Next Article in Journal
Selective Activation of ZAK β Expression by 3-Hydroxy-2-Phenylchromone Inhibits Human Osteosarcoma Cells and Triggers Apoptosis via JNK Activation
Previous Article in Journal
Mitochondria Targeting as an Effective Strategy for Cancer Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms21093364
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gene Signatures of Early Response to Anti-TNF Drugs in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

by
Sara Salvador-Martín
1,†,
Irene Raposo-Gutiérrez
1,†,
Víctor Manuel Navas-López
2,
Carmen Gallego-Fernández
3,
Ana Moreno-Álvarez
4,
Alfonso Solar-Boga
4,
Rosana Muñoz-Codoceo
5,
Lorena Magallares
6,
Eva Martínez-Ojinaga
6,
María J. Fobelo
7,
Antonio Millán-Jiménez
8,
Alejandro Rodriguez-Martinez
9,
Concepción A. Vayo
10,
Cesar Sánchez
11,
Mar Tolin
11,
Ferrán Bossacoma
12,
Gemma Pujol-Muncunill
13,
Rafael González de Caldas
14,
Inés Loverdos
15,
José A. Blanca-García
16,
Oscar Segarra
17,
Francisco J. Eizaguirre
18,
Ruth García-Romero
19,
Vicente Merino-Bohórquez
20,
María Sanjurjo-Sáez
1 and
Luis A. López-Fernández
1,*add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Pharmacy Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain
2
Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, IBIMA Multidisciplinary Group for Pediatric Research, 29010 Málaga, Spain
3
Pharmacy Department, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain
4
Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, A Coruña University Hospital, 15006 A Coruña, Spain
5
Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, 28009 Madrid, Spain
6
Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University Hospital La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain
7
Pharmacy Service, Hospital Virgen de Valme, 41014 Sevilla, Spain
8
Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Virgen de Valme, 41014 Sevilla, Spain
9
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Seville, Spain
10
Pharmacy Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Seville, Spain
11
Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain
12
Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Salut Emporda, 08950 Barcelona, Spain
13
Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, 08950 Barcelona, Spain
14
Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Reina Sofía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
15
Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital de Sabadell, Corporació Sanitària Universitària Parc Taulí, 08208 Barcelona, Spain
16
Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Puerta del Mar, 11009 Cadiz, Spain
17
Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebrón, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
18
Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario Donostia, 20014 San Sebastián, Spain
19
Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Infantil Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
20
UGC Pharmacy Department, Hospital Virgen de la Macarena, 41009 Sevilla, Spain
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(9), 3364; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093364
Submission received: 19 February 2020 / Revised: 5 May 2020 / Accepted: 7 May 2020 / Published: 9 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Around a 20–30% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are diagnosed before they are 18 years old. Anti-TNF drugs can induce and maintain remission in IBD, however, up to 30% of patients do not respond. The aim of the work was to identify markers that would predict an early response to anti-TNF drugs in pediatric patients with IBD. The study population included 43 patients aged <18 years with IBD who started treatment with infliximab or adalimumab. Patients were classified into primary responders (n = 27) and non-responders to anti-TNF therapy (n = 6). Response to treatment could not be analyzed in 10 patients. Response was defined as a decrease in over 15 points in the disease activity indexes from week 0 to week 10 of infliximab treatment or from week 0 to week 26 of adalimumab treatment. The expression profiles of nine genes in total RNA isolated from the whole-blood of pediatric IBD patients taken before biologic administration and after 2 weeks were analyzed using qPCR and the 2−∆∆Ct method. Before initiation and after 2 weeks of treatment the expression of SMAD7 was decreased in patients who were considered as non-responders (p value < 0.05). Changes in expression were also observed for TLR2 at T0 and T2, although that did not reach the level of statistical significance. In addition, the expression of DEFA5 decreased 1.75-fold during the first 2 weeks of anti-TNF treatment in responders, whereas no changes were observed in non-responders. Expression of the SMAD7 gene is a pharmacogenomic biomarker of early response to anti-TNF agents in pediatric IBD. TLR2 and DEFA5 need to be validated in larger studies.

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), is an autoimmune disorder whose pathogenesis genetics and environmental factors play a key role [1,2]. Around 20–30% of IBD patients are diagnosed before they are 18 years old. Pediatric IBD (pIBD) is associated with more extensive disease and a more complicated course than adult-onset IBD [3]. These characteristics and the fact that children have to live longer with the existing therapy underline the need for optimization of treatments of pIBD.
Biological therapy, mainly anti-TNF agents, has revolutionized the treatment of IBD and other inflammatory diseases. The phenotype of pIBD usually leads to earlier use of biological therapy in children [4]. However, and in spite of the usefulness of anti-TNF agents, failure of treatment is a major area for improvement. Thus, after 10 weeks of treatment with infliximab in children with moderate-to-severe CD, 11.6% did not respond and 41.1% did not achieve clinical remission [5]. Failure rates were even higher at week 54, with no response in 46.5% and a failure to have a clinical response in 44.2%. However, other biological drugs approved in adults, such as vedolizumab (anti-integrin α4β7) or ustekimumab (an anti-IL-23), are used off-label in children when treatment with infliximab and adalimumab fails [6].
Mucosal healing is the best outcome measure in pIBD and it is used to compare the efficacy of different biological therapies [7]. However, given that pIBD is a chronic disease, frequent biopsies would be required to monitor response and because this is unfeasible, the use of non-invasive biomarkers is highly recommended.
Serological or fecal biomarkers, such as trough serum anti-TNF levels and antidrug antibodies and fecal calprotectin, have been related to the response to anti-TNF treatment and are usually monitored in clinical practice [8,9,10,11]. However, their predictive value during the first 2 weeks of anti-TNF treatment is limited and more biomarkers are needed. Trough serum anti-TNF levels 6 weeks after initiation of treatment were recently reported to predict remission [12]. Several DNA polymorphisms have been associated with a response to anti-TNF drugs. However, most of these associations are weak and not valid for use in clinical practice [13,14,15,16,17,18]. In addition, most of them have been identified in adults but have not been tested in children yet.
The identification of genomic biomarkers could help us to identify groups of children who are less likely to respond to anti-TNFs before the beginning of treatment. The expression profile of several genes in inflamed tissues have been associated with a response to anti-TNF agents in adults diagnosed with IBD or other autoimmune disorders [19,20,21,22,23]. However, little is known about this subject in children with IBD. A recent study analyzing blood transcriptome biomarkers identified genes that were differentially expressed in children with clinically active IBD (but not adults) and healthy donors [24]. Unfortunately, most of these studies used biopsied inflamed tissue as their sample, and, as biopsy is an invasive technique, the biomarkers obtained could not be monitored. Gene expression biomarkers from whole blood could prove advantageous, although only a few studies have used this approach, and, again, the study population only comprised adults [25,26].
In the present study, we measured the expression of the genes SMAD7, TNF, TLR2, TNFRSF1B, TBX21, DEFA5, IL11, TREM1, and OSM (previously studied as related to the anti-TNF response or IBD in adults) [25,27,28,29,30,31] in the whole blood of children with IBD before and after 2 weeks of anti-TNF treatment. The aim was to evaluate whether these genes could be very early pharmacogenomics biomarkers of response to anti-TNF agents in pIBD.

2. Results

2.1. Patients Characteristics

Forty-three patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study (Figure 1). Twenty-seven responded to anti-TNF treatment according to the established criteria, six did not respond and ten were excluded from further analysis due to missing samples, missing clinical data needed to evaluate the response, or due to low RNA/cDNA quality.
The anti-TNF treatment failure rate was 18.2%, which was much lower than expected. The characteristics of both groups of patients are summarized in Table 1.
Eighteen patients received infliximab and fifteen patients were treated with adalimumab. The only statistically significant characteristic between the two response groups was the PCDAI at the start of treatment (PCDAI 30 in responders vs. 15 in non-responders, p value = 0.013) (Table 1).

2.2. Differential Gene Expression in the Response of Anti-TNF Agents Prior to Starting Treatment

In order to identify differential gene expression profiles that could be used as markers of response to anti-TNF treatment, we compared the relative expression of TLR2, TNF, TNFRSF1B, IL11, TBX21, SMAD7, TREM1, OSM and DEFA5 in responders and non-responders immediately prior to the first administration of the anti-TNF agents. The analysis was performed using responders (R-T0) as the biological reference group. The SMAD7 mRNA expression was decreased in non-responders compared to responders (–2.1-fold. p value < 0.05). In addition, a decrease in expression of DEFA5 (–2.0-fold) and TLR2 (–1.8-fold) were observed in non-responders compared with responders (Supplemental Table S1), but these changes were not statistically significant.
These results and the inter-sample variability are observed more clearly when the relative expression values of each sample are represented graphically (Figure 2).

2.3. Differential Gene Expression in Response to Anti-TNF Agents at Week 2 Post-Treatment

Gene expression was analyzed at week 2 post-treatment in responders vs. non-responders, as in the previous case, using the responders as the biological reference group (R-T2). The results showed a lower expression of SMAD7 (–1.8-fold, p value < 0.05) in non-responders compared with responders (Supplemental Table S2).
These results and inter-sample variability were observed more clearly when the relative expression values of each sample were represented graphically (Figure 3). The expression of TLR2 was lower (–1.6-fold) in non-responders, although this difference was not statistically significant.

2.4. Differential Change in Gene Expression during the First 2 Weeks of Anti-TNF Treatment

We studied the changes in gene expression produced during the first 2 weeks of anti-TNF treatment, which differed between responders and non-responders. This difference was measured as the ratio of the expression levels for each patient at time 2 weeks (t2) and before initiation of treatment (t0) (t2/t0). The expression of DEFA5 decreased 1.75-fold after the first 2 weeks of anti-TNF treatment in responders, whereas no changes were observed in non-responders, although this difference was not statistically significant. These results and inter-sample variability were observed more clearly when the relative expression values of each sample were represented graphically (Figure 4).

2.5. Prediction of Response to Anti-TNF Therapy Based on SMAD7 Expression Prior to Starting Treatment

The SMAD7 mRNA expression at t0 was decreased in non-responders compared to responders (Figure 1). The positive predictive value (PPV) for response to anti-TNF treatment was 45%, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 95%. Sensitivity was 83% and specificity 77% using a cut-off of 1 for SMAD7 relative expression in whole blood prior to treatment. The diagnostic odds ratio, which measures the effectiveness of a test independently of the prevalence, was 16.14. In addition, with a prevalence of 0.18, the positive likelihood ratio (+LR) was 3.75 (95% CI 1.70–8.27), and the negative LR (–LR) was 0.21 (95% CI 0.03–1.32).

3. Discussion

Although the anti-TNF agents infliximab and adalimumab have revolutionized the treatment of autoimmune diseases, a significant percentage of patients do not respond to this therapy [8]. Knowing in which patient therapy is more likely to fail after 2 weeks or even before initiation would allow therapy to be personalized, thus making it safer and more efficient, especially in children, who are necessarily treated for longer. There is currently, no other approved biological treatment in Europe for children with inflammatory bowel disease (infliximab and adalimumab for CD and infliximab for UC) which makes optimization of treatment especially important in this population. In addition, the genetics of pIBD differs from adult IBD highlighting the relevance for finding specific biomarkers for children. Thus, polymorphisms in genes, such as NOD2/CAR15, ATG16L1, IL23R, and IL10R have been involved in susceptibility to pIBD or to very-early-onset ulcerative colitis [32,33]. Differences in serum levels of clusterin and ceruloplasmin between children and adults with IBD have also been found [34]. Concerning differences in response to treatment, SNPs in ATG16L1, CDKAL1, ICOSLG, BRWD1, and HLA-DQA1 have been associated with an anti-TNF response specifically in children [35]. However, concerning gene expression, specific profiles have been associated with a response to anti-TNF agents in adults with IBD, but not in children [19,20,23]. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to analyze gene expression profiles in children with IBD based on biomarkers of response to anti-TNF agents. We identified TNF, SMAD7, and DEFA5 to be potential pharmacogenomic markers for early response to anti-TNF drugs in pediatric patients with IBD. This discovery is a first step for what in the future may constitute a minimally invasive routine test in daily clinical practice that could help to select the best treatment options for these patients. Several authors have included these three genes in their gene expression studies in the search for a biomarker that would enable us to predict the response to anti-TNF agents in patients with various diseases, mainly rheumatoid arthritis [21,22,26,36,37]. None of these three genes proved to be a biomarker of response. However, none of the aforementioned studies were performed in adults, thus suggesting that there are differences in expression that are specific to children.
Our results showed that expression of SMAD7 mRNA was downregulated in the peripheral blood cells of non-responders after 2 weeks of anti-TNF treatment. SMAD7 negatively regulates phosphorylation of the SMAD2/SMAD3 complex, which is necessary for TGF-ß signaling [38,39]. Several studies have linked deregulation of the TGF-β/SMAD pathway with the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases, including psoriasis [40] and IBD. In the case of IBD, the inflammation associated with CD is characterized by a decrease in the immunosuppressive activity of TGF-β as a result of overexpression of SMAD7 in the affected regions of the intestine [41]. However, other authors suggest that inhibition of SMAD7 increases values for proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-2, thus driving inflammation and enhancing the proinflammatory Th17 immune response [42]. Expression of SMAD7 also decreases in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with multiple sclerosis [43,44]. Recently, our group confirmed this observation and extended its findings to adults diagnosed with CD [45]. We suggest that highly-expressed SMAD7 cells are enriched at inflammation sites and, in parallel, poorly expressed SMAD7 cells are enriched in peripheral blood. TGF-β is a cytokine with important immunomodulatory properties that control the activation status of all immune system cells and contributes to peripheral differentiation of regulatory cells (anti-inflammatory cells) and Th17 T cells (pro-inflammatory cells) [46]. This dual role of TGF-ß makes it difficult to understand the exact molecular mechanisms behind its regulation. In any case, expression of SMAD7 is a valuable biomarker of early response to anti-TNF response in children with IBD, although this should be validated in a larger cohort.
In addition, our results showed that DEFA5 mRNA levels tend to decrease between week 0 and 2 in responders, but not in non-responders. DEFA5 is a cytotoxic peptide that is produced in large quantities by Paneth cells. It is involved in the control of intestinal microbiota and plays a crucial role in its homeostasis [47]. DEFA5 and DEFA6 are reduced in the small bowel of patients with CD [47]. Recently, Hu et al. [48] demonstrated the implication of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) in IBD. ATF4 is decreased in the inflamed intestinal mucosa of patients with IBD, and its deficiency in mice leads to reduced glutamine absorption and decreased expression of antimicrobial peptides such as DEFA5 in the Paneth cells of the ileum. For this reason, it is difficult to determine the cause of the decrease in DEFA5 mRNA expression in blood during the first 2 weeks of anti-TNF treatment in pediatric responders. As for SMAD7, expression in inflamed tissues and in blood may be increased in one and decreased in the other.
TREM1 and TNF genes have been associated with a response to anti-TNF drugs in adults [25,49]. Furthermore, TNF level in stimulated PBMCs has been described as a good marker of response to infliximab in adults with IBD [50]. In our study, no differences were observed for these genes in children treated with infliximab or adalimumab. This lack of correlation could be due to low sample size or other study limitations. However, inherent differences in gene expression between children and adults in the response to anti-TNF drugs could also be the cause.
The main limitation of the study is its sample size, which is insufficiently large to take account of the wide interindividual variability in gene expression observed in blood [22,26]. Gene expression may also vary with respect to the two drugs used, adalimumab and infliximab. This low sample size also prevents us from knowing whether the difference observed in the PCDAI index between responders and non-responders is or may be a direct cause of the response. Sample size also made it impossible to analyze differences between CD and UC and precluded correction for multiple testing Additionally, an effect of drug exposure on outcomes cannot be ruled out, although its impact was minimized due to monitoring of trough serum anti-TNF levels during follow-up in most of these patients. However, the analysis performed in this paper was preliminary.
In addition, comparison with similar studies is difficult for two reasons. First, there are no data on children. Second, response criteria differ with studies. Thus, for example, the response may be based on various parameters, such as endoscopic and histological healing [19], or the decrease in the Mayo score [23].
More studies involving larger populations are necessary to confirm these findings. Nevertheless, the various blood biomarkers of response to anti-TNF agents identified to date could help to improve the therapy in pIBD.
In summary, we verified that low SMAD7 expression prior and after 2 weeks of anti-TNF treatment were associated with a lack of response in children diagnosed with IBD. Moreover, TLR2 and DEFA5 were also differentially expressed in responder patients to anti-TNF drugs when compared to non-responders, but these trends need to be validated in larger cohorts to achieve significant results.
In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess levels of SMAD7 mRNA in blood as pharmacogenomic markers of early response to anti-TNF drugs in pIBD.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patient Samples

Between March 2017 and March 2019, 43 IBD patients aged under 18 years were prospectively recruited from the Pediatric Gastroenterology Units of 14 Spanish hospitals. The groups were matched for age and gender. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) diagnosis of IBD established based on clinical manifestations, radiological findings, and endoscopic and histological criteria; (2) age 1 to 18 years old; and (3) start of treatment with infliximab (induction regimen of 3 doses [0, 2 and 6 weeks] at 5 mg/kg) or adalimumab (<40 kg: induction with first dose of 80 mg at week 0 followed by a second dose of 40 mg at week 2 and maintenance treatment of 40 mg every two weeks. In patients weighing <40 kg these doses were decreased by half). Demographic and clinical information were also collected. Disease activity was assessed using the Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) and Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI). Patients were classified as responders and non-responders to anti-TNF therapy based on changes in the PCDAI or PUCAI. Response was defined as a decrease higher than 15 points in any of these indexes from week 0 to 10 for infliximab or from week 0 to 26 for adalimumab. Response was defined as reaching a value of 0 in patients with a value lower than 15 points prior to treatment in any of these indexes.

4.2. Ethics Statement

The present study was approved by the Ethic Committee of the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón and the other participating hospitals (approval number: LLF-TNF-2016-01, 20 January 2017). All patients from 6 to 18 years old assented and parents or legal representatives provided their written informed consent to participate, in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

4.3. Extraction of Total RNA from Whole Blood

A blood sample was collected in PAXgene Blood RNA tubes (PreAnalytiX, Hombrechtikon, Switzerland) before the administration of the anti-TNF agent (week 0) and after 2 weeks of treatment (week 2). Total whole blood RNA was extracted using PAXgene Blood RNA kits (PreAnalitiX) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentrations were measured using the Quawell Q5000 Spectrophotometer (Quawell Technology Inc, San Jose, CA, USA). RNA integrity was verified using the Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit in a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Extracted RNA was stored at −80 °C until further processing. All RNA samples fulfilled both of the following criteria: RNA integrity ˃ 7 and an optical density ratio of absorbance at 260/280 of between 1.8 and 2.

4.4. Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

Total RNA was reverse transcribed using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. A 1:20 dilution of each cDNA synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA in a volume of 20 µL was used. Expression of the selected genes was quantitated using qPCRBIO SyGreen™ Mix (PCR Biosystems; London, UK) and a StepOnePlus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Gene expression was calculated using the 2−∆∆Ct method. GAPDH and HPRT1 were used for normalization. Real-time PCR was performed in triplicate using 2 μL/well of the cDNA dilution, and 0.04 μM SMAD7, TNF, TLR2, TNFRSF1B, TBX21, DEFA5, IL11, GAPDH, and HPRT1 (see Table 2 for primer sequences). In total, the cycling parameters for PCR were 10 min for 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s and annealing and extension at 60 °C for 60 s. The specificity of the DNA amplifications was verified by melting curve analysis.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Continuous clinical and demographic variables were expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD) or as the median and interquartile range (IQR); qualitative variables were presented as absolute and relative frequencies. The Fisher exact test or t-test was used to compare qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively.
Gene expression was quantified using ExpressionSuite v1.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and data were reported as the mean relative quantification and maximum and minimum relative quantification; all the assays were run in triplicate. The unpaired t-test was applied to compare gene expression between groups, with a confidence level of 95% and maximum Ct of 35. Efficiency for each primer pair probe was calculated and used for correction. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analyses were performed using ExpressionSuite v1.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and GraphPad Prism v5.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, United States).
The PPV, NPV, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratios for SMAD7 relative expression were calculated as previously described [51]. Likelihood ratio + and—were calculated with a CI of 95%.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/9/3364/s1, Table S1: Comparison of relative expression of the TLR2, TNF, TNFRSF1B, IL11, TBX21, SMAD7 and DEFA5 genes in responders vs. non-responders before initiation of anti-TNF treatment., Table S2: Relative expression of the TLR2, TNF, TNFRSF1B, IL11, TBX21, SMAD7, and DEFA5 genes in responders vs. non-responders at week 2.

Author Contributions

L.A.L.-F. conceived and designed the research. S.S.-M., I.R.-G., performed the experiments; S.S.-M., I.R.-G., V.M.N.-L., C.G.-F., L.M., E.M.-O., A.M.-Á., A.S.-B., M.J.F., A.M.-J., A.R.-M., C.A.V., C.S., M.T., F.B., G.P.-M., R.G.d.C., R.M.-C., I.L., J.A.B.-G., O.S., F.J.E., R.G.-R., V.M.-B., M.S.-S. participated in data acquisition and curation; S.S.-M., I.R.-G., and L.A.L.-F. wrote the original draft. L.A.L.-F. obtained funds. All authors revised, read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grants numbers PI16/00559 and PI19/00792), Consejería de Educación y Deporte de la Comunidad de Madrid (grant number PEJ16/MED/AI-1260), and by the Gregorio Marañón Health Research Institute (grant number PRE-2018-2), The study was cofunded by ERDF Funds (FEDER) from the European Commission, “A way of making Europe”.

Acknowledgments

In this section you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

IBDInflammatory bowel disease
pIBDPediatric inflammatory bowel disease
UCUlcerative colitis
CDCrohn’s disease
SDStandard deviation
IQRInterquartile range
PCDAIPCDAI. Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index
PUCAIPediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index
SEMStandard error of the mean
PPVPositive predictive value
SEMStandard error of the mean
PPVPositive predictive value
NPVNegative predictive value

References

  1. Gu, P.; Feagins, L.A. Dining with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review of the Literature on Diet in the Pathogenesis and Management of IBD. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2020, 26, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kuhnen, A. Genetic and Environmental Considerations for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 99, 1197–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sawczenko, A.; Sandhu, B.K. Presenting features of inflammatory bowel disease in Great Britain and Ireland. Arch. Dis. Child. 2003, 88, 995–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Henderson, P.; van Limbergen, J.E.; Wilson, D.C.; Satsangi, J.; Russell, R.K. Genetics of childhood-onset inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2011, 17, 346–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hyams, J.; Crandall, W.; Kugathasan, S.; Griffiths, A.; Olson, A.; Johanns, J.; Liu, G.; Travers, S.; Heuschkel, R.; Markowitz, J.; et al. Induction and Maintenance Infliximab Therapy for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Crohn’s Disease in Children. Gastroenterology 2007, 132, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shim, H.H.; Chan, P.W.; Chuah, S.W.; Schwender, B.J.; Kong, S.C.; Ling, K.L. A review of vedolizumab and ustekinumab for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. JGH Open 2018, 2, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cholapranee, A.; Hazlewood, G.S.; Kaplan, G.G.; Peyrin-Biroulet, L.; Ananthakrishnan, A.N. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Comparative efficacy of biologics for induction and maintenance of mucosal healing in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis controlled trials. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 45, 1291–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hendy, P.; Hart, A.; Irving, P. Anti-TNF drug and antidrug antibody level monitoring in IBD: A practical guide. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2016, 7, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kelly, O.B.; Donnell, S.O.; Stempak, J.M.; Steinhart, A.H.; Silverberg, M.S. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring to Guide Infliximab Dose Adjustment is Associated with Better Endoscopic Outcomes than Clinical Decision Making Alone in Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2017, 23, 1202–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Laserna-Mendieta, E.J.; Lucendo, A.J. Faecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel diseases: A review focused on meta-analyses and routine usage limitations. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2019, 57, 1295–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ma, C.; Battat, R.; Khanna, R.; Parker, C.E.; Feagan, B.G.; Jairath, V. What is the role of C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin in evaluating Crohn’s disease activity? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2019, 38–39, 101602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Courbette, O.; Aupiais, C.; Viala, J.; Hugot, J.-P.; Roblin, X.; Candon, S.; Louveau, B.; Chatenoud, L.; Martinez-Vinson, C. Trough Levels of Infliximab at W6 Are Predictive of Remission at W14 in Pediatric Crohn Disease. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2020, 70, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Balog, A.; Klausz, G.; Gal, J.; Molnar, T.; Nagy, F.; Ocsovszky, I.; Gyulai, Z.; Mandi, Y. Investigation of the prognostic value of TNF-alpha gene polymorphism among patients treated with infliximab, and the effects of infliximab therapy on TNF-α production and apoptosis. Pathobiology 2004, 71, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Matsukura, H.; Ikeda, S.; Yoshimura, N.; Takazoe, M.; Muramatsu, M. Genetic polymorphisms of tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily 1A and 1B affect responses to infliximab in Japanese patients with Crohn’s disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 27, 765–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bank, S.; Andersen, P.S.; Burisch, J.; Pedersen, N.; Roug, S.; Galsgaard, J.; Turino, S.Y.; Brodersen, J.B.; Rashid, S.; Rasmussen, B.K. Associations between functional polymorphisms in the NFκB signaling pathway and response to anti-TNF treatment in Danish patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Pharm. J. 2014, 14, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cravo, M.; Ferreira, P.; Sousa, P.; Moura-Santos, P.; Velho, S.; Tavares, L.; Deus, J.R.; Ministro, P.; da Silva, J.P.; Correia, L.; et al. Clinical and genetic factors predicting response to therapy in patients with Crohn’s disease. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2014, 2, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bek, S.; Nielsen, J.V.; Bojesen, A.B.; Franke, A.; Bank, S.; Vogel, U.; Andersen, V. Systematic review: Genetic biomarkers associated with anti-TNF treatment response in inflammatory bowel diseases. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 44, 554–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. López-Hernández, R.; Valdés, M.; Campillo, J.A.; Martínez-García, P.; Salama, H.; Bolarin, J.M.; Martínez, H.; Moya-Quiles, M.R.; Minguela, A.; Sánchez-Torres, A.; et al. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine gene single-nucleotide polymorphisms in inflammatory bowel disease. Int. J. Immunogenet. 2015, 42, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arijs, I.; Li, K.; Toedter, G.; Quintens, R.; Van Lommel, L.; Van Steen, K.; Leemans, P.; De Hertogh, G.; Lemaire, K.; Ferrante, M.; et al. Mucosal gene signatures to predict response to infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut 2009, 58, 1612–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arijs, I.; Quintens, R.; Van Lommel, L.; Van Steen, K.; De Hertogh, G.; Lemaire, K.; Schraenen, A.; Perrier, C.; Van Assche, G.; Vermeire, S.; et al. Predictive value of epithelial gene expression profiles for response to infliximab in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2010, 16, 2090–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Julià, A.; Erra, A.; Palacio, C.; Tomas, C.; Sans, X.; Barceló, P.; Marsal, S. An eight-gene blood expression profile predicts the response to infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Nakamura, S.; Suzuki, K.; Iijima, H.; Hata, Y.; Lim, C.R.; Ishizawa, Y.; Kameda, H.; Amano, K.; Matsubara, K.; Matoba, R.; et al. Identification of baseline gene expression signatures predicting therapeutic responses to three biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective observational study. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2016, 18, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Toedter, G.; Li, K.; Marano, C.; Ma, K.; Sague, S.; Huang, C.C.; Song, X.-Y.; Rutgeerts, P.; Baribaud, F. Gene Expression Profiling and Response Signatures Associated With Differential Responses to Infliximab Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 106, 1272–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ostrowski, J.; Dabrowska, M.; Lazowska, I.; Paziewska, A.; Balabas, A.; Kluska, A.; Kulecka, M.; Karczmarski, J.; Ambrozkiewicz, F.; Piatkowska, M.; et al. Redefining the Practical Utility of Blood Transcriptome Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2019, 13, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Verstockt, B.; Verstockt, S.; Dehairs, J.; Ballet, V.; Blevi, H.; Wollants, W.-J.; Breynaert, C.; Van Assche, G.; Vermeire, S.; Ferrante, M. Low TREM1 expression in whole blood predicts anti-TNF response in inflammatory bowel disease. EBioMedicine 2019, 40, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Toonen, E.J.M.; Gilissen, C.; Franke, B.; Kievit, W.; Eijsbouts, A.M.; den Broeder, A.A.; van Reijmersdal, S.V.; Veltman, J.A.; Scheffer, H.; Radstake, T.R.D.J.; et al. Validation Study of Existing Gene Expression Signatures for Anti-TNF Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Abarca-Zabalia, J.; Garcia, M.I.; Lozano Ros, A.; Marin-Jimenez, I.; Martinez-Gines, M.L.; Lopez-Cauce, B.; Martin-Barbero, M.L.; Salvador-Martin, S.; Sanjurjo-Saez, M.; Garcia-Dominguez, J.M.; et al. Differential Expression of SMAD Genes and S1PR1 on Circulating CD4+ T Cells in Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Dobre, M.; Manuc, T.E.; Milanesi, E.; Plesea, I.E.; Tieranu, E.N.; Popa, C.; Manuc, M.; Preda, C.M.; Tieranu, I.; Diculescu, M.M.; et al. Mucosal CCR1 gene expression as a marker of molecular activity in Crohn’s disease: Preliminary data. Rom. J. Morphol. Embryol. Rev. Roum. Morphol. Embryol. 2017, 58, 1263–1268. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nguyen, P.M.; Putoczki, T.L.; Ernst, M. STAT3-Activating Cytokines: A Therapeutic Opportunity for Inflammatory Bowel Disease? J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2015, 35, 340–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Salvador-Martín, S.; López-Cauce, B.; Nuñez, O.; Laserna-Mendieta, E.J.; García, M.I.; Lobato, E.; Abarca-Zabalía, J.; Sanjurjo-Saez, M.; Lucendo, A.J.; Marín-Jiménez, I.; et al. Genetic predictors of long-term response and trough levels of infliximab in crohn’s disease. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 149, 104478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Arkteg, C.B.; Goll, R.; Gundersen, M.D.; Anderssen, E.; Fenton, C.; Florholmen, J. Mucosal gene transcription of ulcerative colitis in endoscopic remission. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 55, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gazouli, M.; Pachoula, I.; Panayotou, I.; Mantzaris, G.; Chrousos, G.; Anagnou, N.P.; Roma-Giannikou, E. NOD2/CARD15, ATG16L1 and IL23R gene polymorphisms and childhood-onset of Crohn’s disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 1753–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Moran, C.J.; Walters, T.D.; Guo, C.-H.; Kugathasan, S.; Klein, C.; Turner, D.; Wolters, V.M.; Bandsma, R.H.; Mouzaki, M.; Zachos, M.; et al. IL-10R polymorphisms are associated with very-early-onset ulcerative colitis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2013, 19, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vaiopoulou, A.; Gazouli, M.; Papadopoulou, A.; Anagnostopoulos, A.K.; Karamanolis, G.; Theodoropoulos, G.E.; M’Koma, A.; Tsangaris, G.T. Serum protein profiling of adults and children with Crohn disease. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2015, 60, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Dubinsky, M.C.; Mei, L.; Friedman, M.; Dhere, T.; Haritunians, T.; Hakonarson, H.; Kim, C.; Glessner, J.; Targan, S.R.; McGovern, D.P.; et al. Genome wide association (GWA) predictors of anti-TNFalpha therapeutic responsiveness in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2010, 16, 1357–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lindberg, J.; Wijbrandts, C.A.; van Baarsen, L.G.; Nader, G.; Klareskog, L.; Catrina, A.; Thurlings, R.; Vervoordeldonk, M.; Lundeberg, J.; Tak, P.P. The gene expression profile in the synovium as a predictor of the clinical response to infliximab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Leal, R.F.; Planell, N.; Kajekar, R.; Lozano, J.J.; Ordás, I.; Dotti, I.; Esteller, M.; Masamunt, M.C.; Parmar, H.; Ricart, E.; et al. Identification of inflammatory mediators in patients with Crohn’s disease unresponsive to anti-TNFα therapy. Gut 2015, 64, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Budi, E.H.; Duan, D.; Derynck, R. Transforming Growth Factor-β Receptors and Smads: Regulatory Complexity and Functional Versatility. Trends Cell Biol. 2017, 27, 658–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Akhurst, R.J.; Hata, A. Targeting the TGFβ signalling pathway in disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2012, 11, 790–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, X.; Feng, A.; He, Y.; Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Lian, X.; Hu, F.; Li, J.; Tu, Y.; Chen, S. Association of down-regulation of CD109 expression with up-expression of Smad7 in pathogenesis of psoriasis. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. Med. Sci. 2016, 36, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Monteleone, G.; Del Vecchio Blanco, G.; Monteleone, I.; Fina, D.; Caruso, R.; Gioia, V.; Ballerini, S.; Federici, G.; Bernardini, S.; Pallone, F.; et al. Post-transcriptional Regulation of Smad7 in the Gut of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterology 2005, 129, 1420–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cejas, P.J.; Walsh, M.C.; Pearce, E.L.; Han, D.; Harms, G.M.; Artis, D.; Turka, L.A.; Choi, Y. TRAF6 inhibits Th17 differentiation and TGF-beta-mediated suppression of IL-2. Blood 2010, 115, 4750–4757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Achiron, A.; Gurevich, M.; Friedman, N.; Kaminski, N.; Mandel, M. Blood transcriptional signatures of multiple sclerosis: Unique gene expression of disease activity. Ann. Neurol. 2004, 55, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bomprezzi, R.; Ringnér, M.; Kim, S.; Bittner, M.L.; Khan, J.; Chen, Y.; Elkahloun, A.; Yu, A.; Bielekova, B.; Meltzer, P.S.; et al. Gene expression profile in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls: Identifying pathways relevant to disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2003, 12, 2191–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lopez Fernandez, L.; Lozano Ros, A.; Marin Jimenez, I.; Garcia Garcia, M.I.; Martinez Gines, M.L.; Goicochea Briceno, H.; Lopez Cauce, B.; Romero Delgado, F.; Garcia Dominguez, J.M. Differential gene expression of SMAD family members and S1PR1 in circulating CD4+T cells in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. 2017, 23, 777–778. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ardizzone, S.; Bevivino, G.; Monteleone, G. Mongersen, an oral Smad7 antisense oligonucleotide, in patients with active Crohn’s disease. Therap. Adv. Gastroenterol. 2016, 9, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wehkamp, J.; Stange, E.F. Paneth’s disease. J. Crohns. Colitis 2010, 4, 523–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Hu, X.; Deng, J.; Yu, T.; Chen, S.; Ge, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, Y.; Ying, H.; Zhai, Q.; Chen, Y.; et al. ATF4 Deficiency Promotes Intestinal Inflammation in Mice by Reducing Uptake of Glutamine and Expression of Antimicrobial Peptides. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 1098–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Takeuchi, T.; Miyasaka, N.; Tatsuki, Y.; Yano, T.; Yoshinari, T.; Abe, T.; Koike, T. Baseline tumour necrosis factor alpha levels predict the necessity for dose escalation of infliximab therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2011, 70, 1208–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jessen, B.; Rodriguez-Sillke, Y.; Sonnenberg, E.; Schumann, M.; Kruglov, A.; Freise, I.; Schmidt, F.; Maul, J.; Kuhl, A.A.; Glauben, R.; et al. Level of Tumor Necrosis Factor Production by Stimulated Blood Mononuclear Cells Can be Used to Predict Response of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases to Infliximab. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Glas, A.S.; Lijmer, J.G.; Prins, M.H.; Bonsel, G.J.; Bossuyt, P.M.M. The diagnostic odds ratio: A single indicator of test performance. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2003, 56, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 03364 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart showing selection of study patients. pIBD, pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Some patients were lost because paxgene could not be collected at time 0 or 2, some data were missing or the quality of cDNA was insufficient.
Figure 1. Flow chart showing selection of study patients. pIBD, pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Some patients were lost because paxgene could not be collected at time 0 or 2, some data were missing or the quality of cDNA was insufficient.
Ijms 21 03364 g001
Ijms 21 03364 g002a 550Ijms 21 03364 g002b 550
Figure 2. Relative expression levels of the (a) TLR2, (b) TNF, (c) TNFRSF1B, (d) IL11, (e) TBX21, (f) SMAD7, (g) DEFA5, (h) TREM1, and (i) OSM genes in responders (R) and non-responders (NR) at time 0. Expression values were normalized to HPRT1 and GAPDH genes. Values are expressed as mean (horizontal line), standard error of the mean (SEM). n, sample size. * p value < 0.05 vs. control (unpaired t-test).
Figure 2. Relative expression levels of the (a) TLR2, (b) TNF, (c) TNFRSF1B, (d) IL11, (e) TBX21, (f) SMAD7, (g) DEFA5, (h) TREM1, and (i) OSM genes in responders (R) and non-responders (NR) at time 0. Expression values were normalized to HPRT1 and GAPDH genes. Values are expressed as mean (horizontal line), standard error of the mean (SEM). n, sample size. * p value < 0.05 vs. control (unpaired t-test).
Ijms 21 03364 g002aIjms 21 03364 g002b
Ijms 21 03364 g003 550
Figure 3. Relative expression levels of the (a) TLR2, (b) TNF, (c) TNFRSF1B, (d) IL11, (e) TBX21, (f) SMAD7, (g) DEFA5, (h) TREM1, and (i) OSM genes in responders (R) and non-responders (NR) at 2 weeks after anti-TNF administration. Expression values were normalized to HPRT1 and GAPDH genes. Values are expressed as mean (horizontal line), standard error of the mean (SEM). n, sample size. * p value < 0.05 vs. control (unpaired t-test).
Figure 3. Relative expression levels of the (a) TLR2, (b) TNF, (c) TNFRSF1B, (d) IL11, (e) TBX21, (f) SMAD7, (g) DEFA5, (h) TREM1, and (i) OSM genes in responders (R) and non-responders (NR) at 2 weeks after anti-TNF administration. Expression values were normalized to HPRT1 and GAPDH genes. Values are expressed as mean (horizontal line), standard error of the mean (SEM). n, sample size. * p value < 0.05 vs. control (unpaired t-test).
Ijms 21 03364 g003
Ijms 21 03364 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the ratio between relative expression levels at week 2 (t2) and week 0 (t0) (t2/t0) of the (a) TLR2, (b) TNF, (c) TNFRSF1B, (d) IL11, (e) TBX21, (f) SMAD7, (g) DEFA5, (h) TREM1, and (i) OSM genes in responders (R) and non-responders (NR). Expression values were normalized to HPRT1 and GAPDH genes. Values are expressed as mean (horizontal line), standard error of the mean (SEM). n, sample size. * p value < 0.05 vs. control (unpaired t-test).
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the ratio between relative expression levels at week 2 (t2) and week 0 (t0) (t2/t0) of the (a) TLR2, (b) TNF, (c) TNFRSF1B, (d) IL11, (e) TBX21, (f) SMAD7, (g) DEFA5, (h) TREM1, and (i) OSM genes in responders (R) and non-responders (NR). Expression values were normalized to HPRT1 and GAPDH genes. Values are expressed as mean (horizontal line), standard error of the mean (SEM). n, sample size. * p value < 0.05 vs. control (unpaired t-test).
Ijms 21 03364 g004
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of patients.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients.
CharacteristicOverall (n = 33)Responders (n = 27)Non-Responders (n = 6)p Value
Gender
Male, n (%)16 (48.5%)12 (44.4%)4 (66.7%)0.398
Female, n (%)17 (51.5%)15 (55.6%)2 (33.3%)
Age (years)
At diagnosis, median (IQR, range)10.4 (4.6; 0.7–17)10.5 (4.7; 6.5–17)10.1 (7.2; 0.7–13.0)0.276
At start of treatment, median (IQR, range)12 (4; 1.1–17)12(4.8; 7.9–17)11.4 (6.2; 1.1–14.1)0.342
Type of IBD
CD, n (%)26 (78.8%)21 (77.8%)5 (83.3%)1
UC, n (%)7 (21.1%)6 (22.2%)1 (16.2%)
Type of Anti-TNF
Infliximab, n (%)18 (54.5%)14 (51.9%)4 (66.7%)0.665
Adalimumab, n (%)15 (45.5%)13 (48.1%)2 (33.3%)
PCDAI at start of treatment, median (IQR, range)28.8 (25.6; 5–60)30 (28.8; 5–60)15 (12.5; 7.5–30)0.013 **
PUCAI at start of treatment, median (IQR, range)45 (40; 5–60)50 (43.8; 5–60)45 *-
C-reactive protein at start of treatment, median (IQR, range)22 (31.6; 0–150.3)22.6 (41.3; 0–105.3)10.6 (19.1; 6.1–27.5)0.054
Other treatments
Enteral nutrition14 (42.4%)12 (44.4%)2 (33.3%)0.682
Corticosteroids12 (36.4%)10 (37%)2 (33.3%)1
Azathioprine20 (60.6%)16 (59.3%)4 (66.7%)1
Aminosalicylates12 (36.4%)11 (40.7%)2 (33.3%)0.379
Methotrexate3 (9.1%)2 (7.4%)1 (16.7%)1
Tacrolimus2 (6.1%)1 (3.7%)1 (16.7%)0.335
Adalimumab1 (3%)01 (16.7%)0.182
Infliximab1 (3%)01 (16.7%)0.182
IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; CD, Crohn’s disease; UC, Ulcerative Colitis; IQR, interquartile range; PCDAI. Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; PUCAI. and Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index; * IQR Not applicable. ** p value < 0.05.
Table
Table 2. Oligonucleotide sequences used for PCR amplification.
Table 2. Oligonucleotide sequences used for PCR amplification.
GeneForward (5′–3′)Reverse (5′–3′)
SMAD7ACCCGATGGATTTTCTCAAAGGGGCCAGATAATTCGTTC
TNFAGCCCATGTTGTAGCAAACCTCTCAGTCTCACGCCATT
TLR2TGTCATTCTTTCTTCCTGCTAAGACTAGGTAGGACAGAGAATGCCTTT
TNFRSF1BAGGCCACCATATTCAGTGCTGCAGATTTCTAGTTAGAAGTGCGTTA
TBX21CCCAACTGTCAATTCCTTGGGGGAACAGGATACTGGTTGG
DEFA5TCAGCTCTTTCCTGGAGTGACAGGACCATCGCCATCCTT
IL11GGACAGGGAAGGGTTAAAGGGCTCAGCACGACCAGGAC
TREM1GATGCTCTTTGTCTCAGAACCTCTCCGTCCCTTATTATCTG
OSMGTACTGCTCACACAGAGGTATATAGGGGTCCAGGAGTC
GAPDHAGCCACATCGCTCAGACACGCCCAATACGACCAAATCC
HPRT1GACCAGTCAACAGGGGACATGTGTCAATTATATCTTCCACAATCAAG

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salvador-Martín, S.; Raposo-Gutiérrez, I.; Navas-López, V.M.; Gallego-Fernández, C.; Moreno-Álvarez, A.; Solar-Boga, A.; Muñoz-Codoceo, R.; Magallares, L.; Martínez-Ojinaga, E.; Fobelo, M.J.; et al. Gene Signatures of Early Response to Anti-TNF Drugs in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3364. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093364

AMA Style

Salvador-Martín S, Raposo-Gutiérrez I, Navas-López VM, Gallego-Fernández C, Moreno-Álvarez A, Solar-Boga A, Muñoz-Codoceo R, Magallares L, Martínez-Ojinaga E, Fobelo MJ, et al. Gene Signatures of Early Response to Anti-TNF Drugs in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(9):3364. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093364

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salvador-Martín, Sara, Irene Raposo-Gutiérrez, Víctor Manuel Navas-López, Carmen Gallego-Fernández, Ana Moreno-Álvarez, Alfonso Solar-Boga, Rosana Muñoz-Codoceo, Lorena Magallares, Eva Martínez-Ojinaga, María J. Fobelo, and et al. 2020. "Gene Signatures of Early Response to Anti-TNF Drugs in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 9: 3364. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093364

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop