Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Caffeoyl-Prolyl-Histidyl-Xaa Derivatives and Evaluation of Their Activities and Stability upon Long-Term Storage
Next Article in Special Issue
Transcriptome Analysis of Tolerant and Susceptible Maize Genotypes Reveals Novel Insights about the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Drought Responses in Leaves
Previous Article in Journal
Merkel Cell Carcinoma from Molecular Pathology to Novel Therapies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Salt Stress on the Expression and Promoter Methylation of the Genes Encoding the Mitochondrial and Cytosolic Forms of Aconitase and Fumarase in Maize
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 12
10.3390/ijms22126304
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ozone Induced Stomatal Regulations, MAPK and Phytohormone Signaling in Plants

by
Md. Mahadi Hasan
1,
Md. Atikur Rahman
2,
Milan Skalicky
3,
Nadiyah M. Alabdallah
4,
Muhammad Waseem
1,
Mohammad Shah Jahan
5,6,
Golam Jalal Ahammed
7,
Mohamed M. El-Mogy
8,
Ahmed Abou El-Yazied
9,
Mohamed F. M. Ibrahim
10 and
Xiang-Wen Fang
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
Grassland and Forage Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea
3
Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic
4
Department of Biology, College of Science, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 383, Saudi Arabia
5
Key Laboratory of Southern Vegetable Crop Genetic Improvement in Ministry of Agriculture, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
6
Department of Horticulture, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
7
College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China
8
Vegetable Crop Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
9
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
10
Department of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(12), 6304; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126304
Submission received: 28 May 2021 / Revised: 8 June 2021 / Accepted: 9 June 2021 / Published: 11 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Stress and Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ozone (O3) is a gaseous environmental pollutant that can enter leaves through stomatal pores and cause damage to foliage. It can induce oxidative stress through the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) like hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) that can actively participate in stomatal closing or opening in plants. A number of phytohormones, including abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene (ET), salicylic acid (SA), and jasmonic acid (JA) are involved in stomatal regulation in plants. The effects of ozone on these phytohormones’ ability to regulate the guard cells of stomata have been little studied, however, and the goal of this paper is to explore and understand the effects of ozone on stomatal regulation through guard cell signaling by phytohormones. In this review, we updated the existing knowledge by considering several physiological mechanisms related to stomatal regulation after response to ozone. The collected information should deepen our understanding of the molecular pathways associated with response to ozone stress, in particular, how it influences stomatal regulation, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity, and phytohormone signaling. After summarizing the findings and noting the gaps in the literature, we present some ideas for future research on ozone stress in plants

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Ozone is formed in the troposphere through the action of sunlight-driven chemical reactions involving nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds [1]. Because of anthropogenic activities, tropospheric ozone concentrations have increased significantly, especially in industrial and urban areas where ozone air pollution negatively affects plant growth and physiology [2]. Ozone’s effect on a particular plant species depends on several factors including concentration and exposure time. Previous studies reported that low levels of ozone decreased photosynthetic and reproductive capacity, as well as accelerating senescence and abscission, and causing foliar damage [3]. Ozone pollution is ultimately responsible for huge economic losses from decreased forest productivity and crop yield [4]. An imbalance in ozone is also associated with global warming and climate change [5].
Plant exposure to ozone produces a number of specific changes in gene expression, metabolic profiles, and enzyme activities. In sensitive accession, acute O3 exposure resulted in increased cell death, lesion development, and decreased photosynthesis [2]. After initiation of ozone exposure, protein modifications can occur quickly, sometimes within just a few minutes [6], because ozone is actively engaged in the generation of ROS in the apoplast. Thus, the formation of apoplastic ROS by ozone can be used as a non-invasive research tool to activate ROS-responsive signaling pathways. The results obtained from ozone-induction experiments proved that the pollutant played a direct, active role in apoplastic ROS signaling [7]. As ozone is highly reactive and unstable, it can induce oxidative stress in plants by chemically modifying various molecules to produce short-lived ROS such as peroxides, hydroxyl radicals, and superoxide [8].
Studies on the effects of ozone on stomatal regulation by phytohormones are limited in the literature. Ozone activates different signaling pathways in plants which are integrated into complex regulatory systems involving phytohormones such as abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ET), ROS, and calcium as secondary messengers [9]. Although significant progress has been made during the past decades in understanding the ozone response mechanisms in guard cells, there are still many gaps in the research. Our review describes recent advances in understanding how ozone enters leaves via stomata, generates ROS, and alters the activity of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and phytohormones in signaling pathways, and the molecular mechanisms of leaf damage formation, NO production, and alteration of metabolite profiles.

2. Ozone Sources, Formation, Emission, and Transport

Ozone (O3) is found throughout the atmosphere but its concentration peaks in two regions, the troposphere (0–15 km) and the stratosphere (15–50 km). The ground-level region of the troposphere is the principal source of toxic air pollutants like ozone. As a result of increased global atmospheric temperatures, the interaction of ultraviolet radiation with primary tropospheric pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds, results in the formation of secondary air pollutants including ozone [10]. Studies of atmospheric chemistry have identified several complex processes that may be involved in the formation of tropospheric ozone. Ultraviolet radiation can cause photodissociation of nitrogen dioxide, NO2, resulting in the formation of nitrogen monoxide (NO, nitric oxide) and free oxygen atoms. These free oxygen atoms, in turn, react with O2 to form ozone, O3 (reactions (i)–(iv))
NO2 + O2 (hν) ↔ NO + O3
CO + 2O2 (hν) → CO2 + O3
CH4 + 4O2 + 2hν → HCHO + H2O + O3
RH + 4O2 + 2hν → R′CHO +H2O + O3
In regions with a lower NO2/NO ratio, the reaction of O3 with NO can lead to the destruction of ozone. However, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as methane can cause oxidation of NO and increase the NO2/NO ratio [11], ultimately resulting in a shift in the chemical reaction towards O3 accumulation. In addition, the production of atmospheric ozone is strongly correlated with alterations in precursor concentrations, a relationship that highlights the non-linearity of the O3-VOCs-NOx system [12]. Plants produce a broad range of natural VOCs, and the continuation of global climate change may cause an escalation in VOC levels, which contributes to an increase in peak tropospheric ozone. The photolysis of this excess ozone could give rise to the increased radical formation that can react with carbon monoxide and organic species, leading to additional ozone production.
Most air pollutants, like ozone precursors, emerge from mid-latitude regions, where long-range transport of emissions is dominated by westerly winds from source to downwind regions at both local and global scales. The lifespan of free ozone in the troposphere ranges from weeks to months, which is compatible with long-range transport that happens on a timescale of days to weeks. The ozone in the middle and upper troposphere travels faster than the ozone in the lower troposphere, owing to the action of strong winds at high altitudes. When an ecosystem encounters circumstances like air pollution, it can stimulate ozone formation at a distance from the precursor source regions [13]. The effects of ozone pollution are clearly observed on leaves, but because of these potential transportation events, care must be exercised in identifying the source of the ozone.

3. Ozone-Induced Stomatal Regulation in Plants

3.1. Stomata Control the Influx of Ozone into Leaves

Ozone can enter the leaves through the stomata with guard cells regulating the opening and closing. Stomatal apertures in leaves control the ozone flux in various ways. Past studies reported that ozone in the range of 50 to 75 ppb decreased stomatal conductance, which restricts the flow of CO2 into the leaves [14]. The reduction of stomatal conductance was observed for up to several hours from the beginning of ozone exposure. Recent studies reported that prior to the longer-lasting reduction in conductivity, ozone stress caused a rapid transient increase or decrease (RTI or RTD) in stomatal conductance [15]. The RTD can occur within a few minutes of ozone exposure, depending on its concentrations [7]. Guard cell ion channels and transporters are the key factors that regulate stomatal pore size, and they also control the transportation of osmotically active molecules across the plasma membrane and tonoplast [16]. Activation of guard cell ion channels is essential for stomatal closure and also crucial for limiting the influx of ozone into leaves. The rapidly deactivating R-type and the slowly deactivating S-type are the two principal types of anion channel involved in stomatal closure [17]. The S-type slow anion channel 1 (SLAC1) is vital for stomatal closure induced by various stimuli, including ozone, which was identified in screening an Arabidopsis mutant for ozone sensitivity [18]. Ozone is not the only factor inducing stomatal closure by SLAC1, however. It can also be triggered by ABA, NO, calcium, and light/dark transitions [17,18]. The protein kinase, open stomata 1 (OST1), activates SLAC1 by phosphorylating the N-terminal region of the ion channel [19] (Figure 1).
In addition to OST1, several calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) and guard cell hydrogen peroxide-resistant 1 (GHR1) can also phosphorylate the N-terminal region of SLAC1 and this can be reversed by the PP2C phosphatases, ABA-insensitive 1 and 2 (ABI-1 and ABI-2) [7]. The ABA receptors, pyrabactin resistance 1 (PYR1) and PYR1-like (PYL), and the regulatory components of ABA receptors (RCAR) inhibit PP2C activity [20], which leads to anion efflux activation and stomatal closure by phosphorylation of SLAC1 [21]. ROS also inhibited ABI-1 and ABI-2 activity [22], indicating an ABA-independent pathway for OST1 activation. It has been confirmed that the above signaling pathways were essential for ozone-induced rapid stomatal closure [23]. In addition, ABI-1 can directly affect the activity of SLAC1 by dephosphorylating the SLAC1 N-terminal region [24]. It has been reported that SLAC1, or related anion channels, are involved in cryptogenic-induced ion fluxes in tobacco BY-2 (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Bright Yellow-2) cells in response to ozone [25].
Guard cell outward-rectifying K+ (GORK) channel activation is also important in stomatal regulation in response to ozone, which triggers membrane depolarization resulting in ozone-induced programmed cell death (PCD) [26]. Previous studies provided evidence that inhibition of the inward-rectifying K+ channel, KAT1, was crucial for stomatal closure [27]. OST1 phosphorylates KAT1 at the C-terminus, which interferes with anion channel activity leading to rapid stomatal closure [28]. Thus, we conclude that OST1 and SLAC1 are the major elements for stomatal closure in response to ozone.
Although OST1 plays a crucial role in ABA-dependent stomatal responses by controlling the ion channels, the ABA-independent stomatal responses through OST1 in the stomatal closure induced by ROS cannot be overlooked. Stomatal closure can be triggered by different factors, including ozone, which are supported by different pathways for the activation of SLAC1. It can be concluded that ROS plays a crucial role in stomatal closure, either directly or indirectly, by modulating several signaling pathways. This exemplifies the deep connection between ROS and ozone with regard to plant stress responses.

3.2. Stomatal Closure and Opening Is Linked to ABA and Ethylene and Shows Cross-Talk in Response to Ozone

Stomatal closure and opening is an important factor in plant growth regulation. ABA and ethylene (ET) are crucial phytohormones that have significant roles in stomatal regulation in plants [29]. It was confirmed by past studies, that these phytohormones directly or indirectly regulate stomatal opening and closing, but their effects on stomata in the presence of ozone need further study. It was observed that when plants with responsive stomata were exposed to ozone, foliar ABA levels increased quickly. Stomatal closure in response to ozone exposure results from the direct oxidation of ABA precursors resulting to ABA synthesis, although in normal photosynthesis, the significance of this ROS interaction is unknown [30]. ABA can increase H2O2 production through NADPH oxidases such as AtRbohF (Figure 2).
This H2O2 is an important signaling molecule that triggers NO production for stomatal closure in plants [32]. H2O2-dependent ABA signaling in guard cells requires the ethylene receptor, ETR1, downstream of H2O2, as H2O2 -mediated stomatal closure is disrupted in the ethylene-insensitive Arabidopsis mutant etr1-7. Stomatal ABA responses in the etr1-1 or ein3-1 ethylene-insensitive Arabidopsis mutants were not antagonized by ethylene [9]. ETR1 plays two roles in guard cells, one mediating ethylene sensing, and the other H2O2 signaling. It is possible that ethylene binding to ETR1 prevents ETR1 from performing its other role in signaling the presence of H2O2, whether it is generated through ozone or ABA, or through ethylene itself [33] (Figure 2). Ethylene may induce stomatal closure through substituting within the ABA signaling pathway. Given the above results and the ozone-induced H2O2 involvement in regulating stomata, it would suggest that ozone could cause stomatal movement in plants.

4. MAPK Cascade Signaling in Response to Ozone Stress

MAPK signaling is activated in response to various abiotic stresses [34,35]. The MAPK signaling mechanism includes three types of protein kinase, which activate and phosphorylate each other: MAPK kinase (MKK) activated by a MAPK kinase kinase (MEKK), which in turn, phosphorylates and activates a MAPK (MPK). These MAPK signaling units, MKK-MPK or MEKK-MKK-MPK, are involved in specific stress responses [36]. In response to ozone, the MAPKs, MPK3, and MPK6 were activated quickly and transiently (0.5–2 h) in two Arabidopsis strains. After activation, MPK3/6 translocated into the nucleus where they regulated the expression of the specific genes, SIPK and WIPK, commonly known as tobacco orthologs, which were found to be induced by ozone [37]. MPK3 and MPK6 were mutually regulated such that MPK3 inhibition led to further strong activation of MPK6 and MPK6 suppression resulted in prolonged and enhanced MPK3 activation [38]. In response to stress from plant pathogens, MKK4/MKK5 were activated by MEKK1 [39]. MKK5 was also involved in MPK3/MPK6 activation in response to ozone exposure [40]. A proper ozone response is required to mediate the optimal balance of MPK3/MPK6 activities because increases in activation time or any perturbations in the strength lead to increased ozone sensitivity. For example, the activation of MPK3/MPK6 in the ozone-sensitive radical-induced cell death1 (rcd1) mutant was prolonged compared to wild-type plants [41]. It has been reported that MPK3/MPK6 substrates are linked to ethylene biosynthesis and signaling, transcriptional factors, and nitric acid (NO) signaling [42] (Figure 2). Moreover, the MKK4/MKK5–MPK3/MPK6 signaling unit is crucial for stomatal regulation, which indirectly affects ozone entrance into leaves [43]. The question of specificity needs to be addressed to determine exactly how a few kinases can regulate all the varied stress responses.

5. Alterations of Phytohormone Signaling in Response to Ozone Stress

5.1. Ozone-Induced Regulation of Signaling Molecules (ROS, H2O2, and NO)

Nitric oxide (NO) is one of the key signaling molecules induced in plants in response to several stressors including O3 [44]. NO and H2O2 accumulation was observed in tobacco plants within 1.5 h of ozone exposure [45]. H2O2 can interact with NO, and NO donors such as sodium nitroprusside (SNP) can induce H2O2 accumulation in plants [46]. Guanosine 3, 5-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) is a known second messenger of NO, and its formation was observed later at >2 h of ozone exposure [45]. In Arabidopsis, spatiotemporal analysis revealed that ozone-induced NO generation occurred first in the guard cells with a peak at 1.5 h of ozone exposure. After that, NO was observed in the palisade spongy mesophyll cells. When plants were exposed to 2 h ozone treatments, the NO donor SNP induced defense-related gene expression. Moreover, combined treatment with ozone and SNP downregulated defense-related gene expression and ethylene biosynthesis. These results indicated that ozone-induced hormone signaling was modulated by NO and that a certain NO level was essential for optimal ozone responses. NO reduction in an Atnoa1 mutant and overproduction of NO in a different Atnoa1 mutant correlated with ozone sensitivity. Cysteine residues of proteins were modified by NO (similar to ROS) via S-nitrosylation. Several proteins such as non-expresser of PR genes 1 (NPR1), RBOHD, and metacaspase 9 were modified by NO involved in ROS signaling (Huang et al., 2019). Both ROS and NO participate in the generation of reactive nitrogen species, which results in the formation of a signaling molecule known as 8-nitro-cGMP that ultimately induces stomatal closure in plants. Considering all these lines of evidence suggests an active role of signaling molecules like NO, H2O2, and ROS in the regulation of plant responses to ozone.

5.2. Phytohormones Involved in Signaling and Gene Expression during Ozone-Induced Oxidative Stress and Cellular Injury

A number of abiotic stressors including ozone cause physical, biomechanical, and molecular alterations in plants as a result of ROS generation, oxidative stress induction, cellular injury, and apoptosis. Phytohormones are recognized as important tools for mitigating the negative impact of abiotic stresses in plants. In the sub-sections, we focus on the involvement of several phytohormones in signaling and gene expression along with alleviation of ozone-induced oxidative stress and cellular injury in plants

5.2.1. Salicylic Acid

Salicylic acid (SA) is a multifunctional phenolic compound involved in plant growth and development, along with responses to numerous stresses including ozone [47]. SA is known to be involved in the same signaling networks as other classical phytohormones such as jasmonic acid and ethylene in response to ozone. Furthermore, SA has been known to cause stomatal closure [48]. Together with other signaling, the guard cell SA signaling and its cross-talk with other signaling play critical roles in stomatal immunity [49], however the molecular mechanism remains unknown. SA is synthesized by the phenylpropanoid pathway or via isochorismate synthase in tobacco, tomato, and Arabidopsis [50]. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) is one of the enzymes that are crucial for SA biosynthesis in plants [51]. It has been reported that SA-accumulation because of ozone stress can be reduced by ET-mediated alteration of the expression of PAL and chorismate mutase (CM) in tobacco plants [52]. Arabidopsis ecotype Wassilewskija (WS) exposed to ozone showed lower expression of the AtSR/NFkB family of redox-sensitive transcription factors and the C2-domain proteins as well as other genes associated with cell wall growth and critical point drying (CPD), such as inactive poly[ADP-ribose] polymerase RCD1 (protein radical-induced cell death 1), which was recognized as a likely candidate gene [53]. 14C-labeled benzoic acid can be used as a precursor of SA in the phenylalanine pathway to measure SA synthesis, and it was observed that isochorismate synthase (ICS) mRNA expression was not induced in ozone-exposed tobacco and ICS activity was low [52]. In Arabidopsis, however, the ICS activity was increased in response to O3. The salicylic acid induction-deficient 2 (sid2) Arabidopsis mutant lacks ICS1 activity, and SA was found to be lower in the mutant in response to ozone [52]. These studies supported the conclusion that SA is synthesized through benzoic acid from phenylalanine in tobacco and through isochorismate in Arabidopsis.
It has been reported that SA accumulation was correlated with leaf lesion formation during ozone exposure to plants [47]. NahG gene expression inhibited SA accumulation and decreased lesion formation in the tobacco cultivar ‘Xanthi’ exposed to ozone. A mediated defense response was reported to be induced during O3 exposure in plants. In the ozone-tolerant Arabidopsis Col-0 ecotype, a NahG-transformed line exhibited higher O3 sensitivity compared to Col-0 plants [54]. Ozone-inducible SA has a dual function depending on its level of production. An Arabidopsis Cvi-0 ecotype known for ozone sensitivity accumulated more than three times the amount of SA than an ozone-tolerant Col-0 ecotype [54]. Exposure to ozone enhanced PR1 (AT2G14610) expression in Cvi-0 from a control stage that was still greater than those in Col-0 (Table 1) [53].
Ozone-mediated changes in the pathway involving AtSR, a homolog of the mammalian NFkB family of redox-sensitive transcription factors, resulted in changes in chaperones, WRKY, and C2H2 proteins and antioxidants [53]. It has also been documented that the generation of antioxidants such as glutathione reductase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione peroxidase were induced in response to ozone in Col-0 plants [54]. Table 2 shows the responses of antioxidant genes to ozone and the controls.
Furthermore, O3-induced regulation of genes has been reported to wild-type and several mutants of model plants Arabidopsis (Table 3).
However, this section can be summarized that SA is required to maintain the cellular redox state and antioxidant defense responses under ozone stress in plants, as well as O3, which can involve directly in stress-induced candidate gene expression in model plants.

5.2.2. Ethylene

Ethylene (ET) is one of the most important phytohormones involved in plant growth and development, and ET production is stimulated by plant exposure to a number of biotic and abiotic stresses [56]. Although the relationship between ET and abiotic stress alleviation is well known, in this section we discuss the functional response to ozone exposure in terms of the ET-responsive biosynthetic genes. The two key enzymes in ethylene biosynthesis, are ACC synthase (ACS) and ACC oxidase (ACO). S-adenosyl-L-methionine is converted to 1- aminocyclopropane -1-carboxylic acid (ACC), which undergoes oxidative cleavage by ACO to produce ethylene [57]. Both ACC synthase (ACS) and ACC oxidase (ACO) are encoded by similar gene families in a number of different organisms all known to catalyze the same reactions in ethylene biosynthesis [58]. Under ozone exposure in Arabidopsis, Cvi-0 showed increased expression of three known ET sensitive genes (AT1G49830, AT1G55150, and AT2G22300) with unknown functions (Table 1). The expression of At5g44440 and At2g26020 were reduced in both Cvi-0 and Col-0 during ozone exposure (Table 1) [53]. Expression of ST-ACS4 and ST-ACS5 is enhanced in potato, whereas LE-ACS1A, LE-ACS2, and LE-ACS6 are induced in ozone-exposed tomato plants [59]. The only major gene among the nine ACS genes [60], that triggers the evolution of ethylene when Arabidopsis is exposed to ozone. The amount of ethylene produced in response to ozone induction showed a correlation between the ozone-induced ethylene biosynthesis rate and the level of leaf injury in several species. When exposed to ozone, the ozone-tolerant ‘Bel-B’ tobacco generated less ethylene than the ozone-sensitive ‘Bel-W3′ strain [61]. Under ozone exposure, treatment with inhibitors of ethylene biosynthesis reduced leaf injury [61]. These findings suggest that the increase in ozone-induced leaf damage associated with ethylene might be due to damaging free radicals and toxic aldehydes via direct chemical reactions between ozone and ethylene [62]. Ethylene acts as a signaling molecule by binding to one or more receptors, and the above discussion suggested that the ethylene signaling pathways could be activated in response to ozone causing leaf damage.

5.2.3. Jasmonic Acid

Jasmonic acid (JA) is involved in the suppression of ROS-dependent lesion development through the ozone-sensitive JA-deficient mutants in ozone-exposed leaves. In Arabidopsis the JA-insensitive 1 mutants are ozone-sensitive (oji1), coronatine insensitive1 (coi1), methyl jasmonate-resistant 1 (jar1), while 12-oxophytodienoate reductase 3 (opr3) mutants are sensitive to ozone [63]. Previous studies reported that pretreatment with MeJA conferred ozone tolerance on Arabidopsis and tobacco, which indicates an involvement of JA in ozone stress [63]. MeJA induced genes that encoded an ethylene receptor (ERS2), whereas leaf damage was inhibited via these receptors [64]. Ozone caused the development of ethylene-dependent lesions that could be inhibited by JA. The JA-induced genes such as AT2G24850 and AT5G24770 are shown in Table 1. JA might also be involved in the production of antioxidants that protect leaves against damage by ozone [53]. MeJ-treated plants showed gene expression of antioxidants like ascorbic acid (VTC1, VTC2, DHAR, and MDHAR) and glutathione (GSH1 and GSH2) [65]. Thus, it is concluded that the accumulation of antioxidants induced by JA in plants could support increased ozone tolerance.

6. Phytohormone Signaling Cross-Talk in Response to Ozone

A number of recent studies revealed that several classical phytohormones (ET, ABA, IAAs, and CKs) and signaling molecules (SA, JA, Pro, and BRs) responded to chronic and acute ozone exposure [7,9]. Ozone exposure induced the generation of ROS in cells leading to PCD, which was regulated by a process of feedback inhibition [66]. In this section, we update the existing knowledge concerning the relationship between phytohormones and signaling intermediates, and their antagonistic and synergistic cross-talk in complex signaling pathways in response to acute ozone stress.
Recently, more attention has been given to exploring the interaction of phytohormones in response to ozone stress in plant cells [47]. It has been proposed that ozone stress causes the generation of ROS, resulting in ET, SA, and JA production along with PCD, where ET accumulation is required for continued ROS generation (Figure 3) [67].
In the oxidative cell death process, JA, SA, and ET show antagonistic influences on each other. Another classical phytohormone, ABA, is required for stomatal closure to block ozone entry and also appears to inhibit ET’s activity in accelerating ozone-induced cell death. The induction of ET biosynthesis was observed in plants within a few hours of ozone treatment [68]. The ET synthesis genes, Le-ACS1A, Le-ACS2, and Le-ACS6, were induced in ozone-treated tomatoes, but the expression of Le-ACS6 and -ACS4 and St-ACS5 was unregulated in potato [9]. The transcription of ACS1, ACS2, and ACO1 was significantly enhanced in beech trees in response to long-term ozone exposure [69,70]. ABA plays a pivotal role in plant growth and development along with the regulation of gene expression associated with the stomatal aperture [71]. It has been revealed that ABA is involved in the response to drought stress by stimulating guard cells to close stomata [72]. There is also evidence that ozone-induced ET may be involved in the stomatal response by interacting with ABA in ozone-sensitive species which leads to stomatal opening. Ozone-induced ET accumulation can disrupt ABA-mediated signaling to stomata [31].
It has also been reported that ROS signaling triggers an auxin response through a combined mechanism. In this process, O3 was considered as a model ROS inducer in plants, and the transcriptome results suggested that auxin homeostasis and signaling were altered by apoplastic ROS, which modulated gene expression in Arabidopsis [73]. Very few studies have been documented concerning the protective role of CKs in oxidative stress following ozone exposure in several crops. Supplementation with kinetin retarded leaf yellowing controlled the reduction of free sterols and inhibited ozone-induced foliar necrosis of the bean [9].

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The significant findings of the past decade in the field of ozone research in plants provide a solid foundation for the widely accepted belief that the degree of ozone exposure affects the regulation of stomata through a coordinated process of signaling, transport, and phytohormonal responses. Variation in ozone exposure induces distinct phytohormone profiles and signaling responses in plant cells. In this review, we have updated the existing knowledge concerning ozone-induced stomatal regulation and the involvement of classical phytohormones in signaling guard cells following ozone exposure in plants. We explored the mechanisms associated with phytohormone-mediated stomatal closure and opening in response to ozone. Moreover, we explored the MAPK signaling pathway in response to ozone in plants. However, the gaps in our understanding mean that it will be necessary to further investigate the unique physiological, molecular, and biochemical networks activated in response to ozone stress. This will provide essential data on (i) the mechanisms underlying divergence in the stomata in response to ozone, (ii) alterations in metabolite levels in guard cells under ozone exposure, (iii) the interactions between guard cell metabolites and plasma membrane proteins, (iv) the O3-mediated activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), and (v) the initiation, progression, and localization of cell death caused by O3. We believe that continued studies of these mechanisms will create a more detailed picture of the nature of ozone stress in plants and indicate potential strategies for overcoming the negative effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, comprehensive writing, reviewing, figure generation, and manuscript preparation, M.M.H., M.A.R. and X.-W.F.; writing and review, M.M.H., M.S., G.J.A., and M.S.J.; Writing, review, and figure generation, N.M.A., M.W., M.M.E.-M., A.A.E.-Y. and M.F.M.I.; Funding acquisition X.-W.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31971406, 31670404), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky-2021-pd07) and partially contributed by an S-grant from the Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports of the Czech Republic.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agroecosystems, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest among them.

References

  1. Mills, G.; Pleijel, H.; Malley, C.S.; Sinha, B.; Cooper, O.R.; Schultz, M.G.; Neufeld, H.S.; Simpson, D.; Sharps, K.; Feng, Z.; et al. Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Present-day tropospheric ozone distribution and trends relevant to vegetation. Elem. Sci. Anthrop. 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morales, L.O.; Shapiguzov, A.; Safronov, O.; Leppälä, J.; Vaahtera, L.; Yarmolinsky, D.; Kollist, H.; Brosché, M. Ozone responses in Arabidopsis: Beyond stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, Z.; Cao, J.; Yu, H.; Shang, H. Effects of elevated ozone levels on photosynthesis, biomass and non-structural carbohydrates of Phoebe bournei and Phoebe zhennan in subtropical china. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Feng, Z.; De Marco, A.; Anav, A.; Gualtieri, M.; Sicard, P.; Tian, H.; Fornasier, F.; Tao, F.; Guo, A.; Paoletti, E. Economic losses due to ozone impacts on human health, forest productivity and crop yield across China. Environ. Int. 2019, 131, 104966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Andrady, A.; Aucamp, P.J.; Austin, A.T.; Bais, A.F.; Ballare, C.L.; Barnes, P.W.; Bernhard, G.H.; Bjoern, L.O.; Bornman, J.F.; Congdon, N.; et al. Environmental effects of ozone depletion and its interactions with climate change: Progress report, 2016. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2017, 16, 107–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ahlfors, R.; Brosché, M.; Kangasjärvi, J. Ozone and nitric oxide interaction in Arabidopsis thaliana: A role for ethylene? Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4, 878–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gandin, A.; Dizengremel, P.; Jolivet, Y. Integrative role of plant mitochondria facing oxidative stress: The case of ozone. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 159, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Caregnato, F.F.; Clebsch, C.C.; Rocha, R.F.; Feistauer, L.B.H.; Oliveira, P.L.; Divan Junior, A.D.; Moreira, J.C.F. Ozone exposure differentially affects oxidative stress parameters in distinct Phaseolus vulgaris L. varieties. J. Plant Interact. 2010, 5, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pellegrini, E.; Trivellini, A.; Cotrozzi, L.; Vernieri, P.; Nali, C. Involvement of phytohormones in plant responses to ozone. In Plant Hormones under Challenging Environmental Factors; Ahammed, G.J., Yu, J.-Q., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 215–245. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, J.; Wei, Y.; Fang, Z. Ozone pollution: A major health hazard worldwide. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Jolivet, Y.; Bagard, M.; Cabané, M.; Vaultier, M.-N.; Gandin, A.; Afif, D.; Dizengremel, P.; Le Thiec, D. Deciphering the ozone-induced changes in cellular processes: A prerequisite for ozone risk assessment at the tree and forest levels. Ann. For. Sci. 2016, 73, 923–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Monks, P.S.; Archibald, A.T.; Colette, A.; Cooper, O.; Coyle, M.; Derwent, R.; Fowler, D.; Granier, C.; Law, K.S.; Mills, G.E.; et al. Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 8889–8973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lin, M.; Fiore, A.M.; Horowitz, L.W.; Cooper, O.R.; Naik, V.; Holloway, J.; Johnson, B.J.; Middlebrook, A.M.; Oltmans, S.J.; Pollack, I.B.; et al. Transport of Asian ozone pollution into surface air over the western United States in spring. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2012, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Super, I.; Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J.; Krol, M.C. Cumulative ozone effect on canopy stomatal resistance and the impact on boundary layer dynamics and CO2 assimilation at the diurnal scale: A case study for grassland in the Netherlands. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2015, 120, 1348–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, S.; Harley, P.C.; Niinemets, Ü. Ozone-induced foliar damage and release of stress volatiles is highly dependent on stomatal openness and priming by low-level ozone exposure in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 1984–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Horaruang, W.; Hills, A.; Blatt, M.R. Communication between the Plasma Membrane and Tonoplast Is an Emergent Property of Ion Transport. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 1833–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Kollist, H.; Nuhkat, M.; Roelfsema, M.R.G. Closing gaps: Linking elements that control stomatal movement. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 44–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Negi, J.; Matsuda, O.; Nagasawa, T.; Oba, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Kawai-Yamada, M.; Uchimiya, H.; Hashimoto, M.; Iba, K. CO2 regulator SLAC1 and its homologues are essential for anion homeostasis in plant cells. Nature 2008, 452, 483–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vahisalu, T.; Kollist, H.; Wang, Y.-F.; Nishimura, N.; Chan, W.-Y.; Valerio, G.; Lamminmäki, A.; Brosché, M.; Moldau, H.; Desikan, R.; et al. SLAC1 is required for plant guard cell S-type anion channel function in stomatal signalling. Nature 2008, 452, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, Y.; Szostkiewicz, I.; Korte, A.; Moes, D.; Yang, Y.; Christmann, A.; Grill, E. Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as abscisic acid sensors. Science 2009, 324, 1064–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hasan, M.M.; Gong, L.; Nie, Z.-F.; Li, F.-P.; Ahammed, G.J.; Fang, X.-W. ABA-induced stomatal movements in vascular plants during dehydration and rehydration. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2021, 186, 104436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Postiglione, A.E.; Muday, G.K. The Role of ROS Homeostasis in ABA-Induced guard cell signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kollist, H.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Sengupta, S.; Nuhkat, M.; Kangasjärvi, J.; Mittler, R. Rapid Responses to Abiotic Stress: Priming the Landscape for the Signal Transduction Network. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Gong, L.; Liu, X.D.; Zeng, Y.Y.; Tian, X.Q.; Li, Y.L.; Turner, N.C.; Fang, X.W. Differences in stomatal morphology and physiology explain differences in stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid across vascular plant lineages. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 782–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kurusu, T.; Saito, K.; Horikoshi, S.; Hanamata, S.; Negi, J.; Yagi, C.; Kitahata, N.; Iba, K.; Kuchitsu, K. An S-type anion channel SLAC1 is involved in cryptogein-induced ion fluxes and modulates hypersensitive responses in tobacco BY-2 cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tran, D.; El-Maarouf-Bouteau, H.; Rossi, M.; Biligui, B.; Briand, J.; Kawano, T.; Mancuso, S.; Bouteau, F. Post-transcriptional regulation of GORK channels by superoxide anion contributes to increases in outward-rectifying K+ currents. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 1039–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Daszkowska-Golec, A.; Szarejko, I. Open or close the gate—Stomata action under the control of phytohormones in drought stress conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Yang, Y.J.; Bi, M.H.; Nie, Z.F.; Jiang, H.; Liu, X.D.; Fang, X.W.; Brodribb, T.J. Evolution of stomatal closure to optimise water use efficiency in response to dehydration in ferns and seed plants. New Phytol. 2021, 230, 2001–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yao, G.Q.; Nie, Z.F.; Turner, N.C.; Li, F.M.; Gao, T.P.; Fang, X.W.; Scoffoni, C. Combined high leaf hydraulic safety and efficiency provides drought tolerance in Caragana species adapted to low mean annual precipitation. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 230–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. McAdam, E.L.; Brodribb, T.J.; McAdam, S.A.M. Does ozone increase ABA levels by non-enzymatic synthesis causing stomata to close? Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wilkinson, S.; Davies, W.J. Drought, ozone, ABA and ethylene: New insights from cell to plant to community. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 510–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Saxena, I.; Srikanth, S.; Chen, Z. Cross talk between H2O2 and interacting signal molecules under plant stress response. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Shi, C.; Qi, C.; Ren, H.; Huang, A.; Hei, S.; She, X. Ethylene mediates brassinosteroid-induced stomatal closure via Gα protein-activated hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide production in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015, 82, 280–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gomi, K.; Ogawa, D.; Katou, S.; Kamada, H.; Nakajima, N.; Saji, H.; Soyano, T.; Sasabe, M.; Machida, Y.; Mitsuhara, I.; et al. A mitogen-activated protein kinase NtMPK4 activated by SIPKK is required for jasmonic acid signaling and involved in ozone tolerance via stomatal movement in Tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 1902–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Sinha, A.K.; Jaggi, M.; Raghuram, B.; Tuteja, N. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plants under abiotic stress. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Pitzschke, A.; Schikora, A.; Hirt, H. MAPK cascade signalling networks in plant defence. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Samuel, M.A.; Ellis, B.E. Double jeopardy: Both overexpression and suppression of a redox-activated plant mitogen-activated protein kinase render tobacco plants ozone sensitive. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 2059–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Miles, G.P.; Samuel, M.A.; Zhang, Y.; Ellis, B.E. RNA interference-based (RNAi) suppression of AtMPK6, an Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinase, results in hypersensitivity to ozone and misregulation of AtMPK3. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 138, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rasmussen, M.; Roux, M.; Petersen, M.; Mundy, J. MAP kinase cascades in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Vainonen, J.P.; Kangasjärvi, J. Plant signalling in acute ozone exposure. Plant Cell Environ. 2015, 38, 240–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Overmyer, K.; Brosché, M.; Pellinen, R.; Kuittinen, T.; Tuominen, H.; Ahlfors, R.; Keinänen, M.; Saarma, M.; Scheel, D.; Kangasjärvi, J. Ozone-induced programmed cell death in the Arabidopsis radical-induced cell death1 mutant. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 1092–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Xu, J.; Zhang, S. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling by protein kinases and phosphatases. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 939–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Wang, H.; Ngwenyama, N.; Liu, Y.; Walker, J.C.; Zhang, S. Stomatal development and patterning are regulated by environmentally responsive mitogen-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Astier, J.; Gross, I.; Durner, J. Nitric oxide production in plants: An update. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 69, 3401–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pasqualini, S.; Meier, S.; Gehring, C.; Madeo, L.; Fornaciari, M.; Romano, B.; Ederli, L. Ozone and nitric oxide induce cGMP-dependent and -independent transcription of defence genes in tobacco. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 181, 860–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Niu, L.; Liao, W. Hydrogen peroxide signaling in plant development and abiotic responses: Crosstalk with nitric oxide and calcium. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Khan, M.I.R.; Fatma, M.; Per, T.S.; Anjum, N.A.; Khan, N.A. Salicylic acid-induced abiotic stress tolerance and underlying mechanisms in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Prodhan, M.Y.; Munemasa, S.; Nahar, M.N.-E.-N.; Nakamura, Y.; Murata, Y. Guard cell salicylic acid signaling is integrated into abscisic acid signaling via the Ca2+/CPK-dependent pathway. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Melotto, M.; Zhang, L.; Oblessuc, P.R.; He, S.Y. Stomatal defense a decade later. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 561–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Fragnière, C.; Serrano, M.; Abou-Mansour, E.; Métraux, J.-P.; L’Haridon, F. Salicylic acid and its location in response to biotic and abiotic stress. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 1847–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Shine, M.B.; Yang, J.-W.; El-Habbak, M.; Nagyabhyru, P.; Fu, D.-Q.; Navarre, D.; Ghabrial, S.; Kachroo, P.; Kachroo, A. Cooperative functioning between phenylalanine ammonia lyase and isochorismate synthase activities contributes to salicylic acid biosynthesis in soybean. New Phytol. 2016, 212, 627–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ogawa, D.; Nakajima, N.; Sano, T.; Tamaoki, M.; Aono, M.; Kubo, A.; Kanna, M.; Ioki, M.; Kamada, H.; Saji, H. Salicylic acid accumulation under O3 exposure is regulated by ethylene in tobacco plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 1062–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, P.; Mane, S.P.; Sioson, A.A.; Robinet, C.V.; Heath, L.S.; Bohnert, H.J.; Grene, R. Effects of chronic ozone exposure on gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes and in Thellungiella halophila. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 854–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Rao, M.V.; Davis, K.R. Ozone-induced cell death occurs via two distinct mechanisms in Arabidopsis: The role of salicylic acid. Plant J. 1999, 17, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Xu, E.; Vaahtera, L.; Brosché, M. Roles of defense hormones in the regulation of ozone-induced changes in gene expression and cell death. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1776–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Sharma, A.; Kumar, V.; Sidhu, G.P.S.; Kumar, R.; Kohli, S.K.; Yadav, P.; Kapoor, D.; Bali, A.S.; Shahzad, B.; Khanna, K.; et al. Abiotic stress management in plants: Role of ethylene. In Molecular Plant Abiotic Stress; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 185–208. [Google Scholar]
  57. Mirica, L.M.; Klinman, J.P. The nature of O2 activation by the ethylene-forming enzyme 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Houben, M.; Van de Poel, B. 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase (ACO): The enzyme that makes the plant hormone ethylene. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Sinn, J.P.; Schlagnhaufer, C.D.; Arteca, R.N.; Pell, E.J. Ozone-induced ethylene and foliar injury responses are altered in 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase antisense potato plants. New Phytol. 2004, 164, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Tsuchisaka, A.; Theologis, A. Unique and overlapping expression patterns among the Arabidopsis 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene family members. Plant Physiol. 2004, 136, 2982–3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Bandurska, H.; Borowiak, K.; Miara, M.J.A.B.C.S.B. Effect of two different ambient ozone concentrations on antioxidative enzymes in leaves of two tobacco cultivars with contrasting ozone sensitivity. Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 2009, 51, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
  62. Gupta, S.K.; Sharma, M.; Majumder, B.; Maurya, V.K.; Lohani, M.; Deeba, F.; Pandey, V. Impact of Ethylene diurea (EDU) on growth, yield and proteome of two winter wheat varieties under high ambient ozone phytotoxicity. Chemosphere 2018, 196, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ruan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, M.; Yan, J.; Khurshid, M.; Weng, W.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, K. Jasmonic acid signaling pathway in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Wang, Y.; Yuan, J.; Yang, W.; Zhu, L.; Su, C.; Wang, X.; Wu, H.; Sun, Z.; Li, X. Genome wide identification and expression profiling of ethylene receptor genes during soybean nodulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Sasaki-Sekimoto, Y.; Taki, N.; Obayashi, T.; Aono, M.; Matsumoto, F.; Sakurai, N.; Suzuki, H.; Hirai, M.Y.; Noji, M.; Saito, K.; et al. Coordinated activation of metabolic pathways for antioxidants and defence compounds by jasmonates and their roles in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2005, 44, 653–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tamaoki, M. The role of phytohormone signaling in ozone-induced cell death in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Kangasjärvi, J.; Jaspers, P.; Kollist, H. Signalling and cell death in ozone-exposed plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 1021–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pellegrini, E.; Trivellini, A.; Campanella, A.; Francini, A.; Lorenzini, G.; Nali, C.; Vernieri, P. Signaling molecules and cell death in Melissa officinalis plants exposed to ozone. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32, 1965–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Nunn, A.J.; Kozovits, A.R.; Reiter, I.M.; Heerdt, C.; Leuchner, M.; Lütz, C.; Liu, X.; Lo¨w, M.; Winkler, J.B.; Grams, T.E.E.; et al. Comparison of ozone uptake and sensitivity between a phytotron study with young beech and a field experiment with adult beech (Fagus sylvatica). Environ. Pollut. 2005, 137, 494–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Betz, G.; Gerstner, E.; Olbrich, M.; Winkler, J.; Langebartels, C.; Heller, W.; Sandermann, H.; Ernst, D. Forestry Effects of abiotic stress on gene transcription in European beech: Ozone affects ethylene biosynthesis in saplings of Fagus sylvatica L. IForest 2009, 2, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 58, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Yao, G.Q.; Li, F.P.; Nie, Z.F.; Bi, M.H.; Jiang, H.; Liu, X.D.; Wei, Y.; Fang, X.W. Ethylene, not ABA, is closely linked to the recovery of gas exchange after drought in four Caragana species. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 44, 399–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Blomster, T.; Salojärvi, J.; Sipari, N.; Brosché, M.; Ahlfors, R.; Keinänen, M.; Overmyer, K.; Kangasjärvi, J. Apoplastic reactive oxygen species transiently decrease auxin signaling and cause stress-induced morphogenic response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1866–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 06304 g001 550
Figure 1. A proposed model associated with signaling in guard cells in response to ozone stress. Ozone leads to the formation of free radicals (ROS) in the apoplast and a rise in Ca2+ level in guard cells (a). Several apoplastic antioxidants including ascorbic acid (AsA) scavenge ROS and inhibit their generation (b). The mechanism of ROS defense triggered by high ozone concentrations involves two key antioxidants—peroxidases (PRX) and NADPH oxidases (RbohF) (c). RbohF in the signal transduction process is activated by second messengers including Ca2+, open stomata 1 (OST1), and calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) (d). Apoplastic ROS may influence plasma membrane sensor proteins and receptor-like kinases, (RLKs) such that ROS (e.g., H2O2) can be transferred through aquaporin (AQP) channels (e). Cytosolic Ca2+ is sensed in chloroplasts by the calcium-sensing receptor (CAS). Apoplastic oxidized dehydroascorbate (DHA) and AsA move across the PM into the cytosol and regulate redox homeostasis (e), which is also sensed by redox-sensitive transcription factors (TFs). Triggering of mitogen-activated protein kinases 3/6 (MPK3/6) (f). Activation of MPK3/6 and translocation to the nucleus leads to phosphorylation and activates transcription factors (TFs) (g). Solid and broken lines indicate direct and indirect interactions, respectively.
Figure 1. A proposed model associated with signaling in guard cells in response to ozone stress. Ozone leads to the formation of free radicals (ROS) in the apoplast and a rise in Ca2+ level in guard cells (a). Several apoplastic antioxidants including ascorbic acid (AsA) scavenge ROS and inhibit their generation (b). The mechanism of ROS defense triggered by high ozone concentrations involves two key antioxidants—peroxidases (PRX) and NADPH oxidases (RbohF) (c). RbohF in the signal transduction process is activated by second messengers including Ca2+, open stomata 1 (OST1), and calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) (d). Apoplastic ROS may influence plasma membrane sensor proteins and receptor-like kinases, (RLKs) such that ROS (e.g., H2O2) can be transferred through aquaporin (AQP) channels (e). Cytosolic Ca2+ is sensed in chloroplasts by the calcium-sensing receptor (CAS). Apoplastic oxidized dehydroascorbate (DHA) and AsA move across the PM into the cytosol and regulate redox homeostasis (e), which is also sensed by redox-sensitive transcription factors (TFs). Triggering of mitogen-activated protein kinases 3/6 (MPK3/6) (f). Activation of MPK3/6 and translocation to the nucleus leads to phosphorylation and activates transcription factors (TFs) (g). Solid and broken lines indicate direct and indirect interactions, respectively.
Ijms 22 06304 g001
Ijms 22 06304 g002 550
Figure 2. A schematic model of phytohormone-induced guard-cell signaling associated with stomatal regulation in response to ozone (O3), adapted from Wilkinson and Davies (2010) [31]. (a) Ozone and ethylene (ET) can substitute within the abscisic acid (ABA) signal transduction branch leading to stomatal closure through H2O2 in the absence of ABA. (b) A higher level of H2O2 and NO might prevent stomatal closure in the presence of ABA, O3, and ET. (c) ET acts via the ETR1 receptor to inhibit response to ABA-induced H2O2 and prevent stomatal closure in the presence of ABA.
Figure 2. A schematic model of phytohormone-induced guard-cell signaling associated with stomatal regulation in response to ozone (O3), adapted from Wilkinson and Davies (2010) [31]. (a) Ozone and ethylene (ET) can substitute within the abscisic acid (ABA) signal transduction branch leading to stomatal closure through H2O2 in the absence of ABA. (b) A higher level of H2O2 and NO might prevent stomatal closure in the presence of ABA, O3, and ET. (c) ET acts via the ETR1 receptor to inhibit response to ABA-induced H2O2 and prevent stomatal closure in the presence of ABA.
Ijms 22 06304 g002
Ijms 22 06304 g003 550
Figure 3. Programmed cell death (PCD) cycle induced by ozone (O3) associated with Phytohormones, adapted from Kangasjarvi et al. (2005) [67]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation is caused by ozone stress and results in the accumulation of salicylic acid (SA) and PCD. Cell death activates ethylene (ET) production required for ROS generation resulting in PCD. Jasmonic acid (JA) antagonizes cell cycle progression by inducing cell death and promoting SA and ET function. Abscisic acid (ABA) antagonizes the function of ET, which may have an important role in ozone-induced PCD.
Figure 3. Programmed cell death (PCD) cycle induced by ozone (O3) associated with Phytohormones, adapted from Kangasjarvi et al. (2005) [67]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation is caused by ozone stress and results in the accumulation of salicylic acid (SA) and PCD. Cell death activates ethylene (ET) production required for ROS generation resulting in PCD. Jasmonic acid (JA) antagonizes cell cycle progression by inducing cell death and promoting SA and ET function. Abscisic acid (ABA) antagonizes the function of ET, which may have an important role in ozone-induced PCD.
Ijms 22 06304 g003
Table
Table 1. Ozone (O3)-induced phytohormone responsive genes in different ecotypes of Arabidopsis (modified and rearranged from Li et al. (2006) [53]).
Table 1. Ozone (O3)-induced phytohormone responsive genes in different ecotypes of Arabidopsis (modified and rearranged from Li et al. (2006) [53]).
Gene
Accession		Gene FamilyResponse Marker Gene/MetabolitesCol-0 (Control vs. Stress)Cvi-0 (Control vs. Stress)Col 0 and Cvi-0
(Control vs. Stress)
SA induced:
AT2G14610PR-1-like proteininduced0+−
AT1G19320pathogenesis-related protein 5 precursors,induced+0+
AT2G22300ET-induced calmodulin-bindingNFkB2-F0+0
ET induced:
AT1G49830ET-responsive protein
ET-responsive element binding		Not responded0+−
AT1G55150box RNA helicase protein, putative
ET-responsive element binding		Not responded0+0
AT2G22300binding plant defensin protein, putativeNGkB2-F0+0
AT5G44420(PDF1.2a) plant defensin protein, putativeinduced−−0
AT2G26020(PDF1.2b)induced−−0
JA induced:
AT2G24850putative tyrosine aminotransferaseinduced−−+
AT5G24770vegetative storage protein Vsp2induced00+
Table
Table 2. Ozone (O3)-induced antioxidant genes in different ecotypes of Arabidopsis (modified and rearranged from Li et al. (2006) [53]).
Table 2. Ozone (O3)-induced antioxidant genes in different ecotypes of Arabidopsis (modified and rearranged from Li et al. (2006) [53]).
Gene AccessionFunctional GroupCol 0
(Control vs. Stress)		Cvi-0 (Control vs. Stress)Col 0 and Cvi- 0
(Control vs. Stress)
AT3G09640ascorbate peroxidaserepressed stableinduced
AT2G28190thylakoid bound ascorbate peroxidaserepressed stablerepressed
AT3G10920manganese superoxide dismutasestableinducedrepressed
AT1G03850glutaredoxin protein family glutaredoxinstableinducedrepressed
AT2G41680thioredoxinstablestablerepressed
Table
Table 3. O3-induced regulation of genes in wild type and both triple mutants of Arabidopsis plants (adapted from Xu et al. (2015) [55]).
Table 3. O3-induced regulation of genes in wild type and both triple mutants of Arabidopsis plants (adapted from Xu et al. (2015) [55]).
Gene AccessionGene NameResponse (WT O3/WT Control)Response (coi1 ein2 sid2 O3/coi1 ein2 sid2 O3 Control)
AT1G15520PDR12Up-regulatedStable
AT1G26380FAD-binding Berberine family proteinUp-regulatedStable
AT1G21120IGMT2Up-regulatedStable
AT2G26560PLA2AUp-regulatedStable
AT4G08770PRX37Up-regulatedUp-regulated
AT4G30280XTH18Up-regulatedUp-regulated
AT5G65730XTH6Down-regulated Down-regulated
AT2G42380BZIP34Down-regulatedDown-regulated
AT1G60590Pectin lyase-likeDown-regulatedDown-regulated
AT5G15310MYB16Down-regulatedDown-regulated
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hasan, M.M.; Rahman, M.A.; Skalicky, M.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Waseem, M.; Jahan, M.S.; Ahammed, G.J.; El-Mogy, M.M.; El-Yazied, A.A.; Ibrahim, M.F.M.; et al. Ozone Induced Stomatal Regulations, MAPK and Phytohormone Signaling in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126304

AMA Style

Hasan MM, Rahman MA, Skalicky M, Alabdallah NM, Waseem M, Jahan MS, Ahammed GJ, El-Mogy MM, El-Yazied AA, Ibrahim MFM, et al. Ozone Induced Stomatal Regulations, MAPK and Phytohormone Signaling in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(12):6304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126304

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hasan, Md. Mahadi, Md. Atikur Rahman, Milan Skalicky, Nadiyah M. Alabdallah, Muhammad Waseem, Mohammad Shah Jahan, Golam Jalal Ahammed, Mohamed M. El-Mogy, Ahmed Abou El-Yazied, Mohamed F. M. Ibrahim, and et al. 2021. "Ozone Induced Stomatal Regulations, MAPK and Phytohormone Signaling in Plants" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 12: 6304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22126304

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop