Next Article in Journal
The Design of Abnormal Microenvironment Responsive MRI Nanoprobe and Its Application
Next Article in Special Issue
Macrophages Compensate for Loss of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase N2 in Dendritic Cells to Protect from Elevated Colitis
Previous Article in Journal
Pseudoephedrine—Benefits and Risks
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Dynamic Imaging of IEL-IEC Co-Cultures Allows for Quantification of CD103-Dependent T Cell Migration

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(10), 5148; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105148
by Karin Enderle 1,2,†, Martin Dinkel 1,2,†, Eva-Maria Spath 1,2, Benjamin Schmid 3, Sebastian Zundler 1,2, Philipp Tripal 3, Markus F. Neurath 1,2, Kai Hildner 1,2,*,‡ and Clemens Neufert 1,2,*,‡
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(10), 5148; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105148
Submission received: 30 March 2021 / Revised: 28 April 2021 / Accepted: 11 May 2021 / Published: 13 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Changing Paradigms in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a very interesting paper building on the work by the Nozaki group and the paper's authors, establishing and characterising an ex vivo model to investigate the relationship between intraepithelial lymphocytes and small intestine epithelial cells. The paper is well written with a couple of grammar errors; line 23 life should be replaced with live, line 405 remove In.

The results are clear and well laid out however, the data in Figure 2 C, CD3+ IEL subsets should be displayed as experimental numbers not pooled, as was done in the CD69+  CD105+ graph.

Could the authors explain in the paper why they stained the IELs with cell proliferation dye in the live cell imaging and confocal microscopy experiments instead of anti CD3?

Despite using a very similar ex vivo set up to the Nozaki group the authors did not see a noticeable change in IEL numbers after 7 days incubation. I think the authors should give an explanation as to why their results differed from the published data. 

Of note, the group stated that, for the first time they showed the better migratory ability of the IELs compared to splenic T cells. However Figure 2 D does not show splenic T cells in the IF picture, not even in the extra organoid space, leading the reader to question whether the splenic T cells were added to the organoid co-culture. 

The authors clearly layout the limitation of the method, in that only the interaction between 2 cell types are investigated, whereas in vivo multiple cell types and micro-organisms are involved.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a very interesting work that focuses on an important issue with plausible implications on intestine research, particularly in IBD.

Questions to the authors:

What is your explanation that the movement in CD103-/- the movement is significantly high outside than inside? Figure 4D

What was the longest time you monitor IELs?

Whit time can be possible that outside IEL enter inside or vice versa?

Have you tried to work with ILEs that were not cultured before with a cocktail including IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Back to TopTop