The authors wish to make the following correction to their published paper [1].
In Figure 10, the response difference curve for the GAPA1 Arg81Leu protein was mislabelled as GAPA1 Arg81Lys. In Figure 10’s caption, “GAPA1 Arg81Lys” should be “GAPA1 Arg81Leu”. The corrected Figure 10 is shown below (Figure 1)
Figure 1.
Comparison of the abilities of wild-type (WT) GAPA1 (red line), point-mutated GAPA1 Asn35Gly (pink line) and GAPA1 Arg81Leu (green line) to bind immobilised 3-AESA in SPR assays. All proteins were injected at 50 nM concentrations. In these sensorgrams, the signal from the mock-coupled surface was subtracted. The response values of the report points (*) after the beginning of the dissociation phase were extracted. The corresponding relative responses are indicated in Resonance Units (RU). The report points are indicated by *.
We apologize for any inconvenience brought to the readers.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
Reference
- Pokotylo, I.; Hellal, D.; Bouceba, T.; Hernandez-Martinez, M.; Kravets, V.; Leitao, L.; Espinasse, C.; Kleiner, I.; Ruelland, E. Deciphering the Binding of Salicylic Acid to Arabidopsis thaliana Chloroplastic GAPDH-A1. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).