Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Critical Determinants of ACE2–SARS CoV-2 RBD Interaction
Next Article in Special Issue
The Adipose Tissue-Derived Secretome (ADS) in Obesity Uniquely Induces L-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 (LAT1) and mTOR Signaling in Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Somatic Copy Number Alterations and Associated Genes in Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma in Brazilian Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Risk of Breast Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms22052267
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Role of the NUDT Enzymes in Breast Cancer

by
Roni H. G. Wright
1,2,* and
Miguel Beato
1,3,*
1
Center for Genomic Regulation (CRG), Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
2
Basic Sciences Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
3
Department of Life Science, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(5), 2267; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052267
Submission received: 1 February 2021 / Revised: 18 February 2021 / Accepted: 23 February 2021 / Published: 25 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Insights on the Molecular Bases of Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer Biology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Despite global research efforts, breast cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. The majority of these deaths are due to metastasis occurring years after the initial treatment of the primary tumor and occurs at a higher frequency in hormone receptor-positive (Estrogen and Progesterone; HR+) breast cancers. We have previously described the role of NUDT5 (Nudix-linked to moiety X-5) in HR+ breast cancer progression, specifically with regards to the growth of breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs). BCSCs are known to be the initiators of epithelial-to-mesenchyme transition (EMT), metastatic colonization, and growth. Therefore, a greater understanding of the proteins and signaling pathways involved in the metastatic process may open the door for therapeutic opportunities. In this review, we discuss the role of NUDT5 and other members of the NUDT family of enzymes in breast and other cancer types. We highlight the use of global omics data based on our recent phosphoproteomic analysis of progestin signaling pathways in breast cancer cells and how this experimental approach provides insight into novel crosstalk mechanisms for stratification and drug discovery projects aiming to treat patients with aggressive cancer.

1. Introduction

1.1. Metastatic Breast Cancer

Currently, breast cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide [1,2]. It has been suggested that 1 in 8 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime, and 1 in 38 will lose their lives to the disease [3]. Breast cancer is a complex disease characterized firstly as either ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), where the cancer has not grown out of the duct, or invasive breast cancer, which can be further characterized into either invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) or invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). IDC accounts for around 80% of invasive carcinomas.
Following detection, further characterization is routinely carried out to ascertain the hormone receptor status of the tumor, which will decide whether the patient may benefit from anti-hormonal therapies. Initially, around 80% of breast cancers are estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive, and from this, 65% are also progesterone receptor (PR)-positive. Treatment options for hormone receptor-positive breast cancers include selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), such as tamoxifen (NovadexTM) or Fulvestrant (FaslodexTM), and aromatase inhibitors, which block estrogen production, such as anastrozole (ArimidezTM) and exemestane (AromasinTM). In addition, 20% of breast cancers are positive for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and are routinely treated with trastuzumab (HerceptinTM) [4,5].
Following radiotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy, and adjuvant therapy, the majority of patients become disease-free long term [6]. However, even considering this group of patients with a long-term favorable outcome, the majority of breast cancer-related deaths are due to metastasis and not the primary tumor. Although HR+ breast cancers predict a more favorable outcome at diagnosis compared to HR- tumors, the long term (>5 years) recurrence rate is significantly higher for HR+ breast cancers compared to HR-tumors, which show a peak in recurrence earlier (2 years after surgery) [7]. Recurrent disease is often incurable with 5-year survival rates less than 50%. To date, there are no diagnostic tools that reliably predict the long-term recurrence of these tumors. Moreover, very few targeted therapies exist for the treatment of metastasis, and often first line treatments are used, which are less effective. In addition, metastatic tumors commonly become resistant to adjuvant therapies [8,9].
The lack of treatment options for metastatic breast cancer [10], and the fact that the majority of patients will eventually relapse even if advanced disease initially responded to treatment, highlights the importance of a greater understanding of breast cancer progression. A more in-depth analysis may open new avenues for future drug discovery projects for breast cancer, which may also have translational applications for other cancer types depending upon the pathway affected.

1.2. Use of 3D Cell Culture as a Model for Metastatic Breast Cancer

Pluripotent breast cancer stem cells (BCSC) have been shown to be resistant both to chemo- and radiotherapy and are the known initiators of metastasis [11,12]. The percentages of BCSCs are relatively low in the primary tumor in vivo and in 2D cell culture in vitro. In recent years, the growth of breast cancer cells in non-adherent conditions has been increasingly used as a more suitable model for studying aggressive cancer cell growth [13,14,15]. In contrast to 2D cultures, the growth of breast cancer cells in non-adherent conditions as three-dimensional (3D) oncospheres leads to enrichment of BCSCs [16,17]. In fact, only these BCSCs are able to grow in non-adherent conditions and express genetic markers of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and “stemness”, more similar to their in vivo counterparts [18,19]. Indeed, there are many different methods in order to grow cells in 3D culture. For example, in suspension in non-adherent plates, in concentrated medium in gel-like substances such as Matrigel, or on a scaffold such as silk, collagen or alginate. The advantages and disadvantages of each method have been extensively described elsewhere [15,20].
Studies that focus on understanding hormone receptor-dependent breast cancer signaling using a 3D cell culture model have shed light on several potential drug target options [21,22,23]. One such target is the enzyme NUDT5 (also known as NUDIX5, Nudix-linked to moiety X-5), which we have shown to be essential for HR+ breast cancer growth and breast cancer stem cell (BCSC) initiation and maintenance [24,25]. NUDT5 is a member of a much larger family of enzymes. In this review, we aim to summarize what is known about the role of NUDT5 and some other members of the NUDT family, in cancer growth and we will discuss how the use of global omic datasets could be integrated to provide additional insight into drug discovery opportunities for aggressive HR+ breast cancers and other cancer types.
The NUDT/NUDIX (Nucleoside Diphosphate Linked to Moiety X) type hydrolase superfamily includes an evolutionary conserved large group of proteins, which hydrolyze a wide range of substrates playing an essential role in important biological processes including cell proliferation, signal transduction and homeostasis (Table 1). An in-depth discussion of the whole enzyme family, including reactions and structures, is not the focus of this review, as it has already been covered extensively in recent years [26,27,28].

2. Role of NUDT Enzymes in Cancer

2.1. Role of NUDT Enzymes in Breast Cancer

Analysis of breast cancer patient data reveals some interesting results stratifying patients based on the expression level of individual NUDT family members. In particular for NUDT1, 2, 5, and 16. The expression level of these four NUDT enzymes if significantly higher in tumor versus normal tissue based on data from TGCA breast cancer data (Figure 1a−d left). In addition, patients with elevated levels of NUDT1, 2, 5 or 16 exhibit significantly poorer overall survival in HR-positive breast cancer (Figure 1a−d center) [25] but not HR-negative breast cancer (Figure 1a−d right). This is further highlighted based on other studies where inhibition of NUDT1 (MTH1) reduced breast cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo [29]. Similarly, NUDT2 is overexpressed in invasive ductal carcinoma, associated with poor clinical outcome [30]. Inhibition of NUDT2 shows promise as a novel chemotherapeutic target, demonstrated by a strong reduction on metastatic pathways [30,31].
The suggestion for an important role of this family of enzymes if further compounded by an analysis of the number of breast cancer patient datasets in which the expression level of a NUDT family member is associated with a significant effect on patient outcome (p < 0.05) (Figure 2a). Interestingly, NUDT4, 13 and 21 are associated with a strong effect on patient outcome in breast cancer patients (79, 29, and 46 datasets respectively). However, relatively little is known to date in the literature with regards to the role of these NUDT family members in breast cancer. Only NUDT13 was identified as up-regulated HR-positive breast cancer [32]. Low expression of NUDT21 is associated with tumor size, stage, and metastasis correlating with poor overall and recurrence-free survival in breast cancer patients, and overexpression of NUDT21 inhibits invasion, EMT, and proliferation in cell culture [33]. Further investigation into the role of NUDT4, 13, and 21 in breast cancer progression may represent an interesting line of investigation in the future.
In recent years, the role of NUDT5 in the biology of breast cancer cells has attracted our attention in the context of our studies on the function of the poly-ADP-Ribose (PAR) synthesis by PARP1 for the hormonal gene regulation. We showed that within minutes of progesterone exposure, PARP1 is activated by CDK2-dependent phosphorylation of two serines in the active center, leading to a dramatic increase of nuclear PARylation that is essential for gene regulation [34,35]. We assumed that the increase in PAR levels will neutralize the positive charge of the histone tails weakening their interaction with DNA and resulting in a more open chromatin state [36,37,38,39,40], which should facilitate the changes in gene expression required for reprogramming gene expression [41,42,43]. Similar explanations were proposed for the role of PARylation in Drosophila development [44]. However, the observation that not only PAR generation but also PAR degradation to ADPR-ribose (ADPR) units by the PARG was required for the hormonal gene regulation forced us to consider other possible functions of ADPR [24]. Moreover, we observed that NUDT5 was identified in the PAR interactome of breast cancer cells exposed to hormone [24], leading us to investigate the role of NUDT5 in hormone action. We found that PARP1, PARG, and NUDT5 were all required for the displacement of linker histone H1, the first step of chromatin remodeling essential for enabling gene regulation by estrogens or progestins [24,45]. Since the remodeling of chromatin also requires ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes, we considered the possibility that NUDT5 could convert ADPR to ATP by pyrophosphorylation, a reaction postulated by Sei-ichi Tanuma 24 years ago [46]. Measuring the levels of nuclear ATP with sensors of the TAP/ADP ratio, we confirmed the increase levels in cells exposed to hormones for 20–30 min hormone exposure, and found that the increase was dependent on PARP1, PARG, and NUDT5 [24].
NUDT5 was known to hydrolyze ADPR to AMP and Ribose-5-phosphate (R5P) [47], and we confirmed this activity using recombinant NUDT5. The crystal structure of NUDT5 shows it as a homodimer with two deep substrate cavities, each of them formed by residues from the two monomers [48]. However, in the known structure there is no possibility for pyrophosphate entering the substrate pocket. Therefore, a structural conformation change was needed. Indeed, we found that immediately after hormone exposure NUDT5 is dephosphorylated at threonine 45, leading to a change in the orientation of the two monomers in the homodimer, which enables binding of pyrophosphate and generation of ATP [24,45]. We confirmed the importance of this modification using a phosphomimetic NUDT5 mutant (T45D) that is unable to generate ATP in vitro and in cells, and behaves as a dominant negative in hormone regulation of gene expression [24]. We also found that the dephosphorylated NUDT5 forms a hexameric structure similar in size to that of the NMNAT1 enzyme that generated NAD+ for PAR synthesis and pyrophosphate, possibly for ATP synthesis [45].

2.2. Role of NUDT5 in Breast Cancer Stem Cells (BCSC)

As discussed earlier NUDT5 overexpression is associated with a more aggressive breast cancers, and we have provided further insight into the possible explanation for this correlation using 3D cell culture of breast cancer cells [25]. NUDT5 is essential not only the response to progesterone but of breast cancer cells to hormones, but also generation and maintenance in BCSC from multiple breast cancer cell lines grown in 3D culture [25]. In particular, and using NUDT5 mutants unable to synthesize ATP but capable of hydrolyzing ADRP, we showed that it the ATP generating activity of NUDT5 that is required for BCSC generation [16]. Analysis of the global gene expression changes occurring in 2D versus 3D cell culture reveals the use of 3D culture as a more realistic in vivo model and identifies gene signatures associated with EMT and stemness that depends on nuclear ATP synthesis by NUDT5. In addition to a gene signature associated with stemness and EMT we were able to identify tumor markers that are used in clinical trials, such as mucin 1 (MUC1; used to monitor metastasis in patients) and members of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) related cell adhesion molecules (CEACAM) family. CEACAM have been used for the diagnosis and monitoring of cancer recurrence following surgery, and elevated levels of CEACAM were identified as metastatic drivers in breast cancer [49,50,51], these changes in the gene expression signature initiated by the culture of cells in 3D, demonstrate that 3D culture is a more comparable model to that of the in vivo signature. These signatures, along with angiogenesis, is characteristic of aggressive breast cancer types and depends on nuclear ATP synthesis by NUDT5. Taken together, this data shows a multifaceted role of NUDT5 in aggressive breast cancer progression (Figure 3).

2.3. A Specific Antibody to the Hexameric form of NUDT5 as a Tool for Breast Cancer Stratification

The above-mentioned observations point to the importance of stratifying breast cancer in terms of their capacity to synthesize ATP from ADPR. To this end, we developed a polyclonal rabbit antibody against a synthetic peptide containing the amino acids exposed in the surface of the active dephosphorylated a hexameric form of NUDT5 [45]. We have previously shown that the shift in catalytic activity from AMP to ATP generation is mediated via a structure change in NUDT5 from a dimeric to a hexameric form. This antibody does not react with the dimeric form of phosphorylated NUDT5 in histochemistry or western blots. Using tissue microarrays from breast cancer samples, staining with this antibody correlates with clinical bad prognosis and metastasis, indicating its possible value as a selection assay for treatment of these patients with inhibitors of PARP or NUDT5.

2.4. Role of NUDT Enzymes in Other Cancer Types

NUDT family members also show a significant enrichment in datasets from several other cancer types (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Focusing on NUDT1, 2, 5, and 16 we observed that although breast cancer is the patient dataset where the majority of datasets and the most statistically significant effect on outcome is observed, the expression of these NUDT enzymes is also predictive in other cancer types (Figure 2b, Supplementary Figure S1, full details are given in Supplementary Table S1).
Indeed, it has been previously shown that the expression levels of NUDT1 (also known as MTH1) are associated with a more aggressive glioblastoma and the expression of MTH1 is essential for glioblastoma cancer stem cells [52]. MTH1 is also up-regulated in melanoma and gastric cancer [53,54]. NUDT16 is an RNA de-capping enzyme and its gene promoter is methylated in over 75% of T-cell-derived leukemia, driving downregulation compared to normal tissues [55]. In addition, knockdown of NUDT16 in Hela cells reduces cell proliferation [56]. NUDT5 was identified as an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer, associated with poor overall survival in clear cell renal carcinoma [57] and, in conjunction with high expression of MTH1, predicts poor survival in esophageal carcinoma [58].
As summarized above, NUDT enzymes are key players in cancer progression and may provide promising therapeutic targets for the future management of cancer patients. However, it is also clear that NUDT enzymes and their effect on the pathways in cancer are dependent on the upstream/downstream pathways, cofactors, interactors, and regulators. For example, NUDT2 is a positive regulator of mTORC [59], NUDT5 is directly dependent on the upstream activation of PARP1 and the subsequent increase in PARylation [24], and NUDT16 is required for p53 stabilization and cell survival in BRCA1 mutant cancers [60]. In addition, the positive correlation of these NUDT enzymes and their respective cofactors in cancer patient gene expression datasets (Figure 2c–e) further supports the greater understanding of the underlying pathways that may have a significant impact on the development of breast cancer. The analysis of omics data may provide further insight into these processes as discussed below.

3. Exploiting Global Signaling and Omic Data to Discover Novel Therapeutic Strategies

Analysis of global gene expression and phosphoproteomic data has already revealed some interesting findings and highlighted the role of NUDT family members in cancer progression. For example, RNA-seq gene expression and subsequent network analysis in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells in culture highlighted the potential of NUDT2 as a therapeutic target, as inhibition of NUDT2 significantly affected gene pathways involved in metastasis, invasion, and apoptosis [31]. In 2015 the gene expression analysis of 30 cancer cell lines identified NUDT4 as a potential target [61]. The combination and analysis of muti-omic data revealed NUDT7 as having a role in colorectal and breast cancer development [62,63].

Progesterone Signaling in Breast Cancer Cells

We have recently contributed to the understanding of breast cancer progression via the analysis of phosphoproteomic datasets [64]. As discussed earlier, NUDT5 generates ATP in the nucleus of breast cancer cells in response to progesterone, dependent on degradation of PARP1 synthesize PAR to ADPR by PARG. The activation of both PARP1 and NUDT5 enzymes is regulated by phosphorylation. PARP1 is rapidly phosphorylated within the NAD+ binding site following hormone, which results in a more open conformation and an increased enzymatic activity [34,35]. NUDT5 is dephosphorylated in response to progesterone which results in a change in the oligomeric structure of NUDT5, favoring a hexameric structure, which facilitates the entry of PPi and the generation of ATP [24,45]. In order to gain more insight into the mechanism of PARP1 and NUDT5 activation in breast cancer cells, a more comprehensive analysis of the phosphorylation events and signaling cascades is required. Several single events within the signaling network induced by progesterone in breast cancer cells have been studied previously, for example, the rapid activation of the MAPK cascade [65,66], but comprehensive global analysis was missing.
To address this, we carried out a global phosphoproteomic analysis over time from antibody arrays and mass spec datasets in order to determine the signaling pathways induced by progesterone in breast cancer cells. As expected, we identified the rapid activation of the MAPK cascade, but we were also able to reconstruct activation of new kinase signaling networks previously not associated with breast cancer cell response to progesterone, including ERBB-EGF, Fc receptor, insulin, and TRK (Tropomyosin receptor kinase) signaling cascades [64]. In addition, we identified signaling networks involved in the processes of EMT, cell adhesion, and angiogenesis, which is consistent with our hypothesis and previous work and with the role of NUDT5 in aggressive cancer progression (Figure 2 [25]). Future work will focus on the interrogation of these signaling and protein-protein interaction networks to try and decipher the upstream regulators of PARP1 and NUDT5, which may provide insight into future drug combination strategies for the management of breast cancer patients, with a focus on metastatic disease for which very few therapeutic options exist.

4. Conclusions

The NUDT family of enzymes is an intriguing family of enzymes that play a key role in the progression of breast and other cancers. The therapeutic potential of NUDT-selective inhibitors has already been shown—NUDT1-selective inhibitors have shown efficacy in multiple studies in vitro and in vivo [67,68,69,70], and the NUDT5-selective inhibitor TH1457 blocks cell proliferation in breast cancer cells [71]. Given the interest in NUDT inhibition for the management of cancer patients, a greater understanding of the signaling pathways impinging on the activity of NUDT enzymes is required and may be facilitated by the interrogation of global phosphoproteomic and gene expression datasets (Figure 4).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/5/2267/s1, Figure S1: Expression levels of NUDT family members in different cancer types, Table S1: Full data mining for NUDT1, 2, 5 and 16 in different cancer types, Table S2: Full data mining for all NUDT enzymes in breast cancer datasets.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.H.G.W. and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, R.H.G.W. and M.B.; writing—review and editing, M.B.; funding acquisition, M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The experimental part of this review was supported by Grants from ERC (Project “4D Genome” 609989 and Project “Impacct” 825176), the Spanish Ministery of Science (G62426937 and), the Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR SGR 757, 2019PROD00115 and INNOV 00036) and the CRG.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of all members of the Chromatin, Gene Regulation laboratory and members of the Gene Regulation Cancer and Stem Cells department at Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG, Barcelona Spain).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ARDT1ADP-ribosyltransferase diphtheria toxin-like 1
BCSCBreast Cancer Stem Cell
DCISDuctal carcinoma in situ
DFSDisease-free survival
EREstrogen Receptor
H1Histone H1
H2A/BHistone H2A/B
HER2Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
HR+Hormone Receptor-positive
HR-Hormone Receptor-negative
IDCInvasive ductal carcinoma
ILCInvasive lobular carcinoma
NUDTNucleoside diphosphate linked moiety X
OSOverall survival
PARPoly-ADP-ribose
PARGPoly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase
PARP1Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase 1
PRProgesterone Receptor
RFSRecurrence-free survival
SERMSelective estrogen receptor modulators
TGCAThe Cancer Genome Altas

References

  1. National Cancer Institute. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Breast Cancer. In National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; 2017. Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/ (accessed on 1 January 2021).
  2. Hortobagyi, G.N.; de la Garza Salazar, J.; Pritchard, K.; Amadori, D.; Haidinger, R.; Hudis, C.A.; Khaled, H.; Liu, M.C.; Martin, M.; Namer, M.; et al. The global breast cancer burden: Variations in epidemiology and survival. Clin. Breast Cancer 2005, 6, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Society, A.C. Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2019–2020; American Cancer Society, Inc.: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Waks, A.G.; Winer, E.P. Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review. JAMA 2019, 321, 288–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Moo, T.A.; Sanford, R.; Dang, C.; Morrow, M. Overview of Breast Cancer Therapy. PET Clin. 2018, 13, 339–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. McGale, P.; Taylor, C.; Correa, C.; Cutter, D.; Duane, F.; Ewertz, M.; Gray, R.; Peto, R.; Whelan, T.; Darby, S.; et al. Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: Meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials. Lancet 2014, 383, 2127–2135. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, X.H.; Giuliano, M.; Trivedi, M.V.; Schiff, R.; Osborne, C.K. Metastasis dormancy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 6389–6397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lee, S.B.; Sohn, G.; Kim, J.; Chung, I.Y.; Lee, J.W.; Kim, H.J.; Ko, B.S.; Son, B.H.; Ahn, S.-H. Survival analysis according to period and analysis of the factors influencing changes in survival in patients with recurrent breast cancer: A large-scale, single-center study. Breast Cancer 2018, 25, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ignatiadis, M.L.; Sotiriou, C. Luminal breast cancer: From biology to treatment. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 10, 494–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Perez, E.A. Treatment strategies for advanced hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative breast cancer: The role of treatment order. Drug Resist. Updat. 2016, 24, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Teng, Y.D.; Wang, L.; Kabatas, S.; Ulrich, H.; Zafonte, R.D. Cancer Stem Cells or Tumor Survival Cells? Stem Cells Dev. 2018, 27, 1466–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Palomeras, S.; Ruiz-Martínez, S.; Puig, T. Targeting Breast Cancer Stem Cells to Overcome Treatment Resistance. Molecules 2018, 23, 2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Schmid, R.; Schmidt, S.K.; Hazur, J.; Detsch, R.; Maurer, E.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Hauptstein, J.; Teßmar, J.; Blunk, T.; Schrüfer, S.; et al. Comparison of Hydrogels for the Development of Well-Defined 3D Cancer Models of Breast Cancer and Melanoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vinci, M.; Gowan, S.; Boxall, F.; Patterson, L.; Zimmermann, M.; Court, W.; Lomas, C.; Mendiola, M.; Hardisson, D.; Eccles, S.A. Advances in establishment and analysis of three-dimensional tumor spheroid-based functional assays for target validation and drug evaluation. BMC Biol. 2012, 10, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kapałczyńska, M.; Kolenda, T.; Przybyła, W.; Zajączkowska, M.; Teresiak, A.; Filas, V.; Ibbs, M.; Bliźniak, R.; Łuczewski, Ł.; Lamperska, K. 2D and 3D cell cultures—A comparison of different types of cancer cell cultures. Arch. Med. Sci. 2018, 14, 910–919. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wicha, M.S. Targeting breast cancer stem cells. Breast 2009, 18 (Suppl. 3), S56–S58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, C.; Yang, Z.; Dong, D.-L.; Jang, T.-S.; Knowles, J.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Jin, G.-Z.; Xuan, Y. 3D culture technologies of cancer stem cells: Promising ex vivo tumor models. J. Tissue Eng. 2020, 11, 2041731420933407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ishiguro, T.; Ohata, H.; Sato, A.; Yamawaki, K.; Enomoto, T.; Okamoto, K. Tumor-derived spheroids: Relevance to cancer stem cells and clinical applications. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. He, J.; Xiong, L.; Li, Q.; Lin, L.; Miao, X.; Yan, S.; Hong, Z.; Yang, L.; Wen, Y.; Deng, X. 3D modeling of cancer stem cell niche. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 1326–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Edmondson, R.; Broglie, J.J.; Adcock, A.F.; Yang, L. Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2014, 12, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Fontoura, J.C.; Viezzer, C.; Dos Santos, F.G.; Ligabue, R.A.; Weinlich, R.; Puga, R.D.; Antonow, D.; Severino, P.; Bonorino, C. Comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture models for cell growth, gene expression and drug resistance. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2020, 107, 110264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Riedl, A.; Schlederer, M.; Pudelko, K.; Stadler, M.; Walter, S.; Unterleuthner, D.; Unger, C.; Kramer, N.; Hengstschläger, M.; Kenner, L.; et al. Comparison of cancer cells in 2D vs 3D culture reveals differences in AKT-mTOR-S6K signaling and drug responses. J. Cell Sci. 2017, 130, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Imamura, Y.; Mukohara, T.; Shimono, Y.; Funakoshi, Y.; Chayahara, N.; Toyoda, M.; Kiyota, N.; Takao, S.; Kono, S.; Nakatsura, T.; et al. Comparison of 2D- and 3D-culture models as drug-testing platforms in breast cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 1837–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wright, R.H.; Lioutas, A.; Le Dily, F.; Soronellas, D.; Pohl, A.; Bonet, J.; Nacht, A.S.; Samino, S.; Font-Mateu, J.; Vicent, G.P.; et al. ADP-ribose-derived nuclear ATP synthesis by NUDIX5 is required for chromatin remodeling. Science 2016, 352, 1221–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pickup, K.E.; Pardow, F.; Carbonell-Caballero, J.; Lioutas, A.; Villanueva-Cañas, J.L.; Wright, R.H.G.; Beato, M. Expression of Oncogenic Drivers in 3D Cell Culture Depends on Nuclear ATP Synthesis by NUDT5. Cancers 2019, 11, 1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Kulikova, V.A.; Nikiforov, A.A. Role of NUDIX Hydrolases in NAD and ADP-Ribose Metabolism in Mammals. Biochemistry 2020, 85, 883–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Carreras-Puigvert, J.; Zitnik, M.; Jemth, A.S.; Carter, M.; Unterlass, J.E.; Hallström, B.; Loseva, O.; Karem, Z.; Calderón-Montaño, J.M.; Lindskog, C.; et al. A comprehensive structural, biochemical and biological profiling of the human NUDIX hydrolase family. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. McLennan, A.G.; Cartwright, J.L.; Gasmi, L. The human NUDT family of nucleotide hydrolases. Enzymes of diverse substrate specificity. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2000, 486, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, X.; Song, W.; Zhou, Y.; Mao, F.; Lin, Y.; Guan, J.; Sun, Q. Expression and function of MutT homolog 1 in distinct subtypes of breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 13, 2161–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Oka, K.; Suzuki, T.; Onodera, Y.; Miki, Y.; Takagi, K.; Nagasaki, S.; Akahira, J.-I.; Ishida, T.; Watanabe, M.; Hirakawa, H.; et al. Nudix-type motif 2 in human breast carcinoma: A potent prognostic factor associated with cell proliferation. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 128, 1770–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marriott, A.S.; Vasieva, O.; Fang, Y.; Copeland, N.A.; McLennan, A.G.; Jones, N.J. NUDT2 Disruption Elevates Diadenosine Tetraphosphate (Ap4A) and Down-Regulates Immune Response and Cancer Promotion Genes. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Harvell, D.M.; Richer, J.K.; Allred, D.C.; Sartorius, C.A.; Horwitz, K.B. Estradiol regulates different genes in human breast tumor xenografts compared with the identical cells in culture. Endocrinology 2006, 147, 700–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, B.J.; Liu, D.C.; Guo, Q.Y.; Han, X.W.; Bi, X.M.; Wang, H.; Wu, Z.-S.; Wu, W.-Y. NUDT21 Suppresses Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis Through Regulating CPSF6 Expression. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 3069–3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Wright, R.H.; Castellano, G.; Bonet, J.; Le Dily, F.; Font-Mateu, J.; Ballare, C.; Nacht, A.S.; Soronellas, D.; Oliva, B.; Beato, M. CDK2-dependent activation of PARP-1 is required for hormonal gene regulation in breast cancer cells. Genes Dev. 2012, 26, 1972–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wright, R.H.; Beato, M. PARty promoters: Hormone-dependent gene regulation requires CDK2 activation of PARP1. Cell Cycle 2012, 11, 4291–4293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Poirier, G.G.; Niedergang, C.; Champagne, M.; Mazen, A.; Mandel, P. Adenosine diphosphate ribosylation of chicken-erythrocyte histones H1, H5 and high-mobility-group proteins by purified calf-thymus poly(adenosinediphosphate-ribose) polymerase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1982, 127, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Poirier, G.G.; De Murcia, G.; Jongstra-Bilen, J.; Niedergang, C.; Mandel, P. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of polynucleosomes causes relaxation of chromatin structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1982, 79, 3423–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Aubin, R.J.; Dam, V.T.; Miclette, J.; Brousseau, Y. Poirier GG. Chromosomal protein poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in pancreatic nucleosomes. Can. J. Biochem. 1982, 60, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Aubin, R.J.; Dam, V.T.; Miclette, J.; Brousseau, Y.; Huletsky, A.; Poirier, G.G. Hyper(ADP-ribosyl)ation of histone H1. Can. J. Biochem. 1982, 60, 1085–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mathis, G.; Althaus, F.R. Release of core DNA from nucleosomal core particles following (ADP-ribose)n-modification in vitro. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1987, 143, 1049–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, M.Y.; Mauro, S.; Gévry, N.; Lis, J.T.; Kraus, W. NAD+-dependent modulation of chromatin structure and transcription by nucleosome binding properties of PARP-1. Cell 2004, 119, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kraus, W.; Lis, J.T. PARP goes transcription. Cell 2003, 113, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Thomas, C.; Tulin, A.V. Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase: Machinery for nuclear processes. Mol. Aspects Med. 2013, 34, 1124–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Tulin, A.; Stewart, D.; Spradling, A.C. The Drosophila heterochromatic gene encoding poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is required to modulate chromatin structure during development. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 2108–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wright, R.H.; Fernandez-Fuentes, N.; Oliva, B.; Beato, M. Insight into the machinery that oils chromatin dynamics. Nucleus 2016, 7, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Maruta, H.; Matsumura, N.; Tanuma, S. Role of (ADP-ribose)n catabolism in DNA repair. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 236, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zha, M.; Guo, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, B.; Ou, Y.; Zhong, C.; Ding, J. Molecular mechanism of ADP-ribose hydrolysis by human NUDT5 from structural and kinetic studies. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 379, 568–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zha, M.; Zhong, C.; Peng, Y.; Hu, H.; Ding, J. Crystal structures of human NUDT5 reveal insights into the structural basis of the substrate specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 364, 1021–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jing, X.; Liang, H.; Hao, C.; Yang, X.; Cui, X. Overexpression of MUC1 predicts poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 41, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ballesta, A.M.; Molina, R.; Filella, X.; Jo, J.; Gimenez, N. Carcinoembryonic antigen in staging and follow-up of patients with solid tumors. Tumour. Biol. 1995, 16, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Powell, E.; Shao, J.; Picon, H.M.; Bristow, C.; Ge, Z.; Peoples, M.; Robinson, F.; Jeter-Jones, S.L.; Schlosberg, C.; Grzeskowiak, C.L.; et al. A functional genomic screen in vivo identifies CEACAM5 as a clinically relevant driver of breast cancer metastasis. NPJ Breast Cancer 2018, 4, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pudelko, L.; Rouhi, P.; Sanjiv, K.; Gad, H.; Kalderen, C.; Hoglund, A.; Squatrito, M.; Schuhmacher, A.J.; Edwards, S.; Hägerstrand, D.; et al. Glioblastoma and glioblastoma stem cells are dependent on functional MTH1. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 84671–84684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Wang, J.Y.; Liu, G.Z.; Wilmott, J.S.; La, T.; Feng, Y.C.; Yari, H.; Yan, X.G.; Thorne, R.F.; Scolyer, R.A.; Zhang, X.D.; et al. Skp2-Mediated Stabilization of MTH1 Promotes Survival of Melanoma Cells upon Oxidative Stress. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 6226–6239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Zhou, W.; Ma, L.; Yang, J.; Qiao, H.; Li, L.; Guo, Q.; Ma, J.; Zhao, L.; Wang, J.; Jiang, G.; et al. Potent and specific MTH1 inhibitors targeting gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Anadón, C.; Van Tetering, G.; Ferreira, H.J.; Moutinho, C.; Martínez-Cardús, A.; Villanueva, A.; Soler, M.; Heyn, H.; Moran, S.; De Moura, M.C.; et al. Epigenetic loss of the RNA decapping enzyme NUDT16 mediates C-MYC activation in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2017, 31, 1622–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Iyama, T.; Abolhassani, N.; Tsuchimoto, D.; Nonaka, M.; Nakabeppu, Y. NUDT16 is a (deoxy)inosine diphosphatase, and its deficiency induces accumulation of single-strand breaks in nuclear DNA and growth arrest. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 4834–4843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wang, Y.; Wan, F.; Chang, K.; Lu, X.; Dai, B.; Ye, D. NUDT expression is predictive of prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 6121–6128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Wang, J.J.; Liu, T.H.; Li, J.; Li, D.N.; Tian, X.Y.; Ouyang, Q.G.; Cai, J.-P. The high expression of MTH1 and NUDT5 predict a poor survival and are associated with malignancy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kwon, O.; Kwak, D.; Ha, S.H.; Jeon, H.; Park, M.; Chang, Y.; Suh, P.-G.; Ryu, S.H. Nudix-type motif 2 contributes to cancer proliferation through the regulation of Rag GTPase-mediated mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 localization. Cell Signal. 2017, 32, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, F.; Lou, L.; Peng, B.; Song, X.; Reizes, O.; Almasan, A.; Gong, Z. Nudix Hydrolase NUDT16 Regulates 53BP1 Protein by Reversing 53BP1 ADP-Ribosylation. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Gyorffy, B.; Serra, V.; Jurchott, K.; Abdul-Ghani, R.; Garber, M.; Stein, U.; Petersen, I.; Lage, H.; Dietel, M.; Schäfer, R. Prediction of doxorubicin sensitivity in breast tumors based on gene expression profiles of drug-resistant cell lines correlates with patient survival. Oncogene 2005, 24, 7542–7551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Song, J.; Park, S.; Oh, J.; Kim, D.; Ryu, J.H.; Park, W.C.; Baek, I.-J.; Cheng, X.; Lu, X.; Jin, E.-J. NUDT7 Loss Promotes Kras(G12D) CRC Development. Cancers 2020, 12, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Barupal, D.K.; Gao, B.; Budczies, J.; Phinney, B.S.; Perroud, B.; Denkert, C.; Fiehn, O. Prioritization of metabolic genes as novel therapeutic targets in estrogen-receptor negative breast tumors using multi-omics data and text mining. Oncotarget 2019, 10, 3894–3909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Wright, R.H.G.; Vastolo, V.; Oliete, J.Q.; Carbonell-Caballero, J.; Beato, M. Signalling Network of Breast Cancer Cells in Response to Progesterone. BioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Reyes, D.; Ballare, C.; Castellano, G.; Soronellas, D.; Bagó, J.R.; Blanco, J.; Beato, M. Activation of mitogen- and stress-activated kinase 1 is required for proliferation of breast cancer cells in response to estrogens or progestins. Oncogene 2014, 33, 1570–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Ballare, C.; Uhrig, M.; Bechtold, T.; Sancho, E.; Di Domenico, M.; Migliaccio, A.; Auricchio, F.; Beato, M. Two domains of the progesterone receptor interact with the estrogen receptor and are required for progesterone activation of the c-Src/Erk pathway in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 23, 1994–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Moukengue, B.; Brown, H.K.; Charrier, C.; Battaglia, S.; Baud’Huin, M.; Quillard, T.; Pham, T.M.; Pateras, I.; Gorgoulis, V.G.; Helleday, T.; et al. TH1579, MTH1 inhibitor, delays tumour growth and inhibits metastases development in osteosarcoma model. EBioMedicine 2020, 53, 102704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gad, H.; Koolmeister, T.; Jemth, A.S.; Eshtad, S.; Jacques, S.A.; Ström, C.E.; Svensson, L.M.; Schultz, N.; Lundbäck, T.; Einarsdottir, B.O.; et al. MTH1 inhibition eradicates cancer by preventing sanitation of the dNTP pool. Nature 2014, 508, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Van der Waals, L.M.; Laoukili, J.; Jongen, J.M.J.; Raats, D.A.; Borel Rinkes, I.H.M.; Kranenburg, O. Differential anti-tumour effects of MTH1 inhibitors in patient-derived 3D colorectal cancer cultures. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Farand, J.; Kropf, J.E.; Blomgren, P.; Xu, J.; Schmitt, A.C.; Newby, Z.E.; Wang, T.; Murakami, E.; Barauskas, O.; Sudhamsu, J.; et al. Discovery of Potent and Selective MTH1 Inhibitors for Oncology: Enabling Rapid Target (In)Validation. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Page, B.D.G.; Valerie, N.C.K.; Wright, R.H.G.; Wallner, O.; Isaksson, R.; Carter, M.; Rudd, S.G.; Loseva, O.; Jemth, A.-S.; Almlöf, I.; et al. Targeted NUDT5 inhibitors block hormone signaling in breast cancer cells. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 02267 g001 550
Figure 1. NUDT1, 2, 5, and 16 in Breast Cancer: (Left) mRNA expression levels of NUDT family member in normal (black) versus tumor (red) patient breast cancer TCGA samples. (Center) Overall survival based on patient stratification using NUDT enzyme in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. (Right) Overall survival based on patient stratification using NUDT enzyme in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patient datasets, (a) NUDT1 (b) NUDT2 (c) NUDT5, and (d) NUDT16.
Figure 1. NUDT1, 2, 5, and 16 in Breast Cancer: (Left) mRNA expression levels of NUDT family member in normal (black) versus tumor (red) patient breast cancer TCGA samples. (Center) Overall survival based on patient stratification using NUDT enzyme in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. (Right) Overall survival based on patient stratification using NUDT enzyme in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patient datasets, (a) NUDT1 (b) NUDT2 (c) NUDT5, and (d) NUDT16.
Ijms 22 02267 g001
Ijms 22 02267 g002 550
Figure 2. Expression Levels of NUDT enzymes in Breast and Other Cancer Types. (a) Number of datasets where there is a significant (p < 0.05) difference between overall or recurrence-free survival of patients based on the expression level of the NUDT family member indicated, full information regarding dataset ID, cohort number are given in Supplementary Table S2. (b) Number of datasets (indicated by size of circle) and mean p values (color circle) where a significant difference in cancer patient outcome is observed based on the expression level of the NUDT enzyme indicated in different types of cancer. Full details of the information are given in Supplementary Table S2. Correlation in expression of NUDT2 and MTOR (c), NUDT5 and PARP1 (d) and NUDT16 and BRCA1 (e).
Figure 2. Expression Levels of NUDT enzymes in Breast and Other Cancer Types. (a) Number of datasets where there is a significant (p < 0.05) difference between overall or recurrence-free survival of patients based on the expression level of the NUDT family member indicated, full information regarding dataset ID, cohort number are given in Supplementary Table S2. (b) Number of datasets (indicated by size of circle) and mean p values (color circle) where a significant difference in cancer patient outcome is observed based on the expression level of the NUDT enzyme indicated in different types of cancer. Full details of the information are given in Supplementary Table S2. Correlation in expression of NUDT2 and MTOR (c), NUDT5 and PARP1 (d) and NUDT16 and BRCA1 (e).
Ijms 22 02267 g002
Ijms 22 02267 g003 550
Figure 3. Multifaceted role of NUDT5 in breast cancer metastasis. Model showing the multiple roles and indications for a key role of NUDT5 in aggressive breast cancer. (1) NUDT5 is elevated in tumor versus normal breast cancer tissue. (2) NUDT5 is essential for breast cancer stem cell (BCSC) generation and maintenance. (3) NUDT5 is highly expressed in circulating tumor cells (CTCs). (4 and 5) Elevated levels of NUDT5 are associated with increased levels of recurrence and metastasis in patients suggesting a role in mesenchyme to epithelial transition and secondary site colonization. And finally (6) analysis of the gene expression changes occurring in BCSC in 3D cell culture suggests a role of NUDT5 in angiogenesis.
Figure 3. Multifaceted role of NUDT5 in breast cancer metastasis. Model showing the multiple roles and indications for a key role of NUDT5 in aggressive breast cancer. (1) NUDT5 is elevated in tumor versus normal breast cancer tissue. (2) NUDT5 is essential for breast cancer stem cell (BCSC) generation and maintenance. (3) NUDT5 is highly expressed in circulating tumor cells (CTCs). (4 and 5) Elevated levels of NUDT5 are associated with increased levels of recurrence and metastasis in patients suggesting a role in mesenchyme to epithelial transition and secondary site colonization. And finally (6) analysis of the gene expression changes occurring in BCSC in 3D cell culture suggests a role of NUDT5 in angiogenesis.
Ijms 22 02267 g003
Ijms 22 02267 g004 550
Figure 4. Data Integration for the identification of novel biomarkers, drug discovery targets and pathways in breast cancer progression. Venn diagram showing the possible different dataset integration strategies which may provide further insight for future cancer drug discovery lines of research.
Figure 4. Data Integration for the identification of novel biomarkers, drug discovery targets and pathways in breast cancer progression. Venn diagram showing the possible different dataset integration strategies which may provide further insight for future cancer drug discovery lines of research.
Ijms 22 02267 g004
Table
Table 1. NUDT family members substrates and reactions.
Table 1. NUDT family members substrates and reactions.
NUDT
(Alternative Name)		Substrate Hydrolase ActivityProduct Hydrolase ActivityRoleEnzyme Entry
(Expasy)
NUDT1 (MTH1)8-oxo-dGTP+ H2O
8-oxo-dATP
8-OH-dATP		8-oxo-dGMP +diphosphate+H+Sanitizing oxidized nucleotidesEC 3.6.1.55
EC 3.6.1.56
NUDT2
(APAH1)		Ap4AAMP + ATPHomeostasisEC 3.6.17
NUDT3
(DIPP-1)		Diphospho-myo-inositol polyphosphate + H2Omyo-inositol polyphosphate + phosphate. EC 3.6.1.52
NUDT4
(DIPP-2)		Diphospho-myo-inositol polyphosphate + H2Omyo-inositol polyphosphate + phosphate.Signal transductionEC:3.6.1.52
NUDT5
(NUDIX5)		ATP + D-ribose 5-phosphate + H+
ADP-D-ribose + H2O
8-oxo-dGDP + H2O
ADP-D-ribose + PPi + H2O		ADP-D-ribose + diphosphate
AMP + D-ribose 5-phosphate + 2 H+
8-oxo-dGMP + H+ + phosphate
ATP+ D-ribose-5-phosphate		Sanitizing oxidized nucleotidesEC 2.7.7.96
EC 3.6.1.13
EC 3.6.1.58
NUDT6
(FGF2AS)		ADP-ribose + H2O
NADH + H2O		AMP + D-ribose 5-phosphate.
AMP + NMNH + 2 H+		Cell proliferationEC 2.7.7.96
NUDT7acetyl-CoA + H2Oacetate + CoA + H(+).Eliminate oxidized coenzyme A (CoA)EC 3.1.2.20
NUDT8unknownunknownunknown
NUDT9ADP-D-ribose + H2OAMP + D-ribose 5-phosphate + 2 H+ EC 3.6.1.13
NUDT10
(DIPP3A, APS2)		H2O + P1,P6-bis(5′-adenosyl) hexaphosphate
H2O + P1,P5-bis(5′-adenosyl) pentaphosphate
Diphospho-myo-inositol polyphosphate + H2O		adenosine 5′-pentaphosphate + AMP + 2 H+
adenosine 5′-tetraphosphate + AMP + 2 H+
myo-inositol polyphosphate + phosphate		Signal transductionEC 3.6.1.60
EC 3.6.1.60
EC 3.6.1.52
NUDT
(Alternative Name)		Substrate Hydrolase ActivityProduct Hydrolase ActivityRoleEnzyme Entry
(Expasy)
NUDT11
(DIPP3B, APS1)		H2O + P1,P6-bis(5′-adenosyl) hexaphosphate
H2O + P1,P5-bis(5′-adenosyl) pentaphosphate
Diphospho-myo-inositol polyphosphate + H2O		adenosine 5′-pentaphosphate + AMP + 2 H+
adenosine 5′-tetraphosphate + AMP + 2 H+
myo-inositol polyphosphate + phosphate		Signal transductionEC 3.6.1.60
EC 3.6.1.60
EC 3.6.1.52
NUDT12H2O + NAD+
H2O + NADH		AMP + β-nicotinamide D-ribonucleotide + 2 H+
AMP + 2 H+ + reduced β-nicotinamide D-ribonucleotide		Regulate nicotinamideEC 3.6.1.22
EC 3.6.1.22
NUDT13unknownunknownunknown
NUDT14
(UGPP)		UDP-sugar + H2OUMP + alpha-D-aldose 1-phosphateunknownEC:3.6.1.45
NUDT15
(MTH2)		a ribonucleoside 5′-triphosphate + H2O
a 2′-deoxyribonucleoside 5′-triphosphate + H2O		a ribonucleoside 5′-phosphate + diphosphate + H+
a 2′-deoxyribonucleoside 5′-phosphate + diphosphate + H+		Sanitizing oxidized nucleotidesEC:3.6.1.9
NUDT16a 5′-end (N7-methyl 5′-triphosphoguanosine)-adenosine in mRNA + H2Oa 5′-end phospho-adenosine in mRNA + 2 H+ + N7-methylguanosine 5′-diphosphateRNA decapping enzymeEC 3.6.1.62
NUDT17unknownunknownunknownunknown
NUDT18
(MTH3)		8-oxo-dGDP + H2O8-oxo-dGMP + H+ + phosphateRemoves oxidized guanine from DNA and RNAEC 3.6.1.58
NUDT19acyl-CoA + H2OCoA + a carboxylate.Hydrolysis CoA estersEC 3.1.2.20
NUDT20
(DCP2)		a 5′-end (N7-methyl 5′-triphosphoguanosine)-adenosine in mRNA+ H2Oa 5′-end phospho-adenosine in mRNA + 2 H+ + N7-methylguanosine 5′-diphosphateRNA decapping enzymeEC 3.6.1.62
NUDT21
(CFIm25)		No hydrolase activityNo hydrolase activityPre-mRNA processing
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wright, R.H.G.; Beato, M. Role of the NUDT Enzymes in Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052267

AMA Style

Wright RHG, Beato M. Role of the NUDT Enzymes in Breast Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(5):2267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wright, Roni H. G., and Miguel Beato. 2021. "Role of the NUDT Enzymes in Breast Cancer" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 5: 2267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22052267

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop