Next Article in Journal
Preconditioned and Genetically Modified Stem Cells for Myocardial Infarction Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Purinergic Signaling in Pancreas—From Physiology to Therapeutic Strategies in Pancreatic Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Immune System Modulation on Prion Disease Susceptibility and Pathogenesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cross-Talk between P2X and NMDA Receptors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 19
10.3390/ijms21197300
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adenosine Metabolism in the Cerebral Cortex from Several Mice Models during Aging

by
Alejandro Sánchez-Melgar
1,
José Luis Albasanz
1,*,
Mercè Pallàs
2 and
Mairena Martín
1
1
Department of Inorganic, Organic and Biochemistry, Faculty of Chemical and Technological Sciences, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, School of Medicine of Ciudad Real, Regional Center of Biomedical Research (CRIB), 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain
2
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Institute of Neuroscience, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(19), 7300; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197300
Submission received: 26 July 2020 / Revised: 27 September 2020 / Accepted: 1 October 2020 / Published: 2 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dissecting the Purinergic Signaling Puzzle)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Adenosine is a neuromodulator that has been involved in aging and neurodegenerative diseases as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In the present work, we analyzed the possible modulation of purine metabolites, 5’nucleotidase (5′NT) and adenosine deaminase (ADA) activities, and adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and its phosphorylated form during aging in the cerebral cortex. Three murine models were used: senescence-accelerated mouse-resistant 1 (SAMR1, normal senescence), senescence-accelerated mouse-prone 8 (SAMP8, a model of AD), and the wild-type C57BL/6J (model of aging) mice strains. Glutamate and excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2) levels were also measured in these animals. HPLC, Western blotting, and enzymatic activity evaluation were performed to this aim. 5′-Nucleotidase (5′NT) activity was decreased at six months and recovered at 12 months in SAMP8 while opposite effects were observed in SAMR1 at the same age, and no changes in C57BL/6J mice. ADA activity significantly decreased from 3 to 12 months in the SAMR1 mice strain, while a significant decrease from 6 to 12 months was observed in the SAMP8 mice strain. Regarding purine metabolites, xanthine and guanosine levels were increased at six months in SAMR1 without significant differences in SAMP8 mice. In C57BL/6J mice, inosine and xanthine were increased, while adenosine decreased, from 4 to 24 months. The AMPK level was decreased at six months in SAMP8 without significant changes nor in SAMR1 or C57BL/6J strains. Glutamate and EAAT2 levels were also modulated during aging. Our data show a different modulation of adenosine metabolism participants in the cerebral cortex of these animal models. Interestingly, the main differences between SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice were found at six months of age, SAMP8 being the most affected strain. As SAMP8 is an AD model, results suggest that adenosinergic metabolism is involved in the neurodegeneration of AD.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Adenosine is a key regulator of the neurotransmission in the central nervous system operating through four receptors: A1, A2A, A2B, and A3. These receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) family, and activate (A2A, A2B) or inhibit (A1, A3) adenylyl cyclase enzyme, thus modulating intracellular cAMP levels. Adenosine receptors’ expression and distribution seem to be region- and cell-type-specific in the brain [1,2,3]. Many studies have revealed that adenosine receptors, mainly A1 and A2A, are strongly altered in neurodegenerative [4,5,6,7,8] and neuropsychiatric disorders [9,10,11].
Adenosine and related metabolites, together with their converting enzymes (Scheme 1), have also been analyzed in several healthy and pathological conditions, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [12,13,14,15]. Furthermore, 5′-nucleotidase (5′NT) catalyzes the formation of adenosine from adenosine monophosphate (AMP) [16], and adenosine deaminase is involved in the degradation of adenosine to inosine [17].
AD is characterized by the extracellular deposition of amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) plaques and the intracellular formation of neurofibrillary tangles in the cerebral cortex [18]. In addition, age affects the brain independently of AD [19], and there is a growing number of proponents of the view that it is important to understand age-related changes to better understand AD. Therefore, studying the brain regions that are vulnerable to both aging and AD, such as the cerebral cortex, may allow us to disentangle disease-specific mechanisms from normal age-related events [20,21].
Age is the main risk factor for prevalent diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders (reviewed in [22]). A causal connection between reactive oxygen species, aging, age-related pathologies, and cell senescence is intensely studied [23]. Aging refers to biological change with time across the lifespan; however, senescence refers to normal progressive functional impairments that occur with age. Age-related disease refers to health conditions for which the incidence increases with age, such as cancer, heart disease, arthritis, osteoporosis, and cognitive decline (e.g., AD) [24].
Mice are extensively used in aging and senescence research due to their genetic and physiological similarity to humans [24]. Wild-type C57BL/6J is the most widely used inbred strain and is frequently used in studies related to aging and neurodegenerative disorders [25,26,27]. Senescence-accelerated mouse-prone 8 (SAMP8) is an ideal model to study AD, displaying age-related learning and memory disorders [28,29,30,31,32]. Senescence-accelerated mouse-resistant 1 (SAMR1) is usually considered as the control strain for SAMP8 mice studies, along with accelerated senescence but without learning and memory impairments [28,29].
The relationship between first-occurring AD-like changes and the monthly age in the brain of SAMP8 mice has been reported [28]. In brief, at three months of age, these mice have aberrant gene expression, oxidative stress, and tau hyperphosphorylation. At six months, they develop cognitive impairment, glial degeneration, inflammation, and Aβ deposition. Finally, at 12 months of age, they show alterations in dendrites, synapses, neurons, Aβ plaques, and neuron loss. The lifespan of SAMP8 mice is about 10–12 months, while SAMR1 mice have a lifespan of 19–21 months [29,33]. Regarding C57BL/6J, its lifespan is about 26–28 months [34,35]. As C57BL/6J mice exhibit a longer lifespan than SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice, we selected mice that were 4 and 24 months of age and approximately at the same survival point as seen for the 3- and 12-month-old SAM mice [33,36]. In fact, it has been reported that one-year-old SAMP8 mice showed age-associated characteristics in tissue histology, proliferation, and differentiation, which were comparable to two-year-old mice of the C57BL/6 strain [37].
Interestingly, age-related changes in adenosinergic signaling, including adenosine receptors levels, have been reported in these models. In relation to this, our group previously described a reduced expression of A1 associated with age [38,39], while increasing the density of A2A was found as an early event in the whole brain from SAMP8 mice when compared to the SAMR1 strain [39].
Several GPCRs that can couple to the Gi/o subfamily are modified during aging. Among these receptors, adenosine A1 receptors have a reduced turnover rate, lesser functional output, and reduced protein levels (reviewed in [40]). In contrast, adenosine A2A receptors, which are coupled to the Gs subfamily, seem to be potentiated by aging, and their overfunction accelerates neurodegeneration processes [41,42].
Homeostatic functions, neuromodulation, and neuroprotection via adenosine receptors also decrease with age [13,40,43]. In addition, aging and neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD, are generally associated with reduced cAMP signaling in the brain compared to normal levels (reviewed in [44]).
The potential role of dietary restriction in the prevention of phenotypic features during aging in the brain and its diverse mechanisms has been reviewed elsewhere [45]. In line with this, nutrient sensors, in particular AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and sirtuins, tend to downregulate with age, and their pharmacological activation is reputed to increase longevity [46,47]. The AMPK is a serine/threonine kinase with a key role as an energy sensor in a wide variety of tissues. It coordinates cell growth, autophagy, and metabolism [48,49,50,51], and appears to be involved in the pathophysiology of AD [52]. AMPK is a trimer, with α-, β-, and γ-subunits. The α-subunit contains the kinase domain and its Thr172 residue is phosphorylated by an upstream kinase and determines its regulation. The binding of AMP, and to a lesser extent ADP, to the γ-subunit stimulates AMPK activity. Thus, changes in the ATP-to-ADP or ATP-to-AMP ratio leads to the allosteric activation of AMPK [53]. Therefore, enzymes involved in the modulation of AMP levels due to the conversion of AMP to adenosine (i.e., 5′NT) or adenosine to AMP (i.e., adenosine kinase), in turn, could control AMPK activation. Extracellular adenosine activates AMPK [54]; however, the authors of [55] reported the PKA-mediated inhibition of AMPK via the increased inhibitory phosphorylation of AMPKSer173 and reduced activating phosphorylation of AMPKThr172.
Adenosine signaling also interacts with many other neurotransmitter systems such as glutamatergic signaling [56,57], which is also modulated by aging and has a role in neurodegeneration [58,59,60,61]. The glutamatergic system has been found to be altered in the human brain in AD patients [62,63] and also in the whole brain of SAMP8 mice [64].
Therefore, the aim of the present work was to assess adenosine, related metabolites and enzymes (5′NT, ADA), and their potential implication on AMPK activation in the cerebral cortex. SAMR1 (senescence, normal impairment), SAMP8 (senescence, abnormal impairment as AD), and the wild-type C57BL/6J (aging, change in functionality with age) mice were analyzed during aging to decipher possible differences, if any, between these murine models. Glutamate and excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2) levels were also measured and analyzed due to their relationship with adenosinergic signaling.

2. Results

2.1. Modulation of 5′-Nucleotidase Activity during Aging in the Cerebral Cortex from SAM and C57BL/6J Mice

Activities of 5′NT located in the plasma membrane and cytosolic fraction were measured separately. In the SAMR1 mice strain, 5′NT activity significantly increased from three to six months, in both the plasma membrane and cytosolic fractions, and returned at 12 months to similar levels measured than in the three-month-old mice (Figure 1). In SAMP8 mice, a reduction of 5′NT activity in both the plasma membrane and cytosolic fractions was found at six months vs. three months. At 12 months, these activities recovered to values similar to those measured at three months. When comparing SAMR1 and SAMP8 values, significantly different activities were found at three and six months in the plasma membrane and at six months in the cytosolic fraction. In the plasma membrane fraction, two-way ANOVA (strain × age) revealed a significant interaction between factors (F(2, 15) = 9.360, p = 0.0023), a nonsignificant main effect of the strain (F(1, 15) = 0.6574, p = 0.4302), and a nonsignificant effect of age (F(2, 15) = 1.248, p = 0.3154). In the cytosolic fraction, two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between factors (F(2, 14) = 5.461, p = 0.0176), a significant main effect of the strain (F(1, 14) = 12.29, p = 0.0035), and a nonsignificant effect of age (F(2, 14) = 0.09649, p = 0.9086). In C57BL/6J mice, 5′NT slightly, but not significantly, increased from 4 to 24 months in the plasma membrane fraction while remaining unchanged in the cytosolic fraction (Figure 2). Therefore, it seems that a different and opposite modulation process takes place in SAM mice strains during aging.

2.2. Modulation of Adenosine Deaminase Activity during Aging in the Cerebral Cortex from SAM and C57BL/6J Mice

Adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity located in the plasma membrane fraction was measured. ADA activity significantly decreased from 3 to 12 months in the SAMR1 mice strain, while a significant decrease from 6 to 12 months was observed in the SAMP8 mice strain (Figure 3a). Two-way ANOVA (strain × age) revealed a significant main effect of age (F(2, 13) = 6.821, p = 0.0094), a nonsignificant main effect of the strain (F(1, 13) = 0.02968, p = 0.8659), and a nonsignificant interaction between factors (F(2, 13) = 1.403, p = 0.2808). Regarding the C57BL/6J mice strain, no significant differences were detected from 4- to 24-month-old mice.

2.3. Modulation of Adenosine and Related Metabolite Levels during Aging in the Cerebral Cortex from SAM and C57BL/6J Mice

Adenosine and related metabolite levels were quantified by HPLC. In SAMR1 mice, adenosine levels remained unchanged during aging (Figure 4a). Inosine, xanthine, hypoxanthine, and guanosine levels showed a similar profile, increasing from three to six months and decreasing from 6 to 12 months (Figure 4b–e). These changes from three to six months and from 6 to 12 months were statistically significant for xanthine and guanosine levels (Figure 4c,e). In SAMP8 mice, there was a more erratic profile during aging for all the measured metabolites, and no significant differences were detected (Figure 4). When comparing SAMR1 and SAMP8 values, only hypoxanthine and guanosine levels were significantly different at six months (Figure 4d,e). Two-way ANOVA revealed no significant changes in adenosine levels with age (F(2, 15) = 0.6746, p = 0.5242), strain (F(1, 15) = 1.250, p = 0.2811), or age × strain (F(2, 15) = 0.3222, p = 0.7294). For inosine levels, two-way ANOVA revealed no significant changes with age (F(2, 14) = 0.5776, p = 0.5741) and age × strain (F(2, 14) = 0.4688, p = 0.6352), and significant changes with strain (F(1, 14) = 5.423, p = 0.0354). For xanthine levels, two-way ANOVA revealed no significant changes with strain (F(1, 15) = 0.1877, p = 0.6710) and age × strain (F(2, 15) = 0.2410, p = 0.7889), and significant changes with age (F(2, 15) = 3.916, p = 0.0428). For hypoxanthine levels, two-way ANOVA revealed no significant changes with strain (F(1, 14) = 2.974, p = 0.1066), age (F(2, 14) = 0.03323, p = 0.9674), and age × strain (F(2, 14) = 3.698, p = 0.0514). For guanosine levels, two-way ANOVA revealed no significant changes with strain (F(1, 14) = 2.334, p = 0.1488) and age × strain (F(2, 14) = 2.264, p = 0.1406), and significant changes with age (F(2, 14) = 5.752, P = 0.0150). In C57BL/6J, adenosine levels were significantly decreased by age, whereas increased levels of inosine and xanthine were observed in older mice (Figure 5). However, hypoxanthine and guanosine levels remained unchanged from 4 to 24 months.

2.4. AMPK Activation State during Aging in the Cerebral Cortex from SAM and C57BL/6J Mice

AMPK and its phosphorylated state (p-AMPK) were analyzed by Western blotting. In SAMR1 mice, AMPK levels seem to be lower at 6 and 12 months than at three months; however, this decrease was not statistically significant (Figure 6a). In SAMP8 mice, a significant decrease was detected from three to six months, followed by an also significant recovery of AMPK levels from 6 to 12 months (Figure 6b). In C57BL/6J mice, AMPK levels were similar at 4 and 24 months (Figure 6c). Finally, the activation of AMPK, measured as the p-AMPK/AMPK ratio, remained unchanged during aging in all analyzed mice (Figure 6a–c).

2.5. Glutamate and Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 2 Levels during Aging in the Cerebral Cortex from SAM and C57BL/6J Mice

We measured the glutamate level in the cytosolic fraction of the cerebral cortex. In SAMR1 mice, glutamate levels were similar at three and six months, but decreased at 12 months. In SAMP8 mice, glutamate levels diminished from three to six months, and significantly increased from 6 to 12 months (Figure 7). While glutamate levels are similar in both SAM strains at three months, they were significantly different at 6 and 12 months. Interestingly, SAMP8 had lower glutamate levels than SAMR1 at six months, while the contrary was found at 12 months. Two-way ANOVA (strain × age) revealed a nonsignificant main effect of age (F(2, 15) = 1.016, p = 0.3857) and strain (F(1, 15) = 0.1543, p = 0.7000), and a significant interaction between factors (F(2, 15) = 7.357, p = 0.0059). In C57BL/6J mice, there is an increase in glutamate levels from 4 to 24 months (Figure 8).
Finally, we measured the protein levels of excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2), which is responsible for the vast majority of glutamate clearance, in the plasma membrane fraction of the cerebral cortex. In SAMR1 mice, EAAT2 levels were similar at three and six months, but significantly increased from 6 to 12 months (Figure 9a). In SAMP8, EAAT2 levels significantly increased from three to six months, and decreased from 6 to 12 months (Figure 9b). In C57BL/6J mice, EAAT2 protein levels were similar at 4 and 24 months (Figure 9c).

3. Discussion

As summarized in Scheme 1, adenosine monophosphate (AMP) can be degraded to adenosine by ecto-5′-nucleotidase (ecto-5′NT), and adenosine can be converted via inosine and hypoxanthine to xanthine by adenosine deaminase (ADA), purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP), and xanthine oxidase (XO), respectively. Guanosine monophosphate (GMP) can be metabolized to guanosine, which can be converted via guanine and hypoxanthine to xanthine by 5′NT, PNP, guanase, and XO, respectively. Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HGPRT) is a purine salvage enzyme, which converts hypoxanthine and guanine to IMP and GMP, respectively [65].
There is evidence of age-dependent changes in the activity of some nucleoside metabolism enzymes, which could result in different nucleoside levels. Age profoundly affects 5′NT activity in different areas of the Fischer 344 rat brain of young, intermediate, and old rats (2, 12, and 24 months, respectively). The activity of cytosolic- and ecto-5′-nucleotidase increased in the cerebral cortex of old- and intermediate-age rats when compared to young animals [15]. Our results in SAMR1 mice indicate that 5′NT activity increased from three to six months. However, in SAMP8 mice, a reduction in 5′NT activity in both the plasma membrane and cytosolic fractions at six months vs. three months, which is in agreement with the decrease we previously found in the whole brain of SAMP8 mice from five to seven months of age [38]. Concerning C57BL/6J mice, a slight increase from 4 to 24 months was found in plasma membrane-associated 5′NT activity.
Levels of inosine and adenosine increased with age in samples from the frontal cortex of old men as compared to their middle-aged counterparts [66]. Thus, an increase in 5′NT activity with age likely leads to an increase in adenosine levels in the brain [15]. However, we did not find any modulation of adenosine levels in SAMR1 mice despite the increased 5′NT activity from three to six months of age. Even decreased 5′NT activity from three to six months, as detected in SAMP8 mice, was unable to modulate adenosine levels. Interestingly, detected 5′NT activities (plasma membrane and cytosolic) and guanosine levels were lower in SAMP8 mice than in SAMR1 mice. Moreover, the increased guanosine levels detected in SAMR1 mice at six months versus three months could be, at least in part, a reflection of the similarly increased 5′NT activity measured at this age. However, the positive relationship between 5′NT and guanosine values is apparently lost in SAMP8 mice. We must note that the total content of nucleosides measured here may not represent the amount available at the synaptic cleft; however, it provides an overview of the nucleoside metabolism in the cerebral cortex of these animals. A more complex scenario is envisaged from the reduced adenosine levels found in C57BL/6J mice, where no significant changes in 5′NT activity were detected. Guanosine levels also remained unchanged with age in these mice, thus reinforcing the relationship between 5′NT and guanosine values. Therefore, adenosine-metabolizing enzymes, such as ADA, could also be regulated by age and contribute to the modulation of adenosine and inosine levels. We found a slight increase in ADA activity from 4 to 24 months in the C57BL/6J mice strain, which could have contributed to the lower adenosine and higher inosine levels detected in old mice. In turn, ADA activity progressively decreased in SAMR1 mice throughout the aging period, while in SAMP8, mice this decrease was observed from 6 to 12 months. In line with this, ADA activities were reported higher in young than in adult Wistar rats [67]; even age-associated alterations of ADA activity in different brain regions have been reported [15]. Interestingly, adenosine, related metabolites, and their converting enzymes are altered in several cortical areas from the postmortem human brain of AD patients, even at the early stages of the disease [12].
Several age-related changes in a wide range of behaviors have been reported in C57BL/6J mice from young to old age (8, 47, 73, and 99 weeks of age). Among these changes, reduced working and spatial memory, alongside impaired cued fear memory, were observed in old-aged mice compared to those in young C57BL/6J mice [68]. A significant spatial learning and memory decline was also detected between 3- and 15-month-old C57BL/6J mice [69]. In line with this, it has been reported that a calorie-restricted diet may improve the hippocampus-dependent spatial learning ability of C57BL mice via an increase in AMPK expression [70]. Total AMPK levels in the brain were not significantly different between old (16–18 months) and young (9–12 weeks) C57BL/6 mice, although the basal AMPK phosphorylation level was higher in old animals [71]. Moreover, no differences in total AMPK content have been reported in the prefrontal cortex from 22- to 33-week-old C57BL/6J mice [72]. In agreement, in the present study, total AMPK and phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK) levels in the cerebral cortex from C57BL/6J mice were preserved from 4 to 24 months.
Regarding SAM strains, the activity of AMPK in the cerebral cortex of young (two-month-old) SAMP8 mice was reported significantly higher than that of SAMR1 controls, thus inhibiting tau hyperphosphorylation [73]. These authors suggested that AMPK activation at an early stage (i.e., presymptomatic two-month-old SAMP8 mice) without prominent AD pathologies plays a protective role against detrimental stress in the cerebral cortex, as the activation of cortical AMPK inhibits the GSK3β-mediated hyperphosphorylation of tau. In addition, activated AMPK (p-AMPK) accumulated in pre-tangle-bearing and tangle-bearing neurons in postmortem brain samples in AD and other major tauopathies [74]. We have not directly compared the levels and activity of AMPK between SAMP8 and SAMR1 mice, as these samples were electrophoresed in different gels. However, it is interesting to note that at the age of six months, total AMPK levels significantly decrease in SAMP8 mice, and significant differences (e.g., 5′NT, guanosine, hypoxanthine, glutamate) between these two SAM strains are detected at this age. This would point to a loss of the cited AMPK-mediated compensatory mechanism at the age of six months. Age-related changes in the AMPK function have been reviewed both at the cell and organism levels. Unfortunately, further investigation is needed to accurately determine how aging modulates the activity and expression of AMPK, mainly in mammals [46].
An age-related reduction in glutamate levels in the whole brain of SAMP8 mice from five- to seven-month-old mice was previously reported by our group [64]. In the present work, covering a wider time frame (3, 6, and 12 months) and a limited region (cerebral cortex), glutamate levels in SAMR1 mice were similar at three and six months, but decreased at 12 months. In SAMP8, glutamate levels diminished from three to six months, and significantly increased from 6 to 12 months. Finally, increased glutamate levels were also detected in aged C57BL/6J mice.
Glutamate levels will depend on its synthesis, uptake, and/or metabolic fate, with a relative contribution that may be different during aging.
Regarding glutamate synthesis, glucose provides the carbon for the de novo synthesis of major neurotransmitters (e.g., glutamate) and the glucose metabolism provides the energy to sustain neurotransmission (reviewed in [75]). A generally increased metabolism of glucose during aging (one to eight months) has been described for SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice strains in different brain areas including the cerebral cortex [76,77]. However, when compared to SAMR1, glucose metabolism in the SAMP8 brain was normal at one month of age but decreased from two to three months of age and onwards (eight months) [76]. Lower glucose metabolism in SAMP8 than in SAMR1 at the age of 7–8 months old was also reported, and the extent of impaired glucose metabolism in the cerebral cortex of SAMP8 mice correlated significantly with the severity of the learning impairments observed in these mice [78]. In agreement, lower glutamate synthesis from glucose and acetate (only metabolized by astrocytes) and lower synthesis of glutamine from acetate have been reported in eight-month-old SAMP8 compared to two-month-old mice [79], suggesting that the glutamate metabolism in the brains of eight-month-old SAMP8 mice is altered [80]. In older (40 weeks) SAMP8 mice, significantly increased serum fasting glucose (1.66-fold) levels were observed compared with young (12 weeks) SAMP8 mice. Nevertheless, there was no difference in the fasting glucose levels of both SAMR1 and C57BL/6 mice strains between 12 and 40 weeks [81]. At 12 months of age, the expression levels of GLUT1 and GLUT3 protein, the main glucose transporters in the brain, were decreased in the cerebral cortex of both SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice when compared to the corresponding four-month-old animals [82].
Regarding glutamate uptake, the neuroprotective capacity of astrocytes by clearing extracellular glutamate has been analyzed in primary cultures enriched in astrocytes using cerebral cortical tissue from two-day-old SAMP8 and SAMR1 mice. Interestingly, glutamate uptake in SAMP8 astrocyte cultures was significantly less than in SAMR1 cultures, while the expression of the glutamate–aspartate transporter (GLAST) was not different between SAMP8 and SAMR1 astrocytes. Moreover, the neuroprotective capacity of astrocytes, evaluated in cocultures with cortical neurons, was lower in SAMP8 astrocytes [83]. In addition, astrocytes aged in vitro have a reduced ability to maintain neuronal survival [84]. This reduction in glial glutamate uptake capacity in SAMP8 may elevate extracellular glutamate levels, leading to neuronal excitotoxicity [85], and contribute to premature learning and memory deficits observed not only in this murine model of early aging but also of AD. In fact, astrocyte senescence and its putative role in the pathologic progress of AD has been recently reviewed [86]. Astrocytes cultured from neonatal SAMP8 mice present similar alterations to those described in the whole brains of SAMP8 mice at 1–5 months of age [83]. Thus, it is conceivable that astrocytes (mal)function could contribute to the significantly higher glutamate levels that we detected in 12-month-old SAMP8 mice when compared with the SAMR1 strain.
In line with this, we detected an increase in EAAT2 levels in SAMR1 mice from 6 to 12 months, when glutamate levels are lower. Furthermore, in SAMP8 mice, the highest EAAT2 protein level is detected at six months, when glutamate content is lowest, suggesting the importance of glutamate uptake in the final glutamate level found in the cerebral cortex of SAM strains.
Another contributing factor to glutamate levels could be a reduced glutamate uptake into synaptic vesicles. In fact, the protein expression of vesicular glutamate transporter (VGLUT) isoforms 1–3 and synaptophysin was decreased in an age-dependent manner in the cerebral cortex of SAMP8 mice of 2, 6, and 12 months, which could indicate that the glutamatergic synaptic transmission was weakened in the brain of aging SAMP8 [87].
Therefore, glutamate synthesis from glucose can be the main, but not unique, contributing factor to glutamate levels at six months of age, while glutamate uptake processes would be more important at 12 months in both SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice.
Glutamic acid decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.15; GAD) promotes the transformation of excessive glutamate to γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Interestingly, GAD activity was lower in the cortex from older (24 months) C57BL/6J mice compared to younger mice (four months) [88]. Lower GAD activity could be a primary contributor to the higher glutamate content in 24-month-old compared to four-month-old C57BL/6J mice that we reported here, as we found no changes in EAAT2 protein levels (i.e., glutamate uptake) between 4 and 24 months.
An additional point of complexity is that changes in brain glutamate levels seem to be region-specific. Thus, the basal glutamate content was increased in CA1, and remained unchanged in CA3 and DG, leading to elevated hippocampal glutamate from 3 to 11 months of age in C57BL/6J mice [89]. In SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice, glutamate monitoring between 2 and 14 months of age revealed a different age-related modulation in the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus [90]. Interestingly, these authors reported that the high K+-evoked release of glutamate was age-dependently decreased in slices of SAMR1, and similarly in SAMP8, where it was also decreased at early stages (two and six months of age); however, it was increased at 9 and 11 months of age.
Together, these results potentially highlight six-month-old SAMP8 mice as the most affected among the three strains analyzed in this work. SAMP8 mice constitute both a senescence-accelerated model and a model for studying the initial neurodegenerative alterations in AD [30,31,32,91,92]. In fact, impairments in spatial learning and increased oxidative stress can be detected in SAMP8 mice as early as three months old, followed by the impairment in spatial memory and increased tau hyperphosphorylation at five months, hippocampal cognitive deficits at six months, and gliosis and increased levels of soluble Aβ at eight months [28,31]. The results presented herein regarding changes in several components of adenosinergic signaling, and the modulation of adenosine receptors by age in both SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice [38,39], are in agreement with the implication of the adenosinergic system in AD neuropathology [93].
Adenosine receptors, mainly A1 and A2A, are modulated in the brain during the neurodegenerative process. Hippocampus-dependent learning and memory were more altered by caffeine exposure during preadolescence (42 days old) and adolescence (180 days old) compared with adulthood in C57BL/6J mice, probably due to age-related differences in adenosine receptor levels [94]. The densities of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors changed oppositely in areas such as the cerebral cortex and hippocampus during aging. Thus, A1 receptor binding to the cerebral cortex in old (24 months) Wistar rats was a 40% of that detected in young (six weeks old) rats, while A2A receptor binding was two-fold higher in old than in young rats [41]. Our group previously described that, in the whole brain of SAMR1 mice, adenosine A1 and A2A receptors were decreased and increased, respectively, from three weeks to six months of age [39]. In SAMP8 mice, we reported that A1 protein levels were maintained from three weeks to six months [39] and decreased from five to seven months of age [38], while A2A protein levels remained unaltered between three weeks and six months [39] and between five and seven months of age [38]. Interestingly, the increased density of the A2A receptor was found as an early event in the whole brain from SAMP8 mice when compared to the SAMR1 strain [39]. In AD patients, A1 and A2A were found to be increased in the frontal cortex [4], whereas a higher A2A density [95,96] and lower A1 [97,98] has been described in the hippocampus. Since adenosine A1 receptors are mainly related to neuroprotection [14], their loss in very young SAMP8 mice suggests the involvement of A1 receptors in the pathogenesis of age-associated neurodegenerative diseases [39]. Moreover, the overfunction of A2A receptors accelerates the neurodegeneration process [14,42], and the apparently preserved levels of A2A receptors in SAMP8 mice during aging would assure some pathological events; for instance, an overstimulated glutamate release [10,99]. Furthermore, a key regulator of A2A-receptor-mediated signaling seems to be 5′NT (reviewed in [100]). The colocation and physical association of 5′NT and A2A receptors has been reported within the same membrane microdomains; for instance, in synaptosomes from the striatum of C57BL/6 animals [101,102]. Thus, extracellularly generated adenosine would immediately activate A2A receptors, which in turn would promote glutamate release. Interestingly, the temporal profile of glutamate content in SAMP8 and C57BL/6J mice reported here was paralleled to plasma 5′-NT activity during aging.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals

Cerebral cortexes from 33 male mice were used in this work: 13 SAMR1 (3 months, n = 5; 6 months, n = 5; 12 months, n = 3), 9 SAMP8 (3 months, n = 3; 6 months, n = 3; 12 months, n = 3), and 11 C57BL/6J mice (4 months, n = 7; 24 months, n = 4). Animals received a standard diet (2018 Teklad Global 18% Protein Rodent Maintenance Diet, Harlan). All the mice had food and water ad libitum and were kept in standard conditions of temperature (22 ± 2 °C) and 12:12 h light–dark cycles (300 lux/0 lux). All procedures were performed in accordance with the institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals established by the Ethical Committee for Animal Experimentation at the University of Barcelona (670/14/8102, approved at 11/14/2014).

4.2. Plasma Membrane Isolation

Plasma membranes of the cerebral cortex from SAM and C57BL/6J mice were isolated as previously described [103]. Samples were homogenized in 20 volumes of isolation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, containing 10 mM MgCl2 and protease inhibitors) in a Dounce homogenizer (10xA, 10xB). After homogenization, samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 1000× g in a Beckman JA 21 for 30 min at 27,000× g. The resulting supernatant was considered as the cytoplasmic fraction, and the pellet was resuspended in an isolation buffer and considered the plasma membrane fraction. Samples were stored at −80 °C until needed. Protein levels were quantified by the Lowry method using bovine serum albumin as standard.

4.3. 5’-Nucleotidase Activity Assay

5′-Nucleotidase activity was measured as previously reported [104]. Briefly, 20 μg of protein were preincubated at 37 °C for 10 min in the reaction medium (50 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM MgCl2, pH 9). Then, the reaction was initiated by adding AMP at a final concentration of 500 μM and stopped 20 min later by adding 10% trichloroacetic acid. The samples were chilled on ice for 10 min and then centrifuged at 12,000× g for 4 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were used to measure inorganic phosphate released using KH2PO4 as Pi standard. The nonenzymatic hydrolysis of AMP was corrected by adding samples after trichloroacetic acid. Incubation times and protein concentration were selected to ensure the linearity of the reactions. All samples were run in duplicate. Enzymatic activity is expressed as nanomolar Pi released/min mg protein.

4.4. Adenosine and Related Metabolite Levels Quantification by HPLC

Chromatographic analysis was performed with Ultimate 3000 U-HPLC (Thermo Fisher, Madrid, Spain) and data peaks were processed with Chromeleon 7 (Thermo Fisher, Madrid, Spain) as previously described [12]. HPLC diode array was used working at a 254 nm wavelength. Purine standards and samples (40 μL) were injected in a C18 column of 4.6 mm × 250 mm with a 5 μm particle size. Two solvents were used for gradient elution: Solvent A—20 mM phosphate buffer solution (pH 5,7), and Solvent B—100% methanol. The gradient was 95% (11 min), 80% (9 min), and 95% (2 min) in Solvent A. The total run time was 22 min with a constant flow rate of 0.8 mL/min at 25 °C. Retention times for hypoxanthine, xanthine, inosine, guanosine, and adenosine were 3.5, 3.9, 8.4, 9.4, and 15.5 min, respectively. Purine levels were interpolated from the standard curve constructed with five concentrations of each purine ranging from 0.1 to 500 μM. Data were then normalized to the protein concentration of each sample.

4.5. Immunodetection of p-AMPK and AMPK by Western Blotting

In total, 20 μg of protein of cytosolic fraction from each sample were mixed with loading buffer containing 0,125 M Tris (pH 6.8), 20% glycerol, 10% β-mercaptoethanol, 4% SDS, and 0.002% bromophenol blue, and heated at 50 °C for 5 min. Protein was electrophoresed on 10% SDS–PAGE gel using a miniprotean system (Bio-Rad, Madrid, Spain) with molecular weight standards (Bio-Rad). Protein transfer to nitrocellulose membranes was carried out in the iBlotTM Dry Blotting System (Invitrogen, Madrid, Spain). Membranes were washed with PBS-Tween 20, blocked with PBS containing 5% skimmed milk, and then incubated with the primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight at 1:1000 dilution for anti-EAAT2 (Abcam, ab41621), 1:600 for anti-AMPK (Abcam, ab207442), 1:1000 for antiphosphorylated AMPK (Abcam, ab23875), and 1:2000 for anti-GAPDH (Abcam, ab8245). GAPDH was used as a gel loading control. After rinsing, the membranes were incubated with the corresponding secondary antibody (Bio-Rad, GAMPO 170-6516, GARPO 172-1019) at a dilution of 1:5000 in PBS containing 5% skimmed milk for 1 h. The antigen was visualized using the ECL chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham, Madrid, Spain) in a G:Box chamber, and specific bands were quantified by densitometry using GeneTools software (Syngene).

4.6. Glutamate Level Quantification

Glutamate level was quantified as indicated in the manufacturer’s protocol (Molecular Probes, Ref. A12221). Briefly, 50 μL of diluted samples were mixed into 96-well black plates with 50 μL of the reaction mix containing Amplex Red, Horseradish peroxidase, L-alanine, and L-glutamate-pyruvate transaminase and L-glutamate oxidase. Fluorescence was measured in kinetic mode for 30 min. Data were then interpolated to a standard curve and normalized to the amount of protein. Excitation/Emission was detected at Ex/Em = 530/590 nm.

4.7. Adenosine Deaminase Activity Assay

Adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity was measured with an enzyme activity assay kit (Abcam ab204695) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The plasma membrane fraction was diluted 1:100 in ADA Buffer Assay in a 96-well plate and assayed in duplicate. Then, the 96-well plate was read at Ex/Em = 535/587 nm as a kinetic curve for 30 min. Sample values were obtained by interpolation in an inosine standard curve performed in parallel on the same plate as previously described [12].

4.8. Statistical and Data Analysis

Data are mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were performed in SAM mice (3-, 6-, and 12-month groups), and Student’s t-test was performed in C57BL/6J mice (4- and 24-month groups) for statistical analysis, as indicated in the aforementioned figure captions. The overall comparisons between the SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice were tested with two-way ANOVA. The main effects tested were strain (measured parameter differs between the SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice), age (measured parameter changes with age), and interaction between strain and age (age-related changes are different between the SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice). Differences between mean values were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. GraphPad Prism 6.0 program was used for statistical and data analysis (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

5. Conclusions

Our data indicate that adenosine metabolism is differently altered in the cerebral cortex of SAMR1, SAMP8, and the wild-type C57BL/6J mice. SAMP8 strain was the most affected, mainly at the age of six months, which is in line with cognitive decline and other features of AD pathology previously described in this strain. Since adenosine has been implicated in multiple key biological processes in the CNS such as neuroinflammation, homeostasis control, neurotransmitter release (e.g., glutamate), among others, the enzymes involved in adenosine metabolism, with a particular emphasis in 5′NT, should be considered as a promising target for neurodegenerative diseases, particularly AD.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design: M.M. and M.P. Acquisition of data: A.S.-M. and J.L.A. Analysis and interpretation of data: A.S.-M., J.L.A., and M.M. Drafting of manuscript: A.S.-M., J.L.A., and M.M. Critical revision: M.M. and M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (grant SAF2016-33307 to M.P. and Grant PID2019-109206GB-I00 to M.M.), by UCLM (Grant 2020-GRIN-29108 cofinanced with the European Union FEDER) to M.M., and by Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM) (Grant SBPLY/19/180501/000251) to M.M. A.S.-M. was the recipient of a postdoctoral grant (PRE-8002/2014) from JCCM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The sponsors had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of the study.

References

  1. Fredholm, B.B.; Ijzerman, A.P.; Jacobson, K.A.; Linden, J.; Müller, C.E. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors-An update. Pharmacol. Rev. 2011, 63, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, J.-F.; Lee, C.-F.; Chern, Y. Adenosine receptor neurobiology: Overview. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2014, 119, 1–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Burnstock, G.; Fredholm, B.B.; Verkhratsky, A. Adenosine and ATP receptors in the brain. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 973–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Albasanz, J.L.; Perez, S.; Barrachina, M.; Ferrer, I.; Martín, M.; Martín, M. Research article: Up-regulation of adenosine receptors in the frontal cortex in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Pathol. 2008, 18, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Blum, D.; Chern, Y.; Domenici, M.R.; Buée, L.; Lin, C.-Y.; Rea, W.; Ferré, S.; Popoli, P. The role of adenosine tone and adenosine receptors in Huntington’s disease. J. Caffeine Adenosine Res. 2018, 8, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Angulo-Pueyo, E.; Ecasado, V.; Mallol, J.; Canela, E.I.; Viñals, F.; Ferrer, I.; Lluis, C.; Franco, R. A1 adenosine receptors accumulate in neurodegenerative structures in Alzheimer disease and mediate both amyloid precursor protein processing and tau phosphorylation and translocation. Brain Pathol. 2003, 13, 440–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, P.; Rial, D.; Canas, P.M.; Yoo, J.-H.; Li, W.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Y.; Van Westen, G.J.; Payen, M.-P.; Augusto, E.; et al. Optogenetic activation of intracellular adenosine A2A receptor signaling in the hippocampus is sufficient to trigger CREB phosphorylation and impair memory. Mol. Psychiatry 2015, 20, 1339–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Franco, R.; Rivas-Santisteban, R.; Casanovas, M.; Lillo, A.; Saura, C.A.; Navarro, G. Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists affects NMDA glutamate receptor function. potential to address neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Cells 2020, 9, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rial, D.; Lara, D.R.; Cunha, R.A. The adenosine neuromodulation system in schizophrenia. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2014, 119, 395–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Matos, M.; Shen, H.-Y.; Augusto, E.; Wang, Y.; Wei, C.J.; Wang, Y.T.; Agostinho, P.; Boison, D.; Cunha, R.A.; Chen, J.-F. Deletion of adenosine A2A receptors from astrocytes disrupts glutamate homeostasis leading to psychomotor and cognitive impairment: Relevance to schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 2015, 78, 763–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Villar-Menéndez, I.; Díaz-Sánchez, S.; Blanch, M.; Albasanz, J.L.; Pereira-Veiga, T.; Monje, A.; Planchat, L.M.; Ferrer, I.; Martín, M.; Barrachina, M.; et al. Reduced striatal adenosine A2A receptor levels define a molecular subgroup in schizophrenia. J. Psychiatry Res. 2014, 51, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alonso-Andrés, P.; Albasanz, J.L.; Ferrer, I.; Martín, M. Purine-related metabolites and their converting enzymes are altered in frontal, parietal and temporal cortex at early stages of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Brain Pathol. 2018, 28, 933–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Burnstock, G.; Dale, N. Purinergic signalling during development and ageing. Purinergic Signal. 2015, 11, 277–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Cunha, R.A. How does adenosine control neuronal dysfunction and neurodegeneration. J. Neurochem. 2016, 139, 1019–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mackiewicz, M.; Nikonova, E.V.; Zimmermann, J.E.; Romer, M.A.; Cater, J.; Galante, R.J.; Pack, A.I. Age-related changes in adenosine metabolic enzymes in sleep/wake regulatory areas of the brain. Neurobiol. Aging 2006, 27, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zimmermann, H.; Zebisch, M.; Sträter, N. Cellular function and molecular structure of ecto-nucleotidases. Purinergic Signal. 2012, 8, 437–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Cortes, A.; Gracia, E.; Moreno, E.; Mallol, J.; Lluís, C.; Canela, E.I.; Ecasado, V. Moonlighting adenosine deaminase: A target protein for drug development. Med. Res. Rev. 2014, 35, 85–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jeong, S. Molecular and cellular basis of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Cells 2017, 40, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hof, P.R.; Morrison, J.H. The aging brain: Morphomolecular senescence of cortical circuits. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fjell, A.M.; McEvoy, L.; Holland, M.; Dale, A.M.; Walhovd, K.B.; Initiative, A.D.N. What is normal in normal aging? Effects of aging, amyloid and Alzheimer’s disease on the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. Prog. Neurobiol. 2014, 117, 20–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Giannakopoulos, P.; Hof, P.R.; Michel, J.-P.; Guimon, J.; Bouras, C. Cerebral cortex pathology in aging and Alzheimer’s disease: A quantitative survey of large hospital-based geriatric and psychiatric cohorts. Brain Res. Rev. 1997, 25, 217–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Niccoli, T.; Partridge, L. Ageing as a risk factor for disease. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, R741–R752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Davalli, P.; Mitic, T.; Caporali, A.; Lauriola, A.; D’Arca, D. ROS, cell senescence, and novel molecular mechanisms in aging and age-related diseases. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Flurkey, K.; Currer, J.; Harrison, D. The Mouse in Aging Research. In The Mouse in Biomedical Research, 2nd Edition; Fox, J.G., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 637–672. [Google Scholar]
  25. Busquets, O.; Ettcheto, M.; Pallás, M.; Beas-Zarate, C.; Verdaguer, E.; Auladell, C.; Folch, J.; Camins, A. Long-term exposition to a high fat diet favors the appearance of β-amyloid depositions in the brain of C57BL/6J mice. A potential model of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2017, 162, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ishii, T.; Takanashi, Y.; Sugita, K.; Miyazawa, M.; Yanagihara, R.; Yasuda, K.; Onouchi, H.; Kawabe, N.; Nakata, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; et al. Endogenous reactive oxygen species cause astrocyte defects and neuronal dysfunctions in the hippocampus: A new model for aging brain. Aging Cell 2016, 16, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jucker, M.; Ingram, D.K. Murine models of brain aging and age-related neurodegenerative diseases. Behav. Brain Res. 1997, 85, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, B.; Liu, J.; Shi, J.-S. SAMP8 Mice as a model of age-related cognition decline with underlying mechanisms in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020, 75, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Takeda, T.; Hosokawa, M.; Higuchi, K. Senescence-accelerated mouse (SAM): A novel murine model of senescence. Exp. Gerontol. 1997, 32, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Akiguchi, I.; Pallàs, M.; Takahashi, R.; Unno, K.; Higuchi, K.; Hosokawa, M.; Budka, H.; Akiyama, H.; Ueno, M.; Han, J.; et al. SAMP8 mice as a neuropathological model of accelerated brain aging and dementia: Toshio Takeda’s legacy and future directions. Neuropathology 2017, 37, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Pallas, M.; Camins, A.; Smith, M.A.; Perry, G.; Lee, H.G.; Casadesus, G. From aging to Alzheimer’s disease: Unveiling “the switch” with the senescence-accelerated mouse model (SAMP8). J. Alzheimers Dis. 2008, 15, 615–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Morley, J.E.; Farr, S.A.; Kumar, V.B.; Armbrecht, H.J. The SAMP8 mouse: A model to develop therapeutic interventions for Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2012, 18, 1123–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Carter, T.A.; Greenhall, J.A.; Yoshida, S.; Fuchs, S.; Helton, R.; Swaroop, A.; Lockhart, D.J.; Barlow, C. Mechanisms of aging in senescence-accelerated mice. Genome Biol. 2005, 6, R48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Yuan, R.; Tsaih, S.-W.; Petkova, S.B.; De Evsikova, C.M.; Xing, S.; Marion, M.A.; Bogue, M.A.; Mills, K.D.; Peters, L.L.; Bult, C.J.; et al. Aging in inbred strains of mice: Study design and interim report on median lifespans and circulating IGF1 levels. Aging Cell 2009, 8, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Kunstyr, I.; Leuenberger, H.-G.W. Gerontological data of C57BL/6J mice. I. Sex differences in survival curves. J. Gerontol. 1975, 30, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dutta, S.; Sengupta, P. Men and mice: Relating their ages. Life Sci. 2016, 152, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Changarathil, G.; Ramirez, K.; Isoda, H.; Sada, A.; Yanagisawa, H. Wild-type and SAMP8 mice show age-dependent changes in distinct stem cell compartments of the interfollicular epidermis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0215908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sánchez-Melgar, A.; Albasanz, J.L.; Palomera-Ávalos, V.; Pallàs, M.; Martín, M. Resveratrol modulates and reverses the age-related effect on adenosine-mediated signalling in SAMP8 mice. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018, 56, 2881–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Castillo-Sarmiento, C.A.; Albasanz, J.L.; León, D.; Jordan, J.; Pallás, M.; Camins, A.; Martín, M. Age-related expression of adenosine receptors in brain from the senescence-accelerated mouse. Exp. Gerontol. 2009, 44, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. De Oliveira, P.G.; Ramos, M.L.S.; Amaro, A.J.; Dias, R.; Vieira, S.I. Gi/o-protein coupled receptors in the aging brain. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2019, 11, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Cunha, R.A.; Constantino, M.D.; Sebastião, A.M.; Ribeiro, J.A. Modification of A-i and A2a adenosine receptor binding in aged striatum, hippocampus and cortex of the rat. NeuroReport 1995, 6, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cunha, R.A. Overactivity of neuronal adenosine A2A receptors accelerates neurodegeneration. Brain 2019, 142, 3323–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Stone, T.W.; Ceruti, S.; Maria, A. Adenosine receptors and neurological disease: Neuroprotection and neurodegeneration. cGMP: Gener. Eff. Ther. Implic. 2009, 193, 535–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kelly, M.P. Cyclic nucleotide signaling changes associated with normal aging and age-related diseases of the brain. Cell. Signal. 2018, 42, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hadem, I.K.H.; Majaw, T.; Kharbuli, B.; Sharma, R. Beneficial effects of dietary restriction in aging brain. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2019, 95, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Morgunova, G.V.; Klebanov, A.A. Age-related AMP-activated protein kinase alterations: From cellular energetics to longevity. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2019, 37, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. López-Otín, C.; Galluzzi, L.; Freije, J.M.P.; Madeo, F.; Kroemer, G. Metabolic control of longevity. Cell 2016, 166, 802–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Peixoto, C.A.; De Oliveira, W.H.; Araújo, S.M.D.R.; Nunes, A.K.S. AMPK activation: Role in the signaling pathways of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. Exp. Neurol. 2017, 298, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Y.-J.; Chern, Y. AMPK-mediated regulation of neuronal metabolism and function in brain diseases. J. Neurogenet. 2015, 29, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hardie, D.G.; Ross, F.A.; Hawley, S.A. AMPK: A nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 13, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Mihaylova, M.M.; Shaw, R.J. The AMPK signalling pathway coordinates cell growth, autophagy and metabolism. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13, 1016–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zimmermann, H.R.; Yang, W.; Kasica, N.P.; Zhou, X.; Wang, X.; Beckelman, B.C.; Lee, J.; Furdui, C.M.; Keene, C.D.; Ma, T. Brain-specific repression of AMPKα1 alleviates pathophysiology in Alzheimer’s model mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Herzig, S.; Shaw, R.J. AMPK: Guardian of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 19, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Aymerich, I.; Foufelle, F.; Ferré, P.; Casado, F.J.; Pastor-Anglada, M. Extracellular adenosine activates AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK). J. Cell Sci. 2006, 119, 1612–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Aw, D.K.L.; Sinha, R.A.; Xie, S.Y.; Yen, P.M. Differential AMPK phosphorylation by glucagon and metformin regulates insulin signaling in human hepatic cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 447, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fredholm, B.B.; Chen, J.-F.; Masino, S.A.; Vaugeois, J.-M. Actions of adenosine at its receptors in the CNS: Insights from knockouts and drugs. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005, 45, 385–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Leon-Navarro, J.L.A.A.M.M.D.A.; Albasanz, J.L.; Martín, M. Functional cross-talk between adenosine and metabotropic glutamate receptors. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2019, 17, 422–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Segovia, G.; Porras, A.; Del Arco, A.; Mora, F. Glutamatergic neurotransmission in aging: A critical perspective. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2001, 122, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kumar, A.; Foster, T. Alteration in NMDA Receptor mediated glutamatergic neurotransmission in the hippocampus during senescence. Neurochem. Res. 2018, 44, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tzschentke, T.M. Glutamatergic mechanisms in different disease states: Overview and therapeutical implications-An introduction. Amino Acids 2002, 23, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gleichmann, M.; Chow, V.W.; Mattson, M.P. Homeostatic disinhibition in the aging brain and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2011, 24, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Treyer, V.; Gietl, A.F.; Suliman, H.; Gruber, E.; Meyer, R.; Buchmann, A.; Johayem, A.; Unschuld, P.G.; Nitsch, R.M.; Buck, A.; et al. Reduced uptake of [11C]- ABP688, a PET tracer for metabolic glutamate receptor 5 in hippocampus and amygdala in Alzheimer’s dementia. Brain Behav. 2020, 10, e01632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Albasanz, J.L.; Dalfó, E.; Ferrer, I.; Martín, M.; Martín, M. Impaired metabotropic glutamate receptor/phospholipase C signaling pathway in the cerebral cortex in Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies correlates with stage of Alzheimer’s-disease-related changes. Neurobiol. Dis. 2005, 20, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sánchez-Melgar, A.; Albasanz, J.L.; Pallás, M.; Martin, M. Resveratrol Differently Modulates Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors depending on age in SAMP8 mice. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2020, 11, 1770–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Boison, D.; Yegutkin, G.G. Adenosine metabolism: Emerging concepts for cancer therapy. Cancer Cell 2019, 36, 582–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kovacs, Z.; Juhasz, G.; Dobolyi, A.; Bobest, M.; Papp, V.; Takáts, L.; Kekesi, K.A. Gender-and age-dependent changes in nucleoside levels in the cerebral cortex and white matter of the human brain. Brain Res. Bull. 2010, 81, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bellé, L.P.; De Bona, K.S.; Abdalla, F.H.; Pimentel, V.C.; Pigatto, A.S.; Moretto, M.B. Comparative evaluation of adenosine deaminase activity in cerebral cortex and hippocampus of young and adult rats: Effect of garlic extract (Allium sativum L.) on their susceptibility to heavy metal exposure. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2009, 104, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shoji, H.; Miyakawa, T. Age-related behavioral changes from young to old age in male mice of a C57BL/6J strain maintained under a genetic stability program. Neuropsychopharmacol. Rep. 2019, 39, 100–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dong, Y.; Guo, C.; Chen, D.; Chen, S.; Peng, Y.; Song, H.; Shi, J. Association between age-related hearing loss and cognitive decline in C57BL/6J mice. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 18, 1726–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ma, L.; Wang, R.; Dong, W.; Zhao, Z. Caloric restriction can improve learning and memory in C57/BL mice probably via regulation of the AMPK signaling pathway. Exp. Gerontol. 2018, 102, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, F.; Benashski, S.E.; Persky, R.; Xu, Y.; Li, J.; McCullough, L.D. Age-related changes in AMP-activated protein kinase after stroke. AGE 2011, 34, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Baranowski, B.J.; Bott, K.N.; MacPherson, R.E.K. Evaluation of neuropathological effects of a high-fat high-sucrose diet in middle-aged male C57BL6/J mice. Physiol. Rep. 2018, 6, e13729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, H.-S.; Moon, S.; Paik, J.-H.; Shin, D.W.; Kim, L.S.; Park, C.-S.; Ha, J.; Kang, J.-H. Activation of the 5′-AMP-Activated Protein Kinase in the Cerebral Cortex of Young Senescence-Accelerated P8 mice and association with GSK3β-and PP2A-dependent inhibition of p-tau396 expression. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2015, 46, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Vingtdeux, V.; Davies, P.; Dickson, D.W.; Marambaud, P. AMPK is abnormally activated in tangle-and pre-tangle-bearing neurons in Alzheimer’s disease and other tauopathies. Acta Neuropathol. 2010, 121, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Dienel, G.A. Brain glucose metabolism: Integration of energetics with function. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 949–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Fujibayashi, Y.; Waki, A.; Wada, K.; Ueno, M.; Magata, Y.; Yonekura, Y.; Konishi, J.; Takeda, T.; Yokoyama, A. differential aging pattern of cerebral accumulation of radiolabeled glucose and amino acid in the senescence accelerated mouse (SAM), a new model for the study of memory impairment. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1994, 17, 102–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Sato, E.; Inoue, A.; Kurokawa, T.; Ishibashi, S. Early changes in glucose metabolism in the cerebrum of senescence accelerated mouse: Involvement of glucose transporter. Brain Res. 1994, 637, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ohta, H.; Nishikawa, H.; Hirai, K.; Kato, K.; Miyamoto, M. Relationship of impaired brain glucose metabolism to learning deficit in the senescence-accelerated mouse. Neurosci. Lett. 1996, 217, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kondziella, D.; Hammer, J.; Sletvold, O.; Sonnewald, U. The pentylenetetrazole-kindling model of epilepsy in SAMP8 mice: Glial-neuronal metabolic interactions. Neurochem. Int. 2003, 43, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kondziella, D.; Bidar, A.; Urfjell, B.; Sletvold, O.; Sonnewald, U. The pentylenetetrazole-kindling model of epilepsy in SAMP8 mice: Behavior and metabolism. Neurochem. Int. 2002, 40, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, H.-W.; Chan, Y.-C.; Wei, C.-C.; Chen, Y.-A.; Wang, M.-F.; Chang, S.-J. An alternative model for studying age-associated metabolic complications: Senescence-accelerated mouse prone 8. Exp. Gerontol. 2017, 99, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, X.; Li, G.; Guo, L.; Nie, K.; Jia, Y.; Zhao, L.; Yu, J. Age-related alteration in cerebral blood flow and energy failure is correlated with cognitive impairment in the senescence-accelerated prone mouse strain 8 (SAMP8). Neurol. Sci. 2013, 34, 1917–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. García-Matas, S.; Gutierrez-Cuesta, J.; Coto-Montes, A.; Rubio-Acero, R.; Díez-Vives, C.; Camins, A.; Pallàs, M.; Sanfeliu, C.; Cristòfol, R. Dysfunction of astrocytes in senescence-accelerated mice SAMP8 reduces their neuroprotective capacity. Aging Cell 2008, 7, 630–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Pertusa, M.; García-Matas, S.; Rodríguez-Farré, E.; Sanfeliu, C.; Cristòfol, R. Astrocytes aged in vitro show a decreased neuroprotective capacity. J. Neurochem. 2007, 101, 794–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Rothstein, J.D.; Dykes-Hoberg, M.; Pardo, C.A.; Bristol, L.A.; Jin, L.; Kuncl, R.W.; Kanai, Y.; Hediger, M.A.; Wang, Y.; Schielke, J.P.; et al. Knockout of glutamate transporters reveals a major role for astroglial transport in excitotoxicity and clearance of glutamate. Neuron 1996, 16, 675–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Han, X.; Zhang, T.; Liu, H.; Mi, Y.; Gou, X. Astrocyte senescence and Alzheimer’s disease: A review. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2020, 12, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Cheng, X.-R.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, Y.-X. Expression of VGLUTs contributes to degeneration and acquisition of learning and memory. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2011, 95, 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Waller, S.B.; Ingram, N.K.; Reynolds, M.A.; London, E.D. Age and strain comparisons of neurotransmitter synthetic enzyme activities in the mouse. J. Neurochem. 1983, 41, 1421–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hascup, E.; Broderick, S.O.; Russell, M.K.; Fang, Y.; Bartke, A.; Boger, H.A.; Hascup, K. Diet-induced insulin resistance elevates hippocampal glutamate as well as VGLUT1 and GFAP expression in AβPP/PS1 mice. J. Neurochem. 2019, 148, 219–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Kitamura, Y.; Zhao, X.-H.; Ohnuki, T.; Takei, M.; Nomura, Y. Age-related changes in transmitter glutamate and NMDA receptor/channels in the brain of senescence-accelerated mouse. Neurosci. Lett. 1992, 137, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Griñán-Ferré, C.; Corpas, R.; Puigoriol-Illamola, D.; Palomera-Avalos, V.; Sanfeliu, C.; Pallás, M. Understanding epigenetics in the neurodegeneration of Alzheimer’s disease: SAMP8 mouse model. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2018, 62, 943–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Morley, J.E.; Armbrecht, H.J.; Farr, S.A.; Kumar, V.B. The senescence accelerated mouse (SAMP8) as a model for oxidative stress and Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Basis Dis. 2012, 1822, 650–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Choudhury, H.; Chellappan, D.K.; Sengupta, P.; Pandey, M.; Gorain, B. Adenosine receptors in modulation of central nervous system disorders. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 2808–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Poole, R.L.; Braak, D.; Gould, T.J. Concentration-and age-dependent effects of chronic caffeine on contextual fear conditioning in C57BL/6J mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 298, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Espinosa, J.; Rocha, A.S.; Nunes, F.; Costa, M.S.; Schein, V.; Kazlauckas, V.; Kalinine, E.; Souza, D.O.; Cunha, R.A.; Porciúncula, L.O. Caffeine consumption prevents memory impairment, neuronal damage, and adenosine A2A receptors upregulation in the hippocampus of a rat model of sporadic dementia. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2013, 34, 509–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Temido-Ferreira, M.; Ferreira, D.G.; Batalha, V.L.; Marques-Morgado, I.; Coelho, J.E.; Pereira, P.; Gomes, R.; Pinto, A.; Carvalho, S.; Canas, P.M.; et al. Age-related shift in LTD is dependent on neuronal adenosine A2A receptors interplay with mGluR5 and NMDA receptors. Mol. Psychiatry 2018, 1, 1876–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Deckert, J.; Abel, F.; Künig, G.; Hartmann, J.; Senitz, D.; Maier, H.; Ransmayr, G.; Riederer, P. Loss of human hippocampal adenosine A1 receptors in dementia: Evidence for lack of specificity. Neurosci. Lett. 1998, 244, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kalaria, R.; Sromek, S.; Wilcox, B.; Unnerstall, J. Hippocampal adenosine A1 receptors are decreased in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 1990, 118, 257–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ciruela, F.; Ecasado, V.; Rodrigues, R.J.; Lujan, R.; Burgueño, J.; Canals, M.; Borycz, J.; Rebola, N.; Goldberg, S.R.; Mallol, J.; et al. Presynaptic control of striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission by adenosine A1–A2A receptor heteromers. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 2080–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Nedeljkovic, N. Complex regulation of ecto-5’-nucleotidase/CD73 and A2AR-mediated adenosine signaling at neurovascular unit: A link between acute and chronic neuroinflammation. Pharmacol. Res. 2019, 144, 99–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rebola, N.; Lujan, R.; Cunha, R.A.; Mulle, C. Adenosine A2A receptors are essential for long-term potentiation of NMDA-EPSCs at hippocampal mossy fiber synapses. Neuron 2008, 57, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Augusto, E.; Matos, M.; Sévigny, J.; El-Tayeb, A.; Bynoe, M.S.; Müller, C.E.; Cunha, R.A.; Chen, J.-F. Ecto-5’-nucleotidase (CD73)-mediated formation of adenosine is critical for the striatal adenosine A2A receptor functions. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33, 11390–11399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. León, D.; Albasanz, J.L.; Ruíz, M.A.; Fernández, M.; Martín, M. Adenosine A1 receptor down-regulation in mothers and fetal brain after caffeine and theophylline treatments to pregnant rats. J. Neurochem. 2002, 82, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. León-Navarro, D.A.; Albasanz, J.L.; Martín, M.; Martín, M. Hyperthermia-induced seizures alter adenosine A1and A2Areceptors and 5′-nucleotidase activity in rat cerebral cortex. J. Neurochem. 2015, 134, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 21 07300 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Adenosine and related metabolites together with their converting enzymes. AMP, adenosine monophosphate; ecto-5′NT (CD73), ecto-5′-nucleotidase; ADA, adenosine deaminase; PNP, purine nucleoside phosphorylase; XO, xanthine oxidase; GMP, guanosine monophosphate; HGPRT, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase; IMP, inosine monophosphate; AMPK, adenosine-monophosphate-activated protein kinase; PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase; ADK, adenosine kinase; SAHH, S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase; ENT, equilibrative nucleoside transporter; CNT, concentrative nucleoside transporter 2; AC, adenylyl cyclase.
Scheme 1. Adenosine and related metabolites together with their converting enzymes. AMP, adenosine monophosphate; ecto-5′NT (CD73), ecto-5′-nucleotidase; ADA, adenosine deaminase; PNP, purine nucleoside phosphorylase; XO, xanthine oxidase; GMP, guanosine monophosphate; HGPRT, hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase; IMP, inosine monophosphate; AMPK, adenosine-monophosphate-activated protein kinase; PKA, cAMP-dependent protein kinase; ADK, adenosine kinase; SAHH, S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase; ENT, equilibrative nucleoside transporter; CNT, concentrative nucleoside transporter 2; AC, adenylyl cyclase.
Ijms 21 07300 sch001
Ijms 21 07300 g001 550
Figure 1. 5′-Nucleotidase activity during aging in the cerebral cortex from senescence-accelerated mouse (SAM) mice. Plasma membrane and cytosolic fraction were obtained from the cerebral cortex of 3-, 6-, and 12-month-old mice, and 5′-nucleotidase (5’NT) was measured as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data are mean ± SEM from three to five different samples. Two-way ANOVA revealed * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 are significantly different from the 3-month value; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001 are significantly different from the corresponding age-matched SAMR1 value; & p < 0.05 is significantly different from the indicated value at 6 months.
Figure 1. 5′-Nucleotidase activity during aging in the cerebral cortex from senescence-accelerated mouse (SAM) mice. Plasma membrane and cytosolic fraction were obtained from the cerebral cortex of 3-, 6-, and 12-month-old mice, and 5′-nucleotidase (5’NT) was measured as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data are mean ± SEM from three to five different samples. Two-way ANOVA revealed * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 are significantly different from the 3-month value; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, and ### p < 0.001 are significantly different from the corresponding age-matched SAMR1 value; & p < 0.05 is significantly different from the indicated value at 6 months.
Ijms 21 07300 g001
Ijms 21 07300 g002 550
Figure 2. 5′-Nucleotidase activity during aging in the cerebral cortex from C57BL/6J mice. Plasma membrane and cytosolic fractions were obtained from the cerebral cortex of 4- and 24-month-old mice. Data are mean ± SEM of three to five different samples.
Figure 2. 5′-Nucleotidase activity during aging in the cerebral cortex from C57BL/6J mice. Plasma membrane and cytosolic fractions were obtained from the cerebral cortex of 4- and 24-month-old mice. Data are mean ± SEM of three to five different samples.
Ijms 21 07300 g002
Ijms 21 07300 g003 550
Figure 3. Adenosine deaminase activity during aging. (a) The plasma membrane was obtained from the cerebral cortex of 3-, 6-, and 12-month-old SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice, and adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity was measured as described in the Materials and Methods section. (b) ADA activity measured in the plasma membrane from the cerebral cortex of 4- and 24-month-old C57BL/6J mice. Data are mean ± SEM from three to five different samples. Two-way ANOVA revealed * p < 0.05 is significantly different from the 3-month value; && p < 0.01 is significantly different from the indicated value at 6 months.
Figure 3. Adenosine deaminase activity during aging. (a) The plasma membrane was obtained from the cerebral cortex of 3-, 6-, and 12-month-old SAMR1 and SAMP8 mice, and adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity was measured as described in the Materials and Methods section. (b) ADA activity measured in the plasma membrane from the cerebral cortex of 4- and 24-month-old C57BL/6J mice. Data are mean ± SEM from three to five different samples. Two-way ANOVA revealed * p < 0.05 is significantly different from the 3-month value; && p < 0.01 is significantly different from the indicated value at 6 months.
Ijms 21 07300 g003
Ijms 21 07300 g004 550
Figure 4. Adenosine and related metabolite levels during aging in the cerebral cortex from SAM mice. Adenosine (a), inosine (b), xanthine (c), hypoxanthine (d), and guanosine (e) were measured by HPLC in the cytosolic fraction from the cerebral cortex of 3-, 6-, and 12-month-old mice, as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data are mean ± SEM from three to five different samples. Two-way ANOVA revealed: * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 are significantly different from the 3-month value; # p < 0.05 is significantly different from the corresponding age-matched SAMR1 value; & p < 0.05 is significantly different from the indicated value at 6 months.
Figure 4. Adenosine and related metabolite levels during aging in the cerebral cortex from SAM mice. Adenosine (a), inosine (b), xanthine (c), hypoxanthine (d), and guanosine (e) were measured by HPLC in the cytosolic fraction from the cerebral cortex of 3-, 6-, and 12-month-old mice, as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data are mean ± SEM from three to five different samples. Two-way ANOVA revealed: * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 are significantly different from the 3-month value; # p < 0.05 is significantly different from the corresponding age-matched SAMR1 value; & p < 0.05 is significantly different from the indicated value at 6 months.
Ijms 21 07300 g004
Ijms 21 07300 g005 550
Figure 5. Adenosine and related metabolite levels during aging in the cerebral cortex from C57BL/6J mice. Adenosine, inosine, xanthine, hypoxanthine, and guanosine were measured by HPLC in the cytosolic fraction from the cerebral cortex of 4- and 24-month-old mice, as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data are mean ± SEM from four to seven different samples. * p < 0.05 is significantly different from the 4-month value according to the Student’s t-test.
Figure 5. Adenosine and related metabolite levels during aging in the cerebral cortex from C57BL/6J mice. Adenosine, inosine, xanthine, hypoxanthine, and guanosine were measured by HPLC in the cytosolic fraction from the cerebral cortex of 4- and 24-month-old mice, as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data are mean ± SEM from four to seven different samples. * p < 0.05 is significantly different from the 4-month value according to the Student’s t-test.
Ijms 21 07300 g005
Ijms 21 07300 g006 550
Figure 6. AMPK and p-AMPK levels during aging in the cerebral cortex from SAM and C57BL76J mice. Cytosolic fractions of the cerebral cortex from SAMR1 (a), SAMP8 (b), and C57BL/6J (c) mice were used to analyze the amount of AMPK and its activated state (p-AMPK). Western blots were performed as described in the Materials and Methods section. GAPDH was used as a gel loading control. Data are mean ± SEM of three to seven different animals. One-way ANOVA revealed *** p < 0.001 is significantly different from the 3-month value; & p < 0.05 is significantly different from the indicated value at 6 months.
Figure 6. AMPK and p-AMPK levels during aging in the cerebral cortex from SAM and C57BL76J mice. Cytosolic fractions of the cerebral cortex from SAMR1 (a), SAMP8 (b), and C57BL/6J (c) mice were used to analyze the amount of AMPK and its activated state (p-AMPK). Western blots were performed as described in the Materials and Methods section. GAPDH was used as a gel loading control. Data are mean ± SEM of three to seven different animals. One-way ANOVA revealed *** p < 0.001 is significantly different from the 3-month value; & p < 0.05 is significantly different from the indicated value at 6 months.
Ijms 21 07300 g006
Ijms 21 07300 g007 550
Figure 7. Glutamate levels in the cerebral cortex from SAM mice. The cytosolic fraction of the cerebral cortex from 3-, 6-, and 12-month-old mice were used to quantify the glutamate level as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data are mean ± SEM of three to five different samples. Two-way ANOVA revealed # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 is significantly different from the corresponding age-matched SAMR1 value; && p < 0.01 is significantly different from the indicated value at 6 months.
Figure 7. Glutamate levels in the cerebral cortex from SAM mice. The cytosolic fraction of the cerebral cortex from 3-, 6-, and 12-month-old mice were used to quantify the glutamate level as described in the Materials and Methods section. Data are mean ± SEM of three to five different samples. Two-way ANOVA revealed # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01 is significantly different from the corresponding age-matched SAMR1 value; && p < 0.01 is significantly different from the indicated value at 6 months.
Ijms 21 07300 g007
Ijms 21 07300 g008 550
Figure 8. Glutamate levels in the cerebral cortex from C57BL/6J mice. Glutamate was quantified in the cytosolic fraction of the cerebral cortex from 4- and 24-month-old mice, as described in the Materials and Methods. Data are mean ± SEM of three to five different samples. ** p < 0.01 is significantly different according to the Student’s t-test.
Figure 8. Glutamate levels in the cerebral cortex from C57BL/6J mice. Glutamate was quantified in the cytosolic fraction of the cerebral cortex from 4- and 24-month-old mice, as described in the Materials and Methods. Data are mean ± SEM of three to five different samples. ** p < 0.01 is significantly different according to the Student’s t-test.
Ijms 21 07300 g008
Ijms 21 07300 g009 550
Figure 9. Excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2) levels during aging in the cerebral cortex from SAM and C57BL76J mice. Plasma membrane fractions of the cerebral cortex from SAMR1 (a), SAMP8 (b), and C57BL/6J (c) mice were used to analyze the amount of EAAT2. Western blots were performed as described in the Materials and Methods section. GAPDH was used as a gel loading control. Data are mean ± SEM of three to seven different animals. One-way ANOVA revealed * p < 0.05 is significantly different from the 3-month value; && p < 0.01 is significantly different from the value at 6 months.
Figure 9. Excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2) levels during aging in the cerebral cortex from SAM and C57BL76J mice. Plasma membrane fractions of the cerebral cortex from SAMR1 (a), SAMP8 (b), and C57BL/6J (c) mice were used to analyze the amount of EAAT2. Western blots were performed as described in the Materials and Methods section. GAPDH was used as a gel loading control. Data are mean ± SEM of three to seven different animals. One-way ANOVA revealed * p < 0.05 is significantly different from the 3-month value; && p < 0.01 is significantly different from the value at 6 months.
Ijms 21 07300 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sánchez-Melgar, A.; Albasanz, J.L.; Pallàs, M.; Martín, M. Adenosine Metabolism in the Cerebral Cortex from Several Mice Models during Aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197300

AMA Style

Sánchez-Melgar A, Albasanz JL, Pallàs M, Martín M. Adenosine Metabolism in the Cerebral Cortex from Several Mice Models during Aging. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(19):7300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197300

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sánchez-Melgar, Alejandro, José Luis Albasanz, Mercè Pallàs, and Mairena Martín. 2020. "Adenosine Metabolism in the Cerebral Cortex from Several Mice Models during Aging" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 19: 7300. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197300

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop