Next Article in Journal
Jasmonic Acid Signaling Pathway in Plants
Next Article in Special Issue
EDB-FN Targeted Peptide–Drug Conjugates for Use against Prostate Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Phloretin Suppresses Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2-Induced Osteoblastogenesis and Mineralization via Inhibition of Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases/Akt Pathway
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hidden Aggregation Hot-Spots on Human Apolipoprotein E: A Structural Study
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Accumulation of Innate Amyloid Beta Peptide in Glioblastoma Tumors

Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Universidad Central del Caribe, PO Box 60327, Bayamon, PR 00960-6032, USA
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Universidad Central del Caribe, PO Box 60327, Bayamon, PR 00960-6032, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(10), 2482;
Submission received: 8 April 2019 / Revised: 23 April 2019 / Accepted: 15 May 2019 / Published: 20 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Peptides for Health Benefits 2019)


Immunostaining with specific antibodies has shown that innate amyloid beta (Aβ) is accumulated naturally in glioma tumors and nearby blood vessels in a mouse model of glioma. In immunofluorescence images, Aβ peptide coincides with glioma cells, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) have shown that Aβ peptide is enriched in the membrane protein fraction of tumor cells. ELISAs have also confirmed that the Aβ(1–40) peptide is enriched in glioma tumor areas relative to healthy brain areas. Thioflavin staining revealed that at least some amyloid is present in glioma tumors in aggregated forms. We may suggest that the presence of aggregated amyloid in glioma tumors together with the presence of Aβ immunofluorescence coinciding with glioma cells and the nearby vasculature imply that the source of Aβ peptides in glioma can be systemic Aβ from blood vessels, but this question remains unresolved and needs additional studies.

1. Introduction

As Alzheimer’s disease (AD) affects mostly the elderly population [1], gliablastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in older people [2]. Recently, statistically independent cohort studies have found an inverse association between cancers in general and AD [3,4,5]. Specifically, most patients with AD are protected from lung cancers [3], and, vice versa, cancer survivors have a lower risk of AD [6]. However, there is a significant positive correlation between the AD mortality rate and the malignant brain tumor mortality rate [4,7,8]. These correlations suggest that there are common factors in these diseases. Mitochondrial metabolism, in general, and the p53, Pin1, and Wnt cellular signaling pathways, in particular, were proposed as possible linkages in this cancer–AD relationship [9,10]. Interestingly, chemotherapy [6] and radiotherapy [9] also affected this correlation.
On the other hand, the buildup of amyloid precursor protein (APP), the precursor of the AD hallmark amyloid beta (Aβ) peptides, have now been found in pancreatic and breast cancer tumors and the corresponding metastatic lymph nodes [11,12]. Proteolytic cleavage of APP by the α-secretase pathway mediates proliferation and migration in breast cancer, while other pathways were not studied [13]. It was also discovered that plasma levels of Aβ peptides in esophageal cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatic cancer, and lung cancer patients were significantly higher than in normal controls [14]. The question arises, what is the source of these Aβ peptides? Moreover, what is their role?
Aβ peptides can be generated by glioma cells themselves. It was shown that glioma cells in culture produce the 4-kDa Aβ peptide, which co-migrates with synthetic Aβ(1–40) (also known as Aβ40) and is specifically recognized by antibodies raised against terminal domains of the Aβ peptide, and releases them into the medium [15]. The role of Aβ peptides in glioma development was investigated in another study [16]. It was reported that full-length Aβ40 is a dose-dependent inhibitor of angiogenesis and suppresses human U87 glioblastoma subcutaneous xenografts in nude mice. A small peptide sequence of Aβ, Aβ(11–20), was found to be a potent, anti-angiogenic molecule. Systemic delivery of this peptide leads to reductions in glioma proliferation, angiogenesis, and invasiveness [16]. Furthermore, parallel experiments in transgenic mice overexpressing Aβ40 also showed reductions in glioma growth, invasion, and angiogenesis [16,17,18].
However, besides glioma itself, there is another systemic source of Aβ peptide production in the body [19,20]. Recently, we showed that platelets produce a massive release of Aβ after thrombosis in the brain and skin and that this release is concentrated near blood vessels [21,22]. It has been shown that platelets are hyperactivated in cancer patients and form cancer cell-induced aggregates and micro-thrombi in the vasculature near tumors (reviewed in [23]). A high platelet count is associated with poor survival in a large variety of cancers, while thrombocytopenia or antiplatelet drugs can reduce the short-term risk of cancer, cancer mortality, and metastasis (reviewed in [24]). Platelets affect glioma cells by releasing platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) [25]. May platelet-generated Aβ also diffuse to glioma cells and accumulate inside these brain tumors?
In our study, we chose specific antibodies against Aβ peptides with low reactivity for the precursor APP to see whether Aβ immunoreactivity is present in glioma tumors and nearby blood vessels in mice. We used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to study Aβ40 content in tumor and “healthy” brain area, while also assessing Aβ40 content in the membrane and cytoplasmic fractions of glioma cells. The presence of aggregated forms of amyloid inside glioma tumors was evaluated as well.

2. Results

2.1. Immunoreactivity against Aβ Peptides Is Present in Glioma Cells in Primary and Secondary Tumors as Well as in Blood Vessels and Erythrocytes in the Near Vicinity, Indicating that the Aβ Level Is Elevated in the Tumor Zone

After glioma implantation into mouse brains using standard methods established in our laboratory [26,27] we allowed 16 days of tumor growth. We then prepared brain slices containing tumors within nearby tissue. Immunostaining with polyclonal (Figure 1A,B, green) antibody against Aβ showed that these peptides are present in glioma cells (white arrows), in nearby broken blood vessels, and in escaped erythrocytes. In addition, astrocytes are marked by red fluorescence (anti-Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (anti-GFAP)), and the nuclei are marked blue (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining). The same images (Figure 1A,B) are presented as moving confocal images (Figure S1A,B) so that blood vessel details and their relation to glioma cells are more discernable. Inside blood vessel segments marked by Aβ green immunofluorescence, erythrocytes were also specifically marked by Aβ (Figure 1A,B, see also Figure S1A,B) as well as erythrocytes diffused locally near broken blood vessels (Figure S1A,B), as blood vessels near the tumor are usually ruptured [28]. As was shown previously, Aβ peptide in blood plasma binds to practically all erythrocytes and may be a marker for AD [29]. Also, the addition of synthetic Aβ specifically marks erythrocyte membranes [30]. We want to stress once again that Aβ immunofluorescence is present only in blood vessel segments near the glioma tumor and in the tumor itself (Figure 1A,B and Figure S1A,B). Therefore, only the glioma cells in the tumor and nearby blood vessels containing erythrocytes and within the distance 0–200 µm from the ruptured blood vessel are fluorescent.
We also made ELISA measurements of mouse Aβ40 peptide in the brain sample tissue containing the main tumor versus the “healthy” control from the corresponding cortical zone in the other hemisphere from the same animal 16 days after glioma implantation. Similar amounts of the homogenate were taken for analysis. It was found that the relative amount of Aβ40 in the glioma tissue was 142 ± 9% larger and statistically different (p < 0.001; t = 4.714; df = 4; n = 3) from “healthy” tissue (Figure 2A).
In these experiments, we found that glioma cells exhibit specific Aβ immunofluorescence that clearly marks these cells, but the question arises whether it is inside the cells or somehow attached to the external membrane.

2.2. Aβ40 Is Concentrated in the Membrane Cell Fraction in Glioma Tumor Tissue

To determine more precisely there Aβ is distributed, we separated the cytoplasmic and membrane fractions of proteins from glioma cells from the main tumor extracted from the brain of animals 16 days after implantation. Before processing, blood cells were eliminated from the tumor tissue samples using the Percoll purification method. Membrane and cytoplasmic proteins were isolated, and the total protein content was determined using the Bradford spectrophotometric method to establish a reference point for measuring the amount of Aβ in each fraction. Using ELISA, it was found that the relative amount of Aβ40 in the membrane fraction is significantly greater (170 ± 4%, p < 0.001, t = 16.23, df = 4, n = 3) than in the cytoplasmic fraction (Figure 2B).

2.3. Glioma Tumor Tissue Contains Aggregated Amyloid

To determine whether glioma tumors have aggregated forms of Aβ with cross-β architecture, we used standard thioflavin T and thioflavin S staining of brain slices with glioma from animals with implanted glioma cells. It was previously demonstrated that both thioflavin T and thioflavin S fluorescence originates mainly from dye bound to aggregated forms of amyloids with cross-β-pleated sheet structure, and gives a distinct increase (and a spectral shift in the case of thioflavin T) in fluorescence emission after binding [31,32]. We used IP injection of thioflavin T, while slices containing tumors were additionally stained with thioflavin S. Both dyes specifically marked glioma tumors (Figure 3), in which staining (green for thioflavin T and red for thioflavin S) is obvious only inside the tumor body, while the nearby normal tissue remained unstained.

3. Discussion

Here we report that antibodies against Aβ with relatively low reactivity against APP [33] show Aβ immunostaining in glioma cells and nearby blood vessels in mice (Figure 1). Using ELISA, we also report that Aβ40 levels are significantly increased in glioma (Figure 2). Glioma tissue from one brain hemisphere contains about two-fold more Aβ than a similar amount of tissue from the “mirror” hemisphere, with Aβ concentrated in the membrane fraction. The question arises whether Aβ is coming from the systemic source—from the blood, and is marking the glioma cell membrane—or is synthetized by glioma cells themselves.
Previous studies support the possibility of systemic source for this Aβ. The results indicating increased Aβ content in blood plasma for different types of cancer have already been reported [14]. Systemic Aβ is generated in large quantities by blood platelets in broken vessels, as we have shown for the thrombotic process [21,22]. Here, broken blood vessels marked by extensive Aβ fluorescence can be seen near tumors in our experiments (Figure 1A,B and Figure S1A,B). It has been shown previously that platelets are hyperactivated in cancer patients and form cancer cell-induced aggregates and micro-thrombi in vasculature near tumors (reviewed in [23]), thus suggesting that the source of Aβ that we have found for the clotting process may also be present here. It seems possible that Aβ released from clots can migrate and somehow mark only glioma cells (Figure 1A,B), but this raises new questions about why Aβ marks glioma cells so specifically.
To bind specifically, Aβ must be recognized by a specific receptor on the external membrane of the glioma cell. A known specific Aβ receptor, such as the PrPC–mGluR5 complex, is associated with proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2 or PTK2B) [34,35]. This receptor localizes to postsynaptic sites in the brain, but is also overexpressed in all glioblastoma cells, where it controls cell migration [27,36]. Aβ is a known inhibitor of Pyk2 [35]. Thus, its release by platelets may be a part of the intrinsic immunity that is directed against cancerous gliomas. Another suspected molecule related to Aβ binding is PI3K (phosphatidylinositol [PI] type 3 receptor tyrosine kinase). This kinase and its signaling network is also present and hyperactivated in a majority of glioblastoma cells, where it controls membrane microdynamics and cell cycling [37,38]. Its Aβ receptor is unknown, but it complexes with PI3K and most probably is situated on the external membrane [39,40]. It is known that Aβ inhibits PI3K activity as well [41]. We speculate that in this case, Aβ peptides generated by platelets also play a role in the intrinsic immunity directed against cancerous gliomas.
In addition, Aβ may bind to the advanced glycation end products (RAGE) receptor. It is known that this receptor is the binding site for Aβ peptides [42] thus mediating Aβ transport through the blood–brain barrier [43]. Very same RAGE receptor regulates the tumor environment and tumor cell migration, is part of the important microglial activation mechanism and is overexpressed in tumors [44].
On the other hand, it was shown that glioma cells in culture produce Aβ peptides that comigrate with synthetic Aβ40 and are specifically recognized by antibodies raised against the terminal domains of the Aβ peptide and released by these cells into the medium [15]. However, cultured and in vivo astrocytes also produce Aβ peptides is similar amounts [45,46,47] and astrocytes were not marked by Aβ immunofluorescence in our experiments, probably because these peptides is present in/near the astrocytes in amounts that can be neglected compared with the glioma tumor cells that we have studied here. While derived from the same cell type, glioma cells are clearly marked by Aβ immunofluorescence in our experiments (Figure 1).
It is clear that the question of whether the source of Aβ is inside the glioma cell itself or is a systemic source from blood vessels should be investigated further. Anyway, all our results from these experiments taken together as well as our previous experience with Aβ peptides released during platelet accumulation and aggregation in thrombotic blood vessels [21,22] lead us to the conclusion that most probably Aβ peptides are generated by platelets and somehow bind almost exclusively to glioma cells.
An additional issue is the accuracy of Aβ40 concentrations measurements in brain tissue. In our study of Aβ40 concentrations in tissue, we used relative values, indicating the percentage change from initial values, as the most accurate. It was shown previously that the Invitrogen Aβ40 ELISA Kit is very specific to murine Aβ40, but the data are very sensitive to “noise” (such as the presence of other proteins and lipids), and absolute values can deviate 40–50% [48]. Also, ELISA data may vary considerably, with a variety of collection and storage protocols [49]. Measurement of Aβ by ELISA reveals mainly free peptides, while a significant amount of Aβ peptide remains bound to proteins, lipoproteins, and cell membranes [50].
Our experiments also indicate that there is some thioflavin-positive amyloid inside glioma tumors (Figure 3). While we have shown that Aβ peptides are definitely present in tumor and may constitute a predominant part of this glioma amyloid, the specific type of aggregated amyloid found inside the borders of glioma tumors is unknown. To our opinion, this amyloid is most probably mixed amyloid, as was found for AD [51]. Protein aggregation is sequence specific, not favoring self-assembly over cross-seeding with nonhomologous sequences [52]. However, proteins with aggregation-prone regions may aggregate with each other at elevated concentrations, forming a mixed misfolded amyloid [53]. In this case, one aggregated protein can work as a “seed” for aggregation of other protein types. Previously, different amyloids were found in a variety of tumors. Different carcinomas have amyloid stroma [54,55], and odontogenic tumors are positive for thioflavin T and Congo Red staining and are also immunopositive for the enamel matrix protein ameloblastin [56,57,58]. Similarly, amyloid was reported in breast cancer tumors but was determined to be a localized amyloid light chain (AL) type (primary amyloidosis caused by ImG light-chain β-sheeting) [59,60]. Localized AL type amyloidosis was also found in myeloma (plasma cell) tumors as well as in kidneys and early-stage non-small-cell lung adenocarcinomas [61]. If the content of amyloid in glioma tumors is mixed, it must be further studied, because tumor-related amyloid could be a new target for anticancer therapy.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Ethics Statement

All procedures involving rodents were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health regulations concerning the use and care of experimental animals and approved by the Universidad Central del Caribe Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All efforts were made to minimize suffering. In all surgical experiments, animals were anesthetized with isoflurane (4% for induction and 1.75% for maintenance) using a Matrix Quanti-flex VMC Anesthesia Machine for small animals (Midmark Corporation, Dayton, OH, USA). The animals were sacrificed for brain tissue and blood analysis after experiments.

4.2. Glioma Cell Culture

The GL261 glioma cell line derived from C57BL/6 mice was obtained from the NCI (Frederick, MD, USA). All cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 0.2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics (50 U/mL penicillin, 50 μG/mL streptomycin) and maintained in a humidified atmosphere of CO2/air (5%/95%) at 37 °C. The medium was exchanged with fresh culture medium every 2–3 days.

4.3. Intracranial Implantation of Glioma Cells

All surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. GL261 glioma cells were implanted into the right cerebral hemisphere of 12–16-week-old C57BL/6 mice. Implantation was performed according to the protocol that we described earlier [26]. Briefly, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane, and a midline incision was made on the scalp. At stereotaxic coordinates of bregma, 2 mm lateral, 1 mm caudal, and 3 mm ventral, a small burr hole (0.5 mm diameter) was drilled into the skull. One microliter of cell suspension (2 × 104 cells/μL in phosphate buffer solution (PBS)) was delivered at a depth of 3 mm over 2 min. Sixteen days following injection, the animals were anesthetized with pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) and transcardially perfused with PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). The brains were removed and post-fixed in 4% PFA/PBS for 24 h at 4 °C, followed by 0.15 M, 0.5 M, and 0.8 M sucrose at 4 °C until fully dehydrated. The brains were then frozen and embedded in Cryo-M-Bed embedding compound (Bright Instrument, Huntingdon, UK) and cut using a Vibratome UltraPro 5000 cryostat (American Instrument, Haverhill, MA, USA).

4.4. Percoll Purification of Blood Cells from Tissue Samples for Membrane Fraction Isolation

To study Aβ distribution inside tumor cells, we first eliminated blood cells from the tumor tissue sample using the Percoll purification method. Tumors and healthy cortex from the contralateral hemisphere were removed from the mouse brains, minced into 1–2-mm pieces with a razor blade, and enzymatically homogenized using a collagenase/hyaluronidase in DMEM (cat. #07912, Stemcell Technologies, WA, USA). Blood cells were separated from the homogenized tissue using Percoll (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) gradients of 30% and 70%. Following this procedure the tissue fraction free from blood cells was collected from the top of the 70% Percoll level and used for further analysis.

4.5. Isolation of Membrane and Cytoplasmic Proteins

A homogenized cell suspension was resuspended and sonicated in 20 mM Tris buffer containing 1 mM ethylenedinitrilotetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, and 5% glycerin, pH 8.5 with HCl, 1 µM Na3VO4, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). After centrifugation the supernatant was collected and used for further investigations as the cytoplasmic protein fraction. The pellet containing the membranes and the membrane proteins was lysed, and clarified cell lysate was used as the membrane protein fraction.

4.6. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Measurements

A specialized, ready-to-use, mouse-specific, solid-phase sandwich ELISA kit (cat. #KMB3481; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for direct measurement of the amount of Aβ40 peptide in the brains of experimental animals in accordance with the manufacturer’s documentation. Briefly, the brain samples were homogenized mechanically, and 100 mg of homogenate was then lysed in guanidine solution (5 M guanidine HCl, 50 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0). In other experiments, the lysate (normalized to total protein content) from membrane and cytoplasmic fractions (see above) were used. A monoclonal antibody against the NH2-terminus of mouse Aβ40 peptide was coated onto the wells of the microtiter strips provided in the kit. Samples, including standards of known Aβ40 content for calibration purposes as well as experimental specimens, were pipetted into the wells. After washing, the rabbit antibody specific to the COOH-terminus of Aβ40 was added and detected with horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit antibody. The optical density values at 450 nm were determined using a Wallac 1420 Victor 2 Microplate Reader (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The calculated mean reading from the healthy hemisphere (normalized cytoplasmic fraction) was defined as 100%, while other readings were presented as the percentage of this value.

4.7. Immunohistochemistry and Confocal Microscopy

Immunostaining was performed using a protocol previously established in our laboratory [22,62]. Frozen 30-µm sections were generated from brain cortex containing the tumor(s). The sections were blocked with 5% normal goat serum/5% normal horse serum (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) in 0.10 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS: NaCl, 137 mM; KCl, 2.70 mM; Na2HPO4, 10.14 mM; KH2PO4, 1.77 mM) containing 0.3% Triton X-100 and 0.05% phenylhydrazine for 60 min for permeabilization and then processed separately using two different antibodies against Aβ. For that purpose, slices were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody to Aβ (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, cat. #ab2539) diluted 1:400 in 0.03% Triton X-100, 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 5% normal horse serum, and 5% normal goat serum in 0.1 M PBS. Anti-GFAP–Cy3 (1:200) was added, and the slice left overnight at 4 °C. After three washes with permeabilization solution for 10 min, the secondary antibodies (fluorescein-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG) were added at a dilution of 1:200 with shaking for 2 h at room temperature and protected from light. The slices were then washed three times with PBS for 10 min and once with distilled water before being transferred onto a glass slide containing Fluoroshield mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, cat. #F6057) with DAPI. Negative controls were routinely performed by removal of primary antibody in each staining experiment to validate the immunohistochemical staining quality and results.
For thioflavin (Th) staining we used: (1) ThT staining, in which mice were injected IP with 10 µL/g of 3 mM solution of ThT in PBS. After 5 min, the animals were euthanized, and the brains were harvested and kept in fixative without light. (2) ThS staining, in which brain slices (30 µm) containing tumors were allowed to completely air dry prior to staining, then stained with a drop of 3 mM ThS in PBS (previously filtered through a 0.2-μm filter) for 5 min, then washed twice with distilled water and dried again. The coverslip was mounted with a drop of Vaseline on the slice. DAPI and Cy3 excitation/emission filters were used to visualize ThT and ThS fluorescence, respectively.
Images were acquired using an Olympus Fluoview FV1000 scanning inverted confocal microscope system equipped with a 20×, 40×, or 60×/1.43 oil objective (Olympus, Melville, NY, USA). The images were analyzed using ImageJ software ( with the Open Microscopy Environment Bio-Formats library and plugin, allowing for the opening of Olympus files ( The data were evaluated using custom colorization.

4.8. Statistics and Measurements

Using GraphPad Prism 7.03 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) for calculations, an unpaired t-test was employed to estimate statistical differences. Values were determined to be significantly different if the two-tailed p-value was <0.05.

5. Conclusions

  • Aggregated amyloid is present inside glioma tumor borders;
  • Aβ peptide immunofluorescence is present in glioma tumors, marking glioma cells and nearby ruptured blood vessels.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, original draft preparation, review and editing, and formal analysis were performed by M.Y.I. and L.Y.K.; experimental investigation, formal analysis, visualization, data curation, and review and editing were performed by L.Y.K., A.Z.-S., A.D.-G., J.-O.-R., and Y.V.K.


This research was supported by NIH grants SC1GM122691 to L.Y.K. and SC2GM111149 to M.Y.I. The funding sources had no role in study design; data collection, analysis, or interpretation; or the decision to submit this article.


We want to thank personnel of Animal Resources Center in Universidad Central del Caribe for their kind help.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.


ELISAenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
ThSThioflavin S
ThTThioflavin T
PMSFPhenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
DMEMDulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium
Amyloid beta peptide


  1. Guerreiro, R.; Bras, J. The age factor in Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med. 2015, 7, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Young, J.S.; Chmura, S.J.; Wainwright, D.A.; Yamini, B.; Peters, K.B.; Lukas, R.V. Management of glioblastoma in elderly patients. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017, 380, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ou, S.M.; Lee, Y.J.; Hu, Y.W.; Liu, C.J.; Chen, T.J.; Fuh, J.L.; Wang, S.J. Does Alzheimer’s disease protect against cancers? A nationwide population-based study. Neuroepidemiology 2013, 40, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Musicco, M.; Adorni, F.; Di Santo, S.; Prinelli, F.; Pettenati, C.; Caltagirone, C.; Palmer, K.; Russo, A. Inverse occurrence of cancer and Alzheimer disease: A population-based incidence study. Neurology 2013, 81, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yarchoan, M.; James, B.D.; Shah, R.C.; Arvanitakis, Z.; Wilson, R.S.; Schneider, J.; Bennett, D.A.; Arnold, S.E. Association of Cancer History with Alzheimer’s Disease Dementia and Neuropathology. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2017, 56, 699–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Driver, J.A.; Beiser, A.; Au, R.; Kreger, B.E.; Splansky, G.L.; Kurth, T.; Kiel, D.P.; Lu, K.P.; Seshadri, S.; Wolf, P.A. Inverse association between cancer and Alzheimer’s disease: Results from the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ 2012, 344, e1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lehrer, S. Glioblastoma and dementia may share a common cause. Med. Hypotheses 2010, 75, 67–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lehrer, S. Glioma and Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. Rep. 2018, 2, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Behrens, M.I.; Lendon, C.; Roe, C.M. A common biological mechanism in cancer and Alzheimer’s disease? Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2009, 6, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sánchez-Valle, J.; Tejero, H.; Ibáñez, K.; Portero, J.L.; Krallinger, M.; Al-Shahrour, F.; Tabarés-Seisdedos, R.; Baudot, A.; Valencia, A. A molecular hypothesis to explain direct and inverse co-morbidities between Alzheimer’s Disease, Glioblastoma and Lung cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hansel, D.E.; Rahman, A.; Wehner, S.; Herzog, V.; Yeo, C.J.; Maitra, A. Increased expression and processing of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein in pancreatic cancer may influence cellular proliferation. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 7032–7037. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Tsang, J.Y.S.; Lee, M.A.; Ni, Y.B.; Chan, S.K.; Cheung, S.Y.; Chan, W.W.; Lau, K.F.; Tse, G.M.K. Amyloid Precursor Protein Is Associated with Aggressive Behavior in Nonluminal Breast Cancers. Oncologist 2018, 23, 1273–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tsang, J.Y.S.; Lee, M.A.; Chan, T.H.; Li, J.; Ni, Y.B.; Shao, Y.; Chan, S.K.; Cheungc, S.Y.; Lau, K.F.; Tse, G.M.K. Proteolytic cleavage of amyloid precursor protein by ADAM10 mediates proliferation and migration in breast cancer. EBioMedicine 2018, 38, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jin, W.S.; Bu, X.L.; Liu, Y.H.; Shen, L.L.; Zhuang, Z.Q.; Jiao, S.S.; Zhu, C.; Wang, Q.H.; Zhou, H.D.; Zhang, T.; et al. Plasma Amyloid-Beta Levels in Patients with Different Types of Cancer. Neurotox. Res. 2017, 31, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Morato, E.; Mayor, F., Jr. Production of the Alzheimer’s beta-amyloid peptide by C6 glioma cells. FEBS Lett. 1993, 336, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Murphy, S.F.; Banasiak, M.; Yee, G.-T.; Wotoczek-Obadia, M.; Tran, Y.; Prak, A.; Albright, R.; Mullan, M.; Paris, D.; Brem, S. A synthetic fragment of beta-amyloid peptide suppresses glioma proliferation, angiogenesis, and invasiveness in vivo and in vitro. Neuro-Oncol. 2010, 12, iv5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paris, D. Modulation of Angiogenesis by a-Beta Peptide Fragments. Patent US20080031954A1, 7 February 2005. [Google Scholar]
  18. Paris, D.; Gan ey, N.; Banasiak, M.; Laporte, V.; Patel, N.; Mullan, M.; Murphy, S.F.; Yee, G.T.; Bachmeier, C.; Ganey, C.; et al. Impaired orthotopic glioma growth and vascularization in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 11251–11258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Inyushin, M.Y.; Sanabria, P.; Rojas, L.; Kucheryavykh, Y.; Kucheryavykh, L. Aβ Peptide Originated from Platelets Promises New Strategy in Anti-Alzheimer’s Drug Development. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 3948360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Inyushin, M.; Zayas-Santiago, A.; Rojas, L.; Kucheryavykh, Y.; Kucheryavykh, L. Platelet-generated amyloid beta peptides in Alzheimer’s disease and glaucoma. Histol. Histopathol. 2019, 18111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kucheryavykh, L.Y.; Dávila-Rodríguez, J.; Rivera-Aponte, D.E.; Zueva, L.V.; Washington, A.V.; Sanabria, P.; Inyushin, M.Y. Platelets are responsible for the accumulation of β-amyloid in blood clots inside and around blood vessels in mouse brain after thrombosis. Brain Res. Bull. 2017, 128, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kucheryavykh, L.Y.; Kucheryavykh, Y.V.; Washington, A.V.; Inyushin, M.Y. Amyloid Beta Peptide Is Released during Thrombosis in the Skin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jurasz, P.; Alonso-Escolano, D.; Radomski, M.W. Platelet–cancer interactions: Mechanisms and pharmacology of tumour cell-induced platelet aggregation. Br. J. Pharm. 2004, 143, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Goubran, H.A.; Burnouf, T.; Radosevic, M.; El-Ekiaby, M. The platelet-cancer loop. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2013, 24, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hermanson, M.; Funa, K.; Hartman, M.; Claesson-Welsh, L.; Heldin, C.H.; Westermark, B.; Nistér, M. Platelet-derived growth factor and its receptors in human glioma tissue: Expression of messenger RNA and protein suggests the presence of autocrine and paracrine loops. Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 3213–3219. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kucheryavykh, L.Y.; Kucheryavykh, Y.V.; Rolón-Reyes, K.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Eaton, M.J.; Cubano, L.A.; Inyushin, M.Y. Visualization of implanted GL261 glioma cells in living mouse brain slices using fluorescent 4-(4-(dimethylamino)-styryl)-N-methylpyridinium iodide (ASP+). Biotechniques 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rolón-Reyes, K.; Kucheryavykh, Y.V.; Cubano, L.A.; Inyushin, M.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Eaton, M.J.; Harrison, J.K.; Kucheryavykh, L.Y. Microglia Activate Migration of Glioma Cells through a Pyk2 Intracellular Pathway. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dubois, L.G.; Campanati, L.; Righy, C.; D’Andrea-Meira, I.; Spohr, T.C.; Porto-Carreiro, I.; Pereira, C.M.; Balça-Silva, J.; Kahn, S.A.; DosSantos, M.F.; et al. Gliomas and the vascular fragility of the blood brain barrier. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2014, 8, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lan, J.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Xue, R.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, P.; Zheng, F.; Sun, X. The peripheral blood of Aβ binding RBC as a biomarker for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Age Ageing 2015, 44, 458–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mohanty, J.G.; Eckley, D.M.; Williamson, J.D.; Launer, L.J.; Rifkind, J.M. Do red blood cell-β-amyloid interactions alter oxygen delivery in Alzheimer’s disease? Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2008, 614, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kelényi, G. Thioflavin S fluorescent and Congo red anisotropic stainings in the histologic demonstration of amyloid. Acta Neuropathol. 1967, 7, 336–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Biancalana, M.; Koide, S. Molecular mechanism of Thioflavin-T binding to amyloid fibrils. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1804, 1405–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, Y.; Du, S.; Johnson, J.L.; Tung, H.Y.; Landers, C.T.; Liu, Y.; Seman, B.G.; Wheeler, R.T.; Costa-Mattioli, M.; Kheradmand, F.; et al. Microglia and amyloid precursor protein coordinate control of transient Candida cerebritis with memory deficits. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Brody, A.H.; Strittmatter, S.M. Synaptotoxic Signaling by Amyloid Beta Oligomers in Alzheimer’s Disease Through Prion Protein and mGluR5. Adv. Pharm. 2018, 82, 293–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Salazar, S.V.; Cox, T.O.; Lee, S.; Brody, A.H.; Chyung, A.S.; Haas, L.T.; Strittmatter, S.M. Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Factor Pyk2 Mediates Amyloid-β-Induced Synaptic Dysfunction and Loss. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 758–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lipinski, C.A.; Tran, N.L.; Menashi, E.; Rohl, C.; Kloss, J.; Bay, R.C.; Berens, M.E.; Loftus, J.C. The tyrosine kinase pyk2 promotes migration and invasion of glioma cells. Neoplasia 2005, 7, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fan, Q.W.; Weiss, W.A. Targeting the RTK-PI3K-mTOR axis in malignant glioma: Overcoming resistance. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2010, 347, 279–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhao, H.F.; Wang, J.; Shao, W.; Wu, C.P.; Chen, Z.P.; To, S.T.; Li, W.P. Recent advances in the use of PI3K inhibitors for glioblastoma multiforme: Current preclinical and clinical development. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Klippel, A.; Reinhard, C.; Kavanaugh, W.M.; Apell, G.; Escobedo, M.A.; Williams, L.T. Membrane localization of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is sufficient to activate multiple signal-transducing kinase pathways. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 16, 4117–4127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gao, X.; Lowry, P.R.; Zhou, X.; Depry, C.; Wei, Z.; Wong, G.W.; Zhang, J. PI3K/Akt signaling requires spatial compartmentalization in plasma membrane microdomains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 14509–14514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Chen, T.J.; Wang, D.C.; Chen, S.S. Amyloid-beta interrupts the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway that could be involved in brain-derived neurotrophic factor-induced Arc expression in rat cortical neurons. J. Neurosci. Res. 2009, 87, 2297–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mruthinti, S.; Hill, W.D.; Swamy-Mruthinti, S.; Buccafusco, J.J. Relationship between the induction of RAGE cell-surface antigen and the expression of amyloid binding sites. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2003, 20, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Deane, R.; Du Yan, S.; Submamaryan, R.K.; LaRue, B.; Jovanovic, S.; Hogg, E.; Welch, D.; Manness, L.; Lin, C.; Yu, J.; et al. RAGE mediates amyloid-beta peptide transport across the blood-brain barrier and accumulation in brain. Nat. Med. 2003, 9, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Logsdon, C.D.; Fuentes, M.K.; Huang, E.H.; Arumugam, T. RAGE and RAGE ligands in cancer. Curr. Mol. Med. 2007, 7, 777–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Verkhratsky, A.; Olabarria, M.; Noristani, H.N.; Yeh, C.-Y.; Rodriguez, J.J. Astrocytes in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurotherapeutics 2010, 7, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Veeraraghavalu, K.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.; Tanzi, R.E.; Sisodia, S.S. Age-dependent non-cell-autonomous deposition of amyloid from synthesis of β-amyloid by cells other than excitatory neurons. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34, 3668–3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Frost, G.R.; Li, Y.M. The role of astrocytes in amyloid production and Alzheimer’s disease. Open Biol. 2017, 7, 170228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Teich, A.F.; Patel, M.; Arancio, O. A reliable way to detect endogenous murine β-amyloid. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e55647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Okereke, O.I.; Xia, W.; Irizarry, M.C.; Sun, X.; Qiu, W.Q.; Fagan, A.M.; Mehta, P.D.; Hyman, B.T.; Selkoe, D.J.; Grodstein, F. Performance characteristics of plasma amyloid-beta 40 and 42 assays. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2009, 16, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aluise, C.D.; Sowell, R.A.; Butterfield, D.A. Peptides and proteins in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid as biomarkers for the prediction, diagnosis, and monitoring of therapeutic efficacy of Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1782, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stewart, K.L.; Radford, S.E. Amyloid plaques beyond Aβ: A survey of the diverse modulators of amyloid aggregation. Biophys. Rev. 2017, 9, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ganesan, A.; Debulpaep, M.; Wilkinson, H.; Van Durme, J.; De Baets, G.; Jonckheere, W.; Ramakers, M.; Ivarsson, Y.; Zimmermann, P.; Van Eldere, J.; et al. Selectivity of aggregation-determining interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2015, 427, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bolognesi, B.; Tartaglia, G.G. Physicochemical principles of protein aggregation. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2013, 117, 53–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Valenta, L.J.; Michel-Bechet, M.; Mattson, J.C.; Singer, F.R. Microfollicular thyroid carcinoma with amyloid rich stroma, resembling the medullary carcinoma of the thyroid (MCT). Cancer 1977, 39, 1573–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Khan, I.S.; Loh, K.S.; Petersson, F. Amyloid and hyaline globules in undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2019, 40, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Franklin, C.D.; Martin, M.V.; Clark, A.; Smith, C.J.; Hindle, M.O. An investigation into the origin and nature of ‘amyloid’ in a calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumour. J. Oral Pathol. 1981, 10, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Delaney, M.A.; Singh, K.; Murphy, C.L.; Solomon, A.; Nel, S.; Boy, S.C. Immunohistochemical and biochemical evidence of ameloblastic origin of amyloid-producing odontogenic tumors in cats. Vet. Pathol. 2013, 50, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hirayama, K.; Endoh, C.; Kagawa, Y.; Ohmachi, T.; Yamagami, T.; Nomura, K.; Matsuda, K.; Okamoto, M.; Taniyama, H. Amyloid-Producing Odontogenic Tumors of the Facial Skin in Three Cats. Vet. Pathol. 2017, 54, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Silverman, J.F.; Dabbs, D.J.; Norris, H.T.; Pories, W.J.; Legier, J.; Kay, S. Localized primary (AL) amyloid tumor of the breast. Cytologic, histologic, immunocytochemical and ultrastructural observations. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1986, 10, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Mori, M.; Kotani, H.; Sawaki, M.; Hattori, M.; Yoshimura, A.; Gondo, N.; Adachi, Y.; Kataoka, A.; Sugino, K.; Horisawa, N.; et al. Amyloid tumor of the breast. Surg. Case Rep. 2019, 5, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rosenzweig, M.; Landau, H. Light chain (AL) amyloidosis: Update on diagnosis and management. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2011, 4, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zayas-Santiago, A.; Ríos, D.S.; Zueva, L.V.; Inyushin, M.Y. Localization of αA-Crystallin in Rat Retinal Müller Glial Cells and Photoreceptors. Microsc. Microanal. 2018, 24, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Aβ peptide immunoreactivity (green) in glioma cells and in nearby blood vessels. (A) A small glioma tumor near a broken blood vessel. Aβ peptide immunoreactivity (green) visible in glioma cells (white arrow) and in blood vessels. Erythrocytes released from the broken vessel are also marked with Aβ-related immunofluorescence (yellow arrow). (B) A larger glioma tumor in which a broken blood vessel passes through the tumor (more clearly visible in the 3D image of this tumor shown in Figure S1B), and white arrows indicate glioma cells marked by green immunofluorescence representing Aβ peptide. For A and B, astrocytes are indicated by immunoreactivity to GFAP (red) and cell nuclei by DAPI staining (blue). Scale bar, 20 µm. (See also supplemental confocal 3D images of the same tumors in Figure S1A,B, respectively).
Figure 1. Aβ peptide immunoreactivity (green) in glioma cells and in nearby blood vessels. (A) A small glioma tumor near a broken blood vessel. Aβ peptide immunoreactivity (green) visible in glioma cells (white arrow) and in blood vessels. Erythrocytes released from the broken vessel are also marked with Aβ-related immunofluorescence (yellow arrow). (B) A larger glioma tumor in which a broken blood vessel passes through the tumor (more clearly visible in the 3D image of this tumor shown in Figure S1B), and white arrows indicate glioma cells marked by green immunofluorescence representing Aβ peptide. For A and B, astrocytes are indicated by immunoreactivity to GFAP (red) and cell nuclei by DAPI staining (blue). Scale bar, 20 µm. (See also supplemental confocal 3D images of the same tumors in Figure S1A,B, respectively).
Ijms 20 02482 g001
Figure 2. (A) The relative amount of Aβ40 in the glioma tissue is elevated. (B) Aβ40 in glioma tumor tissue is concentrated in the cell membrane fraction.
Figure 2. (A) The relative amount of Aβ40 in the glioma tissue is elevated. (B) Aβ40 in glioma tumor tissue is concentrated in the cell membrane fraction.
Ijms 20 02482 g002
Figure 3. Aggregated amyloid visualized by staining with thioflavin T (green) and thioflavin S (red) inside the glioma tumor body. The white arrow shows the glioma tumor body visible in the brain slice.
Figure 3. Aggregated amyloid visualized by staining with thioflavin T (green) and thioflavin S (red) inside the glioma tumor body. The white arrow shows the glioma tumor body visible in the brain slice.
Ijms 20 02482 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kucheryavykh, L.Y.; Ortiz-Rivera, J.; Kucheryavykh, Y.V.; Zayas-Santiago, A.; Diaz-Garcia, A.; Inyushin, M.Y. Accumulation of Innate Amyloid Beta Peptide in Glioblastoma Tumors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2482.

AMA Style

Kucheryavykh LY, Ortiz-Rivera J, Kucheryavykh YV, Zayas-Santiago A, Diaz-Garcia A, Inyushin MY. Accumulation of Innate Amyloid Beta Peptide in Glioblastoma Tumors. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(10):2482.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kucheryavykh, Lilia Y., Jescelica Ortiz-Rivera, Yuriy V. Kucheryavykh, Astrid Zayas-Santiago, Amanda Diaz-Garcia, and Mikhail Y. Inyushin. 2019. "Accumulation of Innate Amyloid Beta Peptide in Glioblastoma Tumors" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 10: 2482.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop