Next Article in Journal
Comparing Ligninolytic Capabilities of Bacterial and Fungal Dye-Decolorizing Peroxidases and Class-II Peroxidase-Catalases
Next Article in Special Issue
Untargeted In Silico Compound Classification—A Novel Metabolomics Method to Assess the Chemodiversity in Bryophytes
Previous Article in Journal
Ca2+-ATPase Molecules as a Calcium-Sensitive Membrane-Endoskeleton of Sarcoplasmic Reticulum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transcriptional and Morpho-Physiological Responses of Marchantia polymorpha upon Phosphate Starvation
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Physcomitrium patens: A Single Model to Study Oriented Cell Divisions in 1D to 3D Patterning

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(5), 2626; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052626
by Jeroen de Keijzer 1,†, Alejandra Freire Rios 1,2,† and Viola Willemsen 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(5), 2626; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052626
Submission received: 9 February 2021 / Revised: 25 February 2021 / Accepted: 25 February 2021 / Published: 5 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Bryophytes)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Overall this review on Physcomitrium patens as a model to study mechanisms of cell division is well written and informative.

 

Specific comments:

 

Title: “Body plan” does not mean “growth dimension”, these are two different things, using body plan in this context is confusing

 

Line 82: “P. patens also benefits from a host of molecular genetic tools and a simple body 82 plan that is easy accessible by microscopy”. Can you explain what is a simple body plan?

 

Line 142: Branching principles have been reviewed recently in

https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(19)31181-9.pdf

 

Line 157: What is the definition of 3 dimensional leafy shoots ?

 

Line 211 : « has never successfully been shown” > been is missing

 

 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

First of all, we would like to thank you carefully reading our manuscript  and for your comments, which were useful and improve the manuscript.

Title: “Body plan” does not mean “growth dimension”, these are two different things, using body plan in this context is confusing

>We agree with this and have changed the title.

Line 82: “P. patens also benefits from a host of molecular genetic tools and a simple body 82 plan that is easy accessible by microscopy”. Can you explain what is a simple body plan?

> Thank you for this comment, we have included the different growth stages in Fig 2A, which shows the simplicity of the body plan and have changed the indicated sentence in the text. 

Line 142: Branching principles have been reviewed recently in

https://www.cell.com/current-biology/pdf/S0960-9822(19)31181-9.pdf

> Sorry, for not including this reference. It is included in the text.

Line 157: What is the definition of 3 dimensional leafy shoots ?

>We have changed the sentence to make it more clear.

Line 211 : « has never successfully been shown” > been is missing

> Thank you for your comment, we had overlooked this and it is now added.

 

 

Reviewer 2 Report

This review is about the mechanisms that control asymmetric cell divisions in plants using the moss Physcomitrella patens as a model system. The authors are first explaining the basic principles behind establishment of formative cell divisions in plants, which involves three major steps: First, establishment of cell polarization, second positioning of the division plane and third separation of the daughter cells. The authors describe the most important protein complexes and signaling pathways including transcription factors and hormonal signals involved in these processes in P. patens. They also explain how these mechanisms are conserved in higher plant species and what is known about orthologous proteins involved. They conclude by outlining how molecular tools available in P. patens can contribute to understanding important basic developmental mechanisms in plant development.

This is a very clear and informative manuscript about key cellular processes in plant biology. The clear and well-structured text is accompanied by two well-designed figures that are nicely illustrating the key questions that are being addressed. I am highly recommending publication of this manuscript.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We would like to thank you for carefully reading our manuscript.

Back to TopTop