Next Article in Journal
Modulation of Telomerase Activity in Cancer Cells by Dietary Compounds: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Computational Method for Detecting DNA Methylation Sites with DNA Sequence Information and Physicochemical Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Alterations of Subchondral Bone Progenitor Cells in Human Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Lead to a Bone Sclerosis Phenotype
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Natural Compounds on DNA Methylation Levels of the Tumor Suppressor Gene RASSF1A in Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in DNA Methylation from Age 18 to Pregnancy in Type 1, 2, and 17 T Helper and Regulatory T-Cells Pathway Genes

by
Sabrina Iqbal
1,
Gabrielle A. Lockett
2,
John W. Holloway
2,3,
S. Hasan Arshad
3,4,
Hongmei Zhang
1,
Akhilesh Kaushal
1,
Sabarinath R. Tetali
1,
Nandini Mukherjee
1 and
Wilfried J. J. Karmaus
1,*
1
Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, 301 Robison Hall, 3825 DeSoto Avenue Memphis, TN 38152, USA
2
Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
3
Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
4
The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, Newport PO30 5TG, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(2), 477; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020477
Submission received: 10 December 2017 / Revised: 30 January 2018 / Accepted: 1 February 2018 / Published: 6 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue DNA Methylation)

Abstract

:
To succeed, pregnancies need to initiate immune biases towards T helper 2 (Th2) responses, yet little is known about what establishes this bias. Using the Illumina 450 K platform, we explored changes in DNA methylation (DNAm) of Th1, Th2, Th17, and regulatory T cell pathway genes before and during pregnancy. Female participants were recruited at birth (1989), and followed through age 18 years and their pregnancy (2011–2015). Peripheral blood DNAm was measured in 245 girls at 18 years; from among these girls, the DNAm of 54 women was repeatedly measured in the first (weeks 8–21, n = 39) and second (weeks 22–38, n = 35) halves of pregnancy, respectively. M-values (logit-transformed β-values of DNAm) were analyzed: First, with repeated measurement models, cytosine–phosphate–guanine sites (CpGs) of pathway genes in pregnancy and at age 18 (nonpregnant) were compared for changes (p ≤ 0.05). Second, we tested how many of the 348 pathway-related CpGs changed compared to 10 randomly selected subsets of all other CpGs and compared to 10 randomly selected subsets of other CD4+-related CpGs (348 in each subset). Contrasted to the nonpregnant state, 27.7% of Th1-related CpGs changed in the first and 36.1% in the second half of pregnancy. Among the Th2 pathway CpGs, proportions of changes were 35.1% (first) and 33.8% (second half). The methylation changes suggest involvement of both Th1 and Th2 pathway CpGs in the immune bias during pregnancy. Changes in regulatory T cell and Th17 pathways need further exploration.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Pregnancy initiates a unique state of immune changes including a bias towards T helper 2 (Th2) responses, observed in several studies [1,2,3,4]. However, there is insufficient knowledge regarding mechanisms that drive these changes, and whether DNA methylation (DNAm) is involved in this process. The gestational immune system plays an important role in defending both mother and fetus against foreign antigens [1,5]. Immune cells at the implantation site help to protect the pregnancy by modifying the response tolerating the presence of a fetus [6]. During pregnancy, the fetal and maternal immune systems show a co-acting state; supporting one another [7]. An insufficient maternal immune deviation during pregnancy is considered to be related to adverse pregnancy outcomes such as abortions (miscarriages) [4,5].
Immune responses have been divided into two patterns—the innate and the adaptive immune system [1,8]. The innate immune responses provide an immediate defense against pathogens, whereas the adaptive immune system reacts to specific antigens [9]. Adaptive immune responses are mediated by T and B lymphocytes. B cells and their antibodies initiate humoral immunity; T cells primarily provide cell-mediated immunity [8,10]. T cells represent a subset of T helper (CD4+) cells which have been subdivided into Th1, Th2, Th17, and regulatory T cells (Treg). The Th1 response is characterized by pro-inflammatory cytokines, whereas the Th2 response is anti-inflammatory [1,8]. The Th17 pathway plays an important role in inducing inflammation [11,12]; Treg cells inhibit inflammation and are responsible for immune regulation.
Th1 cells produce proteins encoded by genes of the IFN-γ family [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], TNF-α family [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23], IL-2 [12,13,14,17,20,22,23], and the IL-12 family [13,18,24,25]. Th2 cytokines and proteins are regulated by genes of IL-4 [12,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,22,26,27,28,29,30,31,32], IL-4R [29,32,33], IL-5 [12,13,16,17,18,19,20,22,23,26,27], IL-9 [17,20,22], IL-13 family [12,13,16,17,18,19,20,22,23,25,26,27,29,31,34], GATA3 [23,29], STAT6 [18,23,29,31,32,34], JAK1 [35], and JAK3 [32,33,35] genes. Th17 and Treg cells are characterized by proteins encoded by gene of the IL-17 family [12,19,22], IL-21 family [22,36], and IL-22 family [19,22]; and FOXP3 [37,38] and CTLA4 [39]; respectively. Table 1 shows genes of the different pathways and the number of cytosine–phosphate–guanine DNA sites (CpG) representing epigenetic marks related to these genes.
Wegmann and colleagues were the first to propose that pregnancy is a Th2-predominant condition with a down-regulation of Th1 responses [2]. The authors suggested that at the beginning of pregnancy a Th1 environment dominates in the uterus to facilitate successful implantation, then changes through midpregnancy into a Th2 condition for the longest period of the pregnancy. At the end of pregnancy, there is another up-regulation of Th1 cytokines before delivery to facilitate labor with an inflammatory environment [5,40,41]. Th17 cells are considered to promote an inflammatory response during gestation whereas Treg cells are suggested to inhibit inflammation and induce tolerance; they also play a major role in immune regulation [42,43]. One study reported that the Th17 cell counts were not different in pregnant and nonpregnant women [42,44], whereas another study showed lower Th17 cell counts in the second half of pregnancy [45]. An increase in the Th1 pathway activity (gestational age not specified) has been reported in investigations that analyzed recurrent miscarriages [46,47] or preeclampsia [48,49]. Nevertheless, some studies also reported a Th2-dominant immunity in recurrent miscarriages without specification of gestational age [50] or in early pregnancy [51], which questions the assumption that a Th2-dominant immunity exists in a normal pregnancy. Hence, the Th1/Th2 paradigm might not be sufficient to explain the changes in the immune system in a successful pregnancy, and there is a need to expand research into Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg immune pathways. We identified potential genes in these pathways starting with the review by Saito et al. [42], including most the genes mentioned in this review; three genes were added based on more recent publications (JAK1, JAK3, CTLA4).
It has been suggested that T cell pathways are under epigenetic regulation, and changes in cytokine activities are linked to gene activity [52,53]. Differential methylation of CpGs represent present epigenetic marks associated with the regulation of cellular processes including gene expression and cellular differentiation [54,55]. Moreover, several reports suggest that factors increasing DNAm may help in silencing T helper differentiation [17,26,56,57].
These findings motivated us to investigate whether during gestation differential DNAm patterns can be identified in genes that encode immune markers of different T helper and Treg pathways and/or aid in their differentiation. Since immune responses keep changing throughout pregnancy, we conducted separate analyses comparing prepregnancy with the first as well as with the second half of gestation [5,40,41]. Hence, in the same women, we contrasted the CpGs of genes that are known to play a role in immune deviations during pregnancy (Table 1) with other genes that are not involved in T helper and Treg immune pathways (random subsets). Random subsets were chosen because the methylation of all CpGs may potentially be equally affected by gestational transitions. Figure 1 provides information on the two steps of the epidemiologic analyses.

2. Results

Of the 245 girls whose DNAm was measured at 18 years of age, the DNAm of 54 women was reassessed in the first and second halves of their pregnancy (n = 35 and n = 39 respectively), which occurred 1 to 6 years later (age at conception: 19 to 24 years). Since the four immune pathways are also involved in allergic diseases, we compared the occurrence of these diseases at the different time points. The groups of women with DNAm in the first and second halves of pregnancies did not differ with regard to asthma, eczema, atopy, and current smoking status from the women with DNAm at age 18 years (Supplemental Table S1), suggesting no selection bias. This table also shows a median age of about 23 years during pregnancy, information on body mass index, and that about 80% of the women who participated in this detailed follow-up study used folic acid supplements, or some used multivitamin drugs. Supplemental Table S2 shows the frequency of smoking during pregnancy for the two groups of participants compared to their smoking status at 18 years of age. Of the women in the first half of pregnancy (n = 39), 21 participants neither smoked at age 18 nor during pregnancy (84%). Five women smoked at age 18, but not during pregnancy. Among the participants in the second half of pregnancy (n = 35), 15 participants never smoked at age 18 nor in pregnancy (79%) and seven participants who were smokers at age 18 did not smoke during pregnancy. The estimated proportions for different cell types at age 18 and during pregnancy are provided in Supplemental Table S3.
Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5 show the genes and their CpGs that changed. The estimates indicate the magnitude of change in methylation from prepregnancy to pregnancy, and their p-values. Regarding genes in the Th1 immune pathway (Table 2 and Supplemental Table S4—descriptive information on all tested CpGs), 43 of 155 (27.7%) CpGs in the first half of pregnancy and 56 of 155 (36.1%) in the second half (Table 2) were significantly differently methylated (M-values) when compared with in the nonpregnant state. Thirty Th1 CpGs were differently methylated (Table 2) in both periods. Of the CpGs in the Th2 pathway, 27 and 26 of 77 CpGs (35.1% and 33.8%) were significantly differently methylated during the first and second halves of pregnancy, respectively (Table 3). Most CpGs in these pathways were affected similarly in the first and second half of pregnancy and all in the same direction, if identified in the first and second halves of pregnancy (higher or lower methylated, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5). Interestingly, five of six CpGs of the IL13RA1 gene were changed, two with higher changes in methylation (M-value, Table 3). Of the Th17 pathway, 34 and 33 of 106 CpGs significantly changed their methylation levels (M-values) in the first and second halves of pregnancy (32.1% and 31.1%), respectively (Table 4). In 7 of 12 CpGs in the IL21R gene, the methylation level was altered; 6 CpGs showed a decrease in methylation; 1 CpG site was increased (M-value). The Treg pathway genes represent the smallest group; 3 and 4 of 10 CpGs were different in the first and second half of the pregnancy compared with in the nonpregnant state (Table 5). In one FOXP3 CpG site, the methylation change was larger. The changes identified in all randomly selected CpGs (348 CpGs in 20 random subsets) are provided in Supplemental Table S4. The results adjusted for false discovery rate (FDR) are similar to the results based on the crude p-values presented above (Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5).
Comparing the proportion of CpGs in the different pathways with 10 random subsets of other CpGs, in the first half of pregnancy, the Th2 immune pathway indicated the largest difference (Table 6). The risk ratios for being statistically significantly different were 1.45 times higher for the Th2 pathway compared with the average of 10 random subsets of CpGs from all genes and 1.46 times higher compared with the average of 10 random subsets of CpGs of CD4+-related genes (explained in the method section and documented in Supplemental Table S8 and S9). In other words, compared to random subsets, changes of CpGs in the Th2 pathway were 46% more likely. In second half of pregnancy, the Th1 immune pathway showed an increased risk ratio between 1.35 and 1.43 for significantly changed methylation in CpGs compared to CpGs of the two different random subsets.
Adjusting for FDR resulted in a reduction of significant CpGs in both the immune pathway genes and in genes from the two random subsets. However, the reduction of significant CpGs in random subsets was higher. Thus, the relative risk of Th2 immune pathway genes in the second half of pregnancy increases from about 1.3–1.4 (30–40% difference) to about 1.7 (70% difference, Table 6). Note that comparable effects were detected when contrasting specific T helper cell CpGs with CpGs from all genes and also with CpGs of genes related to CD4+ cells. In second half of pregnancy, when comparing CpGs in immune pathway genes with the reference CpGs, the Th1 immune pathway showed an increased risk ratio between 1.68 and 1.72 for significantly changed methylation in CpGs contrasted with CpGs of the two different random subsets (all CpGs and CpGs related to CD4+ cells). Adjusting for multiple testing also resulted in higher relative risks of significantly changed CpGs in the Th2 pathway (Table 6). CpGs in the Th2 pathway were 1.74 to 1.77 times more likely to have changed from the prepregnancy to the pregnancy status. However, compared to the reference subsets, the 95% confidence interval of statistically significantly changed CpGs in the Th17 pathway included the value one and thus was not statistically different.
The position of the significantly different CpGs relative to gene structure shows some interesting differences (Table 7). As expected, since the selection was based on genes, there were no CpG sites in intergenic regions of the CD4+-related genes as well as the ones from Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg pathways. However, the reference group of CpGs from the whole genome had 21.9% CpGs from intergenic regions. As a consequence of the higher number of intergenic CpGs, the proportion of CpGs located in the promoter region is lower in the randomly selected CpGs from the whole genome than in the reference group of CpGs from genes expressed on CD4+ cells and in CpGs from the Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg pathway genes. For this reason, we compared the proportion of significant CpGs in the reference groups with and without CpGs in the intergenic regions, as shown in Supplemental Table S5. We found comparable proportions of significantly changed CpGs, indicating that there is no bias based on the inclusion of intergenic CpGs in the whole genome reference group. Supplemental Table S6 shows whether significant CpG methylation changes of the same direction (increase or decrease) clustered within 1500 base pairs up- or downstream of one significantly altered CpG. There is no clear pattern regarding the spatial clustering of significant CpG sites.
We also compared the number and proportion of significant CpGs in the group of 20 participants who participated three times (before pregnancy, first half and second half of gestation) with 39 participants in the first half of pregnancy and with 35 participants in the second half of pregnancy. The nonpregnant state at age 18 was used as the reference in both scenarios. The proportion of significantly changed CpG sites among the two groups were not statistically different from each other, neither in the first nor the second half of pregnancy, as shown in Supplemental Table S7. However, the proportion of significantly changed CpG sites was slightly lower in the group of women who participated three times.

3. Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing changes in DNAm of CpGs in Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg pathway genes from before pregnancy to during the first and second halves of pregnancy. In the first half of pregnancy, changes in methylation levels were more frequent among Th2 pathway genes, while in the second half, changes in methylation of CpGs of the Th1 pathway were more frequent compared to those of randomly selected CpGs. Also, in the second half of pregnancy, more changes in CpGs in Th2 pathway genes are seen after adjustment for multiple testing. The findings were similar and independent on whether we compared the immune pathway CpGs with random subsets of all CpGs or with random subsets of CpGs of genes found on CD4+ cells (immune-cell-related). We did not consider the direction of the methylation changes, just its presence, since, depending on the methylation of specific regions, lower and higher methylation of different regions may have the same functional effects (e.g., gene expression).
One limitation of our study is that the CpGs were taken from white blood cells, but not from specific cell types, since we could not separate the cells and costs for DNAm analyses would have been multiplied by the number of different cells. To overcome this limitation, we deconvoluted the analyses of the CpGs by adjusting for cell types. In addition, we also took 15 surrogate variables into account—a procedure which has been demonstrated to address latent subjects which may affect DNAm [59]. We did not attempt to replicate the DNAm measurements based on the Illumina 450 K array with other methods such as pyrosequencing since this array has been shown to be technically reliable in multiple studies [60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]. Another limitation of this study is that blood subsets could not be collected in all three trimesters; however, the separation of gestation into trimesters is arbitrary. We therefore decided to analyze changes in methylation from age 18 years (prepregnancy) to the first and second halves of pregnancy. The subsets of pregnant women are part of a whole birth cohort; however, it only represents a Caucasian population. Hence, results might differ for populations of other races and ethnicities. Genes of Th1/Th2/Th17 and Treg pathways were selected based on prior study reports, excluding genes with contradictive findings that could not be allocated to one pathway (Table 1).
One strength lies in comparing the same women before and during pregnancy using repeated measurements of DNAm (age 18 and during pregnancy). A second strength is the design that does not compare women who conceived with women who did not conceive, which would require taking a wide range of confounding into account. Since we focus on intra-individual changes, we also did not need to adjust for genetic polymorphisms, which in turn influence the potential of the methylation of specific CpG sites. Against that, we contrasted CpGs of genes that are known to play a role in immune deviations during pregnancy with random subsets of genes that are not involved in T helper and Treg immune pathways (random subsets). We used random subsets because the methylation of all CpGs may potentially be equally affected by gestational transitions, providing a contrast with immune pathway genes. The advantage of this design is that potential confounding factors such as aging are implicitly taken into account when comparing different sets of CpGs in the same mother. A limitation of our study is the small sample size or a lower statistical power; however, we found a large number of methylation changes in the four immune pathway genes. Nevertheless, we may not have identified weaker changes in the four immune pathway genes as statistically significant.
Gestational immunity has been suggested to be a Th2-predominant condition with a down-regulation of Th1 [2]. The results presented here shows changes in the DNAm of Th2 pathway genes in the first and second halves of pregnancy and changes in the DNAm of Th1 pathway genes during the second half of pregnancy. In particular, CpGs on the IL13RA1 (Th2 pathway) showed a number of changes, which were large compared with those of other CpGs. Frequent changes in DNAm of Th2 pathway genes in the first and second halves of pregnancy and frequent changes in DNAm of Th1 pathway genes during the second half of pregnancy suggest that both Th1 and Th2 pathways are involved in the gestational immune bias. Moreover, experimental studies indicated that DNAm of genes related with T helper cell differentiation may induce polarization towards or away from an allergic phenotype. Thus, focusing on changes in methylation in these pathways during gestation may guide the future detection of predictive markers for allergy.
The Th17 pathway is considered to establish a protective immune response in pregnancy [42]; however, its role has not yet been clearly established. One study reported a lower count of Th17 cells in the second half of pregnancy [45], whereas another study showed a similar frequency for Th17 cells during pregnancy compared to that in nonpregnant women. Although we do not have cell counts, in the second half of pregnancy our results suggest some changes in methylation of CpGs in Th17 pathway genes that may need future investigation. In particular, CpGs on the IL21R gene may need further consideration (Table 4). We also tested for the direction of change and position of the significant CpGs (Supplemental Table S6), but could not detect a clear overall pattern independent of the genes. The relation between the direction of methylation changes and the position of the CpGs on the genes and their effect on gene expression needs further investigation.
In conclusion, in Th1 pathway CpGs, comparing the prepregnancy with the pregnancy state, we found 1.68 to 1.72 times higher relative risk of change in the second half of pregnancy. CpGs in the Th2 pathway were 1.74 to 1.77 times more likely to have changed from the prepregnancy to the late pregnancy state. We did not identify any other study comparing prepregnancy with pregnancy status of DNAm. Hence, replications are warranted. Future studies should also examine whether the reported changes in methylation of maternal blood can also be found in cord blood and are related to allergic manifestations in offspring. Better knowledge of the mechanisms of Th1 and Th2 pathway regulation in pregnancy may contribute to understanding of intra-uterine origin of allergic diseases and will provide guidance to initiate preventive screening strategies for early detection of allergic diseases in offspring.

4. Participants and Methods

4.1. The Isle of Wight Birth Cohort

The Isle of Wight Whole Population Birth Cohort was established in 1989 in United Kingdom, to prospectively study the natural history of asthma and allergic conditions. All newborns were recruited into the study in 1989 and have being followed to date. For analyses of DNAm, blood samples were collected at age 18 years and again during the first (8–21 weeks) and the second (22–38 weeks) halves of pregnancy. Questionnaires were completed at age 18 and during pregnancy and gathered information including smoking, diet, and medication, and asthma, eczema, and atopy status. The 1989 birth cohort has been described elsewhere [57,68]. Female participants of the birth cohort have been followed through their pregnancies occurring between years 2011–2015.

4.2. Ethics

Ethics approval was given by the Isle of Wight Local Research Ethics Committee before recruiting participants between January 1989 and February 1990. Permission was granted for all follow-ups as well as collection of samples for genetic studies. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before they participated in the study. The investigation was approved by the Isle of Wight, Portsmouth and SE Hampshire Local Research Ethics Committee (Research Ethics Committee reference number: 09/H0504/129; 4 December 2009). At the University of Memphis, the internal review board approved the project (FWA00006815, 7 December 2012).

4.3. Study Design

We measured DNAm in white blood cells in women at 18 years of age (nonpregnant state) and in the same women in the first and second halves of pregnancy. We hypothesized that, compared to a preceding nonpregnant state, the methylation of genes that code for immune markers of Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg are more likely to change during pregnancy than any randomly selected set of nonpathway CpG sites. The analyses comprise two main and three supplementary steps. First, we compared the DNAm of all CpG sites of the selected 48 Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg pathway genes measured separately during the first and second halves of pregnancy with DNAm measured at 18 years of age (nonpregnant) using repeated measurement models. Second, since DNAm of other genes may also change with pregnancy, we examined whether statistically significant changes in methylation levels of Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg pathway CpGs were more frequent than changes in ten randomly selected subsets of CpGs (Supplemental Table S8). Since contrasts with one random subset may depend on the particular subset selected, we repeated the assessment in 10 random subsets. Third, as Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg pathway genes are expressed in blood cells, but a random subset of all genes may not represent blood cells, we added a second comparison group with 10 random subsets of genes identified in CD4 (cluster of differentiation 4) blood-borne immune cells [58] (Supplemental Table S9). Fourth, since Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg pathway genes as well as the CD4+ random subset do not include CpGs from intergenic regions, to ensure that inclusion of the intergenic regions did not bias our findings, we compared the two reference groups with CpGs excluding intergenic regions. Fifth, to make sure that the observed changes in DNAm are not explained by changes in blood cell counts between age 18 and the first and second halves of pregnancy, we adjusted for the respective cell mixtures.
We nested a follow-up study of women in the Cohort who became pregnant to examine and compare changes in DNAm of CpGs in Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg pathway genes from the nonpregnant state at age 18 years to the first and second halves of pregnancy. Genes encoding components of the Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg pathways were selected based on published journal articles (Table 1) and their CpGs were selected from the Illumina 450 K array manifest file http://support.illumina.com/downloads/humanmethylation450_15017482_v1-2_product_files.html (last accessed 5 February 2018).
The main analysis was divided into two parts. First, we performed repeated measurement analyses, comparing the methylation of specific Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg pathway genes at 18 years of age with the methylation levels of the same CpGs in the same women during the first half of pregnancy for a group of 39 women. General linear models for repeated measurements were used to determine statistically significant changes in methylation of CpGs. The same procedure was applied for the 35 women who had their DNAm assessed at age 18 and during the second half of pregnancy. The number of CpGs with statistically significant changes (p ≤ 0.05) was determined. Twenty participants of the sub-subsets of 39 and 35 pregnant women, also included in the 245 nonpregnant participants (at age 18 years), had DNAm measurements at all three time points. Thus, to determine whether results are altered when we focused on these 20 common participants, we additionally repeated the analyses of the time effect on DNAm (prepregnancy to pregnancy) for the subset of 20 women.
Since the methylation of other genes may also change with pregnancy, in the second part of the analyses, we used general linear models to assess methylation changes in randomly selected CpGs from the whole genome between the two time periods (age 18 years and first or second halves of pregnancy, respectively). To reduce the probability that any detected difference in DNAm between the T cell pathways and the randomly selected reference subsets is due to chance, we repeated the random sampling 10 times. That is, 10 random subsets of 348 CpGs each (which is equal to the number of total CpGs in the four pathways) were selected and used as a reference set from the complete list of CpGs. Another 10 random subsets of 348 CpGs each were selected from a list of CD4+ genes [58] and used as a second reference set. The latter reference more likely reflects genes active in blood cells. The results of the analysis of random subsets informed whether DNAm changes are more likely to occur in CpGs of T cell pathways (Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg) during pregnancy. To this end, we compared the risks of changes from prepregnancy to pregnancy in T cell pathway CpGs with the risk of changes in the random subsets of CpGs using log–linear models and estimated risk ratios.

4.4. DNA Methylation

A standard salting out procedure [69] was used to extract DNA from blood samples. One microgram of DNA from each sample was bisulfite converted using the EZ-96 DNAm kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA), and genome-wide DNAm was measured using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 beadchip (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Methylation data were extracted from image data files using the Methylation module of Genome Studio software and were preprocessed using the IMA package [70] executed in the R statistical computing package. The methylation level was measured by β-values which represent the proportion of methylated (M) over the sum of methylated and unmethylated (U) allele intensities (β = M/[c + M + U]), where c is a constant to prevent dividing by zero [71]. Logit-transformed β-values (M-values) were used for these differential methylation analyses as β-values have severe heteroscedasticity [72].
The raw data of DNAm were preprocessed to achieve high quality for data analyses. The Bioconductor IMA (Illumina methylation analyzer) package31 and the ComBat32 package were used to remove background noise, adjust for interarray variation, perform peak correction, and to remove batch effects. In addition, CpGs with probe SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) were removed from the list of all CpG sites if their Minor Allele Frequency (MAF) was larger than 1% (N = 89,678; http://support.illumina.com/downloads/humanmethylation450_15017482_v1-2_product_files.html, last accessed 5 February 2018). Probe SNPs are single-nucleotide polymorphisms within the probe, which may interfere with DNAm measurement. Due to these procedures, the number of eligible CpG sites was reduced to 274,710 probes (approximately 60% of the original number).
We then tested methylation changes in 348 CpGs annotated to genes in the Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg pathways (Table 1). For Th1, we examined CpGs of the following genes: IFN-γ family, TNF-α family, IL-2, IL-12 family, and IL-12RB1, IL-12RB2; for the Th2 pathway, CpGs of the IL-4, IL-4R, IL-5, IL-9, IL-13 family, GATA3, STAT6, JAK1, JAK3 and IL1RL1; for Th17, IL-17 family, IL-21 family, and IL-22 family; and for the Treg pathway, FOXP3 and CTLA4 genes. The final numbers of CpGs were 155 CpGs (19 genes) for Th1, 77 CpGs (12 genes) in Th2, 106 CpGs (15 genes) in Th17, 10 CpGs (2 genes) for Treg; and an identical number of 348 CpGs in each randomly selected reference set.

4.5. Variables Used for the Description of the Population Samples

Since some of the genes in the four immune pathways are also involved in allergic diseases, we briefly described our cohort with regard to these diseases. At 18 years of age, information about asthma was collected using the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaire [73]. Asthma was defined as history of physician-diagnosed asthma, combined with wheezing or whistling in the chest in the last 12 months and/or asthma treatment in last 12 months. Eczema was defined as chronic or chronically relapsing itchy dermatitis lasting more than six weeks with characteristic morphology and distribution [74], following Hanifin and Rajka criteria [75]. At 18 years, to define atopy or allergic sensitization, regardless of symptoms, skin prick tests (SPT) were performed with a standard battery of 13 common allergens (ALK-Albello, Horsholm, Denmark). Inhalant allergens tested were house dust mite, cat, dog, Alternaria alternata, Cladosporium herbarium, grass pollen mix, and tree pollen mix; food allergens tested were cows’ milk, soya, hens’ egg, peanut, and cod. Atopy or allergic sensitization was defined as having a response to at least one allergen of mean wheal diameter 3 mm greater than the negative control. Participants were asked about their current smoking status at age 18 years, twice during pregnancy, and again after delivery. These responses were grouped into the following categories, “never”, “early in pregnancy”, “transient” (occasional), and “throughout pregnancy”.

4.6. Statistical Analyses

The baseline to assess changes in DNAm was 245 women of the birth cohort, who had DNAm at age 18 years. To check whether the two study samples (39 women with DNAm measured in the first half of pregnancy, and 35 women with DNAm measured in the second half of pregnancy (total of 54 women)) are similar to characteristics of all women who had their DNAm measured at 18 years of age (n = 245), the characteristics of those 54 women were compared against the 245 women (total number of women with DNAm data at age 18 years) in the cohort using the Chi-square test.
The Bioconductor IMA (Illumina methylation analyzer) package and the ComBat package [76] were used to remove background noise, adjust for interarray variation, perform peak correction, quantile normalization, and remove batch effects (7 batches) [70,77]. DNAm levels for each CpG were estimated as the proportion of intensity of methylated (M) over the sum of methylated (M) and unmethylated (U) probes, β = M/(c + M + U), with c being a constant to prevent dividing by zero. We focused on the 22 autosome excluding all CpGs on the sex chromosomes. Methylation determined in whole blood can distort the comparison of DNAm between the prepregnancy and the pregnancy states since it contains different cell types with different methylation levels. To overcome this limitation, we conducted two deconvolution steps to adjust for cell mixture effects on the methylation of all CpGs (a non-reference-based surrogate variable analysis (SVA) followed by cell type adjustment). The non-reference-based method utilizes singular value decomposition as conducted in surrogate variable analysis (SVA) [59]. The fifteen most important surrogate variables, identified in SVA, were then used in regression models, separately for nonpregnant data and for the data of the first and second halves of pregnancy, to estimate the part of the methylation of the CpGs (the residuals) that was not influenced by the 15 surrogate variables. To additionally adjust for cell types (B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, eosinophils, granulocytes, monocytes, and natural killer cells), we estimated the cell type proportions for each sample using Bioconductor [78], the R package “minfi” [79], which is based on reference values of cell-type-specific CpGs [80]. Both SVA and cell type adjustment were used since the latter, based on data of men, may not provide sufficient adjustment for women. The SVA adjustments were performed in R-3.1.0.
General linear models with repeated measurements (measured each time at age 18 and during pregnancy) were then applied using the residual DNAm to test whether there were statistically significant changes between the prepregnancy and pregnancy states while adjusting cell type proportions estimated each time. Time and cell type proportions were used as fixed effects. Unstructured covariance was used to allow for heterogeneous variances at each time and heterogeneous covariance between two time points. General linear models and log-linear models were done in SAS 9.3.
The cell type proportions then were additionally used in repeated measurement models of the residual DNAm to test whether there were statistically significant changes between the prepregnancy and pregnancy states. Hence, we deconvoluted the methylation of CpGs twice using residuals after adjusting for surrogate variables (SV) and estimated cell type proportions in the repeated measurement model.
To assess changes in DNAm between age 18 years and first and second halves of pregnancy in the four immune pathways and in the reference CpGs outside these pathways, we compared the methylation of Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg CpGs and randomly selected CpGs at these two time points. General linear models, adjusted for cell type proportions, were applied to the SV-adjusted residuals at each time point as the response variable with time as the independent variable. Multiple testing was adjusted by controlling false discovery rate (FDR) [81].
Once we identified, in general linear models, CpGs whose methylation was significantly different between prepregnancy and pregnancy, in a second step, we examined whether DNAm changes related to pregnancy in the four immune pathways are more likely to occur in the identified CpGs compared to in CpGs in references. Two reference sets were employed: the 10 randomly selected subsets of CpGs from the complete list of all CpGs (3480 of the total of 274,710 CpGs) and another 10 random subsets of 3480 CpGs from a set 9620 CpGs of CD4+ genes [58] (each having 348 CpGs). The latter set allowed a comparison of immune pathways in blood-borne cells with genes of blood-borne CD4+ cells. Log-linear models were then applied to test whether significant changes in DNAm as the response variable were more frequent in the four immune pathways compared to in the random reference set. To ensure that the results do not depend on a single random selection, we repeated the procedure 10 times with multiple sets of reference CpG sites, randomly selected from all 274,354 CpG or from 9620 CD4+-related CpGs with each set composed of the same number of CpGs as the sum of CpGs from all the four pathways (348 CpGs). This analysis provides sets of the T helper pathway CpGs and of CpGs from random subsets that were significantly affected by pregnancy compared to the prepregnancy status. We then estimated the risks on whether Th2 pathway CpGs were more often statistically significantly changed than random subsets of CpGs using the GENMOD procedure (SAS 9.3). The estimated risk ratios show how the number of CpGs that are significantly different in the respective pathway (Th1, Th2, Th17, or Treg) is larger compared with the number of significantly different CpGs identified in random subsets. These risk ratios and their 95% confidence limits for the 10 random subsets were, at that point, combined using the median proportions of significant changes, separate for the two different sets (random CpGs from the whole genome and random CpGs from CD4+ T-cell-specific genes). The estimation of risk ratios was repeated for the CpGs that remained statistically significant after adjustment for false discovery rate (FDR) in the four pathways and in the random subsets.
Finally, we inspected the direction of change for CpGs in the promoter, the 5′UTR, body region, and the 3′UTR region of the various immune pathway genes. Finally, to determine whether statistically significant methylation changes of CpGs were clustered, we tested for each CpG site with a significant change, whether adjacent CpGs, 1500 base pairs upstream, and 1500 base pairs downstream also changed significantly from the nonpregnant to the pregnant state. The significance level for all models was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/2/477/s1.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of the children and parents who participated in this study, and appreciate the hard work of the Isle of Wight research team in collecting data and of Nikki Graham for technical support. We thank the High-Throughput Genomics Group at the Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics (funded by Wellcome Trust grant reference 090532/Z/09/Z and MRC Hub grant G0900747 91070) for the generation of the methylation data. Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under Award Number R01 AI091905.

Author Contributions

Sabrina Iqbal conducted the statistical analyses, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. Wilfried J. J. Karmaus designed the study, reviewed the data quality, and helped with statistical analyses and the manuscript. Wilfried J. J. Karmaus and Hongmei Zhang guided the statistical analysis and interpretation of the results. Akhilesh Kaushal estimated the surrogate variables and the cell counts. S. Hasan Arshad was responsible for cohort assessments, phenotype data, and sample collections. Gabrielle A. Lockett and John W. Holloway conducted the DNAm measurements. Gabrielle A. Lockett, John W. Holloway, S. Hasan Arshad, Sabarinath R. Tetali, Nandini Mukherjee, and Akhilesh Kaushal revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript drafting and final proofreading.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sykes, L.; MacIntyre, D.A.; Yap, X.J.; Teoh, T.G.; Bennett, P.R. The Th1:th2 dichotomy of pregnancy and preterm labour. Mediat. Inflamm. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wegmann, T.G.; Lin, H.; Guilbert, L.; Mosmann, T.R. Bidirectional cytokine interactions in the maternal-fetal relationship: Is successful pregnancy a TH2 phenomenon? Immunol. Today 1993, 14, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vince, G.S.; Johnson, P.M. Is there a Th2 bias in human pregnancy? J. Reprod. Immunol. 1996, 32, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Raghupathy, R.; Makhseed, M.; Azizieh, F.; Omu, A.; Gupta, M.; Farhat, R. Cytokine production by maternal lymphocytes during normal human pregnancy and in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Hum. Reprod. 2000, 15, 713–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mor, G.; Cardenas, I.; Abrahams, V.; Guller, S. Inflammation and pregnancy: The role of the immune system at the implantation site. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1221, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mor, G.; Cardenas, I. The immune system in pregnancy: A unique complexity. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mor, G.; Romero, R.; Aldo, P.B.; Abrahams, V.M. Is the trophoblast an immune regulator? The role of Toll-like receptors during pregnancy. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2005, 25, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Abrams, E.T.; Miller, E.M. The roles of the immune system in women’s reproduction: Evolutionary constraints and life history trade-offs. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2011, 146, 134–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Luppi, P. How immune mechanisms are affected by pregnancy. Vaccine 2003, 21, 3352–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aagaard-Tillery, K.M.; Silver, R.; Dalton, J. Immunology of normal pregnancy. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006, 11, 279–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Peck, A.; Mellins, E.D. Plasticity of T-cell phenotype and function: The T helper type 17 example. Immunology 2010, 129, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Crome, S.Q.; Wang, A.Y.; Levings, M.K. Translational mini-review series on Th17 cells: Function and regulation of human T helper 17 cells in health and disease. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2010, 159, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Salem, M.L. Estrogen, a double-edged sword: Modulation of TH1- and TH2-mediated inflammations by differential regulation of TH1/TH2 cytokine production. Curr. Drug Targets Inflamm. Allergy 2004, 3, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Halonen, M.; Lohman, I.C.; Stern, D.A.; Spangenberg, A.; Anderson, D.; Mobley, S.; Ciano, K.; Peck, M.; Wright, A.L. Th1/Th2 patterns and balance in cytokine production in the parents and infants of a large birth cohort. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 3285–3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sanders, V.M. Epigenetic regulation of Th1 and Th2 cell development. Brain Behav. Immun. 2006, 20, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kuo, M.L.; Huang, J.L.; Yeh, K.W.; Li, P.S.; Hsieh, K.H. Evaluation of Th1/Th2 ratio and cytokine production profile during acute exacerbation and convalescence in asthmatic children. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001, 86, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barnes, P.J. Th2 cytokines and asthma: An introduction. Respir. Res. 2001, 2, 64–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Khaled, W.T.; Read, E.K.; Nicholson, S.E.; Baxter, F.O.; Brennan, A.J.; Came, P.J.; Sprigg, N.; McKenzie, A.N.; Watson, C.J. The IL-4/IL-13/Stat6 signalling pathway promotes luminal mammary epithelial cell development. Development 2007, 134, 2739–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ciofani, M.; Madar, A.; Galan, C.; Sellars, M.; Mace, K.; Pauli, F.; Agarwal, A.; Huang, W.; Parkurst, C.N.; Muratet, M.; et al. A validated regulatory network for Th17 cell specification. Cell 2012, 151, 289–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Glimcher, L.H.; Murphy, K.M. Lineage commitment in the immune system: The T helper lymphocyte grows up. Genes Dev. 2000, 14, 1693–1711. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Fujio, K.; Okamura, T.; Sumitomo, S.; Yamamoto, K. The functions of CD4+CD25-LAG3+ regulatory T cells and Egr2 in the regulation of autoimmunity. Jpn. J. Clin. Immunol. 2014, 37, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, J.; Paul, W.E. CD4 T cells: Fates, functions, and faults. Blood 2008, 112, 1557–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hosokawa, H.; Tanaka, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Iwamura, C.; Ohkubo, S.; Endoh, K.; Kato, M.; Endo, Y.; Onodera, A.; Tumes, D.J.; et al. Functionally distinct Gata3/Chd4 complexes coordinately establish T helper 2 (Th2) cell identity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 4691–4696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yang, C.Y.; Ma, X.; Tsuneyama, K.; Huang, S.; Takahashi, T.; Chalasani, N.P.; Bowlus, C.L.; Yang, G.X.; Leung, P.S.; Ansari, A.A.; et al. IL-12/Th1 and IL-23/Th17 biliary microenvironment in primary biliary cirrhosis: Implications for therapy. Hepatology 2014, 59, 1944–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, X.; Hawkins, G.A.; Ampleford, E.J.; Moore, W.C.; Li, H.; Hastie, A.T.; Howard, T.D.; Boushey, H.A.; Busse, W.W.; Calhoun, W.J.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies TH1 pathway genes associated with lung function in asthmatic patients. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lloyd, C.M.; Hessel, E.M. Functions of T cells in asthma: More than just T(H)2 cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 838–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lloyd, C.M.; Saglani, S. T cells in asthma: Influences of genetics, environment, and T-cell plasticity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kay, A.B. Allergy and allergic diseases. First of two parts. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, H.; Tong, X.; Holloway, J.W.; Rezwan, F.I.; Lockett, G.A.; Patil, V.; Ray, M.; Everson, T.M.; Soto-Ramirez, N.; Arshad, S.H.; et al. The interplay of DNA methylation over time with Th2 pathway genetic variants on asthma risk and temporal asthma transition. Clin. Epigenetics 2014, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Castro, A.; Sengupta, T.K.; Ruiz, D.C.; Yang, E.; Ivashkiv, L.B. IL-4 selectively inhibits IL-2-triggered Stat5 activation, but not proliferation, in human T cells. J. Immunol. 1999, 162, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Kim, E.G.; Shin, H.J.; Lee, C.G.; Park, H.Y.; Kim, Y.K.; Park, H.W.; Cho, S.H.; Min, K.U.; Cho, M.L.; Park, S.H.; et al. DNA methylation and not allelic variation regulates STAT6 expression in human T cells. Clin. Exp. Med. 2010, 10, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kubo, M.; Yamashita, M.; Abe, R.; Tada, T.; Okumura, K.; Ransom, J.T.; Nakayama, T. CD28 costimulation accelerates IL-4 receptor sensitivity and IL-4-mediated Th2 differentiation. J. Immunol. 1999, 163, 2432–2442. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Yamashita, M.; Katsumata, M.; Iwashima, M.; Kimura, M.; Shimizu, C.; Kamata, T.; Shin, T.; Seki, N.; Suzuki, S.; Taniguchi, M.; et al. T cell receptor-induced calcineurin activation regulates T helper type 2 cell development by modifying the interleukin 4 receptor signaling complex. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 191, 1869–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ziyab, A.H.; Davies, G.A.; Ewart, S.; Hopkin, J.M.; Schauberger, E.M.; Wills-Karp, M.; Holloway, J.W.; Arshad, S.H.; Zhang, H.; Karmaus, W. Interactive effect of STAT6 and IL13 gene polymorphisms on eczema status: Results from a longitudinal and a cross-sectional study. BMC Med. Genet. 2013, 14, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ashino, S.; Takeda, K.; Li, H.; Taylor, V.; Joetham, A.; Pine, P.R.; Gelfand, E.W. Janus kinase 1/3 signaling pathways are key initiators of TH2 differentiation and lung allergic responses. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 1162–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Korn, T.; Bettelli, E.; Gao, W.; Awasthi, A.; Jager, A.; Strom, T.B.; Oukka, M.; Kuchroo, V.K. IL-21 initiates an alternative pathway to induce proinflammatory T(H)17 cells. Nature 2007, 448, 484–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Holmes, D.; Jiang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Su, L. Foxp3 and Treg cells in HIV-1 infection and immuno-pathogenesis. Immunol. Res. 2008, 41, 248–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kaczorowski, M.; Jutel, M. Human T regulatory cells: On the way to cognition. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2013, 61, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. McCoy, K.D.; Le Gros, G. The role of CTLA-4 in the regulation of T cell immune responses. Immunol. Cell Biol. 1999, 77, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chaouat, G.; Dubanchet, S.; Ledee, N. Cytokines: Important for implantation? J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2007, 24, 491–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Koga, K.; Aldo, P.B.; Mor, G. Toll-like receptors and pregnancy: Trophoblast as modulators of the immune response. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2009, 35, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Saito, S.; Nakashima, A.; Shima, T.; Ito, M. Th1/Th2/Th17 and regulatory T-cell paradigm in pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Guerin, L.R.; Prins, J.R.; Robertson, S.A. Regulatory T-cells and immune tolerance in pregnancy: A new target for infertility treatment? Hum. Reprod. Update 2009, 15, 517–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nakashima, A.; Ito, M.; Yoneda, S.; Shiozaki, A.; Hidaka, T.; Saito, S. Circulating and decidual Th17 cell levels in healthy pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Santner-Nanan, B.; Peek, M.J.; Khanam, R.; Richarts, L.; Zhu, E.; Fazekas de St Groth, B.; Nanan, R. Systemic increase in the ratio between Foxp3+ and IL-17-producing CD4+ T cells in healthy pregnancy but not in preeclampsia. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 7023–7030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Druckmann, R.; Druckmann, M.A. Progesterone and the immunology of pregnancy. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 97, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Raghupathy, R. Th1-type immunity is incompatible with successful pregnancy. Immunol. Today 1997, 18, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lin, H.; Mosmann, T.R.; Guilbert, L.; Tuntipopipat, S.; Wegmann, T.G. Synthesis of T helper 2-type cytokines at the maternal-fetal interface. J. Immunol. 1993, 151, 4562–4573. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Saito, S.; Sakai, M. Th1/Th2 balance in preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2003, 59, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chaouat, G.; Ledee-Bataille, N.; Zourbas, S.; Ostojic, S.; Dubanchet, S.; Martal, J.; Frydman, R. Cytokines, implantation and early abortion: Re-examining the Th1/Th2 paradigm leads to question the single pathway, single therapy concept. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2003, 50, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bates, M.D.; Quenby, S.; Takakuwa, K.; Johnson, P.M.; Vince, G.S. Aberrant cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in recurrent pregnancy loss? Hum. Reprod. 2002, 17, 2439–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Janson, P.C.; Winerdal, M.E.; Winqvist, O. At the crossroads of T helper lineage commitment-Epigenetics points the way. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1790, 906–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lee, G.R.; Kim, S.T.; Spilianakis, C.G.; Fields, P.E.; Flavell, R.A. T helper cell differentiation: Regulation by cis elements and epigenetics. Immunity 2006, 24, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Smith, Z.D.; Meissner, A. DNA methylation: Roles in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14, 204–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Prescott, S.L.; Clifton, V. Asthma and pregnancy: Emerging evidence of epigenetic interactions in utero. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 9, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Miller, R.L.; Ho, S.M. Environmental epigenetics and asthma: Current concepts and call for studies. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2008, 177, 567–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Arshad, S.H.; Hide, D.W. Effect of environmental factors on the development of allergic disorders in infancy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 1992, 90, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, H.; Nestor, C.E.; Zhao, S.; Lentini, A.; Bohle, B.; Benson, M.; Wang, H. Profiling of human CD4+ T-cell subsets identifies the TH2-specific noncoding RNA GATA3-AS1. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 1005–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Leek, J.T.; Storey, J.D. Capturing heterogeneity in gene expression studies by surrogate variable analysis. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3, 1724–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Dedeurwaerder, S.; Defrance, M.; Calonne, E.; Denis, H.; Sotiriou, C.; Fuks, F. Evaluation of the Infinium Methylation 450K technology. Epigenomics 2011, 3, 771–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Yang, Y.; Sebra, R.; Pullman, B.S.; Qiao, W.; Peter, I.; Desnick, R.J.; Geyer, C.R.; DeCoteau, J.F.; Scott, S.A. Quantitative and multiplexed DNA methylation analysis using long-read single-molecule real-time bisulfite sequencing (SMRT-BS). BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Roessler, J.; Ammerpohl, O.; Gutwein, J.; Hasemeier, B.; Anwar, S.L.; Kreipe, H.; Lehmann, U. Quantitative cross-validation and content analysis of the 450 k DNA methylation array from Illumina, Inc. BMC Res. Notes 2012, 5, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ronn, T.; Volkov, P.; Davegardh, C.; Dayeh, T.; Hall, E.; Olsson, A.H.; Nilsson, E.; Tornberg, A.; Dekker Nitert, M.; Eriksson, K.F.; et al. A six months exercise intervention influences the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern in human adipose tissue. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hall, E.; Volkov, P.; Dayeh, T.; Esguerra, J.L.; Salo, S.; Eliasson, L.; Ronn, T.; Bacos, K.; Ling, C. Sex differences in the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern and impact on gene expression, microRNA levels and insulin secretion in human pancreatic islets. Genome Biol 2014, 15, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Glossop, J.R.; Nixon, N.B.; Emes, R.D.; Haworth, K.E.; Packham, J.C.; Dawes, P.T.; Fryer, A.A.; Mattey, D.L.; Farrell, W.E. Epigenome-wide profiling identifies significant differences in DNA methylation between matched-pairs of T- and B-lymphocytes from healthy individuals. Epigenetics 2013, 8, 1188–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gabriel, A.S.; Lafta, F.M.; Schwalbe, E.C.; Nakjang, S.; Cockell, S.J.; Iliasova, A.; Enshaei, A.; Schwab, C.; Rand, V.; Clifford, S.C.; et al. Epigenetic landscape correlates with genetic subtype but does not predict outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Epigenetics 2015, 10, 717–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Acevedo, N.; Reinius, L.E.; Greco, D.; Gref, A.; Orsmark-Pietras, C.; Persson, H.; Pershagen, G.; Hedlin, G.; Melen, E.; Scheynius, A.; et al. Risk of childhood asthma is associated with CpG-site polymorphisms, regional DNA methylation and mRNA levels at the GSDMB/ORMDL3 locus. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015, 24, 875–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Soto-Ramirez, N.; Ziyab, A.H.; Karmaus, W.; Zhang, H.; Kurukulaaratchy, R.J.; Ewart, S.; Arshad, S.H. Epidemiologic methods of assessing asthma and wheezing episodes in longitudinal studies: Measures of change and stability. J. Epidemiol. Jpn. Epidemiol. Assoc. 2013, 23, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Miller, S.A.; Dykes, D.D.; Polesky, H.F. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988, 16, 1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Wang, D.; Yan, L.; Hu, Q.; Sucheston, L.E.; Higgins, M.J.; Ambrosone, C.B.; Johnson, C.S.; Smiraglia, D.J.; Liu, S. IMA: An R package for high-throughput analysis of Illumina’s 450 K Infinium methylation data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 729–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Kuan, P.F.; Wang, S.; Zhou, X.; Chu, H. A statistical framework for Illumina DNA methylation arrays. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2849–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Du, P.; Zhang, X.; Huang, C.C.; Jafari, N.; Kibbe, W.A.; Hou, L.; Lin, S.M. Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Asher, M.I.; Keil, U.; Anderson, H.R.; Beasley, R.; Crane, J.; Martinez, F.; Mitchell, E.A.; Pearce, N.; Sibbald, B.; Stewart, A.W.; et al. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): Rationale and methods. Eur. Respir. J. 1995, 8, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Arshad, S.H.; Karmaus, W.; Kurukulaaratchy, R.; Sadeghnejad, A.; Huebner, M.; Ewart, S. Polymorphisms in the interleukin 13 and GATA binding protein 3 genes and the development of eczema during childhood. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008, 158, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hanifin, J.M.; Rajka, G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1980, 92, 44–47. [Google Scholar]
  76. Johnson, W.E.; Li, C.; Rabinovic, A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics 2007, 8, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Touleimat, N.; Tost, J. Complete pipeline for Infinium((R)) Human Methylation 450 K BeadChip data processing using subset quantile normalization for accurate DNA methylation estimation. Epigenomics 2012, 4, 325–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Gentleman, R.C.; Carey, V.J.; Bates, D.M.; Bolstad, B.; Dettling, M.; Dudoit, S.; Ellis, B.; Gautier, L.; Ge, Y.; Gentry, J.; et al. Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 2004, 5, R80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Aryee, M.J.; Jaffe, A.E.; Corrada-Bravo, H.; Ladd-Acosta, C.; Feinberg, A.P.; Hansen, K.D.; Irizarry, R.A. Minfi: A flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1363–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Houseman, E.A.; Accomando, W.P.; Koestler, D.C.; Christensen, B.C.; Marsit, C.J.; Nelson, H.H.; Wiencke, J.K.; Kelsey, K.T. DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinform. 2012, 13, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Design and steps of the epidemiologic analyses. Step 1 provides information on changes for 348 specific CpGs found in Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg immune genes described in Table 1. In Step 1 we checked each CpG of different genes individually. In Step 2, we tested whether the 348 CpGs of genes involved in T cell pathways changed more frequently from prepregnancy to early or late pregnancy than randomly selected CpGs from non-T cell-pathways. The two comparison groups of CpGs included first, 10 subsets of randomly selected CpGs from all other non-T cell-pathways CpGs, and second, 10 subsets of randomly selected CpGs from other CD4+-genes (immune-related genes) [58].
Figure 1. Design and steps of the epidemiologic analyses. Step 1 provides information on changes for 348 specific CpGs found in Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg immune genes described in Table 1. In Step 1 we checked each CpG of different genes individually. In Step 2, we tested whether the 348 CpGs of genes involved in T cell pathways changed more frequently from prepregnancy to early or late pregnancy than randomly selected CpGs from non-T cell-pathways. The two comparison groups of CpGs included first, 10 subsets of randomly selected CpGs from all other non-T cell-pathways CpGs, and second, 10 subsets of randomly selected CpGs from other CD4+-genes (immune-related genes) [58].
Ijms 19 00477 g001
Table 1. Genes considered for T cell pathways in the study and their numbers of cytosine–phosphate–guanine (CpG) sites.
Table 1. Genes considered for T cell pathways in the study and their numbers of cytosine–phosphate–guanine (CpG) sites.
PathwayNumber of GenesGenes Coding Cytokines, Proteins, or ReceptorsNumber of CpG Sites
Th119IFN-γ family [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]
TNF-α family [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]
IL-2 [12,13,14,17,20,22,23]
IL-12 family [13,18,24]
155
Th212IL-4 [12,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,22,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]
IL4R [29,32,33]
IL-5 5 [12,13,16,17,18,19,20,22,23,26,27]
IL-9 [17,20,22]
IL-13 family [12,13,16,17,18,19,20,22,23,25,26,27,29,31,34]
GATA3 [23,29]
STAT6 [18,23,29,31,32,34]
JAK1 [35]
JAK3 [32,33,35]
IL1RL1 [12,19,22]
77
Th1715IL17 family [12,19,22]
IL21 family [22,36]
IL22 family [19,22]
106
Treg2FOXP3 [37,38]
CTLA4 [39]
10
Table 2. Th1 CpGs showing statistically significant changes (p ≤ 0.05) during first and second halves of pregnancy a.
Table 2. Th1 CpGs showing statistically significant changes (p ≤ 0.05) during first and second halves of pregnancy a.
Th1 Gene NamesTotal Number of CpGsSignificant CpGs in First Half of Pregnancy bSignificant CpGs in Second Half of Pregnancy c
No. of Significant CpGsCpG SitesParameter Estimatesp-ValueFDR-Adjusted p-ValueNo. of Significant CpGsCpG SitesParameter Estimatesp-ValueFDR-Adjusted p-Value
IFNG51cg019408100.150.0340.1451
cg262274650.130.0140.056
IFNGR131cg26668632−0.140.0450.1631
cg07401792−0.250.0110.044
IFNGR2103cg08173915−0.491.00 × 10−32<1.0 × 10−64cg08173915−0.44<1 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6
cg17356733−0.54.44 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6cg17356733−0.433.48 × 10−11<1.0 × 10−6
cg22669060−0.491.01 × 10−12<1.0 × 10−6cg22669060−0.471.05 × 10−10<1.0 × 10−6
cg27469991−0.150.0180.066
IL12A73cg09362366−0.566.60 × 10−40.0042
cg20515136−0.314.34 × 10−61.1 × 10−5cg20515136−0.51.16 × 10−7<1.0 × 10−6
cg25829945−0.240.0410.150cg25829945−0.180.0390.113
IL12B91cg06111286−0.392.31 × 10−52.4 × 10−51cg06111286−0.453.16 × 10−9<1.0 × 10−6
IL12RB161cg12123019−0.51.35 × 10−40.0012cg12123019−0.336.963 × 10−40.005
cg18307303−0.140.0160.059
IL12RB2107cg025663910.461.48 × 10−12<1.0 × 10−68cg025663910.49<1 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6
cg06952660−0.290.0300.140cg06952660−0.323.54 × 10−40.003
cg090181070.487.67 × 10−10<1.0 × 10−6cg090181070.372.44 × 10−62.0 × 10−6
cg126334100.210.0310.140cg126334100.160.0250.081
cg148498550.321.53 × 10−7<1.0 × 10−6cg148498550.190.0040.021
cg19745415−0.494.40 × 10−40.003cg19745415−0.410.0030.016
cg20253742−0.537.27 × 10−50.001cg20253742−0.250.00230.012
cg11132246−0.270.0210.073
IL210 0
IL2RA20 0
IL2RB41cg213074840.276.63 × 10−50.0013cg213074840.180.0020.011
cg245098150.182.13 × 10−9<1.0 × 10−6
cg267576730.234.09 × 10−7<1.0 × 10−6
TNF114cg013606270.160.0060.0316cg013606270.32.42 × 10−11<1.0 × 10−6
cg04425624−0.270.0020.011
cg10650821−0.331.43 × 10−40.001cg10650821−0.37.45 × 10−40.005
cg10717214−0.250.0020.011
cg177553210.150.0270.088
cg159896080.210.0430.122
cg233847080.226.21 × 10−50.001
cg267363410.140.0320.099
TNFAIP151cg22640868−0.52.29 × 10−12<1.0 × 10−64cg22640868−0.461.27 × 10−13<1.0 × 10−6
cg266634690.160.0330.101
cg11814826−0.240.0100.031
cg13290523−0.180.0310.097
TNFAIP282cg030216900.120.0360.1454cg030216900.140.0020.015
cg131445940.230.0120.058cg131445940.260.0160.059
cg03572388−0.120.0490.135
cg042640020.140.0070.033
TNFAIP3134cg067799450.170.0390.0492
cg08919597−0.840.0000<1.0 × 10−6cg08919597−0.430.0030.018
cg12200164−0.190.0350.145
cg18264753−0.130.0180.085
cg12214665−0.140.0110.044
TNFAIP641cg03406844−0.491.79 × 10−12<1.0 × 10−61cg03406844−0.514.44 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6
TNFAIP8229cg00524900−0.711.03 × 10−9<1.0 × 10−67cg00524900−0.88<1 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6
cg01057573−0.73<1 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6cg01057573−0.72<1 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6
cg03665078−0.210.0010.007cg03665078−0.170.0090.040
cg07398791−0.314.40 × 10−61.1 × 10−5cg07398791−0.351.83 × 10−7<1.0 × 10−6
cg118462260.221.34 × 10−40.001
cg12148675−0.180.0370.145
cg15408889−0.20.0100.053cg15408889−0.20.0100.042
cg21239001−0.456.10 × 10−12<1.0 × 10−6cg21239001−0.498.88 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6
cg070863800.222.67 × 10−40.002cg070863800.276.82 × 10−50.001
TNFAIP8L304cg21544402−0.334.61 × 10−40.00310
cg05503460−0.262.16 × 10−40.002cg05503460−0.33.251 × 10−53.1 × 10−5
cg12122631−0.150.0390.149
cg23343680−0.150.0340.145cg23343680−0.150.0060.001
cg02436098−0.20.0070.032
cg11708963−0.170.02370.079
cg22754389−0.150.0360.108
cg23612220−0.440.0050.026
cg022331970.180.0080.038
cg02346713−0.251.37 × 10−51.2 × 10−5
cg034546390.220.0240.081
cg220381240.10.0390.113
Total15543 56
a CpGs with statistically significant differences after applying false discovery rate (FDR) tests are bolded; b Changes in methylation from age 18 years to first half of pregnancy (8–21 weeks) for Treg pathway gene CpGs; c Changes in methylation from age 18 years to second half of pregnancy (22–38 weeks) for Treg pathway gene CpGs.
Table 3. Th2 CpGs showing statistically significant changes (p ≤ 0.05) during first and second halves of pregnancy a.
Table 3. Th2 CpGs showing statistically significant changes (p ≤ 0.05) during first and second halves of pregnancy a.
Th2 GenesTotal Number of CpGsSignificant CpGs in First Half of Pregnancy bSignificant CpGs in Second Half of Pregnancy c
No. of Sign. CpGsCpG SitesParameter Estimatesp-ValueFDR-Adjusted p-ValueNo. of Sign. CpGsCpG SitesParameter Estimatesp-ValueFDR-Adjusted p-Value
GATA3176cg004633670.180.0250.0954cg004633670.292.94 × 10−62.0 × 10−6
cg01255894−0.270.0140.055
cg03669298−0.321 × 10−40.001cg03669298−0.282 × 10−40.001
cg10008757−0.150.0070.034cg10008757−0.20.0060.027
cg114300770.380.0010.005
cg227709110.242 × 10−40.002cg227709110.120.0210.074
IL1341cg153291790.190.0050.0241
cg13566430−0.130.0420.130
IL13RA165cg010808621.81.27 × 10−9<1.0 × 10−65cg010808621.771.41 × 10−12<1.0 × 10−6
cg228170421.196.81 × 10−10<1.0 × 10−6cg228170420.947.48 × 10−10<1.0 × 10−6
cg23508470−0.130.0390.126cg23508470−0.160.0120.047
cg259687481.069.49 × 10−13<1.0 × 10−6cg259687480.763.99 × 10−8<1.0 × 10−6
cg275010071.92<1 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6cg275010071.76<1 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6
IL13RA221cg03244736−0.930.0010.0051cg03244736−0.530.0130.049
IL1RL142cg11916609−0.350.0020.0141cg11916609−0.366.14 × 10−7<1.0 × 10−6
cg177386840.150.0480.138
IL410 0
IL4R84cg01165142−0.341.63 × 10−62.0 × 10−64cg01165142−0.399.78 × 10−8<1.0 × 10−6
cg05903710−0.140.04270.126
cg16649560−0.545.50 × 10−13<1.0 × 10−6cg16649560−0.53<1 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6
cg26937798−0.320.0420.126cg26937798−0.30.0330.112
cg057290930.210.0080.035
IL520 1cg16184131−0.394.52 × 10−8<1.0 × 10−6
IL5RA73cg013100290.190.0340.1203
cg230324210.565.21 × 10−40.004cg230324210.587.72 × 10−12<1.0 × 10−6
cg23828301−0.682.64 × 10−13<1.0 × 10−6cg23828301−0.67<1 × 10−16<1.0 × 10−6
cg084042250.250.0010.005
IL930 0
JAK1113cg00153395−0.225.77 × 10−61.0 × 10−53cg00153395−0.386.29 × 10−10<1.0 × 10−6
cg12444684−0.160.0290.107
cg26315985−0.270.0130.055
cg077986020.140.0140.052
cg25020373−0.280.0010.003
JAK371cg066554140.340.0390.1262
cg02285920−0.270.0490.145
cg25623545−0.250.0080.035
STAT651cg126935950.160.0120.0531
cg25157914−0.150.0360.114
Total7727 26
a CpGs with statistically significant differences after applying false discovery tests are bolded. b Changes in methylation from age 18 years to first half of pregnancy (8–21 weeks) for Th2 pathway gene CpGs. c Changes in methylation from age 18 years to second half of pregnancy (22–38 weeks) for Th2 pathway gene CpGs.
Table 4. Th17 CpGs showing statistically significant changes (p ≤ 0.05) during first and second halves of pregnancy a.
Table 4. Th17 CpGs showing statistically significant changes (p ≤ 0.05) during first and second halves of pregnancy a.
Th17 Gene NamesTotal Number of CpGsSignificant CpGs in First Half of Pregnancy bSignificant CpGs in Second Half of Pregnancy c
No. of Sign. CpGsCpG SitesParameter Estimatesp-ValueFDR-Adjusted p-ValueNo. of Sign. CpGsCpG SitesParameter Estimatesp-ValueFDR-Adjusted p-Value
IL17A21cg05884768−0.210.0460.1550
IL17B71cg015796360.210.0020.0142cg015796360.130.0110.047
cg05860978−0.120.0140.059
IL17C53cg08155347−0.210.0120.0582
cg266866080.143.27 × 10−40.003cg266866080.140.0090.042
cg271321520.180.0090.050cg271321520.230.0040.020
IL17D131cg099853510.20.0470.1552
cg12475590−0.270.0020.017
cg02792322−0.170.0060.031
IL17F50 0
IL17RA85cg010853280.170.0110.0554
cg01760983−0.651.23 × 10−40.001cg01760983−0.240.0390.130
cg02866761−0.160.0010.009
cg16389078−0.522.72 × 10−8<1.0 × 10−6cg16389078−0.360.0010.005
cg199018660.240.0320.118
cg135954390.150.0150.061
cg15502903−0.191.76 × 10−40.002
IL17RC20 0
IL17RD154cg00770158−0.090.0290.1105
cg01797381−0.290.0050.027cg01797381−0.324.18 × 10−40.004
cg03435901−0.485.82 × 10−50.001cg03435901−0.40.0030.020
cg10882522−0.280.0010.009cg10882522−0.180.0190.073
cg094297000.110.0040.020
cg007435400.190.0020.014
IL17RE84cg02968508−0.110.0250.1012
cg052534800.20.0170.070
cg06619959−0.160.0030.016cg06619959−0.10.0030.011
cg150953270.130.0430.151cg150953270.190.0310.116
IL17REL125cg006922790.124.28 × 10−40.0044
cg044857990.140.0260.101cg044857990.130.0390.130
cg120098030.110.0130.061
cg262061850.552.3 × 10−53.5 × 10−5
cg27068297−0.140.0030.016
cg000906740.232.16 × 10−40.002
cg135633340.151.96 × 10−53.5 × 10−5
cg006922790.130.0070.032
IL2131cg00136405−0.160.0140.0621cg00136405−0.160.0040.020
IL21R127cg02656594−0.532.86 × 10−14<1.0 × 10−67cg02656594−0.522.89 × 10−15<1.0 × 10−6
cg000506180.260.0010.006cg000506180.223.05 × 10−66.0 × 10−6
cg05814654−0.865.46 × 10−61.2 × 10−5cg05814654−0.821.01 × 10−40.002
cg02983090−0.729.87 × 10−61.7 × 10−5cg02983090−0.732.14 × 10−71.0 × 10−6
cg08282819−1.075.33 × 10−9<1.0 × 10−6cg08282819−0.964.29 × 10−14<1.0 × 10−6
cg19423311−0.480.0480.15494cg19423311−0.410.0350.125
cg27027151−0.474.7 × 10−11<1.0 × 10−6
IL2280 1cg13851647−0.220.0460.149
IL22RA141cg212932160.280.0090.0503cg212932160.41.55 × 10−40.002
cg091520890.180.0320.116
cg116514460.170.0020.014
IL22RA221cg004153330.140.0500.1550
Total number10634 33
a CpGs with statistically significant differences after applying false discovery tests are bolded; b Changes in methylation from age 18 years to first half of pregnancy (8–21 weeks) for Treg pathway gene CpGs; c Changes in methylation from age 18 years to second half of pregnancy (22–38 weeks) for Treg pathway gene CpGs.
Table 5. Treg CpGs showing statistically significant changes (p ≤ 0.05) during first and second halves of pregnancy a.
Table 5. Treg CpGs showing statistically significant changes (p ≤ 0.05) during first and second halves of pregnancy a.
Treg Gene NamesTotal Number of CpGsSignificant CpGs in First Half of Pregnancy bSignificant CpGs in Second Half of Pregnancy c
No. of Sign. CpGsCpG SitesParameter Estimates p-ValueFDR-Adjusted p-ValueNo. of Sign. CpGsCpG SitesParameter Estimatesp-ValueFDR-Adjusted p-Value
FOXP373cg01905377−1.012.19 × 10−8<1.0 × 10−64cg01905377−1.287.46 × 10−11<1.0 × 10−6
cg067670080.427.46 × 10−12<1.0 × 10−6cg067670080.372.22 × 10−60.10
cg15614573−0.410.0330.11cg15614573−0.810.0011.0 × 10−5
cg049206160.210.0400.004
CTLA430 0
Total103 4
a CpGs with statistically significant differences after applying false discovery tests are bolded; b Changes in methylation from age 18 years to first half of pregnancy (8–21 weeks) for Treg pathway gene CpGs; c Changes in methylation from age 18 years to second half of pregnancy (22–38 weeks) for Treg pathway gene CpGs.
Table 6. Relative risk of significant CpG changes in immune pathways in pregnancy compared to random CpGs.
Table 6. Relative risk of significant CpG changes in immune pathways in pregnancy compared to random CpGs.
TimeFirst Half of PregnancySecond Half of Pregnancy
Association Based on Original p-ValueAssociation Based on FDR-Tested p-ValueAssociation Based on Original p-ValueAssociation Based on FDR-Tested p-Value
Pathway (Total Number of CpGs)Proportion of Significant CpGsRisk Ratio95% Confidence IntervalProportion of Significant CpGsRisk Ratio95% Confidence IntervalProportion of Significant CpGsRisk Ratio95% Confidence IntervalProportion of Significant CpGsRisk Ratio95% Confidence Interval
Compared to 10 random subsets based on the whole genome
Th1 (155)27.71.150.84–1.5718.71.450.95–2.2236.11.431.08–1.8825.21.681.16–2.44
Th2 (77)35.11.451.02–2.0720.91.610.96–2.6933.81.330.93–1.9126.01.741.11–2.73
Th17 (106)32.11.330.95–1.8518.91.460.90–2.3631.11.230.88–1.7222.61.520.98–2.33
Treg (10)30.01.240.47–3.2620.01.550.44–5.5140.01.580.72–3.4430.02.010.75–5.35
Random (Median proportion)24.1 12.9 24.6 14.9
Compared to 10 random subsets based on the genes expressed in CD4+ cells
Th1 (155)27.71.160.84–1.5918.71.300.86–1.9736.11.351.03–1.7825.21.721.18–2.49
Th2 (77)35.11.461.02–2.0920.91.450.87–2.4033.81.260.88–1.8126.01.771.13–2.79
Th17 (106)32.11.340.96–1.8718.91.310.82–2.1031.11.170.84–1.6222.61.551.00–2.38
Treg (10)30.01.250.48–3.2820.01.390.39–4.9440.01.500.69–3.2630.02.050.77–5.46
Random (Median proportion)24.0 10.4 26.7 9.80
The table shows the median risk ratios of significant changes of CpGs between age 18 years and pregnancy (22–24 years) in different immune pathways (Th1, Th2, Th17, Treg) compared to two sets of random samples of CpGs separate for the first and second halves of pregnancy.
Table 7. Number and proportion of CpG sites according to their position on the gene.
Table 7. Number and proportion of CpG sites according to their position on the gene.
Position of CpGs on Gene aTh1, Th2, Th17 and Treg Gene CpGs (Total 348) n (%)Random CpGs from Whole Genome (Total 3480) n (%)Random CpGs from Genes Expressed in CD4+ Cells (Total 3480) n (%)Random CpGs from Whole Genome Excluding CpGs Situated in Intergenic Region (Total 348) n (%)
Body, 3′UTR, and Promoter 0 (0)1 (0.03)0 (0)1 (0.03)
Body, 5′UTR, and Promoter 6 (1.7)33 (1.0)74 (2.1)37 (1.1)
Body and 3′UTR3 (0.9)23 (0.7)26 (0.8)34 (1.0)
Body and 5′UTR21 (6.0)148 (4.3)197 (5.7)180 (5.2)
Body and Promoter4 (1.2)134 (3.9)293 (8.4)161 (4.6)
Body129 (37.1)1140 (32.8)1375 (39.5)1489 (42.8)
3′UTR and Promoter 1 (0.3)5 (0.1)15 (0.4)9 (0.1)
5′UTR and Promoter8 (2.3)55 (1.6)116 (3.3)65 (1.9)
Promoter 117 (33.6)854 (24.5)1005 (28.9)1114 (32.0)
3′UTR and 5′UTR0 (0)0 (0)1 (0.03)0 (0)
3′UTR26 (7.5)124 (3.6)149 (4.1)153 (4.4)
5′UTR33 (9.5)200 (5.7)229 (6.6)237 (6.8)
Intergenic0 (0)763 (21.9)0 (0)0 (0)
a Body = Body and/or 1st Exon; Promoter = TSS (transcription start site).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iqbal, S.; Lockett, G.A.; Holloway, J.W.; Arshad, S.H.; Zhang, H.; Kaushal, A.; Tetali, S.R.; Mukherjee, N.; Karmaus, W.J.J. Changes in DNA Methylation from Age 18 to Pregnancy in Type 1, 2, and 17 T Helper and Regulatory T-Cells Pathway Genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020477

AMA Style

Iqbal S, Lockett GA, Holloway JW, Arshad SH, Zhang H, Kaushal A, Tetali SR, Mukherjee N, Karmaus WJJ. Changes in DNA Methylation from Age 18 to Pregnancy in Type 1, 2, and 17 T Helper and Regulatory T-Cells Pathway Genes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(2):477. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020477

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iqbal, Sabrina, Gabrielle A. Lockett, John W. Holloway, S. Hasan Arshad, Hongmei Zhang, Akhilesh Kaushal, Sabarinath R. Tetali, Nandini Mukherjee, and Wilfried J. J. Karmaus. 2018. "Changes in DNA Methylation from Age 18 to Pregnancy in Type 1, 2, and 17 T Helper and Regulatory T-Cells Pathway Genes" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 2: 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19020477

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop