Next Article in Journal
Silk Fiber-Reinforced Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel for Cartilage Tissue Engineering
Next Article in Special Issue
FeIII, CuII and ZnII Complexes of the Rigid 9-Oxido-phenalenone Ligand—Spectroscopy, Electrochemistry, and Cytotoxic Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Adenine Methylation on the Structure and Thermodynamic Stability of a DNA Minidumbbell
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Study of the Effects of Platinum (II) Complexes on β-Amyloid Aggregation: Potential Neurodrug Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms22073634
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Affinity of Carboplatin to B-Vitamins and Nucleobases

by
Beata Szefler
*,
Przemysław Czeleń
and
Przemysław Krawczyk
Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Kurpińskiego 5, 85-096 Bydgoszcz, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(7), 3634; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073634
Submission received: 18 March 2021 / Revised: 26 March 2021 / Accepted: 28 March 2021 / Published: 31 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metallodrugs: Mechanisms of Action, Molecular Targets and Biological Activity)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Platinum compounds have found wide application in the treatment of various types of cancer and carboplatin is one of the main platinum-based drugs used as antitumor agents. The anticancer activity of carboplatin arises from interacting with DNA and inducing programmed cell death. However, such interactions may occur with other chemical compounds, such as vitamins containing aromatic rings with lone-pair orbitals, which reduces the anti-cancer effect of carboplatin. The most important aspect of the conducted research was related to the evaluation of carboplatin affinity to vitamins from the B group and the potential impact of such interactions on the reduction of therapeutic capabilities of carboplatin in anticancer therapy. Realized computations, including estimation of Gibbs Free Energies, allowed for the identification of the most reactive molecule, namely vitamin B6 (pyridoxal phosphate). In this case, the computational estimations indicating carboplatin reactivity were confirmed by spectrophotometric measurements.

1. Introduction

Carboplatin (1,1-cyclobutyldicarboxylate) is a drug used to treat cancer during chemotherapy [1]. It is a complex compound containing a heavy metal, i.e., platinum. The anticancer activity of cisplatin was discovered in the early 1960s by Professor Barnett Rosenberg at the University of Michigan [2,3].
Platinum compounds have found wide application in the treatment of various types of cancer and carboplatin is one of the main platinum-based drugs used as antitumor agents. It is intended specifically for the treatment of cancer of the testis, ovary, head, neck, and small cell lung cancer [4].
Currently, in addition to carboplatin, this group of drugs includes cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Carboplatin is a derivative of cisplatin and has a similar mechanism of action, differing only in terms of structure and toxicity [1]. Compared to cisplatin, carboplatin has a more favorable side effect profile. Carboplatin is also less reactive than cisplatin and, as a consequence, must be used at several times higher doses. Carboplatin is used as monotherapy or in combination with other anti-cancer drugs in the chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer [5,6] and advanced ovarian cancer [7,8].
Carboplatin, like other platinum compounds used to treat cancer, works by interacting with the cell’s genetic material, i.e., DNA nucleic acid (deoxyribonucleic acid). Platinum complexes react with DNA to form cross-links both within the molecule and between the DNA molecules. The adducts formed by this compound can be monoadducts or intra- and interchain diadducts [9] (Figure 1). The formation of abnormal bonds disturbs the structure of DNA, contributes to the formation of cracks in the DNA strand, interferes with the synthesis of DNA and RNA (ribonucleic acid), and prevents cell division [10]. The nature of these DNA adducts affects a number of transduction pathways and triggers apoptosis or necrosis in tumor cells. Inhibition of basic biological processes becomes a signal leading to cell death. The action of carboplatin relates particularly to rapidly dividing cells, which are cancer cells. Therefore, carboplatin limits the growth and development of cancer.
Carboplatin is less bound to plasma proteins than cisplatin. It bounds to several plasma proteins, including albumin, transferrin, and γ-globulin [11,12,13]. In contrast, nearly 90% of platinum-derived carboplatin binds to plasma proteins within 24 h after administration [13,14]. It is excreted mainly in the urine, and also in small amounts in bile.

1.1. Theoretical Studies

The anticancer activity of cisplatin was discovered for the first time in the 1960s by Professor Barnett Rosenberg at the University of Michigan [2,3]. Several years later the same scientist showed that the bivalent complex cis-[Pt(NH3)2Cl2] is much less active [2]. Carozzi showed that cisplatin has an anti-cancer effect [15]. After Rosenberg’s first work, other scientists found several thousands of platinum compounds, and some of them were synthesized, but in the end, only five of these compounds have been approved for commercialization: oxaliplatin, nedaplatin, lobaplatin, heptaplatin, and carboplatin [16]. Carboplatin (1,1-cyclobutyldicarboxylate), as one of the most often used antitumor compounds, is used first of all in the case of treatment of cancer of the testis, ovary, head, neck, and small cell lung cancer [4]. Brabec and Kasparkova described the effect of its activity on a molecular level [10]. Carboplatin binds to the nucleobases of DNA, which leads to suppression of replication and transcription, followed by cell death, apoptosis, or necrosis in tumor cells [10]. The adducts formed by this compound can be monoadducts or intra- and interchain diadducts [9] (Figure 1). Inducing greater damage to DNA, impairing mechanisms of DNA repair, or activating and preventing apoptosis may lead to decreased tumor cell viability [17,18]. Due to low toxicity, Kang and other scientists tested carboplatin on several tumors and the premise of these efforts was to determine against which tumors carboplatin can be effectively administered. It was found that these are: such as epithelial ovarian cancer, cancer of the esophagus, cancer of the cervix, lung cancer, cancer of the head and neck, breast cancer [19,20,21,22].

1.2. The Pathway of Carboplatin and Anticancer Activity

Carboplatin as a nature prodrug does not interact with nucleobases of DNA or vitamins in its native form. To be activated, the carboplatin must cross the cell membrane. Inside the cell, the molecule undergoes hydrolysis. CTR (high-affinity copper transporter) as a copper transporter [23,24,25,26] primarily participates in the transport of carboplatin through the cell membrane inside the cell where the molecule undergoes the hydrolysis of 1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylate (Scheme 1). The decomposition of carboplatin in water is expected to take place through a biphasic mechanism with a ring-opening process followed by the loss of the malonato ligand (Scheme 1b). In this way, it becomes positively charged. The bond breakage between the platinum and the oxygen atoms in the carboplatin leads to the formation of a molecule with a total charge of one (Scheme 1b), next in the presence of water the molecule undergoes further hydrolysis and the [(NH3)2Pt(H2O)2]2+ molecule (di-aqua cis-platin) is formed (Scheme 1d). Deprotonation of such a molecule leads to the formation of an (NH3)2Pt(OH)2 molecule (di-hydroxyl cis-platin) (Scheme 1e), which undergoes dehydroxylation to ([Pt(NH3)2(OH)]+). Such molecules can generate the formation of adducts of platinum by interacting with nucleophilic molecules within the cell, such as DNA, RNA, and proteins [27]. Through covalent binding of carboplatin to the N7 site of purine bases, DNA-protein or DNA-DNA interactions are formed (Scheme 1).
Figure 2 represents the structures of carboplatin and cisplatin [28]. When pharmacodynamically comparing carboplatin with cisplatin, it has fewer side effects than its precursor cisplatin. Carboplatin also has lower potency, which may be due to differences in the rate of DNA adduct formation. These toxicity differences are probably related to the low reactivity rate of carboplatin with nucleophiles, as 1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylate is a poorer leaving group than chloride [9].
The connection between DNA and carboplatin causes changes in DNA (Figure 3), which inhibits the process of DNA replication that generates replication errors, along with the accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase and induction of apoptosis [29]. The formation of connections between carboplatin and DNA strands causes cytotoxicity.
These processes lead to the creation of one and two positively charged complexes that react with the DNA bases forming a mono-functional adduct. The electron-rich site on DNA is the N7 position on Guanine (Adenine) and 1, 2-GpG (1, 2-ApG). The majority of adducts formed by binding of carboplatin to Guanine (or Adenine) are intra-strand crosslinks (Figure 4).
In this way, carboplatin forms Guanine-Guanine, Adenine-Adenine, or Adenine-Guanine adducts what leads to DNA strand distortion [30,31].

1.3. The Motivation of Work

It is well known that carboplatin passes through the cell membrane to the inside of the cell where the molecule undergoes the hydrolysis of 1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylate (Scheme 1) [23,24,26]. In this way, it becomes positively charged. Such highly reactive molecule significantly contributes to the formation of adducts of platinum by interacting with nucleophilic molecules within the cell, such as DNA, RNA, and proteins. As it is also well known that carboplatin, as well as cisplatin [1,4,7,10], have anticancer activity by interacting with DNA and inducing the programmed cell death, the following question is addressed here: how the presence of competitive compounds, such as vitamins containing aromatic rings with lone-pair orbitals analogous to N7 in purine, will influence the therapeutic effect of carboplatin?
The impulse for this work is the observation of the reduction of cisplatin effectiveness when administered to patients suffering from cancer in situations of regular consumption of fresh vegetable juices, particularly carrot and beetroot during treatment, which are rich in Thiamine (B1), Riboflavin (B2), Pyridoxal phosphate (B6) and Niacin (B3) [32] (Figure 5). As this problem was described in an earlier work [33], one should ask another question: how will drinking these juices by the patient affect the cancer treatment during carboplatin therapy?
Based on the literature, it can be said that high levels of some B vitamins can cause cancer or accelerate its development [34,35,36]. However, it is widely accepted that eating meals rich in vitamins and minerals, such as carrot and beetroot juice, reduces the likelihood of cancer, prevents it from metastasis, and may even help with cancer therapy. The concentration of B vitamins at the cellular level depends on the dose concentration of these vitamins and the type of transport [37,38,39]. On the other hand, after cisplatin chemotherapy, the patient receives small daily doses of vitamin B6 (2.5 mg per day), because this compound increases the bioavailability of magnesium ions, which in turn causes a decrease in the toxic effect of cisplatin during anticancer therapy, in particular the reduction of the neuropathy effect [40,41].
Hence, the aim of this work is a theoretical and experimental study on the initial Pt-N7(N1) bond formation with vitamins from the B group and their comparison with values characterizing native purines.

2. Results

2.1. In Silico Study

In our study, there were analyzed the reactivities of ([Pt(NH3)2(OH)]+) derivatives of carboplatin (Figure 3 and Figure 6), with the following compounds belonging to the group of B vitamins, namely Thiamine (vitamin B1), Niacin (vitamin B3), Riboflavin (vitamin B2) and Pyridoxal phosphate (vitamin B6) (Figure 3).
All these B vitamins, as well as Guanine and Adenine, contain aromatic rings with lone-pair orbitals analogous to N7 in purine. The similar structure of B vitamins enables them to react in a similar way as Guanine or Adenine, so they are certainly competition for nucleobases. Besides, Thiamine (vitamin B1) not only has a N7 atom in purine, but also a second nitrogen atom N1. Based on an earlier study [33], it is known that affinities of all analyzed vitamins to cis-Platinum are smaller if compared to Guanine (GUA). However, it has been found that for all chloroaqua and diaqua platinumed complexes the estimated values of Gibbs free energy of reaction ΔGr are negative (Table 1 and Table 2) [33].
Contrary, it has been found that for the two of four ([Pt(NH3)2(OH)]+)-vitamin B complexes the estimated values of Gibbs free energy of reaction ΔGr are positive (Table 3). However, for the complexes of carboplatin with Guanine and Adenine the estimated values of Gibbs free energy of reaction ΔGr are negative, which was, of course, expected [33]. Only for complexes of carboplatin with vitamin B3 (Niacin) and B6 (Pyridoxal phosphate), the energies are negative (Table 3).
Hence, it can be concluded that part of considered vitamins, being a component of beet and carrot juice, cannot freely react with carboplatin, which in consequence cannot possibly lead to a reduction of the therapeutic effectiveness of this drug, which is the opposite of cisplatin. The exceptions are vitamins B3 and B6, which may interact with carboplatin.

2.2. Experimental Analysis

Quantum-mechanical calculations show that vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) has the highest affinity for carboplatin (Table 3) with the value of Gibbs free energy of reaction equal to −12.96 kcal/mol. That is why the complexation of carboplatin with this vitamin was carried out experimentally.
Physico-chemical characterization of the interaction of pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin B6) and carboplatin was performed by using UV-vis spectroscopic techniques, in the wavelength range from 190 nm to 500 nm (Figure 7).
In an incubation buffer, the maximum absorbance of the vitamin was obtained at 323 nm wavelength, with absorption equal to 2.928 (Figure 7) what reflects a 0.721 mmol/L concentration of vitamin B6. After adding the solution of carboplatin to the solution of vitamin B6 in buffer, the maximum absorbance for the vitamin decreased to a value of 2.3467 (Figure 7, time 0 h) which reflects a decrease in vitamin B6 concentration to a value of 0.624 mmol/l. The decrease of absorbance of pyridoxine hydrochloride is caused by the formation of a vitamin B6-carboplatin complex. After 48 h the concentration of vitamin B6 in the mixture was only 0.515 mmol/L. It is therefore evident that after 48 h, compared to the initial starting point, there is observed a decrease in vitamin B6 concentration by more than 17% after administration of carboplatin solution, and a 28% decrease, relative to the baseline vitamin B6 concentration value.

3. Discussion

The affinities of B-vitamins to carboplatin were quantified and compared to interactions with canonical purines (Table 3, Figure 6). For the vitamin with the highest affinity for carboplatin physico-chemical characterization of vitamin B–carboplatin interaction was performed (Figure 7).
Four vitamins from the B group were studied, namely Thiamine (vitamin B1), Niacin (vitamin B3), Riboflavin (vitamin B2), and Pyridoxal phosphate (vitamin B6). All these vitamins have a similar structure as nucleobases, having a nitrogen atom with lone electron pairs in their structure, which one would suppose allows them to form a complex with carboplatin (Figure 5). For all considered compounds, the computed values of Gibbs Free Energies of reaction (ΔGr) were compared with values for cisplatin [33] (Table 1 and Table 2). It has been found that for two ([Pt(NH3)2(OH)]+)-vitamin B complexes the estimated values of Gibbs free energy of reaction ΔGr were positive. However, for the complexes of carboplatin with Guanine and Adenine the estimated values of Gibbs free energy of reaction ΔGr were negative, which was of course expected (Table 3). Only for complexes of carboplatin with vitamins B3 (Niacin) and B6 (Pyridoxal phosphate), the affinity indicates a spontaneous reaction (Table 3). It could be concluded that the part of the considered vitamins, being a component of beet and carrot juice, cannot freely react with carboplatin, which in consequence, cannot possibly lead to a reduction of the therapeutic effectiveness of this drug, what is the opposite of cisplatin. The exceptions being vitamins B3 and B6, which may interact with carboplatin.
Because the quantum-mechanical calculations show that vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride) has the highest affinity for carboplatin, the complexation of carboplatin with this vitamin was carried out experimentally. After adding the solution of carboplatin to the solution of vitamin B6 in buffer, the maximum absorbance for this vitamin decreased relative to its baseline value.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Gibbs Free Energy Calculation

The geometries of all compounds were optimized at the B3LYP/6–31G** level of theory using Gaussian 09 [42]. The platinum atoms were described with the use of a lanl2dz basis set including relativistic effective core potentials, necessary in the case of heavy atoms [43]. The vibrational frequency calculations and vibrational entropy corrections (room temperature) were estimated at the same level of theory. The calculations including solvation effects were realized with the use of a self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) approach [44] based on accurate numerical solutions of the Poisson–Boltzmann equation [45]. In all computations including the PCM continuum (the Polarizable Continuum Model) model the water dielectric constant 78 and radii Bondi [46] were applied. The chemical affinity was computed by adding contributions of ZPE corrections (Zero-Point Energy), thermal corrections to the enthalpy and entropy terms, as well as continuum solvation free energies.

4.2. Spectroscopic Measurements

In the experimental part of the study, the following reagents were used: pyridoxine hydrochloride was purchased from Pol-Aura, Poland, sodium chloride (pure p.a.), from Avantor, Poland, and carboplatin solution for injection 10 mg/mL from Pfizer Service Company. The phosphate buffer for release was obtained from Chempur, Poland. The concentration of vitamin B6 was measured spectrophotometrically on a Biosens UV-6000 spectrophotometer with a resolution of 1 nm, the absorbance was measured at 323 nm. Both carboplatin (7.3 × 10−4 mol × L−1) and vitamin B6 (14.6 × 10−3 mol × L−1) were prepared in the incubation buffer (1 mmol × L−1 phosphate buffer, 4 mmol × L−1 sodium-chloride, pH 7.4). For the solutions of the considered vitamin, a standard curve was established based on the set of dilutions of the stock solution (Figure 8 and Figure 9). During the measurements, the vitamin B6 (14.6 × 10−3 mol L−1) was incubated at 37 °C with carboplatin in a ratio of 2:1. Aliquots of this mixture were taken after 0 h, 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 24 h, and 48 h incubation.

5. Conclusions

The affinity of B-vitamins to carboplatin was studied both using computational chemistry, as well as UV-vis spectroscopy. The obtained results were compared with the reference values of nucleobases of DNA. The affinity of the complexes of carboplatin with vitamins B3 (Niacin) and B6 (Pyridoxal phosphate) indicates a spontaneous reaction. In spectroscopic studies, it was revealed that after complexation of B6 vitamin and carboplatin, the decrease of maximum absorbance for the vitamin relative to the baseline is observed.

Author Contributions

B.S.: Conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, software, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, visualization, software, validation, reviewing, and editing. P.C.: Methodology, software, data curation, visualization, software, reviewing, and editing; P.K.: reviewing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The studies not involve humans or animals.

Informed Consent Statement

The studies not involve humans or animals.

Data Availability Statement

All data is in the article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by PL-Grid Infrastructure (http://www.plgrid.pl/en (accessed on 18 March 2021)).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ho, G.Y.; Woodward, N.; Coward, J.I.G. Cisplatin versus carboplatin: Comparative review of therapeutic management in solid malignancies. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2016, 102, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Rosenberg, B.; VanCamp, L.; Trosko, J.E.; Mansour, V.H. Platinum compounds: A new class of potent antitumour agents. Nature 1969, 222, 385–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rosenberg, B.; Van Camp, L.; Krigas, T. Inhibition of cell division in Escherichia coli by electrolysis products from a platinum electrode. Nature 1965, 205, 698–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fuertes, M.A.; Alonso, C.; Pérez, J.M. Biochemical modulation of cisplatin mechanisms of action: Enhancement of antitumor activity and circumvention of drug resistance. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 645–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rugo, H.S.; Olopade, O.I.; DeMichele, A.; Yau, C.; van’t Veer, L.J.; Buxton, M.B.; Hogarth, M.; Hylton, N.M.; Paoloni, M.; Perlmutter, J.; et al. Adaptive Randomization of Veliparib–Carboplatin Treatment in Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abotaleb, M.; Kubatka, P.; Caprnda, M.; Varghese, E.; Zolakova, B.; Zubor, P.; Opatrilova, R.; Kruzliak, P.; Stefanicka, P.; Büsselberg, D. Chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: An update. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 101, 458–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mikuła-Pietrasik, J.; Witucka, A.; Pakuła, M.; Uruski, P.; Begier-Krasińska, B.; Niklas, A.; Tykarski, A.; Książek, K. Comprehensive review on how platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy of ovarian cancer affects biology of normal cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 681–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Van Zyl, B.; Tang, D.; Bowden, N.A. Biomarkers of platinum resistance in ovarian cancer: What can we use to improve treatment. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2018, 25, R303–R318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hah, S.S.; Stivers, K.M.; De Vere White, R.W.; Henderson, P.T. Kinetics of carboplatin-DNA binding in genomic DNA and bladder cancer cells as determined by accelerator mass spectrometry. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2006, 19, 622–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Brabec, V.; Kasparkova, J. Modifications of DNA by platinum complexes. Drug Resist. Updat. 2005, 8, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gullo, J.J.; Litterst, C.L.; Maguire, P.J.; Sikic, B.I.; Hoth, D.F.; Woolley, P.V. Pharmacokinetics and protein binding of cis-dichlorodiammine platinum (II) administered as a one hour or as a twenty hour infusion. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khalaila, I.; Bergamo, A.; Bussy, F.; Sava, G.; Dyson, P.J. The role of cisplatin and NAMI-A plasma-protein interactions in relation to combination therapy. Int. J. Oncol. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sooriyaarachchi, M.; Narendran, A.; Gailer, J. Comparative hydrolysis and plasma protein binding of cis-platin and carboplatin in human plasma in vitro. Metallomics 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Unger, F.T.; Klasen, H.A.; Tchartchian, G.; de Wilde, R.L.; Witte, I. DNA damage induced by cis- and carboplatin as indicator for in vitro sensitivity of ovarian carcinowma cells. BMC Cancer 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Carozzi, V.; Chiorazzi, A.; Canta, A.; Oggioni, N.; Gilardini, A.; Rodriguez-Menendez, V.; Avezza, F.; Crippa, L.; Ceresa, C.; Nicolini, G.; et al. Effect of the chronic combined administration of cisplatin and paclitaxel in a rat model of peripheral neurotoxicity. Eur. J. Cancer 2009, 45, 656–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McWhinney, S.R.; Goldberg, R.M.; McLeod, H.L. Platinum neurotoxicity pharmacogenetics. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Shahzad, M.M.K.; Lopez-Berestein, G.; Sood, A.K. Novel strategies for reversing platinum resistance. Drug Resist. Updat. 2009, 12, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Burger, H.; Loos, W.J.; Eechoute, K.; Verweij, J.; Mathijssen, R.H.J.; Wiemer, E.A.C. Drug transporters of platinum-based anticancer agents and their clinical significance. Drug Resist. Updat. 2011, 14, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kang, S.; Ju, W.; Jae, W.K.; Park, N.H.; Song, Y.S.; Seung, C.K.; Park, S.Y.; Kang, S.B.; Lee, H.P. Association between excision repair cross-complementation group 1 polymorphism and clinical outcome of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Exp. Mol. Med. 2006, 38, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Angioli, R.; Plotti, F.; Luvero, D.; Aloisi, A.; Guzzo, F.; Capriglione, S.; Terranova, C.; De Cicco Nardone, C.; Benedetti-Panici, P. Feasibility and safety of carboplatin plus paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A pilot study. Tumor Biol. 2014, 35, 2741–2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Perez, E.A.; Suman, V.J.; Fitch, T.R.; Mailliard, J.A.; Ingle, J.N.; Cole, J.T.; Veeder, M.H.; Flynn, P.J.; Walsh, D.J.; Addo, F.K. A phase II trial of docetaxel and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: NCCTG study N9932. Oncology 2005, 69, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lim, K.H.; Lee, H.Y.; Song, S.Y. Efficacy and feasibility of gemcitabine and carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chin. Med. J. 2013, 126, 4644–4648. [Google Scholar]
  23. Howell, S.B.; Safaei, R.; Larson, C.A.; Sailor, M.J. Copper transporters and the cellular pharmacology of the platinum-containing cancer drugs. Mol. Pharmacol. 2010, 77, 887–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Larson, C.A.; Blair, B.G.; Safaei, R.; Howell, S.B. The role of the mammalian copper transporter 1 in the cellular accumulation of platinum-based drugs. Mol. Pharmacol. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Holzer, A.K.; Manorek, G.H.; Howell, S.B. Contribution of the major copper influx transporter CTR1 to the cellular accumulation of cisplatin, carboplatin, and oxaliplatin. Mol. Pharmacol. 2006, 70, 1390–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Blair, B.G.; Larson, C.; Safaei, R.; Howell, S.B. Copper transporter 2 regulates the cellular accumulation and cytotoxicity of cisplatin and carboplatin. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Shabalin, I.; Dauter, Z.; Jaskolski, M.; Minor, W.; Wlodawer, A. Crystallography and chemistry should always go together: A cautionary tale of protein complexes with cisplatin and carboplatin. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Johnstone, T.C.; Alexander, S.M.; Wilson, J.J.; Lippard, S.J. Oxidative halogenation of cisplatin and carboplatin: Synthesis, spectroscopy, and crystal and molecular structures of Pt(iv) prodrugs. Dalt. Trans. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Shi, L.; Nishioka, W.K.; Th’ng, J.; Bradbury, E.M.; Litchfield, D.W.; Greenberg, A.H. Premature p34cdc2 activation required for apoptosis. Science 1994, 263, 1143–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sarmah, A.; Roy, R.K. Understanding the preferential binding interaction of aqua-cisplatins with nucleobase guanine over adenine: A density functional reactivity theory based approach. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Takahara, P.M.; Rosenzweig, A.C.; Frederick, C.A.; Lippard, S.J. Crystal structure of double-stranded DNA containing the major adduct of the anticancer drug cisplatin. Nature 1995, 377, 649–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Stipanuk, M.H.; Caudill, M.A. Biochemical, Physiological, and Molecular Aspects of Human Nutrition; Elsevier Health Sciences: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; ISBN 9781455746293. [Google Scholar]
  33. Szefler, B.; Czeleń, P.; Szczepanik, A.; Cysewski, P. Does the Affinity of Cisplatin to B-Vitamins Impair the Therapeutic Effect in the Case of Patients with Lung Cancer-consuming Carrot or Beet Juice? Anticancer. Agents Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 1775–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Council, N.R. Diet., Nutrition, and Cancer; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1982; ISBN 978-0-309-03280-3. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lyon, P.; Strippoli, V.; Fang, B.; Cimmino, L. B Vitamins and One-Carbon Metabolism: Implications in Human Health and Disease. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. White, E.; Patterson, R.E.; Kristal, A.R.; Thornquist, M.; King, I.; Shattuck, A.L.; Evans, I.; Satia-Abouta, J.; Littman, A.J.; Potter, J.D. VITamins and Lifestyle Cohort Study: Study Design and Characteristics of Supplement Users. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kennedy, D. B Vitamins and the Brain: Mechanisms, Dose and Efficacy—A Review. Nutrients 2016, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zielińska-Dawidziak, M.; Grajek, K.; Olejnik, A.; Czaczyk, K.; Grajek, W. Transport of high concentration of thiamin, riboflavin and pyridoxine across intestinal epithelial cells Caco-2. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo) 2008, 54, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Vandemark, N.L.; Salisbury, G.W. The concentration of some B vitamins in bull semen. J. Biol. Chem. 1944, 156, 289–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. de Broe, M.E.; Wedeen, R.P. Prevention of cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Eur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol. 1986, 22, 1029–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Miller, R.P.; Tadagavadi, R.K.; Ramesh, G.; Reeves, W.B. Mechanisms of cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Toxins (Basel) 2010, 2, 2490–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G.A.; Nakatsuji, H.; et al. Gaussian 09, Revision A.02, 2016; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford CT, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  43. Hay, P.J.; Wadt, W.R. Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations. Potentials for the transition metal atoms Sc to Hg. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 82, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cramer, C.J.; Truhlar, D.G. Implicit Solvation Models: Equilibria, Structure, Spectra, and Dynamics. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2161–2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Marten, B.; Kim, K.; Cortis, C.; Friesner, R.A.; Murphy, R.B.; Ringnalda, M.N.; Sitkoff, D.; Honig, B. New model for calculation of solvation free energies: Correction of self-consistent reaction field continuum dielectric theory for short-range hydrogen-bonding effects. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 11775–11788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Tomasi, J. A new definition of cavities for the computation of solvation free energies by the polarizable continuum model. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3210–3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 03634 g001 550
Figure 1. Formation of adducts between DNA and carboplatin.
Figure 1. Formation of adducts between DNA and carboplatin.
Ijms 22 03634 g001
Ijms 22 03634 sch001 550
Scheme 1. The pathway of carboplatin and anticancer activity. Ctr1 is a high-affinity copper transporter. The following labels correspond to (a) carboplatin (b) carboplatin after hydrolysis of one bond between Platinum and 1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylate (c) hydroxyl derivative of mono hydrolyzed carboplatin molecule (d) di-aqua cis-platin (e) di-hydroxyl cis-platin.
Scheme 1. The pathway of carboplatin and anticancer activity. Ctr1 is a high-affinity copper transporter. The following labels correspond to (a) carboplatin (b) carboplatin after hydrolysis of one bond between Platinum and 1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylate (c) hydroxyl derivative of mono hydrolyzed carboplatin molecule (d) di-aqua cis-platin (e) di-hydroxyl cis-platin.
Ijms 22 03634 sch001
Ijms 22 03634 g002 550
Figure 2. Structure of carboplatin (a) and cisplatin (b).
Figure 2. Structure of carboplatin (a) and cisplatin (b).
Ijms 22 03634 g002
Ijms 22 03634 g003 550
Figure 3. Scheme of the interaction of carboplatin with nucleobases.
Figure 3. Scheme of the interaction of carboplatin with nucleobases.
Ijms 22 03634 g003
Ijms 22 03634 g004 550
Figure 4. The crosslink of carboplatin with Guanine (GUA) on the DNA.
Figure 4. The crosslink of carboplatin with Guanine (GUA) on the DNA.
Ijms 22 03634 g004
Ijms 22 03634 g005 550
Figure 5. The B vitamins.
Figure 5. The B vitamins.
Ijms 22 03634 g005
Ijms 22 03634 g006 550
Figure 6. Scheme of complexes of B vitamins with Pt(NH3)2(OH)+ of carboplatin. The only vitamin with a positive charge is Thiamine (vitamin B1).
Figure 6. Scheme of complexes of B vitamins with Pt(NH3)2(OH)+ of carboplatin. The only vitamin with a positive charge is Thiamine (vitamin B1).
Ijms 22 03634 g006
Ijms 22 03634 g007 550
Figure 7. UV-vis absorbance spectrum of vitamin B6 and carboplatin mixture in an incubation buffer (1 mmol L−1 phosphate buffer, 4 mmol L−1 sodium-chloride, pH 7.4).
Figure 7. UV-vis absorbance spectrum of vitamin B6 and carboplatin mixture in an incubation buffer (1 mmol L−1 phosphate buffer, 4 mmol L−1 sodium-chloride, pH 7.4).
Ijms 22 03634 g007
Ijms 22 03634 g008 550
Figure 8. UV-vis absorbance spectrum of vitamin B6 (Pyridoxal phosphate).
Figure 8. UV-vis absorbance spectrum of vitamin B6 (Pyridoxal phosphate).
Ijms 22 03634 g008
Ijms 22 03634 g009 550
Figure 9. A standard curve for vitamin B6 (Pyridoxal phosphate).
Figure 9. A standard curve for vitamin B6 (Pyridoxal phosphate).
Ijms 22 03634 g009
Table
Table 1. The energetic characteristics of the cis-Pt-Chloroaqua reactions with derivatives of vitamin B. All energies are given in kcal/mol. Symbol Pt* stands for Pt(NH3)2Cl [33].
Table 1. The energetic characteristics of the cis-Pt-Chloroaqua reactions with derivatives of vitamin B. All energies are given in kcal/mol. Symbol Pt* stands for Pt(NH3)2Cl [33].
Number of ReactionReactionΔGr
1cis[Pt*]+ + B1(N7) → cis[Pt*~B1(N7)]+−18.90
2cis[Pt*]+ + B1(N1) → cis[Pt*~B1(N1)]+−20.89
3cis[Pt*]+ + B2(N7) → cis[Pt*~B2(N7)]+−3.75
4cis[Pt*]+ + B3(N7) → cis[Pt*~B3(N7)]+−24.90
5cis[Pt*]+ + B6(N7) → cis[Pt*~B6(N7)]+-−15.61
6cis[Pt*]+ + GUA(N7) → cis[Pt*~GUA1(N7)]+−28.17
Table
Table 2. The energetic characteristics of the cisPt-diaqua reactions with derivatives of vitamin B. All energies are given in kcal/mol. Symbol Pt** stands for Pt(NH3)2(H2O) [33].
Table 2. The energetic characteristics of the cisPt-diaqua reactions with derivatives of vitamin B. All energies are given in kcal/mol. Symbol Pt** stands for Pt(NH3)2(H2O) [33].
Number of ReactionReactionΔGr
1cis[Pt**]2+ + B1(N7) → cis[Pt**~B1(N7)]2+−20.23
2cis[Pt**]2+ + B1(N1) → cis[Pt**~B1(N1)]2+−22.64
3cis[Pt**]2+ + B2(N7) → cis[Pt**~B2(N7)]2+−7.84
4cis[Pt**]2+ + B3(N7) → cis[Pt**~B3(N7)]2+−27.28
5cis[Pt**]2+ + B6(N7) → cis[Pt**~B6(N7)]2+−24.66
6cis[Pt**]2+ + GUA(N7) → cis~[Pt**~GUA(N7)]2+−37.58
Table
Table 3. The energetic characteristics of the ([Pt(NH3)2(OH)]+) reactions with derivatives of vitamin B. All energies are given in kcal/mol. Symbol Pt*** stands for Pt(NH3)2(OH).
Table 3. The energetic characteristics of the ([Pt(NH3)2(OH)]+) reactions with derivatives of vitamin B. All energies are given in kcal/mol. Symbol Pt*** stands for Pt(NH3)2(OH).
Number of ReactionReactionΔGr
1carbo[Pt***]+ + B1(N7) → carbo[Pt***~B1(N7)]+149.53
2carbo[Pt***]+ + B1(N1) → carbo[Pt***~B1(N1)]+144.60
3carbo[Pt***]+ + B2(N7) → carbo[Pt***~B2(N7)]+233.04
4carbo[Pt***]+ + B3(N7) → carbo[Pt***~B3(N7)]+−6.3
5carbo[Pt***]+ + B6(N7) → carbo[Pt***~B6(N7)]+-−12.96
6carbo[Pt***]+ + ADE(N7) → carbo[Pt***~ADE(N7)]+−26.46
7carbo[Pt***]+ + GUA(N7) → carbo[Pt***~GUA(N7)]+−30.89
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szefler, B.; Czeleń, P.; Krawczyk, P. The Affinity of Carboplatin to B-Vitamins and Nucleobases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073634

AMA Style

Szefler B, Czeleń P, Krawczyk P. The Affinity of Carboplatin to B-Vitamins and Nucleobases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(7):3634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szefler, Beata, Przemysław Czeleń, and Przemysław Krawczyk. 2021. "The Affinity of Carboplatin to B-Vitamins and Nucleobases" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 7: 3634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop