Next Article in Journal
FOXC2 Disease Mutations Identified in Lymphedema Distichiasis Patients Impair Transcriptional Activity and Cell Proliferation
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of a Cognitive Training Program on the Platelet APP Ratio in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
CRISPR/Cas9-Based Mutagenesis of Starch Biosynthetic Genes in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea Batatas) for the Improvement of Starch Quality
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

CRISPR/Cas9: A Robust Genome-Editing Tool with Versatile Functions and Endless Application

Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(14), 5111; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145111
Submission received: 13 July 2020 / Accepted: 17 July 2020 / Published: 20 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genome Editing in Plants)
Since a potential genome editing tool was first recognized in 2012 [1,2], the CRISPR/Cas9 system has been becoming a powerful and robust genome editing tool for gene function study and crop improvement. Over the past decade, as new Cas enzymes have been identified, current Cas9 enzymes modified, and new bioinformatics tools developed, CRISPR/Cas9-based research has been developing extremely quickly. Particularly, the modification of Cas enzymes has significantly boosted the application potentials of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing [3]. Although there are many other Cas enzymes identified and utilized in genome editing, the CRISPR/Cas9 system currently refers to any CRISPR/Cas system, including Cas12 and Cas13, majorly due to the fact that Cas9 is the first and most commonly used Cas enzyme in genome editing [4]. At present, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing has been widely used in many plant species, including both model plant species and agriculturally important crops, such as wheat [5], cotton [6] and soybean [7], not only for gene functional study but also for crop improvement. To facilitate the quick development and application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. We edited this Special Issue of “Genome Editing in Plants”. In a short time period, this Special Issue attracted a lot of attention from the scientific field and industries. Finally, after the expert peer review, a total of 15 papers were accepted to be published in this Special Issue of International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Among the 15 published papers, three are timely review papers. Jansing and colleagues (2019) reviewed the technical and practical consideration of genome editing in agriculture, particularly focusing on the current delivery method of the CRISPR/Cas9 system into plant cells and their regeneration methods. They also discussed the suitability of CRISPR/Cas9 for improving different traits of agriculturally important crops [8]. Among all crops, significant progress has been made in rice using CRISPR/Cas genome editing technology. In a review written by Fiaz and colleagues (2019), they reviewed the current status of CRISPR/Cas9 on rice improvement, particularly on rice grain quality improvement [9]. Increasing CRISPR/Cas9 on-target efficiency and reducing the off-target effect is always a major topic for genome editing. A lot of offers have been added into this field in the past half-decade. In this Special Issue, Hajiahmadi and colleagues (2019) reviewed the major strategies for reducing the off-target effect of CRISPR/Cas9. They thought that the combination of single guide RNA (sgRNA) and a ligand-dependent aptazyme strategy may be a great strategy for decreasing the frequency of off-target mutations in plants [10].
The remaining 12 research articles are associated with 12 different plant species, including rice [11], cotton [12], wheat [13,14], Brassica napus [15], soybean [16], sweet potato [17], cowpea [18], tomato [19], potato [19], chicory [20] and model plant Arabidopsis [21], as well as alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii [22]. From here, it is clearly seen that more and more research has been focused on agriculturally important crops. The majority of these studies employed traditional CRISPR/Cas9 technology to knock out an individual gene, except one study, which employed the CRISPR/Cas9 base editor to create a transgene-free genome editing tomato and potato [19]. Among these studies, the majority of them worked on agriculturally important traits. For example, Wang and colleagues (2019) studied the function of IbGBSSI and IbSBEII genes in starch biosynthesis in sweet potato by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing [17]. Chen and colleagues investigated the function of the M-locus protein kinase (MLPK) BnaMLPKs, the functional homolog of BrMLPKs in Brassica rapa [15]. Chen and colleagues used Arabidopsis as a model to study the role of DPA4 and SOD7 genes in seed development and response to abiotic stress [21]. All these studies have provided new tools and/or new insight into our understanding of agriculturally important traits.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gasiunas, G.; Barrangou, R.; Horvath, P.; Siksnys, V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E2579–E2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jinek, M.; Chylinski, K.; Fonfara, I.; Hauer, M.; Doudna, J.A. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial i9mmunity. Science 2012, 337, 816–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, D.; Zhang, B. SpRY: Engineered CRISPR/Cas9 Harnesses New Genome-Editing Power. Trends Genet. 2020, 36, 546–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Iranzo, J.; Shmakov, S.A.; Alkhnbashi, O.S.; Brouns, S.J.J.; Charpentier, E.; Cheng, D.; Haft, D.H.; Horvath, P.; et al. Evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems: A burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shan, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, K.; Liang, Z.; Zhang, K.; Liu, J.; Xi, J.J.; Qiu, J.-L.; et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 686–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, C.; Unver, T.; Zhang, B. A high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted mutagenesis in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Jacobs, T.B.; Lafayette, P.R.; Schmitz, R.J.; Parrott, W.A. Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnol. 2015, 15, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jansing, J.; Schiermeyer, A.; Schillberg, S.; Fischer, R.; Bortesi, L. Genome Editing in Agriculture: Technical and Practical Considerations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Fiaz, S.; Ahmad, S.; Noor, M.A.; Wang, X.; Younas, A.; Riaz, A.; Riaz, A.; Ali, F. Applications of the CRISPR/Cas9 System for Rice Grain Quality Improvement: Perspectives and Opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hajiahmadi, Z.; Movahedi, A.; Wei, H.; Li, D.; Orooji, Y.; Ruan, H.; Zhuge, Q. Strategies to Increase On-Target, and Reduce Off.-Target. Effects of the CRISPR/Cas9 System in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3719. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wu, T.-M.; Huang, J.-Z.; Oung, H.-M.; Hsu, Y.T.; Tsai, Y.-C.; Hong, C.-Y. H2O2-Based Method for Rapid Detection of Transgene-Free Rice Plants from Segregating CRISPR/Cas9 Genome-Edited Progenies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Zhu, S.; Yu, X.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Sun, J. Highly Efficient Targeted Gene Editing in Upland Cotton Using the CRISPR/Cas9 System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Slim, A.; Piarulli, L.; Kourda, H.C.; Rouaissi, M.; Robbana, C.; Chaabane, R.; Pignone, D.; Montemurro, C.; Mangini, G. Genetic Structure Analysis of a Collection of Tunisian Durum Wheat Germplasm. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zhang, S.; Zhang, R.; Gao, J.; Gu, T.; Song, G.; Li, W.; Li, D.; Li, Y.; Li, G. Highly Efficient and Heritable Targeted Mutagenesis in Wheat via the Agrobacteriumtumefaciens-Mediated CRISPR/Cas9 System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chen, F.; Yang, Y.; Li, B.; Liu, Z.; Khan, F.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, G.; Tu, J.; Shen, J.; Yi, B.; et al. Functional Analysis of M-Locus Protein Kinase Revealed a Novel Regulatory Mechanism of Self-Incompatibility in Brassica napus L. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Cai, Y.; Chen, L.; Sun, S.; Wu, C.; Yao, W.; Jiang, B.; Han, T.; Hou, W. CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Deletion of Large Genomic Fragments in Soybean. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Fan, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, S.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, P. CRISPR/Cas9-Based Mutagenesis of Starch Biosynthetic Genes in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea Batatas) for the Improvement of Starch Quality. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ji, J.; Zhang, C.; Sun, Z.; Wang, L.; Duanmu, D.; Fan, Q. Genome Editing in Cowpea Vigna unguiculata Using CRISPR-Cas9. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Veillet, F.; Perrot, L.; Chauvin, L.; Kermarrec, M.-P.; Guyon-Debast, A.; Chauvin, J.-E.; Nogué, F.; Mazier, M. Transgene-Free Genome Editing in Tomato and Potato Plants Using Agrobacterium-Mediated Delivery of a CRISPR/Cas9 Cytidine Base Editor. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bernard, G.; Gagneul, D.; Dos Santos, H.A.; Etienne, A.; Hilbert, J.-L.; Rambaud, C. Efficient Genome Editing Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in Chicory. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chen, S.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, G.; Tian, H.; Hussain, S.; Ahmed, S.; Wang, T.; Wang, S. Genome Editing to Integrate Seed Size and Abiotic Stress Tolerance Traits in Arabidopsis Reveals a Role for DPA4 and SOD7 in the Regulation of Inflorescence Architecture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Guzmán-Zapata, D.; Sandoval-Vargas, J.M.; Macedo-Osorio, K.S.; Salgado-Manjarrez, E.; Castrejón-Flores, J.L.; Oliver-Salvador, M.D.C.; Durán-Figueroa, N.V.; Nogué, F.; Badillo-Corona, J. Efficient Editing of the Nuclear APT Reporter Gene in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii via Expression of a CRISPR-Cas9 Module. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, B. CRISPR/Cas9: A Robust Genome-Editing Tool with Versatile Functions and Endless Application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145111

AMA Style

Zhang B. CRISPR/Cas9: A Robust Genome-Editing Tool with Versatile Functions and Endless Application. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(14):5111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145111

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Baohong. 2020. "CRISPR/Cas9: A Robust Genome-Editing Tool with Versatile Functions and Endless Application" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 14: 5111. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145111

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop