Next Article in Journal
The Interaction of Helicobacter pylori with TFF1 and Its Role in Mediating the Tropism of the Bacteria Within the Stomach
Previous Article in Journal
Protein Kinase CK2—A Putative Target for the Therapy of Diabetes Mellitus?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 18
10.3390/ijms20184399
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Social Learning of Acquiring Novel Feeding Habit in Mandarin Fish (Siniperca chuatsi)

by
Jian Peng
1,2,3,†,
Ya-Qi Dou
1,2,3,†,
Hui Liang
1,2,3,†,
Shan He
1,2,3,*,
Xu-Fang Liang
1,2,3 and
Lin-Jie Shi
1,2,3
1
College of Fisheries, Chinese Perch Research Center, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Freshwater Aquaculture Collaborative Innovation Center of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430070, China
3
Key Lab of Freshwater Animal Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Those authors contribute equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(18), 4399; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184399
Submission received: 3 August 2019 / Revised: 29 August 2019 / Accepted: 2 September 2019 / Published: 7 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Social learning plays important roles in gaining new foraging skills and food preferences. However, the potential role and molecular mechanism of social learning in acquiring new feeding habits is less clear in fish. In the present study, we examined the success rate of feeding habit domestication from live prey fish to dead prey fish, as well as the food intake of dead prey fish in mandarin fish with or without feeders of dead prey fish as demonstrators. Here, we found that mandarin fish can learn from each other how to solve novel foraging tasks, feeding on dead prey fish. In addition, the analysis of gene expressions and signaling pathways of learning through Western blotting and transcriptome sequencing shows that the expression of the c-fos, fra2, zif268, c/ebpd and sytIV genes were significantly increased, and the anorexigenic pomc and leptin a expressions were decreased in fish of the learning group. The phosphorylation levels of protein kinase A (PKA) and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) in the learning group were significantly higher than those of the control group, while the phosphorylation level of S6 ribosomal protein (S6) was lower. With the inhibitors of PKA and CaMKII signaling and the chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, we further found that the social learning of new feeding habits in mandarin fish could be attributed to the activation of the CaMKII signaling pathway and then the stimulation of the expression of the c-fos gene, which might be an important transcriptional factor to inhibit the expression of the anorexigenic gene pomc, resulting in the food intake of dead prey fish in mandarin fish. Altogether, our results support the hypothesis that social learning could facilitate the acquisition of novel feeding habits in fish, and it considerably increases the rate of subsequent individual food intake and domestication through the interaction between the learning gene c-fos and the appetite control gene pomc.

1. Introduction

Social learning is the process in which animals gain new skills and information through interaction with or observation of other individuals, and it eliminates the need for individuals to pay the costs of acquiring information on their own. Social learning plays important roles in a wide range of contexts, including acquiring new foraging skills and food preferences. There is now strong experimental evidence in humans that the eating behavior of other people can strongly influence the amount of food that we eat [1,2]. The learning of foraging what, where and how to eat is the main topic in studies of behavioral innovations in birds [3,4].
Because of the complex foraging environments and the change of food items, seasonally or spatially, learning plays a role in the foraging flexibility of fish [5]. Several studies have demonstrated that experience influences the foraging success, novel foraging behavior and profitability of different prey types. Groups of fish forage more efficiently than individuals, such as the goldfish (Carassius auratus auratus), bluntnose minnows (Pimephales notatus), Alaska pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) and sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) [6,7,8,9]. The enhancement of foraging by social learning has also been reported in hatchery-reared juvenile chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta), Alaska pollock and rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris) [8,10,11]. In addition, there are well-documented effects of social learning on novel foraging behavior through the observation of conspecifics in fishes. Anthouard reported that European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) learned to press a lever to receive a food reward through the observation of the trained demonstrators [12]. However, little is known about the potential role of social learning in acquiring new feeding habits in fish.
Mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi) is an important aquaculture fish and highly valued due to its excellent flesh quality with an output value of more than 3 billion U.S. dollars (20 billion Yuan). Mandarin fish are aggressive piscivores; once their fry start feeding, they feed solely on live fry of other fish species and refuse zooplankton or formulated diets [13]. The acceptance of dead prey fish or artificial diets represents a key challenge in the aquaculture of mandarin fish, similar in the Eurasiam perch [14]. We designed a specific training paradigm to domesticate the feeding habits of mandarin fish, and we found that some individuals could accept dead prey fish successfully (feeders) [15]. What is less clear is whether mandarin fish are aware of the influence of social learning from feeders on their feeding behavior of accepting dead prey fish as a novel feeding habit.
Observational learning, i.e., the learning of individual (observer, actor) by the direct observation of the behavior of an experienced individual (demonstrator, tutor) is the most frequent type of social learning [16]. To investigate the effect of social learning on acquiring new feeding habits of mandarin fish, we examined the success rate of feeding habit domestication from live prey fish to dead prey fish, as well as the food intake of dead prey fish in mandarin fish with or without feeders of dead prey fish as demonstrator. In addition, the analysis of gene expressions and signaling pathways of learning through Western blotting, transcriptome sequencing, inhibitor treatment and a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay allowed us to gain insights into the molecular mechanism of social learning in acquiring new feeding habits in mandarin fish. These results can support aquaculture domestication programs and research in mandarin fish, and they can lay a solid genetic foundation to understand the social learning of feeding behavior.

2. Results

2.1. Success Rate, Learning Times, and Food Intake of Dead Prey Fish

The success rate of feeding habit domestication from live prey fish to dead prey fish in the learning group (with the positive demonstration fish) was significantly higher than in that of the control group (with the negative demonstration fish), and the learning times were significantly decreased in the learning group (Figure 1). The food intake of dead prey fish was also increased in the learning group (Figure 1). Mandarin fish with the positive demonstration fish might be easier to be domesticated to accept dead prey fish, suggesting the social learning of acquiring new feeding habits in mandarin fish.

2.2. Expression of Learning or Appetite Control-Relative Genes

As shown in Figure 2, with the positive demonstration fish, the gene expressions of c-fos, fos-related antigen 2 (fra2), zif268, ccaat/enhancer binding protein d (c/ebpd) and synaptotagmin-4 (sytIV) were significantly increased (p < 0.05) in fish of the learning group, whereas the expression of the cAMP-response element binding protein I (creb I) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (bdnf) genes showed no difference between the two groups. For the appetite control genes, we examined the orexigenic genes such as neuropeptide y (npy), agouti-related protein (agrp) and ghrelin, and the anorexigenic genes such as pomc, cocaine and amphetamine-regulated transcript (cart), leptin a and cholecystokinin (cck) in the two groups. We found that the orexigenic gene agrp and the anorexigenic genes pomc and leptin a were significantly decreased in the fish of learning group (p < 0.05), while no changes were found in the expression of the npy, ghrelin, cart and cck genes between the two groups (Figure 3).

2.3. Transcriptome Analysis

To obtain an overview of the gene expression profile in mandarin fish with or without social learning, cDNA libraries were constructed from the brains of mandarin fish with the negative demonstration fish (wild mandarin fish without training) (Group CG) and fish with the positive demonstration fish (well-trained fish which could accept dead prey fish) (Group LG), which were sequenced using a BGISEQ (Beijing Genomics institution sequencing)-500 system. After removing the low-quality reads, we obtained 64,448,976 (CG) and 64,560,824 (LG) clean reads (Table 1). The removal of partial overlapping sequences yielded 93,699 distinct sequences (All-Unigene, mean size: 1049 bp, N50: 1775 bp). Among these unigenes, 69.5% (82,108) were between 100 and 500 bp in length, and 30.6% (36,110) were longer than 500 bp, of which 9.8% (11,550) were longer than 1000 bp. The sequencing data in this study have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (accession number: PRJNA529539). Of the 67,206 annotated sequences in the mandarin fish transcriptome, 47.65%, 69.24%, 39.10%, 39.73%, 34.47%, 27.80% and 8.97% were assigned with the NR, NT, SwissProt, KEGG, KOG, Pfam and GO databases, respectively.
We found 24,819 genes to be differentially expressed between Groups CG and LG (FDR (false discovery rate) ≤ 0.001, fold-change ≥ 2). We mapped the differentially expressed genes to the reference canonical pathways in KEGG to identify the biological pathways. The representative pathways with the differentially expressed genes were cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling, neurotrophin signaling, long-term potentiation, long-term depression, serotonergic synapse, dopaminergic synapse, glutamatergic synapse, and cholinergic synapse pathways (Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11, Table S1).

2.4. Learning Related Signaling Pathways

For the signaling of the learning activated, we examined the phosphorylation level of AMP-response element-binding (CREB), protein kinase A (PKA), extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK)1/2, protein kinase B (AKT), Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and S6 ribosomal protein (S6), which have been reported to be involved in the gene activation of learning or appetite control. The phosphorylation levels of PKA and CaMKII in fish of the learning group were significantly higher than those of the control group, while the phosphorylation level of S6 was lower than that of the control group, and the phosphorylation level of CREB, ERK1/2 and AKT showed no difference between the two groups (Figure 12).

2.5. PKA and CaMKII Signaling Pathway

To confirm whether the PKA and CaMKII signaling pathways are involved in feeding habit domestication through social learning, we used the specific inhibitors to study the effects of PKA and CaMKII signaling on the regulation of the expression of learning and appetite control genes. No significant change of the p-PKA level and mRNA expression of the zif268, c/ebpd, npy, pomc, leptin a and melanin-concentrating hormone (mch) genes were observed upon the inhibitor H-89 treatment, but the phospho-cAMP-response element binding (p-CREB) level, c-fos and agrp gene expressions were significantly decreased (p < 0.05) (Figure 13). As shown in Figure 14, we found that the p-CaMKII level and c-fos expression with KN-62 treatment were significantly lower than that without treatment (p < 0.05), the p-CREB level and pomc expression were significantly increased (p < 0.05), and the expression of the agrp and leptin a genes show no changes between groups.

2.6. ChIP

To further determine whether c-Fos has any direct regulation on the transcriptional activity of the pomc gene, we examined the interaction between transcriptional factor c-Fos and the three potential AP-1 (activator protein 1) binding sites of the pomc gene with a ChIP assay. We found the significant enrichments at Site 3 in c-Fos-immunoprecipitate compared with the IgG control (Figure 14), suggesting the binding of c-Fos to AP-1 binding sites in the regulatory region of the pomc gene.

3. Discussion

Most studies of social learning in a foraging context have been focused on the social transmission of new foraging skills [17,18,19] and food preferences [20,21,22]. To date, there have been few studies demonstrating learning processes in the feeding habit domestication of fish. Our study showed that mandarin fish were capable of social learning to acquire a new feeding habit. The success rates of feeding habit domestication from live prey fish to dead prey fish was significantly higher in mandarin fish with the positive demonstration fish than that with the negative demonstration fish. The food intake of dead prey fish was also increased in the learning group, and the learning times were decreased. Mandarin fish with the positive demonstration fish might be easier to be domesticated to feed on dead prey fish, suggesting that the learning ability of mandarin fish during the domestication of feeding habits. This is the first time that it has been shown that that social learning could enable mandarin fish with a naive feeding habit of live prey fish to acquire information of accepting dead prey fish from a knowledgeable one, thus avoiding the costs of learning solely by individual experience. Food preference resulting from the observation of the feeding behavior of the demonstrator has been found also in other fish. The observation of a trained conspecific Atlantic salmon Salmo salar significantly increased the rate at which naive hatchery-reared fish accepted novel, live prey items [23]. The young-of-the-year perch Perca fluviatilis could finish a shift from natural food items to commercial dry feeds faster through the presence of conspecifics that are familiar with the dry feed than without the demonstrators [24]. Previous studies have shown that changes due to experience increased the capture rate of a specific prey type and shortened the time to approach a novel food item in naive rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) [25] and pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) [26]. Our results indicated that social learning could facilitate the acquisition of a novel feeding habit in mandarin fish and have a great effect on domestication and food intake. However, it is unclear how social learning could affect feeding habits, as is the molecular mechanism of social learning on food preference.
With regard to the molecular mechanism of social learning during the domestication of feeding habits in mandarin fish, we examined the mRNA expression of learning genes. In mandarin fish with the positive demonstration fish, the gene expressions of c-fos, fra2, zif268, c/ebpd and sytIV were significantly increased, and the expression of the creb I and bdnf genes showed no difference between the two groups. The TORC1 (target of rapamycin complex 1)-mediated CREB regulation is a critical molecular step underlying synaptic plasticity and long-term memory [27]. As members of immediate early gene (IEG) and the Fos family of transcription factors, c-fos and fra2 mRNA expressions are up-regulated in response to a variety of neuronal activation protocols, including long-term protentiation (LTP) [28] and behavioral training [29,30]. The expression of the c-Fos protein is increased in the hippocampus of rats trained on the socially transmitted food preference (STFP) [31]. The short-term memory impairment of ethanol-exposed rats is related to a decrease of c-fos expression in the hippocampus [32]. Besides c-fos, another IEG gene, zif268, is reported to be involved in learning and memory, and several studies have shown that zif268 mRNA is upregulated during different forms of associative learning [33,34]. In the present study, compared with fish in the control group, the mRNA levels of c-fos, zif268 and c/ebpd were dramatically increased in fish of the learning group, suggesting that the social learning to exploit new food sources in mandarin fish might be attributed to the higher expression of the c-fos, zif268 and c/ebpd genes, potentially resulting in the long-term protentiation of a new feeding habit (feed on dead prey fish).
Consistent with the increase of food intake of dead prey fish, mandarin fish with the positive demonstration fish showed a decrease of anorexigenic pomc and leptin a. The neuropeptides npy, agrp, pomc and cart play essential roles in the regulation of food intake and energy homeostasis in mammals [35]. Recent findings have demonstrated that peripherally-derived endocrine signals act on receptors in hippocampal neurons to regulate food intake through leptin or ghrelin and to learn food reward-driven responding [36]. Our results suggested that the lower expression of the anorexigenic genes pomc and leptin a might facilitate the food intake of dead prey fish in the learning group. Furthermore, c-Fos has been considered as the learning molecule, whether the appetite control genes pomc and leptin a could be the downstream molecular targets of c-Fos is poorly understood.
Though social learning is necessary for the domestication of feeding habits, the neural mechanisms are mostly unknown. To obtain an overview of gene expression profile in mandarin fish with or without learning, we found the differentially expressed genes between Groups CG and LG in several signaling pathways, such as the cAMP signaling, neurotrophin signaling, long-term potentiation, long-term depression, serotonergic synapse, dopaminergic synapse, glutamatergic synapse, and cholinergic synapse pathways. Learning and memory processes depend on electro-chemical signaling undertaken by amino acids, biogenic monoamines, acetylcholine, gasotransmitters, and peptides within the neuronal networks in the brain [37]. It has been shown that dopamine is involved in the expression of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity as well as in behavioral learning and learning-associated immediate-early gene expression [38]. In the present study, mandarin fish in the LG group showed a higher expression of D3-class receptors (D3/D4R), suggesting that the exposure to the novel feeding habit of dead prey fish might be known to release dopamine and facilitate dopamine-dependent synaptic plasticity induction via D3-class receptors. The efficacy of glutamate transmission can be persistently changed following the neuronal activities [39] in LTP and long-term depression (LTD) [40]. Our results also showed that the glutamatergic synapse signaling was involved in the social learning process of new feeding habits in mandarin fish through both long-term potentiation and long-term depression.
Here, to investigate the signaling pathways that lead to activation of the IEGs and the upstream targets of these genes will advance our understanding of how functional activation of c-fos and zif268 may be implicated in processing social learning. It remains unclear why the social learning of feeding habits in mandarin fish promoted the expression of learning related genes, such as c-fos, fra2, zif268, c/ebpd and sytIV. The long-lasting synaptic plasticity, which is frequently investigated in LTP and in learning paradigms, is associated with several cellular events: Ca2+ influx through the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, the generation of cAMP and the activation of PKA, the phosphorylation of mitogen-associated protein kinase (MAPK) and CREB, and the subsequent transcription of plasticity-associated genes [28,41]. CaMKII is also an essential component of the signaling cascade required for the regulation of synaptic plasticity and neuronal growth [42]. The PKA signaling pathway has been proposed to participate in both the late phase of long term potentiation and protein synthesis-dependent phase of memory formation [43]. Based on the current study, the increased success rate of domestication and food intake of dead prey fish could be attributed to the phosphorylation and activation of the PKA and CaMKII signaling pathway. The learning-induced phosphorylation of CREB co-occurs with the expression of the c-Fos protein [31]. There strong evidence that the phosphorylation of CREB is important for the long term consolidation of memories and long-term memory formation [44,45], but not short-term memory for socially transmitted food preference [31]. In the present study, p-CREB was measured in the brain of mandarin fish following the acquisition of a new feeding habit. The result indicated that the phosphorylation of CREB is not related to the short-term memory of new feeding habits in mandarin fish. In addition, the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is considered as an intracellular signaling for the regulation of food intake and energy homeostasis [46]. We found that the phosphorylation level of the S6 ribosomal protein (p-S6) was significantly decreased in the learning group with the increased food intake of dead prey fish. The result was consistent the hypothesis that the inhibition of mTOR signaling might stimulate food intake through changing the translation levels of the anorexigenic Pomc protein in mandarin fish (data not published).
The interaction between learning genes and appetite control genes involved in the social learning of mandarin fish to accept dead prey fish through the PKA and CaMKII signaling pathways remains to be further explored. We used the inhibitors of the learning signaling pathway, H-89 for PKA and KN-62 for CaMKII, to confirm if the learning signaling pathway, especially the learning gene c-fos, could affect appetite control genes. The results showed that no significant change of the p-PKA level and mRNA expression of the zif268, c/ebpd, npy, pomc, leptin a and mch genes were observed upon the inhibitor H-89 treatment, but the p-CREB level, c-fos and agrp gene expressions were significantly decreased. Though the p-PKA level did not change with inhibitor treatment, the downstream signaling of the PKA pathway, the p-CREB level was decreased, suggesting that the PKA pathway might regulate c-fos expression through CREB signaling but not work on the anorexigenic gene expression. The p-CaMKII level and c-fos expression with KN-62 treatment were significantly lower than that without treatment, the p-CREB level and pomc expression were significantly increased, and the expression of the agrp and leptin a genes show no changes between groups. It is suggested that the CaMKII signaling pathway activated by social learning could stimulate the expression of the c-fos gene, and then c-fos might be an important transcriptional factor to inhibit the expression of the anorexigenic gene pomc, resulting the increase of food intake of dead prey fish in mandarin fish.
To determine whether c-Fos has any direct regulation on transcriptional activity of the pomc gene, we examined the interaction between transcriptional factor c-Fos and the three potential AP-1 binding sites of the pomc gene with a ChIP assay. We found significant enrichments at the Site 3 in c-Fos-immunoprecipitate, suggesting the binding of c-Fos to AP-1 binding sites in the regulatory region of pomc. A previous study has shown that c-Fos functions as a proapoptotic agent by binding the c-FLIP(L) (FLICE (FADD-like IL-1β-converting enzyme) -like inhibitory protein) promoter and repressing the antiapoptotic molecule c-FLIP(L) transcriptional activity [47]. The AP-1 family member protein c-Fos plays a crucial role in a variety of biological processes, and the downstream targets of c-Fos have been identified in a wide range of normal development, inflammation, and oncogenesis [47]. In this report, we showed that c-Fos, in addition to its well-known oncogenic function, has a novel regulatory function on food intake by the pomc gene. The regulation of c-Fos on pomc might be a key pathway for feeding and food habit modification by learning, and the activator of the c-Fos/pomc pathway could play important roles in animal culture with artificial diets, especially endangered species and economic animals, and in the formation of healthy food preferences for children, such as socially transmitted food preference.
In conclusion, we investigated the effect of social learning on the feeding habit domestication from live prey fish to dead prey fish in mandarin fish. Our results showed that with the positive demonstration fish that feed on the dead prey fish, mandarin fish also could accept the dead prey fish with a higher success rate and lower learning times than those with the negative demonstration fish. The social learning of acquiring new feeding habits in mandarin fish could be attributed to the expression of learning and appetite control genes, as well as the activation of the CaMKII signaling pathway. The CaMKII signaling pathway was activated by social learning and the stimulation of the expression of the c-fos gene. As such, the c-fos gene might be an important transcriptional factor to inhibit the expression of the anorexigenic gene pomc, resulting in an increase of the food intake of dead prey fish in mandarin fish. This offers a first insight into the ability and molecular mechanism of social learning on acquiring novel feeding habits in fish. As the ability to copy the feeding behavior from intraspecific tutors, our experiment encourages further studies on the potential roles of social learning in the context of feeding training in fish, especially for large-scale aquaculture purpose.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Reagents and Fish

Phospho-CREB (Ser133) (87G3) Rabbit mAb, Phospho-PKA C (Thr197) (D45D3) Rabbit mAb, Phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) (D13.14.4E) XP® Rabbit mAb, Phospho-CaMKII (Thr286) (D21E4) Rabbit mAb, Phospho-S6(Ser235/236) (D57.2.2E) XP® Rabbit mAb and H-89 (Dihydrochloride) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Phospho-AKT (Thr308) antibody, β-tubulin antibody and β-actin antibody were purchased from Bioss (Bioss Beijing, China). KN-62 was purchased from TOCRIS (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Mandarin fish S. chuatsi (3 months of age, total length 21.22 ± 1.35 cm) were obtained from the Chinese Perch Research Center of Huazhong Agricultural University (Wuhan, China). Fish were maintained in an aquarium (60 × 45 × 45 cm) with a continuous system of water filtration and aeration at constant temperature (25 ± 1 °C). Fish were acclimated to the condition for 2 weeks prior to experimentation. Fish were fed once daily at 5:30 pm with live India mrigal Cirrhinus mrigala juvenile. The animal protocol was approved by The Scientific Ethics Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University (Wuhan, China). The ethical code is HZAUFI-2019-013.

4.2. Learning Test

The experimental fish were randomly divided into two groups (n = 12)—the control group and the learning group. The control group: Experimental fish were paired with the negative demonstration fish (fish without training). The learning group: Experimental fish were paired with the positive demonstration fish (fish had been pre-trained to accept dead prey fish using the method mentioned in the previous study [15]). The live and frozen India mrigal were used as live prey fish and dead prey fish, respectively. During the test period, mandarin fish were fed with prey fish 10 times (2 min per time) at 5:30 pm each day over a 12 day period. The prey fish were placed 20 cm away from mandarin fish, and only one live or dead prey fish was allowed into each aquarium at any time. After 2 min, the live or dead prey fish that had not been eaten were removed from the aquarium. The testing process was recorded with a digital camera. The success rates, learning times of feeding dead prey fish, and food intake were counted from the videos. As long as one dead prey fish was successfully accepted, the experimental fish was marked as a successful transformer of feeding habits to dead prey fish. No mandarin fish died of natural causes during the testing.

4.3. Sample Collection

The experimental fish (n = 12) were anesthetized with MS-222 (Argent Chemical Laboratories, Redmond, WA, USA) (200 mg L−1), and euthanized by decapitation at 2 h after feeding. Brain tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen upon surgical resection and stored at −80 °C prior to RNA isolation and protein isolation.

4.4. RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription

Total RNA was isolated with a Trizol reagent (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The extracted RNA was re-suspended in 30 μL of RNase-free water and then quantified with a BioTek Synergy™2 Multi-detection Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis. One microgram of total RNA was used for reverse transcription with Revert Aid™ Reverse Transcriptase (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The synthesized cDNA was stored at −20 °C.

4.5. Real-Time Quantitative PCR

Primers were designed using Primer 5.0 software (Premier, Canada) based on the sequences obtained from transcriptome sequencing data of mandarin fish, and they were synthesized by Sangon (Shanghai, China). The amplification information of the primers is listed in Table 2. A set of housekeeping genes including β-actin, rpl13a, b2m, ywha2, hmbs and sdha were selected according to the literature [48]. The Rpl13a gene was more stable and amplified as the internal control. Real-time quantitative PCR was carried out with a MyiQ™ 2 Two-Color Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA USA). PCR was performed in a total volume of 20 μL containing 10 μL of AceQ® qPCR SYBR® Green Master Mix (Vazyme, Piscataway, NJ, USA), 0.4 M of each primer, and 20 ng of cDNA. The PCR cycling parameters were 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, and annealing temperatures for 30 s. A melt curve analysis was performed from 65 to 95 °C, gradually increasing at 0.5 °C/6 s, to verify the specificity. Reactions for each sample were performed in triplicate. Gene expression levels were quantified relative to the expression of rpl13a using the optimized comparative Ct (2−ΔΔCt) value method [49]. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6).

4.6. Transcriptome Sequencing

An equal amount of total RNA of each group was used to construct the libraries for the transcriptome analysis using MGIEasy RNA kit following manufacturer’s instructions (BGI, Wuhan, China). Poly(A) mRNA was purified from total RNA using oligo-dT-attached magnetic beads. Paired-end cDNA libraries were sequenced using the BGISEQ-500 system (BGI, Wuhan, China). Image deconvolution and base calling were performed with the SOAPnuke. Clean reads were obtained by removing adaptor reads and low quality reads (Q ≤ 10), on which all following analyses were based. Transcriptome assembly was carried out with short reads assembling program Trinity with k-mer length 25 bp. The reads were mapped back to assembled contigs. By using the paired-end information, it was able to detect contigs from the same transcript as well as the distances between these contigs. We connected the contigs using N to represent unknown sequences between each pair of contigs, and then scaffolds were made. Paired-end reads were used again for gap filling of scaffolds to obtain sequences with least Ns and could not be extended on either end. Such sequences were defined as unigenes. To annotate the transcriptome, we performed the BLAST alignment between unigene and databases such as the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Gene Ontology (GO), NR, NT, SwissProt, Pfam and KOG with Blast2GO, hmmscan and getorf software.
To estimate expression levels, the RNA-Seq reads generated were mapped to the unigenes using Bowtie2. Gene expression levels were measured through RSEM. We analyzed the differentially expressed genes used DEGseq method described before [50], and false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.001 and fold change ≥ 2.00 as the threshold to judge the significance of gene expression difference. A GO functional analysis and a KEGG pathway analysis were then carried out in differentially expressed genes.

4.7. Signaling Pathways Analysis

Brain tissues stored at −80 °C were solubilized in a lysis buffer, and lysates were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gel. Proteins were then transferred onto a PVDF membrane. Phospho-cAMP-response element-binding protein (p-CREB), Phospho-protein kinase A (p-PKA), Phospho- extracellular regulated protein kinases (p-ERK1/2), Phospho-protein kinase B (p-AKT), Phospho-Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (p-CaMKII), Phospho-S6 ribosomal protein (p-S6), β-tubulin and β-actin were detected by immunoblotting with the antibody (1:1000–1:4000). Blots were probed by goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse second antibody with IR-Dye 680 or 800 cw labeled (1:2000–1:4000, Licor, Lincoln, NE, USA) at room temperature for 1 h. The membranes were then visualized using a LiCor Odyssey scanner (Licor, Lincoln, NE, USA) and quantified with ImageJ 1.44 software (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD). The phosphorylation levels of the cAMP-response element-binding protein (CREB), the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), the extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK1/2), protein kinase B (AKT), Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) and S6 ribosomal protein (S6) were normalized according to the loading of proteins by expressing the data as a ratio over β-actin or β-tubulin.

4.8. Effects of the Inhibitors for PKA and CaMKII Signaling Pathway

Brain cells were obtained from mandarin fish and maintained at 28 °C in L15 (leibovitz’s L15-medium) containing 20% newborn calf serum and 5% bio-antibiotics (Penicillin-Streptomycin). After three generations, cells were plated on 60 mm dishes and incubated at 28 °C without CO2. Four days later, the cells were with 80% coverage, were washed twice, and starved for 24 h with L15 media. The starved cells were treated for 0.5–3.0 h with either buffer alone or different concentration of the inhibitors (H-89 for the PKA signaling pathway, KN-62 for the CaMKII signaling pathway). The best time point and drug concentration were chosen based on pre-experiment. Total RNA or protein samples were collected with a lysis buffer or Trizol reagent. The gene expression levels of learning or appetite control related genes and the phospho-PKA, phospho-CaMKII and phospho-CREB were detected by real-time quantitative PCR and a Western blotting analysis, respectively.

4.9. ChIP Assay

A CHIP assay was performed using a SimpleChIP® Enzymatic ChIP kit (CST, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The brain tissue from KM mice was isolated, and the DNA sample was purified with a ChIP Kit following manufacturer’s instructions. Positive controls were 10% of each DNA sample, which did not include the immunoprecipitation step. The remainder of the samples were equally divided into two groups. The experimental group was immunoprecipitated with a specific mouse c-Fos antibody (Santa Cruz, USA; 1:500), whereas the negative control group was immunoprecipitated with a general mouse IgG antibody (proteintech, wuhan; 1:250). The isolated DNA was firstly purified then amplified by PCR using specific primers encompassing the AP-1 binding site of the anorexigenic neuropeptides proopiomelanocortin (pomc) gene. The putative transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) of the regulatory region at 2000 bp upstream from the transcriptional start site of the pomc gene were predicted by AliBaba2.1 software (http://gene-regulation.com/pub/programs/alibaba2) and PROMO using version 8.3 of TRANSFAC (http://alggen.lsi.upc.es/cgi-bin/promo_v3/promo/promoinit.cgidirDB=TF_8.3). These putative binding sites of c-Fos protein are located at -1541 to -1534 bp (gtttcagt, site 1), -1128 to -1119 bp (tcactgaagg, site 2), and -383 to -374 bp (tttatagtga, site 3) on the upstream of the transcriptional start site. The primers are 5′-GCCAACCCAAACTTACCT-3′ (site 1, forward primer) and 5′-TTCAACCTCCCATCCACC-3′ (site 1, reverse primer), 5′-AACTGGGAGATGATGGGG-3′ (site 2, forward primer) and 5′-CGGAGTGACTTCCTGCTGT-3′ (site 2, reverse primer), 5′-CCCACTCCAAAAGGTAGC-3′ (site 3, forward primer) and 5′-TGAGGAAGGGGATTTGTTA-3′ (site 3, reverse primer).

4.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). All data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variances using the Shapiro–Wilk’s test and Levene’s test, respectively. Significant differences were found using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Fisher’s least significant difference post hoc test and Duncan’s multiple range tests, after confirming data normality and homogeneity of variances. Differences were considered to be significant if p < 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/18/4399/s1.

Author Contributions

J.P., Y.Q.D., H.L. and L.J.S. contributed to the sample preparation and examination. S.H. and H.L. performed the assembly and bioinformatical analysis. S.H., J.P. and H.L. performed the data analysis. S.H. and X.F.L. gave technical advice and contributed to the study design. S.H. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31602131), Wuhan Morning Light Plan of Youth Science and Technology (No. 2017050304010318), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772822).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hermans, R.C.J.; Larsen, J.K.; Herman, C.P.; Engels, R.C.M.E. Modeling of palatable food intake in female young adults. effects of perceived body size. Appetite 2008, 51, 512–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Robinson, E.; Thomas, J.; Aveyard, P.; Higgs, S. What everyone else is eating. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of informational eating norms on eating behavior. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2014a, 114, 414–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Emery, N.J. Cognitive ornithology: The evolution of avian intelligence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 2006, 361, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Aplin, L.M.; Farine, D.R.; Morand-Ferron, J.; Sheldon, B.C. Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds. Proc. R. Soc. B 2012, 279, 4199–4205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Dill, L.M. Adaptive flexibility in the foraging behaviour of fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1983, 40, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pitcher, T.J.; House, A. Foraging rules for group feeders: Area copying depends upon density in shoaling goldfish. Ethology 1987, 76, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morgan, M.J. The influence of hunger, shoal size and predator presence on foraging in bluntnose minnows. Anim. Behav. 1988, 36, 1317–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ryer, C.H.; Olla, B.L. Social mechanisms facilitating exploitation of spatially variable ephemeral food patches in a pelagic marine fish. Anim. Behav. 1992, 44, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peuhkuri, N.; Ranta, E.; Juvonen, S.K.; Lindstrom, K. Schooling affects growth in the 3-spined stickle-back, Gasterosteus aculeatus. J. Fish Biol. 1995, 46, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Templeton, J.J. Individual differences in the behaviour of juvenile rock bass (Ambloplites Rupestris): Causes and consequences. Master’s Thesis, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ryer, C.H.; Olla, B.L. Information transfer and the facilitation and inhibition of feeding in a schooling fish. Environ. Biol. Fish. 1991, 30, 3l7–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Anthouard, M. A study of social transmission in juvenile Dicentrarchus labrax (pisces, serranidae), in an operant conditioning situation. Behaviour 1987, 103, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liang, X.F.; Liu, J.K.; Huang, B.Y. The role of sense organs in the feeding behaviour of Chinese perch. J. Fish Biol. 1998, 52, 1058–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Laura, H.; Pekka, H.; Lauri, M.V.A. Growth, survival and interspecific social learning in the first hatchery generation of eurasian perch (perca fluviatilis). Aquaculture 2017, 466, 64–71. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liang, X.F.; Oku, H.; Ogata, H.Y.; Liu, J.; He, X. Weaning Chinese perch Siniperca chuatsi (Basilewsky) onto artificial diets based upon its specific sensory modality in feeding. Aquac. Res. 2001, 32, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lieberman, D.A. Learning: Behavior and Cognition, 3rd ed.; Wadsworth/thomson Learning: Belmont, CA, USA, 2000; p. 595. [Google Scholar]
  17. Templeton, J.J.; Kamil, A.C.; Balda, R.P. Sociality and social learning in two species of corvids: The Pinyon Jay (Gymnorhinus cynocephalus) and the Clark’s Nuncracker (Nucifraga columbiana). J. Compart. Psychol. 1999, 113, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aplin, L.M.; Sheldon, B.C.; Morand-Ferron, J. Milk bottles revisited: Social learning and individual variation in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus. Anim. Behav. 2013, 85, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Auersperg, A.M.I.; Von Bayern, A.M.I.; Weber, S.; Szabadvari, A.; Bugnyar, T.; Kacelnik, A. Social transmission of tool use and tool manufacture in Goffin cockatoos (Cacatua goffini). Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 2014, 281, 20140972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Allen, T.; Clarke, J.A. Social learning of food preferences by white-tailed ptarmigan chicks. Anim. Behav. 2005, 70, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guillette, L.M.; Morgan, K.V.; Hall, Z.J.; Bailey, I.E.; Healy, S.D. Food preference and copying behaviour in zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. Behav. Process. 2014, 109, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bence, J.R. Feeding rate and attack specialization: The roles of predator experience and energetic tradeoffs. Environ. Biol. Fish. 1986, 16, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brown, C.; Laland, K. Social enhancement and social inhibition of foraging behaviour in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon. J. Fish Biol. 2002, 61, 987–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Magnhagen, C.; Staffan, F. Social learning in young-of-the-year perch encountering a novel food type. J. Fish Biol. 2003, 63, 824–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ware, D.M. Predation by rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri): The effect of experience. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 1971, 28, 1847–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Godin, J.G.J. Behaviour of juvenile pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) toward novel prey: Influence of ontogeny and experience. Env. Biol. Fish. 1978, 3, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kovács, K.A.; Steullet, P.; Steinmann, M.; Do, K.Q.; Magistretti, P.J.; Halfon, O.; Cardinaux, J.R. TORC1 is a calcium and cAMP-sensitive coincidence detector involved in hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 4700–4705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Alberini, C.M. Transcription factors in long-term memory and synaptic plasticity. Physiol. Rev. 2009, 89, 121–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Smulders, T.V.; Devoogd, T.J. Expression of immediate early genes in the hippocampal formation of the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus) during a food-hoarding task. Behav. Brain Res. 2000, 114, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Colombo, P.J.; Brightwell, J.J.; Countryman, R.A. Cognitive strategy-specific increases in phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein and c-Fos in the hippocampus and dorsal striatum. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 3547–3554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Countryman, R.A.; Orlowski, J.D.; Brightwell, J.J.; Oskowitz, A.Z.; Colombo, P.J. CREB phosphorylation and c-Fos expression in the hippocampus of rats during acquisition and recall of a socially transmitted food preference. Hippocampus 2005, 15, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Clements, K.M.; Girard, T.A.; Ellard, C.G.; Wainwright, P.E. Short-term memory impairment and reduced hippocampal c-Fos expression in an animal model of fetal alcohol syndrome. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2010, 29, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bozon, B. How necessary is the activation of the immediate early gene zif268 in synaptic plasticity and learning? Behav. Brain Res. 2003, 142, 17–30. [Google Scholar]
  34. Toscano, C.D.; Mcglothan, J.L.; Guilarte, T.R. Experience-dependent regulation of zif268 gene expression and spatial learning. Exp. Neurol. 2006, 200, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schwartz, M.W.; Woods, S.C.; Porte, J.D.; Seeley, R.J.; Baskin, D.G. Central nervous system control of food intake. Nature 2000, 404, 661–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kanoski, S.E.; Grill, H.J. Hippocampus contributions to food intake control: Mnemonic, neuroanatomical, and endocrine mechanisms. Biol. Psychiat. 2017, 81, 748–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. GøTzsche, C.R.; Woldbye, D.P.D. The role of NPY in learning and memory. Neuropeptides 2016, 55, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. O’Carroll, C.M.; Morris, R.G. Heterosynaptic co-activation of glutamatergic and dopaminergic afferents is required to induce persistent long-term potentiation. Neuropharmacology 2004, 47, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nicoll, R.A.; Malenka, R.C. Contrasting properties of two forms of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 1995, 377, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bliss, T.V.; Collingridge, G.L. A synaptic model of memory: Longterm potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 1993, 361, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Waltereit, R.; Weller, M. Signaling from cAMP/PKA to MAPK and synaptic plasticity. Mol. Neurobiol. 2003, 27, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Curtis, J.; Finkbeiner, S. Sending signals from the synapse to the nucleus: Possible roles for CaMK, Ras/ERK, and SAPK pathways in the regulation of synaptic plasticity and neuronal growth. J. Neurosci. Res. 1999, 58, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kandel, E.R. The molecular biology of memory storage: A dialogue between genes and synapses. Science 2001, 294, 1030–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yuan, Q.; Harley, C.W.; Darby-King, A.; Neve, R.L.; McLean, J.H. Early odor preference learning in the rat: Bidirectional effects of cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) and mutant CREB support a causal role for phosphorylated CREB. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 4760–4765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, J.J.; Okutani, F.; Inoue, S.; Kaba, H. Activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway leading to cyclic AMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation is required for the long term facilitation process of aversive olfactory learning in young rats. Neuroscience 2003, 121, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Cota, D.; Proulx, K.; Smith, K.A.; Kozma, S.C.; Thomas, G.; Woods, S.C.; Seeley, R.J. Hypothalamic mTOR signaling regulates food intake. Science 2006, 312, 927–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Yang, H.; Huang, X.; Otu, H.; Libermann, T.A.; DeWolf, W.C.; Khosravi-Far, R.; Olumi, A.F. c-Fos as a proapoptotic agent in trail-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 9425–9434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Vandesompele, J.; Preter, K.D.; Pattyn, F.; Poppe, B.; Roy, N.V.; Paepe, A.D. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome. Biol. 2002, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wang, L.; Feng, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X. Degseq: An r package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 20 04399 g001 550
Figure 1. The success rate (A), learning times (B) and food intake (C) of mandarin fish (CG) with the negative demonstration fish (wild mandarin fish without training) and fish (LG) with the positive demonstration fish (pre-trained mandarin fish which could accept dead prey fish). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 12). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05).
Figure 1. The success rate (A), learning times (B) and food intake (C) of mandarin fish (CG) with the negative demonstration fish (wild mandarin fish without training) and fish (LG) with the positive demonstration fish (pre-trained mandarin fish which could accept dead prey fish). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 12). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05).
Ijms 20 04399 g001
Ijms 20 04399 g002 550
Figure 2. Learning-relative genes expression in mandarin fish (CG) with the negative demonstration fish (wild mandarin fish without training) and fish (LG) with the positive demonstration fish (pre-trained mandarin fish which could accept dead prey fish). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Learning-relative genes expression in mandarin fish (CG) with the negative demonstration fish (wild mandarin fish without training) and fish (LG) with the positive demonstration fish (pre-trained mandarin fish which could accept dead prey fish). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05).
Ijms 20 04399 g002
Ijms 20 04399 g003 550
Figure 3. Appetite control genes expression in mandarin fish (CG) with the negative demonstration fish (wild mandarin fish without training) and fish (LG) with the positive demonstration fish (pre-trained mandarin fish which could accept dead prey fish). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 3. Appetite control genes expression in mandarin fish (CG) with the negative demonstration fish (wild mandarin fish without training) and fish (LG) with the positive demonstration fish (pre-trained mandarin fish which could accept dead prey fish). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 20 04399 g003
Ijms 20 04399 g004 550
Figure 4. Differentially expressed genes in the neurotrophin signaling pathway between mandarin fish at CG and LG from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of the rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Figure 4. Differentially expressed genes in the neurotrophin signaling pathway between mandarin fish at CG and LG from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of the rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Ijms 20 04399 g004
Ijms 20 04399 g005 550
Figure 5. Differentially expressed genes in the cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling pathway between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Figure 5. Differentially expressed genes in the cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling pathway between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Ijms 20 04399 g005
Ijms 20 04399 g006 550
Figure 6. Differentially expressed genes in the long-term potentiation between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Figure 6. Differentially expressed genes in the long-term potentiation between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Ijms 20 04399 g006
Ijms 20 04399 g007 550
Figure 7. Differentially expressed genes in the long-term depression between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Figure 7. Differentially expressed genes in the long-term depression between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Ijms 20 04399 g007
Ijms 20 04399 g008 550
Figure 8. Differentially expressed genes in the serotonergic synapse between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Figure 8. Differentially expressed genes in the serotonergic synapse between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Ijms 20 04399 g008
Ijms 20 04399 g009 550
Figure 9. Differentially expressed genes in the dopaminergic synapse between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Figure 9. Differentially expressed genes in the dopaminergic synapse between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Ijms 20 04399 g009
Ijms 20 04399 g010 550
Figure 10. Differentially expressed genes in the glutamatergic synapse between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Figure 10. Differentially expressed genes in the glutamatergic synapse between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Ijms 20 04399 g010
Ijms 20 04399 g011 550
Figure 11. Differentially expressed genes in the cholinergic synapse between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Figure 11. Differentially expressed genes in the cholinergic synapse between mandarin fish in the control group (CG) and the learning group (LG) from a transcriptome analysis. The colors of rectangles were shaded according to the different expression (red: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly higher than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1); green: The mRNA expression levels of fish in Group LG were significantly lower than those in Group CG (FDR ≤ 0.001, the absolute value of log2 (Ratio) ≥ 1)).
Ijms 20 04399 g011
Ijms 20 04399 g012 550
Figure 12. The phosphorylation levels of cAMP-response element binding (CREB) (A), protein kinase A (PKA) (B), extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK)1/2 (C), AKT (D), Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) (E) and S6 ribosomal protein (S6) (F) of mandarin fish (CG) with the negative demonstration fish (wild mandarin fish without training), and fish (LG) with the positive demonstration fish (well-trained fish which could accept dead prey fish). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 12. The phosphorylation levels of cAMP-response element binding (CREB) (A), protein kinase A (PKA) (B), extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK)1/2 (C), AKT (D), Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) (E) and S6 ribosomal protein (S6) (F) of mandarin fish (CG) with the negative demonstration fish (wild mandarin fish without training), and fish (LG) with the positive demonstration fish (well-trained fish which could accept dead prey fish). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 20 04399 g012
Ijms 20 04399 g013 550
Figure 13. The phospho-protein kinase A (p-PKA) (A) and p-CREB levels (B), and learning and appetite control-relative genes expression (C) in mandarin fish brain cells with the treatment of inhibitor H-89 (20 μm, 0.5 h). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 13. The phospho-protein kinase A (p-PKA) (A) and p-CREB levels (B), and learning and appetite control-relative genes expression (C) in mandarin fish brain cells with the treatment of inhibitor H-89 (20 μm, 0.5 h). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 20 04399 g013
Ijms 20 04399 g014 550
Figure 14. The p-CaMKII (A) and p-CREB levels (B), and learning and appetite control-relative genes expression (C) in mandarin fish brain cells with the treatment of inhibitor KN-62 (200 nm, 0.5 h). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays with anti-c-fos antibody or control mouse IgG (D) for the determination of c-Fos binding sites in the pomc promter in the brain tissue of KM mice (Kunming mice). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 14. The p-CaMKII (A) and p-CREB levels (B), and learning and appetite control-relative genes expression (C) in mandarin fish brain cells with the treatment of inhibitor KN-62 (200 nm, 0.5 h). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays with anti-c-fos antibody or control mouse IgG (D) for the determination of c-Fos binding sites in the pomc promter in the brain tissue of KM mice (Kunming mice). Data are represented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 6). A value followed by * differs significantly from all other values not followed by the same superscript at the same time point based on a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the post hoc test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 20 04399 g014
Table
Table 1. Summary of data generated from mandarin fish transcriptome.
Table 1. Summary of data generated from mandarin fish transcriptome.
SampleTotal NumberTotal Length (bp)Mean Length (bp)N50 (bp)N70 (bp)N90 (bp)GC (%)
C164,50160,882,979943155193138343.36
C259,50244,077,685740107666731742.59
C360,13857,556,579957157195338943.33
L156,44144,437,838787117073633442.69
L266,28353,448,676806120974834242.9
L365,09455,146,532847132081635342.91
All-Unigene93,69998,332,05410491775108043043.30
Table
Table 2. Gene-specific primers used for the analysis of gene expression in mandarin fish.
Table 2. Gene-specific primers used for the analysis of gene expression in mandarin fish.
GenePrimersSequence 5′-3′Product Size (bp)Annealing Temp (°C)
rpl13arpl13a-FTATCCCCCCACCCTATGACA100 bp59
rpl13a-RACGCCCAAGGAGAGCGAACT
c-fosc-fos-FCGATGATGTTTACCGCTTTC88 bp60
c-fos-RTAGTATCCCAGATTGTCCC
bdnfbdnf-FAACTGCCCTCACTCACA107 bp58
bdnf-RACCTCCCTGGCTCTTAT
fra2fra2-FCAACCAGGACCTCCAGTG215 bp58
fra2-RTCTACGCCTTTCAATCTC
sytIVsytIV-FTGTCGGAGGATTAGAACG133 bp58
sytIV-RCTGAAAGTCCAATGGGTAC
crebIcrebI-FATACACCCTCCCACTTCA97 bp58
crebI-RTCTCCTCCACATCCGTTC
zif268zif268-FGGATCTTGCCGTGCCTCTTG221 bp60
zif268-RCTGCGACCGCCGTTTCTC
c/ebpdc/ebpd-FGCAGGAGAAGGCGGATTT88 bp60
c/ebpd-RCTGGGAAGGCAGGGATGA
pomcpomc-FTGTTAGTGGTGGTGATGGC268 bp58
pomc-RCTGTCGCTGTGGGCTTTC
npynpy-FGGAAGGATACCCGGTGAAA202 bp52
npy-RTCTTGACTGTGGAATCGTG
agrpagrp-FGTGCTGCTCTGCTGTTGG295 bp65
agrp-RAGGTGTCACAGGGGTCGC
mchmch-FAAGAAACTCATCCACGAAG175 bp52
mch-RGGTGAAAGTATCCTGCTCC
cartcart-FTCTGCACGAAGTGTTGGA176 bp56
cart-RGCACATCTTCCCGATACGA
ghrelinghrelin-FTTGCTGGTCTTCCTGTTGTGT101 bp54
ghrelin-RTTCCCCTTGTTCTGAGGTTTT
cckcck-FGTGTTCTCCTGGCTGCTGTG180 bp59
cck-RCCTGCGGCTGGTTGTAGTTG
leptin aleptin a-FCCTCTGCCAGTGGAAGTA188 bp61
leptin a-RGTGTCAGAGATCAGGCTGT

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peng, J.; Dou, Y.-Q.; Liang, H.; He, S.; Liang, X.-F.; Shi, L.-J. Social Learning of Acquiring Novel Feeding Habit in Mandarin Fish (Siniperca chuatsi). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4399. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184399

AMA Style

Peng J, Dou Y-Q, Liang H, He S, Liang X-F, Shi L-J. Social Learning of Acquiring Novel Feeding Habit in Mandarin Fish (Siniperca chuatsi). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(18):4399. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peng, Jian, Ya-Qi Dou, Hui Liang, Shan He, Xu-Fang Liang, and Lin-Jie Shi. 2019. "Social Learning of Acquiring Novel Feeding Habit in Mandarin Fish (Siniperca chuatsi)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 18: 4399. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20184399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop