Next Article in Journal
Aortic Valve Stenosis and Mitochondrial Dysfunctions: Clinical and Molecular Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
The Interaction Network and Signaling Specificity of Two-Component System in Arabidopsis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms21144897
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comprehensive Characterization of Secondary Metabolites from Colebrookea oppositifolia (Smith) Leaves from Nepal and Assessment of Cytotoxic Effect and Anti-Nf-κB and AP-1 Activities In Vitro

by
Gregorio Peron
1,*,
Jan Hošek
2,
Ganga Prasad Phuyal
3,
Dharma Raj Kandel
3,
Rameshwar Adhikari
3 and
Stefano Dall’Acqua
1
1
Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 5, 35131 Padova, Italy
2
Division of Biologically Active Complexes and Molecular Magnets, Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Faculty of Science, Palacký University in Olomouc, Šlechtitelů 27, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic
3
Research Centre for Applied Science and Technology, Tribhuvan University, Kiritipur, 44613 Kathmandu, Nepal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(14), 4897; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144897
Submission received: 20 June 2020 / Revised: 2 July 2020 / Accepted: 9 July 2020 / Published: 11 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Here we report the comprehensive characterization of the secondary metabolites from the leaves of Colebrookea oppositifolia Smith, a species used as medicinal plant in the traditional medicine of Nepal. Phytochemical screening of bioactives was performed using an integrated LC-MSn and high resolution MS (Mass Spectrometry) approach. Forty-three compounds were tentatively identified, mainly aglyconic and glycosilated flavonoids and phenolic acids, as well as other bioactives such as coumarins and terpenes were detected. Furthermore, the NF-κB and AP-1 inhibitory activity of C. oppositifolia extract were evaluated, as well as its cytotoxicity against THP-1 cells, in order to assess the potential use of this herb as a source of anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic compounds. The results so far obtained indicate that C. oppositifolia leaves extract could significantly reduce the viability of THP-1 cells (IC50 = 6.2 ± 1.2 µg/mL), as well as the activation of both NF-κB and AP-1 at the concentration of 2 μg/mL. Our results indicate that Nepalese C. oppositifolia is a valuable source of anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic compounds. The phytochemical composition reported here can partially justify the traditional uses of C. oppositifolia in Nepal, especially in the treatment of inflammatory diseases, although further research will be needed to assess the full potential of this species.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Colebrookea oppositifolia Smith is the only species of the Colebrookea genus (Lamiaceae). This plant, commonly known as “Indian squirrel tail”, is widely distributed in the subtropical regions of India, Nepal, Pakistan, Myanmar, Thailand, and China, where it grows in hills and plains at altitudes of 250–1700 m [1]. The aerial part of C. oppositifolia consists on a branched shrub up to 1.5–3 m tall, with quadrangular stems and elliptic to ovate-elliptic darkish green leaves, 10–18 cm long × 3.5–7.5 cm large, acuminate, with crenulate to serrulate margins, whitish tomentose beneath. The plant shows tiny white flowers arranged in panicles of 1.5–11 cm-long upright spikes, that look hairy and resemble a squirrel’s tail [2]. In Nepal, C. oppositifolia is traditionally known as dhusure, dosul, dhulsu, or dhursuli, and its leaves are used mainly to treat ailments of the ocular region such as cataract, corneal opacity, and keratoconjunctivitis, and as anthelmintic [3,4]. In India and China, this herb has been extensively utilized as a traditional remedy for several other ailments, such as headache, fever, dysentery, peptic ulcer, dermatitis, and wounds [5], although its most frequent use is for the treatment of epilepsy, for which the roots of the plant are considered [6]. Medicinal preparations based on aerial parts of C. oppositifolia are used by Dai people of the Yunnan province of China as anti-inflammatory, specifically for the treatment of fractures, traumatic injuries, and rheumatoid arthritis [7]. Nevertheless, studies on C. oppositifolia have shown that the different parts of this plant could exert several other pharmacological activities [5]: the whole plant and the roots have been reported as effective as antioxidant [8], anticonvulsant [9], and antiulcer [1] agents, while the leaves have been investigated for their cardio-protective [1], anti-fertility [10], and antibacterial [11] properties. However, to the best of our knowledge, the phytochemical composition of this plant remains scarcely explored, and the majority of these bioactivities have not been attributed to specific compounds yet. Flavonoids such as apigenin, alnustin, mosloflavone [12], and flavonoid glycosides such as negletein-6-O-β-d-glucopyranoside and 5,7,2′-trihydroxyflavone-2′-O-β-d-glucopyranoside [7] have been identified in the aerial parts, together with the terpenes phytol [1] and (+)-14,15-dinor-9α-hydroxy-cis-labd-11(E)-en-13-one [12]. C. oppositifolia is also a source of acteoside [13], a phenylethanoid glycoside that possess antioxidant, antimicrobial, neuroprotective, antitumor, and analgesic properties, and has been studied for its anti-inflammatory activity [14]. Nevertheless, studies on the anti-inflammatory potential of the plant are still lacking, despite its traditional uses. Due to the importance of this medicinal plant in Nepal and due to the relatively scarce literature regarding its phytochemical composition and its biological activities, we selected C. oppositifolia to proceed with our studies on the valorization of Nepalese medicinal herbs [15,16,17]. In particular, our aim was that to focus on possible natural sources of bioactive constituents or mixtures targeted on inflammation and/or cancer [15], considering that herbs may offer a safer, and often an equally effective, alternative treatment, especially for long-term utilization [18,19]. In this paper, we reported for the first time the comprehensive characterization of the secondary metabolites extracted from the leaves of C. oppositifolia from Nepal, obtained by ultrasound-assisted methanolic extraction of the dried aerial parts. In vitro biological activity of the same extract was also evaluated, and results from anti-NF-κB (Nuclear factor-κB), anti-AP-1 (Activator protein-1), and cytotoxicity assays on human cells are here presented.

2. Results

2.1. LC-MS Phytochemical Characterization of C. oppositifolia Methanol Extract

The chromatographic analysis of C. oppositifolia methanol extract (COME) allowed the detection and tentative identification of 43 chemical constituents (Figure 1). The most representative chemical classes were flavonoids (21 compounds) and phenolic acids (12 compounds), while small amounts of coumarins, triterpenes, and anthocyanins were also identified (Table 1). Detected flavonoids and phenolic acids were quantified using calibration curves built from reference standards, and the results were in alignment with previously published quantitative data on the same plant species [20].
The amount of flavonoids extracted from C. oppositifolia was 12.23 ± 0.03 mg/g dry weight (DW), showing a higher content compared to the amounts reported for the same species collected in Pakistan (9.9 and 7.3 mg/g DW for methanol/chloroform and aqueous extracts, respectively) [20]. The sum of the amounts of diosmetin (2), quercetin-O-glucoside (13), 6,8-di-C-β-glucopyranosylchrysin (14), myricetin-dihexoside (19), baicalin (21), and anisofolin A (20) accounted for more than 5% of the identified flavonoids (Table 2), and among these, (20) was the most abundant flavonoid derivative in the extract, with an amount of 1.87 mg/g. Considering phenolic acids, the total amount in COME was 32.33 ± 0.51 mg/g DW, and again the result was in agreement with the 32.3 and 25.9 mg/g DW previously reported in methanol/chloroform and aqueous extracts of the same plant collected in Pakistan [20].
The most representative derivative in COME was acteoside (27) (Table 3), also known as verbascoside, a phenylethanoid glycoside that has been previously described as a marker compound of C. oppositifolia [13] and as the possible co-responsible of numerous biological activities attributed to the plant [5]. In our extract, compound (27), together with its isomer isoacteoside (28), resulted also the most abundant constituent among those quantified in COME, with a cumulative amount of 24.71 mg/g (27 + 28). The two compounds could not be accurately quantified due to the partial superimposition of their chromatographic peaks, however, considering their peak areas, we could determine that (27) was more abundant than (28), with an amount ratio of 2:1. Another four derivatives sharing similar chemical structure were identified among the most abundant constituents of COME, namely β-oxoacteoside (29), martynoside (30), and β-methoxylverbascoside (31) (Table 1 and Table 3), which are here reported in C. oppositifolia for the first time.
The other identified compounds comprised the two coumarins umbelliferone (34) and methoxsalen (35) and the spirostanol neotigogenin (42), also here reported in C. oppositifolia for the first time.

2.2. Cytotoxicity of COME

The COME showed moderate cytotoxic effect on THP-1-XBlue™-MD2-CD14 cells. The IC50 value of the extract was calculated to be 6.2 ± 1.2 µg/mL (95% CI 4.8–10.6 µg/mL) (Figure 2). On the basis of this result, the COME concentration of 2 µg/mL was used for further analysis considered as non-toxic.

2.3. Inhibition of NF-κB/AP-1 Activities

To evaluate the anti-inflammatory potential of COME, its ability to attenuate the activity of pro-inflammatory transcription factors NF-κB and AP-1 was measured (Figure 3). COME in the concentration of 2 µg/mL was able to significantly decrease the activity of NF-κB/AP-1 by the factor of 4.8 after LPS stimulation. On the other hand, the commercially available drug prednisone (1 µM) reduced their activity only by the factor of 1.2.

3. Discussion

C. oppositifolia is widely used in the traditional medicine of South-Eastern Asiatic countries, comprising China, India, and Nepal, to treat a wide spectrum of disorders, ranging from inflammatory diseases to epilepsy [1,12]. In particular, in Nepal the leaves are traditionally used to treat ailments of the ocular region such as cataract, corneal opacity and keratoconjunctivitis, and as anthelmintic [3,4]. Furthermore, the leaves of C. oppositifolia have been investigated for their cardio-protective [1], anti-fertility [9], and antibacterial [10] properties. However, despite wide traditional uses of this shrub, only limited studies concerning the assessment of its biological activities in vitro and in vivo, as well as the comprehensive characterization of its secondary metabolites, have been published up until now. Comprehensive phytochemical screening of C. oppositifolia could lead not only to the identification and further isolation of potential novel active compounds, but could also allow to explore the molecular pathways that are responsible for the bioactivities. One of the most recent studies regarding the phytochemical characterization of C. oppositifolia was published in 2016 by Chinchansure et al. [11], who reported the new diterpene (+)-14,15-dinor-9α-hydroxy-cis-labd-11(E)-en-13-one in the acetone extract of the aerial parts, together with nine known flavonoids and flavone-derivatives such as alnustin, mosloflavone, apigenin, anisofolin A, and apigetrin, and the phenolic acids caffeic acid and forsythoside A. Older studies have reported the characterization of the flavonoids quercetin [43], 5,6,7,4′-tetramethoxyflavone [44], chrysin and landenein [1] from the leaves of C. oppositifolia, while 5,6,7-trimethoxyflavone and 5,6,7,4′-tetramethoxyflavone have been characterized from the roots [45]. Moreover, C. oppositifolia has been regarded as a rich source of acteoside [5], a phenylethanoid glycoside (verbascoside) with a role in the prevention and treatment of various human diseases and disorders [46]. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, limited information about C. oppositifolia from Nepal is available. Our comprehensive phytochemical analysis revealed acteoside and its isomer isoacteoside as the most abundant compounds among the ones identified and quantified in COME, with 24.71 mg/g DW extracted from the leaves. Other three acteoside derivatives were identified and quantified in leaf extract, namely β-oxoacteoside (0.81 mg/g DW), martynoside (0.54 mg/g DW), and β-methoxylverbascoside (0.99 mg/g DW), and are here reported for the first time in C. oppositifolia. In the last decade, interests on verbascoside derivatives has been growing because of the increasing evidence showing their role in the prevention and treatment of various human diseases and disorders [46], and due to their apparent low toxicity in mammals, as observed in non-human primate kidney (Vero E6) cells and human erythrocytes [47]. Plants with high concentrations of phenylethanol glycosides have been used in the traditional medicine to treat inflammation and microbial infections [46]. Hence, the high amount of verbascoside derivatives in COME could explain, at least in part, the anti-inflammatory activity observed in vitro. In particular, acteoside has been reported to significantly reduce the expression and activity of both COX and NOS by interfering with the activation of AP-1 [48], and to inhibit the overproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines in serum and cartilage tissues of osteoarthritic rats by decreasing the activation of NF-κB [49]. AP-1 is a transcriptional regulator of cytokine expression in immune cells and it is involved in the modulation of inflammatory processes, but it has also a role in regulating cell proliferation, neoplastic transformation, and apoptosis. For this reason, AP-1 is considered an interesting target for novel therapeutic applications against inflammation and cancer [50]. On the other hand, NF-κB is a pro-inflammatory transcription factor that plays a determinant role in promoting cellular stress. When activated in the cytosol, NF-κB can activate pro-inflammatory genes by binding to their promoter region, thereby upregulating the production of pro-inflammatory mediators like TNF-α and IL-6 [51]. Also this transcriptional factor is implicated in the regulation of pre-carcinogenic cell transformation, and is considered another interesting target for both anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor agents [52]. Inflammatory response is regulated at several different levels: the gene level (mediated by transcriptional regulation of particular genes), the signal-transduction level (encompassing regulation of intracellular signaling pathways), and, finally, the cellular level (including cell differentiation, activation, and regulation of cell-cell signaling). The main control point has been proposed to lie at the level of transcriptional control [53], hence targeting transcriptional factors such as NF-κB and AP-1 represents a promising therapeutic approach. In our study, we observed that COME, at the concentration of 2 µg/mL, was able to significantly decrease the activity of both NF-κB and AP-1 by the factor of 4.8 after LPS stimulation. This activity factor was four-time higher than that of the commercially available anti-inflammatory drug prednisone used as control, which reduced the activity of both the mediators only by the factor of 1.2, at a concentration of 1 µM. Among the compounds characterized in COME, flavonoids have been largely studied for their anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor activity, and specific members of this family detected in the same extract, namely chrysin, quercetin-O-glucoside, and diosmetin, have been reported as NF-κB and AP-1 blockers [54,55,56,57,58]. Also phenolic acids have been already studied for their anti-inflammatory activity, and compounds such as chlorogenic acids, ferulic acid and quinic acid, characterized in COME, have been reported to attenuate the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in murine cells by down regulating the NF-κB pathway [59,60,61]. Among the other compounds identified in COME, the two coumarins umbelliferone and methoxsalen have been reported to suppress the expression of NF-κB in animal models [62,63], while peonidin-3-glucoside to reduce the metastasis of lung cancer cells by acting via different mechanisms, among which the blocking of AP-1 activation [64]. Overall, these constituents could also contribute to the observed anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activities of COME.
Considering the results presented in this work, the traditional uses of C. oppositifolia in Nepal could be associated to the phytochemical composition of the secondary metabolites of COME. In particular, the presence of relatively high amounts of flavonoids and phenolic acids could explain both the anti-inflammatory properties of the leaves, here confirmed in vitro, as well as the anthelmintic and antibacterial activities, that have been already described for both the classes of compounds [65]. On the other hand, anti-inflammatory potential determined by in vitro anti-NF-κB/AP-1 assay used in this paper could not be obtained by in vivo tests or clinical trials, due to complex and unrevealed pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of plant extracts. Transcription factors NF-κB and AP-1 are not only pro-inflammatory, but also contribute to other physiological processes. Hence, the inhibition of NF-κB/AP-1 signaling pathway could lead to undesired side effects [66]. However, if the anti-inflammatory effect of COME is proven in vivo and the particular mechanism of action is elucidated, there will be a therapeutic potential to treat a broad range of inflammatory diseases, at least as food supplement, because of the high popularity of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population [67].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Collection and Identification

The leaves of C. oppositifolia were harvested in May 2017 by G. Prasad and D. Raj in the Bardibas municipality, Mahottari District, Province No. 2, Nepal (26°58′6.8″ N 85°50′42.7″ E). The botanical identification of the plant was confirmed by prof. R.P. Chaudhary, using available literature [2]. The collected specimens were washed in running water and dried in the shadow at room temperature for 7 days, then mounted on an herbarium sheet. A voucher specimen was deposited at the National Herbarium and Plant Laboratories, Godawari-5, Lalitpur, Nepal, under the representative code: MD01 (KATH).

4.2. Extraction of Plant Material

Extraction of dried plant material was performed following a previously published protocol [15]. Briefly, 50 g of dried and grinded leaves were suspended in 250 mL of methanol and extracted at room temperature in an ultrasonic bath (Branson, Danbury, CT, USA) for 2 h, shaking the sample every 30 min to homogenize the mixture. Afterwards, the solid residue was recovered by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min and further extracted for other 30 min, using an additional 250 mL of methanol as described above. Finally, the liquid extracts were pooled, filtered and dried under vacuum at 40 °C to constant weight, and the dried residue was stored at −20 °C until analysis. The whole extraction procedure was performed in triplicate. The mean percentage yield of the crude COME obtained was 15 ± 1.3%.

4.3. LC-MSn and UPLC (Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography)-QTOF (Quadrupole-Time of Flight) Analyses of Secondary Metabolites

Polar constituents of COME were tentatively identified by an integrated LC-MS approach, comparing the fragmentation patterns with literature data and with standard compounds, when available. Further information was obtained searching for possible candidates in freely available MS databases by comparison of the accurate m/z values and the calculated molecular formulas, obtained from LC-QTOF analysis. The dried extract was dissolved in methanol at a concentration of 5 mg/mL, and the solution was filtered through a 0.45 µm Millipore filter. A Varian 212 binary pump equipped with a Varian Prostar 430 autosampler and coupled to a Varian 500 Ion Trap mass detector (MS) was employed. The mass spectrometer was equipped with an Electrospray Ionization (ESI) ion source, operating in both negative [ESI(−)] and positive [ESI(+)] ion modes. Stationary and mobile phases, chromatographic conditions and MS parameters have been already reported in [15]. For quantification of flavonoids and phenolic acids, calibration curves of rutin and chlorogenic acid, respectively, were obtained using concentrations ranging from 10 to 120 mg/L. The calibration curves were y = 13011x – 192439 (R2 = 0.992) and y = 523050x (R2 = 0.990) for rutin in ESI(−) and ESI(+), respectively, and y = 17133.7x + 18842 (R2 = 0.997) for chlorogenic acid in ESI(−). Quantitative results were expressed as milligrams per grams of dry weight (DW).
Accurate m/z values were obtained using a Waters Acquity H-Class UPLC system coupled to a Waters Xevo G2 QTOF MS detector, operating in both ESI(−) and ESI(+) modes. MS parameters have been already reported in [15], while the chromatographic conditions were kept as previously described.

4.4. Cell Viability Determination

The influence of COME on cell viability was determined as previously described [15]. Briefly, cells [THP1-XBlue™-MD2-CD14 (Invivogen, San Diego, CA, USA)] were incubated for 24 h with increasing concentrations (1.25–20 µg/mL) of COME dissolved in DMSO. The solvent did not exceed the concentration of 0.1% (v/v). After 24 h incubation, the amount of metabolically active (i.e., live) cells was evaluated by Cell Proliferation Reagent kit WST-1 (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s manual. Relative cell viability was calculated as the ratio of absorbance values of COME-treated to DMSO-only-treated cells. The IC50 value of COME was determined by four parameter logistic (4PL) analysis from the obtained viability curve. For further analysis, the concentration of COME 2 µg/mL was considered as non-toxic.

4.5. Determination of NF-κB and AP-1 Activity

THP-1-XBlue™-MD2-CD14 cell line was used as a model for determination of the effect of COME on the activation of transcription factors NF-κB and AP-1 (key pro-inflammatory transcription factors). This genetically modified cell line has been specially designed for testing the activity of these transcription factors. We analyzed the ability of COME to suppress the activity of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated NF-κB/AP-1 as previously described [15]. Briefly, cells were pre-treated with COME at the non-toxic concentration of 2 µg/mL and control drug prednisone 1 µM (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) dissolved in DMSO for 1 h. Subsequently, cells were stimulated by LPS isolated from Escherichia coli O111:B4 (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium (1 µg/mL). 24 h later, the activity of NF-κB/AP-1 was determined by Quanti-Blue™ medium (Invivogen, Toulouse, France) spectrophotometrically on FLUOstar Omega Microplate Reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) at 650 nm, according to manufacturer’s manual. Results were compared with a control incubated only with DMSO and stimulated with LPS (100% NF-κB/AP-1 activity).

4.6. Statistical Analysis

All the biological experiments were performed in triplicate. The results are presented as mean values, with the error bars representing the standard error of the mean (SEM). A one-way ANOVA test was used for statistical comparisons, followed by Fisher’s LSD multiple comparison test. GraphPad Prism 8.01 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to perform the statistical analysis. A value of p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

C. oppositifolia is a shrub largely used as medicinal species in Nepal and other Asiatic countries, nevertheless, exhaustive chemical characterizations of the utilized parts are still lacking. Furthermore, despite one of the traditional uses of the leaves of this plant in Nepal and China is for the treatment of inflammatory diseases, no reports on their anti-inflammatory activity has been published up until now, nor in vitro, nor in vivo. In this article, we report for the first time the comprehensive characterization of the secondary metabolites obtained from the leaves of C. oppositifolia of Nepalese origin, and the assessment of its anti-NF-κB, anti-AP-1 and cytotoxic activities in human cell lines. Overall, the preliminary data presented here could contribute to rationalize the medicinal use of this plant by the local communities of Nepal, and could be a starting point for the isolation of potential novel anti-inflammatory and anti-tumor agents.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.P. and S.D.; methodology, G.P., J.H., G.P.P., and D.R.K.; software, G.P. and J.H.; validation, G.P., J.H., S.D., and R.A.; formal analysis, G.P.; investigation, G.P., J.H., G.P.P., and D.R.K.; resources, S.D., J.H., and R.A.; data curation, G.P. and J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, G.P. and J.H.; writing—review and editing, G.P., S.D., and R.A.; visualization, G.P.; supervision, S.D.; project administration, S.D. and R.A.; funding acquisition, S.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AP-1Activator protein-1
COMEColebrookea Oppositifolia methanol extract
DWDry weight
ESIElectrospray ionization
IC50Half maximal inhibitory concentration
LCLiquid Chromatography
MSMass Spectrometry
NF-κBNuclear factor-κB
QTOFQuadrupole-Time of Flight
R.T.Retention time
UPLCUltra-high performance liquid chromatography

References

  1. Yadav, D.K. Pharmacognostical, Phytochemical and Pharmacological profile of Colebrookea oppositifolia Smith. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2019, 9, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hansen, B.; Grierson, A.J.C.; Long, D.G. Flora of Buthan. Including a record of plants from Sikkim. Nord. J. Bot. 1989, 8, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Joshi, A.R.; Joshi, K. Indigenous knowledge and uses of medicinal plants by local communities of the Kali Gandaki Watershed Area, Nepal. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 73, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Acharya, K.P.; Acharya, M. Traditional knowledge on medicinal plants used for the treatment of livestock diseases in Sardikhola VDC, Kaski, Nepal. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010, 4, 235–239. [Google Scholar]
  5. Viswanatha, G.L.; Venkataranganna, M.V.; Prasad, N.B.L.; Hanumanthappa, S. Chemical characterization and cerebroprotective effect of methanolic root extract of Colebrookea oppositifolia in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 223, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Madhavan, V.; Yadav, D.K.; Gurudeva, M.; Yoganarasimhan, S. Pharmacognostical studies on the leaves of Colebrookea oppositifolia Smith. Asian J. Trad. Med. 2011, 6, 134–144. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yang, F.; Li, X.C.; Wang, H.Q.; Yang, C.R. Flavonoid glycosides from Colebrookea oppositifolia. Phytochemistry 1996, 42, 867–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Riaz, T.; Abbasi, M.A.; Shahzadi, T.; Aziz-ur-Rehman; Siddiqui, S.Z.; Ajaib, M. Colebrookia oppositifolia: A valuable source for natural antioxidants. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 4180–4187. [Google Scholar]
  9. Viswanatha, G.L.; Venkataranganna, M.V.; Prasad, N.B.L. Ameliorative potential of Colebrookea oppositifolia methanolic root extract against experimental models of epilepsy: Possible role of GABA mediated mechanism. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 90, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gupta, R.S.; Yadav, R.K.; Dixit, V.P.; Dobhal, M.P. Antifertility studies of Colebrookia oppositifolia leaf extract in male rats with special reference to testicular cell population dynamics. Fitoterapia 2001, 42, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Panda, S.K.; Padhi, L.; Leyssen, P.; Liu, M.; Neyts, J.; Luyten, W. Antimicrobial, anthelmintic, and antiviral activity of plants traditionally used for treating infectious disease in the Similipal Biosphere Reserve, Odisha, India. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Chinchansure, A.; Arkile, M.; Shinde, D.; Sarkar, D.; Joshi, S. A New Dinor-cis-Labdane Diterpene and Flavonoids with Antimycobacterium Activity from Colebrookea oppositifolia. Planta Med. Lett. 2016, 3, e20–e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ali, I.; Sharma, P.; Suri, K.A.; Satti, N.K.; Dutt, P.; Afrin, F.; Khan, I.A. In vitro antifungal activities of amphotericin B in combination with acteoside, a phenylethanoid glycoside from Colebrookea oppositifolia. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 60, 1326–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Khullar, M.; Sharma, A.; Wani, A.; Sharma, N.; Sharma, N.; Chandan, B.K.; Kumar, A.; Ahmed, Z. Acteoside ameliorates inflammatory responses through NFkB pathway in alcohol induced hepatic damage. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2019, 69, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Peron, G.; Hošek, J.; Rajbhandary, S.; Pant, D.R.; Dall’Acqua, S. LC-MSn and HR-MS characterization of secondary metabolites from Hypericum japonicum Thunb. ex Murray from Nepalese Himalayan region and assessment of cytotoxic effect and inhibition of NF-κB and AP-1 transcription factors in vitro. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 174, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shrestha, S.S.; Sut, S.; Di Marco, S.B.; Zengin, G.; Gandin, V.; De Franco, M.; Pant, D.R.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; Dall’Acqua, S.; Rajbhandary, S. Phytochemical fingerprinting and in vitro bioassays of the ethnomedicinal fern tectaria coadunata (J. Smith) C. Christensen from Central Nepal. Molecules 2019, 24, 4457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Shrestha, S.S.; Sut, S.; Ferrarese, I.; Di Marco, S.B.; Zengin, G.; de Franco, M.; Pant, D.R.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; Ferri, N.; Biancorosso, N.; et al. Himalayan nettle girardinia diversifolia as a candidate ingredient for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications-phytochemical analysis and in vitro bioassays. Molecules 2020, 25, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bost, J.; Maroon, A.; Maroon, J. Natural anti-inflammatory agents for pain relief. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2010, 1, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Seca, A.M.L.; Pinto, D.C.G.A. Plant secondary metabolites as anticancer agents: Successes in clinical trials and therapeutic application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Akhtar, N.; Ihsan-ul-Haq; Mirza, B. Phytochemical analysis and comprehensive evaluation of antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of 61 medicinal plant species. Arab. J. Chem. 2018, 11, 1223–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mitreski, I.; Stanoeva, J.P.; Stefova, M.; Stefkov, G.; Kulevanova, S. Polyphenols in representative teucrium species in the flora of R. Macedonia: LC/DAD/ESI-MSn profile and content. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2014, 9, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Li, S.; Lin, Z.; Jiang, H.; Tong, L.; Wang, H.; Chen, S. Rapid Identification and Assignation of the Active Ingredients in Fufang Banbianlian Injection Using HPLC-DAD-ESI-IT-TOF-MS. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2016, 54, 1225–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Singh, B.; Jain, S.K.; Bharate, S.B.; Kushwaha, M.; Gupta, A.P.; Vishwakarma, R.A. Simultaneous quantification of five bioactive flavonoids in high altitude plant Actinocarya tibetica by LC-ESI-MS/MS. J. AOAC Int. 2015, 98, 907–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Martucci, M.E.P.; De Vos, R.C.H.; Carollo, C.A.; Gobbo-Neto, L. Metabolomics as a potential chemotaxonomical tool: Application in the genus Vernonia Schreb. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e93149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Kang, J.; Price, W.E.; Ashton, J.; Tapsell, L.C.; Johnson, S. Identification and characterization of phenolic compounds in hydromethanolic extracts of sorghum wholegrains by LC-ESI-MSn. Food Chem. 2016, 211, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Chen, G.; Li, X.; Saleri, F.; Guo, M. Analysis of flavonoids in Rhamnus davurica and its antiproliferative activities. Molecules 2016, 21, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Barros, L.; Dueñas, M.; Dias, M.I.; Sousa, M.J.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phenolic profiles of in vivo and in vitro grown Coriandrum sativum L. Food Chem. 2012, 132, 841–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gobbo-Neto, L.; Lopes, N.P. Online identification of chlorogenic acids, sesquiterpene lactones, and flavonoids in the Brazilian arnica Lychnophora ericoides Mart. (Asteraceae) leaves by HPLC-DAD-MS and HPLC-DAD-MS/MS and a validated HPLC-DAD method for their simultaneous analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 1193–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Spínola, V.; Castilho, P.C. Evaluation of Asteraceae herbal extracts in the management of diabetes and obesity. Contribution of caffeoylquinic acids on the inhibition of digestive enzymes activity and formation of advanced glycation end-products (in vitro). Phytochemistry 2017, 143, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. El-Hagrassy, A.M.; Elkhateeb, A.; Hussein, S.R.; Abdel-Hameed, E.S.S.; Marzouk, M.M. LC-ESI-MS profile, antioxidant activity and cytotoxic screening of Oligomeris linifolia (Vahl) Macbr. (Resedaceae). J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 7, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ibrahima, R.M.; El-Halawany, A.M.; Saleh, D.O.; El Naggar, E.M.B.; EL-Shabrawy, A.E.R.O.; El-Hawary, S.S. HPLC-DAD-MS/MS profiling of phenolics from securigera securidaca flowers and its anti-hyperglycemic and anti-hyperlipidemic activities. Braz. J. Pharmacogn. 2015, 25, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ghouti, D.; Rached, W.; Abdallah, M.; Pires, T.C.S.P.; Calhelha, R.C.; Alves, M.J.; Abderrahmane, L.H.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phenolic profile and in vitro bioactive potential of Saharan Juniperus phoenicea L. and Cotula cinerea (Del) growing in Algeria. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 4664–4672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Sun, J.; Chen, P. A flow-injection mass spectrometry fingerprinting method for authentication and quality assessment of Scutellaria lateriflora-based dietary supplements. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 401, 1577–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pacifico, S.; Galasso, S.; Piccolella, S.; Kretschmer, N.; Pan, S.P.; Nocera, P.; Lettieri, A.; Bauer, R.; Monaco, P. Winter wild fennel leaves as a source of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant polyphenols. Arab. J. Chem. 2018, 11, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Grzegorczyk-Karolak, I.; Kiss, A.K. Determination of the phenolic profile and antioxidant properties of Salvia viridis L. Shoots: A comparison of aqueous and hydroethanolic extracts. Molecules 2018, 23, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sanz, M.; De Simón, B.F.; Cadahía, E.; Esteruelas, E.; Muñoz, A.M.; Hernández, T.; Estrella, I.; Pinto, E. LC-DAD/ESI-MS/MS study of phenolic compounds in ash (Fraxinus excelsior L. and F. americana L.) heartwood. Effect of toasting intensity at cooperage. J. Mass Spectrom. 2012, 47, 905–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cerulli, A.; Napolitano, A.; Masullo, M.; Hošek, J.; Pizza, C.; Piacente, S. Chestnut shells (Italian cultivar “Marrone di Roccadaspide” PGI): Antioxidant activity and chemical investigation with in depth LC-HRMS/MSn rationalization of tannins. Food Res. Int. 2020, 129, 108787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abu-Reidah, I.M.; Ali-Shtayeh, M.S.; Jamous, R.M.; Arráez-Román, D.; Segura-Carretero, A. HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS screening of bioactive components from Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac) fruits. Food Chem. 2015, 166, 179–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Rodríguez-Pérez, C.; Gómez-Caravaca, A.M.; Guerra-Hernández, E.; Cerretani, L.; García-Villanova, B.; Verardo, V. Comprehensive metabolite profiling of Solanum tuberosum L. (potato) leaves by HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS. Food Res. Int. 2018, 112, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Marzouk, M.M.; Hussein, S.R.; Elkhateeb, A.; El-shabrawy, M.; Abdel-Hameed, E.S.S.; Kawashty, S.A. Comparative study of Mentha species growing wild in Egypt: LC-ESI-MS analysis and chemosystematic significance. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 8, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Li, H.; Peng, S.Y.; Yang, D.P.; Bai, B.; Zhu, L.P.; Mu, C.Y.; Tian, Y.J.; Wang, D.M.; Zhao, Z.M. Enantiomeric Neolignans and a Sesquiterpene from Solanum erianthum and Their Absolute Configuration Assignment. Chirality 2016, 28, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Shi, P.B.; Yue, T.X.; Ai, L.L.; Cheng, Y.F.; Meng, J.F.; Li, M.H.; Zhang, Z.W. Phenolic compound profiles in grape skins of Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Syrah and Marselan Cultivated in the Shacheng Area (China). S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 2016, 37, 132–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mukherjee, P.K.; Mukherjee, K.; Hermans-Lokkerbol, A.C.J.; Verpoorte, R.; Suresh, B. Flavonoid Content of Eupatorium glandulosum and Coolebroke oppositifolia. J. Nat. Remedies 2001, 1, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Verma, S.K.; Pareek, D.; Singhal, R.; Chauhan, A.K.; Parashar, P.; Dobhal, M.P. Ferulic acid ester from colebrookea oppositifolia. Indian J. Chem. B 2012, 51, 1502–1503. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ansari, S.; Dobhal, M.P.; Tyagi, R.P.; Joshi, B.C.; Barar, F.S. Chemical investigation and pharmacological screening of the roots of colebrookia oppositifolia Smith. Pharmazie 1982, 37, 70. [Google Scholar]
  46. Alipieva, K.; Korkina, L.; Orhan, I.E.; Georgiev, M.I. Verbascoside—A review of its occurrence, (bio)synthesis and pharmacological significance. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 1065–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zürn, M.; Tóth, G.; Kraszni, M.; Sólyomváry, A.; Mucsi, Z.; Deme, R.; Rózsa, B.; Fodor, B.; Molnár-Perl, I.; Horváti, K.; et al. Galls of European Fraxinus trees as new and abundant sources of valuable phenylethanoid and coumarin glycosides. Ind. Crop Prod. 2019, 139, 111517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pesce, M.; Franceschelli, S.; Ferrone, A.; De Lutiis, M.A.; Patruno, A.; Grilli, A.; Felaco, M.; Speranza, L. Verbascoside down-regulates some pro-inflammatory signal transduction pathways by increasing the activity of tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 in the U937 cell line. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2015, 19, 1548–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ma, H.; Qin, S.; Zhao, S. Osteoarthritis is Prevented in Rats by Verbascoside via Nuclear Factor kappa B (NF-kB) Pathway Downregulation. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e921276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ye, N.; Ding, Y.; Wild, C.; Shen, Q.; Zhou, J. Small molecule inhibitors targeting activator protein 1 (AP-1). J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 6930–6948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, T.; Zhang, L.; Joo, D.; Sun, S.C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Freitas, R.H.C.N.; Fraga, C.A.M. NF-κB-IKKβ Pathway as a Target for Drug Development: Realities, Challenges and Perspectives. Curr. Drug Targets 2018, 19, 1933–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Medzhitov, R.; Horng, T. Transcriptional Control of the Inflammatory Response. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 692–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ha, S.K.; Moon, E.; Kim, S.Y. Chrysin suppresses LPS-stimulated proinflammatory responses by blocking NF-κB and JNK activations in microglia cells. Neurosci. Lett. 2010, 485, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yang, Y.; Gong, X.B.; Huang, L.G.; Wang, Z.X.; Wan, R.Z.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, B.S. Diosmetin exerts anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic effects to protect against endotoxin-induced acute hepatic failure in mice. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 30723–30733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Chen, L.; Teng, H.; Jia, Z.; Battino, M.; Miron, A.; Yu, Z.; Cao, H.; Xiao, J. Intracellular signaling pathways of inflammation modulated by dietary flavonoids: The most recent evidence. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2908–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Tan, C.; Meng, F.; Reece, E.A.; Zhao, Z. Modulation of nuclear factor-κB signaling and reduction of neural tube defects by quercetin-3-glucoside in embryos of diabetic mice. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 219, 197.e1–197.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sun, L.R.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, H.M.; Guo, Q.S.; Yang, W.; Li, B.J.; Sun, Z.H.; Gao, S.H.; Cui, R.J. Modulation of Multiple Signaling Pathways of the Plant-Derived Natural Products in Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Åkesson, C.; Lindgren, H.; Pero, R.W.; Leanderson, T.; Ivars, F. Quinic acid is a biologically active component of the Uncaria tomentosa extract C-Med 100®. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2005, 5, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nagasaka, R.; Chotimarkorn, C.; Shafiqul, I.M.; Hori, M.; Ozaki, H.; Ushio, H. Anti-inflammatory effects of hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 358, 615–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liang, N.; Kitts, D.D. Role of chlorogenic acids in controlling oxidative and inflammatory stress conditions. Nutrients 2016, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ouyang, L.; Dan, Y.; Shao, Z.; Yang, S.; Yang, C.; Liu, G.; Zhou, W.; Duan, D. Effect of umbelliferone on adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats by MAPK/NF-κB pathway. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2019, 13, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Li, J.; Yin, P.; Gong, P.; Lv, A.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, F. 8-Methoxypsoralen protects bovine mammary epithelial cells against lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory injury via suppressing JAK/STAT and NF-κB pathway. Microbiol. Immunol. 2019, 63, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ho, M.L.; Chen, P.N.; Chu, S.C.; Kuo, D.Y.; Kuo, W.H.; Chen, J.Y.; Hsieh, Y.S. Peonidin 3-glucoside inhibits lung cancer metastasis by downregulation of proteinases activities and MAPK pathway. Nutr. Cancer 2010, 11, 628–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ndhlala, A.R.; Ghebrehiwot, H.M.; Ncube, B.; Aremu, A.O.; Gruz, J.; Šubrtová, M.; Doležal, K.; du Plooy, C.P.; Abdelgadir, H.A.; Van Staden, J. Antimicrobial, anthelmintic activities and characterisation of functional phenolic acids of Achyranthes aspera Linn.: A medicinal plant used for the treatment of wounds and ringworm in east Africa. Front. Pharmacol. 2015, 6, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. D’Acquisto, F.; May, M.J.; Ghosh, S. Inhibition of Nuclear Factor Kappa B (NF-B): An Emerging Theme in Anti-Inflammatory Therapies. Mol. Interv. 2002, 2, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Mainardi, T.; Kapoor, S.; Bielory, L. Complementary and alternative medicine: Herbs, phytochemicals and vitamins and their immunologic effects. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 123, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 04897 g001 550
Figure 1. Intensity of base peak chromatograms obtained from the LC-MSn analysis of Colebrookea oppositifolia methanol extract (COME) in ESI(−) (upper panel) and ESI(+) (lower panel) modes. The numbers in the chromatograms indicate the tentatively identified phytoconstituents, as reported in Table 1.
Figure 1. Intensity of base peak chromatograms obtained from the LC-MSn analysis of Colebrookea oppositifolia methanol extract (COME) in ESI(−) (upper panel) and ESI(+) (lower panel) modes. The numbers in the chromatograms indicate the tentatively identified phytoconstituents, as reported in Table 1.
Ijms 21 04897 g001
Ijms 21 04897 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative cell viability determined after COME application. Results are expressed as percentage of viability of untreated cells (contained only 0.1 v/v DMSO), particular point are means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Dashed lines indicate IC50 value.
Figure 2. Relative cell viability determined after COME application. Results are expressed as percentage of viability of untreated cells (contained only 0.1 v/v DMSO), particular point are means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Dashed lines indicate IC50 value.
Ijms 21 04897 g002
Ijms 21 04897 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of COME on the activity of NF-κB/AP-1 in LPS-stimulated THP-1-XBlue™-MD2-CD14 cells. Cells were pre-treated in indicated concentrations by COME, prednisone or only solvent (DMSO) for 1 h, after that, LPS was added and NF-κB/AP-1 activity was measured 24 h later. ** indicates statistical significance to positive control (DMSO) p < 0.01, **** indicates statistical significance to positive control (DMSO) p < 0.0001.
Figure 3. Effect of COME on the activity of NF-κB/AP-1 in LPS-stimulated THP-1-XBlue™-MD2-CD14 cells. Cells were pre-treated in indicated concentrations by COME, prednisone or only solvent (DMSO) for 1 h, after that, LPS was added and NF-κB/AP-1 activity was measured 24 h later. ** indicates statistical significance to positive control (DMSO) p < 0.01, **** indicates statistical significance to positive control (DMSO) p < 0.0001.
Ijms 21 04897 g003
Table
Table 1. Identification of polar constituents from the methanol extract of Colebrookea oppositifolia by HPLC-MSn.
Table 1. Identification of polar constituents from the methanol extract of Colebrookea oppositifolia by HPLC-MSn.
NºExperimental
m/z		Theoretical
m/z		ppmMolecular FormulaESI(−)/
ESI(+)		MS2 #MS3R.T. (min)Tentative IdentificationChemical ClassReference
1253.0494253.05012.9C15H10O4−161 145 143 121 18.2ChrysinFlavonoid[12]
2299.0548299.05562.8C16H11O6−284256 22714.9Diosmetin aFlavonoid[21]
3299.0546299.05563.5C16H11O6−284255 256 227 211 15.94′-HydroxywogoninFlavonoid[22]
4299.0909299.09193.5C17H15O5+28425623.4MosloflavoneFlavonoid[23]
5301.0341301.03482.5C15H9O7−179 151 10.7Quercetin *Flavonoid-
6313.0701313.07123.7C17H13O6−298 299 19.0LadaneinFlavonoid[12]
7313.1070313.10762.0C18H17O5+298 283 269 252 18.4Retusin dimethyletherFlavonoidMetlin
8331.0824331.08181.9C17H15O7+316301 28814.13,7-dimethoxy-5,3′,4′-trihydroxyflavoneFlavonoid[24]
9335.0417335.04034.4C15H11O9−291 272 263 193 24.66-HydroxyampelopsinFlavonoid[25]
10345.0961345.09744.0C18H17O7+330 312 284 17.5EupatorinFlavonoidMetlin
11403.1380403.13923.2C21H23O8+373 355 342 327358 345 330 30118.1Irigenin trimethyletherFlavonoidMetlin
12461.1073461.10842.5C22H21O11−299 301 284 6.9Diosmetin 7-O-glucosideFlavonoid[26]
13463.0885463.08771.8C21H19O12−301 10.6Quercetin-O-glucosideFlavonoid[27]
14577.1544577.15572.4C27H29O14−487 457 367 337 8.76,8-di-C-β-glucopyranosylchrysinFlavonoid[28]
15593.1500593.15071.3C27H29O15−503 473 383 353 325 12.5Apigenin-6,8-di-C-hexoside (vicenin-2)Flavonoid[29]
16595.1651595.16632.1C27H31O15−505 475 385 355 271 8.0Naringenin-6,8-di-C-hexosideFlavonoid[30]
17609.1462609.14561.0C27H29O16−301 9.2Rutin *Flavonoid-
18639.1554639.15611.2C28H31O17−477 459 315 8.1Isorhamnetin-O-sophorosideFlavonoid[31]
19641.1334641.13543.3C27H29O18−479 463 317 8.0Myricetin-dihexosideFlavonoid[32]
20723.1698723.17142.4C39H31O14−577 559 453 269 17.8Anisofolin aFlavonoid[11]
21891.1591891.16203.5C42H35O22−44526912.3Baicalin (dimer) bFlavonoid[33]
22191.0547191.05565.0C7H11O6−173 3.0Quinic acid *Phenolic acid-
23193.0499193.05011.1C10H9O4-134 3.2Ferulic acid *Phenolic acid-
24353.0866353.08732.1C16H17O9-191 179 173 5.6Chlorogenic acid isomer 1Phenolic acid[25]
25353.0865353.08732.4C16H17O9-191 179 173 7.2Chlorogenic acid isomer 2Phenolic acid[25]
26549.1964549.19721.5C27H33O12-387 505 489225 207 16311.112-O-(6′-caffeoylhexosyl)jasmonic acidPhenolic acid[34]
27623.1958623.19763.1C29H35O15-461 315 2971359.8Acteoside (verbascoside)Phenolic acid[35]
28623.1961623.19762.5C29H35O15-461 315 2971359.9Isoacteoside (isoverbascoside)Phenolic acid[35]
29637.1788637.17693.2C29H33O16-475367 329 31210.4β-oxoacteosidePhenolic acid[35]
30651.2263651.22894.2C31H39O15-505 475 457 329 11.7MartynosidePhenolic acid[35]
31653.2066653.20822.6C30H37O16-621 491 459 9.3β-methoxylverbascosidePhenolic acid[36]
32951.0719951.07392.2C41H27O27-789 475 12.6HHDP-valoneoyl-glucose isomer 1Phenolic acid[37]
33951.0718951.07392.2C41H27O27-789 475 13.3HHDP-valoneoyl-glucose isomer 2Phenolic acid[37]
34163.0391163.03952.6C9H7O3+145118 1179.9UmbelliferoneCoumarin[38]
35217.0497217.05011.9C12H9O4+202 189 173 161174 14612.3MethoxsalenCoumarinMetlin
36132.0810132.08132.4C9H10N+91 1.03-methylindoleOtherMetlin
37161.0441161.04505.9C6H9O5-117 9.4Hydroxymethylglutaric acidOther[39]
38201.1020201.10284.2C12H13N2O+160 8.9HarmalolOtherMetlin
39387.1644387.16553.0C18H27O9-225 207 163 11.112-Hydroxyjasmonic acid glucosideOther[40]
40403.1751403.17561.3C22H27O7+373 342 18.3(7S,8R,7′E)-4-hydroxy-3,5,5′,9′-tetramethoxy-4′,7-epoxy-8,3′-neo-lign-7′-en-9-olOther[41]
41403.1750403.17561.6C22H27O7+373 342 17.9(7S,8R,7′E)-4-hydroxy-3,5,5′,9′-tetramethoxy-4′,7-epoxy-8,3′-neo-lign-7′-en-9-ol isomerOther[41]
42417.3355417.33683.3C27H45O3+400 226 212 31.1NeotigogeninOtherMetlin
43463.1233463.12401.6C22H23O11+301 258 10.3Peonidin-3-glucosideOther[42]
a Detected also in ESI(+) mode. m/z: 301.0705; MS2 fragments: 286, 258. b Detected also in ESI(+) mode. m/z: 447.0936; MS2 fragments: 271, 253. * Identification was confirmed by co-injection with reference standard. HHDP—hexahydroxydiphenoyl group. # Numbers in bold indicate the base peaks.
Table
Table 2. Quantitative analysis of flavonoids from Colebrookea oppositifolia methanol extract.
Table 2. Quantitative analysis of flavonoids from Colebrookea oppositifolia methanol extract.
ESI(−)/
ESI(+)		Nº[M-H]−/
[M+H]+		Compoundmg·g−1 DW *
−1253Chrysin0.53 ± 0.01
2299Diosmetin0.75 ± 0.02
32994′-Hydroxywogonin0.61 ± 0.01
5301Quercetin0.46 ± 0.00
6313Ladanein0.53 ± 0.01
93356-Hydroxyampelopsin0.54 ± 0.01
12461Diosmetin 7-O-glucoside0.47 ± 0.00
13463Quercetin-O-glucoside0.66 ± 0.00
145776,8-di-C-β-glucopyranosylchrysin0.66 ± 0.02
15593Apigenin-6,8-di-C-hexoside0.54 ± 0.01
16595Naringenin-6,8-di-C-hexoside0.56 ± 0.00
17609Rutin0.51 ± 0.01
18639Isorhamnetin-O-sophoroside0.53 ± 0.01
19641Myricetin-dihexoside0.65 ± 0.01
20723Anisofolin a1.87 ± 0.01
21891Baicalin (dimer)0.62 ± 0.00
+4299Mosloflavone0.51 ± 0.01
7313Retusin dimethylether0.23 ± 0.01
83313,7-dimethoxy-5,3′,4′-trihydroxyflavone0.30 ± 0.02
10345Eupatorin0.51 ± 0.01
11403Irigenin trimethylether0.21 ± 0.01
Total12.23 ± 0.03
* Values are expressed as mean of results from three analyses ± S.D.
Table
Table 3. Quantitative analysis of phenolic acids from Colebrookea oppositifolia methanol extract.
Table 3. Quantitative analysis of phenolic acids from Colebrookea oppositifolia methanol extract.
Nº[M-H]-Compoundmg·g−1 DW *
22191Quinic acid0.13 ± 0.01
23193Ferulic acid0.02 ± 0.01
24353Chlorogenic acid isomer 10.74 ± 0.06
25353Chlorogenic acid isomer 20.10 ± 0.01
2654912-O-(6′-caffeoylhexosyl)jasmonic acid0.48 ± 0.08
27 + 28623Acteoside + Isoacteoside24.71 ± 0.10
29637β-oxoacteoside0.81 ± 0.03
30651Martynoside0.54 ± 0.07
31653β-methoxylverbascoside0.99 ± 0.04
32951HHDP-valoneoyl-glucose isomer 12.17 ± 0.07
33951HHDP-valoneoyl-glucose isomer 21.64 ± 0.05
Total32.33 ± 0.51
* Values are expressed as mean of results from three analyses ± S.D. HHDP—hexahydroxydiphenoyl group.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peron, G.; Hošek, J.; Prasad Phuyal, G.; Raj Kandel, D.; Adhikari, R.; Dall’Acqua, S. Comprehensive Characterization of Secondary Metabolites from Colebrookea oppositifolia (Smith) Leaves from Nepal and Assessment of Cytotoxic Effect and Anti-Nf-κB and AP-1 Activities In Vitro. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144897

AMA Style

Peron G, Hošek J, Prasad Phuyal G, Raj Kandel D, Adhikari R, Dall’Acqua S. Comprehensive Characterization of Secondary Metabolites from Colebrookea oppositifolia (Smith) Leaves from Nepal and Assessment of Cytotoxic Effect and Anti-Nf-κB and AP-1 Activities In Vitro. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(14):4897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144897

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peron, Gregorio, Jan Hošek, Ganga Prasad Phuyal, Dharma Raj Kandel, Rameshwar Adhikari, and Stefano Dall’Acqua. 2020. "Comprehensive Characterization of Secondary Metabolites from Colebrookea oppositifolia (Smith) Leaves from Nepal and Assessment of Cytotoxic Effect and Anti-Nf-κB and AP-1 Activities In Vitro" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 14: 4897. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21144897

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop