Next Article in Journal
ABC Efflux Transporters and the Circuitry of miRNAs: Kinetics of Expression in Cancer Drug Resistance
Next Article in Special Issue
The Dichotomic Role of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor in Neurodegeneration
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification of M35 Family Metalloproteases in Rhizoctonia cerealis and Functional Analysis of RcMEP2 as a Virulence Factor during the Fungal Infection to Wheat
Previous Article in Special Issue
Current Symptomatic and Disease-Modifying Treatments in Multiple System Atrophy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms21082989
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Fluorinated Molecules and Nanotechnology: Future ‘Avengers’ against the Alzheimer’s Disease?

by
Meghna Dabur
,
Joana A. Loureiro
* and
Maria Carmo Pereira
*
LEPABE, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, s/n, R. Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(8), 2989; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082989
Submission received: 12 April 2020 / Revised: 20 April 2020 / Accepted: 21 April 2020 / Published: 23 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue CNS Drug Action in Neurodegenerative Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a serious health concern, affecting millions of people globally, which leads to cognitive impairment, dementia, and inevitable death. There is still no medically accepted treatment for AD. Developing therapeutic treatments for AD is an overwhelming challenge in the medicinal field, as the exact mechanics underlying its devastating symptoms is still not completely understood. Rather than the unknown mechanism of the disease, one of the limiting factors in developing new drugs for AD is the blood–brain barrier (BBB). A combination of nanotechnology with fluorinated molecules is proposed as a promising therapeutic treatment to meet the desired pharmacokinetic/physiochemical properties for crossing the BBB passage. This paper reviews the research conducted on fluorine-containing compounds and fluorinated nanoparticles (NPs) that have been designed and tested for the inhibition of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide aggregation. Additionally, this study summarizes fluorinated molecules and NPs as promising agents and further future work is encouraged to be effective for the treatment of AD.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive and irreversible neurodegenerative disease [1] and is responsible for about 70% of all late-onset dementia cases [2]. With the increase in research and development in medicine for heart diseases and cancer, there has been an overall increase in life expectancy. Thus, deaths reported from heart diseases and various types of cancer have decreased since 2000, whereas deaths from AD have increased to 145% [3]. This reveals the lack of therapies in the field of AD. In 2018, the annual cost of people with Alzheimer’s or dementia, including care provided by family members or caregivers was estimated to be 18.5 billion hours with the value cost at nearly $234 billion [3]. Therefore, AD is considered to be a social and economic burden in our society.
The exact mechanism underlying AD is still debatable [4]. The most relevant pathogenic hallmarks of Alzheimer’s are associated with an alteration of the structure of the proteins amyloid-beta (Aβ) and Tau protein and their subsequent aggregation. Those aggregates deposit in the brain, extracellularly (Aβ) or appear inside the cells (aggregates of hyperphosphorylated Tau protein) [5,6,7]. Several facts have proven a causative role of the Aβ in the disease’ onset. Physiological Aβ in monomeric form is benign, but by an unknown mechanism it aggregates and becomes neurotoxic [8]. These aggregates deteriorate healthy brain cells, causing loss of memory and cognitive impairment [9]. The modern era of drug development for AD treatment has begun with cholinergic hypothesis [10,11]. Since then, only four cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine have been marketed for the delay of AD [12]. Out of which, one cholinesterase inhibitor (Tacrine) has been inactive due to its hepatotoxicity [13]. Current therapeutics available for the treatment for AD only relieve symptoms, cannot terminate/reverse the aggregation of amyloid deposits in the brain. This leads to the serious concern and urgent need for disease modifying treatments that can prevent, delay, and slow down the progression by targeting one of the most evident key pathophysiology mechanisms that cause AD [14,15].
Fluorine substitution has proven effective for therapeutic. Fluorine and fluorinated molecules have distinct properties such as low surface tension, good biocompatibility, sensitive temperature-dependent miscibility with organic solvents, and hydrophobic properties [16,17,18]. The conjugation of drug molecules with fluorine atoms have been explored but gained limited attention in the field of AD.
However, one of the limiting factors in developing new drugs for AD is the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Pharmaceuticals show disadvantages like inability to cross the BBB [19], weak therapeutic efficiency, poor bioavailability, and toxic side-affects due to the accumulation of the drug at undesired locations. In recent years, nanotechnology-based strategies have proven effective and shown capability to overcome these drawbacks innate to BBB passage and used as the carriers of drug molecules [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Nanoparticles (NPs) have proven to be an excellent system for transporting drug to the specified organ with controlled drug release and minimal side effects [27]. NPs guarantee a potential therapeutic outcome of a drug candidate without modifying its physiochemical properties and enhance solubility of the drug, high stability, high specificity, and high therapeutic efficacy [27,28]. It was already reported that NPs are one of the reliable approaches for reducing the death rate in patients with AD [27]. Due to their small size, the administration of NPs can be achieved via various routes including nasal, oral, and parenteral, making nanotechnology a promising approach at present and in future [29]. NPs decorated with fluorine were already proposed for AD and demonstrated to be efficient [30,31].
Previously, our research group has discussed the potential effect of fluorinated molecules for AD treatment [32]. The current study reveals the powerful role of fluorine for the inhibition of anti-amyloid aggregation and suggests a new therapeutic approach of fluorine in combination with nanotechnology. This paper reviews the most recent reported evidence on fluorine-containing compounds and fluorinated NPs that have been designed and tested for the treatment of AD. The systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Science direct, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science as online databases until March 2020. Only papers written in English were considered with unlimited publication date.

2. The Role of Fluorine in the Development of Therapeutic Drugs

The chemistry and the biological applications of fluorine and fluoroorganic compounds were discussed by many research groups in the last 20 years [33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Fluorine chemistry has gained huge attention and undergone a significant transformation from only a subfield of organic chemistry into a major area of interdisciplinary research associated with medicinal chemistry and drug discovery [28]. Nowadays, an increasing number of fluorinated drugs are available in commercial market and a significant number of fluorine-containing compounds have been approved by the FDA for medical uses [40,41].
Fluorine substitution influences the physical and chemical properties, rate of metabolism, lipophilicity, and biological activity of drugs or a bio-active compound [42]. Fluorine atoms have small atomic size (1.47 Å), high electronegativity (3.98/Pauling scale), low polarizability, and high C-F bond strength (116 kcal/mol) [43]. Figure 1 presents a schematic diagram that summarizes the physiochemical and pharmacokinetics properties of fluorine for therapeutic drugs development.
The replacement of a hydrogen atom, methyl, hydroxyl group, and other univalent atoms with a fluorine atom can alter the dipole moments, the pKa, chemical reactivity, and stability of neighboring functional group(s) of a lead compound [33]. These characteristics of fluorine improve the oral absorption in the blood and further enhance the bioavailability of drug candidates. Fluorine substitution can prevent oxidative metabolism at the site of metabolic attack as C-F bond has higher stability than the C-H bond (C-H = 99 kcal/mol) [33]. Additionally, fluorine substitution influences drug metabolism when placed at next to or far-off sites to the site of metabolic attack due to its stereo electronic properties [35]. The inclusion of fluorine in a bioactive drug candidate can enhance the interaction, binding efficacy, and selectivity towards a target protein [44]. The lipophilic behavior of fluorine atom and fluorine-containing functional groups enhance membrane penetration of drugs and facilitate crossing of molecules into the blood–brain barrier [33]. Numerous central nervous system (CNS) drugs contain either CF3 group or a fluoro-phenyl group which subsidizes overall pharmacological activity of the compounds [33,45].
However, unsuitable fluorine positioning in a bio-active compound or a drug molecule can cause stability and toxicity issues. The concern regarding the toxicity of fluorinated molecules has drawn attention to medicinal chemists in the last few years due to the instability of C-F bond in the presence of a nucleophile or drug-metabolizing enzymes [46]. There is a clinical evidence that shows the prolong use of antifungal voriconazole can increase plasma fluoride levels and lead to painful periostitis/exostoses in patients [47].
With the discovery of more innovative fluorinated molecules, medicinal chemists, and other researchers are equipped with more powerful tools to recognize the potential liability of fluorinated molecules/drugs and play around in placing fluorine atoms at different position for tackling such issues [46].

2.1. The Role of Fluorine-Containing Compounds in the Modulation of Amyloid-Beta Peptide

Various research groups have studied, designed, and tested fluorine-containing compounds for the inhibition of oligomerization of Aβ peptide (either Aβ40 or Aβ42). Many findings have suggested that the conversion of alpha(α)-helical structure (non-pathogenic) to beta(β)-sheet configuration (pathogenic) is responsible for aggregation [48,49]. It was demonstrated that fluorinated alcohols act as a conformational effector which can refold the β-conformation into the α-helical structure and alter the intermolecular interaction in a protein solution [50]. Vieira et al. [51] has presented the effectiveness of different fluorinated alcohols for β-to-α refolding process of Aβ40. Trifluoroethanol (TFE) and hexafluoroisopropanl (HFIP) (Figure 2A) were experimented in comparison with ethanol (EtOH), as well as the adsorption at fluorinated surfaces. Ethanol found to be the weakest of all the agents that were studied in terms of the hydrophobic character. HFIP was a stronger α-helix inducer than TFE; at 12% v/vsol, the Aβ has reduced its total β-sheet content by 50% and 80% for TFE and HFIP, respectively. The higher the fluorination rate, the greater the efficiency. The molecules of fluorinated alcohol can enclose the protein molecules, easily infiltrate into the aggregates and detach them [51].
Another strategy was explored, like the conjugation of fluorinated molecules into peptides to modify the proteolytic stability [52,53], hydrophobicity [54], and to control the conformations of a peptide chain [55]. Loureiro et al. [56] synthesized fluorinated peptides with a sequence of five amino acids against Aβ aggregation. These fluorinated peptides were based on the central hydrophobic residues of Aβ and in the iAβ5 β-sheet breaker peptide; LVFFD sequence. In this sequence, valine was substituted by either 4,4,4-trifluorovaline or 4-fluoroproline or 3,4,5-trifluorophenylalanine (Figure 2B). The thioflavin T (ThT) binding assay showed that two of the fluorinated peptides (LVFfFD–PEG and LVfFFD–PEG) are able to delay the aggregation of the Aβ42 by 1.5 h and 3.1 h. The authors proposed that the position of the fluorine at the extremity of the conjugate seems to influence the hydrophobicity of the sequence. Botz et al. [57] synthesized two peptides, one containing the trifluoromethylated (Tfm) analogue (R)-α-trifluoromethylalanine (Figure 2C) and the other incorporating the nonfluorinated analogue α-aminoisobutyric (Aib). The in vitro studies of these two peptides were evaluated and compared using fluorescence spectroscopy (thought the ThT assay), circular dichroism (CD), and liquid state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) for the inhibition of Aβ aggregation. The ThT assay studies of fluorinated amino acids have shown the declination of lag phase of Aβ42 from 10 h to 15 h with a reduction in final fluorescence intensity by a factor of 2 and decrease in aggregation rate. The ThT assay results were coherent with the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results as smaller and thinner fibrils were formed in the presence of a fluorinated amino acid while long and twisted amyloid fibrils with widths between 10 and 15 nm were observed in the presence of a non-fluorinated amino acid analogue. The CD signal of Aβ42 in the presence of a fluorinated peptide remained stable for at least 96 h, showing no evidence of β-sheet structure and no conformational transition was observed, while in case of a non-fluorinated peptide transition occurred at 50 h. 1H-NMR studies were performed to study the kinetics of monomeric soluble Aβ42 in the presence and absence of a fluorinated amino acid. The complete disappearance of monomeric NMR signals was observed after 14 h in case of a non-fluorinated peptide. Whereas in case of a fluorinated amino, acid, monomeric Aβ42 was detected even after 20 h incubation. These results advocated that the Tfm group is more effective and has a better affinity with Aβ peptide than the methyl groups of the Aib amino acid.
Török et al. introduced organofluorine Aβ40 fibrillogenesis inhibitors. The core structure containing indol-3-yl, trifluoromethyl, hydroxyl, and carboxylic acid ester functions in the chain (Figure 2D) [58]. Trifluoro-hydroxylindolyl-propionic acid esters performed well in dose-dependent studies, three of these compounds (Figure 2D) practically exhibited complete blocking of fibril formation (percentile values are between 93% and 96%) in favorable (molinhibitor/molpeptide = 10) stoichiometry. The ThT fluorescence and TEM results were consistent and showed a network of long fibrils in an inhibitor-free Aβ sample while no aggregates formation was observed in organofluorine inhibitors Aβ sample. The 19F-NMR studies indicated the interactions between organofluorine inhibitors and the Aβ peptide. For understanding the nature of this interaction, the data showed that the removal of CF3 groups generated a substantial change in activity; these molecules rather acted as fibrillogenesis promoters. The in vitro studies interpreted that CF3 is responsible for activating OH, which binds to the peptide (possibly to one or both lysine residues, 16 and 28 of Aβ sequence). Therefore, CF3 plays a fundamental role in inhibiting the amyloid fibrillation process. Additionally, Sood et al. [59] studied effective organofluorine-chiral inhibitors [58] and their enantiomeric compounds for their potency in in vitro. They have confirmed that the individual enantiomers of substituted trifluoro-hydroxylindolyl-propionic acid esters are potent inhibitors of the Aβ self-assembly, similar to their racemic mixtures. This research data suggested that the inhibitory effect is not a result of highly stereospecific binding between inhibitors and the peptides, but rather non-stereospecific binding forces (chemical nature, substituents, and electronic character of the molecule). Later, Sood et al. [60] observed that 5′-halogen substituted 3,3,3-trifluoro-hydroxylindolyl-propionic acid esters exhibited potential to work as disassembly agents against the preformed fibrils, irrespective of the stereo specificity associated with each compound in reference with melatonin [61] (a well-known amyloid inhibitor). The data followed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed a shift from 1630 cm−1 (characteristic of β-sheet structure) to around 1645–1650 cm−1 suggested the formation of oligomers or other less ordered species [60]. Therefore, organofluorine molecules were classified as ‘dual nature inhibitors’ since they were good fibrillogenesis inhibitors [58,59] and disassembly agents [60] as well. This dual action makes them potential candidates for drug development of AD treatment in future.
Another strategy replacing univalent atom or hydroxyl group with fluorine isotopes were proposed as both diagnostic and therapeutic. Elmaleh et al. [62] claimed Cromolyn-based (anti-inflammatory agent) radiolabeled (isotopes of 13C, F18 or F19 label) derivatives. The fluorinated derivatives (Figure 2E) were proposed as both AD diagnostic and therapeutic agents; biomarkers (F19 aided magnetic resonance imaging) to monitor the advancement of the disease and the inhibitors (F18 facilitated positron emission tomography: PET) of Aβ peptide aggregation. The in vivo bio-distribution of fluorinated Cromolyn (F18) derivatives showed a substantial brain uptake and clearance activity. Additionally, the oligomerization of Aβ was decelerated by 18F-ligand derivative by approximately 2.5 times. Reed et al. [63] invented small molecules comprising a biaryl-scaffold with a nitro and a benzyl amino moiety (Figure 2F). These compounds regarded as good anti-aggregating agent and metabolically stable, with low IC50 value against Aβ peptide concentration via ThT assay. The organofluorine analogue was found to be a good BBB penetrable compound exhibiting remarkable blood and brain exposure levels (brain/plasma ratio: 1.54). The in vivo efficacy trials on 5 × FAD (Familial Alzheimer’s disease) transgenic AD mouse indicated that organofluorine inhibitor has beneficial effects on their cognitive impairment. Horwell et al. [64] discovered a series of small compounds with potential anti-AD properties. The compound bearing 2-fluorobenzonitrile moiety surfaced as a promising candidate against AD with a remarkable anti-aggregating Aβ42 capability and cellular activity (Figure 2G). The analogues with a carboxyl or an amide substituent were found inactive, highlighting the biological activity of 2-fluorobenzonitrile framework. The in vitro experiment on rat brain cell lines showed that compound has blocked the toxic effect on long-term potentiation (LTP). Moreover, the same research group [65] has also synthesized a compound bearing 8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2Hbenzo [1,4] oxazine moiety that presented an excellent neuroprotective profile in in vitro against amyloid toxicity (Figure 2H). Additionally, it blocked the toxic effect in rat hippocampal brain slices in the presence of Aβ42 in LTP.
Another strategy to understand the role of fluorine for the modulation of the Aβ peptide was addressed by Giacomelli et al. [66]. They studied the effect of a hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) (Figure 2I) as a solid sorbent surface on the conformation of Aβ40. The in vitro experiments were carried out by dissolving Aβ40 (containing monomers, small oligomers, and fibrillary aggregates) at different pH (4, 7, and 10). Upon analysis of peptide-surface (hydrophobic Teflon) interaction using CD, the random structure (pH 10) and the β-sheets (pH 7) were converted into α-helical structures. However, when the fluorinated surface becomes crowded, lateral interactions amongst the adsorbed peptide molecules persuades β-sheet structure formation. These findings showed that the fluorinated surfaces strongly promote α-helix reformation.
Additionally, theoretical studies were done with the fluorinated compounds against AD. Török et al. reviewed the basis of 321 compounds, discussed the role of each chemical structure and the effect of their substituents in designing the map of their inhibition against Aβ peptide [67]. Based on their analysis, acidic moieties like CF3, appeared to be the second most important substituent of these small organofluorine inhibitors implying fluorinated motifs as possible binding units to Aβ peptide. Khosravan et al. [68] theoretically investigated the effect of fluorine substitution on an anti-Alzheimer drug donepezil (FDA approved), including seven fluorinated derivatives of it, via density functional theory (DFT) and molecular docking calculations. This study shows that the fluorine substitution influences the solubility, molecular polarity, and structural stability of the donepezil drug. After analyzing natural bond orbital (NBO) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) calculations, they indicated that the fluorination of donepezil seems to enhance intramolecular hydrogen bonding, charge distribution, and aromaticity of donepezil.
Table 1 summarizes the aforementioned results already discussed in brief.

2.2. The Role of Fluorine-Containing Compounds in the Modulation of the Secretases

β-Site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme (BACE1) plays a crucial role in controlling the formation of Aβ peptide as it is the only enzyme responsible for the β-secretase activity in the brain [69]. Therefore, BACE1 inhibitors present the possibility of disease-modifying treatment for AD. Since 1999, after the identification of the potential pharmacological target along with the results from the BACE1 knockout mice [70], many research groups and companies have invested in developing BACE1 inhibitors (Table 2). Several companies like Pfizer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb (BMS), Lilly, Roche, Novartis, etc. have introduced fluorine atom and fluoro-methyl substituents to the BACE1 inhibitors to increase potency, improve cellular activity and metabolic stability. We are presenting selected BACE1 inhibitors containing at least one fluorine element in the chemical structure that have been designed and tested between 2010 and 2020 [69].
Inspired from the work by Elan and Pfizer [71], Fustero et al. [72] synthesized fluorinated ethanolamines (Figure 3A) to analyze the essential fragments for the stereo-selective synthesis of hydroethyl secondary amine (HEA). They substituted phenyldifluoromethyl at the α-carbon of the HEA and explored the chemical space of the inhibitor by replacing hydrogen atoms at the benzylic position by fluorine atoms for enhancing the pharmacological profile of the series [44,73,74]. The biological evaluation of these derivatives disclosed a notable BACE1 inhibitor activity. Docking studies showed the potential of fluorine atoms in influencing the potency of the inhibitors [72].
In 2015, Lilly’s LY-2886721 [75] (Figure 3B) was the first 1,3-thiazine based BACE1 inhibitor advancing to a phase 2 trial. In the phase 1 trial, LY-2886721 was found efficient and decreased the Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). However, this inhibitor was terminated by the company due to liver toxicity. Later, they reported a modification of LY-2886721 by introducing a fluorine atom at the ring junction and over all enhancing the basicity of the compound. The fluorinated analogue 4a-Fluoro-furo[3,4-d][1,3]thiazine [76] (Figure 3C) showed improvement in biological parameters and potent reduction of amyloid levels in in vitro and in vivo as compared to LY-2886721. Similar to the 1, 3-thiazine analogue, Lilly patented several fluorinated compounds [77,78,79], using difluoroethane group (CF2CH3) on the tetrahydrofuran (THF) ring. These fluorinated analogues have shown good BACE1/2 selectivity and a slight improvement in BACE1 potency. Lilly claimed another THF fused-1, 3-oxazine BACE1 inhibitor [78] in the same patent application with the incorporation of a fluorine atom. This fluorinated inhibitor (Figure 3D) showed high BACE1/2 selectivity and that can be contributed to the introduction of bulky difluoroethyl group on the THF ring which is in close vicinity to the flap region. The in vivo experiments showed that the fluorinated inhibitor at 24 h and 48 h post dose reduced Aβ levels 65% and 55% in CSF.
In THF-fused thiazine series, Eisai [80,81] has further modified THF substituents exploring substituents from CH3, CH2F, CHF2, to CF3 (Figure 3E). This was carried out to adjust pKa and selectivity over BACE2 for both in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Shingoi and Janssen [82] together claimed a series of patent focusing on 1,3-thiazine based BACE1 inhibitors. These 1, 3-thiazine inhibitors were decorated with fluoro(alkyl) substituents like, CHF2, CF3, and CF2CH3 (Figure 3F,G,H, respectively) at the 6th position for improving the biochemical properties. These series of inhibitors found to be non-P-gp (non-polyglycoprotein) substrates but has shown less selectivity for BACE1 over BACE2.
Multiple companies like Roche [83], Novartis [84], Amgen [85], and Shionogi [86] have also explored fluorine, fluoromethyl, difluoromethyl, or trifluoromethyl with 1,3-oxazine based amidines as BACE1 inhibitors for the treatment of AD. Roche’s publication on fluorinated 1,3-oxazines (Figure 3I) discusses not only the influence of degree of fluorination to modify basicity (suitable range: pKa 5.8–7.4), but other parameters including cellular and enzymatic activity, P-gp efflux in in vitro and in vivo potency [87]. The study revealed that the CF3 substituted oxazine was highly potent and excellent brain penetrant BACE1 inhibitor and reduced significant CSF levels (both Aβ40 and Aβ42) in rats at low oral doses.

3. Nanoparticles Designed with Fluorine Molecules for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease

Based on fluorine advantageous properties to treat AD, few research groups have tried another approach. They have developed NPs designed with fluorine molecules (Table 3). Rocha et al. [30] studied the influence of fluorinated and hydrogenated NPs on the fibrillogenesis of Aβ40 using CD and TEM. The fluorinated complexes designed by the group shown the inhibition of amyloid fibril formation by binding to Aβ40. After titrating Aβ40 with P1F complexes [Poly(N,N′-diallyl-N,N′dimethylammoniumalt-maleamic Carboxylate) as P1 complexed with perfluorododecanoic acid (F)] the CD spectra showed the content of α-helix to be 8%, 16%, and 31% after the addition of 2, 4 and 8 g L-1 of P1F complexes. The unordered content decreased to 27% where β-sheet structures remained almost constant. While in case of P1H [Poly(N,N′-diallyl-N,N′dimethylammoniumalt-maleamic Carboxylate) as P1 complexed with dodecanoic acid (H)], the hydrogenated analogues did not seem to induce any α-helix structure on Aβ40. The fraction of β-sheet increased from 27% to 37% and the unordered content decrease from 56% to 37%. After the addition of fluorinated NPs P2F [(Poly(N,N′-diallyl-N,N′-dimethylammonium-alt-N-phenylmaleamic Carboxylate as P2 complexed with (F)], the α-content was, however smaller as compared to P1F (from 3% to 21% at 8 g L−1). This was explained through the steric hindrance caused by the other phenyl groups and inhibited the interaction of fluorine molecules with the α-helical structure. TEM images have shown the interaction of fluorinated NPs with Aβ aggregation. This is due to the high negative zeta potential of fluorinated NPs and their hydrophobicity that have shown significant inhibition towards the Aβ formation. Following that, Saraiva et al. [31] studied the effect of similar fluorinated and hydrogenated NPs on Aβ42 oligomerization and cytotoxicity. The data from CD, AFM, immunoblotting, and SDS-PAGE were consistent and indicated that fluorinated NPs promote β-to-α conformational transition, delayed the oligomerization of Aβ42 and hence lower the peptide-induced cytotoxicity. Whereas the hydrogenated NPs have promoted the nucleation and aggregation rate of Aβ42 monomers and oligomers. This might be due to the intermolecular interaction between fluorinated NPs and two hydrophobic residues responsible for Aβ oligomerization (Leu17-Ala21 and Ala30-Ala42) or with the residues lying in proximity of Aβ assembly, preventing the inter-peptide hydrophobic interactions and intervening the process of further aggregation. The caspase-3 (an indicator of apoptosis) fluorometric assays indicated that fluorinated NPs produced the caspase-3 activation values that are almost similar to the values without Aβ42 peptide (1.1 ± 0.07 fluorescence intensity per mg of protein for the control without peptide). Whereas enzymatic activity was increased in the presence of hydrogenated NPs (1.9 ± 0.15 of fluorescence intensity per mg of protein). Their research study reported that fluorinated NPs exhibits anti-oligomeric and anti-apoptotic activity and has also increased cell viability in the presence of Aβ42 oligomerization.

4. Conclusion and Future Perspective

In the last two decades, the fluorine-containing compounds have attracted a great deal of academic and industrial interest owing to the overall remarkable properties like high metabolic stability, distribution, and excretion properties etc. From this research study, we have reviewed the strategies that have been explored using fluorinated molecules for the treatment of AD. Fluorinated alcohols were studied in regard to protein misfolding. This study showed the effect of CF3 group on the conformational change (β-to-α conversion) and has opened the possibility for the therapeutic in vivo use of fluorinated drugs to prevent Aβ aggregation. In consistent with this, adsorption studies of Aβ solutions on Teflon surface have strongly promoted re-formation of α-helix. Few research groups have also explored fluorinated amino acids and their incorporation into peptides, revealing fluorinated peptides as effective β-sheet breaker peptides. So, the modification of compounds/peptides/anti-amyloid inhibitors with fluorine contributes in understanding the interaction between Aβ peptide and fluorinated molecules. The fluorination increases the hydrophobicity of the molecules and interact with the hydrophobic region of the Aβ peptide. Fluoro(methyl) substituents are not only limited to one class of anti-amyloid agent but have also been explored with BACE1 inhibitors. Big Pharmaceuticals like Novartis, Lilly, and Roche have introduced fluorine into the chemical structure of many patented BACE1 inhibitors to improve overall biochemical and pharmacological properties of the lead compound.
These findings reveal the power of fluorine and have proven it to be a ‘potential superhero’ in the therapeutic treatment of AD.
The currently available therapeutic treatments for AD are often compromised due to BBB passage. Many promising Aβ ligands or organofluorine compounds that have been discussed in literature review cannot cross the BBB junction. A promising idea is to explore a medically accepted vehicle (for example: nanocarriers/particles) in combination with Aβ ligands or fluorinated molecules to cross the BBB. NPs surface can easily be modified with specific molecules or antibodies to reach site-specific organ, avoid recognition by the macrophages of the reticuloendothelial system (RES) and successful penetration into the BBB. Only a few researchers have studied NPs decorated with fluorine for the treatment of AD. Fluorinated NPs exhibit anti-oligomeric and anti-apoptotic activity and are demonstrated to be effective. These findings will generate more investigations in the chemistry of fluorinated NPs and could lead to the development of potential nano-fluorinated vehicles for Alzheimer’s disease.
The real culprit behind AD is still unidentified and the current therapeutic treatments lack therapeutic efficacy to attenuate the symptoms of this disease. Keeping this in mind, new innovative therapeutic approaches are in demand. Therefore, we suggest a combination of nanotechnology with fluorinated molecules can be a promising/potential therapeutic treatment to meet the desired pharmacokinetic/physiochemical properties for crossing the BBB passage and treat AD.

Author Contributions

M.D. wrote the manuscript. J.A.L. and M.C.P. contributed with the paper organization, writing, reviewing and discussion. All the authors contributed with the bibliographic research. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by: Base Funding - UIDB/00511/2020 of the Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy—LEPABE—funded by national funds through the FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC); European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 810685 (DelNAM); and by Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa (MB37-2017). FCT supported J.A.L under the Scientific Employment Stimulus - Institutional Call - [CEECINST/00049/2018].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

αAlpha
βBeta
AβAmyloid-beta
ADAlzheimer’s disease
AFMAtomic force microscopy
BACEβ-Site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme
BBBBlood-brain barrier
CDCircular dichroism
CNSCentral nervous system
CSFCerebrospinal fluid
DFTDensity functional theory
EtOHEthanol
FADFamilial Alzheimer’s disease
FTIRFourier-transform infrared spectroscopy
HFIPHexafluoroisopropanl
LTPLong-term potentiation
NBONatural bond orbital
NMRNuclear magnetic resonance
NPsNanoparticles
TeflonPolytetrafluoroethylene
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
TFETrifluoroethanol
TfmTrifluoromethylated
THFTetrahydrofuran
ThTThioflavin T

References

  1. Association, A. 2015 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s & Dement. 2015, 11, 332–384. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertram, L.; Tanzi, R.E. The genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2012, 107, 79–100. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Association, A. 2019 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimer’s & Dement. 2019, 15, 321–387. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ricciarelli, R.; Fedele, E. The Amyloid Cascade Hypothesis in Alzheimer’s Disease: It’s Time to Change Our Mind. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2017, 15, 926–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Selkoe, D.J. Folding proteins in fatal ways. Nature 2003, 426, 900–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sumner Makin, O.; Serpell, L.C. Structural Characterisation of Islet Amyloid Polypeptide Fibrils. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 335, 1279–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Irvine, G.B.; El-Agnaf, O.M.; Shankar, G.M.; Walsh, D.M. Protein aggregation in the brain: The molecular basis for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Mol. Med. 2008, 14, 451–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nag, S.; Sarkar, B.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Sahoo, B.; Sreenivasan, V.K.; Kombrabail, M.; Muralidharan, C.; Maiti, S. Nature of the amyloid-beta monomer and the monomer-oligomer equilibrium. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 13827–13833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Yiannopoulou, K.G.; Papageorgiou, S.G. Current and future treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2013, 6, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Davies, P.; Maloney, A.J. Selective loss of central cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet (London, England) 1976, 2, 1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bowen, D.M.; Smith, C.B.; White, P.; Davison, A.N. Neurotransmitter-related enzymes and indices of hypoxia in senile dementia and other abiotrophies. Brain A J. Neurol. 1976, 99, 459–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Cummings, J.L.; Morstorf, T.; Zhong, K. Alzheimer’s disease drug-development pipeline: Few candidates, frequent failures. Alzheimer’s Res. & Ther. 2014, 6, 37. [Google Scholar]
  13. Balson, R.; Gibson, P.R.; Ames, D.; Bhathal, P.S. Tacrine-Induced Hepatotoxicity. CNS Drugs 1995, 4, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Maia, M.A.; Sousa, E. BACE-1 and γ-Secretase as Therapeutic Targets for Alzheimer’s Disease. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2019, 12, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Andrade, S.; Ramalho, M.J.; Loureiro, J.A.; Pereira, M.D.C. Natural Compounds for Alzheimer’s Disease Therapy: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gladysz, J.A.; Curran, D.P. Fluorous chemistry: From biphasic catalysis to a parallel chemical universe and beyond. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 3823–3825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yi, W.-B.; Ma, J.-J.; Jiang, L.-Q.; Cai, C.; Zhang, W. Synthesis and uses of fluorous and highly fluorinated macrocyclic and spherical molecules. J. Fluor. Chem. 2014, 157, 84–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gillis, E.P.; Eastman, K.J.; Hill, M.D.; Donnelly, D.J.; Meanwell, N.A. Applications of Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry. J. Med Chem. 2015, 58, 8315–8359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Potschka, H. Targeting the brain--surmounting or bypassing the blood-brain barrier. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2010, 197, 411–431. [Google Scholar]
  20. Loureiro, J.A.; Gomes, B.; Coelho, M.A.; Do Carmo Pereira, M.; Rocha, S. Targeting nanoparticles across the blood-brain barrier with monoclonal antibodies. Nanomedicine (London) 2014, 9, 709–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Joshi, S.A.; Chavhan, S.S.; Sawant, K.K. Rivastigmine-loaded PLGA and PBCA nanoparticles: Preparation, optimization, characterization, in vitro and pharmacodynamic studies. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2010, 76, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sánchez-López, E.; Ettcheto, M.; Egea, M.A.; Espina, M.; Cano, A.; Calpena, A.C.; Camins, A.; Carmona, N.; Silva, A.M.; Souto, E.B.; et al. Memantine loaded PLGA PEGylated nanoparticles for Alzheimer’s disease: In vitro and in vivo characterization. J. Nanobiotechnology 2018, 16, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wilson, B.; Samanta, M.K.; Santhi, K.; Kumar, K.P.S.; Paramakrishnan, N.; Suresh, B. Poly(n-butylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles coated with polysorbate 80 for the targeted delivery of rivastigmine into the brain to treat Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 2008, 1200, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Brambilla, D.; Le Droumaguet, B.; Nicolas, J.; Hashemi, S.H.; Wu, L.P.; Moghimi, S.M.; Couvreur, P.; Andrieux, K. Nanotechnologies for Alzheimer’s disease: Diagnosis, therapy, and safety issues. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2011, 7, 521–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Sun, L.; Han, D.; Li, H.; Wang, C. Pharmacological and toxicological target organelles and safe use of single-walled carbon nanotubes as drug carriers in treating Alzheimer disease. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2010, 6, 427–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kreuter, J. Nanoparticulate systems for brain delivery of drugs. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 47, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Arya, M.A.; Kumar, M.; Sabitha, M.; Menon, K.; Nair, S. Nanotechnology approaches for enhanced CNS delivery in treating Alzheimer’s disease. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2019, 51, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Loureiro, J.A.; Gomes, B.; Fricker, G.; Coelho, M.A.N.; Rocha, S.; Pereira, M.C. Cellular uptake of PLGA nanoparticles targeted with anti-amyloid and anti-transferrin receptor antibodies for Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 145, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Karthivashan, G.; Ganesan, P.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, J.S.; Choi, D.K. Therapeutic strategies and nano-drug delivery applications in management of ageing Alzheimer’s disease. Drug Deliv. 2018, 25, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rocha, S.; Thunemann, A.F.; Pereira Mdo, C.; Coelho, M.; Mohwald, H.; Brezesinski, G. Influence of fluorinated and hydrogenated nanoparticles on the structure and fibrillogenesis of amyloid beta-peptide. Biophys. Chem. 2008, 137, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Saraiva , A.M.; Cardoso , I.; Pereira, M.C.; Coelho, M.A.N.; Saraiva, M.J.; Möhwald, H.; Brezesinski, G. Controlling Amyloid-β Peptide(1–42) Oligomerization and Toxicity by Fluorinated Nanoparticles. ChemBioChem 2010, 11, 1905–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gomes, B.; Loureiro, J.A.; Coelho, M.A.; Pereira Mdo, C. The Potential Effect of Fluorinated Compounds in the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 5725–5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Park, B.K.; Kitteringham, N.R.; O’Neill, P.M. Metabolism of fluorine-containing drugs. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001, 41, 443–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mei, H.; Han, J.; Fustero, S.; Medio-Simon, M.; Sedgwick, D.M.; Santi, C.; Ruzziconi, R.; Soloshonok, V.A. Fluorine-Containing Drugs Approved by the FDA in 2018. Chem.—A Eur. J. 2019, 25, 11797–11819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Meanwell, N.A. Fluorine and Fluorinated Motifs in the Design and Application of Bioisosteres for Drug Design. J. Med Chem. 2018, 61, 5822–5880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kirk, K.L.; Filler, R. Recent Advances in the Biomedicinal Chemistry of Fluorine-Containing Compounds. In Biomedical Frontiers of Fluorine Chemistry; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1996; Volume 639, pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  37. O’Hagan, D.S.; Rzepa, H. Some influences of fluorine in bioorganic chemistry. Chem. Commun. 1997, 7, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, X.J.; Lai, T.B.; Kong, R.Y. Biology of fluoro-organic compounds. Top. Curr. Chem. 2012, 308, 365–404. [Google Scholar]
  39. Resnati, G. Aspects of the medicinal chemistry of fluoroorganic compounds. Part, I. Farm. (Soc. Chim. Ital. 1989) 1990, 45, 1043–1066. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, J.; Sánchez-Roselló, M.; Aceña, J.L.; Del Pozo, C.; Sorochinsky, A.E.; Fustero, S.; Soloshonok, V.A.; Liu, H. Fluorine in Pharmaceutical Industry: Fluorine-Containing Drugs Introduced to the Market in the Last Decade (2001–2011). Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 2432–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bégué, J.-P.; Bonnet-Delpon, D. Recent advances (1995–2005) in fluorinated pharmaceuticals based on natural products. J. Fluor. Chem. 2006, 127, 992–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shah, P.; Westwell, A.D. The role of fluorine in medical chemistry. J. Enzime Inhib. Med Chem. 2005, 22, 527–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Haranahalli, K.; Honda, T.; Ojima, I. Recent progress in the strategic incorporation of fluorine into medicinally active compounds. J. Fluor. Chem. 2019, 217, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Muller, K.; Faeh, C.; Diederich, F. Fluorine in pharmaceuticals: Looking beyond intuition. Science (New York) 2007, 317, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Shengguo, S.; Adeboye, A. Fluorinated Molecules as Drugs and Imaging Agents in the CNS. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 1457–1464. [Google Scholar]
  46. Pan, Y. The Dark Side of Fluorine. ACS Medicinal Chem. Lett. 2019, 10, 1016–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Wermers, R.A.; Cooper, K.; Razonable, R.R.; Deziel, P.J.; Whitford, G.M.; Kremers, W.K.; Moyer, T.P. Fluoride excess and periostitis in transplant patients receiving long-term voriconazole therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 52, 604–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cohen, F.E.; Kelly, J.W. Therapeutic approaches to protein-misfolding diseases. Nature 2003, 426, 905–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Murphy, R.M. Peptide aggregation in neurodegenerative disease. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 4, 155–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Carrotta, R.; Manno, M.; Giordano, F.M.; Longo, A.; Portale, G.; Martorana, V.; Biagio, P.L.S. Protein stability modulated by a conformational effector: Effects of trifluoroethanol on bovine serum albumin. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 4007–4018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vieira, E.P.; Hermel, H.; Möhwald, H. Change and stabilization of the amyloid-β(1–40) secondary structure by fluorocompounds. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Proteins Proteom. 2003, 1645, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Asante, V.; Mortier, J.; Wolber, G.; Koksch, B. Impact of fluorination on proteolytic stability of peptides: A case study with alpha-chymotrypsin and pepsin. Amino Acids 2014, 46, 2733–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Koksch, B.; Sewald, N.; Hofmann, H.J.; Burger, K.; Jakubke, H.D. Proteolytically stable peptides by incorporation of alpha-Tfm amino acids. J. Pept. Sci. An Off. Publ. Eur. Pept. Soc. 1997, 3, 157–167. [Google Scholar]
  54. Salwiczek, M.; Nyakatura, E.K.; Gerling, U.I.; Ye, S.; Koksch, B. Fluorinated amino acids: Compatibility with native protein structures and effects on protein-protein interactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2135–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Feytens, D.; Chaume, G.; Chassaing, G.; Lavielle, S.; Brigaud, T.; Byun, B.J.; Kang, Y.K.; Miclet, E. Local control of the cis-trans isomerization and backbone dihedral angles in peptides using trifluoromethylated pseudoprolines. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 4069–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Loureiro, J.A.; Crespo, R.; Börner, H.; Martins, P.M.; Rocha, F.A.; Coelho, M.; Pereira, M.C.; Rocha, S. Fluorinated beta-sheet breaker peptides. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 2259–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Botz, A.; Gasparik, V.; Devillers, E.; Hoffmann, A.R.; Caillon, L.; Chelain, E.; Lequin, O.; Brigaud, T.; Khemtemourian, L. (R)-α-trifluoromethylalanine containing short peptide in the inhibition of amyloid peptide fibrillation. Biopolymers 2015, 104, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Török, M.; Abid, M.; Mhadgut, S.C.; Török, B. Organofluorine Inhibitors of Amyloid Fibrillogenesis. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 5377–5383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sood, A.; Abid, M.; Hailemichael, S.; Foster, M.; Török, B.; Török, M. Effect of chirality of small molecule organofluorine inhibitors of amyloid self-assembly on inhibitor potency. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 6931–6934. [Google Scholar]
  60. Sood, A.; Abid, M.; Sauer, C.; Hailemichael, S.; Foster, M.; Török, B.; Török, M. Disassembly of preformed amyloid beta fibrils by small organofluorine molecules. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 2044–2047. [Google Scholar]
  61. Pappolla, M.; Bozner, P.; Soto, C.; Shao, H.; Robakis, N.K.; Zagorski, M.; Frangione, B.; Ghiso, J. Inhibition of Alzheimer β-fibrillogenesis by melatonin. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 7185–7188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Elmaleh, D.R.; Shoup, T. Cromolyn Derivatives and Related Methods of Imaging and Treatment. WO 2010088455A2, 29 January 2010. [Google Scholar]
  63. Reed, M.A.; Yadav, A.; Banfield, S.C.; Barden, C.J. Anti-amyloid Compounds and Methods. WO 2012119035A1, 9 July 2012. [Google Scholar]
  64. Horwell, D.; Scopes, D. Compounds. WO 2011144577A1, 10 May 2011. [Google Scholar]
  65. Horwell, D.C.; Scopes, D.I.C. Compounds. WO 2011144578A1, 10 May 2011. [Google Scholar]
  66. Giacomelli, C.E.; Norde, W. Influence of Hydrophobic Teflon Particles on the Structure of Amyloid β-Peptide. Biomacromolecules 2003, 4, 1719–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bela, T.; Sujaya, D.; Marianna, T. Chemistry of Small Molecule Inhibitors in Self-Assembly of Alzheimers Disease Related Amyloid-Beta Peptide. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2008, 4, 159–174. [Google Scholar]
  68. Khosravan, A.; Marani, S.; Sadeghi Googheri, M.S. The effects of fluorine substitution on the chemical properties and inhibitory capacity of Donepezil anti-Alzheimer drug; density functional theory and molecular docking calculations. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2017, 71, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hsiao, C.-C.; Rombouts, F.; Gijsen, H.J.M. New evolutions in the BACE1 inhibitor field from 2014 to 2018. Bioorganic & Med. Chem. Lett. 2019, 29, 761–777. [Google Scholar]
  70. Roberds, S.L.; Anderson, J.; Basi, G.; Bienkowski, M.J.; Branstetter, D.G.; Chen, K.S.; Freedman, S.B.; Frigon, N.L.; Games, D.; Hu, K.; et al. BACE knockout mice are healthy despite lacking the primary beta-secretase activity in brain: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease therapeutics. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001, 10, 1317–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Maillard, M.C.; Hom, R.K.; Benson, T.E.; Moon, J.B.; Mamo, S.; Bienkowski, M.; Tomasselli, A.G.; Woods, D.D.; Prince, D.B.; Paddock, D.J.; et al. Design, Synthesis, and Crystal Structure of Hydroxyethyl Secondary Amine-Based Peptidomimetic Inhibitors of Human β-Secretase. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 776–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Fustero, S.; Cuñat, A.C.; Flores, S.; Báez, C.; Oliver, J.; Cynamon, M.; Gütschow, M.; Mertens, M.D.; Delgado, O.; Tresadern, G.; et al. Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel Fluorinated Ethanolamines. Chem.—A Eur. J. 2011, 17, 14772–14784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hagmann, W.K. The Many Roles for Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4359–4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Purser, S.; Moore, P.R.; Swallow, S.; Gouverneur, V. Fluorine in medicinal chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 320–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. May, P.C.; Willis, B.A.; Lowe, S.L.; Dean, R.A.; Monk, S.A.; Cocke, P.J.; Audia, J.E.; Boggs, L.N.; Borders, A.R.; Brier, R.A.; et al. The Potent BACE1 Inhibitor LY2886721 Elicits Robust Central Aβ Pharmacodynamic Responses in Mice, Dogs, and Humans. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 1199–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Green, S.J.; Hembre, E.J.; Mergott, D.J.; Shi, Y.; Watson, B.M.; Winneroski Jr., L.L. BACE Inhibitors. WO 2014204730, 11 June 2014. [Google Scholar]
  77. Michael, D.; Simon, R.; Richards, J.; Sanderson, A.J. Tetrahydrofurane-Fused Aminohydrothiazine Derivatives which are Useful in the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. WO 2016176118A1, 22 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
  78. Coates, D.A.; Hembre, E.J. -[3-[2-amino-5-(1,1-difluoroethyl) -4,4a,5,7-tetrahydrofuro [3,4-d][1,3]oxazin-7a-yl]-4-fluoro-phenyl]-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine-2-carboxamide and its (4ar,5s,7as) isomer as a selective bace1 inhibitor for treating e.g., alzheimer’s disease. WO 2017200863A1, 15 May 2017. [Google Scholar]
  79. Mergott, D.J.; Willis, B.A. Combination therapy of BACE-1 inhibitor and anti-N3PGLU abeta antibody. WO 2018034977, 22 February 2018. [Google Scholar]
  80. Dimopoulos, P.; Hall, A.; Kita, Y.; Madin, A.; Shuker, N.L. Fused aminodihydrothiaziine derivatives. WO /2012/093148, 22 February 2012. [Google Scholar]
  81. Hall, A.; Farthing, C.N.; Castro, P.; Fused, J. Used aminodihydrothiazine derivatives useful as bace inhibitors. WO /2012/098213, 21 January 2012. [Google Scholar]
  82. Kusakabe, K.; Tadano, G.; Komano, K.; Fuchino, K.; Nakahara, K. Dihydrothiazine and dihydrooxazine derivatives having BACE1 inhibitory activity. WO /2015/156421, 15 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  83. Woltering, T.J.; Wostl, W.; Hilpert, H.; Rogers-Evans, M.; Pinard, E.; Mayweg, A.; Göbel, M.; Banner, D.W.; Benz, J.; Travagli, M.; et al. BACE1 inhibitors: A head group scan on a series of amides. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 4239–4243. [Google Scholar]
  84. Lueoend, R.M.; Machauer, R.; Rueeger, H.; Veenstra, S.J. 2 -amino-4 -(pyridin-2-yl)-5, 6-dihidro-4H-1, 3-oxazine derivatives and their use as BACE-1 and/or BACE—2 inhibitors. WO /2013/027188, 28 February 2013. [Google Scholar]
  85. Low, J.D.; Bartberger, M.D.; Cheng, Y.; Whittington, D.; Xue, Q.; Wood, S.; Allen, J.R.; Minatti, A.E. Diastereoselective synthesis of fused cyclopropyl-3-amino-2,4-oxazine beta-amyloid cleaving enzyme (BACE) inhibitors and their biological evaluation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 1111–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Odagiri, T.; Inagaki, H.; Nagamochi, M.; Kitamura, T.; Komoriya, S.; Takahashi, H. Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel 7-[(3aS,7aS)-3a-Aminohexahydropyrano [3,4-c]pyrrol-2(3H)-yl]-8-methoxyquinolines with Potent Antibacterial Activity against Respiratory Pathogens. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 7234–7244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Hilpert, H.; Guba, W.; Woltering, T.J.; Wostl, W.; Pinard, E.; Mauser, H.; Mayweg, A.V.; Rogers-Evans, M.; Humm, R.; Krummenacher, D.; et al. β-Secretase (BACE1) Inhibitors with High in Vivo Efficacy Suitable for Clinical Evaluation in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 3980–3995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liang, S.H.; Southon, A.G.; Fraser, B.H.; Krause-Heuer, A.M.; Zhang, B.; Shoup, T.M.; Lewis, R.; Volitakis, I.; Han, Y.; Greguric, I.; et al. Novel Fluorinated 8-Hydroxyquinoline Based Metal Ionophores for Exploring the Metal Hypothesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 1025–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ijms 21 02989 g001 550
Figure 1. A schematic diagram showing physiochemical and pharmacokinetics properties of fluorine for therapeutic drugs development.
Figure 1. A schematic diagram showing physiochemical and pharmacokinetics properties of fluorine for therapeutic drugs development.
Ijms 21 02989 g001
Ijms 21 02989 g002 550
Figure 2. Chemical structures of the fluorine-containing compounds for the inhibition of amyloid-beta peptide. (A) Fluorinated alcohols (A1: 2,2,2-trifluoroethan-1-ol (TFE), A2: 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropan-2-ol (HFIP));. (B) Fluorinated amino acids and peptides (B1-3,4,5-trifluorophenylalanine, B2- 4-fluoroproline, B3- 4,4,4-trifluorovaline, B4- Fluorinated peptides conjugated to Polyethylene glycol (PEG)); (C) (R)-α-trifluoromethylalanine peptide (H-Ala-(R)-Tfm-Ala-Leu-OH); (D) Trifluoro-hydroxylindolyl-propionic acid esters;. (E) Cromoyln-based derivative (5,5’-((2-fluoropropane-1,3-diyl)bis(oxy))bis(4-oxo-4H-chromene-2-carboxylic acid)); (F) Organofluorine inhibitor (1-(3’-(benzylamino)-4’-nitro-[1,1’-biphenyl]-3-yl)-2,2,2-trifluoroethan-1-ol);.(G) SEN1500 (2-fluoro-5-((5-(3-morpholinophenoxy)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)benzonitrile); (H) 8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H benzo [1,4] oxazine inhibitor (8-fluoro-4-(5-(3-morpholinophenoxy)pyrimidin-2-yl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[b][1,4]oxazine); and (I) Poly(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethylene) (Teflon). In red color are represented fluorine molecules (F) and trifluoromethyl groups (CF3).
Figure 2. Chemical structures of the fluorine-containing compounds for the inhibition of amyloid-beta peptide. (A) Fluorinated alcohols (A1: 2,2,2-trifluoroethan-1-ol (TFE), A2: 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropan-2-ol (HFIP));. (B) Fluorinated amino acids and peptides (B1-3,4,5-trifluorophenylalanine, B2- 4-fluoroproline, B3- 4,4,4-trifluorovaline, B4- Fluorinated peptides conjugated to Polyethylene glycol (PEG)); (C) (R)-α-trifluoromethylalanine peptide (H-Ala-(R)-Tfm-Ala-Leu-OH); (D) Trifluoro-hydroxylindolyl-propionic acid esters;. (E) Cromoyln-based derivative (5,5’-((2-fluoropropane-1,3-diyl)bis(oxy))bis(4-oxo-4H-chromene-2-carboxylic acid)); (F) Organofluorine inhibitor (1-(3’-(benzylamino)-4’-nitro-[1,1’-biphenyl]-3-yl)-2,2,2-trifluoroethan-1-ol);.(G) SEN1500 (2-fluoro-5-((5-(3-morpholinophenoxy)pyrimidin-2-yl)amino)benzonitrile); (H) 8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H benzo [1,4] oxazine inhibitor (8-fluoro-4-(5-(3-morpholinophenoxy)pyrimidin-2-yl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[b][1,4]oxazine); and (I) Poly(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethylene) (Teflon). In red color are represented fluorine molecules (F) and trifluoromethyl groups (CF3).
Ijms 21 02989 g002
Ijms 21 02989 g003 550
Figure 3. Chemical structures of the fluorine-decorated BACE1 inhibitors (A) Fluorinated ethanolamines; (B)LY-2886721(N-(3-((4aS,7aR)-2-amino-4a,5-dihydro-4H-furo[3,4-d][1,3]thiazin-7a(7H)-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-fluoropicolinamide); (C) Fluorinated analogue of LY-2886721(N-(3-((4aR,7aR)-2-amino- 4a-fluoro-4a,5-dihydro-4H-furo[3,4-d][1,3]thiazin-7a(7H)-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-cyanopicolinamide); (D) Lilly’s Fluorinated Inhibitor (N-(3-((4aR,5S,7aR)-2-amino-5-(1,1-difluoroethyl)-4a,5-dihydro-4H-furo[3,4-d][1,3]oxazin-7a(7H)-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)picolinamide); (E): Eisai’s BACE1 inhibitor [1,3] thiazine series Fluoro(methyl) analogues; F, G and H) Shingoi and Janssen’s organofluorine substituted BACE1 inhibitors; (F) N-(3-((4S,6S)-2-amino-6-(difluoromethyl)-4-methyl-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazin-4-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(fluoromethoxy)pyrazine-2-carboxamide; (G) N-(3-((4S,6S)-2-amino-4-methyl-6-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazin-4-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(fluoromethoxy)picolinamide; (H) N-(3-((4S,6S)-2-amino-6-(1,1-difluoroethyl)-4-methyl-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazin-4-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(fluoromethoxy)picolinamide); and (I) Roche’s Fluorinated 1,3-oxazines inhibitors.In red color are represented fluorine molecules (F) and trifluoromethyl groups (CF3).
Figure 3. Chemical structures of the fluorine-decorated BACE1 inhibitors (A) Fluorinated ethanolamines; (B)LY-2886721(N-(3-((4aS,7aR)-2-amino-4a,5-dihydro-4H-furo[3,4-d][1,3]thiazin-7a(7H)-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-fluoropicolinamide); (C) Fluorinated analogue of LY-2886721(N-(3-((4aR,7aR)-2-amino- 4a-fluoro-4a,5-dihydro-4H-furo[3,4-d][1,3]thiazin-7a(7H)-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-cyanopicolinamide); (D) Lilly’s Fluorinated Inhibitor (N-(3-((4aR,5S,7aR)-2-amino-5-(1,1-difluoroethyl)-4a,5-dihydro-4H-furo[3,4-d][1,3]oxazin-7a(7H)-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)picolinamide); (E): Eisai’s BACE1 inhibitor [1,3] thiazine series Fluoro(methyl) analogues; F, G and H) Shingoi and Janssen’s organofluorine substituted BACE1 inhibitors; (F) N-(3-((4S,6S)-2-amino-6-(difluoromethyl)-4-methyl-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazin-4-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(fluoromethoxy)pyrazine-2-carboxamide; (G) N-(3-((4S,6S)-2-amino-4-methyl-6-(trifluoromethyl)-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazin-4-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(fluoromethoxy)picolinamide; (H) N-(3-((4S,6S)-2-amino-6-(1,1-difluoroethyl)-4-methyl-5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-thiazin-4-yl)-4-fluorophenyl)-5-(fluoromethoxy)picolinamide); and (I) Roche’s Fluorinated 1,3-oxazines inhibitors.In red color are represented fluorine molecules (F) and trifluoromethyl groups (CF3).
Ijms 21 02989 g003
Table
Table 1. Fluorinated molecules and surfaces developed for the inhibition of amyloid-beta peptide.
Table 1. Fluorinated molecules and surfaces developed for the inhibition of amyloid-beta peptide.
CompoundsSite of ActionObserved EffectsModels UsedReference
Fluorinated alcohols (TFE and HFIP)Aβ40
peptide		Induce conformational transition from β-sheet to α-helical structure Stock solution of Aβ40 peptide[51]
LVfFFD-PEG and LVFfFD-PEGAβ42
peptide		Delay the formation of the Aβ aggregatesStock solution of Aβ42 peptide[56]
(R)-α-trifluoromethylalanineDelays the conformational transition for at least 96 h; Slows the kinetic depletion rate of Aβ monomersStock solution of Aβ42 peptide[57]
5′-halogen substituted 3,3,3-trifluoromethyl-2-hydroxyl-(indol-3-yl)-propionic acid esters Aβ40 peptideInhibits the fibrillogenesis; Disassemble preformed fibrilsStock solution of Aβ40 peptide[58,59,60]
Cromolyn-based fluorinated derivativeAβ40 and Aβ42 aggregatesInhibits the Aβ oligomerization;
Displays significant brain uptake and clearance activity		Stock solution of Aβ40 and Aβ42 peptideand WT mice [62]
Organofluorine inhibitorAβ40 peptideImprove the cognitive impairment;
Enhance the BBB permeability 		Stock solution of Aβ40 peptide
and mice 		[63]
SEN 1500Aβ42
peptide		Demonstrates anti-aggregating capability;
Blocks the toxic effect in LTP		Stock solution of Aβ42 peptide,
SH-SY5Y cells and 7PA2 CM cells		[65]
8-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H benzo [1,4] oxazine inhibitorInhibits Aβ aggregation; Shows excellent neuroprotective profile Stock solution of Aβ42 peptide, SH-SY5Y cells, hippocampal slices of male young rat (6–8 weeks old)[65]
Fluorinated surface (Teflon)Aβ40 peptidePromotes α-helix reformationStock solution of Aβ40 peptide[66]
Table
Table 2. Fluorinated BACE1 inhibitors for the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) treatment.
Table 2. Fluorinated BACE1 inhibitors for the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) treatment.
CompoundsSite of ActionObserved EffectsModel UsedReference
Fluorinated ethanolamines β-secretase (BACE1)Inhibits BACE1 activityEnzymatic assay (human BACE1), human neuroblastoma SKNBE2 cells[72]
LY-2886721Decreases the Aβ levels in CSFHuman. Terminated after phase 2 due to liver toxicity[75]
Fluorinated LY-2886721Reduces the amyloid levelsHEK293 cells (Human BACE1)PDAPP young mice[76]
1,3 oxazine-based BACE1 inhibitor (difluoroethyl substituted analogue)Display good BACE1/2 selectivity;
Reduce Aβ levels in CSF		HEK293 cells (Both human BACE1 and BACE2)
male beagle dogs		[78]
Eisai’s BACE1 inhibitor [1,3] thiazine series Fluoro(methyl) analoguesEnhance the basicity and show selectivity over BACE2 Human/Rat Aβ42; neuronal cultures of rat’s fetus brain[80,81]
Organofluorine substituted BACE1 inhibitorsImprove the drug efficacy (non-P-gp substrates)Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, human liver microsomes,
ICR mice (7–9 weeks old)		[82]
Fluorinated oxazines analoguesEnhance potency and basicity;
Reduce the Aβ levels at low doses		Enzymatic assays (BACE1 and BACE2), HEK293 cells, LLC-PK1 cells,
female WT-mice		[88]
Table
Table 3. Fluorinated nanoparticles used for the treatment for AD.
Table 3. Fluorinated nanoparticles used for the treatment for AD.
CompoundsSite of ActionObserved EffectsModel UsedReference
Fluorinated nanoparticlesAβ40Inhibition of amyloid fibril formationStock solution of Aβ40 peptide
(in vitro)		[30]
Aβ42Anti-oligomeric and anti-apoptotic activityStock solution of Aβ42 peptide
(in vitro) and SH-SY5Y cells (in vitro)		[31]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dabur, M.; Loureiro, J.A.; Pereira, M.C. Fluorinated Molecules and Nanotechnology: Future ‘Avengers’ against the Alzheimer’s Disease? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2989. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082989

AMA Style

Dabur M, Loureiro JA, Pereira MC. Fluorinated Molecules and Nanotechnology: Future ‘Avengers’ against the Alzheimer’s Disease? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(8):2989. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082989

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dabur, Meghna, Joana A. Loureiro, and Maria Carmo Pereira. 2020. "Fluorinated Molecules and Nanotechnology: Future ‘Avengers’ against the Alzheimer’s Disease?" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 8: 2989. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21082989

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop