Next Article in Journal
Root Abscisic Acid Contributes to Defending Photoinibition in Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) under Salt Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Overexpression of Arabidopsis OPR3 in Hexaploid Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Alters Plant Development and Freezing Tolerance
Previous Article in Journal
A Conserved Glycine Is Identified to be Essential for Desaturase Activity of IpFAD2s by Analyzing Natural Variants from Idesia polycarpa
Previous Article in Special Issue
RNA Sequencing-Based Bulked Segregant Analysis Facilitates Efficient D-genome Marker Development for a Specific Chromosomal Region of Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Using the 6RLKu Minichromosome of Rye (Secale cereale L.) to Create Wheat-Rye 6D/6RLKu Small Segment Translocation Lines with Powdery Mildew Resistance

1
College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, Chengdu 611130, China
2
Institute of Ecological Agriculture, Sichuan Agricultural University, Wenjiang, Chengdu 611130, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(12), 3933; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123933
Submission received: 18 October 2018 / Revised: 28 November 2018 / Accepted: 4 December 2018 / Published: 7 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Advances in Wheat and Barley)

Abstract

:
Long arms of rye (Secale cereale L.) chromosome 6 (6RL) carry powdery mildew resistance genes. However, these sources of resistance have not yet been successfully used in commercial wheat cultivars. The development of small segment translocation chromosomes carrying resistance may result in lines carrying the 6R chromosome becoming more commercially acceptable. However, no wheat-rye 6RL small segment translocation line with powdery mildew resistance has been reported. In this study, a wheat-rye 6RLKu minichromosome addition line with powdery mildew resistance was identified, and this minichromosome was derived from the segment between L2.5 and L2.8 of the 6RLKu chromosome arm. Following irradiation, the 6RLKu minichromosome divided into two smaller segments, named 6RLKumi200 and 6RLKumi119, and these fragments participated in the formation of wheat-rye small segment translocation chromosomes 6DS/6RLKumi200 and 6DL/6RLKumi119, respectively. The powdery mildew resistance gene was found to be located on the 6RLKumi119 segment. Sixteen 6RLKumi119-specific markers were developed, and their products were cloned and sequenced. Nucleotide BLAST searches indicated that 14 of the 16 sequences had 91–100% similarity with nine scaffolds derived from 6R chromosome of S. cereale L. Lo7. The small segment translocation chromosome 6DL/6RLKumi119 makes the practical utilization in agriculture of powdery mildew resistance gene on 6RLKu more likely. The nine scaffolds are useful for further studying the structure and function of this small segment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

It has already been reported that the long arms of rye (Secale cereale L.) chromosome 6 (6RL) carry powdery mildew resistance gene Pm20 [1], and this gene was introduced into wheat background in the form of a 6BS/6RL translocation chromosome [1]. The gene Pm20 still has a broad spectrum of resistance to Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt) isolates [2,3]. The 6RL chromosome arm that carries Pm20 was derived from S. cereale L. cv. Prolific [1]. Recently, some reports indicated that 6RL arms derived from S. cereale cv. Jingzhouheimai, S. cereale cv. German White, and S. cereale cv. Kustro also carried powdery mildew resistance genes [3,4,5,6]. It has already been established that the powdery mildew resistance gene on 6RL of German White was different from the gene Pm20 [3], and this indicates that different 6RL arms may also display genetic diversity for powdery mildew resistance genes. However, the powdery mildew resistance genes on 6RL arms have not been successfully used in commercial wheat cultivars because of agronomic disadvantages, possibly caused by non-compensation and linkage drag of the 6RL arm. The development of small segment translocations between wheat chromosomes and 6RL, which causes minimal loss of indispensable wheat genes, may resolve this problem [3,4,7,8]. Only one translocation chromosome carrying a small segment of a 6RL arm, Ti4AS.4AL-6RL-4AL, has been reported. In this case, the 6RL segment was derived from the telomeric region and carried the Hessian fly-resistant gene H25 [9,10]. So far, no wheat-rye 6RL small segment translocation lines with powdery mildew resistance have been reported. In this study, a wheat-rye 6RLKu minichromosome addition line was developed, and 6D/6RLKu small segment translocation lines were identified from the irradiated seeds of this minichromosome addition line.

2. Results

2.1. Obtaining Wheat-Rye 6RLKu Minichromosome Addition Line

A 6RLKu minichromosome addition line, MiA6RLKu, was found among the self-pollinated progeny of wheat-rye 6RLKu monotelosomic addition line MTA6RLKu. Line MiA6RLKu contained one minichromosome derived from the 6RLKu arm (Figure 1). According to the FISH map of 6RLKu arm constructed based on the signal patterns of probes Oligo-pSc200, Oligo-pSc250, and Oligo-pSc119.2-1 [6], the 6RLKu minichromosome was derived from the segment between L2.5 and L2.8 (Figure 1). Through measuring the fraction length of the 6RLKu arm, combined with the fraction length standard of 6RL built by Mukai et al. [11], it can be deduced that the 6RLKu minichromosome comprised about 11% of the original 6RLKu length.

2.2. Transmission of 6RLKu Minichromosome

Thirty-four seeds were randomly selected from the self-fertilized progeny of line MiA6RLKu for ND-FISH analysis. Among the 34 plants, 24 had no 6RLKu minichromosome; nine contained one 6RLKu minichromosome; and one plant, 13FT104-7, contained a pair of this minichromosome (Figure 1C). From the self-fertilized progeny of line 13FT104-7, 100 seeds were randomly selected for ND-FISH analysis; 25 plants contained two 6RLKu minichromosomes, 62 plants contained one 6RLKu minichromosomes, and the remaining 13 plants had none of this minichromosome. The progeny of 13FT104-7 were named 15T154, and some of these plants were used for developing additional 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers and producing wheat-rye small segment translocations.

2.3. Development of 6D/6RLKu Small Segment Translocation Lines

Some seeds that were derived from line 14T154-35 with two 6RLKu minichromosomes were exposed to 60Co-γ rays. A total of 1428 M1 seeds were analyzed using ND-FISH, and ten wheat-rye 6D/6RLKu small segment translocation lines were detected and named 16T379 or 16T380 (Table 1, Figure 2). In these 6D/6RLKu small segment translocation lines, the 6RLKu minichromosome divided into two smaller segments. One small segment, with the Oligo-pSc200 and Oligo-pSc250 signals and a strong Oligo-pSc119.2-1 signal, was named 6RLKumi119. The other small segment, with the Oligo-pSc200 and Oligo-pSc250 signals and a weak Oligo-pSc119.2-1 signal, was named 6RLKumi200. The segment 6RLKumi200 had been translocated onto the 6DS arm, while the segment 6RLKumi119 was translocated onto the 6DL arm (Figure 2). The small segment translocation chromosome fused with 6DS was named 6DS/6RLKumi200, and the other translocation attached with 6DL was named 6DL/6RLKumi119 (Figure 2).

2.4. Transmission Rates of 6DS/6RLKumi200 and 6DL/6RLKumi119

Among 100 randomly selected seeds from the progeny of 16T379-1, 21 derived seedlings contained no translocation chromosomes, 16 seedlings contained two 6DS/6RLKumi200 and two 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosomes, 42 seedlings contained one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome, eight contained two 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome (Figure 3A), three plants contained one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and two 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosomes (Figure 3B), three plants contained only one 6DS/6RLKumi200 chromosome (Figure 3C), and seven plants contained only one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome (Figure 3D). The progeny of 16T379-1 were named 17T256, and some of these plants were used for further marker development. All of the randomly selected 100 seeds from the progeny of 16T379-4 contained two 6DS/6RLKumi200 and two 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosomes. These results indicate that the 6DS/6RLKumi200 and 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosomes show a high frequency of transmission to progeny.

2.5. Development of 6RLKu Minichromosome-Specific Markers

Common wheat Chinese Spring (CS), Mianyang 11 (MY11), rye Kustro, line MTA6RLKu, line 14T154-35 with two 6RLKu minichromosomes, and two lines (14T154-31 and 14T154-41) without the minichromosome were used to develop 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers. One thousand and eighty-six pairs of primers were designed according to the 6RLKu minichromosome-specific pair-end reads. Sixteen of the 1086 primer pairs amplified their target bands from the genomic DNAs of rye Kustro, line MTA6RLKu, and line 14T154-35, and not from the genomic DNA of CS, MY11, and lines 14T154-31 and 14T154-41 (Figure 4). Therefore, the 16 primer pairs were tentatively regarded as 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers and are listed in Table 2. From the progeny of 16T379-1, three lines (17T256-7, 17T256-10, and 17T256-17) without 6D/6RLKu translocation chromosomes, three lines (17T256-8, 17T256-12, and 17T256-14) that only contained one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome, and three lines (17T256-5, 17T256-9, and 17T256-11) that only contained one 6DS/6RLKumi200 chromosome, were used to validate the 16 primer pairs. The 16 primer pairs only amplified target bands from lines 17T256-8, 17T256-12, and 17T256-14 (Figure 5). This indicated that all the 16 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers were located on the segment 6RLKumi119. Therefore, the 16 markers were 6RLKumi119-specific.

2.6. Sequence Characteristics of the Products Amplified by the 16 Markers

The sequences amplified by the 16 6RLKumi119-specific markers were isolated. These sequences have been deposited in the GenBank Database (GenBank accession numbers: MK051036–MK051051). Sequence alignment using the BLAST tool in NCBI and gene annotation indicated that all the 16 sequences did not belong to any gene sequence; therefore, they are probably not involved in active genes. Analysis using RepeatMasker software (http://repeatmasker.org/) also indicated that these sequences were not involved in repetitive DNA sequences. Nucleotide BLAST searches indicated that 14 of the 16 sequences had 91–100% similarity with the scaffolds from the 6R chromosome of S. cereale L. Lo7, and the other two sequences had 99–100% similarity with the scaffolds derived from 0R of S. cereale L. Lo7 scaffolds (Table 2). It can be noted that all the five sequences (MK051040, MK051042, MK051044, MK051045, and MK051047) were located in the scaffold Lo7_v2_scaffold_445202 6R, and both MK051050 and MK051051 were located in the scaffold Lo7_v2_scaffold_445253 6R (Table 2). According to the gene annotation of these scaffolds published by Bauer et al. [12], they did not contain genes; however, these scaffolds were still useful for the future study on the structure and function of the 6RLKumi119 segment.

2.7. Powdery Mildew Resistance

Powdery mildew resistance testing indicated that parental wheat MY11, lines without 6RLKu minichromosome, and lines with only one 6DS/6RLKumi200 chromosome were highly susceptible to powdery mildew (Figure 6). Lines with both the 6DS/6RLKumi200 and 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosomes and lines with only one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome displayed high resistance to powdery mildew (Figure 6). These results indicated that the powdery mildew resistance gene on 6RLKu was located on the small segment 6RLKumi119.

3. Discussion

3.1. Extending Genetic Basis of Powdery Mildew Resistance Genes

Several reports have highlighted the current narrowness of genetic diversity of powdery mildew resistance genes in wheat breeding programs in China [13,14,15]. For example, the wheat cultivars (lines) from the Yangtze River region mainly contained genes Pm4a and Pm21 [13]. The gene Pm21 is widely used in wheat cultivars from Sichuan and Guizhou provinces [14], while the wheat cultivars (lines) from Henan province mainly carry genes Pm2, Pm4, Pm21and unknown gene(s) located on a new 1RS.1BL translocation chromosome [15]. It should be noted that gene Pm21 has played an important role in wheat powdery mildew resistance breeding programs in China, but there is the risk of pathogen directional selection caused by the high frequency of Pm21 gene in wheat breeding programs [15]. Therefore, extending the genetic basis of powdery mildew resistance genes in wheat breeding programs in China must be an urgent priority. 6R chromosomes of rye (S. cereale L.) carry powdery mildew resistance genes, and still display effective resistance to powdery mildew pathotypes in China [1,2,3,4,5,6,16]. In addition, the powdery mildew resistance genes on 6R chromosomes have genetic diversity [3,16], which may provide recipient wheat lines with resistance to future virulent powdery mildew races that might defeat existing genes. However, these 6R-derived powdery mildew resistance genes have not been successfully used in commercial wheat cultivars because of the loss of indispensable wheat genes and alien chromosome-associated linkage drag. Therefore, the development of new wheat-rye 6RL small segment translocation chromosomes with powdery mildew resistance gene(s) is of pressing concern [3,4,8]. It has been reported that few recombinants (sometime none) can be recovered between 6R and wheat chromosomes, even in a ph1b mutant background. Furthermore, it is difficult to produce suitable wheat-rye 6RL small segment translocations [17]. In this study, a wheat-rye small segment translocation chromosome 6DL/6RLKumi119 with powdery mildew resistance was developed using a 6RLKu minichromosome. According to the fraction length standard of the 6RL arm constructed by Mukai et al. [11], the size of the 6RLKumi119 segment might be slightly larger than the small 6RL segment in the Ti4AS.4AL-6RL-4AL translocation chromosome, in which the 6RL segment occupied 10% of the total length of 6RL [11]. Therefore, the occurrence of possible deleterious genes on the 6RLKu arm may have been greatly reduced. Additionally, the 6DS/6RLKumi200 and 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosomes showed high transmission to progeny. These characteristics make the successful utilization of the powdery mildew resistance gene on 6RLKu more likely, although the agronomic traits of the lines with 6DS/6RLKumi200 and 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosomes have not been investigated.

3.2. 6RLKu Minichromosome Specific Markers

For the effective utilization of elite genes in wild germplasm, it is necessary to increase our understanding of the molecular basis of target alien chromosome regions [18,19]. In this study, the small segment translocation chromosome 6DL/6RLKumi119 provides an opportunity to understand the molecular basis of the small segment 6RLKumi119 carrying powdery mildew resistance. Additionally, 16 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers were developed, and these markers were subsequently located onto the segment 6RLKumi119 with powdery mildew resistance. These markers represent convenient tools to use the 6DL/6RLKumi119 translocation chromosome in wheat breeding programs. Using the sequences amplified by the 16 markers, 11 scaffolds derived from winter rye inbred line S. cereale L. Lo7 [12] were located on the segment 6RLKumi119. These scaffolds are useful for the further detailed studying of this segment. However, published data indicated that no active genes could be found among the 11 scaffolds [12]. There are two possible explanations for this phenomenon. First, the 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers may be insufficient in number. Second, large gaps may exist in these scaffolds. Therefore, a greater number of 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers are required and more complete rye genomic sequences are needed.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

A monotelosomic addition line MTA6RLKu was developed according to the methods described by Qiu et al. [20]. From the self-pollinated progeny of MTA6RLKu, a 6RLKu minichromosome addition line MiA6RLKu was identified. Some seeds selected from the progeny of MiA6RLKu were irradiated with 60Co-γ rays at the Biotechnology and Nuclear Technology Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China. Common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Mianyang 11 (MY11) and Chinese Spring (CS) were used as controls.

4.2. Cytological Analysis

The root-tip metaphase cells were analyzed using non-denaturing fluorescence in situ hybridization (ND-FISH) technology. Oligonucleotide (oligo) probes Oligo-1162, Oligo-pSc200, Oligo-pSc250, Oligo-pSc119.2-1, and Oligo-pTa535-1 [21,22] were used. These oligo probes were 5′end-labelled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM) or 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (Tamra). Root-tip metaphase chromosomes were prepared following the methods described by Han et al. [23]. ND-FISH analysis was performed following the methods described by Fu et al. [22] with the following minor modification. When dropped onto cell spreads, the probe mixture containing Oligo-1162 around the slides was kept above 28 °C, and the slides were immediately placed into a moist box that was incubated at 42 °C in advance for 1–2 h. Then, the slides were washed 15–20 s in 2 × SSC at 42 °C.

4.3. Development of 6RLKu Minichromosome-Specific PCR-Based Markers

Genomic DNAs of S. cereale L. Kustro and MiA6RLKu were sequenced by using the Specific Length Amplified Fragment Sequencing (SLAF-seq) technique (Biomarker, Beijing, China). The sequencing procedure followed the methods described by Duan et al. [24]. The pair-end reads derived from Kustro and MiA6RLKu were compared with the whole genome shotgun assembly sequences (IWGSC WGA v0.4) of common wheat cv. Chinese Spring (Triticum aestivum L.) (http://www.wheatgenome.org) using SOAP software (Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI), Beijing, China) [25]. The pair-end reads with high wheat homology were discarded. At last, after comparing specific pair-end reads of Kustro and MiA6RLKu, the 6RLKu minichromosome-specific pair-end reads were obtained. Primers were designed according to the 6RLKu minichromosome-specific pair-end reads using the software Primer 3 (version 4.0). The optimal melting temperature and size values of primers were set following the methods described by Duan et al. [24].

4.4. PCR Analysis and Sequence Cloning

The PCR amplifications were carried out according to the procedure described by Li et al. [6]. Agarose gel (2%) electrophoresis was used to detect the amplicons in 1 × TAE buffer. The products amplified by the 6RLKumi119-specific primers were recovered using Universal DNA Purification Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) and cloned using pClone007 Vector Kit (TsingKe Biotech Co., Ltd, Beijing, China). Inserts were sequenced by TsingKe Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd. These sequences were deposited in the GenBank Database. Finally, these sequences were used for Nucleotide BLAST searches against the S. cereale L. Lo7 scaffolds database using the BLAST tool in GrainGenes (https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/cgi-bin/seqserve/blast_rye.cgi) and gene annotation was carried out according to the data sets related to the publication by Bauer et al. [12]. Additionally, RepeatMasker software (http://repeatmasker.org/) was used to identify whether these sequences amplified by the 6RLKumi119-specific primers are repetitive DNA.

4.5. Powdery Mildew Resistance Test

The resistance of line MiA6RLKu, the progeny of MiA6RLKu, 6D/6RLKu small segment translocation lines, and parental wheat MY11 to powdery mildew were evaluated. Plants were grown in Qionglai, Sichuan, China. The materials were naturally inoculated by locally occurring field derived powdery mildew, and infection types (IT) were scored according to the standard described by Fu et al. [5].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, a new wheat-rye small segment translocation chromosome 6DL/6RLKumi119 with powdery mildew resistance was produced. Sixteen 6RLKumi119 specific markers were developed, and 11 S. cereale L. Lo7 scaffolds were located on the small rye segment 6RLKumi119. The small segment translocation chromosome 6DL/6RLKumi119 makes the practical utilization of the powdery mildew resistance gene on 6RLKu more likely. The 6RLKumi119-specific markers and the S. cereale L. Lo7 scaffolds that were located on the 6RLKumi119 segment may find application in future detailed studies of the structure and function of this small segment.

Author Contributions

S.F. and Z.T. created the materials, designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. H.D. and Q.D. did the ND-FISH analysis, the PCR experiments, and cloned the sequences. S.T. did the BLAST searches. S.F. and Z.T. did the powdery mildew resistance test.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770373 and 31470409).

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Ian Dundas, The University of Adelaide, Australia and Zujun Yang, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China for discussion and revision of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

This research has no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the experiment design, material creation, data analysis, manuscript writing, and decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Friebe, B.; Heun, M.; Tuleen, N.; Zeller, F.J.; Gill, B.S. Cytogenetically monitored transfer of powdery mildew resistance from rye into wheat. Crop Sci. 1994, 34, 621–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, Z.H.; Sun, H.G.; Song, W.; Lu, M.; Huang, J.; Wu, L.F.; Wang, X.M.; Li, H.J. Genetic analysis and detection of the gene MlLX99 on chromosome 2BL conferring resistance to powdery mildew in the wheat cultivar Liangxing 99. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2013, 126, 3081–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. An, D.; Zheng, Q.; Luo, Q.; Ma, P.; Zhang, H.; Li, L.; Han, F.; Xu, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y. Molecular cytogenetic identification of a new wheat-rye 6R chromosome disomic addition line with powdery mildew resistance. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, D.; Zhuang, L.F.; Sun, L.; Feng, Y.G.; Pei, Z.Y.; Qi, Z.J. Allocation of a powdery mildew resistance locus to the chromosome arm 6RL of Secale cereale L. cv. ‘Jingzhouheimai’. Euphytica 2010, 176, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fu, S.; Ren, Z.; Chen, X.; Yan, B.; Tan, F.; Fu, T.; Tang, Z. New wheat-rye 5DS-4RS.4RL and 4RS-5DS.5DL translocation lines with powdery mildew resistance. J. Plant Res. 2014, 127, 743–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, M.; Tang, Z.X.; Qiu, L.; Wang, Y.Y.; Tang, S.Y.; Fu, S.L. Identification and physical mapping of new PCR-based markers specific for the long arm of rye (Secale cereale L.) chromosome 6. J. Genet. Genomics 2016, 43, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fu, S.; Tang, Z.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, H. 2010 Transfer to wheat (Triticum aestivum) of small chromosome segments from rye (Secale cereale) carrying disease resistance genes. J. Appl. Genet. 2010, 51, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lukaszewski, A.J. Alien Introgression in Wheat, 1st ed.; Molnár-Láng, M., Ceoloni, C., Doležel, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Charpter 7; pp. 163–189. [Google Scholar]
  9. Friebe, B.; Hatchett, J.H.; Gill, B.S.; Mukai, Y.; Sebeata, E.E. Transfer of Hessian fly resistance from rye to wheat via radiation-induced terminal and intercalary chromosomal translocations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1991, 83, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Friebe, B.; Jiang, J.; Raupp, W.J.; McIntosh, R.A.; Gill, B.S. Characterization of wheat-alien translocations conferring resistance to diseases and pests: current status. Euphytica 1996, 91, 59–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mukai, Y.; Friebe, B.; Hatchett, J.H.; Yamamoto, M.; Gill, B.S. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of radiation-induced wheat-rye terminal and intercalary chromosomal translocations and the detection of rye chromatin specifying resistance to Hessian fly. Chromosoma 1993, 102, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bauer, E.; Schmutzer, T.; Barilar, I.; Mascher, M.; Gundlach, H.; Martis, M.M.; Twardziok, S.O.; Hackauf, B.; Gordillo, A.; Wilde, P.; et al. Towards a whole-genome sequence for rye (Secale cereale L.). Plant J. 2017, 89, 853–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, H.J.; Wang, X.M.; Song, F.J.; Wu, C.P.; Wu, X.F.; Zhang, N.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.Y. Response to powdery mildew and detection of resistance genes in wheat cultivars from China. Acta Agron. Sin. 2011, 37, 943–954, (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiang, Z.; Wang, Q.L.; Wu, J.H.; Xue, W.B.; Zeng, Q.D.; Huang, L.L.; Kang, Z.S.; Han, D.J. Distribution of powdery mildew resistance gene Pm21 in Chinese winter wheat cultivars and breeding lines based on gene-specific marker. Scientia Agri. Sin. 2014, 47, 2078–2087, (in Chinese with English abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Q.H.; Chen, Y.X.; Li, D.; Wang, Z.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, C.G.; Wang, X.C.; Zhao, H.; Cao, T.J.; Liu, Z.Y. Large scale detection of powdery mildew resistance genes in wheat via SNP and bulked segregate analysis. Acta Agron. Sin. 2018, 44, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hao, M.; Luo, J.; Fan, C.; Yi, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yuan, Z.; Ning, S.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, D. Introgression of powdery mildew resistance gene Pm56 on rye chromosome arm 6RS into wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dundas, I.S.; Frappell, D.E.; Crack, D.M.; Fisher, J.M. Deletion mapping of a nematode resistance gene on rye chromosome 6R in wheat. Crop Sci. 2001, 1771–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feuillet, C.; Langridge, P.; Waugh, R. Cereal breeding takes a walk on the wild side. Trends Genet. 2008, 24, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tester, M.; Langridge, P. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 2010, 327, 818–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qiu, L.; Tang, Z.X.; Li, M.; Fu, S.L. Development of new PCR-based markers specific for chromosome arms of rye (Secale cereal L.). Genome 2016, 59, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, Z.X.; Yang, Z.J.; Fu, S.L. Oligonucleotides replacing the roles of repetitive sequences pAs1, pSc119.2, pTa-535, pTa71, CCS1, and pAWRC.1 for FISH analysis. J. Appl. Genet. 2014, 55, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, S.L.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.Y.; Li, M.; Yang, Z.J.; Qiu, L.; Yan, B.J.; Ren, Z.L.; Tang, Z.X. Oligonucleotide probes for ND-FISH analysis to identify rye and wheat chromosomes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Han, F.P.; Lamb, J.C.; Birchler, A. High frequency of centromere inactivation resulting in stable dicentric chromosomes of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 3238–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Duan, Q.; Wang, Y.Y.; Qiu, L.; Ren, T.H.; Li, Z.; Fu, S.L.; Tang, Z.X. Physical location of new PCR-based markers and powdery mildew resistance gene(s) on rye (Secale cereale L.) chromosome 4 using 4R dissection lines. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, R.; Yu, C.; Li, Y.; Lam, T.W.; Yiu, S.M.; Kristiansen, K.; Wang, J. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1966–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. ND-FISH analysis of MTA6RLKu and MiA6RLKu. (A,B,C) Oligo-1162 (red), Oligo-pSc200 (red), Oligo-pSc250 (red), and Oligo-pSc119.2-1 (green) were used as probes. (D) Cut and pasted 6RLKu from MTA6RLKu and 6RLKu minichromosome from 13FT104-7. The FISH map of 6RLKu is the same as the one reported by Li et al. [6]. Chromosomes were counterstained with 4’-6-diamidino-2-phenyllindole (DAPI) (blue). Scale bar 10 μm.
Figure 1. ND-FISH analysis of MTA6RLKu and MiA6RLKu. (A,B,C) Oligo-1162 (red), Oligo-pSc200 (red), Oligo-pSc250 (red), and Oligo-pSc119.2-1 (green) were used as probes. (D) Cut and pasted 6RLKu from MTA6RLKu and 6RLKu minichromosome from 13FT104-7. The FISH map of 6RLKu is the same as the one reported by Li et al. [6]. Chromosomes were counterstained with 4’-6-diamidino-2-phenyllindole (DAPI) (blue). Scale bar 10 μm.
Ijms 19 03933 g001
Figure 2. Oligo-pTa535-1 (red), Oligo-pSc119.2-1 (green), Oligo-1162 (red), Oligo-pSc200 (red), and Oligo-pSc250 (red) were used as probes for ND-FISH analysis of wheat-rye 6D/6RLKu small segment translocation lines. (A,B) Line 16T379-4 represents lines with two 6DS/6RLKumi200 and two 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosomes. (A) and (B) are the same cell. (C,D) Line 16T379-1 represents lines with one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome. (C) and (D) are the same cell. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar 10 μm.
Figure 2. Oligo-pTa535-1 (red), Oligo-pSc119.2-1 (green), Oligo-1162 (red), Oligo-pSc200 (red), and Oligo-pSc250 (red) were used as probes for ND-FISH analysis of wheat-rye 6D/6RLKu small segment translocation lines. (A,B) Line 16T379-4 represents lines with two 6DS/6RLKumi200 and two 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosomes. (A) and (B) are the same cell. (C,D) Line 16T379-1 represents lines with one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome. (C) and (D) are the same cell. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar 10 μm.
Ijms 19 03933 g002
Figure 3. Oligo-pSc119.2-1 (green), Oligo-1162 (red), Oligo-pSc200 (red), and Oligo-pSc250 (red) were used as probes for ND-FISH analysis of the progeny of line 16T379-1. (A) Line 17T256-16 carried two 6DS/6RLKumi200 chromosomes and one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome. (B) Line 17T256-19 carried one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and two 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosomes. (C) Line 17T256-5 possessed only one 6DS/6RLKumi200 chromosome. (D) Line 17T256-8 had only one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar 10μm.
Figure 3. Oligo-pSc119.2-1 (green), Oligo-1162 (red), Oligo-pSc200 (red), and Oligo-pSc250 (red) were used as probes for ND-FISH analysis of the progeny of line 16T379-1. (A) Line 17T256-16 carried two 6DS/6RLKumi200 chromosomes and one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome. (B) Line 17T256-19 carried one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and two 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosomes. (C) Line 17T256-5 possessed only one 6DS/6RLKumi200 chromosome. (D) Line 17T256-8 had only one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar 10μm.
Ijms 19 03933 g003
Figure 4. Representative results of developing 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers. (A) Products amplified marker 6RL-M55. (B) Products amplified marker 6RL-M63. M, DNA marker. Arrows indicate 6RLKu minichromosome-specific bands.
Figure 4. Representative results of developing 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers. (A) Products amplified marker 6RL-M55. (B) Products amplified marker 6RL-M63. M, DNA marker. Arrows indicate 6RLKu minichromosome-specific bands.
Ijms 19 03933 g004
Figure 5. Representative results of locating 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers on 6RLKumi119 segment. (A) Products amplified by marker 6RL-M11. (B) Products amplified by marker 6RL-M102. M, DNA marker. Arrows indicate 6RLKumi119-specific bands.
Figure 5. Representative results of locating 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers on 6RLKumi119 segment. (A) Products amplified by marker 6RL-M11. (B) Products amplified by marker 6RL-M102. M, DNA marker. Arrows indicate 6RLKumi119-specific bands.
Ijms 19 03933 g005
Figure 6. Identification of resistance to powdery mildew. Parental wheat and lines without 6D/6RLKu translocation chromosomes and lines with only one 6DS/6RLKumi200 chromosome are highly susceptible to powdery mildew. Lines with one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome and lines with only one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome are highly resistant to powdery mildew.
Figure 6. Identification of resistance to powdery mildew. Parental wheat and lines without 6D/6RLKu translocation chromosomes and lines with only one 6DS/6RLKumi200 chromosome are highly susceptible to powdery mildew. Lines with one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome and lines with only one 6DL/6RLKumi119 chromosome are highly resistant to powdery mildew.
Ijms 19 03933 g006
Table 1. Wheat-rye 6D/6RLKu small segment translocation lines with 6DS/6RLKumi200 and 6DL/6RLKumi119 translocation chromosomes.
Table 1. Wheat-rye 6D/6RLKu small segment translocation lines with 6DS/6RLKumi200 and 6DL/6RLKumi119 translocation chromosomes.
Small Segment Translocation LinesSmall Segment Translocation Chromosomes
16T379-1one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119
16T379-4two 6DS/6RLKumi200 and two 6DL/6RLKumi119
16T379-6one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119
16T379-8two 6DS/6RLKumi200 and two 6DL/6RLKumi119
16T379-9one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119
16T379-11one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119
16T379-13one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119
16T379-14two 6DS/6RLKumi200 and two 6DL/6RLKumi119
16T380-2one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119
16T380-3one 6DS/6RLKumi200 and one 6DL/6RLKumi119
Table 2. 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers and the similarity between the sequences amplified by the markers and the S. cereale Lo7 scaffolds.
Table 2. 6RLKu minichromosome-specific markers and the similarity between the sequences amplified by the markers and the S. cereale Lo7 scaffolds.
MarkerForward (5′-3′)Reverse (5′-3′)GenBank Accession Number of Amplified SequenceSimilarity of Amplified Sequence with the S. cereale Lo7 Scaffolds
6RL-M8CAACCTATTCGGACCAGAGCGATTAAACCGCTGGTGAGAAACMK05103699% similarity with 7794–8206 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_453717 6R
6RL-M11GGGGGAACTTTGAGTATGCTTGATCGGATCGGTTGAGTTGTMK05103799% similarity with 464–1239 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_651086 0R
6RL-M55TGATGCAAGTTCGTTGGTGTCGTTGACTCCCTTCCGTTAGMK05103891% similarity with 1–108 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_457844 6R
6RL-M63TCGAAATGCATCGGACAATTCCATGGTCTCCTCGAGTGTMK051039100% similarity with 144–422 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_492428 6R
6RL-M102CGGGAGAGGACTGGTTCTTCATATGTACAACAGAGGCATCTTCMK05104098% similarity with 26957–27168 bp, 27841-27881 bp and 27923-28047 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_445202 6R
6RL-M118TCCCCCTTCTAGGGTTTCATATAGCCCCATCTGCAAACACMK051041100% similarity with 488–896 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_484582 6R
6RL-M149AATGGCTGCAATTTCTTGGAAAAAAGCCACAAAACACTGCMK051042100% similarity with 34805–34422 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_445202 6R
6RL-M220GCACAAGTCCATGTCCTTCAGATCCATCTGGCTGTGTGTGMK05104399% similarity with 4112–4449 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_448816 6R
6RL-M221CGCTATATGCAATGCAGGTGCTTGCTTGCAACACCAAAAAMK05104498% similarity with 41511–41912 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_445202 6R
6RL-M255CCTTATGACCACCCATGCTCTTCATAGCTGCCTCTTTTAGGTGMK05104599% similarity with 31812–32230 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_445202 6R
6RL-M710CAAACTCACACGAAGCCAAACTGATCCAAATTTGCCCAGTMK05104692% similarity with 3600–3681 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_457146 6R
6RL-M828TTTGTCGAGAGCAACAATGGCCCGCTTCTAAGTTCAATCGMK051047100% similarity with 39318–39668 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_445202 6R
6RL-M869GGGTCAACCCATCTTGTTTCCCTCTTCCACTGCAGAGCTTMK05104899% similarity with 589–962 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_451612 6R
6RL-M896GACGAAACACAACAAATCATTCAGGGAAAATCGAAAACTGCAAMK051049100% similarity with 10161–10344 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_620512 0R
6RL-M1074AAAGCCGATGAAAAATGGTGGAAGAAGAAGAAGATGGGGTGTTMK051050100% similarity with 9159–9365 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_445253 6R
6RL-M1081TTGCATGCTCGCTTTAGTTGCCACTTGACGTTGCCCTATTMK051051100% similarity with 8940–9193 bp of Lo7_v2_scaffold_445253 6R

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Du, H.; Tang, Z.; Duan, Q.; Tang, S.; Fu, S. Using the 6RLKu Minichromosome of Rye (Secale cereale L.) to Create Wheat-Rye 6D/6RLKu Small Segment Translocation Lines with Powdery Mildew Resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3933. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123933

AMA Style

Du H, Tang Z, Duan Q, Tang S, Fu S. Using the 6RLKu Minichromosome of Rye (Secale cereale L.) to Create Wheat-Rye 6D/6RLKu Small Segment Translocation Lines with Powdery Mildew Resistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(12):3933. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123933

Chicago/Turabian Style

Du, Haimei, Zongxiang Tang, Qiong Duan, Shuyao Tang, and Shulan Fu. 2018. "Using the 6RLKu Minichromosome of Rye (Secale cereale L.) to Create Wheat-Rye 6D/6RLKu Small Segment Translocation Lines with Powdery Mildew Resistance" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 12: 3933. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19123933

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop