A Valine Mismatch at Position 129 of MICA Is an Independent Predictor of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Acute Kidney Rejection in Simultaneous Pancreas–Kidney Transplantation Recipients
by
, , and
Rafael Tomoya Michita
1,2
,
José Artur Bogo Chies
2
,
Sabine Schramm
1,
Peter A. Horn
1,
Falko M. Heinemann
1,
Andreas Wunsch
3,
Richard Viebahn
3,
Peter Schenker
3 and
Vera Rebmann
1,* 1
Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
2
Post-Graduation Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology, Genetics Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 91501-970, Brazil
3
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44892 Bochum, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(9), 2618; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092618
Submission received: 19 August 2018
/
Revised: 30 August 2018
/
Accepted: 31 August 2018
/
Published: 4 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Host-Cytomegalovirus Interactions: Pro- and Antiviral Key Factors Affecting CMV Infection Outcome or Therapeutic Approaches)
Abstract
:The polymorphic major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related molecule A (MICA) and its soluble form (sMICA) interact with activating receptor natural-killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) on natural-killer (NK) and T cells, thereby modifying immune responses to transplantation and infectious agents (e.g., cytomegalovirus). Two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), rs2596538GA in the MICA promoter and rs1051792AG in the coding region (MICA-129Val/Met), influence MICA expression or binding to NKG2D, with MICA-129Met molecules showing higher receptor affinity. To investigate the impact of these SNPs on the occurrence of cytomegalovirus infection or acute rejection (AR) in individuals who underwent simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation (SPKT), 50 recipient-donor pairs were genotyped, and sMICA levels were measured during the first year post-transplantation. Recipients with a Val-mismatch (recipient Met/Met and donor Val/Met or Val/Val) showed shorter cytomegalovirus infection-free and shorter kidney AR-free survival. Additionally, Val mismatch was an independent predictor of cytomegalovirus infection and kidney AR in the first year post-transplantation. Interestingly, sMICA levels were lower in rs2596538AA and MICA129Met/Met-homozygous recipients. These results provide further evidence that genetic variants of MICA influence sMICA levels, and that Val mismatch at position 129 increases cytomegalovirus infection and kidney AR risk during the first year post-SPKT.
1. Introduction
Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKT) is the most effective treatment for diabetes mellitus type 1 patients with end-stage renal disease. Graft survival following SPKT has improved over the previous decade due to advances in immunosuppressive regimens: antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab induction therapies are used by the majority of transplant centers, with the former associated with lower rejection rates during the first year post-transplantation [1].
Despite the overall improvement in SPKT, acute rejection (AR) remains the major challenge in solid-organ transplantation, as it has a negative effect on the allograft function and may trigger chronic rejection. Notably, the occurrence of AR in SPKT is partially attributed to donor type, as the majority of pancreas and kidney donors are deceased (cardiac-dead and brain-dead donors). Consequently, allografts from such donors are more strongly affected by ischemia-reperfusion injury capable of causing delayed graft function and/or ultimate rejection.
Another complication influencing graft survival is human cytomegalovirus infection, which frequently occurs after transplantation and leads to severe complications. In solid-organ transplantation, the main risk factors associated with cytomegalovirus infection are serological mismatch between recipient and donor (recipient is cytomegalovirus-negative and donor is cytomegalovirus-positive; cytomegalovirus R−/D+), high doses of methylprednisolone, and T cell-depletion therapy [2]. In immunocompetent hosts, cytomegalovirus infection is usually asymptomatic; however, in immunosuppressed transplantation recipients, the infection manifests as a systemic syndrome that affects multiple organs. Importantly, cytomegalovirus infection increases the risk of opportunistic infections, allograft dysfunction, and the overall cost of transplantation.
The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I chain-related molecule A (MICA) encodes a stress-induced protein located within MHC loci and is close to the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B gene [3]. MICA is a highly polymorphic non-MHC gene that includes 107 alleles encoding 82 proteins, according to Immuno Polymorphism Database [4]. MICA proteins exist as membrane-bound and soluble molecules (sMICA), each with distinct biological properties. Unlike classic MHC class I molecules, MICA is not involved in antigen presentation, but rather acts as a ligand for natural-killer (NK) group 2-member D (NKG2D), an activating C-type lectin-like receptor. The constitutive expression of MICA is restricted to few cell types, including endothelial cells, dendritic cells, fibroblasts, and epithelial cells (reviewed in Reference [5]). MICA upregulation in tissues indicates virus-induced stress or injury, malign transformation, or ischemia-reperfusion injury of allografts in the transplantation setting [6]. Because MICA expression functions as a costimulatory signal for CD8+ T cells and triggers cytotoxic and cytokine immune responses by NK effectors, its expression and potential for stress-induced upregulation represent an additional boundary between tolerance and rejection in allogeneic situations such as transplantation.
MICA single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) influence expression patterns of the gene. Specifically, rs2596538G/A located in the promoter region at position –2778 from exon 1 influences sMICA levels by modifying the affinity to transcription factor specificity protein-1. The variant rs2596538G is associated with higher sMICA expression levels, especially in patients with hepatitis C virus-induced hepatocellular carcinoma [7]. SNP rs1051792, also known as MICA-129Val/Met, is characterized by a substitution of guanine with adenine at position 454 in exon 3, which results in a nonsynonymous mutation of valine to methionine at codon 129. MICA-129Val/Met not only affects sMICA levels, but also its affinity to the NKG2D receptor expressed on CD8+ T cells, γδ T cells, and NK cells. MICA-129Met proteins bind soluble NKG2D with a 10- to 50-fold higher affinity than MICA-129Val proteins [5,8]. Additionally, MICA-129Met proteins are expressed at low levels in the cell membrane due to intracellular retention, and are highly susceptible to membrane shedding [9].
The clinical relevance of MICA-129Val/Met has been highlighted by diverse association studies, including those in patients with autoimmune disorders, malignancies, and infections [3,10]. Recent studies on hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation have produced conflicting results, with different MICA-129 genotypes being associated with different outcomes [11,12,13,14,15]. The effects of both functionally relevant SNPs (rs2596538 and MICA-129Val/Met) on the incidence of cytomegalovirus infection and AR after SPKT remain unknown. Therefore, we investigated the impact of these SNPs on the occurrence of cytomegalovirus infection or AR in SPKT by genotyping 50 recipient-donor pairs and defining their sMICA levels during the first year post-transplantation.
2. Results
Clinical and demographic characteristics of SPKT recipients with or without at least one AR event are provided in Table 1. AR was observed in 19 (38%) individuals with SPKT and at different frequencies in kidney (84.2%) and pancreas (21.1%) allografts. Only one patient exhibited graft rejection of both. The median age, biochemical parameters, cold ischemia time of the graft, and the number of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A, -B, and -DR mismatches between AR and functional/stable graft recipients were similar. Before transplantation, anti-MICA antibodies were more frequently detected in patients in the AR group (26.3% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.030) as compared with those without AR. After transplantation, the frequencies of anti-MICA antibody detection were similar in both groups.
Cytomegalovirus-positive recipients were more prevalent among those with stable grafts than with AR allografts (61.3 vs. 26.3; p = 0.016), and the frequency of patients receiving cytomegalovirus-positive grafts was higher in the AR group (42.1 vs. 16.1, p = 0.042). After a one-year follow-up, active infection was observed with similar frequencies in both groups (AR: 15.8% vs. stable grafts: 12.9%; p > 0.05).
We then evaluated the impact of MICA-129Val/Met mismatches between recipient and donor pairs. Kaplan–Meier curves indicated that MICA-129 mismatch status (recipient Met/Met and donor Met/Val or Val/Val) conferred shorter cytomegalovirus-infection-free survival (p = 0.004; Figure 1A) and kidney-rejection-free survival rates (p = 0.007; Figure 1B) during the first year post-SPKT. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that MICA-129 mismatch represented an independent prognostic risk factor for cytomegalovirus infection (p = 0.049; hazard ratio (HR): 5.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00–28.1; Table 2) and kidney AR (p = 0.006; HR: 6.04; 95% CI: 1.68–21.7, Table 3) during the first year post-transplantation.
Additionally, in the first year post-transplantation: SPK patient, pancreas-, and kidney-graft survival rates were 96%, 84%, and 88%, respectively. In recipients without valine mismatch: SPK patient, pancreas-, and kidney-graft survival rates were 97.5%, 90%, and 92.5%. In the valine mismatch group: SPK patient, pancreas-, and kidney-graft survival rates were slightly worse, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (90%, 70%, and 60%, respectively).
Evaluation of MICA-129Val/Met genotypes based on plasma sMICA levels from SPKT recipients showed that in all measurements, Met/Met homozygotes had the lowest plasma sMICA levels (below the detection limit) relative to those in patients with Val/Val and Val/Met genotypes (p = 0.005, Table 4). Evaluation of SNP rs2596538G/A in the MICA-promoter region revealed that for all measurements, rs2596538AA homozygotes had the lowest median sMICA levels, with these differences being more pronounced when AA homozygotes were compared with rs2596538G-allele carriers [GG + GA = 0.73 (range: 0.54–1.05) vs. AA < 0.02; p = 0.025]. Furthermore, additional sMICA measurements from voluntary blood donors confirmed that MICA-129Met/Met and rs2596538AA genotypes were associated with the lowest sMICA levels (p < 0.001).
Analysis of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between MICA variants in recipients (D’ = 0.61, r2 = 0.37) and recipients plus donors (D’ = 0.64, r2 = 0.40) suggested only recombination and low incidence of LD. Interestingly, 89.9% (8/9) of MICA-129Met/Met homozygotes carried at least one rs2596538A allele, with 55.6% (5/8) being homozygous for this allele (rs2596538AA). Furthermore, 96.3% (26/27) of MICA-129Val/Val homozygotes carried at least one rs2596538G allele, with 77.8% (21/27) being homozygous for this allele (rs2596538GG). Similar to SPKT recipients, all Met/Met homozygotes carried at least one rs2596538A allele, and 57.1% of them (4/7) were also rs2596538AA homozygous, whereas all Val/Val homozygotes harbored at least one rs2596538G allele, and 70.0% (14/20) were also GG homozygous.
3. Discussion
Studies evaluating MICA-129 mismatch in solid-organ transplantation are scarce, as MICA typing is seldom reported, except for the detection of anti-MICA antibodies, which affect allograft survival [16,17]. In the present study, we report that the direction and type of MICA mismatches, rather than their number, influence SPKT outcomes. Specifically, we observed for the first time that MICA-129Val mismatch (donor MICA-129Val carrier and recipient MICA-129Met homozygote) is an independent predictor of cytomegalovirus infection and kidney AR in the first year post-SPKT. The functional implications of variability of MICA-129 molecules that bind to NKG2D with low (Val) or high (Met) affinity have been reported [12]. In hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation studies, MICA has gained special attention due to the functional impact of MICA-129Val/Met dimorphism. However, despite extensive investigations, the question of whether MICA mismatches increase or decrease the risk of graft-versus-host disease or overall patient survival remains a matter of debate [11,12,13,14,15].
The increased risk of AR in recipients harboring MICA-129Met/Met can be explained by the low level of sMICA present in AR patients, which could cause insufficient host immune suppression due to the downregulation of surface NKG2D expression on NK and CD8+ T cells. We also suggest that the expression of membrane MICA-129 valine molecules on the allograft tissue has potential for stimulating an immune response in MICA-129Met/Met recipients and leading to worse clinical outcomes.
Consistent with our observations, decreased expression of membrane-bound and sMICA molecules is associated with the MICA-129Met allele [12]. However, it should be noted that in our study, Met/Met homozygotes were likely to be rs2596538AA homozygous, and the latter genotype is associated with lower sMICA levels. Moreover, the rs2596538G allele influences specificity protein-1 transcription-factor binding, and thus is associated with higher sMICA levels than the rs2596538A allele [7].
In heart and kidney transplantation patients, consistent sMICA expression is associated with improved graft tolerance [18,19]. In our SPKT study, MICA-129Val/rs2596538G carriers exhibited the highest sMICA levels, whereas MICA-129Met/Met and rs2596538AA homozygotes had the lowest sMICA levels. Concomitant with low sMICA levels, MICA-129Met/Met carriers are exposed to MICA-129Val proteins expressed on donor allograft cells (Val mismatches), with the expression levels of these proteins correlating with NKG2D-mediated downstream signaling in NK and CD8+ T cells that promotes secretion of tissue-injury related mediators. Additionally, overexpression of MICA-129Met proteins leads to NKG2D internalization, resulting in impaired functions of both NK and CD8+ T cells [10,12]. Therefore, the evaluation of recipient-donor MICA-129Val/Met genotypes might provide reliable markers for patients that are at higher AR risk based on the mismatch type.
Currently, few studies evaluated the impact of MICA genetic variation on the clinical outcome of immunologic disorders and transplantation (reviewed in Reference [10]). An exception includes a study evaluating the variation in regulatory regions of the gene, such as the rs2596542 and rs2596538 SNPs [7]. The investigation and impact of MICA alleles in distinct outcomes are even more limited since MICA gene is highly polymorphic (>100 alleles). Consequently, a comprehensive evaluation requires high-throughput methodologies. Noteworthy, MICA Val129Met genotyping allows differentiation of the most frequent alleles in two groups.
It has been shown that genotyping of MICA-129Val/Met allows classification of MICA alleles by low (Val) or high (Met) affinity of the protein product to NKG2D [5]. Therefore, depending on the population under investigation, this might provide a rough estimate of segregated MICA alleles. We were unable to confirm donor–recipient MICA–allele typing in SPKT patients. However, MICA-129Val is present in the MICA*008 allele, which is most frequently identified in Caucasians, and is currently under intense investigation [5].
Interestingly, the product of MICA*008 lacks the cytoplasmic domain due to a microsatellite SNP (A5.1). However, this allele still expresses a protein on the membrane through a dynamic mechanism involving glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchoring. Because the latter is a slow process, unbound MICA proteins can be released as nanovesicles and soluble proteins, indicating that mechanisms other than those currently explored (i.e., SNPs) impact MICA expression patterns [10,20]. Additionally, it is possible that MICA*008- and MICA-129Val-expression patterns overlap.
In the specific context of cytomegalovirus infection, cytomegalovirus eludes host immune system by targeting and downregulating NKG2D ligands at multiple checkpoints, including those involved in protein sequestration, mRNA degradation, translational repression, protein degradation, in the allele-specific manner [21]. The MICA*008 allele illustrates this specificity as it represents an “escape variant” resistant to most cytomegalovirus viral glycoproteins, except for the recently identified US9 protein. Therefore, MICA*008 carriers are less prone to cytomegalovirus infection than individuals with full-length MICA alleles [22,23]. A higher risk of cytomegalovirus reactivation is associated with A5.1 homozygosity (which includes the MICA*008 allele) in HIV-immunodeficient patients [24]. It should be noted that HIV-1 Nef protein downregulates MICA expression, and this circumstance needs to be taken into account in coinfected and immunosuppressed patients [25].
Consequently, we suggest that susceptibility to cytomegalovirus infection in SPKT represents a cumulative effect of recipient–donor MICA-129Val/Met genotypes, with equivalent effects of serological mismatches, immunosuppressive regimens, and lymphocyte-depletion therapy. In this study, we observed that Val-mismatch recipients were at higher risk of cytomegalovirus infection post-SPKT. The fact that Met/Met homozygotes lack the “escape variant” and likely carry a 2596538A allele makes them susceptible to cytomegalovirus-specific immune evasion because MICA expression becomes downregulated in favor of viral replication [21,26]. However, additional studies are required to clarify the mechanisms associated with the susceptibility of Val-mismatch recipients to cytomegalovirus-infection risk, as well as the impact of donor-allograft genotypes and different cytomegalovirus strains. Although we focused our attention on cytomegalovirus infection, our observations are also relevant for assessing the risk of other opportunistic infections, especially those caused by other herpesviruses that adopt multiple means to evade immune response, including MICA downregulation [27]. It is noteworthy that MICA Val129Met SNP influence on cytomegalovirus infection and AR could be specific for SPKT since the current cohort under investigation differs in the clinical practice/management and characteristics of other types of solid organ transplantation. Consequently, it makes SPKT and kidney only transplantation not comparable, although the functional relevance of MICA Val129Met SNP may overlap.
In summary, for the first time, we evaluated MICA-129Val/Met and rs2596538G/A genetic variations in SPKT recipients. We demonstrated that MICA-129Val mismatch is an effective predictor of AR risk and cytomegalovirus infection in the first year post-SPKT. Additionally, MICA-129Val/Met genotypes affect overall sMICA levels in individuals with SPKT, and, more importantly, rs2596538G/A SNP in the MICA-promoter region also affects sMICA levels. These findings indicated that evaluation of MICA-129-mismatch in individuals with SPKT might help to stratify them by the probable risks of developing AR and contracting cytomegalovirus infection. Furthermore, a simultaneous determination of rs2596538G/A genotype in the MICA-promoter region might provide a better understanding of the mechanisms associated with sMICA expression, which will be beneficial in the context of allotransplantation.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Study Population and Outcome Parameters
A total of 50 diabetes mellitus type 1 patients undergoing SPKT were recruited from 2012 to 2016 at Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus (Bochum, Germany). Induction immunosuppression was employed in all patients. Most patients received thymoglobulin (Sanofi, Frankfurt, Germany) induction in daily doses of 1.5 mg/kg body weight for 3 days. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, and prednisolone in most cases.
Serum creatinine, blood-glucose values, and serum-lipase levels were used to detect allograft dysfunction. When rejection was suspected, a biopsy of the kidney graft was performed primarily and graded according to the BANFF classification [28]. A biopsy of the pancreas graft was performed only when isolated pancreas graft rejection was suspected. AR episodes were treated with methylprednisolone initially for 3 consecutive days, and, if resistant, with thymoglobulin. Antibody-mediated rejections were treated with thymoglobulin and/or plasmapheresis and intravenous immune globulin.
All patients received cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with ganciclovir, followed by valganciclovir for at least 3 months postoperatively. In individuals with presumed high-risk sensitivity to cytomegalovirus (D+/R−; D+/R+), cytomegalovirus prophylaxis was prolonged to 6 months. Surveillance for cytomegalovirus infection was performed by PCR (Cobas 4800; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) weekly during the first month following SPKT and monthly thereafter until the end of the first year or in cases of clinical suspicion. Any level of detection was considered positive. Cytomegalovirus disease was defined as cytomegalovirus infection with at least one of the symptoms: newly occurred malaise, fever > 38 °C, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, elevation of hepatic transaminases to more than twice the standard values, or graft dysfunction. Treatment of cytomegalovirus infection was performed using intravenous ganciclovir adjusted to the calculated glomerular-filtration rate, followed by 3 additional months of prophylactic valganciclovir treatment.
Recipients and deceased-donor grafts were typed for HLA-A, -B, and -DR. The recipients were followed-up with over a 1-year period after SPKT and evaluated for the occurrence of graft failure, cytomegalovirus infection, and AR. Demographic and clinical data were collected before and after SPKT and summarized according to cytomegalovirus status and AR outcomes (Table 1). Voluntary blood donors (n = 44) were included in the study in order to evaluate the effect of MICA-129Val/Met and rs2596538G/A genotypes on sMICA levels. The protocols used in this study were approved by the local ethics board of the Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr-University of Bochum (No. 12-4380; date: 20 September 2012) and were in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki. Before inclusion in the study, all participants provided written informed consent.
4.2. MIC-A 454G/A and rs2596538A/G Genotyping
Genomic DNA was obtained using a QIAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions from whole-blood samples collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Genotypes associated with SNP rs1051792 involving an A > G substitution at position 454 in exon 3 of the MICA gene were determined by nested PCR, followed by RsaI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) restriction digestion (PCR conditions are described in Table S1). Electrophoresis was performed on a 2.5% agarose gel at 140 V for 20 min in order to visualize digestion patterns and determine the presence of MIC-A 454G/A genotypes associated with the following nonsynonymous substitutions: 454GG = Val/Val (106 and 21 bp (base pair)); 454GA = Val/Met (127, 106, and 21 bp), and 454AA = Met/Met (127 bp).
Genotyping of rs2596538A/G was performed using a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism technique described in Table S2. All PCR amplifications were evaluated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and AluI (New England Biolabs) restriction digest reactions according to manufacturer instructions. The amplified sequences had a total of 339 bp and contained 4 AluI-recognition sites, yielding the following fragments after digestion: 139, 92, 78, 23, and 7 bp. The presence of the A allele led to the digestion of the 170 bp fragment resulting in the segments of 78 and 92 bp in length. Electrophoresis on a 3.5% agarose gel was used to visualize the digestion patterns and determine the following MICA rs2596538A/G genotypes: AA (139, 92, 78, 23, and 7 bp), AG (170, 139, 92, 78, 23, and 7 bp), and GG (170, 139, 23, and 7 bp). Samples were processed in batches, including all known genotypes as additional positive controls. At the end, 10% of samples were randomly selected and retested; 100% reproducibility was obtained for both methods.
4.3. sMICA Measurement
Determination of sMICA levels was performed as previously described [29]. Briefly, sMICA molecules were captured using an AMOI antibody (BAMOMAB, Munich, Germany) at a final concentration of 25 ng/mL. Detection of bound sMICA molecules was performed using a biotin-labeled polyclonal goat anti-human MICA antibody (R and D Systems GmbH, Wiesbaden-Nordenstadt, Germany) diluted to 400 ng/mL in phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 2% inactivated goat serum. Detection of bound antibodies was performed by streptavidin conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (R and D Systems GmbH) diluted 1:200 in phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% bovine serum albumin. 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Munich, Germany) served as substrate solution, and absorbance was measured at 450 nm (Biotek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). Recombinant MICA protein fused with the Fc portion of human IgG (R and D Systems GmbH) was used as standard. The detection limit of sMICA was 20.4 pg/mL or 0.024 ng/mL, with detection limits calculated according to DIN 32645 standard. Intra-assay coefficients of variation were 4.1%, and interassay coefficients of variation were 14.3%.
4.4. Statistical Analysis
Asymmetric distributions were described by the median (25–75 percentiles). Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney U or Kruskal–Wallis test and chi-squared tests, as appropriate. The SPKT outcomes evaluated included AR, graft function, and cytomegalovirus infection in the first year post-SPKT. Survival in groups with allograft AR and cytomegalovirus infection was estimated by Kaplan–Meier curves and evaluated through the log-rank test implemented in the R package survminer (v0.4.0; https://www.r-project.org/). Multivariate Cox regression according to proportional hazards assumption was used to assess the risk of allograft AR and cytomegalovirus infection. Covariates were entered in the multivariate analysis based on conceptual evaluation of the literature or/and by means of a statistical threshold (association of the covariate with the outcome and with the study factor at p ≤ 0.20). LD was tested by D’ and r2 statistics was calculated by using Haploview software (https://www.broadinstitute.org/haploview/haploview). All remaining analyses were performed in SPSS for Windows (v18.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Effects were considered statistically if p < 0.05.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/9/2618/s1.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, R.T.M., J.A.B.C., P.A.H., P.S., and V.R.; performed the experiments, R.T.M. and S.S.; interpreted the data, R.T.M., J.A.B.C., P.A.H., A.W., R.V., P.S., and V.R.; performed statistical analyses, R.T.M. and V.R.; writing and original draft preparation, R.T.M.; contributed clinical data, F.M.H. and P.S.; writing, review, and editing, R.T.M., J.A.B.C., S.S., P.A.H., F.M.H., A.W., R.V., P.S., and V.R.
Funding
The study was funded by Novartis grant number CERL080ADE28T.
Acknowledgments
We especially thank the patients that participated in this study. We are grateful to Monika Collenburg for the technical support. R.T.M. was supported by the “Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasília-DF Brazil (99999.000124/2016-08)”, the “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico” (CNPq) Foundation, Ministry of Science and Technology of Brazil, Brasília-DF Brazil (142475/2015-7), and by the “Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst” (DAAD) Scholarship of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. We would like to thank Editage for language editing. This study was an investigator-initiated clinical trial conducted by the Department of Surgery, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University (Bochum, Germany).
Conflicts of Interest
P.S. has received speaker’s honoraria, travel funding, and research grants from Astellas, Novartis, Neovii, and Hexal; A.W. has received travel funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Köhler-Chemie; and R.V. has received speaker’s honoraria, travel funding, and research grants from Astellas, Köhler-Chemie, Novartis, and Hexal. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study, data collection, analyses, or interpretation, manuscript writing, or in the decision to publish the results.
Abbreviations
| AR | Acute rejection |
| bp | base pair |
| D | Donor |
| HIV | Human immunodeficiency virus |
| HLA | Human leukocyte antigen |
| LD | Linkage disequilibrium |
| Met | Methionine |
| MHC | Major histocompatibility complex |
| MICA | Major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related molecule A |
| NK | Natural killer |
| NKG2D | Natural-killer group 2 member D |
| PBS | Phosphate buffered saline |
| R | Recipient |
| SD | Standard deviation |
| sMICA | soluble MICA |
| SNP | Single nucleotide polymorphism |
| SPKT | Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation |
| Val | Valine |
References
- Bazerbachi, F.; Selzner, M.; Boehnert, M.U.; Marquez, M.A.; Norgate, A.; McGilvray, I.D.; Schiff, J.; Cattral, M.S. Thymoglobulin versus basiliximab induction therapy for simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation: Impact on rejection, graft function, and long-term outcome. Transplantation 2011, 92, 1039–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Razonable, R.R.; Rivero, A.; Rodriguez, A.; Wilson, J.; Daniels, J.; Jenkins, G.; Larson, T.; Hellinger, W.C.; Spivey, J.R.; Paya, C.V. Allograft rejection predicts the occurrence of late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease among CMV-mismatched solid organ transplant patients receiving prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir. J. Infect. Dis. 2001, 184, 1461–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baranwal, A.K.; Mehra, N.K. Major Histocompatibility complex class i chain-related A (MICA) molecules: Relevance in solid organ transplantation. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robinson, J.; Halliwell, J.A.; Hayhurst, J.D.; Flicek, P.; Parham, P.; Marsh, S.G.E. The IPD and IMGT/HLA database: Allele variant databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D423–D431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Risti, M.; Bicalho, M.D.G. MICA and NKG2D: Is There an Impact on Kidney Transplant Outcome? Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, L.; Lu, J.; Wei, L.; Long, D.; Guo, J.Y.; Shan, J.; Li, F.S.; Lu, P.Y.; Li, P.Y.; Feng, L. The role of HIF-1 in up-regulating MICA expression on human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells during hypoxia/reoxygenation. BMC Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lo, P.H.Y.; Urabe, Y.; Kumar, V.; Tanikawa, C.; Koike, K.; Kato, N.; Miki, D.; Chayama, K.; Kubo, M.; Nakamura, Y.; et al. Identification of a functional variant in the MICA promoter which regulates MICA expression and increases HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma risk. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Steinle, A.; Li, P.; Morris, D.L.; Groh, V.; Lanier, L.L.; Strong, R.K.; Spies, T. Interactions of human NKG2D with its ligands MICA, MICB, and homologs of the mouse RAE-1 protein family. Immunogenetics 2001, 53, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Isernhagen, A.; Schilling, D.; Monecke, S.; Shah, P.; Elsner, L.; Walter, L.; Multhoff, G.; Dressel, R. The MICA-129Met/Val dimorphism affects plasma membrane expression and shedding of the NKG2D ligand MICA. Immunogenetics 2016, 68, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Isernhagen, A.; Malzahn, D.; Bickeböller, H.; Dressel, R. Impact of the MICA-129Met/Val Dimorphism on NKG2D-Mediated Biological Functions and Disease Risks. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boukouaci, W.; Busson, M.; Peffault de Latour, R.; Rocha, V.; Suberbielle, C.; Bengoufa, D.; Dulphy, N.; Haas, P.; Scieux, C.; Amroun, H.; et al. MICA-129 genotype, soluble MICA, and anti-MICA antibodies as biomarkers of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2009, 114, 5216–5224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Isernhagen, A.; Malzahn, D.; Viktorova, E.; Elsner, L.; Monecke, S.; von Bonin, F.; Kilisch, M.; Wermuth, J.M.; Walther, N.; Balavarca, Y.; et al. The MICA-129 dimorphism affects NKG2D signaling and outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. EMBO Mol. Med. 2015, 7, 1480–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Carapito, R.; Jung, N.; Kwemou, M.; Untrau, M.; Michel, S.; Pichot, A.; Giacometti, G.; Macquin, C.; Ilias, W.; Morlon, A.; et al. Matching for the nonconventional MHC-I MICA gene significantly reduces the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD. Blood 2016, 128, 1979–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fuerst, D.; Neuchel, C.; Niederwieser, D.; Bunjes, D.; Gramatzki, M.; Wagner, E.; Wulf, G.; Glass, B.; Pfreundschuh, M.; Einsele, H.; et al. Matching for the MICA-129 polymorphism is beneficial in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2016, 128, 3169–3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Askar, M.; Sobecks, R.; Wang, T.; Haagenson, M.; Majhail, N.; Madbouly, A.; Thomas, D.; Zhang, A.; Fleischhauer, K.; Hsu, K.; et al. MHC Class I Chain-Related Gene A (MICA) Donor-Recipient Mismatches and MICA-129 Polymorphism in Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantations Has No Impact on Outcomes in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A center of international blood and marrow transplant research study. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017, 23, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cox, S.T.; Stephens, H.A.F.; Fernando, R.; Karasu, A.; Harber, M.; Howie, A.J.; Powis, S.; Zou, Y.; Stastny, P.; Madrigal, J.A.; et al. Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A allele mismatching, antibodies, and rejection in renal transplantation. Hum. Immunol. 2011, 72, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tonnerre, P.; Gerard, N.; Chatelais, M.; Poli, C.; Allard, S.; Cury, S.; Bressollette, C.; Cesbron-Gautier, A.; Charreau, B. MICA variant promotes allosensitization after kidney transplantation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013, 24, 954–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suárez-Alvarez, B.; López-Vázquez, A.; Díaz-Molina, B.; Bernardo-Rodríguez, M.J.; Alvarez-López, R.; Pascual, D.; Astudillo, A.; Martínez-Borra, J.; Lambert, J.L.; González, S.; et al. The predictive value of soluble major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related molecule A (MICA) levels on heart allograft rejection. Transplantation 2006, 82, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baranwal, A.K.; Goswami, S.; Bhat, D.K.; Kaur, G.; Agarwal, S.K.; Mehra, N.K. Soluble Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I related Chain A (sMICA) levels influence graft outcome following Renal Transplantation. Hum. Immunol. 2018, 79, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ashiru, O.; López-Cobo, S.; Fernández-Messina, L.; Pontes-Quero, S.; Pandolfi, R.; Reyburn, H.T.; Valés-Gómez, M. A GPI anchor explains the unique biological features of the common NKG2D-ligand allele MICA*008. Biochem. J. 2013, 454, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Seidel, E.; Le, V.T.K.; Bar-On, Y.; Tsukerman, P.; Enk, J.; Yamin, R.; Stein, N.; Schmiedel, D.; Oiknine Djian, E.; Weisblum, Y.; et al. Dynamic co-evolution of host and pathogen: HCMV downregulates the prevalent allele MICA∗008 to escape elimination by NK cells. Cell Rep. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chalupny, N.J.; Rein-Weston, A.; Dosch, S.; Cosman, D. Down-regulation of the NKG2D ligand MICA by the human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein UL142. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 346, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ashiru, O.; Bennett, N.J.; Boyle, L.H.; Thomas, M.; Trowsdale, J.; Wills, M.R. NKG2D ligand MICA is retained in the cis-Golgi apparatus by human cytomegalovirus protein UL142. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 12345–12354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moenkemeyer, M.; Heiken, H.; Schmidt, R.E.; Witte, T. Higher risk of cytomegalovirus reactivation in human immunodeficiency virus–1–infected patients homozygous for MICA5.1. Hum. Immunol. 2009, 70, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cerboni, C.; Neri, F.; Casartelli, N.; Zingoni, A.; Cosman, D.; Rossi, P.; Santoni, A.; Doria, M. Human immunodeficiency virus 1 Nef protein downmodulates the ligands of the activating receptor NKG2D and inhibits natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88, 242–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Goodier, M.R.; Jonjić, S.; Riley, E.M.; Juranić Lisnić, V. CMV and natural killer cells: Shaping the response to vaccination. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018, 48, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Odom, C.I.; Gaston, D.C.; Markert, J.M.; Cassady, K.A. Human herpesviridae methods of natural killer cell evasion. Adv. Virol. 2012, 2012, 359869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Racusen, L.C.; Solez, K.; Colvin, R.B. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int. 1999, 55, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nückel, H.; Switala, M.; Sellmann, L.; Horn, P.A.; Dürig, J.; Dührsen, U.; Küppers, R.; Grosse-Wilde, H.; Rebmann, V. The prognostic significance of soluble NKG2D ligands in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia 2010, 24, 1152–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
Impact of MICA-129Val/Met on survival following simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. (A) Effect of MICA-129-Val mismatch (recipient Met/Met and donor Met/Val or Val/Val) in patients with cytomegalovirus infection at one year post-transplantation. (B) Effect of MICA-129-Val mismatch in patients with kidney acute rejection in one year post-transplantation.
Figure 1.
Impact of MICA-129Val/Met on survival following simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. (A) Effect of MICA-129-Val mismatch (recipient Met/Met and donor Met/Val or Val/Val) in patients with cytomegalovirus infection at one year post-transplantation. (B) Effect of MICA-129-Val mismatch in patients with kidney acute rejection in one year post-transplantation.
Table 1.
Clinical and demographic characteristics of SPKT patients stratified by the presence of AR in the first year post–transplantation.
Table 1.
Clinical and demographic characteristics of SPKT patients stratified by the presence of AR in the first year post–transplantation.
| Variables | AR (n = 19) | No AR (n = 31) | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (median: 25–75%) | 50 (35.0–56.5) | 43.0 (34.5–53.0) | 0.289 |
| Recipient gender (male/female) | 10/9 | 19/12 | 0.547 |
| Donor gender (male/female) | 11/8 | 14/17 | 0.382 |
| BMI (median: 25–75%) | 24.2 (21.8–26.43) | 25.0 (20.8–27.8) | 0.818 |
| Urea, mg/dL (median: 25–75%) | 18.6 (16.1–27.2) | 18.5 (15.4–20.5) | 0.431 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL (median: 25–75%) | 1.36 (1.09–1.61) | 1.30 (1.02–1.55) | 0.516 |
| Glucose, mg/dL (median: 25–75%) | 104 (90.0–119.0) | 97.5 (88.0–116.0) | 0.382 |
| HbA1C, % (median: 25–75%) | 5.85 (5.33–6.70) | 5.70 (5.3–6.4) | 0.693 |
| Kidney graft cold ischemia time, min (±SD) | 816.7 (158.4) | 798.4 (173.9) | 0.772 |
| Pancreas graft cold ischemia time, min (±SD) | 677.4 (133.4) | 682.6 (137.2) | 0.697 |
| HLA-A and -B mismatches (median: 25%–75%) | 3.0 (3.0–4.0) | 3.0 (2.0–3.0) | 0.267 |
| HLA–DR mismatch (median: 25–75%) | 2.0 (1.5–2.0) | 2.0 (1.0–2.0) | 0.225 |
| Anti–MICA pretransplantation | 5 (26.3) | 1 (3.4) | 0.030 |
| Anti–MICA post-transplantation | 2 (11.1) | 4 (14.8) | 1.000 |
| Anti–MHC I post-transplantation | 5 (27.8) | 5 (18.5) | 0.489 |
| Anti–MHC II post-transplantation | 4 (22.3) | 6 (22.2) | 1.000 |
| Cytomegalovirus D+ | 11 (57.9) | 11 (35.5) | 0.121 |
| Cytomegalovirus R+ | 5 (26.3) | 19 (61.3) | 0.016 |
| Cytomegalovirus, R−/D+ | 8 (42.1) | 5 (16.1) | 0.042 |
| Cytomegalovirus infection, first-year post-transplantation | 3 (15.8) | 4 (12.9) | 1.000 |
| Pancreas and kidney graft AR | 1 (5.2) | ND | |
| Pancreas graft AR | 4 (21.1) | ND | |
| Kidney graft AR | 16 (84.2) | ND | |
| Immunosuppressive drugs (n (%)) | |||
| ATG | 19 (100) | 31 (100) | |
| Steroids | 19 (100) | 31 (100) | |
| Tacrolimus | 18 (94.7) | 30 (96.8) | |
| Mycophenolic acid | 19 (100) | 30 (96.8) | |
| Cyclosporine A | 1 (5.3) | 1 (3.2) | |
| Azathioprine | ND | 1 (3.2) | |
| Simulect | ND | 1 (3.2) | |
| Rituximab | ND | 1 (3.2) |
Bold p values indicate statistically different parameters. AR = acute rejection; ATG = antithymocyte globulin; BMI = body-mass index; D = donor; HLA = human leukocyte antigen; MICA = MHC class I-related sequence A; R = recipient; SD = standard deviation; SPKT = simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation. ND = no data available.
Table 2.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of individual covariates and their impact on the risk of cytomegalovirus infection.
Table 2.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of individual covariates and their impact on the risk of cytomegalovirus infection.
| Variables | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | p | HR (95% CI) | p | |
| Univariate analysis (n = 7) | ||||
| Valine mismatch 1 | 7.37 (1.47–36.9) | 0.015 | 5.32 (1.0–28.1) | 0.049 |
| MICA antibodies pretransplantation 2 | 0.04 (0.00–1381.6) | 0.546 | ||
| HLA mismatch 3 | ||||
| 4/6 | 1.39 (0.12–15.3) | 0.790 | ||
| 5/6 | 0.80 (0.07–8.76) | 0.851 | ||
| 6/6 | 1.74 (0.16–19.2) | 0.651 | ||
| Cytomegalovirus R−/D+ 4 | 4.29 (0.96–19.6) | 0.057 | 4.89 (0.86–27.9) | 0.074 |
| Kidney graft ischemia time | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 0.860 | ||
| Kidney graft AR | 1.61 (0.36–7.20) | 0.532 | ||
Reference categories: 1 No mismatch. 2 No donor-specific antibodies. 3 3/6 mismatch number (HLA-A, -B, and -DR). 4 Recipient cytomegalovirus+. CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio. Bold values indicate statistically significant effects.
Table 3.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of predictor variables in SPKT patients with acute kidney rejection.
Table 3.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of predictor variables in SPKT patients with acute kidney rejection.
| Variables | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | p | HR (95% CI) | p | |
| Univariate analysis (n = 16) | ||||
| Valine mismatch 1 | 4.00 (1.4–12.0) | 0.012 | 6.04 (1.68–21.7) | 0.006 |
| MICA antibodies pretransplantation 2 | 2.80 (0.89–8.7) | 0.077 | 3.40 (0.84–13.8) | 0.086 |
| HLA mismatch 3 | ||||
| 4/6 | 2.91 (0.32–26.0) | 0.340 | 3.65 (0.39–34.0) | 0.256 |
| 5/6 | 4.02 (0.49–32.8) | 0.193 | 5.34 (0.64–44.7) | 0.122 |
| 6/6 | 4.03 (0.45–36.1) | 0.212 | 3.11 (0.32–30.6) | 0.330 |
| HLA-DR mismatch 4 | 1.82 (0.58–5.64) | 0.300 | ||
| Gender mismatch 5 | 1.47 (0.51–4.20) | 0.480 | ||
| Cytomegalovirus infection 6 | 1.40 (0.40–4.90) | 0.590 | ||
| Kidney graft ischemia time | 1.00 (1.00–1.00) | 0.860 | ||
Acute kidney rejection (n = 16). Reference categories: 1 No mismatch. 2 No donor-specific antibodies. 3 3/6 mismatch number (HLA-A, -B, and -DR). 4 HLA-DR mismatch number (n = 0 or 1). 5 Female recipient and male donor. 6 No infection in the first year post-transplantation. Bold values indicate statistically significant effects.
Table 4.
Effect of Val129Met substitution and rs2596538GA on sMICA levels in SPKT recipients.
| Measurements, Days after Transplantation (± SD) | Val/Val | Val/Met | Met/Met | p * |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Val129Met | ||||
| 1st, 0.58 (0.90) 1 | 0.87 (0.75–1.44) | 1.22 (0.60–1.75) | <0.02 | 0.265 |
| 2nd, 98.5 (46.0) 2 | 0.42 (0.35–0.90) | 0.55 (0.53–0.88) | <0.02 | 0.007 |
| 3rd, 238.9 (72.5) 3 | 0.66 (0.40–0.75) | 0.50 (0.45–1.08) | <0.02 | 0.035 |
| Median values at one year post-transplantation 4 | 0.69 (0.49–0.87) | 1.04 (0.71–1.19) | <0.02 | 0.005 |
| Healthy individuals ** | 1.16 (0.88–1.54) | 0.55 (0.44–0.62) | 0.00 (0.00–0.04) | <0.001 |
| rs2596538GA | GG | GA | AA | |
| First, 0.58 (0.9) 1 | 0.87 (0.65–1.59) | 0.87 (0.81–1.64) | <0.02 | 0.241 |
| Second, 98.5 (46.0) 2 | 0.49 (0.42–0.76) | 0.55 (0.45–0.72) | 0.00 (0.00–0.45) | 0.103 |
| Third, 238.9 (72.5) 3 | 0.58 (0.32–1.17) | 0.63 (0.47–0.89) | <0.02 | 0.036 |
| Median values at one year post-transplantation 4 | 0.76 (0.60–1.17) | 0.71 (0.47–0.97) | <0.02 | 0.075 |
| Healthy individuals ** | 1.37 (0.91–1.55) | 0.58 (0.43–0.83) | 0.00 (0.00–0.06) | <0.001 |
sMICA values are presented as medians (25%–75%). Bold values indicate statistically significant effects. 1 First measurement: Val129Met Val/Val (n = 6), Val/Met (n = 6), and Met/Met (n = 1); rs2596528 GG (n = 7), GA (n = 5), and AA (n = 1). 2 Second measurement: Val129Met Val/Val (n = 8), Val/Met (n = 7), and Met/Met (n = 4); rs2596538 GG (n = 7), GA (n = 7), and AA (n = 5). 3 Third measurement: Val129Met Val/Val (n = 6), Val/Met (n = 5), and Met/Met (n = 3); rs2596538 GG (n = 4), GA (n = 7), and AA (n = 3). 4 Median values at one year post-transplantation: Val129Met Val/Val (n = 10), Val/Met (n = 7), and Met/Met (n = 4); rs2596538 GG (n = 8), GA (n = 8), and AA (n = 5). sMICA-detection limit: >0.02 pg/mL. * Kruskal–Wallis test. ** Healthy voluntary individuals: Val/Val (n = 20), Val/Met (n = 11), and Met/Met (n = 7); rs2596358, GG (n = 16), GA (n = 23), and AA (n = 5). sMICA = soluble MICA.
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Michita, R.T.; Chies, J.A.B.; Schramm, S.; Horn, P.A.; Heinemann, F.M.; Wunsch, A.; Viebahn, R.; Schenker, P.; Rebmann, V. A Valine Mismatch at Position 129 of MICA Is an Independent Predictor of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Acute Kidney Rejection in Simultaneous Pancreas–Kidney Transplantation Recipients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092618
AMA Style
Michita RT, Chies JAB, Schramm S, Horn PA, Heinemann FM, Wunsch A, Viebahn R, Schenker P, Rebmann V. A Valine Mismatch at Position 129 of MICA Is an Independent Predictor of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Acute Kidney Rejection in Simultaneous Pancreas–Kidney Transplantation Recipients. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(9):2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092618
Chicago/Turabian StyleMichita, Rafael Tomoya, José Artur Bogo Chies, Sabine Schramm, Peter A. Horn, Falko M. Heinemann, Andreas Wunsch, Richard Viebahn, Peter Schenker, and Vera Rebmann. 2018. "A Valine Mismatch at Position 129 of MICA Is an Independent Predictor of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Acute Kidney Rejection in Simultaneous Pancreas–Kidney Transplantation Recipients" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 9: 2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092618
APA StyleMichita, R. T., Chies, J. A. B., Schramm, S., Horn, P. A., Heinemann, F. M., Wunsch, A., Viebahn, R., Schenker, P., & Rebmann, V. (2018). A Valine Mismatch at Position 129 of MICA Is an Independent Predictor of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Acute Kidney Rejection in Simultaneous Pancreas–Kidney Transplantation Recipients. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(9), 2618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092618
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
