Next Article in Journal
A Gadolinium(III) Complex Based on the Thymine Nucleobase with Properties Suitable for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Previous Article in Journal
State-of-Art of Cellular Therapy for Acute Leukemia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Involvement of IL-4, IL-13 and Their Receptors in Pancreatic Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chemokine-Cytokine Networks in the Head and Neck Tumor Microenvironment

1
Molecular and Metabolic Imaging Laboratory, Cancer Research Department, Sidra Medicine, Doha 26999, Qatar
2
Department of Zoology, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Kashmir, Ganderbal 191201, India
3
Department of Genomic Medicine, Genetikode 400102, India
4
Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, Central University of Kashmir, Ganderbal 191201, India
5
Departmental of Medical Oncology, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
6
Keshav Mahavidyalaya, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110034, India
7
Centre for Dental Education and Research, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
8
Centre for Advanced Research, School of Biotechnology and Indian Council of Medical Research, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Katra 182320, India
9
Laboratory Animal Research Center, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar
10
Watson-Crick Centre for Molecular Medicine, Islamic University of Science and Technology, Awantipora 192122, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Contributed equally to the first authorship.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(9), 4584; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094584
Submission received: 20 February 2021 / Revised: 3 April 2021 / Accepted: 5 April 2021 / Published: 27 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cytokines/Chemokines in Cancer Metastasis)

Abstract

:
Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) are aggressive diseases with a dismal patient prognosis. Despite significant advances in treatment modalities, the five-year survival rate in patients with HNSCC has improved marginally and therefore warrants a comprehensive understanding of the HNSCC biology. Alterations in the cellular and non-cellular components of the HNSCC tumor micro-environment (TME) play a critical role in regulating many hallmarks of cancer development including evasion of apoptosis, activation of invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, response to therapy, immune escape mechanisms, deregulation of energetics, and therefore the development of an overall aggressive HNSCC phenotype. Cytokines and chemokines are small secretory proteins produced by neoplastic or stromal cells, controlling complex and dynamic cell–cell interactions in the TME to regulate many cancer hallmarks. This review summarizes the current understanding of the complex cytokine/chemokine networks in the HNSCC TME, their role in activating diverse signaling pathways and promoting tumor progression, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance development.

1. Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a very aggressive disease with a dismal prognosis. With an annual incidence of ~800,000 new cases and 350,000 deaths worldwide, HNSCC is the sixth most common cancer globally [1]. HNSCC includes tumors of the oral cavity, hypopharynx, oropharynx, larynx and, paranasal sinuses and is clinically, pathologically, phenotypically, and biologically a heterogeneous disease [2]. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), being the primary subtype of HNSCC, accounts for two-thirds of the cases occurring in developing nations. Although tobacco and alcohol consumption account for nearly 75% of the total HNSCC cases, there has been a recent rise in the incidence of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) associated oropharynx cancers (OPC) [3]. Cytokines and chemokines are soluble, low molecular weight secretory proteins, which regulate lymphoid tissue development, immune and inflammatory responses by controlling immune cell growth, differentiation, and activation [4,5]. While the cytokines are non-structural, pleiotropic proteins or glycoproteins, which have a complex regulatory influence on inflammation and immunity, chemokines are a large family of low molecular weight (8–14 KDa) heparin-binding chemotactic cytokines that regulate leukocyte trafficking, development, angiogenesis, and hematopoiesis [4,5]. Based on the variations in the structural motif of the first two closely paired and highly conserved cysteine residues, chemokines are divided into CXC, CC, CX3C, and the C subfamilies. While the C subfamily has only two cysteine residues, CXC, CC, and CX3C have four cysteine residues [6]. The letter ‘‘L” followed by a number denotes a specific chemokine (e.g., CCL2 or CXCL8). The receptors are labeled by the letter R followed by the number (e.g., CCR2 or CXCR1) [7,8]. Based on the conserved glutamic acid-leucine-arginine “Glu-Leu-Arg” (ELR) motif at the NH2 terminus, the CXC chemokine family is further subdivided into ELR+ve and ELR−ve. The ELR+ve CXC chemokines are angiogenic and activate CXCR2 mediated signaling pathway in endothelial cells, while the ELR−ve CXC chemokines are angio-static and are potent chemo-attractants for mononuclear leukocytes [9,10,11]. Cytokines such as TNF (α and β), interleukin 1 family (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-1 receptor antagonistic (IL-Ira) and IL-2, IL -6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-11, IL-12, IL-15, IL-16, IL -17, IL-18, IL-19, IL-20, IL-21, IL-22, IL-23, IL-24, interferon’s (α, β, and γ), TGFβ, are produced by various types of cell including mononuclear phagocytic cells, T-lymphocytes, B-lymphocytes, Langerhans cells, polymorph nuclear neutrophils (PMNs), and mast cells [12]. Based on their biological properties, these cytokines are classified into T-helper 1 (Th1), T-helper 2 (Th2), and T-helper 17 (Th17) [13]. While Th1 and Th2 cytokines stimulate cellular and humoral immune responses, Th17 cytokines are known to regulate inflammatory responses and autoimmunity [13].
In addition to regulating immune cell function, recent studies have shown that cytokines and chemokines play an important role in cancer-related inflammation and immune evasion processes [14] and help in the development and progression of many tumors including HNSCC [15,16,17]. For example, cytokines/chemokines and growth factors like epidermal growth factor (EGF), IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, TGF-β, RANTES (CCL5), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), monocyte chemo-attractant protein 1 (MCP-1), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), family granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), are upregulated in the HNSCC tumor micro-environment (TME) and are involved in the progression and metastasis [18,19]. These cytokines and chemokines induce cellular transformation [20], control autocrine or paracrine communication within and between the individual cells in the TME [21], and play diverse roles in the HNSCC by controlling processes not limited to Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), anoikis resistance, invasion and metastasis, angiogenesis and development of therapeutic resistance [22], thus, contributing to the development of aggressive HNSCC tumors. These cytokines and chemokines also create an immunosuppressive TME and help evade anti-tumor immune response [21].

2. HNSCC Tumor Microenvironment

The HNSCC TME is a heterogeneous complex of cellular and non-cellular components that dictate aberrant tissue function and promote the development of aggressive tumors [23]. While the non-cellular components include extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins and many physical and chemical parameters, cellular components of HNSCC TME includes immune cells such as T cells, B cells, natural killer cells (NK cells), langerhans cells, dendritic cells (DC), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), macrophages, tumor associated-platelets (TAPs), mast cells, adipocytes, neuroendocrine cells, blood lymphatic vascular cells, endothelial cells (EC), pericytes and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) [24]. In addition to providing intermediate metabolites and nutrients to the tumor cells, these stromal cells secrete a diverse array of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors that support tumor growth, progression, metastasis [25], host immunosuppression [14], and promote the development of aggressive tumors [22] (Figure 1). However, dysfunctional T-cells, regulatory T cells (Tregs), MDSCs, impaired NK cell activity, and type 2 macrophages (M2) present in the HNSCC TME have an inverse function and promote tumor growth, metastasis, and resistance to therapy [26]. The immunosuppressive HNSCC TME is also facilitated by the downregulation of MHC molecules (human leukocyte antigen, HLA), inactivation of the antigen processing machinery (APM), and dysregulation of checkpoint proteins (reviewed in [27]). The important HNSCC-associated TME cells, cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors are discussed below.
Cancer-associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) are the major cell type in the HNSCC and help maintain a favorable TME aiding tumorigenesis [28]. Though controversial, CAFs are believed to be generated from myofibroblasts, transformed cancer cells, epithelial cells via epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), resting resident fibroblasts or pericytes via mesothelial-mesenchymal transition (MMT), endothelial cells via endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndMT), adipocytes, and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) [29]. HNSCC CAF’s secrete a wide variety of cytokines (autocrine or paracrine in function) and tumor-promoting factors essential for inflammation, cell proliferation, tumor growth, invasion & metastasis, angiogenesis, cancer stem cell (CSC) maintenance, and resistance to therapy [30]. These include various cytokines, interleukins (ILs) such as IL-6, IL-17A, and IL-22, growth factors such as EGF, HGF, VEGF, chemokines such as C-X-C motif chemokine ligands (CXCLs), CXCL1, CXCL8, CXCL12 (SDF-1α), and CXCL14, and C-C motif chemokine ligands (CCLs), CCL2, CCL5 and CCL7 [31,32]. These factors promote ECM degradation and modulation by secreting matrix metalloproteins (MMPs) such as MMP-2 and MMP-9 for effective invasion and metastasis of tumor cells [33]. Endothelins (iso-peptides) produced by vascular epithelium upon binding to CAFs activate ADAM17 and trigger release of EGFR ligands such as amphiregulin and TGF-α [33]. These ligands activate EGFR signaling in HNSCC cells, upregulate COX-2 and stimulate the growth, invasion, and metastasis of HNSCC cells [34]. Although little is known about the interaction of CAF-tumor cells in HNSCC, poor overall survival (OS) of HNSCC patients has been associated with increased α-SMA expression regardless of the clinical stage [30]. All these findings ascertain the credibility of CAFs in promoting growth and thus can be useful in facilitating the development of new therapeutic strategies against tumor progression in HNSCC.
Macrophages engage in both innate and adaptive immune responses and protect the body against invading pathogens. These macrophages can either help tumor growth or destroy tumor cells depending upon the external cues from TME. In response to interferons, macrophages are polarized and activated into pro-inflammatory classical M1 type that produces cytokines, such as interferon-γ (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-23, IL-12, CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL5 and help destroy tumor cells via activating Th1 cells [35]. M2 type macrophages closely resemble tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and are characterized by increased expression of IFN-γ, CCL2, CCL5, CXCL16, CXCL10, CXCL9, TNF-α, MMP9 and IL-10, arginase-1, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) [36]. HNSCC tumors with high M2 TAM infiltration have an advanced stage lymph node metastasis, and poor patient outcome [37]. Elevated CD68+ macrophages are also associated with poor patient survival [38]. Furthermore, increased M2 TAM infiltration is associated with increased tissue levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) and serum TGF-β levels. Though TGF-β is suppressive in function, MIF helps recruit neutrophils to the TME and promotes invasion and metastasis by producing ROS, MMP9 and, VEGF expression [39]. All these studies conclusively established the pro-tumorigenic role of M2 TAMs in regulating cell proliferation, invasion & metastasis, angiogenesis, and promoting immune evasion.
Neutrophils are the most abundant granulocytes present in the blood and an important component of innate and adaptive immunity by regulating T cell activation, antigen presentation and T cell-independent antibody responses [40]. Like TAMs, tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) can be either tumor-promoting (N2) or tumor suppressors (N1). By activating platelets, neutrophils enhance the risk of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) and death in HNSCC patients [41]. Due to the lack of specific markers, identification and characterization of TANs are difficult. However, nonspecific markers including CD14, CD15, CD16, CD11b, CD62L and CD66b are routinely used for their isolation and characterization (reviewed [37]). Natural Killer (NK) cells are large granular CD3−ve cytotoxic type 1 innate lymphoid cells that detect and kill virus-infected and cancer cells. Based on the expression of adhesion molecules CD56 and the low-affinity FcγR CD16, NK cells are classified into a highly cytotoxic CD56lowCD16high population predominantly present in the peripheral blood, and less cytotoxic CD56highCD16low cells present in the secondary lymphoid and other tissues [42]. These CD56highCD16low NK cells, like neutrophils and macrophages, kill cells directly by secreting a plethora of immunomodulatory molecules such as IL-5, IL-8, IL-10, IL-13, CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5 IFN-γ, TNF-α, GM-SCF and, CXCL10 [43]. Recently, tumor-infiltrating NK cells from HNSCC patients have been shown to possess a decreased expression of activating receptors like NKG2D, DNAM-1, NKp30, CD16, and 2B4 and upregulation of inhibitory receptors NKG2A and PD-1 compared to NK cells from matched peripheral cells [44]. The study also observed low cytotoxicity and reduced IFN-γ secretion from tumor-infiltrating NK cells in vitro [44]. Though no stimulation is needed for NK activation, a small percentage of NK T-cells (NKT) require priming for activation [45]. These NKT cells are specialized cells with morphological and functional characteristics and surface markers of both T and NK cells. The presence of another small subset of invariant NK T cells (iNKT) that express invariant αβ T cell receptors is associated with poor outcomes for HNSCC patients [46,47].
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are another class of inhibitory immune cells present in the TME of almost all solid tumors. MDSCs are a heterogeneous population of immature immune cells comprising early myeloid progenitors, immature dendritic cells (DCs), neutrophils, and monocytes, which negatively regulate the activity of NK cells and induce Tregs [48]. Though difficult to identify due to their diversity, MDSCs were initially identified from HNSCC patients as immature CD34+ cells [49,50]. MDSCs inhibit the production of innate inflammatory cytokines such as IL-23, IL-12, and IL-1 by DCs, thereby suppressing antitumor IFN-γ secreting CD4+ and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells [51]. They regulate T cell activation, migration, proliferation and induce apoptosis by overexpressing immunomodulatory cytokines like IL-10, TGF-β, CD86, PD-L1, TGF-β and suppressing IFN-γ production [52]. MDSCs indirectly suppress the T- cell activation by inducing Tregs, TAMs, and modulating NK cell activity. They also promote angiogenesis and metastasis by producing βFGF, TGF-β and, VEGFA and degrading ECM [53]. Therefore, targeting the inhibitory functions of MDSCs represents a novel avenue for therapeutic intervention in HNSCC tumors.
Regulatory T-cells are immunosuppressive cells with a crucial function in maintaining self-tolerance immune homeostasis (reviewed in [51]). They are also known to regulate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, macrophages, B cells, NK cells, and DCs. Based on origin, localization, and marker expression, Tregs are mainly divided into CD25+ CD4+ Tregs (natural regulatory T cells) that mature in the thymus and peripheral CD25+ CD4+ Tregs (induced or adaptive Tregs). [54]. These Tregs are known to function by releasing IL-35, IL-10, and TGF-β, inhibiting DC maturation, cytolysis and granzyme/perforin dependent killing of cells, metabolic disruption of effector T cells, and modulation of DC maturation [55]. The genomic and epigenomic differences between HPV+ve and HPV−ve HNSCC tumors favor less infiltration of PD-1 and TIM3 co-expressing CD8+ T-cells in HPV−ve HNSCC [56]. On the contrary, HPV+ve HNSCC tumors are infiltrated with increased Tregs, Tregs/CD8+, and CD56low NK cells, CD56+ CD3+ NKT cells, CD3+ T cell, and activated T cells with increased CTLA4 and PD-1 expression and PD-1/TIM3 co-expressing CD8+ T cells, suggesting compromised immune system [57]. All these studies suggest heterogeneity in cellular phenotype, function, and location among HPV+ve and HPV−ve HNSCC tumors and may potentially be responsible for the varied therapeutic responses.
Besides Tregs, MDSCs, NK, macrophages, neutrophils, platelets, mast cells, adipose cells, and neuroendocrine cells constitute an integral part of the HNSCC TME. In addition to their thrombosis and wound healing activities, thrombocytes or platelets play an important role in tumor biology and inflammation. Besides the secretion of specific granules, viz. dense granules, lysosomes, and α-granules involved in platelet aggregation, platelets also secrete various growth factors in the TME [58]. Interestingly, these granules also contain membranous protein CD63 and lysosomal associated membrane protein 1 & 2 (LAMP1/2), integrin α2β3, p-selectin and glycoprotein-Iβ (GP-Iβ), and secrete molecules like ATP, ADP, Ca2+, serotonin, phosphatase into the TME [59]. It is interesting to mention that CD63 and LAMP1/2 membrane proteins help create an acidic environment for acid hydrolases’ optimum activity to degrade ECM [60]. Besides, α-granules also contain many growth factors, a wide variety of chemokines, MMPs, proteins like thrombospondin, fibrinogen, fibronectin, vitronectin, Von Willebrand factor (VWF), and inflammatory proteins that stimulate tumor growth and angiogenesis [61].
Mast cells are another critical component of the immune system regulating both innate and acquired immune response. When mast cells undergo cross-linkage with IgE receptor (FcERI) on their surface, mast cells exocytose many inflammatory mediators including histamine, heparin, prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), leukotriene C4 (LTC4), chondroitin sulfate E, chymase, tryptase, Cathepsin G, carboxypeptidase-A (CPA1), GM-CSF and interleukins into the TME [62]. These cells also secrete fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), VEGF, MMPs, protease, cytokines, chemokines, and promote proliferation, invasion, and migration of neoplastic cells and angiogenesis [63,64]. Mast cells produce numerous pro-angiogenic factors specific to HNSCC TME, such as FGFβ, TGFβ, tryptase, heparin, and MMPs, to support growth and development [65].In the HNSCC, increased mast cell numbers have been associated with angiogenesis and tumor progression [66].
Neuroendocrine cells release norepinephrine (NE) and epinephrine (E) neurotransmitters. They may either show strong antitumor properties or pro-tumorigenic effects by regulating tumor cell invasion and migration and modulating the immune response. Neurotransmitter substance P (SP) (a member of the tachykinin neuropeptide family), secreted by both tumor and stromal cells, is known to induce many cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α). Neurotransmitter SP stimulates tumor cell migration and blocks the integrin β1 mediated adhesion of T cells [67]. In addition, SP also acts as a mitogen factor via a neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R), activates protein kinases (PK1 and 2), and promotes cell migration [68], proliferation and protection from apoptosis [69]. Interestingly, both SP and NK-1R are overexpressed and associated with the development and progression of HNSCC [70,71]. Secretion of NE neurotransmitters also inhibits TNF-α synthesis and thereby prevents the generation of CTLs [72]. The α- and β-adrenoreceptors (ARs) for NE and E are overexpressed in the HNSCC cell lines [73], and administration of NE has been shown to increase the proliferation of these cells [74]. A recent study has shown that increased expression of β2-AR promotes EMT in HNSCC cells by activating the IL-6/STAT3/Snail1 signaling pathway [75]. In addition, increased expression of β2-AR was associated with differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and reduced OS of HNSCC patients [75].
Dendritic cells are the most potent antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Through their interaction with lymphoid and myeloid cells, DCs play a vital role in regulating adaptive and innate immune responses during normal and pathophysiological conditions [76]. DCs become immunogenic upon maturation by up-regulation of MHC class II, co-stimulatory molecules, and by secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-12, TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 [77]. Interestingly, tumor-associated or tumor-treated DCs show low levels of co-stimulatory molecules [78], slow production of IL-12, inhibited antigen-processing machinery (APM), suppressed endocytic activity, and abnormal motility, etc. [79,80]. While higher tumor infiltration of immature DCs is usually observed, increased immature DCs in patients’ peripheral blood with HNSCC, esophageal, lung, and breast cancer have also been reported [81]. Through abortive proliferation, anergy of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes or Tregs produce IL-10 and TGF-β and prevent immune response, immature DCs also induce tolerance, thus inhibiting co-stimulatory signals [82,83].
Endothelial cells (ECs) play an important role in the development and progression of many tumors [84]. By secreting large amounts of VEGF [85], ECs, in an autocrine manner, induce Bcl-2 expression in the TME micro-vessels and promote angiogenesis and tumor growth [86,87,88]. By regulating the secretion of various CXC chemokines in the HNSCC TME, Bcl-2 is known to enhance invasiveness and the development of recurrent tumors [89,90]. VEGF via IKK/IκB/NF-κB signaling pathway also modulates the expression levels of growth-related oncogene GRO-α (or CXCL1) and interleukin 8 (CXCL8) expression in HNSCC [86] and promotes the development of aggressive tumors. Another study reported that Jagged1, a notch ligand, induced by the growth factors via the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase-activator protein-1 (MAPK) in HNSCC cells, triggered Notch signaling in adjacent endothelial cells, thus enhancing neovascularization and tumor growth in vivo [91]. Like the ECs, pericytes are an important cellular component of TME and critically important for tumor initiation, progression, and angiogenesis [92]. Pericytes and ECs communicate with each other by paracrine signaling or by chemo-mechanical signaling pathways [93]. By providing mechanical and physiological support to EC, pericytes stabilize vascular walls, promote vessel remodeling, maturation [94,95], regulation of blood flow, and vessel permeability [96]. Although, there are limited studies on the role of pericytes in HNSCC, some studies have shown the presence of abnormal vessels in the OSCC tumor tissue and a reduction of pericyte population in the peritumoral area, thus showing that the pericyte population is significantly affected during OSCC development [97,98,99].

Extracellular Matrix and Chemokine/Cytokine Activation

The ECM is a 3D network of interwoven macromolecules including glycoproteins, structural fibrous proteins (collagen, elastin, fibronectin, laminin, and tenascin), immersed with enzymes, growth factors, non-cellular components, physical and chemical parameters such as pH, oxygen tension, interstitial pressure, and fluid flux. The ECM provides biophysical, structural, mechanical, and biochemical support to the surrounding cells and helps in-cell adhesion, cell–cell communication, and differentiation [100,101]. Collagen, which constitutes about 30–40% of the total mass of ECM, plays a vital role in cell behavior regulation and development by providing mechanical and structural support and helps in cell adhesion, differentiation, migration, wound repair, and tissue scaffoldings [102,103]. Overexpression of type IV collagen is often observed in HNSCC [104], and collagen XVII, Col15 interaction with integrins has been shown to chemotactically attract HNSCC cells [105]. Notably, Type I collagen has been shown to stimulate the expression of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β in HNSCC [106]. Glycoprotein fibronectin (Fn) produced by fibroblasts and endothelial cells interacts with fibrin, integrins, heparin, collagen, gelatin, and syndecan and promotes tumor progression, migration, invasion, and therapeutic resistance [107]. Peptide hydrolases and MMPs produced by tumor and stromal cells cleave the basement membrane, cell surface receptors, and adhesion molecules and result in the disorganization and deregulation of ECM necessary for invasion and metastasis [108,109]. As in many tumors, ECM proteins such as collagen, laminin, and fibronectin have been shown to promote HNSCC tumor growth, progression, and metastasis [110,111]. Besides, increased expression of fibronectin, tenascin, and decreased expression of laminin, collagen type IV and vitronectin have also been reported to be associated with aggressive HNSCC phenotypes [37,112,113,114]. While the interaction of integrins, particularly α5β1 integrin with fibronectin, and αvβ5 with vitronectin were shown to modulate HNSCC cell behavior, αvβ3-osteopontin, αvβ3-fibronectin, and α5β1-fibronectin interactions are involved in angiogenesis [115]. Overall, ECM plays a very pivotal role in the development and metastasis of tumors by altering the phenotype of stromal or tumor cells, availability of secreted cytokines/chemokines and growth factors, providing acidic and hypoxic conditions for the tumor cells to survive and prevent neoplastic cells from immune attack [116].

3. Deregulated Chemokine and Cytokine Expression in HNSCC

Deregulation of cytokines and chemokines is a hallmark of many cancers [18,19]. Using bioinformatics analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data, we also observed many cytokines and chemokines deregulated in HNSCC (Figure 2). Consistent with these observations, previous studies have also reported a decrease in Th1 and increase in Th2 cytokine levels [117,118] such as IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, GM-CSF, VEGF, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and bFGF during the development and progression of HNSCC [119,120,121]. While the increased IL-10, IL-17A, and IL-22 levels, and decreased IFN-γ expressions are collaborated with the loco-regional metastasis [122,123], increased VEGF, FGF, and IL-8 expression contribute to tumorigenesis, metastasis, and HNSCC angiogenesis [16,124,125]. In addition, stromal IL-33 has been shown to promote the enrichment of Foxp3+ Tregs and correlated with poor HNSCC prognosis [126]. These studies further showed that stimulation by IL-33 increased infiltration of ST2-expressing Foxp3+ GATA3+ Tregs (ST2 is the only receptor of IL-33) with increased expression of immune suppressive IL-10 and TGF-β1 [126]. Importantly, IL-1β is known to promote drug resistance by modulating Snail expression, thereby regulating COX-2-dependent E-cadherin expression in HNSCC [127]. Furthermore, TGF-β is known to increase invasion and metastasis by increasing STAT3 expression and malat1/miR-30a interaction in HNSCC [128]. While the increased expression of CCL2 by CAFs enhanced proliferation, invasion and metastasis, and HNSCC tumor growth, the use of specific CCL2 inhibitors significantly reduced tumor burden in vivo [129]. Similarly, increased expression of CCL3 and CCR1 was observed in HNSCC and associated with increased lymph node metastasis [130]. Increased expression of CCL5 in OSCC was also shown to induce MMP-9 secretion and increased cell migration, but the use of siRNA against MMP-9 inhibited CCL5 induced cell motility [131]. Using in vitro and in vivo models, CCL7 has been shown to modulate cytoskeleton re-organization in OSCC, an important regulator of invasion and migration [132]. Use of CCL7 neutralizing antibodies or CCR1 and CCR3 antibodies inhibited invasiveness of OSCC cells [132]. Increased CCL20 or MIP-3α is also associated with increased metastasis and the use of CCL20 siRNA reduced invasive and migratory potential of OSCC cells [133]. CCL21 is a potent stimulator for SCC migration [134], and CCR7 (CCL21 receptor) positive cells have increased capacity to adhere to lymph nodes [134]. In collaboration with these studies, upregulated CCR7 expression in HNSCC has been shown to induce cytoskeletal reorganization, and increasing MMP-9 thereby stimulated migration, invasion, and adhesion [134,135,136,137]. Notably, increased CCR7 expression was correlated with tumor size, clinical stage, recurrence, lymph node metastasis, poor OS, and DFS of HNSCC [132]. Likewise, overexpression and hyperactivity of CCL19/CCL21/CCR7 signaling pathway were positively correlated with lymph node metastasis, and poor prognosis of HNSCC patients [134,138,139].
Like many cytokines, increased CXCL1 expression activates epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling and increased human dysplastic oral proliferation [140]. Likewise, CXCL8/CXCR1 and CXCL8/CXCR2 axis are known to induce tumor growth, angiogenesis, motility, and EMT [141]. Consistent with these observations increased expression of CXCL8 and CXCR2 in HNSCC has been shown to promote invasion and migration, and this effect was reversed upon the use of siRNA or blocking antibodies against CXCL8 or CXCR2, respectively [142]. Importantly, CXCL8 polymorphisms are also associated with an increased risk of HNSCC development [143]. While CXCL9 upregulation was reported in the serum of patients with HNSCC compared to healthy controls and associated with poor clinical outcome [144], its downregulation by siRNA resulted in a significant reduction in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of HNSCC in vitro [144]. Similarly, CXCL12/SDF-1, an α-chemokine via G-protein-coupled CXCR4, regulates stem/progenitor cell trafficking [145]. Of the entire chemokines, CXCL11/CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 axis is the most studied chemokine system in HNSCC [146]. While the expression of CXCL12 (SDF-1α) and CXCR4 progressively increased from oral leukoplakia (OLK) to dysplasia to frank malignancy [147], hyperactivation of this axis in HNSCC is associated with aggressive tumors, regional and distant metastasis, and lower DFS [148]. Furthermore, CXCL12 polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of HNSCC development [149]. Similarly, XCR1/XCL1 axis is known to enhance MMP-2, MMP-7, and MMP-9 secretion and increase proliferation, invasion, and migration of HNSCC cells [150]. All these studies confer the involvement of cytokines and chemokines in the development of aggressive tumors and therefore as important avenues for novel therapeutic intervention in HNSCC (Table 1).

4. Chemokine and Cytokine Mediated Signaling Pathways in HNSCC

Chemokines and cytokines exert their effects by activating diverse signaling pathways in HNSCC (Figure 3). Chemokines like TNFα, IL-1, HGF, IFN-α, and their receptors activate MAPK, nuclear factor-kappa-β (NF-kB), and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/Akt, signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways involved in cell proliferation, survival, invasion, metastasis, and tumor growth [151,182]. NF-kB regulates many genes involved in inflammation and tumor progression. [183,184]. Proinflammatory cytokines like IL-1 and TNF-α by activating IkB kinases (IKKs) and casein kinase 2 (CK2) promote phosphorylation and degradation of NF-kB inhibitors (IkBs). CCL22 is overexpressed in HNSCC and is involved in cell proliferation, migration, invasion, cell transformation, and Tregs infiltration [154]. Secretion of IL-1β by CAFs activates NF-κB signaling in the tumor cells, thereby increasing CCL22 expression [154]. By activating the ERK signaling pathway and phosphorylation of c-Jun/Fos, c-Myc, and E-26-like protein 1 [155], IL-1β also promotes cell survival and tumor progression [185]. Fascin is an actin cross-linking protein that promotes tumor cell invasion [156]. IL-1β activates ERK1/2, JNK, NF-κB, and CREB signaling pathways, increasing Fascin expression and promoting the invasion of HNSCC cells [156]. In addition to IL-1β, increased expression of IL-1α was also correlated with distant metastasis of HNSCC [186].
As mentioned earlier, CXCR7 plays an important role in the progression of many cancers. In the HNSCC, CXCR7 activates Smad2/3 signaling, increases TGF-β1 secretion, and results in EMT of HNSCC cells associated with increased invasion and metastasis [187]. TGF-β, TGF-β receptor II and TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) are upregulated in HNSCC and result in constitutive hyper-activation of NF-κB with increased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [188]. TGF-β1 via the TβRII/Smad3 signaling pathway also induces VEGF secretion from HNSCC associated macrophages and helps promote angiogenesis and metastasis [189]. In addition, an alternative TGF-β1-Smad3-Jagged1-Notch1-Slug signaling pathway has been shown to favor tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) [190]. Similarly, IL-17A was found to promote TSCC by downregulating the expression of miR-23b via the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway [191]. In addition to TGF-β1, TGF-β2 has been shown to specifically activate MAPK/p38α/β signaling in the bone marrow that causes induction of DEC2/SHARP1 and p27, and the downregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and results in the dormancy of malignant disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) [192]. IL-6 is known to activate many signaling cascades including JAK/STAT, PI3K/AKT, RAS/MAPK, and Wnt signaling pathways affecting angiogenesis and metastasis [193,194,195,196], and to induce a dysfunctional immune response. Constitutive activation of IL-6/STAT3 signaling is associated with reduced (OS) in p16−ve HNSCC [197]. It was recently shown that the IL-6 induced STAT3 signaling pathway promoted immunosuppressive HNSCC TME by upregulating PD-1/PD-L1 expression [198]. However, inhibition of STAT3 signaling pathway downregulated PD-1/PD-L1 expression and improved immune surveillance in TGFβr1/PTEN 2cKO mouse model of HNSCC [198]. IL-6 was also shown to promote HNSCC tumorigenesis by activating fibroblasts and increasing tumor cells–CAF crosstalk [199]. Like the IL-6/STAT3 signaling axis, activation of the STAT1 signaling pathway by IFN-α promotes immunosuppression in HNSCC [200,201]. The underlying molecular mechanisms revealed increased PD-L1 and RIG-I expression in tumor cells [200,201], and PD-1 in immune cells [200] via IFNαR1 activation. IL-8 is upregulated in HNSCC and affects pathways involved in inflammation. The RAS/MAPK signaling pathway is critical for carcinogenesis and regulates inflammation, cell proliferation, survival, and tumor growth [202]. Using in vitro studies, IL-8 was shown to regulate inflammatory response by activating both NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways in HNSCC [203]. In addition, IL-8 also activates the CXCR1/2-mediated NOD1/RIP2 signaling pathway, thereby facilitating the formation and progression of HNSCC [161]. SDF-1/CXCL12-CXCR4 axis has been shown to activate the Akt/PKB and ERK1/2 signaling pathway and induce directional tumor cell migration, supporting its role in invasion and metastasis of HNSCC cells [204]. MCP-1/CCL2, is a potent monocyte-attracting chemokine which helps recruit monocyte to the tumors [205], modulate pro-survival signals and promote HNSCC progression [206].

5. Chemokines and Cytokines Promote Aggressive HNSCC Phenotype

Cytokines, chemokines, and their receptors are important players of TME and are known for initiation, promotion, progression, metastasis, and development of aggressiveness [207]. For example, upregulation of CXCR7 increased cell migration and invasion through the Smad2/Akt signaling pathway, promoted lymph node metastasis [208], and is associated with the aggressive phenotype of HNSCC [187]. Further studies showed that CCR7 in HNSCC is upregulated by NF-kB and AP1 and contributes to metastatic phenotype [209]. Infiltrated macrophages are well-known contributors to aggressive HNSCC [210]. The underlying mechanism revealed the involvement of the CCL2/EGF positive feedback loop. The tumor cell-derived CCL2 transforms monocytes into M2-like macrophages, resulting in the increased production of EGF, which activates EGFR signaling in the tumor cells promoting the formation of invadopodia associated with increased HNSCC cell motility [210]. Like CCL2, the role of the CXCL12 (SDF-1α)/CXCR4 axis in the metastatic processes of HNSCC has been explored in many studies. Activation of the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis enhances cell adhesion and MMP-9 secretion, thereby increasing HNSCC metastasis [211]. The CXCL12/CXCR4 axis, by upregulating MMP-13 via activation of ERK1/2/AP-1 signaling pathway, also increased invasion and metastasis of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal SCC (LHSCC) [147,212]. In support of these studies, CXCR4 upregulation in HNSCC is confined to tumor nests, but not in the stroma [213,214]. CXCL5 and CXCL9 chemokines are essential determinants of tumor development and malignancy. Like SDF-1α, overexpression of CXCL5 and CXCL9 induced invasion and migration of HNSCC cells and aggravated HNSCC phenotype [144,215,216]. In a paracrine manner, CAF secreted CCL11, and IL-33 promoted migration, invasion, and aggressive HNSCC phenotype of cells [217,218]. Similarly, CCL21/CCR7 axis has been shown to promote MMP-9 release, stimulate tumor cell survival, adhesion, invasion, and metastasis in HNSCC [134,135,136,137]. IL-8 and its receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 are overexpressed in HNSCC and involved in progression, metastasis, and aggressive tumor phenotype [161,219]. The underlying mechanisms revealed inactivation of PTEN and activation of the STAT3 signaling pathway by IL-8/CXCR1/2 axis in promoting aggressive HNSCC phenotype [219]. In addition to IL-8, migration inhibitory factor (MIF) from tumor cells induces CXCR2-dependent chemotaxis, improved neutrophil survival, and release of CCL4 and MMP-9, helping develop aggressive HNSCC phenotype [220]. Besides IL-8, the STAT3 signaling pathway is also activated by the IL-6 cytokine known to be upregulated in most HNSCC patients. The IL-6 mediated STAT3 activation upregulates many downstream target genes involved in proliferation, invasion, migration, and EMT of HNSCC [193], suggesting its role in aggressive tumor behavior. IL-6 promoter has aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), suggesting the involvement of AhR in translational regulation of IL-6 and development of aggressive HNSCC. The use of AhR antagonists has been shown to reduce IL-6 expression and decreased the aggressive phenotype of HNSCC cells [221]. Moreover, defects in TGF-β signaling are found to be associated with the growth and development of HNSCC [222]. A recent study has reported overexpression of TGF-βRII in HNSCC and found this to be inversely correlated with local disease aggressiveness [223].

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

Despite significant advances in the treatment modalities, the prognosis of HNSCC patients has not changed considerably in decades, the underlying reasons being the aggressive tumor behavior associated with local and distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis, and intrinsic and acquired resistance to the currently available therapies. The HNSCC TME is a very complex structure with interplay and convergence of several signaling pathways. Cytokines and chemokines, as important entities of these interplays, contribute to tumor growth, aggressiveness, and metastasis in HNSCC. Therefore, exploring the potential of chemokines and cytokines can aid in developing novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of HNSCC. The use of chemokine receptor antagonists or inhibitors and anti-chemokine antibodies can also serve as an adjuvant chemotherapy alternative in HNSCC. As mentioned above, the CXCL11/CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 axis is the most studied chemokines system in HNSCC, and it can serve as an important therapeutic target. In addition, CCL19/CCR7, CCL5/CCR5, and CCL2/CCR2 axis are important targets for therapeutic intervention and would help improve HNSCC outcomes. Studies highlighting the contribution of individual pathways and their predominance in response to a particular mutation will help in achieving an optimum therapeutic outcome in HNSCC.
Moreover, IFN-γ and IL-7 can be used as risk markers in neck metastasis due to their downregulation, specifically in HNSCC cases with nodal metastasis [175]. As IFN has been found to exhibit anti-proliferative properties, it can be used as an immunomodulatory agent. Another immunotherapy approach for the treatment of HNSCC is the application of recombinant cytokines which can induce a targeted manipulation of the immune system. Stimulation of immune cells that can alter the cytokine profile in HNSCC and diminish its immunosuppressive effects is another interesting approach. Typically, delay in diagnosing HNSCC requires surgical treatment with the combination of radio- or chemotherapy. In this context, salivary cytokine can serve as diagnostic biomarker and predict CRT outcome in HNSCC [224]. Furthermore, elevated levels of IL-6, IL-8, VEGF, HGF, and GRO-1 found in HNSCC patients with poor survival indicate that targeting this pathway could be of therapeutic significance [225]. Moreover, IL-15 can act as a therapeutic target in HNSCC as is reported to be a powerful stimulator of NK and CD8+ T cell function. Recently, a phase I clinical trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerable dose of recombinant human IL-15 (rhIL15) in patients with advanced solid tumors including HNSCC [124]. Although the clinical trial showed no objective clinical responses, few patients were found to show disease stabilization after IL-15 administration [124]. Another strategy for restoring antitumor immune functions in HNSCC is the use of a primary-cell-derived biologic known as IRX-2. IRX-2 is a natural cytokine biologic derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) that contain active components such as IL-2, IL-1β, TNF-α, and IFN-γ [226]. IRX-2 helps overcome tumor-mediated immunosuppression by acting on multiple immune cells such as DCs, NK, and T cells. Several promising phase I and phase II clinical trials have been conducted on IRX-2, thus suggesting that it can be used as an immunotherapy target for the treatment of HNSCC as well as other malignancies [226]. Therefore, in the future, cytokine-based immunotherapies must focus on combining strategies/schemes that enhance antitumor responses and suppress protumorigenic immune cells. Moreover, new approaches such as vector delivery or modified recombinant proteins can improve cytokine targeting and enhance the efficacy of cytokine-based immunotherapies in cancer [227]. In conclusion, chemokines and cytokines are the essential players for HNSCC pathogenesis and targeting their complex networks could become therapeutic strategies explicitly targeting HNSCC.

Author Contributions

S.N., P.Y., T.M., M.S., M.A.M., A.A.B.: Prepared the scientific material, wrote the manuscript, generated figures. N.A.W., S.H., G.S., D.M., R.K., M.H.: critical revision and editing of the scientific contents. M.H., M.A.M., A.A.B.: conceived of and designed the review contents and contributed to manuscript writing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Ramalingaswami Fellowship (Grant number: D.O.NO.BT/HRD/35/02/2006) from the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India, New Delhi to Muzafar A. Macha. Sidra Medicine Precision Program funded this research to Mohammad Haris (5081012001, 5081012001) and Ajaz A. Bhat (5081012003).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

TAMtumor associated macrophages
DCdendritic cells
MDSCmyeloid derived suppressor cells
CAFcancer associated fibroblasts
NK cellsnatural killer cells
ILinterleukins
TregsT regulatory cells
CSCcancer stem cells

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Leemans, C.R.; Braakhuis, B.J.; Brakenhoff, R.H. The molecular biology of head and neck cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Blot, W.J.; McLaughlin, J.K.; Winn, D.M.; Austin, D.F.; Greenberg, R.S.; Preston-Martin, S.; Bernstein, L.; Schoenberg, J.B.; Stemhagen, A.; Fraumeni, J.F., Jr. Smoking and drinking in relation to oral and pharyngeal cancer. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 3282–3287. [Google Scholar]
  4. Turner, M.D.; Nedjai, B.; Hurst, T.; Pennington, D.J. Cytokines and chemokines: At the crossroads of cell signalling and inflammatory disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 2563–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Commins, S.P.; Borish, L.; Steinke, J.W. Immunologic messenger molecules: Cytokines, interferons, and chemokines. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 125 (Suppl. 2), S53–S72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hromas, R.; Broxmeyer, H.E.; Kim, C.; Nakshatri, H.; Christopherson, K., 2nd; Azam, M.; Hou, Y.H. Cloning of BRAK, a novel divergent CXC chemokine preferentially expressed in normal versus malignant cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999, 255, 703–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bacon, K.; Baggiolini, M.; Broxmeyer, H.; Horuk, R.; Lindley, I.; Mantovani, A.; Maysushima, K.; Murphy, P.; Nomiyama, H.; Oppenheim, J.; et al. Chemokine/chemokine receptor nomenclature. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. Off. J. Int. Soc. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2002, 22, 1067–1068. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cameron, M.J.; Kelvin, D.J. Cytokines and chemokines--their receptors and their genes: An overview. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2003, 520, 8–32. [Google Scholar]
  9. Strieter, R.M.; Burdick, M.D.; Mestas, J.; Gomperts, B.; Keane, M.P.; Belperio, J.A. Cancer CXC chemokine networks and tumour angiogenesis. Eur. J. Cancer 2006, 42, 768–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Luster, A.D. Chemokines—Chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Belperio, J.A.; Keane, M.P.; Arenberg, D.A.; Addison, C.L.; Ehlert, J.E.; Burdick, M.D.; Strieter, R.M. CXC chemokines in angiogenesis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2000, 68, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Borish, L.C.; Steinke, J.W. 2. Cytokines and chemokines. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003, 111 (Suppl. 2), S460–S475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Akdis, M.; Burgler, S.; Crameri, R.; Eiwegger, T.; Fujita, H.; Gomez, E.; Klunker, S.; Meyer, N.; O’Mahony, L.; Palomares, O.; et al. Interleukins, from 1 to 37, and interferon-γ: Receptors, functions, and roles in diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 701–721.e70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Quezada, S.A.; Peggs, K.S.; Simpson, T.R.; Allison, J.P. Shifting the equilibrium in cancer immunoediting: From tumor tolerance to eradication. Immunol. Rev. 2011, 241, 104–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hathaway, B.; Landsittel, D.P.; Gooding, W.; Whiteside, T.L.; Grandis, J.R.; Siegfried, J.M.; Bigbee, W.L.; Ferris, R.L. Multiplexed analysis of serum cytokines as biomarkers in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck patients. Laryngoscope 2005, 115, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Linkov, F.; Lisovich, A.; Yurkovetsky, Z.; Marrangoni, A.; Velikokhatnaya, L.; Nolen, B.; Winans, M.; Bigbee, W.; Siegfried, J.; Lokshin, A.; et al. Early detection of head and neck cancer: Development of a novel screening tool using multiplexed immunobead-based biomarker profiling. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. A Publ. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Cosponsored Am. Soc. Prev. Oncol. 2007, 16, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Druzgal, C.H.; Chen, Z.; Yeh, N.T.; Thomas, G.R.; Ondrey, F.G.; Duffey, D.C.; Vilela, R.J.; Ende, K.; McCullagh, L.; Rudy, S.F.; et al. A pilot study of longitudinal serum cytokine and angiogenesis factor levels as markers of therapeutic response and survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2005, 27, 771–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Johnson, S.D.; De Costa, A.M.; Young, M.R. Effect of the premalignant and tumor microenvironment on immune cell cytokine production in head and neck cancer. Cancers 2014, 6, 756–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Mehanna, H.; Robinson, M.; Hartley, A.; Kong, A.; Foran, B.; Fulton-Lieuw, T.; Dalby, M.; Mistry, P.; Sen, M.; O’Toole, L.; et al. Radiotherapy plus cisplatin or cetuximab in low-risk human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (De-ESCALaTE HPV): An open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019, 393, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Dhawan, P.; Richmond, A. Role of CXCL1 in tumorigenesis of melanoma. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2002, 72, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wilson, J.; Balkwill, F. The role of cytokines in the epithelial cancer microenvironment. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2002, 12, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Giancotti, F.G. Deregulation of cell signaling in cancer. Febs Lett. 2014, 88, 2558–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Chen, F.; Zhuang, X.; Lin, L.; Yu, P.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Hu, G.; Sun, Y. New horizons in tumor microenvironment biology: Challenges and opportunities. BMC Med. 2015, 13, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bhat, A.A.; Yousuf, P.; Wani, N.A.; Rizwan, A.; Chauhan, S.S.; Siddiqi, M.A.; Bedognetti, D.; El-Rifai, W.; Frenneaux, M.P.; Batra, S.K.; et al. Tumor microenvironment: An evil nexus promoting aggressive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and avenue for targeted therapy. Signal. Transduct Target. 2021, 6, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cheng, L.; Huang, Z.; Zhou, W.; Wu, Q.; Donnola, S.; Liu, J.K.; Fang, X.; Sloan, A.E.; Mao, Y.; Lathia, J.D.; et al. Glioblastoma stem cells generate vascular pericytes to support vessel function and tumor growth. Cell 2013, 153, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Tlsty, T.D.; Hein, P.W. Know thy neighbor: Stromal cells can contribute oncogenic signals. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2001, 11, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Canning, M.; Guo, G.; Yu, M.; Myint, C.; Groves, M.W.; Byrd, J.K.; Cui, Y. Heterogeneity of the Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Immune Landscape and Its Impact on Immunotherapy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sazeides, C.; Le, A. Metabolic Relationship between Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Cancer Cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1063, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Xing, F.; Saidou, J.; Watabe, K. Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in tumor microenvironment. Front. Biosci 2010, 15, 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kalluri, R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 582–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Augsten, M.; Sjöberg, E.; Frings, O.; Vorrink, S.U.; Frijhoff, J.; Olsson, E.; Borg, Å.; Östman, A. Cancer-associated fibroblasts expressing CXCL14 rely upon NOS1-derived nitric oxide signaling for their tumor-supporting properties. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 2999–3010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jia, C.C.; Wang, T.T.; Liu, W.; Fu, B.S.; Hua, X.; Wang, G.Y.; Li, T.J.; Li, X.; Wu, X.Y.; Tai, Y.; et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts from hepatocellular carcinoma promote malignant cell proliferation by HGF secretion. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Glentis, A.; Oertle, P.; Mariani, P.; Chikina, A.; El Marjou, F.; Attieh, Y.; Zaccarini, F.; Lae, M.; Loew, D.; Dingli, F.; et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce metalloprotease-independent cancer cell invasion of the basement membrane. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hinsley, E.E.; Hunt, S.; Hunter, K.D.; Whawell, S.A.; Lambert, D.W. Endothelin-1 stimulates motility of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells by promoting stromal-epithelial interactions. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 130, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Atri, C.; Guerfali, F.Z.; Laouini, D. Role of Human Macrophage Polarization in Inflammation during Infectious Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2018, 19, 1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Liu, C.Y.; Xu, J.Y.; Shi, X.Y.; Huang, W.; Ruan, T.Y.; Xie, P.; Ding, J.L. M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophages promoted epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer cells, partially through TLR4/IL-10 signaling pathway. Lab. Investig. A J. Tech. Methods Pathol. 2013, 93, 844–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Peltanova, B.; Raudenska, M.; Masarik, M. Effect of tumor microenvironment on pathogenesis of the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wolf, G.T.; Chepeha, D.B.; Bellile, E.; Nguyen, A.; Thomas, D.; McHugh, J. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and prognosis in oral cavity squamous carcinoma: A preliminary study. Oral Oncol. 2015, 51, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Galdiero, M.R.; Garlanda, C.; Jaillon, S.; Marone, G.; Mantovani, A. Tumor associated macrophages and neutrophils in tumor progression. J. Cell. Physiol. 2013, 228, 1404–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liew, P.X.; Kubes, P. The Neutrophil’s Role During Health and Disease. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 1223–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Paneesha, S.; McManus, A.; Arya, R.; Scriven, N.; Farren, T.; Nokes, T.; Bacon, S.; Nieland, A.; Cooper, D.; Smith, H.; et al. Frequency, demographics and risk (according to tumour type or site) of cancer-associated thrombosis among patients seen at outpatient DVT clinics. Thromb. Haemost. 2010, 103, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Stabile, H.; Fionda, C.; Gismondi, A.; Santoni, A. Role of Distinct Natural Killer Cell Subsets in Anticancer Response. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Teng, T.S.; Ji, A.L.; Ji, X.Y.; Li, Y.Z. Neutrophils and Immunity: From Bactericidal Action to Being Conquered. J. Immunol. Res. 2017, 2017, 9671604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Korrer, M.J.; Kim, Y. Phenotypical and functional analysis of natural killer cells from primary human head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. J. Immunol. 2019, 202 (Suppl. 1), 134.19. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chan, C.J.; Smyth, M.J.; Martinet, L. Molecular mechanisms of natural killer cell activation in response to cellular stress. Cell death and differentiation 2014, 21, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Horinaka, A.; Sakurai, D.; Ihara, F.; Makita, Y.; Kunii, N.; Motohashi, S.; Nakayama, T.; Okamoto, Y. Invariant NKT cells are resistant to circulating CD15+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells in patients with head and neck cancer. Cancer Sci. 2016, 107, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Takami, M.; Ihara, F.; Motohashi, S. Clinical Application of iNKT Cell-mediated Anti-tumor Activity Against Lung Cancer and Head and Neck Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Youn, J.I.; Nagaraj, S.; Collazo, M.; Gabrilovich, D.I. Subsets of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-bearing mice. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 5791–5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Garrity, T.; Pandit, R.; Wright, M.A.; Benefield, J.; Keni, S.; Young, M.R. Increased presence of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood of head and neck cancer patients and their differentiation into dendritic cells. Int. J. Cancer 1997, 73, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pak, A.S.; Wright, M.A.; Matthews, J.P.; Collins, S.L.; Petruzzelli, G.J.; Young, M.R. Mechanisms of immune suppression in patients with head and neck cancer: Presence of CD34(+) cells which suppress immune functions within cancers that secrete granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 1995, 1, 95–103. [Google Scholar]
  51. Butt, A.Q.; Mills, K.H. Immunosuppressive networks and checkpoints controlling antitumor immunity and their blockade in the development of cancer immunotherapeutics and vaccines. Oncogene 2014, 33, 4623–4631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Chikamatsu, K.; Sakakura, K.; Toyoda, M.; Takahashi, K.; Yamamoto, T.; Masuyama, K. Immunosuppressive activity of CD14+ HLA-DR- cells in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Sci. 2012, 103, 976–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Du, R.; Lu, K.V.; Petritsch, C.; Liu, P.; Ganss, R.; Passegué, E.; Song, H.; Vandenberg, S.; Johnson, R.S.; Werb, Z.; et al. HIF1alpha induces the recruitment of bone marrow-derived vascular modulatory cells to regulate tumor angiogenesis and invasion. Cancer Cell 2008, 13, 206–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Zheng, S.G.; Wang, J.; Wang, P.; Gray, J.D.; Horwitz, D.A. IL-2 is essential for TGF-beta to convert naive CD4+CD25- cells to CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells and for expansion of these cells. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 2018–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Vignali, D.A.; Collison, L.W.; Workman, C.J. How regulatory T cells work. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Hanna, G.J.; Liu, H.; Jones, R.E.; Bacay, A.F.; Lizotte, P.H.; Ivanova, E.V.; Bittinger, M.A.; Cavanaugh, M.E.; Rode, A.J.; Schoenfeld, J.D.; et al. Defining an inflamed tumor immunophenotype in recurrent, metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncol. 2017, 67, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Badoual, C.; Hans, S.; Merillon, N.; Van Ryswick, C.; Ravel, P.; Benhamouda, N.; Levionnois, E.; Nizard, M.; Si-Mohamed, A.; Besnier, N.; et al. PD-1-expressing tumor-infiltrating T cells are a favorable prognostic biomarker in HPV-associated head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Shah, B.H.; Rasheed, H.; Rahman, I.H.; Shariff, A.H.; Khan, F.L.; Rahman, H.B.; Hanif, S.; Saeed, S.A. Molecular mechanisms involved in human platelet aggregation by synergistic interaction of platelet-activating factor and 5-hydroxytryptamine. Exp. Mol. Med. 2001, 33, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Ruiz, F.A.; Lea, C.R.; Oldfield, E.; Docampo, R. Human platelet dense granules contain polyphosphate and are similar to acidocalcisomes of bacteria and unicellular eukaryotes. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 44250–44257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Metzelaar, M.J.; Wijngaard, P.L.; Peters, P.J.; Sixma, J.J.; Nieuwenhuis, H.K.; Clevers, H.C. CD63 antigen. A novel lysosomal membrane glycoprotein, cloned by a screening procedure for intracellular antigens in eukaryotic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 3239–3245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gleissner, C.A.; von Hundelshausen, P.; Ley, K. Platelet chemokines in vascular disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2008, 28, 1920–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Prussin, C.; Metcalfe, D.D. 4. IgE, mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003, 111 (Suppl. 2), S486–S494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Saleem, S.J.; Martin, R.K.; Morales, J.K.; Sturgill, J.L.; Gibb, D.R.; Graham, L.; Bear, H.D.; Manjili, M.H.; Ryan, J.J.; Conrad, D.H. Cutting edge: Mast cells critically augment myeloid-derived suppressor cell activity. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Stoyanov, E.; Uddin, M.; Mankuta, D.; Dubinett, S.M.; Levi-Schaffer, F. Mast cells and histamine enhance the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells. Lung Cancer 2012, 75, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ciurea, R.; Mărgăritescu, C.; Simionescu, C.; Stepan, A.; Ciurea, M. VEGF and his R1 and R2 receptors expression in mast cells of oral squamous cells carcinomas and their involvement in tumoral angiogenesis. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. Rev. Roum. Morphol. Embryol. 2011, 52, 1227–1232. [Google Scholar]
  66. Barth, P.J.; Schenck zu Schweinsberg, T.; Ramaswamy, A.; Moll, R. CD34+ fibrocytes, alpha-smooth muscle antigen-positive myofibroblasts, and CD117 expression in the stroma of invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx. Virchows Arch. Int. J. Pathol. 2004, 444, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Levite, M. Nerve-driven immunity. The direct effects of neurotransmitters on T-cell function. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000, 917, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Muñoz, M.; González-Ortega, A.; Rosso, M.; Robles-Frias, M.J.; Carranza, A.; Salinas-Martín, M.V.; Coveñas, R. The substance P/neurokinin-1 receptor system in lung cancer: Focus on the antitumor action of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists. Peptides 2012, 38, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Koon, H.W.; Zhao, D.; Na, X.; Moyer, M.P.; Pothoulakis, C. Metalloproteinases and transforming growth factor-alpha mediate substance P-induced mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and proliferation in human colonocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 45519–45527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Brener, S.; González-Moles, M.A.; Tostes, D.; Esteban, F.; Gil-Montoya, J.A.; Ruiz-Avila, I.; Bravo, M.; Muñoz, M. A role for the substance P/NK-1 receptor complex in cell proliferation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 2323–2329. [Google Scholar]
  71. Mehboob, R.; Tanvir, I.; Warraich, R.A.; Perveen, S.; Yasmeen, S.; Ahmad, F.J. Role of neurotransmitter Substance P in progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2015, 211, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lala, P.K.; Parhar, R.S.; Singh, P. Indomethacin therapy abrogates the prostaglandin-mediated suppression of natural killer activity in tumor-bearing mice and prevents tumor metastasis. Cell. Immunol. 1986, 99, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bernabé, D.G.; Tamae, A.C.; Biasoli, É.R.; Oliveira, S.H. Stress hormones increase cell proliferation and regulates interleukin-6 secretion in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Brain Behav. Immunol. 2011, 25, 574–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Shang, Z.J.; Liu, K.; Liang, D.F. Expression of beta2-adrenergic receptor in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Oral Pathol. Med. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Oral Pathol. Am. Acad. Oral Pathol. 2009, 38, 371–376. [Google Scholar]
  75. Liu, H.; Wang, C.; Xie, N.; Zhuang, Z.; Liu, X.; Hou, J.; Huang, H. Activation of adrenergic receptor β2 promotes tumor progression and epithelial mesenchymal transition in tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 41, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shurin, M.R. Dendritic cells presenting tumor antigen. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 1996, 43, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lutz, M.B.; Schuler, G. Immature, semi-mature and fully mature dendritic cells: Which signals induce tolerance or immunity? Trends Immunol. 2002, 23, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chaux, P.; Moutet, M.; Faivre, J.; Martin, F.; Martin, M. Inflammatory cells infiltrating human colorectal carcinomas express HLA class II but not B7–1 and B7–2 costimulatory molecules of the T-cell activation. Lab. Investig. A J. Tech. Methods Pathol. 1996, 74, 975–983. [Google Scholar]
  79. Shurin, M.R.; Shurin, G.V.; Lokshin, A.; Yurkovetsky, Z.R.; Gutkin, D.W.; Chatta, G.; Zhong, H.; Han, B.; Ferris, R.L. Intratumoral cytokines/chemokines/growth factors and tumor infiltrating dendritic cells: Friends or enemies? Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006, 25, 333–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Makarenkova, V.P.; Shurin, G.V.; Tourkova, I.L.; Balkir, L.; Pirtskhalaishvili, G.; Perez, L.; Gerein, V.; Siegfried, J.M.; Shurin, M.R. Lung cancer-derived bombesin-like peptides down-regulate the generation and function of human dendritic cells. J. Neuroimmunol. 2003, 145, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lizée, G.; Radvanyi, L.G.; Overwijk, W.W.; Hwu, P. Improving antitumor immune responses by circumventing immunoregulatory cells and mechanisms. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 4794–4803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Mahnke, K.; Schmitt, E.; Bonifaz, L.; Enk, A.H.; Jonuleit, H. Immature, but not inactive: The tolerogenic function of immature dendritic cells. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2002, 80, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hawiger, D.; Inaba, K.; Dorsett, Y.; Guo, M.; Mahnke, K.; Rivera, M.; Ravetch, J.V.; Steinman, R.M.; Nussenzweig, M.C. Dendritic cells induce peripheral T cell unresponsiveness under steady state conditions in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2001, 194, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Folkman, J. Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis. Semin. Oncol. 2002, 29 (Suppl. 16), 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Eisma, R.J.; Spiro, J.D.; Kreutzer, D.L. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. 1997, 174, 513–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kaneko, T.; Zhang, Z.; Mantellini, M.G.; Karl, E.; Zeitlin, B.; Verhaegen, M.; Soengas, M.S.; Lingen, M.; Strieter, R.M.; Nunez, G.; et al. Bcl-2 orchestrates a cross-talk between endothelial and tumor cells that promotes tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 9685–9693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Nör, J.E.; Christensen, J.; Mooney, D.J.; Polverini, P.J. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated angiogenesis is associated with enhanced endothelial cell survival and induction of Bcl-2 expression. Am. J. Pathol. 1999, 154, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Nör, J.E.; Christensen, J.; Liu, J.; Peters, M.; Mooney, D.J.; Strieter, R.M.; Polverini, P.J. Up-Regulation of Bcl-2 in microvascular endothelial cells enhances intratumoral angiogenesis and accelerates tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 2183–2188. [Google Scholar]
  89. Karl, E.; Warner, K.; Zeitlin, B.; Kaneko, T.; Wurtzel, L.; Jin, T.; Chang, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.Y.; Strieter, R.M.; et al. Bcl-2 acts in a proangiogenic signaling pathway through nuclear factor-kappaB and CXC chemokines. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 5063–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Warner, K.A.; Miyazawa, M.; Cordeiro, M.M.; Love, W.J.; Pinsky, M.S.; Neiva, K.G.; Spalding, A.C.; Nör, J.E. Endothelial cells enhance tumor cell invasion through a crosstalk mediated by CXC chemokine signaling. Neoplasia 2008, 10, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Zeng, Q.; Li, S.; Chepeha, D.B.; Giordano, T.J.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Polverini, P.J.; Nor, J.; Kitajewski, J.; Wang, C.Y. Crosstalk between tumor and endothelial cells promotes tumor angiogenesis by MAPK activation of Notch signaling. Cancer Cell 2005, 8, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Pietras, K.; Ostman, A. Hallmarks of cancer: Interactions with the tumor stroma. Exp. Cell Res. 2010, 316, 1324–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Durham, J.T.; Surks, H.K.; Dulmovits, B.M.; Herman, I.M. Pericyte contractility controls endothelial cell cycle progression and sprouting: Insights into angiogenic switch mechanics. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2014, 307, C878–C892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Ribatti, D.; Nico, B.; Crivellato, E. The role of pericytes in angiogenesis. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2011, 55, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Gerhardt, H.; Betsholtz, C. Endothelial-pericyte interactions in angiogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 2003, 314, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Bergers, G.; Song, S. The role of pericytes in blood-vessel formation and maintenance. Neuro Oncol. 2005, 7, 452–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Mărgăritescu, C.; Simionescu, C.; Pirici, D.; Mogoantă, L.; Ciurea, R.; Stepan, A. Immunohistochemical characterization of tumoral vessels in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. Rev. Roum. Morphol. Embryol. 2008, 49, 447–458. [Google Scholar]
  98. Valle, I.B.; Schuch, L.F.; da Silva, J.M.; Gala-García, A.; Diniz, I.M.A.; Birbrair, A.; Abreu, L.G.; Silva, T.A. Pericyte in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Head Neck Pathol. 2020, 14, 1080–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Hollemann, D.; Yanagida, G.; Rüger, B.M.; Neuchrist, C.; Fischer, M.B. New vessel formation in peritumoral area of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2012, 34, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Muncie, J.M.; Weaver, V.M. The Physical and Biochemical Properties of the Extracellular Matrix Regulate Cell Fate. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2018, 130, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  101. Urbanczyk, M.; Layland, S.L.; Schenke-Layland, K. The role of extracellular matrix in biomechanics and its impact on bioengineering of cells and 3D tissues. Matrix Biol. 2020, 85–86, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhu, J.; Liang, L.; Jiao, Y.; Liu, L. Enhanced invasion of metastatic cancer cells via extracellular matrix interface. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Schminke, B.; Frese, J.; Bode, C.; Goldring, M.B.; Miosge, N. Laminins and Nidogens in the Pericellular Matrix of Chondrocytes: Their Role in Osteoarthritis and Chondrogenic Differentiation. Am. J. Pathol. 2016, 186, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Cao, X.L.; Xu, R.J.; Zheng, Y.Y.; Liu, J.; Teng, Y.S.; Li, Y.; Zhu, J. Expression of type IV collagen, metalloproteinase-2, metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2011, 12, 3245–3249. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Parikka, M.; Nissinen, L.; Kainulainen, T.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L.; Salo, T.; Heino, J.; Tasanen, K. Collagen XVII promotes integrin-mediated squamous cell carcinoma transmigration--a novel role for alphaIIb integrin and tirofiban. Exp. Cell Res. 2006, 312, 1431–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Koontongkaew, S.; Amornphimoltham, P.; Yapong, B. Tumor-stroma interactions influence cytokine expression and matrix metalloproteinase activities in paired primary and metastatic head and neck cancer cells. Cell Biol. Int. 2009, 33, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Nam, J.M.; Onodera, Y.; Bissell, M.J.; Park, C.C. Breast cancer cells in three-dimensional culture display an enhanced radioresponse after coordinate targeting of integrin alpha5beta1 and fibronectin. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 5238–5248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Levental, K.R.; Yu, H.; Kass, L.; Lakins, J.N.; Egeblad, M.; Erler, J.T.; Fong, S.F.; Csiszar, K.; Giaccia, A.; Weninger, W.; et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 2009, 139, 891–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Provenzano, P.P.; Eliceiri, K.W.; Campbell, J.M.; Inman, D.R.; White, J.G.; Keely, P.J. Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion. BMC Med. 2006, 4, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Ziober, A.F.; Falls, E.M.; Ziober, B.L. The extracellular matrix in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Friend or foe? Head Neck 2006, 28, 740–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Harada, T.; Shinohara, M.; Nakamura, S.; Oka, M. An immunohistochemical study of the extracellular matrix in oral squamous cell carcinoma and its association with invasive and metastatic potential. Virchows Arch. Int. J. Pathol. 1994, 424, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Agarwal, P.; Ballabh, R. Expression of type IV collagen in different histological grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma: An immunohistochemical study. J. Cancer Res. 2013, 9, 272–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Shruthy, R.; Sharada, P.; Swaminathan, U.; Nagamalini, B. Immunohistochemical expression of basement membrane laminin in histological grades of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A semiquantitative analysis. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2013, 17, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Firth, N.A.; Reade, P.C. The prognosis of oral mucosal squamous cell carcinomas: A comparison of clinical and histopathological grading and of laminin and type IV collagen staining. Aust Dent. J. 1996, 41, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Fabricius, E.M.; Wildner, G.P.; Kruse-Boitschenko, U.; Hoffmeister, B.; Goodman, S.L.; Raguse, J.D. Immunohistochemical analysis of integrins alphavbeta3, alphavbeta5 and alpha5beta1, and their ligands, fibrinogen, fibronectin, osteopontin and vitronectin, in frozen sections of human oral head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Exp. Ther. Med. 2011, 2, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Popovic, Z.V.; Sandhoff, R.; Sijmonsma, T.P.; Kaden, S.; Jennemann, R.; Kiss, E.; Tone, E.; Autschbach, F.; Platt, N.; Malle, E.; et al. Sulfated glycosphingolipid as mediator of phagocytosis: SM4s enhances apoptotic cell clearance and modulates macrophage activity. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 6770–6782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Ohara, K.; Ohkuri, T.; Kumai, T.; Nagato, T.; Nozaki, Y.; Ishibashi, K.; Kosaka, A.; Nagata, M.; Harabuchi, S.; Ohara, M.; et al. Targeting phosphorylated p53 to elicit tumor-reactive T helper responses against head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncoimmunology 2018, 7, e1466771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Maggioni, D.; Pignataro, L.; Garavello, W. T-helper and T-regulatory cells modulation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncoimmunology 2017, 6, e1325066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Mironska, A.; Łukaszewicz-Zajac, M.; Mroczko, B. Clinical Significance of Selected Chemokines in Thyroid Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2019, 39, 2715–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Khurshid, Z.; Zafar, M.S.; Khan, R.S.; Najeeb, S.; Slowey, P.D.; Rehman, I.U. Role of Salivary Biomarkers in Oral Cancer Detection. Adv. Clin. Chem. 2018, 86, 23–70. [Google Scholar]
  121. Riley, P.; Glenny, A.M.; Worthington, H.V.; Littlewood, A.; Fernandez Mauleffinch, L.M.; Clarkson, J.E.; McCabe, M.G. Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: Cytokines and growth factors. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 11, Cd011990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Muderris, T.K.; Gul, F.; Doblan, A.; Ergin, M.; Muderris, T. Role of T-helper 17 cell related cytokines in laryngeal cancer. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2019, 133, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sotirović, J.; Perić, A.; Vojvodić, D.; Baletić, N.; Zaletel, I.; Stanojević, I.; Erdoglija, M.; Milojević, M. Serum cytokine profile of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2017, 131, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Miller, J.S.; Morishima, C.; McNeel, D.G.; Patel, M.R.; Kohrt, H.E.K.; Thompson, J.A.; Sondel, P.M.; Wakelee, H.A.; Disis, M.L.; Kaiser, J.C.; et al. A First-in-Human Phase I Study of Subcutaneous Outpatient Recombinant Human IL15 (rhIL15) in Adults with Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 1525–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Ishikawa, K.; Yagi-Nakanishi, S.; Nakanishi, Y.; Kondo, S.; Tsuji, A.; Endo, K.; Wakisaka, N.; Murono, S.; Yoshizaki, T. Expression of interleukin-33 is correlated with poor prognosis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. AurisNasusLarynx 2014, 41, 552–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Wen, Y.H.; Lin, H.Q.; Li, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lui, V.W.Y.; Chen, L.; Wu, X.M.; Sun, W.; Wen, W.P. Stromal interleukin-33 promotes regulatory T cell-mediated immunosuppression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and correlates with poor prognosis. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2019, 68, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. St John, M.A. Inflammatory mediators drive metastasis and drug resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2015, 125 (Suppl. 3), S1–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wang, Y.; Wu, C.; Zhang, C.; Li, Z.; Zhu, T.; Chen, J.; Ren, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, X. TGF-β-induced STAT3 overexpression promotes human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma invasion and metastasis through malat1/miR-30a interactions. Cancer Lett. 2018, 436, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Li, X.; Xu, Q.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Tang, D.; Han, L.; Fan, Q. A CCL2/ROS autoregulation loop is critical for cancer-associated fibroblasts-enhanced tumor growth of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 1362–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Silva, T.A.; Ribeiro, F.L.; Oliveira-Neto, H.H.; Watanabe, S.; Alencar Rde, C.; Fukada, S.Y.; Cunha, F.Q.; Leles, C.R.; Mendonça, E.F.; Batista, A.C. Dual role of CCL3/CCR1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Implications in tumor metastasis and local host defense. Oncol. Rep. 2007, 18, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  131. Chuang, J.Y.; Yang, W.H.; Chen, H.T.; Huang, C.Y.; Tan, T.W.; Lin, Y.T.; Hsu, C.J.; Fong, Y.C.; Tang, C.H. CCL5/CCR5 axis promotes the motility of human oral cancer cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2009, 220, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Jung, D.W.; Che, Z.M.; Kim, J.; Kim, K.; Kim, K.Y.; Williams, D.; Kim, J. Tumor-stromal crosstalk in invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma: A pivotal role of CCL7. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 332–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Chang, K.P.; Kao, H.K.; Yen, T.C.; Chang, Y.L.; Liang, Y.; Liu, S.C.; Lee, L.Y.; Chang, Y.L.; Kang, C.J.; Chen, I.H.; et al. Overexpression of macrophage inflammatory protein-3α in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is associated with nodal metastasis. Oral Oncol. 2011, 47, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Shang, Z.J.; Liu, K.; Shao, Z. Expression of chemokine receptor CCR7 is associated with cervical lymph node metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2009, 45, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Li, P.; Zhao, Z.J.; Liu, F.Y.; Sun, L.Y.; Ding, X.; Zhang, W.Z.; Shang, D.H.; Sun, C.F. The chemokine receptor 7 regulates cell adhesion and migration via beta1 integrin in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oncol. Rep. 2010, 24, 989–995. [Google Scholar]
  136. Guo, N.; Liu, F.; Yang, L.; Huang, J.; Ding, X.; Sun, C. Chemokine receptor 7 enhances cell chemotaxis and migration of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck through activation of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Oncol. Rep. 2014, 32, 794–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Liu, F.Y.; Safdar, J.; Li, Z.N.; Fang, Q.G.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Z.F.; Sun, C.F. CCR7 regulates cell migration and invasion through MAPKs in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. Int. J. Oncol. 2014, 45, 2502–2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  138. Irino, T.; Takeuchi, H.; Matsuda, S.; Saikawa, Y.; Kawakubo, H.; Wada, N.; Takahashi, T.; Nakamura, R.; Fukuda, K.; Omori, T.; et al. CC-Chemokine receptor CCR7: A key molecule for lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Tsuzuki, H.; Takahashi, N.; Kojima, A.; Narita, N.; Sunaga, H.; Takabayashi, T.; Fujieda, S. Oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas expressing CCR7 have poor prognoses. AurisNasusLarynx 2006, 33, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lee, C.H.; Syu, S.H.; Liu, K.J.; Chu, P.Y.; Yang, W.C.; Lin, P.; Shieh, W.Y. Interleukin-1 beta transactivates epidermal growth factor receptor via the CXCL1-CXCR2 axis in oral cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 38866–38880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Campbell, L.M.; Maxwell, P.J.; Waugh, D.J. Rationale and Means to Target Pro-Inflammatory Interleukin-8 (CXCL8) Signaling in Cancer. Pharm 2013, 6, 929–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Khurram, S.A.; Bingle, L.; McCabe, B.M.; Farthing, P.M.; Whawell, S.A. The chemokine receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 regulate oral cancer cell behaviour. J. Oral Pathol. Med. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Oral Pathol. Am. Acad. Oral Pathol. 2014, 43, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Liu, C.M.; Yeh, C.J.; Yu, C.C.; Chou, M.Y.; Lin, C.H.; Wei, L.H.; Lin, C.W.; Yang, S.F.; Chien, M.H. Impact of interleukin-8 gene polymorphisms and environmental factors on oral cancer susceptibility in Taiwan. Oral Dis. 2012, 18, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Chang, K.P.; Wu, C.C.; Fang, K.H.; Tsai, C.Y.; Chang, Y.L.; Liu, S.C.; Kao, H.K. Serum levels of chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9 (CXCL9) are associated with tumor progression and treatment outcome in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2013, 49, 802–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Kucia, M.; Jankowski, K.; Reca, R.; Wysoczynski, M.; Bandura, L.; Allendorf, D.J.; Zhang, J.; Ratajczak, J.; Ratajczak, M.Z. CXCR4-SDF-1 signalling, locomotion, chemotaxis and adhesion. J. Mol. Histol. 2004, 35, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Xia, J.; Chen, N.; Hong, Y.; Chen, X.; Tao, X.; Cheng, B.; Huang, Y. Expressions of CXCL12/CXCR4 in oral premalignant and malignant lesions. Mediat. Inflamm. 2012, 2012, 516395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Uchida, D.; Begum, N.M.; Almofti, A.; Nakashiro, K.; Kawamata, H.; Tateishi, Y.; Hamakawa, H.; Yoshida, H.; Sato, M. Possible role of stromal-cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 signaling on lymph node metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Exp. Cell Res. 2003, 290, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. León, X.; Diez, S.; García, J.; Lop, J.; Sumarroca, A.; Quer, M.; Camacho, M. Expression of the CXCL12/CXCR4 chemokine axis predicts regional control in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. Off. J. Eur. Fed. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. Soc. (Eufos) Affil. Ger. Soc. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016, 273, 4525–4533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Teng, Y.H.; Liu, T.H.; Tseng, H.C.; Chung, T.T.; Yeh, C.M.; Li, Y.C.; Ou, Y.H.; Lin, L.Y.; Tsai, H.T.; Yang, S.F. Contribution of genetic polymorphisms of stromal cell-derived factor-1 and its receptor, CXCR4, to the susceptibility and clinicopathologic development of oral cancer. Head Neck 2009, 31, 1282–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Khurram, S.A.; Whawell, S.A.; Bingle, L.; Murdoch, C.; McCabe, B.M.; Farthing, P.M. Functional expression of the chemokine receptor XCR1 on oral epithelial cells. J. Pathol. 2010, 221, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Luangdilok, S.; Box, C.; Harrington, K.; Rhŷs-Evans, P.; Eccles, S. MAPK and PI3K signalling differentially regulate angiogenic and lymphangiogenic cytokine secretion in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur. J. Cancer 2011, 47, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Stanam, A.; Gibson-Corley, K.N.; Love-Homan, L.; Ihejirika, N.; Simons, A.L. Interleukin-1 blockade overcomes erlotinib resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 76087–76100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Kaneko, N.; Kurata, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Morikawa, S.; Masumoto, J. The role of interleukin-1 in general pathology. Inflamm. Regen. 2019, 39, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Huang, Y.H.; Chang, C.Y.; Kuo, Y.Z.; Fang, W.Y.; Kao, H.Y.; Tsai, S.T.; Wu, L.W. Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived interleukin-1beta activates protumor C-C motif chemokine ligand 22 signaling in head and neck cancer. Cancer Sci. 2019, 110, 2783–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Yang, H.T.; Cohen, P.; Rousseau, S. IL-1beta-stimulated activation of ERK1/2 and p38alpha MAPK mediates the transcriptional up-regulation of IL-6, IL-8 and GRO-alpha in HeLa cells. Cell Signal. 2008, 20, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Lee, M.K.; Park, J.H.; Gi, S.H.; Hwang, Y.S. IL-1β Induces Fascin Expression and Increases Cancer Invasion. Anticancer Res. 2018, 38, 6127–6132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Wu, T.; Hong, Y.; Jia, L.; Wu, J.; Xia, J.; Wang, J.; Hu, Q.; Cheng, B. Modulation of IL-1β reprogrammes the tumor microenvironment to interrupt oral carcinogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Suzuki, A.; Leland, P.; Joshi, B.H.; Puri, R.K. Targeting of IL-4 and IL-13 receptors for cancer therapy. Cytokine 2015, 75, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Chonov, D.C.; Ignatova, M.M.K.; Ananiev, J.R.; Gulubova, M.V. IL-6 Activities in the Tumour Microenvironment. Part 1. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 7, 2391–2398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Shinriki, S.; Jono, H.; Ota, K.; Ueda, M.; Kudo, M.; Ota, T.; Oike, Y.; Endo, M.; Ibusuki, M.; Hiraki, A.; et al. Humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody suppresses tumor angiogenesis and in vivo growth of human oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 5426–5434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Chan, L.P.; Wang, L.F.; Chiang, F.Y.; Lee, K.W.; Kuo, P.L.; Liang, C.H. IL-8 promotes HNSCC progression on CXCR1/2-meidated NOD1/RIP2 signaling pathway. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 61820–61831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Bilusic, M.; Heery, C.R.; Collins, J.M.; Donahue, R.N.; Palena, C.; Madan, R.A.; Karzai, F.; Marté, J.L.; Strauss, J.; Gatti-Mays, M.E.; et al. Phase I trial of HuMax-IL8 (BMS-986253), an anti-IL-8 monoclonal antibody, in patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors. J. Immunother. Cancer 2019, 7, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Aziz, S.; Ahmed, S.S.; Ali, A.; Khan, F.A.; Zulfiqar, G.; Iqbal, J.; Khan, A.A.; Shoaib, M. Salivary Immunosuppressive Cytokines IL-10 and IL-13 Are Significantly Elevated in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients. Cancer Investig. 2015, 33, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Takahashi, H.; Sakakura, K.; Kudo, T.; Toyoda, M.; Kaira, K.; Oyama, T.; Chikamatsu, K. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote an immunosuppressive microenvironment through the induction and accumulation of protumoral macrophages. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 8633–8647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Chen, W.Y.; Tsai, T.H.; Yang, J.L.; Li, L.C. Therapeutic Strategies for Targeting IL-33/ST2 Signalling for the Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. Int. J. Exp. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 49, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Kitamura, T.; Pollard, J.W. Therapeutic potential of chemokine signal inhibition for metastatic breast cancer. Pharmacol. Res. 2015, 100, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. Thompson, W.L.; Van Eldik, L.J. Inflammatory cytokines stimulate the chemokines CCL2/MCP-1 and CCL7/MCP-3 through NFkB and MAPK dependent pathways in rat astrocytes [corrected]. Brain Res. 2009, 1287, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Ranasinghe, R.; Eri, R. Modulation of the CCR6-CCL20 Axis: A Potential Therapeutic Target in Inflammation and Cancer. Medicina 2018, 54, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  169. Dufies, M.; Grytsai, O.; Ronco, C.; Camara, O.; Ambrosetti, D.; Hagege, A.; Parola, J.; Mateo, L.; Ayrault, M.; Giuliano, S.; et al. New CXCR1/CXCR2 inhibitors represent an effective treatment for kidney or head and neck cancers sensitive or refractory to reference treatments. Theranostics 2019, 9, 5332–5346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Liu, Q.; Li, A.; Tian, Y.; Wu, J.D.; Liu, Y.; Li, T.; Chen, Y.; Han, X.; Wu, K. The CXCL8-CXCR1/2 pathways in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2016, 31, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Gladue, R.P.; Brown, M.F.; Zwillich, S.H. CCR1 antagonists: What have we learned from clinical trials. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 1268–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Huang, S.; Mills, L.; Mian, B.; Tellez, C.; McCarty, M.; Yang, X.D.; Gudas, J.M.; Bar-Eli, M. Fully humanized neutralizing antibodies to interleukin-8 (ABX-IL8) inhibit angiogenesis, tumor growth, and metastasis of human melanoma. Am. J. Pathol. 2002, 161, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Yan, W.L.; Shen, K.Y.; Tien, C.Y.; Chen, Y.A.; Liu, S.J. Recent progress in GM-CSF-based cancer immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2017, 9, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Akl, M.R.; Nagpal, P.; Ayoub, N.M.; Tai, B.; Prabhu, S.A.; Capac, C.M.; Gliksman, M.; Goy, A.; Suh, K.S. Molecular and clinical significance of fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2 /bFGF) in malignancies of solid and hematological cancers for personalized therapies. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 44735–44762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Bussu, F.; Graziani, C.; Gallus, R.; Cittadini, A.; Galli, J.; De Corso, E.; di Cintio, G.; Corbi, M.; Almadori, G.; Boninsegna, A.; et al. IFN-γ and other serum cytokines in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. Organo Uff. Della Soc. Ital. Di Otorinolaringol. E Chir. Cervico-Facciale 2018, 38, 94–102. [Google Scholar]
  176. Jorgovanovic, D.; Song, M.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y. Roles of IFN-γ in tumor progression and regression: A review. Biomark. Res. 2020, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Pang, X.; Tang, Y.L.; Liang, X.H. Transforming growth factor-β signaling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Insights into cellular responses. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 4799–4806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Bedi, A.; Chang, X.; Noonan, K.; Pham, V.; Bedi, R.; Fertig, E.J.; Considine, M.; Califano, J.A.; Borrello, I.; Chung, C.H.; et al. Inhibition of TGF-β enhances the in vivo antitumor efficacy of EGF receptor-targeted therapy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11, 2429–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Selimovic, D.; Wahl, R.U.; Ruiz, E.; Aslam, R.; Flanagan, T.W.; Hassan, S.Y.; Santourlidis, S.; Haikel, Y.; Friedlander, P.; Megahed, M.; et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α triggers opposing signals in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and induces apoptosis via mitochondrial- and non-mitochondrial-dependent pathways. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 55, 1324–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Wang, X.; Lin, Y. Tumor necrosis factor and cancer, buddies or foes? Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2008, 29, 1275–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  181. Micaily, I.; Johnson, J.; Argiris, A. An update on angiogenesis targeting in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancers Head Neck 2020, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Umemura, N.; Zhu, J.; Mburu, Y.K.; Forero, A.; Hsieh, P.N.; Muthuswamy, R.; Kalinski, P.; Ferris, R.L.; Sarkar, S.N. Defective NF-κB signaling in metastatic head and neck cancer cells leads to enhanced apoptosis by double-stranded RNA. Cancer Res. 2012, 7, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Brown, M.; Cohen, J.; Arun, P.; Chen, Z.; Van Waes, C. NF-kappaB in carcinoma therapy and prevention. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2008, 12, 1109–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Sen, B.; Peng, S.; Woods, D.M.; Wistuba, I.; Bell, D.; El-Naggar, A.K.; Lai, S.Y.; Johnson, F.M. STAT5A-mediated SOCS2 expression regulates Jak2 and STAT3 activity following c-Src inhibition in head and neck squamous carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Lee, C.H.; Chang, J.S.; Syu, S.H.; Wong, T.S.; Chan, J.Y.; Tang, Y.C.; Yang, Z.P.; Yang, W.C.; Chen, C.T.; Lu, S.C.; et al. IL-1β promotes malignant transformation and tumor aggressiveness in oral cancer. J. Cell. Physiol. 2015, 230, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. León, X.; Bothe, C.; García, J.; Parreño, M.; Alcolea, S.; Quer, M.; Vila, L.; Camacho, M. Expression of IL-1α correlates with distant metastasis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 37398–37409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Kim, N.; Ryu, H.; Kim, S.; Joo, M.; Jeon, H.J.; Lee, M.W.; Song, I.C.; Kim, M.N.; Kim, J.M.; Lee, H.J. CXCR7 promotes migration and invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by upregulating TGF-beta1/Smad2/3 signaling. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  188. Freudlsperger, C.; Bian, Y.; Contag Wise, S.; Burnett, J.; Coupar, J.; Yang, X.; Chen, Z.; Van Waes, C. TGF-β and NF-κB signal pathway cross-talk is mediated through TAK1 and SMAD7 in a subset of head and neck cancers. Oncogene 2013, 32, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  189. Sun, H.; Miao, C.; Liu, W.; Qiao, X.; Yang, W.; Li, L.; Li, C. TGF-β1/TβRII/Smad3 signaling pathway promotes VEGF expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma tumor-associated macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 497, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Zhang, T.; Liang, L.; Liu, X.; Wu, J.N.; Chen, J.; Su, K.; Zheng, Q.; Huang, H.; Liao, G.Q. TGFβ1-Smad3-Jagged1-Notch1-Slug signaling pathway takes part in tumorigenesis and progress of tongue squamous cell carcinoma. J. Oral Pathol. Med. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Oral Pathol. Am. Acad. Oral Pathol. 2016, 45, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Wei, T.; Cong, X.; Wang, X.T.; Xu, X.J.; Min, S.N.; Ye, P.; Peng, X.; Wu, L.L.; Yu, G.Y. Interleukin-17A promotes tongue squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through activating miR-23b/versican pathway. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 6663–6680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  192. Bragado, P.; Estrada, Y.; Parikh, F.; Krause, S.; Capobianco, C.; Farina, H.G.; Schewe, D.M.; Aguirre-Ghiso, J.A. TGF-β2 dictates disseminated tumour cell fate in target organs through TGF-β-RIII and p38α/β signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 1351–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  193. Choudhary, M.M.; France, T.J.; Teknos, T.N.; Kumar, P. Interleukin-6 role in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma progression. World J. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2016, 2, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  194. Kim, M.S.; Lee, W.S.; Jeong, J.; Kim, S.J.; Jin, W. Induction of metastatic potential by TrkB via activation of IL6/JAK2/STAT3 and PI3K/AKT signaling in breast cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 40158–40171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Linnskog, R.; Jönsson, G.; Axelsson, L.; Prasad, C.P.; Andersson, T. Interleukin-6 drives melanoma cell motility through p38α-MAPK-dependent up-regulation of WNT5A expression. Mol. Oncol. 2014, 8, 1365–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Yadav, A.; Kumar, B.; Datta, J.; Teknos, T.N.; Kumar, P. IL-6 promotes head and neck tumor metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition via the JAK-STAT3-SNAIL signaling pathway. Mol. Cancer Res. 2011, 9, 1658–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Lesinski, G.B.; Nannapaneni, S.; Griffith, C.C.; Patel, M.; Chen, W.; Chen, Z.; Ahmed, R.; Wieland, A.; Shin, D.M.; Chen, Z.G.; et al. Interleukin-6/STAT3 Signaling is Prominent and Associated with Reduced Overall Survival in p16 Negative Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2019, 13, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Bu, L.L.; Yu, G.T.; Wu, L.; Mao, L.; Deng, W.W.; Liu, J.F.; Kulkarni, A.B.; Zhang, W.F.; Zhang, L.; Sun, Z.J. STAT3 Induces Immunosuppression by Upregulating PD-1/PD-L1 in HNSCC. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Karakasheva, T.A.; Lin, E.W.; Tang, Q.; Qiao, E.; Waldron, T.J.; Soni, M.; Klein-Szanto, A.J.; Sahu, V.; Basu, D.; Ohashi, S.; et al. IL-6 Mediates Cross-Talk between Tumor Cells and Activated Fibroblasts in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 4957–4970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  200. Ma, H.; Yang, W.; Zhang, L.; Liu, S.; Zhao, M.; Zhou, G.; Wang, L.; Jin, S.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, J. Interferon-alpha promotes immunosuppression through IFNAR1/STAT1 signalling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 120, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Ma, H.; Jin, S.; Yang, W.; Zhou, G.; Zhao, M.; Fang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Hu, J. Interferon-alpha enhances the antitumour activity of EGFR-targeted therapies by upregulating RIG-I in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2018, 118, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Koul, H.K.; Pal, M.; Koul, S. Role of p38 MAP Kinase Signal Transduction in Solid Tumors. Genes Cancer 2013, 4, 342–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Chan, L.P.; Liu, C.; Chiang, F.Y.; Wang, L.F.; Lee, K.W.; Chen, W.T.; Kuo, P.L.; Liang, C.H. IL-8 promotes inflammatory mediators and stimulates activation of p38 MAPK/ERK-NF-κB pathway and reduction of JNK in HNSCC. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 56375–56388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Muller, A.; Sonkoly, E.; Eulert, C.; Gerber, P.A.; Kubitza, R.; Schirlau, K.; Franken-Kunkel, P.; Poremba, C.; Snyderman, C.; Klotz, L.O.; et al. Chemokine receptors in head and neck cancer: Association with metastatic spread and regulation during chemotherapy. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 118, 2147–2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Yoshimura, T. The chemokine MCP-1 (CCL2) in the host interaction with cancer: A foe or ally? Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 15, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  206. Ji, W.T.; Chen, H.R.; Lin, C.H.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, C.C. Monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) modulates pro-survival signaling to promote progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Marcuzzi, E.; Angioni, R.; Molon, B.; Calì, B. Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors: Orchestrating Tumor Metastasization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 20, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  208. Lee, M.W.; Kim, N.; Kim, S.; Joo, M.; Ryu, H.; Lee, H.J. Chemokine receptor CXCR7 expression, function and clinical implications in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Ann. Oncol. 2018, 29, viii680–viii681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Mburu, Y.K.; Egloff, A.M.; Walker, W.H.; Wang, L.; Seethala, R.R.; van Waes, C.; Ferris, R.L. Chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) gene expression is regulated by NF-κB and activator protein 1 (AP1) in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (SCCHN). J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 3581–3590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Gao, L.; Wang, F.-Q.; Li, H.-M.; Yang, J.-G.; Ren, J.-G.; He, K.-F.; Liu, B.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, Y.-F. CCL2/EGF positive feedback loop between cancer cells and macrophages promotes cell migration and invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 87037–87051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  211. Samara, G.J.; Lawrence, D.M.; Chiarelli, C.J.; Valentino, M.D.; Lyubsky, S.; Zucker, S.; Vaday, G.G. CXCR4-mediated adhesion and MMP-9 secretion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2004, 214, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Tan, C.-T.; Chu, C.-Y.; Lu, Y.-C.; Chang, C.-C.; Lin, B.-R.; Wu, H.-H.; Liu, H.-L.; Cha, S.-T.; Prakash, E.; Ko, J.-Y.; et al. CXCL12/CXCR4 promotes laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma metastasis through MMP-13-dependent invasion via the ERK1/2/AP-1 pathway. Carcinogenesis 2008, 29, 1519–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  213. Faber, A.; Goessler, U.R.; Hoermann, K.; Schultz, J.D.; Umbreit, C.; Stern-Straeter, J. SDF-1-CXCR4 axis: Cell trafficking in the cancer stem cell niche of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2013, 29, 2325–2331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  214. De-Colle, C.; Mönnich, D.; Welz, S.; Boeke, S.; Sipos, B.; Fend, F.; Mauz, P.-S.; Tinhofer, I.; Budach, V.; Jawad, J.A.; et al. SDF-1/CXCR4 expression in head and neck cancer and outcome after postoperative radiochemotherapy. Clin. Transl Radiat Oncol. 2017, 5, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  215. Miyazaki, H.; Patel, V.; Wang, H.; Edmunds, R.K.; Gutkind, J.S.; Yeudall, W.A. Down-regulation of CXCL5 Inhibits Squamous Carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 4279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  216. Hsin, L.-J.; Kao, H.-K.; Chen, I.H.; Tsang, N.-M.; Hsu, C.-L.; Liu, S.-C.; Chang, Y.-S.; Chang, K.-P. Serum CXCL9 Levels Are Associated with Tumor Progression and Treatment Outcome in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Lin, Y.-C. Cancer-associated fibroblast induced chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 11 contribute to the progression of head and neck cancer. In Joint Event on 33rd International Conference on Oncology Nursing and Cancer Care and 16th Asia Pacific Pathology Congress, Tokyo, Japan, 2018; e-Century Publishing Corporatio: Tokyo, Japan, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  218. Chen, S.-F.; Nieh, S.; Jao, S.-W.; Wu, M.-Z.; Liu, C.-L.; Chang, Y.-C.; Lin, Y.-S. The paracrine effect of cancer-associated fibroblast-induced interleukin-33 regulates the invasiveness of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J. Pathol. 2013, 231, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Xu, Q.; Ma, H.; Chang, H.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, C.; Yang, X. The interaction of interleukin-8 and PTEN inactivation promotes the malignant progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma via the STAT3 pathway. Cell Death Dis 2020, 11, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Dumitru, C.A.; Gholaman, H.; Trellakis, S.; Bruderek, K.; Dominas, N.; Gu, X.; Bankfalvi, A.; Whiteside, T.L.; Lang, S.; Brandau, S. Tumor-derived macrophage migration inhibitory factor modulates the biology of head and neck cancer cells via neutrophil activation. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 129, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. DiNatale, B.C.; Smith, K.; John, K.; Krishnegowda, G.; Amin, S.G.; Perdew, G.H. Ah Receptor Antagonism Represses Head and Neck Tumor Cell Aggressive Phenotype. Mol. Cancer Res. 2012, 10, 1369–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  222. White, R.A.; Malkoski, S.P.; Wang, X.J. TGFβ signaling in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene 2010, 29, 5437–5446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  223. Muro-Cacho, C.A.; Anderson, M.; Cordero, J.; Munoz-Antonia, T. Expression of transforming growth factor beta type II receptors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 1999, 5, 1243–1248. [Google Scholar]
  224. Principe, S.; Dikova, V.; Bagán, J. Salivary Cytokines in patients with Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) treated with Radiotherapy. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2019, 11, e1072–e1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Bigbee, W.L.; Grandis, J.R.; Siegfried, J.M. Multiple cytokine and growth factor serum biomarkers predict therapeutic response and survival in advanced-stage head and neck cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 3107–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  226. Wolf, G.T.; Moyer, J.S.; Kaplan, M.J.; Newman, J.G.; Egan, J.E.; Berinstein, N.L.; Whiteside, T.L. IRX-2 natural cytokine biologic for immunotherapy in patients with head and neck cancers. Onco Targets 2018, 11, 3731–3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  227. Chulpanova, D.S.; Kitaeva, K.V.; Green, A.R.; Rizvanov, A.A.; Solovyeva, V.V. Molecular Aspects and Future Perspectives of Cytokine-Based Anti-cancer Immunotherapy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemokine and cytokine-mediated crosstalk in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tumor micro-environment (TME). Cytokines and chemokines secreted by a variety of stromal cells affect tumor cell growth, proliferation & metastasis in many ways. By inducing immune-suppressive TME, they promote immune evasion and metastasis. Many chemokines and cytokines help degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, induce angiogenesis, and thereby promote invasion and metastasis.
Figure 1. Chemokine and cytokine-mediated crosstalk in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) tumor micro-environment (TME). Cytokines and chemokines secreted by a variety of stromal cells affect tumor cell growth, proliferation & metastasis in many ways. By inducing immune-suppressive TME, they promote immune evasion and metastasis. Many chemokines and cytokines help degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, induce angiogenesis, and thereby promote invasion and metastasis.
Ijms 22 04584 g001
Figure 2. Deregulated chemokines and cytokines in HNSCC. The heat maps showing deregulated expression of (A) chemokines and, (B) cytokines in HNSCC patients. The heat maps were constructed through data mining in the HNSCC TCGA database by using the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu (accessed on 9 February 2021)) (adjacent normal, n = 44, tumor tissue, n = 518 and metastatic = 02) samples).
Figure 2. Deregulated chemokines and cytokines in HNSCC. The heat maps showing deregulated expression of (A) chemokines and, (B) cytokines in HNSCC patients. The heat maps were constructed through data mining in the HNSCC TCGA database by using the UCSC Xena browser (http://xena.ucsc.edu (accessed on 9 February 2021)) (adjacent normal, n = 44, tumor tissue, n = 518 and metastatic = 02) samples).
Ijms 22 04584 g002
Figure 3. Cytokines/Chemokines activate signaling pathways. Chemokines/cytokines via transmembrane protein GPCR activate an array of signaling pathways like PI3K/AKT/mTOR, JAK/STAT, RAS/RAF, integrin mediates SRC/FAK and Rho/RAC. Deregulation of these signaling pathways is known to promote initiation, progression, and metastasis in HNSCC.
Figure 3. Cytokines/Chemokines activate signaling pathways. Chemokines/cytokines via transmembrane protein GPCR activate an array of signaling pathways like PI3K/AKT/mTOR, JAK/STAT, RAS/RAF, integrin mediates SRC/FAK and Rho/RAC. Deregulation of these signaling pathways is known to promote initiation, progression, and metastasis in HNSCC.
Ijms 22 04584 g003
Table 1. Deregulated Chemokines/Cytokines and their Therapeutic Targeting in HNSCC.
Table 1. Deregulated Chemokines/Cytokines and their Therapeutic Targeting in HNSCC.
S.NoChemokine/CytokineExpressionSignaling Pathway(s) ActivatedInteracts with CellsInvolved inTargeted OR Can Be Targeted byReferences
1IL-1UpMAPK/ERK1/2, NF-KB,
PI3K/AKT, & JAK/STAT
Tumor, T-cells, TAMs & macrophagesRecruitment of TAMs, MDSCs and TregsRecombinant IL-1R antagonist (anakinra)[151,152]
2IL-1βUpNF-kB, ERK1/2, JNK, CREBEndothelial & leukocytesIncrease integrin expressionLenti virus mediated shRNA[153,154,155,156,157]
3IL-4UpMAPKTumor, TAMs & endothelial cellsPromote tumor growth, angiogenesis & immuno-suppressionrIL-4 with Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE) targeting IL-4R[158]
4IL-6UpJAK/STAT, PI3K/AKT, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK1/2 & WntTumor, Th17 cells & CAFsSupport tumor growth, immune evasion & CAF activationHumanized antiIL-6R antibody (Tocilizumab)[159,160]
5IL-8UpNF-kB, MAPK, CXCR1/2/NOD1/RIP2Tumor, endothelial cells & neutrophilsPromotes tumor invasion, angiogenesis & recruit neutrophils to the TMEHumanized anti- IL-8 antibody (HuMax-IL8)[161,162]
6IL-10UpJAK/STAT3T cells, TAMsSuppress T-cell proliferation and promote immuno-suppression-[163,164]
7IL-15UpJAK/STAT3, PI3K/AKTCD8+ T cell & NK cellStimulate NK and CD8+ T cell functionRecombinant human IL-15 (rhIL15)[124]
8IL-33UpRAS/RAF//MEK/ERK1/2 and JNKTregsEnrich FOXP3+ TregsAnti-IL-33 antibodies[125,129,165]
9CCL-2UpMAPK, PI3K/AKTMonocytes, TAMsRecruits TAMs and monocytesCCL-2 inhibitor mNOX-E36 or neutralizing antibody CNTO88[166]
10CCL-7UpNF-kB and MAPKDCs, NK and T cellsRecruitment of TAMs and CAFs proliferationCCL-7 neutralizing antibodies[132,167]
11CCL-20UpNF-kB, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK1/2NK, TAMs and TregsRecruit TAMs & TregsAnti-CCL20 (WO2017011559A1) or CCR6 antibodies[133,168]
12CXCL-1UpPI3K/AKT/mTOR,
RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK, and NF-ĸB
MDSCs, TAMs, CAFsRecruit MDSCs to TME and promote metastasisSmall molecule inhibitor (C29) against CXCR1[140,169]
13CXCL-8UpPI3K/AKT, FAK/Src, Rho/GTPase and MAPKCSC, endothelial cellsPromote angiogenesis, and CSC proliferationAntibodies (ABX-CXCL8, HuMax CXCL8) or CXCR1/2 inhibitor Reparixin[142,170]
14CCR-1UpRAS/RAF/MEK/ERK, AKT-mTOR, JAK/STAT3MDSCs, TAMs, T cellsTumor infiltration of MDSCs and Treg cellsCCR-1 inhibitor MLN3897[169,170,171]
15CXCR-2UpMAPK/MEK/ERK1/2, NF-kB, PI3K/AKT and JAK/STAT3Cancer cells, TAMs, Monocytes, T cellsIncrease cell proliferationAntibodies (ABX-CXCL8, HuMax CXCL8) or CXCR-2 inhibitor Reparixin[162,172]
16GM-CSFUpJAK/STAT, SRC kinase, MAPK/MEK/ERK1/2, and PI3K/AKTTumor cells, DCDC differentiation, TAM & Treg function and favour IL9-producing Th (Th9) cellsRecombinant GM-CSF or GM-CSF-based DNA vaccines[18,19,173]
17βFGFUpFGFR, JAK/STAT, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERKTumor cells, CAFs and endothelial cellsPromote cell proliferation and tumor growthFGFR inhibitors or antibodies (MFGR1877S, BAY 1179470)[174]
18IFN-γDownIFN-γR1/2/JAK-STAT, PI3K/AKT/mTOR,
IFN-γ/ICAM1-PI3K-Akt-Notch1
Tumor cells, DC, T cells, Tregs, Macrophages,Recruits NK cells to the TME & modulates their activityrIFN-γ[122,123,175,176]
19TGF-βUpTGFβRII/SMAD3,
TGFβ/TAK1, NF-κB
Tumor cells, Macrophages, Tregs, NK cells, MDSCsDC dysfunction, TAMs formation, suppression of NK cells, MDSC recruitmentAnti TGF-β antibody[18,19,128,177,178]
20TNF-αUpMAPK, PI3K/AKT, NF-kB, JAK/STAT, FAK/SrcTumor cells, CAFsIncrease angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis-[18,19,179,180]
21VEGFUpPI3K/AKT/mTOR, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERKEndothelial cellsControls vascular permeability & angiogenesisAnti-VEGF (Bevacizumab) or anti-VEGFR (Ramucirumab) antibodies[181]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nisar, S.; Yousuf, P.; Masoodi, T.; Wani, N.A.; Hashem, S.; Singh, M.; Sageena, G.; Mishra, D.; Kumar, R.; Haris, M.; et al. Chemokine-Cytokine Networks in the Head and Neck Tumor Microenvironment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4584. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094584

AMA Style

Nisar S, Yousuf P, Masoodi T, Wani NA, Hashem S, Singh M, Sageena G, Mishra D, Kumar R, Haris M, et al. Chemokine-Cytokine Networks in the Head and Neck Tumor Microenvironment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(9):4584. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094584

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nisar, Sabah, Parvaiz Yousuf, Tariq Masoodi, Nissar A. Wani, Sheema Hashem, Mayank Singh, Geetanjali Sageena, Deepika Mishra, Rakesh Kumar, Mohammad Haris, and et al. 2021. "Chemokine-Cytokine Networks in the Head and Neck Tumor Microenvironment" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 9: 4584. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094584

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop