forces binding the cell and 3-PBA.
The effects of biomass amount and 3-PBA concentration on 3-PBA removal are presented in Figure 2d,e. As it can be seen, the adsorption rate was positively related to the biomass amount, and the effect was obvious. When the volume of the reaction system was constant, the number of bacteria increased with the increase in the concentration, and the concentration of 3-PBA remained unchanged. Similarly, the higher the biomass, the higher the adsorption of 3-PBA. With respect to the substrate concentration, the highest adsorption rate was achieved when 3-PBA was fortified at 5 mg/L. In this scenario, the adsorption rate did not greatly increase with the increase in the contaminant concentration, which may be due to the fact that there were far more adsorption sites than adsorbate. Zhang et al. [16] analyzed the adsorption capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae toward cypermethrin, and the results indicated that adsorption rate was closely related to the adsorption sites, instead of the substrate concentration.
To sum up, the best demonstration could be attained by setting the conditions as follows: pH 6.0–8.0, incubation time of 8 h, and incubation temperature of 37 °C. Additionally, there was a positive correlation between the adsorption rate and cell concentration.

2.3. Adsorption Kinetics

Kinetics models (pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and Weber–Morris intraparticle diffusion models) are usually used to depict the adsorption process and mechanism for traditional adsorbents [17,18]. The pseudo-first-order model and pseudo-second-order model are generally used to simulate the initial phase and all phases of biosorption [19], respectively. Figure 3a,b shows the pseudo-first/second-order model results of 3-PBA adsorption by L. plantarum RS20, among which the latter model showed a higher degree of fitting (R2 = 0.9996). 3-PBA adsorption by L. plantarum RS20 conformed to the pseudo-second-order model, and the equation could reflect more comprehensive and truer behaviors than the pseudo-first-order model. Therefore, it can be speculated that chemisorption is involved in 3-PBA biosorption and may be the rate-limiting step [20]. This is in line with the report of Zhang et al. [16] that cypermethrin adsorption by Saccharomyces cerevisiae followed the pseudo-second-order model, and similar results were also observed by Gohari [21].
The Weber–Morris model is presented in Figure 3c. The Weber–Morris model is commonly used for control analysis. The model assumes that the liquid film diffusion resistance can be ignored and the intra-particle diffusion rate constant of the adsorbent does not change along with the adsorption time and location. The adsorption process was split into two regions, and neither qt nor t1/2 passed through the origin, indicating that intra particle diffusion was not the only step controlling the adsorption process. The initial step was a rapid reaction, in which 3-PBA molecules were diffused from the solution to the bacterial surface through the liquid membrane in a short time. Then, adsorption approached equilibrium after about 30 min (t1/2 = 5.48), and the combination of 3-PBA with the cellular surface’s active functional groups occurred in this second step [22].

2.4. Adsorption Isotherms

Several mathematical models are used to evaluate the adsorption strength and predict the biosorption capacity [23]. The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models were used to analyze the data regarding 3-PBA biosorption in the present study. The calculated parameters are given in Table 1—the Langmuir model was more suitable than the Freundlich model, with a higher R2 value (0.989). Similarly, Dai et al. [24] reported that the adsorption of Pb (II) by Lactobacillus brevis can be well fitted by Langmuir isotherm models. From the parameters of the Langmuir isotherm, the equilibrium adsorption value reached 10.725 mg/g, which indicates that the adsorption process seemed to involve physisorption.

2.5. Adsorption Mechanism of 3-PBA

2.5.1. Effects of Pretreatment on the 3-PBA Adsorption Ability

Cells were deactivated using heat and acid. Their 3-PBA adsorption capacity was investigated and compared to that of live cells. The results are shown in Figure 4. The adsorption ability of L. plantarum RS20 toward 3-PBA did not decline after different treatments. Instead, higher removals (p < 0.05) were obtained using heating and acid in comparison with the control, with adsorption rates of 74.44% and 84.53%, respectively.
Studies have shown that surface adsorption by lactic acid bacteria is related to peptidoglycans and polysaccharides, which are extremely sensitive to heat and acid treatment. Heat denatures proteins and causes a Maillard reaction between polysaccharides and proteins, whereas acid treatment destroys the glycosidic bond of polysaccharides, that is, it destroys the peptidoglycan structure, which could probably explain the rise in the 3-PBA adsorption capacity after acid treatment (Figure 4). Wang et al. [25] found that the main factors affecting penicillin absorption by Lactobacillus brevis 20,023 were polysaccharides and proteins, mainly concerning the functional groups C–O, OH, and/or NH.
Figure 4 shows that the surface adsorption by lactic acid bacteria was not significantly different between the viable and heat-treated bacteria, indicating that the adsorption process was not dependent on biomass viability. This phenomenon can be ascribed to the adsorption process not being biodegradation or biotransformation, but biosorption [26]. Similar results were reported by McKinley et al. [27], where aflatoxin B1 and zearalenone adsorption by gastro-intestinal flora were investigated. It was found that the inactivated strains exhibited the same or even higher effectiveness in addressing these toxins compared with live strains, which is consistent with the results obtained in present study, showing that the 3-PBA adsorption rate significantly decreased before and after heat treatment. On the contrary, Hatab et al. [28] reported that there was no significant difference in the patpenicillin removal ability of dead lactic acid bacteria and live ones. The reason is that mycotoxin removal by Bifidobacterium bifidum 6071 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus 6149 mainly depended on adsorption to the cellular surface.
Nowadays, numerous biological technologies have been developed to remove toxic substances from the environment, which have shed light on on-site remediation. However, choosing a suitable biomaterial is a major challenge in this context. At present, living/dead microorganisms and surface-modified biomass are the most prevailing candidates. With respect to L. plantarum RS20, the adsorption process was not dependent on biomass viability. Extensive literature suggests that the probiotic nature of LAB depends on peptidoglycan, polysaccharides, or metabolites. Therefore, L. Plantarum RS20 can be used as a biomaterial to remove 3-PBA, and probiotics can be kept in the intestines when used in feed or food in the future.
Figure 4 also shows that the adsorption rates in all treatment groups decreased (23%) after eluting with PBS buffer solution. This was the consequence of desorption, which indicated that non-covalent bonding (physical adsorption) existed during 3-PBA adsorption. This observation is consistent with the effect of pH on the adsorption rate, since the adsorption rate of 3-PBA significantly changed under pH 2.0–6.0, indicating that hydrogen bonding and ionic exchange may have been the main interaction forces binding the cell and 3-PBA. Similar results were reported previously by Shen et al. [29], where acrylamide was physically adsorbed by L. plantarum, which was closely associated with the cell wall roughness, hydrophobicity, nitrogen-to-carbon (N/C) ratio, and functional groups.

2.5.2. Adsorption Ability of Different Cellular Structures

To our best knowledge, most researchers agree with the mechanism that proteins, carbohydrates, peptidoglycan, polysaccharides, and other substances in the lactic acid bacterial cell wall play key roles within the pollutant adsorption process [30], so this aspect was also considered in the present study. Figure 5 shows the adsorption ability of bacterial cells in the absence of either EPS or surface proteins, and the cell wall toward 3-PBA. A significant difference in terms of the adsorption rate was observed between the cells in the absence and presence of EPS, which indicates that EPS contributed to 3-PBA adsorption. The cell walls exhibited the greatest capability to remove 3-PBA (70.92%). Additionally, the 3-PBA adsorption rate of the bacterial cells in the absence of the cell surface protein was 40.86–43.79%. In contrast, the adsorption rate was only 9.32% for the protoplast. These results suggest that there are many adsorption sites on cell walls, among which the cell surface protein plays a significant role. Haskard et al. investigated the adsorption mechanism of aflatoxin B1 by L. rhamnosus strain GG and L. rhamnosus strain LC-705 and found that the extracellular bacterial surface affected the process [31].
L. plantarum RS20 is a Gram-positive bacterium, the main components of the cell wall of which are peptidoglycan and teichoic acid. Their 3-PBA adsorption rates are 54.83% and 16.09%, respectively. Therefore, peptidoglycan played the main role in 3-PBA adsorption in the cell wall. However, different findings were reported by Zhang et al. [32] in the case of patulin adsorption by yeast, where physical adsorption was mainly due to proteins and polysaccharides. Hence, further research is needed to address the mechanisms behind this.

2.5.3. SEM Analysis

The effect of 3-PBA on the cells was analyzed by SEM. The contaminant was spiked at two different concentrations, 5 mg/L and 100 mg/L. As shown in Figure 6, compared with the blank control, cells retained their short rod structure and their appearance did not change significantly after adsorption when 3-PBA was fortified at 5 mg/L. However, the cell surface became rough, together with distinct granular material adhering to the surface after raising the substrate concentration to 100 mg/L 3-PBA. On the other hand, none of the cells in the experimental group exhibited cleavage and perforation. Therefore, based on the above results, it can be inferred that 3-PBA binds to the active sites on the cell’s surface.

2.5.4. FT-IR Analysis

To better understand the surface adsorption mechanism, FT-IR analysis was employed to identify potential functional groups participating in 3-PBA removal by L. plantarum RS20 (Figure 7). Characteristic peaks were identified according to the references [33,34]. Compared with the FT-IR spectra of the control, the peak position of the bound 3-PBA shifted. The peak at 3304 cm−1 was the result of –OH and N–H stretching vibrations. The wavenumber shifted to 3296 and 3295 cm−1, respectively, after exposure to 3-PBA at 5 and 100 mg/L, indicating that –OH/–N–H contributed to 3-PBA adsorption. The peaks at 2933, 1658, 1545, 1454, and 1065 cm−1 generally shifted toward lower wavenumbers when 3-PBA was present. The absorption peak at 1445 cm−1 was in the amide II region, and it corresponded to a combination of the N–H in-plane bending and the –CN stretching vibration [35]. The peaks at 1407 cm−1 shifted to 1381 cm−1 and 1375 cm−1, which were assigned to amide III, indicating that amide promoted 3-PBA adsorption. The observed changes indicated that the –OH, –N–H, –C–N, and –C–O groups were involved in the 3-PBA biosorption process. These functional groups have also been reported to be involved in other xenobiotics’ bio adsorption, including cypermethrin, patulin, and Cd2+ [16,28,36].

2.6. 3-PBA Adsorption Assay under Simulated GI Conditions

Considering that the application of lactic acid bacteria as probiotics in food and feed has great potential [37,38], we evaluated the tolerance of L. plantarum RS20 to the gastrointestinal tract via simulated gastric and intestinal juices. As shown in Figure 8, it can be seen that the survival rates of L. plantarum RS20 were more than 90% in simulated gastric and intestinal juices after treatment, indicating that this strain could tolerate the simulated GI tract conditions and remain relatively viable. Zoghi et al. reported that L. plantarum has a high ability to remove patulin under GI conditions [39]. In comparison with intestinal juice, the 3-PBA adsorption ability was higher after gastric juice treatment, which is consistent with the previous results that acid treatment could enhance the adsorption capacity (Section 2.5.1). Meanwhile, a low quantity of 3-PBA was released after washing, which suggests that strain RS20 can safely remove 3-PBA when added to food or feed. These findings are in agreement with the study of Zhao et al., where Leuconostoc mesenteroides DM12 exhibited a high adsorption rate in a simulated gastrointestinal system [40]. Therefore, L. plantarum RS20 can survive and remove 3-PBA in simulated digestive juices, indicating that this strain is a promising adsorbent candidate for application in vivo.

2.7. Degradation of 3-PBA by Cooperation of RS20 and SC-1

Figure 9 shows the degradation of 3-PBA by the cooperation of RS20 and SC-1. The degradation of 3-PBA in co-culture was significantly higher than that of the experimental group inoculated with SC-1 alone (79.23% and 61.21%, respectively). The possible reason for this was that 3-PBA was enriched by RS20 adsorption, which was conducive to the degradation of 3-PBA by SC-1. The results showed that the complex bacterial system of RS20 and SC-1 had great application potential in the elimination of 3-PBA in food and the environment.
Kaolinite has strong adsorption capacity for phenol, and it was found to be the most effective in accelerating the degradation rate, as well as improving the degradation efficiency by Sphingomonas sp. GY2B [41]. Similar results can be found in this paper. The adsorption of RS20 on 3-PBA could provide protection for SC-1 and partially resist the adverse effects of substrate inhibition. Liu et al. [42] studied the degradation of cypermethrin and its metabolites (3-PBA) by a co-culture of Bacillus licheniformis B-1 and Sphingomonas sp. SC-1. The degradation of 3-PBA by SC-1 promoted the positive metabolism of cypermethrin and accelerated the degradation of cypermethrin by B-1. Therefore, co-culture technology has certain application potential in the elimination of toxic substances.

3. Experimental Design

3.1. Microorganism

Lactobacillus plantarum RS20 was obtained from Sichuan paocai (Meishan, China). Sphingomonas SC-1 that could degrade 3-PBA completely was isolated from activated sludge and was proven to be safe by a bacterial toxicological experiment. Lactobacillus plantarum RS20 and Sphingomonas SC-1 were preserved in the microbiological laboratory of the College of Food Science, Sichuan Agricultural University.

3.2. Chemicals and Reagents

3-Phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA, 98% purity) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (Shanghai, China). Chromatographic-grade acetonitrile was obtained from CNW Technologies GmbH (Dusseldorf, Germany). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.
A 3-PBA working solution was prepared by dissolving an appropriate quantity of the substance in 1 mL of methanol, followed by adding Milli-Q water up to 10 mL. Then, the solution was subsequently filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane and stored at 4 °C until use.

3.3. Biomass Preparation

L. plantarum RS20 was cultured in MRS broth (De Man, Rogosa, Sharpe, DifcoTM) at 30 ± 1 °C for 20 h, thereby achieving a cell concentration of about 1.0 × 1010 cfu/mL. The culture was employed as the fermentation component (FC). Then, after centrifuging at 7.24 × 103× g (4 °C) for 10 min, the precipitate was washed three times with phosphate buffer solution (PBS, 0.02 M, pH 7.2). The obtained pellet was considered as the active cell component (AC), from which the freeze-dried component (FDC) was prepared and stored at −20 °C.

3.4. Stress of 3-PBA on L. plantarum RS20

L. plantarum RS20 was cultured in MRS broth using 96-well plates at 37 °C for 24 h in the absence and presence of 3-PBA at different concentrations (0, 5, 50, and 100 mg/L). The OD value at 600 nm was measured using an enzyme-labeled instrument (Varioskan LUX Multimode, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

3.5. Batch Experiments

Batch adsorption experiments were conducted in 10 mL of Eppendorf, where the reaction system consisted of 5 mL of bacterial suspension and 3-PBA working solution. Factors including the incubation time (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h), temperature (15 °C, 20 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C, 37 °C, and 42 °C), pH (2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, and 10.0), 3-PBA concentration (2, 5, 10, 50, and 100 mg/L), and biomass amount (1.0 × 108, 1.0 × 109, 5.0 × 109, and 1.0 × 1010 cfu/mL) were selected as the independent variables. The control was prepared under the same conditions in the absence of L. plantarum RS20. Cultures were incubated on a rotary shaker at 55.9× g, unless otherwise mentioned. After the designed period, the supernatant was obtained through centrifugation (2.9 × 104× g, 10 min, 4 °C) and subjected to 3-PBA residue determination.

3.6. Kinetic Study

The FDC was suspended in 0.5–50 mg/L 3-PBA working solution, and the cell concentration was adjusted to 1 g/L (m/v). The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 5–360 min. In this case, the pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and Weber–Morris models were adopted to fit the obtained data.

3.7. Biosorption Isotherm

Two equilibrium isotherms, including the Langmuir and Freundlich models, were used to describe the biosorption equilibrium [43]. The experimental steps were as follows: 1 mg of FDC was inoculated with 1 mL of 3-PBA working solution (20 mg/L). The mixture was incubated for 5–300 min at 37 °C.

3.8. Adsorption Mechanism of 3-PBA

3.8.1. Effect of Different Treatments on Adsorption Ability

Heat treatment: The AC was autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min, followed by resuspension in 1 mL of 5 mg/L 3-PBA and incubating for 8 h at 37 °C. After centrifugation, a sample was taken from the suspension to evaluate the 3-PBA adsorption ability.
Acid treatment: The AC was resuspended in 2 M HCl for 90 min, then centrifuged at 7.24 × 103× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The cell precipitation was washed three times with PBS (0.02 M and pH 7.2) and resuspended in 1 mL of 5 mg/L 3-PBA. The mixture was incubated for 8 h at 37 °C. Afterward, the 3-PBA residues were analyzed by HPLC.
Stability of adsorption ability: The AC treated with heating and acid were incubated in 1 mL of 3-PBA solution (5 mg/L) at 37 °C for 8 h, then centrifuged at 7.24 × 103× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The cell precipitation was washed three times with PBS (0.02 M, pH 7.2) and resuspended in 1 mL of PBS (0.02 M, pH 7.2). After 1 h of incubation, the supernatant was collected and subjected to 3-PBA residue analysis.

3.8.2. Adsorption Ability of Different Cellular Structures

Effect of Exopolysaccharides (EPS)

AC was suspended in 1.0 M NaCl and underwent ultrasonication for 5 min (100 W, 20–25 kHz, and 1 s interval every 4 s) in an ice bath. Then, the cell pellet was treated with 0.05 M EDTA. After 12 h of incubation with 5 mg/L 3-PBA, the sample was collected and subjected to 3-PBA residue analysis.

Effect of Bacterial Surface Protein

AC was treated with 5 M LiCl at 4 °C for 60 min, followed by 8 M urea solution at 37 °C for 2 h. The cell precipitation was washed three times with PBS (0.02 M, pH 7.2) and resuspended in 1 mL of 5 mg/L 3-PBA. The mixture was incubated for 8 h at 37 °C. Afterward, cells were collected to assess the 3-PBA adsorption rate.

Adsorption Ability of Cellular Components

AC was suspended in PBS buffer and crushed by ultrasonic disruption for 60 min (400 W, 20–25 kHz, and 1 s interval every 4 s) in an ice bath. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected as the cell-free extract (CFE). 3-PBA was fortified in the CFE, reaching a concentration of 5 mg/L. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 8 h. Afterward, the 3-PBA concentration was determined using HPLC. Simultaneously, the precipitate was washed twice with sterile PBS buffer and transferred to sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (8 g/L). The mixture was incubated in boiling water for 10 min to separate protein substances [44]. The SDS was removed by washing with sterile ultrapure water and resuspended in sterile PBS buffer. Then, trypsin was added to a concentration of 3 mg/mL and the matrix was further incubated at 37 °C for 12 h. After centrifugation, the precipitate was washed twice with sterile PBS buffer to obtain the cell wall (CW). The peptidoglycan and protoplasts were prepared in accordance with the methods reported by Rolain et al. [45] and Yu et al. [46]. A sample was collected to evaluate the 3-PBA adsorption ability.

3.8.3. SEM Analysis

FC was resuspended in 3-PBA working solutions with 5 and 100 mg/L and incubated at 37 °C for 8 h. After centrifugation (7.24 × 103× g, 10 min), cells were firstly fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde overnight at 4 °C, and then successively dehydrated in 30, 50, 70, 80, 90, and 100% ethanol. Finally, they were further dried using a critical point dryer and subsequently coated using a Sputter coater (SPT-20, Coxem, Daejeon, Korea) in order to improve the quality of the images [47]. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images were collected on a JEOL JEM-7500F scanning electron microscope.

3.8.4. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectrum (FT-IR) Analysis

AC was resuspended in the 3-PBA working solution (100 mg/L) and incubated at 37 °C for 8 h. Afterward, cells were washed with PBS (0.02 M, pH 7.2) and freeze dried. An amount of 1.0 mg of cells was ground with 100 mg of anhydrous KBr powder and the spectra were recorded at 4000 to 400 cm−1 by a spectrophotometer (Nicolet iS5, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

3.9. 3-PBA Adsorption Assay in Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions

Simulated gastric and intestinal juices were prepared as described by Zhang et al. [16], where distilled water was replaced with the 3-PBA working solution, achieving a final concentration of 5 mg/L. The initial cell concentration was 1 × 109 cfu/mL and the culture was placed in a shaking water bath maintained at 37 °C for 2 h. The survival rate was calculated in accordance with the equation of Guo et al. [48] (Equation (2)). Then, a sample was collected, and 3-PBA residues were analyzed by HPLC.

3.10. Degradation of 3-PBA by Cooperation of RS20 and SC-1

Mixed inocula of RS20 and SC-1 at 1:1 biomass ratios were prepared, and the cell densities of the mixed inocula were all 1.0 × 108 cfu/mL. Each inoculum (1.5 mL) was separately inoculated to 30 mL of MRS broth with 100 mg/L 3-PBA. Uninoculated MRS broth with 100 mg/L 3-PBA served as the control. All of the inocula were cultivated using a shaker at 30 °C and 7.2× g for 72 h. Then, the 3-PBA contents (mg/L) in the media were measured.

3.11. Analytical Methods

The residual 3-PBA concentration was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, LC-2010, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a C18 column (InertSustain, 250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5.0 μm). Acetonitrile (A) and phosphoric acid water (B, pH 2.5) were used as the mobile phase. An isocratic elution was performed by employing A:B = 55:45 at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The injection volume was 20 μL. The detection wavelength was set as 210 nm. The 3-PBA adsorption rate (%) was calculated using Equation (1).
Adsorption   rate   ( % ) = [ 1     S   C   ]   ×   100 %
where S and C correspond to the 3-PBA concentration in the experimental supernatant and control, respectively.
The survival rate was calculated according to the following equation:
Survival   rate   ( % ) = logcfu   N 1   logcfu   N 0     ×   100 %
where N1 is the total viable count of strain RS20 after treatment with distilled water or simulated gastrointestinal juices. N0 represents the total viable count of strain RS20 before treatment.
The pseudo-first-order model of adsorption kinetics could be expressed as follows:
ln   ( q e q t ) =   ln   q e K 1 t
where qe is the 3-PBA biosorption equilibrium capacity (mg/g), qt is the amount of 3-PBA adsorbed at any time t, and K1 corresponds to the rate constant of pseudo-first-order kinetics (min−1).
The pseudo-second-order model of adsorption kinetics is presented in Equation (4):
t q t = 1 q e 2 + 1 K 2 q e t
where qt is the amount of 3-PBA adsorbed at time t (min), qe is the equilibrium uptake of 3-PBA (mg/g), and K2 represents the pseudo-second-order rate constant (g/mg·min).
The intraparticle diffusion model (Weber–Morris model) can be used to analyze the adsorption kinetics, and its formula is as follows:
q t = k id t 1 / 2 + C
where qt (mg/g) is the 3-PBA uptake at time t (min), Kid is the intraparticle diffusion rate constant (mg/[g·min1/2]), and C is the constant related to the boundary layer effect of adsorption. If the adsorption process is completely controlled by intraparticle diffusion, the plot of qt versus t1/2 passes through the origin [49].
The Langmuir isotherm model describes a monolayer adsorption process, presented as Equation (6) [50]:
q e = q max K L C e 1 + K L C e
where Ce is the equilibrium 3-PBA concentration in solution (mg/L), qe is the amount of 3-PBA absorbed in the equilibrium state, qmax is the maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g), and KL corresponds to the Langmuir constant and indicates the affinity between adsorbents and adsorption sites.
The Freundlich isotherm model assumes that the adsorption heat of multilayer adsorption on a heterogeneous adsorption surface is not uniformly distributed [50]. This model is expressed as Equation (7):
qe = KFCe1/n
where Ce is the equilibrium 3-PBA concentration in solution (mg/L), qe is the amount of 3-PBA absorbed in the equilibrium state, and KF and n are the Freundlich constants representing the adsorption capacity and adsorption intensity, respectively.
All the tests were carried out at least in triplicate. Data analysis was performed using the software of SPSS (version V22.0, IBM SPSS, USA Almonk). The value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and analyses were conducted using ANOVA using the SPSS V22.0 software.

4. Conclusions

3-PBA adsorption by L. plantarum RS20 was strongly affected by the temperature, pH, cell concentration, and 3-PBA concentration. In particular, the incubation time exerted almost no effect on the adsorption rate, while it was positively correlated with the cell concentration. The kinetic study showed that the biosorption kinetic data fitted the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, and the Langmuir and Freundlich equations were more suitable for the data of the adsorption of 3-PBA by L. plantarum RS20. The biomass viability was not the prerequisite for 3-PBA adsorption, which mainly occurred on the cell surface. The results of the adsorption test using different cellular structures indicated that the adsorption process involved chemisorption and physisorption, during which the cell walls and the protoplasts played a major role in 3-PBA adsorption. The FTIR spectra showed numerous functional groups in L. plantarum RS20 that could easily bind 3-PBA. In particular, the co-culture system of RS20 and SC-1 could improve the degradation of 3-PBA, indicating that L. plantarum RS20 displayed great potential in removing 3-PBA from food, feed, and the environment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23105809/s1.

Author Contributions

J.L.: Investigation, resources, writing—original draft. K.H.: Writing—original draft, review, and editing. L.H. (Lu Hu) and X.H. (Xinjie Hu): Formal analysis. X.H. (Xiaoyan Hou): Formal analysis, methodology. Q.L., A.L. and S.C.: Investigation, writing—original draft. X.A. and L.H. (Li He): Resources. H.T. and D.H.: Writing—review and editing. Y.Y.: Writing—review and editing, supervision. L.Z.: Writing—review and editing, supervision. S.L.: Conceptualization, writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31871770), Key Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No.2019YFC1605302-3) and the National Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (No.22NSFSC3372).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smith, T.M.; Stratton, G.W. Effects of synthetic pyrethroid insecticides on nontarget organisms. Residue Rev. 1986, 97, 93–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gu, X.Z.; Zhang, G.Y.; Chen, L.; Dai, R.L.; Yu, Y.C. Persistence and dissipation of synthetic pyrethroid pesticides in red soils from the Yangtze River Delta area. Environ. Geochem. Health 2008, 30, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gavrilescu, M. Fate of Pesticides in the Environment and its Bioremediation. Eng. Life Sci. 2010, 5, 497–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ueyama, J.; Kimata, A.; Kamijima, M.; Hamajima, N.; Ito, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Inoue, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Takagi, K.; Saito, I. Urinary excretion of 3-phenoxybenzoic acid in middle-aged and elderly general population of Japan. Environ. Res. 2009, 109, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Yin, K.; Wang, Q.N.; Lv, M.; Chen, L.X. Microorganism remediation strategies towards heavy metals—ScienceDirect. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 360, 1553–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rotar, M.A.; Semeniuc, C.; Apostu, S.; Suharoschi, R.; Culea, M. Researched concerning microbiological evolution of lactic acid bacteria to yoghurt storage during shelf life. J. Agroaliment. Processes Technol. 2007, 1, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sangsila, A.; Faucet-Marquis, V.; Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A.; Itsaranuwat, P. Detoxification of zearalenone by Lactobacillus pentosus strains. Food Control 2016, 62, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bahati, P.; Zeng, X.; Uzizerimana, F.; Tsoggerel, A.; Yuan, Y. Adsorption Mechanism of Patulin from Apple Juice by Inactivated Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Kefir Grains. Toxins 2021, 13, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Niderkorn, V.; Boudra, H.; Morgavi, D.P. Binding of Fusarium mycotoxins by fermentative bacteria in vitro. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 101, 849–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. El-Nezami, H.S.; Chrevatidis, A.; Auriola, S.; Salminen, S.; Mykkänen, H. Removal of common Fusarium toxins in vitro by strains of Lactobacillus and Propionibacterium. Food Addit. Contam. 2002, 19, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. JLeblanc, G.; Levit, R.; Giori, G.; Leblanc, A. Application of vitamin-producing lactic acid bacteria to treat intestinal inflammatory diseases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 3331–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhuang, G.; Wang, J.; Yan, L.; Chen, W.; Liu, X.M.; Zhang, H.P. In vitro comparison of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus casei Zhang, a potential new probiotic, with selected probiotic strains. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 1640–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ali, R.M.; Hamad, H.A.; Hussein, M.M.; Malash, G.F. Potential of using green adsorbent of heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions: Adsorption kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamic, mechanism and economic analysis. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 91, 317–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Langmuir, I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1918, 40, 1361–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Tang, Y.R.; Ni, X.Q.; Zeng, D. Inhibition of Lactobacillus on Aspergillus flavus growth. Chin. Feed. 2008, 542–545. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, M.; Wen, Y.; Luo, X.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Liu, A.; He, L.; Chen, S.; Ao, X.; Yang, Y. Characterization, mechanism of cypermethrin biosorption by Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains YS81 and HP and removal of cypermethrin from apple and cucumber juices by inactive cells. J. Hazard Mater. 2021, 407, 124350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Karami-Osboo, R. An in vitro Investigation of Aflatoxin B1 Biological Control by Lactobacillus plantarum. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2007, 10, 2553–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhang, J.; Qiao, Y.F.; Wang, X.; Pei, J.W.; Zheng, J.Y.; Zhang, B.L. Absorption of fumonisin B1 and B2 by Lactobacillus plantarum ZJ8. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 2014, 54, 1481–1488. [Google Scholar]
  19. Juri, M.G.F.; Dalcero, A.M.; Magnoli, C.E. In vitro aflatoxin B1 binding capacity by two Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from healthy dog feaces. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 118, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abdi, S.; Nasiri, M.; Mesbahi, A.; Khani, M.H. Investigation of uranium (VI) adsorption by polypyrrole—ScienceDirect. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 332, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.; Hu, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Gu, X. Adsorption behavior and mechanism of different arsenic species on mesoporous MnFe2O4 magnetic nanoparticles. Chemosphere Environ. Toxicol. Risk Assess. 2017, 181, 328–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ho, Y.; McKay, G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999, 34, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, L.; Wang, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Cai, R.; Niu, C.; Yue, T. Identification of key factors involved in the biosorption of patulin by inactivated lactic acid bacteria (LAB) cells. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e143431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gohari, M.; Hosseini, S.N.; Sharifnia, S.; Khatami, M. Enhancement of metal ion adsorption capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae’s cells by using disruption method. J. Taiwan. Inst. Chem. E 2013, 44, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, W.; Wu, H.; Xu, M.; Wu, F. Study on kinetics and thermodynamics of phosphorus adsorption onto PAC sludge. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2011, 5, 2287–2292. [Google Scholar]
  26. Won, S.W.; Mao, J.; Kwak, I.S.; Sathishkumar, M.; Yun, Y.S. Platinum recovery from ICP wastewater by a combined method of biosorption and incineration. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1135–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. QDai, H.; Bian, X.Y.; Li, R.; Jiang, C.B.; Ge, J.M.; Li, B.L.; Ou, J. Biosorption of lead(II) from aqueous solution by lactic acid bacteria. Water Sci. Technol. 2019, 79, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, L.; Yue, T.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ye, M.; Cai, R. A new insight into the adsorption mechanism of patulin by the heat-inactive lactic acid bacteria cells. Food Control 2015, 50, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dalié, D.K.D.; Deschamps, A.M.; Richard-Forget, F. Lactic acid bacteria–Potential for control of mould growth and mycotoxins: A review. Food Control 2010, 21, 370–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mckinley, E.R.; Carlton, W.W.; Boon, G.D. Patulin mycotoxicosis in the rat: Toxicology, pathology and clinical pathology. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1982, 20, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hatab, S.; Yue, T.; Mohamad, O. Reduction of Patulin in Aqueous Solution by Lactic Acid Bacteria. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, M238–M241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shen, Y.; Zhao, S.; Zhao, X.; Sun, H.; Shao, M.; Xu, H. In vitro adsorption mechanism of acrylamide by lactic acid bacteria. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 100, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hwang, K.; Lee, W.; Kim, G.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, J. The Binding of Aflatoxin B Modulates the Adhesion Properties of Lactobacillus casei KCTC 3260 to a HT29 Colon Cancer Cell Line. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2005, 14, 866–870. [Google Scholar]
  34. Haskard, C.A.; El-Nezami, H.S.; Kankaanpaa, P.E.; Salminen, S.; Ahokas, J.T. Surface Binding of Aflatoxin B1 by Lactic Acid Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 3086–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zhang, Z.; Li, M.; Wu, C.; Peng, B. Physical adsorption of patulin by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during fermentation. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 2326–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xia, L.; Xu, X.; Zhu, W.; Huang, Q.; Chen, W. A Comparative Study on the Biosorption of Cd2+ onto Paecilomyces lilacinus XLA and Mucoromycote sp. XLC. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 15670–15687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Deepika, K.V.; Raghuram, M.; Kariali, E.; Bramhachari, P.V. Biological responses of symbiotic Rhizobium radiobacter strain VBCK1062 to the arsenic contaminated rhizosphere soils of mung bean. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 134, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gerbino, E.; Carasi, P.; Araujo-Andrade, C.; Tymczyszyn, E.E.; Gómez-Zavaglia, A. Role of S-layer proteins in the biosorption capacity of lead by Lactobacillus kefir. World J. Microb. Biot. 2015, 31, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, S.; Xing, Y.; Liu, S.; Hao, X.; Chen, W.; Huang, Q. Characterization of Cd2+ biosorption by Pseudomonas sp. strain 375, a novel biosorbent isolated from soil polluted with heavy metals in Southern China. Chemosphere 2020, 240, 124893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pinto, A.; Barbosa, J.; Albano, H.; Isidro, J.; Teixeira, P. Screening of Bacteriocinogenic Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Characterization as Potential Probiotics. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Dumitru, M.; Tabuc, C.; Jurcoane, S. Obtaining a feed additive based of Lactobacillus plantarum strain. Agron. Ser. Sci. Res. /Lucr. Stiintifice Ser. Agron. 2018, 61, 61115–61122. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zoghi, A.; Darani, K.K.; Hekmatdoost, A. Effects of Pretreatments on Patulin Removal from Apple Juices Using Lactobacilli: Binding Stability in Simulated Gastrointestinal Condition and Modeling. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2021, 13, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhao, L.; Pan, X.; Yang, Q.; Zhao, R.; Li, X. The ability of lactic acid bacteria strains to remove di-n-butyl phthalate in simulated food matrices. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 2, 553–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gong, B.; Wu, P.; Huang, Z.; Li, Y.; Dang, Z.; Ruan, B.; Kang, C.; Zhu, N. Enhanced degradation of phenol by sphingomonas sp gy2b with resistance towards suboptimal environment through adsorption on kaolinite. Chemosphere Environ. Toxicol. Risk Assess. 2016, 148, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Liu, F.; Chi, Y.; Wu, S.; Jia, D.; Yao, K.D. Simultaneous degradation of cypermethrin and its metabolite, 3-phenoxybenzoic acid, by the cooperation of Bacillus licheniformis B-1 and Sphingomonas sp. SC-1. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 8256–8262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khadivinia, E.; Sharafi, H.; Hadi, F.; Zahiri, H.S.; Modiri, S.; Tohidi, A.; Mousavi, A.; Salmanian, A.H.; Noghabi, K.A. Cadmium biosorption by a glyphosate-degrading bacterium, a novel biosorbent isolated from pesticide-contaminated agricultural soils. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 4304–4310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Piotrowska, M.; Masek, A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell wall components as tools for ochratoxin A decontamination. Toxins 2015, 7, 1151–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Rolain, T.; Bernard, E.; Courtin, P.; Bron, P.A.; Kleerebezem, M.; Chapot-Chartier, M.; Hols, P. Identification of key peptidoglycan hydrolases for morphogenesis, autolysis, and peptidoglycan composition of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Microb. Cell Factories 2012, 11, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Yu, Z.; Luan, J.; Xu, P.; Wang, J.; Zhao, C. Research on the Preparation and Regeneration of Protoplast from High-concentration Mash Resistant Saccharomyces cerevisia. Liquor. Mak. Sci. Technol. 2008, 4, 45. [Google Scholar]
  50. Kim, A.R.; Ahn, K.B.; Yun, C.; Park, O.; Perinpanayagam, H.; Yoo, Y.; Kum, K.; Han, S.H. Lactobacillus plantarum lipoteichoic acid inhibits oral multispecies biofilm. J. Endodont 2019, 45, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. 3-PBA tolerance of L. plantarum RS20.
Figure 1. 3-PBA tolerance of L. plantarum RS20.
Ijms 23 05809 g001
Figure 2. Effects of incubation time (a), temperature (b), pH (c), RS20 concentration (d), and 3-PBA concentration (e) on the removal of 3-PBA. Bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effects of incubation time (a), temperature (b), pH (c), RS20 concentration (d), and 3-PBA concentration (e) on the removal of 3-PBA. Bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 05809 g002
Figure 3. Pseudo-first/second-order kinetics equation fitting curve and Weber–Morris model for 3-PBA adsorption by L. plantarum RS20. Note: (a) is the pseudo-first-order kinetics equation; (b) is the pseudo-second-order kinetics equation; and (c) is the Weber–Morris model.
Figure 3. Pseudo-first/second-order kinetics equation fitting curve and Weber–Morris model for 3-PBA adsorption by L. plantarum RS20. Note: (a) is the pseudo-first-order kinetics equation; (b) is the pseudo-second-order kinetics equation; and (c) is the Weber–Morris model.
Ijms 23 05809 g003
Figure 4. Influence of heat-inactivated and acid-inactivated L. plantarum RS20 cells on the 3-PBA-removing capacity. Note: different lower case letters between different treatments mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Influence of heat-inactivated and acid-inactivated L. plantarum RS20 cells on the 3-PBA-removing capacity. Note: different lower case letters between different treatments mean significant differences (p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 05809 g004
Figure 5. Adsorption abilities of different cellular components. Note: parentheses mean that different methods were used to remove EPS or surface proteins. Bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Adsorption abilities of different cellular components. Note: parentheses mean that different methods were used to remove EPS or surface proteins. Bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 05809 g005
Figure 6. SEM photographs of L. plantarum RS20 biomass under three different 3-PBA concentrations ((a) control group, (b) 5 mg/L, and (c) 100 mg/L).
Figure 6. SEM photographs of L. plantarum RS20 biomass under three different 3-PBA concentrations ((a) control group, (b) 5 mg/L, and (c) 100 mg/L).
Ijms 23 05809 g006
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of L. plantarum RS20 powder biomass.
Figure 7. FTIR spectra of L. plantarum RS20 powder biomass.
Ijms 23 05809 g007
Figure 8. Tolerance of L. plantarum RS20 to simulated gastric and simulated intestinal juices.
Figure 8. Tolerance of L. plantarum RS20 to simulated gastric and simulated intestinal juices.
Ijms 23 05809 g008
Figure 9. Degradation of 3-PBA by the cooperation of strain RS20 and strain SC-1. Note: Bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Figure 9. Degradation of 3-PBA by the cooperation of strain RS20 and strain SC-1. Note: Bars with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Ijms 23 05809 g009
Table 1. Adsorption constants derived from simulations with different isotherm models.
Table 1. Adsorption constants derived from simulations with different isotherm models.
Isotherm ParametersKqmax (mg/g)1/nR2
Langmuir0.053910.72500.9890
Freundlich1.25600.44800.9340
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Hu, K.; Hu, L.; Hou, X.; Li, Q.; Liu, A.; Chen, S.; Ao, X.; Hu, X.; He, L.; et al. Adsorption Behavior of 3-phenoxybenzoic Acid by Lactobacillus Plantarum and Its Potential Application in Simulated Digestive Juices. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5809. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105809

AMA Style

Li J, Hu K, Hu L, Hou X, Li Q, Liu A, Chen S, Ao X, Hu X, He L, et al. Adsorption Behavior of 3-phenoxybenzoic Acid by Lactobacillus Plantarum and Its Potential Application in Simulated Digestive Juices. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(10):5809. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105809

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jianlong, Kaidi Hu, Lu Hu, Xiaoyan Hou, Qin Li, Aiping Liu, Shujuan Chen, Xiaolin Ao, Xinjie Hu, Li He, and et al. 2022. "Adsorption Behavior of 3-phenoxybenzoic Acid by Lactobacillus Plantarum and Its Potential Application in Simulated Digestive Juices" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 10: 5809. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23105809

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop