You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Review
  • Open Access

11 May 2020

Colorectal Cancer Invasion and Atrophy of the Enteric Nervous System: Potential Feedback and Impact on Cancer Progression

and
1
Department of Human Histology and Embryology, Collegium Medicum, School of Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-082 Olsztyn, Poland
2
Department of Histology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Survival Pathways Involved in Resistance to Apoptosis in Cancer

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) invasion within the large intestine wall results in the replacement of normal tissue architecture by tumour mass. Cancer cells digest the extracellular matrix (ECM) by the release of proteolytic enzymes. The disintegration of matrix ground substance activates several deposited growth factors which stimulate cell proliferation. Stromal (mainly fibroblasts), immune and cancer cells dominate in this area and become involved in a network of multimodal interactions which significantly induce proliferation of colon cancer cells, inhibit their apoptosis and promote their spreading within the local tumour microenvironment. Cancer invasion destroys nerve fibres and neurons of the local enteric nervous system (ENS) and induces subsequent atrophy of the submucosal and myenteric plexuses in areas adjacent to the cancer boundary. Interestingly, the reduction of plexuses’ size is accompanied by the increased number of galanin-immunoreactive neurons and increased galanin content in parts of the colon located close to the tumour. Galanin, a neuroprotective peptide, may inhibit the extrinsic pathway of apoptosis and in this way promote cancer cell survival. The possible role of acetylcholine and some ENS neuropeptides was also discussed. Invasion of cancer cells spreads along nerve fibres with the involvement of locally-released neutrophins which promote, via their specific receptors, cancer cell proliferation and pro-survival signalling pathways. Thus, during CRC development cancer cells and neurons of the ENS release many neurotransmitters/neuropeptides which affect key cellular signalling pathways promoting cancer cell proliferation and pro-survival phenotype. The multiple interactions between ENS neurons, cancer cells and other cell types present in the colon wall increase cancer cell invasiveness and have a negative impact on the course of CRC.

1. Introduction: General Features of Cancer Invasion

Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents an invasive cancerous process which starts within the large intestine and is caused by the constant proliferation of epithelial cells which acquire the neoplastic phenotype. During this process, the epithelial cells lose the proper nature (a compact and regular arrangement and shape, cellular polarity, intercellular junctions and adherence to the basal lamina) and achieve the characteristic features of mesenchymal cells (oval or fusiform shape, lack of polarisation and cytoskeleton reorganisation). Such morphological and functional cell transformation is referred to as the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT).
Neoplastic tumour formation within the large intestine wall is related to the replacement of normal tissues by cancer cell mass. In microscopic observations, two types of tumour invasive fronts have been classified and described, the first type is a “pushing tumour border” in which a well-demarcated tumour border extends and pushes normal tissues with a desmoplastic stromal reaction []. The second type is an “infiltrative tumour border configuration” in which irregular cancer cords penetrate into the lining tissue and a clear boundary between infiltrating and normal tissues is not visible. Frequently, such projections of cancer tissue at the invasive front are led by singular cancer cells or small clusters of cancer cells which are defined as “tumour buds” []. The different types of cancer invasion are related to different molecular backgrounds of cancer cells, which results in different courses of the illness. Infiltrative tumour border configuration is mostly associated with vascular invasion, lymph node and distant metastases and is correlated with poor patient prognosis (shorter overall survival, OS and disease-free survival, DFS) [,]. Subsequently, the cancer invasion destroys layers of the colon wall and forms a solid tumour which causes clinical symptoms correlated with the dysfunction of this part of the intestine.
Cancer cells may produce and secrete proteolytic enzymes (proteinases) which digest the epithelial basement membrane (BM) and the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the underlying connective tissue. BM destruction defines the invasive potential of the cancer. This activity is possible because colon cancer cells produce matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), gelatinases which dissolve type IV collagen, the essential component of BM [,]. The MMP-9 protein expression in CRC tissue is higher than in adenomas or the normal colon mucosa and its expression in a tumour tissue significantly correlates with clinical data: cancer grade, higher risk of disease recurrence and shorter survival of CRC patients [,]. The findings of MMP-9 presence not only in the primary tumour but also in the tumour budding strongly supports the hypothesis that proteolytic activity helps to create an “infiltrative tumour border configuration” [].
A cancer invasion which destroys and disintegrates the stromal tissue interacts with cells located in this area. Stromal cells, including fibroblasts, mesenchymal stem cells, mast cells and transient cells such as blood-derived leukocytes (mainly macrophages, neutrophils and lymphocytes) are found in this location and, together with cancer cells, constitute a specific cancer milieu known as the tumour microenvironment (TM). Colon cancer cells interact with these residential and transient cells through different types of cell communication via soluble ligands or extracellular vesicles as well as cell–matrix interactions. This multi-stage process of mutual communication eventually promotes cancer growth and invasion, induces EMT, initiates angiogenesis and develops significant tolerance of the immune system to tumour antigens. In the course of cancer invasion, infiltrative tumour degrades gradually the innervation of the intestine and causes atrophy of the enteric nervous system components.

2. Morphology and Neurotransmission within the Enteric Nervous System

In normal conditions, the numerous nervous ganglia are regularly displaced between the particular layers of the large intestine wall. They form the enteric nervous system (ENS) which innervates the particular layers of the gastrointestinal (GI) tube wall. The spatially arranged, regularly distributed ganglia of the ENS are interconnected by nervous fibres and regulate the proper physiological functions of the intestine.
Morphologically, the human ENS consists of plexuses and nerve fibres located in the submucosa and muscularis externa of the intestinal wall. The submucosa contains a complex of three small ganglia: the inner submucosal plexus (ISP; Meissner’s plexus), adjacent to the muscularis mucosae, the intermediate submucosal plexus (IMSP) and the outer submucosal plexus (OSP) adjacent to the muscularis externa. Furthermore, significantly larger clusters of neurons and glial cells, which form the myenteric plexus (MP; Auerbach’s plexus), are located between two layers of the muscularis externa [] (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Major structural components and function of the enteric nervous system in human large intestine close and distant from the colorectal cancer mass. On the left side, cancer tumour and adjacent colon walls with white arrows showing the direction of changes in the expression of neuropeptides as compared to the normal intestine at the resection margin. On the right side, location of submucosal and myenteric plexuses in the normal large intestine. For clarity efferent and afferent nerve fibres are not shown. Diagram illustrates major cancer-related alterations of the ENS and major functions of the ENS plexuses as detailed in the main text. Abbreviations: Ach—acetylcholine, CART—cocaine and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide, CGRP—calcitonin gene-related peptide, ENS—enteric nervous system, GAL—galanin, IMSP—intermediate submucosal plexus, ISP—inner submucosal plexus, MP—myenteric plexus, OSP—outer submucosal plexus, NPY—neuropeptide Y, PACAP—pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, SP—substance P, SST—somatostatin, VIP—vasoactive intestinal peptide.
In humans, the number of ENS neurons is about 500 million, many more than in the other parts of the peripheral autonomic nervous system []. The longitudinal and circular layers of the muscularis externa are innervated by nerve fibres of sympathetic extrinsic ganglia and nerve fibres of Auerbach′s plexus motoneurons and such organisation regulates proper intestinal motility. Moreover, the peristaltic reflexes of the intestine are coordinated by an abundant network of the myenteric plexuses descending and ascending nerve fibres []. The intestinal mucosa is innervated by fibres of secretomotor neurons originating from submucosal plexuses. Secretomotor neurons regulate fluid exchange, intestinal permeability and coordinate proper intestinal reflexes. The lumen of submucosal blood vessels is regulated by axons of the vasomotor neurons (dilatory function) of submucosal plexuses and/or nitrergic (neuronal nitric oxide synthase, i.e., nNOS) neurons and axons of sympathetic neurons of extrinsic ganglia (constrictory function) [,]. Moreover, all the layers of the intestine and blood vessels are innervated by the sensory neurons (with mechano-, thermo- and chemoreceptors) of submucosal and myenteric plexuses as well as dorsal root ganglia. All components of the ENS are interconnected by numerous interneurons which functionally integrate them into one system which functions are based on physiological reflexes [,].
Acetylcholine (Ach) is the main neurotransmitter in the ENS neurons which stimulates secretory activity of the intestine and contraction of smooth muscle in the wall of the GI tube. It is present in almost all types of neurons: excitatory muscle motor neurons, secretomotor neurons, sensory neurons and some interneurons. The opposite action has vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), a neurotransmitter which causes relaxation of smooth muscles, especially in the wall of blood vessels (vasodilatory function) []. The actions of these two basic neurotransmitters are modified by the activity of about 30 other neurotransmitters (neuromodulators) which are present in the neurons of the ENS. Most neurons show the simultaneous expression of 2–3 neurotransmitters/neuromodulators, but some groups of neurons express larger numbers of neuropeptides. Generally, co-activity and modulatory action of many neurotransmitters are known as chemical coding ensuring flexibility of intestinal functions [,,].

3. Cancer and the ENS Decomposition

The neuronal responses within the ENS are based on composed reflexes and multimodal transmissions, and they are modified under pathological conditions. It is known that parasite infections [] and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) cause prominent changes in the ENS including altered expression of neurotransmitters/neuropeptides within neurons []. In such clinical conditions, many ENS neuropeptides may act as proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory factors affecting cytokine secretion, maintenance of intestinal permeability and promotion of neuron survival by neuropeptides [].
Moreover, it was found that ENS plasticity occurs also during colorectal cancer development []. A wide range of changes in the submucosal and myenteric plexuses components located close to the front of the CRC invasion was observed. These changes involve a decreased number of neurons and/or nerve fibres containing several neuropeptides: VIP, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), somatostatin (SST/SOM), substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) [,]. The alterations of these neurotransmitters in colorectal cancer cell lines, tumour tissue, blood and experimental animal models are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1. Function and localisation of the ENS neurotransmitters in the normal human large intestine and CRC cell lines and tumour tissue.
Table 1 Function and localisation of the ENS neurotransmitters in the normal human large intestine and colorectal cancer cell lines and tumour tissue. ACh—acetylcholine, CASP8—caspase 8, CGRP—calcitonin gene-related peptide, CRC—colorectal cancer, EGF—epithelial growth factor, ERK—extracellular signal-regulated kinase, ENS—enteric nervous system, FLIP—FLICE-inhibitory protein, GAL—galanin, GRP—gastrin related peptide, IHC-immunohistochemistry, 3mAChR—muscarinic receptor type 3, MAPK—mitogen-activated protein kinases, MMP7—matrix metalloproteinase 7, NK1Rs—neurokinin-1 receptors, NPY—neuropeptide Y, PACAP—pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, PI3Κ—phosphoinositide 3-kinase, SP—substance P, SST/SOM—somatostatin, VIP—vasoactive intestinal peptide.
Interestingly, we found that the number of neurons containing galanin (GAL) within myenteric plexuses located in the vicinity of the infiltrating cancer was higher compared to the MPs in a region distally located from the tumour margin []. Moreover, the relative number of cocaine and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide (CART)-immunoreactive neurons increased by three-fold in OSP, and ISP [] located in cancer invasion boundary.
There are distinct differences in the histological structure and location of two basic types of the ENS plexuses within the intestinal wall: small submucosal plexuses of oval or irregular shape are present in a loose structure of the submucosal connective tissue, while large and elongated myenteric ganglia are regularly deployed in a very narrow space between the inner circular and the outer longitudinal muscle layers of the muscular externa. The cancer invasion gradually destroys the normal morphology of the colon wall including the entire innervation located in the invasive area. Furthermore, our microscopic observations indicated that cancer infiltration causes displacement and subsequent atrophy of the submucosal and myenteric plexuses in the region adjacent to the tumour boundary []. This observation was confirmed by morphometric analyses which demonstrated that MPs located in close proximity to the cancer invasion were significantly smaller and had a lower number of neurons per plexus than the MPs located farther from the tumour []. Moreover, electron microscopy analysis demonstrated that in the MPs located close to the cancer invasion, expansion of extracellular matrix and a sporadic presence of apoptotic neurons were observed []. Ciurea et al. observed a decrease of the relative area for both Auerbach and Meissner plexuses with the increase of the tumour grading as well as an increase of the relative area of other nervous elements not in the Meissner plexus or in the Auerbach plexus with the tumour grading [].
To date, the mechanism which causes the atrophy of myenteric ganglia in the colon wall of patients with CRC has not been clearly elucidated. The stroma reaction, with a tumour mass-related increased local tissue pressure with simultaneous hypoxia, could be considered as a potential factor of such atrophy. It could be also promoted by cancer cells located close to the ganglia via paracrine signalling. Such possibility seems to be supported by the results of our study of the colon samples of patients with CRC in which we observed an increased number of neurons with caspase 8 immunoreactivity (CASP8-Ir) within the myenteric ganglia in the vicinity of tumour tissue []. CASP8 is triggered by binding of the extracellular ligands to a cell membrane receptor which activates the extrinsic pathway of apoptosis. In the same plexuses, we observed a significantly lower number of neurons with caspase 3 (CASP3) immunoreactivity than those with CASP8-Ir (26% vs. 46%), which may suggest the extrinsic apoptotic pathway had been silenced at the terminal, executive phase of apoptosis. The fact that almost all neurons expressing CASP3 also demonstrated the presence of GAL indicates a possible role for this neuropeptide in the observed phenomenon []. Thus, atrophy of myenteric plexuses may be caused by stromal reaction and tissue decomposition, which is observed at the front of cancer invasion as well as by molecules originating from cancer cells which are released into the tumour environment as secretome and/or extracellular vesicles.

5. Cancer Perineural Invasion

It is a well-known morphological observation that cancer invasion can spread along nerve fibres in many neoplasms, especially prostate cancer and pancreas cancer. In the CRC, such type of perineural invasion (PNI) is observed in about 20% of patients and is concerned as a feature of cancer invasiveness potential []. Perineural invasion is correlated with other histological features of cancer development such as tumour growth pattern, tumour budding presence, tumour grade (T feature) and regional lymph metastasis (N feature) and lymphatic and blood vessel invasion []. Moreover, PNI may affect the clinical course of CRC since a correlation with its presence and shorter patient survival was observed and found to be an independent prognostic factor of patient poor prognosis []. Furthermore, it could be used as a factor which can result in clinical decisions related to the use of chemotherapy in clinical stage II CRC patients []. A recent in vitro study by Duchalais et al. [] carried out on the co-cultures tumour epithelial cells (TEC) from human primary colon adenocarcinomas and cell lines with primary cultures of ENS and cultures of human ENS plexus revealed that TEC adhered preferentially and with stronger adhesion forces to the ENS structures than to mesenchymal cells and that the adhesion to ENS involved direct interactions with enteric neurons. Moreover, these authors showed that blocking N-cadherin and L1CAM decreased TEC migration along ENS structures, and therefore, concluded, that the enteric neuronal network guides tumour cell migration [].
The second factor supporting the correlation of cancer development and innervation of the large intestine may be derived from the studies of Chagas disease. In the course of Trypanosoma crusi infection, there is severe ENS damage and degeneration which causes widening of the large intestine (megacolon) and pathological constipation. The slow passage of faeces was suggested to be a risk factor in colon carcinogenesis since it enables prolonged exposition of the intestinal epithelium to carcinogens present in stool. However, it was clearly demonstrated that the risk of CRC is significantly lower in the course of Chagas disease than in the normal population []. For example, in 894 chagasic patients who were operated on for megacolon resection in one San Paulo (Brazil) hospital from 1952 until 2001 any type of colonic neoplasm was found, despite the presence of other CRC risk factors such as mucosal ulcers, hyperplasia and chronic inflammation []. Interestingly, atrophy of myenteric plexuses and gliosis characterise the morphology of colon wall in Chagas disease [,,], and the ensuing loss of innervation within colon wall was implicated as the factor which prevents cancer development in patients with Chagas disease [].
In analysing the PNI phenomena in CRC invasion, it could be assumed that cancer cells proliferate and invade colon tissue by actively migrating along axons in a mechanism called neural tracking. The ability of cancer cells to track along nerves is facilitated by multiple growth factors and cytokines secreted by various cell types in the perineural niche []. Moreover, the observations of nerve fibre atrophy close to cancer infiltration [] may also suggest that the degenerative changes of fibres which are caused by external factors may result in neurotrophic factor secretion. It is possible that these factors interact with cancer cell invasions and stimulate those cells to proliferate which predominate in the perineural area due to a higher concentration of neurotrophic factors along nerve fibres.
Within the ENS of the human large intestine, essential neurotrophic factors such as nerve growth factor (NGF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophin 3 (NT-3) are normally present []. They not only affect neuron migration and axon guidance during the development of gut innervation in the embryonal period but play an active role also in such diseases as IBD, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), Trichinella spiralis infection, bowel obstruction and diabetes-induced enteric neuropathy []. In the colon wall, neutrophins eutrophins are secreted not only by the ENS neurons but also other cell types such as enteric glial cells, epithelial cells, lamina propria cells and cells of the immune system [].
Neurotrophins control differentiation, plasticity and neuron survival via two different types of receptors: the p75 neurotrophin receptor which belongs to the tumour necrosis factor receptor family and three tropomyosin receptor kinases (Trk) which belong to the RTKs family []. P75 is the receptor for all four (including NT-4) neurotrophins whereas NGF binds TrkA, BDNF and NT-4 bind TrkB and NT-3 mainly binds TrkC []. These Trk receptors activate three key signalling pathways related to cell survival: MAPK/ERK, PI3K/Akt and phospholipase C gamma pathways [,]. It was found that both BDNF [] and TrkB receptors [,] are overexpressed in colon cancer tissue, especially in advanced clinical stages of disease []. BDNF and TrkB agonists increased the proliferation of CRC cell lines and showed anti-apoptotic activity [,]. Moreover, the up-regulation of the TrkB receptor in colon cancer cells was correlated with higher lymphatic vessel density and metastasis []. Thus, BDNF/TrkB signalling inhibition could be a new therapeutic target in the treatment of CRC [,] and other digestive tract cancers [].
The basic intracellular pathways activated in the colorectal cancer cells by acetylcholine, neuropeptides and growth factors are presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Schematic presentation of key pathways activated in a colorectal cancer cell by three groups of cell membrane receptors. Binding of Ach, GAL and SP to GPCRs triggers multiple transduction pathways which promote cell proliferation and survival, binding of EGF and neutrophins to the RTKs promotes cell proliferation whereas binding of FasR ligands activates extrinsic pathway of apoptosis. A more detailed description is in the main text. Abbreviations: Ach—acetylcholine, AKT—serine/threonine kinase, BDNF—brain-derived neurotrophic factor, CREB—cAMP response element-binding protein, EGF—epidermal growth factor, EGFR—EGF receptor, ERK—extracellular signal-regulated kinase, FADD—Fas-associated protein with death domain, FasR—Fas receptor, GAL—galanin, GALR1—galanin receptor 1, GALR2—galanin receptor 2, GPCR— G protein–coupled receptor, Grb2—Growth factor receptor-bound protein 2, MAPK—mitogen-activated protein kinases, MEK—MAPK/ERK kinase, 3mAChR—muscarinic receptor, NF-kB—nuclear factor-kappa B, NK1R—neurokinin-1 receptor, PI3Κ—phosphoinositide 3-kinase, PKA—protein kinase A, PKC—protein kinase C, RAF—mitogen-activated protein kinase, RAS—mitogen-activated protein kinase, RTK—receptor tyrosine kinase, SOS—Son of sevenless, SP—substance P, TrkB—tropomyosin-related kinase receptor B.

6. Conclusions

Colorectal cancer infiltrates the intestinal tissue and evokes reactions of stromal cells present in the tumour’s microenvironment. Invasive tumour mass causes atrophy of the components of the enteric nervous system located in the adjacent area. The neuroprotective reaction of neurons and glial cells results in the secretion of neuromediators and neurotrophic factors which affect cancer cells by stimulating their proliferation and perineural invasion. Such positive feedback significantly affects the invasiveness of cancer, which results in a worse prognosis and course of the disease.

Funding

Publication of the paper was supported by the statutory grant of the School of Medicine, the Warmia and Mazury University of Olsztyn, Poland, and the statutory grant (ST-12) of the Medical University of Gdansk, Poland.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Koelzer, V.H.; Lugli, A. The tumor border configuration of colorectal cancer as histomorphological prognostic indicator. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dawson, H.; Lugli, A. Molecular and pathogenetic aspects of tumor budding in colorectal cancer. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2015, 2, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shi, M.; Yu, B.; Gao, H.; Mu, J.; Ji, C. Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 Overexpression and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2013, 40, 617–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Araújo, R.F., Jr.; Lira, G.A.; Vilaça, J.A.; Guedes, H.G.; Leitão, M.C.A.; Lucena, H.F.; Ramos, C.C.O. Prognostic and Diagnostic Implications of MMP-2, MMP-9, and VEGF-α Expressions in Colorectal Cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2015, 211, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Herszényi, L.; Sipos, F.; Galamb, O.; Solymosi, N.; Hritz, I.; Miheller, P.; Berczi, L.; Molnár, B.; Tulassay, Z. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression in the normal mucosa-adenoma-dysplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence of the colon. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2008, 14, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bendardaf, R.; Buhmeida, A.; Hilska, M.; Laato, M.; Syrjänen, S.; Syrjänen, K.; Collan, Y.; Pyrhönen, S. MMP-9 (gelatinase B) expression is associated with disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Investig. 2010, 28, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kessenbrock, K.; Plaks, V.; Werb, Z. Matrix metalloproteinases: Regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell 2010, 141, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Timmermans, J.P.; Adriaensen, D.; Cornelissen, W.; Scheuermann, D.W. Structural organization and neuropeptide distribution in the mammalian enteric nervous system, with special attention to those components involved in mucosal reflexes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1997, 118, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hansen, M.B. The enteric nervous system I: Organisation and classification. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2003, 92, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hansen, M.B. The enteric nervous system II: Gastrointestinal functions. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2003, 92, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Furness, J.B.; Callaghan, B.P.; Rivera, L.R.; Cho, H.J. The Enteric Nervous System and Gastrointestinal Innervation: Integrated Local and Central Control. In Microbial Endocrinology: The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Health and Disease (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology); Lyte, M., Cryan, J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Volume 817. [Google Scholar]
  12. Natale, G.; Ryskalin, L.; Busceti, C.L.; Biagioni, F.; Fornai, F. The Nature of Catecholamine-Containing Neurons in the Enteric Nervous System in Relationship with Organogenesis, Normal Human Anatomy and Neurodegeneration. Arch. Ital. Biol. 2017, 155, 118–130. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Palmer, J.M.; Greenwood-Van Meerveld, B. Integrative neuroimmunomodulation of gastrointestinal function during enteric parasitism. J. Parasitol. 2001, 87, 483–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. El-Salhy, M.; Solomon, T.; Hausken, T.; Gilja, O.H.; Hatlebakk, J.G. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine peptides/amines in inflammatory bowel disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 28, 5068–5085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Brinkman, D.J.; Ten Hove, A.S.; Vervoordeldonk, M.J.; Luyer, M.D.; de Jonge, W.J. Neuroimmune Interactions in the Gut and Their Significance for Intestinal Immunity. Cells 2019, 8, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rademakers, G.; Vaes, N.; Schonkeren, S.; Koch, A.; Sharkey, K.A.; Melotte, V. The role of enteric neurons in the development and progression of colorectal cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Rev. Cancer 2017, 1868, 420–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Godlewski, J.; Lakomy, I.M. Changes in vasoactive intestinal peptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide and neuropeptide Y-ergic structures of the enteric nervous system in the carcinoma of the human large intestine. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2010, 48, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Godlewski, J.; Kaleczyc, J. Somatostatin, substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide-positive intramural nerve structures of the human large intestine affected by carcinoma. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2010, 48, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Furness, J.B. Integrated Neural and Endocrine Control of Gastrointestinal Function. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016, 891, 159–173. [Google Scholar]
  20. Harington, A.M.; Hutson, J.M.; Southwell, B.R. Cholinergic neurotransmission and muscarinic receptors in the enteric nervous system. Prog. Histochem. Cytochem. 2010, 44, 173–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xue, J.; Askwith, C.; Javed, N.H.; Cooke, H.J. Autonomic nervous system and secretion across the intestinal surface. Auton. Neurosci. 2007, 133, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cheng, K.; Samimi, R.; Xie, G.; Shant, J.; Drachenberg, C.; Wade, M.; Davis, R.J.; Nomikos, G.; Raufman, J.P. Acetylcholine release by human colon cancer cells mediates autocrine stimulation of cell proliferation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008, 295, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Belo, A.; Cheng, K.; Chahdi, A.; Shant, J.; Xie, G.; Khurana, S.; Raufman, J.P. Muscarinic receptor agonists stimulate human colon cancer cell migration and invasion. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2011, 300, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Raufman, J.P.; Samimi, R.; Shah, N.; Khurana, S.; Shant, J.; Drachenberg, C.; Xie, G.; Wess, J.; Cheng, K. Genetic ablation of M3 muscarinic receptors attenuates murine colon epithelial cell proliferation and neoplasia. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 3573–3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cheng, K.; Shang, A.C.; Drachenberg, C.B.; Zhan, M.; Raufman, J.P. Differential expression of M3 muscarinic receptors in progressive colon neoplasia and metastasis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 21106–21114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Iwasaki, M.; Akiba, Y.; Kaunitz, J.D. Recent advances in vasoactive intestinal peptide physiology and pathophysiology: Focus on the gastrointestinal system. F1000Research 2019, 8(F1000 Faculty Rev), 1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Krueger, D.; Michel, K.; Zeller, F.; Demir, I.E.; Ceyhan, G.O.; Slotta-Huspenina, J.; Schemann, M. Neural Influences on Human Intestinal Epithelium in Vitro. J. Physiol. 2016, 594, 357–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chandrasekharan, B.; Nezami, B.G.; Srinivasan, S. Emerging neuropeptide targets in inflammation: NPY and VIP. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2013, 304, 949–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jayawardena, D.; Guzman, G.; Gill, R.K.; Alrefai, W.A.; Onyuksel, H.; Dudeja, P.K. Expression and Localization of VPAC1, the Major Receptor of Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Along the Length of the Intestine. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2017, 313, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alleaume, C.; Eychène, A.; Caigneaux, E.; Muller, J.M.; Philippe, M. Vasoactive intestinal peptide stimulates proliferation in HT29 human colonic adenocarcinoma cells: Concomitant activation of Ras/Rap1-B-Raf-ERK signalling pathway. Neuropeptides 2003, 37, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Levy, A.; Gal, R.; Granoth, R.; Dreznik, Z.; Fridkin, M.; Gozes, I. In vitro and in vivo treatment of colon cancer by VIP antagonists. Regul. Pept. 2002, 109, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ogasawara, M.; Murata, J.; Ayukawa, K.; Saimi, I. Differential effect of intestinal neuropeptides on invasion and migration of colon carcinoma cells in vitro. Cancer Lett. 1997, 119, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, S.; Zeng, Y.; Li, Y.; Guo, W.; Liu, J.; Ouyang, N. VPAC1 overexpression is associated with poor differentiation in colon cancer. Tumour Biol. 2014, 35, 6397–6404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ogasawara, M.; Murata, J.; Kamitani, Y.; Hayashi, K.; Saiki, I. Inhibition by vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) of angiogenesis induced by murine Colon 26-L5 carcinoma cells metastasized in liver. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 1999, 17, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ogasawara, M.; Murata, J.; Ayukawa, K.; Saiki, I. Inhibitory effect of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) on experimental liver metastasis by murine colon 26-L5 carcinoma cells. Oncol. Res. 1998, 10, 361–370. [Google Scholar]
  36. Iishi, H.; Tatsuta, M.; Baba, M.; Okuda, S.; Taniguchi, H. Enhacement by vasoactive intestinal peptide of experimental carcinogenesis induced by azoxymethane in rat colon. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 4890–4893. [Google Scholar]
  37. Vu, J.P.; Benhammou, J.N.; Goyal, D.; Luong, L.; Oh, S.; Germano, P.; Pisegna, J.R. PACAP regulation of gastrointestinal function and obesity. Current. In Topics of Neurotoxicity 11 Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase Activating Polypeptide-PACAP; Reglodi, D., Tamas, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 261–270. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wu, M.J.; Kee, K.H.; Na, J.; Kim, S.W.; Bae, Y.; Shin, D.H.; Choi, S.; Jun, J.Y.; Jeong, H.-S.; Park, J.-S. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide inhibits pacemaker activity of colonic interstitial cells of Cajal. Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2015, 19, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Le, S.V.; Yamaguchi, D.J.; McArdle, C.A.; Tachiki, K.; Pisegna, J.R.; Germano, P. PAC1 and PACAP expression, signaling, and effect on the growth of HCT8, human colonic tumor cells. Regul. Pept. 2002, 109, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Szanto, Z.; Sarszegi, Z.; Reglodi, D.; Nemeth, J.; Szabadfi, K.; Kiss, P.; Varga, A.; Banki, E.; Csanaky, K.; Gaszner, B.; et al. PACAP immunoreactivity in human malignant tumor samples and cardiac diseases. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2012, 48, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nemetz, N.; Abad, C.; Lawson, G.; Nobuta, H.; Chhith, S.; Duong, L.; Tse, G.; Braun, J.; Waschek, J.A. Induction of colitis and rapid development of colorectal tumors in mice deficient in neuropeptide PACAP. Int. J. Cancer 2008, 122, 1803–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Holzer, P.; Reichmann, F.; Farzi, A. Neuropeptide Y, peptide YY and pancreatic polypeptide in the gut-brain axis. Neuropeptides 2012, 46, 261–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Roperch, J.-P.; Incitti, R.; Forbin, S.; Bard, F.; Mansour, H.; Mesli, F.; Baumgaertner, I.; Brunetti, F.; Sobhani, I. Aberrant methylation of NPY, PENK, and WIF1 as a promising marker for blood-based diagnosis of colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Garrigou, S.; Perkins, G.; Garlan, F.; Normand, C.; Didelot, A.; le Corre, D.; Peyvandi, S.; Mulot, C.; Niarra, R.; Aucouturier, P.; et al. A study of hypermethylated circulating tumor DNA as a universal colorectal cancer biomarker. Clin. Chem. 2016, 62, 1129–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jeppsson, S.; Srinivasan, S.; Chandrasekharan, B. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) promotes inflammation-induced tumorigenesis by enhancing epithelial cell proliferation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2017, 312, G103–G111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rosso, M.; Robles-Frías, M.J.; Coveñas, R.; Salinas-Martín, M.V.; Muñoz, M. The NK-1 receptor is expressed in human primary gastric and colon adenocarcinomas and is involved in the antitumor action of L-733,060 and the mitogenic action of substance P on human gastrointestinal cancer cell lines. Tumour Biol. 2008, 29, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Garnier, A.; Vykoukal, J.; Hubertus, J.; Alt, E.; von Schweinitz, D.; Kappler, R.; Berger, M.; Ilmer, M. Targeting the neurokinin-1 receptor inhibits growth of human colon cancer cell. Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 47, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, X.Y.; Ru, G.Q.; Ma, Y.Y.; Xie, J.; Chen, W.Y.; Wang, H.J.; Wang, S.B.; Li, L.; Jin, K.T.; He, X.L.; et al. High expression of substance P and its receptor neurokinin-1 receptor in colorectal cancer is associated with tumor progression and prognosis. Onco. Targets Ther. 2016, 9, 3595–3602. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gonkowski, S.; Rytel, L. Somatostatin as an active substance in the mammalian enteric nervous system. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Colucci, R.; Blandizzi, C.; Ghishu, N.; Florio, T.; Del Tacca, M. Somatostatin inhibits colon cancer cell growth through cyclooxygenase-2 downregulation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 155, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, S.; Bao, Z.; Liang, Q.M.; Long, J.W.; Xiao, Z.S.; Jiang, Z.J.; Liu, B.; Yang, J.; Long, Z.X. Octreotide stimulates somatostatin receptor-induces apoptosis of SW480 colon cancer cells by activation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β, a WNT/β pathway modulator. Hepatogastroenterology 2013, 60, 1639–1646. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Chen, J.S.; Liang, Q.M.; Li, H.S.; Yang, J.; Wang, S.; Long, J.W. Octrotide inhibits growth of colonic cancer SW480 cells by modulating the Wnt/P pathway. Pharmazie 2009, 64, 126–131. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hohla, F.; Buchholz, S.; Schally, A.V.; Krishan, A.; Rick, F.G.; Szalontay, L.; Papadia, A.; Halmos, G.; Koster, F.; Aigner, E.; et al. Targeted cytotoxic somatostatin analog AN-162 ihibits growth of human colon carcinomas and increases sensitivity of doxorubicin resistant murine leukemia cells. Cancer Lett. 2010, 294, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Evangelou, I.; Petraki, C.; Msaouel, P.; Scorilas, A.; Sdrolia, E.; Padazi, G.; Koborozos, V.; Koutsilieris, M. Immunohistochemical expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes 2 and 5 in colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 42, 777–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, Y.; Chew, M.H.; Tham, C.K.; Tang, C.L.; Ong, S.Y.K.; Zhao, Y. Methylation of serum SST gene in an independent prognostic marker in colorectal cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2016, 6, 2098–2108. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Benya, R.V.; Matkowskyj, K.A.; Danilkovich, A.; Hecht, G. Galanin causes Cl-secretion in the human colon. Potential significance of inflammation-associated NF-kappa B activation on galanin-1 receptor expression and function. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998, 863, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Botella, A.; Delvaux, M.; Frexinos, J.; Bueno, L. Comparative effects of galanin on isolated smooth muscle cells from ileum in five mammalian species. Life Sci. 1992, 50, 1253–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kim, K.Y.; Kee, M.K.; Chong, S.A.; Nam, M.J. Galanin is up-regulated in colon adenocarcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2007, 16, 2373–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Stevenson, L.; Allen, W.L.; Turkington, R.; Jithesh, P.V.; Proutski, I.; Stewart, G.; Lenz, H.-J.; Schaeybroeck, S.V.; Longley, D.B.; Johnston, P.G. Identification of galanin and its receptor GalR1 as novel determinants of resistance to chemotherapy and potential biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 5412–5426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kwiatkowski, P.; Godlewski, J.; Kieżun, J.; Kraziński, B.E.; Kmieć, Z. Colorectal cancer patients exhibit increased levels of galanin in serum and colon tissues. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 12, 3323–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nagayoshi, K.; Ueki, T.; Tashiro, K.; Mizuuchi, Y.; Manabe, T.; Araki, H.; Oda, Y.; Kuhara, S.; Tanaka, M. Galanin plays an important role in cancer invasiveness and is associated with poor prognosis in stage II colorectal cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tell, R.; Rivera, C.A.; Eskra, J.; Taglia, L.N.; Blunier, A.; Wang, Q.T.; Benya, R.V. Gastrin-realising peptide signaling alters colon cancer invasiveness via heterochromatin protein 1HSβ. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 672–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Carrol, R.E.; Matkowskyj, K.A.; Chakrabarti, S.; McDonald, T.J.; Benya, R.V. Aberrant expression of gastrin-releasing peptide and its receptor by well-differentiated colon cancers in humans. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 276, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Rivera, C.A.; Ahlberg, N.C.; Taglia, L.; Kumar, M.; Blunier, A.; Benya, R.V. Expression of GRP and its receptor is associated with improved survival in patients with colon cancer. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2009, 26, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Godlewski, J.; Pidsudko, Z. Characteristic of galaninergic components of the enteric nervous system in the cancer invasion of human large intestine. Ann. Anat. 2012, 194, 368–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Oponowicz, A.; Kozłowska, A.; Gonkowski, S.; Godlewski, J.; Majewski, M. Changes in the Distribution of Cocaine- And Amphetamine-Regulated Transcript-Containing Neural Structures in the Human Colon Affected by the Neoplastic Process. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Godlewski, J. Morphological changes in the enteric nervous system caused by carcinoma of the human large intestine. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2010, 48, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zauszkiewicz-Pawlak, A.; Godlewski, J.; Kwiatkowski, P.; Kmiec, Z. Ultrastructural characteristics of myenteric plexus in patients with colorectal cancer. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2017, 55, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ciurea, R.N.; Rogoveanu, I.; Pirici, D.; Tartea, G.C.; Streba, C.T.; Florescu, C.; Catalin, B.; Puiu, I.; Tartea, E.A.; Vere, C.C. B2 adrenic receptors and morphological changes of the enteric nervous system in colorectal adenocarcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 1250–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kozlowska, A.; Kwiatkowski, P.; Oponowicz, A.; Majewski, M.; Kmiec, Z.; Godlewski, J. Myenteric plexuses atrophy in the vicinity of colorectal cancer tissue is not caused by apoptosis or necrosis. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2016, 54, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Van Neerven, S.M.; Vermeulen, L. The interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic Wnt signaling in controlling intestinal transformation. Differentiation 2019, 108, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Konishi, M.; Hayakawa, Y.; Koike, K. Role of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Signaling in Gastrointestinal Cancers. Biomedicines 2019, 7, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Von Rosenvinge, E.C.; Raufman, J.P. Muscarinic receptor signaling in colon cancer. Cancers 2011, 3, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Shah, N.; Khurana, S.; Cheng, K.; Raufman, J.P. Muscarinic receptors and ligands in cancer. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2009, 296, C221–C232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Labed, S.A.; Wani, K.A.; Jagadeesan, S.; Hakkim, A.; Najibi, M.; Irazoqui, J.E. Intestinal Epithelial Wnt Signaling Mediates Acetylcholine-Triggered Host Defense against Infection. Immunity 2018, 48, 963–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Xie, G.; Cheng, K.; Shant, J.; Raufman, J.P. Acethylcholine induced activation of M3 muscarinic receptors stimulates robust matrix metalloproteinase gene expression in human colon cancer cells. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2009, 296, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tolaymat, M.; Larabee, S.M.; Hu, S.; Xie, G.; Raufman, J.-P. The Role of M3 Muscarinic Receptor Ligand-Induced Kinase Signaling in Colon Cancer Progression. Cancers 2019, 11, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Carethers, J.M.; Jung, B.H. Genetics and Genetic Biomarkers in Sporadic Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2015, 149, 1177–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lakomy, M.; Sienkiewicz, W.; Zmudzki, J.; Wasowicz, K. Changes in the expression of some neuropeptide in the intestines and nerve ganglia during the porcine dysyntery. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy. 2005, 49, 393–398. [Google Scholar]
  80. Skobowiat, C.; Calka, J.; Majewski, M. Axotomy induced changes in neuronal plasticity of sympathetic chain ganglia (SChG) neurons supplying descending colon in the pig. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2011, 90, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lang, R.; Gundlach, A.L.; Kofler, B. The galanin peptide family: Receptor pharmacology, pleiotropic biological actions, and implications in health and disease. Pharmacol. Ther. 2007, 115, 177–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gudermann, T.; Roelle, S. Calcium-dependent growth regulation of small cell lung cancer cells by neuropeptides. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2006, 13, 1069–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Banerjee, R.; Henson, B.S.; Russo, N.; Tsodikov, A.; D’Silva, N.J. Rap1 mediates galanin receptor 2-induced proliferation and survival in squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Signal. 2011, 23, 1110–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mashaghi, A.; Marmalidou, A.; Tehrani, M.; Grace, P.M.; Pothoulakis, C.; Dana, R. Neuropeptide substance P and the immune response. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 4249–4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Muñoz, M.; Coveñas, R. Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists as antitumor drugs in gastrointestinal cancer: A new approach. Saudi J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 22, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Knijn, N.; Mogk, S.C.; Teerenstra, S.; Simmer, F.; Nagtegaal, I.D. Perineural Invasion is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2016, 40, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Liebig, C.; Ayala, G.; Wilks, J.; Verstovsek, G.; Liu, H.; Agarwal, N.; Berger, D.H.; Albo, D. Perineural invasion is an independent predictor of outcome in colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 5131–5137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zhou, Y.; Wang, H.; Gong, H.; Cao, M.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Y. Clinical significance of perineural invasion in stages II and III colorectal cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2015, 211, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Duchalais, E.; Guilluy, C.; Steven Nedellec, S.; Touvron, M.; Bessard, A.; Touchefeu, Y.; Bossard, C.; Boudin, H.; Louarn, G.; Neunlist, M.; et al. Colorectal Cancer Cells Adhere to and Migrate Along the Neurons of the Enteric Nervous System. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 5, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Adad, S.J.; Etchebehere, R.M.; Araujo, J.R.; Madureira, A.B.; Lima, V.G.; Silva, A.A.; Eduardo, C. Association of chagasic megacolon and cancer of the colon: Case report and review of the literature. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2002, 35, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  91. Garcia, S.B.; Aranha, A.L.; Garcia, F.R.; Basile, F.V.; Pinto, A.P.; de Oliveira, E.C.; Zucoloto, S. A retrospective study of histopathological findings in 894 cases of megacolon: What is the relationship between megacolon and colonic cancer? Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2003, 45, 91–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kannen, V.; de Oliveira, E.C.; Motta, B.Z.; Chaguri, A.J.; Brunaldi, M.O.; Garcia, S.B. Trypanosomiasis-induced megacolon illustrates how myenteric neurons modulate the risk for colon cancer in rats and humans. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Amit, M.; Na’ara, S.; Gil, Z. Mechanisms of cancer dissemination along nerves. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Liu, S. Neurotrophic factors in enteric physiology and pathophysiology. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2018, 30, e13446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Meldolesi, J. Neurotrophin receptors in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacol. Res. 2017, 121, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Reichardt, L.F. Neurotrophin-regulated signalling pathways. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2006, 361, 1545–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Brunetto de Farias, C.; Rosenberg, D.B.; Heinen, T.E.; Koehler-Santos, P.; Abujamra, A.L.; Kapczinski, F.; Brunetto, A.L.; Aston-Prolla, P.; Meurer, L.; Reis Bogo, M.; et al. BDNF/TrkB content and interaction with gastrin-releasing peptide receptor blockade in colorectal cancer. Oncology 2010, 79, 430–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Yu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Yang, Z.; Ou, G. Overexpression of TrkB promotes the progression of colon cancer. APMIS 2010, 118, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Meng, L.; Liu, B.; Ji, R.; Jiang, X.; Yan, X.; Xin, Y. Targeting the BDNF/TrkB pathway for the treatment of tumors. Oncol. Lett. 2019, 17, 2031–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mazouffre, C.; Geyl, S.; Perraud, A.; Blondy, S.; Jauberteau, M.O.; Mathonnet, M.; Verdier, M. Dual inhibition of BDNF/TrkB and autophagy: A promising therapeutic approach for colorectal cancer. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2017, 21, 2610–2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Blondy, S.; Christou, N.; David, V.; Verdier, M.; Jauberteau, M.O.; Mathonnet, M.; Perraud, A. Neurotrophins and their involvement in digestive cancers. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.