Next Article in Journal
Combined FCS and PCH Analysis to Quantify Protein Dimerization in Living Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Plants as Biofactories to Produce Food, Medicines, and Materials for a True Green Revolution
Previous Article in Journal
Neither a Novel Tau Proteinopathy nor an Expansion of a Phenotype: Reappraising Clinicopathology-Based Nosology
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Efficacy of Black Chokeberry Fruits against Cardiovascular Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms22147301
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Genotype on High Glucosinolate Synthesis Lines of Brassica rapa

by
Prabhakaran Soundararajan
1,
Sin-Gi Park
2,
So Youn Won
1,
Mi-Sun Moon
1,
Hyun Woo Park
1,
Kang-Mo Ku
3,4 and
Jung Sun Kim
1,*
1
Genomics Division, Department of Agricultural Bio-Resources, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Wansan-gu, Jeonju 54874, Korea
2
Bioinformatics Team of Theragen Etex Institute, Suwon 16229, Korea
3
BK21 Interdisciplinary Program in IT-Bio Convergence System, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
4
Department of Horticulture, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(14), 7301; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147301
Submission received: 26 April 2021 / Revised: 28 June 2021 / Accepted: 29 June 2021 / Published: 7 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biochemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Plants)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study was conducted to investigate doubled haploid (DH) lines produced between high GSL (HGSL) Brassica rapa ssp. trilocularis (yellow sarson) and low GSL (LGSL) B. rapa ssp. chinensis (pak choi) parents. In total, 161 DH lines were generated. GSL content of HGSL DH lines ranged from 44.12 to 57.04 μmol·g−1·dry weight (dw), which is within the level of high GSL B. rapa ssp. trilocularis (47.46 to 59.56 μmol g−1 dw). We resequenced five of the HGSL DH lines and three of the LGSL DH lines. Recombination blocks were formed between the parental and DH lines with 108,328 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in all chromosomes. In the measured GSL, gluconapin occurred as the major substrate in HGSL DH lines. Among the HGSL DH lines, BrYSP_DH005 had glucoraphanin levels approximately 12-fold higher than those of the HGSL mother plant. The hydrolysis capacity of GSL was analyzed in HGSL DH lines with a Korean pak choi cultivar as a control. Bioactive compounds, such as 3-butenyl isothiocyanate, 4-pentenyl isothiocyanate, 2-phenethyl isothiocyanate, and sulforaphane, were present in the HGSL DH lines at 3-fold to 6.3-fold higher levels compared to the commercial cultivar. The selected HGSL DH lines, resequencing data, and SNP identification were utilized for genome-assisted selection to develop elite GSL-enriched cultivars and the industrial production of potential anti-cancerous metabolites such as gluconapin and glucoraphanin.

1. Introduction

There is experimental evidence supporting the idea that compounds in Cruciferous plants are effective against cancer and heart ailments [1,2,3]. Strong anti-carcinogenic effects of members of the family Brassicaceae are attributed to their glucosinolate (GSL) content [4,5]. For consumption, some GSLs such as glucoraphanin (GRA), glucoalyssin (GAL), gluconapin (GNA), neoglucobrassicin (NGBS), and gluconasturtiin (GNT) are considerably beneficial whereas hydrolysis products from progoitrin (PRO), epiprogoitrin (epiPRO), and gluconapoleiferin (GNL) can cause goiter in animals [6]. GSLs are not actual bioactive agents, but rather their hydrolysis products such as isothiocyanates (ITCs), nitriles, epithionitriles, thiocyanates, and indoles [7]. Some of the important bioactive compounds are butenyl sulforaphane (SFN), isothiocyanate (BITC) and pentenyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) (Figure 1) [6,7].
The biosynthesis of GSL is one of the more complex processes and more than 130 GSLs have been identified so far [8]. The existence of the different GSL structures is controlled by variability in genes on individual genotypes, especially at loci involved in initial elongation and side-chain modification reactions [9]. In addition, the molecular function of a gene can be altered depending on the plant species, allelic condition, and polymorphic state of the regulatory network controlling it [10]. According to previous works, four major loci, GS-ELONG, GS-OX, GS-AOP (GS-ALK and GS-OHP), and GS-OH, control the difference in the accumulation of aliphatic GSLs [6,11,12]. GS-ELONG consists of genes methylthioalkylmalate synthase 1 (MAM1), MAM2, and MAM3 to regulate the chain length of GSLs [13,14]. The GS-OX loci contain flavin monooxygenase (FMOGS-ox) and GS-AOP two tightly linked loci, GS-ALK for 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases (AOP2) and GS-OHP for AOP3 involved in the side-chain modification reaction determines the type of GSL products [15,16,17]. AOP2 genes are responsible for the conversion of GRA to GNA. In most B rapa, GNA makes up the major proportion of total GSL. However, the presence of stop codons in B. oleracea leads BoAOP2.2 and BoAOP2.3 into non-functional genes. This results in the major GSL content in B. oleracea being GRA instead of GNA [18,19,20]. GS-OH locus controls oxidation of 3-butenyl GSL to alkenyl GSL [6,21]. Most importantly, the accumulation and content of GSL are strongly influenced by R2R3-myeloblastosis (MYB) transcription factors (TFs) [22]. MYB28, MYB29, and MYB76 regulate the aliphatic GSL genes while MYB34, MYB51, and MYB122 regulate the indolic GSL genes [23]. For fine mapping and selection of individual genotypes, it is necessary to identify allelic discrepancies on key loci and for different TFs.
Resequencing provides the opportunity to develop a vast amount of novel markers. Identification of genes related to important agronomic traits, genetic diversity analysis, characterize and environmental factors influences are mandatory in genome-assisted breeding for crop improvement [24]. Combining quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping with whole-genome sequencing helps in the precise detection of functional loci for traits of interest and their candidate genes. Major advantages of resequencing are functional allele mining and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery between large populations. The identification of trait loci in biparental cross populations by high-resolution linkage map and functional allele mining utilizing SNPs and Insertions–Deletions (InDels) as markers provides a powerful complementary strategy to genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [25]. Recently, Chen et al. (2016) resequenced 199 and 119 accessions representing 12 and nine morphotypes of B. rapa and B. oleracea, respectively. This resequencing data aided in the identification of leaf-heading and tuberous morphotypes associated with sub-genome parallel selection during diversification and domestication of B. rapa and B. oleracea [26]. Meanwhile, the resequencing of 588 B. napus accessions led to the identification of A and C sub-genome origins [27]. Similarly, genome mapping helped to characterize genes responsible for club root resistance [28], blackleg resistance [29], black rot resistance [30], and flowering time [31], etc.
B. rapa is one of the model plants for GSL metabolism and polyploid species with phenotypically diverse cultivated subspecies. In our previous study, we determined that eight subspecies of B. rapa have different GSL levels ranging from 4.42 μmol g−1 dry weight (dw) in B. rapa ssp. narinosa to 53.51 μmol·g−1·dw in B. rapa ssp. trilocularis [32]. The current study was conducted to identity SNPs based on resequencing between high GSL (HGSL) and low GSL (LGSL) content doubled haploid (DH) lines generated from two different parents, B. rapa ssp. trilocularis (yellow sarson) and B. rapa ssp. chinensis (pak choi). Yellow sarson is an oil plant with relatively high amounts of several beneficial GSLs, whereas pak choi is one of the major leafy vegetables in Korean and Chinese diets but contains lesser amounts of GSL. The aim of this work is to produce edible DH lines with high beneficial GSLs and low toxic substances like PRO. Detailed analysis of recombinant blocks between the HGSL and LGSL lines was carried out based on GSL biosynthetic pathways. The results from this study could be useful for precise genome-assisted selection in the development of elite B. rapa cultivars with enriched GSL content for commercial purposes.

2. Results

2.1. Generation of BrYSP DH Lines and GSL Content Profiles

Accessions YS-033 (CGN06835) and PC-099 (CGN132924) [33] were maintained in our greenhouse. As neither of these accessions were perfect inbred genotypes, we performed selfing for four generations (S4) of YS-033 and named LP08. DH plant of PC-099 was named LP21. LP08 and LP21 were used as the set of homozygous parents. The F1 plant was developed using a female of LP08 and male of LP21 (Figure 2). Microspore cultures were followed according to our previous method [34,35]. The leaf edge shapes were segregated in female and male parent’s phenotype boundary (Figure 2, middle). Phenotype classification of the leaf edge shape consisted of (a) entire, (b) slightly serrated, (c) intermediately serrated, and (d) very serrated. Our population was named “BrYSP_DH000” in accordance with B. rapa (Br), yellow sarson + pak choi (YSP), doubled haploid (DH), and a unique three-digit number for each line. The regulation of GSL biosynthesis was then examined in Chiffu, LP08, LP21, F1, and 161 BrYSP_DH plants.
We selected five HGSL lines and three LGSL lines among the 161 BrYSP_DH plants for further studies, including resequencing and GSL analysis (Table 1, Figure 2). Total GSL amounts were detected from 44.12 ± 2.86 μmol·g−1·dw (BrYSP_DH005) to 57.04 ± 1.54 μmol·g−1·dw (BrYSP_DH026). It was consistent with the range of total GSL for B. rapa ssp. trilocularis, a higher GSL content subspecies in our previous study (47.46 to 59.56 μmol g−1 dw) [32]. The most abundant GSL in the HGSL lines was GNA, which was 80 to 91% of the total GSL. We selected the HGSL lines based on lesser PRO content (<0.6 μmol g−1 dw) as PRO is known to cause harmful effects on human health. As shown in Table 1, the BrYSP_DH005 line exhibited a highly unique profile with enriched aliphatic GSLs GRA (1.23 ± 0.18 μmol g−1 dw) and GAL (3.47 ± 0.18 μmol g−1 dw), indolic GSL NGBS (2.03 ± 0.20 μmol g−1 dw), and aromatic GSL GNT (0.68 ± 0.34 μmol g−1 dw). Significance difference between the DH lines was observed in all GSLs (Table 1).

2.2. Resequencing of Parents, HGSL Lines, and LGSL Lines

Sequencing reads of 150 bp were generated using 10 paired-end sequencing libraries of 350 bp insert size. Resequencing of LP08 and LP21 produced around 775 and 704 million raw reads, respectively. The total bases of sequence obtained were 78.2 Gb for LP08 and 71.1 Gb for LP21. The sequences of the DH lines ranged from around 125.5 to 192.4 million clean reads. These reads sequenced were mapped to the B. rapa v3.0 reference genome [36]. Mapping reads (%) between parents differed with 90.65% (LP08) and 93.19% (LP21). The DH lines had slightly higher and more similar mapping read percentages, ranging from 94.8% to 95.98%. The genome coverages for the two parent sequences had a 157.05× depth for LP08 and 156.07× depth for LP21. Nine DH line were mapped from 46.89× (BrYSP_DH059) to 70.80× (BrYSP_DH026) (Table 2).

2.3. SNP Genotyping and InDels

Approximately ~3.5 million and ~2.5 million SNPs were predicted in LP08 and LP21 lines in reference to B. rapa v3.0 genome, respectively [36]. SNP density was calculated as 27.5 per 1-kb in LP08 and 22.2 per 1-kb in LP21. The maximum number of InDels were identified in LP08, i.e., 724,760. Comparatively, a lesser number of InDels were detected in LP21, i.e., 552,220. On average, 2,707,400 high-quality SNPs and 617,408 InDels were identified in the DH lines. Details regarding the SNPs and InDels of the parents and DH lines are provided in Table S1.

2.4. Identification of GSL Biosynthesis-Specific Recombinant Blocks

Overall, 108,328 variants were extracted as allelic differences between LP08 and LP21 in the recombinant block search of 342 recombinant blocks among the genotypes (Table S2, Figure S1). Out of 110 GSL biosynthetic genes, 75 were identified in recombinant blocks and mapped to their respective chromosomes (Figure 3). Uniformly, the recombinant blocks between the region of 12,929,867–23,248,122 bp of A03 with 3716 SNPs were discovered and identified to be present in only the HGSL lines (Table 3). The ten GSL synthesis genes positioned between 12.9 Mb and 23.2 Mb of A03 commonly differed between all resequenced HGSL and LGSL lines. In detail, TFs MYB28.1 of aliphatic GSLs and MYB34.2 of indolic GSLs of the HGSL lines were LP08 types. Similarly, for the chain elongation step, branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase 4 (BCAT4; Bra001761), MAM1 (Bra013007), MAM3 (Bra013009 and Bra013011), and bile acid transporter 5 (BAT5; Bra000760) of the HGSL lines belong to LP08. AOP1 (Bra000847) and AOP2 (Bra000848) were the two keys genes derived from LP08 in high GSL lines for the side-chain modification process. One of the genes involved in the sulfur donation from chloroplast to sulfotransferase for production of desulfo GSL, APS kinase (APK)1 (Bra013120) is the LP08 type in all high GSL lines (Table 3).
Though all MAM genes are LP08 type in BrYSP_DH005, only three MAM genes are LP21 types in other high DH lines. In a similar way, all MAM genes were LP21 in BrYSP_DH059 and BrYSP_DH061 but three genes were LP08 type in the BrYSP_DH009 line. Even though in the core structure synthesis phase of BrYSP_DH005 most of the genes were identified as LP21 type, other HGSL lines showed about 50% of genes were LP08 type. It is noteworthy that BrYSP_DH014, BrYSP_DH026 and BrYSP_DH016, BrYSP_DH017 shared similar parental type recombinant blocks of GSL biosynthetic genes.
Table
Table 2. Summary of re-sequencing and alignment result for DH lines of Brassica rapa.
Table 2. Summary of re-sequencing and alignment result for DH lines of Brassica rapa.
Sample IDNo. of ReadsNo. of BasesNo. of Clean ReadsClean Reads (%)No. of Clean BasesClean Bases (%)De-Duplicated ReadsDe-
Duplicated Reads (%)		Mapped
Reads		Mapped
Reads (%)		Ave. Coverage (x)
LP08(♀)775,036,33278,278,669,532748,357,76696.5675,085,735,554 95.92613,028,55481.92555,700,09490.65157.05
LP21(♂)704,684,56271,173,140,762676,201,11895.9667,699,611,150 95.12592,219,74387.58551,893,41293.19156.07
BrYSP_DH005135,586,70820,473,592,908132,434,32097.6819,674,335,422 96.10121,145,70491.48116,215,95995.9348.48
BrYSP_DH009130,566,11019,715,482,610128,070,23298.0919,054,916,880 96.65120,327,98593.95115,494,19495.9848.06
BrYSP_DH014143,278,51221,635,055,312141,074,21698.4621,128,122,142 97.66133,925,20094.93127,330,97795.0853.5
BrYSP_DH016134,052,43420,241,917,534132,201,87098.6219,784,969,829 97.74123,574,66693.47117,994,49895.4849.38
BrYSP_DH017145,561,74821,979,823,948144,029,95298.9521,590,666,966 98.23133,547,33192.72126,848,29994.9853.23
BrYSP_DH026194,633,90429,389,719,504192,401,31698.8528,832,473,186 98.1176,347,87391.66168,647,64495.6370.80
BrYSP_DH059126,815,04219,149,071,342125,484,03298.9518,829,119,983 98.33117,116,77493.33111,549,89395.2546.89
BrYSP_DH061138,437,79420,904,106,894137,010,40698.9720,534,954,754 98.23127,865,42493.33122,305,76795.6551.45
Table
Table 3. Gene blocks identified as high (LP08) and low (LP21) GSL parents with the DH lines.
Table 3. Gene blocks identified as high (LP08) and low (LP21) GSL parents with the DH lines.
♀HGSL LineLGSL Lines♂
ChromStartStopNameGene ID V1.5Gene ID V3.0StagesLP08DH
005		DH
014		DH
016		DH
017		DH
026		DH
009		DH
059		DH
061		LP21
A032132686921328218MYB28.1Bra012961BraA03g044440.3CTranscription factors—AliphaticLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A0934691133470483MYB28.2Bra035929BraA09g007000.3CLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A022540387525405492MYB28.3Bra029311BraA02g043310.3CLP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21
A0313643091365719MYB29.1Bra005949BraA03g003070.3CLP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A0933564333357581MYB34.1Bra035954BraA09g006760.3CTranscription factors—IndolicLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A032112927921130669MYB34.2Bra013000BraA03g043850.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A022518382625184998MYB34.3Bra029349BraA02g042890.3CLP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21
A022517290625179858MYB34.4Bra029350BraA02g042880.3CLP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21
A081824835218249890MYB51.2Bra016553BraA08g028300.3CLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21
A0668416886842966MYB51.3Bra025666BraA06g013940.3CLP08LP21LP21LP08LP08LP21LP08LP08LP21LP21
A072341131323412768MYB122.1Bra015939BraA07g037950.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A021232734912329278MYB122.2Bra008131BraA02g022140.3CLP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP08LP21
A031830291918305368BCAT-4Bra001761BraA03g039030.3CSide chain elongationLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A051830515218307632BCAT-4Bra022448BraA05g027600.3CLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A0688492378851230BCAT-3Bra017964BraA06g017190.3CLP08LP21LP21LP08LP08LP21LP08LP08LP21LP21
A011481488914817183BCAT-3Bra029966BraA01g023550.3CLP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21
A0223916912393547IPMDH1Bra023450BraA02g005400.3CLP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP08LP21
A032108539221093219MAM1Bra013007BraA03g043770.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A032106111221065885MAM3Bra013009BraA03g043760.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A032105453721056963MAM3Bra013011BraA03g043750.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A021593474415944413MAM1Bra018524 LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21
A022511550725119702MAM1Bra029355BraA02g042820.3CLP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21
A022510344925106649MAM3Bra029356BraA02g042810.3CLP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21
A0456538745657118IPMI LSU1Bra032708BraA04g008730.3CLP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21
A0859640645967370IPMI LSU1Bra040341BraA08g006340.3CLP08LP21LP21LP08LP08LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21
A0516083811609157IPMI SSU2Bra004744BraA05g003360.3CLP08LP21LP21LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21
A031294314012945015BAT5Bra000760BraA03g027810.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A091720446817206516BAT5Bra029434BraA09g026220.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21
A0660079266010112CYP79F1Bra026058BraA06g012170.3CCore structure synthesis—AliphaticLP08LP21LP21LP08LP08LP21LP08LP08LP21LP21
A0454603935462018CYP83A1Bra032734BraA04g008410.3CLP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21
A02768271770517CYP79A2–AromaticBra028764BraA02g001710.3CLP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP08LP21
A052481169824812553GSTF11Bra032010BraA05g041750.3CLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP08LP21
A071749841817499341GSTU20Bra003645BraA07g026570.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A0133596203360837GGP1Bra011201BraA01g007200.3CLP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21
A032790199827903448GGP1Bra024068BraA03g029390.3CLP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A081283345112834884GGP1Bra010282 LP08LP21LP21LP08LP08LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21
A081283583012837549GGP1Bra010283BraA08g017720.3CLP08LP21LP21LP08LP08LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21
A0959496185952361SUR1Bra036703BraA09g011980.3CLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP08LP21
A092512365825125223UGT74B1Bra024634BraA09g038870.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21
A011696487816965828ST5bBra031476BraA01g028650.3CLP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21LP21
A071847954618480592ST5bBra003817 LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A071848174818482782ST5bBra003818BraA07g028360.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A071800272918003723ST5bBra003726BraA07g027400.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A072341904823420082ST5bBra015938BraA07g037960.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A072342659523427635ST5bBra015936BraA07g037980.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A0977267677727825ST5bBra027623BraA09g012830.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A0990193119020375ST5bBra027117BraA09g016490.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A0990216419022747ST5bBra027118BraA09g016500.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A0999778929978911ST5bBra027880BraA09g017830.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21
A0668500536851066ST5cBra025668BraA06g013960.3CLP08LP21LP21LP08LP08LP21LP08LP08LP21LP21
A01374137375874CYP79B2Bra011821BraA01g000840.3CCore structure synthesis—IndolicLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A033120316931205210CYP79B2Bra017871BraA03g061480.3CLP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A081497344414975600CYP79B2Bra010644BraA08g021670.3CLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21
A0850580975059748CYP83B1Bra034941BraA08g007380.3C LP08LP21LP21LP08LP08LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21
A0372304007231268GSTF9Bra022815BraA03g016240.3C LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A041390144213902299GSTF9Bra021673BraA04g022220.3C LP08LP21LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A0372328447233982GSTF10Bra022816BraA03g016250.3C LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A021233718012338199ST5aBra008132BraA02g022150.3C LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP08LP21
A072342790923428469ST5aBra015935 LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A081920381019205763FMOGS-OX5Bra016787BraA08g030720.3CSide chain modification—AliphaticLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21
A0982178248219479FMOGS-OX2Bra027035BraA09g015600.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21
A021597374115976278AOP2Bra018521BraA02g027430.3CLP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21
A031349293613494533AOP1Bra000847BraA03g028760.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A031349881513503183AOP2Bra000848BraA03g028770.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A0911706261172022AOP1Bra034182BraA09g001250.3CLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A0911685031169786AOP1Bra034181BraA09g001260.3CLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A0911650281166807AOP2Bra034180 LP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A0377682937769612GSL-OHBra022920BraA03g017350.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A041385255113853809GSL-OHBra021670BraA04g022180.3CLP08LP21LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A041387739713878646GSL-OHBra021671BraA04g022190.3CLP08LP21LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A0258463925848174CYP81F2Bra020459BraA02g012540.3CSide chain modification—IndolicLP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21LP08LP21LP08LP21
A0352339245236233CYP81F2Bra006830BraA03g012390.3CLP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A032037681720378290APK1Bra013120BraA03g042630.3C LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A01361733363288APK2Bra011822BraA01g000800.3CSulphur supplementationLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21
A033121896931220359APK2Bra017872BraA03g061500.3CLP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP08LP21LP21LP21LP21
A081498024814981406APK2Bra010645BraA08g021680.3CLP08LP21LP08LP08LP08LP08LP08LP21LP21LP21
Bold letters are indicated when all HGSL lines had the LP08 genotypes whereas LGSL lines had the LP21 genotypes. Pink (LP08) and sky-blue (LP21).

2.5. Comparative Analysis of GSL Pathway between Individual Genotypes

Stepwise comparative analysis on the GSL biosynthetic pathway between the HGSL line BrYSP_DH005 and LGSL line BrYSP_DH059 was performed based on the recombinant blocks of parents LP08 and LP21. Key differences were observed between BrYSP_DH005 and BrYSP_DH059 in amino acid elongation and side-chain modification step TFs such as MYB28 and MYB29. Entire MAM1, AOP1, AOP2, and GSL-OH genes of BrYSP_DH059 were present as LP21 recombinant blocks. In contrast, complete MAM1, one AOP1 (Bra000847), two AOP2 (Bra018521 and Bra000848), and one GSL-OH (Bra022920) were LP08 blocks in BrYSP_DH005. Interestingly, all genes of indolic and aromatic pathways in BrYSP_DH059, except ST5a (Bra024634) and UGT74B1 (Bra024634), were LP21 recombination blocks. Contrastingly, critical genes for the synthesis of glucobrassicin (GBA) in BrYSP_DH005, such as ST5a (Bra008132 and Bra015935), and CYP81F2 (Bra020459 and Bra006830), were LP08 blocks. Except for MYB28.2 (Bra035929), TFs involved in the biosynthesis of the aliphatic GSL were LP08 blocks in BrYSP_DH005, whereas, aliphatic TFs of BrYSP_DH059 were LP21 blocks. A similar trend was observed in MYB34 TFs. Other than MYB34.2 (Bra013000), all MYB34 homologues in BrYSP_DH005 were LP08 types. MYB34 TFs in BrYSP_DH059 remained as the LP21 genotype (Figure 4).

2.6. GSL Hydrolysis Products

Main hydrolysis products of GSL such as BITC, 4-PEITC, 2-PEITC, and SFN of high GSL lines were compared with the commercial pak choi cultivar used in South Korea. All five of the representative HGSL DH lines possessed increased amounts of hydrolysis products. Overall, BrYSP_DH014 had the highest level of hydrolysis products (870.29 µg∙g−1 dw). It is about 6.3-fold higher levels than that of the commercial cultivar. The HGSL line with the lowest level of hydrolysis products was the BrYSP_DH017 line which is about 417.5 µg∙g−1 dw. Still, it had a 3.0-fold high-level hydrolysis product than that of the control pak choi. Most importantly, the amount of anti-carcinogenic agent SFN in BrYSP_DH005 was 20.2 µg∙g−1 dw. This was 7–10-fold higher than that in the other HGSL DH lines and nearly 35-times more than that of the commercial cultivar (Table 4).

2.7. Nitrile Formation

Among the five HGSL DH lines tested, BrYSP_DH005 showed significantly lower nitrile formation compared to that of the other HGSL DH lines, from both SNG and GNT substrate-based assays (Figure 5). The lower SNG substrate-based nitrile formation may explain why BrYSP_DH005 generated higher concentrations of SFN compared to other HGSL DH lines (Table 4). Although a decrease in GNT-based nitrile formation was observed in BrYSP_DH005 compared with other HGSL DH lines, it was more increased than the commercial pak choi.

3. Discussion

In this study, the representative lines were selected from previously developed 161 DH lines with HGSL and LGSL content for metabolite, resequencing, SNP mapping, and GSL biosynthetic pathway analysis. Total GSL content ranged from 44 μmol·g−1·dw to 57 μmol·g−1·dw in HGSL DH lines (Table 1). Amounts of GSL were significantly higher than those in the inbred line Brassicaraphanus “BB1” [7] and broccoli (B. oleracea var. italica) [38]. Glucoraphasatin is the major GSL of Raphanus sativus [39] and Brassicoraphanus “BB1” [7], SNG in mustard [1] and horseradish [40] cultivars. Similar to our study, GNA was found to be the predominant GSL in B. rapa “Chinese cabbage”. However, the range is around 54% only [41], but in our study, GNA is 80% to 91% of total GSL. Though GNA is the major GSL present in HGSL DH lines, BrYSP_DH005 possessed a considerable amount of other important metabolites such as GRA, GAL, NGBS, and GNT (Table 1). Due to its higher content of several beneficial GSLs, BrYSP_DH005 was selected as a vital genotype and detailed analysis on the GSL pathway was carried out in comparison with the representative LGSL line BrYSP_DH059 (Table 1).
For any hybrid studies, SNPs and InDels are valuable for developing linkage maps of trait loci in the cross-population lines. High-density SNPs and InDels polymorphism markers could be a valuable resource for genetic-linkage studies and precise QTL mapping of desirable traits [24,42] in Brassica (Table S1, Figure S1). The predicted recombinant block between 12.9–23.2 bp of A03 chromosome in the GSL-rich parent, all five HGSL lines, and three LGSL lines indicate that it is a key region that should be focused on GWAS (Table 3, Figure 3). GWAS analysis in combination with metabolite profiling has gained widespread acceptance to assess natural variations between populations [43].
Sønderby et al. (2010) noted that decreases in a few transcripts can have a major impact on the accumulation of GSL [22]. Epistatic effects of transcript expression levels are highly complex to mirrored with the GSL content. Resequencing followed by recombinant block analysis showed a clear picture of genes derived from HGSL and LGSL parents (Table S2, Figure 3). The results of this study indicate that integration of critical recombinant blocks from parents LP08 and LP21 triggered to turn on the genes involved in biosynthesis, transportation and regulation in the GSL metabolic pathway (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).
Transcriptional activation of aliphatic and indolic genes by MYB factors are as follows: MYB28, MYB29 and MYB76 activate MAM, CYP79F1/F2, CYP83A1, GGP1, SUR1, UGT74B1/C1, and STb/c of the aliphatic pathway and MYB34, MYB51, and MYB 122 activate CYP79B2/B3, CYP83B1, YGT74B1, and STa of the indolic pathway [23]. MYB factors also modulate genes involved in the sulfur supplementation route such as ATPS1/S3 and APK1/2 [44]. For instance, MYB28.2, MYB 34.1 and MYB51.2 are LP08 derived in all HGSL DH lines except BrYSP_DH005. Contrastingly, MYB28.3, MYB34.3, MYB34.4 and MYB122.2 were LP08 types in BrYSP_DH005 whereas they are LP21-derived in other HGSL lines. This could be correlated to the excess amounts of GRA, GAL, NGBS, and GNT and also to the lesser content of GNA, GBN, and 4-MOGBS in BrYSP_DH005 than other HGSL lines. Similarly, the LP08 type of MYB29.1 in BrYSP_DH005, BrYSP_DH014, and BrYSP_DH026 can be associated with an appreciable amount of GAL (Table 1 and Table 3). Induction of glucoraphasatin biosynthesis genes by MBY29 in radish (R. sativus L.) root was reported [39]. LP08-type recombinant block with MYB29.1 could also be related to a higher level of GSL hydrolysis products (Table 3 and Table 4). Though MYBs involved in aliphatic and indolic pathways are close homologs to each other, they have distinct functional roles [45]. However, their functions overlap and they are able to substitute for each other in cases of mutants, decreased expression, and overexpression [22,45,46,47].
The first chain elongation process catalyzed by BCAT4 deaminates Met and homoMet to corresponding 2-oxoacids. Two copies of BAT5 serve as the importer of 2-oxo acids into plastid. Out of two copies of BCAT4 and one copy (Bra001761) present in all HGSL lines belonged to the LP08 genotype. The other copy (Bra022448) was also LP08-type in all HGSL DH lines except BrYSP_DH005. Both copies of BAT5 were LP08-type in BrYSP_DH005. Individual mutants of bcat4 and bat5 exhibit approximately a 50% reduction in the level of aliphatic GSLs [48]. As the GS-ELONG locus contains MAM genes, the number of side chains of GSL is decided by the elongation cycles it undergoes the initial steps [14]. Gene duplication, neo-functionalization, and polymorphism of MAM1 lead to the diversification of GSL profiles [49]. Following isomerization by isopropylmalate (IPM) isomerase and oxidative decarboxylation by IPM dehydrogenase (IPM-DH), the 2-oxo acid yields homoMet and chain-elongated derivatives of Met to enter the core GSL structure pathway [6].
There are five genes present in the GS-OX locus of A. thaliana (FMOGS-ox1-5), but only one copy of FMOGS-ox2 and two copies of FMOGS-ox5 have been identified in B. rapa. This locus is responsible for the oxygenation of glucoibervirin, glucoerucin, and glucoberteroin based on the co-expression of TFs for aliphatic GSLs [15,16]. AOP2 belongs to GS-ALK for conversion of S-oxygenated GSLs and AOP3 belongs to GS-OHP for conversion of hydroxyl GSLs [6]. Our fine-mapping on the key locus regions such as BCAT4, MAM1, BAT5, AOP2, and GS-OH in recombinant inbred lines showed the high production of GNA with less conversion of PRO (Figure 4, Table 1, Table 3 and Table S2).
Cytochrome P450 (CYP) CYP79F1 catalyzes the conversion of all chain-elongated Met derivatives. CYP79F1 mainly for long-chained Met derivatives, but no copies of CYP79F2 have been found in B. rapa [50]. CYP79B2 and CYP79B3 are identified for indolic whereas CYP79A2 for aromatic derivatives [51]. The resulting aldoximes are then converted into nitrile oxides or aci-nitro compounds by CYP83A1 for Met derivatives and CYP83B1 for Trp and Phe derivatives [52]. Glutathione-S-transferase (GSTF) is involved in the catalysis of nitrile into S-alkyl-thiohydroximate. In this step, sulfur is supplied to alkyl-thiohydroximate as glutathione (GSH) [53]. GSH is a tripeptide with a gamma peptide linkage between glutamate and cysteine with glycine. S-alkyl thiohydroximates are converted into thiohydroximates by four copies of Y-glutamyl peptidase 1 (GGP1) and two copies of superroot1 (SUR1) [54]. S-glucosylated is catalyzed by glucotransferase. UDP-glucosyl transferase 74C1 (UGT74C1) and UGT74B1 metabolize Met-derived and Phe-derived compounds of thiohydroximates into desulfo GSL [55]. In the final step of core structure biosynthesis, the sulfate donor 3′-phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS) is produced by two steps. First, ATP sulfurylase (ATPS) produces the intermediate adenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (APS). APS kinase then catalyzes APS to Cys. Of four copies of APK1, Bra013120 present in all the HGSL were LP08 type. The other three copies varied among the HGSL DH lines (Table 3). All APK1 and APK2 genes were LP21 type in BrYSP_DH059 (Figure 4b). Double mutants of apk1 and apk2 reduce total GSL in A. thaliana by almost 80%. In addition, the accumulation of desulfoGSL is noticeable in mutants, but present at undetectable levels in wild-type plants [56]. Core structures of GSLs depend on sulfur assimilation, especially sulfotransferase (ST) reaction [9,55]. Two copies of ST5a catalyze both Trp and Phe desulfoGSL. About ten copies of ST5b and one copy of ST5c are involved in the synthesis of aliphatic GSLs, such as glucoibervirin, glucoerucin, and glucoberteroin [57].
Hydrolysis of GSLs by endogenous myrosinase (β-D-thioglucosidase) produces active compounds, such as ITCs, nitriles, and indoles [3]. An important ITC, SFN is reported to be a natural inducer of phase II detoxification enzymes, including glutathione-S-transferase and quinone reductase (QR). SFN triggers cytostasis and apoptosis and also detoxifies xenobiotics [7]. BITC and PEITC have proved to induce apoptosis in cancer cell lines [8,9]. Nitriles have a weaker chemopreventive effect than ITCs [7]. Although broccoli is a well-known health-promoting vegetable due to high SFN concentrations, it has a wide range of ESP activity from 17.1% to 46% among 20 commercial broccoli cultivars [58]. In contrast, the HGSL DH lines of the current study exhibited much lower nitrile formation, and increasing GRA levels may have directly contributed to the induction of phase II detoxification enzymes (Figure 6). Nitrile formation using SNG as a substrate in the HGSL DH lines ranged from 0.44% to 2.66%, which was considerably lower than nitrile formation compared with 11 commercial mustard cultivars (7.4–62.4%) or USDA fancy horseradish (average, 7.1%) [1,40]. Although nitrile formation based on GNT of BrYSP_DH005 was significantly higher than commercial pak choi, it was still lower than the recent report on broccoli [38]. In this study, important ITCs including SFN, BITC, 4-PEITC, and 2-PEITC were the major hydrolysis compounds along with some nitrile hydrolysis products from GNA (1-cyano-3,4-epithiobutane) and GNT (benzenepropanenitrile) (Table S3). Our current multilayered analysis of resequencing and the revelation of SNP-based recombinant block discovery results will be helpful for further fine QTL mapping.
This information will be beneficial to the production of elite GSL-enriched cultivars for commercialization of potential anti-cancerous metabolites, such as GRA, GLA, NGBS, and GNT, with higher SFN activity.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Accessions YS-033 (CGN06835) and PC-099 (CGN132924) [33] were provided by professor Guusje Bonnema. We performed selfing for four generations (S4) of YS-033 and named LP08. DH plant of PC-099 was named LP21. LP08 and LP21 were used as the set of homozygous parents. The F1 plant was developed using an LP08 as female and LP21 as male parent (Figure 1). Microspores were collected and cultures were followed according to our previous method [34,35]. B. rapa ssp. perkinensis “Chiffu-401-42” was used as the reference.

4.2. HPLC Analysis for Identification of GSL Content

GSL content was estimated according to Seo et al. [32]. Fresh leaves of 6-weeks old plants were freeze-dried and 100 mg samples were used for protein extraction by boiling with 1.5 mL of 70% (v/v) methanol in a 10 mL test tube for 10 min at 95 °C. Extracts were loaded on Sephadex A25 columns and desulfation was conducted with aryl sulfatase (EC 3.1.6.1) before HPLC. Desulfated GSLs were quantified in Agilent 1200 Series HPLC System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with an Inertsil ODS-3 column (150 × 3.0 mm inner diameter, particle size 3 µm; GL Science, Tokyo, Japan). Analysis was done using a flow rate of 0.4 mL·min−1 at a column over temperature of 35 °C and a wavelength of 227 nm. Sinigrin (SNG) was used as an external standard for quantification. Total and individual GSL content was calculated as means of three biological replicates.

4.3. Resequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaves as previously described [59]. In liquid nitrogen, 5 g of samples were finely ground and put in 50 mL falcon tube. It is mixed with the pre-warmed 15 mL of DNA extraction buffer (500 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCL, pH 8.0, 50 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 1.25% SDS, and add 0.38% sodium bisulfite before use with adjust pH 8.0 with 0.2 N, NaOH). Incubate for 30 min, and invert gently every ten min at 65 °C. Add 5 mL of aquaphenol and rotate at 14 rpm for 10 min at room temperature (RT). Add to an equal volume of Chloroform: Isoamyalchole (24:1) and rotate at 20 rpm for 15 min at RT. Centrifuge for 15 min at 15 °C at 10,000 rpm. Supernatant was transferred to a new 50 mL falcon tube. Add 10 µL of RNaseA (20 mg/mL) and incubate at 37 °C in 10 min. An equal proportion of isopropanol was added and gently mix by inverting. Carefully pull out the DNA pellet with the closed sterile glass tube. DAN pellet was washed with 70% ethanol several times. Completely dry the pellet under vacuum pressure. Finally, dissolve the pellet in 0.1× TE buffer. Libraries with an average insert size of 350 bp were constructed using the genomic DNA TruSeq Nano DNA Sample Prep Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequencing was performed with 150 bp paired-end sequencing using the NovaSeq6000 platform. Reads were converted from the binary base call (BCL) format file using bcl2fastq V2.20 software with parameter “–barcode-mismatches 0”.

4.4. Variant Calling

To remove low-quality bases, clean reads were trimmed using sickle v1.33 with a Phred quality score threshold of 20 (accuracy 99%) to derive high-quality reads. The mapped reads were aligned against the B. rapa reference genome sequence available in the Brassica database (BRAD V3.0, http://brassicadb.org/brad/ (accessed on 1 December 2020) using mem algorithm in Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA) V0.7.17 software “-Am”, “-k 45”. After alignment, duplicates were marked using MarkDuplicates tools in GATK V4.0.2.1. Multi-sample variant calling of SNPs and InDels were performed using Haplotype Caller in GATK V4.0.2.1.

4.5. Identification of Recombinant Blocks

For recombinant block search, extraction of variants with allelic differences between LP08 and LP21 was performed. Recombinant blocks for each sample were defined as LP08, LP21, or hetero based on SNPs and InDels using in-house scripts. GSL biosynthetic genes were identified using BLASTp with E-value of 1 × 10−5 against the B. rapa reference genome [36]. BioSample accession number of DH lines deposited in NCBI are as follows: BrYSP_DH005, SAMN18818129; BrYSP_DH009, SAMN18818130; BrYSP_DH014, SAMN18818131; BrYSP_DH016, SAMN18818133; BrYSP_DH017, SAMN18818134; BrYSP_DH026, SAMN18818135; BrYSP_DH059, SAMN18818139; BrYSP_DH061, SAMN18818140.

4.6. Quantification of Glucosinolate Hydrolysis Products

Freeze-dried sample powder (50 mg) was suspended in 2 mL micro-centrifuge tube (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with 1 mL distilled water. Under darkness for 24 h, hydrolysis products were generated naturally by endogenous myrosinase. Samples were added with 1 mL of dichloromethane and centrifuged at 12,000× g for 2 min. Lower organic layer was carefully collected. To quantify the GSL hydrolysis products, gas chromatograph (GC) (6890N, Agilent Technologies) coupled to an MS detector (5975B, Agilent Technologies) equipped with an auto sampler (7683B, Agilent Technologies) and a capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 µm J&W HP-5, Agilent Technologies) was used. From extract, 1 µL was injected in GC-MS with split ratio of 1:1. Initial temperature was set to 40 °C for 2 min, then the oven temperature was increased to 260 °C at 10 °C/min and hold for 10 min. Temperature of injector and detector were set at 200 °C and 280 °C, respectively, with the flow rate in the helium carrier at 1.1 mL/min. Peaks were identified using the respective standards [40,41].

4.7. Measurement of Nitrile Formation

Nitrile formation (%) was measured to estimate the epithiospecifier protein (ESP) activity as ESP enhances the formation of nitriles over isothiocyanates. Nitrile formation in each sample was determined by incubating concentrated horseradish root extract with crude protein extract of the sample and analyzed using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Firstly, concentrated horseradish extract was prepared by powdered 10 g root samples were mixed in 100 mL of 70% methanol. After centrifuging at 4000× g for 5 min, supernatant was boiled in the beaker until all solvent was evaporated and reconstituted in 50 mL of deionized water. Freeze-dried powder (75 mg) of B. rapa DH leaves sample were mixed with 1.5 mL of concentrated “1091” horseradish root extract in 2 mL microcentrifuge. Centrifugation was carried out at 12,000× g for 2 min. Supernatant (0.6 mL) was transferred to 1.5 mL Teflon centrifuge tube (Savillex Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) and mixed with 0.6 mL of dichloromethane. Samples were incubated in RT for 1 h upside down to minimize volatile compounds loss. Vortexed tubes were centrifuged at 12,000× g for 2 min. Bottom organic layer was injected to GC-MS (Trace 1310 GC, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to a MS detector system (ISQ QD, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and an auto sampler (Triplus RSH, Thermo Fisher ScientificA capillary column (DB-5MS, Agilent Technologies; 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm capillary column). The sample was held at 40 °C for 2 min. Oven temperature was increased to 320 °C at 15 °C/min and held for 4 min. Injector and detector temperature were set at 270 °C and 275 °C, respectively. Flow rate of helium carrier gas was 1.2 mL/min. Standard curve was used to quantify hydrolysis rate of nitriles [40,41].

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SAS Enterprise Guide 7.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Carrey, NC, USA). Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test was performed using Prism 5 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).

5. Conclusions

The present study advances our knowledge regarding the inheritance of GSL biosynthetic genes in B. rapa for high GSL synthesis and increased ITCs with low concentrations of nitriles. The result of this work will be useful for genome-assisted precise breeding in B. rapa. Metabolite profiling in various DH lines and its recombinant block predicted in A03 (12.9 Mb-23.2 Mb) chromosome based on SNPs and InDels broadens our understanding of GSL biosynthesis and the key genes responsible for the production of beneficial GSL. The integrative genetic-linkage map brings detailed knowledge of variants in GSL biosynthetic genes in the A03 chromosome region. Further recombinant blocks responsible for GSL biosynthesis can be used for the selection and development of GSL-rich edible cultivars of B. rapa.

6. Patents

High GSL content DH lines have been patented with “variety protection right” under Korean Patent Law and Seed Industry Law. Patent IDs are as follows: BrYSP_DH005, 10-2020-0130241; BrYSP_DH014, 10-2020-0130238; BrYSP_DH016, 10-2020-0130239; BrYSP_DH017, 10-2020-0130240; and BrYSP_DH026, 10-2020-0130242.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22147301/s1.

Author Contributions

J.S.K. conceived the idea, designed the experiments, and revised the manuscript. P.S. performed the GSL metabolic gene analysis and wrote the manuscript. S.Y.W. revised the manuscript. S.-G.P. performed the variants and recombinant blocks analysis. J.S.K. produced the parents and doubled haploid lines by microspore-culture. S.Y.W. and M.-S.M. treated DH lines by bud-pollination and managed the seeds. K.-M.K. quantified the hydrolysis products of GSL and nitrile formation. H.W.P. maintained the plants and assisted in analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by “The Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (PJ013388201)”, Rural Development Administration (RDA), and Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Guusje Bonnema kindly allowed the use YS-033 and PC-099 plant.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. Frazie, M.D.; Kim, M.J.; Ku, K.M. Health-promoting phytochemicals from 11 mustard cultivars at baby leaf and mature stages. Molecules 2017, 22, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ku, K.M.; Jeffery, E.H.; Juvik, J.A. Influence of seasonal variation and methyl jasmonate mediated induction of glucosinolate biosynthesis on quinone reductase activity in broccoli florets. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 9623–9631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lee, Y.S.; Ku, K.M.; Becker, T.M.; Juvik, J.A. Chemopreventive glucosinolate accumulation in various broccoli and collard tissues: Microfluidic-based targeted transcriptomics for by-product valorization. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Prabhakaran, S.; Kim, J.S. Anti-carcinogenic glucosinolates in cruciferous vegetables and their antagonistic effects on prevention of Cancers. Molecules 2018, 23, 2983. [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Gioia, F.; Tzortzakis, N.; Rouphael, Y.; Kyriacou, M.C.; Sampaio, S.L.; Ferreira, I.; Petropoulos, S.A. Grown to be blue—Antioxidant properties and health effects of colored vegetables. Part II: Leafy, fruit, and other vegetables. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sønderby, I.E.; Geu-Flores, F.; Halkier, B.A. Biosynthesis of glucosinolates–gene discovery and beyond. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Han, N.; Ku, K.M.; Kim, J.K. Postharvest variation of major glucosinolate and their hydrolytic products in Brassicoraphanus ‘BB1’. Posrtharvest Biol. Technol. 2019, 154, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nguyen, V.P.T.; Stewart, J.; Lopez, M.; Ioannou, I.; Allais, F. Glucosinolates: Natural Occurrence, Biosynthesis, Accessibility, Isolation, Structures, and Biological Activities. Molecules 2020, 19, 4537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Halkier, B.A.; Gershenzon, J. Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 303–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, X.; Ramchiary, N.; Dhandapani, V.; Choi, S.R.; Hur, Y.; Nou, I.S.; Yoon, M.K.; Lim, Y.P. Quantitative trait loci mapping in Brassica rapa revealed the structural and functional conservation of genetic loci governing morphological and yield component traits in the A, B, and C subgenomes of Brassica species. DNA Res. 2012, 20, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wang, H.; Wu, J.; Sun, S.; Liu, B.; Cheng, F.; Sun, R.; Wang, X. Glucosinolate biosynthetic genes in Brassica rapa. Gene 2011, 487, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, J.; Liu, D.; Wang, X.; Ji, C.; Cheng, F.; Liu, B.; Yao, P. The genome sequence of allopolyploid Brassica juncea and analysis of differential homoeolog gene expression influencing selection. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sawada, Y.; Kuwahara, A.; Nagano, M.; Narisawa, T.; Sakata, A.; Saito, K.; Yokota, H.M. Omics-based approaches to methionine side chain elongation in Arabidopsis: Characterization of the genes encoding methylthioalkylmalate isomerase and methylthioalkylmalate dehydrogenase. Plant Cell. Physiol. 2009, 50, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Textor, S.; Bartram, S.; Kroymann, J.; Falk, K.L.; Hick, A.; Pickett, J.A.; Gershenzon, J. Biosynthesis of methionine-derived glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana: Recombinant expression and characterization of methylthioalkylmalate synthase, the condensing enzyme of the chain-elongation cycle. Planta 2004, 218, 1026–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hansen, B.G.; Kliebenstein, D.J.; Halkier, B.A. Identification of a flavin-monooxygenase as the S-oxygenating enzyme in aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2007, 50, 902–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, J.; Hansen, B.G.; Ober, J.A.; Kliebenstein, D.J.; Halkier, B.A. Subclade of flavin-monooxygenases involved in aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 1721–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Neal, C.S.; Fredericks, D.P.; Griffiths, C.A.; Neale, A.D. The characterisation of AOP2: A gene associated with the biosynthesis of aliphatic alkenyl glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Tong, C.; Edwards, D.; Parkin, I.A.; Zhao, M.; Ma, J.; Yu, J.; Huang, S.; et al. The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Liang, J.; Wu, J.; Cheng, F.; Wang, X. Three genes encoding AOP2, a protein involved in aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis, are differentially expressed in Brassica rapa. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 6205–6218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, Z.; Liang, J.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Cheng, F.; Wang, X. Enriching glucoraphanin in Brassica rapa through replacement of BrAOP2. 2/BrAOP2. 3 with non-functional genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Petersen, A.; Wang, C.; Crocoll, C.; Halkier, B.A. Biotechnological approaches in glucosinolate production. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 1231–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sønderby, I.E.; Burow, M.; Rowe, H.C.; Kliebenstein, D.J.; Halkier, B.A. A complex interplay of three R2R3 MYB transcription factors determines the profile of aliphatic glucosinolates in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 348–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Seo, M.; Kim, J.S. Understanding of MYB transcription factors involved in glucosinolate biosynthesis in Brassicaceae. Moleules 2017, 9, 1549. [Google Scholar]
  24. Edwards, D.; Batley, J. Plant genome sequencing: Applications for crop improvement. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2010, 8, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, X.; Wang, H.; Zhong, W.; Bai, J.; Liu, P.; He, Y. QTL mapping of leafy heads by genome resequencing in the RIL population of Brassica rapa. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Cheng, F.; Sun, R.; Hou, X.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Liang, J.; Zhuang, M.; Liu, Y.; et al. Subgenome parallel selection is associated with morphotype diversification and convergent crop domestication in Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 1218–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lu, K.; Wei, L.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Liu, M.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Z.; Xiao, Z.; Jian, H.; et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals Brassica napus origin and genetic loci involved in its improvement. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Hatakeyama, K.; Suwabe, K.; Tomita, R.N.; Kato, T.; Nunome, T.; Fukuoka, H.; Matsumoto, S. Identification and characterization of Crr1a, a gene for resistance to clubroot disease (Plasmodiophora brassicae Woronin) in Brassica rapa L. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54745. [Google Scholar]
  29. Tollenaere, R.; Hayward, A.; Dalton-Morgan, J.; Campbell, E.; Lee, J.R.M.; Lorenc, M.T.; Manoli, S.; Manoli, S.; Raman, R.; Raman, H.; et al. Identification and characterization of candidate Rlm4 blackleg resistance genes in Brassica napus using nextgeneration sequencing. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2012, 10, 709–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Afrin, K.S.; Rahim, M.A.; Park, J.I.; Natarajan, S.; Kim, H.T.; Nou, I.S. Identification of NBS-encoding genes linked to black rot resistance in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2018, 45, 773–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xiao, D.; Zhao, J.J.; Hou, X.L.; Basnet, R.K.; Carpio, D.P.D.; Zhang, N.W.; Bucher, J.; Lin, K.; Cheng, F.; Wang, X.W.; et al. The Brassica rapa FLC homologue FLC2 is a key regulator of flowering time, identified through transcriptional coexpression networks. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4503–4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Seo, M.S.; Jin, M.; Shon, S.H.; Kim, J.S. Expression profiles of BrMYB transcription factors related to glucosinolate biosynthesis and stress response in eight subspecies of Brassica rapa. FEBBS Open Bio 2017, 7, 1646–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, J.; Wang, X.; Deng, B.; Lou, P.; Wu, J.; Sun, R.; Xu, Z.; Vromans, J.; Koornneef, M.; Bonnema, G. Genetic relationships within Brassica rapa as inferred from AFLP fingerprints. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 110, 1301–13041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Seo, M.S.; Sohn, S.H.; Park, B.S.; Ko, H.C.; Ji, M.A. Efficiency of microspore embryogenesis in Brassica rapa using different genotypes and culture conditions. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2014, 41, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Seo, M.S.; Won, S.Y.; Kang, S.H.; Kim, J. S Analysis of flavonoids in double haploid population derived from microspore culture of F1 hybrid of Brassica rapa. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Zhang, L.; Cai, X.; Wu, J.; Liu, M.; Grob, S.; Cheng, F.; Wang, F. Improved Brassica rapa reference genome by single-molecule sequencing and chromosome conformation capture technologies. Hortic. Res. 2018, 5, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Augustine, R.; Majee, M.; Gershenzon, J.; Bisht, N.C. Four genes encoding MYB28, a major transcriptional regulator of the aliphatic glucosinolate pathway, are differentially expressed in the allopolyploid Brassica juncea. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4907–4921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, M.; Zhang, L.; Ser, S.L.; Cumming, J.R.; Ku, K.M. Comparative phytonutrient analysis of broccoli by-products: The potentials for broccoli by-product utilization. Molecules 2018, 23, 900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kang, J.N.; Won, S.Y.; Seo, M.S.; Lee, J.Y.; Lee, S.M.; Kwon, S.J.; Kim, J.S. Induction of glucoraphasatin biosynthesis genes by MYB29 in Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) roots. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ku, K.M.; Jeffery, E.H.; Jubik, J.A.; Kushad, M.M. Correlation of quinone reductase activity and allyl isothiocyanate formation among different genotypes and grades of horseradish roots. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 2947–2955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, M.J.; Chiu, Y.C.; Kim, N.K.; Park, H.M.; Lee, C.H.; Juvik, J.A.; Ku, K.M. Cultivar-specific changes in primary and secondary metabolites in pak choi (Brassica rapa, chinensis group) by methyl jasmonate. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Paux, E.; Sourdille, P.; Mackay, I.; Feuillet, C. Sequence-based marker development in wheat: Advances and applications to breeding. Biotechnol. Adv. 2012, 30, 1071–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rai, A.; Yamazaki, M.; Saito, K. A new era in plant functional genomics. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 2019, 15, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Frerigmann, H. Glucosinolate Regulation in a Complex Relationship—MYC and MYB—No One Can Act Without Each Other. In Glucosinolates; Kopriva, S., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2016; Volume 80, pp. 57–97. [Google Scholar]
  45. Sønderby, I.E.; Hansen, B.G.; Bjarnholt, N.; Ticconi, C.; Halkier, B.A.; Kliebenstein, D.J. A systems biology approach identifies a R2R3 MYB gene subfamily with distinct and overlapping functions in regulation of aliphatic glucosinolates. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Frerigmann, H.; Gigolashvili, T. MYB34, MYB51, and MYB122 distinctly regulate indolic glucosinolate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 814–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zuluaga, D.L.; Graham, N.S.; Klinder, A.; Kloeke, A.E.E.O.; Marcotrigiano, A.R.; Wagstaff, C.; Gabriella, S.; Aarts, M.G.M. Overexpression of the MYB29 transcription factor affects aliphatic glucosinolate synthesis in Brassica oleracea. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 101, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Gigolashvili, T.; Yatusevich, R.; Rollwitz, I.; Humphry, M.; Gershenzon, J.; Flügge, U.I. The plastidic bile acid transporter 5 is required for the biosynthesis of methionine-derived glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 1813–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Textor, S.; de Kraker, J.W.; Hause, B.; Gershenzon, J.; Tokuhisa, J.G. MAM3 catalyzes the formation of all aliphatic glucosinolate chain lengths in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Chen, S.; Glawischnig, E.; Jørgensen, K.; Naur, P.; Jørgensen, B.; Olsen, C.E.; Halkier, B.A. CYP79F1 and CYP79F2 have distinct functions in the biosynthesis of aliphatic glucosinolates in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2003, 33, 923–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wittstock, U.; Halkier, B.A. Cytochrome P450 CYP79A2 from Arabidopsis thaliana L. catalyzes the conversion of L-phenylalanine to phenylacetaldoxime in the biosynthesis of benzylglucosinolate. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 14659–14666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Naur, P.; Petersen, B.L.; Mikkelsen, M.D.; Bak, S.; Rasmussen, H.; Olsen, C.E.; Halkier, B.A. CYP83A1 and CYP83B1, two nonredundant cytochrome P450 enzymes metabolizing oximes in the biosynthesis of glucosinolates in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Geu-Flores, F.; Nielsen, M.T.; Nafisi, M.; Møldrup, M.E.; Olsen, C.E.; Motawia, M.S.; Halkier, B.A. Glucosinolate engineering identifies a γ-glutamyl peptidase. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 575–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mikkelsen, M.D.; Naur, P.; Halkier, B.A. Arabidopsis mutants in the C–S lyase of glucosinolate biosynthesis establish a critical role for indole-3-acetaldoxime in auxin homeostasis. Plant J. 2004, 37, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Grubb, C.D.; Abel, S. Glucosinolate metabolism and its control. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mugford, S.G.; Yoshimoto, N.; Reichelt, M.; Wirtz, M.; Hill, L.; Mugford, S.T.; Gigolashvili, T. Disruption of adenosine-5′-phosphosulfate kinase in Arabidopsis reduces levels of sulfated secondary metabolites. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 910–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Piotrowski, M.; Schemenewitz, A.; Lopukhina, A.; Müller, A.; Janowitz, T.; Weiler, E.W.; Oecking, C. Desulfoglucosinolate sulfotransferases from Arabidopsis thaliana catalyze the final step in the biosynthesis of the glucosinolate core structure. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 50717–50725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Matusheski, N.V.; Swarup, R.; Juvik, J.A.; Mithen, R.; Bennett, M.; Jeffery, E.H. Epithiospecifier protein from broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. ssp. italica) inhibits formation of the anticancer agent sulforaphane. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 2069–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kim, J.S.; Chung, T.Y.; King, G.J.; Jin, M.; Yang, T.J.; Jin, Y.M.; Kim, H.I.; Park, B.S. A sequence-tagged linkage map of Brassica rapa. Genetics 2006, 174, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 07301 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structure of glucosinolates and hydrolyzed bioactive compounds. Structure was drawn in ChemSketch software using smile notation from ChemSpider (www.chemspider.com (accessed on 7 June 2021)) database.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of glucosinolates and hydrolyzed bioactive compounds. Structure was drawn in ChemSketch software using smile notation from ChemSpider (www.chemspider.com (accessed on 7 June 2021)) database.
Ijms 22 07301 g001
Ijms 22 07301 g002 550
Figure 2. Development strategy of high glucosinolate synthesis lines using hybrid plants from different B. rapa subspecies.
Figure 2. Development strategy of high glucosinolate synthesis lines using hybrid plants from different B. rapa subspecies.
Ijms 22 07301 g002
Ijms 22 07301 g003 550
Figure 3. Glucosinolate (GSL) biosynthesis genes identified from recombinant blocks between LP08 and LP21. Key genes uniformly present as LP08 type in high GSL lines are indicated in red. Chromosomal regions are highlighted in the green boxes.
Figure 3. Glucosinolate (GSL) biosynthesis genes identified from recombinant blocks between LP08 and LP21. Key genes uniformly present as LP08 type in high GSL lines are indicated in red. Chromosomal regions are highlighted in the green boxes.
Ijms 22 07301 g003
Ijms 22 07301 g004a 550Ijms 22 07301 g004b 550
Figure 4. Metabolic pathway profiling of genes derived from recombinant blocks between high and low GSL parents of doubled haploid lines BrYSP_DH005 (A) and BrYSP_DH059 (B). The pathway and product structures are adapted from previously published reports [6,18,21,37] and the Brassica database BRAD. Genes not identified in recombinant blocks are not highlighted. Structure of all products were drawn using ChemSketch software.
Figure 4. Metabolic pathway profiling of genes derived from recombinant blocks between high and low GSL parents of doubled haploid lines BrYSP_DH005 (A) and BrYSP_DH059 (B). The pathway and product structures are adapted from previously published reports [6,18,21,37] and the Brassica database BRAD. Genes not identified in recombinant blocks are not highlighted. Structure of all products were drawn using ChemSketch software.
Ijms 22 07301 g004aIjms 22 07301 g004b
Ijms 22 07301 g005 550
Figure 5. Percentage of nitrile formation in high GSL DH lines using sinigrin (A) and gluconasturtiin (B) as substrate. Lowercase letters above the error bar indicate significant differences among the accessions as determined by Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Percentage of nitrile formation in high GSL DH lines using sinigrin (A) and gluconasturtiin (B) as substrate. Lowercase letters above the error bar indicate significant differences among the accessions as determined by Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.05.
Ijms 22 07301 g005
Ijms 22 07301 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparison of cancer-preventive effect of high glucosinolate DH_line with low nitrile formation ability with broccoli as well-known cancer fighting vegetable as model. Genome-assisted precision breeding in B. rapa achieved high GSLs DH line that directly contribute to high ITCs-mediated restoration of Nrf2/ARE signaling.
Figure 6. Comparison of cancer-preventive effect of high glucosinolate DH_line with low nitrile formation ability with broccoli as well-known cancer fighting vegetable as model. Genome-assisted precision breeding in B. rapa achieved high GSLs DH line that directly contribute to high ITCs-mediated restoration of Nrf2/ARE signaling.
Ijms 22 07301 g006
Table
Table 1. Total and individual GSL content (µmol·g−1·dw) in leaves of Chiffu, a parent of LP08 and LP21, F1, and eight BrYSP_DH lines of Brassica rapa.
Table 1. Total and individual GSL content (µmol·g−1·dw) in leaves of Chiffu, a parent of LP08 and LP21, F1, and eight BrYSP_DH lines of Brassica rapa.
GenotypeAliphaticIndolicAromatic
GRAGALSNGGNAGBNGNLPROGBS4-MOGBSNGBSGNTTotal
μmol g−1 dw
ChiffuNDNDND0.00 e0.00 f0.00 c0.38 ± 0.00 def4.00 ± 0.26 a1.09 ± 0.04 a3.16 ± 0.52 b0.14 ± 0.09 de8.77 ± 0.69 ef
LP08(♀)0.11 ± 0.05 b0.55 ± 0.05 g0.17 ± 0.00 a43.40 ± 3.63 b0.66 ± 0.06 e0.00c0.71 ± 0.06 cd0.40 ± 0.01 d0.31 ± 0.04 c0.76 ± 0.06 d0.47 ± 0.14 bc47.55 ± 3.66 bc
LP21(♂)0.00b0.89 ± 0.10 def0.00e1.82 ± 0.66 d0.00f0.27 ± 0.03 a0.88 ± 0.09 c2.03 ± 0.02 b0.63 ± 0.03 b3.44 ± 0.24 b0.81 ± 0.09 a10.76 ± 0.36 e
F10.10 ± 0.01 b0.85 ± 0.12 ef0.00e1.97 ± 0.16 d1.68 ± 0.14 d0.34 ± 0.03 a3.86 ± 0.29 a0.59 ± 0.02 c0.64 ± 0.03 b4.58 ± 0.16 a0.47 ± 0.05 bc15.07 ± 0.79 d
High GSL linesBrYSP_DH0051.23 ± 0.18 a3.47 ± 0.18 a0.05 ± 0.01 cde35.51 ± 2.84 c0.63 ± 0.04 e0.10 ± 0.04 b0.22 ± 0.03 ef0.14 ± 0.00 e0.06 ± 0.00 f2.03 ± 0.20 c0.68 ± 0.34 ab44.12 ± 2.86 c
BrYSP_DH0140.07 ± 0.02 b2.16 ± 0.05 b0.05 ± 0.01 cde45.19 ± 2.69 ab7.13 ± 0.62 a0.02 ± 0.01 bc0.06 ± 0.02 f0.11 ± 0.01 e0.10 ± 0.01 ef0.77 ± 0.04 d0.39 ± 0.04 cd56.06 ± 3.28 a
BrYSP_DH0160.12 ± 0.07 b0.43 ± 0.05 g0.11 ± 0.07 b44.42 ± 1.34 b1.68 ± 0.07 dND0.57 ± 0.37 cde0.20 ± 0.01 e0.16 ± 0.01 d0.76 ± 0.02 d0.24 ± 0.03 cde48.69 ± 0.95 b
BrYSP_DH0170.07 ± 0.01 b0.62 ± 0.17 fg0.08 ± 0.02 bc45.66 ± 1.25 ab2.70 ± 0.09 c0.10 ± 0.11 b0.32 ± 0.03 ef0.19 ± 0.01 e0.19 ± 0.02 d0.50 ± 0.02 def0.20 ± 0.01 cde50.62 ± 1.51 b
BrYSP_DH0260.09 ± 0.02 b2.05 ± 0.04 b0.07 ± 0.04 bcd48.23 ± 1.31 a5.39 ± 0.25 b0.03 ± 0.02 bc0.05 ± 0.00 f0.08 ± 0.00 e0.11 ± 0.00 e0.57 ± 0.05 de0.39 ± 0.03 cd57.04 ± 1.54 a
Low GSL linesBrYSP_DH0090.04 ± 0.03 b1.16 ± 0.10 d0.00 ± 0.00 e0.25 ± 0.05 d0.26 ± 0.07 ef0.09 ± 0.03 b0.82 ± 0.26 c0.12 ± 0.02 e0.10 ± 0.01 ef0.33 ± 0.03 ef0.08 ± 0.03 e3.26 ± 0.62 g
BrYSP_DH0590.06 ± 0.01 b1.44 ± 0.19 c0.01 ± 0.01 de0.32 ± 0.06 d0.52 ± 0.08 ef0.30 ± 0.03 a1.97 ± 0.23 b0.10 ± 0.02 e0.07 ± 0.01 ef0.38 ± 0.03 def0.15 ± 0.02 de5.31 ± 0.67 fg
BrYSP_DH061ND1.13 ± 0.26 de0.01 ± 0.01 de2.35 ± 0.81 d1.70 ± 0.64 d0.00 ± 0.00 c0.05 ± 0.01 f0.05 ± 0.01 e0.01 ± 0.00 g0.11 ± 0.02 f0.23 ± 0.07 cde5.63 ± 1.76 fg
ANOVASum of square3.85229.5730.09116,645165.680.52539.646.363.60172.881.66916,984
Mean sum of square0.3502.6880.0081513.215.0610.0473.64.2150.3276.6260.1521544
F value68.22103.259.09348.84132.2822.8180.11471.38494.16129.537.5286.69
p************************************************
GRA, Glucoraphanin; GAL, Glucoalyssin; SNG, Sinigrin; GNA, Gluconapin; GBN, Glucobrassicanapin; GNL, Gluconapoleiferin; PRO, Progoitrin; GBS, Glucobrassicin; 4-MOGBS, 4-Methoxyglucobrassicin; NGBS, Neoglucobrassicin; GNT, Gluconasturtiin; ND, Not detected. Different letters indicate significant difference between the genotypes under Duncan’s test (p ≤ 0.05) for three individual biological replicates. F-test are significant at **** p ≤ 0.0001 or Nonsignificant, respectively.
Table
Table 4. Hydrolysis products of high glucosinolate doubled haploid (DH) lines.
Table 4. Hydrolysis products of high glucosinolate doubled haploid (DH) lines.
AccessionsBITC4-PEITC2-PEITCSFNTotalFold
BrYSP_DH005601.0 ± 16.847.7 ± 1.340.8 ± 0.820.24 ± 1.33709.8 ± 16.75.1
BrYSP_DH014778.8 ± 32.964.5 ± 3.925.0 ± 1.22.03 ± 0.15870.3 ± 37.66.3
BrYSP_DH016425.1 ± 10.0100.1 ± 2.518.5 ± 0.72.90 ± 0.13546.6 ± 12.53.9
BrYSP_DH017281.7 ± 15.3120.7 ± 5.312.7 ± 0.82.35 ± 0.21417.5 ± 21.53.0
BrYSP_DH026653.0 ± 20.894.0 ± 2.334.5 ± 0.52.39 ± 0.15783.9 ± 23.55.6
pak choi©108.9 ± 2.721.6 ± 0.68.1 ± 0.20.57 ± 0.04139.2 ± 3.6Control
pak choi©, Commercial cultivar in South Korea. BITC, 3-Butenyl isothiocyanate; 4-PEITC, 4-pentenyl isothiocyanate (brassicanapin); 2-PEITC, 2-Phenethyl isothiocyanate; and SFN, Sulforaphane. Unit, µg∙g−1 dw.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Soundararajan, P.; Park, S.-G.; Won, S.Y.; Moon, M.-S.; Park, H.W.; Ku, K.-M.; Kim, J.S. Influence of Genotype on High Glucosinolate Synthesis Lines of Brassica rapa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147301

AMA Style

Soundararajan P, Park S-G, Won SY, Moon M-S, Park HW, Ku K-M, Kim JS. Influence of Genotype on High Glucosinolate Synthesis Lines of Brassica rapa. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(14):7301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Soundararajan, Prabhakaran, Sin-Gi Park, So Youn Won, Mi-Sun Moon, Hyun Woo Park, Kang-Mo Ku, and Jung Sun Kim. 2021. "Influence of Genotype on High Glucosinolate Synthesis Lines of Brassica rapa" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 14: 7301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147301

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop