Next Article in Journal
Tying Small Changes to Large Outcomes: The Cautious Promise in Incorporating the Microbiome into Immunotherapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Reduced Placental CD24 in Preterm Preeclampsia Is an Indicator for a Failure of Immune Tolerance
Previous Article in Journal
Microfabrication of a Chamber for High-Resolution, In Situ Imaging of the Whole Root for Plant–Microbe Interactions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Placental Transcriptome Adaptations to Maternal Nutrient Restriction in Sheep
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Human Placental Transcriptome Reveals Critical Alterations in Inflammation and Energy Metabolism with Fetal Sex Differences in Spontaneous Preterm Birth

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(15), 7899; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157899
by Yu-Chin Lien 1,2, Zhe Zhang 3, Yi Cheng 4, Erzsebet Polyak 4, Laura Sillers 2, Marni J. Falk 4, Harry Ischiropoulos 2, Samuel Parry 1,5 and Rebecca A. Simmons 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(15), 7899; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22157899
Submission received: 16 June 2021 / Revised: 15 July 2021 / Accepted: 20 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Placental Related Disorders of Pregnancy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Lien et al manuscript is focusing on a highly relevant medical issue of preterm birth. The reviewer finds the study of high interest to the field. The strength of the study is the study design, careful selection of subjects, and the specific focus on minority population, highly affected population with high pre-term birth case numbers. The major clear difference found in gene expression between males and females is also of high importance and will be of interest to broader audience.  

Minor issues: The manuscript result section itself could be slightly improved, if few titles (in line 206,318,329,347) were revised to be more clear, and results could be shortened and one summary sentence would be added to each subsection to summarize it and to help focusing attention on the major conclusions of each subsection.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the suggestions. The titles in the Result section have been modified and summary sentences have been added in the revised manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have presented a very interesting work, well written and with results that support the conclusions. Personally, as a physician who works in the field of obstetric and maternal-perinatal pathology, I have to congratulate the authors, I believe that the manuscript will be cited. Only small doubts arise, the sample size is limited. This point must be justified, I recommend that the authors make an adequate statistical justification. Again, I congratulate the authors.

Author Response

We thank the reviewer for the suggestion. We have included the power calculation that we performed when we designed this study. We used a false positive rate of 0.05 (two-sided) and power of 80% to target a 2-fold change, and the result indicates that 6 samples are sufficient to tell the differences. This information has been added to the Result section in the revised manuscript.

Back to TopTop