Next Article in Journal
Systematic Review: Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Platelet-Rich Plasma and Biomaterials as New Regenerative Strategies in Chronic Skin Wounds and Soft Tissue Defects
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Characterization of Receptor–Receptor Interactions in the Allosteric Modulation of G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) Dimers
Previous Article in Journal
A Mechanistic Model of NMDA and AMPA Receptor-Mediated Synaptic Transmission in Individual Hippocampal CA3-CA1 Synapses: A Computational Multiscale Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms22041537
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pneumoviral Phosphoprotein, a Multidomain Adaptor-Like Protein of Apparent Low Structural Complexity and High Conformational Versatility

by
Christophe Cardone
,
Claire-Marie Caseau
,
Nelson Pereira
and
Christina Sizun
*
CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Institut de Chimie des Substances Naturelles, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(4), 1537; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041537
Submission received: 14 January 2021 / Revised: 31 January 2021 / Accepted: 1 February 2021 / Published: 3 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biophysical Characterization and Molecular Engineering of Multidomain Proteins 2.0)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mononegavirales phosphoproteins (P) are essential co-factors of the viral polymerase by serving as a linchpin between the catalytic subunit and the ribonucleoprotein template. They have highly diverged, but their overall architecture is conserved. They are multidomain proteins, which all possess an oligomerization domain that separates N- and C-terminal domains. Large intrinsically disordered regions constitute their hallmark. Here, we exemplify their structural features and interaction potential, based on the Pneumoviridae P proteins. These P proteins are rather small, and their oligomerization domain is the only part with a defined 3D structure, owing to a quaternary arrangement. All other parts are either flexible or form short-lived secondary structure elements that transiently associate with the rest of the protein. Pneumoviridae P proteins interact with several viral and cellular proteins that are essential for viral transcription and replication. The combination of intrinsic disorder and tetrameric organization enables them to structurally adapt to different partners and to act as adaptor-like platforms to bring the latter close in space. Transient structures are stabilized in complex with protein partners. This class of proteins gives an insight into the structural versatility of non-globular intrinsically disordered protein domains.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Among multidomain proteins, those with very large intrinsically disordered regions form a special class, as these regions can delineate domains of their own. Disordered regions are generally associated with a low complexity, as they form neither stable secondary nor tertiary structures [1,2]. As linkers, they allow the relative positioning of globular domains. Their plasticity comes into play for repositioning adjacent globular domains under different conditions. They are also often involved in signaling and regulation by post-translational modifications. However, large intrinsically disordered regions may be more than adaptable linkers. Here, we present the structural properties of a family of nearly fully intrinsically disordered proteins, namely the phosphoproteins of pneumoviruses. Their domain organization is fundamental for their function as essential polymerase co-factors for these viruses. We show how structural complexity is gained by the presence of a very short oligomerization domain, which results in quaternary organization, and how the plasticity of the proteins leads to very different structures in a variety of protein complexes. Despite or rather because of their low intrinsic structural complexity, these P proteins are puzzling multifunctional proteins that can engage in multiple interactions with weak to high affinities. We review here the structural specificities of the Pneumoviridae P proteins, using RSV and hMPV P as examples. We focus on the multiplicity of binding sites afforded by the different domains, either on a single domain or consecutive domains, and show how they locally switch conformations when engaged in protein complexes. This ability confers them adaptor-like properties, since they position protein partners, which do not directly bind to each other, close in space to form functional complexes.

2. Structural Features of Mononegavirales Phosphoproteins

Human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV) are enveloped viruses of the Mononegavirales order [3]. They are the archetypes of Orthopneumovirus and Metapneumovirus genera inside the Pneumoviridae family [4]. Pneumoviruses, i.e., viruses of this family, are major pathogens for pediatric acute respiratory disease, worldwide. hRSV is the main agent of acute lower respiratory infections in infants and young children, causing pneumonia and bronchiolitis, and thus a leading cause for pediatric hospitalization and child mortality [5,6]. The bovine form of RSV is a major pathogen for bovine respiratory disease in young calves and represents an important economic burden for the cattle industry [7]. hMPV is the second most common cause, after hRSV, of acute respiratory disease and related hospitalization of young children [8,9].
The viral genome of Mononegavirales is a ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) consisting of a non-segmented, negative-strand RNA molecule that is encapsidated by the viral nucleoprotein (N) [10,11,12,13]. The RNP complex serves as the template for the viral RNA polymerase complex during transcription and replication, which produce mRNA and genomic RNA, respectively. While mRNA remains naked, newly synthesized genomic RNA is covered by N as it is synthesized. The apo polymerase complex is formed a minima by the large polymerase unit (L), a protein endowed with enzymatic activities, and its essential co-factor, the viral phosphoprotein (P) [14,15]. In the holo RNA polymerase complex, the P protein acts as a linchpin that tethers and positions the polymerase on the RNP, by binding to both L and N. It has been suggested that P is involved in local decapsidation of the viral genome to allow L access to the genomic RNA [16]. Due to their multimeric organization, it has been suggested that Mononegavirales P proteins bind to consecutive N units on the RNP and that P proceeds by cartwheeling along the RNP for RNA elongation by L [10].
While the Mononegavirales L proteins are structurally conserved [15], the Mononegavirales P proteins display pronounced structural diversity. Their lengths vary considerably: RSV P is the shortest with 241 residues, and Nipah virus P the longest with 709 residues. P proteins do not share sequence similarity beyond the level of subfamilies or families within the Mononegavirales. However, they display the same overall architecture and common structural features. First, they contain a central oligomerization domain, delimiting the N- and C-terminal domains. The oligomerization domain contains a helical coiled-coil core of variable arrangement and length (Figure 1). The P oligomerization domains are arranged either as parallel dimers, such as in the vesicular stomatitis virus [17] or rabies virus P [18]; as antiparallel dimers of parallel dimers, such as in the mumps virus P [16]; as parallel tetramers, such as in the measles virus [19] or in hMPV P [20]; or parallel trimers, such as in some Filoviridae virus phosphoproteins [21,22] (Figure 1).
A second common feature of the Mononegavirales P proteins is the presence of large intrinsically disordered regions, on each side of the oligomerization domain [23,24,25]. Some of these P proteins possess small folded domains, involved in binding to N complexed to RNA (N-RNA complex), located at the C-terminus, such as the C-terminal X domain of the Paramyxoviridae P proteins formed of a 3-helix bundle [26] or the C-terminal domain of the rabies virus [27,28] (Figure 1). In the case of Filoviridae phosphoproteins, a folded C-terminal domain is involved in specific interferon inhibition [29]. The structural differences point to the evolutionary divergence of the Mononegavirales P proteins, which have evolved specific interactions with their cognate N and L proteins, and thus specific RNP recognition mechanisms by the cognate polymerase. In the case of Pneumoviridae P proteins, the oligomerization domain delimits two intrinsically disordered domains, denoted here PNT and PCT (Figure 1).

3. The Three Domains in Pneumoviridae Phosphoproteins Display Multiple Binding Sites Associated to Multiple Functions

RSV and hMPV P are composed of 241 and 294 amino acids, respectively, and have been both reported to form tetramers [20,30,31]. Sequence alignment of the Pneumoviridae phosphoproteins, adjusted for structural similarity on the basis of the recently reported L–P complex structures [32,33,34], points to two regions with marked conservation: the oligomerization domain and a proximal C-terminal region inside the PCT domain (Figure 2). In the PNT domain, the N-terminus and the region proximal to the oligomerization domain also display conservation, but specificity remains for the Orthopneumovirus and Metapneumovirus genera. The three domains, PNT, POD and PCT, are involved in specific complexes associated to different functions of P, involving mainly P regions with a certain degree of conservation.
As the main co-factor of the viral RNA polymerase, P binds to L via nearly the entire PCT, with the exception of a C-terminal tail, completed by POD [32,33,34,36,37]. Recognition of the RNP template by the RNA polymerase is mediated by a direct interaction between the P and N proteins, also via PCT [38]. In this N–P binding mode, the C-terminal tail of P is the primary binding region for the RNP and more generally a binding site for the RNA-bound N [38,39,40] (Figure 2). The L–P complex must be of high affinity, whereas binding of P to the RNP must be sufficiently weak to allow processivity of the polymerase. The N–P interaction is also required for the formation of cytoplasmic virus-induced, highly dynamic organelles, termed inclusion bodies (IBs), which act as viral factories, where N, L and P proteins accumulate [38,41,42,43,44,45].
Like all Mononegavirales P proteins, Pneumoviridae P proteins may also engage with their cognate N protein following a second binding mode, which is distinct from the N-RNA–P binding mode. In this mode, P serves as a chaperone for N, by maintaining neo-synthesized N monomeric and mRNA-free, and thus competent for encapsidation of genomic RNA. The interaction with N in the N0–P mode is mediated by a conserved region located in PNT [11] (Figure 2).
The viral transcription activity of the Pneumoviridae is modulated by an additional co-factor, the M2-1 phosphoprotein. RSV M2-1 is required for efficient transcription of RSV by preventing premature transcription termination at the gene junctions [46,47,48]. For hMPV, it was reported to be dispensable [49]. In infected cells, M2-1 is recruited to the viral cytoplasmic IBs [43,50], via a direct interaction with RSV PNT [51,52] (Figure 2). Dynamic phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of RSV M2-1, and speculatively MPV M2-1, is needed for efficient transcription. Dephosphorylation of RSV M2-1 is operated by the cellular PP1 phosphatase, which binds to P in a conserved region proximal to the M2-1 binding region [52] (Figure 2). It thus appears that the specific role of Pneumoviridae P for transcription emanates from PNT.
RSV P was found to be constitutively phosphorylated in vivo [53,54]. Two main clusters of phosphorylated serines, S116/S117/S119 and S232/S237, were identified in the PNT and PCT domains (Figure 2) [55,56,57]. The phosphorylation state of these serines was reported to modulate RSV replication and budding in vivo [55]. P phosphorylation was also shown to regulate several protein–protein interactions. RSV P mutants impaired for phosphorylation at the main sites displayed reduced interaction between the N and P proteins and resulted in attenuated RSV virus or impaired budding [55]. However, most constitutive phosphorylation sites were reported to be dispensable for viral RNA transcription and virus replication in vitro [55,57,58]. Moreover, among the phosphorylatable serine/threonine residues in RSV P, only position 119 seems to be conserved in the Pneumoviridae family. The S/T119-F/Y-D/E-E consensus sequence corresponds to the general S-X-X-E/D recognition motif of casein kinase II (Figure 2). Otherwise, sequence alignment shows that the phosphorylation sites are located in variable regions (Figure 2), suggesting that they are specific for each virus or genus. Notably phosphorylation of RSV T108 prevented interaction with RSV M2-1 [52,59], but T108 has no counterpart in MPV.

4. Pneumoviridae Phosphoproteins Display a High Degree of Intrinsic Disorder

4.1. The Oligomerisation Domain Is the Only Stably Folded Domain in RSV/hMPV Phosphoproteins

Whereas high-resolution structural information and structural models could be obtained for the RSV and hMPV N proteins in the form of N0, N-RNA rings or nucleocapsids [40,60,61] the P proteins have long eluded detailed structural elucidation. A combination of computational, biochemical and biophysical experiments, performed by different laboratories, pointed to a similar domain organization, with a central oligomerization domain that is critical for the function of P [30,31,58,62,63,64]. Mass spectrometry in combination with trypsin degradation assessed the overall intrinsic disorder in RSV P [62,65].
The oligomerization domain of RSV P was first mapped to residues Y120–H150 by cross-linking and deletion mutants [30]. The approximate location of the oligomerization domain was confirmed by trypsin-chymotrypsin digestion, resulting in the Y* fragment S119–T160 [31], and by the reduced oligomerization capacity of the double mutants L135A/L142A and D139K/E140K [58]. Cross-linking [30] and sedimentation experiments [31] indicated a stoichiometry of four protomers in the oligomerization domain. Electron micrographs of negatively stained P preparations revealed objects with an elongated shape [31]. The high stability of the oligomeric state of P was assessed by denaturation experiments, while the helical content of the oligomerization domain was established by far UV circular dichroism [63].
Sequence alignment indicates that the RSV P region R134–I178 (R175–I219 in hMPV P), comprising the oligomerization domain POD, has the highest conservation among the Pneumoviridae P proteins (Figure 2). High-resolution structural information obtained from the first X-ray crystallography structure of the hMPV oligomerization domain [20] was therefore expected to be transposable to RSV P with high confidence. This hMPV P structure confirmed the tetrameric stoichiometry and revealed the quaternary arrangement of a rather small region (residues S171–N194, equivalent to N130–V153 in RSV P) into a parallel helical coiled-coil. Two other crystal structures of hMPV POD displayed a similar arrangement, but revealed relative flexibility as well as fraying at the C-terminal end of the coiled-coil helices [66], suggesting that it may be subject to structural variations. Interestingly, the crystals yielding the hMPV POD structure were obtained from the hMPV P construct S158–E237, containing large N- and C-terminal regions flanking POD, which probably underwent proteolysis, confirming the intrinsic disorder outside of POD.

4.2. Relative Disorder in the N- and C-terminal Regions of RSV/hMPV Phosphoproteins

Although intrinsically disordered proteins and large intrinsically disordered regions do not adopt a defined secondary or tertiary structure [67], they nonetheless display complexity in the form of structural and temporal heterogeneity [1,2]. Pneumoviridae P proteins provide good illustrations for these properties. Different biophysical approaches, performed in solution and combined with a fragment approach, where several P constructs devoid of N- or C-terminal regions or POD were used, gave insight into the differential dynamics and secondary structure propensities of the RSV and hMPV P proteins.
The overall secondary structure propensity and compactness of RSV P was assessed by circular dichroism and size exclusion chromatography, and pointed to a modular behavior of P [63,64]. The oligomerization domain was singled out as a stably folded α-helical domain. However, thermal and chemical denaturation assays conducted on RSV P and several complementary P deletion constructs also indicated α-helical propensity outside of the oligomerization domain, in more loosely packed regions [63,64]. Whereas the PNT region was found to be fully disordered, PCT displayed α-helical propensity in the S161–R197 region, located C-terminally to POD (Figure 2). The secondary structure propensity of this C-terminal module could be modulated, e.g., by changing the pH, with a gain in α-helicity correlated with increased compaction. These results were interpreted in terms of folding into a pre-molten globule, displaying a reversible order to disorder transition in the 5–37 °C range, with low but still significant cooperativity [64].
The conformational distribution of hMPV P in solution was investigated by small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and molecular dynamics, also by adopting a fragment approach [20,66]. Structural ensembles, selected by adjusting the SAXS curves, contained α-helices C-terminally to the oligomerization domain. In contrast to the coiled-coil oligomerization domain, they displayed inter-protomer mobility and structural lability [20,66]. In some structural models, they packed against the oligomerization domain, resulting in the compaction of P. However, these interactions appeared to be rather weak, according to chemical denaturation experiments followed by SAXS. Helical propensity was also predicted at the N-terminus of hMPV P, in the G13–R28 stretch (equivalent to G10–K25 in RSV P) of a fragment encompassing the first 60 residues [66]. This stretch coincides with the hMPV N0 binding site [60], which displays high sequence conservation among Pneumoviridae P proteins (Figure 2). Finally, α-helical propensity was predicted for a second region in hMPV P, E253–V262 (equivalent to P218–L227 in RSVP) [66], which is part of the hRSV L binding site [36].

4.3. Characterization of Disorder at the Residue-Level of RSV Phosphoprotein

Whereas SAXS proved to be a powerful tool to investigate the overall conformational space and spatial extension of hMPV P, as well as its intrinsically disordered regions in solution, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) gave detailed structural and dynamic insight at an atomic scale for the RSV P protein. Different experiments were performed on the RSV P to probe its secondary structure propensity, local flexibility and spatial proximity between the protein regions, at the single residue level [68]. Most of these experiments rely on the acquisition of 2D 1H-15N heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) spectra, which display correlation peaks for the amide 1H-15N pairs, as shown in Figure 3. Sharp signals with low chemical shift dispersion in the 1H dimension were observed, indicating a large proportion of intrinsically disordered regions for RSV P. However, neither the oligomerization domain nor the proximal C-terminal α-helical module identified in [64] could be observed in the 1H–15N HSQC spectra, due to unfavorable dynamics.
Finer analysis was done by investigating the per residue secondary structure propensity (SSP) of RSV P by NMR, based on backbone chemical shifts, also by adopting a fragment approach [68]. Removal of the oligomerization domain in the PΔOD construct restored the signal in the C-terminal α-helical module, without significantly affecting the other signals ([68], Figure 3). SSP predictions, made with different algorithms, provided qualitatively similar SSPs, but differed in quantification (Figure 4). A transient helix, with a maximal propensity of 10–20 %, was detected for RSV PNT residues ~D12–I24 [68] (Figure 4). α-helical propensity of the same order (~20%) was also reported in the PNT of hMPV P, residues M1–K60, by fitting SAXS data with an ensemble of structural models [66]. In RSV PΔOD and other P fragments devoid of the oligomerization domain, the region T160–T210 displayed a rather high α-helical propensity, with two adjacent transient helices (Figure 4). The SSP profiles also suggested that several regions might contain short strands as well as additional extremely transient α-helices. Dihedral angle ranges were derived from backbone chemical shifts for the P regions with a high secondary structure propensity and were used as constraints to build the structural models shown in Figure 4.
15N spin relaxation [72,73,74] was used to get deeper insight into the protein backbone dynamics. The relaxation parameters, such as longitudinal (R1) and transverse (R2) 15N spin relaxation rates, as well as the amide 1H–15N steady state nuclear Overhauser effects (NOE) were measured for different deletion constructs of P [68] and for full-length P (Figure 5). These parameters were not homogeneous along the amino acid sequence of P. The 1H–15N NOE values were all below 0.5, suggesting that internal motions took place at the ps-ns timescale. This is in line with the overall disordered state of RSV P outside of the oligomerization domain. Regions with α-helical propensity displayed the highest 1H–15N NOE values, suggesting that these regions were less flexible. The concomitant increase of R2 and decrease of R1 in the α-helical C-terminal module in PΔOD indicated slower tumbling, and confirmed the high secondary structure propensity of this region. Increased R2 values in several regions of the PNT domain pointed to rapid conformational exchange, on the µs-ms timescale, between a disordered state and a minor α-helical state. Interestingly, the 15N spin relaxation revealed regions that underwent conformational exchange within the PNT domain, for which the α-helical SSP could not unambiguously be determined, e.g., the binding site for RSV M2-1 [52] (Figure 2, Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Finally, incorporation of nitroxide spin labels at given positions [75] was used to probe transient long-range contacts within a 15 Å distance in full-length RSV P by paramagnetic relaxation enhancement experiments [68]. This type of experiment showed that the oligomerization domain as well as all short-lived secondary structure elements transiently associated with each other, at the hydrophobic surface patches exhibited in the stabilized α-helices. This network of transient interactions would explain the overall compaction observed for P in the absence of stably folded domains [64].

4.4. Disorder Correlates with Fuzzy Binding of the Phosphoprotein to the Nucleoprotein

The interaction between P and N is fundamental for viral replication in Mononegavirales as it drives recognition of the RNP by the RNA polymerase. The primary binding region for N in RSV P was mapped to a 9-residue-long C-terminal tail, which is in a fully disordered state when P is unbound [38,39] (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The core of the Mononegavirales and Pneumoviridae N proteins is formed of two N- and C-terminal domains, NNTD and NCTD, held together by a hinge, where the genomic RNA is tightly bound [11,24]. The NNTD domain alone does not bind RNA and can be produced as a monomeric, RNA-free recombinant protein. However, it retains the ability to bind the C-terminus of P and can be used as a model to investigate the N-RNA- or RNP-binding mode [76]. A 30 µM in vitro binding constant was measured for a complex between PCT and NNTD by surface plasmon resonance [76]. This value is compatible with the requirement for polymerase processivity.
Structural determinants for N–P binding were obtained by X-ray crystal structures of the NNTD co-crystallized with phenylalanine and a series of peptides containing the C-terminal of P, of 2 up to 13 residues [76]. The C-terminal aromatic P F241 residue was consistently found inserted in a hydrophobic pocket at the surface of NNTD, providing the anchor point of P. For short P peptides, the D240 residue could also be observed, but all other residues appeared to be highly disordered. This raised the question if only residues binding to a defined and ordered site were sufficient to account for the whole binding process.
An answer was provided by NMR. Chemical shift perturbations induced by P peptides were observed in 1H–15N HSQC spectra of the 15N-labeled NNTD for residues that were inside but also outside the P binding pocket [76]. When using the 15N-labeled PCTD fragment, spectral perturbations were observed for the last 10 C-terminal residues in the presence of NNTD [68]. Altogether these results suggested that P binding to N was not restricted to the D240 and F241 residues. This was corroborated by affinity measurements conducted with NMR titration experiments. They indicated that the binding strength of the P peptides increased with their length: the dissociation constants were ~5 mM for the D240–F241 dipeptide, and 25–50 µM for a 12-amino-acid-long P peptide and for PCTD, respectively [68,76]. These findings suggested that affinity is driven by additional interactions, mediated by the full C-terminal tail of P. This contains many negatively charged residues that bind in a fuzzy fashion to the positively charged surface of N outside of the F241-binding pocket [77,78].
A proof of concept for the druggability of this interaction was given with a small molecule that competed with P for binding and displayed some antiviral activity with a recombinant RSV virus [76]. The scaffold of this molecule was based on an aromatic moiety and a carboxylate mimicking the F241 and D240 side chains. Interestingly, none of the two C-terminal residues are conserved between the RSV and MPV viruses (Figure 2). The C-terminal tails are highly acidic for both proteins, but have very different lengths, with 9 and 26 amino acids for RSV and MPV P, respectively, indicating that even fuzzy binding modes are specific for each virus type.

5. Folding Upon Binding in the Intrinsically Disordered Domains of Pneumoviridae Phosphoprotein

5.1. The Disordered N-Terminus of P Folds in the N0–P Complex

In addition to the N–P binding mode described above, a second N0–P binding mode corresponds to the chaperone activity of P. The N0–P complex was investigated for both RSV and hMPV [60,79]. This complex is tighter than the labile NNTD–PCT complex. A 5 µM affinity was measured by surface plasmon resonance between RSV PNT and a monomeric N K170A/R185A mutant, impaired for RNA binding [79]. For RSV, the N0-binding region was mapped to residues M1–T29 by mutational analysis and validated with a minigenome [79].
A simplified RSV N0–P complex was reconstituted using an N-terminally truncated form of N, impaired for oligomerization, and an N-terminal P peptide of 40 residues, but could not be crystallized [80]. A similar complex was obtained for the hMPV N0–P complex, by using a trypsin-treated fusion protein comprising a 40-residue N-terminal P peptide and full-length hMPV N. The structure of the latter was solved by X-ray crystallography, giving high resolution insight into this binding mode [60]. The first 28 residues were well resolved, and residues G13–L27 (equivalent to G10-I24I in RSV P) formed an α-helix (Figure 6). The latter region displays a high degree of sequence conservation (Figure 2), which suggests that the transient helix observed in free RSV P can be stabilized upon complex formation (Figure 4). This was further corroborated by binding assays of the RSV N-terminal P peptides, spanning residues E11–S30 and constrained into an α-helical conformation by stapling to the monomeric N. These stapled peptides competed with the equivalent wild-type peptide and furthermore exhibited antiviral activity on recombinant RSV viruses in vitro and in vivo [81].

5.2. Pneumoviridae P Protomers Each Adopt a Unique Fold in the L–P Complex

Before high-resolution structural information became available for the L–P complex, two regions of P were reported to be the RSV L binding sites. A first region was mapped to residues Y121–T160, i.e., approximately to POD, by using deletion mutants in co-immunoprecipitation assays [37]. When RSV L was produced as a recombinant protein, a second region in PCT, encompassing residues D216–N234, was determined [36]. According to NMR data on RSV P, this region did not display any α-helical propensity.
Very recently a major breakthrough was achieved with the cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of hRSV and hMPV RNA polymerases in the elongation mode, featuring the complex between the L and P proteins [32,33,34]. These structures showed that P engaged to L via POD and nearly the full PCT (Figure 6), confirming the previously determined regions [37]. Although the complexes were produced with full-length P, the density for PNT was missing, showing that PNT was not directly involved in L-binding [32,33,34]. Moreover, these structures confirmed that the oligomerization domain of P was organized in a parallel coiled-coil helix bundle, with a core spanning residues N131–T151 in RSV P. Interestingly, three protomers displayed an extension of the oligomerization domain α-helices by six residues, whereas one is prolonged by a β-strand. In free P, this heterogeneity is manifested by fraying at the C-terminus of these helices. The most striking aspect of these complexes is that each P protomer in PCT adopts a distinct conformation, consisting of helices of different boundaries and lengths. It is the same in the two RSV L–P complexes and very similar for hMPV L–P (detailed in Figure 2). This highlights the plasticity of Pneumoviridae PCT, required in this type of complex. The high helical propensity observed by NMR for free RSV P in the R173–K205 region shows that the α-helical structures in PCT are already sampled in the free form. They are stabilized, each in a specific way, by binding to L. Only the small most C-terminal α-helix L216–S232 in RSV P (equivalent to L251–T2267 in hMPV), observed for one protomer in the L–P complex, had not been detected in free P, suggesting that it folded upon binding to L. Interestingly, the only part of PCT that does not engage with L are the 9 C-terminal residues forming the N-RNA binding site, suggesting that the N- and L-binding sites are proximal, but do not overlap. However, they are well positioned to bring the RNP template into close proximity to the polymerase, illustrating how P acts as an adaptor protein within the Pneumoviridae replication complex. The striking difference in size between the binding sites for the two partner proteins (up to 90 residues per protomer for L versus 9 residues for N) reflects the difference in binding strength, where P stays bound to L while it switches from one N protein to the next along the RNP template to allow elongation of the newly synthesized RNA molecule.

6. Pneumoviridae P Protein Serves as a Docking Platform for a Tertiary Complex Involved in Transcription Regulation

In line with the large intrinsic disorder in Pneumoviridae P proteins, several binding sites for partner proteins are localized to short linear motifs (SLiMs), which are short stretches in the protein sequences (Figure 2). Transient structures and weak binding are characteristic of these elements [67]. In eukaryotes, SLiMs are involved in cellular signaling [67,82,83]. Some viruses mimic eukaryotic SLiMs to interfere with the host immune response [82]. Viral SLiMs may also serve as recognition motifs between viral proteins. In RSV and hMPV P protein, the N0-binding region can be considered as an α-helix SLiM. Another SLiM was identified N-terminally to RSV POD, as a binding site for transcription cofactor M2-1.

6.1. A Disordered Short Linear Motif in PNT Folds Into an α-Helix in the RSV M2-1–P Complex

RSV M2-1 was early described as an RNA-binding protein [84,85]. It is a well-folded protein organized as a tetramer. Its 3D structure was solved for hRSV [86]. That of hMPV M2-1 was solved in complex with RNA [87]. Moreover, RSV M2-1 was shown to bind to P, in competition with RNA, on adjacent sites. The interaction between P and M2-1 is essential for RSV transcription [51,88,89], as P recruits M2-1 to the viral IBs [50,51]. An 8 nM affinity was measured by fluorescence anisotropy for full-length proteins [63]. When using a truncated form of M2-1, containing only the central domain of M2-1, a weaker binding of 3 µM was measured by isothermal titration calorimetry [51].
The binding domain for RSV M2-1 on P was mapped to the D100-Y120 region, just upstream of the oligomerization domain [88]. A P fragment encompassing residues P93–T110 was shown to be the smallest fragment able to bind to M2-1 [52]. The binding site was finely adjusted to a SLiM, residues F98–F109, which corresponds to an extremely transient α-helix in the free form [52] (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Three hydrophobic or aromatic P residues (L101, Y102 and F109), conserved in the Orthopneumovirus genus, were reported to be required for RSV M2-1 binding and in vitro transcription [88]. Information obtained by mutagenesis and NMR was used to model the RSV M2-1–P complex by docking the F98–F109 SLiM in α-helical conformation onto M2-1 [52]. This model was subsequently confirmed by structure resolution of this complex by X-ray crystallography [90] (Figure 7).
In the case of hMPV, there are no data for the M2-1–P complex. Although the M2-1 binding region displays some sequence conservation between the Orthopneumovirus and Metapneumovirus P proteins (Figure 2), only one critical residue (L101) is conserved. Moreover, hMPV M2-1 is not essential for the processivity of transcription, in contrast to RSV [49]. This suggests that the M2-1–P complex is specific to each genus in the Pneumoviridae family, possibly with distinct binding sites. The hMPV P protein should be amenable to NMR studies in the same way as hRSV P. This would provide residue-specific interaction information and allow a more precise structural comparison between these two proteins.

6.2. A Short Linear Motif in RSV PNT Binds to the PP1 Phosphatase That Dephosphorylates M2-1

The bulk phosphorylation of M2-1 or P does not play a major role in the RSV M2-1–P interaction [52,88]. Although M2-1 is mainly unphosphorylated in RSV-infected cells [84], it needs nevertheless to be phosphorylated for efficient transcription [85]. For hMPV, M2-1 phosphorylation upregulates viral replication [92]. The phosphorylation state of RSV M2-1 determines its localization and mRNA-binding properties. Unphosphorylated M2-1 concentrates in the dynamic sub-compartments of viral IBs, where viral mRNA is produced and accumulates [43,52]. Dephosphorylation of M2-1 is achieved by the cellular phosphatase PP1, which is co-localized with M2-1 in RSV IBs [52]. Importantly, M2-1 and PP1 do not interact directly, but PP1 binds to P via an RVxF-like consensus motif present in the P protein [52].
RVxF PP1-binding motifs are found in intrinsically disordered regions of PP1-binding proteins [93]. In Pneumoviridae P proteins, such a motif is located in PNT, N-terminally to the M2-1-binding motif. The K82–F87 (K123–F127 in hMPV) stretch is very well conserved throughout the Pneumoviridae members (Figure 2). It is a good illustration for a viral mimetic of a eukaryotic SLiM. A homology model built for the PP1–P complex, using the X-ray crystallographic structure of a complex between the catalytic unit of PP1 and the RVxF motif of another PP1-binding protein, Gadd34, gives insight into the binding mode. The RVxF-like motif in RSV P is expected to adopt an extended structure, which is already sampled in the free form, as seen from the secondary structure propensities (Figure 4), and laterally docks onto a β-sheet in PP1 (Figure 7). Hence, P offers a platform onto which both proteins, M2-1 and PP1, can bind in close spatial proximity for M2-1 to be dephosphorylated by PP1. The PP1- and M2-1-binding motifs are nearly contiguous in the sequence of P and on the same domain, PNT. However, due to steric hindrance, binding of the two proteins probably occurs on two different protomers. This again underlines the essential role of the quaternary organization of the P protein that offers a structurally more complex environment than afforded by a single domain. Moreover, the proximity of the stably folded oligomerization may counterbalance the effect of the intrinsic disorder, which may be unfavorable to the formation of a ternary complex, by restricting the space that can be explored by the two SLiMs once they are bound to their respective bulky partner proteins.

7. Conclusions and Perspectives

Pneumoviridae P proteins are examples of atypical multidomain proteins. Due to disorder, structure determination of Pneumoviridae P has proven a complex endeavor. However, by adding pieces together, from isolated protein and from two-by-two protein complexes, a picture of the structure–function relationship in these proteins started to emerge, providing a structural basis to unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying the replication of pneumoviruses. Pneumoviridae P proteins act as the central architectural piece of the viral holo polymerase complex, where the polymerase is associated to its ribonucleoprotein template. They perform a structural role by providing a scaffold for several multi-protein complexes, reviewed herein. Their role as docking platforms arises from their organization into three domains, with a central folded oligomerization domain and two flanking regions. These are neither compact nor rigid, but still form distinct intrinsically disordered domains, PNT and PCT.
It is remarkable that the only domain with a stable structure, POD, arises from quaternary organization, i.e., from the tetramerization of a small region. On the other hand, disorder of PNT and PCT provides the necessary structural adaptability and several binding sites of different sizes. Notably, the two flanking domains, PNT and PCT, have their own specificities. Whereas PNT displays a large degree of disorder, PCT displays higher order, even in the absence of binding partners. This suggests that these two domains are not equivalent in terms of the binding potential. PNT contains several short linear binding sites. In the cases of M2-1 and RNA-N, the small size of the binding sites correlates with the weak affinity of the complexes formed with P, as each protein needs to dissociate from P to form new interactions, in a cyclic manner. In contrast, PCT is nearly completely engaged in the L–P complex, which needs to be stable for a functional polymerase.
Interactome analysis has revealed that RSV P also recruits cellular factors to the polymerase complex, such as the Hsp70 chaperone, or associates with tropomyosin [94,95]. Binding regions for these proteins have not been specified yet, but could coincide with the previously identified potential binding regions of P. Other interaction sites might be detected by NMR interaction experiments that reveal changes in the dynamics of the disordered regions induced by binding. This has been done before for RSV P protein [68], but also for measles virus P protein, where ultraweak interactions, yet essential for viral replication, were characterized [96].
In conclusion, Pneumoviridae phosphoproteins illustrate the structural and dynamic versatility of multidomain proteins with large intrinsically disordered domains. These can be grasped by a multi-scale strategy, ranging from the molecular to atomic scale, which may be transposed to other proteins with similar structural organization and features. Regarding spectroscopic techniques, NMR and SAXS proved to be precious tools to grasp the dynamic properties of isolated protein. X-ray crystallography and cryogenic electron microscopy confirmed the stabilization of the transient structures by complex formation with protein partners. In the case of Pneumoviridae P proteins, it was essential to be able to work with protein fragments, which was facilitated by the disordered nature of the PNT and PCT domains.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S.; methodology, C.S.; formal analysis, C.C., C.-M.C., N.P. and C.S.; investigation, C.C., C.-M.C., N.P. and C.S.; data curation, C.C., C.-M.C., N.P. and C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.C. and C.S.; writing—review and editing, C.S.; visualization, C.C., C.-M.C., N.P. and C.S.; supervision, C.S.; funding acquisition, C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Agence Nationale de la Recherche grant ANR-13-ISV3-0007 and LabEx LERMIT Emergence 2018 grant PepRSV. Doctoral fellowships from Région Ile-de-France DIM Malinf (C.C.), Université Paris Saclay (C.-M.C.) and Fondation de l'Académie des Sciences pour le Développement de la Chimie des Substances Naturelles (N.P.) are kindly acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors kindly acknowledge Monika Bajorek, Charles-Adrien Richard, Jean-François Eléouët and Marie Galloux, INRAE Jouy-en-Josas, for a stimulating collaboration and fruitful discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

IBInclusion body
LLarge subunit of polymerase
hMPVHuman Metapneumovirus
HSQCHeteronuclear Single Quantum Correlation
NNucleoprotein
NMRNuclear magnetic resonance
NOENuclear Overhauser Effect
PP protein, phosphoprotein
PCTP protein C-terminal domain
PNTP protein N-terminal domain
PODP protein oligomerization domain
RNPRibonucleoprotein complex
hRSVHuman Respiratory syncytial virus
SAXSSmall angle X-ray scattering
SLiMShort linear motif
SSPSecondary Structure Propensity

References

  1. Uversky, V.N. Unusual biophysics of intrinsically disordered proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1834, 932–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Uversky, V.N.; Santambrogio, C.; Brocca, S.; Grandori, R. Length-dependent compaction of intrinsically disordered proteins. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Amarasinghe, G.K.; Ayllon, M.A.; Bao, Y.; Basler, C.F.; Bavari, S.; Blasdell, K.R.; Briese, T.; Brown, P.A.; Bukreyev, A.; Balkema-Buschmann, A.; et al. Taxonomy of the order Mononegavirales: Update 2019. Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 1967–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Collins, P.L.; Karron, R.A. Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Metapneumovirus. In Fields Virology, 6th ed.; Knipe, D.M., Howley, P.M., Eds.; Lippinscot Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2013; pp. 1086–1123. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shi, T.; McAllister, D.A.; O’Brien, K.L.; Simoes, E.A.F.; Madhi, S.A.; Gessner, B.D.; Polack, F.P.; Balsells, E.; Acacio, S.; Aguayo, C.; et al. Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children in 2015: A systematic review and modelling study. Lancet 2017, 390, 946–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Coultas, J.A.; Smyth, R.; Openshaw, P.J. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV): A scourge from infancy to old age. Thorax 2019, 74, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sacco, R.E.; McGill, J.L.; Pillatzki, A.E.; Palmer, M.V.; Ackermann, M.R. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in cattle. Vet. Pathol. 2014, 51, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Caracciolo, S.; Minini, C.; Colombrita, D.; Rossi, D.; Miglietti, N.; Vettore, E.; Caruso, A.; Fiorentini, S. Human metapneumovirus infection in young children hospitalized with acute respiratory tract disease: Virologic and clinical features. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2008, 27, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Edwards, K.M.; Zhu, Y.; Griffin, M.R.; Weinberg, G.A.; Hall, C.B.; Szilagyi, P.G.; Staat, M.A.; Iwane, M.; Prill, M.M.; Williams, J.V. Burden of human metapneumovirus infection in young children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ruigrok, R.W.; Crepin, T.; Kolakofsky, D. Nucleoproteins and nucleocapsids of negative-strand RNA viruses. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2011, 14, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jamin, M.; Yabukarski, F. Nonsegmented Negative-Sense RNA Viruses-Structural Data Bring New Insights Into Nucleocapsid Assembly. Adv. Virus Res. 2017, 97, 143–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morin, B.; Kranzusch, P.J.; Rahmeh, A.A.; Whelan, S.P. The polymerase of negative-stranded RNA viruses. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2013, 3, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Collins, P.L.; Melero, J.A. Progress in understanding and controlling respiratory syncytial virus: Still crazy after all these years. Virus Res. 2011, 162, 80–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Fearns, R.; Plemper, R.K. Polymerases of paramyxoviruses and pneumoviruses. Virus Res. 2017, 234, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Liang, B. Structures of the Mononegavirales Polymerases. J. Virol. 2020, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cox, R.; Pickar, A.; Qiu, S.; Tsao, J.; Rodenburg, C.; Dokland, T.; Elson, A.; He, B.; Luo, M. Structural studies on the authentic mumps virus nucleocapsid showing uncoiling by the phosphoprotein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 15208–15213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ding, H.; Green, T.J.; Lu, S.; Luo, M. Crystal structure of the oligomerization domain of the phosphoprotein of vesicular stomatitis virus. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 2808–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Ivanov, I.; Crepin, T.; Jamin, M.; Ruigrok, R.W. Structure of the dimerization domain of the rabies virus phosphoprotein. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 3707–3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Communie, G.; Crepin, T.; Maurin, D.; Jensen, M.R.; Blackledge, M.; Ruigrok, R.W. Structure of the tetramerization domain of measles virus phosphoprotein. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 7166–7169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Leyrat, C.; Renner, M.; Harlos, K.; Grimes, J.M. Solution and crystallographic structures of the central region of the phosphoprotein from human metapneumovirus. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bruhn, J.F.; Kirchdoerfer, R.N.; Urata, S.M.; Li, S.; Tickle, I.J.; Bricogne, G.; Saphire, E.O. Crystal Structure of the Marburg Virus VP35 Oligomerization Domain. J. Virol. 2017, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zinzula, L.; Nagy, I.; Orsini, M.; Weyher-Stingl, E.; Bracher, A.; Baumeister, W. Structures of Ebola and Reston Virus VP35 Oligomerization Domains and Comparative Biophysical Characterization in All Ebolavirus Species. Structure 2019, 27, 39–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Karlin, D.; Belshaw, R. Detecting Remote Sequence Homology in Disordered Proteins: Discovery of Conserved Motifs in the N-Termini of Mononegavirales phosphoproteins. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Longhi, S. Structural disorder within paramyxoviral nucleoproteins. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 2649–2659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Whelan, J.N.; Reddy, K.D.; Uversky, V.N.; Teng, M.N. Functional correlations of respiratory syncytial virus proteins to intrinsic disorder. Mol. Biosyst. 2016, 12, 1507–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Habchi, J.; Longhi, S. Structural Disorder within Paramyxoviral Nucleoproteins and Phosphoproteins in Their Free and Bound Forms: From Predictions to Experimental Assessment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 15688–15726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mavrakis, M.; McCarthy, A.A.; Roche, S.; Blondel, D.; Ruigrok, R.W. Structure and function of the C-terminal domain of the polymerase cofactor of rabies virus. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 343, 819–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ivanov, I.; Yabukarski, F.; Ruigrok, R.W.; Jamin, M. Structural insights into the rhabdovirus transcription/replication complex. Virus Res. 2011, 162, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Leung, D.W.; Ginder, N.D.; Fulton, D.B.; Nix, J.; Basler, C.F.; Honzatko, R.B.; Amarasinghe, G.K. Structure of the Ebola VP35 interferon inhibitory domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 411–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Castagne, N.; Barbier, A.; Bernard, J.; Rezaei, H.; Huet, J.C.; Henry, C.; Da Costa, B.; Eleouet, J.F. Biochemical characterization of the respiratory syncytial virus P-P and P-N protein complexes and localization of the P protein oligomerization domain. J. Gen. Virol. 2004, 85, 1643–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Llorente, M.T.; Taylor, I.A.; Lopez-Vinas, E.; Gomez-Puertas, P.; Calder, L.J.; Garcia-Barreno, B.; Melero, J.A. Structural properties of the human respiratory syncytial virus P protein: Evidence for an elongated homotetrameric molecule that is the smallest orthologue within the family of paramyxovirus polymerase cofactors. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2008, 72, 946–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gilman, M.S.A.; Liu, C.; Fung, A.; Behera, I.; Jordan, P.; Rigaux, P.; Ysebaert, N.; Tcherniuk, S.; Sourimant, J.; Eleouet, J.F.; et al. Structure of the Respiratory Syncytial Virus Polymerase Complex. Cell 2019, 179, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Cao, D.; Gao, Y.; Roesler, C.; Rice, S.; D’Cunha, P.; Zhuang, L.; Slack, J.; Domke, M.; Antonova, A.; Romanelli, S.; et al. Cryo-EM structure of the respiratory syncytial virus RNA polymerase. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Pan, J.; Qian, X.; Lattmann, S.; El Sahili, A.; Yeo, T.H.; Jia, H.; Cressey, T.; Ludeke, B.; Noton, S.; Kalocsay, M.; et al. Structure of the human metapneumovirus polymerase phosphoprotein complex. Nature 2020, 577, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gouet, P.; Robert, X.; Courcelle, E. ESPript/ENDscript: Extracting and rendering sequence and 3D information from atomic structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3320–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sourimant, J.; Rameix-Welti, M.A.; Gaillard, A.L.; Chevret, D.; Galloux, M.; Gault, E.; Eleouet, J.F. Fine mapping and characterization of the L-polymerase-binding domain of the respiratory syncytial virus phosphoprotein. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 4421–4433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Khattar, S.K.; Yunus, A.S.; Samal, S.K. Mapping the domains on the phosphoprotein of bovine respiratory syncytial virus required for N-P and P-L interactions using a minigenome system. J. Gen. Virol. 2001, 82, 775–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Galloux, M.; Tarus, B.; Blazevic, I.; Fix, J.; Duquerroy, S.; Eleouet, J.F. Characterization of a viral phosphoprotein binding site on the surface of the respiratory syncytial nucleoprotein. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 8375–8387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Tran, T.L.; Castagne, N.; Bhella, D.; Varela, P.F.; Bernard, J.; Chilmonczyk, S.; Berkenkamp, S.; Benhamo, V.; Grznarova, K.; Grosclaude, J.; et al. The nine C-terminal amino acids of the respiratory syncytial virus protein P are necessary and sufficient for binding to ribonucleoprotein complexes in which six ribonucleotides are contacted per N protein protomer. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bakker, S.E.; Duquerroy, S.; Galloux, M.; Loney, C.; Conner, E.; Eleouet, J.F.; Rey, F.A.; Bhella, D. The respiratory syncytial virus nucleoprotein-RNA complex forms a left-handed helical nucleocapsid. J. Gen. Virol. 2013, 94, 1734–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Galloux, M.; Risso-Ballester, J.; Richard, C.A.; Fix, J.; Rameix-Welti, M.A.; Eleouet, J.F. Minimal Elements Required for the Formation of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Cytoplasmic Inclusion Bodies In Vivo and In Vitro. MBio 2020, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Garcia-Barreno, B.; Delgado, T.; Melero, J.A. Identification of protein regions involved in the interaction of human respiratory syncytial virus phosphoprotein and nucleoprotein: Significance for nucleocapsid assembly and formation of cytoplasmic inclusions. J. Virol. 1996, 70, 801–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Rincheval, V.; Lelek, M.; Gault, E.; Bouillier, C.; Sitterlin, D.; Blouquit-Laye, S.; Galloux, M.; Zimmer, C.; Eleouet, J.F.; Rameix-Welti, M.A. Functional organization of cytoplasmic inclusion bodies in cells infected by respiratory syncytial virus. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Cifuentes-Munoz, N.; Ellis Dutch, R. To assemble or not to assemble: The changing rules of pneumovirus transmission. Virus Res. 2019, 265, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Derdowski, A.; Peters, T.R.; Glover, N.; Qian, R.; Utley, T.J.; Burnett, A.; Williams, J.V.; Spearman, P.; Crowe, J.E. Human metapneumovirus nucleoprotein and phosphoprotein interact and provide the minimal requirements for inclusion body formation. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 2698–2708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hardy, R.W.; Wertz, G.W. The product of the respiratory syncytial virus M2 gene ORF1 enhances readthrough of intergenic junctions during viral transcription. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Collins, P.L.; Hill, M.G.; Cristina, J.; Grosfeld, H. Transcription elongation factor of respiratory syncytial virus, a nonsegmented negative-strand RNA virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Cowton, V.M.; McGivern, D.R.; Fearns, R. Unravelling the complexities of respiratory syncytial virus RNA synthesis. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 1805–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Buchholz, U.J.; Biacchesi, S.; Pham, Q.N.; Tran, K.C.; Yang, L.; Luongo, C.L.; Skiadopoulos, M.H.; Murphy, B.R.; Collins, P.L. Deletion of M2 gene open reading frames 1 and 2 of human metapneumovirus: Effects on RNA synthesis, attenuation, and immunogenicity. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 6588–6597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Garcia, J.; Garcia-Barreno, B.; Vivo, A.; Melero, J.A. Cytoplasmic inclusions of respiratory syncytial virus-infected cells: Formation of inclusion bodies in transfected cells that coexpress the nucleoprotein, the phosphoprotein, and the 22K protein. Virology 1993, 195, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Blondot, M.L.; Dubosclard, V.; Fix, J.; Lassoued, S.; Aumont-Nicaise, M.; Bontems, F.; Eleouet, J.F.; Sizun, C. Structure and Functional Analysis of the RNA and Viral Phosphoprotein Binding Domain of Respiratory Syncytial Virus M2-1 Protein. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Richard, C.A.; Rincheval, V.; Lassoued, S.; Fix, J.; Cardone, C.; Esneau, C.; Nekhai, S.; Galloux, M.; Rameix-Welti, M.A.; Sizun, C.; et al. RSV hijacks cellular protein phosphatase 1 to regulate M2-1 phosphorylation and viral transcription. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1006920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Navarro, J.; Lopez-Otin, C.; Villanueva, N. Location of phosphorylated residues in human respiratory syncytial virus phosphoprotein. J. Gen. Virol. 1991, 72 Pt 6, 1455–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Asenjo, A.; Rodriguez, L.; Villanueva, N. Determination of phosphorylated residues from human respiratory syncytial virus P protein that are dynamically dephosphorylated by cellular phosphatases: A possible role for serine 54. J. Gen. Virol. 2005, 86, 1109–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lu, B.; Ma, C.H.; Brazas, R.; Jin, H. The major phosphorylation sites of the respiratory syncytial virus phosphoprotein are dispensable for virus replication in vitro. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 10776–10784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Mazumder, B.; Barik, S. Requirement of casein kinase II-mediated phosphorylation for the transcriptional activity of human respiratory syncytial viral phosphoprotein P: Transdominant negative phenotype of phosphorylation-defective P mutants. Virology 1994, 205, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Villanueva, N.; Hardy, R.; Asenjo, A.; Yu, Q.; Wertz, G. The bulk of the phosphorylation of human respiratory syncytial virus phosphoprotein is not essential but modulates viral RNA transcription and replication. Microbiology 2000, 81, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Asenjo, A.; Mendieta, J.; Gomez-Puertas, P.; Villanueva, N. Residues in human respiratory syncytial virus P protein that are essential for its activity on RNA viral synthesis. Virus Res. 2008, 132, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Asenjo, A.; Calvo, E.; Villanueva, N. Phosphorylation of human respiratory syncytial virus P protein at threonine 108 controls its interaction with the M2-1 protein in the viral RNA polymerase complex. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 3637–3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Renner, M.; Bertinelli, M.; Leyrat, C.; Paesen, G.C.; de Oliveira, L.F.S.; Huiskonen, J.T.; Grimes, J.M. Nucleocapsid assembly in pneumoviruses is regulated by conformational switching of the N protein. Elife 2016, 5, e12627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tawar, R.G.; Duquerroy, S.; Vonrhein, C.; Varela, P.F.; Damier-Piolle, L.; Castagne, N.; MacLellan, K.; Bedouelle, H.; Bricogne, G.; Bhella, D.; et al. Crystal structure of a nucleocapsid-like nucleoprotein-RNA complex of respiratory syncytial virus. Science 2009, 326, 1279–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Simabuco, F.M.; Asara, J.M.; Guerrero, M.C.; Libermann, T.A.; Zerbini, L.F.; Ventura, A.M. Structural analysis of human respiratory syncytial virus P protein: Identification of intrinsically disordered domains. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2011, 42, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Esperante, S.A.; Paris, G.; de Prat-Gay, G. Modular unfolding and dissociation of the human respiratory syncytial virus phosphoprotein p and its interaction with the M2-1 antiterminator: A singular tetramer-tetramer interface arrangement. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 8100–8110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Noval, M.G.; Esperante, S.A.; Molina, I.G.; Chemes, L.B.; de Prat-Gay, G. Intrinsic disorder to order transitions in the scaffold phosphoprotein P from the respiratory syncytial virus RNA-polymerase complex. Biochemistry 2016, 55, 1441–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Llorente, M.T.; Garcia-Barreno, B.; Calero, M.; Camafeita, E.; Lopez, J.A.; Longhi, S.; Ferron, F.; Varela, P.F.; Melero, J.A. Structural analysis of the human respiratory syncytial virus phosphoprotein: Characterization of an alpha-helical domain involved in oligomerization. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Renner, M.; Paesen, G.C.; Grison, C.M.; Granier, S.; Grimes, J.M.; Leyrat, C. Structural dissection of human metapneumovirus phosphoprotein using small angle x-ray scattering. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 14865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Tompa, P. Intrinsically disordered proteins: A 10-year recap. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2012, 37, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pereira, N.; Cardone, C.; Lassoued, S.; Galloux, M.; Fix, J.; Assrir, N.; Lescop, E.; Bontems, F.; Eleouet, J.F.; Sizun, C. New Insights into Structural Disorder in Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Phosphoprotein and Implications for Binding of Protein Partners. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 2120–2131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Shen, Y.; Delaglio, F.; Cornilescu, G.; Bax, A. TALOS+: A hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts. J. Biomol. NMR 2009, 44, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Camilloni, C.; De Simone, A.; Vranken, W.F.; Vendruscolo, M. Determination of secondary structure populations in disordered states of proteins using nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 2224–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Guntert, P. Automated NMR Structure Calculation With CYANA. In Protein NMR Techniques; Downing, A.K., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2004; pp. 353–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kay, L.E.; Torchia, D.A.; Bax, A. Backbone dynamics of proteins as studied by 15N inverse detected heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy: Application to staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry 1989, 28, 8972–8979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Palmer, A.G., III. NMR probes of molecular dynamics: Overview and comparison with other techniques. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2001, 30, 129–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Fischer, M.W.F.; Majumdar, A.; Zuiderweg, E.R.P. Protein NMR relaxation: Theory, applications and outlook. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1998, 33, 207–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Clore, G.M.; Iwahara, J. Theory, practice, and applications of paramagnetic relaxation enhancement for the characterization of transient low-population states of biological macromolecules and their complexes. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4108–4139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Ouizougun-Oubari, M.; Pereira, N.; Tarus, B.; Galloux, M.; Lassoued, S.; Fix, J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Hoos, S.; Baron, B.; England, P.; et al. A Druggable Pocket at the Nucleocapsid/Phosphoprotein Interaction Site of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 11129–11143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Sharma, R.; Raduly, Z.; Miskei, M.; Fuxreiter, M. Fuzzy complexes: Specific binding without complete folding. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 2533–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Tompa, P.; Fuxreiter, M. Fuzzy complexes: Polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2008, 33, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Galloux, M.; Gabiane, G.; Sourimant, J.; Richard, C.A.; England, P.; Moudjou, M.; Aumont-Nicaise, M.; Fix, J.; Rameix-Welti, M.A.; Eleouet, J.F. Identification and characterization of the binding site of the respiratory syncytial virus phosphoprotein to RNA-free nucleoprotein. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 3484–3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Esneau, C.; Raynal, B.; Roblin, P.; Brule, S.; Richard, C.A.; Fix, J.; Eleouet, J.F.; Galloux, M. Biochemical characterization of the respiratory syncytial virus N0-P complex in solution. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 3647–3660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Galloux, M.; Gsponer, N.; Gaillard, V.; Fenner, B.; Larcher, T.; Vilotte, M.; Riviere, J.; Richard, C.A.; Eleouet, J.F.; Le Goffic, R.; et al. Targeting the Respiratory Syncytial Virus N0-P complex with constrained alpha-helical peptides in cells and in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Hraber, P.; O’Maille, P.E.; Silberfarb, A.; Davis-Anderson, K.; Generous, N.; McMahon, B.H.; Fair, J.M. Resources to Discover and Use Short Linear Motifs in Viral Proteins. Trends Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 113–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Van Roey, K.; Uyar, B.; Weatheritt, R.J.; Dinkel, H.; Seiler, M.; Budd, A.; Gibson, T.J.; Davey, N.E. Short linear motifs: Ubiquitous and functionally diverse protein interaction modules directing cell regulation. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 6733–6778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cuesta, I.; Geng, X.; Asenjo, A.; Villanueva, N. Structural phosphoprotein M2-1 of the human respiratory syncytial virus is an RNA binding protein. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 9858–9867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Cartee, T.L.; Wertz, G.W. Respiratory syncytial virus M2-1 protein requires phosphorylation for efficient function and binds viral RNA during infection. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 12188–12197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Tanner, S.J.; Ariza, A.; Richard, C.A.; Kyle, H.F.; Dods, R.L.; Blondot, M.L.; Wu, W.; Trincao, J.; Trinh, C.H.; Hiscox, J.A.; et al. Crystal structure of the essential transcription antiterminator M2-1 protein of human respiratory syncytial virus and implications of its phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 1580–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Leyrat, C.; Renner, M.; Harlos, K.; Huiskonen, J.T.; Grimes, J.M. Drastic changes in conformational dynamics of the antiterminator M2-1 regulate transcription efficiency in Pneumovirinae. Elife 2014, 3, e02674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Mason, S.W.; Aberg, E.; Lawetz, C.; DeLong, R.; Whitehead, P.; Liuzzi, M. Interaction between human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) M2-1 and P proteins is required for reconstitution of M2-1-dependent RSV minigenome activity. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 10670–10676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Tran, T.L.; Castagne, N.; Dubosclard, V.; Noinville, S.; Koch, E.; Moudjou, M.; Henry, C.; Bernard, J.; Yeo, R.P.; Eleouet, J.F. The respiratory syncytial virus M2-1 protein forms tetramers and interacts with RNA and P in a competitive manner. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 6363–6374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Selvaraj, M.; Yegambaram, K.; Todd, E.; Richard, C.A.; Dods, R.L.; Pangratiou, G.M.; Trinh, C.H.; Moul, S.L.; Murphy, J.C.; Mankouri, J.; et al. The Structure of the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus M2-1 Protein Bound to the Interaction Domain of the Phosphoprotein P Defines the Orientation of the Complex. MBio 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Marti-Renom, M.A.; Stuart, A.C.; Fiser, A.; Sanchez, R.; Melo, F.; Sali, A. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2000, 29, 291–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Cai, H.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, M.; Liang, X.; Jennings, R.; Niewiesk, S.; Li, J. Phosphorylation of Human Metapneumovirus M2-1 Protein Upregulates Viral Replication and Pathogenesis. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 7323–7338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Bollen, M.; Peti, W.; Ragusa, M.J.; Beullens, M. The extended PP1 toolkit: Designed to create specificity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Oliveira, A.P.; Simabuco, F.M.; Tamura, R.E.; Guerrero, M.C.; Ribeiro, P.G.; Libermann, T.A.; Zerbini, L.F.; Ventura, A.M. Human respiratory syncytial virus N, P and M protein interactions in HEK-293T cells. Virus Res. 2013, 177, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Munday, D.C.; Wu, W.; Smith, N.; Fix, J.; Noton, S.L.; Galloux, M.; Touzelet, O.; Armstrong, S.D.; Dawson, J.M.; Aljabr, W.; et al. Interactome analysis of the human respiratory syncytial virus RNA polymerase complex identifies protein chaperones as important cofactors that promote L-protein stability and RNA synthesis. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 917–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Milles, S.; Jensen, M.R.; Lazert, C.; Guseva, S.; Ivashchenko, S.; Communie, G.; Maurin, D.; Gerlier, D.; Ruigrok, R.W.H.; Blackledge, M. An ultraweak interaction in the intrinsically disordered replication machinery is essential for measles virus function. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat7778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 01537 g001 550
Figure 1. Overall architecture of the Mononegavirales phosphoproteins (P) and the structural diversity of the individual domains. On top is shown a scheme of the P protein, with the 3-fold repartition between the N- and C-terminal regions (PNT and PCT), comprising distinct binding sites for the nucleoprotein (N), either as monomeric N0 or as an N-RNA complex, separated by an oligomerization domain (POD). Representative structures are shown below, in cartoon, for POD (protomers are in different shades of blue) and the C-terminal N-RNA-binding domains (green), for viruses belonging to the Filoviridae, Paramyxoviridae, Pneumoviridae and Rhabdoviridae families. PDB codes are indicated next to the structure. Sub-families and genera are indicated in bold and regular font, respectively. Virus names are given in parentheses. N- and C-termini are indicated by N and C letters. For parallel oligomers, this indication is given only for the first protomer.
Figure 1. Overall architecture of the Mononegavirales phosphoproteins (P) and the structural diversity of the individual domains. On top is shown a scheme of the P protein, with the 3-fold repartition between the N- and C-terminal regions (PNT and PCT), comprising distinct binding sites for the nucleoprotein (N), either as monomeric N0 or as an N-RNA complex, separated by an oligomerization domain (POD). Representative structures are shown below, in cartoon, for POD (protomers are in different shades of blue) and the C-terminal N-RNA-binding domains (green), for viruses belonging to the Filoviridae, Paramyxoviridae, Pneumoviridae and Rhabdoviridae families. PDB codes are indicated next to the structure. Sub-families and genera are indicated in bold and regular font, respectively. Virus names are given in parentheses. N- and C-termini are indicated by N and C letters. For parallel oligomers, this indication is given only for the first protomer.
Ijms 22 01537 g001
Ijms 22 01537 g002 550
Figure 2. Sequence alignment of the Pneumoviridae phosphoproteins for the two genera Orthopneumovirus: human RSV strains A and B (hRSVA/hRSVB, Uniprot record numbers P03421/O42062), bovine RSV (bRSV, P33454), ovine RSV (oRSV, Q83956) and murine pneumonia virus (mPV, Q5MKM7); and Metapneumovirus: avian MPV (aMPV, Q2Y2M5) and human MPV (hMPV, Q8B9Q8). Sequence numbers are indicated for hRSVA on top and for hMPV at the bottom. Coloring was made according to sequence conservation with ESPript 3 [35]. Constitutively phosphorylated hRSV P serines are marked with bold stars. Other phosphorylatable Ser/Thr sites are marked with regular stars. Secondary structures, drawn for hRSVA and hMPV P, were taken from the X-ray crystal structures of hMPV POD (PDB 5oix), hMPV N0–P (PDB 5fvd) and hRSV M2-1–P (PDB 6g0y) and cryo-EM structures of hRSV L–P (PDB 6pzk) and hMPV L–P (PDB 6u5o) complexes. PCT protomers adopt different conformations in the L–P complex. The interaction regions are boxed, and the protein partners indicated on top. For L, only the partial binding region reported in [36] is shown.
Figure 2. Sequence alignment of the Pneumoviridae phosphoproteins for the two genera Orthopneumovirus: human RSV strains A and B (hRSVA/hRSVB, Uniprot record numbers P03421/O42062), bovine RSV (bRSV, P33454), ovine RSV (oRSV, Q83956) and murine pneumonia virus (mPV, Q5MKM7); and Metapneumovirus: avian MPV (aMPV, Q2Y2M5) and human MPV (hMPV, Q8B9Q8). Sequence numbers are indicated for hRSVA on top and for hMPV at the bottom. Coloring was made according to sequence conservation with ESPript 3 [35]. Constitutively phosphorylated hRSV P serines are marked with bold stars. Other phosphorylatable Ser/Thr sites are marked with regular stars. Secondary structures, drawn for hRSVA and hMPV P, were taken from the X-ray crystal structures of hMPV POD (PDB 5oix), hMPV N0–P (PDB 5fvd) and hRSV M2-1–P (PDB 6g0y) and cryo-EM structures of hRSV L–P (PDB 6pzk) and hMPV L–P (PDB 6u5o) complexes. PCT protomers adopt different conformations in the L–P complex. The interaction regions are boxed, and the protein partners indicated on top. For L, only the partial binding region reported in [36] is shown.
Ijms 22 01537 g002
Ijms 22 01537 g003 550
Figure 3. 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectra of full-length RSV P and PΔOD, a deletion mutant of P devoid of the oligomerization domain. Acquisition was done at a temperature of 288 K and at a magnetic field of 14.T (600 MHz 1H resonance frequency), using a triple resonance cryoprobe equipped with Z-axis gradients. Samples contained 175 µL of protein at concentrations of 250 µM for P and 80 µM for PΔOD, in a 20 mM Na phosphate 100 mM NaCl buffer at pH 6.5, and 15 µL of D2O to lock the NMR spectrometer frequency. Assignments are not indicated, but can be retrieved from [68].
Figure 3. 2D 1H–15N HSQC spectra of full-length RSV P and PΔOD, a deletion mutant of P devoid of the oligomerization domain. Acquisition was done at a temperature of 288 K and at a magnetic field of 14.T (600 MHz 1H resonance frequency), using a triple resonance cryoprobe equipped with Z-axis gradients. Samples contained 175 µL of protein at concentrations of 250 µM for P and 80 µM for PΔOD, in a 20 mM Na phosphate 100 mM NaCl buffer at pH 6.5, and 15 µL of D2O to lock the NMR spectrometer frequency. Assignments are not indicated, but can be retrieved from [68].
Ijms 22 01537 g003
Ijms 22 01537 g004 550
Figure 4. Secondary structure propensities for an RSV P construct deleted of the oligomerization domain (RSV PΔOD), predicted from backbone chemical shifts, using two different algorithms, Talos+ [69] and δ2D [70]. The dotted area on the diagrams marks the deleted region in PΔOD. On top of the diagrams are indicated the locations in the sequence of RSV P of POD and of regions with α-helical propensity or increased 15N relaxation (see Figure 5). On the right are shown structural models (5 tetramers) of RSV P, calculated with CYANA software [71] using only the torsion angle constraints derived from the backbone chemical shifts of PΔOD and POD.
Figure 4. Secondary structure propensities for an RSV P construct deleted of the oligomerization domain (RSV PΔOD), predicted from backbone chemical shifts, using two different algorithms, Talos+ [69] and δ2D [70]. The dotted area on the diagrams marks the deleted region in PΔOD. On top of the diagrams are indicated the locations in the sequence of RSV P of POD and of regions with α-helical propensity or increased 15N relaxation (see Figure 5). On the right are shown structural models (5 tetramers) of RSV P, calculated with CYANA software [71] using only the torsion angle constraints derived from the backbone chemical shifts of PΔOD and POD.
Ijms 22 01537 g004
Ijms 22 01537 g005 550
Figure 5. Comparison of the 15N spin relaxation properties between full-length RSV P and PΔOD, a P fragment deleted of the oligomerization domain (indicated with dotted boxes on the diagrams for PΔOD data). The 15N nuclear longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates, R1 and R2, were plotted as well as the heteronuclear Overhauser effect, determined for each backbone amide signal along the protein sequence. Measurements were done at a temperature of 288 K, at a magnetic field of 14.T, using a triple resonance cryoprobe equipped with Z-axis gradients. On top are highlighted the regions in the sequence of RSV P with increased R2 values, indicative of either structured regions or regions in conformational exchange between disordered and folded forms.
Figure 5. Comparison of the 15N spin relaxation properties between full-length RSV P and PΔOD, a P fragment deleted of the oligomerization domain (indicated with dotted boxes on the diagrams for PΔOD data). The 15N nuclear longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates, R1 and R2, were plotted as well as the heteronuclear Overhauser effect, determined for each backbone amide signal along the protein sequence. Measurements were done at a temperature of 288 K, at a magnetic field of 14.T, using a triple resonance cryoprobe equipped with Z-axis gradients. On top are highlighted the regions in the sequence of RSV P with increased R2 values, indicative of either structured regions or regions in conformational exchange between disordered and folded forms.
Ijms 22 01537 g005
Ijms 22 01537 g006 550
Figure 6. Folding of Pneumoviridae P protein upon binding to N0 and L proteins. (A) X-ray crystal structure of the hMPV N0–P complex, with stabilization of a transient N-terminal helix of P (PDB code 5FVD) [60]. (B) Structural model of the RSV L–P complex determined by cryogenic electron microscopy at a 3.2 Å resolution (PDB 6PZK) [32]. A similar structural organization was observed in a second cryo-EM structure of the RSV L–P complex at a 3.67 Å resolution (PDB 6UEN) [33] as well as in an hMPV L–P complex at a 3.8 Å resolution (PDB 6U5O) [34]. The partner proteins, N0 and L, are represented in white cartoon. The P fragments are shown in cartoon and in color. The color code for the complexed P helices is indicated in the scheme on top of the figure. In the L–P complex, the regions located between the tetramerization domain and the C-terminal transient helices predicted by NMR are shown in pale blue. The C-terminal helix N217-E228, which has no α-helical propensity in free P, is shown in magenta. The precise topology of each P protomer is indicated in Figure 2.
Figure 6. Folding of Pneumoviridae P protein upon binding to N0 and L proteins. (A) X-ray crystal structure of the hMPV N0–P complex, with stabilization of a transient N-terminal helix of P (PDB code 5FVD) [60]. (B) Structural model of the RSV L–P complex determined by cryogenic electron microscopy at a 3.2 Å resolution (PDB 6PZK) [32]. A similar structural organization was observed in a second cryo-EM structure of the RSV L–P complex at a 3.67 Å resolution (PDB 6UEN) [33] as well as in an hMPV L–P complex at a 3.8 Å resolution (PDB 6U5O) [34]. The partner proteins, N0 and L, are represented in white cartoon. The P fragments are shown in cartoon and in color. The color code for the complexed P helices is indicated in the scheme on top of the figure. In the L–P complex, the regions located between the tetramerization domain and the C-terminal transient helices predicted by NMR are shown in pale blue. The C-terminal helix N217-E228, which has no α-helical propensity in free P, is shown in magenta. The precise topology of each P protomer is indicated in Figure 2.
Ijms 22 01537 g006
Ijms 22 01537 g007 550
Figure 7. Stabilization of the structure of two short linear motifs (SLiMs) in RSV P protein, located in the N-terminal domain, upon complex formation. (A) X-ray structure of the hRSV M2-1–P complex, where a short transient helix, P residues P97–F109, is stabilized (PDB 6G0Y) [90]. (B) Homology model of the complex between the RVxF-like motif of P and cellular protein phosphatase 1, built with Modeller software [91]. The model was obtained by using the X-ray structure of the complex between the catalytic unit of PP1 and another PP1-binding protein, Gadd34 (PDB 4XPN), and by aligning the RVxF-like motifs of P and Gadd34. P fragments are shown in cartoon and lines. The color code is given in the scheme on top of the figure. The partner proteins are represented in the white cartoon.
Figure 7. Stabilization of the structure of two short linear motifs (SLiMs) in RSV P protein, located in the N-terminal domain, upon complex formation. (A) X-ray structure of the hRSV M2-1–P complex, where a short transient helix, P residues P97–F109, is stabilized (PDB 6G0Y) [90]. (B) Homology model of the complex between the RVxF-like motif of P and cellular protein phosphatase 1, built with Modeller software [91]. The model was obtained by using the X-ray structure of the complex between the catalytic unit of PP1 and another PP1-binding protein, Gadd34 (PDB 4XPN), and by aligning the RVxF-like motifs of P and Gadd34. P fragments are shown in cartoon and lines. The color code is given in the scheme on top of the figure. The partner proteins are represented in the white cartoon.
Ijms 22 01537 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cardone, C.; Caseau, C.-M.; Pereira, N.; Sizun, C. Pneumoviral Phosphoprotein, a Multidomain Adaptor-Like Protein of Apparent Low Structural Complexity and High Conformational Versatility. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041537

AMA Style

Cardone C, Caseau C-M, Pereira N, Sizun C. Pneumoviral Phosphoprotein, a Multidomain Adaptor-Like Protein of Apparent Low Structural Complexity and High Conformational Versatility. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(4):1537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041537

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cardone, Christophe, Claire-Marie Caseau, Nelson Pereira, and Christina Sizun. 2021. "Pneumoviral Phosphoprotein, a Multidomain Adaptor-Like Protein of Apparent Low Structural Complexity and High Conformational Versatility" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 4: 1537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041537

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop