Next Article in Journal
Pilot Scale Study: First Demonstration of Hydrophobic Membranes for the Removal of Ammonia Molecules from Rendering Condensate Wastewater
Next Article in Special Issue
In-Silico Characterization of Glycosyl Hydrolase Family 1 β-Glucosidase from Trichoderma asperellum UPM1
Previous Article in Journal
SRC Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor and X-rays Combined Effect on Glioblastoma Cell Lines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Galactofuranose-Related Enzymes: Challenges and Hopes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 11
10.3390/ijms21113919
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combined Optimization of Codon Usage and Glycine Supplementation Enhances the Extracellular Production of a β-Cyclodextrin Glycosyltransferase from Bacillus sp. NR5 UPM in Escherichia coli

by
Nik Ida Mardiana Nik-Pa
1,2,
Mohamad Farhan Mohamad Sobri
1,3,
Suraini Abd-Aziz
1,
Mohamad Faizal Ibrahim
1,
Ezyana Kamal Bahrin
1,
Noorjahan Banu Mohammed Alitheen
4 and
Norhayati Ramli
1,*
1
Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
2
Section of Bioengineering Technology, University Kuala Lumpur Branch Campus Malaysian Institute of Chemical & Bioengineering Technology, Taboh Naning, Alor Gajah 78000, Melaka, Malaysia
3
School of Bioprocess Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kompleks Pusat Pengajian Jejawi 3, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
4
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(11), 3919; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113919
Submission received: 25 March 2020 / Revised: 2 May 2020 / Accepted: 5 May 2020 / Published: 30 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes: Structure, Activity and Reaction Products 2020)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Two optimization strategies, codon usage modification and glycine supplementation, were adopted to improve the extracellular production of Bacillus sp. NR5 UPM β-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGT-BS) in recombinant Escherichia coli. Several rare codons were eliminated and replaced with the ones favored by E. coli cells, resulting in an increased codon adaptation index (CAI) from 0.67 to 0.78. The cultivation of the codon modified recombinant E. coli following optimization of glycine supplementation enhanced the secretion of β-CGTase activity up to 2.2-fold at 12 h of cultivation as compared to the control. β-CGTase secreted into the culture medium by the transformant reached 65.524 U/mL at post-induction temperature of 37 °C with addition of 1.2 mM glycine and induced at 2 h of cultivation. A 20.1-fold purity of the recombinant β-CGTase was obtained when purified through a combination of diafiltration and nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) affinity chromatography. This combined strategy doubled the extracellular β-CGTase production when compared to the single approach, hence offering the potential of enhancing the expression of extracellular enzymes, particularly β-CGTase by the recombinant E. coli.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGTase, EC 2.4.1.19) is a carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZy) that belongs to glycosyl hydrolase family 13 (http://www.cazy.org/). This enzyme catalyzes transglycosylation reactions, including hydrolysis, cyclization, coupling and disproportionation [1]. Through the cyclization reaction, CGTase catalyzes the conversion of starch into cyclodextrin, with well-characterized ones such as α, β and γ-cyclodextrins [2]. Cyclodextrin has a broad range of applications in the food [3], agriculture [4] and pharmaceutical [5] industries, as well as in environmental engineering [6], hence it is crucial to develop an efficient process for the synthesis of CGTase.
Due to the problems concerning low CGTase production at longer cultivation time by the natural host cells [7], the use of a genetically engineered strain is seen as the potential approach to fulfil the higher demand of cyclodextrin at an industrial scale. However, the issues of inclusion body formation, slow growth and inactivation of protein [8] has made the expression and production of CGTase from recombinant Escherichia coli even more challenging. In order to circumvent these obstacles, several strategies have been adopted that include codon usage optimization where codons are modified in a selected sequence to the high-frequency codons favored in the expression host [2]. Codon optimization is a synonymous mutation that modifies the nucleotide sequence of a gene without altering the amino acid sequence.
Evidence showed that the choice of the synonymous codons can influence protein production by improving the correlation with the transfer RNA (tRNA) levels in the host [9] and changing the messenger RNA (mRNA) secondary structure [10]. The codons favored by the host cell are normally correlated with the large quantity of aminoacyl tRNAs [11] which guarantees the recycling of tRNA, hence resulting in an efficient gene translation. The presence of rare codons in the native gene could disrupt the translational efficiency due to the longer waiting time for a suitable aminoacyl tRNA [12]. In addition, rare codons could cause a slow elongation rate along the mRNA, resulting in ribosomal pause, hence causing the mRNA to be unstable [13]. In the worst case scenario, the rare codons could stimulate mRNA degradation [14].
It is also crucial to understand the genetic information of CGTase, so that a functional protein could be produced in a heterologous expression system. Several bioinformatics tools present in the ExPasy server, and in particular ProtParam [15], have been used to derive information about the stability, the total charge, the isoelectric point (pI) and hydrophobicity of β-CGTase.
The optimization of the cultivation process has been regularly employed to improve the expression of extracellular CGTase [16]. The use of inducers gives substantial advantages in altering the integrity of the cell wall of E. coli that will promote the secretion of extracellular recombinant enzyme into the culture medium. It is common that microbial cell membranes are very selective for the translocation of materials [17] in and out of the cell membrane. However, the rate and amount of materials transported across the cell membrane can be changed by altering the cell membrane permeability [18]. Glycine has been particularly shown to act as the best inducer in enhancing the secretion of recombinant β-CGTase as compared to Triton X-100 and xylose [19], even though all of these inducers were reported to play a role in increasing the permeability of cell membrane, which allowed protein translocation across the membrane.
In a previous study, the individual supplementation of glycine into the culture media was shown to enhance the α-CGTase secretion from 2.4 to 32 U/mL at 48 h of cultivation [20]. It is even more impressive that the addition of glycine as an inducer did not cause apparent effects on bacterial cell viability [19], which indicates that the secretion of recombinant β-CGTase into the culture medium was not due to cell lysis. Since the optimization of either codon usage or glycine supplementation could enhance the secretion of enzyme into the culture medium, we are hypothesizing that the combined optimization could further improve the extracellular expression of β-CGTase even better than a single approach.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Construction of Recombinant E. coli for Expression of codon-Optimized cgt-BS Gene

The codons for the native cgt-BS gene were optimized using the GenScript Rare Codon Analysis Tool software (https://www.genscript.com/tools/codon-frequency-table) to be more corresponding to the codon usage of E. coli, where the codon adaptation index (CAI) was increased from 0.67 to 0.78. Table 1 shows the codon usage of E. coli (as obtained from http://www.kazusa.or.jp/codon/; last accessed on 29 April 2019) as compared to the fraction of codons for both native (cgt-BS) and codon optimized (cocgt-BS) gene sequences.
The replacements of several rare codons with those favored by E. coli were noted such as AGA(R) and CGA(R) to CGC(R) and AUA(I) to AUC(I). The major changes in frequencies of selected codons to those preferred by E. coli were also recorded such as CUG(L) from 2 to 27, UUA(L) from 31 to 13 and CCG(P) from 2 to 18. The changes in codons of β-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGT-BS) were balanced with the host preference without altering the amino acid sequences. In a previous study, the systematic codon optimization strategy was employed to further improve the expression of α-CGTase in E. coli with 2.79-fold increment following after IPTG induction at 48 h of fermentation [2]. In this study, the codon optimized cocgt-BS gene was constructed in pQE30xa and in frame with 6×-His tag to assist in protein purification using affinity chromatography. The expression vector was successfully constructed and verified by sequencing before it was transformed into E. coli JM109.

2.2. Prediction of Theoretical Physicochemical Properties of β-Cyclodextrin Glycosyltransferase (CGT-BS)

The physicochemical parameters of recombinant CGT-BS protein were analyzed using ExPASY’s ProtParam tool at http://web.expasy.org/protparam/ and compared with the selected Bacillus spp. CGTases proteins (Table 2). The positively charged amino acids for the selected CGTases proteins including CGT-BS were relatively similar, ranging between 46 and 52. The presence of low number of positively charged amino acids (Arg and Lys) as compared to negatively charged amino acids (Asp and Glu) in CGT-BS and other selected Bacillus spp. CGTases might contribute to the stability of these proteins. Arg was reported to act as suppressor of aggregation and destabilizer of proteins, while Lys have either little effect or might not contribute to the stability of proteins [21].
However, the formation of a salt bridge was suggested through the interaction of a positively charged amino acid with a negatively charged one, potentially contributing to protein conformational stability, especially when these two ionic groups are located adjacent to each other [22]. In addition, the aliphatic index of CGT-BS indicates a higher value and showed a close similitude to other selected CGTases proteins, hence indicating thermally stable CGTase proteins. Nonetheless, the instability index classified all selected CGTases including CGT-BS as stable proteins.

2.3. Optimization of Glycine Supplementation to Improve Extracellular Secretion of Recombinant β-CGTase

To further enhance the expression level of the extracellular recombinant β-CGTase from E. coli, the optimum glycine supplementation was determined using a central composite design (CCD). Glycine was found to cause morphological changes, such as an enlargement of spheroidal morphology in E. coli, as it is integrated into the nucleotide-activated peptidoglycan precursors, which leads to the increased permeability of host cell [23,24]. The glycine added into the culture medium could replace the alanine residues in the peptide component of the peptidoglycan of E. coli cell wall, resulting in a more loosely cross-linked peptidoglycan and therefore, enhancing the permeability of outer membrane of E. coli [25], without causing bacterial cell lysis [19,24].
A total of 20 experimental runs of different combinations of glycine supplementation were carried out in this study where the response was β-CGTase activity. The fifth column of Table 3 shows experimental values obtained in this study as compared to the values predicted by CCD (sixth column). β-CGTase activities measured were ranged from a minimum value of 3.109 U/mL to a maximum value of 65.733 U/mL. Based on Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) (Table 4), the model fit the data well and the model terms A, B and C corresponding to concentration of glycine, induction time and post-induction temperature, respectively were implied as significant factors that influence the expression of recombinant β-CGTase with p-values less than 0.05. In addition, p-value for ‘lack of fit’ showed greater than 0.05, hence indicated the ‘lack of fit’ of the model is insignificant. Therefore, the model was fit with the responses data collected and was desirable for further experiment. The multiple regression equation for the β-CGTase activity derived from the above three factors analyzed by Design Expert Software (Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA, Version 7) is as follows:
β - CGTase = 64.17 + 2.17 A − 3.15 B + 2.18 C + 3.90 AB − 1.52 AC + 0.4 BC − 7.25 A 2 − 9.96 B 2 − 20.81 C 2
where A, concentration of glycine; B, induction time; C, post-induction temperature.
The goodness of the model expressed by coefficient of determination (R2) was calculated as 0.9966. This explained 99.66% of the total variation for β-CGTase activity. Meanwhile, the Adjusted R2 was calculated to be 0.9936, indicating that only <1% of the total variation was not included in the model. The adjusted R2 also indicated that a good agreement was achieved between the response value and predicted value [26]. The predicted R2 of 0.9763 was in reasonable agreement with the adjusted R2. Therefore, the regression model was applied to calculate the predicted values (Table 3). From the results obtained, the optimum β-CGTase activity for the experimental and predicted values was achieved using 1.2 mM glycine, 37 °C post-induction temperature and 2 h induction time.
The relation between the concentrations of glycine and induction time on β-CGTase activity is shown in Figure 1a. The ANOVA showed that the effect of glycine concentration on induction time (AB) was the most significant factor on the expression of recombinant β-CGTase (p < 0.0001). The increased of glycine concentration until it reached 1.2 mM followed by the induction time at 2 h resulted in higher recombinant β-CGTase activity (65.733 U/mL). However, a reduction of the recombinant β-CGTase activity (29.961 U/mL) was observed at 3.68 h of induction time with fixed glycine concentration, hence indicating that induction time had greater effect than glycine concentration. When the induction time was kept constant at 2 h, the recombinant β-CGTase activity was 40.495 and 47.644 U/mL with the addition of 0.53 and 1.87 mM glycine, respectively (Table 3). At high inducer concentrations, the reduction in specific growth rate was critical that led to early stationary phase and cell death [27].
According to Li et al. [7], the extracellular secretion of the recombinant α-CGTase into the culture medium of E. coli was affected by glycine induction time, where the supplementation of glycine at the middle of the log phase of cell growth resulted in higher extracellular activity of the recombinant enzyme. A higher cellular energy level or carbon source was not only used for producing the recombinant protein, but also for the movement of proteins into the periplasm [28]. Therefore, the induction time between the early-log stage and middle-log phase where the carbon source is still available is suitable for the production of recombinant β-CGTase from E. coli.
The effect of glycine concentration on post-induction temperature (AC) was also a significant factor (p = 0.0246) that influenced the expression of the extracellular recombinant β-CGTase (Figure 1b). A higher glycine concentration at higher post-induction temperature resulted in an increment of the recombinant β-CGTase production until it reached the optimum level which was at 37 °C post-induction temperature and 1.2 mM of glycine concentration. Any further increase beyond this point led to reduction of the recombinant β-CGTase activity. When the induction time was kept constant at 2 h with 1.2 mM glycine concentration, the recombinant β-CGTase activity was 8.469 and 3.109 U/mL at 28 °C and 45 °C post induction temperature, respectively.
It has been stated that the number of ribosomes per cell and level of ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) remained constant in the temperature range of 23–42 °C [29]. The polypeptide chain elongation rate would also increase with an increase in temperature, resulting in higher synthesis of proteins. However, by further increasing the temperature, the microorganism spends a lot of energy for maintenance. On the other hand, the transport of nutrients is also hindered at lower temperature [30]. Nevertheless, the interaction between induction time and post-induction temperature gave insignificant effect to the expression of recombinant β-CGTase (p = 0.5044), which was greater than 0.05 (Figure 1c). Lo et al. [26] stated that the interactions among the cultivation conditions would not give a significant influence towards the expression of the enzyme.
To confirm the model’s adequacy for predicting the maximum β-CGTase activity, the experiment was carried out by using optimum conditions (1.2 mM glycine, 37 °C post-induction temperature and 2 h induction time) with a desirability of 0.965. Based on the results obtained, in comparison with the predicted value, there was relatively small error which was only 2%. Therefore, a good agreement was achieved between the predictive and actual values of β-CGTase activity at the optimum conditions, giving high validity of the model. The supplementation of glycine into the culture medium enhanced the extracellular secretion of β-CGTase activity by E. coli carrying pQEcocgt-BS as compared to the culture without glycine (Figure 2).
With the addition of glycine using the optimized feeding strategy as discussed earlier, the β-CGTase activity increased gradually and reached its highest secretion of 65.524 U/mL at 12 h of cultivation, which was increased by 1.7-fold in comparison to a single approach of codon usage optimization and 5.6-fold as compared to the wild type strain when using soluble starch as a substrate [31]. In a different study by Ding et al. [17], the secretion of recombinant α-CGTase into the culture medium of E. coli was improved by adding 0.3% glycine, resulted in 12.89 U/mL of activity, which was 15 times higher as compared to the culture without glycine.

2.4. Purification of Recombinant β-CGTase and Its Kinetic Parameters

The recombinant β-CGTase was purified from the 12 h culture induced with 1.2 mM glycine at 2 h induction time at 37 °C. The recombinant β-CGTase carried an N-terminal fusion peptide containing a 6×-His sequence that has metal-binding affinity. The enzyme was purified through a combination of diafiltration and nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) affinity chromatography, which resulted in increased purity to 20.1-fold. The protein was then concentrated using ultrafiltration where the purity was increased to 23.8-fold (Table 5). However, by taking into account the theoretical extinction coefficient for the oxidized and reduced CGT-BS protein of 142,810 and 142,560 M−1·cm−1, respectively (Table 2) with the absorbance of the purified (ultrafiltration) protein fraction was 0.109, the purified protein concentration was calculated to be 0.06 mg/mL. Nonetheless, the purity of codon optimized protein (cocgt-BS) obtained in this study was not much different with the resultant recombinant cgt-BS protein (non-optimized codon) in the previous study [19]. Similarly, the results of sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) also showed the expected band size of the purified protein at approximately 80 kDa (Supplementary Figure S1), in correlation with the theoretical molecular weight predicted using ExPASY’s ProtParam online tool (Table 2).
A different range of soluble starch concentrations was then tested to produce β-cyclodextrin by recombinant β-CGTase. A maximum β-cyclodextrin of 16.57 mg/mL was achieved by using 4 mg/mL of soluble starch (Figure 3). However, the production of β-cyclodextrin was reduced and attained almost a similar concentration with an increased soluble starch concentration. At this point, the enzyme could probably reach saturation with the substrate [32]. The cyclization reaction of β-CGTase was then described by Michaelis–Menten kinetic parameters (Figure 4) to evaluate the performance of recombinant β-CGTase for β-cyclodextrin production [33,34]. The Vmax and Km values were evaluated to be 1.25 mg/mL/min and 0.025 mg/mL, respectively. A small value of Km could indicate a high affinity for the substrate [35] and it could achieve its highest catalytic efficiency at minimum concentration of soluble starch.

2.5. Characterization of Recombinant β-CGTase

The effects of pH and pH stability on the crude and purified codon optimized β-CGTase activities were studied and presented in Figure 5a,b, respectively. The purified β-CGTase was highly tolerant in the pH range of 5–7, with relative activity equivalent to 80% and more. Nonetheless, both the crude and purified β-CGTases showed an optimum activity at pH 6. Extreme conditions at pH 4 and pH 8–10 gave critical effects on both crude and purified β-CGTases relative activity with reduction of more than 52%. After incubating the crude and purified β-CGTases with different pH buffer for 30 min, the purified β-CGTase showed more than 50% residual activity at pH 5–9. Meanwhile, crude β-CGTase showed large reduction of its residual activity at the same pH range by 30–65%. An almost similar result was obtained by Ong et al. [35] where the purified recombinant CGTase G1 was found to be stable over a wide range of pH from 5 to 9 with a gradual loss of activity at acidic pH.
The effects of temperature and temperature stability on crude and purified β-CGTase activities are presented in Figure 6a,b, respectively. The purified β-CGTase could be classified as thermo-tolerant, able to maintain a relative activity of more than 84% at 50–70 °C. However, the crude β-CGTase showed a lower temperature tolerance where the relative activity was reduced to approximately 70% at the same temperature ranges. However, the optimum temperature for both crude and purified β-CGTases was the same at 60 °C.
Following that, the crude and purified β-CGTases were incubated for 30 min with soluble starch at different temperatures ranged from 40 to 90 °C. The residual activity of the purified β-CGTase was reduced to 60% at 60 °C, but the residual activity of the crude β-CGTase was slightly lower at the same temperature which was at 52%. In a previous study, the purified α-CGTase retained 50% of its initial cyclization activity after incubation for approximately 8 h at 40 °C, 1.25 h at 45 °C and 0.5 h at 50 °C [7]. The high stability of the purified β-CGTase produced from this study with respect to pH and temperature could makes this recombinant enzyme potentially useful in various applications. However, more characterization studies need to be carried out in the future prior to its application at an industrial scale.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Bacterial Strain and Plasmid

cgt-BS gene from a previous study [36] was mutated with codon usage optimization. Escherichia coli JM109 [endA1, recA1, gyrA96, thi, hsdR17 (rk-,mk+), relA1, supE44, D (lac-proAB), F’ (tra D36, pro AB, lacIqZ Δ M15)] from Promega (Madison, WI, USA) was used as a host strain and plasmid pQE30xa (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) was used as an expression vector.

3.2. Codon Optimization of cgt-BS Gene

The codons of the cgt-BS gene with the size of 2460 bp originally from Bacillus sp. NR5 UPM (GenBank accession number: HQ876173.1) were optimized based on the codon preference of E. coli by referring to a codon table containing fractional preference for each codon equal to that found in the genome of E. coli. By using the GenScript Rare Codon Analysis Tool software (https://www.genscript.com/tools/codon-frequency-table), the codons were optimized without compromising the encoded amino acid sequences functional for protein expression. The synthesis of the codon-optimized gene was performed by Apical Scientific Sdn. Bhd., Malaysia.

3.3. Construction of the Expression System

The amplified PCR fragment encoding the codon optimized cgt-BS gene was ligated into pQE30xa vector, designated as pQEcoCGT-BS. The amplification of cocgt-BS gene was performed under standard PCR conditions with 1 μg of genomic DNA, 200 ρmol of each forward and reverse primer, 0.01 μL of Taq DNA polymerase in 1× reaction buffer and 0.2 mM of dNTPs in a final volume of 20 μL. The specific primers designed for amplification of cocgt-BS gene used for construction of pQEcoCGT-BS expression system were coCGTF 5′-GGATCCCTTCTGTAAATTGACCAACCGG-3′ and coCGTR 5′-AAGCTTTTACCAGTTGATCATTACGGTA-3′ for forward and reverse primer, respectively. The forward and reverse primers were designed to contain the restriction sites BamHI and HindIII (underlined), respectively. The amplified DNA fragment was purified after performing agarose gel electrophoresis using Hi Yield Gel/PCR DNA Mini Kit (Real Biotech Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan) and digested with BamHI and HindIII before ligation into pQE30xa. The ligation products were subsequently introduced into E. coli JM109. Luria-Bertani (LB)-ampicillin (100 μg/mL) was used to plate out the transformation mixtures. After overnight growth at 37 °C, colonies were chosen for insert confirmation.

3.4. Prediction of Physicochemical Characteristics

Multiple physicochemical characteristics of the CGT-BS protein were evaluated by ExPASY’s ProtParam online tool at http://web.expasy.org/protparam/ [15] including theoretical isoelectric point (pI), number of positively and negatively charged amino acids, extinction coefficient (EC), instability index (II), aliphatic index (AI), grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) and total number of atoms (TNA), in comparison to other CGTases from selected Bacillus spp.

3.5. Medium and Culture Conditions

Recombinant E. coli JM109 harboring pQEcoCGT-BS was inoculated into LB broth containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin for preparation of inoculum. The inoculum flask was incubated overnight at 37 °C in an incubator shaker, agitated at 200 rpm until an optical density of 1.5 at 600 nm was obtained. The inoculum size of 10% v/v was adjusted and standardized throughout the experiments. The production medium was prepared using Terrific Broth (TB) supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin for the preparation of crude recombinant β-CGTase, according to the design of experiment carried out using central composite design (CCD) as stated in Section 3.6. The culture was incubated at 37 °C, agitated at 200 rpm for 24 h and sampled every 4 h. For estimation of cell growth, the pellets were appropriately diluted, and the optical density was measured at 600 nm by using spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-2900, Hitachi, Japan).

3.6. Design of Experiments for Optimum Condition of Glycine Supplementation

Experimental design was carried out using Design Expert Software (Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA, Version 7). The results obtained from the CCD was subjected to the statistical analysis to identify the variables that had significant effect on the response which was β-CGTase activity. Three parameters which were the concentration of glycine (mM), time of induction (h) and post-induction temperature (°C) consisting 20 runs (14 combinations with 6 replications of the center points and axial points of α equals to 1.68) were carried out in this study. The value set for each parameter is given in Table 3. The range of each parameters were based on previous study where the glycine supplementation was optimized using one factor at a time approach [19]. All values were tested in order to get the maximum production of recombinant β-CGTase. Expression of β-CGTase was then confirmed by measuring its activity following 12 h of fermentation with culture condition stated in Section 3.5 and with the optimal glycine supplementation. For the determination of enzyme expression profile, cell-free supernatant was collected by centrifuging the fermentation broth at 14,500× g for 10 min at 4 °C. All runs were conducted in triplicate and the significance value of the experimental data was analyzed using ANOVA test to determine factors having a significant effect (p ≤ 0.05). The validation of the response surface model was done in triplicate under the predicted optimum conditions.

3.7. Purification of Recombinant β-CGTase

The recombinant β-CGTase was subjected to AKTA Flux tangential flow filtration system (GE Healthcare, New York, NY, USA) using a 30 kDa molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) membrane, equilibrated with 10 mM imidazole. Affinity purification was then performed on a Ni-NTA column on an AKTA Avant chromatography system (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sample was incubated for 30 min in the column, followed by washing with buffer containing 20 mM imidazole (pH 8.0). Elution buffer containing 250 mM imidazole (pH 8.0) was used to elute the bound enzyme. The fractions with maximum activity were pooled together and Amicon ultrafiltration membrane kit (30 kDa MWCO membrane) was used to concentrate the samples. The samples were assayed for β-CGTase activity and protein concentration.

3.8. Assay of β-CGTase Activity

The β-CGTase activity was measured using phenolphthalein assay [37]. Reaction mixture containing 1 mL of 40 mg of soluble starch in 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) and 0.1 mL of enzyme solution was incubated at 60 °C for 10 min in a water bath. Then, 3.5 mL of 30 mM NaOH was added to stop the reaction. Subsequently, 0.5 mL of 0.02% (w/v) phenolphthalein in 5 mM Na2CO3 solution was added to the reaction mixture and mixed well. After 15 min, the reduction in color intensity was measured at 550 nm. Blanks lacking the CGTase were analyzed simultaneously with each batch of samples. As a standard, the soluble starch and enzyme were replaced with 0.5 mg of β-cyclodextrin and 0.1 mL of water, respectively. A calibration curve was made using β-cyclodextrin in 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.0. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that formed 1 µmol β-cyclodextrin per min under the conditions defined above.

3.9. Molecular Mass Determination of β-CGTase

Protein concentration was measured according to Lowry et al. [38] with bovine serum albumin as a standard. The protein size was analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) at constant voltage of 100 V for 1.5 h at room temperature until the band was migrated sufficiently. Gel (8.3 cm × 7.3 cm) was run according to the method of Laemmli [39]. The concentrations of the stacking and resolving gels were 5% and 12%, respectively. Appropriately diluted protein samples (30 μg) with 4× marker containing 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 40% (w/v) of glycerol, 10% (w/v) of SDS, 5% (v/v) of mercaptoethanol and 0.05% (w/v) of bromophenol blue were boiled for 5 min before applied into each lane. The lane was formed by a 10-well comb (Mini-PROTEAN®, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and the molecular weight marker (PageRuler™ Unstained Protein Ladder) from Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA was used as a standard. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

3.10. Characterization of Crude and Purified Codon Optimized Recombinant β-CGTase

The measurement of the optimum pH for the crude and purified recombinant β-CGTase was done by reacting 0.1 mL enzyme with 1 mL of 40 mg of soluble starch dissolved in different buffers at pH 4–9 [40]. The phosphate buffer (0.1 M), pH 6 used in the β-CGTase assay was replaced with the following buffers: sodium acetate buffer, 0.1 M (pH 4–5), potassium phosphate buffer, 0.1 M (pH 6–8) and glycine-NaOH buffer, 0.1 M (pH 9). Meanwhile, the effect of pH stability on crude and purified recombinant β-CGTase was determined by incubating 0.1 mL of enzyme with 0.2 mL of different buffers at pH 4–9, without substrate at 50 °C for 30 min.
On the other hand, the optimum temperature for the crude and purified recombinant β-CGTase was determined by incubating the reaction mixture of β-CGTase assay in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.0 at different temperatures ranging from 40 to 80 °C for 10 min [40]. Meanwhile, the effect of temperature on the stability of crude and purified recombinant β-CGTase was determined by incubating 0.1 mL of enzyme with 0.2 mL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) without substrate for 30 min at different temperatures, ranging from 40–90 °C. For both effects of pH and temperature, the reaction was carried out according to the method of β-CGTase assay as described above [37].

3.11. Cyclodextrin Production and Kinetic Parameters of Purified β-CGTase

The kinetic parameters (Km and Vmax) for the pure enzyme were determined by incubating 0.5 U/mL of purified β-CGTase in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) at various concentrations of soluble starch solution, ranging from 2 to 10 mg/mL at 60 °C for 30 min. The values of Km and Vmax were analyzed by linear regression with the linear transformation (Hanes-Woolf plot) of the Michaelis–Menten equation using an Excel curve-fitting program (Microsoft Excel 2010, San Francisco, CA, USA) [41]. The concentrations of β-cyclodextrin in the final sample were determined by Refractive Index–High Performance Liquid Chromatography (RI-HPLC) (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), using a Lichrospher-NH2 column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) eluted with 65:35 acetonitrile–water at 1 mL/min.

4. Conclusions

The combined strategy of codon usage modification and optimization of glycine supplementation has been shown to greatly improve the expression of extracellular recombinant β-CGTase as compared to a single approach. The adaptation of rare codons of the cgt-BS gene to the preferred ones in E. coli is important to ensure an efficient expression of functional protein, as demonstrated by a CAI of 0.78. With the help of an in-silico tool, the recombinant CGT-BS protein was determined as a stable protein. In addition, the optimized glycine feeding into the cultivation medium at the concentration of 1.2 mM, induced at 2 h induction time at 37 °C post-induction temperature altogether managed to enhance the recombinant β-CGTase activity up to 2.2-fold at 12 h of cultivation as compared to un-optimized conditions. This combined approach could be potentially used to further enhance the expression of recombinant protein at the upstream and downstream levels.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/11/3919/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: N.R.; Methodology, investigation and data curation: N.I.M.N.-P., M.F.M.S., and N.R.; Writing—Original draft preparation: N.I.M.N.-P. and N.R.; Writing—Review and editing: N.R., S.A.-A., M.F.I, E.K.B. and N.B.M.A.; Supervision: N.R., S.A.-A., M.F.I., E.K.B. and N.B.M.A.; Funding acquisition: N.R. and S.A.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/2/2013/SG05/UPM/02/17) provided by the Ministry of Education, Malaysia.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Universiti Kuala Lumpur (UniKL) and Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA) for the provision of study leave and scholarship of N.I.M.N.-P.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Van der Veen, B.A.; Uitdehaag, J.C.M.; Dijkstra, B.W.; Dijkhuizen, L. Engineering of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase reaction and product specificity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1543, 336–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Liu, H.; Li, J.; Du, G.; Zhou, J.; Chen, J. Enhanced production of α-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase in Escherichia coli by systematic codon usage optimization. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 39, 1841–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Samperio, C.; Boyer, R.; Eigel, W.N., III; Holland, K.W.; McKinney, J.S.; O’Keefe, S.F.; Smith, R.; Marcy, J.E. Enhancement of plant essential oils’ aqueous solubility and stability using alpha and beta cyclodextrin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 12950–12956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Campos, E.V.R.; Proenç, P.L.F.; Oliveira, J.L.; Melville, C.C. Chitosan nanoparticles functionalized with β-cyclodextrin: A promising carrier for botanical pesticides. Sci. Rep. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Qiu, N.; Cheng, X.; Wang, G.; Wang, W.; Wen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Song, H.; Ma, L.; Wei, Y.; Peng, A.; et al. Inclusion complex of barbigerone with hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin: Preparation and in vitro evaluation. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, G.; Xie, X.; Qin, L.; Hu, X.; Zhang, D.; Xu, J.; Li, D.; Ji, X.; Huang, Y.; Tu, Y.; et al. Simple synthesis of a swellable porous β-cyclodextrin-based polymer for rapid removal of organic micro-pollutants from water. Green Chem. 2019, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, Z.; Li, B.; Gu, Z.; Du, G.; Wu, J.; Chen, J. Extracellular expression and biochemical characterization of alpha-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Paenibacillus macerans. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 886–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rosano, G.L.; Ceccarelli, E.A. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli : Advances and challenges. Front Microbiol. 2014, 5, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Zhou, J.; Liu, H.; Du, G.; Li, J.; Chen, J. Production of α-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase in Bacillus megaterium MS941 by systematic codon usage optimization. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 10285–10292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Angov, E. Codon usage: Nature’s roadmap to expression and folding of proteins. Biotechnol. J. 2011, 6, 650–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gasmi, N.; Fudalej, F.; Kallel, H. A molecular approach to optimize hIFN α2b expression and secretion in Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 89, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Scorer, C.A.; Carrier, M.J.; Rosenberger, R.F. Amino acid misincorporation during high-level expression of mouse epidermal growth factor in Escherichia coli. Nucleic. Acids Res. 1991, 19, 3511–3516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Koda, A.; Bogaki, T.; Minetoki, T.; Hirotsune, M. High expression of a synthetic gene encoding potato α-glucan phosphorylase in Aspergillus niger. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2005, 100, 531–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Komar, A.A.; Lesnik, T.; Reiss, C. Synonymous codon substitutions affect ribosome traffic and protein folding during in vitro translation. FEBS Lett. 1999, 462, 387–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Gasteiger, E.; Hoogland, C.; Gattiker, A.; Wilkins, M.R.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In The Proteomics Protocols Handbook; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2005; pp. 571–607. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheng, J.; Wu, D.; Chen, S.; Chen, J.; Wu, J. High-level extracellular production of α-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase with recombinant Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 3797–3802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ding, R.; Li, Z.; Chen, S.; Wu, D.; Wu, J.; Chen, J. Enhanced secretion of recombinant α-cyclodextrin glucosyltransferase from E. coli by medium additives. Process. Biochem. 2010, 45, 880–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tesfai, B.T.; Wu, D.; Chen, S.; Chen, J.; Wu, J. Strategies for enhancing extracellular secretion of recombinant cyclodextrin glucanotransferase in E. coli. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 167, 897–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nik-Pa, N.I.M.; Abd-Aziz, S.; Ibrahim, M.F.; Alitheen, N.B.M.; Ramli, N. Improved extracellular secretion of β-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Escherichia coli by glycine supplementation without apparent cell lysis. Asia Pac. J. Mol. Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 27, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, B.; Wang, L.; Su, L.; Chen, S.; Li, Z.; Chen, J.; Wu, J. Glycine and Triton X-100 enhanced secretion of recombinant α-CGTase mediated by OmpA signal peptide in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioprocess. Eng. 2012, 17, 1128–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Anumalla, B.; Prabhu, N.P. Counteracting effect of charged amino acids against the destabilization of proteins by arginine. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 189, 541–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Smith, M.S.; Billings, W.M.; Whitby, F.G.; Miller, M.B.; Price, J.L. Enhancing a long-range salt bridge with intermediate aromatic and nonpolar amino acids. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 5882–5886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Choi, J.H.; Lee, S.Y. Secretory and extracellular production of recombinant proteins using Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 64, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, Z.; Gu, Z.; Wang, M.; Du, G.; Wu, J.; Chen, J. Delayed supplementation of glycine enhances extracellular secretion of the recombinant alpha-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010, 85, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Pan, X.; Hou, J.; Ran, C.; Zhou, Z. Improving extracellular production of Serratia marcescens lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase CBP21 and Aeromonas veronii B565 chitinase Chi92 in Escherichia coli and their synergism. AMB Express 2017, 7, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Lo, P.K.; Hassan, O.; Ahmad, A.; Mahadi, N.M.; Illias, R.M. Excretory over-expression of Bacillus sp. G1 cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) in Escherichia coli: Optimization of the cultivation conditions by response surface methodology. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2007, 40, 1256–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Donovan, R.S.; Robinson, C.W.; Click, B.R. Review: Optimizing inducer and culture conditions for expression of foreign proteins under the control of the lac promoter. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1996, 16, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sanden, A.M.; Prytz, I.; Tubulekas, I.; Forberg, C.; Le, H.; Hektor, A.; Neubauer, P.; Pragai, Z.; Harwood, C.; Ward, A.; et al. Limiting factors in Escherichia coli Fed-batch production of recombinant proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2003, 81, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Duan, X.; Chen, S.; Chen, J.; Wu, J. Enhancing the cyclodextrin production by synchronous utilization of isoamylase and α-CGTase. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 3467–3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Farewell, A.; Neidhardt, F.C. Effect of temperature on in vivo protein synthetic capacity in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1998, 180, 4704–4710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ramli, N.; Abd-aziz, S.; Hassan, M.A.; Alitheen, N.; Kamaruddin, K. Potential cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase producer from locally isolated bacteria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 7317–7321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Robinson, P.K. Enzymes: Principles and biotechnological applications. Essays Biocehmistry 2015, 59, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Deng, C.; Li, J.; Shin, H.; Du, G.; Chen, J.; Liu, L. Efficient expression of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus in Escherichia coli by promoter engineering and downstream box evolution. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 266, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rakmai, J.; Cheirsilp, B. Continuous production of β-cyclodextrin by cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase immobilized in mixed gel beads: Comparative study in continuous stirred tank reactor and packed bed reactor. Biochem. Eng. J. 2016, 105, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ong, R.M.; Goh, K.M.; Mahadi, N.M.; Hassan, O.; Rahman, R.N.Z.R.A.; Illias, R.M. Cloning, extracellular expression and characterization of a predominant β-CGTase from Bacillus sp. G1 in E. coli. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35, 1705–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ramli, N.; Abd-Aziz, S.; Alitheen, N.B.; Hassan, M.A.; Maeda, T. Improvement of cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase gene expression in Escherichia coli by insertion of regulatory sequences involved in the promotion of RNA transcription. Mol. Biotechnol. 2013, 54, 961–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kaneko, T.; Kato, T.; Nakamura, N.; Horikoshi, K. Spectrophotometric determination of cyclization activity of β-cyclodextrin-forming cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase. J. Jpn. Soc. Starch. Sci. 1987, 34, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lowry, O.H.; Randall, R.J.; Rosebrough, N.J.; Farr, A.L. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Laemmli, U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rahman, K.; Illias, R.M.; Hassan, O.; Mahmood, N.A.N.; Rashid, N.A.A. Molecular cloning of a cyclodextrin glucanotransferase gene from alkalophilic Bacillus sp. TS1-1 and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2006, 39, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Martins, R.F.; Hatti-Kaul, R. A new cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from an alkaliphilic Bacillus agaradhaerens isolate: Purification and characterisation. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2002, 30, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 03919 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of (a) glycine concentration vs. induction time, (b) glycine concentration vs. post-induction temperature, (c) post-induction temperature vs. induction time on the recombinant β-CGTase activities.
Figure 1. Effects of (a) glycine concentration vs. induction time, (b) glycine concentration vs. post-induction temperature, (c) post-induction temperature vs. induction time on the recombinant β-CGTase activities.
Ijms 21 03919 g001
Ijms 21 03919 g002 550
Figure 2. E. coli harboring pQEcoCGT-BS were grown in Terrific Broth (TB) media without glycine (□) and with glycine supplementation at the optimized conditions (▲) which were at post-induction temperature of 37 °C, glycine concentration of 1.2 mM and induction at 2 h of cultivation as indicates by arrow.
Figure 2. E. coli harboring pQEcoCGT-BS were grown in Terrific Broth (TB) media without glycine (□) and with glycine supplementation at the optimized conditions (▲) which were at post-induction temperature of 37 °C, glycine concentration of 1.2 mM and induction at 2 h of cultivation as indicates by arrow.
Ijms 21 03919 g002
Ijms 21 03919 g003 550
Figure 3. Production of β-cyclodextrin by purified β-CGTase using different concentrations of soluble starch. Standard deviations are shown as bars and the deviation from the mean is below 5%.
Figure 3. Production of β-cyclodextrin by purified β-CGTase using different concentrations of soluble starch. Standard deviations are shown as bars and the deviation from the mean is below 5%.
Ijms 21 03919 g003
Ijms 21 03919 g004 550
Figure 4. Hanes–Woolf plot to identify Km and Vmax which were used in the Michaelis–Menten equation. S: substrate, v: velocity.
Figure 4. Hanes–Woolf plot to identify Km and Vmax which were used in the Michaelis–Menten equation. S: substrate, v: velocity.
Ijms 21 03919 g004
Ijms 21 03919 g005 550
Figure 5. Properties of the recombinant β-CGTase produced by E. coli harboring pQEcoCGT-BS; (a) Optimal pH and (b) pH stability of the crude (○) and purified (■) β-CGTase.
Figure 5. Properties of the recombinant β-CGTase produced by E. coli harboring pQEcoCGT-BS; (a) Optimal pH and (b) pH stability of the crude (○) and purified (■) β-CGTase.
Ijms 21 03919 g005
Ijms 21 03919 g006 550
Figure 6. Properties of the recombinant β-CGTase produced by E. coli harboring pQEcoCGT-BS; (a) Temperature profile and (b) temperature stability of the crude (○) and purified (■) β-CGTase.
Figure 6. Properties of the recombinant β-CGTase produced by E. coli harboring pQEcoCGT-BS; (a) Temperature profile and (b) temperature stability of the crude (○) and purified (■) β-CGTase.
Ijms 21 03919 g006
Table
Table 1. Codon preference in E. coli, codon usage in the native gene (cgt-BS) and the optimized synthetic gene (cocgt-BS).
Table 1. Codon preference in E. coli, codon usage in the native gene (cgt-BS) and the optimized synthetic gene (cocgt-BS).
Amino AcidCodonRelative FrequencyFrequencyAmino AcidCodonRelative FrequencyFrequency
E. colicgt-BScocgt-BSE. colicgt-BScocgt-BS
Ala (A)GCA0.22117Leu (L)CUA0.0350
GCC0.2589CUC0.1046
GCG0.34516CUG0.55227
GCU0.1991CUU0.1095
Arg (R)AGA0.0430UUA0.113113
AGG0.0310UUG0.1199
CGA0.0550Lys (K)AAA0.762227
CGC0.37412AAG0.24105
CGG0.0812Met (M)AUG1.001515
CGU0.4288Phe (F)UUC0.491114
Asn (N)AAC0.613441UUU0.512421
AAU0.393629Pro (P)CCA0.2074
Asp (D)GAC0.411120CCC0.1032
GAU0.593728CCG0.55218
Cys (C)UGC0.5714CCU0.1675
UGU0.4330Ser (S)AGC0.271619
Gln (Q)CAA0.312210AGU0.13118
CAG0.691022UCA0.121614
Glu (E)GAA0.702221UCC0.1769
GAG0.30910UCG0.13414
Gly (G)GGA0.09133UCU0.19143
GGC0.401722Thr (T)ACA0.301711
GGG0.13137ACC0.431426
GGU0.381627ACG0.231413
His (H)CAC0.4877ACU0.21116
CAU0.521010Trp (V)UGG1.001515
Ile (I)AUA0.07120Tyr (Y)UAC0.472019
AUC0.461330UAU0.532829
AUU0.472419Val (V)GUA0.171810
GUC0.201118
GUG0.34511
GUU0.291914
Table
Table 2. Physicochemical parameters of CGT-BS (this study) in comparison to the other CGTases from selected Bacillus spp., computed using ExPASY’s ProtParam tool.
Table 2. Physicochemical parameters of CGT-BS (this study) in comparison to the other CGTases from selected Bacillus spp., computed using ExPASY’s ProtParam tool.
DescriptionAccession NumberTheoretical MW (Da)pIR+R−EC a (M−1·cm−1)EC b (M−1·cm−1)IIStabilityAIGRAVYTNA
Bacillus sp. NR5 UPM cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (cgt) gene *HQ876173.180,622.344.814876142,810142,56024.57stable75.36−0.40511,108
B. circulans strain 251 cgt geneX78145.177,309.286.085258120,795120,67022.72stable74.05−0.25010,710
B. licheniformis cgtA gene for cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase)X15752.178,002.685.574859124,805124,68018.17stable71.75−0.24310,785
Bacillus sp. (strain no. 38-2) cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase (CGTase) geneM19880.178,249.295.414963133,285133,16025.23stable75.76−0.28610,826
Bacillus sp. strain Y112 cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase precursor (cgtase) geneKX579963.280,168.904.2346111129,735129,61030.92stable73.39−0.48310,983
Bacillus sp. BL-31 cyclodextrin glucanotransferase (cgt) geneEF363797.180,096.844.2446110129,735129,61030.65stable73.39−0.47810,974
* This study. Theoretical isoelectric point (pI), number of positively charged amino acids − Arg + Lys (R+); number of negatively charged amino acids − Asp + Glu (R−); extinction coefficient (EC) (a: assuming all pairs of Cys residues form cystines, b: assuming all Cys residues are reduced); instability index (II); aliphatic index (AI); grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY); total number of atoms (TNA).
Table
Table 3. Central composite design (CCD) matrix, the predicted and experimental values obtained for the expression of codon optimized CGTase (cocgtBS) from recombinant E. coli.
Table 3. Central composite design (CCD) matrix, the predicted and experimental values obtained for the expression of codon optimized CGTase (cocgtBS) from recombinant E. coli.
RunConcentration (mM)Induction Time (h)Post-Induction Temperature (°C)β-CGTase Activity (U/mL)
ExperimentalPredicted
11.601.0042.023.4723.47
21.603.0032.034.2332.38
31.202.0037.064.7664.17
41.202.0037.063.8864.17
51.603.0042.024.3725.77
61.202.0037.062.7264.17
71.202.0037.065.7364.17
81.203.6837.029.9630.70
91.202.0037.063.9764.17
101.601.0032.030.1831.67
111.202.0037.063.8364.17
120.803.0032.016.6117.19
131.200.3237.042.8841.31
140.803.0042.017.5716.66
151.202.0028.68.479.11
160.801.0032.032.9232.10
171.202.0045.43.111.65
181.872.0037.047.6447.31
190.801.0042.027.5529.98
200.532.0037.040.5040.01
Table
Table 4. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for response surface quadratic model for the expression of extracellular recombinant CGTase (cocgtBS) from recombinant E. coli.
Table 4. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for response surface quadratic model for the expression of extracellular recombinant CGTase (cocgtBS) from recombinant E. coli.
SourceSum of SquaresDegree of Freedom (df)Mean SquareF Valuep-Value (Probability > F)Significant Term Based on p-Value
Model7839.269871.03329.64<0.0001Significant
A64.26164.2624.320.0006
B135.821135.8251.40<0.0001
C64.98164.9824.590.0006
AB121.961121.9646.16<0.0001
AC18.47118.476.990.0246
BC1.2711.270.480.5044
A2758.031758.03286.88<0.0001
B21428.8511428.85540.75<0.0001
C26229.1216229.122357.42<0.0001
Residual26.42102.64
Lack of fit21.2954.264.140.0724Not significant
Pure error5.1451.03
Cor total7865.6919
R20.9966
Adjusted R20.9936
Table
Table 5. Purification yield of recombinant codon optimized β-CGTase (cocgtBS) from E. coli following induction with 1.2 mM glycine at 2 h of fermentation at 37 °C.
Table 5. Purification yield of recombinant codon optimized β-CGTase (cocgtBS) from E. coli following induction with 1.2 mM glycine at 2 h of fermentation at 37 °C.
Purification StepVolume (mL)Total Activity (U/mL)Total Protein (mg/mL)Specific Activity (U/mg)Purification FoldPurification Yield (%)
Crude100077.116.24.81.0100.0
Diafiltration25065.610.66.21.385.2
Affinity Chromatography919.10.295.620.024.8
Ultrafiltration311.00.1113.423.814.3

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nik-Pa, N.I.M.; Sobri, M.F.M.; Abd-Aziz, S.; Ibrahim, M.F.; Kamal Bahrin, E.; Mohammed Alitheen, N.B.; Ramli, N. Combined Optimization of Codon Usage and Glycine Supplementation Enhances the Extracellular Production of a β-Cyclodextrin Glycosyltransferase from Bacillus sp. NR5 UPM in Escherichia coli. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3919. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113919

AMA Style

Nik-Pa NIM, Sobri MFM, Abd-Aziz S, Ibrahim MF, Kamal Bahrin E, Mohammed Alitheen NB, Ramli N. Combined Optimization of Codon Usage and Glycine Supplementation Enhances the Extracellular Production of a β-Cyclodextrin Glycosyltransferase from Bacillus sp. NR5 UPM in Escherichia coli. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(11):3919. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113919

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nik-Pa, Nik Ida Mardiana, Mohamad Farhan Mohamad Sobri, Suraini Abd-Aziz, Mohamad Faizal Ibrahim, Ezyana Kamal Bahrin, Noorjahan Banu Mohammed Alitheen, and Norhayati Ramli. 2020. "Combined Optimization of Codon Usage and Glycine Supplementation Enhances the Extracellular Production of a β-Cyclodextrin Glycosyltransferase from Bacillus sp. NR5 UPM in Escherichia coli" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 11: 3919. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113919

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop