Next Article in Journal
Niemann-Pick Type A Disease: Behavior of Neutral Sphingomyelinase and Vitamin D Receptor
Next Article in Special Issue
Changes of Thermostability, Organic Solvent, and pH Stability in Geobacillus zalihae HT1 and Its Mutant by Calcium Ion
Previous Article in Journal
A Symphony of Signals: Intercellular and Intracellular Signaling Mechanisms Underlying Circadian Timekeeping in Mice and Flies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expression of Ca2+-Binding Buffer Proteins in the Human and Mouse Retinal Neurons
Open AccessReview

Calcium-Binding Proteins in the Nervous System during Hibernation: Neuroprotective Strategies in Hypometabolic Conditions?

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
Former Full Professor of Zoology, Neurogenesis and Comparative Neuromorphology, (Residence address) Viale Matteotti 73, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(9), 2364;
Received: 14 April 2019 / Revised: 6 May 2019 / Accepted: 11 May 2019 / Published: 13 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Calcium-Binding Proteins and Cell Signaling)


Calcium-binding proteins (CBPs) can influence and react to Ca2+ transients and modulate the activity of proteins involved in both maintaining homeostatic conditions and protecting cells in harsh environmental conditions. Hibernation is a strategy that evolved in vertebrate and invertebrate species to survive in cold environments; it relies on molecular, cellular, and behavioral adaptations guided by the neuroendocrine system that together ensure unmatched tolerance to hypothermia, hypometabolism, and hypoxia. Therefore, hibernation is a useful model to study molecular neuroprotective adaptations to extreme conditions, and can reveal useful applications to human pathological conditions. In this review, we describe the known changes in Ca2+-signaling and the detection and activity of CBPs in the nervous system of vertebrate and invertebrate models during hibernation, focusing on cytosolic Ca2+ buffers and calmodulin. Then, we discuss these findings in the context of the neuroprotective and neural plasticity mechanisms in the central nervous system: in particular, those associated with cytoskeletal proteins. Finally, we compare the expression of CBPs in the hibernating nervous system with two different conditions of neurodegeneration, i.e., platinum-induced neurotoxicity and Alzheimer’s disease, to highlight the similarities and differences and demonstrate the potential of hibernation to shed light into part of the molecular mechanisms behind neurodegenerative diseases.
Keywords: calcium-binding proteins; hibernation; central nervous system; cytoskeleton proteins; neuroprotection; neurodegeneration calcium-binding proteins; hibernation; central nervous system; cytoskeleton proteins; neuroprotection; neurodegeneration

1. Introduction

The individual cells of an organism are not isolated in a stable medium, but are immersed in an ever-changing environment influenced by both the activity of surrounding cells and the external conditions in which the organism is living. Changes in the cell’s environment and cell-to-cell interactions can lead to modifications in gene expression, enzyme activity, and ion exchange between the two sides of the plasma membrane, which are processes that must be strictly controlled to avoid damage, cell degeneration, and death. This is particularly true for neurons, which rely on transient changes in ion concentrations for the transmission of electric signals, and therefore need precise molecular mechanisms to restore and maintain the normal electric potential for transmitting new signals and avoiding the alteration of normal cell activities [1,2]. Moreover, the nervous system has very limited regenerative abilities in many animals; therefore, cell loss could lead to irreversible damage at the tissue level and compromised connectivity [3,4].
Calcium (Ca2+) has long been recognized as an indispensable ion in neurons, as it is involved in functions as diverse as membrane excitability, signal transduction, neurotransmitters release, synaptic plasticity, cell cycle regulation, cell migration, and axon growing [5,6,7,8]. A highly conserved signaling toolkit controls the level of intracellular Ca2+: Ca2+ ions enter the cytoplasm through channels on the plasma membrane, or can be released from intracellular stores in the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, and mitochondria; then, through the activity of pumps and ion exchangers, the Ca2+ concentration can return to lower steady-state levels [8,9,10]. These mechanisms allow the formation of Ca2+ transients during which Ca2+ can act directly or indirectly on several pathways by binding to calcium-binding proteins (CBPs), which interpret and respond to the transients [10,11].
CBPs have fundamental roles in animal nervous systems: from the regulation of cellular Ca2+ concentration to cell signaling, cytoskeletal remodeling, and protein phosphorylation, which are activities that are modulated throughout the entire life cycle (from development to adulthood), both in homeostatic conditions and to react to changes in the external environment [10,12]. In this review, we provide an overview of the known changes in the detection and activity of CBPs that have been studied and reported in the nervous system during hibernation, which is a strategy used by several invertebrate and vertebrate animals to survive in cold conditions. (i). Our primary goal is to focus on four CBPs: the three main cytosolic buffers, i.e., calbindin (CB), parvalbumin (PV), and calretinin (CR), and the most studied Ca2+ sensor, calmodulin (CaM), to shed light on their possible involvement in the molecular and cytological adaptations to hypometabolism and hypothermia that hibernators use to prevent freezing while minimizing energy loss in unfavorable conditions. (ii). Secondly, given the widespread role of calcium signaling, it is not surprising that several pathologies have been correlated to alterations of normal calcium homeostasis [13,14,15,16]; since neuroprotective mechanisms have been demonstrated during hibernation, we show that studying calcium regulation in this model could reveal interesting applications to tackle human pathological conditions such as neurodegenerative diseases. (iii). Furthermore, based on our expertise on the effects of cytotoxic drugs on nervous tissues [17,18,19], we try to clarify the alterations in CBPs in the case of the cytological and histological damage of the nervous system, and compare these models of neurodegeneration to the unmatched tolerance observed in the natural condition of hibernation, taking into consideration the relationship between the components of CBPs and the cytoskeleton.

2. CBPs in the Central Nervous System

CBPs are a large class of proteins involved in managing and reacting to Ca2+ transients in cells. More than 200 proteins with the capacity to bind Ca2+ ions have been identified with widespread roles that span from gene expression control to synaptic plasticity, indicating their fundamental importance for the survival of the cell [20,21] (Figure 1). These molecules can essentially be divided into two categories: buffer proteins exert a fine control over the calcium concentration within the cell, while sensor proteins can interact with a wide variety of specific targets depending on the information received through Ca2+ signaling [20,22].

2.1. Calcium Buffers

Calcium buffers are traditionally described as molecules that can bind calcium with different affinity, but do not exhibit substantial conformational changes, and do not directly influence the activity of other macromolecules. Their primary role is to control the free Ca2+ concentration in the cell and modulate Ca2+ signals both in terms of spatial localization and temporal duration, ensuring that they are correctly “interpreted” by the cell. Cytosolic calcium buffers can quickly diffuse and therefore determine the mean concentration of Ca2+ in the whole cytoplasm; they can also act in concert with other CBPs in precise locations where a finer or quicker control of Ca2+ concentration is needed [20,23]. Different CBP buffers exert the same function, but importantly, the number of Ca2+-binding sites, the affinity for the ion, and consequently the binding speed can be widely different [22]. In homeostatic conditions, when the intracellular Ca2+ concentration is between 20–100 nM, these proteins are in a Ca2+ free state, and only during Ca2+ transients, when the Ca2+ concentration increases by at least one order of magnitude, do the buffers exert their role and start binding the ions [22,23]. The nervous system is particularly enriched in Ca2+ buffers, and different subpopulations of neurons express different combinations of CBPs, highlighting the need for a fine control of electrical and synaptic activity. Interestingly, knockout experiments performed on mice, in which one or a combination of Ca2+ buffers are inactivated constitutively or in specific cell types using a variety of transgenesis tools, shows that if a CBP is lost, there is no increase in the expression of other types [24]. This indicates that in normal conditions, the expression of many CBPs is highly repressed at the transcriptional level, and suggests that each may have an important and irreplaceable function in the cell. Moreover, this has allowed the use of these proteins as immunohistochemical markers to identify cell types in different areas of the brain, helping to resolve the architecture of the cerebral and cerebellar cortex [25,26,27]. Here, we briefly describe the nervous system localization and function in mammals of the three most studied cytosolic CBPs.
Calbindin D-28k. Calbindin (CB) is a 28-kDa protein with six EF-hand Ca2+-binding domains, but only four are active and have rapid binding kinetics. In the brain, it can be found mainly in populations of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-containing interneurons scattered throughout cortical layers but concentrated in supragranular layers; positive interneurons can also be identified in the hippocampus, where granule cells of the dentate gyrus and some CA1 pyramidal neurons are also immunoreactive to this protein, and in the hypothalamus [28,29,30,31]. In the cerebellum, CB is specifically and strongly expressed in Purkinje cells, and in some mammals, in Golgi cells [24,26]. The kinetic properties of CB lead to rapid saturation during Ca2+ transients at the pre-synaptic site, followed by a transient decrease in binding capacity that has a role in synaptic facilitation through a mechanism called “facilitation by buffer saturation” [23]. This means that just by controlling the ions’ activity near the synapse Ca2+ buffers can have a role in synaptic plasticity. Studies on the null-mutant CB–/– mice have shown that the absence of this protein does not have any developmental or morphological effect, but the impairment of motor coordination has been identified and ascribed to Purkinje cells’ control of motor behavior [24,32]. Interestingly, although no role for calbindin in cell signaling has been identified, this molecule has been shown to bind to several cell components, including the cytoskeleton, likely leading to a more precise localization within the cytoplasm [32,33].
Calretinin. Calretinin (CR) is a less studied, 31-kDa protein with five active Ca2+ binding domains that is distributed in a distinct but smaller population of cortical interneurons of the cerebral cortex, in some neurons of the thalamus, and in the granule cells and unipolar brush cells of the cerebellum [26,30,34,35]. CR-/- mice obtained through homologous recombination had impaired long-term potentiation in the hippocampus, while in the cerebellum, the alteration of granule cell excitability following CR depletion also led to altered CB activity and Ca2+ homeostasis in Purkinje cells, resulting in a mild motor coordination impairment that is less pronounced than the one observed for CB knockout [24,32]. Recent studies have indicated the implication of CR in several pathways, and therefore an additional role as a Ca2+ sensor [35].
Parvalbumin. Parvalbumin (PV) was the first discovered EF-hand-containing protein, with three mixed Ca2+/Mg2+-binding sites. In the cerebral cortex, PV is expressed in GABAergic subpopulations that do not contain CB, including some stellate, basket, and chandelier cells, distributed in all layers except for layer one [27,30,36,37]. In the hippocampus, basket cells and other interneurons are labeled by anti-PV antibodies throughout all areas [25,38]. In the cerebellum, PV is expressed in Purkinje, stellate, and basket cells and, in humans, it is expressed in some Golgi cells [24,26,39]. The slow kinetics of Ca2+ binding by PV and the agonistic relationship with Mg2+ ions leads to a “slow-onset” Ca2+-buffering action by PV. While the rise in Ca2+ concentration is not affected by this protein, the late phase of decay at the end of the transient is prolonged, leading to a biexponential decay and a delayed release of neurotransmitters in some synapses, as discovered in cerebellar interneurons [22,23,32]. PV knockouts in mice strains have been repeatedly obtained for 20 years, first through homologous recombination and more recently using cre/lox recombination combined with tetracyclin-dependent or tamoxifen-dependent techniques to create conditional knockouts in specific cell types [32]. These studies confirmed the role of PV as a “slow” CBP: in Purkinje cells, the absence of the PV does not impair the initial inhibitory post-synaptic currents; rather, it modulates synaptic plasticity in the short-term period [24]. A similar conclusion was reached on the role of PV in hippocampal interneurons [32].

2.2. Calcium Sensors

Controlling Ca2+ concentration buffers can have indirect effects on neurons’ excitability and synaptic plasticity; on the other hand, Ca2+ sensors can bind calcium and undergo conformational changes that reveal or activate binding sites for other proteins, and therefore directly regulate their functions. Moreover, if present in high concentrations, calcium sensors can also act as calcium buffers [40]. Several members of this class have been identified in the nervous system, including a large class of neuronal calcium sensors (NCS) [41], but by far the best studied and most important Ca2+ sensor is the ubiquitous protein calmodulin (CaM). This small protein is conserved in all eukaryotes and consists of two domains, each with two EF-hand Ca2+-binding sites connected by a linker that ensures a great structural plasticity that is the secret to calmodulin’s impressive ability to bind to a large number of targets depending on the concentration of Ca2+ ions [42,43]. It is hard to underestimate the importance and the variety of calmodulin functions in the cell: dozens of targets have been identified, including enzymes, channels, pumps, transcription factors, and structural proteins [44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. One of the main ways in which calmodulin modulates cells’ activities in response to Ca2+ stimuli is by controlling protein phosphorylation though the regulation of kinases and proteases [51,52]. If a kinase is in an autoinhibited state, the binding with Ca2+/CaM can release the inhibition and activate different processes, including signal transduction, gene expression, and cytoskeletal remodeling [52,53]. Similarly, CaM can bind and regulate the activity of Ca2+ channels or pumps, thereby influencing the intensity and/or duration of calcium transients [8,23,54].
Given their roles in the cell and their use as neuron markers, these CBPs have often been exploited to identify changes in the brain in pathological or stress conditions, which in many cases lead to significant alterations in the number of positive neurons and the amount of intracellular CBPs [55,56,57,58]. In the next sections of this review, we focus on the molecular and histochemical changes in CBPs activity in hibernation, which is a model of cell tolerance to hypometabolic and hypothermic conditions.

3. Hibernation: Who, How, and Why is it Interesting?

All organisms are influenced throughout their life cycle by biotic and abiotic factors that are extremely variable in space and time, and several strategies have evolved to react to adverse environmental changes. Hibernation is one of the most widespread and best studied strategies to cope with low temperatures: during winter in temperate and seasonal areas, numerous animals can strongly reduce metabolic activity and temporarily suspend movement, nutrition, and growth [59,60,61]. All hibernating species require the integration of molecular, cellular, and behavioral adaptations that together orchestrate the entrance into the dormancy state and ensure that tissues are protected from damage [62,63,64,65].
Among vertebrates, hibernation has been mostly studied in mammals, for which we now have a large body of literature describing adaptations in cell gene expression, biochemistry, and physiology [66,67,68,69,70,71]. While the precise endocrine signals that induce hibernation are still unknown, the hypothalamus is thought to play a key role in decreasing metabolic rate and inhibiting heat production, leading to a gradual decline in body temperature [72]. The hypothalamus remains active during hibernation when compared to the rest of the brain, and it seems to maintain thermoregulatory control to avoid freezing [73]. Mammal hibernation is generally characterized by a succession of torpor bouts and arousal periods during which temperature oscillates between the torpid level and normothermia, and whose role and significance are still obscure [72,74,75]. During torpor, cells are usually in hypothermic and hypoxic conditions, but at arousal, no widespread damage can be detected at the cellular and tissue level [76,77]. Moreover, hibernating species show resistance to these conditions even when they are not hibernating [78,79,80]. This suggests that specific cellular adaptations in hibernating species ensure protection from damage, but these mechanisms have only been partially explained. For example, tolerance to hypoxia seems to arise from a combination of higher hemoglobin affinity for oxygen, and in the brain, increased antioxidants activity, regulation of the immune system, and alterations in ion channels’ activity [78,81]. Strikingly, the heart and skeletal muscles of hibernating ground squirrels showed the preservation of intracellular Ca2+ concentration [82,83]. This homeostasis is maintained even in harsh conditions through a reduction of Ca2+ influx by the suppression of Ca2+ channels and by an increased uptake by the endoplasmic reticulum, in which a hibernator-specific isoform of calsequestrin, a sarcoplasmic CBP, facilitates the uptake and storage of the ion [84,85].
Endotherms are not the only animals that can hibernate: several vertebrate and invertebrate ectotherms have evolved strategies to avoid or tolerate freezing temperatures in hypometabolic conditions [86,87]. Among vertebrate ectotherms, many frogs possess remarkable tolerance to freezing, and can therefore live in extremely cold environments [88]. Invertebrates such as pulmonate gastropods, despite being adapted to life on land, are still susceptible to dehydration and freezing in winter. To avoid this, some species of snail hibernate. The main environmental factor that triggers hibernation in these molluscs is the photoperiod, although temperature and humidity also play a role [89]. In this state, the snails enclose themselves into their shells and avoid the formation of extracellular ice by concentrating the hemolymph, eliminating ice nucleating agents, and accumulating low molecular weight anti-freezing molecules such as glycogen [90,91,92,93]. The neuroendocrine control of hibernation entrance in molluscs is still unknown, but the large size of their neurons and the simple and well-known structure of their neural circuits make them suitable models for immunohistochemical and physiological studies, as the subcellular localization of molecules can often be inferred and the electrical activity of neurons can be precisely tracked and controlled [94,95,96], providing a unique opportunity to study the cytological basis of behavior. For example, several molecules have been shown to change their localization or expression level during hibernation when compared to activity, including bioactive peptides, neurotransmitters, and ion channels [97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104].
This brief overview shows that hibernation has attracted attention for four main reasons:
  • It is a convenient and efficient model to study reaction and adaptation to extreme conditions at different levels of organization, from behavior down to the genetic control and the changes in molecular interactions.
  • Hibernating animals show unmatched tolerance to these conditions thanks to protective mechanisms; this is especially true for the nervous system, which requires large amounts of energy to be maintained.
  • It is an interesting case of convergent evolution, as these strategies independently evolved several times in distantly related phyla and closely related groups of mammals. By comparing similarities and differences, general properties of cell resistance could be discovered [81,105].
  • Understanding these properties could have direct applications to human health, as similar protective mechanisms could be harnessed to cure or prevent human pathologies [106,107,108].

4. CBPs in the Hibernating Nervous System: A Role in Neuroprotection and Plasticity?

As the central nervous system (CNS) controls both fast responses to external stimuli and, through the regulation of hormone production and release, slower systemic reactions guided by endocrine organs, it has to influence any type of regulated change in animal physiology and behavior to ensure synchronization among different processes without damaging the organism. In hibernating animals, the nervous system needs to remain at least partially active to guide entrance into torpor and arousal, but at the same time, it requires neuroprotective strategies to survive in hypometabolic and hypothermic conditions in the same way as the rest of the organism [73]. Moreover, as several activities are suspended or greatly reduced, the connectivity of the CNS is expected to undergo passive and active remodeling, providing a unique opportunity to analyze molecular and functional aspects of neural plasticity.

4.1. Ca2+ and CBPs

Numerous protective mechanisms have been identified in the CNS of mammals during hibernation [109]. The hypothalamus is a key regulator of torpor entrance together with a set of hibernation-specific proteins (HP) that are thought to induce permissive hormonal signals to prepare neurons for hypothermia and reduced activity [110,111]. The neuromodulator adenosine is involved in regulating the onset of torpor, and it has been experimentally shown that exogenous application in the CNS can induce hypothermia [111,112]. Interestingly, the injection of Ca2+ in the brain of ground squirrels and hamsters triggered deep hypothermia, suggesting that it may also be involved in torpor entrance by contributing to establish a new body temperature set point [113,114]. During torpor, adaptations such as inflammatory activation, antioxidant production, and apoptosis avoidance ensure an unmatched tolerance at the cellular and system levels [109,115,116]. These adaptations are paralleled by significant changes in gene expression, which are thought to occur through differential control by transcription factors and chromatin remodeling [84,117,118,119]. These changes involve among other functions metabolism, response to hypoxia, DNA repair, cytoskeletal remodeling, and Ca2+ signaling [120,121,122].
Information on Ca2+ concentration in mammal neurons during hibernation is scarce: only one study showed that in ground squirrels, resting Ca2+ concentration and Ca2+ accumulation in synaptosomes are both reduced during hibernation [123]. However, insights on Ca2+ signaling can also be deduced by studying the wide variety of molecules that interact with this ion. In particular, several works have highlighted changes in the detection of CBPs between the active and inactive periods in numerous species. We have summarized the results in Table 1. The majority of these studies have identified and quantified different CBPs in non-model species through Western blot and immunohistochemistry, comparing activity and hibernation periods both in terms of number of stained cells and the intensity of immunoreactivity. In more recent years, gene expression and proteomic analyses have opened the possibility for a more comprehensive understanding of life-cycle changes, including those associated with hibernation [121,124,125].
Regarding our experience on CBPs in hibernating vertebrate models, specific changes were found in the CNS, with different brain areas showing different degrees of variation in CBP content, supporting the idea that each part of the brain has distinct functions and activity levels during hibernation. Immunoreactivity for buffer and sensor CBPs decreased during hibernation in the cerebellum of hedgehogs and frogs [126,127]. In particular, Purkinje cells showed drastically decreased CB and PV immunoreactivity after a long hibernation period in the hedgehog, which was paralleled by a decrease in PV and CR positivity in the molecular and the internal granular layer [127]. In the frog cerebellum, Purkinje and stellate cells showed a decreased positivity for CaM [126]. Similarly, in the cortex of ground squirrels, the expression of the genes encoding CaM and CR is decreased in torpid animals compared to active ones, but no change in CB or PV expression could be detected [128]. This could mean that protein levels are controlled at the post-transcriptional level, and highlights the importance of comparing immunohistochemical and gene expression data: indeed, it has been shown that protein synthesis is altered in the inactive phase [129]. On the other hand, the expression of buffer protein genes in the hypothalamus remained the same throughout the annual cycle of the thirteen-lined ground squirrel, and only a small, non-significant decrease was observed for CaM, in accordance with the idea that this area remains active throughout torpor, controlling body temperature and arousal [128]. In this context, buffer proteins in the hypothalamus would guide Ca2+ transients similarly to euthermic months, avoiding alterations of neurotransmitters release and synaptic rearrangements that could delay or compromise neuronal activity.
Moving to invertebrates, the CNS of the garden snail Cornu aspersum is an excellent model to study cytological and histological changes during the annual cycle due to the large size of its neurons. It consists of a pair of cerebral ganglia connected with anterior buccal ganglia, and a large suboesophageal ganglion that sends projections to different organs in the visceral sac [130,131]. The comparison of free Ca2+ ions using ion-sensitive microelectrodes between active and hibernating neurons showed a significant increase during the inactive period [132]. Persistently high intracellular Ca2+ concentration can potentially lead to cell damage or apoptosis, but aroused animals show no signs of degeneration, indicating the presence of regulated protective mechanisms. The expression and activity of sodium channels was shown to significantly decrease during hibernation [99], and Ca2+-ATPase-like immunoreactivity was lower in hibernating specimens compared to active ones [95], suggesting a differential regulation of ion exchange between the two sides of the cell membrane and a decrease in Ca2+ removal that could partially explain the increased Ca2+ concentration in hibernating neurons. We recently showed that CaM-like immunoreactivity significantly increases during hibernation in the cerebral ganglion, and that the level of PV-like is unaltered throughout the entire annual cycle [133]. The high level of these CBPs during hibernation could contrast and maintain the higher intracellular Ca2+ concentration, avoiding cytotoxic effects, as high concentrations of Ca2+ sensors can have a buffering effect.
To test whether the increased CaM-like positivity is specific to the cerebral ganglion, here we have further compared CaM-like immunoreactivity in the suboesophageal ganglion of active and hibernating C. aspersum combining chromogenic and fluorescent immunohistochemistry (Figure 2). While only few cells showed positivity for this marker in the cytoplasm in awake snails (Figure 2A, insert), most neurons were strongly immunoreactive during hibernation (Figure 2B,D). By quantifying immunofluorescence intensity using the ImageJ particle analysis tool (ImageJ 1.51 s; NIH, Bethesda, MA, USA) as described previously [133], we showed that the observed changes between activity and hibernation are highly significant (Figure 2E), indicating that CaM plays a key role in neuron survival in the entire nervous system by buffering Ca2+ concentration or by binding to other effector proteins.
In accordance with this hypothesis, the activity of numerous molecules has been shown to change during hibernation in both vertebrate and invertebrate models. Ca2+-dependent kinases and phosphatases are particularly interesting in this context for their potential to respond to variations in Ca2+ concentration. Arendt et al. monitored the activity of several kinases during torpor in Arctic ground squirrels [140], detecting shifts in both directions: glycogen synthase kinase (GSK-3ß), extracellular regulated protein kinase 2 (ERK2), and stress-activated protein kinase/Jun-amino-terminal kinase (SAPK/JNK) activity decreased, while protein kinase A (PKA) and ERK1 activity increased during hibernation. Unfortunately, despite their essential role in the cell and their reported association with cold resistance [141,142], Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinases have not been considered in these studies, and a deeper understanding of their activity is needed to conclusively interpret the distribution of this Ca2+ sensor. Gene expression analysis showed a decrease in CaMKII gene expression in the cortex of torpid ground squirrels, while no difference could be detected in the hypothalamus, suggesting that in inactive areas of the mammalian brain, CaM-dependent phosphorylation might be downregulated following CaM decrease [128]. Other studies have compared the expression and activity of different phosphatases: protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), one of the most important enzymes involved in dephosphorylation, showed a decreased gene expression and activity in different independent works [135,143,144,145], while other enzymes such as protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) and protein phosphatase 2C (PP2C) had a significant increase in activity levels during hibernation [143].

4.2. CBPs and Cytoskeleton Components

Taken together, these results show that specific changes in Ca2+ signaling, CBP localization, and protein phosphorylation are characteristic of the hibernating phase in both vertebrates and invertebrates. The differences seen between hibernating species are likely a result of the independent evolution of this strategy in different lineages, but the significance of these cytological modifications strongly points to a functional role in allowing neuron survival in hypometabolic and hypothermic conditions by changing the interactions among different pathways. At the cell level, these molecular adaptations are paralleled by visible morphological remodeling that has been ascribed to both plastic and neuroprotective strategies. In fact, during hibernation in mammals, a substantial but reversible modification of neural connectivity has been discovered in the hippocampus [146,147] and later in other areas of the encephalon [148], which is characterized by a decrease in cell body area, branching complexity, and spine density, and by an alteration of synaptic protein content [136,149,150]. This retraction is readily reversed during arousal periods, and does not seem to be associated with memory loss [139,151,152,153]. Such an impressive phenomenon requires a controlled modification of the cytoskeleton, which will then translate into cell-shape change. Accordingly, significant changes in the gene expression and protein localization of cytoskeletal components between activity and hibernation have been discovered over the years, and are often associated with Ca2+-interacting molecules for their recognized roles in the control of cytoskeletal assembly [122,154] (Table 1).
Microtubules are among the main constituents of the cytoskeleton and, together with defining the cell shape, they have a primary role in molecular transport and synaptic transmission in neurons. The dynamic balance between assembly and disassembly is controlled by microtubule associated proteins (MAPs) which, depending on their phosphorylation state, can bind and stabilize tubulin subunits [155,156,157]. Microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP-2) immunoreactivity was shown to decrease in the cerebellum of the European hedgehog and European ground squirrels during hibernation [127,134], and to transfer from a dendritic/synaptic to a cytoplasmic localization in mammals and frogs [126,136,158], following the decrease of synaptic complexity. As the expression of the MAP-2 gene does not change across the brain, these results can be ascribed to a reduced translation with the aim of increasing neuroplasticity and at the same time storing the protein in the cytoplasm so that it can be readily used after arousal [128,136]. Using an anti-MAP-2 antibody on snail neurons, we recently noted an increase in MAP-2-like immunoreactivity in the soma of cerebral ganglia neurons of C. aspersum during hibernation that may improve cytoskeletal stability [133], while in the neuropil, a decreased immunopositivity was discovered in a previous work [95], indicating similar modifications in the intracellular localization of MAPs in both vertebrate and invertebrate models. Tau is another MAP that can stabilize microtubules in its phosphate-free form, whereas phosphorylation by several kinases, including Ca2+/CaM-dependent kinases, causes its detachment from microtubules and an accumulation in its free-form in the cytoplasm [159,160]. During hibernation, a highly significant increase in tau phosphorylation was observed in both mammals and molluscs, despite the differences in the physiology between the different animals [133,134,137,158,161]. In fact, high phosphorylated tau (P-Tau) has been found in neurons of obligate and optional hibernators with both continuous dormancy or torpor-arousal cycles. While in humans hyperphosphorylated tau is associated with neurodegenerative disorders collectively called Tauopathies, P-Tau levels in hibernators quickly return to euthermic levels after arousal [134,135,162]; the implications of this interesting phenomenon will be discussed in the following section.
CaM is implicated in the regulation of MAPs activity through two complementary mechanisms: firstly, this CBP can control the activity of kinases and phosphatases that act on these cytoskeletal proteins, as exemplified by Ca2+/CaM-dependent kinases’ control of tau phosphorylation [160,163,164,165]; secondly, CaM can directly bind to both MAP-2 and tau with a flip-flop mechanism by which CaM binding prevents the association of MAPs and microtubules in a Ca2+-dependent manner, thereby destabilizing microtubules [166,167,168]. Interestingly, in the neurons of C. aspersum, both CaM- and P-Tau-like immunoreactivity showed the co-localization of strongly immunopositive masses during hibernation, suggesting a stage-specific interaction that could either be direct or involve the mediation of kinases, which may increase the levels of P-Tau and result in decreased binding to microtubules [133]. In mammals, the decrease of PP2A activity, one of the main tau phosphatases, is greater than the decrease in the activity of tau kinases, likely leading to a net increase in the level of tau phosphorylation [158]. With the reversal of kinase and phosphatase activity and CBP levels at arousal, tau proteins are then dephosphorylated to normal levels.
Neurofilaments are nervous system-specific class IV intermediate filaments and the main constituents of neuron cytoskeleton, with roles that span from development and shape to transport and plasticity [169]. The phosphorylation of neurofilament subunits is an essential process for their activity: for example, the heavy subunit of neurofilaments (NF-H) is found in its phosphate-free form in the somata, where polymerization is inhibited, while phosphorylation progressively increases along the axons where the subunits are added to the bigger neurofilament protein [170].
The total mRNA and protein levels of NF-H in mammals increase in the hibernating cortex of the 13-lined ground squirrel [122,128]; however, immunohistochemical data show that in both mammals and amphibians, the amount of NF-H phosphorylation decreases during hibernation, implying an alteration in the dynamic growth of neurofilaments [126,127]. Instead, in the snail, immunohistochemical reactions using anti-NF-H antibodies showed that both total and phosphorylated NF-H-like immunoreactivity increases in the hibernating cerebral ganglia [95,133], suggesting that the accumulation of neurofilaments in the somata might be a convergent strategy to increase cellular stability and allow storage of the protein to be re-used after arousal. On the other hand, the level of phosphorylation differs in the independently-evolved strategies; the increase in the epitopes recognized by the phosphorylated anti-NF-H antibody in snails could have the function of protecting neurofilaments from the action of proteases [171], while the decrease in pNF-H in vertebrates probably follows the reduced need for axonal transport and stability. Accordingly, we show here that the total NF-H-like immunoreactivity increases in the hibernating suboesophageal ganglia of C. aspersum as part of a general neuroprotective strategy. Interestingly, the increase in NF-H-like immunoreactivity is correlated with an increase in CaM-like immunoreactivity in snails, while in vertebrates, the decrease in NF-H phosphorylation is associated with a decrease in CBPs detection, as demonstrated by the hedgehog (Figure 3) and frog cerebellum, supporting the link between CBPs and cytoskeletal proteins. In summary, these results indicate that CBPs play an important role in the nervous system in the process of hibernation as demonstrated by the extensive changes in their distribution when compared to the active period of the annual cycle. Moreover, these changes and the correlation with other molecules involved in cell reorganization and resistance, such as cytoskeletal proteins, offer a unique opportunity to formulate testable hypotheses on the mechanisms of neuroprotection and neural plasticity.

5. Hibernation and Translational Medicine: the Case of Neurodegeneration

The exceptional tolerance to hypometabolic, hypothermic, and hypoxic conditions observed in hibernating animals has attracted a lot of attention in the past two decades due to the possible applications to human health. Since molecular pathways controlling different functions are highly conserved in mammals, understanding how hibernating cells resist to harsh conditions could give us valuable information on how to recreate those protective strategies in humans. The best example is represented by the impressive tolerance to ischemic conditions in torpid animals, which has been extensively analyzed and reviewed to look for possible strategies to reduce brain damage [57,172,173]. Similarly, hibernation has been studied for its potential to improve organ transplant techniques, particularly with respect to controlled hypothermia that can trigger short-term protective mechanisms [108,174,175]. These studies make use of in vitro and ex vivo models and focus on molecules that induce some of the phenotypes observed during hibernation, evaluating cytological and morphological modifications together with overall tissue damage. The synthetic peptide [D-Ala2, D-Leu5]-enkephalin (DADLE) was shown to induce hibernation when injected in active ground squirrels [176], protect against the negative effects of ischemia [175,177], and drastically increase the survival time of explanted organ preparations [178]. At the cell level, DADLE interacts with delta opioid receptors and reduces proliferation and RNA transcription, but the mechanisms of action are still poorly understood [177,179]. It has been speculated that in neurons, the activation of delta opioid receptors could reduce Ca2+ dysregulation and inhibit glutamate release preserving ionic homeostasis and avoiding apoptosis and excitotoxicity [175]. Strikingly, another molecule extracted from hibernating mammal’s blood that can induce hibernation in summer-active ground squirrels, which is called the hibernation induction trigger (HIT), was suggested to bind to delta opioid receptors or induce release of opioid peptides [179]. This example demonstrates the potential of these models to apply the information obtained in hibernating animals to human health, and at the same time help unravel some of the physiological and biochemical mechanisms that are characteristic of hibernation and their relation to more general strategies of cell resistance.
An interesting aspect of hibernation is the absence of extensive neurodegeneration: several complementary mechanisms are used by torpid mammals to avoid apoptosis, and no alterations in tissue organization and connectivity can be detected at arousal [115,180]. Moreover, in the frog’s brain, the increased cell death observed during hibernation is balanced by increased cell proliferation in the corresponding ventricular areas [181]. The lack of severe cellular damage can also be inferred by comparing hibernation with models of cytotoxicity and neurodegeneration. Neurotoxicity associated with the treatment of platinum compounds has been thoroughly studied for the wide use of these substances as chemotherapeutic agents [182,183,184,185]. Here, we focus briefly on experimental works carried out by our research group at the Department of Biology and Biotechnology (formerly Animal Biology) of the University of Pavia from 1986 to the present, which have revealed alterations in the immunopositivity for CBPs in developing and adult rats exposed to two platinum compounds, cisplatin (CisPt) and [Pt(O,O′-acac)(γ-acac)(DMS)] (PtAcacDMS) (Table 2). These studies have highlighted a dynamic decrease in two buffer CBPs, CB and PV, following treatment with both compounds in the hippocampus and cerebellum, and also detected a less severe damage by PtAcacDMS compared to CisPt, demonstrating that CBPs can help discriminate between compounds by providing a reliable estimation of neuronal damage [19,39,186,187,188]. Interestingly, contrary to what was observed in hibernating animals, there is no correlation between changes in CBPs and cytoskeletal detection, as CB immunolabelling decreases while NF-H phosphorylation increases following CisPt treatment [18,188], and is likely responsible for the marked morphological signs of degeneration observed in Purkinje cells of the developing rat cerebellum [189]. This indicates that the two processes rely on different pathways, and suggests that the changes in CBP detection during hibernation are not a sign of neurodegeneration.
In this context, we find it of particular interest to compare these results with a pathological condition such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), which is the most widespread and costly neurodegenerative disease in the world, accounting for more than 50% cases of dementia [190]. Despite the great progress in understanding the cellular and molecular aspects of this disorder, its causes are still obscure, and it remains one of the biggest health problems that lack a successful cure. Two of the well-known hallmarks of AD are the formation of ß-amyloid plaques in the extracellular space and the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau in the form of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in the neuron cytoplasm, but the exact significance of these two features in the pathogenesis is still unclear [191,192]. Among the various pathways involved in AD, the Calcium Hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease and brain ageing, which was formulated in 1994, states that long-lasting alterations in Ca2+ homeostasis and Ca2+ signaling play a pivotal role in AD and other disfunctions associated with aging by contributing to all the mechanisms underlying brain damage, including but not limited to amyloid plaques and NFTs [16,193,194]. In accordance with this scenario, studies focusing on CBPs have revealed extensive alterations associated with both normal aging and AD, which are summarized in Table 3. CB immunoreactivity decreases with aging together with the number of positive neurons in various areas of the brain, indicating a general susceptibility to the damage of brain interneurons, which is reflected by the severe decrease associated with AD in humans as well as mouse models of the disease. On the other hand, PV localization is not negatively affected by age, and some studies even report an increase in immunopositivity during ageing. However, AD causes a significant decrease in the number of PV interneurons, indicating the specific neurodegeneration associated with the disorder. Interestingly, some studies have hypothesized a possible neuroprotective role for these two buffer proteins, as CB- and PV-positive GABAergic interneurons are less sensitive to the formation of NFTs in AD [195]. CaM response to aging is much more variable in the CNS depending on the area, but in humans, a decrease in CaM immunoreactivity can be observed throughout the cortex in AD, indicating alterations in Ca2+ signaling [196,197].
Regarding the state of cytoskeletal proteins, almost 20 years ago, Arendt et al. discovered that tau hyperphosphorylation, one of the hallmarks of AD, was also present during hibernation in ground squirrels, but was not associated with the formation of NFTs, and fully reversed back to a steady-state level quickly after arousal [134]. Subsequent studies demonstrated that this is a common feature of obligate and permissive mammal hibernators, and is the result of passive temperature-dependent and active hibernation-specific mechanisms [137,161]. The phosphorylation of tau in these animals is interpreted as a mechanism to destabilize microtubules, as P-Tau is unable to bind to tubulin; therefore, it is considered a neuroprotective strategy to improve neural plasticity [158]. Moreover, it has been shown that a moderate and controlled phosphorylation of tau may actually protect cells against apoptosis [198,199]. The phosphorylation of tau is under the control of different kinases, including Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinases, and can therefore be influenced by changes in Ca2+ concentration and CBP distribution [58,160]. In a recent publication, we observed increased P-Tau-like immunoreactivity in the cerebral ganglia of C. aspersum in the form of strongly immunoreactive masses distributed in the cytoplasm of neurons, suggesting that tau phosphorylation could be an ancient neuroprotective strategy exploited by cells to survive in adverse conditions that is independently co-opted in different lineages [133]. These aggregations specifically co-localized with CaM-like epitopes during the hibernation phase, hinting at a Ca2+-dependent control of tau activity.
Tau phosphorylation is known to increase following hypothermia and hypometabolism [217,218]. Intriguingly, the analysis of AD symptoms showed that neurons are subject to hypometabolic conditions early during the course of the disease [219,220,221,222]. These findings support the hypothesis that tau phosphorylation may initially be a protective or compensatory mechanism in the pathogenesis of AD to suppress apoptosis and imbalance in neural transmission and Ca2+-signaling that follow hypometabolism, whose causes are still unclear. In this scenario, neurons that express buffer CBPs are initially protected against abrupt changes in Ca2+ concentration, and therefore show less accumulation of P-Tau [138]. However, in hibernating mammals, tau phosphorylation reverts to a normal state following arousal, avoiding cytotoxic effects; it has been proposed that the need to return to low levels of P-Tau could be one of the main constraints that explain the cycles of torpor and arousal observed in most mammals [158]. In fact, the energy required for re-warming the body during these periodic arousal episodes may account for up to 90% of the total energy expense of the hibernating period, and therefore is thought to underlie an essential function for the survival of the organism. In accordance with this scenario, hibernation in black bears, which is characterized by a continuous torpor but relatively high body temperature, is associated with the formation of permanent P-Tau aggregations in old animals [137]. In AD and other tauopathies, the constant high level of P-Tau coupled with a progressive increase in Ca2+-signaling alterations over the course of several years would lead to the formation of NFTs and ultimately cell death. Then, the decrease in CBP detection in the cortex interneurons during the development of AD could speed up the process with a positive feedback mechanism. In this respect, understanding what makes tau phosphorylation reversible in hibernating animals could lead to fundamental advancements in our understanding of AD pathogenesis and open the way to new studies aimed at recreating the same conditions, making hibernation a promising model in translational medicine.

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

We still have much to learn about animal hibernation, especially regarding how the integration of different molecular and biochemical mechanisms facilitates a precise and harmless transition to and from hypometabolic states. Particular attention should be given to CBPs due to their roles in cell activities and because several studies have hinted at the numerous processes specific to this annual cycle phase that are influenced by them. The variations observed in the expression and localization of buffer and sensor CBPs are thought to affect the activity of kinases and phosphatases which consequently exert neuroprotective functions by regulating ionic balance and suppressing cell degeneration and death. Then, these mechanisms lead to unmatched tolerance to severe conditions that could potentially be exploited to tackle several human pathologies, including neurodegenerative diseases. That some of these changes can be found in all hibernating animals raises the captivating possibility of independently evolved strategies that arose from common and crucial aspects of cell resistance and neuroprotection. Several works have also found a correlation between CBPs and the changes in cytoskeletal proteins between active and inactive stages, which seems to indicate an essential and conserved role for CBPs in neural plasticity.
Since hibernation is a widespread adaptation, vertebrate and invertebrate models can be combined and compared, exploiting the advantages of each of them. In particular, mammals are more directly comparable with humans; their neuroanatomy is well known, and the roles of CBPs in normal and pathological conditions are established. On the other hand, invertebrate models can be used for the size of their neurons, the simplicity of their neural circuits, and the potential to correlate molecules and behaviors [223]. Finally, in light of the potential applications, numerous studies have tried to induce the hibernation-like state in non-hibernating or cellular models to exploit their amenability to numerous techniques and, for the latter, the possibility to study changes in the localization of various molecules within the cell [108,174,224,225]. One of the main limitations of these studies up until now is that it is difficult to distinguish real hibernation-induced protective strategies from passive reactions to hypothermia, hypoxia, or hypometabolism. A more comprehensive understanding of the processes that guide hibernation and the interactions between the protective strategies is needed before effectively using these models.
The information obtained up to this point on CBPs and hibernation opens exciting opportunities for both basic and applied research, and suggests that hibernation still has a lot to tell us about how cells work and adapt to different environmental conditions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: G.B.; Methodology: G.G. and G.B.; Project Administration: G.B. Investigation: G.G.; Interpretation of Data: G.G. and G.B.; Visualization: G.G.; Resources: G.G. and G.B.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation: G.G.; Writing—Review & Editing: G.B.; Supervision: G.B.


This research received no external funding.


The findings reported and discussed here were obtained at the Department of Biology and Biotechnology “Lazzaro Spallanzani”, University of Pavia. In particular, the experiments carried out for this review were conducted by the authors at the Laboratory of Cell Biology and Neurobiology within the Department.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


ADAlzheimer’s disease
CA1, 2Cornu Ammonis 1, 2
CAMKCa2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase
CAMKIICa2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase 2
CBPsCalcium-binding proteins
CCCell count
CNSCentral nervous system
DADLE[D-Ala2, D-Leu5]-enkephalin
DGDentate gyrus
ERK1Extracellular regulated protein kinase 1
ERK2Extracellular regulated protein kinase 2
GABAγ-aminobutyric acid
HITHibernation induction trigger
HPHibernation-specific protein
ISHIn situ hybridization
MAPMicrotubule-associated protein
MAP-2Microtubule-associated protein 2
NF-HHeavy subunit of neurofilaments
NFTNeurofibrillary tangles
P-NPPhosphorylated and non-phosphorylated
P-TauPhosphorylated tau
PKAProtein kinase A
pNF-HPhosphorylated heavy subunit of neurofilaments
PP1Protein phosphatase 1
PP2AProtein phosphatase 2A
PP2CProtein phosphatase 2C
SAPK/JNKStress-activated protein kinase/Jun-amino-terminal kinase
SISignal intensity
WBWestern blot


  1. Choi, D.W. Excitotoxic cell death. J. Neurobiol. 1992, 23, 1261–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hutchins, J.B.; Barger, S.W. Why neurons die: Cell death in the nervous system. Anat. Rec. 1998, 253, 79–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  3. Deshpande, J.K.; Siesjo, B.K.; Wieloch, T. Calcium accumulation and neuronal damage in the rat hippocampus following cerebral ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1987, 7, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ming, G.; Song, H. Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian central nervous system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 28, 223–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Giorgi, C.; Danese, A.; Missiroli, S.; Patergnani, S.; Pinton, P. Calcium dynamics as a machine for decoding signals. Trends Cell Biol. 2018, 28, 258–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Humeau, J.; Bravo-San Pedro, J.M.; Vitale, I.; Nunez, L.; Villalobo, C.; Kroemer, G.; Senovilla, L. Calcium signaling and cell cycle: Progression or death. Cell Calcium 2018, 70, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gasperini, R.J.; Pavez, M.; Thompson, A.C.; Mitchell, C.B.; Hardy, H.; Young, K.M.; Chilton, J.K.; Foa, L. How does calcium interact with the cytoskeleton to regulate growth cone motility during axon path finding? Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2017, 84, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Berridge, M.J.; Bootman, M.D.; Roderick, H.L. Calcium signalling: Dynamics, homeostasis and remodelling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 517–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elliott, E.; Malouf, A.; Catterall, W. Role of calcium channel subtypes in calcium transients in hippocampal CA3 neurons. J. Neurosci. 2018, 15, 6433–6444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carafoli, E.; Santella, L.; Branca, D.; Brini, M. Generation, control, and processing of cellular calcium signals. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2001, 36, 107–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bagur, R.; Hajnoczky, G. Intracellular Ca2+ sensing: Its role in calcium homeostasis and signaling. Mol. Cell 2017, 66, 780–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kreutz, M.R.; Naranjo, K.R.; Koch, K.-W.; Schwaller, B. The neuronal functions of EF-hand Ca2+-binding proteins. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2012, 5, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pchitskaya, E.; Popugaeva, E.; Bezprozvanny, I. Calcium signaling and molecular mechanisms underlying neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Calcium 2018, 70, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bezprozvanny, I. Calcium signaling and neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Mol. Med. 2009, 15, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  15. Bezprozvanny, I.; Mattson, M.P. Neuronal calcium mishandling and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 2008, 31, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Berridge, M.J. Calcium signalling and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem. Res. 2011, 36, 1149–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vignola, C.; Necchi, D.; Scherini, E.; Bernocchi, G. MPTP-induced changes in the monkey cerebellum - immunohistochemistry of calcium-binding and cytoskeletal proteins. Neurodeg. 1994, 3, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  18. Scherini, E.; Bernocchi, G. CisDDP treatment and development of the rat cerebellum. Prog. Neurobiol. 1994, 42, 161–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cerri, S.; Piccolini, V.M.; Santin, G.; Bottone, M.G.; de Pascali, S.A.; Migoni, D.; Iadarola, P.; Fanizzi, F.P.; Bernocchi, G. The developmental neurotoxicity study of platinum compounds. Effects of cisplatin versus a novel Pt(II) complex on rat cerebellum. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2011, 33, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Permyakov, E.A.; Kretsinger, R.H. Calcium binding proteins; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; ISBN 9780470525845. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kretsinger, R.H. Calcium-binding proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1976, 45, 239–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schwaller, B. Emerging functions of the “Ca2+ buffers” parvalbumin, calbindin D-28k and calretinin in the brain. In Handbook of Neurochemistry and Molecular Neurobiology: Neural Protein Metabolism and Function; Lajtha, A., Banik, N., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2007; pp. 117–221. ISBN 9780387303468. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schwaller, B. Cytosolic Ca2+ buffers. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2, a004051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schwaller, B.; Meyer, M.; Schiffmann, S. ‘New’ functions for ‘old’ proteins: The role of the calcium-binding proteins calbindin D-28k, calretinin and parvalbumin, in cerebellar physiology. Studies with knockout mice. The Cerebellum 2002, 1, 241–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Andressen, C.; Blumcke, I.; Celio, M.R. Calcium-binding proteins: Selective markers of nerve cells. Cell Tissue Res. 1993, 271, 181–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bastianelli, E. Distribution of calcium-binding proteins in the cerebellum. Cerebellum 2003, 2, 242–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gonchar, Y.; Wang, Q.; Burkhalter, A. Multiple distinct subtypes of GABAergic neurons in mouse visual cortex identified by triple immunostaining. Front. Neuroanat. 2008, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Litwinowicz, B.; Labuda, C.; Kowiański, P.; Spodnik, J.H.; Ludkiewicz, B.; Wojcik, S.; Morys, J. Developmental pattern of calbindin D28k protein expression in the rat striatum and cerebral cortex. Folia Morphol. (Warsz). 2003, 62, 327–329. [Google Scholar]
  29. Piccolini, V.M.; Bottone, M.G.; Bottiroli, G.; Pascali, S.A.; De Fanizzi, F.P.; Bernocchi, G. Platinum drugs and neurotoxicity: Effects on intracellular calcium homeostasis. Cell. Biol. Toxicol. 2013, 29, 339–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ahn, J.H.; Hong, S.; Park, J.H.; Kim, I.H.; Cho, J.H.; Lee, T.-K.; Lee, J.-C.; Chen, B.H.; Shin, B.-N.; Bae, E.J.; et al. Immunoreactivities of calbindin-D28k, calretinin and parvalbumin in the somatosensory cortex of rodents during normal aging. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 7191–7198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  31. Bae, J.E.; Chen, H.B.; Shin, B.-N.; Cho, J.H.; Kim, I.H.; Park, J.H.; Lee, J.-C.; Tae, H.J.; Choi, S.Y.; Kim, J.-D.; et al. Comparison of immunoreactivities of calbindin-D28k, calretinin and parvalbumin in the striatum between young, adult and aged mice, rats and gerbils. Neurochem. Res. 2015, 40, 864–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schwaller, B. The use of transgenic mouse models to reveal the functions of Ca2+ buffer proteins in excitable cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1820, 1294–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sayer, R.J.; Turnbull, C.I.; Hubbard, M.J. Calbindin(28kDa) is specifically associated with extranuclear constituents of the dense particulate fraction. Cell Tissue Res. 2000, 302, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Necchi, D.; Soldani, C.; Pisu, M.B.; Bernocchi, G.; Scherini, E. Distribution of calretinin-like immunoreactivity in the brain of Rana esculenta. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 1999, 16, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schwaller, B. Calretinin: From a “simple” Ca2+ buffer to a multifunctional protein implicated in many biological processes. Front. Neuroanat. 2014, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Caballero, A.; Flores-Barrera, E.; Cass, D.K.; Tseng, K.Y. Differential regulation of parvalbumin and calretinin interneurons in the prefrontal cortex during adolescence. Brain Struct. Funct. 2014, 219, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ueno, H.; Suemitsu, S.; Okamoto, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Ishihara, T. Parvalbumin neurons and perineuronal nets in the mouse prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience 2017, 343, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yamada, J.; Jinno, S. Spatio-temporal differences in perineuronal net expression in the mouse hippocampus, with reference to parvalbumin. Neuroscience 2013, 253, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pisu, M.B.; Roda, E.; Avella, D.; Bernocchi, G. Developmental plasticity of rat cerebellar cortex after cisplatin injury: Inhibitory synapses and differentiating Purkinje neurons. Neuroscience 2004, 129, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. McMahon, S.M.; Jackson, M.B. An inconvenient truth: Calcium sensors are calcium buffers. Trends Neurosci. 2018, 41, 880–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Burgoyne, R.D. Neuronal calcium sensor proteins: Generating diversity in neuronal Ca2+ signalling. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2007, 8, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, M.; Abrams, C.; Wang, L.; Gizzi, A.; He, L.; Lin, R.; Chen, Y.; Loll, P.J.; Pascal, J.M.; Zhang, J. Structural basis for calmodulin as a dynamic calcium sensor. Structure 2012, 20, 911–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  43. Villarroel, A.; Taglialatela, M.; Bernardo-Seisdedos, G.; Alaimo, A.; Agirre, J.; Alberdi, A.; Gomis-Perez, C.; Soldovieri, M.V.; Ambrosino, P.; Malo, C.; et al. The ever changing moods of calmodulin: How structural plasticity entails transductional adaptability. J. Mol. Biol. 2014, 426, 2717–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Klee, C.B.; Vanaman, T.C. Calmodulin. Adv. Protein Chem. 1982, 35, 213–321. [Google Scholar]
  45. Means, A.R.; Tash, J.S.; Chafouleas, J.G. Physiological implications in the presence, distribution and regulation of calmodulin in eukaryotic cells. Physiol. Rev. 1982, 62, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cheung, W.Y. Calmodulin plays a pivotal role in cellular regulation. Sciencee 1978, 207, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sharma, R.K.; Parameswaran, S. Calmodulin-binding proteins: A journey of 40 years. Cell Calcium 2018, 75, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chin, D.; Means, A.R. Calmodulin: A prototypical calcium sensor. Trends Cell Biol. 2000, 10, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xia, Z.; Storm, D.R. The role of calmodulin as a signal integrator for synaptic plasticity. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Berchtold, M.W.; Villalobo, A. The many faces of calmodulin in cell proliferation, programmed cell death, autophagy, and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1843, 398–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  51. Takemoto-Kimura, S.; Suzuki, K.; Horigane, S.; Kamijo, S.; Inoue, M.; Sakamoto, M.; Fujii, H.; Bito, H. Calmodulin kinases: Essential regulators in health and disease. J. Neurochem. 2017, 141, 808–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Simon, B.; Huart, A.; Wilmanns, M. Molecular mechanisms of protein kinase regulation by calcium/calmodulin. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2015, 23, 2749–2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Colbran, R.J.; Schworer, C.M.; Hashimoto, Y.; Fong, Y.; Rich, D.P.; Smith, M.K.; Soderling, T.R. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Biochem. J. 1989, 258, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  54. Liu, X.; Murray, K.D. Neuronal excitability and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type II: Location, location, location. Epilepsia 2012, 53, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  55. Zadrozna, M.; Nowak, B.; Lason-Tyburkiewicz, M.; Wolak, M.; Sowa-Kucma, M.; Papp, M.; Ossowska, G.; Pilc, A.; Nowak, G. Different pattern of changes in calcium binding proteins immunoreactivity in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats exposed to stress models of depression. Pharmacol. Reports 2011, 63, 1539–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Eyles, D.W.; Mcgrath, J.J.; Reynolds, G.P. Neuronal calcium-binding proteins and schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2002, 57, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Freund, T.F.; Buzsaki, G.; Leon, A.; Baimbridge, K.G.; Somogyi, P. Relationship of neural vulnerability and calcium binding protein immunoreactivity in ischemia. Exp. Brain Res. 1990, 83, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. O’Day, D.H.; Eshak, K.; Myre, M.A. Calmodulin binding proteins and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2015, 46, 553–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Calixto, A. Life without food and the implications for neurodegeneration. Adv. Genet. 2015, 92, 53–74. [Google Scholar]
  60. Geiser, F. Hibernation. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Staples, J.F. Metabolic flexibility: Hibernation, torpor, and estivation. Compr. Physiol. 2016, 6, 737–771. [Google Scholar]
  62. Rubtsov, A.M. Hibernation: Protein adaptations. In Protein Adaptations and Signal Transductions; Storey, K.B., Storey, J.M., Eds.; Elsevier Science B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 57–71. [Google Scholar]
  63. Carey, H.V.; Andrews, M.T.; Martin, S.L. Mammalian hibernation: Cellular and molecular responses to depressed metabolism and low temperature. Am. Physiol. Soc. 2003, 83, 1153–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Boutilier, R.G. Mechanisms of cell survival in hypoxia and hypothermia. J. Exp. Biol. 2001, 204, 3171–3181. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Schwartz, C.; Andrews, M.T. Circannual transitions in gene expression: Lessons from seasonal adaptations. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2013, 105, 247–273. [Google Scholar] [PubMed][Green Version]
  66. Andrews, M.T. Molecular interactions underpinning the phenotype of hibernation in mammals. J. Exp. Zool. 2019, 222, jeb160606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lust, W.D.; Wheaton, A.B.; Feussner, G.; Passonneau, J. Metabolism in the hamster brain during hibernation and arousal. Brain Res. 1989, 489, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Morin, P.J.; Storey, K.B. Mammalian hibernation: Differential gene expression and novel application of epigenetic controls. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2009, 53, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Williams, C.T.; Barnes, B.M.; Buck, C.L. Integrating physiology, behavior, and energetics: Biologging in a free-living arctic hibernator. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2016, 202, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yan, J.; Barnes, B.M.; Kohl, F.; Marr, T.G. Modulation of gene expression in hibernating arctic ground squirrels. Physiol. Genomicsl 2008, 32, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  71. Antón-Fernández, A.; León-Espinosa, G.; DeFelipe, J.; Munoz, A. Changes in the Golgi apparatus of neocortical and hippocampal neurons in the hibernating hamster. Front. Neuroanat. 2015, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Storey, K.B.; Heldmaier, G.; Rider, M.H. Mammalian hibernation: Physiology, cell signaling, and gene controls on metabolic rate depression. In Dormancy and Resistance in Harsh Environments; Lubzens, E., Cerda, J., Clark, M.S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 227–252. ISBN 9783642124228. [Google Scholar]
  73. Horowitz, J.M.; Horrigan, D.J. Hibernation in mammals: Central nervous system function. Compr. Physiol. 2011, 1, 533–539. [Google Scholar]
  74. Storey, K.B. Out cold: Biochemical regulation of mammalian hibernation—A mini-review. Gerontology 2010, 56, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tsukamoto, D.; Hasegawa, T.; Hirose, S.; Sakurai, Y.; Ito, M.; Takamatsu, N. Circadian transcription factor HSF1 regulates differential HSP70 gene transcription during the arousal-torpor cycle in mammalian hibernation. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ma, Y.L.; Zhu, X.; Rivera, P.M.; Tøien, Ø.; Barnes, B.M.; Lamanna, J.C.; Smith, M.A.; Drew, K.L. Absence of cellular stress in brain after hypoxia induced by arousal from hibernation in Arctic ground squirrels. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2005, 289, R1297–R1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  77. Bogren, L.K.; Drew, K.L. Ischemia/reperfusion injury resistance in hibernators is more than an effect of reduced body temperature or winter season. Temperature 2014, 1, 87–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  78. Drew, K.L.; Harris, M.B.; LaManna, J.C.; Smith, M.A.; Zhu, X.W.; Ma, Y.L. Hypoxia tolerance in mammalian heterotherms. J. Exp. Biol. 2004, 207, 3155–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  79. Dave, K.R.; Prado, R.; Raval, A.P.; Drew, K.L.; Perez-Pinzon, M.A. The Arctic ground squirrel brain is resistant to injury from cardiac arrest during euthermia. Stroke 2006, 37, 1261–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bhowmick, S.; Moore, J.T.; Kirschner, D.L.; Drew, K.L. Arctic ground squirrel hippocampus tolerates oxygen glucose deprivation independent of hibernation season even when not hibernating and after ATP depletion, acidosis, and glutamate efflux. J. Neurochem. 2017, 142, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Larson, J.; Drew, K.L.; Folkow, L.P.; Milton, S.L.; Park, T.J. No oxygen? No problem! Intrinsic brain tolerance to hypoxia in vertebrates. J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 1024–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Fu, W.; Hu, H.; Dang, K.; Chang, H.; Du, B.; Wu, X.; Gao, Y. Remarkable preservation of Ca2+ homeostasis and inhibition of apoptosis contribute to anti-muscle atrophy effect in hibernating Daurian ground squirrels. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Wang, S.Q.; Lakatta, E.G.; Cheng, H.; Zhou, Z.Q. Adaptive mechanisms of intracellular calcium homeostasis in mammalian hibernators. J. Exp. Biol. 2002, 205, 2957–2962. [Google Scholar]
  84. Andrews, M.T. Advances in molecular biology of hibernation in mammals. BioEssays 2007, 29, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Milner, R.E.; Michalak, M.; Wang, L.C.H. Altered properties of calsequestrin and the ryanodine receptor in the cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum of hibernating mammals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1991, 1063, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Càceres, C.E. Dormancy in invertebrates. Invertebr. Biol. 1997, 116, 371–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Storey, K.B.; Storey, J.M. Hibernation: Poikilotherms. In eLS; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; ISBN 9780470015902. [Google Scholar][Green Version]
  88. Costanzo, J.P. Overwintering adaptations and extreme freeze tolerance in a subarctic population of the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. J. Comp. Physiol. B 2019, 189, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ansart, A.; Vernon, P.; Daguzan, J. Photoperiod is the main cue that triggers supercooling ability in the land snail, Helix aspersa (Gastropoda, Helicidae). Cryobiology 2001, 42, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ansart, A.; Vernon, P. Cold hardiness in molluscs. Acta Oecologica 2003, 24, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ansart, A.; Nicolai, A.; Vernon, P.; Madec, L. Do ice nucleating agents limit the supercooling ability of the land snail Cornu aspersum? Cryo-Letters 2010, 31, 329–340. [Google Scholar]
  92. Nowakowska, A.; Caputa, M.; Rogalska, J. Seasonal changes in cryoprotectants concentrations in Helix pomatia snails. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2006, 8, 93–105. [Google Scholar]
  93. Nicolai, A.; Filser, J.; Lenz, R.; Bertrand, C.; Charrier, M. Quantitative assessment of hemolymph metabolites in two physiological states and two populations of the land snail Helix pomatia. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2012, 85, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. León-Olea, M.; Miller-Pérez, C.; Cruz, R.; Antón, B.; Vega, R.; Soto, E. Immunohistochemical localization and electrophysiological action of nociceptin/orphanin-FQ in the snail (Helix aspersa) neurons. Neurosci. Lett. 2001, 316, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Vignola, C.; Fenoglio, C.; Scherini, E.; Bernocchi, G. The cerebral neurons of Helix aspersa during hibernation. Changes in the cytochemical detection of calmodulin, cytoskeletal components and phosphatases. Tissue Cell 1995, 27, 185–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Moreton, R.B. Electrophysiology and ionic movements in the central nervous system of the snail, Helix aspersa. J. Exp. Biol. 1972, 57, 513–541. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Korobtsov, G.N.; Sakharov, D.A. Effect of serotonin and acetylcholine on neurons in the central nervous system of snails. Neurophysiology 1974, 6, 512–517. [Google Scholar]
  98. Pirger, Z.; Lubics, A.; Reglodi, D.; Laszlo, Z.; Mark, L.; Kiss, T. Mass spectrometric analysis of activity-dependent changes of neuropeptide profile in the snail, Helix pomatia. Neuropeptides 2010, 44, 475–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kiss, T.; Battonyai, I.; Pirger, Z. Down regulation of sodium channels in the central nervous system of hibernating snails. Physiol. Behav. 2014, 131, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hiripi, L.; Salánki, J. Seasonal and activity-dependent changes of the serotonin level in the C.N.S. and heart of the snail (Helix Pomatia L.). Comp. Gen. Pharmacol. 1973, 4, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pisu, M.B.; Conforti, E.; Fenoglio, C.; Necchi, D.; Scherini, E.; Bernocchi, G. Nitric oxide-containing neurons in the nervous ganglia of Helix aspersa during rest and activity: Immunocytochemical and enzyme histochemical detection. J. Comp. Neurol. 1999, 409, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pisu, M.B.; Conforti, E.; Scherini, E.; Bernocchi, G. Gastrin-Cholecystokinin immunoreactivity in the central nervous system of Helix aspersa during rest and activity. J. Exp. Zool. 2000, 287, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bernocchi, G.; Vignola, C.; Scherini, E.; Necchi, D.; Pisu, M.B. Bioactive peptides and serotonin immunocytochemistry in the cerebral ganglia of hibernating Helix aspersa. J. Exp. Zool. 1998, 280, 354–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Michaelidis, B.; Loumbourdis, N.S.; Kapaki, E. Analysis of monoamines, adenosine and GABA in tissues of the land snail Helix lucorum and lizard Agama stellio stellio during hibernation. J. Exp. Biol. 2002, 205, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar]
  105. Breukelen, F.; Van Krumschnabel, G.; Podrabsky, J.E. Vertebrate cell death in energy-limited conditions and how to avoid it: What we might learn from mammalian hibernators and other stress-tolerant vertebrates. Apoptosis 2010, 15, 386–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jinka, T.R.; Combs, V.M.; Drew, K.L. Translating drug-induced hibernation to therapeutic hypothermia. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2015, 6, 899–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Drew, K.L.; Zuckerman, J.A.; Shenk, P.E.; Bogren, L.K.; Jinka, T.R.; Moore, J.T. Hibernation: A natural model of tolerance to cerebral ischemia/reperfusion. In Innate tolerance in the CNS; Gidday, J.M., Perez-Pinzon, M.A., Zhang, J.H., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 37–50. [Google Scholar]
  108. Malatesta, M.; Biggiogera, M.; Zancanaro, C. Hypometabolic induced state: A potential tool in biomedicine and space exploration. In Life in Extreme Environments; Amils, R., Ellis-Evans, C., Hinghofer-Szalkay, H., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006; pp. 47–60. [Google Scholar]
  109. Dave, K.R.; Christian, S.L.; Perez-Pinzon, M.A.; Drew, K.L. Neuroprotection: Lessons from hibernators. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2012, 162, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  110. Kondo, N. Endogenous circannual clock and HP complex in a hibernation control system. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2007, 72, 607–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Drew, K.L.; Buck, C.L.; Barnes, B.M.; Christian, S.L.; Rasley, B.T.; Harris, M.B. Central nervous system regulation of mammalian hibernation: Implications for metabolic suppression and ischemia tolerance. J. Neurochem. 2007, 102, 1713–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Miller, L.P.; Hsu, C. Therapeutic potential for adenosine receptor activation in ischemic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 1992, 9, S563–S567. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  113. Hanegan, J.L.; Williams, B.A. Ca2+ induced hypothermia in a hibernator (Citellus beechyi). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1975, 50, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Myers, R.D.; Buckman, J.E. Deep hypothermia induced in the golden hamster by altering cerebral calcium levels. Am. J. Physiol. 1972, 223, 1313–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Zhou, F.; Zhu, X.; Castellani, R.J.; Stimmelmayr, R.; Perry, G.; Smith, M.A.; Drew, K.L. Hibernation, a model of neuroprotection. Am. J. Pathol. 2001, 158, 2145–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Cogut, V.; Bruintjes, J.J.; Eggen, B.J.L.; van der Zee, E.A.; Henning, R.H. Brain inflammatory cytokines and microglia morphology changes throughout hibernation phases in Syrian hamster. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018, 68, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Malatesta, M.; Biggiogera, M.; Baldelli, B.; Barabino, S.M.L.; Martin, T.E.; Zancanaro, C. Hibernation as a far-reaching program for the modulation of RNA transcription. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2008, 71, 564–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bernocchi, G.; Barni, S.; Scherini, E. The annual cycle of Erinaceus europaeus L. as a model for a further study of cytochemical heterogeneity in Purkinje neuron nuclei. Neuroscience 1986, 17, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Giacometti, S.; Scherini, E.; Bernocchi, G. Seasonal changes in the nucleoli of Purkinje cells of the hedgehog cerebellum. Brain Res. 1989, 488, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bai, L.; Liu, E.; Bai, L.; Liu, B.; Ji, C.; Zhao, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, R.; Wang, W.; Yao, P.; et al. Hypoxic and cold adaptation insights from the himalayan marmot genome. iScience 2018, 11, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Gonzales-Riano, C.; Leon-Espinosa, G.; Regalado-Reyes, M.; Garcia, A.; DeFelipe, J.; Barbas, C. Metabolomic study of hibernating syrian hamster brains: In search of neuroprotective agents. J. Proteome Res. 2019, 18, 1175–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Hindle, A.G.; Martin, S.L. Cytoskeletal regulation dominates temperature-sensitive proteomic changes of hibernation in forebrain of 13-lined ground squirrels. PLoS One 2013, 8, e71627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Gentile, N.T.; Brenner, M.; Spatz, M.; McCarron, R.M.; Hallenbeck, J.M. Decreased calcium accumulation in isolated nerve endings during hibernation in ground squirrels. Neurochem. Res. 2006, 21, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Brauch, K.M.; Dhruv, N.D.; Hanse, E.A.; Andrews, M.T. Digital transcriptome analysis indicates adaptive mechanisms in the heart of a hibernating mammal. Physiol. Genomics 2005, 23, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  125. Chen, J.; Yuan, L.; Sun, M.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, S. Screening of hibernation-related genes in the brain of Rhinolophus ferrumequinum during hibernation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B 2008, 149, 388–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Pisu, M.B.; Scherini, E.; Bernocchi, G. Immunocytochemical changes of cytoskeleton components and calmodulin in the frog cerebellum and optic tectum during hibernation. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 1998, 72, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Roda, E.; Bottone, M.G.; Insolia, V.; Barni, S.; Bernocchi, G. Changes in the cerebellar cytoarchitecture of hibernating hedgehog Erinaceus europaeus L. (Mammalia): An immunocytochemical approach. Eur. Zool. J. 2017, 84, 496–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Schwartz, C.; Hampton, M.; Andrews, M.T. Seasonal and regional differences in gene expression in the brain of a hibernating mammal. PLoS One 2013, 8, e58427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Frerichs, K.U.; Smith, C.B.; Brenner, M.; DeGracia, D.J.; Krause, G.S.; Marrone, L.; Dever, T.E.; Hallenbeck, J.M. Suppression of protein synthesis in brain during hibernation involves inhibition of protein initiation and elongation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 14511–14516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  130. Chase, R. Structure and function in the cerebral ganglion. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2000, 49, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kerkut, G.A.; Lambert, J.D.C.; Gayton, R.J.; Loker, J.E.; Walker, R.J. Mapping of nerve cells in the suboesophageal ganglia of Helix aspersa. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 1975, 50, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Alvarez-Leefmans, F.J.; Rink, T.J.; Tsien, R.Y. Free calcium ions in neurones of Helix aspersa measured with ion-selective microelectrodes. J. Physiol. 1981, 315, 531–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gattoni, G.; Insolia, V.; Bernocchi, G. Hibernation induces changes in the metacerebral neurons of Cornu aspersum: Distribution and co-localization of cytoskeletal and calcium-binding proteins. Invertebr. Neurosci. 2018, 18, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Arendt, T.; Stieler, J.; Strijkstra, A.M.; Hut, R.A.; Rudiger, J.; Can der Zee, E.A.; Harkany, T.; Holzer, M.; Hartig, W. Reversible paired helical filament-like phosphorylation of tau is an adaptive process associated with neuronal plasticity in hibernating animals. Development/Plasticity/Repair 2003, 23, 6972–6981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Su, B.; Wang, X.; Srew, K.L.; Perry, G.; Smith, M.A.; Zhu, X. Physiological regulation of tau phosphorylation during hibernation. J. Neurochem. 2008, 105, 2098–2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  136. von der Ohe, C.G.; Garner, C.C.; Darian-smith, C.; Heller, H.C. Synaptic protein dynamics in hibernation. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Stieler, J.T.; Bullmann, T.; Kohl, F.; Tøien, Ø.; Bruckner, M.K.; Hartig, W.; Barnes, B.M.; Arendt, T. The physiological link between metabolic rate depression and tau phosphorylation in mammalian hibernation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e14530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Härtig, W.; Stieler, J.; Boerema, A.S.; Wolf, J.; Schmidt, U.; Weißfuß, J.; Bullmann, T.; Strijkstra, A.M.; Arendt, T. Hibernation model of tau phosphorylation in hamsters: Selective vulnerability of cholinergic basal forebrain neurons – implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007, 25, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Bullmann, T.; Seeger, G.; Stieler, J.; Hanics, J.; Reimann, K.; Kretzschmann, T.P.; Hilbrich, I.; Holzer, M.; Alpar, A.; Arendt, T. Tau phosphorylation-associated spine regression does not impair hippocampal-dependent memory in hibernating golden hamsters. Hippocampus 2016, 26, 301–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Stieler, J.T.; Borema, A.S.; Bullmann, T.; Kohl, F.; Strijkstra, A.M.; Barnes, B.M.; Arendt, T. Activity-state profile of tau kinases in hibernating animals. In Hypometabolism in Animals, Hibernation, Torpor and Cryobiology; Lovegrove, B.G., Mckechnie, A.E., Eds.; University of KwaZulu-Natal: Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, 2008; pp. 133–142. [Google Scholar]
  141. Bao, B.; Xu, W. Identification of gene expression changes associated with the initiation of diapause in the brain of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. BMC Genomics 2011, 12, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Ahn, J.J.; Choi, K.; Huang, S.; Al Baki, A.; Ahmed, S.; Kim, Y. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, and its association with rapid cold hardiness. J. Asia. Pac. Entomol. 2018, 21, 1275–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. MacDonald, J.A.; Storey, K.B. The effect of hibernation on protein phosphatases from ground squirrel organs. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2007, 468, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Wu, C.; Reardon, A.J.; Storey, K.B. Effects of hibernation on regulation of mammalian protein phosphatase type-2-A. Cryobiology 2013, 66, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Chen, Y.; Matsushita, M.; Nairn, A.C.; Damuni, Z.; Cai, D.; Frerichs, K.U.; Hallenbeck, J.M. Mechanisms for increased levels of phosphorylation of Elongation Factor-2 during hibernation in ground squirrels. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 11565–11570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Popov, V.I.; Bocharova, L.S.; Bragin, A.G. Repeated changes of dendritic morphology in the hippocampus of ground squirrels in the course of hibernation. Neuroscience 1992, 48, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Popov, V.I.; Bocharova, L.S. Hibernation-induced structural changes in synaptic contacts between mossy fibers and hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Neuroscience 1992, 48, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. von der Ohe, C.G.; Darian-smith, C.; Garner, C.C.; Heller, H.C. Ubiquitous and temperature-dependent neural plasticity in hibernators. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 10590–10598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Magarinos, A.M.; Mcewen, B.S.; Saboureau, M.; Pevet, P. Rapid and reversible changes in intrahippocampal connectivity during the course of hibernation in European hamsters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 18775–18780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  150. Horowitz, J.M.; Horwitz, B.A. Extreme neuroplasticity of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in hibernating mammalian species. Front. Neuroanat. 2019, 13, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Ruczynski, I.; Siemers, B.M. Hibernation does not affect memory retention in bats. Biol. Lett. 2011, 7, 153–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Clemens, L.E.; Heldmaier, G.; Exner, C. Keep cool: Memory is retained during hibernation in Alpine marmots. Physiol. Behav. 2009, 98, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. McNamara, M.C.; Riedesel, M.L. Memory and hibernation in Citellus lateralis. Science 1973, 179, 92–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Emirbekov, E.Z.; Pashaeva, M.E. Expression of cytoskeleton proteins in hypothalamic cells in winter sleeping ground squirrels Citellus pygmaeus Pallas during hibernation. Neurochem. J. 2014, 8, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Dehmelt, L.; Halpain, S. The MAP2/Tau family of microtubule-associated proteins. Genome Biol. 2004, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Penazzi, L.; Bakota, L.; Brandt, R. Microtubule dynamics in neuronal development, plasticity, and neurodegeneration. In International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology; Vanpouille-Box, C., Galluzzi, L., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Volume 321, pp. 89–169. [Google Scholar]
  157. Johnson, G.V.W.; Jope, R.S. The role of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP-2) in neuronal growth, plasticity and degeneration. J. Neurosci. Res. 1992, 33, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Arendt, T.; Bullmann, T. Neuronal plasticity in hibernation and the proposed role of the microtubule-associated protein tau as a “master switch” regulating synaptic gain in neuronal networks. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2013, 305, 478–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Gómez-Ramos, A.; Smith, M.A.; Perry, G.; Avila, J. Tau phosphorylation and assembly. Acta Neurobiol. Exp. (Wars). 2004, 64, 33–39. [Google Scholar]
  160. Baudier, J.; Cole, R.D. Phosphorylation of tau proteins to a state like that in Alzheimer’s brain is catalyzed by a calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase and modulated by phospholipids. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 17577–17583. [Google Scholar]
  161. Leon-Espinosa, G.; Garcia, E.; Garcia-Escudero, V.; Felix, H.; DeFelipe, F.; Avila, J. Changes in tau phosphorylation in hibernating rodents. J. Neurosci. Res. 2013, 91, 954–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  162. Stieler, J.T.; Bullmann, T.; Kohl, F.; Barnes, B.M.; Arendt, T. PHF-like tau phosphorylation in mammalian hibernation is not associated with p25-formation. J. Neural Transm. 2009, 116, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Oka, M.; Fukisaki, N.; Maruko-Otake, A.; Ohtake, Y.; Shimizu, S.; Saito, T.; Hisanaga, S.-I.; Iijima, K.M.; Ando, K. Calcium/Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II promotes neurodegeneration caused by tau phosphorylated at Ser262/356 in a transgenic Drosophila model of tauopathy. J. Biochem. 2017, 162, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Sánchez, C.; Díaz-Nido, J.; Avila, J. Phosphorylation of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) and its relevance for the regulation of the neuronal cytoskeleton function. Prog. Neurobiol. 2000, 61, 133–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Wei, Y.; Ye, J.; Wang, X.; Li-ping, Z.; Hu, Q.; Wang, Q.; Ke, D.; Tian, Q.; Wang, J.-Z. Tau-induced calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase-IV activation aggravates nuclear tau hyperphosphorylation. Neurosci. Bull. 2017, 34, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Lee, Y.C.; Wolff, J. Calmodulin binds to both microtubule-associated protein 2 and tau proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 1984, 259, 1226–1230. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  167. Padilla, R.; Maccioni, R.B.; Avila, J. Calmodulin binds to a tubulin binding site of the microtubule-associated protein tau. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1990, 97, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Kakiuchi, S.; Sobue, K. Calcium and calmodulin-dependent flip-flop mechanism in microtubule assembly-disassembly. FEBS Lett. 1981, 132, 141–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Liu, Q.; Xie, F.; Siedlak, S.L.; Nunomura, A.; Honda, K.; Moreira, P.I.; Zhua, X.; Smith, M.A.; Perry, G. Neurofilament proteins in neurodegenerative diseases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2004, 61, 3057–3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  170. Ackerley, S.; Thornhill, P.; Grierson, A.J.; Brownlees, J.; Anderton, B.H.; Leigh, P.N.; Shaw, C.E.; Miller, C.C.J. Neurofilament heavy chain side arm phosphorylation regulates axonal transport of neurofilaments. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 161, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  171. Goldstein, M.E.; Sternberger, N.H.; Sternberger, L.A. Phosphorylation protects neurofilaments against proteolysis. J. Neuroimmunol. 1987, 14, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Drew, K.L.; Rice, M.E.; Kuhn, T.B.; Smith, M.A. Neuroprotective adaptations in hibernation: Therapeutic implications for ischemia-reperfusion, traumatic brain injury ad neurodegenerative diseases. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 31, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Stenzel-Poore, M.P.; Stevens, S.L.; Xiong, Z.; Lessov, N.S.; Harrington, C.A.; Mori, M.; Meller, R.; Rosenzweig, H.L.; Tobar, E.; Shaw, T.E.; et al. Effect of ischaemic preconditioning on genomic response to cerebral ischaemia: Similarity to neuroprotective strategies in hibernation and hypoxia-tolerant states. Lancet 2003, 362, 1028–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Zancanaro, C.; Biggiogera, M.; Malatesta, M. Mammalian Hibernation:Relevance to a Possible Human Hypometabolic State; European Space Agency: Paris, France, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  175. Liska, M.G.; Crowley, M.G.; Tuazon, J.P.; Borlongan, C.V. Neuroprotective and neuroregenerative potential of pharmacologically-induced hypothermia with D-alanine D-leucine enkephalin in brain injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2018, 13, 2029–2037. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  176. Oeltgen, P.R.; Nilekani, S.P.; Nuchols, P.A.; Spurrier, W.A.; Su, T.P. Further studies on opioids and hibernation: Delta opioid receptor ligand selectively induced hibernation in summer-active ground squirrels. Life Sci. 1988, 43, 1565–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Vecchio, L.; Soldani, C.; Bottone, M.G.; Malatesta, M.; Martin, T.E.; Rothblum, L.I.; Pellicciari, C.; Biggiogera, M. DADLE induces a reversible hibernation-like state in HeLa cells. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2006, 125, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Su, T. Delta opioid peptide [D-Ala2,D-Leu5]Enkephalin promotes cell survival. J. Biomed. Sci. 2000, 7, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Borlongan, C.V.; Wang, Y.; Su, T. Delta opioid peptide ((D-ALA2,D-LEU 5)Enkephalin: Linking hibernation and neuroprotection. Front. Biosci. 2004, 9, 3392–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Logan, S.M.; Storey, K.B. Avoiding apoptosis during mammalian hibernation. Temperature 2017, 4, 15–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Cerri, S.; Bottiroli, G.; Bottone, M.G.; Barni, S.; Bernocchi, G. Cell proliferation and death in the brain of active and hibernating frogs. J. Anat. 2009, 215, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  182. McWhinney, S.R.; Goldberg, R.M.; McLeod, H.L. Platinum neurotoxicity pharmacogenetics. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Amptoulach, S.; Tsavaris, N. Neurotoxicity caused by the treatment with platinum analogues. Chemother. Res. Pract. 2011, 2011, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Bernocchi, G.; Bottone, M.G.; Piccolini, V.M.; Dal Bo, V.; Santin, G.; De Pascali, S.A.; Migoni, D.; Fanizzi, F.P. Developing central nervous system and vulnerability to platinum compounds. Chemother. Res. Pract. 2011, 2011, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Unel, C.C.; Erol, K. The role of ionic homeostasis in cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity: A preliminary study. Eurasian J. Med. 2018, 50, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  186. Bernocchi, G.; Fanizzi, F.P.; Pascali, S.A.; de Piccolini, V.M.; Gasperini, C.; Insolia, V.; Bottone, M.G. Neurotoxic effects of platinum compounds: Studies in vivo on intracellular calcium homeostasis in the immature central nervous system. Toxics 2015, 3, 224–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Piccolini, V.M.; Esposito, A.; Dal Bo, V.; Insolia, V.; Bottone, M.G.; De Pascali, S.A.; Fanizzi, F.P.; Bernocchi, G. Cerebellum neurotransmission during postnatal development: [Pt(O,O′-acac)(γ-acac)(DMS)] vs cisplatin and neurotoxicity. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2015, 40, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Necchi, D.; Scherini, E.; Bernocchi, G. Glial cell reaction to cis-dichlorodiammine platinum treatment in the immature rat cerebellum. Exp. Neurol. 1997, 144, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Scherini, E.; Biggiogera, M.; Bernocchi, G.; Mares, V. Damage and repair of the immature rat cerebellum after cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum II (cis-DDP) treatment. An ultrastructural study. Acta Neuropathol. 1987, 72, 218–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Bertram, L.; Tanzi, R.E. The genetic epidemiology of neurodegenerative disease. J. Clin. Invest. 2005, 115, 1449–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  191. LaFerla, F.M.; Oddo, S. Alzheimer’s disease: Aβ, tau and synaptic dysfunction. Trends Mol. Med. 2005, 11, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Bakota, L.; Brandt, R. Tau biology and tau-directed therapies for Alzheimer’s disease. Drugs 2016, 76, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Alzheimer’s Association Calcium Hypothesis Workgroup. Calcium hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease and brain aging: A framework for integrating new evidence into a comprehensive theory of pathogenesis. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2017, 13, 178–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Llinas, R.; Moreno, H. Perspective on calcium and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2017, 13, 196–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Iritani, S.; Niizato, K.; Emson, P.C. Relationship of calbindin D28K-immunoreactive cells and neuropathological changes in the hippocampal formation of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropathology 2001, 21, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Hoskins, B.; Ho, I.K. Effects of maturation and aging on calmodulin and calmodulin-regulated enzymes in various regions of mouse brain. Mech. Ageing Dev. 1986, 36, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Lu, T.; Pan, Y.; Kao, S.; Li, C.; Kohane, I.; Chan, J.; Yankner, B.A. Gene regulation and DNA damage in the ageing human brain. Nature 2004, 429, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Lesort, M.; Blanchard, C.; Yardin, C.; Esclaire, F.; Hugon, J. Cultured neurons expressing phosphorylated tau are more resistant to apoptosis induced by NMDA or serum deprivation. Mol. Brain Res. 1997, 45, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Arendt, T.; Holzer, M.; Fruth, R.; Brückner, M.K.; Gärtner, U. Phosphorylation of tau, aβ-formation, and apoptosis after in vivo inhibition of PP-1 and PP-2A. Neurobiol. Aging 1998, 19, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Bu, J.; Sathyendra, V.; Nagykery, N.; Geula, C. Age-related changes in calbindin-D28k, calretinin, and parvalbumin-immunoreactive neurons in the human cerebral cortex. Exp. Neurol. 2003, 182, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Ueno, H.; Takao, K.; Suemitsu, S.; Murakami, S.; Kitamura, N.; Wani, K.; Okamoto Aoki, S.; Ishihara, T. Age-dependent and region-specific alteration of parvalbumin neurons and perineuronal nets in the mouse cerebral cortex. Neurochem. Int. 2018, 112, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Villa, A.; Podini, P.; Panzeri, M.C.; Racchetti, G.; Meldolesi, J. Cytosolic Ca2+ binding proteins during rat brain ageind: Loss of calbindin and calretinin hippocampus, with no change in the cerebellum. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1994, 6, 1491–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Ouda, L.; Burianova, J.; Syka, J. Age-related changes in calbindin and calretinin immunoreactivity in the central auditory system of the rat. Exp. Gerontol. 2012, 47, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Lee, C.H.; Hwang, I.K.; Yoo, K.-Y.; Choi, J.H.; Park, O.K.; Lee, J.-C.; Jeong, Y.-G.; Lee, I.S.; Won, M.-H. Calbindin D-28k immunoreactivity and its protein level in hippocampal subregions during normal aging in gerbils. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2009, 29, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Kishimoto, J.; Tsuchiya, T.; Cox, H.; Emson, P.C.; Nakayama, Y. Age-related changes of calbindin-D28k, calretinin and parvalbumin mRNAs in the hamster brain. Neurobiol. Aging 1998, 19, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. McLachlan, D.R.; Wong, L.; Bergeron, C.; Baimbridge, K.G. Calmodulin and calbindin D28K in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 1987, 1, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Ichimiya, Y.; Emson, P.C.; Mountjoy, C.Q.; Lawson, D.E.M.; Heizmann, C.W. Loss of calbindin-28K immunoreactive neurones from the cortex in Alzheimer-type dementia. Brain Res. 1988, 475, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Ichimiya, Y.; Emson, P.C.; Mountjoy, C.Q.; Lawson, D.E.M.; Iizuka, R. Caibindin-immunoreactive cholinergic neurones in the nucleus basalis of Meynert in Alzheimer-type dementia. Brain Res. 1989, 499, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Hof, P.R.; Morrison, J.H. Neocortical neuronal subpopulations labeled by a monoclonal antibody to calbindin exhibit differential vulnerability in Alzheimer’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 1991, 111, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Nishiyama, E.; Ohwada, J.; Iwamoto, N.; Arai, H. Selective loss of calbindin D28K-immunoreative neurons in the cortical layer II in brains of Alzheimer’s disease: A morphometric study. Neurosci. Lett. 1993, 163, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Satoh, J.; Tabira, T.; Sano, M.; Nakayama, H.; Tateishi, J. Parvalbumin-immunoreactive neurons in the human central nervous system are decreased in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 1991, 81, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Brady, D.R.; Mufson, E.J. Parvalbumin-immunoreactive neurons in the hippocampal formation of Alzheimer’s diseased brain. Neuroscience 1997, 80, 1113–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Solomon, B.; Koppel, R.; Jossiphov, J. Immunostaining of calmodulin and aluminium in Alzheimer’s disease-affected brains. Brain Res. Bull. 2001, 55, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Palop, J.J.; Jones, B.; Kekonius, L.; Chin, J.; Yu, G.-Q.; Raber, J.; Masliah, E.; Mucke, L. Neuronal depletion of calcium-dependent proteins in the dentate gyrus is tightly linked to Alzheimer’s disease-related cognitive deficits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 9572–9577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Palop, J.J.; Chin, J.; Roberson, E.D.; Wang, J.; Thwin, M.T.; Bien-Ly, N.; Yoo, J.; Ho, K.O.; Yu, G.-Q.; Kreitzer, A.; et al. Aberrant excitatory neuronal activity and compensatory remodeling of inhibitory hippocampal circuits in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 2007, 55, 697–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Zallo, F.; Gardenal, E.; Verkhratsky, A.; Julio, J. Loss of calretinin and parvalbumin positive interneurones in the hippocampal CA1 of aged Alzheimer’s disease mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 681, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Mosconi, L.; Pupi, A.; De Leon, M.J. Brain glucose hypometabolism and oxidative stress in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1147, 180–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Arendt, T.; Stieler, J.; Holzer, M. Brain hypometabolism triggers PHF-like phosphorylation of tau, a major hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. J. Neural Transm. 2015, 122, 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Nestor, P.J.; Fryer, T.D.; Smielewski, P.; Hodges, J.R. Limbic hypometabolism in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Ann. Neurol. 2003, 54, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Bretteville, A.; Marcouiller, F.; Julien, C.; El Khoury, N.B.; Petry, F.R.; Poitras, I.; Mouginot, D.; Lévesque, G.; Hébert, S.S.; Planel, E. Hypothermia-induced hyperphosphorylation: A new model to study tau kinase inhibitors. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Mosconi, L.; Sorbi, S.; de Leon, M.J.; Li, Y.; Nacmias, B.; Myoung, P.S.; Tsui, W.; Ginestroni, A.; Bessi, V.; Fayyazz, M.; et al. Hypometabolism exceeds atrophy in presymptomatic early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease. J. Nucl. Med. 2006, 47, 1778–1786. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  222. Hirono, N.; Mori, E.; Ishii, K.; Ikejiri, Y.; Imamura, T.; Shimomura, T.; Hashimoto, M.; Yamashita, H.; Sasaki, M. Frontal lobe hypometabolism and depression in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1998, 50, 380–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Tascedda, F.; Malagoli, D.; Accorsi, A.; Rigillo, G.; Blom, J.M.C.; Ottaviani, E. Molluscs as models for translational medicine. Med. Sci. Monit. Basic Res. 2015, 21, 96–99. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  224. Pan, M. Hibernation induction in non-hibernating species. Biosci. Horizons 2018, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Frerichs, K.U.; Hallenbeck, J.M. Hibernation in ground squirrels induces state and species-specific tolerance to hypoxia and aglycemia: An in vitro study in hippocampal slices. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1998, 18, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic overview of the functions of buffer and sensor calcium-binding proteins (CBPs) in neurons. Ca2+ buffers directly control intracellular Ca2+ concentration during Ca2+ transients. As a consequence, they can indirectly influence spike duration and intensity, and therefore regulate the release and short-term synaptic plasticity of neurotransmitters. CaM and other Ca2+ sensors interact with a wide variety of intracellular proteins, often activating complex cascades of signal transduction through direct interaction or protein phosphorylation. These cascades control gene expression, cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and cytoskeletal remodeling, among other functions. Furthermore, CaM is known to affect the activity of ion channels that control Ca2+ uptake and storage, thereby modulating Ca2+ transients depending on external and internal signals, and can even act as a buffer at high concentrations. The overall effect on the intracellular Ca2+ dynamics of different CBPs influence all aspects of Ca2+ signaling, contributing to regulating cell homeostasis and reactions to changes in environmental conditions.
Figure 1. Schematic overview of the functions of buffer and sensor calcium-binding proteins (CBPs) in neurons. Ca2+ buffers directly control intracellular Ca2+ concentration during Ca2+ transients. As a consequence, they can indirectly influence spike duration and intensity, and therefore regulate the release and short-term synaptic plasticity of neurotransmitters. CaM and other Ca2+ sensors interact with a wide variety of intracellular proteins, often activating complex cascades of signal transduction through direct interaction or protein phosphorylation. These cascades control gene expression, cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and cytoskeletal remodeling, among other functions. Furthermore, CaM is known to affect the activity of ion channels that control Ca2+ uptake and storage, thereby modulating Ca2+ transients depending on external and internal signals, and can even act as a buffer at high concentrations. The overall effect on the intracellular Ca2+ dynamics of different CBPs influence all aspects of Ca2+ signaling, contributing to regulating cell homeostasis and reactions to changes in environmental conditions.
Ijms 20 02364 g001
Figure 2. Immunohistochemistry with light (A,B) and fluorescence (C,D) microscopy for the Ca2+-binding protein calmodulin-like (CaM-like) in the suboesophageal ganglia of Cornu aspersum during activity and hibernation. In active snails, pale CaM-like immunoreactivity was detected across the ganglion (A,C) with only few sparse cells showing strong staining in the cytoplasm (A, insert). Hibernating suboesophageal ganglia showed a stronger and more diffuse positivity to CaM-like in all panels evaluated (B,D). The signal could be detected in both the somata and axons of most neurons (B, insert). Quantitative analysis on immunofluorescence labeling demonstrated that the change between activity and hibernation is highly significant (asterisk: Student’s t test, p value < 0.01) (E). Experiments were carried out as described in [133]. Magnification: 10× (A–D).
Figure 2. Immunohistochemistry with light (A,B) and fluorescence (C,D) microscopy for the Ca2+-binding protein calmodulin-like (CaM-like) in the suboesophageal ganglia of Cornu aspersum during activity and hibernation. In active snails, pale CaM-like immunoreactivity was detected across the ganglion (A,C) with only few sparse cells showing strong staining in the cytoplasm (A, insert). Hibernating suboesophageal ganglia showed a stronger and more diffuse positivity to CaM-like in all panels evaluated (B,D). The signal could be detected in both the somata and axons of most neurons (B, insert). Quantitative analysis on immunofluorescence labeling demonstrated that the change between activity and hibernation is highly significant (asterisk: Student’s t test, p value < 0.01) (E). Experiments were carried out as described in [133]. Magnification: 10× (A–D).
Ijms 20 02364 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of immunohistochemistry staining for CBPs and NF-H between activity and hibernation in vertebrate (European hedgehog, AD) and invertebrate (garden snail, E–L) models. In the cerebellum of active hedgehogs, the cytoplasm and dendritic tree of Purkinje neurons showed strong CB labeling (A), while a visible decrease was detected after a long period of hibernation (B). NF-H immunopositivity was present in axons and terminals around Purkinje cells somata during activity (C, arrows), and strongly decreased after a long period of hibernation, when it was observed only in few terminals (D, arrowheads). In the cerebral (EH) and suboesophageal (IL) ganglia of the garden snail, a significant increase in the number of positive neurons and intensity of immunoreactivity for CaM-like during hibernation (F,J) was accompanied by an increased recognition of epitopes by anti-NF-H antibodies (H,L) with respect to activity (E, I and G, K, respectively). Throughout the snail CNS, several neurons showed hibernation-specific aggregates of CaM-like in the cytoplasm (F, J, double arrowheads). Experiments were carried out as described in [127,133]. Magnification: 40× (A–D, I–L); 60× (G); 100×(E,F,H).
Figure 3. Comparison of immunohistochemistry staining for CBPs and NF-H between activity and hibernation in vertebrate (European hedgehog, AD) and invertebrate (garden snail, E–L) models. In the cerebellum of active hedgehogs, the cytoplasm and dendritic tree of Purkinje neurons showed strong CB labeling (A), while a visible decrease was detected after a long period of hibernation (B). NF-H immunopositivity was present in axons and terminals around Purkinje cells somata during activity (C, arrows), and strongly decreased after a long period of hibernation, when it was observed only in few terminals (D, arrowheads). In the cerebral (EH) and suboesophageal (IL) ganglia of the garden snail, a significant increase in the number of positive neurons and intensity of immunoreactivity for CaM-like during hibernation (F,J) was accompanied by an increased recognition of epitopes by anti-NF-H antibodies (H,L) with respect to activity (E, I and G, K, respectively). Throughout the snail CNS, several neurons showed hibernation-specific aggregates of CaM-like in the cytoplasm (F, J, double arrowheads). Experiments were carried out as described in [127,133]. Magnification: 40× (A–D, I–L); 60× (G); 100×(E,F,H).
Ijms 20 02364 g003
Table 1. Changes in CBPs and cytoskeletal proteins during hibernation in vertebrates and invertebrates.
Table 1. Changes in CBPs and cytoskeletal proteins during hibernation in vertebrates and invertebrates.
SpeciesCalcium-Binding ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsAreaRef.
Ictidomys tridecemlineatusNo changeNo changeDecrease
No change
No change Increase
No change
Increase (P-NP)Forebrain[122]
Spermophilus citellus DecreaseIncrease Brain[134]
Increase Forebrain[135]
Spermophilus lateralis Decrease Brain (synapses)[136]
Spermophilus parryii Increase Brain[137]
Mesocricetus auratus Increase Forebrain[138]
Increase Brain[137]
Increase Brain[71]
Increase Hippocampus[139]
Increase Brain[121]
Erinaceus europaeusDecreaseDecreaseDecrease Decrease Decrease (P)Cerebellum[127]
Ursus americanus Increase Brain[137]
Rana esculenta Decrease
No change
Decrease (f)
Decrease (P)
Decrease (P)
Optic tectum
Cornu aspersum IncreaseDecrease (f) Increase (P)Cerebral ganglia[95]
No change IncreaseIncreaseIncreaseIncrease (P-NP)Cerebral ganglia[133]
Increase Increase (P-NP)Suboesophageal GanglionThis work
CB: calbindin, PV: parvalbumin, CR: calretinin, CaM: calmodulin, P-TAU: high phosphorylated tau, NF-H: heavy subunit of neurofilaments.
Table 2. Effect of platinum compounds treatment on CBPs localization and NF-H phosphorylation in the rat CNS. CisPt: cisplatin (CisPt), PtAcacDMS: [Pt(O,O′-acac)(-acac)(DMS)].
Table 2. Effect of platinum compounds treatment on CBPs localization and NF-H phosphorylation in the rat CNS. CisPt: cisplatin (CisPt), PtAcacDMS: [Pt(O,O′-acac)(-acac)(DMS)].
Calcium-Binding ProteinspNF-HCompoundAreaReference
Decrease + no change
No change
Decrease CisPtCerebellum[39]
Table 3. Changes in the detection of CBPs associated with age and Alzheimer’s disease in different mammal models.
Table 3. Changes in the detection of CBPs associated with age and Alzheimer’s disease in different mammal models.
Homo sapiensDecreaseNo effect CC Cortex, Hippocampus[200]
Decrease No effectDecrease tot mRNAFrontal cortex[197]
Mus musculusDecreaseNo effect CC, WBStriatum[31]
DecreaseNo effect CC, WBSomatosensory cortex[30]
No effect
SIHippocampus (CA1)
Hippocampus (CA3, DG)
Decrease CC, SIBrain[201]
No effect
Cortex, Cerebellum
Diencephalon, Medulla
Rattus norvegicusDecrease
No effect
WB, IDHippocampus
Decrease WBStriatum[28]
Decrease CC, WBAuditory system[203]
DecreaseNo effect CC, WBStriatum[31]
DecreaseIncrease CC Somatosensory cortex[30]
Meriones unguiculatusDecrease SI, WBHippocampus[204]
DecreaseNo effect CC, WBStriatum[31]
DecreaseIncrease CC, WBSomatosensory cortex[30]
Mesocricetus auratusDecrease No effect ISH, ARGHippocampus, Striatum, Cerebellum[205]
Alzheimer’s Disease
Homo sapiensDecrease DecreaseRIAFrontal, Temporal, Parietal Cortex[206]
Decrease CC, SICortex[207,208]
Decrease CCPrefrontal cortex[209]
Decrease CCTemporal cortex[210]
Decrease CCHippocampus[195]
Decrease CCTemporal, Parahippocampal, Parietal cortex, Cerebellum[211]
No effect
Mus musculusDecrease SI, WB, RT-PCRDentate gyrus[214]
Decrease CC, SIHippocampus[215]
Decrease SI, WBHippocampus[216]
CC: cell count; WB: Western blot, SI: signal intensity; RIA: radioimmunoassay; ID: immunodot, ISH: in situ hybridization, ARG: autoradiography, CA1: cornu Ammonis 1, CA2: cornu Ammonis 2, DG: dentate gyrus.
Back to TopTop