Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Analysis of DCL, AGO, and RDR Gene Families in Pepper (Capsicum Annuum L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Different Natural Selection Pressures on the atpF Gene in Evergreen Sclerophyllous and Deciduous Oak Species: Evidence from Comparative Analysis of the Complete Chloroplast Genome of Quercus aquifolioides with Other Oak Species
Previous Article in Journal
LGR5 and BMI1 Increase Pig Intestinal Epithelial Cell Proliferation by Stimulating WNT/β-Catenin Signaling
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence of Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) (Sapindales: Simaroubaceae), an Important Pantropical Tree
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms19041037
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Whole-Genome Comparison Reveals Heterogeneous Divergence and Mutation Hotspots in Chloroplast Genome of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver

by
Wencai Wang
1,
Siyun Chen
2 and
Xianzhi Zhang
3,*
1
Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510000, China
2
Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China
3
College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(4), 1037; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041037
Submission received: 1 March 2018 / Revised: 24 March 2018 / Accepted: 25 March 2018 / Published: 30 March 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chloroplast)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Eucommia ulmoides (E. ulmoides), the sole species of Eucommiaceae with high importance of medicinal and industrial values, is a Tertiary relic plant that is endemic to China. However, the population genetics study of E. ulmoides lags far behind largely due to the scarcity of genomic data. In this study, one complete chloroplast (cp) genome of E. ulmoides was generated via the genome skimming approach and compared to another available E. ulmoides cp genome comprehensively at the genome scale. We found that the structure of the cp genome in E. ulmoides was highly consistent with genome size variation which might result from DNA repeat variations in the two E. ulmoides cp genomes. Heterogeneous sequence divergence patterns were revealed in different regions of the E. ulmoides cp genomes, with most (59 out of 75) of the detected SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) located in the gene regions, whereas most (50 out of 80) of the indels (insertions/deletions) were distributed in the intergenic spacers. In addition, we also found that all the 40 putative coding-region-located SNPs were synonymous mutations. A total of 71 polymorphic cpDNA fragments were further identified, among which 20 loci were selected as potential molecular markers for subsequent population genetics studies of E. ulmoides. Moreover, eight polymorphic cpSSR loci were also developed. The sister relationship between E. ulmoides and Aucuba japonica in Garryales was also confirmed based on the cp phylogenomic analyses. Overall, this study will shed new light on the conservation genomics of this endangered plant in the future.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

There are profuse paleoendemics (e.g., Eucommiaceae) and/or phylogenetically primitive taxa (e.g., Cercidiphyllaceae) in China due to the glaciation refuge role played during the Quaternary period [1,2]. Unfortunately, up to circa 5000 flora species are currently endangered in China, some of which have already become extinct [3]. Many plant species with important medicinal values have also been threatened seriously due to the increasing demand for raw materials of medicines, over-harvesting and habitat-loss [4,5,6]. Conservation of medicinal plants has become one of the most urgent issues faced today in China.
Eucommia ulmoides Oliver, a dioecious woody plant endemic to China, is the sole species in the family Eucommiaceae [7]. E. ulmoides has been widely cultivated and used as a herbal drug to reduce blood pressure and strengthen the body in central and southern China for at least 2000 years [8,9]. E. ulmoides is also well-known as a “hardy rubber” tree that produces trans-polyisoprene rubber (i.e., gutta or Eu-rubber) in the leaves, bark, and pericarp [10,11]. It has been shown that Eucommia fossils occurred widely across the Northern Hemisphere from the Palaeocene onwards [12], which indicates that E. ulmoides is a representative model of Tertiary relict species, i.e., living from Tertiary to present. However, E. ulmoides may have been extinct in the wild and already listed in the Red List of Endangered Plant Species in China probably due to exhaustive human exploration [13,14]. Therefore, effective strategies are urgently needed to conserve this rare and endangered medicinal plant.
To date, studies on E. ulmoides have mainly focused on the morphological variation and the natural products [8,15]. Molecular and population genetics studies of this valuable tree lag behind largely due to limited DNA sequence resources [16,17]. Recently, nuclear microsatellites (nrSSR) were developed to investigate the genetic diversity of E. ulmoides [18,19]. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) have been used to construct genetic maps of E. ulmoides [20,21]. The genetic markers of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), chloroplast microsatellite (cpSSR) and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) have also been uncovered [22,23,24]. Nevertheless, the variability of these developed fingerprinting markers in E. ulmoides is relatively low, with limited population genetics information. A new and promising marker type i.e., Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) has gained high popularity during the last two decades [25,26]. With the on-going progress of high throughput sequencing techniques, it has become convenient to collect large-scale SNP data for genetic analyses [27,28]. Using SNP markers in conservation genetics studies of endangered plants has attracted much attention; for instance, in Pinus ponderosa Douglas ex Lawson [29], and Sciadopitys verticillata (Thunb.) Siebold and Zucc [30].
Chloroplast (cp) DNA sequences have been extensively used in the studies of plant population genetics and molecular phylogenetics [31,32,33]. Typically, cp genomes of land plants have a quadripartite structure with a pair of inverted repeats (IRs) separating a large single-copy (LSC) region and a small single-copy (SSC) region, ranging from 115 to 165 kilobase (kb) [34]. The cp genomes in general are inherited uniparentally, mostly maternally and are essentially recombination-free, leading to a smaller effective population size and a shorter coalescent time than the nuclear genomes [35]. Recently Wang et al. [17] reported a cp genome sequence of E. ulmoides with a length of 163,341 bp. Clearly, the availability of additional sequenced cp genomes from E. ulmoides would aid our understanding of the cp genome-wide variation at the individual level. Through comparative genomic analysis, polymorphic cpDNA loci with plentiful SNPs and indels i.e., nucleotide insertions and deletions can also be detected, which would be useful for further population genetics studies of E. ulmoides.
Genome skimming is currently one of the most economical techniques to obtain plastome sequences [36], through which obtaining complete cp genomes for plant phylogenomics inference becomes convenient [37]. In this study, we generated and characterized one complete cp genome of E. ulmoides using the genome skimming approach. By comparing the cp genome generated in this study and the one published previously [17], our main goals were to: (1) test whether the cp genomes in E. ulmoides show structural rearrangements; (2) reveal the divergence pattern of the cp genome in E. ulmoides; (3) identify highly variable cp genome-wide markers for subsequent population genetics studies of E. ulmoides.

2. Results

2.1. Chloroplast Genome Variation in E. ulmoides

About 20 million clean reads (4.72 Gb data) were generated from genome skimming sequencing. Two assembly methods (CLC Genomics Workbench and SPAdes software) both obtained the complete cp genome of E. ulmoides with high genome coverage (>180×) and there is no difference between the two assembled sequences, suggesting a high-quality cp genome map was achieved. The final cp genome size was determined to be 163,586 bp, similar to the previously published one (KU204775) (Table 1). The number of protein-coding genes, tRNA genes and rRNA genes, were the same as those in the available E. ulmoides cp genome (KU204775). We have deposited the newly sequenced E. ulmoides cp genome in GenBank with accession number MF766010. The genome skimming sequencing reads have also been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with the accession number PRJNA399774.
The whole genome alignments from MAFFT (Figure 1A) and MAUVE (Figure 1B) were consistent. There were no large genome rearrangements in the two cp genomes, which indicated that the cp genome structure in E. ulmoides is highly conserved and perfectly syntenic (Figure 1). Interestingly, small-scale nucleotide insertions and deletions were detected in the E. ulmoides cp genome. We found 15 insertions with more than ten nucleotides (11–111 bp) in the two cp genomes (Table 2). Five deletions in the range of 16–90 bp were also uncovered. It is worth noting that all of these insertions and deletions were involved in repeat sequence expansions and contractions (Table 2). Furthermore, across the entire cp genome of E. ulmoides, the sequence divergences were not uniform but highly heterogeneous (Figure 1).

2.2. Molecular Marker Development

A total of 155 mutational events, including 75 nucleotide substitutions (SNPs) and 80 nucleotide indels (insertions and deletions), were detected within 71 loci of the cp genome in E. ulmoides (Figure 2). There were 98 mutations (51 SNPs and 47 indels) and 15 mutations (12 SNPs and 3 indels) in the LSC and SSC regions, respectively. In addition, 42 mutations (12 SNPs and 30 indels) were located in the IR region. Distribution patterns of SNPs and indels differed largely in the cp genic and intergenic regions of E. ulmoides. Most of the SNPs (59 out of 75) were found in the gene sequences, including 31 protein-coding genes and one tRNA gene. In contrast, indels were mainly (50 out of 80) distributed in the intergenic spacers (Figure 2). Upon further investigation of SNPs and indels in the nine intron-containing protein-coding genes (atpF, ndhA, ndhB, rpl2, rpl16, rpoC1, rps12, rps16, ycf3), we found that all the mutations were located in the intron regions. In all, 40 SNPs and 14 indels occurred in the plastid-coding sequence (CDS) regions.
The proportion of variability in the 71 polymorphic loci ranged from 0.03% to 1.55% with a mean value of 0.37% (Figure 3). The mutation rates in most (53 out of 71) of the loci were between 0.10 and 1.00%. Five of these DNA fragments i.e., atpF-atpA, rps18-rpl33, psaJ, infA and rpl32 had variations exceeding 1.00%. Considering the relatively high percentage of variability and convenience for primer design in PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) and sequencing experiments, we chose 20 highly variable loci with length of 200–1500 bp as potential molecular markers for subsequent population genetic studies (Table 3). The percentage of variations in these 20 loci all exceeded 0.25%, among which 16 had a percentage of variable characters (VCs) greater than 0.30% (Table 3).
Through SSR analysis, we found a total of 31 SSR loci in the newly assembled E. ulmoides cp genome, among which 27 were shared by the two genomes. Further detection revealed that eight cpSSR loci were polymorphic in E. ulmoides (Table 4). All the polymorphic cpSSR loci were mononucleotide repeats, ranging from 10–15 bp in length. Five polymorphic cpSSR loci were located in the LSC region, with another three ones in the IR regions (Table 4).

2.3. SNP Calling and Phylogenomic Inference

The SNPs calling analysis using the previously published E. ulmoides cp genome (KU204775) as reference revealed a total of 75 SNPs. This result of SNP occurrence was consistent with the aforementioned molecular marker analysis (75 SNPs, Figure 2), which indicated that the detected SNPs were really present in different individuals of E. ulmoides. Further examination of the 40 SNPs in the CDS regions suggested that all these SNPs were synonymous, i.e., no amino acid change at the protein level. There were 34 transitions and six transversions in the protein-coding region SNPs. The average frequency of SNPs occurrence in the E. ulmoides cp genome was calculated as 0.46 per kb.
The final length of the supermatrix dataset contained 96,894 unambiguously aligned nucleotide characters. Three methods produced a congruent phylogenetic tree, shown in Figure 4. Eudicots, monocots and magnoliids were all highly supported to be monophyletic (94–100/90–100/1.00). Magnoliids diverged firstly, followed by monocots, then Chloranthales and eudicots, with relatively low (60–72/74–80/0.90–0.99) support values. Two E. ulmoides individuals clustered together with high statistical support values (100/100/1.00), which was subsequently sister to Aucuba japonica Thunb. in the Garryales clade with high statistical support values (100/100/1.00). Garryales, Gentianales and Solanales formed as the highly supported lamiids lineage (100/100/1.00), resolved as (Garryales, (Gentianales, Solanales)). Asterales and Dipsacales formed a highly supported clade, campanulids (100/100/1.00), which was sister to lamiids (100/100/1.00) in asterids. Ericales was resolved as the basal most group in the asterids lineage (100/100/1.00). Brassicales, Malvales, Myrtales and Sapindales clustered in the malvids clade (95/98/1.00) with resolution as (((Brassicales, Malvales), Sapindales), Myrtales). Fabales, Malpighiales and Rosales were located in the fabids lineage (98/100/1.00), which was a sister clade to malvids in rosdis.

3. Discussion

3.1. Conserved Chloroplast Genome Structure in E. ulmoides

Land plant cp genomes are generally inherited as a haplotype with no recombination, providing useful genetic information to trace relationships between different species [35,38]. Within species cp genome structure was highly conserved [39]. As expected, it is the case in E. ulmoides in terms of the contained genes and coding regions in the cp genomes (Table 1). Further whole-genome alignments suggested that the two cp genomes of E. ulmoides did not show genome rearrangement having the same linear gene order (Figure 1). As such it is reasonable to use cp genomes for subsequent conservation genomics studies on E. ulmoides.
It is noteworthy that the newly sequenced cp genome of E. ulmoides (163,586 bp) in this study is 245 bp larger than that of the previously reported one (163,341 bp, [17]) (Table 1). The cp genome size variation within different individuals of the same species has been reported for several other plants, such as in Camptotheca acuminate Decne. with its size varied as 157,806 bp [40], 157,877 bp [41] and 162,382 bp [42]. Nuclear genome size variations in plants are mostly caused by the repeats activities (e.g., expansions/contractions) via illegitimate recombination in addition to polyploidy [43,44,45,46,47]. In the two E. ulmoides cp genomes, we detected 15 insertions and five deletions, with more than 10 nucleotides for each (Table 2). All these sequences were observed to be part of or the whole DNA repeats. For instance, the repeat sequences in rps16-trnT(UGU), psbD-trnT(GGU), rps12-rpl20 and accD-trnM(CAU) have been detected in the study of Wang et al. [17] as well. Therefore, potentially the illegitimate recombination between repeat regions of E. ulmoides cp genome may contribute to the cp genome size variation.

3.2. Heterogeneous Divergence in E. ulmoides Chloroplast Genome

Heterogenous divergence patterns in cp genomes have been reported in several plant groups, such as in Actinidiaceae [37] and in Poaceae [48]. The alignment of the two available cp genomes of E. ulmoides revealed highly heterogeneous sequence divergences within this species (Figure 1 and Figure 2). All the identified SNPs and indels from the intron-containing protein-coding genes were located in the intron regions. Due to natural selection CDS regions are in general more conserved than non-coding regions (i.e., intergenic sequences and introns) [49]. In addition, nucleotide substitutions likely have less destructive effect to the integrity of open reading frame (ORF) than indels [50]. We, thus, speculated that this functional constraint may lead to the contrasting occurrences of SNPs and indels in the E. ulmoides cp genomes.
The occurrence of synonymous SNPs was more abundant than that of the non-synonymous SNPs in CDS regions because of selection process [51,52]. As expected, all the SNPs detected in protein-coding regions were synonymous. Moreover, since the transitions rather than the transversions usually would generate more synonymous mutations in the CDS the transitions SNPs are more easily retained than the transversion ones [52,53]. In this study we found that the transition SNPs (34) were indeed more frequently detected than the transversion SNPs (6). Previous studies have reported a high level of nuclear genetic diversity at the population level of E. ulmoides [18,54]. In this study, we revealed that the frequency of plastid SNPs were 0.46 per kb at the whole cp genome level, lower than the average of 1.02 per kb in the nuclear genes of E. ulmoides [54]. The difference of SNP frequency between the cp genome and the nuclear genes could be caused by insufficient sampling in this study and/or different variation rates between the plastid and nuclear sequences.

3.3. Mutation Hotspots in E. ulmoides Chloroplast Genome

In general, protein-coding genes in the cp genome have lower sequence variation than the non-coding loci, for instance in bamboos [55] and mimosoid legume [56]. However, an accelerated variation rate of some plastid protein-coding genes has been reported, such as the psb in Poaceae [51], rps in Saxifragales [57], and accD and rpl20 in Actinidiaceae [37]. In E. ulmoides, we found three protein-coding genes (infA, psaJ and rpl32) that varied the most quickly, all having variations exceeding 1.2% (Figure 3). The gene infA encodes translation initiation factor 1 and has been found missing in cp genomes of several plant lineages, e.g., in rosids [58]. The other two genes i.e., psaJ and rpl32 code for photosystem I protein J and ribosomal protein L32, respectively, both of which are short in length with the former having 129 bp and the latter 138 bp (this study and [17]). The relatively high level of variation of these genes in E. ulmoides indicates that they are less constrained. Abnormal DNA replication, repair or recombination [59,60] may lead to the elevated divergence of these genes.
The genetic markers of SSR, AFLP and SRAP have been developed and used for the population genetics studies of E. ulmoides [18,20,21]. However, the above fingerprinting markers [23,24] may provide insufficient genetic information to resolve the population structure and history of E. ulmoides. The relationships among natural and cultivated populations of E. ulmoides are elusive at present [18,24]. SNP markers are ample in plant cp genomes, making them useful candidates for population genetics studies. Using cp genome SNP markers has widely received attention during the past few years with the advances of high throughput sequencing techniques [61,62]. Highly variable cpDNA fragments have been mined for phylogenetic and population genetic studies in several species using cp genomes data, such as in kiwifruit [37] and temperate woody bamboos [55]. Given that it would be easy to amplify and sequence DNA fragments with length from circa 200 to 1500 bp using Sanger sequencing method [62,63], we thus chose 20 cpDNA loci with relatively high genetic divergences as potential molecular markers (Table 3) for subsequent population genomics studies of E. ulmoides. These selected plastid genome-wide loci would genetically be informative for uncovering the genetic relationships among the natural and cultivated E. ulmoides populations.
Additionally, 27 cpSSR loci identified by Wang et al. [17] were also confirmed in our SSR analysis, among which eight were further mined as polymorphic cpSSR loci (Table 4). Given that polymorphic cpSSR loci could be applied as useful markers to meet certain study purposes under the circumstances of limited budget [64,65], the newly developed polymorphic cpSSR loci in E. ulmoides here would be potential genetic markers to facilitate subsequent population genetics studies in the future.

3.4. Phylogenomic Validation of E. ulmoides

The newly obtained E. ulmoides cp genome was further validated via phylogenomic analyses using 34 complete plastomes from 10 major lineages of angiosperms. The resulting phylogenomic tree highly supported the clade of two E. ulmoides cp genomes (Figure 4), confirming the validity of the assembled and annotated cp genome of E. ulmoides in this study. The sister relationship between E. ulmoides and A. japonica in the Garryales clade was highly supported, which is consistent with the results derived from five organellar genes [66] and 36 plastid genes [17], supporting the classification of E. ulmoides (Eucommiaceae) in the updated APG IV system [67]. E. ulmoides and A. japonica are both woody and have unisexual flowers in separate individuals, which seem to be morphological synapomorphies for the order Garryales [68]. An average of 92.6% identities between 78 common unique cp protein-coding genes in E. ulmoides and A. japonica were also detected, suggesting a high similarity between the two species at the molecular level. Garryales was shown to be closely related to the clade of (Gentianales + Solanales) in lamiids, in line with the APG IV system [67].
All 20 sampled orders were highly supported to be monophyletic separately (Figure 4), agreeing with the APG IV system [67]. Within eudicots two large sister clades i.e., asterids and rosids were uncovered, and the relationships among these two lineages were highly resolved as ((campanulids, lamiids), Ericales) and ((fabids, malvids), Vitales), respectively as stated previously [69]. The branching patterns of species within campanulids and lamiids are consistent with recent studies [66,70] as (((Gentianales, Solanales), Garryales), (Asterales, Dipsacales)). Our analyses also resolved the phylogenetic relationships within fabids and malvids as ((((Brassicales, Malvales), Sapindales), Myrtales), ((Fabales, Rosales), Malpighiales)), consistent with the results of previous studies [17,69]. It is noteworthy that the branching orders of magnoliids, monocots, Chloranthales and eudicots only obtained low-level support values here (Figure 4). Further studies with expanded taxon samples are expected to confirm the phylogeny of these lineages. Moreover, plastome is inherited uniparentally in general, which might introduce biases to species phylogeny inference [71,72]. Analyses using orthologous nuclear genes are also needed for studying the evolutionary history of E. ulmoides among the flowering plants [54].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and DNA Sequencing

Fresh healthy leaves were collected from an adult male individual of E. ulmoides growing in the Arboretum of Northwest Agricuture and Forest University in Yangling, Shanxi, China, in April 2015. After collection, the leaves were immediately immersed in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C until use. The voucher specimen of this tree was deposited at the Trees Herbarium of Northwest A and F University with accession number ZXZ15027.
Total genomic DNA was extracted by the CTAB method [73]. Paired-end (PE) libraries with insert size circa 500 bp were constructed from fragmented genomic DNA based on standard Illumina protocols (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Prepared library was then sequenced for PE 100 bp read length on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) in Shenzhen, China.

4.2. Genome Assembly and Annotation

Fastq format PE reads were supplied with adaptor sequences removed. Poor quality reads with phred scores lower than 20 for more than 10% of their bases were also removed. Two independent methods were used to assemble the E. ulmoides cp genome. (1) The cp genome was de novo assembled using the CLC Genomics Workbench v7.5 software (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark) based on the clean reads. After discarding contigs with length <300 bp and sequences with coverage <50, the remaining contigs were searched against the available cp genome of E. ulmoides (GenBank accession number KU204775) that used as the reference by BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) with e-value <10−5. Aligned contigs with ≥90% similarity and query coverage were determined as cpDNA sequences and ordered according to the reference genome. Small gaps were filled using PE clean reads as conducted in Wang et al. [37]. (2) The clean reads were firstly mapped to the reference cp genome of E. ulmoides to determine the proportion of cpDNA using Bowtie v2.3.1 program [74] with a maximum of 3 mismatches. Subsequently, we applied SPAdes v3.9 software [75] with default setting to assemble the cp genome using the determined cpDNA clean reads.
DOGMA software [76] was used for initial cp genome annotation. Start/stop codons and intron/exon boundaries were checked and adjusted manually when necessary by comparing to the reference genome. tRNA genes were confirmed based on tRNAscan-SE 1.21 [77].

4.3. Genome-Wide Comparison and Divergent Hotspot Identification

The previously published cp genome of E. ulmoides (accession number: KU204775) was downloaded from GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). This genome was aligned with the E. ulmoides cp genome described herein, using MAFFT program [78] and MAUVE software [79], respectively, and manually adjusted where necessary. The obtained pairwise alignment of the cp genomes was visualized in Geneious v9.0 [80]. Moreover, given the genome repeat sequences expansion and contraction may result in genome size variation [81], we examined the DNA insertions and deletions in repeat regions of the two E. ulmoides cp genomes.
The two E. ulmoides cp genomes were analyzed to identify molecular markers that can be selected in subsequent population genetic studies. We firstly extracted both the genic and intergenic DNA fragments in each cp genome using the “Extract Sequences” option in DOGMA [76]. Then the homologous loci were aligned individually by MUSCLE program (http://www.drive5.com/muscle/) [82] implemented in Geneious v9.0 [80] with default settings. Manual adjustments were made for the alignments where necessary. The proportion of mutational events for each genic and intergenic locus was calculated as follows: the proportion of variation = ((NS + ID)/L) × 100, where NS = the number of nucleotide substitutions (SNPs), ID = the number of indels (insertions and deletions), L = the aligned sequence length.
Polymorphic cpSSR loci were further mined by genome comparison. Firstly, SSRs in the newly sequenced E. ulmoides cp genome were detected by MISA perl script (http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/). The parameter of minimum repeat unit was set as 10 for mono-, 6 for di-, and 5 for tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide SSRs [83]. Then, all the identified SSR loci were compared to the 29 cpSSR loci of Wang et al. [17] to develop polymorphic cpSSR markers in E. ulmoides.

4.4. SNPs Validation and Phylogenomic Analyses

To confirm the SNPs identified by the aforementioned cp genome alignment, we here mapped the genome skimming clean reads generated in this study to the previously published E. ulmoides cp genome (KU204775) [17] for SNP calling. Picard-tools v1.41 (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) and samtools v0.1.18 [84] were applied to sort and remove duplicated reads and merge the bam alignment results. GATK3 software [85] was further used to perform SNPs identification. Raw vcf files were filtered with GATK standard filter method and other parameters were set as defaults. Moreover, to reveal if the coding region SNPs detected in E. ulmoides cp genome caused amino acid substitution on protein level, we firstly translated each protein-coding gene into amino acids in Geneious v9.0 [80]. Then the protein sequences of each gene were aligned, respectively using MUSCLE [82]. The mutational events were checked to uncover the synonymous and nonsynonymous SNPs and the nucleotide transitions and transversions.
Phylogenomic analyses were also conducted to validate the newly assembled and annotated E. ulmoides cp genome. 34 plastomes representing 10 major lineages of angiosperms (Table S1) were included for phylogenomic analyses. Amborella trichopoda from basal angiosperm lineages was defined as outgroup according to previous studies [66,67]. 80 unique plastid protein-coding genes of E. ulmoides (Table S2) were used for the phylogenetic inferences. Each gene was aligned individually by MUSCLE [82] in Geneious v9.0 [80], and then concatenated as a supermatrix. Gaps were not included in the dataset.
Three methods i.e., maximum parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian inference (BI) were used for phylogenetic reconstruction. We performed parsimony heuristic tree searches in PAUP v4.0b10 [86] with parameters set as 1000 random addition sequence replicates, tree bisection and reconnection (TBR) branch swapping, and MulTrees option in effect. 1000 bootstrap replicates [87] were calculated to evaluate the branch support (MPBS) of the MP tree. RAxML v.8.2.8 [88] and MrBayes 3.2.6 [89] in the CIPRES Science Gateway v3.3.3 [90] were applied for ML and BI analyses, respectively. Supermatrix was partitioned by genes and GTR + G model of nucleotide substitution was used. For the ML tree we conducted 1000 fast bootstrap ML reps to assess the support values (MLBS) of internal nodes. In Bayesian analysis two runs with four chains were carried out up to 50,000,000 generations, sampling one tree every 1000 generations till convergence, i.e., the average standard deviation of split frequencies <0.01. We discarded the first 25% of trees as burn-in, and used the remaining trees to estimate the majority-rule consensus BI tree and posterior probabilities (PP).

5. Conclusions

In summary, in the present study we generated one complete cp genome of E. ulmoides using the genome skimming approach. Through comprehensive genome-wide comparative analyses we found that the cp genomes within E. ulmoides were highly conserved in terms of structure and content. Nevertheless, obviously heterogeneous sequence divergences were revealed in different regions of the E. ulmoides cp genome. A total of 20 polymorphic DNA fragments and eight SSR loci have been identified as potential cpDNA markers for subsequent population genetics studies of this tree species. The phylogenetic placement of E. ulmoides in angiosperms was robustly resolved as well based on the cp genomes data, strongly supporting the sister relationship between E. ulmoides and A. japonica in the asterids lineage. The data presented here will aid further conservation genomic studies and facilitate the development of plastid genetic engineering for E. ulmoides.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/4/1037/s1. Table S1: Taxa and GenBank accession numbers included in the phylogenomic analyses, Table S2: List of 80 unique plastid protein-coding genes of Eucommia ulmoides included in the phylogenomic analyses.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Zhirong Zhang for the help in the experiment performance. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600173) and the Basic Science Fund of Northwest A&F University (2452016052).

Author Contributions

Wencai Wang and Xianzhi Zhang conceived and designed the experiments; Wencai Wang performed the experiments; Siyun Chen and Xianzhi Zhang analyzed the data; Xianzhi Zhang contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Wencai Wang and Xianzhi Zhang wrote the paper. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, H. Plant diversity and conservation in China: Planning a strategic bioresource for a sustainable future. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2011, 166, 282–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, J.; Ouyang, Z.; Pimm, S.L.; Raven, P.H.; Wang, X.; Miao, H.; Han, N. Protecting China’s biodiversity. Science 2003, 300, 1240–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lópezpujol, J.; Zhang, F.M.; Ge, S. Plant biodiversity in China: Richly varied, endangered, and in need of conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 2006, 15, 3983–4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gu, J. Conservation of plant diversity in China: Achievements, prospects and concerns. Biol. Conserv. 1998, 85, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, S.L.; Hua, Y.; Luo, H.M.; Wu, Q.; Li, C.F.; Steinmetz, A. Conservation and sustainable use of medicinal plants: Problems, progress, and prospects. Chin. Med. 2016, 11, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Huang, L.; Yang, B.; Wang, M.; Fu, G. An approach to some problems on utilization of medicinal plant resource in China. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 1999, 24, 70–73. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, Z.Y.; Zhang, H.D.; Turland, N.J. Eucommiaceae. In Flora of China; Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H., Hong, D.Y., Eds.; Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden: Beijing, China, 2003; p. 43. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kawasaki, T.; Uezono, K.; Nakazawa, Y. Antihypertensive mechanism of food for specified health use: “Eucommia leaf glycoside” and its clinical application. J. Health Sci. 2000, 22, 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, H.; Hongyan, D.U.; Tana, W. Advances in research on biotechnology breeding of Eucommia ulmoides. Hunan For. Sci. Technol. 2016, 43, 132–136. [Google Scholar]
  10. Suzuki, N.; Uefuji, H.; Nishikawa, T.; Mukai, Y.; Yamashita, A.; Hattori, M.; Ogasawara, N.; Bamba, T.; Fukusaki, E.; Kobayashi, A. Construction and analysis of EST libraries of the trans-polyisoprene producing plant, Eucommia ulmoides Oliver. Planta 2012, 236, 1405–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Du, H.Y.; Hu, W.Z.; Yu, R. The Report on Development of China’s Eucommia Rubber Resources and Industry (2014-2015); Social Sciences Academic Press: Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  12. Manchester, S.R.; Chen, Z.D.; An-Ming, L.U.; Uemura, K. Eastern Asian endemic seed plant genera and their paleogeographic history throughout the Northern Hemisphere. J. Syst. Evol. 2009, 47, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mabberley, D.J. The Plant Book; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fu, L.G.; Jin, J.M. Red List of Endangered Plants in China; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  15. Du, H.Y. China Eucommia Pictorial; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, L.; Du, H.; Wuyun, T.N. Genome-wide identification of microRNAs and their targets in the leaves and fruits of Eucommia ulmoides using high-throughput sequencing. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, L.; Wuyun, T.N.; Du, H.; Wang, D.; Cao, D. Complete chloroplast genome sequences of Eucommia ulmoides: Genome structure and evolution. Tree Genet. Genomes 2016, 12, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, J.; Xing, C.; Tian, H.; Yao, X. Microsatellite genetic variation in the Chinese endemic Eucommia ulmoides (Eucommiaceae): Implications for conservation. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2013, 173, 775–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, W.R.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Wu, C.H.; Ye, S.; Yuan, W.J. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for Eucommia ulmoides (Eucommiaceae), an endangered tree, using next-generation sequencing. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Li, Z.; Wei, J.; Jin, C.; Liu, M. A molecular genetic linkage map of Eucommia ulmoides and quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis for growth traits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 2053–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, D.; Li, Y.; Li, L.; Wei, Y.; Li, Z. The first genetic linkage map of Eucommia ulmoides. J. Genet. 2014, 93, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Wang, A.Q.; Huang, L.Q.; Shao, A.J.; Cui, G.H.; Chen, M.; Tong, C.H. Genetic diversity of Eucommia ulmoides by RAPD analysis. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 2006, 31, 1583–1586. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yao, X.; Deng, J.; Huang, H. Genetic diversity in Eucommia ulmoides (Eucommiaceae), an endangered traditional Chinese medicinal plant. Conserv. Genet. 2012, 13, 1499–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, J.; Wang, Y.; Peng, L.; Ru, M.; Liang, Z.S. Genetic diversity and population structure of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver, an endangered medicinal plant in China. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 2471–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vignal, A.; Milan, D.; Sancristobal, M.; Eggen, A. A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2002, 34, 275–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bernardi, J.; Mazza, R.; Caruso, P.; Reforgiato, R.G.; Marocco, A.; Licciardello, C. Use of an expressed sequence tag-based method for single nucleotide polymorphism identification and discrimination of Citrus species and cultivars. Mol. Breed. 2013, 31, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Elshire, R.J.; Glaubitz, J.C.; Sun, Q.; Poland, J.A.; Kawamoto, K.; Buckler, E.S.; Mitchell, S.E. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kess, T.; Gross, J.; Harper, F.; Boulding, E.G. Low-cost ddRAD method of SNP discovery and genotyping applied to the periwinkle Littorina saxatilis. J. Molluscan Stud. 2016, 82, eyv042. [Google Scholar]
  29. Potter, K.M.; Hipkins, V.D.; Mahalovich, M.F.; Means, R.E. Nuclear genetic variation across the range of ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa): Phylogeographic, taxonomic and conservation implications. Tree Genet. Genomes 2015, 11, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Worth, J.R.P.; Yokogawa, M.; Pérez-Figueroa, A.; Tsumura, Y.; Tomaru, N.; Janes, J.K.; Isagi, Y. Conflict in outcomes for conservation based on population genetic diversity and genetic divergence approaches: A case study in the Japanese relictual conifer Sciadopitys verticillata (Sciadopityaceae). Conserv. Genet. 2014, 15, 1243–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chung, S.M.; Staub, J.E.; Lebeda, A.; Paris, H.S. Consensus chloroplast primer analysis: A molecular tool for evolutionary studies in Cucurbitaceae. In Proceedings of the Progress in Cucurbit Genetics and Breeding Research, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 12–17 July 2004. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ahmed, I.; Matthews, P.J.; Biggs, P.J.; Naeem, M.; Mclenachan, P.A.; Lockhart, P.J. Identification of chloroplast genome loci suitable for high-resolution phylogeographic studies of Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott (Araceae) and closely related taxa. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2013, 13, 929–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, Y.; Du, L.; Ao, L.; Chen, J.; Li, W.; Hu, W.; Wei, Z.; Kim, K.; Lee, S.C.; Yang, T.J. The complete chloroplast genome sequences of five Epimedium species: Lights into phylogenetic and taxonomic analyses. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Raubeson, L.A.; Jansen, R.K. Chloroplast genomes of plants. In Plant Diversity and Evolution: Genotypic and Phenotypic Variation in Higher Plants; Henry, R.J., Ed.; CABI: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 45–68. [Google Scholar]
  35. Birky, C.W., Jr. Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: Mechanisms and evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 92, 11331–11338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Straub, S.C.; Parks, M.; Weitemier, K.; Fishbein, M.; Cronn, R.C.; Liston, A. Navigating the tip of the genomic iceberg: Next-generation sequencing for plant systematics. Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99, 349–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wang, W.C.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, X.Z. Chloroplast genome evolution in Actinidiaceae: clpP Loss, heterogenous divergence and phylogenomic practice. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wicke, S.; Schneeweiss, G.M.; Müller, K.F.; Quandt, D. The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: Gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 76, 273–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wicke, S.; Schneeweiss, G.M. Next-Generation Organellar Genomics: Potentials and Pitfalls of High-Throughput Technologies for Molecular Evolutionary Studies and Plant Systematics. In Next Generation Sequencing in Plant Systematics; International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT): Bratislava, Slovakia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  40. Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, X.Z. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of the relict Chinese false tupelo, Camptotheca acuminata. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2017, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yang, Z.; Ji, Y. Comparative and phylogenetic analyses of the complete chloroplast genomes of three Arcto-Tertiary relicts: Camptotheca acuminata, Davidia involucrata, and Nyssa sinensis. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, W.; Liu, H.; He, Q.; Yang, W.L.; Chen, Z.; Wang, M.; Su, Y.; Ma, T. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Camptotheca acuminata. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2017, 9, 241–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Puterova, J.; Razumova, O.; Martinek, T.; Alexandrov, O.; Divashuk, M.; Kubat, Z.; Hobza, R.; Karlov, G.; Kejnovsky, E. Satellite DNA and transposable elements in seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides), a dioecious plant with small Y and large X chromosomes. Genome Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 197–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rocha, E.P.C. An appraisal of the potential for illegitimate recombination in bacterial genomes and its consequences: From duplications to genome reduction. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 1123–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kegel, A.; Martinez, P.; Carter, S.D.; Aström, S.U. Genome wide distribution of illegitimate recombination events in Kluyveromyces lactis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 1633–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dodsworth, S.; Leitch, A.R.; Leitch, I.J. Genome size diversity in angiosperms and its influence on gene space. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2015, 35, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lisch, D. How important are transposons for plant evolution? Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhong, B.; Yonezawa, T.; Zhong, Y.; Hasegawa, M. Episodic evolution and adaptation of chloroplast genomes in ancestral grasses. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shaw, J.; Lickey, E.B.; Schilling, E.E.; Small, R.L. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: The tortoise and the hare III. Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94, 275–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zhang, Z.; Gerstein, M. Patterns of nucleotide substitution, insertion and deletion in the human genome inferred from pseudogenes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 5338–5348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Matsuoka, Y.; Yamazaki, Y.; Ogihara, Y.; Tsunewaki, K. Whole chloroplast genome comparison of rice, maize, and wheat: Implications for chloroplast gene diversification and phylogeny of cereals. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19, 2084–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Castle, J.C. SNPs occur in regions with less genomic sequence conservation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Allegre, M.; Argout, X.; Boccara, M.; Fouet, O.; Roguet, Y.; Bérard, A.; Thévenin, J.M.; Chauveau, A.; Rivallan, R.; Clement, D. Discovery and mapping of a new expressed sequence tag-single nucleotide polymorphism and simple sequence repeat panel for large-scale genetic studies and breeding of Theobroma cacao L. DNA Res. 2011, 19, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wang, W.; Zhang, X. Identification of the sex-biased gene expression and putative sex-associated genes in Eucommia ulmoides Oliver using comparative transcriptome analyses. Molecules 2017, 22, 2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, Y.-J.; Ma, P.-F.; Li, D.-Z. High-throughput sequencing of six bamboo chloroplast genomes: Phylogenetic implications for temperate woody bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae). PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Magee, A.M.; Aspinall, S.; Rice, D.W.; Cusack, B.P.; Sémon, M.; Perry, A.S.; Stefanović, S.; Milbourne, D.; Barth, S.; Palmer, J.D. Localized hypermutation and associated gene losses in legume chloroplast genomes. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1700–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Dong, W.; Xu, C.; Cheng, T.; Zhou, S. Complete chloroplast genome of Sedum sarmentosum and chloroplast genome evolution in Saxifragales. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Millen, R.S.; Olmstead, R.G.; Adams, K.L.; Palmer, J.D.; Lao, N.T.; Heggie, L.; Kavanagh, T.A.; Hibberd, J.M.; Gray, J.C.; Morden, C.W. Many parallel losses of infA from chloroplast DNA during angiosperm evolution with multiple independent transfers to the nucleus. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 645–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Guisinger, M.M.; Kuehl, J.V.; Boore, J.L.; Jansen, R.K. Genome-wide analyses of Geraniaceae plastid DNA reveal unprecedented patterns of increased nucleotide substitutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 18424–18429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Dugas, D.V.; Hernandez, D.; Koenen, E.J.; Schwarz, E.; Straub, S.; Hughes, C.E.; Jansen, R.K.; Nageswara-Rao, M.; Staats, M.; Trujillo, J.T. Mimosoid legume plastome evolution: IR expansion, tandem repeat expansions, and accelerated rate of evolution in clpP. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Bock, D.G.; Kane, N.C.; Ebert, D.P.; Rieseberg, L.H. Genome skimming reveals the origin of the Jerusalem Artichoke tuber crop species: Neither from Jerusalem nor an artichoke. New Phytol. 2014, 201, 1021–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Downie, S.R.; Jansen, R.K. A comparative analysis of whole plastid genomes from the Apiales: Expansion and contraction of the inverted repeat, mitochondrial to plastid transfer of DNA, and identification of highly divergent noncoding regions. Syst. Bot. 2015, 40, 336–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shaw, J.; Lickey, E.B.; Beck, J.T.; Farmer, S.B.; Liu, W.; Miller, J.; Siripun, K.C.; Winder, C.T.; Schilling, E.E.; Small, R.L. The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am. J. Bot. 2005, 92, 142–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Huang, J.; Yang, X.; Zhang, C.; Yin, X.; Liu, S.; Li, X. Development of chloroplast microsatellite markers and analysis of chloroplast diversity in Chinese jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) and wild jujube (Ziziphus acidojujuba Mill.). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ren, X.; Jiang, H.; Yan, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, X.; Huang, L.; Lei, Y.; Huang, J.; Yan, L.; Qi, Y. Genetic diversity and population structure of the major peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars grown in China by SSR markers. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Chen, Z.D.; Yang, T.; Lin, L.; Lu, L.M.; Li, H.L.; Sun, M.; Liu, B.; Chen, M.; Niu, Y.T.; Ye, J.F. Tree of life for the genera of Chinese vascular plants. J. Syst. Evol. 2016, 54, 277–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Byng, J.W.; Chase, M.W.; Christenhusz, M.J.; Fay, M.F.; Judd, W.S.; Mabberley, D.J.; Sennikov, A.N.; Soltis, D.E.; Soltis, P.S.; Stevens, P.F. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 181, 105–121. [Google Scholar]
  68. Stevens, P.F. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 12, July 2012 (and More or Less Continuously Updated Since). Available online: http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/ (accessed on 1 March 2018).
  69. Jansen, R.K.; Cai, Z.; Raubeson, L.A.; Daniell, H.; Depamphilis, C.W.; Leebensmack, J.; Müller, K.F.; Guisingerbellian, M.; Haberle, R.C.; Hansen, A.K. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19369–19374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Smith, S.A.; Beaulieu, J.M.; Donoghue, M.J. An uncorrelated relaxed-clock analysis suggests an earlier origin for flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5897–5902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Davis, C.C.; Xi, Z.; Mathews, S. Plastid phylogenomics and green plant phylogeny: Almost full circle but not quite there. BMC Biol. 2014, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Zeng, L.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, R.; Kong, H.; Zhang, N.; Ma, H.; Zeng, L.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, R.; Kong, H. Resolution of deep angiosperm phylogeny using conserved nuclear genes and estimates of early divergence times. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Doyle, J.J. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 1987, 19, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  74. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Wyman, S.K.; Jansen, R.K.; Boore, J.L. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 3252–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Schattner, P.; Brooks, A.N.; Lowe, T.M. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33 (Suppl. 2), W686–W689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Darling, A.C.; Mau, B.; Blattner, F.R.; Perna, N.T. Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 1394–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Wang, W.; Ma, L.; Becher, H.; Garcia, S.; Kovarikova, A.; Leitch, I.J.; Leitch, A.R.; Kovarik, A. Astonishing 35S rDNA diversity in the gymnosperm speciesCycas revolutaThunb. Chromosoma 2016, 125, 683–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhao, H.; Li, Y.; Peng, Z.; Sun, H.; Yue, X.; Lou, Y.; Dong, L.; Wang, L.; Gao, Z. Developing genome-wide microsatellite markers of bamboo and their applications on molecular marker assisted taxonomy for accessions in the genus Phyllostachys. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R. The sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Transpl. Proc. 2009, 19, 1653–1654. [Google Scholar]
  85. Van der Auwera, G.A.; Carneiro, M.O.; Hartl, C.; Poplin, R.; Del Angel, G.; Levy-Moonshine, A.; Jordan, T.; Shakir, K.; Roazen, D.; et al. From FastQ Data to High-Confidence Variant Calls: The Genome Analysis Toolkit Best Practices Pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2013, 43, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Swofford, D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, version 4.0 b10; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  87. Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012, 61, 539–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Miller, M.A.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for Inference of Large Phylogenetic Trees. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, USA, 14 November 2010; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 19 01037 g001 550
Figure 1. Conserved chloroplast genome structure in Eucommia ulmoides. (A) Pairwise chloroplast genome alignments derived from Multiple Alignment using Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT) program. The sequence identity is indicated on the top. Label KU204775.1 represents the E. ulmoides chloroplast genome retrieved from GenBank, while label E. ulmoides indicates the newly sequenced genome in this study. (B) Pairwise chloroplast genome alignments derived from MAUVE software.
Figure 1. Conserved chloroplast genome structure in Eucommia ulmoides. (A) Pairwise chloroplast genome alignments derived from Multiple Alignment using Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT) program. The sequence identity is indicated on the top. Label KU204775.1 represents the E. ulmoides chloroplast genome retrieved from GenBank, while label E. ulmoides indicates the newly sequenced genome in this study. (B) Pairwise chloroplast genome alignments derived from MAUVE software.
Ijms 19 01037 g001
Ijms 19 01037 g002 550
Figure 2. Mutational events (SNPs and indels) detected across the chloroplast genome of Eucommia ulmoides. SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) indicate nucleotide substitutions and indels represent nucleotide insertions and deletions. The homologous loci are oriented according to their locations in the chloroplast genome.
Figure 2. Mutational events (SNPs and indels) detected across the chloroplast genome of Eucommia ulmoides. SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) indicate nucleotide substitutions and indels represent nucleotide insertions and deletions. The homologous loci are oriented according to their locations in the chloroplast genome.
Ijms 19 01037 g002
Ijms 19 01037 g003 550
Figure 3. Percentage of variable characters (SNPs and indels) in polymorphic chloroplast loci in Eucommia ulmoides. The homologous loci are oriented according to their locations in the chloroplast genome.
Figure 3. Percentage of variable characters (SNPs and indels) in polymorphic chloroplast loci in Eucommia ulmoides. The homologous loci are oriented according to their locations in the chloroplast genome.
Ijms 19 01037 g003
Ijms 19 01037 g004 550
Figure 4. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree for 34 taxa based on 80 unique plastid protein-coding genes of Eucommia ulmoides. Values above the branches represent maximum parsimony bootstrap (MPBS)/maximum likelihood bootstrap (MLBS)/Bayesian inference posterior probability (PP). The newly sequenced Eucommia ulmoides chloroplast genome is indicated by red color and the previously published E. ulmoides chloroplast genome is followed by its GenBank accession number KU204775.
Figure 4. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree for 34 taxa based on 80 unique plastid protein-coding genes of Eucommia ulmoides. Values above the branches represent maximum parsimony bootstrap (MPBS)/maximum likelihood bootstrap (MLBS)/Bayesian inference posterior probability (PP). The newly sequenced Eucommia ulmoides chloroplast genome is indicated by red color and the previously published E. ulmoides chloroplast genome is followed by its GenBank accession number KU204775.
Ijms 19 01037 g004
Table
Table 1. Comparison between the newly and previously sequenced chloroplast genomes of Eucommia ulmoides.
Table 1. Comparison between the newly and previously sequenced chloroplast genomes of Eucommia ulmoides.
ItemThis StudyKU204775
Chloroplast genome size (bp)163,586163,341
LSC a length (bp)86,76486,592
SSC b length (bp)14,16614,149
IRa/IRb c length (bp)31,32831,300
Number of genes (unique genes)136 (115)136 (115)
Number of protein-coding genes (unique genes)89 (80)89 (80)
Number of tRNA genes (unique genes)39 (31)39 (31)
Number of rRNA genes (unique genes)8 (4)8 (4)
GC d content (%)38.33%38.34%
Protein-coding regions (%)51.91%51.99%
a LSC, large single-copy region; b SSC, small single-copy region; c IRa/IRb, two identical inverted repeat regions a/b; d GC, Guanine and Cytosine.
Table
Table 2. DNA insertions and deletions with more than 10 nucleotides in the chloroplast genomes of Eucommia ulmoides.
Table 2. DNA insertions and deletions with more than 10 nucleotides in the chloroplast genomes of Eucommia ulmoides.
No.Size (bp)Start PositionLocationType
1566851rps16-trnT(UGU)insertion
2277006rps16-trnT(UGU)insertion
3457196rps16-trnT(UGU)insertion
41312,693ycf3-psaAinsertion
52312,912ycf3-psaAinsertion
611113,312ycf3-psaAinsertion
71213,471ycf3-psaAinsertion
83224,279psbD-trnT(GGU)insertion
91226,615trnD(GUC)-psbMinsertion
101151,194rps12-rpl20insertion
111752,547rps18-rpl33insertion
124057,075psbJ-petAinsertion
131864,506accD-trnM(CAU)insertion
141273,717trnL(UAA) introninsertion
1514127,486ndhG-ndhIinsertion
16164673trnK(UUU)-rps16deletion
174424,700trnG(TTU)-trnE(UUC)deletion
183141,767atpI-atpHdeletion
194451,109rps12-rpl20deletion
209062,865accD-trnM(CAU)deletion
Table
Table 3. The 20 chloroplast DNA fragments with relative high genetic divergences identified in Eucommia ulmoides.
Table 3. The 20 chloroplast DNA fragments with relative high genetic divergences identified in Eucommia ulmoides.
RegionAligned Length (bp)No. VCs aPercentage of VCs (%)
infA23431.28
rps18-rpl3334341.17
rps1236930.81
rrn5-trnR(ACG)26620.75
ycf1521010.48
trnI(GAU)106250.47
petB65130.46
ycf3-psaA150260.40
trnT(GGU)-atpE26110.38
ndhG53120.38
ycf454620.37
trnG(UCC)-psbZ28010.36
rps16117040.34
trnA(UGG)88130.34
ndhB-rps732510.31
psbK-trnQ(UUG)33810.30
trnI(CAU)-ycf235710.28
ycf15-trnL(CAA)35910.28
psbB152140.27
rpl2038410.26
a VCs: variable characters, including SNPs and indels.
Table
Table 4. The polymorphic chloroplast SSRs identified in Eucommia ulmoides.
Table 4. The polymorphic chloroplast SSRs identified in Eucommia ulmoides.
No.SSR Repeat MotifLength Variation (bp)LocationRegion a
1(G)10–11trnG(UCC)-psbZLSC
2(A)12–15rpoC2LSC
3(A)12–13ycf1IRb
4(A)13–14rpl32-trnL(UAG)IRa
5(T)10–14psbJ-petALSC
6(T)10–11trnG(GCC)-trnS(GCU)LSC
7(T)12–13ycf1IRa
8(T)14–15rpl16-rps3LSC
a LSC, large single-copy region; IRa/IRb, two identical inverted repeat regions a/b.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, W.; Chen, S.; Zhang, X. Whole-Genome Comparison Reveals Heterogeneous Divergence and Mutation Hotspots in Chloroplast Genome of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041037

AMA Style

Wang W, Chen S, Zhang X. Whole-Genome Comparison Reveals Heterogeneous Divergence and Mutation Hotspots in Chloroplast Genome of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(4):1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Wencai, Siyun Chen, and Xianzhi Zhang. 2018. "Whole-Genome Comparison Reveals Heterogeneous Divergence and Mutation Hotspots in Chloroplast Genome of Eucommia ulmoides Oliver" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 4: 1037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041037

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop